Gtx 980 vs 1650 super: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980 Graphics cards Comparison

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980 Graphics cards Comparison

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Check Price

GeForce GTX 980

Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce GTX 980
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	165 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3. 0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	2x 6-pins
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Recommended system power (PSU)		500 Watt
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 980 has 65% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 980 — with Maxwell.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 980 — by 28 nm process technology.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 219 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 980.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 11993 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 980.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
QHD / 1440p	27−30	30−35
4K / 2160p	14−16	18−20
low / 720p	75−80	80−85
medium / 1080p	60−65	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p	80−85	85−90
ultra / 1080p	70−75	75−80
QHD / 1440p	55−60	60−65
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−35
low / 720p	130−140	140−150
medium / 1080p	90−95	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	250−260
medium / 768p	230−240	230−240
QHD / 1440p	150−160	150−160
4K / 2160p	100−110	100−110
high / 768p	220−230	220−230
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p	70−75	70−75
medium / 1080p	50−55	50−55
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	110−120	110−120
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	65−70	70−75
ultra / 1080p	60−65	65−70
QHD / 1440p	40−45	45−50
4K / 2160p	21−24	24−27
low / 720p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	65−70	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Far Cry 5 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	70−75	80−85
QHD / 1440p	45−50	50−55
4K / 2160p	21−24	21−24
low / 720p	220−230	230−240
medium / 1080p	140−150	150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p	85−90	95−100
ultra / 1080p	65−70	75−80
QHD / 1440p	50−55	55−60
4K / 2160p	30−35	35−40
low / 720p	130−140	140−150
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p	160−170	160−170
medium / 768p	150−160	150−160
high / 1080p	95−100	100−110
ultra / 1080p	45−50	55−60
QHD / 1440p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p	35−40	40−45
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
QHD / 1440p	24−27	27−30
4K / 2160p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	95−100	100−110
medium / 1080p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	75−80	90−95
ultra / 1080p	55−60	65−70
4K / 2160p	18−20	18−20
low / 720p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p	35−40	40−45
ultra / 1080p	24−27	27−30
QHD / 1440p	16−18	21−24
4K / 2160p	10−12	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	100−110
medium / 1080p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p	190−200	210−220
medium / 768p	120−130	140−150
high / 1080p	70−75	80−85
ultra / 1080p	40−45	45−50
4K / 2160p	24−27	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p	120−130	140−150
ultra / 1080p	65−70	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce GTX 980
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Code name	TU116	GM204
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	22 November 2019	19 September 2014
Pipelines	1280	2048
Boost Clock	1725 MHz	1216 MHz
Transistor count	6,600 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	138.0	144 billion/sec
Floating-point performance		4,981 gflops
Length	229 mm	10. 5″ (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	224 GB/s
Shared memory		—
G-SYNC support	+	+
VR Ready	+
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	7.5	+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0. 54 kh/s
G-SYNC	+
Multi Monitor	+
CUDA cores		2048
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376″ (11.1 cm)
SLI options		+
Multi monitor support		4 displays
HDMI		+
HDCP		+
Maximum VGA resolution		2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		579 Mh/s
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		+
H. 264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder		+
Optimus		+
Decred / DCR (Decred)		1.74 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		20.28 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)		312.12 Sol/s
GameStream		+
GeForce ShadowPlay		+
GPU Boost		2.0
GameWorks		+
BatteryBoost		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Similar compares

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro T1000 mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon Pro SSG
GeForce GTX 980 vs Quadro T1000 mobile
GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro SSG

Asus GeForce GTX 980 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super: What is the difference?

42points

Asus GeForce GTX 980

50points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

54 facts in comparison

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Why is Asus GeForce GTX 980 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super?

16. 9 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
72.1 GPixel/svs55.2 GPixel/s
253MHz faster memory clock speed?
1753MHzvs1500MHz
32GB/s more memory bandwidth?
224GB/svs192GB/s
128bit wider memory bus width?
256bitvs128bit
768 more shading units?
2048vs1280
48 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
128vs80
32 more render output units (ROPs)?
64vs32
2 more DisplayPort outputs?
3vs1

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super better than Asus GeForce GTX 980?

403MHz faster GPU clock speed?
1530MHzvs1127MHz
65W lower TDP?
100Wvs165W
4990MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
12000MHzvs7010MHz
509MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1725MHzvs1216MHz
1400million more transistors?
6600 millionvs5200 million
16nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs28nm
1 higher version of GDDR memory?
6vs5
108mm narrower?
160mmvs268mm

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce MX350

Asus GeForce GTX 980

MSI Radeon RX 570 Gaming

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Intel Arc A380

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce MX150

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia Quadro GV100

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Asus GeForce GTX 980

0 User reviews

Asus GeForce GTX 980

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

2 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

10.0/10

2 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

10.0/10

2 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

9.5/10

2 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

9.5/10

2 votes

Fan noise

No reviews yet

9.0/10

2 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

10.0/10

2 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1127MHz

1530MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1216MHz

1725MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3. pixel rate

72.1 GPixel/s

55.2 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

4.62 TFLOPS

4.42 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

144 GTexels/s

138 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1753MHz

1500MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

7010MHz

12000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

224GB/s

192GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

128bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980

Home
VGA Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

7% higher gaming performance.

65 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 980 .

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Supports PhysX

Supports G-Sync

Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 980

Supports PhysX

Supports G-Sync

Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (9 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration

	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER		GeForce GTX 980
GPU Name	TU116 ()	vs	GM204 (GM204-400-A1)
Fab Process	12 nm	vs	28 nm
Die Size	284 mmÂ²	vs	398 mmÂ²
Transistors	6,600 million	vs	5,200 million
Shaders	1280	vs	2048
Compute Units	20	vs	16
Core clock	1530 MHz	vs	1127 MHz
ROPs	32	vs	64
TMUs	80	vs	128

Memory Configuration

	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER		GeForce GTX 980
Memory Type	GDDR6	vs	GDDR5
Bus Width	128 bit	vs	256 bit
Memory Speed	1500 MHz 12000 MHz effective	vs	1753 MHz 7012 MHz effective
Memory Size	4096 Mb	vs	4096 Mb

Additional details

	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER		GeForce GTX 980
TDP	100 watts	vs	165 watts
Release Date	22 Nov 2019	vs	19 Sep 2014

GigaPixels — higher is better

GigaTexels — higher is better

GB/s — higher is better

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

	VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	VS	Radeon RX 580

	VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	VS	GeForce GTX 1060

	VS
GeForce GTX 980	VS	Radeon RX 580

	VS
GeForce GTX 980	VS	GeForce GTX 1060

	VS
Radeon RX 5500	VS	GeForce GTX 1660

	VS
GeForce GTX 1660	VS	Radeon R9 Nano

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Availability

MSRP in USD: $649

EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB K|NGP|N w/ACX 2.0+ (72%+ ASIC), Whisper Silent w/ Multi-Color LED Cooler, Customized Overclocking Graphics Card 06G-P4-5998-KR

Buy on Amazon

$828.97

In Stock

Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 93 minutes ago

Availability

MSRP in USD: $159

Gigabyte Gv-N165SWF2OC-4GD GeForce GTX 1650 Super Windforce OC 4G Graphics Card, 2X Windforce Fans, 4GB 128-Bit GDDR6, Video Card

Buy on Amazon

$394.99

In Stock

~~1725~~ 1755 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 93 minutes agoASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 Super Overclocked 4GB Edition HDMI DP DVI Gaming Graphics Card (TUF-GTX1650S-O4G-GAMING)

Buy on Amazon

$443.49

In Stock

Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 93 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 980 Ti outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 980 Ti is 1634 days older than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Up to 52% cheaper than GeForce GTX 980 Ti — $394.99 vs $828.97
Up to 37% better value when playing VALORANT than GeForce GTX 980 Ti — $1.61 vs $2.54 per FPS
Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — 100 vs 250 Watts

VALORANT

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2015

FPS

327

100%

Value, $/FPS

$2.54/FPS

42%

Price, $

$828.97

47%

FPS Winner

EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB K|NGP|N w/ACX 2.0+ (72%+ ASIC), Whisper Silent w/ Multi-Color LED Cooler, Customized Overclocking Graphics Card 06G-P4-5998-KR

Buy for $828. 97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 93 minutes ago

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019

FPS

245

67%

Value, $/FPS

$1.61/FPS

100%

Price, $

$394.99

100%

Value Winner

Gigabyte Gv-N165SWF2OC-4GD GeForce GTX 1650 Super Windforce OC 4G Graphics Card, 2X Windforce Fans, 4GB 128-Bit GDDR6, Video Card

Buy for $394.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 93 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2015

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019

729

FPS

548

FPS

League of Legends

173

FPS

130

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

327

FPS

245

FPS

VALORANT

200

FPS

151

FPS

Apex Legends

187

FPS

140

FPS

Fortnite

Theoretical Performance

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2015

Pixel Fillrate

103. 3 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

189.4 GTexel/s

100%

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019

Pixel Fillrate

55.2 GPixel/s

13%

Texel Fillrate

138 GTexel/s

63%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	vs	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Jun 2nd, 2015	Release Date	Nov 22nd, 2019
GeForce 900	Generation	GeForce 16
$649	MSRP	$159
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	Outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	Power Connectors	1x 6-pin
Desktop	Segment	Desktop
6 GB	Memory	4 GB
GDDR5	Type	GDDR6
384-bit	Bus	128-bit
336. 6 GB/s	Bandwidth	192 GB/s
1000 MHz	Base Clock Speed	1530 MHz
1076 MHz	Boost Clock Speed	1725 MHz
1753 MHz	Memory Clock Speed	1500 MHz

Builds Using GeForce GTX 980 Ti or GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VALORANT, 1080p, High

iBUYPOWER SlateMR 500AD Gaming Desktop PC

234 FPS

$2.56/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-11400F

8 GB, 500 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$599

In Stock

Updated 78 minutes ago

Skytech Chronos Mini Gaming PC

177 FPS

$3.35/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Ryzen 3 3100

8 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$592.32

In Stock

Updated 85 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

168 FPS

$3.65/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i3-10100

8 GB, 256 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$613. 95

In Stock

Updated 86 minutes ago

SkyTech Blaze II Gaming Computer PC

169 FPS

$3.96/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i3-10100F

8 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$669.75

In Stock

Updated 86 minutes ago

SkyTech Blaze II Gaming Computer PC

198 FPS

$4.04/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$799.99

In Stock

Updated 84 minutes ago

Allied Gaming Stinger Desktop PC

179 FPS

$4.74/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-10400F

8 GB, 240 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$849

In Stock

Updated 82 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

179 FPS

$4.78/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-10400F

20 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$855

In Stock

Updated 76 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

179 FPS

$4. 92/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-10400F

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$879.99

In Stock

Updated 78 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

179 FPS

$5.02/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-10400F

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$899

In Stock

Updated 78 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

179 FPS

$5.58/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-10400F

32 GB, 2 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$999

In Stock

Updated 85340 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

$828.97

Radeon R9 290X

N/A Stock

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

$844.99

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

$828.97

GeForce RTX 3050

$280.25

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

$828. 97

GeForce RTX 3060

$389.99

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

$828.97

Radeon RX 6600

$249.99

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

$828.97

Radeon RX 580

$197.49

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

$394.99

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

$218.99

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

$394.99

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

$709.99

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

$394.99

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

$369.99

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

$394.99

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2048 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,2 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 896 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,7 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card	Nvidia GeForce GTX 980	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	Q3 2014	Q2 2019
Model number	GM204-400-A1	TU117-300-A1
GPU name	GM204	TU117
Architecture	Maxwell 2. 0	Turing
Generation	GeForce 900	GeForce 16
Lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Transistors	5.200.000.000	4.700.000.000
Bus interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock	1,13 GHz	1,49 GHz
GPU boost clock	1,22 GHz	1,67 GHz
Memory frequency	1.753 MHz	2.001 MHz
Effective memory speed	7 GB/s	8 GB/s
Memory size	4 GB	4 GB
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory bus	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory bandwidth	224,4 GB/s	128,1 GB/s
TDP	165 W	75 W
Suggested PSU	500W ATX Power Supply	300W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology	4-way SLI	—
Outputs	1x DVI 1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort
Maximum GPU Temperature	98°C	94°C
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)	16	14
Shading units (cuda cores)	2. 048	896
TMUs	128	56
ROPs	64	32
Cache memory	2 MB	1 MB
Pixel fillrate	77,8 GP/s	53,3 GP/s
Texture fillrate	155,6 GT/s	93,2 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)	5,0 TFLOPS	3,0 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)	155,6 GFLOPS	93,2 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980	4.984
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650	2.984

The difference is 67%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1650 AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 980 GPU Comparison

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 209

$ 331. 91
significantly less expensive

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

38 %

5%
slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

47 FPS

2 FPS
slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

44 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

29 FPS

38 FPS

9 FPS
significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

34 FPS

1 FPS
slightly higher City frame rate

33 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

22 FPS

31 FPS

10 FPS
significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce GTX 980? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Geekbench (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

40,258

34%
slightly higher Geekbench (CUDA) score

29,848

Geekbench (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38,315

14%
slightly higher Geekbench (OpenCL) score

33,463

Geekbench (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35,907

41,306

15%
slightly higher Geekbench (Vulkan) score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

4,376

20%
slightly higher 3DMark Graphics score

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1,485 MHz

31%
slightly higher core clock speed

1,126 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1,665 MHz

36%
slightly higher boost clock speed

1,216 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100%
significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128 GB/s

224 GB/s

75%
significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

120%
significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53 Gigapixels/s

78 Gigapixels/s

46%
significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93 Gigatexels/s

156 Gigatexels/s

66%
significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3 TFLOPS

5 TFLOPS

66%
significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2,048

128%
significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

128

128%
significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100%
significantly more render output processors

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

103rd
of 526

95th
of 526

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

April 2019

—

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12. 0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 980 benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 980 graphics card is better than the GeForce GTX 1650 in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Memory size doesn’t directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 980 at 165 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 980 is faster than the GeForce GTX 1650.

Latest posts

How to choose a power supply for your gaming PC: wattage and efficiencyJuly 11, 2022

How to compare GPUs and GPUs: find the best components for gamingJuly 02, 2022

Best PC benchmarking tools 2022: how to performance test your gaming PCJuly 02, 2022

Popular GPU Comparisons

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3060

Radeon RX 570 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

0023 55. 2 GPixel/s

253MHz faster memory speed?
1753MHz vs 1500MHz

32GB/s more memory bandwidth?
224GB/s vs 192GB/s

128bit wider memory bus?
256bit vs 128bit

768 more stream processors?
2048 vs 1280

48 more texture units (TMUs)?
128 vs 80

32 more ROPs?
64 vs 32

2 more DisplayPort outputs?
3 vs 1

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super better than Asus GeForce GTX 980?

GPU frequency 403MHz higher?
1530MHz vs 1127MHz
65W below TDP?
100W vs 165W
4990MHz higher effective clock speed?
12000MHz vs 7010MHz
509MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1725MHz vs 1216MHz
1400million more transistors?
6600 million vs 5200 million
Are 16nm semiconductors smaller?
12nm vs 28nm
1 later versions of GDDR memory?
6 vs 5
108mm narrower?
160mm vs 268mm

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce MX350

Asus GeForce GTX 980

MSI Radeon RX 570 Gaming

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Intel Arc A380

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce RTX 20003

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce MX150

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super0003

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia Quadro GV100

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Asus GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

Price Comparison

User Reviews

10. 0 /10

2 VOTES

Games

Reviews not yet

9.5 /10

2 VOTES

performance

9000 9000 9000 9000 /10000 2 VOTES

Fan noise

reviews yet there are no

/10

2 Votes

Reliability

reviews yet there are no

004

10.0 /10

2 votes

Performance

1.GPU Clock Speed

1127MHz

1530MHz

GPU has higher clock speed.

2.turbo GPU

1216MHz

1725MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel speed

72.1 GPixel/s

55.2 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4. flops

4.62 TFLOPS

4.42 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

144 GTexels/s

138 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1753MHz

1500MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

7010MHz

12000MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

224GB/s

192GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

128bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5. GDDR memory versions

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6.Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5. GPU temperature at boot

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Asus GeForce GTX 980

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔Asus GeForce GTX 980

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2.HDMI connectors

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

3rd HDMI version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 980)

HDMI 2.0

New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price Match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980: What is the difference?

50 points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

47 points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

54 facts in comparison

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 980?

GPU frequency 404MHz higher?
1530MHz vs 1126MHz
65W below TDP?
100W vs 165W
4988MHz higher effective clock speed?
12000MHz vs 7012MHz
509MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1725MHz vs 1216MHz
1400million more transistors?
6600 million vs 5200 million
12°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
69°C vs 81°C
Semiconductor size 16nm smaller?
12nm vs 28nm
1 later versions of GDDR memory?
6 vs 5

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super?

16. 9 GPixel/s higher pixel speed?
72.1 GPixel/s vs 55.2 GPixel/s
253MHz faster memory speed?
1753MHz vs 1500MHz
32GB/s more memory bandwidth?
224GB/s vs 192GB/s
128bit wider memory bus?
256bit vs 128bit
768 more stream processors?
2048 vs 1280
48 more texture units (TMUs)?
128 vs 80
32 more ROPs?
64 vs 32
2 more DisplayPort outputs?
3 vs 1

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce MX350

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

XFX HD 6950 XXX 2GB

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

AMD Radeon RX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

0003

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia Tesla C2050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 970

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

XFX HD 6950 XXX 1GB

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 GeForce Nvidia TX

0003

2 reviews of users

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

0 Reviews of users

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

0. 0 /10

0 Reviews of Users /Quality 9000 9000 9000 9000 10 No reviews yet0004 performance

9 /10

2 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

2.turbo GPU

1725MHz

1216MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

55.2 GPixel/s

72.1 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

4.42 TFLOPS

4.6 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

138 GTexels/s

144 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1500MHz

1753MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

12000MHz

7012MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

192GB/s

224GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

128bit

256bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5.versions of GDDR memory

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory debug code

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5. GPU Temperature at Boot

Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI-based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2.HDMI connectors

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980)

More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

HDMI 3.Version

HDMI 2.0

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price Match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — Th200

Contents

Introduction

Features

Tests

Games

Key differences

Conclusion

Comments

Video card

Video card

Introduction

We compared two graphics cards: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a Turing architecture GeForce 16 Mobile generation graphics card released on Apr 23rd, 2019. It comes with 6GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1500MHz and consumes up to 0W.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a Turing-based GeForce 16 generation graphics card released on Nov 22nd, 2019. It comes with 4GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1500MHz, has a 1x 6-pin power connector, and consumes up to 165W.

192.0 GB/S

Theoretical Performance

Pixel filling speed

64.08 GPIXEL/S

55.20 GPIXEL/S

Filling the Texes

128.2 GTEXEL/S

.0 GTEXEL/S

.0 GTEXEL/S

.0 GTEXEL/S

.2 performance

8.202 TFLOPS (2:1)

8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)

FP32 (float) performance

4.101 TFLOPS

4.416 TFLOPS

FP64 (double) performance

128. 2 GFLOPS (1:32)

138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)

CLOCK Speeds

Basic frequency

1140 MHZ

1530 MHZ

Maximum frequency

MHZ

1725 MHZ 9000

Render Config

SHADING Units

1536

1280

Texture Units

80

Raster UNITS

48

9000 9000

SM CUUNT

24

20

Graphics Features

DirectX

12 (12_1)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

4.6

OpenCL

3.0

3.0

Cuda

7.5

7.5

VULKAN

1.2

1.2

BOARD Design

Heating

100W

003

MXM Module

Dual-slot

Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics

3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
+7%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Blender bmw27

Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
+39%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Th200 RP

Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
+14%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Games

1920×1080, Ultra

Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

Battlefield V

Hitman 2

Metro Exodus

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

The Witcher 3

Average 0. 00 fps
57.00 fps

2560×1440, Ultra

Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Anno 1800

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

Battlefield V

Far Cry 5

Hitman 2

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

The Witcher 3

Average 0. 00 fps
42.66 fps

3840×2160, Ultra

Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Anno 1800

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

Battlefield V

Far Cry 5

Hitman 2

Metro Exodus

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

The Witcher 3

Average 0. 00 fps
22.16 fps

Key Differences

Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

Has 14% better performance

Has 2 GB more memory

Has a slightly larger memory bus

Has 50% higher bandwidth — 288.0 GB/s vs 192.0 GB/s

Has 17% higher pixel fill rate — 64.08 GPixel/s vs 55.20 GPixel/s

Has more texture units +16

Has more shading units +16

Has 256 more shading units

Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q?

Newer — released 7 months later

Has 8% faster texture fill rate — 138.0 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s

Conclusion

Which is better GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q or GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q delivers 14% better performance, while holding 2 GB more memory. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 3990X is more powerful than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER according to our research.

What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q?

The Radeon RX 5600M is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q. It is 25% more powerful, and holds the same amount of memory.

What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q?

The GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q. It is 4% more powerful, and holds the same amount of memory.

How does GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q perform compared to GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and other graphics cards?

Relative performance

General performance

Desktop performance

Mobile performance

specs and benchmarks in 88 games and 15 benchmarks

NVIDIA started selling the GeForce GTX 980 on September 19, 2014 for a suggested retail price of $549. This is a desktop graphics card based on the Maxwell 2.0 architecture with a 28 nm process technology. It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory with a frequency of 1753 MHz, a 256-bit bus, which provides a bandwidth of 7 Gb / s.

The card occupies 2 slots, connected via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. The reference version is 267mm long, 111mm wide and 40mm high. The card requires the connection of two 6-pin auxiliary power cables, the declared maximum power consumption is 165 watts.

Specifications

GPU

GPU option

GM204-400-A1

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

Manufacturer

TSMC

Process

28 nm

Number of transistors

5200 million

Crystal area

398 mm²

Graphic card

Release date

September 19, 2014

Generation

GeForce 900

Predecessor

GeForce 700

Descendant

GeForce 10

Launch price

$549

Market price

$249

Data bus interface

PCIe 3. 0 x16

Frequencies

Base frequency

1127 MHz

Boost frequency

1216 MHz

Memory frequency

1753 MHz

Memory

Memory capacity

4 GB

Memory type

GDDR5

Memory bus

256 bit

Memory speed

7 Gb/s

Memory bandwidth

224.4 GB/s

Render configuration

Shader blocks

2048

Texture blocks

128

Raster blocks

64

Streaming multiprocessors

16

L1 cache

48 KB

L2 cache

2MB

Rated output

Pixel fill rate

77. 82 HP/s

Texture Fill Rate

155.6 GT/s

Performance FP32

4.981 Tflops

Performance FP64

155.6 GFlops

Graphics

DirectX

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

OpenCL

1.2

Vulcan

1.1

CUDA

5.2

Shader model

6.4

Video card design

Occupied slots

2

Length

267 mm

Width

111 mm

Height

40 mm

Heat Sink Requirements

165W

Recommended PSU power

450 W

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort

Power supply

2x 6-pin

Board number

PG401

Maximum temperature

81 °C

Maximum noise

48. 1 dB

Game FPS

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

(2020)

Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 31.9

2560×1440 / Ultra / 27.6

3840×2160 / Ultra / 18.7

Valorant

(2020)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 139. 8

2560×1440 / Ultra / 114.3

3840×2160 / Ultra / 99.5

Death Stranding

(2020)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500M.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 63.3

2560×1440 / Ultra / 49.1

3840×2160 / Ultra / 29.8

Cyberpunk 2077

(2020)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 31.9

2560×1440 / Ultra / 29.8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 19.6

Apex Legends

(2019)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 Nano.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 72.0

2560×1440 / Ultra / 53.6

3840×2160 / Ultra / 32. 0

Metro Exodus

(2019)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 38.2

2560×1440 / Ultra / 29.8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 18.7

Red Dead Redemption 2

(2019)

Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 32. 7

2560×1440 / Ultra / 26.8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 17.0

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

1280×720 / Low / 129

1920×1080 / Medium / 92.9

1920×1080 / Tall / 79.4

1920×1080 / Ultra / 55. 8

2560×1440 / Ultra / 45.0

3840×2160 / Ultra / 25.0

3840×2160 / Ultra / 19.8

Overwatch

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

1280×720 / Low / 299

1366×768 / Medium / 298

1920×1080 / Tall / 197

1920×1080 / Ultra / 116. 5

2560×1440 / Ultra / 78.4

3840×2160 / Ultra / 40.6

3840×2160 / Ultra / 62.3

Grand Theft Auto V

(2015)

Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, but worse than NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU.

1024×768 / Low / 139.7

1366×768 / Medium / 131.8

1920×1080 / Tall / 99. 3

1920×1080 / Ultra / 45.4

2560×1440 / Ultra / 44.3

3840×2160 / Ultra / 36.5

3840×2160 / Ultra / 59.4

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

(2012)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 195.4

2560×1440 / Ultra / 162. 8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 146.5

League of Legends

(2019)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

1920×1080 / Ultra / 366.3

2560×1440 / Ultra / 203.5

3840×2160 / Ultra / 81.4

The Witcher 3

(2015)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1024×768 / Low / 213.55

1366×768 / Medium / 146.9

1920×1080 / Tall / 84.9

1920×1080 / Ultra / 45.6

2560×1440 / Ultra / 45.6

3840×2160 / Tall / 29

3840×2160 / Ultra / 26.1

3840×2160 / Ultra / 28. 65

Battlefield V

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU.

1280×720 / Low / 188

1920×1080 / Medium / 109

1920×1080 / Tall / 90.2

1920×1080 / Ultra / 81.9

2560×1440 / Ultra / 62

2560×1440 / Ultra / 61. 5

3840×2160 / Ultra / 32

3840×2160 / Ultra / 32

Hitman 2

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650.

1280×720 / Low / 84.9

1920×1080 / Medium / 75.2

1920×1080 / Tall / 68.9

1920×1080 / Ultra / 67

2560×1440 / Ultra / 46. 7

3840×2160 / Ultra / 22.3

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile.

1280×720 / Low / 96

1920×1080 / Medium / 69

1920×1080 / Tall / 58

1920×1080 / Ultra / 35

2560×1440 / Ultra / 27

2560×1440 / Ultra / 27

3840×2160 / Ultra / 14

3840×2160 / Ultra / 14

Forza Horizon 4

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile.

1280×720 / Low / 145

1920×1080 / Medium / 90

1920×1080 / Tall / 83

1920×1080 / Ultra / 59

2560×1440 / Ultra / 48

2560×1440 / Ultra / 48

3840×2160 / Ultra / 34

3840×2160 / Ultra / 34

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 132

1920×1080 / Medium / 66

1920×1080 / Tall / 59

1920×1080 / Ultra / 51

2560×1440 / Tall / 34

2560×1440 / Ultra / 34

3840×2160 / Tall / 17

3840×2160 / Ultra / 17

Far Cry 5

(2018)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 570, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 126

1920×1080 / Medium / 80

1920×1080 / Tall / 73

1920×1080 / Ultra / 69

2560×1440 / Ultra / 48

2560×1440 / Ultra / 48

3840×2160 / Ultra / 24

3840×2160 / Ultra / 24

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

1280×720 / Low / 121

1920×1080 / Medium / 63

1920×1080 / Tall / 44.6

3840×2160 / Ultra / 17.1

Rise of the Tomb Raider

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI.

1024×768 / Low / 205

1366×768 / Medium / 135

1920×1080 / Tall / 80. 5

1920×1080 / Ultra / 72.7

3840×2160 / Ultra / 27.9

Just Cause 4

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

1280×720 / Low / 109

1920×1080 / Medium / 77.1

1920×1080 / Tall / 66.6

1920×1080 / Ultra / 61. 8

2560×1440 / Ultra / 43.9

3840×2160 / Ultra / 23.5

Darksiders III

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660.

1280×720 / Low / 236

1920×1080 / Medium / 112

1920×1080 / Tall / 91

1920×1080 / Ultra / 79

2560×1440 / Ultra / 48. 3

3840×2160 / Ultra / 23.7

Farming Simulator 19

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

1280×720 / Low / 311

1920×1080 / Medium / 210

1920×1080 / Tall / 135

1920×1080 / Ultra / 102

2560×1440 / Ultra / 68. 8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 35.9

Fallout 76

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

1280×720 / Low / 60

1920×1080 / Medium / 60

1920×1080 / Tall / 59.9

1920×1080 / Ultra / 59.9

2560×1440 / Ultra / 57. 4

3840×2160 / Ultra / 30.9

Call of Duty Black Ops 4

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 158

1920×1080 / Medium / 85.7

1920×1080 / Tall / 77.1

1920×1080 / Ultra / 70

2560×1440 / Ultra / 46. 5

3840×2160 / Ultra / 22.4

FIFA 19

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 570.

1280×720 / Low / 305

1920×1080 / Medium / 253

1920×1080 / Tall / 230

1920×1080 / Ultra / 208

2560×1440 / Ultra / 147

3840×2160 / Ultra / 75. 8

F1 2018

(2018)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 204

1920×1080 / Medium / 130

1920×1080 / Tall / 103

1920×1080 / Ultra / 70

2560×1440 / Ultra / 54

3840×2160 / Ultra / 32

Monster Hunter World

(2018)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 570, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 480.

1280×720 / Low / 104

1920×1080 / Medium / 68.5

1920×1080 / Tall / 59.9

1920×1080 / Ultra / 50.1

2560×1440 / Ultra / 31.5

3840×2160 / Ultra / 15.8

The Crew 2

(2018)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 590, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q.

1280×720 / Low / 60

1920×1080 / Medium / 60

1920×1080 / Tall / 60

1920×1080 / Ultra / 60

2560×1440 / Ultra / 44.5

3840×2160 / Ultra / 23.6

Kingdom Come: Deliverance

(2018)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 580, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 145

1920×1080 / Medium / 84.1

1920×1080 / Tall / 69.4

1920×1080 / Ultra / 50.1

2560×1440 / Ultra / 33.4

3840×2160 / Ultra / 16.1

Fortnite

(2018)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 460, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 316

1920×1080 / Medium / 242

1920×1080 / Tall / 116

1920×1080 / Ultra / 91.4

2560×1440 / Ultra / 53.1

3840×2160 / Ultra / 25.3

Star Wars Battlefront 2

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 212

1920×1080 / Medium / 95.7

1920×1080 / Tall / 84.2

1920×1080 / Ultra / 69.8

2560×1440 / Ultra / 44.4

3840×2160 / Ultra / 8.6

Need for Speed Payback

(2017)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 480, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

1280×720 / Low / 161

1920×1080 / Medium / 107

1920×1080 / Tall / 93.8

1920×1080 / Ultra / 87.2

2560×1440 / Ultra / 58.7

3840×2160 / Ultra / 29.8

Call of Duty WWII

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 480.

1280×720 / Low / 249

1920×1080 / Medium / 212

1920×1080 / Tall / 105

1920×1080 / Ultra / 80.1

2560×1440 / Ultra / 63.8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 37.2

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 154

1920×1080 / Medium / 97.5

1920×1080 / Tall / 85.5

1920×1080 / Ultra / 69.4

2560×1440 / Ultra / 48.7

3840×2160 / Ultra / 28.1

Destiny 2

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080.

1280×720 / Low / 166

1920×1080 / Medium / 122

1920×1080 / Tall / 109

1920×1080 / Ultra / 88.1

2560×1440 / Ultra / 43.4

3840×2160 / Ultra / 22.6

ELEX

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 580.

1280×720 / Low / 122

1920×1080 / Medium / 94.8

1920×1080 / Tall / 76.6

1920×1080 / Ultra / 58.3

2560×1440 / Ultra / 38.7

3840×2160 / Ultra / 19.6

The Evil Within 2

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI.

1280×720 / Low / 92.8

1920×1080 / Medium / 58.4

1920×1080 / Tall / 55.4

1920×1080 / Ultra / 53.1

3840×2160 / Ultra / 20.5

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

1280×720 / Low / 167

1920×1080 / Medium / 103

1920×1080 / Tall / 78

1920×1080 / Ultra / 53

3840×2160 / Ultra / 21

Ark Survival Evolved

(2017)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 580, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 118

1920×1080 / Medium / 57.2

1920×1080 / Tall / 39.7

1920×1080 / Ultra / 26.7

3840×2160 / Ultra / 9.4

Dirt 4

(2017)

Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 580.

1280×720 / Low / 332

1920×1080 / Medium / 163

1920×1080 / Tall / 105

1920×1080 / Ultra / 69. 1

3840×2160 / Ultra / 38.3

Rocket League

(2017)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 480, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER.

1280×720 / Low / 250

1920×1080 / Medium / 231

1920×1080 / Tall / 156

3840×2160 / Ultra / 70.1

Prey

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

1280×720 / Low / 144

1920×1080 / Medium / 143

1920×1080 / Tall / 135

1920×1080 / Ultra / 131

3840×2160 / Ultra / 41

Mass Effect Andromeda

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 580.

1280×720 / Low / 160

1920×1080 / Medium / 93. 9

1920×1080 / Tall / 63.3

1920×1080 / Ultra / 55.8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 24.2

Ghost Recon Wildlands

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 144

1920×1080 / Medium / 76.4

1920×1080 / Tall / 70. 4

1920×1080 / Ultra / 38.8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 25.7

For Honor

(2017)

Better than AMD Radeon RX 590, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

1280×720 / Low / 279

1920×1080 / Medium / 121

1920×1080 / Tall / 115

1920×1080 / Ultra / 83. 1

3840×2160 / Ultra / 35.3

Resident Evil 7

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 480.

1280×720 / Low / 395

1920×1080 / Medium / 201

1920×1080 / Tall / 126

1920×1080 / Ultra / 104

3840×2160 / Ultra / 34. 4

Dishonored 2

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA Titan X Pascal.

1280×720 / Low / 104

1366×768 / Medium / 98.2

1920×1080 / Tall / 67.8

1920×1080 / Ultra / 61.8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 32.1

Call of Duty Infinite Warfare

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA Titan X Pascal.

1280×720 / Low / 125

1366×768 / Medium / 124

1920×1080 / Tall / 106

1920×1080 / Ultra / 90.2

3840×2160 / Ultra / 46.9

Titanfall 2

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 470.

1280×720 / Low / 144

1366×768 / Medium / 144

1920×1080 / Tall / 101

1920×1080 / Ultra / 90. 9

3840×2160 / Ultra / 34.3

Farming Simulator 17

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro P2000.

1280×720 / Low / 311

1366×768 / Medium / 269

1920×1080 / Tall / 246

1920×1080 / Ultra / 196

3840×2160 / Ultra / 106

Civilization VI

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

1024×768 / Low / 89.9

1366×768 / Medium / 73.5

1920×1080 / Tall / 66.2

1920×1080 / Ultra / 64.1

3840×2160 / Ultra / 61.3

Battlefield 1

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.

1280×720 / Low / 199

1366×768 / Medium / 194

1920×1080 / Tall / 105

1920×1080 / Ultra / 96. 9

3840×2160 / Ultra / 39.2

Mafia 3

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 94.2

1366×768 / Medium / 66.6

1920×1080 / Tall / 36.5

3840×2160 / Ultra / 15.4

Deus Ex Mankind Divided

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650.

1280×720 / Low / 129

1366×768 / Medium / 99.8

1920×1080 / Tall / 57

1920×1080 / Ultra / 32.4

3840×2160 / Ultra / 18

Doom

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER.

1280×720 / Low / 177

1366×768 / Medium / 172

1920×1080 / Tall / 104

1920×1080 / Ultra / 97. 5

3840×2160 / Ultra / 34.4

Hitman 2016

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (mobile), but worse than NVIDIA Quadro P2000.

1280×720 / Low / 85.2

1366×768 / Medium / 83.7

1920×1080 / Tall / 60.9

1920×1080 / Ultra / 57.8

3840×2160 / Ultra / 26. 2

The Division

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 185

1366×768 / Medium / 143

1920×1080 / Tall / 72.7

1920×1080 / Ultra / 57.7

3840×2160 / Ultra / 27.7

Far Cry Primal

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (mobile), but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

1280×720 / Low / 135

1920×1080 / Medium / 99

1920×1080 / Tall / 88

1920×1080 / Ultra / 63

3840×2160 / Ultra / 29

Rainbow Six Siege

(2015)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (mobile).

1024×768 / Low / 347. 2

1366×768 / Medium / 256.4

1920×1080 / Tall / 149.6

1920×1080 / Ultra / 107.6

3840×2160 / Ultra / 50.1

Fallout 4

(2015)

Better than AMD Radeon R9 390X, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 390X.

1280×720 / Low / 148.9

1366×768 / Medium / 140. 8

1920×1080 / Tall / 95.6

1920×1080 / Ultra / 79.7

3840×2160 / Ultra / 33.8

World of Warships

(2015)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA Titan X Pascal.

1366×768 / Low / 161.2

1366×768 / Medium / 134.9

1920×1080 / Tall / 118

1920×1080 / Ultra / 114. 4

3840×2160 / Ultra / 60.2

Dirt Rally

(2015)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 290X.

1024×768 / Low / 419.4

1366×768 / Medium / 163.8

1920×1080 / Tall / 132.1

1920×1080 / Ultra / 96.4

3840×2160 / Ultra / 84

Dragon Age: Inquisition

(2014)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 M290X.

1024×768 / Low / 126.8

1366×768 / Medium / 119

1920×1080 / Tall / 77.4

1920×1080 / Ultra / 55.85

Battlefield 4

(2013)

Better than AMD Radeon R9 390X, but worse than AMD Radeon R7 370.

1024×768 / Low / 179.7

1366×768 / Medium / 162. 7

1366×768 / Tall / 157.4

1920×1080 / Ultra / 93.4

3840×2160 / Ultra / 51

Metro: Last Light

(2013)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, but worse than AMD Radeon R7 370.

1024×768 / Low / 146.3

1366×768 / Medium / 141

1366×768 / Tall / 129. 5

1920×1080 / Ultra / 86.4

BioShock Infinite

(2013)

Better than AMD Radeon R9 390X, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

1280×720 / Low / 286.4

1366×768 / Medium / 241.7

1366×768 / Tall / 225

1920×1080 / Ultra / 116.35

Crysis 3

(2013)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

1024×768 / Low / 147.4

1366×768 / Medium / 134.5

1366×768 / Tall / 105.7

1920×1080 / Ultra / 58.3

Assassin’s Creed Origins

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 570.

1280×720 / Low / 103

1920×1080 / Medium / 70

1920×1080 / Tall / 64

1920×1080 / Ultra / 54

2560×1440 / Ultra / 34

3840×2160 / Ultra / 19

F1 2017

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

1280×720 / Low / 230

1920×1080 / Medium / 143

1920×1080 / Tall / 117

1920×1080 / Ultra / 75

3840×2160 / Ultra / 34

FIFA 18

(2017)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 361

1920×1080 / Medium / 329

1920×1080 / Tall / 285

1920×1080 / Ultra / 251

3840×2160 / Ultra / 113

Mirror’s Edge Catalyst

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1280×720 / Low / 198

1366×768 / Medium / 156

1920×1080 / Tall / 83.4

1920×1080 / Ultra / 76.4

3840×2160 / Ultra / 28.3

XCOM 2

(2016)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

1280×720 / Low / 124

1920×1080 / Medium / 87. 3

1920×1080 / Tall / 65.4

1920×1080 / Ultra / 31.3

3840×2160 / Ultra / 18.7

Assassin’s Creed Syndicate

(2015)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1024×768 / Low / 123.2

1366×768 / Medium / 113.7

1920×1080 / Tall / 80. 8

1920×1080 / Ultra / 33.5

3840×2160 / Ultra / 27.6

Star Wars Battlefront

(2015)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB.

1024×768 / Low / 200

1366×768 / Medium / 199.9

1920×1080 / Tall / 119.2

1920×1080 / Ultra / 104. 1

3840×2160 / Ultra / 40.4

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3

(2015)

Better than AMD Radeon R9 M390, but worse than AMD Radeon R7 370.

1024×768 / Low / 123

1366×768 / Medium / 120.4

1920×1080 / Tall / 98.5

1920×1080 / Ultra / 77.4

3840×2160 / Ultra / 30. 3

Anno 2205

(2015)

Better than AMD FirePro W7170M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (mobile).

1024×768 / Low / 156.4

1366×768 / Medium / 145.4

1920×1080 / Tall / 84.3

1920×1080 / Ultra / 31.6

3840×2160 / Ultra / 34.2

Alien: Isolation

(2014)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q.

1024×768 / Low / 245.3

1366×768 / Medium / 229.8

1920×1080 / Tall / 135

1920×1080 / Ultra / 114.2

Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor

(2014)

Better than AMD Radeon R9 390X, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti.

1280×720 / Low / 218.7

1344×756 / Medium / 193. 3

1920×1080 / Tall / 110.1

1920×1080 / Ultra / 89.45

Tomb Raider

(2013)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

1024×768 / Low / 491.4

1366×768 / Medium / 402.4

1366×768 / Tall / 323.6

1920×1080 / Ultra / 151. 2

The Sims 4

(2014)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030.

1024×768 / Low / 199.3

1366×768 / Medium / 150.4

1920×1080 / Tall / 113.5

1920×1080 / Ultra / 105.6

Thief

(2014)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M.

1024×768 / Low / 101.6

1366×768 / Medium / 98.6

1366×768 / Tall / 98

1920×1080 / Ultra / 81.15

Far Cry 4

(2014)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M.

1024×768 / Low / 102.4

1366×768 / Medium / 101. 4

1920×1080 / Tall / 68.5

1920×1080 / Ultra / 62.3

Assassin’s Creed Unity

(2014)

Better than AMD Radeon R7 370, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

1024×768 / Low / 78.4

1366×768 / Medium / 70

1920×1080 / Tall / 51.9

1920×1080 / Ultra / 38. 8

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

(2014)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 290X.

1024×768 / Low / 179.2

1366×768 / Medium / 135.2

1920×1080 / Tall / 80.25

1920×1080 / Ultra / 60.3

Wolfenstein: The New Order

(2014)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760.

1280×720 / Low / 60

1280×720 / Medium / 60

1920×1080 / Tall / 60

1920×1080 / Ultra / 60

Hitman: Absolution

(2012)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q.

1024×768 / Low / 105.4

1366×768 / Medium / 99. 3

1366×768 / Tall / 89.7

1920×1080 / Ultra / 68.3

Benchmark tests

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: 85374 Better than AMD Radeon RX 580, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score: 21638.5 Better than AMD FirePro W7170M but worse than AMD Radeon RX 470.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 12938 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

3DMark Fire Strike Score: 10397.5 Better than AMD Radeon RX 480 but worse than AMD Radeon R9390X.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU: 323076 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, but worse than AMD Radeon R7 370.

3DMark Vantage P: 37997 Better than AMD Radeon R9 290X but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti.

3DMark11 P: 14169 Better than AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 390X.

3DMark11P GPU: 17604.5 Better than AMD Radeon R9 FURY, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 470.

Cinebench R10 32Bit OpenGL: 6831 Better than NVIDIA Quadro P4000, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit: 109.6 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q.

ComputeMark v2.1 Normal, Score: 9554 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500M.

Octane Render OctaneBench: 96 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK.

Passmark: 11214 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile.

Unigine Heaven 3.0: 129.65 Better than NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 480.

Unigine Heaven 4.0: 1889 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti.

Comparison with other graphics cards

Map 1:

Map 2:

Video reviews and tests

Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded

If you find an error or have something to add, write in the comments. Have you had any experience with this video card? Is it worth buying such a card today?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Specifications, Price and Overview

Video card Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Market (main) Desktop

Release date Q4 2019

Model Number TU116-250-KA-A1

GPU name TU116

Architecture Turing

Generation GeForce 16

Lithograph 12nm

Transistors 6. 600.000.000

Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16

GPU base clock 1.53 GHz

GPU clock speed 1.73 GHz

Memory frequency 1.500 MHz

Effective memory speed 12 GB/s

Memory size 4GB

Memory type GDDR6

Memory Bus 128 Bit

Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s

TDP 100W

Multi-card technology —

Outlets
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort

Maximum GPU Temperature 90°C

Cores (computing units, SM, SMX) 20

Shading units (cuda Kernels) 1. 280

TMUs 80

ROPs 32

Cache 1MB

Pixel Fill Rate 55.2 GPixel/s

Texture Fill Rate 138.0 GTexel/s

Performance FP16 (half) 8.8TFLOPS

Performance FP32 (float) 4.4TFLOPS

Performance FP64 (double) 138GFLOPS

Latest devices

More from the same brand

Review and testing of Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

The GTX 1650 SUPER has more CUDA cores and more texture units than the GTX 1650, so NVIDIA switched from GPU TU117 to TU116. Unlike the GTX 1650, the new SUPER is equipped with faster GDDR6 memory with a bandwidth of 12 Gb / s, the predecessor had GDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 8 Gb / s. The opponent of the GTX 1650 SUPER seems to be the AMD Radeon RX 5500, which the Reds are positioning as an alternative to the GeForce GTX 1650, so the new GTX 1650 SUPER, having a comparable cost to the Radeon RX 5500, should at least outperform it in gaming tests, tmk whether it’s us Let’s find out from this review.

The entire GTX 1600 Super series is based on the stripped-down Turing architecture and supports features such as simultaneous integer and floating point operations, a unified cache architecture, and adaptive shading technology to improve performance. It is important to note that the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER graphics card is equipped with high-speed GDDR6 memory with an effective frequency of 12 GHz. Compared to its predecessor GTX 1650, the new product with the «Super» prefix received not only a changed type of memory, but also increased throughput from 128 to 192 GB/s. but also an increase in stream processors from 896 to 1280 (the number of texture units has been expanded from 56 to 80). The standard core frequency has also increased from 1485 MHz (Boost — 1665 MHz) to 1530 MHz (Boost — 1725 MHz). But as for the amount of memory, it unfortunately remained the same — 4 GB.

GeForce GTX 1650 Super belongs to the GeForce GTX 16 family, which does not have RT cores and tensor cores. The GeForce GTX 1650 Super graphics card is the most affordable graphics accelerator of the new series, which according to the manufacturer demonstrate superior performance up to two times compared to the GTX 1000 series GPU (GTX 1050) and up to 50% compared to the original GTX 1650 graphics card in popular games like Fortnite, PUBG and Apex Legends. The GeForce GTX 1650 Super graphics card is poised for a significant performance boost over its predecessor, though it loses the standout feature of the vanilla GTX 1650: the ability to run without any additional power cables. While the original 75W model can be covered by your motherboard’s PCIe slot, the extra power of the GTX 1650 Super pushes power consumption up to 100W. 920×1080 / / 67 2560×1440 / / 45.7 2560×1440 / / 46 3840×2160 / / 27.7 3840×2160 / / 22
Cyberpunk 2077
(2020) Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

1280×720 / Low / 78 1920×1080 / Medium / 44 2560×1440 / / 52 2560×1440 / / 52 3840×2160 / / 28 3840×2160 / / 28

Battlefield V
(2018) Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile.

1280×720 / Low / 121 1920×1080 / Medium / 72 1920×1080 / High / 58 1920×1080 / / 57 2560×1440 / / 42 2560×1440 / / 42 3840×2160 / / 24 3840 ×2160 / Ultra / 24

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
(2018) Better than AMD Radeon RX 570, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

1280×720 / Low / 181 1920×1080 / Medium / 915 MHz on the GPU, and the memory frequency increased to 1900 MHz.

Benchmark tests

3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score: 44256

Better than AMD Radeon RX 590 but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 11688

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK.

3DMark Fire Strike Score: 11050

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU: 450349

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT.

3DMark Time Spy Graphics: 4632

Better than AMD Radeon R9 Nano, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max.

3DMark Time Spy Score: 5099

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile.

3DMark Vantage P: 57390

Better than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile.

3DMark06: 46823

Better than AMD Radeon RX 6700M but worse than AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT.

3DMark11 P: 17833

Better than AMD Radeon RX 570 but worse than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000.

3DMark11 P GPU: 17849

Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 480. but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980.

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit Sala GPUs-only: 2972 

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 290X.

Passmark: 9881

Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max, but worse than AMD Radeon Pro 5600M.

Unigine Valley 1.0 Extreme HD DirectX: 54.1

Better than AMD Radeon RX 480, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 580. .5 x 18.2 x 7.3 cm.

The design is modest, without a large image of the device and with a brief description in several languages, including Russian.

The outer box is made of thin cardboard — decorative, more durable underneath with foam inserts inside, which reliably protect the video card during transportation.

The bundle is limited to a memo and a DVD with drivers, which is not surprising given the budget positioning.

Cooling system and printed circuit board

Cooling is built according to a common scheme with an aluminum radiator pierced by a copper heat pipe in contact with the video processor using direct contact technology. The top cover is secured with four screws on the sides, allowing it to be removed for occasional dusting.

The heatsink is fixed with four spring-loaded screws on the back of the board. They do not have a warranty seal. One large section with low-profile finning is evenly and S-shaped permeated by one heat pipe. O-rings are installed on the heatsink in places where they rest against the board, and a soft cube-shaped gasket is used on the edge. As a thermal interface, gray thermal paste of medium density is used. The contact patch between the heatsink and the GPU die is uniform. Memory chips and elements of the power subsystem without additional cooling.

Two 11-blade Colorful CF-12915S fans with INNO3D logo are used to cool the entire structure. The connection is parallel, so they work synchronously. There is no RPM monitoring, as one two-wire cable and connector is used.

Marking on the board “Nvidia Corp. Model:PG166″ refers to the use of a reference design when designing a device.

Навигация по записям

Previous: Amd a6 9225 vs intel i5: AMD A6-9225 vs Intel Core i5-8265U: What is the difference?
Next: Computer server radiation: Error 403 (Forbidden)

Найти:

Свежие записи

Intel pentium dual core 6000: Please click the green button to continue.

Rivatuner osd not display in league of legends: Reddit — Dive into anything

980 ti wattage: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Specs

A6-5200M: AMD A-Series A6-5200 Notebook Processor

G502 lightspeed review: Logitech G502 LIGHTSPEED Review — RTINGS.com

Свежие комментарии
Архивы

Октябрь 2023

Сентябрь 2023

Август 2023

Июль 2023

Июнь 2023

Май 2023

Апрель 2023

Март 2023

Февраль 2023

Январь 2023

Декабрь 2022

Ноябрь 2022

Октябрь 2022

Сентябрь 2022

Август 2022

Июль 2022

Июнь 2022

Май 2022

Апрель 2022

Март 2022

Февраль 2022

Январь 2022

Декабрь 2021

Ноябрь 2021

Октябрь 2021

Сентябрь 2021

Август 2021

Июль 2021

Июнь 2021

Май 2021

Апрель 2021

Март 2021

Февраль 2021

Январь 2021

Декабрь 2020

Ноябрь 2020

Октябрь 2020

Сентябрь 2020

Август 2020

Июль 2020

Июнь 2020

Май 2020

Апрель 2020

Март 2020

Февраль 2020

Январь 2020

Декабрь 2019

Рубрики

Amd

Benchmark

Cpu

Gpu

Miscellaneous

Monitor

Playstation

Radeon

Windows

Xbox

Мета

Войти

Лента записей

Лента комментариев

WordPress.org

2024 © All rights reserved

Gtx 980 vs 1650 super: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980 Graphics cards Comparison

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980 Graphics cards Comparison

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares

Asus GeForce GTX 980 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super: What is the difference?

Why is Asus GeForce GTX 980 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super?

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super better than Asus GeForce GTX 980?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Features

Performance

Memory

Features

Ports

Price comparison

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 980

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core Configuration

Memory Configuration

Additional details

GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Key Differences

VALORANT

League of Legends

Grand Theft Auto V

VALORANT

Apex Legends

Fortnite

Theoretical Performance

Builds Using GeForce GTX 980 Ti or GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Radeon R9 290X

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Radeon RX 6600

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Radeon RX 580

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Specifications:

Performances :

See also:

Equivalence:

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 980 GPU Comparison

GPU Comparison

Price

Overall Score

Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Geekbench (CUDA) score

Geekbench (OpenCL) score

Geekbench (Vulkan) score

3DMark Graphics score

Core Clock Speed

Boost Clock Speed

Memory

Memory Bus Width

Memory Bandwidth

TDP

Pixel Rate