Gtx 1660 ti vs gtx 1060 6gb: GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1060 6GB Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-8700K vs i7-6700K)

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: What is the difference?

54points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

55points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

54 facts in comparison

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

  • 502MHz faster memory clock speed?
    2002MHzvs1500MHz
  • 2 more DisplayPort outputs?
    3vs1

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060?

  • 1.58 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    5.44 TFLOPSvs3.85 TFLOPS
  • 12.66 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    84.96 GPixel/svs72.3 GPixel/s
  • 3992MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    12000MHzvs8008MHz
  • 49.4 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    169.9 GTexels/svs120. 5 GTexels/s
  • 95.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    288GB/svs192.2GB/s
  • 256 more shading units?
    1536vs1280
  • 2200million more transistors?
    6600 millionvs4400 million
  • 9°C lower load GPU temperature?
    65°Cvs74°C

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Manli GeForce GTX 1650

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5500M

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

3 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

7. 3/10

3 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

3 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

10.0/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

7.3/10

3 votes

9.3/10

3 votes

Gaming

7.0/10

3 votes

8.7/10

3 votes

Performance

7.0/10

3 votes

9.7/10

3 votes

Fan noise

7.0/10

3 votes

8.3/10

3 votes

Reliability

7.0/10

3 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1506MHz

1500MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1708MHz

1770MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3. pixel rate

72.3 GPixel/s

84.96 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

3.85 TFLOPS

5.44 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

120.5 GTexels/s

169.9 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

2002MHz

1500MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

8008MHz

12000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

192.2GB/s

288GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

192bit

192bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

HDMI 2.0

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1060

Ever since it came out all those years ago, Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1060 has been one of the go-to graphics cards of this generation. Capable of superb frame rates at 1080p and 1440p alike, there’s no wonder it’s become one of the most popular GPUs on the planet. Now, however, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has arrived, and by golly it’s a corker. In fact, it’s just gone straight in as one of the best graphics cards you can buy today. But just how much faster is the GTX 1660 Ti vs the GTX 1060? Well, that’s what I’m here to find out through the power of graphs. Let’s hop to it, shall we?

GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1060: How we test

As per usual, I’ve tested each card with my general games benchmarking suite at 1920×1080 and 2560×1440 resolutions. That includes Final Fantasy XV (with Nvidia’s fancy HairWorks, TurfEffects, VXAO and ShadowLibs effects turned off), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Monster Hunter: World, Total War: Warhammer II, The Witcher III, Forza Horizon 4 and Metro Exodus.

Paired with my Intel Core i5-8600K CPU and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance 2133MHz RAM, I’ve seen what each card can do on max settings at each resolution and taken an average frame rate (either from their own built-in benchmarks or from my own repeated manual gameplay tests) to see how they stack up against each other.

The cards in question are the Asus’ ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC and the 6GB Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps Edition. Now I should note, this particular GTX 1060 isn’t actually available to buy any more, but it’s the only one I have to hand. The good news, though, is that when it was available, it was one of the faster GTX 1060s out there, so it should still give us a pretty good idea about what the absolute base case scenario is compared to the GTX 1660 Ti.

That said, Asus’ ROG Strix OC card is also one of the more expensive and faster GTX 1660 Ti cards out there as well, so the results below should also be taken as a kind of best case type deal for what you can get on a GTX 1660 Ti. I’m pretty confident that you’ll be able to apply most of the results below to the cheaper GTX 1660 Ti cards out there as well, though, as my early tests with Asus’ £260 Phoenix GTX 1660 Ti were only an average of 2-5fps behind the ROG Strix OC — and in most cases it was more like 2-3fps. As a result, I reckon you can safely apply all the figures I talk about below to nearly all the GTX 1660 Tis out there, regardless of how much they cost.

Now we’ve got the methodology out of the way, let us gaze upon some lovely graphs.

GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1060: 1080p performance

With games getting more demanding by the year, the GTX 1060 has slowly started to lose its foothold as the best graphics card for playing games at 60fps on Ultra settings at 1080p, and nowhere is this more prevalent than on the games I’ve tested above. Don’t get me wrong — 45-55fps is still perfectly playable in my eyes, but when the GTX 1660 Ti glides in with an effortless average of 56fps minimum, it starts to make the GTX 1060 look very old hat indeed.

Indeed, with a boost of at least 10fps, if not closer to 15fps in a lot of cases, the GTX 1660 Ti is quite the step up over the 6GB GTX 1060, turning some of today’s toughest games (aside from Metro Exodus, that is) from sort-of-playable-but-slightly-creaking adventures into buttery smooth delights.

That said, as evidenced by the GTX 1060’s still excellent average of 55fps in The Witcher III, Nvidia’s outgoing 1080p champ is probably still more than enough if your game library has a slightly older vintage than the latest and greatest. Indeed, unless you’ve got a 1920×1080 with a high refresh rate, then you probably won’t see any benefit on the GTX 1660 Ti at all in these sorts of games, as your monitor will only ever be able to display 60fps — which the GTX 1060 is probably capable of doing already.

However, if you are one of those people whose PC is starting to feel like it’s falling apart on some of these newer games, then the GTX 1660 Ti is absolutely the way to go if you want the bestest best speeds at the bestest best settings.

Speaking of which, if you’re wondering why the GTX 1060’s Shadow of the Tomb Raider result looks a little low, that’s because I’ve got the full SMAA x4 anti-aliasing option enabled here, rather than something a bit more manageable like regular SMAA. You can still get frame rates around the 60fps mark with said regular SMAA setting on the GTX 1060, truth be told, but what I really wanted to highlight here was how much more capable the GTX 1660 Ti is when the game’s really piling on the pressure. And by way of comparison, running the game with SMAA on the GTX 1660 Ti will get you frame rates in the 80-90fps region.

Of course, it’s still perfectly possible to get a decent 60fps on High with the 6GB GTX 1060 at this resolution, which for most people will be absolutely fine — especially when it costs a good £60 less than the GTX 1660 Ti in the UK right now. However, when the GTX 1660 Ti can hit speeds in the 70-90fps region at this resolution, you’re not only better future-proofed for when games start to get even tougher, but you’ve also got more scope to enjoy higher refresh rates if you decide to upgrade your monitor further down the line as well. That’s why the GTX 1660 Ti is my new best graphics card of choice for 1080p resolutions, while the GTX 1060 (and RX 580) have been relegated to ‘What you should actually buy’ status if you’re looking to save some cash and aren’t that fussy about playing games at the best graphics settings.

GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1060: 1440p performance

Where the GTX 1660 Ti really starts to make a name for itself is at 2560×1440. As you can see from the graph below, a lot of games are barely playable on the GTX 1060 on Ultra settings at this resolution, with titles like Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Monster Hunter: World and Metro Exodus all in the stuttering mid-20s, and The Witcher III, Final Fantasy XV and Total War: Warhammer II in the dangerous mid-30s zone.

Admittedly, it’s not like the GTX 1660 Ti is hitting a consistent 60fps here, either, with half the games on test hovering around the 40-45fps mark. But as I said in my GTX 1660 Ti vs RTX 2060 comparison piece, the 30-40fps region is definitely the point at which a small bump in numbers can make a surprisingly big difference to overall smoothness, transforming a game that’s teetering on the wrong side of 30fps into something a lot more manageable.

I’d happily take 43fps in Final Fantasy XV, for example, if it meant being able to play it at its Highest detail setting at 1440p (sans Nvidia effects, mind), and I’d probably also hazard Monster Hunter: World on 40fps as well just so I can gaze at its fabulous dino costumes in greater detail.

Of course, you’ll get much better results on both cards by dropping things down to High. Here, the GTX 1660 Ti really comes into its own, hitting near-60fps in practically everything going (except Metro, because everything struggles with Metro’s insane benchmarking settings, more details of which can be found in my Metro Exodus graphics performance marathon).

I’ve excluded Forza Horizon 4 here, as both cards could already hit 60fps back on Ultra at this resolution, and I’ve also missed off Shadow of the Tomb Raider because a) the GTX 1660 Ti can already do 60fps on Highest (with regular SMAA enabled, as per the graph above), and b) because you’d have to settle for Low on the GTX 1060 before you got the same kind of speed with just regular SMAA enabled and I didn’t want it to get all embarrassed.

As I said above, the GTX 1060’s 40-50fps results here are still perfectly playable at this resolution. But a smooth 60fps on High here is a pretty mean feat for a graphics card that only costs £260 / $279, especially when a lot of GTX 1060s in the US are still going for $250 in the US right now. This makes the GTX 1660 Ti such an easy recommendation for anyone looking to buy a new graphics card right now — especially if you’re in the US, because why settle for 60fps on Medium at 1440p when you can have the same speed on High for practically the same money?

It’s a slightly tougher sell in the UK, where 6GB GTX 1060 prices are still as low as £200 at time of writing, as for me that’s still enough of a price gap to make the GTX 1060 worth considering as a budget option for those looking to keep costs as low as possible. Personally, I’d urge you to stretch to £260 if you possibly can, but I understand that not everyone has enough money to do that.

GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1060: Conclusion

As a result, if you’re looking to spend as little as possible and aren’t that fussed about having the latest and greatest graphics settings, then I reckon you’ll still be perfectly happy opting for a 6GB GTX 1060 if a) you’re in the UK, and b) are mainly looking to play games at 1920×1080.

If you’re aiming for 2560×1440, however, then I’d strongly recommend finding room in your budget for the GTX 1660 Ti, as you’ll not only get a heck of a lot more out of it at this resolution, but it will also stand you in much better stead as games get increasingly more demanding down the line.

If you live in the US, on the other hand, the GTX 1660 Ti is hands down way better value for money than the GTX 1060, regardless of whether you’re looking for a 1080p card or a 1440p job. The RTX 2060 still has the edge as the absolute best graphics card for 1440p if you don’t want to break the bank (just), but if you’re looking to keep costs under £300 / $300, the GTX 1660 Ti is the card to buy.

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile Graphics cards Comparison

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today’s games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards’ performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don’t overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile

Check Price

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile here:

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile Laptops

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount 6.144 MB 6 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort No outputs
 

Check Price

  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3. 0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile — in Laptops.
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is build with Pascal architecture, and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile — with Turing.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is 51 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile.
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile — by 12 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 50−55 50−55
ultra / 1080p 35−40 35−40
QHD / 1440p 27−30 27−30
4K / 2160p 16−18 16−18
low / 720p 80−85 80−85
medium / 1080p 60−65 60−65
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p 80−85 80−85
ultra / 1080p 70−75 70−75
QHD / 1440p 55−60 55−60
4K / 2160p 30−33 30−33
low / 720p 130−140 130−140
medium / 1080p 90−95 90−95
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p 45−50 45−50
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 250−260 250−260
medium / 768p 230−240 230−240
QHD / 1440p 150−160 150−160
4K / 2160p 100−110 100−110
high / 768p 220−230 220−230
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p 70−75 70−75
medium / 1080p 50−55 50−55
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
ultra / 1080p 110−120 110−120
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p 65−70 65−70
ultra / 1080p 60−65 60−65
QHD / 1440p 40−45 40−45
4K / 2160p 21−24 21−24
low / 720p 100−110 100−110
medium / 1080p 70−75 70−75
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p 95−100 95−100
ultra / 1080p 75−80 75−80
QHD / 1440p 45−50 45−50
4K / 2160p 21−24 21−24
low / 720p 220−230 220−230
medium / 1080p 150−160 150−160
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p 90−95 85−90
ultra / 1080p 70−75 70−75
QHD / 1440p 50−55 50−55
4K / 2160p 35−40 35−40
low / 720p 140−150 140−150
medium / 1080p 95−100 95−100
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p 160−170 160−170
medium / 768p 150−160 150−160
high / 1080p 100−110 100−110
ultra / 1080p 50−55 50−55
QHD / 1440p 40−45 40−45
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p 40−45 40−45
ultra / 1080p 30−35 30−35
QHD / 1440p 24−27 24−27
4K / 2160p 14−16 14−16
low / 720p 95−100 95−100
medium / 1080p 55−60 55−60
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p 80−85 80−85
ultra / 1080p 60−65 55−60
4K / 2160p 18−20 18−20
low / 720p 120−130 120−130
medium / 1080p 90−95 90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile.
high / 1080p 35−40 35−40
ultra / 1080p 24−27 24−27
QHD / 1440p 18−20 18−20
4K / 2160p 12−14 12−14
low / 720p 95−100 95−100
medium / 1080p 55−60 55−60
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p 190−200 190−200
medium / 768p 130−140 130−140
high / 1080p 75−80 75−80
ultra / 1080p 40−45 40−45
4K / 2160p 27−30 27−30
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p 130−140 130−140
ultra / 1080p 65−70 65−70
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile
Architecture Pascal Turing
Code name GP106 N18E-G0
Type Desktop Laptop
Release date 19 July 2016 23 April 2019
Pipelines 1280 1536
Core clock speed 1506 MHz 1455 MHz
Boost Clock 1708 MHz 1590 MHz
Transistor count 4,400 million 6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 12 nm
Texture fill rate 136. 7 152.6
Floating-point performance 4,375 gflops
Length 250 mm
Memory bus width 192 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 192.2 GB/s 288.0 GB/s
Shared memory
G-SYNC support +
VR Ready +
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 6.4 6.5
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1. 2
Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131
CUDA 6.1 7.5
G-SYNC +
Laptop size medium sized
 

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 1070 mobile
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 mobile
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Review

Nvidia’s latest attempt to excite gamers arrives in the form of a new mid-range GPU with no RTX features on board. The new GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes as no surprise as it’s been widely rumored for some time and most recent leaks were so detailed they virtually confirmed its existence, down to the exact specs and pricing.

And while Nvidia has been pushing the more expensive RTX series as the holy grail for gamers, the reality has been a whole lot less miraculous. Then again, this is akin to what we and many others were asking for: a cut down Turing GPU that trims off the fat. After all, RT cores and Tensor cores are of no value on a mid-range part.

We doubt many of you will miss the ability to enable ray tracing or DLSS anyway, so by dropping these architectural features, Nvidia is able to offer a sub-$300 Turing GPU. However we still get the new SM units featuring dedicated cores for processing FP32 and integer operations simultaneously, and FP16 processing at double the rate of FP32, while also including the latest advancements in programmable shading. The new SM units also feature enhanced caches for increased capacity and bandwidth.

Compared to the RTX 2060, the GTX 1660 Ti packs 25% fewer CUDA cores, but because it also drops the RT and Tensor cores the die is 36% smaller. When compared to the Pascal-based GTX 1060 6GB, the 1660 Ti die is 42% larger, but only packs 20% more CUDA cores. But as we just mentioned, those cores have been upgraded and are now much wider.

The new GTX 1660 Ti also comes with 6GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 1500MHz for a DDR clock of 6 GHz, and a data rate of 12 Gbps. Using a 192-bit wide memory bus, that results in a peak throughput of 288.1 GB/s which is a 14% reduction in bandwidth when compared to the RTX 2060, but 13% higher than the GTX 1070 and 50% more than the 1060.

With those kind of specs, we’re expecting the 1660 Ti to offer GTX 1070-like performance at the designated $280 price point, which would be good news for gamers.

For testing we’ll be looking at performance in a dozen titles. As we get some extra time for running more tests, we’ll run our full suite of 30+ game benchmarks. The focus of this review will be on 1080p and 1440p performance, using our Core i9-9900K test system clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3200 memory. We used Game Ready 418.91 WHQL drivers for the GeForce GPUs tested and Adrenalin 2019 Edition 19.2.2 for the Radeon GPUs.

Benchmarks

First up we have Shadow of the Tomb Raider and here the GTX 1660 Ti looks impressive, matching the GTX 1070 Ti with 87 fps on average at 1080p. This allowed it to match Vega 56 and therefore destroy the RX 590 by almost 40%. It remained lethal at 1440p as well, again matching the GTX 1070 Ti and beating the RX 590 by an impressive 41% margin.

Forza Horizon 4 was actually one of the first games we benchmarked and we were shocked to find the GTX 1660 Ti so close to the RTX 2060. We’ve seen already that Turing GPUs aren’t much faster than their Pascal counterparts in this title, and in the case of the RTX 2070 it’s actually a little slower than the 1080.

The GTX 1660 Ti had no trouble keeping up with the GTX 1070 and as a result was just 5% slower than the 2060.

We see the same trends at 1440p. Here the 1660 Ti was just a single frame slower than the 2060, we don’t expect we’ll see many more results like this though.

Keeping frame rates above 60 fps in Just Cause 4 certainly isn’t easy, but even so the GTX 1660 Ti is now by far the best sub $300 GPU in this title, averaging 73 fps at 1080p, making it 14% faster than the RX 590.

Similar margins are seen at 1440p. The 1660 Ti matches the GTX 1070 and this means it was just a few frames slower than Vega 56.

The GTX 1660 Ti slayed Resident Evil 2 with an impressive 108 fps on average, this placed it between the 1070 and 1070 Ti, so a solid result there. It maintained this position at 1440p and in a strong title for AMD it was still 11% faster than the Radeon RX 590, so another very solid result for Nvidia’s new sub $300 GPU.

Hitman 2 is a bit odd at 1080p because we’re CPU bottlenecked at this resolution. Moving to 1440p gives us a better idea of how these GPUs compare and here we see the 1660 Ti roughly matching the GTX 1070, making it just 12% slower than the RTX 2060.

The GTX 1660 Ti is no doubt going to be a popular choice amongst Fortnite players, it’s by far the cheapest way to push well past 100 fps using high quality settings. It also proves very capable at 1440p, pushing well over 70 fps throughout our test run. Once again, you’re looking at GTX 1070-like performance.

Metro Exodus is an exciting new game that we’ve already covered in-depth, but obviously this is the first time we’ve tested it with the GTX 1660 Ti. Performance at 1080p is respectable as is gaming at 1440p. On the latter, the 1660 Ti matches the 1070, making it 30% faster than the 6GB GTX 1060.

Rainbow Six Siege always provides us with interesting results and today’s review is no exception. For the most part the GTX 1660 Ti has mirrored the GTX 1070’s performance, but here it shatters it and manages to even edge out the GTX 1080.

Much the same is seen at 1440p, where the 1660 Ti matches the GTX 1080 making it 16% faster than the 1070 and 58% faster than the 1060 6GB, while it was just 2% slower than Vega 56.

Our updated Battlefield V testing saw the GTX 1660 Ti come in just behind the GTX 1070 at 1080p, but with 90 fps on average it was a good step up from the GTX 1060. Then at 1440p we see much of the same. There the 1660 Ti was slightly slower than the GTX 1070, though with just 2fps in it, you could comfortably say they provided the same experience. Not only that, but with over 60 fps rendered during our test, the 1660 Ti provided highly playable performance in Battlefield V at 1440p.

Interestingly the GTX 1660 Ti was unable to match the GTX 1070 in World of Tanks at 1080p, where it was 7% slower. A rare result from the new Turing GPU coming in behind the 1070. It did manage to beat Vega 56 however, and was almost 40% faster than the RX 590.

At 1440p we see very similar results. Vega 56 creeps ahead for the average frame rate, but is down for the 1% low result. Still at 35% faster than the Radeon RX 590, the 1660 Ti more than gets the job done.

As the new ultra popular battle royale title in town, we’ve tested Apex Legends with the new GTX 1660 Ti. The card spat out 123 fps at 1080p, making it a whisker faster than Vega 56 and a whisker slower than the GTX 1070 Ti. It was also 16% slower than the RTX 2060.

Moving to 1440p, the 1660 Ti is found positioned between the 1070 Ti and Vega 56 making it 9% faster than the vanilla 1070 and 55% faster than the 6GB GTX 1060.

Wrapping up the game benchmarks we have the new Far Cry title: New Dawn. The results are similar to what we saw in Far Cry 5, which is to be expected since it’s the same world and game engine. Here the 1660 Ti matches the GTX 1070, making it a little slower than Vega 56.

Then at 1440p as we’ve seen numerous times already, the margins remain the same.

Power & Temperatures

When it comes to power consumption the GTX 1660 Ti pushed total consumption to just 271 watts making it very efficient. In essence you’re getting GTX 1070-like performance for an 8% power saving for the total system.

We’re not going to bother comparing that result with Vega 56, you can see the difference for yourself, plus Vega 56 has to be modified before it can be placed in a power graph like this, you know, standard out of the box stuff like undervolting until it’s running on lemon juice. But in all seriousness, this is what you can expect from Vega 56 and 64 out of the box, same goes for Radeon VII.

As for operating temperatures, the MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X we used was whisper quiet, even after an hour of heavy load. The fans only spun up to around 1500 RPM and this allowed for a peak GPU temperature of 66 degrees in a 21 C room. Very impressive stuff from this relatively small graphics card.

Overclocking

Even when overclocked, the 1660 Ti maintained basically the same operating temperature and fan speed, running just a single degree warmer. The operating frequency was only boosted by 4% on average, but we were able to massively overclock the memory speed, increasing the data rate from 12 Gbps to 15 Gbps, the maximum speed MSI AfterBurner would allow us to hit.

This boost combination allowed for an 8% performance increase when testing with Far Cry New Dawn. It’s not exactly mindblowing stuff, but that’s a pretty typical overclock for a modern Nvidia graphics card.

Individual Matchups

We’ve got a pretty good idea of how the new GeForce GTX 1660 Ti performs out of the box, how hot the MSI Gaming X runs, how well it overclocks, and how efficient it is. But how about we now check out exactly how the GPU stacks up against the GTX 1060, 1070, RTX 2060, Radeon RX 590 and Vega 56? Let’s do that…

GTX 1660 Ti vs. GTX 1060

The GTX 1660 Ti is actually a decent upgrade over the GTX 1060 6GB, at least it can be depending on the title. On average it is 38% faster at 1080p and 40% faster at 1440p, and that right there is a big performance boost and certainly justifies spending $280 in our opinion. Especially if you want to delve into 1440p gaming.

Upgrades aside, you wouldn’t even entertain purchasing a GTX 1060 6GB anymore. We mean, you shouldn’t have as the RX 580 is much better value. Anything north of $200 and we wouldn’t give it a second look.

GTX 1660 Ti vs. GTX 1070

This one we called it throughout the review and benchmark results, so you know the GTX 1660 Ti is kind of the new GTX 1070. Performance does vary a bit in a few titles, but for the most part we’re looking at a single digit performance difference. We see the same 2% performance difference at 1440p.

The 1660 Ti performed well in Rainbow Six Siege, Shadow of the Tomb Raider and Apex Legends, but as we said overall performance was much the same.

GTX 1660 Ti vs. RTX 2060

It’s interesting to note that the GTX 1660 Ti is 20% cheaper than the RTX 2060, but at 1080p is just 12% slower. You could of course argue that the 2060 is better value because of those RT and Tensor cores that enable ray tracing and DLSS, but we’d scoff at such a claim. The 1660 Ti was also just 12% slower at 1440p.

GTX 1660 Ti vs.

Radeon RX 590

Compared to the similarly priced RX 590, the GTX 1660 Ti is a full 24% faster.

Since we reviewed the RX 590, we said the pricing for that GPU was not right and was not a good value, but now AMD will be forced to make adjustments. The new 1660 Ti gets you 24% more performance for an 8% price hike. Not only that, but in the worst gaming scenario the 1660 Ti was still 7% faster than the RX 590, while in the best case up to 46% faster. So it’s clearly the better buy.

Expect further RX 590 price drops now that the 1660 Ti is on the scene. The margins we just described were maintained at 1440p, where the 1660 Ti was ~25% faster on average.

GTX 1660 Ti vs. Vega 56

Finally we have Vega 56 which typically sells for $400, with the crazy sale here and there dropping it down closer to $300. The GTX 1660 Ti was 7% slower on average and even if Vega 56 was to sell at $330 (the last deal we saw recently), the 1660 Ti would still be 15% cheaper, making it the better value overall. Not to mention, much more efficient.

Cost per Frame and Conclusion

With everything we’ve just seen, you’d expect the GTX 1660 Ti to fare well in the value department and it does. Basically you’re looking at a similar price-to-performance ratio as the Radeon RX 580, which is incredibly good news for gamers.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is an entire tier above the RX 580, so for this GPU to deliver a similar cost per frame is simply great.

With a similar level of performance to that of Vega 56, the GTX 1660 Ti comes out at a saving of 25% per frame. It is also 19% more cost effective than the GTX 1060 6GB. The least impressive comparison can be made with the RTX 2060, here it was just 9% more cost effective, which is still an impressive margin and I’ll talk more about this in a moment.

The first Turing GPUs were released last September, and in our opinion it wasn’t until Nvidia released the RTX 2060 that we got a well rounded model worth buying. To be fair the RTX 2080 Ti is an incredible beast and we love gaming at 4K with it, but it’s also stupidly overpriced at $1300. For a wide majority of gamers, it’s not that good.

The RTX 2080 was a snooze fest at launch, particularly because it was selling well above the MSRP. Today it’s definitely better. The RTX 2070 meanwhile is far worse off, as it was effectively eliminated by the 2060 just three months after release. Then for those that hadn’t yet nodded off, AMD chimed in with some elite level ASMR with their Radeon VII…

The GTX 1660 Ti may be the first GPU release in a while that we’ve come away feeling completely pleased. We’re getting GTX 1070-like performance for a slight price premium over the GTX 1060 6GB, and while many would have prefered pricing set at $250, without any competition from AMD at the moment we think this is a pretty good result.

Speaking of AMD, the 1660 Ti puts them in a tough spot. Previously the RX 580 was the obvious sub-$300 option, but now the choice is more difficult and frankly we’d go for the 1660 Ti. It’s $80 more but offers higher tier performance. In today’s games the RX 580 is more of a 1080p solution, whereas the 1660 Ti can be used for high refresh rate 1080p gaming or 1440p gaming. It’s also much more efficient and we expect all cards to run cool and quiet. Fingers crossed AMD can pull a rabbit out of their hat with Navi later in the year, that would certainly benefit us all.

In the meantime though, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the new sub-$300 king, and we are not at all concerned by the lack of RT and Tensor cores. Frankly, we’d much rather have a GTX 2080 Ti with some extra CUDA cores… we’d certainly be more compelled to spend $1300 on that.

The only question remaining is, how much will you have to pay to get a new GTX 1660 Ti? As it often happens, pricing will likely be all over the place during the initial few weeks, but with the RTX 2060, 2070 and 2080 all selling at the MSRP, we expect the same will be true for the GTX 1660 Ti before long.

Shopping Shortcuts:
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2060 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2080 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX Vega 56 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX Vega 64 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX 570 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX 580 on Amazon, Newegg

A Worthy Successor To The GTX 1060?

Today Nvidia is launching its GeForce GTX 1660 —  the long-awaited successor to its massively popular GTX 1060, which still sits at the top of the Steam Hardware Survey as the most popular graphics card.   Hot on the heels of the GTX 1660 Ti, the new cheaper model, Nvidia has told me, will be available for around $219 and that’s around the same price as the GTX 1060 3GB plus some of the cheaper GTX 1060 6GB models floating around, which is great news.

Antony Leather

In this article, I’ll be taking a look at how the GTX 1660 performs against its nearest rivals as well as its predecessor plus checking out a GTX 1660-based PC from popular UK system builder Scan to see how capable a sub $1,000/£750 PC stacks up for 1080p gaming using Nvidia’s latest GPU.

Scan.co.uk

GTX 1660 GTX 1660 Ti GTX 1060 3GB GTX 1060 6GB RTX 2060
Base Freq 1,530 1,500 1,506 1506 1,365MHz
Boost Freq 1,785 1,770 1,708 1708 1,680MHz
Cuda Cores 1,408 1,536 1,152 1280 1,920
Tensor Cores 240
Memory 6GB GDDR5 6GB GDDR 6 3GB GDDR5 6GB GDDR5 6GB GDDR6
TDP 120 120 120 120 160W
Launch/current Price US $219 — $279 — $199/$184 $249/$209 $349 —
Launch/current Price UK £199 —  £259/£245  £189/£164 £239/£190  £329 —

Looking more closely at the pricing and the GTX 1660 sits between the launch prices of the GTX 1060 3GB and 1060 6GB, so while the RTX series has certainly received some less favorable press concerning its pricing, that’s certainly not the case here, assuming cards hit shelves at the stated $219/£199 of course. There is also the issue that pricing for all versions of the GTX 1060 is obviously lower than at launch now and I’ve added some of the cheaper examples to the above table. The GTX 1060 3GB can be had for just $184/£164 and the 6GB card for $209/£190, the latter being practically the same as the GTX 1660.

This means that the GTX 1660 needs to add some decent margins over the GTX 1060 6GB. As usual, it will be worth watching pricing of the older Pascal-based cards over the next few weeks as there are likely to be some bargains out there.

Antony Leather

Both the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 1660 use Nvidia’s TU166 Turing GPU, with the caveat that it doesn’t support RTX features such as DLSS and ray tracing like the RTX 2060. However, it does sport Nvidia’s new streaming multiprocessor that offers numerous performance-enhancing tweaks and upgrades such as enhanced caches and improved bandwidth that Nvidia claims offers dramatic improvements over the equivalent tech in GP106 Pascal-based GPUs.

The GTX 1660 Ti and GTX 1660 are roughly similar in terms of clock speeds — in fact the latter offers higher base and boost frequencies. However, the more expensive card offers more Cuda cores as well as faster GDDR6 as opposed to GDDR5 memory, meaning the GTX 1660 trails in memory bandwidth at 192.1GB/sec compared to 288.1GB/sec. With a promised 15% performance boost over the GTX 1060 6GB and up to 30% over the similarly-priced 3GB model of that card, the GTX 1660 still has what it takes to be an excellent 1080p HD gaming card, on paper at least.

Testing

Antony Leather

My test system includes an Intel Core i9-7900X, 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 3,200MHz memory, an Asus ROG Strix X299 Gaming motherboard, a 500GB Samsung 960 Pro SSD, NZXT Kraken X42 cooler and Corsair RM850i PSU. I’m also using a fully up-to-date install of Windows 10 with all security patches including those for Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities plus the latest AMD and Nvidia drivers as of the date of this article.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Antony Leather

Antony Leather

At 1,920 x 1,080, the GTX 1660 was a huge amount faster than the GTX 1060 6GB, offering a near 30% speed boost to the minimum frame rate. While there was a big step up on the minimum from the RX 590, the latter was only 2fps behind on the average frame rate. Given the price difference between it and the GTX 1660 Ti, the pricing here is pretty much spot on too, with the more expensive Turing card adding around 15% on top of the GTX 1660’s performance.

Stepping up to 2,560 x 1,440 and there’s very little difference between the RX 590 and GTX 1660, with just a small bump in the minimum frame rate for the Nvidia card. A minimum frame rate of 37fps is a great result here given this is a mid-range resolution at some fairly high settings in this game, although I’d be tempted to opt for the GTX 1660 Ti for a little more headroom. Once again, there’s a huge near 30% step up from the GTX 1060 6GB, meaning that you’d probably consider the new card a worthwhile upgrade.

World of Tanks

Antony Leather

Antony Leather

Still a popular free-to-play MMO, World of Tanks isn’t particularly taxing, but you still see big increases in frame rates with the new Core graphics engine as you rise up the GPU scale. At 1,920 x 1,080, the GTX 1060 has the measure of the RX 590 and adds 14% to the minimum and 10% to the average frame rates of the GTX 1060 6GB. Clearly not a worthwhile upgrade — you’d need to step up to the GTX 1660 Ti for that. At 1440p, the GTX 1660 switched places with the RX 590, but was still getting on for 10% quicker than the GTX 1060 6GB in maintaining a minimum frame rate of 67fps.

Forza Horizon 4

Antony Leather

Antony Leather

Another relatively easy game to run if you have a mid-range graphics card, AMD’s RX 590 was particularly strong here, bettering even the GTX 1660 Ti. The latter wasn’t that much quicker than the GTX 1660 either, with the lower three Nvidia cards bunching up at the bottom of the graph. Stepping up to 1440p, though, and the graph looks very different. The GTX 1660 Ti performed excellently and was well ahead of the RX 590, leaving the GTX 1660 snapping at the AMD card’s heels. However, it still offered a 20% boost over the GTX 1060 6GB.

Far Cry 5

There was some more bunching going on in Far Cry 5, with not a great deal of difference between the GTX 1660 and GTX 1660 Ti, with both cards managing a minimum frame rate around 70fps, with the pricier card offering a higher average frame rate. Nvidia’s claimed boost over the GTX 1060 6GB was spot on here with a 15% advantage in minimum frame rate courtesy of the GTX 1660.

Stepping up to 1440p and the GTX 1660 Ti extended its lead over the cheaper Turing card and only the RTX 2060 managed to reach over 60fps consistently. The RX 590 and GTX 1660 were practically identical while the latter offered a 21% boost over the GTX 1060 6GB’s minimum frame rate and 19% over the average frame rate.

Antony Leather

Antony Leather

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

Antony Leather

Antony Leather

An aging but still tough game to deal with, Deus Ex saw the RX 590 outperform the GTX 1660 at both resolutions and here the GTX 1660 Ti’s advantages in Cuda cores and memory bandwidth really came into their own too as it offered a huge leap over the cheaper Turin card, again at both resolutions. There was between 10-15% between the GTX 1660 and GTX 1060 6GB too — again Nvidia was right on the money here.

UL VRMark

Antony Leather

A virtual reality benchmark developed to test HTC Vive and Oculus Rift performance, Nvidia fared well here in general, but the Turing cards were particularly potent, with the GTX 1660 bettering the RX 590 by a healthy margin and offering a 21% boost over the GTX 1060 6GB.

Antony Leather

Antony Leather

Despite the higher performance than the GTX 1060 6GB in every test, sometimes significantly so, the GTX 1660 used very little extra power — just 2W under load and with a similar idle power draw too. The Pascal range of cards prided itself on its efficiency and with near  30% more performance here on occasions, Turing is clearly doing the same.

Now we take a look at the GTX 1660-based system from Scan, which alongside an EVGA GTX 1660, with a slight boost to its frequencies, sports the following specification:

Antony Leather

Scan Gamer system (£749.99)

Case Corsair Carbide SPEC Delta RGB Tempered Glass

PSU 550W Corsair VS, 80PLUS

Motherboard Asus EX-A320M Gaming

CPU AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Memory 8GB (2x 4GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR4 2666MHz

Graphics Cards 6GB EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 XC Black Gaming

SSD 250GB Seagate Barracuda

HDD 1TB Seagate Barracuda

Operating System Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64-bit

Warranty 2 Years RTB (Parts and Labour)

Finally, then, we’re seeing the possibility of sub £750/$1000 PCs with much-improved performance compared to the usual GTX 1060-based system and with an AMD Ryzen 5 2600 here too, the Scan Gamer promises to be a potent content creation PC as well as gaming PC.

Antony Leather

Despite using a much cheaper CPU than my test system, there was no difference in the frame rates in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with the Scan Gamer PC managing a healthy minimum frame rate of 54fps.

Antony Leather

Dues Ex was a similar story at 1080p, with the scan PC managing a minimum of 48fps and average of 59fps

Antony Leather

Far Cry 5 was tiny bit slower on the Scan PC than on my own test system, but only by a couple of frames per second, with the Pc maintaining a minimum frame rate of at least 67fps, with clear scope for gaming at higher resolutions.

Antony Leather

Aside from competitors within AMD’s own ranks, a likely alternative is Intel’s Core i5-9600K, at least until cheaper 9th generation CPUs appear. Despite the huge price hike for this CPU over the Ryzen 5 2600, it only offered a small boost to the Adobe Premier Pro export time.

Antony Leather

The PC Mark 10 image editing test went in AMD’s favor with a huge lead over the Core i5-9600K in this multi-threaded test thanks to the additional threads offered by the Ryzen 5 2600.

Antony Leather

handBrake also benefitted here in this 4K video transcode test and despite the Intel CPU costing a vast amount more, it was slower here.

Antony Leather

Cinebench was yet another win for Scan’s AMD system, with an even bigger lead over the Core i5-9600K thanks to its extra threads.

Antony Leather

Finally, there’s power consumption and with both the CPU and GPU under full load, the system drew a maximum of 255W, but remained very quiet despite using the Wraith Stealth cooler that came with the AMD CPU.

Antony Leather

Antony Leather

Conclusions

Scan Gamer PC:

Starting with the Scan PC, and what we have in an excellent affordable PC that’s bolstered by the fact that Nvidia’s GTX 1660 is much quicker than the GTX 1060 6GB, but costs about the same as the cheapest examples of the latter out there at the moment. Coupled with some affordable but powerful AMD Ryzen-based hardware and what we have is a capable gaming machine that offered decent performance in content creation too. It also looks great in Corsair’s Carbide SPEC Delta RGB Tempered Glass and has a sensible storage arrangement of a 250GB SSD and 1TB hard disk. 

Nvidia GTX 1660:

Antony Leather

What we have in the GTX 1660 is a very welcome, if somewhat predictable graphics card which slots in almost perfectly in amongst other mid-range cards out there. Nvidia’s statement that performance is around 15% better than the GTX 1060 6GB is maybe even underselling the GTX 1660’s performance. I did test with the older GDDR5 rather than GDDR5X version of the GTX 1060 6GB, but even so, the performance improvements were close to 30% on occasions, which means that the GTX 1660 isn’t just an incremental step up, but a worthwhile upgrade if you own a GTX 1060 6GB. This isn’t true everywhere, but I saw decent gains in almost every game I tested.

Compared to the RX 590, things are less clear cut. Both cards look set to retail at similar prices once the GTX 1660 hits the shelves. Overall the Nvidia card is faster, but there are some titles where the difference is negligible and others where the AMD card is faster. This also flipped moving between resolutions in some games too. Ultimately the GTX 1660 is exactly what it needs to be — much quicker than the GTX 1060 6GB, a match for the RX 590 and a huge step up from the GTX 1060 3GB, which unless you’re picking it up for less than $160/£150, really isn’t worth it now.

In fact, even a $180/£160 GTX 1060 6GB doesn’t make much sense when for an extra $40/£40, you’re getting up to 30% more performance. It’s a good time for the consumer then as we’re likely going to see cut-price Pascal cards, but as it stands the GTX 1660 is definitely worth the cash and if you’re a 1080p gamer, it offers plenty of headroom too.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GPU Comparison

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

63 %

49%
significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

79 FPS

34 FPS
significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

45 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

50 FPS

10 FPS
slightly higher Electron frame rate

41 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

58 FPS

27 FPS
significantly higher City frame rate

31 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

38 FPS

5 FPS
slightly higher Clouds frame rate

33 FPS

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the GeForce GTX 1060 6GB? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Geekbench (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

66,368

95%
significantly higher Geekbench (CUDA) score

34,034

Geekbench (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

61,373

68%
significantly higher Geekbench (OpenCL) score

36,416

Geekbench (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

53,550

43%
significantly higher Geekbench (Vulkan) score

37,241

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1,500 MHz

1,506 MHz

0%
slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1,770 MHz

3%
slightly higher boost clock speed

1,709 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB

Identical

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

Identical

192 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s

49%
significantly higher memory bandwidth

192 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W

Identical

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

85 Gigapixels/s

3%
slightly higher pixel rate

82 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

170 Gigatexels/s

24%
slightly higher texture rate

137 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5 TFLOPS

34%
slightly better floating point performance

4 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1,536

20%
slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

96

20%
slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

48

Identical

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

56th
of 526

89th
of 526

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

February 2019

July 2016

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12. 0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.6


GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1060 6GB benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti graphics card is better than the GeForce GTX 1060 6GB in our tests.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1060 6GB has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 6 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, both the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the GeForce GTX 1060 6GB have an identical TDP. Heat output doesn’t match power consumption directly but, it’s a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is faster than the GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

Latest posts

How to choose a power supply for your gaming PC: wattage and efficiencyJuly 11, 2022

How to compare GPUs and GPUs: find the best components for gamingJuly 02, 2022

Best PC benchmarking tools 2022: how to performance test your gaming PCJuly 02, 2022

Popular GPU Comparisons

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3060

Radeon RX 570 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

0024

  • 2 more DisplayPort outputs?
    3 vs 1
  • Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060?

    • 1. 58 TFLOPS above FLOPS?
      5.44 TFLOPS vs 3.85 TFLOPS
    • 12.66 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
      84.96 GPixel/s vs 72.3 GPixel/s
    • 3992MHz higher effective clock speed?
      12000MHz vs 8008MHz
    • 49.4 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
      288GB/s vs 192.2GB/s
    • 256 more stream processors?
      1536 vs 1280
    • 2200million more transistors?
      6600 million vs 4400 million
    • 9°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
      65°C vs 74°C

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 580

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    VS

    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1060

    VS

    NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 2060

    NVIDIA GTX

    VS

    NVIDIA GTX 100003

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    Manli GeForce GTX 1650

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 16600004 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    3 Reviews of users

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TI

    10. 0 /10

    3 Reviews of users

    Functions

    9.3 /10

    3 Votes

    Games

    7.0220 /10

    3 VOTES

    8.7 /10

    3 VOTES

    Production

    0003

    7.0 /10

    3 Votes

    /10

    3 Votes

    TARTION NOME

    7.0 /10 9000

    3 VOTES

    8.3 /10 9000 9000 3 VOTES 3 Reliability

    7.0 /10

    3 Votes

    /10

    3 Votes

    Productivity

    1. TECTION FRIENTION GP

    1506MHz

    1500MHz

    GPUs (GPU) has a higher processor (GPU) has a higher processor (GPU) frequency.

    2.turbo GPU

    1708MHz

    1770MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    72.3 GPixel/s

    84.96 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    3.85 TFLOPS

    5.44 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    120.5 GTexels/s

    169.9 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    2002MHz

    1500MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    8008MHz

    12000MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    192.2GB/s

    288GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    192bit

    192bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5. versions of GDDR memory

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5.GPU Temperature at Boot

    Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to an attached display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI 3.Version

    HDMI 2.0

    HDMI 2.0

    New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

    Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

    Price match

    Cancel

    Which graphic cards are better?

    Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2

    Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 for all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
    Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)

    versus

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2

    Benefits

    Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)

    • Newer graphics card, 1 year(s) 3 month(s)
    • more shader processors vs 1280
    • A newer graphics card manufacturing process allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 16 nm
    • 50% more memory clock: 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
    • About 17% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 16828 vs 14345
    • ) about 17% more: 16828 vs 14345
    Release date 23 April 2019 vs 5 January 2018
    Number of shader processors 1536 vs 1280
    Process 12 nm vs 16 nm
    Memory frequency 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16828 vs 14345
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16828 vs 14345

    Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2

    • About 4% faster core clock: 1506 MHz vs 1455 MHz
    • 7% faster core clock in Boost mode: 1709 MHz vs 1590 MHz
    Core clock 1506 MHz vs 1455 MHz
    Boost core clock 1709 MHz vs 1590 MHz

    Benchmark comparison

    GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
    GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2

    GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB Rev. 2
    PassMark — G2D Mark 507
    PassMark — G3D Mark 10176
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 5586
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 15109
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 15109
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16828 14345
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16828 14345
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 8054
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 8054

    Performance comparison

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB Rev. 2
    Architecture Turing Pascal
    Codename N18E-G0 GP106
    Production date 23 April 2019 January 5, 2018
    Place in the ranking 63 44
    Type Laptop Desktop
    Price at first issue date $299
    Boost core clock 1590MHz 1709 MHz
    Core clock 1455 MHz 1506 MHz
    Process 12nm 16nm
    Number of shaders 1536 1280
    Number of transistors 6600 million 4,400 million
    Floating point performance 4. 375 gflops
    Texturing Speed ​​ 136.7 GTexel/s
    Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt
    Video connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
    Notebook size medium sized
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
    Length 250mm
    Additional power connectors 1x 6-pin
    DirectX 12. 1 12.0 (12_1)
    OpenGL 4.6
    Maximum memory size 6144MB 6GB
    Memory bus width 192bit 192 Bit
    Memory frequency 12000 MHz 8008MHz
    Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
    Memory bandwidth 938MHz

    1500MHz

    max 2457

    Average: 938 MHz

    GPU memory frequency

    This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

    2002MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326. 6 MHz

    1500MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326.6 MHz

    FLOPS

    The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

    4.25TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    5.37TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    Turbo GPU

    If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
    Show all

    1708 MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375.8 MHz

    1785MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375. 8 MHz

    Texture size

    A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
    Show all

    136.7 GTexels/s

    max 756.8

    Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

    171.4 GTexels/s

    max 756.8

    Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
    98.3GB/s

    288GB/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    Effective memory speed

    The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
    Show all

    8008 MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984. 5 MHz

    12000MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984.5 MHz

    RAM

    6 GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    6 GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    GDDR Memory Versions

    Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
    Show all

    5

    Average: 4.5

    6

    Average: 4.5

    Memory bus width

    A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
    Show all

    192bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    192bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    Heat dissipation (TDP)

    Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
    Show all

    120W

    Average: 140.4W

    120W

    Average: 140.4W

    Process

    The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

    16 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    12 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    Number of transistors

    The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates

    4400 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    6600 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    PCIe version

    Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
    Show all

    3

    Mean: 2. 8

    3

    Mean: 2.8

    Width

    183mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    228mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    DirectX

    Used in demanding games for enhanced graphics

    12

    max 12.2

    Average: 11.1

    12

    max 12.2

    Average: 11.1

    OpenCL version

    Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
    Show all

    1. 2

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    1.2

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    opengl version

    Later versions provide better game graphics

    4.5

    max 4.6

    Average: 4

    4.6

    max 4.6

    Average: 4

    Shader model version

    6.4

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    6.5

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    Vulkan version

    1.2

    1.2

    CUDA version

    6. 1

    7.5

    Has HDMI output

    HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.

    Yes

    Yes

    HDMI version

    The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
    Show all

    2

    max 2.1

    Average: 2

    2

    max 2.1

    Average: 2

    DisplayPort

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort

    one

    Average: 2

    one

    Average: 2

    DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI

    one

    Mean: 1. 4

    one

    Mean: 1.4

    Number of HDMI sockets

    The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
    Show all

    2

    Average: 1.1

    one

    Average: 1.1

    HDMI

    Yes

    Yes

    Passmark score

    10047

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    11582

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score

    74947

    max 1

    Average: 80042. 3

    max 1

    Average: 80042.3

    3DMark Fire Strike Score

    10818

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    14362

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score

    12560

    max 49575

    Average: 11859.1

    15679

    max 49575

    Average: 11859.1

    3DMark 11 Performance GPU Score

    16942

    max 57937

    Average: 18799. 9

    21685

    max 57937

    Average: 18799.9

    3DMark Vantage Performance Score

    42843

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    51159

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    3DMark Ice Storm GPU score

    230475

    max 533357

    Average: 372425.7

    436267

    max 533357

    Average: 372425.7

    Unigine Heaven 3.0 score

    8909

    max 60072

    Average: 2402

    max 60072

    Average: 2402

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — Solidworks

    45

    max 202

    Average: 62. 4

    max 202

    Average: 62.4

    SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — specvp12 sw-03

    45

    max 202

    Average: 64

    max 202

    Average: 64

    SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Siemens NX

    6

    max 212

    Average: 14

    max 212

    Average: 14

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01

    63

    max 232

    Average: 121.3

    max 232

    Average: 121.3

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — Showcase

    63

    max 175

    Average: 108. 4

    max 175

    Average: 108.4

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — Medical

    31

    max 107

    Average: 39.6

    max 107

    Average: 39.6

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01

    31

    max 107

    Average: 39

    max 107

    Average: 39

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — Maya

    101

    max 177

    Average: 129.8

    121

    max 177

    Average: 129. 8

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04

    101

    max 180

    Average: 132.8

    max 180

    Average: 132.8

    SPECviewperf 12 score — Energy

    6

    max 25

    Average: 9.7

    max 25

    Average: 9.7

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01

    6

    max 21

    Average: 10.7

    max 21

    Average: 10.7

    SPECviewperf 12 — Creo 9 test score0606

    34

    max 153

    Average: 49. 5

    max 153

    Average: 49.5

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01

    34

    max 153

    Average: 52.5

    max 153

    Average: 52.5

    SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — specvp12 catia-04

    fifty

    max 189

    Average: 91.5

    max 189

    Average: 91.5

    SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Catia

    fifty

    max 189

    Average: 88.6

    max 189

    Average: 88.6

    GTX 1660 Super vs GTX 1660 and GTX 1660 Ti Game FPS Comparison

    The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is a gaming graphics card introduced by NVIDIA in October 2019of the year. Built on the basis of the regular GTX 1660 (introduced in the spring of 2019), it differs from it in faster and more modern GDDR6 memory (the 1660 uses GDDR5 video memory). The same GDDR6 memory is used in the GTX 1660 Ti, but the GTX 1660 Super is even faster: 14 GB/s versus 12 GB/s on the 1660 Ti! True, the GTX 1660 Ti has more CUDA cores: 1536 versus 1408.

    So, the new product is better than the GTX 1660 and even surpasses the older GTX 1660 Ti in some ways.

    NVIDIA proposes to consider the GTX 1660 Super as a replacement for the regular GTX 1660 and promises that the GTX 1660 Super is on average up to 20% faster than the simple 1660 and up to 40% faster than the GTX 1060:

    Is this really true? Let’s check!

    Test stand

    For a comparative test, we took 3 exactly the same appearance of the Palit StormX video card (not OC version):

    • PA-GTX1660 StormX 6G (NE51660018J9-165F)
    • PA-GTX19 PA-GTX16 NE6166S018J9-161F)
    • PA-GTX1660Ti StormX 6G (NE6166T018J9-161F)

    These are affordable graphics cards with a simple but effective cooling system with three heat pipes and one fan that constantly rotates.

    Other components are typical for mid-range gaming PCs:

    • Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (6 cores, 12 threads, 4.1 GHz in turbo mode for all cores)
    • Processor cooler AMD Wraith Spire Motherboard ASRock B450 Pro4 (AMD B450 chipset)
    • Memory 2×8 GB Patriot Steel Series 3200MHz CL16
    • SSD Patriot Burst 480GB
    • Power Supply
    • 9 Zalman ZM-700LX

    The test PC has Win10 with the latest updates on 11/05/2019 and video driver 441.08, specially released by Nvidia for the start of sales of the GTX 1660 Super. The tests were carried out in a system unit with open walls — keep this in mind when comparing the temperatures of video chips in the test.

    All games tested at FullHD resolution (1920×1080) and ultra graphics presets

    GTX 1660 vs GTX 1660 Super vs GTX 1660 Ti in games0019

    We have summarized the results of the tests in one video. If text format is more suitable for you, scroll through the video and read on.

    FPS data decryption on screenshots:

    D3D12 or VULKAN — current FPS value (to the right is the frame time)
    Avg — the most important value in our test
    1% Low — the minimum FPS value for 1% of the time since the start of the test (this value indicates to what value the FPS dropped during the test; depends on the processor, not on the video card)

    Battlefield 5

    In Battlefield 5, the GeForce GTX 1660 Super averaged 103 FPS on ultra presets. This is 11% higher than the regular GTX 1660 and almost the same as the more expensive GTX 1660 Ti! Pay attention to the fastest video memory in this trio: 7 GHz for Super versus 6 GHz for Ti and 4 GHz for «just 1660» with its GDDR5 memory

    Shadow Of The Tomb Raider

    Lara Croft GTX 1660 Super shows the same 11% advantage over a simple 1660 and only 5% does not reach the result of the older GTX 1660 Ti: 85 FPS vs 89

    Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey

    In the Odyssey performance test, the FPS counter showed absolutely the same result for the new product and for its older sister — the GTX 1660 Ti! The average value during the test is 61 fps

    Metro Exodus

    In the exclusion zone survival game, Super has an average result between 1660 and 1660 Ti: 81 FPS , which is 7% better than younger, and 4% worse than older video cards:

    PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG)

    In this mega-popular online shooter, the GTX 1660 Super is capable of delivering the same 88 FPS as the GTX 1660 Ti! Truly, super-fast memory works wonders!

    FAR CRY 5

    GTX 1660 Super with its 86 FPS «leaked» the 1660 Ti quite a bit. Such a small difference in FPS can be attributed to testing error. GTX 1660 catches up but 11-12% behind Super

    Rage 2

    The GTX 1660 Super ( 96 FPS ) falls short of the results of its «big brother», the GTX 1660 Ti, but its performance is much closer to the 1660 Ti than to the simple 1660:

    Summing up the results

    In this test, we did not cover many games, but we tried to test projects of different genres, implemented on different «engines». This sample is enough to draw conclusions about the performance of the new video card from the «greens».

    In all games, the performance of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super was, if not equal to the GTX 1660 Ti, then very close to that of the . In any case, the speed of the novelty, equipped with modern GDDR6 video memory, is much closer to the more expensive Ti than to the regular 1660. 1660 Ti at a much more affordable price! And while the assortment of GTX 1660 Super graphics cards from different vendors is still not as large as we would like, choosing this GPU is an excellent solution when building a mid-budget gaming PC!

    Excellent performance, acceptable temperatures and low price make the GTX 1660 Super a great bargain! A gaming computer with such a video card will allow you to get comfortable gaming on ultra-graphics presets in 1080p resolution in all current projects.

    2022 © All rights reserved