Temperature & Power Consumption Results : NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — The Gaming Card for the Masses?
Trending
Dyson’s new Big+Quiet Formaldehyde air purifier is quiet and built for large spaces
M1 adds 5G roaming across 17 countries to four of its mobile plans
Google tipped to optimise apps for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 cover display
Product Listing
- News
- Reviews & Articles
-
Page 1 of 10 — NVIDA GeForce GTX 760 — The Gaming Card for the Masses?Page 2 of 10 — Test SetupPage 3 of 10 — 3DMark 11 & 3DMark (2013) Page 4 of 10 — Unigine 4.0 «Heaven» and Unigine «Valley» 1.0 Results Page 5 of 10 — Crysis 2 & Tomb Raider ResultsPage 6 of 10 — Assassin’s Creed 3 & Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 Results Page 7 of 10 — Far Cry 3 & Hitman: Absolution ResultsPage 8 of 10 — Crysis 3 & Overclocking ResultsPage 9 of 10 — Temperature & Power Consumption ResultsPage 10 of 10 — Conclusion
Page 9 of 10 — Temperature & Power Consumption Results
- Next >
Temperature
Coincidentally, the maximum recorded temperature, at 65 degrees Celsius, of the GTX 760 was the same as the GTX 670. Take note that the temperature results of the GeForce GTX 660 and the GTX 660 Ti are taken from add-in board partner cards. The recorded temperatures of the AMD Radeon cards and that of the GeForce GTX 670 were taken from reference cards.
Power Consumption
Updated on 9th July: The original graph had presented comparison test card results from an older test-bed and thus the differences between the GTX 760 and the rest were more pronounced. We’ve since rectified the graph, but the conclusion remains that the GTX 760 draws more power than ideal.
The GTX 760 idled with a system power draw of 148W, but its load power consumption was the highest at 350W. While it’s in-line with the higher power consumption figures that we’ve seen from the new GeForce GTX 770 and 780 cards, the GeForce GTX 760 is still a fair bit higher than its competitors. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 has the closest power consumption profile to the GTX 760 as both cards have a similarly rated TDP of 170W.
What’s unfortunate is that the actual performance levels of the GeForce GTX 760 are more in-line with that of the GeForce GTX 660 Ti — thus the newcomer’s performance-per watt is below expectations.
-
Page 1 of 10 — NVIDA GeForce GTX 760 — The Gaming Card for the Masses?Page 2 of 10 — Test SetupPage 3 of 10 — 3DMark 11 & 3DMark (2013) Page 4 of 10 — Unigine 4.0 «Heaven» and Unigine «Valley» 1.0 Results Page 5 of 10 — Crysis 2 & Tomb Raider ResultsPage 6 of 10 — Assassin’s Creed 3 & Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 Results Page 7 of 10 — Far Cry 3 & Hitman: Absolution ResultsPage 8 of 10 — Crysis 3 & Overclocking ResultsPage 9 of 10 — Temperature & Power Consumption ResultsPage 10 of 10 — Conclusion
Page 9 of 10 — Temperature & Power Consumption Results
- Next >
Join HWZ’s Telegram channel here and catch all the latest tech news!
Our articles may contain affiliate links.
If you buy through these links, we may earn a small commission.
Sponsored Links
GeForce GTX 760 Folding@Home PPD Averages, Power Consumption & Research Projects
- GPU PPD
- Brands
- Nvidia
- GPU Folding@Home Profile
GPU FOLDING OVERVIEW
Folding@Home PPD for the GeForce GTX 760 represents the averages of folding work unit
samples collected from a wide variety of users different computer hardware configurations.
Average values are used to
best represent folding PPD performance of a GeForce GTX 760 across different F@H projects and user
variables such as power settings, overclocks, operating system and specific work units which can yield
wildly different highs and lows for PPD scores on the same GPU platform.
GPU PPD AVERAGE: ALL OS
56,306
Average of 500 most recent PPD samples
Data Samples: ALL OS
5,310
All Time
Stats as of Thursday, 15 June 2023 12:09:29
TRY OUR BETTER F@H WEB CLIENT
Get more details on your GPU and CPU PPD in real-time, save money with folding time of use scheduling. Available for chrome, edge, brave and other chromium browsers.
GET IT FOR FREE NOW
Folding STATISTICS GK104 [GeForce GTX 760] 2258 — Nvidia
|
DATA SAMPLES INFO Filter applied, PPD samples all time |
AVERAGE FOLDING PERFORMANCE Based on ALL available PPD samples by filter |
WORK UNIT PPD RECORDS All Time |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS FILTER | SAMPLES | PPD | WU Per 24hrs | Time Per WU | Points Per WU | BEST PPD | WORST PPD |
| All OS AVG | 5310 | 110,592 | 1. 58 |
15 hrs 13 mins | 70,141 | 2,467,382 | 5,936 |
| Linux | 108 | 155,367 | 4.43 | 5 hrs 25 mins | 35,097 | 179,022 | 16,441 |
| Windows | 5202 | 109,663 | 1.55 | 16 hrs 31 mins | 70,868 | 2,467,382 | 5,936 |
12 WEEK AVG PPD CHANGE VS. WORK UNITS AVAILABLE — GeForce GTX 760
GPU PPD average changes week to week for a number of reasons such as credit for type of projects/causes available, varience in work unit difficulty, OS/GPU drivers, folding cores, GPU models, clocks, power targets etc.
The chart below serves as a way to see historical week to week performance change as PPD for a GPU is never a constant, as the work units processed are always changing.
Recent Work Unit Research Type Allocations — GeForce GTX 760
Average PPD is impacted by the types of research work units being done as they return different amounts of points and take different amounts of time.
The following shows the work unit allocation of research causes to better understand changes in PPD over time for the GeForce GTX 760.
24 HOUR WU ALLOCATION
No data available to report for this time frame.
7 DAY WU ALLOCATION
No data available to report for this time frame.
12 WEEK WU ALLOCATION
CANCER — 66.15%
LIQUID-PHASE-SEPARATION — 29.57%
MEMBRANE TRANSPORT — 4.28%
GeForce GTX 760 kWh POWER CONSUMPTION & COST
Power consumption information for the GeForce GTX 760 is based on an average wattage taken from
vendor information for the lowest and highest power draws for the GPU under folding@home compute loads.
Wattage information is only for the GPU and does not include the host computers power usage.
|
GPU Power Draw Watts — TDP |
Daily Power Usage kWh |
Points per kWh |
Daily Cost at $0.10 per kWh |
Power Cost per 1m Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 170 W | 4. 08 kWh |
13,800 | $0.41 | $7.246 |
GeForce GTX 760 COMPUTE
VS kWH USAGE
DAY, MONTH, WEEK & YEAR
Folding@Home compute projections for the GeForce GTX 760 can be used to help inform long term point goals and related costs based on 24/7 usage.
| Duration | Nick Name |
Points Average |
Work Units Average |
Power Usage kWh |
Power Cost at $0.10 per kWh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | PPD | 56,306 | 0.68 | 4.08 kWh | $0.41 |
| Week | PPW | 394,142 | 4.74 | 28.56 kWh | $2.86 |
| Month | PPM | 1,712,640 | 20.61 | 124.10 kWh | $12.41 |
| Year | PPY | 20,551,690 | 247.29 | 1489.20 kWh | $148.92 |
5 BEST PPD RESEARCH PROJECTS — GeForce GTX 760
The following data is the average PPD values for GeForce GTX 760 project work units based on multiple samples collected via the use of our Folding@Home dark mode web client.
| PPD Rank |
Project ID |
Cause Research |
PPD Average |
Points WU Average |
WUs Day Average |
WU Time Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16921 | cancer | 669,425 | 32,360 | 20.69 | 1 hrs 10 mins |
| 2 | 13429 | covid-19 | 278,024 | 11,757 | 23.65 | 1 hrs 1 mins |
| 3 | 14486 | myosins | 208,716 | 49,280 | 4.24 | 6 hrs 40 mins |
| 4 | 18117 | cancer | 186,066 | 50,320 | 3.70 | 6 hrs 29 mins |
| 5 | 17505 | cancer | 184,812 | 36,624 | 5.05 | 5 hrs 45 mins |
5 LOWEST PPD RESEARCH PROJECTS — GeForce GTX 760
The following data is the average PPD values for GeForce GTX 760 project work units based on multiple samples collected via the use of our Folding@Home dark mode web client.
| PPD Rank |
Project ID |
Cause Research |
PPD Average |
Points WU Average |
WUs Day Average |
WU Time Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16569 | Liquid-Phase-Separation | 7,395 | 50,000 | 0.15 | 162 hrs 16 mins |
| 2 | 18913 | cancer | 10,200 | 38,293 | 0.27 | 90 hrs 6 mins |
| 3 | 18717 | cancer | 25,462 | 120,370 | 0.21 | 113 hrs 28 mins |
| 4 | 17711 | unspecified | 44,342 | 12,112 | 3.66 | 7 hrs 33 mins |
| 5 | 18122 | cancer | 56,943 | 26,037 | 2.19 | 11 hrs 58 mins |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 graphics card, specifications and benchmarks
Comparison, specifications and characteristics of the graphics card
A brief overview of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 graphics card from Nvidia.
Card issue date 24-06-2013.
This is a Discrete graphics card, the code name for the Kepler architecture, DirectX is 11,
developed using 28 nm technology, it has 2 Gb of GDDR5 memory at a frequency of 1502 MHz,
and together with the 256 Bit interface this creates a throughput of 192.300 GB/sec.
Power consumption (TDP) is 170 W, the maximum temperature that the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 graphics card can operate at is 97 °C.
Display outputs include: 1x HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 connects to the rest of the system via a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
|
Comparison Criteria *General InformationGPUClock SpeedsMemoryRender ConfigurationTheoretical PerformanceGraphics FeaturesCompatibility and Dimensions
Show tips |
|
| General information | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|
| Developer | Nvidia |
| Released: | 2013 |
| Series | GeForce 700 |
| Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 |
| Board number: | P2004 |
| Maximum resolution: | 4096 x 2160 |
| Recommended resolution | No data |
| Production | Out of production |
| Starting price | $249 |
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
| Processor name | GK104 |
| Processor option | GK104-225-A2 |
| Number of chips | 1 |
| Architecture | Kepler |
| Manufacturer | TSMC |
| Process | 28nm |
| transistors | 3540 mln |
| Die size | 294 mm² |
| Clock frequencies | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
| Core frequency: | 980 MHz |
| Boost frequency | 1032MHz |
| Memory frequency | 1502 MHz |
| Effective memory speed: | 6 Gbps effective |
| Memory | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
| Memory capacity | 2048 Mb |
| Memory type | General system |
| Tire width | 256bit |
| Capacity |
192. 300 GB/s |
| Render Configuration | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
| Shader units: | 1152 |
| ROP units: | 96 |
| Texture blocks: | 32 |
| SM Count: | No data |
| SMM Count: | No data |
| Tensor cores: | No data |
| RT cores: | No data |
| L1 Cache: | 16 KB (per SMX) |
| L2 Cache: | 512KB |
| Theoretical capacity | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
| Pixel fill rate: | 24. 770 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 99.070 GTexel/s |
| FP16 (half) performance: | No data |
| FP32 (float) performance: | 2.378TFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) performance: | 99.07 GFLOPS |
| Graphic Features | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
| DirectX: | 12 (Feature Level 11_0) |
| OpenGL: | 4. 6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 |
| Vulcan: | 1.1 |
| CUDA: | 3.0 |
| Shader Model: | 5.1 |
| Technology and instructions: |
NVIDIA Adaptive V-Sync NVIDIA GameStream NVIDIA GPU Boost HDCP NVIDIA CUDA NVIDIA PureVideo NVIDIA PhysX NVIDIA 3D Vision FXAA TXAA |
| Compatibility and dimensions | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
| Video card category: | Desktop computer |
| Video card type: | Discrete |
| SLI/CrossFireX: | SLI |
| Slot width: | Double slot |
| Length: |
241 mm 9.  5 inches |
| Width: | No data |
| Height: | No data |
| Power consumption (TDP): | 170W |
| Power supply requirements: | 450W |
| Max. allowable temperature: | 97°C |
| Power connectors: | 2x 6-pin |
| Outlets: |
1x HDMI 2x DVI 1x DisplayPort |
| * Specifications subject to change without notice | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Overview.
Benchmarks and specs
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 graphics card (GPU) is #206 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: NVIDIA. Runs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 with a minimum clock speed of 980 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or when overclocked at a frequency of 1033 MHz. The RAM size is 2 GB GB with a clock speed of 3000 MHz and a bandwidth of 192.2 GB/s.
The power consumption of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 is 170 Watt and the process technology is only 28 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important characteristics of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760. To get an idea of which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.
4.3
From 159
Hitesti Grade
Popular video cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
Yandex Market
SberMegaMarket
AliExpress
General information
The base set of information will help you find out the release date of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 graphics card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost.
This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.
| Position in performance rating: | 265 | |||
| Value for money: | 33.84 | |||
| Architecture: | Kepler | |||
| Code name: | GK104 | |||
| Type: | Desktop | |||
| Release date: | 25 June 2013 (8 years ago) | |||
| Starting price: | $249 | |||
| Current price: | $141 (0.6x MSRP) | |||
| Value for money: | 14.45 | |||
| GPU code name: | GK104 | |||
| Market segment: | Desktop | |||
Specifications
This is important information that determines all the power characteristics of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 video card.
The smaller the chip manufacturing process, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).
| Conveyors: | 1152 | |||
| Core Clock: | 980MHz | |||
| Acceleration: | 1033MHz | |||
| Number of transistors: | 3,540 million | |||
| Process: | 28nm | |||
| Power consumption (TDP): | 170 Watt | |||
| Number of texels processed in 1 second: | 94.1 billion/sec | |||
| Floating point: | 2.378 gflops | |||
| Maximum temperature: | 97 °C | |||
| CUDA cores: | 1152 | |||
| Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 1152 | |||
| Acceleration speed: | 1033MHz | |||
| Number of transistors: | 3,540 million | |||
| Estimated heat output: | 170 Watt | |||
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility
There are many form factors of PC cases and laptop sizes today, so it is extremely important to know the length of the video card and its connection types (except for laptop versions).
This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.
| Interface: | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |||
| Length: | 9.5″ (24.1 cm) | |||
| Additional power: | Two 6-pin | |||
| SLI options: | + | |||
| Tire support: | PCI Express 3.0 | |||
| Height: | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | |||
| Minimum recommended system power: | 500 Watt | |||
Memory (Frequency and Overclocking)
Internal memory is used to store data during calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 + overclocking in turbo mode.
| Memory type: | GDDR5 | |||
| Maximum RAM amount: | 2GB | |||
| Memory bus width: | 256 Bit | |||
| Memory frequency: | 3000 MHz | |||
| Memory bandwidth: | 192.2 GB/s | |||
| Shared memory: | — | |||
Support for ports and displays
As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.
| Display connections: | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort | |||
| G-SYNC support: | + | |||
| Multi monitor support: | 4 displays | |||
| HDCP: | + | |||
| Maximum VGA resolution: | 2048×1536 | |||
| Audio input for HDMI: | Internal | |||
| HDMI: | + | |||
Technologies
Each graphics card manufacturer complements its products with proprietary technologies that are used both in games and in the workflow.
Below is a list of features that will be useful to you.
| 3D Vision: | + | |||
| GPU Boost: | + | |||
| CUDA: | + | |||
| GeForce Experience: | + | |||
| Blu Ray 3D: | + | |||
| 3D Gaming: | + | |||
| 3D Vision Live: | + | |||
| FXAA: | + | |||
| TXAA: | + | |||
| Adaptive VSync: | + | |||
| PhysX: | + | |||
API Support
All NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 supported APIs are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.
| DirectX: | 12 (11_0) | |||
| OpenGL: | 4.3 | |||
| Vulkan: | 1.1.126 | |||
| Shader Model: | 5.1 | |||
| OpenCL: | 1.2 | |||
Overall gaming performance
All tests are based on FPS. Let’s take a look at where the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ranks in the gaming performance test (the calculation was made in accordance with the recommendations of the game developer for system requirements; it may differ from real situations).
Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.
0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2EL EXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth : Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Maf ia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — Timed emoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
| Description | |
| 5 | Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. |
| May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. | |
| 30 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more |
| 40 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
| 60 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 58 fps or more |
May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been sufficiently studied. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates. |
|
| ? | Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene. |
| Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been sufficiently studied. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category. | |
| The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value. | |
AMD equivalent
AMD Radeon R9 370
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 in benchmark results
Benchmarks help determine performance in standard NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 benchmarks. We’ve compiled a list of the world’s best-known benchmarks so you can get accurate results for each one (see description).
Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.
Overall performance in benchmarks
ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
AMD Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
21.93%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
21.93%
AMD Radeon R9 370
21.87%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
21.68%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU GPU test results at hitesti.com
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
AMD Radeon R7 370
3DMark Fire Strike Score Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check the 3DMark Fire Strike Score for GPUs at hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results.
Check out the 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics GPU test results at hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
AMD Radeon R7 370
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI
AMD Radeon R9 270
3DMark 11 Performance GPU Benchmark: Graphics card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU GPU test results at hitesti.com
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark Vantage Performance GPU results at hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
AMD Radeon R7 370
Passmark benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check Passmark GPU test results at hitesti.
com
AMD Radeon R9 270X
AMD Radeon HD 7950
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
AMD Radeon R9 370
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check Unigine Heaven 4.0 GPU test results at hitesti.com
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Unigine Heaven 3.0 Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 GPU test results at hitesti.com
AMD FirePro W7170M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Octane Render Benchmark OctaneBench: Graphic card performance test results. Check Octane Render OctaneBench GPU test results at hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
4.