Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1050-vs-geforce-gtx-750-ti%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1050-vs-geforce-gtx-750-ti%23benchmarks
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
Comparative analysis of video cards Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
nine0003
Intel UHD Graphics 750
versus
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 4 year(s) 7 month(s) 5 times less 9002 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 3.3 times more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 11068 vs 3356
- 3.3 times more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) benchmark more: 11068 vs 3356
Issue date | 2021 vs 21 May 2018 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
- 4.6x more core clock(s): 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz about 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 8368 vs 2899
- About 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 3717 vs 3219
- 2.9 times more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8368 vs 2899
- About 15% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3219
Core frequency 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz Boost core clock 1518 MHz vs 1300 MHz GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8368 vs 2899 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3219 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8368 vs 2899 nine0035
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3219 Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GBGFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 nine0032
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) nine0028 GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) GPU 1 GPU 2 nine0032
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) GPU 1 GPU 2 Name Intel UHD Graphics 750 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB PassMark — G3D Mark 1755 PassMark — G2D Mark 343 Geekbench — OpenCL nine0031 7782
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2899 8368 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3219 3717 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 11068 3356 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2899 8368 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3219 3717 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 11068 3356 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 642 Performance comparison
Intel UHD Graphics 750 nine0249 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Architecture Generation 12. 1 Pascal Codename Rocket Lake GT1 GP107 Production date 2021 21 May 2018 Place in the ranking 545 408 Type Desktop Desktop Boost core clock 1300MHz 1518MHz Compute 32 Core frequency 300MHz 1392 MHz Process nine0031 14 nm
14nm Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 166. 4GFLOPS (1:4) Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 665.6GFLOPS Number of shaders 256 Pixel fill rate 10.40 GPixel/s Texturing speed 20.80 GTexel/s Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt Number of transistors 3,300 million Video connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort DirectX 12. 0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1) OpenCL 3.0 OpenGL 4.6 4.6 Shader Model 6.4 Vulcan Interface nine0031 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 145mm Additional power connectors None Memory frequency 7008MHz nine0035
looking for affordable happiness GECID.
com. Page 1
::>Video cards
>2016
> ASUS EX-GTX1050-2G12-16-2016
Page 1
Page 2
One pageYou can have different attitudes to different esports disciplines, MMO and MOBA games, but numbers are a stubborn thing. And they show, for example, that 9of the top 10 top-grossing PC games of 2015, according to SuperData Research, are relatively undemanding multiplayer games, many of which are nominally free. Here are the ten:
- League of Legends (Tencent/Riot Games) − $1.628 billion
- CrossFire (SmileGate) − $1.110 billion
- Dungeon Fighter Online (Neople) — $1.052 billion
- World of Warcraft (Activision) — $814 million
- World of Tanks (Wargaming.net) — $446 million
- Lineage I (NCSoft Corporation) − $339 million
- Maplestory (Nexon) — $253 million
- Dota 2 (Valve Corporation) − $238 million
- Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (Valve Corporation) — $221 million
- Grand Theft Auto V (Take-Two Interactive) — $205 million
According to the latest rating for 2016 (from January to October), the TOP 10 is as follows:
- League of Legends
- CrossFire
- World of Warcraft
- Dungeon Fighter Online
- Sid Meier’s Civilization VI
- Overwatch
- Battlefield 1
- World of Tanks
- Dota 2
- Fantasy Westward Journey Online II
Unfortunately, in the new rating SuperData Research analysts did not indicate digital profitability indicators, but even without this it is clear that successful MMO and MOBA games generate super profits for their creators from year to year, while the main income is producers of the usual story games. games are received only at the time of their launch. On the one hand, this pushes developers to look for new ideas for releasing their own products in the niche of online projects. On the other hand, entry-level gaming video cards will continue to be very popular among users, because they are not only used in home systems, but also in various kinds of Internet cafes and gaming clubs. And many users don’t need more, if only after work or study for an hour or two to immerse themselves in their favorite world of magic, counter-terrorist operations, tanks or ships. nine0003
In this regard, in the fall of this year, NVIDIA has almost completed the transfer of the gaming video card model range to the NVIDIA Pascal microarchitecture. The latest to debut budget video accelerators NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Calling less powerful graphics adapters «gaming» can only be a stretch, and with the release of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, she is in no hurry for two reasons. Firstly, AMD does not have a worthy competitor in the market, and secondly, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 is already selling well, so there is no need to create an internal competitor for it. nine0003
This review is dedicated specifically to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050. Nominally, it replaced the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and is positioned as the optimal solution for a variety of MMOs, MOBAs, eSports disciplines and other undemanding projects. That is, AMD Radeon RX 460 will be its main competitor.0631
If you take a closer look at the predecessor, the first thing that catches your eye is the transfer of the GPU to a thinner process technology (from 28 to 14 nm), which made it possible to increase the number of transistors by 76% while reducing the area by 11%. As a result, the number of CUDA cores increased from 512 to 640, texture units — from 32 to 40, raster modules — from 16 to 32. Additionally, the amount of GDDR5 memory increased (from 1 to 2 GB) and clock frequencies increased significantly.
For more clarity, we suggest looking at the summary table:
Model
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
nine0032
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
GPU
NVIDIA GM107-300
NVIDIA GM107-400
NVIDIA GM206-250
NVIDIA GM206-300
nine0031
NVIDIA GP107-300
NVIDIA GP107-400
NVIDIA GP106-300
NVIDIA GP106-400
Microarchitecture
NVIDIA Maxwell
NVIDIA Maxwell
NVIDIA Maxwell 2. 0
NVIDIA Maxwell 2.0
NVIDIA Pascal
NVIDIA Pascal
NVIDIA Pascal
NVIDIA Pascal
Technical process, nm
28
28
nine0032
28
28
14
14
16
16
Crystal area, mm 2
148
148
nine0031
228
220
132
132
220
220
Number of transistors, billion
1.87
1.87
nine0002 2. 94 2.94
3.3
3.3
4.4
4.4
Number of SM units
4
5
6
nine0032
8
5
6
9
10
Number of CUDA cores
512
640
768
nine0002 1024 640
768
1152
1280
Number of texture units
32
40
48
64
40
48
72
80
Number of raster blocks
16
16
32
32
nine0031
32
32
48
48
Base/dynamic clock, MHz
1020 / 1085
1020 / 1085
1024 / 1188
nine0002 1127 / 1178 1354 / 1455
1290 / 1392
1506 / 1708
1506 / 1708
Video memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
GDDR5
nine0032
GDDR5
GDDR5
GDDR5
GDDR5
GDDR5
Video memory size, GB
1
2
2
nine0031
2
2
4
3
6
Effective memory frequency, MHz
5012
5400
6612
nine0002 7012 7008
7008
8000
8000
Bus width, bit
128
128
128
128
128
128
192
192
Memory bandwidth, GB/s
80. 2
86.4
105.8
112
112
112
192
192
Computing power, TFLOPS
1.045
1.306
1.573
2.308
1.733
1.981
3.470
3.855
TDP, W
55
60
90
120
nine0031
75
75
120
120
Recommended price at the start of sales, $
119
149
159
199
nine0032
109
139
199
249 / 299
Thus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 in theory really has everything you need to run the above projects.
But can she do more? Is it possible to count on the passage of demanding current projects, albeit not with the maximum graphics settings, but with an acceptable gameplay speed? Video card 9 will help us answer these questions.0115 ASUS Expedition GeForce GTX 1050 ( EX — GTX 1050-2 G ) .
Specification
Model
ASUS Expedition GeForce GTX 1050 (EX-GTX1050-2G)
nine0002 GPU NVIDIA GP107-300
Microarchitecture
NVIDIA Pascal
Technical process, nm
14
Number of CUDA cores
640
Number of texture units
40
Number of raster blocks
32
GPU clock frequency, MHz
1354 / 1455
Video memory type
GDDR5
Volume, GB
2
Effective memory frequency, MHz
7008
Memory bus width, bit
128
Memory bandwidth, GB/s
nine0032
112
External interfaces
1 x DVI-D
1 x HDMI 2. 0b
1 x DisplayPort 1.4Minimum recommended power supply wattage, W
300
Optional PCIe power connector
nine0031
—
Dimensions from the official website, mm
212 x 111 x 38
Drivers
Latest drivers can be downloaded from the ASUS website or the GPU manufacturer’s website
Manufacturer website
ASUS
Packaging and delivery
The colorful packaging of ASUS Expedition GeForce GTX 1050 will tell the potential owner about all the key features of the novelty except for the frequency formula. Particular attention should be paid to the possibility of activating the World of Warships invite code until January 30, 2017 to receive the premium cruiser Diana and 15 days of premium access.
Manufacturer’s recommended system requirements are printed on one side. In particular, the power of the power supply should not fall below 300 watts. But an additional PCIe power connector is not required, since the power consumption of the video card does not exceed 75 watts. nine0003
Delivery includes paper documentation and driver CD.
Appearance
The ASUS EX-GTX1050-2G is made in a rather compact case with declared dimensions of 212 x 111 x 38 mm (222 x 111 mm according to its own measurements), which makes it a welcome guest in many small cases . And the design in black and red colors can be called classic for a video card of a gaming level.
We weren’t allowed to look inside the graphics adapter, but we can say that it uses a reference 3+1-phase power subsystem, selected Super Alloy Power II components and automated technology from ASUS AUTO-Extreme Technology. The high reliability and stability of the ASUS Expedition GeForce GTX 1050 in conditions close to the operation of computer clubs and Internet cafes was confirmed by iCafé Labs during a rigorous 144-hour test.
The reverse side of the video card is not covered with a stiffening plate. Firstly, the heat dissipation of the GPU is relatively small, so an installed cooling system should be enough to cool it. Secondly, the cooler itself is characterized by compact dimensions and low weight, so you shouldn’t worry about the breakage of the textolite. nine0003
The new product does not require an additional power connector, since its power consumption does not exceed 75 W provided by the PCI Express x16 interface.
You should also not count on the presence of a connector for connecting an NVIDIA SLI bridge, since this technology is not available for all representatives of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 series. In turn, the set of external interfaces includes the following ports:
- 1 x DVI-D
nine0019 1 x HDMI 2.0b
- 1 x DisplayPort 1.4
NVIDIA recommends that partners use a set of three DisplayPorts, one HDMI, and one DVI. However, the absence of two DisplayPorts is not particularly problematic, since the ASUS EX-GTX1050-2G is not aimed at either VR or multi-screen configurations.
GPU-Z utility confirms all parameters of this video accelerator familiar to us. In particular, the NVIDIA GP107-300 graphics processor includes 640 CUDA cores, 40 texture units and 32 raster units. The base frequency of its operation is 1354 MHz, and the dynamic frequency is 1455 MHz. In turn, the video memory is recruited using SK Hynix GDDR5 chips with a total capacity of 2 GB. The effective clock frequency of its operation is 7008 MHz, which, with a 128-bit bus, gives a throughput of 112.1 GB / s. nine0003
There are no additional factory overclocked profiles in the ASUS GPU Tweak II utility.
Cooling system
The cooling system for ASUS Expedition GeForce GTX 1050 (EX-GTX1050-2G) graphics card has a fairly simple design. It consists of an aluminum radiator (173 x 78 x 18 mm) and two 75 mm axial fans mounted on a plastic casing. The radiator contacts only the GPU, but the memory chips and elements of the power subsystem are devoid of any additional cooling. nine0003
ASUS GPU Tweak II utility was used to check the efficiency of the cooling system. With automatic fan speed control, at maximum load, the graphics core heated up to 60 ° C, and the propellers themselves worked virtually silently at 34% (1159 rpm) of their maximum power.
Running the game DOOM (2016) with the cooler running in automatic mode led to GPU heating only up to 61°C at almost the same speed of rotation of the blades (1196 rpm). However, the frequency of the GPU has increased significantly compared to the test in the benchmark: from 1405 to 1658 MHz. It’s nice to see that the cooling system coped with such an increase without any problems.
Forced setting of the blades rotation speed to maximum (3342 rpm) ensured that the GPU temperature dropped to 47°C, but the noise rose slightly above average and was not very comfortable for constant use. Recall that the maximum declared temperature for NVIDIA GP107-300 is 97°C, that is, there is a good margin for overclocking experiments.
In the absence of load, the frequencies of the graphics core and memory were automatically reduced, allowing to reduce power consumption and heat dissipation of the video accelerator as a whole. In this mode, the GPU temperature did not exceed 29 ° C, and the fans were temporarily turned off. They resumed active work only when the temperature rose to 55°C.
Thus, there were no questions about the efficiency of the cooling system of the ASUS EX-GTX1050-2G video card: the GPU temperature was kept much below the critical level, no extraneous sounds in the form of a high-frequency squeak of chokes were noticed, and when the fans were running automatically, the noise level remained more than comfortable. Yes, we could not check the heating of the memory chips and the VRM zone, but during testing, the new product worked stably, and monitoring did not show any problems.