Gtx 980 vs 1650 super: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980 Graphics cards Comparison

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980 Graphics cards Comparison

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Check Price

GeForce GTX 980

Check Price

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 980
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 165 Watt
Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 2x 6-pins
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Recommended system power (PSU) 500 Watt
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • GeForce GTX 980 has 65% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 980 — with Maxwell.
  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 980 — by 28 nm process technology.
  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 219 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 980.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 11993 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 980.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 50−55 55−60
ultra / 1080p 30−35 35−40
QHD / 1440p 27−30 30−35
4K / 2160p 14−16 18−20
low / 720p 75−80 80−85
medium / 1080p 60−65 65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p 80−85 85−90
ultra / 1080p 70−75 75−80
QHD / 1440p 55−60 60−65
4K / 2160p 27−30 30−35
low / 720p 130−140 140−150
medium / 1080p 90−95 95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p 45−50 45−50
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 250−260 250−260
medium / 768p 230−240 230−240
QHD / 1440p 150−160 150−160
4K / 2160p 100−110 100−110
high / 768p 220−230 220−230
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p 70−75 70−75
medium / 1080p 50−55 50−55
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
ultra / 1080p 110−120 110−120
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p 65−70 70−75
ultra / 1080p 60−65 65−70
QHD / 1440p 40−45 45−50
4K / 2160p 21−24 24−27
low / 720p 100−110 100−110
medium / 1080p 65−70 75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Far Cry 5 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p 90−95 100−110
ultra / 1080p 70−75 80−85
QHD / 1440p 45−50 50−55
4K / 2160p 21−24 21−24
low / 720p 220−230 230−240
medium / 1080p 140−150 150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p 85−90 95−100
ultra / 1080p 65−70 75−80
QHD / 1440p 50−55 55−60
4K / 2160p 30−35 35−40
low / 720p 130−140 140−150
medium / 1080p 90−95 100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p 160−170 160−170
medium / 768p 150−160 150−160
high / 1080p 95−100 100−110
ultra / 1080p 45−50 55−60
QHD / 1440p 40−45 45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p 35−40 40−45
ultra / 1080p 30−35 35−40
QHD / 1440p 24−27 27−30
4K / 2160p 14−16 16−18
low / 720p 95−100 100−110
medium / 1080p 50−55 60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p 75−80 90−95
ultra / 1080p 55−60 65−70
4K / 2160p 18−20 18−20
low / 720p 120−130 130−140
medium / 1080p 85−90 100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p 35−40 40−45
ultra / 1080p 24−27 27−30
QHD / 1440p 16−18 21−24
4K / 2160p 10−12 14−16
low / 720p 95−100 100−110
medium / 1080p 55−60 60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p 190−200 210−220
medium / 768p 120−130 140−150
high / 1080p 70−75 80−85
ultra / 1080p 40−45 45−50
4K / 2160p 24−27 30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p 120−130 140−150
ultra / 1080p 65−70 70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 980
Architecture Turing Maxwell
Code name TU116 GM204
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 22 November 2019 19 September 2014
Pipelines 1280 2048
Boost Clock 1725 MHz 1216 MHz
Transistor count 6,600 million 5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 138.0 144 billion/sec
Floating-point performance 4,981 gflops
Length 229 mm 10. 5″ (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 224 GB/s
Shared memory
G-SYNC support + +
VR Ready +
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
CUDA 7.5 +
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0. 54 kh/s
G-SYNC +
Multi Monitor +
CUDA cores 2048
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm)
SLI options +
Multi monitor support 4 displays
HDMI +
HDCP +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 579 Mh/s
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support +
H. 264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder +
Optimus +
Decred / DCR (Decred) 1.74 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 20.28 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 312.12 Sol/s
GameStream +
GeForce ShadowPlay +
GPU Boost 2.0
GameWorks +
BatteryBoost +
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro T1000 mobile
  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon Pro SSG
  • GeForce GTX 980 vs Quadro T1000 mobile
  • GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro SSG

Asus GeForce GTX 980 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super: What is the difference?

42points

Asus GeForce GTX 980

50points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

vs

54 facts in comparison

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Why is Asus GeForce GTX 980 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super?

  • 16. 9 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    72.1 GPixel/svs55.2 GPixel/s
  • 253MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1753MHzvs1500MHz
  • 32GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    224GB/svs192GB/s
  • 128bit wider memory bus width?
    256bitvs128bit
  • 768 more shading units?
    2048vs1280
  • 48 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
    128vs80
  • 32 more render output units (ROPs)?
    64vs32
  • 2 more DisplayPort outputs?
    3vs1

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super better than Asus GeForce GTX 980?

  • 403MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1530MHzvs1127MHz
  • 65W lower TDP?
    100Wvs165W
  • 4990MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    12000MHzvs7010MHz
  • 509MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1725MHzvs1216MHz
  • 1400million more transistors?
    6600 millionvs5200 million
  • 16nm smaller semiconductor size?
    12nmvs28nm
  • 1 higher version of GDDR memory?
    6vs5
  • 108mm narrower?
    160mmvs268mm

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Asus GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX350

Asus GeForce GTX 980

vs

MSI Radeon RX 570 Gaming

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Asus GeForce GTX 980

vs

Intel Arc A380

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Asus GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Asus GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Asus GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX150

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

Asus GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Asus GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Asus GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia Quadro GV100

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Asus GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Asus GeForce GTX 980

0 User reviews

Asus GeForce GTX 980

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

2 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

10.0/10

2 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

2 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

 

9.5/10

2 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

 

9.5/10

2 votes

Fan noise

No reviews yet

 

9.0/10

2 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

2 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1127MHz

1530MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1216MHz

1725MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3. pixel rate

72.1 GPixel/s

55.2 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

4.62 TFLOPS

4.42 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

144 GTexels/s

138 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1753MHz

1500MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

7010MHz

12000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

224GB/s

192GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

128bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980


GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980


  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
7% higher gaming performance.
65 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 980 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 980
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (9 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 980
GPU Name TU116 () vs GM204 (GM204-400-A1)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 284 mm² vs 398 mm²
Transistors 6,600 million vs 5,200 million
Shaders 1280 vs 2048
Compute Units 20 vs 16
Core clock 1530 MHz vs 1127 MHz
ROPs 32 vs 64
TMUs 80 vs 128

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 980
Memory Type GDDR6 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 128 bit vs 256 bit
Memory Speed 1500 MHz

12000 MHz effective
vs 1753 MHz

7012 MHz effective
Memory Size 4096 Mb vs 4096 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 980
TDP 100 watts vs 165 watts
Release Date 22 Nov 2019 vs 19 Sep 2014

GigaPixels — higher is better

GigaTexels — higher is better

GB/s — higher is better

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Radeon RX 580
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1060
VS
GeForce GTX 980 Radeon RX 580
VS
GeForce GTX 980 GeForce GTX 1060
VS
Radeon RX 5500 GeForce GTX 1660
VS
GeForce GTX 1660 Radeon R9 Nano

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Availability

MSRP in USD: $649

EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB K|NGP|N w/ACX 2.0+ (72%+ ASIC), Whisper Silent w/ Multi-Color LED Cooler, Customized Overclocking Graphics Card 06G-P4-5998-KR

Buy on Amazon

$828.97

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 93 minutes ago

Availability

MSRP in USD: $159

Gigabyte Gv-N165SWF2OC-4GD GeForce GTX 1650 Super Windforce OC 4G Graphics Card, 2X Windforce Fans, 4GB 128-Bit GDDR6, Video Card

Buy on Amazon

$394.99

In Stock


1725 1755 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 93 minutes agoASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 Super Overclocked 4GB Edition HDMI DP DVI Gaming Graphics Card (TUF-GTX1650S-O4G-GAMING)

Buy on Amazon

$443.49

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 93 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 980 Ti outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 980 Ti is 1634 days older than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

  • Up to 52% cheaper than GeForce GTX 980 Ti — $394.99 vs $828.97

  • Up to 37% better value when playing VALORANT than GeForce GTX 980 Ti — $1.61 vs $2.54 per FPS

  • Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — 100 vs 250 Watts

VALORANT

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2015


FPS

327

100%

Value, $/FPS

$2.54/FPS

42%

Price, $

$828.97

47%

FPS Winner

EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB K|NGP|N w/ACX 2.0+ (72%+ ASIC), Whisper Silent w/ Multi-Color LED Cooler, Customized Overclocking Graphics Card 06G-P4-5998-KR

Buy for $828. 97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 93 minutes ago

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019


FPS

245

67%

Value, $/FPS

$1.61/FPS

100%

Price, $

$394.99

100%

Value Winner

Gigabyte Gv-N165SWF2OC-4GD GeForce GTX 1650 Super Windforce OC 4G Graphics Card, 2X Windforce Fans, 4GB 128-Bit GDDR6, Video Card

Buy for $394.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 93 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2015

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019

729

FPS

548

FPS

League of Legends

173

FPS

130

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

327

FPS

245

FPS

VALORANT

200

FPS

151

FPS

Apex Legends

187

FPS

140

FPS

Fortnite

Theoretical Performance

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2015


Pixel Fillrate

103. 3 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

189.4 GTexel/s

100%

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

55.2 GPixel/s

13%

Texel Fillrate

138 GTexel/s

63%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Jun 2nd, 2015 Release Date

Nov 22nd, 2019

GeForce 900 Generation GeForce 16
$649 MSRP

$159

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort Outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin Power Connectors 1x 6-pin

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

6 GB

Memory 4 GB
GDDR5 Type GDDR6
384-bit Bus 128-bit

336. 6 GB/s

Bandwidth 192 GB/s
1000 MHz Base Clock Speed

1530 MHz

1076 MHz Boost Clock Speed

1725 MHz

1753 MHz

Memory Clock Speed 1500 MHz

Builds Using GeForce GTX 980 Ti or GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VALORANT, 1080p, High

iBUYPOWER SlateMR 500AD Gaming Desktop PC

234 FPS

$2.56/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-11400F

8 GB, 500 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$599

In Stock

Updated 78 minutes ago

Skytech Chronos Mini Gaming PC

177 FPS

$3.35/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Ryzen 3 3100

8 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$592.32

In Stock

Updated 85 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

168 FPS

$3.65/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i3-10100

8 GB, 256 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$613. 95

In Stock

Updated 86 minutes ago

SkyTech Blaze II Gaming Computer PC

169 FPS

$3.96/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i3-10100F

8 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$669.75

In Stock

Updated 86 minutes ago

SkyTech Blaze II Gaming Computer PC

198 FPS

$4.04/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$799.99

In Stock

Updated 84 minutes ago

Allied Gaming Stinger Desktop PC

179 FPS

$4.74/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-10400F

8 GB, 240 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$849

In Stock

Updated 82 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

179 FPS

$4.78/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-10400F

20 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$855

In Stock

Updated 76 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

179 FPS

$4. 92/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-10400F

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$879.99

In Stock

Updated 78 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

179 FPS

$5.02/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-10400F

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$899

In Stock

Updated 78 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

179 FPS

$5.58/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-10400F

32 GB, 2 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$999

In Stock

Updated 85340 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

$828.97

Radeon R9 290X

N/A Stock

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

$844.99

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

$828.97

GeForce RTX 3050

$280.25

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

$828. 97

GeForce RTX 3060

$389.99

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

$828.97

Radeon RX 6600

$249.99

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

$828.97

Radeon RX 580

$197.49

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

$394.99

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

$218.99

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

$394.99

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

$709.99

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

$394.99

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

$369.99

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

$394.99

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650








Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2048 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,2 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 896 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,7 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q3 2014

Q2 2019
Model number

GM204-400-A1

TU117-300-A1
GPU name

GM204

TU117
Architecture

Maxwell 2. 0

Turing
Generation

GeForce 900

GeForce 16
Lithography

28 nm

12 nm
Transistors

5.200.000.000

4.700.000.000
Bus interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock

1,13 GHz

1,49 GHz
GPU boost clock

1,22 GHz

1,67 GHz
Memory frequency

1.753 MHz

2.001 MHz
Effective memory speed

7 GB/s

8 GB/s
Memory size

4 GB

4 GB
Memory type

GDDR5

GDDR5
Memory bus

256 Bit

128 Bit
Memory bandwidth

224,4 GB/s

128,1 GB/s
TDP

165 W

75 W
Suggested PSU 500W ATX Power Supply 300W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology

4-way SLI


Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI
3x DisplayPort

1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort


Maximum GPU Temperature

98°C

94°C
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

16

14
Shading units (cuda cores)

2. 048

896
TMUs

128

56
ROPs

64

32
Cache memory

2 MB

1 MB
Pixel fillrate

77,8 GP/s

53,3 GP/s
Texture fillrate

155,6 GT/s

93,2 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)

5,0 TFLOPS

3,0 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

155,6 GFLOPS

93,2 GFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

4.984
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

2.984

The difference is 67%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 980 TiNvidia GeForce GTX 980MNvidia GeForce GTX 980MX

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Max-QNvidia GeForce GTX 1650 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SuperNvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-QNvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 1650 TU106Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1650 AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 980 GPU Comparison

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 209

$ 331. 91
significantly less expensive

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

38 %

5%
slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

47 FPS

2 FPS
slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

44 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

29 FPS

38 FPS

9 FPS
significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

34 FPS

1 FPS
slightly higher City frame rate

33 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

22 FPS

31 FPS

10 FPS
significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce GTX 980? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Geekbench (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

40,258

34%
slightly higher Geekbench (CUDA) score

29,848

Geekbench (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38,315

14%
slightly higher Geekbench (OpenCL) score

33,463

Geekbench (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35,907

41,306

15%
slightly higher Geekbench (Vulkan) score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

4,376

20%
slightly higher 3DMark Graphics score

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1,485 MHz

31%
slightly higher core clock speed

1,126 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1,665 MHz

36%
slightly higher boost clock speed

1,216 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100%
significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128 GB/s

224 GB/s

75%
significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

120%
significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53 Gigapixels/s

78 Gigapixels/s

46%
significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93 Gigatexels/s

156 Gigatexels/s

66%
significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3 TFLOPS

5 TFLOPS

66%
significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2,048

128%
significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

128

128%
significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

64

100%
significantly more render output processors

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

103rd
of 526

95th
of 526

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

April 2019

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12. 0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5


GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 980 benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 980 graphics card is better than the GeForce GTX 1650 in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Memory size doesn’t directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 980 at 165 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 980 is faster than the GeForce GTX 1650.

Latest posts

How to choose a power supply for your gaming PC: wattage and efficiencyJuly 11, 2022

How to compare GPUs and GPUs: find the best components for gamingJuly 02, 2022

Best PC benchmarking tools 2022: how to performance test your gaming PCJuly 02, 2022

Popular GPU Comparisons

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3060

Radeon RX 570 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

0023 55. 2 GPixel/s

  • 253MHz faster memory speed?
    1753MHz vs 1500MHz
  • 32GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    224GB/s vs 192GB/s
  • 128bit wider memory bus?
    256bit vs 128bit
  • 768 more stream processors?
    2048 vs 1280
  • 48 more texture units (TMUs)?
    128 vs 80
  • 32 more ROPs?
    64 vs 32
  • 2 more DisplayPort outputs?
    3 vs 1
  • Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super better than Asus GeForce GTX 980?

    • GPU frequency 403MHz higher?
      1530MHz vs 1127MHz
    • 65W below TDP?
      100W vs 165W
    • 4990MHz higher effective clock speed?
      12000MHz vs 7010MHz
    • 509MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
      1725MHz vs 1216MHz
    • 1400million more transistors?
      6600 million vs 5200 million
    • Are 16nm semiconductors smaller?
      12nm vs 28nm
    • 1 later versions of GDDR memory?
      6 vs 5
    • 108mm narrower?
      160mm vs 268mm

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    Asus GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX350

    Asus GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    MSI Radeon RX 570 Gaming

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

    Asus GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Intel Arc A380

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

    Asus GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

    Asus GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 20003

    Asus GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX150

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

    Asus GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Asus GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super0003

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Asus GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia Quadro GV100

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

    Asus GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

    Price Comparison

    User Reviews

    10. 0 /10

    2 VOTES

    Games

    Reviews not yet

    9.5 /10

    2 VOTES

    performance

    9000 9000 9000 9000 /10000 2 VOTES

    Fan noise

    reviews yet there are no

    /10

    2 Votes

    Reliability

    reviews yet there are no

    004

    10.0 /10

    2 votes

    Performance

    1.GPU Clock Speed ​​

    1127MHz

    1530MHz

    1530MHz

    GPU has higher clock speed.

    2.turbo GPU

    1216MHz

    1725MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel speed

    72.1 GPixel/s

    55.2 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4. flops

    4.62 TFLOPS

    4.42 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    144 GTexels/s

    138 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1753MHz

    1500MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    7010MHz

    12000MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    224GB/s

    192GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    256bit

    128bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5. GDDR memory versions

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6.Supports memory troubleshooting code

    ✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5. GPU temperature at boot

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

    Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7.Supports 3D

    ✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

    More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    3rd HDMI version

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

    HDMI 2.0

    New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

    Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

    Price Match

    Cancel

    Which graphics cards are better?

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980: What is the difference?

    50 points

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    47 points

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    54 facts in comparison

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 980?

    • GPU frequency 404MHz higher?
      1530MHz vs 1126MHz
    • 65W below TDP?
      100W vs 165W
    • 4988MHz higher effective clock speed?
      12000MHz vs 7012MHz
    • 509MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
      1725MHz vs 1216MHz
    • 1400million more transistors?
      6600 million vs 5200 million
    • 12°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
      69°C vs 81°C
    • Semiconductor size 16nm smaller?
      12nm vs 28nm
    • 1 later versions of GDDR memory?
      6 vs 5

    Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super?

    • 16. 9 GPixel/s higher pixel speed?
      72.1 GPixel/s vs 55.2 GPixel/s
    • 253MHz faster memory speed?
      1753MHz vs 1500MHz
    • 32GB/s more memory bandwidth?
      224GB/s vs 192GB/s
    • 128bit wider memory bus?
      256bit vs 128bit
    • 768 more stream processors?
      2048 vs 1280
    • 48 more texture units (TMUs)?
      128 vs 80
    • 32 more ROPs?
      64 vs 32
    • 2 more DisplayPort outputs?
      3 vs 1

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX350

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    XFX HD 6950 XXX 2GB

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

    AMD Radeon RX 580

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    0003

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia Tesla C2050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    GeForce GTX 970

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    vs

    XFX HD 6950 XXX 1GB

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 GeForce Nvidia TX

    0003

    2 reviews of users

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

    0 Reviews of users

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

    0. 0 /10

    0 Reviews of Users /Quality 9000 9000 9000 9000 10 No reviews yet0004 performance

    9 /10

    2 votes

    No reviews yet

    Performance

    2.turbo GPU

    1725MHz

    1216MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    55.2 GPixel/s

    72.1 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    4.42 TFLOPS

    4.6 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    138 GTexels/s

    144 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1500MHz

    1753MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    12000MHz

    7012MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    192GB/s

    224GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    128bit

    256bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5.versions of GDDR memory

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5. GPU Temperature at Boot

    Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI-based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980)

    More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI 3.Version

    HDMI 2.0

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980)

    Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

    Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

    Price Match

    Cancel

    Which graphics cards are better?

    GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

    GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — Th200

    Contents

    1. Introduction
    2. Features
    3. Tests
    4. Games
    5. Key differences
    6. Conclusion
    7. Comments

    Video card

    Video card

    Introduction

    We compared two graphics cards: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

    The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a Turing architecture GeForce 16 Mobile generation graphics card released on Apr 23rd, 2019. It comes with 6GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1500MHz and consumes up to 0W.

    The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a Turing-based GeForce 16 generation graphics card released on Nov 22nd, 2019. It comes with 4GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1500MHz, has a 1x 6-pin power connector, and consumes up to 165W.

    192.0 GB/S

    Theoretical Performance

    Pixel filling speed

    64.08 GPIXEL/S

    55.20 GPIXEL/S

    Filling the Texes

    128.2 GTEXEL/S

    .0 GTEXEL/S

    .0 GTEXEL/S

    .0 GTEXEL/S

    .2 performance

    8.202 TFLOPS (2:1)

    8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)

    FP32 (float) performance

    4.101 TFLOPS

    4.416 TFLOPS

    FP64 (double) performance

    128. 2 GFLOPS (1:32)

    138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)

    CLOCK Speeds

    Basic frequency

    1140 MHZ

    1530 MHZ

    Maximum frequency

    MHZ

    1725 MHZ 9000

    Render Config

    SHADING Units

    1536

    1280

    Texture Units

    80

    Raster UNITS

    48

    9000 9000

    SM CUUNT

    24

    20

    Graphics Features

    DirectX

    12 (12_1)

    12 (12_1)

    OpenGL

    4.6

    4.6

    OpenCL

    3.0

    3.0

    Cuda

    7.5

    7.5

    VULKAN

    1.2

    1.2

    BOARD Design

    Heating

    100W

    003

    MXM Module

    Dual-slot

    Benchmarks

    3DMark Graphics

    3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
    +7%

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

    Blender bmw27

    Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
    +39%

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

    Th200 RP

    Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
    +14%

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

    Games

    1920×1080, Ultra

    Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
    Battlefield V
    Hitman 2
    Metro Exodus
    Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    The Witcher 3
    Average 0. 00 fps

    57.00 fps

    2560×1440, Ultra

    Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
    Anno 1800
    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
    Battlefield V
    Far Cry 5
    Hitman 2
    Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    The Witcher 3
    Average 0. 00 fps

    42.66 fps

    3840×2160, Ultra

    Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
    Anno 1800
    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
    Battlefield V
    Far Cry 5
    Hitman 2
    Metro Exodus
    Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    The Witcher 3
    Average 0. 00 fps

    22.16 fps

    Key Differences

    Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

    Has 14% better performance

    Has 2 GB more memory

    Has a slightly larger memory bus

    Has 50% higher bandwidth — 288.0 GB/s vs 192.0 GB/s

    Has 17% higher pixel fill rate — 64.08 GPixel/s vs 55.20 GPixel/s

    Has more texture units +16

    Has more shading units +16

    Has 256 more shading units

    Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q?

    Newer — released 7 months later

    Has 8% faster texture fill rate — 138.0 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s

    Conclusion

    Which is better GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q or GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

    The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q delivers 14% better performance, while holding 2 GB more memory. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 3990X is more powerful than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER according to our research.

    What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q?

    The Radeon RX 5600M is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q. It is 25% more powerful, and holds the same amount of memory.

    What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q?

    The GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q. It is 4% more powerful, and holds the same amount of memory.

    How does GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q perform compared to GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and other graphics cards?

    Relative performance

    General performance

    Desktop performance

    Mobile performance

    specs and benchmarks in 88 games and 15 benchmarks

    NVIDIA started selling the GeForce GTX 980 on September 19, 2014 for a suggested retail price of $549. This is a desktop graphics card based on the Maxwell 2.0 architecture with a 28 nm process technology. It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory with a frequency of 1753 MHz, a 256-bit bus, which provides a bandwidth of 7 Gb / s.

    The card occupies 2 slots, connected via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. The reference version is 267mm long, 111mm wide and 40mm high. The card requires the connection of two 6-pin auxiliary power cables, the declared maximum power consumption is 165 watts.

    Specifications

    GPU

    GPU option
    GM204-400-A1
    Architecture
    Maxwell 2.0
    Manufacturer
    TSMC
    Process
    28 nm
    Number of transistors
    5200 million
    Crystal area
    398 mm²

    Graphic card

    Release date
    September 19, 2014
    Generation
    GeForce 900
    Predecessor
    GeForce 700
    Descendant
    GeForce 10
    Launch price
    $549
    Market price
    $249
    Data bus interface
    PCIe 3. 0 x16

    Frequencies

    Base frequency
    1127 MHz
    Boost frequency
    1216 MHz
    Memory frequency
    1753 MHz

    Memory

    Memory capacity
    4 GB
    Memory type
    GDDR5
    Memory bus
    256 bit
    Memory speed
    7 Gb/s
    Memory bandwidth
    224.4 GB/s

    Render configuration

    Shader blocks
    2048
    Texture blocks
    128
    Raster blocks
    64
    Streaming multiprocessors
    16
    L1 cache
    48 KB
    L2 cache
    2MB

    Rated output

    Pixel fill rate
    77. 82 HP/s
    Texture Fill Rate
    155.6 GT/s
    Performance FP32
    4.981 Tflops
    Performance FP64
    155.6 GFlops

    Graphics

    DirectX
    12 (12_1)
    OpenGL
    4.6
    OpenCL
    1.2
    Vulcan
    1.1
    CUDA
    5.2
    Shader model
    6.4

    Video card design

    Occupied slots
    2
    Length
    267 mm
    Width
    111 mm
    Height
    40 mm
    Heat Sink Requirements
    165W
    Recommended PSU power
    450 W
    Outputs
    1x DVI 1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort
    Power supply
    2x 6-pin
    Board number
    PG401
    Maximum temperature
    81 °C
    Maximum noise
    48. 1 dB

    Game FPS

    Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

    (2020)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 31.9

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 27.6

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 18.7

    Valorant

    (2020)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 139. 8

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 114.3

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 99.5

    Death Stranding

    (2020)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500M.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 63.3

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 49.1

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 29.8

    Cyberpunk 2077

    (2020)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 31.9

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 29.8

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 19.6

    Apex Legends

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 Nano.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 72.0

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 53.6

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 32. 0

    Metro Exodus

    (2019)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 38.2

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 29.8

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 18.7

    Red Dead Redemption 2

    (2019)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 32. 7

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 26.8

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 17.0

    PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

    1280×720 / Low / 129

    1920×1080 / Medium / 92.9

    1920×1080 / Tall / 79.4

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 55. 8

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 45.0

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 25.0

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 19.8

    Overwatch

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

    1280×720 / Low / 299

    1366×768 / Medium / 298

    1920×1080 / Tall / 197

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 116. 5

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 78.4

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 40.6

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 62.3

    Grand Theft Auto V

    (2015)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, but worse than NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU.

    1024×768 / Low / 139.7

    1366×768 / Medium / 131.8

    1920×1080 / Tall / 99. 3

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 45.4

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 44.3

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 36.5

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 59.4

    Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

    (2012)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 195.4

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 162. 8

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 146.5

    League of Legends

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 366.3

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 203.5

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 81.4

    The Witcher 3

    (2015)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1024×768 / Low / 213.55

    1366×768 / Medium / 146.9

    1920×1080 / Tall / 84.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 45.6

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 45.6

    3840×2160 / Tall / 29

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 26.1

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 28. 65

    Battlefield V

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU.

    1280×720 / Low / 188

    1920×1080 / Medium / 109

    1920×1080 / Tall / 90.2

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 81.9

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 62

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 61. 5

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 32

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 32

    Hitman 2

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650.

    1280×720 / Low / 84.9

    1920×1080 / Medium / 75.2

    1920×1080 / Tall / 68.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 67

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 46. 7

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 22.3

    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 96

    1920×1080 / Medium / 69

    1920×1080 / Tall / 58

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 35

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 27

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 27

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 14

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 14

    Forza Horizon 4

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 145

    1920×1080 / Medium / 90

    1920×1080 / Tall / 83

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 59

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 48

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 48

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 34

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 34

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 132

    1920×1080 / Medium / 66

    1920×1080 / Tall / 59

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 51

    2560×1440 / Tall / 34

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 34

    3840×2160 / Tall / 17

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 17

    Far Cry 5

    (2018)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 570, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 126

    1920×1080 / Medium / 80

    1920×1080 / Tall / 73

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 69

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 48

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 48

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 24

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 24

    Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

    1280×720 / Low / 121

    1920×1080 / Medium / 63

    1920×1080 / Tall / 44.6

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 17.1

    Rise of the Tomb Raider

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI.

    1024×768 / Low / 205

    1366×768 / Medium / 135

    1920×1080 / Tall / 80. 5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 72.7

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 27.9

    Just Cause 4

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 109

    1920×1080 / Medium / 77.1

    1920×1080 / Tall / 66.6

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 61. 8

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 43.9

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 23.5

    Darksiders III

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660.

    1280×720 / Low / 236

    1920×1080 / Medium / 112

    1920×1080 / Tall / 91

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 79

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 48. 3

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 23.7

    Farming Simulator 19

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

    1280×720 / Low / 311

    1920×1080 / Medium / 210

    1920×1080 / Tall / 135

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 102

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 68. 8

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 35.9

    Fallout 76

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

    1280×720 / Low / 60

    1920×1080 / Medium / 60

    1920×1080 / Tall / 59.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 59.9

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 57. 4

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 30.9

    Call of Duty Black Ops 4

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 158

    1920×1080 / Medium / 85.7

    1920×1080 / Tall / 77.1

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 70

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 46. 5

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 22.4

    FIFA 19

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 570.

    1280×720 / Low / 305

    1920×1080 / Medium / 253

    1920×1080 / Tall / 230

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 208

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 147

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 75. 8

    F1 2018

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 204

    1920×1080 / Medium / 130

    1920×1080 / Tall / 103

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 70

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 54

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 32

    Monster Hunter World

    (2018)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 570, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 480.

    1280×720 / Low / 104

    1920×1080 / Medium / 68.5

    1920×1080 / Tall / 59.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 50.1

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 31.5

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 15.8

    The Crew 2

    (2018)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 590, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q.

    1280×720 / Low / 60

    1920×1080 / Medium / 60

    1920×1080 / Tall / 60

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 60

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 44.5

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 23.6

    Kingdom Come: Deliverance

    (2018)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 580, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 145

    1920×1080 / Medium / 84.1

    1920×1080 / Tall / 69.4

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 50.1

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 33.4

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 16.1

    Fortnite

    (2018)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 460, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 316

    1920×1080 / Medium / 242

    1920×1080 / Tall / 116

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 91.4

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 53.1

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 25.3

    Star Wars Battlefront 2

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 212

    1920×1080 / Medium / 95.7

    1920×1080 / Tall / 84.2

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 69.8

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 44.4

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 8.6

    Need for Speed ​​Payback

    (2017)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 480, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

    1280×720 / Low / 161

    1920×1080 / Medium / 107

    1920×1080 / Tall / 93.8

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 87.2

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 58.7

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 29.8

    Call of Duty WWII

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 480.

    1280×720 / Low / 249

    1920×1080 / Medium / 212

    1920×1080 / Tall / 105

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 80.1

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 63.8

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 37.2

    Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 154

    1920×1080 / Medium / 97.5

    1920×1080 / Tall / 85.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 69.4

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 48.7

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 28.1

    Destiny 2

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080.

    1280×720 / Low / 166

    1920×1080 / Medium / 122

    1920×1080 / Tall / 109

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 88.1

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 43.4

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 22.6

    ELEX

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 580.

    1280×720 / Low / 122

    1920×1080 / Medium / 94.8

    1920×1080 / Tall / 76.6

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 58.3

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 38.7

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 19.6

    The Evil Within 2

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI.

    1280×720 / Low / 92.8

    1920×1080 / Medium / 58.4

    1920×1080 / Tall / 55.4

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 53.1

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 20.5

    Middle-earth: Shadow of War

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

    1280×720 / Low / 167

    1920×1080 / Medium / 103

    1920×1080 / Tall / 78

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 53

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 21

    Ark Survival Evolved

    (2017)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 580, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 118

    1920×1080 / Medium / 57.2

    1920×1080 / Tall / 39.7

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 26.7

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 9.4

    Dirt 4

    (2017)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 580.

    1280×720 / Low / 332

    1920×1080 / Medium / 163

    1920×1080 / Tall / 105

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 69. 1

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 38.3

    Rocket League

    (2017)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 480, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER.

    1280×720 / Low / 250

    1920×1080 / Medium / 231

    1920×1080 / Tall / 156

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 70.1

    Prey

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

    1280×720 / Low / 144

    1920×1080 / Medium / 143

    1920×1080 / Tall / 135

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 131

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 41

    Mass Effect Andromeda

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 580.

    1280×720 / Low / 160

    1920×1080 / Medium / 93. 9

    1920×1080 / Tall / 63.3

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 55.8

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 24.2

    Ghost Recon Wildlands

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 144

    1920×1080 / Medium / 76.4

    1920×1080 / Tall / 70. 4

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 38.8

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 25.7

    For Honor

    (2017)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 590, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 279

    1920×1080 / Medium / 121

    1920×1080 / Tall / 115

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 83. 1

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 35.3

    Resident Evil 7

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 480.

    1280×720 / Low / 395

    1920×1080 / Medium / 201

    1920×1080 / Tall / 126

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 104

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 34. 4

    Dishonored 2

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA Titan X Pascal.

    1280×720 / Low / 104

    1366×768 / Medium / 98.2

    1920×1080 / Tall / 67.8

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 61.8

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 32.1

    Call of Duty Infinite Warfare

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA Titan X Pascal.

    1280×720 / Low / 125

    1366×768 / Medium / 124

    1920×1080 / Tall / 106

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 90.2

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 46.9

    Titanfall 2

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 470.

    1280×720 / Low / 144

    1366×768 / Medium / 144

    1920×1080 / Tall / 101

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 90. 9

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 34.3

    Farming Simulator 17

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro P2000.

    1280×720 / Low / 311

    1366×768 / Medium / 269

    1920×1080 / Tall / 246

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 196

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 106

    Civilization VI

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

    1024×768 / Low / 89.9

    1366×768 / Medium / 73.5

    1920×1080 / Tall / 66.2

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 64.1

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 61.3

    Battlefield 1

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.

    1280×720 / Low / 199

    1366×768 / Medium / 194

    1920×1080 / Tall / 105

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 96. 9

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 39.2

    Mafia 3

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 94.2

    1366×768 / Medium / 66.6

    1920×1080 / Tall / 36.5

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 15.4

    Deus Ex Mankind Divided

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650.

    1280×720 / Low / 129

    1366×768 / Medium / 99.8

    1920×1080 / Tall / 57

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 32.4

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 18

    Doom

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER.

    1280×720 / Low / 177

    1366×768 / Medium / 172

    1920×1080 / Tall / 104

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 97. 5

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 34.4

    Hitman 2016

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (mobile), but worse than NVIDIA Quadro P2000.

    1280×720 / Low / 85.2

    1366×768 / Medium / 83.7

    1920×1080 / Tall / 60.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 57.8

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 26. 2

    The Division

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 185

    1366×768 / Medium / 143

    1920×1080 / Tall / 72.7

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 57.7

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 27.7

    Far Cry Primal

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (mobile), but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

    1280×720 / Low / 135

    1920×1080 / Medium / 99

    1920×1080 / Tall / 88

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 63

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 29

    Rainbow Six Siege

    (2015)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (mobile).

    1024×768 / Low / 347. 2

    1366×768 / Medium / 256.4

    1920×1080 / Tall / 149.6

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 107.6

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 50.1

    Fallout 4

    (2015)

    Better than AMD Radeon R9 390X, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 390X.

    1280×720 / Low / 148.9

    1366×768 / Medium / 140. 8

    1920×1080 / Tall / 95.6

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 79.7

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 33.8

    World of Warships

    (2015)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA Titan X Pascal.

    1366×768 / Low / 161.2

    1366×768 / Medium / 134.9

    1920×1080 / Tall / 118

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 114. 4

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 60.2

    Dirt Rally

    (2015)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 290X.

    1024×768 / Low / 419.4

    1366×768 / Medium / 163.8

    1920×1080 / Tall / 132.1

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 96.4

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 84

    Dragon Age: Inquisition

    (2014)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 M290X.

    1024×768 / Low / 126.8

    1366×768 / Medium / 119

    1920×1080 / Tall / 77.4

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 55.85

    Battlefield 4

    (2013)

    Better than AMD Radeon R9 390X, but worse than AMD Radeon R7 370.

    1024×768 / Low / 179.7

    1366×768 / Medium / 162. 7

    1366×768 / Tall / 157.4

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 93.4

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 51

    Metro: Last Light

    (2013)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, but worse than AMD Radeon R7 370.

    1024×768 / Low / 146.3

    1366×768 / Medium / 141

    1366×768 / Tall / 129. 5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 86.4

    BioShock Infinite

    (2013)

    Better than AMD Radeon R9 390X, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 286.4

    1366×768 / Medium / 241.7

    1366×768 / Tall / 225

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 116.35

    Crysis 3

    (2013)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

    1024×768 / Low / 147.4

    1366×768 / Medium / 134.5

    1366×768 / Tall / 105.7

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 58.3

    Assassin’s Creed Origins

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 570.

    1280×720 / Low / 103

    1920×1080 / Medium / 70

    1920×1080 / Tall / 64

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 54

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 34

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 19

    F1 2017

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

    1280×720 / Low / 230

    1920×1080 / Medium / 143

    1920×1080 / Tall / 117

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 75

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 34

    FIFA 18

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 361

    1920×1080 / Medium / 329

    1920×1080 / Tall / 285

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 251

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 113

    Mirror’s Edge Catalyst

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1280×720 / Low / 198

    1366×768 / Medium / 156

    1920×1080 / Tall / 83.4

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 76.4

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 28.3

    XCOM 2

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 124

    1920×1080 / Medium / 87. 3

    1920×1080 / Tall / 65.4

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 31.3

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 18.7

    Assassin’s Creed Syndicate

    (2015)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1024×768 / Low / 123.2

    1366×768 / Medium / 113.7

    1920×1080 / Tall / 80. 8

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 33.5

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 27.6

    Star Wars Battlefront

    (2015)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

    1024×768 / Low / 200

    1366×768 / Medium / 199.9

    1920×1080 / Tall / 119.2

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 104. 1

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 40.4

    Call of Duty: Black Ops 3

    (2015)

    Better than AMD Radeon R9 M390, but worse than AMD Radeon R7 370.

    1024×768 / Low / 123

    1366×768 / Medium / 120.4

    1920×1080 / Tall / 98.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 77.4

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 30. 3

    Anno 2205

    (2015)

    Better than AMD FirePro W7170M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (mobile).

    1024×768 / Low / 156.4

    1366×768 / Medium / 145.4

    1920×1080 / Tall / 84.3

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 31.6

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 34.2

    Alien: Isolation

    (2014)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q.

    1024×768 / Low / 245.3

    1366×768 / Medium / 229.8

    1920×1080 / Tall / 135

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 114.2

    Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor

    (2014)

    Better than AMD Radeon R9 390X, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti.

    1280×720 / Low / 218.7

    1344×756 / Medium / 193. 3

    1920×1080 / Tall / 110.1

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 89.45

    Tomb Raider

    (2013)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

    1024×768 / Low / 491.4

    1366×768 / Medium / 402.4

    1366×768 / Tall / 323.6

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 151. 2

    The Sims 4

    (2014)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030.

    1024×768 / Low / 199.3

    1366×768 / Medium / 150.4

    1920×1080 / Tall / 113.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 105.6

    Thief

    (2014)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M.

    1024×768 / Low / 101.6

    1366×768 / Medium / 98.6

    1366×768 / Tall / 98

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 81.15

    Far Cry 4

    (2014)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M.

    1024×768 / Low / 102.4

    1366×768 / Medium / 101. 4

    1920×1080 / Tall / 68.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 62.3

    Assassin’s Creed Unity

    (2014)

    Better than AMD Radeon R7 370, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

    1024×768 / Low / 78.4

    1366×768 / Medium / 70

    1920×1080 / Tall / 51.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 38. 8

    Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

    (2014)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 290X.

    1024×768 / Low / 179.2

    1366×768 / Medium / 135.2

    1920×1080 / Tall / 80.25

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 60.3

    Wolfenstein: The New Order

    (2014)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760.

    1280×720 / Low / 60

    1280×720 / Medium / 60

    1920×1080 / Tall / 60

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 60

    Hitman: Absolution

    (2012)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q.

    1024×768 / Low / 105.4

    1366×768 / Medium / 99. 3

    1366×768 / Tall / 89.7

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 68.3

    Benchmark tests

    3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: 85374 Better than AMD Radeon RX 580, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

    3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score: 21638.5 Better than AMD FirePro W7170M but worse than AMD Radeon RX 470.

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 12938 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

    3DMark Fire Strike Score: 10397.5 Better than AMD Radeon RX 480 but worse than AMD Radeon R9390X.

    3DMark Ice Storm GPU: 323076 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, but worse than AMD Radeon R7 370.

    3DMark Vantage P: 37997 Better than AMD Radeon R9 290X but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti.

    3DMark11 P: 14169 Better than AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 390X.

    3DMark11P GPU: 17604.5 Better than AMD Radeon R9 FURY, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 470.

    Cinebench R10 32Bit OpenGL: 6831 Better than NVIDIA Quadro P4000, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.

    Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit: 109.6 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q.

    ComputeMark v2.1 Normal, Score: 9554 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500M.

    Octane Render OctaneBench: 96 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK.

    Passmark: 11214 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile.

    Unigine Heaven 3.0: 129.65 Better than NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 480.

    Unigine Heaven 4.0: 1889 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti.

    Comparison with other graphics cards

    Map 1:

    Map 2:

    Video reviews and tests

    Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded

    If you find an error or have something to add, write in the comments. Have you had any experience with this video card? Is it worth buying such a card today?

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    Specifications, Price and Overview

    Video card Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super
    Market (main) Desktop
    Release date Q4 2019
    Model Number TU116-250-KA-A1
    GPU name TU116
    Architecture Turing
    Generation GeForce 16
    Lithograph 12nm
    Transistors 6. 600.000.000
    Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16
    GPU base clock 1.53 GHz
    GPU clock speed 1.73 GHz
    Memory frequency 1.500 MHz
    Effective memory speed 12 GB/s
    Memory size 4GB
    Memory type GDDR6
    Memory Bus 128 Bit
    Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s
    TDP 100W
    Multi-card technology
    Outlets

    1x DVI
    1x HDMI
    1x DisplayPort

    Maximum GPU Temperature 90°C
    Cores (computing units, SM, SMX) 20
    Shading units (cuda Kernels) 1. 280
    TMUs 80
    ROPs 32
    Cache 1MB
    Pixel Fill Rate 55.2 GPixel/s
    Texture Fill Rate 138.0 GTexel/s
    Performance FP16 (half) 8.8TFLOPS
    Performance FP32 (float) 4.4TFLOPS
    Performance FP64 (double) 138GFLOPS
    Latest devices
    More from the same brand

    Review and testing of Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

    The GTX 1650 SUPER has more CUDA cores and more texture units than the GTX 1650, so NVIDIA switched from GPU TU117 to TU116. Unlike the GTX 1650, the new SUPER is equipped with faster GDDR6 memory with a bandwidth of 12 Gb / s, the predecessor had GDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 8 Gb / s. The opponent of the GTX 1650 SUPER seems to be the AMD Radeon RX 5500, which the Reds are positioning as an alternative to the GeForce GTX 1650, so the new GTX 1650 SUPER, having a comparable cost to the Radeon RX 5500, should at least outperform it in gaming tests, tmk whether it’s us Let’s find out from this review.

    The entire GTX 1600 Super series is based on the stripped-down Turing architecture and supports features such as simultaneous integer and floating point operations, a unified cache architecture, and adaptive shading technology to improve performance. It is important to note that the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER graphics card is equipped with high-speed GDDR6 memory with an effective frequency of 12 GHz. Compared to its predecessor GTX 1650, the new product with the «Super» prefix received not only a changed type of memory, but also increased throughput from 128 to 192 GB/s. but also an increase in stream processors from 896 to 1280 (the number of texture units has been expanded from 56 to 80). The standard core frequency has also increased from 1485 MHz (Boost — 1665 MHz) to 1530 MHz (Boost — 1725 MHz). But as for the amount of memory, it unfortunately remained the same — 4 GB.

    GeForce GTX 1650 Super belongs to the GeForce GTX 16 family, which does not have RT cores and tensor cores. The GeForce GTX 1650 Super graphics card is the most affordable graphics accelerator of the new series, which according to the manufacturer demonstrate superior performance up to two times compared to the GTX 1000 series GPU (GTX 1050) and up to 50% compared to the original GTX 1650 graphics card in popular games like Fortnite, PUBG and Apex Legends. The GeForce GTX 1650 Super graphics card is poised for a significant performance boost over its predecessor, though it loses the standout feature of the vanilla GTX 1650: the ability to run without any additional power cables. While the original 75W model can be covered by your motherboard’s PCIe slot, the extra power of the GTX 1650 Super pushes power consumption up to 100W. 920×1080 / Ультра / 67 2560×1440 / Ультра / 45.7 2560×1440 / Ультра / 46 3840×2160 / Ультра / 27.7 3840×2160 / Ультра / 22

    Cyberpunk 2077
    (2020) Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

    1280×720 / Low / 78 1920×1080 / Medium / 44 2560×1440 / Ультра / 52 2560×1440 / Ультра / 52 3840×2160 / Ультра / 28 3840×2160 / Ультра / 28

    Battlefield V
    (2018) Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 121 1920×1080 / Medium / 72 1920×1080 / High / 58 1920×1080 / Ультра / 57 2560×1440 / Ультра / 42 2560×1440 / Ультра / 42 3840×2160 / Ультра / 24 3840 ×2160 / Ultra / 24

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    (2018) Better than AMD Radeon RX 570, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

    1280×720 / Low / 181 1920×1080 / Medium / 915 MHz on the GPU, and the memory frequency increased to 1900 MHz.



    Benchmark tests

    3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score: 44256

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 590 but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile.

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 11688

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK.

    3DMark Fire Strike Score: 11050

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

    3DMark Ice Storm GPU: 450349

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT.

    3DMark Time Spy Graphics: 4632

    Better than AMD Radeon R9 Nano, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max.

    3DMark Time Spy Score: 5099

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile.

    3DMark Vantage P: 57390

    Better than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile.

    3DMark06: 46823

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 6700M but worse than AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT.

    3DMark11 P: 17833

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 570 but worse than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000.

    3DMark11 P GPU: 17849

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 480. but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980.

    LuxMark v2.0 64Bit Sala GPUs-only: 2972 ​​

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 290X.

    Passmark: 9881

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max, but worse than AMD Radeon Pro 5600M.

    Unigine Valley 1.0 Extreme HD DirectX: 54.1

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 480, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 580. .5 x 18.2 x 7.3 cm.

    The design is modest, without a large image of the device and with a brief description in several languages, including Russian.

    The outer box is made of thin cardboard — decorative, more durable underneath with foam inserts inside, which reliably protect the video card during transportation.

    The bundle is limited to a memo and a DVD with drivers, which is not surprising given the budget positioning.

    Cooling system and printed circuit board

    Cooling is built according to a common scheme with an aluminum radiator pierced by a copper heat pipe in contact with the video processor using direct contact technology. The top cover is secured with four screws on the sides, allowing it to be removed for occasional dusting.

    The heatsink is fixed with four spring-loaded screws on the back of the board. They do not have a warranty seal. One large section with low-profile finning is evenly and S-shaped permeated by one heat pipe. O-rings are installed on the heatsink in places where they rest against the board, and a soft cube-shaped gasket is used on the edge. As a thermal interface, gray thermal paste of medium density is used. The contact patch between the heatsink and the GPU die is uniform. Memory chips and elements of the power subsystem without additional cooling.

    Two 11-blade Colorful CF-12915S fans with INNO3D logo are used to cool the entire structure. The connection is parallel, so they work synchronously. There is no RPM monitoring, as one two-wire cable and connector is used.

    Marking on the board “Nvidia Corp. Model:PG166″ refers to the use of a reference design when designing a device.

    2022 © All rights reserved