Gtx 960 vs rx 570: AMD Radeon RX 570 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 960: What is the difference?

AMD Radeon RX 570 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 960: What is the difference?

50points

AMD Radeon RX 570

46points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

54 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Why is AMD Radeon RX 570 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 960?

2.69 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
5 TFLOPSvs2.31 TFLOPS
3.7 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
39.8 GPixel/svs36.1 GPixel/s
2x more VRAM?
4GBvs2GB
87.1 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
159.2 GTexels/svs72.1 GTexels/s
112GB/s more memory bandwidth?
224GB/svs112GB/s
128bit wider memory bus width?
256bitvs128bit
1024 more shading units?
2048vs1024
66MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1244MHzvs1178MHz

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 better than AMD Radeon RX 570?

Supports 3D?
9W lower power consumption when idle?
74Wvs83W

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon RX 570

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

AMD Radeon RX 550

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

AMD Radeon RX 570

Gigabyte Radeon RX 6500 XT Gaming OC

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

AMD Radeon RX 570

AMD Radeon RX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

AMD Radeon RX 570

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

AMD Radeon RX 570

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce MX330

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

AMD Radeon Vega 8

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce MX150

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Radeon RX 570

2 User reviews

AMD Radeon RX 570

8. 5/10

2 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

3 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

9.3/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.5/10

2 votes

8.3/10

3 votes

Gaming

8.5/10

2 votes

8.7/10

3 votes

Performance

8.5/10

2 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Fan noise

7.5/10

2 votes

8.0/10

3 votes

Reliability

8.5/10

2 votes

10.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1168MHz

1127MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1244MHz

1178MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3. pixel rate

39.8 GPixel/s

36.1 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

5 TFLOPS

2.31 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

159.2 GTexels/s

72.1 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1750MHz

1753MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

7000MHz

7012MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

224GB/s

112GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

128bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔AMD Radeon RX 570

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX 570

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX 570)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

Radeon RX 570 vs GeForce GTX 960

Home
VGA Benchmarks
Radeon RX 570 vs GeForce GTX 960

Radeon RX 570

216%
GeForce GTX 960

100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 570

116% higher gaming performance.

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute

Supports FreeSync

Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Supports TrueAudio

Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 960

Supports PhysX

Supports G-Sync

Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends Radeon RX 570

The Radeon RX 570 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (23 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration

	Radeon RX 570		GeForce GTX 960
GPU Name	Ellesmere (Ellesmere PRO)	vs	GM206 (GM206-300-A1)
Fab Process	14 nm	vs	28 nm
Die Size	232 mmÂ²	vs	228 mmÂ²
Transistors	5,700 million	vs	2,940 million
Shaders	2048	vs	1024
Compute Units	32	vs	8
Core clock	926 MHz	vs	1127 MHz
ROPs	32	vs	32
TMUs	128	vs	64

Memory Configuration

	Radeon RX 570		GeForce GTX 960
Memory Type	GDDR5	vs	GDDR5
Bus Width	256 bit	vs	128 bit
Memory Speed	1650 MHz 6600 MHz effective	vs	1753 MHz 7012 MHz effective
Memory Size	4096 Mb	vs	2048 Mb

Additional details

	Radeon RX 570		GeForce GTX 960
TDP	120 watts	vs	120 watts
Release Date	1 Apr 2017	vs	22 Jan 2015

Radeon RX 570

38. 60 GP/s
GeForce GTX 960

36.10 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

Radeon RX 570

154.40 GT/s
GeForce GTX 960

72.10 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

Radeon RX 570

211.20 GB/s
GeForce GTX 960

112.20 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

Radeon RX 570

4940.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 960

2308.10 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality,DX11, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

49
GeForce GTX 960

34

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Very High Settings

Radeon RX 570

69
GeForce GTX 960

42

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

81
GeForce GTX 960

42

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

Radeon RX 570

82
GeForce GTX 960

53

FPS (higher is better)

Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

88
GeForce GTX 960

22

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

71
GeForce GTX 960

31

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

Radeon RX 570

58
GeForce GTX 960

36

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

44
GeForce GTX 960

30

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality,DX11, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

33
GeForce GTX 960

29

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Very High Settings

Radeon RX 570

48
GeForce GTX 960

27

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

52
GeForce GTX 960

27

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

Radeon RX 570

56
GeForce GTX 960

37

FPS (higher is better)

Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

54
GeForce GTX 960

18

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

48
GeForce GTX 960

21

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

Radeon RX 570

42
GeForce GTX 960

27

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

30
GeForce GTX 960

20

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality,DX11, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

26
GeForce GTX 960

14

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Very High Settings

Radeon RX 570

26
GeForce GTX 960

10

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

25
GeForce GTX 960

9

FPS (higher is better)

Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

24
GeForce GTX 960

5

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

25
GeForce GTX 960

9

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

Radeon RX 570

24
GeForce GTX 960

14

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 570

16
GeForce GTX 960

6

FPS (higher is better)

	VS
Radeon RX 570	VS	GeForce GTX 1650

	VS
Radeon RX 570	VS	GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

	VS
GeForce GTX 960	VS	GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

	VS
GeForce GTX 960	VS	GeForce GTX 1050

	VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	VS	Radeon RX 580 2048SP

	VS
Radeon RX 580 2048SP	VS	Radeon RX 580X

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Nvidia GTX 960 Vs AMD RX 570: Which One to Buy?


AMD RX 570	NVIDIA GTX 960
BUY NOW	BUY NOW
PROS	PROS
Excellent Full HD performance. Wide range of designs available. Quiet cooler on this model.	Solid 1080p performance. Low power consumption and temperatures. Available in ITX and overclocked versions.
CONS	CONS
Blurred lines between RX 580 and GTX 1060 pricing. Power hog when overclocked.	Surrounded by strong AMD competition. Poor memory interface.

AMD’s Radeon RX 570 XT graphics card is now available, but how does it compare against Nvidia’s GTX 970? I’ve compared 10 different games at 1080p resolution to help you decide.

SPECIFICATIONS

OVERVIEW	RX 570	GTX 960
Card Status	Released	Released
Manufacturer	AMD	NVIDIA
Release Date	18th April, 2017	22nd January, 2015
Launch Price	$169 USD	$199 USD

GPU	RX 570	GTX 960
GPU Model	14nm Polaris 20 XL	28nm GM206-300
Cores : TMUs : ROPs	2048 : 128 : 32	1024 : 64 : 32

MEMORY	RX 570	GTX 960
Memory Size	8GB GDDR5	4GB GDDR5
Memory Bus Width	256-bit	128-bit
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	112. 19 GB/s

PHYSICAL	RX 570	GTX 960
Interface	PCI-Express 3.0 x16	PCI-Express 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power	150 W	120 W

CLOCKS	RX 570	GTX 960
Base Clock	1168 MHz	1127 MHz
Boost Clock	1244 MHz	1178 MHz
Memory Clock (Effective)	1750 (7000) MHz	1753 (7012) MHz
Computing Power (FP32)	4,784 GFLOPS	2,308 GFLOPS

PERFORMANCE

GRAPHICS CARD USED:

XFX Radeon RX 570 8GB
MSI GTX 970 4GB

SYSTEM SPECS:

The system that I’m testing with has an AMD RYZEN 5 2600 CPU in an MSI X470 GAMING PLUS motherboard running at stock speeds, along with 16GB of memory running at DDR4-3200 in dual channel.

I have not compared games at 1080p only.

LET’S GET INTO RESULTS.

F1 2018

F1 2018 was tested in campaign mode. In this test it’s a win for the RX 570, which was scoring around 21% higher average FPS over the GTX 970 at 1080p.

WORLD OF TANKS ENCORE RT

WORLD OF TANKS ENCORE RT was tested using the games built in benchmark tool, and the GTX 970 was back in the lead here, granted only with a slight 11% lead at 1080p.

GHOST RECON BREAKPOINT

GHOST RECON BREAKPOINT was tested in campaign mode, and was another win for the RX 570, at least in terms of average FPS.

PUBG

PUBG was tested with the games benchmark tool, and the results were very close here, with the 2060 just a 3 frames ahead of the GTX 970 at 1080p resolution.

ASSASSINS CREED ODYSSEY

ASSASSINS CREED ODYSSEY was tested with all graphical settings at ultra. At 1080p the RX 570 was almost 34% faster.

ASSASSINS CREED ORIGINS

ASSASSINS CREED ORIGINS was tested with the game’s benchmark tool, and unlike the last game, this one seemed to really favour the RX 570. At 1080p, there was a large 4.4% higher average frame rates.

FAR CRY NEW DAWN

FAR CRY NEW DAWN was tested using the replay feature, with the exact same replay file used for all testing. This was another win for the RX 570, which was only 1FPS ahead at 1080p.

RAINBOW SIX SIEGE

RAINBOW SIX SIEGE was tested using the built in benchmark. The results were extremely close together in this test, RX 570 was 10% ahead GTX 970.

BORDERLANDS 3

BORDERLANDS 3 saw some interesting results, the average FPS was higher with the GTX 970 in my test, however there was only 1FPS difference.

WITCHER 3

WITCHER 3 was tested using the built in benchmark, and the RX 570 was ahead again in terms of average FPS, granted the difference was quite small, with just a one to two FPS lead over the GTX 970.

CONCLUSION

Overall both the graphics card were performing good. RX 570 was ahead in 6 games and GTX 970 was ahead in 4 games, so the clear winner is RX 570. I will recommend you to buy RX 570 as it was performing good and it’s latest than GTX 970. So with all of that in mind which would you pick? The Radeon RX 570, or Nvidia GTX 970? Let me know in the comments.

GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon RX 570 Graphics cards Comparison

When comparing GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GTX 960

Check Price

Radeon RX 570

Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 960	Radeon RX 570
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pins	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Recommended system power (PSU)	400 Watt
	Check Price	Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 120 Watt.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon RX 570 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 960 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 570 — with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX 570 is 41 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960.
GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 570 — by 14 nm process technology.
Radeon RX 570 is 232 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 960.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 570 is 6993 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p	35−40	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
4K / 2160p	10−11	10−11
low / 720p	60−65	60−65
medium / 1080p	40−45	40−45
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	35−40	35−40
4K / 2160p	18−20	18−20
low / 720p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	60−65	60−65
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	250−260
medium / 768p	220−230	220−230
ultra / 1080p	180−190	180−190
QHD / 1440p	110−120	110−120
4K / 2160p	70−75	70−75
high / 768p	210−220	210−220
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	100−110
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
ultra / 1080p	40−45	40−45
QHD / 1440p	27−30	27−30
4K / 2160p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	80−85	80−85
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	27−30	27−30
4K / 2160p	27−30	27−30
low / 720p	180−190	180−190
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	30−35	30−35
4K / 2160p	24−27	24−27
low / 720p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	65−70	65−70
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p	140−150	140−150
medium / 768p	120−130	120−130
high / 1080p	70−75	70−75
ultra / 1080p	30−35	30−35
QHD / 1440p	21−24	21−24
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	20−22	20−22
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
low / 720p	65−70	65−70
medium / 1080p	30−35	30−35
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p	130−140	130−140
medium / 1080p	120−130	120−130
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
QHD / 1440p	10−11	10−11
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
low / 720p	65−70	65−70
medium / 1080p	35−40	35−40
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	130−140	130−140
medium / 768p	85−90	85−90
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
ultra / 1080p	24−27	24−27
4K / 2160p	16−18	16−18
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	50−55
high / 768p	60−65	60−65
GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon RX 570 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 960	Radeon RX 570
Architecture	Maxwell	Polaris
Code name	GM206	Polaris 20 Ellesmere
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	22 January 2015	18 April 2017
Pipelines	1024	2048
Core clock speed	1127 MHz	1168 MHz
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1244 MHz
Transistor count	2,940 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	72 billion/sec	159. 2
Floating-point performance	2,413 gflops	5,095 gflops
Length	9.5″ (24.1 cm)	241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	—	—
G-SYNC support	+
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1. 1.126	+
CUDA	+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)	0.27 kh/s
FreeSync		+
CUDA cores	1024
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376″ (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	4 displays
HDCP	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	318 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred)	0. 92 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	8 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)	141.47 Sol/s
GameStream	+
GeForce ShadowPlay	+
GPU Boost	2.0
GameWorks	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Similar compares

GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
GeForce GTX 960 vs Quadro K5200
Radeon RX 570 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Radeon RX 570 vs Quadro K5200
GeForce GTX 960 vs Quadro P3200
GeForce GTX 960 vs Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 570 vs Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 570 vs Quadro P3200

AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

log 01. 23:23:28

#0 checking url part for id 9873 +0s … 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6311 +0s … 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:27:11 +0200 +0s … 0s

#4 composed specs +0.086s … 0.086s

#5 did output specs +0s … 0.086s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.086s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.028s … 0.115s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.115s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.115s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s … 0.119s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.119s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.119s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9873 +0.002s … 0.121s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.121s

#15 got single benchmarks 9873 +0.007s … 0.128s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.132s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.134s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.134s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 6311 +0s … 0.134s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.135s

#21 got single benchmarks 6311 +0.007s … 0.142s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.142s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.142s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.142s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.143s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.143s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.144s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.144s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.144s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.145s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.145s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.146s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.146s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.146s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.147s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.147s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.147s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.147s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.147s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.148s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.148s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.149s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.149s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.149s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.15s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.15s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.15s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.151s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.151s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.152s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.152s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.153s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.153s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0. 001s … 0.154s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.155s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.156s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.156s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.156s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.157s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.157s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.157s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.158s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.158s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.158s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.159s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.159s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.16s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.16s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.16s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.162s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.162s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.163s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.163s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.164s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.164s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.165s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.165s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.166s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.166s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.166s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.167s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.167s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.167s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.168s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.168s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.169s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.169s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.17s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.17s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.17s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.171s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.171s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.172s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.172s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.173s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.173s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.173s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.173s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.174s

#102 min, max, avg, median took s +0s . .. 0.174s

#103 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.174s

#104 Got 491 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s … 0.191s

#105 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.191s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.191s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.191s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.191s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.191s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.191s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0. 192s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.192s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.192s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.192s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.192s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.193s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.193s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.193s

#201 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#202 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#208 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#211 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.193s

#215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#218 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#220 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#221 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#223 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#224 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#225 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#226 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#227 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#228 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.193s

#229 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#230 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#232 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#236 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#237 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#238 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#239 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#240 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#241 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#242 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.194s

#243 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#244 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#245 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#246 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#247 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#248 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#249 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#250 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#251 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#252 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#253 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#254 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#255 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#256 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.194s

#257 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#258 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#259 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#260 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#261 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#262 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#263 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#264 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#265 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#266 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#267 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#268 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#269 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#270 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.194s

#271 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#272 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#273 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#274 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#275 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#276 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#277 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#278 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#279 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#280 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#281 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#282 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#283 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#284 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.195s

#285 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#286 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#287 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#288 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#289 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#290 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#291 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#292 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#293 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#294 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#295 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#296 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#297 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#298 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.195s

#299 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#300 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#301 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#302 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#303 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#304 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#305 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#306 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#307 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#308 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#309 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#310 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#311 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#312 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.195s

#313 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#314 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#315 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#316 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#317 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#318 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#319 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#320 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#321 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#322 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#323 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#324 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#325 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#326 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.196s

#327 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#328 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#329 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#330 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#331 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#332 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#333 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#334 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#335 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#336 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#337 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#338 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#339 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#340 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.196s

#341 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#342 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#343 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#344 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#345 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#346 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#347 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#348 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#349 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#350 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#351 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#352 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#353 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#354 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.196s

#355 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#356 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#357 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#358 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#359 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#360 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#361 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#362 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#363 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#364 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#365 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#366 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#367 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#368 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.197s

#369 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#370 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#371 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#372 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#373 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#374 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#375 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#376 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#377 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#378 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#379 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#380 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#381 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#382 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.197s

#383 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#384 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#385 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#386 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#387 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#388 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#389 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#390 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#391 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#392 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#393 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#394 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#395 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#396 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.197s

#397 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#398 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#399 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#400 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#401 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#402 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#403 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#404 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#405 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#406 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#407 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#408 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#409 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#410 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.198s

#411 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#412 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#413 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#414 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#415 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#416 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#417 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#418 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#419 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#420 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#421 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#422 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#423 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#424 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.198s

#425 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#426 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#427 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#428 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#429 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#430 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#431 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#432 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#433 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#434 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#435 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#436 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#437 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#438 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.198s

#439 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#440 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#441 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#442 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#443 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#444 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#445 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#446 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#447 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#448 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#449 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#450 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#451 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#452 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.198s

#453 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#454 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#455 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#456 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#457 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#458 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#459 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#460 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#461 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#462 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#463 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#464 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#465 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#466 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.199s

#467 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#468 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#469 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#470 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#471 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#472 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#473 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#474 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#475 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#476 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#477 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#478 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#479 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#480 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.199s

#481 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#482 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#483 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#484 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#485 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#486 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#487 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#488 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#489 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#490 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#491 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#492 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#493 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#494 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.199s

#495 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#496 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#497 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#498 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#499 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#500 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#501 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#502 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#503 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#504 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#505 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#506 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s … 0.203s

#507 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.05s … 0.253s

#508 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.253s

#509 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.253s

#510 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.253s

#511 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.253s

#512 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.253s

#513 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.253s

#514 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.253s

#515 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.254s

#516 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.254s

#517 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.254s

#518 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.254s

#519 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.257s

#520 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.257s

#521 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.257s

#522 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.258s

#523 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.259s

#524 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.259s

#525 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.259s

#526 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.259s

#527 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.26s

#528 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.26s

#529 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.26s

#530 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.26s

#531 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.262s

#532 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#533 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#534 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#535 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.265s

#536 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#537 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.265s

#538 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#539 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.266s

#540 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#541 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#542 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#543 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s … 0.267s

#544 calculated avg scores. +0s … 0.267s

#545 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.047s … 0.314s

#546 return log +0.002s … 0.317s

FIFA 23 System Requirements — Can I Run It?

FIFA 23 recommended requirements

Memory: 12 GB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
CPU: Intel Core i7-6700
File Size: 100 GB
OS: Windows 10 64-bit

FIFA 23 minimum requirements

Memory: 8 GB
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon RX 570
CPU: Intel Core i5-6600K
File Size: 100 GB
OS: Windows 10 64-bit

Can you run it? Test your computer against FIFA 23 system requirements.

Can I Run It?
Test Your PC Automatically
Can I Run It?
Enter your system details

Can I Run FIFA 23?

The minimum memory requirement for EA SPORTS™ FIFA 23 is 8 GB of RAM installed in your computer. Additionally, the game developers recommend somewhere around 12 GB of RAM in your system. The cheapest graphics card you can play it on is an AMD Radeon RX 570. But, according to the developers the recommended graphics card is an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660. You will need at least 100 GB of free disk space to install EA SPORTS™ FIFA 23. An Intel Core i5-6600K CPU is required at a minimum to run EA SPORTS™ FIFA 23. However, the developers recommend a CPU greater or equal to an Intel Core i7-6700 to play the game.

FIFA 23 will run on PC system with Windows 10 64-bit and upwards.

Looking for an upgrade? Try our easy to use FIFA 23 set up guides to find the best, cheapest cards. Filter for FIFA 23 graphics card comparison and CPU compare. We’ll help you find the best deal for the right gear to run the game.

FIFA 23 System Requirements — Can You Run FIFA 23?

Download :	Via Steam
Developer :	EA Canada & EA Romania
Publisher :	Electronic Arts
Categories :	Sports Simulation
FIFA 23 Release Date :	29th of September 2022

FIFA 23 PC price today:

$69. 99

What is FIFA 23?

FIFA 23 brings The World’s Game to the pitch, with HyperMotion2 Technology that delivers even more gameplay realism, men’s and women’s FIFA World Cup™ coming during the season, women’s club teams, cross-play features*, and more.

Looking for ready made system? We have 182 laptop computers in our database that can run FIFA 23.
We take over 29 gaming laptops under $1000.

Check our full compare laptops chart for the right systems or these best deals we’ve picked out below.

Latest Posts

FPS monitor: how to track your PC game frame rate with an FPS counter

23rd of August 2022

class=»small-header»>

FIFA 23 System Requirements

GTA 5 System Requirements

Valorant System Requirements

Elden Ring System Requirements

Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered System Requirements

Call of Duty: Warzone System Requirements

Red Dead Redemption 2 System Requirements

Fortnite System Requirements

Genshin Impact System Requirements

Apex Legends System Requirements

CSGO System Requirements

Microsoft Flight Simulator System Requirements

Minecraft System Requirements

FIFA 22 System Requirements

Stray System Requirements

Fall Guys System Requirements

Tower of Fantasy System Requirements

Farthest Frontier System Requirements

Cult of the Lamb System Requirements

MultiVersus System Requirements
0022 39. 8 GPixel/s vs 36.1 GPixel/s

2x more VRAM?
4GB vs 2GB

87.1 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
159.2 GTexels/s vs 72.1 GTexels/s

224GB/s vs 112GB/s

128bit wider memory bus?
256bit vs 128bit

1024 more stream processors?
2048 vs 1024

66MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1244MHz vs 1178MHz

Supports 3D?
9W lower standby power consumption?
74W vs 83W

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Radeon RX 570

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

AMD Radeon RX 550

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

AMD Radeon RX 570

GIGABYTE RADEON RX 6500 XT Gaming OC

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1650

AMD Radeon RX 570

9000 AMD RADEN0003

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

AMD Radeon RX 570

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

AMD Radeon RX 570

AMD Radeon RX 6400

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 960

NVIDIA GEFORCE MX330

AMD Radeon RX 570 9000

NVIDIA RTXE RTOR NVIDIA RTOR0003

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

AMD Radeon Vega 8

AMD Radeon RX 570

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660 Super

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 960

NVIDIA GEFORCE MX1504

AMD Radeon RX 570

9000 NVIDI0003

Comparison prices

Users reviews

General rating

AMD Radeon RX 570

2 Reviews of users

AMD Radeon RX 570

8. 5

NVIDIA GTORCE User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

9.3 /10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.5 /10

2 Votes

8.3 /10

3 Votes

Games

8.5 /10

9000

8.5 /10

2 Votes

/10

3 VOTES

TARTHER IMPLY

7.5 /10

2 VOTES

8.0 /10 9000 9000 9000 VOTS

Reliability

8.5 /10

2 Votes

10.0 /10

3 Votes

1. TECH FRIENTS GP

1168MHZ

1127MHz

graphic processor (GP high clock frequency.

2.turbo GPU

1244MHz

1178MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

39. 8 GPixel/s

36.1 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

5 TFLOPS

2.31 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

159.2 GTexels/s

72.1 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1750MHz

1753MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

7000MHz

7012MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

224GB/s

112GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4. memory bus width

256bit

128bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5. GDDR memory versions

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔AMD Radeon RX 570

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5.GPU Temperature at Boot

Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX 570

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to an attached display.

2. HDMI connectors

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

3rd HDMI version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 570)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price match

Cancel

Which graphic cards are better?

Comparison of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 570

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX 570

Newer graphics card, release dates 2 year(s) 2 month(s) % difference in core mode
9021 more: 1206-1244 MHz vs 1178 MHz

2211. 5 times more texture speed: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 72 billion / sec

2 times more shader processors: 2048 vs 1024 914 nm vs 28 nm a) more: 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s

About 16% more performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 6967 vs 6032

About 96% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 40810 vs 20858

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 43% faster performance: 105.688 vs 73.733

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 37% faster: 1083.926 vs 792.44

About 69% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) benchmark: 8.251 vs 4.888

2.2x more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark :79.029 vs 35.338

2.6 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 200.825

About 27% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark : 9172 vs 7218

Approximately 27% increase in GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) performance: 9172 vs 7218

Approximately 68% increase in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score performance: 3841 vs 2293

Production date 18 April 2017 vs 22 January 2015

Boost core clock 1206-1244 MHz vs 1178 MHz

Texturing speed 159.23 GTexel/s vs 72 billion / sec

Number of shader processors 2048 vs 1024

Process 14 nm vs 28 nm

Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 2 GB

Memory frequency 7000 MHz vs 7. 0 GB/s

PassMark — G3D Mark 6967 vs 6032

Geekbench — OpenCL 40810 vs 20858

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.688 vs 73.733

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1083.926 vs 792.44

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.251 vs 4.888

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.029 vs 35.338

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 520. 089 vs 200.825

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9172 vs 7218

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 3335

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9172 vs 7218

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 3335

3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 3841 vs 2293

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

About 22% more core clock: 1127 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz

473.1 times greater floating point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs

Approx. 25% less power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt

Approx. 8% PassMark — G2D Mark performance more: 673 vs 626

About 2% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 3691 vs 3624

About 2% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 3691 vs 3624

Core clock 1127 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz

Floating point performance 2.413 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs

Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt vs 150 Watt

PassMark — G2D Mark 673 vs 626

GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3691 vs 3624

GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3691 vs 3624

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark — G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

PassMark — G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

Geekbench — OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

105.688

73.733

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1083.926

792.44

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

79.029

35.338

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

520.089

200.825

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

Name AMD Radeon RX 570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark — G3D Mark 6967 6032

PassMark — G2D Mark 626 673

Geekbench — OpenCL 40810 20858

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.688 73.733

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1083.926 792.44

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.251 4.888

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.029 35.338

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 520.089 200.825

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9172 7218

GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3624 3691

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3346 3335

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9172 7218

GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3624 3691

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3346 3335

3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 3841 2293

Feature comparison

AMD Radeon RX 570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Architecture GCN 4. 0 Maxwell 2.0

Codename Polaris 20 GM206

Design Radeon RX 500 Series

Generation GCN 4th Gen

Issue date April 18, 2017 22 January 2015

Price at first issue date $169 $199

Place in the rating 263 374

Price now $149. 99 $229.99

Type Desktop, Laptop Desktop

Price/performance ratio (0-100) 59.00 34.63

Boost core clock 1206-1244 MHz 1178 MHz

Core clock 926-1168 MHz 1127 MHz

Floating point performance 5.1 TFLOPs 2.413 gflops

Process 14nm 28nm

Number of shaders 2048 1024

Pixel fill rate 39. 81GP/s

Render output units 32

Stream Processors 2048

Texturing speed 159.23 GTexel/s 72 billion / sec

Texture Units 128

Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 120 Watt

Number of transistors 5,700 million 2,940 million

Number of CUDA conveyors 1024

Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2. 0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

DisplayPort support

Dual-link DVI support

HDMI

VGA

Audio input for HDMI Internal

HDCP

Maximum resolution VGA 2048×1536

Multi-monitor support

CrossFire without bridge

Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

Length 241 mm 9.5″ (24.1 cm)

Recommended power supply 450 Watt 400 Watt

Additional power connectors 1x 6-pin 1x 6-pins

Tire PCI Express 3.0

Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm)

SLI support 2x

DirectX 12. 0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_1)

OpenCL 2.0

OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Vulcan

Maximum memory size 8GB 2GB

Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 112GB/s

Memory bus width 256bit 128 Bit

Memory frequency 7000MHz 7. 0 GB/s

Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Shared memory 0

4K h364 Decode

4K h364 Encode

AMD Eyefinity

AMD Radeon™ Chill

AMD Radeon™ ReLive

CrossFire

FreeSync

h365/HEVC Decode

h365/HEVC Encode

HDMI 4K Support

PowerTune

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)

Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)

CUDA

GameStream

GameWorks

GeForce ShadowPlay

GPU Boost

Compare AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 570

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX 570

Newer graphics card, release date difference 1 year(s) 4 month(s)

texture times( ) more: 159. 23 GTexel/s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
2x more shader processors: 2048 vs 1024

28 nm

Maximum memory size is 2x larger: 8 GB vs 4 GB

Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 38% more: 105.688 vs 76.687

Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 22% more: 1083.926 vs 890.785

CompuBench 1.5 performance Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.8 times more: 79.029 vs 28.659

Issue date 18 April 2017 vs 26 November 2015

Boost core clock 1206-1244 MHz vs 1201 MHz

Texturing speed 159.23 GTexel/s vs 76.86 GTexel/s

Number of shader processors 2048 vs 1024

Process 14 nm vs 28 nm

Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.688 vs 76.687

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1083.926 vs 890.785

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.029 vs 28.659

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

About 27% faster core clock: 1176 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz

482.4 times faster floating point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs

5 Core clock
5
1176 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz

Floating point performance 2,460 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs

Memory frequency 7012 MHz vs 7000 MHz

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

105.688

76.687

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1083.926

890.785

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

79. 029

28.659

Name AMD Radeon RX 570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

PassMark — G3D Mark 6967

PassMark — G2D Mark 626

Geekbench — OpenCL 40810

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.688 76.687

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1083.926 890.785

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.251

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.029 28.659

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 520.089

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9172

GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3624

GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3346

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9172

GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3624

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3346

3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 3841

Feature comparison

AMD Radeon RX 570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

Architecture GCN 4. 0 Maxwell 2.0

Codename Polaris 20 GM206

Design Radeon RX 500 Series

Generation GCN 4th Gen

Issue date April 18, 2017 November 26, 2015

Price at first issue date $169

Place in the rating 263 677

Price now $149. 99

Type Desktop, Laptop Desktop

Price/performance ratio (0-100) 59.00

Boost core clock 1206-1244 MHz 1201 MHz

Core clock 926-1168 MHz 1176 MHz

Floating point performance 5.1 TFLOPs 2.460 gflops

Process 14nm 28nm

Number of shaders 2048 1024

Pixel fill rate 39. 81 GP/s

Render output units 32

Stream Processors 2048

Texturing speed 159.23 GTexel/s 76.86 GTexel/s

Texture Units 128

Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt

Number of transistors 5,700 million 2,940 million

Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort No outputs

DisplayPort support

Dual-link DVI support

HDMI

VGA

CrossFire without bridge

Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

Length 241 mm

Recommended power supply 450 Watt

Additional power connectors 1x 6-pin None

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_1)

OpenCL 2.0

OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Vulcan

Maximum memory size 8GB 4GB

Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 112. 2 GB/s

Memory bus width 256bit 128 Bit

Memory frequency 7000MHz 7012MHz

Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

4K h364 Decode

4K h364 Encode

AMD Eyefinity

AMD Radeon™ Chill

AMD Radeon™ ReLive

CrossFire

FreeSync

h365/HEVC Decode

h365/HEVC Encode

HDMI 4K Support

PowerTune

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)

Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)

Comparison AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 which is better?

General information

Price-quality ratio

The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

59.2%

8% (15.6%) better than
51.2%

Architecture

GCN 4.0 Maxwell 2.0

Codename

Polaris 20 GM206

Type

Desktop Desktop

Release price

$169

-30 $ (-15.1%) better than
199 $

Number of shaders

2048

1024 (100%) better than
1024

Core clock

1168MHz

41 MHz (3.6%) better than
1127 MHz

Boost frequency

1244 MHz

At 66 MHz (5. 6%) better than
1178 MHz

Number of transistors

5.700 million 2.940 million

Process

14 nm

-14 nm (-50%) better than
28 nm

Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

Power Demand (TDP)

Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

120W 120 W

Length

241 mm 24.1 cm

Additional power connectors

1x 6-pin 1x 6-pin

G-SYNC Ready

NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts.

SLI support

n/a +

3D Vision

n/a +

GPU Boost

n/a +

GeForce Experience

n/a +

Vulkan

NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs).
It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.

+ +

CUDA

The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for
parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.

Surround

n/a +

Adaptive Vertical Sync

n/a +

Recommended power supply

n/a 400 Watt

Multi-monitor support

n/a 4

Decred / DCR (Decred)

n/a 0. 92 Gh/s

Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)

n/a 1 Sol/s

Tire

n/a PCI Express 3.0

Number of CUDA cores

A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing,
especially affect anti-aliasing and lighting in games, the speed of training neural networks.

n/a 1024

Height

n/a 11.1 cm

HDCP

n/a +

Maximum resolution via VGA

n/a 2048×1536

Audio input for HDMI

n/a internal

GameStream

n/a +

GeForce ShadowPlay

GameWorks

FreeSync

+ n/a

DisplayPort 1. 3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready

+ n/a

Video connectors

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2

DirectX

12 (12_0) 12 (12_1)

Floating point performance

5.095 gflops 2.413 gflops

Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)

n/a 8 Mh/s

Memory

Memory type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Maximum memory

Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures,
use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.

8 GB

4 GB (100%) better than
4 GB

Memory bus width

The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.

256 bit

128 bit (100%) better than
128 bit

Shared memory

— —

Memory frequency

A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.

7000 MHz

At 6993 MHz (99900%) better than
7 MHz

Memory bandwidth

The greater the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.

224

112 (100%) better than
112

GeForce GTX 960 test and comparison

Tuesday, 15 September 2015

1

2

3

4

5

(3 votes)

Video cards

Author

Alexander

The transition to the Maxwell architecture has ensured the success of the latest series of GeForce graphics cards. The reorganization of computing units and the focus on energy efficiency has improved all the characteristics of new graphics accelerators, the heart of which is Maxwell processors. In the desktop segment, the pioneer was the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Some time later, the second generation of the architecture arrived in the form of the GM204 GPU. Based on it, the GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce GTX 9 were released80. For mid-range solutions, the GM206 processor was developed, on which the GeForce GTX 960 is based.

According to the numbering, the GeForce GTX 960 is a replacement for the GeForce GTX 760, which is based on the Kepler architecture GK104 processor. Both GPUs have computing units organized into large graphics clusters. The GM206 has two Graphics Processing Clusters (GPCs). Each GPC contains four SMMs.

Blocks within the SMM are organized into four computing arrays. The minimum computing unit is the CUDA core stream processor. There are only 128 of them in SMM, which gives a total of 1024 streaming cores for the entire GM206 GPU. Each of the four arrays inside the SMM has its own schedulers and control logic. SMM operates 8 texture units with a dedicated texture cache. Shared L1 cache for one SMM 96 KB. there is a Polymorph Engine geometry processing block with a special tesselator block.

With 1024 stream cores, there are 64 more TMUs and 32 ROPs. The total L2 cache is 1 MB, which is quite a lot. Once upon a time, the top-end GeForce GTX 980 on the GK104 boasted a 512 KB L2 cache.

128-bit memory bus, which is smaller than its predecessors. But this is compensated by a new color coding algorithm, which allows more data to be transmitted with one bus bandwidth. Under certain conditions, this advantage can reach a peak value of 33%. Increasing the cache further reduces the number of external memory accesses.

Memory size has not changed. Old and new NVIDIA graphics cards in this price range are equipped with two gigabytes of GDDR5. Some manufacturers are releasing the GeForce GTX 960 with 4 GB.

The processor is manufactured using the same 28nm process technology as older GeForce models. But thanks to the progressive architecture of the GeForce GTX 960, it consumes less power and heats up less. The official TDP level is 120W versus 170W for the GeForce GTX 760. This means that the GeForce GTX 960 is easier to cool and the graphics cards will be quieter.

GeForce GTX 960 standard frequency formula is 1126/1178/7012 MHz, where 1126 MHz is the base GPU frequency, 1178 MHz is the Boost Clock, and 7012 MHz is the effective GDDR5 memory frequency. The GM206 processor supports GPU Boost technology, which strikes a balance between performance, power and heat. The base value is fixed and guaranteed for any of the heaviest 3D modes. But the processor can accelerate to a certain level if the power consumption level or temperature limit is not reached. When the limits are reached, the frequency gradually decreases, but not below the base level. The official value of Boost Clock is a certain average value of Boost. The video adapter can operate at higher frequencies. In the case of modern Maxwell-based GeForces, this is true in almost all cases. GeForce GTX 960 with a base frequency of 1126 MHz can operate at frequencies up to 1178 MHz, maintaining this level in almost all gaming applications.

The second generation of Maxwell processors has extensive support for DirectX 12 at Feature Level 12.1. Older graphics cards have a lower level of support for the new DirectX, including competitive models from AMD. DirectX 12 makes better use of computing resources, allowing you to increase performance. The update will also bring new graphics features.

Maxwell supports the advanced Voxel Global Illumination (VXGI) lighting method, which takes into account many scattering parameters and the effect of reflected light on objects, taking into account dynamic parameters.

The GeForce GTX 960 supports the new MFAA method, which uses MSAA algorithms but is faster. More aggressive anti-aliasing TXAA, which gives the best quality anti-aliasing, is also on the list of features.

The NVIDIA Control Panel has recently expanded its software functionality with the addition of image scaling using Dynamic Super Resolution (DSR) technology. With this technology, ultra-high resolutions can be used on lower resolution monitors. In some modern games, this feature is implemented at the level of basic settings. And, as our study of the GTA 5 settings showed, such scaling raises the clarity of detail quite well.

The GeForce GTX 960 will provide full support for NVIDIA GameWorks graphics technologies, including PhysX effects. Among the new directions, it is worth noting HairWorks, thanks to which we could observe the magnificent fur of animals from Far Cry 4 and the magnificent dynamic hair of Geralt in Witcher 3. But you should understand that the level of video card performance for such modes may not be enough.

The standard (reference) version is produced in the familiar style — with a black «turbine» on a short circuit board. A similar design was the GeForce GTX 760.

Sales are dominated by non-reference models that offer improved cooling and higher operating frequencies.

We will try to abstract away from specific models and make a general performance comparison, adjusting the frequencies of all participants to the standard level. The ultimate goal is to get the most complete picture of the performance balance between next-tier models, direct competitors, and GeForce GTX 9 predecessors.60. At the same time, we will compare all the participants during overclocking in order to assess their additional potential.

Test participants

The total list of test participants is as follows:

GeForce GTX 960 2GB

GeForce GTX 770 2GB

GeForce GTX 760 2GB

Radeon R9 280X 3GB

Radeon HD 7970 3GB

Radeon R9 380 2GB

Radeon R9 285 2GB

Radeon R9270X 2GB

All specifications are shown in the table below. For GeForce, the official frequency level is indicated (Base and Boost Clock). The real value of the maximum Boost is reflected in the final diagrams. To offset small differences in frequencies due to the BIOS of different models, the GPU frequency of our GTX 960 instance was adjusted to a value of 1270 MHz. The predecessor GeForce GTX 760 has also slightly lowered the Boost frequency relative to the maximum — to the level of 1110 MHz.

GeForce GTX 770

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 760

Radeon R9 280X

Radeon HD 7970

Radeon R9 380

Radeon R9 285

Radeon R9 270X

GPU codename

GK104

GM206

GK104

Tahiti

Tahiti

Antigua

Tonga

Curacao

Number of transistors, million

3500

2940

3500

4313

4313

5000

5000

2800

Technical process, nm

28

28

28

28

28

28

28

28

Core area, sq. mm

294

228

294

352

352

366

366

212

Number of stream processors

1536

1024

1152

2048

2048

1792

1792

1280

Number of texture units

128

64

96

128

128

112

112

80

Number of ROPs

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

Core frequency, MHz

1045/1085

1126/1178

980/1033

1000

925

970

918

1050

Memory bus bit

256

128

256

384

384

256

256

256

Memory type

GDDR5

GDDR5

GDDR5

GDDR5

GDDR5

GDDR5

GDDR5

GDDR5

Effective memory frequency, MHz

7010

7012

6008

6000

5500

5500

5500

5600

Memory size, MB

2048

2048

2048

3072

3072

2048

2048

2048

Interface

PCI-E 3. 0

PCI-E 3.0

PCI-E 3.0

PCI-E 3.0

PCI-E 3.0

PCI-E 3.0

PCI-E 3.0

PCI-E 3.0

TDP level, W

230

120

170

250

250

190

190

180

All participants additionally tested under overclocking, which was carried out using MSI Afterburner. For video adapters that support a software increase in operating voltage, this auxiliary measure was also activated.

Below are the final frequencies, including the maximum Boost for GeForce:

GeForce GTX 960 2GB 1352-1516/8074MHz

GeForce GTX 770 2GB 1187-1306/7806MHz

GeForce GTX 760 2GB 1107-1228/7438MHz

Radeon R9 280X 3GB 1175/7200 MHz

Radeon R9 380 2GB 1090/6120 MHz

Radeon R9 270X 2GB 1235/5820MHz

Radeon HD 7970 and Radeon R9 280X are in fact the same video card at different frequencies.

Gtx 960 vs rx 570: AMD Radeon RX 570 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 960: What is the difference?

AMD Radeon RX 570 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 960: What is the difference?

Why is AMD Radeon RX 570 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 960?

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 better than AMD Radeon RX 570?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Features

Performance

Memory

Features

Ports

Price comparison

Which are the best graphics cards?

Radeon RX 570 vs GeForce GTX 960

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 570

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 960

HWBench recommends Radeon RX 570

Core Configuration

Memory Configuration

Additional details

Nvidia GTX 960 Vs AMD RX 570: Which One to Buy?

GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon RX 570 Graphics cards Comparison

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares

AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

FIFA 23 System Requirements — Can I Run It?

FIFA 23 minimum requirements

Can I Run FIFA 23?

Download

Developer

Publisher

Categories

FIFA 23 PC price today:

What is FIFA 23?

Latest Posts

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Comparison prices

Users reviews

General rating

Features

Memory

Functions

Ports

Price match

Which graphic cards are better?

Comparison of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX 570

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Benchmark comparison

Feature comparison

Compare AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX 570

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

Benchmark comparison

Feature comparison

Comparison AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 which is better?

GeForce GTX 960 test and comparison