Gtx 580 vs gtx 650 ti: Please click the green button to continue.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti: What is the difference?

38points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

46points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparison winner

vs

54 facts in comparison

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti?

  • 0.16 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    1.58 TFLOPSvs1.43 TFLOPS
  • 9.9 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    24.7 GPixel/svs14.8 GPixel/s
  • 2x more VRAM?
    2GBvs1GB
  • 106GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    192.4GB/svs86.4GB/s
  • 256bit wider memory bus width?
    384bitvs128bit
  • 460million more transistors?
    3000 millionvs2540 million
  • 32 more render output units (ROPs)?
    48vs16
  • 2230 higher PassMark (G3D) result?
    4922vs2692

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 580?

  • 156MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    928MHzvs772MHz
  • 134W lower TDP?
    110Wvs244W
  • 348MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1350MHzvs1002MHz
  • 1392MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    5400MHzvs4008MHz
  • 10 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    59. 4 GTexels/svs49.4 GTexels/s
  • 256 more shading units?
    768vs512
  • 25°C lower load GPU temperature?
    56°Cvs81°C
  • 12nm smaller semiconductor size?
    28nmvs40nm

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

vs

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX150

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

vs

AMD Radeon HD 6950

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

vs

AMD Radeon R9 270X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GT 630

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX110

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

vs

AMD Radeon 535

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 560

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

1. GPU clock speed

772MHz

928MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti)

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

24.7 GPixel/s

14.8 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

1.58 TFLOPS

1.43 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

49.4 GTexels/s

59.4 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6. GPU memory speed

1002MHz

1350MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

4008MHz

5400MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

192.4GB/s

86.4GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

384bit

128bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5. load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9. PassMark (G3D) result

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 580 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost Graphics cards Comparison

When comparing GeForce GTX 580 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 580 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GTX 580

Check Price

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Check Price

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 580 GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Power consumption (TDP) 244 Watt 134 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin and One 8-pin One 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • GeForce GTX 580 has 82% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
  • GeForce GTX 580 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • GeForce GTX 580 has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 580 is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — with Kepler.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 580 is 564 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
  • GeForce GTX 580 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — by 28 nm process technology.
  • GeForce GTX 580 is 1 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 580 is 1998 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 21−24 16−18
ultra / 1080p 14−16 9−10
QHD / 1440p 8−9 3−4
4K / 2160p 6−7
low / 720p 40−45 30−35
medium / 1080p 27−30 21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p 35−40 27−30
ultra / 1080p 30−35 21−24
QHD / 1440p 16−18 6−7
4K / 2160p 10−11 5−6
low / 720p 75−80 55−60
medium / 1080p 40−45 30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p 50−55 50−55
high / 1080p 45−50
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
GeForce GTX 580 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 240−250 210−220
medium / 768p 210−220 180−190
ultra / 1080p 130−140 100−110
QHD / 1440p 100−110 60−65
4K / 2160p 55−60 30−35
high / 768p 180−190 150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 55−60 40−45
medium / 1080p 55−60 55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p 120−130 110−120
medium / 768p 110−120 100−110
ultra / 1080p 85−90 70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p 27−30 20−22
ultra / 1080p 24−27 18−20
QHD / 1440p 21−24 18−20
4K / 2160p 9−10 6−7
low / 720p 55−60 40−45
medium / 1080p 30−35 21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p 35−40 27−30
ultra / 1080p 27−30 21−24
QHD / 1440p 18−20 12−14
low / 720p 130−140 100−110
medium / 1080p 80−85 60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Fortnite is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p 40−45 27−30
ultra / 1080p 30−33 21−24
QHD / 1440p 16−18 10−11
4K / 2160p 14−16
low / 720p 75−80 55−60
medium / 1080p 40−45 30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p 110−120 90−95
medium / 768p 100−110 80−85
high / 1080p 45−50 30−35
ultra / 1080p 18−20 12−14
QHD / 1440p 10−11 3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p 14−16 10−11
ultra / 1080p 12−14 8−9
QHD / 1440p 10−12
4K / 2160p 4−5 1−2
low / 720p 45−50 30−35
medium / 1080p 21−24 14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Metro Exodus is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p 120−130 110−120
medium / 1080p 110−120 110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
ultra / 1080p 14−16 14−16
low / 720p 75−80 60−65
medium / 1080p 18−20 18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p 16−18 12−14
ultra / 1080p 10−12 9−10
QHD / 1440p 3−4 0−1
4K / 2160p 2−3
low / 720p 45−50 30−35
medium / 1080p 21−24 16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p 85−90 60−65
medium / 768p 50−55 35−40
high / 1080p 27−30 21−24
ultra / 1080p 16−18 12−14
4K / 2160p 9−10 6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p 90−95 90−95
medium / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 45−50 35−40
high / 768p 55−60 55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 580 GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Architecture Fermi Kepler
Code name GF110 GK106
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 9 November 2010 26 March 2013
Pipelines 512 768
Core clock speed 1544 MHz 980 MHz
Boost Clock 1033 MHz
Transistor count 3,000 million 2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 49. 4 billion/sec 62.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance 1,581.1 gflops 1,585 gflops
Length 10.5″ (267 mm) (26.7 cm) 9.5″ (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width 384 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) 6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth 192.4 GB/s 144.2 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.2 4.3
OpenCL 1.1 1.2
Vulkan N/A 1.1.126
CUDA + +
CUDA cores 512 768
Bus support PCI-E 2. 0 x 16 PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376″ (111 mm) (11.1 cm) 4.376″ (11.1 cm)
SLI options + +
Multi monitor support + 4 Displays
HDMI + +
HDCP +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048×1536 2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal Internal
3D Blu-Ray +
3D Gaming +
3D Vision +
3D Vision Live +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 142 Mh/s 54 Mh/s
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 580 vs Radeon HD 7870
  • GeForce GTX 580 vs Quadro M2200
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon HD 7870
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Quadro M2200
  • GeForce GTX 580 vs Tesla C2070
  • GeForce GTX 580 vs GeForce GTX 860M
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Tesla C2070
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs GeForce GTX 860M

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost








Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 512 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0,8 GHz, its lithography is 40 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,0 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q4 2010

Q1 2013
Model number

GF110-375-A1

GK106-240-A1
GPU name

GF110

GK106
Architecture

Fermi 2. 0

Kepler
Generation

GeForce 500

GeForce 600
Lithography

40 nm

28 nm
Transistors

3.000.000.000

2.540.000.000
Bus interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock

772 MHz

980 MHz
GPU boost clock

772 MHz

1,03 GHz
Memory frequency

1.002 MHz

1.502 MHz
Effective memory speed

4 GB/s

6 GB/s
Memory size

2 GB

2 GB
Memory type

GDDR5

GDDR5
Memory bus

384 Bit

192 Bit
Memory bandwidth

192,4 GB/s

144,2 GB/s
TDP

244 W

134 W
Suggested PSU 550W ATX Power Supply 450W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology

SLi Quad

SLI
Outputs

2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI

2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort


Maximum GPU Temperature

97°C

97°C
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

16

4
Shading units (cuda cores)

512

768
TMUs

64

64
ROPs

48

24
Cache memory

768 KB

384 KB
Pixel fillrate

24,7 GP/s

16,5 GP/s
Texture fillrate

49,4 GT/s

66,1 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)

1,6 TFLOPS

1,6 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

197,6 GFLOPS

66,1 GFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

1.585
Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

1.581

The difference is 0%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Availability

MSRP in USD: $229

MSI Gaming Radeon RX 580 256-bit 4GB GDRR5 DirectX 12 VR Ready CFX Graphcis Card (RX 580 GAMING X 4G)

Buy on Amazon

€170.4

In Stock


1340 1353 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 65 minutes agoSAPPHIRE Radeon 11265-05-20G Pulse RX 580 8GB GDDR5 Dual HDMI/ DVI-D/ Dual DP OC with Backplate (UEFI) PCI-E Graphics Card Graphic Cards

Buy on Amazon

€180.89

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 65 minutes agoASUS Radeon RX 580 O4G Dual-Fan OC Edition GDDR5 DP HDMI DVI VR Ready AMD Graphics Card (DUAL-RX580-O4G)

Buy on Amazon

€185.32

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 65 minutes agoGigabyte Radeon RX 580 Gaming 8GB Graphic Cards GV-RX580GAMING-8GD

Buy on Amazon

€198. 84

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 65 minutes agoSapphire 11265-67-20G Radeon Pulse RX 580 8GB GDDR5 Dual HDMI / Dual DP OC w/ Backplate (UEFI) PCI-E Graphics Card

Buy on Amazon

€202.9

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 65 minutes agoXFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1405MHz OC+, 8gb 256bit GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Double Dissipation, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, PCI-E AMD Graphics Card (RX-580P828D6)

Buy on Amazon

€405.8

In Stock


1340 1386 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 65 minutes agoSapphire Technology Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 580 DirectX 12 11265-05-20T 8GB 256-Bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 CrossFireX Support ATX Video Card

Buy on Amazon

€453.69

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 65 minutes agoAMD Radeon RX 580 8GB GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 Gaming Graphics Card — OEM

Buy on Amazon

€607.11

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 65 minutes ago

Availability

MSRP in USD: $149

No items available

Key Differences

In short — Radeon RX 580 outperforms GeForce GTX 650 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 580 is 1652 days newer than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 580

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

League of Legends

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Radeon RX 580

Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017


FPS

532

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.32/FPS

100%

Price, €

€170.4

100%

FPS and Value Winner

MSI Gaming Radeon RX 580 256-bit 4GB GDRR5 DirectX 12 VR Ready CFX Graphcis Card (RX 580 GAMING X 4G)

Buy for €170.4 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 65 minutes ago

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Desktop • Oct 9th, 2012


FPS

409

70%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Radeon RX 580

Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Desktop • Oct 9th, 2012

133

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

697

FPS

538

FPS

Minecraft

532

FPS

409

FPS

League of Legends

234

FPS

183

FPS

VALORANT

330

FPS

254

FPS

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Theoretical Performance

Radeon RX 580

Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017


Pixel Fillrate

42. 88 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

193 GTexel/s

100%

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Desktop • Oct 9th, 2012


Pixel Fillrate

14.85 GPixel/s

-89%

Texel Fillrate

59.39 GTexel/s

-125%

AMD Radeon RX 580

vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Apr 18th, 2017

Release Date Oct 9th, 2012
Polaris Generation GeForce 600
$229 MSRP

$149

1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort Outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
1x 8-pin Power Connectors 1x 6-pin

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

8 GB

Memory 1 GB
GDDR5 Type GDDR5
256-bit Bus 128-bit

256 GB/s

Bandwidth 86. 4 GB/s

1257 MHz

Base Clock Speed 928 MHz
1340 MHz Boost Clock Speed Not Available

2000 MHz

Memory Clock Speed 1350 MHz

Builds Using Radeon RX 580 or GeForce GTX 650 Ti

League of Legends, 1080p, High

Skytech Archangel 3.0 Gaming PC

380 FPS

€1.5/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Ryzen 3 3100

16 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

€630.62

In Stock

Updated 51 minutes ago

iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC

454 FPS

€2.86/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Core i7-10700F

16 GB, 480 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

€1,439.64

In Stock

Updated 58 minutes ago

Dell XPS 8930 Tower Desktop PC

401 FPS

€4.05/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Core i7-8700

16 GB, 256 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

€1,801

In Stock

Updated 53 minutes ago

Dell Inspiron High Performance Gaming Desktop PC

380 FPS

€4. 06/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Ryzen 7 2700X

16 GB, 256 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

€1,710.81

In Stock

Updated 54 minutes ago

Acer Nitro 50 Gaming Desktop PC

350 FPS

€4.17/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Core i5-8400

16 GB, 256 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

€1,620.72

In Stock

Updated 53 minutes ago

Acer Nitro 50 Gaming Desktop PC

350 FPS

€4.4/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Core i5-8400

24 GB, 256 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

€1,710.81

In Stock

Updated 54 minutes ago

Acer Nitro 50 Gaming Desktop PC

350 FPS

€5.1/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Core i5-8400

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

€1,981.08

In Stock

Updated 53 minutes ago

Acer Nitro 50 Gaming Desktop PC

350 FPS

€6.26/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Core i5-8400

64 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

€2,431. 53

In Stock

Updated 53 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Radeon RX 6500 XT

€162.15

Radeon RX 580

€189.14

Radeon RX 580

€189.14

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

€122.87

Radeon RX 580

€189.14

Radeon RX 470

N/A Stock

Radeon RX 580

€189.14

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

N/A Stock

GeForce RTX 3060

€342.33

Radeon RX 580

€189.14

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

€761.25

Radeon RX 580

€189.14

GeForce RTX 3050

€270.26

Radeon RX 580

€189.14

Radeon RX 6600

€234.23

Radeon RX 580

€189.14

GeForce RTX 2060

€244.14

Radeon RX 580

€189.14

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti


Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Buy on Amazon


vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 4% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 928 MHz
  • 3. 7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 110 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3335
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3335








Launch date 17 November 2017 vs 9 October 2012
Core clock speed 965 MHz vs 928 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 110 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 3335

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s
  • 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
  • Around 87% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
  • Around 73% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 2539 vs 1468
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 401 vs 193
  • Around 54% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 7101 vs 4623
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 2197
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 2197
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3502
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3502











Texture fill rate 59.2 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 256
Floating-point performance 1,425 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
PassMark — G3D Mark 2539 vs 1468
PassMark — G2D Mark 401 vs 193
Geekbench — OpenCL 7101 vs 4623
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3948 vs 2197
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3948 vs 2197
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3707 vs 3502
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3707 vs 3502

Compare benchmarks


GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti










PassMark — G3D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


PassMark — G2D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


Geekbench — OpenCL

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


















Name NVIDIA GeForce MX110 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark — G3D Mark 1468 2539
PassMark — G2D Mark 193 401
Geekbench — OpenCL 4623 7101
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2197 3948
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2197 3948
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3502 3707
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3502 3707
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3352 3335
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3352 3335
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

22. 525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

588.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

2.127
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

47.404
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score

881

Compare specifications (specs)












































NVIDIA GeForce MX110 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM108 GK106
Launch date 17 November 2017 9 October 2012
Place in performance rating 840 760
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)

$149
Price now

$169. 99
Value for money (0-100)

18.72
Boost clock speed 993 MHz
Core clock speed 965 MHz 928 MHz
Floating-point performance 762.6 gflops 1,425 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 256 768
Texture fill rate 23. 83 GTexel / s 59.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 110 Watt
CUDA cores

768
Maximum GPU temperature

105 °C
Transistor count

2,540 million
Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini…
Audio input for HDMI

Internal
HDCP

HDMI

Maximum VGA resolution

2048×1536
Multi monitor support

Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None One 6-pin
Bus support

PCI Express 3.0
Height

4.376″ (11.1 cm)
Length

5.7″ (14.5 cm)
DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.3
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 40. 1 GB / s 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 5.4 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 / DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers
3D Blu-Ray

3D Gaming

Adaptive VSync

FXAA

TXAA

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti (Reference Card) Review



Peter Kapas


October 9, 2012
Hardware, NVIDIA, Reviews & Articles, Video Cards/Graphics Cards

3 Comments

 

Nvidia last month released the GeForce GTX 660 and GTX 650 graphics cards. The GTX 660 was mainly focused for the mid-range gamers, while the GTX 650 is more focused towards the low-to-mid range users on a budget. Today, Nvidia is releasing their latest budget mid-range graphics card for those that don’t want to spend as much money on a video card as the GTX 660, but would like more performance than the GTX 650. We introduce you to Nvidia’s latest GeForce GTX 650 Ti graphics card.

Nvidia has had a great year with their new Kepler architecture. Throughout the year, they managed to release several cards from the lowest GeForce GT 610, all the way up to the Dual-GPU beast, the GeForce GTX 690. Of course the lower-end cards like the GT 610, GT 620, GT 630, and GT 640 are mainly designed for everyday work, entertainment and maybe some lower resolution casual gaming. The mid-range cards, like the GTX 650, GTX 660, and GTX 660 Ti come with a higher price tag, but can also provide a bit more performance to make even newer games enjoyable to play at higher HD resolutions. Finally the high-end cards, including the GTX 670, GTX 680 and the dual-GPU GTX 690 are the cards that will get you the ultimate performance in just about any game without having to worry about low framerates. These high-end cards can vary in price anywhere from $300 to up to $1000, and even some mid range cards are within the $200+ range, which is why not everyone can afford such cards. Now with the understanding of Nvidia’s Kepler line-up, Nvidia just released a new card to complement their mid-range cards, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti. The new GeForce GTX 650 Ti comes in at $149 MSRP, with the potential of easily beating the GeForce GTX 650 ($109) by 40% in gaming performance. The Nvidia GTX 660 will still be a higher performer card, but that also reflects on its price of $229.

With lots of exciting games coming out this year, especially DX11 titles, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti might be a cheap upgrade for those coming from older DX9 or DX10 hardware, like the 9600 GT, 9800 GT, or even the GTX 250, or GTX 260. The advantage of the GeForce GTX 650 Ti is that new games like World of Warcraft: Mist of Pandaria, Planetside 2, and Mechwarrior will use DX11 and/or PhysX and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti would be a great card not just for dedicated DX11 gaming, but also for a dedicated PhysX card for the PhysX based games. At the moment with the non-unified 306.38  display drivers it is impossible to enable the GTX 650 Ti as a dedicated PhysX card, but hopefully in the next major driver release, this will be possible. In this review we’ll be taking a closer look at the performance of the card and what it offers. We’ll also compare it to the AMD competition, preferably the 7770, as this cards seem the be within the same price range as the GeForce GTX 650 Ti.  So without further ado, let us dive into what this card can offer and its specifications.

Features & Specifications

The Geforce GTX 660 Ti came with 1344 CUDA cores, the GeForce GTX 660 comes with 960 CUDA cores. In most cases the higher CUDA core count means you get more performance. But it is important to understand that this might not be the case when comparing cards between different architectures. Kepler definitely has more CUDA cores, but sometimes Fermi cards with lower CUDA core counts can still perform better than the Kepler cards with the same amount of CUDA cores. With this said, the GTX 660 Ti was a fantastic card for all the latest DX11 titles. It allowed gamers to really max out their games and still play it without lags. The GTX 660 was also another great card, but with 384 less CUDA cores. The card still managed to perform great in most cases with the games set to high-resolutions and high settings. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti comes with 768 cores, which is 192 CUDA cores less than the GTX 660. This means that performance should not be too far apart as we have seen between the GTX 660 and the GTX 650. Either way, we’re not expecting amazing performance from a $149 card, but it will be interesting to see how it performs against AMDs competing cards in this price range.  

Specifications Nvidia GT 640 (Reference)
Nvidia GTX 650 (Reference)
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti (Reference)
Nvidia GTX 550 Ti (Reference)
CUDA Cores (Stream Processors)
384 384 768 192
Bus Interface PCI-Express 3. 0 PCI-Express 3.0 PCI-Express 3.0 PCI-Express 2.0
Texture Units
32 32 64 x
ROPs
16 16 16 x
SMXs
2 2 4 N/A
Core Clock 900 MHz 1058 MHz 925 MHz 900 MHz
Boost Clock
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Memory Clock
1800 MHz Effective 5000 MHz Effective 5400 MHz Effective 4100 MHz Effective
Memory Bus Width
128 Bit 128 Bit 128 Bit 192 Bit
Total Memory Bandwidth
28. 5 GB/s 80.0 GB/s 86.4 GB/s 98.4 GB/s
Texture Fill Rate (Bilinear)
28.8 GT/s 33.9 GT/s 59.2 GT/s 28.8 GT/s
VRAM 2GB (DDR3) 1GB (GDDR5) 1GB (GDDR5) 1GB (GDDR5)
SLI Ready N/A N/A N/A 2-Way
TDP 65W 64W 75W 116W
Recommended Power Supply 350W+ 400W+ 400W+ 400W+
Power connectors N/A 1x 6-Pin PCI-E 1x 6-Pin PCI-E 1x 6-Pin PCI-E
Outputs Dual Link-DVI-I, Dual Link DVI-D, Mini HDMI Dual Link-DVI-I, Dual Link DVI-D, Mini HDMI Dual Link-DVI-I, Dual Link DVI-D, Mini HDMI 1x Mini HDMI, 2x Dual Link DVI
Manufacturing Process
TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 40nm
Thermal Threshold 98C 98C 98C 100C
Launch Price $99. 99 (MSRP) $109.99 (MSRP) $149.99 (MSRP) $149.99 (MSRP)

The 768 CUDA cores on the GTX 650 Ti come with 4 SMX units, 16 ROPs and 64 texture units. This is the double of what you get on a standard non-Ti version GTX 650. As far as memory subsystem goes, the GTX 650 Ti consists of two 64-bit memory controllers, which basically makes it a 128-bit configuration with 1GB of GDDR5 memory. Other configurations are possible as we’ll see in other reviews from other manufacturers like GIGABYTE. Core Clock speed is slightly lower than that of the GTX 650, but this is not a big deal due to more CUDA cores. Memory frequency is up at 5400 MHz instead of 5000 MHz. No boost clock speeds on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti though. The GTX 660 still had that feature, along with the 660 Ti, but anything below the 660 line and you won’t be getting that feature.

Click Images to Enlarge

The card we have received did not come in any specific packaging, because we’ll most likely only see these cards from specific manufacturers, like MSI, GIGABYTE, ASUS, etc.. This is a very small card. It would not necessarily work in a low-profile system, but we’re sure such cards might be available from other manufacturers. The card comes in at the length of the PCI-Express slot, which means that if you have a slot available in your system, it should fit without any problems, no matter of the size of the case, as motherboards are usually way longer than the length of the PCI-Express slot. The card will still use two available expansion slots due to its dual-slot cooler design, but because the cooler does not extend to the back of the expansion slot, additional accessory can be installed in the available expansion slot. The cooler on the GPU is a simple heatsink with a fan on top of it. According to our tests, the noise level coming from the fan is almost inaudible, making this card very quiet even during gameplay. This card does need one 6-Pin PCI-E power connector, and at least a 400W Power Supply. Lower wattage power supplies should still work as long as efficiency is ideal, and the power supply is certified for higher-output graphics cards.

Click Images to Enlarge

A reference design GeForce GTX 650 Ti will come with three monitor output connectors: Mini-HDMI, DVI-I, and DVI-D. Certain cards such as the GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 650 Ti OC 2GB video card will not only come with 2GB of VRAM, but also a standard HDMI port, along with a D-SUB (VGA) port. Other cards like the MSI GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition video card will come with a more efficient custom cooler which they call the “Cyclone II”. So we’ll definitely see some variations across the board and different specifications for each card, so it’s good to do some research and figuring out which card will be useful for you before buying the card. Do keep in mind that these cards do not come with SLI support, so you cannot buy another one later down the line to boost performance in games. This was done in order to save cost on the manufacturing, and to make it possible for gamers on the budget to also enjoy a fairly decent mid-range gaming card.

The OS we use is Windows 8 Pro 64bit (Retail) with all patches and updates applied. We also use the latest drivers available for the motherboard and any devices attached to the computer. We do not disable background tasks or tweak the OS or system in any way. We turn off drive indexing and daily defragging. We also turn off Prefetch and Superfetch. This is not an attempt to produce bigger benchmark numbers. Drive indexing and defragging can interfere with testing and produce confusing numbers. If a test were to be run while a drive was being indexed or defragged, and then the same test was later run when these processes were off, the two results would be contradictory and erroneous. As we cannot control when defragging and indexing occur precisely enough to guarantee that they won’t interfere with testing, we opt to disable the features entirely.

Prefetch tries to predict what users will load the next time they boot the machine by caching the relevant files and storing them for later use. We want to learn how the program runs without any of the files being cached, and we disable it so that each test run we do not have to clear pre-fetch to get accurate numbers. Lastly we disable Superfetch. Superfetch loads often-used programs into the memory. It is one of the reasons that Windows Vista occupies so much memory. Vista fills the memory in an attempt to predict what users will load. Having one test run with files cached, and another test run with the files un-cached would result in inaccurate numbers. Again, since we can’t control its timings so precisely, it we turn it off. Because these four features can potentially interfere with benchmarking, and and are out of our control, we disable them. We do not disable anything else.

We ran each test a total of 3 times, and reported the average score from all three scores. Benchmark screenshots are of the median result. Anomalous results were discounted and the benchmarks were rerun.

Please note that due to new driver releases with performance improvements, we rebenched every card shown in the results section. The results here will be different than previous reviews due to the performance increases in drivers.

Test Rig

Test Rig
Case Cooler Master Storm Trooper
CPUs Intel Core i7 3960X (Sandy Bridge-E) @ 4.6GHz
Motherboards ASUS P9X79 WS X79 Chipset Motherboard
Ram Kingston HyperX Genesis 32GB (8x4GB) 1600Mhz 9-9-11-27 Quad-Channel Kit
CPU Cooler Noctua NH-D14 Air Cooler
Hard Drives 2x Western Digital RE3 1TB 7200RPM 3Gb/s Hard Drives in RAID 0
SSD
  • 2x Kingston HyperX 240GB SATA III 6Gb/s SSD in RAID 0 (Main)
  • 1x Kingston HyperX 240GB SATA III 6Gb/s SSD (Storage)
Optical ASUS DVD-Burner
GPU
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 2GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 2GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB
  • EVGA GTX 660 SuperClocked 2GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 2GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB
  • MSI GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition 2GB
  • GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 650 Ti OC 2GB
  • Nvida GeForce GTX 580 1. 5GB
  • Palit GTX 560 Ti Sonic 1GB
  • EVGA GTX 560 SuperClocked 1GB
  • AMD HD 7970 3GB
  • AMD HD 7870 2GB
  • AMD HD 7770 1GB
  • AMD HD 7750 1GB
PSU Cooler Master Silent Pro Gold 1200W PSU
Mouse Razer Imperator Battlefield 3 Edition
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Ultimate Battlefield 3 Edition

Synthetic Benchmarks & Games

Benchmarks
3DMark 11
Just Cause 2
Lost Planet 2
Metro 2033
Battlefield 3
Unigine Heaven 3. 0
Batman Arkham City
Dirt 3

3DMark 11

We decided to skip on 3DMark Vantage, and to just use 3DMark 11 for our future testing. All new video cards now support DX11, therefore it is better to see how these cards perform in DX11 based graphics tests. 3DMark 11 can really push these cards to their limit as we have seen in these scores. The good news is that the GTX 650 Ti 1GB reference card beat the EVGA SuperClocked GTX 560 video card which was factory overclocked, and technically one level higher than the GTX 550 Ti. This just shows the great performance increase on the Kepler architecture. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti also didn’t have any problem  performing better than the AMd HD 7770 in both the Performance and Extreme settings.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Unigine Heaven is a benchmark program based on Unigine Corp’s latest engine, Unigine. The engine features DirectX 11, Hardware tessellation, DirectCompute, and Shader Model 5.0. All of these new technologies combined with the ability to run each card through the same exact test means this benchmark should be in our arsenal for a long time.

Unigine Heaven shows us similar results. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti still performs faster than the factory overclocked EVGA GTX 560, and the card still outperforms both AMD HD7750 and HD7770 cards by a 4-5 FPS margin.

Battlefield 3

Battlefield 3 just barely gets enough FPS to make the game playable. Though these are average frames per second, which means that there might be lows and highs in framerate. It would be much better if average would be around 40FPS, but this just shows what the GeForce GTX 650 Ti is capable of at maximum settings in Battlefield 3. Lowering these settings would make the game much more playable. As far as checking out other GTX 650 Ti scores, it looks like the 2GB GIGABYTE card has much better performance gap between 1680×1050 and 1920×1080, as if the video buffer difference would make a difference in resolution performance.

Metro 2033

Here we have a prime example showing how certain cards are not designed for extreme gaming. As we know, the GTX 650 Ti costs $149.99, which makes it an inexpensive video card for what it offers. Well Metro 2033 is one of the most demanding games when it comes to graphics rendering. We can see this from our results, as the GTX 650 Ti only got 22.67 FPS at 1920×1080 on DX11 settings with 4x AA and 16x AF. Dropping down to a lower resolution gives us about 2.5FPS higher framerate, but moving down to DX10 mode and no AA would drastically improve gameplay and would make the game enjoyable to play.

Batman Arkham City

While Batman Arkham City has some fantastic graphics, it is also not too demanding on the graphics card. The GTX 650 Ti got 72FPS at maximum graphics settings at 1920×1080, which is quite impressive. Though lets keep in mind that PhysX was disabled. PhysX would drastically drop this number, because extra load would be put on the GPU or CPU. However, we have thought about using another GTX 650 Ti to test how a dedicated PhysX card would perform with another GTX 650 Ti, but the current drivers did not support this option yet. Let’s hope the next drivers will support it. Taking a look at the AMD competition, they have really fell behind. This is most likely due to Batman Arkham City being optimized for Nvidia graphics cards.

Just Cause 2

Just Cause 2 seems to be a game that works far better on AMD graphics. We can see this as the AMD HD 7770 beat the GTX 650 Ti in performance. Though even so, the game is fairly maxed out, and we are still getting a nice 50 FPS during gameplay.

Lost Planet 2

Lost Planet 2 was tested in DX11 mode, at maximum graphics settings. While 36.6 FPS is reasonable for gameplay, it is probably better to lower the graphics to get above 40FPS for even smoother gameplay at 1920×1080. This is another great example where a lower end card shows its weakness. Not a design fault, as the card was designed like this on purpose to make it accessible to the lower-end budget gamers. In all honesty though, we can see almost double the performance from AMD’s HD 7750 video card, and a quite a bit of jump from HD 7770.

Dirt 3

Dirt 3 is one of the games were we have seen some very interesting performance numbers in the past. Including the EVGA GTX 660 SC 2GB card, which almost scored just as high as the GeForce GTX 580. This is however not the case with the GTX 650 Ti. The card still outperforms the AMD HD 7770 by 11 FPS at 1920×1080 and by 13 FPS at 1680×1080. The performance is still very good and the game should be playable at maxed out settings.

TEMPERATURES

To measure the temperature of the video card, we used EVGA’s Precision X and ran the Metro 2033 benchmark in a loop to find the Load temperatures for the video cards. The highest temperature was recorded. After looping for 10 minutes, Metro 2033 was turned off and we let the computer sit at the desktop for another 10 minutes before we measured the idle temperatures.

Unfortunately, we do not have any recent tested AMD cards for temperatures, but the temperature readings we got from the GTX 650 Ti were quite astonishing. We were not expecting temperatures in the lower 50s and higher 40s at full load. The reference design card which uses a very small heatsink with a fan on top of it manages to keep the card at 56C at full load after several minutes of gameplay. This is definitely a big improvement over last years Fermi architecture, which showed a 73C temperature at full load on a weaker card.

POWER CONSUMPTION

To get our power consumption numbers, we plugged in our Kill A Watt power measurement device and took the Idle reading at the desktop during our temperature readings. We left it at the desktop for about 15 minutes and took the idle reading. Then we ran Metro 2033 for a few minutes minutes and recorded the highest power usage.

The power consumption of the GTX 650 Ti reference card was quite surprising. In all honestly, we were expecting the card to use roughly about 270-280W, but the reference design only used 248W at full load, and 127W at idle. The idle power consumption is drastically lower than that of the AMD HD 7770, but the load power consumption is also 2W lower on the GTX 650 Ti. Impressive. As we will take a look in the other GTX 650 Ti reviews we are publishing, the MSI and GIGABYTE GTX 650 Ti cards did use a bit more power, but that’s also due to their factory overclocked settings, VRM configuration and cooler designs.

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti is a very nice budget graphics card. It runs all the latest games on the market, and will run them flawlessly, with the sacrifice of lower graphics settings. While our tests have shown that the GeForce GTX 650 Ti can outperform the AMD HD 7770 in most of the games, certain games are better optimized for AMD graphics cards. With this said, we can definitely point out some of the best parts of the card, including its low power consumption, low heat output, and low acoustic level during gameplay. As we’ve mentioned earlier, Nvidia decided to leave SLI out of the picture on the GTX 650 Ti. This was done to lower manufacturing costs, and to make this card available to the lower-end market, but it would have still been nice to see SLI, because having that option would have potentially given the user the possibility to later add another card for even better performance.

Also, we would like to note that during our testing, we came to realize that the GeForce GTX 650 Ti could be a potentially great dedicated PhysX card. At a price tag of $149.99, it wouldn’t break the bank if someone would get this card for a dedicated PhysX card. While we wanted to run some tests to see how much a dedicated PhysX card would help out while running it with another graphics card, we didn’t get the chance to do so due to driver limitations. We’re hoping that Nvidia will soon release new drivers that will allow us to test this feature and give you guys a better overview of what this card could do in a PhysX environment.

To summarize everything into two sentence, if you’re looking for a card that will not cost you much and will play all the latest games at mid to high settings, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti is for you. If you need more performance and would like to enjoy higher graphics settings, you might want to consider saving up for the GTX 660 or the GTX 660 Ti.

OUR VERDICT: Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 1GB Video Card
Performance 7
Value 8
Quality 7.5
Features 7
Innovation 7

We are using a new addition to our scoring system to provide additional feedback beyond a flat score. Please note that the final score isn’t an aggregate average of the new rating system.

Total 7. 5
  • Small Card
  • Quiet during Gameplay
  • Runs Cool
  • Low Power Consumption
  • Decent performance at a good price.
  • GPU supports 4 display outputs, but card only comes with 3.
  • No SLI support
Summary: The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is an excellent card for the budget gamer. You might not be able to use high resolutions in certain games, and you might not be able to max out the graphics settings in all video games, but this card will get the job done nonetheless. While we know that the card is designed for gamers on a low budget, the card still lacks a few features that would have made this card stand out a bit more, including SLI, and GPU Boost. This is why we’re awarding the Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Bjorn3D’s Bronze Bear Award.

 

0025 0.81 TFLOPS

  • 16.24 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? higher number of textured pixels?
    49.4 GTexels/s vs 33.9 GTexels/s
  • 2x more VRAM?
    2GB vs 1GB
  • 112.4GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    192.4GB/s vs 80GB/s
  • 256bit wider memory bus?
    384bit vs 128bit
  • 128 more stream processors?
    512 vs 384
  • 1730million more transistors?
    3000M vs 1270M
  • Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 580?

    • GPU frequency 286MHz higher?
      1058MHz vs 772MHz
    • 179W below TDP?
      65W vs 244W
    • 248MHz faster memory speed?
      1250MHz vs 1002MHz
    • 992MHz higher effective clock speed?
      5000MHz vs 4008MHz
    • 30°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
      51°C vs 81°C
    • Are 12nm smaller semiconductors?
      28nm vs 40nm
    • 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
      3 vs 2
    • 9°C below GPU idle temperature?
      27°C vs 36°C

    What are the most popular comparisons?

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce 940MX

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    AMD Radeon HD 6950

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    AMD Radeon R9 270X

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    VS

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 580

    VS

    AMD Radeon RX 5500003

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 460

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 603

    vs

    0004 Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    vs

    AMD Radeon HD 7750

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    AMD Radeon 535

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GT 640

    Price Comparison

    User Reviews

    Performance

    1. GPU Clock Speed ​​

    772MHz

    1058MHz

    The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

    2.turbo GPU

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 650)

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel speed

    24.7 GPixel/s

    8.46 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    1.58 TFLOPS

    0.81 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    49.4 GTexels/s

    33.9 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1002MHz

    1250MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    4008MHz

    5000MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    192.4GB/s

    80GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    384bit

    128bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5.GDDR memory versions

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5. GPU Temperature at Boot

    Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 650)

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI version 3

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 650)

    Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    6.mini DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.

    Price match

    Cancel

    Which graphic cards are better?

    Comparison of Radeon RX 580 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti. Which video card is better?

    Home / Video Card Comparison / Which is better Radeon RX 580 or GeForce GTX 650 Ti?

    Radeon RX 580

    GeForce GTX 650 Ti

    April, 2017 | 1.3GHz | 8GB GDDR5

    November, 2012 | 1GHz | 1GB GDDR5

    Edelmark rating
    7.3

    Edelmark rating
    7.2

    General comparison

    Game performance

    Tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation , Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.

    Radeon RX 580 n/a
    GeForce GTX 650 Ti 7.1 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 1060 n/a

    Graphics

    Video card tests were performed on: T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor.

    Radeon RX 580 6.4 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 650 Ti 6.8 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 1060 5.2 out of 10

    Computing power

    Tested on: Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining.

    Radeon RX 580 7.9 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 650 Ti n/a
    GeForce GTX 1060 7.3 out of 10

    Output per W

    Video card tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive , Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP.

    Radeon RX 580 7.4 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 650 Ti 7.9 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 1060 7.2 out of 10

    Noise and power

    Tested on: TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level.

    Radeon RX 580 8.5 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 650 Ti 9.2 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 1060 9.1 out of 10

    Benefits

    Why is the Radeon RX 580 better?

    Significantly more memory 8.192 MB vs 1.024MB 8x more memory
    Overclocked 1.257 MHz vs 1.006 MHz Approximately 25% higher clock speed
    Significantly higher memory bandwidth 256 GB/s vs 86. 4 GB/s Approximately 3x the memory bandwidth of
    Significantly better floating point performance 6.175 GFLOPS vs 1,545.2 GFLOPS Approximately 4x better floating point performance
    Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 8.000 MHz vs 5.400 MHz Approximately 50% higher effective memory clock speed
    Significantly faster texture processing speed 193 GTexel/s vs 64.4 GTexel/s Approximately 3x faster texture rendering speed
    Much better Fire Strike test 75.63 vs 24.78 More than 3x better Fire Strike test
    Higher pixel fill rate 42.88GPixel/s vs 16.1GPixel/s Approximately 2.8x faster pixel fill rate
    Significantly more shader units 2. 304 vs 768 Three times as many shader units
    Significantly more texture units 144 vs 64 80 more texture units
    Significantly higher memory clock speed 2.000 MHz vs 1.350 MHz Approximately 50% higher memory clock speed
    More raster operation blocks 32 vs 16 Twice as many raster operation blocks
    Slightly wider memory bus 256bit vs 128bit 2x wider memory bus

    Why is the GeForce GTX 650 Ti better?

    Lower power consumption 110W vs 185W More than 40% lower power consumption

    Comparative benchmarks (benchmarks)

    Fire Strike test

    Radeon RX 580 75. 63
    GeForce GTX 650 Ti 24.78

    Sky Diver Test

    Radeon RX 580 441.03
    GeForce GTX 650 Ti 214.55

    Cloud Gate test

    Radeon RX 580 22.5
    GeForce GTX 650 Ti 15.37


    Tags:compare, GeForce GTX 650 Ti, Radeon RX 580

    Characteristics and reviews of the video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti / Overclockers.ua

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

    The GTX 590 may be the extreme flagship of most of the latest Fermi 2.0 graphics card suite, but keep their prices out of reach of the high- end PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTX 580 is closer to being reasonably affordable at $32,729..four. NVIDIA’s xx80 card has always been high-end priced with performance that knocks on the doors of extreme graphics cards — especially when overclocked. Having taken the time to fully test the Fermi 2.0 graphics card inside the GTX 580, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

    Unfortunately, the gaming performance was not as impressive. Even if the GTX 580 consistently delivers frame rate increases over the GTX 480, the gains aren’t that great for the GTX 480 to justify an upgrade.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    The GTX 760 may be the entry-level flagship of the latest Maxwell line of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most budget PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTX 750 Ti is closer to being reasonably affordable at $9772.9. NVIDIA’s xx50 card has always been budget priced with performance that knocks on the doors of entry-level graphics cards — especially when overclocked. Having taken the time to fully test the Maxwell graphics card inside the GTX 750 Ti, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

    The GTX 750 Ti is much more expensive than the GTX 650 as it costs a whopping $9772.9. Compare that to the GTX 650, which originally came in at $7,149.30. Meanwhile, the closest equivalent AMD card is the R7 265 which costs ₽9772.9. GTX 650 The GTX 750 Ti has 2GB of RAM compared to the GTX 650 1.

    The GTX 760 may be the entry-level flagship of Maxwell’s latest graphics card suite, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most budget PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTX 750 Ti is closer to being reasonably affordable for $9.772.9. NVIDIA’s xx50 card has always been budget priced with performance that knocks on the doors of entry-level graphics cards — especially when overclocked. Having taken the time to fully test the Maxwell graphics card inside the GTX 750 Ti, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

    The GTX 750 Ti is much more expensive than the GTX 650 as it costs a whopping $9772.9. Compare that to the GTX 650, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost, which originally came in at $7149.3, $11084.7. Meanwhile, the closest equivalent AMD card is the R7 265 which costs ₽9772.9. GTX 650 GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB of RAM compared to GTX 650 1.

    We recently reviewed the gaming capabilities of the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G APU’s built-in Radeon Vega 8 graphics core against budget discrete graphics cards, and now it’s time for the Radeon Vega 11 In a direct comparison with opponents, we will look at its capabilities and evaluate how its performance differs from inexpensive video cards.

    In case you forgot, we remind you that AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has 4 processor cores with SMT support, which operate at frequencies of 3.6 — 3.9GHz. The built-in RAM controller is guaranteed to run DDR4-2933 modules in dual-channel mode, and only 8 PCIe lanes are available for connecting an external video card. TDP is 65W, and the estimated price tag has already dropped to $174.

    The integrated Radeon Vega 11 core consists of 704 compute units, 44 texture units, and 16 raster units. Its maximum frequency is 1250 MHz. There is support for DirectX 12 with feature level 12_1, OpenGL 4.6, Open CL 2.0 and Vulkan 1.0 and probably 1.1.

    Let’s move on to the test bench. Finally, we can say thank you to AMD, because we received an official press kit for testing, which includes not only the APU itself, but also the bundled Wraith Stealth cooler, MSI B350I PRO AC motherboard and 16 GB G.SKILL RAM kit Flare X. That is, at the same time we will check the efficiency of the standard cooling system.

    The motherboard itself is sure to please those who like to assemble a compact universal system in Mini-ITX format. Two DIMM slots mean that the RAM configuration is better thought out in advance. But there should be no problems with the disk subsystem, because there are four SATA ports and one Turbo M.2 on the back. There is a PCI Express x16 slot for an expansion card. A nice bonus is the Wi-Fi and Bluetooth wireless interface module.

    It came with a special engineering BIOS version. But since we are making tests closer to reality, we immediately updated the firmware to the latest stable version. At first it was 13, and a day later there was 14, which brought more different settings to the menu. Unfortunately, we did not check the stability of the APU on the engineering BIOS, but on the regular versions we observed all the previously noted troubles with unstable video core frequencies and friezes in games.

    Therefore, to improve stability, we fixed the speed at 1240 MHz. But we could not set the SoC Voltage at 1.2 V: when trying, the temperature of the cores exceeded 100 ° C. Therefore, we left the value of 1.1 V suggested by the system, but in heavy games the temperature still reached 100 ° C.

    In turn, the G.SKILL Flare X RAM kit was created specifically for the Socket AM4 platform and is equipped with a low-profile heatsink for better cooling of the chips. The total height of the modules is 40 mm, so they can be used in tandem with overall coolers. The nominal frequency reaches 3200 MHz at a voltage of 1.35 V. Activation is carried out by the XMP profile, which greatly simplifies overclocking. We used the frequency 2933 MHz as nominal for this APU.

    The rest of the stand configuration has not changed:

    • AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
    • MSI B350I PRO AC
    • 2x 8GB DDR4-2933 G.SKILL Flare X
    • GOODRAM Ir >

    Let’s move on to the opponents. The first represents the category of entry-level gaming graphics cards of past generations. This is a GeForce GTX 750 Ti from ZOTAC with minimal GPU factory overclocking. The card uses all available 8 PCIe lanes and offers a 128-bit memory bus, thus outperforming Vega 11 in terms of bandwidth. But the integrated video core boasts a faster pixel and texture fill rate, as well as support for more up-to-date software interfaces. Whether this will help him in real gaming tests, you will soon find out.

    The second opponent represents the actual budget segment. We are talking about the GeForce GT 1030 version from ASUS, which turned out to be 17-19% faster than Vega 8. It features a 2% factory overclocking of the GPU. 2 GB of GDDR5 memory runs at a standard effective frequency of 6 GHz. The weaknesses of all representatives of the GeForce GT 1030 series are the 64-bit memory bus and the use of only 4 PCIe 3.0 lanes for communication with the processor. Therefore, 8 APU lines will be enough with a margin. As a result, the pixel fill rate of the GeForce GT 1030 and Vega 11 is almost the same, and the filling of textures is 80% faster in the iGPU.

    The third competitor is selected from current entry-level gaming graphics cards. This category includes the GeForce GTX 1050, Radeon RX 560 and Radeon RX 560D. The latter is a rebranded Radeon RX 460. The Radeon RX 460 itself has almost disappeared from sale, but we managed to find the ASUS ROG Strix RX 460 model. It is based on the Baffin PRO GPU, which has 896 stream processors, 56 texture units and 16 raster units in its structure. .

    This video card is interesting with a slight factory overclocking of the GPU and the presence of 4 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 128-bit bus and an effective speed of 7 GHz. It also uses only 8 PCIe lanes, so it doesn’t suffer from the limited number of PCIe lanes in the APU. Its texture fill rate is higher, but DirectX 12 extensions are supported to a lesser extent.

    So we come to the actual testing. The games were selected based on the results of a survey among viewers of the YouTube channel, and the settings were selected in such a way as to obtain a playable FPS on a system with Vega 11. at a low graphics preset. The impossibility of synchronization of gameplays does not allow us to talk about the repeatability of the results, but in general, Vega 11 was able to provide a playable 30-40 FPS with a not too torn frame time graph. The temperature reached 100°C, but the frequencies remained stable. The rest of the opponents are at least 12% ahead, and the GeForce GT 1030 loses slightly only in terms of the minimum speed.

    In The Third Witcher at HD resolution and medium profiles, the APU temperature is at the level of 70-80°C, so we were no longer worried about the stability of the work, but still the performance is high. A run around the city is given on average at 38 frames / s with drawdowns up to 35. For some this will be enough, for the rest we recommend installing a discrete graphics card. Even with the GeForce GT 1030 we get 3-8% more, and with the GeForce GTX 750 Ti the bonus exceeds 22%.

    In GTA V , we chose almost the minimum settings in Full HD and got decent results — an average of 57 FPS with drawdowns up to 40. True, the frame time graph was quite torn, especially against the background of opponents. Their video sequence speed was also at least 38% higher.

    If you wish, you can run Vega 11 even in PUBG at HD and very low settings. The average frame rate was 56 fps, and the minimum — 45. We did not feel freezes and lags, despite the not very smooth Frame Time graph. In conjunction with the GeForce GT 1030 APU gives

    Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

    Name 90Radeon RX 580 XTRRadeon RX 580Radeon RX 570Radeon RX 560Radeon RX 550Radeon RX 480Radeon RX 470Radeon RX 460Radeon R9 Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770 HD 7770Radeon90Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Radeon HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4290 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870Radeon HD 3850Radeon HD 3690Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 3470Radeon HD 3450Radeon HD 3300 (IGP)Radeon HD 3200 ( IGP)Radeon HD 3100 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT50 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1950 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTRadeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum Edition Radeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire Edition ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBRadeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProNVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev. 2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce GTX 1080GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1060 3GBGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce GTX 1050GeForce GT 1030GeForce GTX Titan XGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480GeForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev. 2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 512MBGeForce 7300 GT Ver2GeForce 7300 GTGeForce 7300 GSGeForce 7300 LEGeForce 7300 SEGeForce 7200 GSGeForce 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6500GeForce 6200 TC 64(256)GeForce 6200 TC 32(128)GeForce 6200 TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev. 2)GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.1)GeForce FX 5600 XTGeForce FX 5600GeForce FX 5500GeForce FX 5200 UltraGeForce FX 5200GeForce FX 5200 SEGeForce 4 Ti 4800GeForce 4 Ti 4800-SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX 460GeForce 4 MX 440GeForce 4 MX 440-SEGeForce 4 MX 420GeForce 3 Ti500GeForce 3 Ti200GeForce 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128 9Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770Radeon HD 7750Radeon HD 6990Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Radeon HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 43500 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870Radeon HD 3850Radeon HD 3690Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 3470Radeon HD 3450Radeon HD 3300 (IGP)Radeon HD 3200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3100 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4Radeon HD 2600 XTRadeon HD 2600 PRORadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon HD 2400 PRORadeon HD 2350Radeon X1950 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1950 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTRadeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X800 XLRadeon X800 GTO 256MBRadeon X800 GTO 128MBRadeon X800 GTO2 256MBRadeon X800Radeon X800 ProRadeon X800 GT 256MBRadeon X800 GT 128MBRadeon X800 SERadeon X700 XTRadeon X700 ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBR adeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProNVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev. 2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce GTX 1080GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1060 3GBGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce GTX 1050GeForce GT 1030GeForce GTX Titan XGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480GeForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev. 2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 512MBGeForce 7300 GT Ver2GeForce 7300 GTGeForce 7300 GSGeForce 7300 LEGeForce 7300 SEGeForce 7200 GSGeForce 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6500GeForce 6200 TC 64(256)GeForce 6200 TC 32(128)GeForce 6200 TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev. 2)GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.1)GeForce FX 5600 XTGeForce FX 5600GeForce FX 5500GeForce FX 5200 UltraGeForce FX 5200GeForce FX 5200 SEGeForce 4 Ti 4800GeForce 4 Ti 4800-SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX 460GeForce 4 MX 440GeForce 4 MX 440-SEGeForce 4 MX 420GeForce 3 Ti500GeForce 3 Ti200GeForce 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128

    You can simultaneously select
    up to 10 video cards by holding Ctrl

    Reviews of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti:

    • Review and testing of the video card Gigabyte GV-N65TOC-1GI

      Gigabyte GV-N65TOC-1GI

    • Review and testing of the video card Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti OC

      Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti OC

    • Review and testing of video card MSI N650Ti-1GD5/OC

      MSI N650Ti-1GD5/OC

    • Review and testing of ASUS GTX650TI-1GD5. New comparison of the GeForce GTX 650 Ti with competitors and predecessors

      ASUS GTX650TI-1GD5

    • Review and testing of two GeForce GTX 650 Ti from Inno3D and KFA2

      Inno3D GeForce GTX 650 Ti (N650-1SDN-D5CW)

      KFA2 GeForce GTX 650 Ti EX OC 1GB

    • Another cold and quiet GeForce GTX 650 Ti. Testing ASUS GTX650TI-DC2T-1GD5

      ASUS GTX650TI-DC2T-1GD5

    • Budget hit? Big test of the new GeForce GTX 650 Ti. Review of MSI N650Ti PE 1GD5/OC with quiet Cyclone II cooler

      MSI N650Ti PE 1GD5/OC

    Gtx 580 vs gtx 750 ti

    Contents

    • 1 Why is EVGA GeForce GTX 580 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti?

    Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than EVGA GeForce GTX 580?

    • GPU frequency 248MHz over

    What are the most popular comparisons?

    EVGA GeForce GTX 580

    MSI Radeon RX 460 OC 4GB

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    AMD Radeon RX 550

    EVGA GeForce GTX 580

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    EVGA GeForce GTX 580

    Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    EVGA GeForce GTX 580

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 570

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    AMD Radeon R7 260X

    EVGA GeForce GTX 580

    Zotac GeForce GTX 960

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    AMD Radeon R7 360

    EVGA GeForce GTX 580

    AMD Radeon HD 6870

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    EVGA GeForce GTX 580

    EVGA GeForce GTX 750 2GB

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Gigabyte Radeon RX 570

    EVGA GeForce GTX 580

    MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor 8GB

    Nvidia GeForce Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 480

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    0003

    Asus GeForce GTX 950

    General Information

    The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.

    A higher transistor count usually indicates a newer, more powerful processor.

    Nvidia Quadro GV100

    A smaller size indicates a newer process for making the chip.

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    PCI Express (PCIe) is a high-speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.

    GTX 580 GTX 750 Ti Difference
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
    Price ₽ 26,170.4 ₽ 18,299.6 7870.8 (30%)
    Year 2010 2014 4 (0%)
    Maximum recorded temperature 88C 65C 23 (26%)
    Maximum fan noise 59. 3dB 39dB 20.3 (34%)
    Recommended power supply 594W 410W 184 (31%)
    Reference Processor Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz ($179.99) Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz ($284.99)
    CPU effect on FPS +0.0 FPS +0.0 FPS 0 (0%)
    CPU impact on FPS% 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%)
    Benchmark quality parameters Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
    Average performance 1080p 43.4 FPS 27.1 FPS 16.3 (38%)
    Average performance 1440p 30.5 FPS 17.2 FPS 13.3 (44%)
    Medium 4K performance 14.0 FPS 10.4 FPS 3.6 (26%)
    Memory 1GB 2GB 1 (100%)
    1080p cost per frame ₽ 754. 3 ₽ 360.7 393.6 (52%)
    1440p Cost per frame ₽ 1,073.1 ₽ 568.0 505.1 (47%)
    4K Cost Per Frame ₽ 2,337.6 ₽ 939.9 1397.7 (60%)
    Variant NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
    Total score combination
    Total score combination
    Description Metric From To Weight
    The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and driver support. Year 2016 2019 13
    2015 2016 11
    2014 2015 8
    2013 2014 4
    2007 2013 2
    The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better. Price 250 35
    250 400 30
    400 550 25
    550 650 15
    650 9999 5
    Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better. PSU 350 4
    350 450 4
    450 550 3
    550 650 2
    650 9999 1
    Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card. Temp 70 2
    70 75 2
    75 80 1
    80 85 1
    85 999 1
    Noise Levels under load. The lower the better. Noise 45 2
    45 48 2
    48 50 2
    50 55 1
    55 999 1
    Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better. FHD 60 9999 18
    55 60 13
    45 55 11
    35 45 7
    35 5
    Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better. QHD 60 9999 10
    55 60 8
    45 55 5
    35 45 4
    35 2
    4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better. F4K 60 9999 5
    55 60 4
    45 55 3
    35 45 2
    35 1
    Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the time this graphics card was released. CPU -5 9999 5
    -7 -5 4
    -10 -7 3
    -15 -10 2
    -9999 -15 1
    Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future demanding games. MEM 8 9999 5
    4 8 4
    2 4 3
    1 2 2
    1 1
    FROM TO VERDICT
    The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components. OVERALL SCORE 80 99 Excellent
    70 80 Very Good
    60 70 Good
    40 60 Acceptable
    40 Weak
    48/100 56/100 8 (17%)

    Value for money

    56.7%

    8.5% (17.6%) better than

    vs

    48.2%

    Release price

    $59.99

    -89.01 $ (-59.7%) better than

    vs

    149 $

    Power Demand (TDP)

    12 W

    -98 W (-89. 1%) better than

    vs

    110 W

    Memory frequency

    800 MHz

    At 794.6 MHz (14714.8%) better than

    vs

    5.4 MHz

    Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

    Comparison winner

    Number of shaders

    768

    720 (1500%) better than

    vs

    48

    Core frequency

    928 MHz

    256 MHz (38.1%) better than

    vs

    672 MHz

    Process

    28 nm

    -12 nm (-30%) better than

    vs

    40 nm

    Number of CUDA cores

    768

    720 (1500%) better than

    vs

    48

    Maximum memory

    2 GB

    1 GB (100%) better than

    vs

    1 GB

    Memory bus width

    128 bit

    64 bit (100%) better than

    vs

    64 bit

    Memory bandwidth

    86. 4

    73.6 (575%) better than

    vs

    12.8

    General

    Value for money

    The sum of all the benefits of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

    56.7%

    8.5% (17.6%) better than

    48.2%

    Architecture

    Fermi Kepler

    Code name

    GF108 GK106

    Type

    Notebook Desktop

    Release price

    $59.99

    -89.01 $ (-59.7%) better than

    149 $

    Number of shaders

    48 768

    720 (1500%) better than

    Core clock

    672MHz 928 MHz

    At 256 MHz (38. 1%) better than

    Number of transistors

    585 million 2.540 million

    Process

    40 nm 28 nm

    -12 nm (-30%) better than

    Interface

    PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

    Power Demand (TDP)

    The calculated heat output indicates the average heat dissipation in load operation,
    the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

    12W

    -98 W (-89.1%) better than

    110 W

    Length

    n/a 14.5 cm

    Additional power connectors

    n/a 1x 6-pin

    3D Vision

    n/a +

    CUDA

    The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for
    parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.

    Maximum temperature

    n/a 105 °C

    Multi-monitor support

    n/a 4

    Decred / DCR (Decred)

    n/a 0.26 Gh/s

    Tire

    n/a PCI Express 3.0

    Number of CUDA cores

    A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing,
    especially affect anti-aliasing and lighting in games, the speed of training neural networks.

    48 768

    720 (1500%) better than

    Height

    n/a 11.1 cm

    HDCP

    n/a +

    Maximum resolution via VGA

    n/a 2048×1536

    Audio input for HDMI

    n/a internal

    HDMI

    OpenCL

    1. 1 n/a

    3D Gaming

    n/a +

    FXAA

    TXAA

    Adaptive VSync

    n/a +

    Verde Drivers

    + n/a

    3D Blu-ray

    n/a +

    DirectCompute

    + n/a

    Video connectors

    No outputs 1x Dual Link DVI-I, 1x Dual Link DVI-D, 1x Mini HDMI

    DirectX

    12 API 12 (11_0)

    Floating point performance

    129. 02 gflops 1.425 gflops

    Optimus

    + n/a

    Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)

    n/a 5 Mh/s
    Benchmarks
    DDR3

    Memory

    Memory type

    GDDR5

    Maximum memory

    Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures,
    use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.

    1GB 2 GB

    1 GB (100%) better than

    Memory bus width

    The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.

    64 bit 128 bit

    64 bit (100%) better than

    Shared memory

    n/a

    Memory frequency

    A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.

    800 MHz

    At 794.6 MHz (14714.8%) better than

    5.4 MHz

    Memory bandwidth

    The greater the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective RAM the PC can use.

    12.8 86.4

    73.6 (575%) better than

    GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

    GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition — Th200

    Contents

    1. Introduction
    2. Features
    3. Tests
    4. Key differences
    5. Conclusion
    6. Comments

    Video card

    Video card

    Introduction

    We compared two graphics cards: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 is a GeForce 500 generation Fermi 2.0 graphics card released on Jun 6th, 2011. It comes with 1.50 GB of GDDR5 memory running at 1002 MHz, has 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector and consumes up to 165W.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition is a GeForce 200 generation Tesla 2.0 graphics card released Jan 15th, 2009. It comes with 1GB of GDDR3 memory running at 1242MHz, has a 2x 6-pin power connector and draws up to 165 Tue

    1002 МГц

    1242 МГц

    Render Config

    Shading Units

    512

    240

    Texture Units

    64

    80

    Raster Units

    48

    32

    SM Count

    16

    30

    Graphics Features

    Directx

    12 (11_0)

    11.1 (10_0)

    Opengl

    4. 6

    3.3

    Opencl

    9000 9000

    9000

    1.1

    CUDA

    2.0

    1.3

    VULKAN

    N/A

    N/A

    Board Design

    Heating

    244W

    204W

    9000 -pin

    2x 6-pin

    Slot Width

    Dual-slot

    Dual-slot

    Tests

    Th200 RP

    Th200 RP Th20 is a test created. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
    +13%

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

    Key Differences

    Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition?

    Newer — 2 years later release

    Has 13% better performance

    More modern manufacturing process — 40 nm vs 55 nm

    Has 512 MB more memory

    More advanced memory type — GDDR5 vs GDDR3

    Has 22% higher bandwidth — 192. 4 GB/s vs 159.0 GB/s

    Has 20% higher pixel fill rate — 24.70 GPixel/s vs 20.74 GPixel/ s

    Has 272 more shading units

    Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2?

    Consumes 17% less power — 204W vs. 244W

    Has a slightly larger memory bus

    Has a 5% higher texture fill rate — 51.84 GTexel/s vs 49.41 GTexel/s

    Has more texture units +16

    Conclusion

    Which is better GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 or GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition?

    The GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 delivers 13% better performance, consumes up to 20% more energy and holds 512 MB more memory. According to our research, the GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 3990X is more powerful than the GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition.

    What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2?

    The Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2. It is 3% more powerful, uses 29% less energy, and holds 512MB more memory.