Hd 6770 vs gts 450: AMD Radeon HD 6770 vs Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

We haven’t talked about it beyond a passing comment, but AMD still has some Radeon 6000 series cards that are OEM-only. We are of course referring to the Radeon HD 6770 and Radeon HD 6750, AMD’s Juniper-powered 5770 & 5750 rebadges for OEMs. While we’ve only recently seen the rest of the Northern Islands lineup launch in the retail space, in the OEM space the last-generation Juniper GPU has been filling out AMD’s lineup between Turks (6500/6600) and Barts (6800) based video cards.

The rationale for OEM space is rather straightforward: OEMs want/need something new to sell. More RAM, a Sandy Bridge CPU, a SSD – their 2011 computers need to look better than their 2010 computers, as they certainly don’t want to be seen as selling last year’s model for anything less than a steep discount. It was perhaps a foolish hope that these shenanigans would remain in the OEM market, as so far AMD has continued to keep the 5770 and 5750 even after the rest of Northern Islands has launched. But here we are, out with the old and in with the old: the 5770 and 5750 are getting rebadged in retail. Say hello to the Radeon HD 6770 and Radeon HD 6750.

	AMD Radeon HD 6770	AMD Radeon HD 5770	AMD Radeon HD 6750	AMD Radeon HD 5750
Stream Processors	800	800	720	720
Texture Units	40	40	36	36
ROPs	16	16	16	16
Core Clock	850MHz	850MHz	700MHz	700MHz
Memory Clock	1. 2GHz (4.8GHz data rate) GDDR5	1.2GHz (4.8GHz data rate) GDDR5	1.15GHz (4.6GHz data rate) GDDR5	1.15GHz (4.6GHz data rate) GDDR5
Memory Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit	128-bit	128-bit
VRAM	1GB	1GB	1GB	1GB
FP64	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Transistor Count	1. 04B	1.04B	1.04B	1.04B
Manufacturing Process	TSMC 40nm	TSMC 40nm	TSMC 40nm	TSMC 40nm
Price Point	?	~$110	?	~$110

There’s really no way to sugarcoat it, and even AMD isn’t really trying. It’s the same Juniper GPU on the same boards with the same clocks, the same power requirements, and the same performance. The only thing different between a 5700 series card and its 6700 series counterpart is the sticker on the card, the BIOS, and quite possibly the price.

Image Courtesy Best Buy

Image Courtesy Newegg

However to be fair to AMD, they have at least made some effort to improve on the 6700 series over the 5700 series through the BIOS. As you may recall, one of the big differences for the 6000 series over the 5000 series is that the 6000 series got HDMI 1.4a support, along with a UVD3 video decoder that was capable of decoding the additional resolutions and bitrates Blu-Ray 3D’s MVC(H.264) profiles require. These changes have been backported to Juniper to some extent.

UVD2.2 is fast enough to process MVC, so now the 6700 series can decode Blu-Ray 3D. Without any hardware on hand we can’t specifically test this, but we suspect AMD may have introduced a new PowerPlay state (or edited an existing one) to further ramp up Juniper’s core clocks when playing MVC content, as this would be the most practical way to increase the max bitrate UVD2.2 can handle, if indeed it couldn’t handle MVC bitrates at the usual core clocks. Update: AMD has confirmed our theory. In fact the UVD3 also have a Blu-Ray 3D PowerPlay state, which means UVD2 and UVD3 may be more similiar than we once thought.

Meanwhile HDMI 1.3 and HDMI 1.4a both have the same bandwidth requirements, so now the 6700 series is HDMI 1.4a capable through some BIOS magic – although we haven’t been able to get confirmation that this support extends beyond support for the frame-packed formats required for HDMI 3D, or in other words it may not support 2K x 4K resolutions and other features normally associated with HDMI 1.4a. Update: AMD confirmed that the 6700 series only supports the HDMI 3D portions of the HDMI 1. 4a spec. Apparently this is consistent with Northern Islands, whcih doesn’t support 2K x 4K resolutions over HDMI either.

The good news here is that we’re not immediately aware of any reason why these features can’t be fully backported to existing 5700 series cards. Although AMD technically refers to UVD2.2 having “firmware”, as far as we know everything is contained in the video card’s BIOS. If this is the case, then for any 5700 series designs being recycled for the 6700 series, it should be easy to use the 6700 series BIOS. Of course this wouldn’t be something AMD supports.

Ultimately AMD considers this rebadging a necessity to some degree. While everyone is free to speculate on whether there are ulterior motives, what is clear is that the 5700 series created a branding problem for AMD: the 5000 series was launched before ATI was rebranded AMD. So the 5770 and 5750 are still technically “ATI” cards, this being nearly 8 months after ATI was fully rebranded to be part of AMD. At the same time this makes AMD’s product stack consistent from top to bottom for both retail and OEMs: every current card from the 6450 to the 6990 is now a 6000 series cards. It’s not a particularly good reason, but it is what it is.

Ultimately our biggest concern at this point is pricing. AMD tells us that 6700 series pricing will be consistent with 5700 series pricing, but we have our doubts. 5770 has actually been really good – it regularly goes on sale for as low as $95, so if you don’t mind a MIR and the choice of only a couple of vendors, you’ve been able to grab a 5770 for under $100. This is cheaper than the 5750 most of the time, never mind what it does to the 6670 and NVIDIA’s lineup. What is NVIDIA’s lineup? The slightly faster GTX 550 Ti at $125+, and the 5750-like GTS 450 at $90+. Compared to everything AMD and NVIDIA, the 5770 is a very good deal; and this is why we’re concerned about the pricing.

We hope to be proven wrong here, but at this point in time there’s little reason for AMD and their partners to sell $100 5770s when there’s no competitive pressure to do so. A good bargain is another name for a product bringing in less profit than it should, and in the cut-throat semiconductor industry you usually need to grab what you can when you can. The concern we have is that it’s as good a time as any to realign 5770 prices with the competitive market and AMD’s product stack – it’s time for a price hike. There is no doubt in my mind that the first 6700 cards will cost more than the cheapest 5700 cards. The only question is whether prices will come back down once stores are fully stocked with 6700 cards as they are today with 5700 cards.

At the end of the day this rebadging seems to only benefit AMD and their partners, to the detriment of buyers. In a weird twist it’s a bit better than how they handled the 6800 series – at least the 6700 series isn’t slower than the 5700 series – but that’s not saying much. Besides the backported MVC/HDMI 1.4a features, the 6700 series lacks everything else that made the rest of the 6000 series an improvement over the 5000 series. There’s no DisplayPort 1.2, no MPEG-2 or MPEG-4 ASP decoding, no color correction, no improved tessellator, and no linear space color correction. With the exception of perhaps DP1.2 they’re not headlining features, but they’re glaring inconsistencies.

When NVIDIA played the rebadge game with G92 it didn’t help consumers then, and with AMD doing it today, it doesn’t help consumers now. Actually, G92 ultimately got a die shrink from 65nm to 55nm and various clockspeed bumps, so unless AMD makes a 28nm Juniper core this may end up being a worse deal.

It’s perhaps with a twinge of sadness to see this happening to Juniper. Juniper above all other AMD GPUs has been AMD’s workhorse. It was the GPUs game developers first saw in the summer of 2009 when AMD sampled their first DX11 parts, and we’re now coming up on 2 years later where it’s still selling strong. We’re glad to see it live on – it’s a great card and continues to be so at $99, but the rebadging adds a permanent tarnish to the reputation; an air of taking advantage of uninformed buyers that it will never escape. This would seem to be the fate of any GPU fortunate to live long enough to cross multiple generations: if you aren’t replaced, you’re renamed.

Tweet

PRINT THIS ARTICLE

HD6770和GTS450這兩款顯示卡的用電功率各是多少

1樓：匿名使用者

我靠 hd6770、gts450 功耗那麼大嗎？這只不過是中端的顯示卡啊，那高階頂級的顯示卡功耗得多大啊。hd6770、gts450只不過有一個6p的輔助供電介面，那些高階顯示卡可都是雙6p、8p+6p、雙8p的輔助供電介面，按照樓上的朋友們的推算 那還不得上千瓦呀。

這那裡是顯示卡啊 簡直就是電爐子嗎。

給樓上的朋友普及普及常識哈 ：

pci-e x16顯示卡插槽：最大供電能力75w6pin介面：最大供電能力75w

8pin介面：最大供電能力150w

以上這些是國際通用標準。如果你自己造的電源介面卡可以不受這個限制。

gts450、hd6770都是一個6pin輔助供電介面，加上顯示卡插槽的供電，最大功耗是不可能超過150w的，否則就是奇蹟了。

gtx590是現在最頂級的顯示卡，是雙8pin輔助供電介面，再加上顯示卡插槽的供電，最大功率是150w+150w+75w=375w。而官方給出的這款顯示卡的功耗是365w。就算是這種最頂級的顯示卡官方也沒能創造出奇蹟來（超過375w的功耗），遠不及樓上的兩位朋友啊。

2樓：匿名使用者

其實很簡單，hd6770和gts450滿載都在100-110w之間，電腦選擇額定400-450w電源就可以了。

gts450和hd6770哪個好？相差多少？
30

3樓：匿名使用者

hd6770好，gts450是和hd6750對抗的，它們相差也就15%到30%，當然這也要看不同的版本了，一般都有“終結版”“升級版”這些，一個gtx450終結版和hd6750一般版相差的就很少了所以具體的要不同來看，

希望對你有用

4樓：匿名使用者

。。hd6770顯示卡效能比gts450稍高個3%左右，實用時感覺不出來的，半斤對五兩啦。

5樓：匿名使用者

先來看看引數

顯示卡晶片 geforce gts 450 amd radeon hd 6770

核心頻率 783mhz 850/900mhz

視訊記憶體頻率 3608mhz 4800mhz

視訊記憶體容量 1024mb 1024mb

視訊記憶體位寬 128bit 128bit

gts450的效能只是接近hd5770，am）d radeon hd 6770比 gts 450 核心頻率 、視訊記憶體頻率 都要高，在位寬相同的情況下，核心頻率 、視訊記憶體頻率高的頻寬高，最主要要看晶片。amd radeon hd 6770要好一些。玩遊戲、作圖要配gtx顯示卡，有gtx750（低配）、gtx960（中配）、gtx1060（高配）。

主機板，cpu、顯示卡都要好，最好配固態硬碟搭配酷睿i5，這樣整體效能才能提上來。

6樓：匿名使用者

hd6770要好一些的 效能差距在百分之10左右 因為gts450是對應hd5750 和 hd6750的

所以 差距還是有一些 在大多數遊戲 hd6770要比gts450表現好一點 只有個別很偏n卡優化的 n卡表現好點 但是最多隻能是差不多 做不到超越hd6770

7樓：匿名使用者

你是要升級嗎？我個人推薦a卡，就是hd6770我多年喜歡a卡，兩個卡效能差不多，a卡就是顯示鮮豔一些，也就是好看，n卡都是聲稱遊戲性好，我是無感，兩種卡都用過，只選a卡，何況兩個卡差不多，看你用來幹嘛了，要是lol，更差的卡也行，看電腦配置再決定升級什麼，就從這兩低檔卡上看，你的配置不一定要弄顯示卡

8樓：匿名使用者

這兩款都效能很低的老顯示卡（如下圖），效能上差不多，而且早就停產了，現在賣的都是二手貨，不值得入手

9樓：匿名使用者

你好,這兩個差不多,

還不如有 hd6790 ,價效比最高,比你這兩個都好!! **也差不多.

最佳吧.

10樓：匿名使用者

hd6770效能高些.

差距在15%以內.

其次功耗上gts450也比hd6770要高.

所以建議上hd6770.

11樓：百度網友

6770，相差倒不算太大，只是你非要分的話。450和6750差不多，那你參考6750 6770吧。

12樓：匿名使用者

6770好點，這兩個顯示卡都太老了，現在隨便幾百塊的顯示卡都能秒殺他們。

13樓：匿名使用者

hd6770略高於gts450，而且hd6770功耗相對較低，效能最多20%。

14樓：蟈蟈

6770好 差距百分之二三十左右 6770對應的是gtx550ti gtx550ti是450的下一代加強版

15樓：路過呵呵

s450優化好，低效能顯示卡差距都不大

16樓：匿名使用者

6770至少強20%以上，gts450是跟hd6750比的

17樓：石榴之花

一個檔次的顯示卡，效能差不多

18樓：百度網友

玩遊戲gts450.學習hd6770。

19樓：匿名使用者

hd 6770好一點，差的不是很多

請問一下，我的電源額定功率為270w，能分別帶動gts450，hd6770,hd7750這三款顯示卡嗎？

20樓：醇正牛奶

戰蝶270 +12v 19a 實際輸出 221w

e6600 65w 主機板風扇等 20w 剩餘 功率 136w

gts450 hd6770 公版頻率 或者 略微超頻的 顯示卡 極限功率 在 110w — 120w

hd7750 不帶 6pin 的 功率 75w 帶 6pin 的 功率 90w

樓主 點名的 三款 顯示卡都可以 正常 使用 不存在 問題的 ！ 放120個心 — — — 辛曉琪

n 卡 在 入門級遊戲顯示卡 沒有什麼價效比 gts450 不推薦的

推薦： gtx650ti 市場價 800 左右

a 卡 推薦： hd6770 450左右 中高特效主流網遊

hd7770 700左右 高特效主流網遊

振華的電源 並不比 安鈦克的差，反而在 評價上 普遍好於 安鈦克 ！

在營銷和普遍印象中 振華 像 是 后羿 安鈦克 有點像 吳剛 — — — 那 誰是 嫦娥 呢 ？

21樓：匿名使用者

hd7750效能相對最強，功耗也相對最低（比gt430都還要低點），不需要過多考慮

22樓：我是隻喵

那幾個東西都要額定400以上，不然你玩遊戲玩著玩著說不定就宕機了

23樓：衣香花滿樓丶

建議換掉。顯示卡的功耗較高。看你12v輸出夠不夠。可以換成安鈦克 vp 350。

24樓：伊布拉稀

gts450估計稍顯吃力，其他兩款沒問題

25樓：匿名使用者

gts450的顯示卡 用到100多瓦是很正常的事  270w 壓力略大    看圖你就懂了

gts450和hd6770哪一款更好？

26樓：匿名使用者

hd6770更好，是今年新出的卡，架構更新，功耗更好，遊戲效能也強於gts450 10%左右。對dx11遊戲支援更好。nv的那些技術只對個別遊戲有優化，a卡也對一些遊戲有自己的優化但沒有像nv的宣傳那麼多，綜合效能還是6770略高。

27樓：匿名使用者

請問ga-h61m-d2p-b3+i3 2100 酷冷至尊 戰斧400 額定功率380w 峰值400w可以用hd6770

28樓：百度網友

我建議你買6770，孤島2都可以開點特效，而且優化dx11，更省電減小電源的負擔

29樓：匿名使用者

藍寶石的不錯。

這兩款其實差別不大，不過索泰用的好像是nvidia的核心。nvidia是有名的花屏大王，所以建議你使用藍寶石

30樓：楊默

從明顯的幾處比較下，視訊記憶體均為1g，gts450與hd6770不同之處：

1、流處理器（sp）：gts450有192個——hd6770為800個（換成n卡規範相當於160個sp）

2、核心頻率：gts450為783mhz————hd6770為860mhz

3、視訊記憶體頻率：gts450為3600mhz———hd6770為4800mhz

4、功耗：gts450待機80w，滿載230w————hd6770待機129w，滿載功耗242w********gts450如果不是經常滿載的情況下，功耗有優勢。

5、溫度：gts450待機35度，滿載70多————hd6770待機42度，滿載79度

6、**：gts450現在700多——hd6770現在800多**********後者貴100多元。

6770 基本上超越450，只是個人用的是n卡，如果玩遊戲，還是推6770吧。

31樓：匿名使用者

hd6850＞gts450＞hd6770 回答完畢

32樓：有太陽就能游泳

hd6770好，沒任何疑問

gts450好還是hd6770

33樓：暴來緱竹筱

效能應該是6770稍強一點，但玩遊戲的話還是選擇n卡比較好。某位說的6770是450的1. 5倍完全是放屁！6850也無非450的1.8倍左右！

34樓：戶雙闢雪兒

hd6770和gtx550ti是一個檔次的，比gts450效能強多了…你這情況看看是不是顯示器沒設定好，或者是遊戲裡也有設定亮度什麼的，調一下試試，我的顯示器買來預設對比度是5000萬:1，很刺眼，調低一點就好了

35樓：王妍後明旭

hd6770的效能不如gts

450，選擇gts

450吧，再說你的hd

6770的視訊記憶體容量也太小了一點。

36樓：匿名使用者

如果用這兩個顯示卡玩這兩個遊戲的話，還是gts450好點，因為在這個顯示卡等級上hd6770無法開啟畫質特效，如果hd6770不能開啟就意味著要被gts450虐了，gts450在最低特效下無論畫質還是流暢度遠遠大於hd6770，而如果開啟特效的話，就反過來了，hd6770就比gts450強多了,總的來說，玩這兩款遊戲gts450比hd6770好

37樓：岑密譙思佳

你好！建議使用藍寶石hd6770，有問題請追問，謝謝採納

hd6770和gts450哪個好，主要是玩遊戲

38樓：匿名使用者

你說的 hd6770和gts450有很多牌子，但如果是七彩虹gts450 ，就最好。

不過，一般1g顯示卡玩榮譽勳章戰士都流暢。

39樓：匿名使用者

看了下應該是gts450要好點

hd6770效能超過gts450是這樣嗎 電腦報評測

40樓：夢國飛

hd6770的效能比gts450效能略強一點，但是差距非常小，平常使用是感覺不出來的，下面是兩款顯示卡的引數對比和顯示卡天梯圖：

視訊記憶體：hd6770為1024mb，gts450為1024mb。

視訊記憶體位寬：hd6770為128bit，gts450為128bit。

視訊記憶體頻率：hd6770為4800mhz，gts450為3800mhz。

流處理量：hd6770為800個，gts450為192個。

核心頻率：hd6770為800mhz，gts450為850mhz。

41樓：匿名使用者

顯示卡梯度圖，自己看了就明白

42樓：丶銀色子彈丶

呃，你打錯了，是hd6670。

hd6670確實很強，而且功耗比hd6750少30w，6670效能其實和6750很接近了，499的小縮6750還真不一定能幹6670。

0026

Why is Sapphire HD 6770 better than Nvidia GeForce GTS 450?

• GPU frequency 67MHz higher?
  850MHz vs 783MHz
• 0. 76 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
  1.36 TFLOPS vs 0.6 TFLOPS
• 7.34 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
  13.6GPixel/s vs 6.26GPixel/s
• 298MHz faster memory speed?
  1200MHz vs 902MHz
• 392MHz higher effective clock speed?
  4000MHz vs 3608MHz
• 8.9 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
  64GB/s vs 57.7GB/s
• 608 more stream processors?
  800 vs 192

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Sapphire HD 6770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Sapphire HD 6770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 460

Sapphire HD 6770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 560

Sapphire HD 6770

vs

AMD Radeon HD 6670

Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Sapphire HD 6770

vs

AMD Radeon R7 250

Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

90 GeForce GT 93 GB 90 OEM0003

Sapphire HD 6770

vs

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

vs

Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT

Sapphire HD 6770

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Aero ITX OC

Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

VS

NVIDIA GEFORCE GT 440

Sapphire HD 6770

VS

AMD Radeon HD 6570

NVIDIA GTS 450

VS

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTP 620

Sapphire HD 6770

0 Reviews of Users

SAPPHire HD 6770

0. 0 /10

0 Reviews of Users

Functions 9000

Games

7.0 /10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Performance 9034

0236 /10

1 Votes

Reviews not yet

RIGHT LANDER

6.0 /10

1 VOTES

Reviews are not

Reliability

No Reviews yet

Performance

1.GPU Clock Speed ​​

783MHz

850MHz

The Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.turbo GPU

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTS 450)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Sapphire HD 6770)

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

6.26 GPixel/s

13.6 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

0.6 TFLOPS

1.36 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

25.1 GTexels/s

34 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

902MHz

1200MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs imaging units

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

3608MHz

4000MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

57.7GB/s

64GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4. memory bus width

128bit

128bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5. GDDR memory versions

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

✖Sapphire HD 6770

Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

✔Sapphire HD 6770

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5. GPU temperature at boot

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Sapphire HD 6770)

Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

✖Sapphire HD 6770

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

✔Sapphire HD 6770

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8. supports DLSS

✖Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

✖Sapphire HD 6770

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

✔Sapphire HD 6770

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2.HDMI connectors

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Sapphire HD 6770)

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices such as game consoles and TVs at the same time.

HDMI version 3

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTS 450)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Sapphire HD 6770)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.

Price Match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

Comparison of AMD Radeon HD 6770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon HD 6770

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

Advantages

reasons to select AMD Radeon HD 6770

• Reveal video card, the difference in production 4 MONTH (S)
• Textory speed by 35% more: 34.0 GTEXEL/ S VSel/ S VS. billion / sec
• 4.2 times more shader processors: 800 vs 192
• 2.3 times more floating point performance: 1,360. 0 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
• Approximately 4% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 315 vs 302
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 vs 302.509
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 4% more performance: 1.004 vs 0.965
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 79% more performance: 26.748 vs 14.925
• 4.2 times better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 vs 27.656
• About 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 vs 2160
• About 1% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 3358 vs 3325
• About 18% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 2546 vs 2160
• benchmark GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) about 1% more: 3358 vs 3325

106 Watt vs 108 Watt — G3D Mark about 8% more: 1333 vs 1237

Issue date	21 January 2011 vs 13 September 2010
Texturing speed	34. 0 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec
Number of shaders	800 vs 192
Floating point performance	1,360.0 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
PassMark — G2D Mark	315 vs 302
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	615.217 vs 302.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.004 vs 0.965
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.748 vs 14.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	115. 157 vs 27.656
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2546 vs 2160
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3325
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2546 vs 2160
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3325
106 Watt vs 108 Watt
Memory frequency	1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1050 MHz
PassMark — G3D Mark	1333 vs 1237
Geekbench — OpenCL	4501 vs 3269
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.758 vs 9.69
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3365 vs 2279
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3365 vs 2279

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

PassMark — G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
PassMark — G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	615.217 302.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.748 14.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.157 27.656
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2

Name	AMD Radeon HD 6770	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark — G3D Mark	1237	1333
PassMark — G2D Mark	315	302
Geekbench — OpenCL	3269	4501
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9. 69	14.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	615.217	302.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.004	0.965
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.748	14.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	115.157	27.656
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2546	2160
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	2279	3365
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3325
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2546	2160
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	2279	3365
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3325
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	0	0

Feature comparison

	AMD Radeon HD 6770	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Fermi
Codename	Juniper	GF106
Design	AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series
Production date	21 January 2011	13 September 2010
Price at first issue date	$129	$129
Place in the rating	1016	1045
Price now	$76. 99	$64.99
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	27.17	26.46
Boost core clock	900MHz
Floating point performance	1,360.0 gflops	601.3 gflops
Process	40 nm	40nm
Number of shaders	800	192
Texturing speed	34. 0 GTexel/s	25.1 billion / sec
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	106 Watt
Number of transistors	1,040 million	1,170 million
Core clock		1566 MHz
Number of CUDA conveyors		192
Maximum temperature		100 °C
Video connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
Maximum resolution VGA		2048×1536
Tire	PCIe 2. 0 x16	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	198mm	8.25″ (210 mm) (21 cm)
Additional power connectors	1x 6-pin	6-pin
Height		4.376″ (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI support		2-way
DirectX	11	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4. 4	4.2
Maximum memory size	1GB	1GB
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	57.7 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory frequency	1050MHz	1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev.

2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770 which is better?

Home / Graphics Card / NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

39%

DeviceList Score

vs

AMD Radeon HD 6770

48%

DeviceList Score

2 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 and compiled a list of benefits and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

Benefits AMD Radeon HD 6770

Comparison winner

General information
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
n/a	41.5%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0	TeraScale 2
Codename
GF116	Juniper
Type
Desktop	Desktop
Release price
n/a	129 $
Number of shaders
192	800 608 (316. 7%) better than
Core clock
783MHz	n/a
Boost frequency
n/a	900 MHz
Number of transistors
1.170 million	1.040 million
Process
40 nm	40 nm
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
106 W -2 W (-1.9%) better than	108W
Length
210 mm	198 mm
Additional power connectors
1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Tire
n/a	PCIe 2. 0 x16
Design
n/a	reference
Eyefinity
n/a	+
HDMI
Video connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
DirectX
12 (11_0)	DirectX® 11
Floating point performance
601.3 gflops	1,360.0 gflops
CrossFire
n/a	+

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

GTX 660 may be the entry-level flagship of the latest Kepler graphics card suite, but their prices keep them out of reach PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTX 650 is closer to being reasonably affordable at $7,149.3. NVIDIA’s xx50 card has always been budget priced with performance that knocks on the doors of entry-level graphics cards — especially when overclocked. Having taken the time to fully test the Kepler graphics card inside the GTX 650, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

The GTX 650 is much cheaper than the GTX 550 Ti as it costs ₽7149. 3. Compare that to the GTX 550 Ti, which originally came in at $9772.90. Meanwhile, the closest equivalent AMD card is the HD 6770 which costs ₽8461.1. The GTX 660 may be the entry-level flagship of Kepler’s latest graphics card set, but their prices keep them out of reach for most budget PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTX 650 is closer to being reasonably affordable at $7,149.3.

The good news is that with the release of the GTX 650 Ti Boost, the price of the GTX 650 is getting more discounts. NVIDIA’s xx50 card has always been budget priced with performance that knocks on the doors of entry-level graphics cards — especially when overclocked. Having taken the time to fully test the Kepler graphics card inside the GTX 650, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

The GTX 650 is much cheaper than the GTX 550 Ti as it costs ₽7149.3. Compare that to the GTX 550 Ti, which originally came in at £9.772.9. Meanwhile, the closest equivalent AMD card is the R7 260 which costs ₽7149. 3.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

The GTX 460 may be the entry-level flagship of the latest Fermi set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most budget PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTS 450 is closer to being reasonably affordable at $8461.1. NVIDIA’s xx50 card has always been budget priced with performance that knocks on the doors of entry-level graphics cards — especially when overclocked. Having taken the time to fully test the Fermi graphics card inside the GTS 450, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

The GTX 460 may be the entry-level flagship of Fermi’s latest set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most budget PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTS 450 is closer to being reasonably affordable at $8461.1. NVIDIA’s xx50 card has always been budget priced with performance that knocks on the doors of entry-level graphics cards — especially when overclocked. Having taken the time to fully test the Fermi graphics card inside the GTS 450, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

gts 450 or gtx 650

Nvidia has firmly established itself on the Olympus of the video card market, having won the lion’s share of users with the quality of its products. Products of the «green» are positioned as the most productive solutions, for the corresponding cost. And although at the moment there are many modern models of 2018-2019 release, some of the «oldies» may be attractive for a certain circle of users.

For one reason or another, the user may not want to update his PC with «fresh» components. For example, when the computer is used once every few months, or the “machine” is located in a country house or in a similar place, if the system itself is so old that it is a pity to invest money in it, or prices bite, and stores with new products are so far away … or in the aggregate all these reasons.

In this case, you can turn your attention to two video cards that have proven themselves in the past, namely: GTS 450 (2010 release) and GTX 650 (2012 release).

Contents

1. GTS 450 — advanced old man
2. GTX 650 — half or a quarter of the flagship …
3. GeForce GTS 450 and GTX 650. Common features, differences and comparison
4. GeForce GTS 450 or GTX 650 … better which one to choose?
5. Why is Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 650?
6. Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 better than Nvidia GeForce GTS 450?
7. What are the most popular comparisons?
8. General Information
9. MORE DETAILS
10. CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
11. Group Test Results

GTS 450 — advanced oldie

In 2010-2011, the GTS 4 and mid-market50 was a product for the lower market segment. Nvidia decided to highlight this by inserting the letter S instead of X, which also marked the arrival of the successor GTS 250 . At the same time, the card had support for the relatively recently released DirectX 11 , which appeared in 2009, which allowed a wide range of users to purchase an inexpensive video card with support for current gaming software with the new GF106 video chip.

• GPU: GF106.
• Manufacturing process: 40 nanometers.
• DirectX 11 API hardware support.
• The frequency of the video processor (GPU): 783 MHz.
• Memory type: GDDR5, 128-bit memory bus.
• Memory capacity: 1024 MB.
• Effective memory frequency: 3608 MHz.
• Output sockets: 2×Dual Link DVI, 1×HDMI, 1×VGA, 1×DisplayPort.
• Motherboard connection interface: PCI-Express x16 (v 2.0).
• Multi-GPU Technology Support: Nvidia SLI.
• Power consumption: up to 106 W.

In general, it was a good model for reasonable money . The video card had all the modern, at the time of 2010, features. Support for DirectX 11, as well as SLI mode, which allowed for significant scaling of graphics card performance, made the GTS 450 a worthy purchase.

GTX 650 — half or a quarter of the flagship …

From the flagship of the line — the GTX 680, according to some characteristics, released in 2012, the GTX 650 differs in that the video card in question has 4 times fewer stream processors, and the memory bus is smaller already 2 times, hence its name supposedly it is half or a quarter of the flagship.

• GPU: GK107.
• Process technology: 28 nanometers.
• DirectX 11 API hardware support.
• The frequency of the video processor (GPU): 1110 MHz.
• Memory type: GDDR5, 128-bit memory bus.
• Memory capacity: 1024 MB.
• Effective memory frequency: 4800-5600 MHz.
• Output sockets: 2×DVI (Dual-Link/HDMI), 1×VGA, 1×HDMI.
• Motherboard connection interface: PCI Express x16 (v 3.0).
• Multi-GPU Technology Support: Nvidia SLI.
• Power consumption: up to 78 W.

Not being something breakthrough for its time, this card could boast only low power consumption and correspondingly quiet cooling system . Asus managed to somewhat improve and offer a high-quality modification, since the GTX 650 made by the Taiwanese was already 20% overclocked from the factory, unlike the reference model. At the same time, the GTX 650, due to its price, could not compete in the market with similar offers from AMD, because the «red» ones at the same price offered the Radeon HD 7770, which has a much greater overclocking potential.

GeForce GTS 450 and GTX 650. Common features, differences and comparison

These cards have a lot of similarities, but these are the most common parameters:

1. DirectX 11 API support.
2. Memory type and bus: GDDR5, 128-bit bus.
3. Memory capacity: 1024 MB.
4. Connection interface: PCI-Express x16.
5. Multiprocessor support:
6. Models were released for the low and early middle segment of the market.
7. Both are morally obsolete, no longer produced, and stores can only have second-hand or r

Differences are better described in the table, for clarity:

Memory
Memory type
GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.
1 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.
128bit	128 bit
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.
3608 MHz At 2558 MHz (243.6%) better than	1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.
57.73	76.8 On 19.07 (33%) better than 90Radeon RX 580 XTRRadeon RX 580Radeon RX 570Radeon RX 560Radeon RX 550Radeon RX 480Radeon RX 470Radeon RX 460Radeon R9 Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770 HD 7770Radeon90Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Radeon HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4290 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870Radeon HD 3850Radeon HD 3690Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 3470Radeon HD 3450Radeon HD 3300 (IGP)Radeon HD 3200 ( IGP)Radeon HD 3100 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT50 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1950 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTRadeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum Edition Radeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire Edition ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBRadeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProNVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev. 2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce GTX 1080GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1060 3GBGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce GTX 1050GeForce GT 1030GeForce GTX Titan XGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480GeForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev. 2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 512MBGeForce 7300 GT Ver2GeForce 7300 GTGeForce 7300 GSGeForce 7300 LEGeForce 7300 SEGeForce 7200 GSGeForce 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6500GeForce 6200 TC 64(256)GeForce 6200 TC 32(128)GeForce 6200 TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev. 2)GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.1)GeForce FX 5600 XTGeForce FX 5600GeForce FX 5500GeForce FX 5200 UltraGeForce FX 5200GeForce FX 5200 SEGeForce 4 Ti 4800GeForce 4 Ti 4800-SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX 460GeForce 4 MX 440GeForce 4 MX 440-SEGeForce 4 MX 420GeForce 3 Ti500GeForce 3 Ti200GeForce 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128 9Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770Radeon HD 7750Radeon HD 6990Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Radeon HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 43500 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870Radeon HD 3850Radeon HD 3690Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 3470Radeon HD 3450Radeon HD 3300 (IGP)Radeon HD 3200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3100 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4Radeon HD 2600 XTRadeon HD 2600 PRORadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon HD 2400 PRORadeon HD 2350Radeon X1950 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1950 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTRadeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X800 XLRadeon X800 GTO 256MBRadeon X800 GTO 128MBRadeon X800 GTO2 256MBRadeon X800Radeon X800 ProRadeon X800 GT 256MBRadeon X800 GT 128MBRadeon X800 SERadeon X700 XTRadeon X700 ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBR adeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProNVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev. 2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce GTX 1080GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1060 3GBGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce GTX 1050GeForce GT 1030GeForce GTX Titan XGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480GeForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev. 2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 512MBGeForce 7300 GT Ver2GeForce 7300 GTGeForce 7300 GSGeForce 7300 LEGeForce 7300 SEGeForce 7200 GSGeForce 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6500GeForce 6200 TC 64(256)GeForce 6200 TC 32(128)GeForce 6200 TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev. 2)GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.1)GeForce FX 5600 XTGeForce FX 5600GeForce FX 5500GeForce FX 5200 UltraGeForce FX 5200GeForce FX 5200 SEGeForce 4 Ti 4800GeForce 4 Ti 4800-SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX 460GeForce 4 MX 440GeForce 4 MX 440-SEGeForce 4 MX 420GeForce 3 Ti500GeForce 3 Ti200GeForce 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128 You can simultaneously select up to 10 video cards by holding Ctrl Reviews of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450: Budget trio from KFA2: GeForce GTX 550 Ti and two GeForce GTS 450 KFA2 GeForce GTS 450 KFA2 GeForce GTS 450 GeForce GTS 450 paired with DDR3 memory from Palit and Zotac Palit GeForce GTS 450 Zotac ZT-40506-10L Custom GeForce GTS 450 from Gigabyte and Sparkle Gigabyte GV-N450OC-1GI Sparkle GeForce GTS450 OC One 1G Review and testing of video cards MSI N450GTS Cyclone 1GD5/OC and N460GTX Cyclone 768D5/OC MSI N450GTS Cyclone 1GD5/OC Video cards Inno3D iChill GeForce GTS 450 Freezer and iChill GeForce GTX 460 Freezer Inno3D iChill GeForce GTS 450 Freezer (C450-1DDN-D5CWX) Introduction to GeForce GTS 450, GeForce GTX 460 768 MB and ASUS DirectCU TOP video cards ASUS ENGTS 450 DirectCU TOP/DI/1GD5 Gts 450 vs gtx 650 Nvidia has firmly established itself on the Olympus of the video card market, having won the lion’s share of users with the quality of its products. Products of the «green» are positioned as the most productive solutions, for the corresponding cost. And although at the moment there are many modern models 2018-2019years of release, some of the «oldies» may be attractive for a certain range of users. For one reason or another, the user may not want to update his PC with «fresh» components. For example, when the computer is used once every few months, or the “machine” is located in a country house or in a similar place, if the system itself is so old that it is a pity to invest money in it, or prices bite, and stores with new products are so far away … or in the aggregate all these reasons. In this case, you can turn your attention to two video cards that have proven themselves in the past, namely: GTS 450 (2010 release) and GTX 650 (2012 release). GTS 450 — advanced old man In 2010-2011, the GTS 450 was a product for the lower and early middle segment of the market. Nvidia decided to highlight this by inserting an S instead of an X, which also marked the arrival of the successor to the GTS 250 . At the same time, the card had support for the relatively recently released DirectX 11 , which appeared in 2009, which allowed a wide range of users to purchase an inexpensive video card with support for current gaming software with the new GF106 video chip. GPU: GF106. Manufacturing process: 40 nanometers. DirectX 11 API hardware support. The frequency of the video processor (GPU): 783 MHz. Memory type: GDDR5, 128-bit memory bus. Memory capacity: 1024 MB. Effective memory frequency: 3608 MHz. Output sockets: 2×Dual Link DVI, 1×HDMI, 1×VGA, 1×DisplayPort. Motherboard connection interface: PCI-Express x16 (v 2.0). Multi-GPU Technology Support: Nvidia SLI. Power consumption: up to 106 W. In general, it was a good model for reasonable money . The video card had all the modern, at the time of 2010, features. Support for DirectX 11, as well as SLI mode, which allowed for significant scaling of graphics card performance, made the GTS 450 a worthy purchase. GTX 650 — half or a quarter of the flagship … From the flagship of the line — the GTX 680, according to some characteristics, released in 2012, the GTX 650 differs in that the video card in question has 4 times fewer stream processors, and the memory bus is smaller already 2 times, hence its name supposedly it is half or a quarter of the flagship. GPU: GK107. Process technology: 28 nanometers. DirectX 11 API hardware support. The frequency of the video processor (GPU): 1110 MHz. Memory type: GDDR5, 128-bit memory bus. Memory capacity: 1024 MB. Effective memory frequency: 4800-5600 MHz. Output sockets: 2×DVI (Dual-Link/HDMI), 1×VGA, 1×HDMI. Motherboard connection interface: PCI Express x16 (v 3.0). Multi-GPU Technology Support: Nvidia SLI. Power consumption: up to 78 W. Not being something breakthrough for its time, this card could boast only low power consumption and, accordingly, quiet cooling system . Asus managed to somewhat improve and offer a high-quality modification, since the GTX 650 made by the Taiwanese was already 20% overclocked from the factory, unlike the reference model. At the same time, the GTX 650, due to its price, could not compete in the market with similar offers from AMD, because the «red» ones at the same price offered the Radeon HD 7770, which has a much greater overclocking potential. GeForce GTS 450 and GTX 650. Common features, differences and comparison These cards have a lot of similarities, but these are the most common parameters: DirectX 11 API support. Memory type and bus: GDDR5, 128-bit bus. Memory capacity: 1024 MB. Connection interface: PCI-Express x16. Multiprocessor support: Models were released for the low and early middle segment of the market. Both are morally obsolete, no longer produced, and stores can only have second-hand or r Differences are better described in the table, for clarity: Difference GTS 450 GTX 650 Year of manufacture 2010 2012 GPU name GF106 GK107 Process technology, nm 40 28 Video processor frequency, MHz 783 1110 Maximum energy consumption, W 106 78 PCI-Express interface version, ver 2. 0 3.0 Other DisplayPort connector present No DisplayPort connector As you can see, the GTX 650 model is 2 years newer, performs better and consumes less power. The only benefit of the GTS 450 is the presence of the DisplayPort 9 connector0710 , however, cannot be called a decisive competitive advantage. GeForce GTS 450 or GTX 650… which one is better, what should I choose? If in 2019 the stars were so aligned that you were faced with the choice of which video card to take the GTS 450 or GTX 650, then the answer is simple — GTX 650 . Whoever you are, and in what other conditions you are not, the GTX 650 is objective in all respects, except for the lack of a DisplayPort connector. Both models are already outdated , no joke, the oldest of the video cards under consideration was released 9 years ago, and the youngest — 7, and here it’s not so much, sometimes dubious, the postulate: “Everything new is better than the old”, but that the GTX 650 is a more productive model. In addition, finding the 650 in the markets, shops selling used and refurbished components is much easier than the GTS 450 … while not the fact that this model has been preserved somewhere in an acceptable condition. As a result, as mentioned above, the clear favorite between the two models under consideration is the GTX 650, due to its performance, low power consumption, the new version of PCI-Express and, in general, if I may say so, novelty . At the same time, if you decide to purchase a video card, then it makes sense to purchase two pieces at once and combine them in SLI mode. In this case, games from 2012-2014 (approximately) will run if not medium, then at low settings for sure, and with the right degree of luck and overclocking, you can aim at later ones. Why is Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 650? 3.6dB lower noise level at full load Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 better than Nvidia GeForce GTS 450? GPU frequency 275MHz is greater than What are the most popular comparisons? Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 Nvidia GeForce GT 630 OEM 2GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 Nvidia GeForce GT 440 Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 AMD Radeon HD 6670 Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 AMD Radeon HD 6850 Nvidia GeForce GTS 450003 AMD Radeon HD 6850 Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 Nvidia GeForce GT 640 Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 Zotac GeForce GTX 660 Zotac GeForce GTX 660 . A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption. A higher transistor count usually indicates a newer, more powerful processor. Nvidia Quadro GV100 A smaller size indicates a newer process for making the chip. AMD Radeon RX 570 PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance. GTX 650 GTS 450 Difference NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Price ₽ 3,213.9 ₽ 13,052.4 9838.5 (306%) Year 2012 2010 2 (0%) Maximum recorded temperature 61C 73C 12 (20%) Maximum fan noise 45dB 40. 3dB 4.7 (10%) Recommended power supply 415W 456W 41 (10%) Reference Processor Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz ($248.98) Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz ($179.99) CPU effect on FPS + FPS +0.0 FPS CPU impact on FPS% 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%) Benchmark quality parameters Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings Average performance 1080p 0.0 FPS 16.1 FPS 16.1 (1610000%) Average performance 1440p 0.0 FPS 7.7 FPS 7.7 (770000%) Medium 4K performance 0.0 FPS 4.7 FPS 4.7 (470000%) Memory 1GB 1GB 0 (0%) 1080p cost per frame ₽ inf ₽ 525. 4 INF (NAN%) 1440p Cost per frame ₽ inf ₽ 1,098.6 INF (NAN%) 4K Cost Per Frame ₽ inf ₽ 1,800.4 INF (NAN%) Variant NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Total score combination Total score combination Description Metric From to Weight The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and driver support. Year 2016 2019 13 2015 2016 11 2014 2015 8 2013 2014 4 2007 2013 2 The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better. Price 250 35 250 400 30 400 550 25 550 650 15 650 9999 5 Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better. PSU 350 4 350 450 4 450 550 3 550 650 2 650 9999 1 Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card. Temp 70 2 70 75 2 75 80 1 80 85 1 85 999 1 Noise Levels under load. The lower the better. Noise 45 2 45 48 2 48 50 2 50 55 1 55 999 1 Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better. FHD 60 9999 18 55 60 13 45 55 11 35 45 7 35 5 Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better. QHD 60 9999 10 55 60 8 45 55 5 35 45 4 35 2 4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better. F4K 60 9999 5 55 60 4 45 55 3 35 45 2 35 1 Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the time this graphics card was released. CPU -5 9999 5 -7 -5 4 -10 -7 3 -15 -10 2 -9999 -15 1 Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future demanding games. MEM 8 9999 5 4 8 4 2 4 3 1 2 2 1 1 FROM TO VERDICT The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components. OVERALL SCORE 80 99 Excellent 70 80 Very Good 60 70 Good 40 60 Acceptable 40 Weak	55/100	54/100	1 (2%)

Difference	GTS 450	GTX 650
Year of manufacture	2010	2012
GPU name	GF106	GK107
Process technology, nm	40	28
Video processor frequency, MHz	783	1110
Maximum energy consumption, W	106	78
PCI-Express interface version, ver	2. 0	3.0
Other	DisplayPort connector present	No DisplayPort connector

As you can see, the GTX 650 model is 2 years newer, performs better and consumes less power. The only benefit of the GTS 450 is the presence of the DisplayPort 9 connector0710 , however, cannot be called a decisive competitive advantage.