Radeon HD 8670 OEM — Technical City
Radeon HD 8670 OEM
Buy
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
- Core clock speed 1000 MHz
- Max video memory 2 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 4600 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started Radeon HD 8670 OEM sales 8 January 2013. This is a GCN 1.0 architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 2 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 4.6 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 73.6 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is single-slot card attached via PCIe 3.0 x8 interface. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 75 Watt.
We have no data on Radeon HD 8670 OEM benchmark results.
General info
Some basic facts about Radeon HD 8670 OEM: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in performance rating | not rated | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | |
| GPU code name | Oland | |
| Market segment | Desktop | |
| Release date | 8 January 2013 (10 years old) |
Technical specs
Radeon HD 8670 OEM’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon HD 8670 OEM’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | of 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX) |
| Number of transistors | 950 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 75 Watt | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
| Texture fill rate | 25. 20 |
of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB) |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon HD 8670 OEM’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Width | 1-slot | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon HD 8670 OEM: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon HD 8670 OEM. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
| HDMI | + |
API support
APIs supported by Radeon HD 8670 OEM, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of Radeon HD 8670 OEM. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
We have no data on Radeon HD 8670 OEM benchmark results.
Radeon HD 8670 OEM NVIDIA equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 8670 OEM from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 650.
GeForce GTX
650
Compare
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
GeForce GTX
650
Compare
Radeon HD
7750
Compare
GeForce GTX
460
Compare
GeForce GT
730A
Compare
Radeon R5
A240
Compare
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Radeon HD 8670 OEM according to our statistics.
Core i3
9100
10%
FX
4300
10%
A4
7210
10%
Core i5
4440
10%
Core i5
6500
10%
A8
7650K
10%
Core i5
4460S
10%
Core 2
Quad Q9300
10%
A10
6700
10%
Core i5
4200U
10%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Radeon HD 8670 OEM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM Graphics Card Benchmarks and Specs
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM Graphics Card Benchmarks and Specs
Specifications of the AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM graphics card dedicated to the desktop sector, with 384 shading units, its maximum frequency is 1,1GHz The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the quantity of texture mapping units, of render output units, the release date, the GFLOPS performance, the values obtained in the benchmark platforms.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the link above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM | |||
| Market (main) | Desktop | |||
| Release date | Q1 2013 | |||
| Model number | 215-0837000, Oland XT | |||
| GPU name | Oland | |||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |||
| Generation | Sea Islands HD 8600 | |||
| Lithography | 28 nm | |||
| Transistors | 950. 000.000 |
|||
| Bus interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |||
| GPU base clock | 1,00 GHz | |||
| GPU boost clock | 1,05 GHz | |||
| Memory frequency | 1.150 MHz | |||
| Effective memory speed | 4,6 GB/s | |||
| Memory size | 2 GB | |||
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |||
| Memory bus | 128 Bit | |||
| Memory bandwidth | 73,6 GB/s | |||
| TDP | 75 W | |||
| Suggested PSU | 250W ATX Power Supply | |||
| Multicard technology | — | |||
| Outputs |
1x DVI |
|||
| Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 6 | |||
| Shading units | 384 | |||
| TMUs | 24 | |||
| ROPs | 8 | |||
| Cache memory | 256 KB | |||
| Pixel fillrate | 8,4 GPixel/s | |||
| Texture fillrate | 25,2 GTexel/s | |||
| Performance FP32 (float) | 806,4 GFLOPS | |||
| Performance FP64 (double) | 50,4 GFLOPS | |||
| Amazon | ||||
| eBay |
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price.
This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
TMUs: texture mapping units. This unit was a physical processor separated from the main graphics processing units. It is able to distort a bitmap image, and also to resize it, to rotate it and to place it as a texture onto a plane of a specific 3D model.
ROPs: render output units. The other name of this unit is raster operations pipeline. This hadware component is taking pixel and texel information, and processing it through vector and matrix operations. The result will be a depth value or a final pixel. It is able to control antialiasing with the merge of several sample into one pixel.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Performance with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between this graphics card and those of equivalent power, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares and rendering performances.
Pixel fillrate performance comparison for this graphics card:
| Pixel fillrate performance in GPixels/s | |
|---|---|
|
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Alder Lake) |
11,6 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Alder Lake) |
11,2 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Raptor Lake) |
11,2 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
10,4 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
10,4 |
|
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM |
8,4 |
|
AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM |
8,24 |
|
AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM |
7,36 |
|
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
6,24 |
|
AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM |
6,24 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
The term pixel fillrate is refering to the number of pixels that the video card is able to generate every second. This performance is achieved by multiplying the raster output units (ROPs) by the clock frequency of the graphics processor unit (GPU).
Texture fillrate performance comparison for this graphics card:
| Texture fillrate performance in GTexels/s | |
|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro T400 |
34,2 |
|
Dell Radeon R7 450 4GB |
29,6 |
|
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM |
29,6 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Raptor Lake) |
26,4 |
|
AMD Radeon R7 350 |
25,6 |
|
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM |
25,2 |
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 1010 |
23,49 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Alder Lake) |
23,2 |
|
AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM |
20,6 |
|
Nvidia Quadro P400 |
20,03 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
The term texture fillrate refers to the number of map texture elements (texels) that the GPU is capable of generating per second. This performance is achieved by multiplying the texture mapping units (TMUs) by the clock frequency of the graphics processor unit.
FP32 performance comparison (single precision; float; floating-point 32) for this graphics card:
| FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro T400 |
1.094 |
|
Dell Radeon R7 450 4GB |
947,2 |
|
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM |
947,2 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Raptor Lake) |
844,8 |
|
AMD Radeon R7 350 |
819,2 |
|
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM |
806,4 |
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 1010 |
751,6 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Alder Lake) |
742,4 |
|
AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM |
659,2 |
|
Nvidia Quadro P400 |
641 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
List of comparisons:
AMDAMD RadeonAMD Radeon GraphicsAMD Radeon HDAMD Radeon HD 6000AMD Radeon HD 7000AMD Radeon HD 7800AMD Radeon HD 8000AMD Radeon MobileAMD Radeon ProAMD Radeon Pro MobileAMD Radeon R2AMD Radeon R4AMD Radeon R5AMD Radeon R6AMD Radeon R7AMD Radeon R7 200AMD Radeon R9AMD Radeon R9 200AMD Radeon RXAMD Radeon RX 300AMD Radeon RX 400AMD Radeon RX 500AMD Radeon RX 5000AMD Radeon RX 5000 MobileAMD Radeon RX 6000AMD Radeon RX 6000 MobileAMD Radeon RX 7000AMD Radeon RX VegaAMD Radeon VegaAMD Radeon Vega 11AMD Radeon Vega 3AMD Radeon Vega 6AMD Radeon Vega 8AMD Radeon Vega MobileAppleARMARM MaliARM Mali-400ARM Mali-450ARM Mali-470ARM Mali-G31ARM Mali-G51ARM Mali-G52ARM Mali-G57ARM Mali-G610ARM Mali-G68ARM Mali-G71ARM Mali-G710ARM Mali-G72ARM Mali-G76ARM Mali-G77ARM Mali-G78ARM Mali-T720ARM Mali-T760ARM Mali-T764ARM Mali-T820ARM Mali-T830ARM Mali-T860ARM Mali-T880ASRockAsusAsus GeForce 4000ATIATI Radeon HDATI Radeon HD 3000ATI Radeon HD 4000ATI Radeon HD 5000BFGBroadcomBroadcom VideoCoreColorfulColorful GeForce 4000DellDMPEVGAEVGA GeForce 1000EVGA GeForce 1600EVGA GeForce 2000EVGA GeForce 3000GainwardGainward GeForce 4000GigabyteGigabyte GeForce 4000ImaginationImagination PowerVRImagination PowerVR SGX543Imagination PowerVR SGX544Inno3DIntelIntel ArcIntel Arctic SoundIntel HD GraphicsIntel Iris GraphicsIntel Iris Plus GraphicsIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7Intel Iris Xe Graphics MobileIntel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 610Intel UHD Graphics 620Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 730Intel UHD Graphics 770Intel Xe GraphicsLeadtekMicrosoftMicrosoft XboxMSIMSI GeForce 3000MSI GeForce 4000NintendoNvidiaNvidia GeForceNvidia GeForce 1000Nvidia GeForce 1000 MobileNvidia GeForce 1600Nvidia GeForce 1600 MobileNvidia GeForce 2000Nvidia GeForce 2000 MobileNvidia GeForce 3000Nvidia GeForce 3000 MobileNvidia GeForce 400Nvidia GeForce 4000Nvidia GeForce 500Nvidia GeForce 600Nvidia GeForce 600MNvidia GeForce 700Nvidia GeForce 700MNvidia GeForce 800M seriesNvidia GeForce 900Nvidia GeForce 900MNvidia GeForce GTNvidia GeForce GT 1000Nvidia GeForce GTXNvidia GeForce GTX 1000Nvidia GeForce GTX 1000 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 1600Nvidia GeForce GTX 1600 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 400Nvidia GeForce GTX 500Nvidia GeForce GTX 600Nvidia GeForce GTX 600 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 700Nvidia GeForce GTX 700 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 800 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 900Nvidia GeForce GTX 900 MobileNvidia GeForce MXNvidia GeForce RTXNvidia GeForce RTX 2000Nvidia GeForce RTX 2000 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 3000Nvidia GeForce RTX 3000 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 4000Nvidia GeForce RTX 4000 MobileNvidia GM20BNvidia Quadro seriesNvidia TeslaNvidia VoltaPalitPalit GeForce 4000PNYQualcommQualcomm AdrenoSamsungSaplosSapphireSonySony PlayStationValveVeinedaVivanteXFXYestonZotacZotac GeForce 4000Graphics cards groups
List of benchmarks:
FP32 performance
Equivalence:
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM Nvidia equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission.
Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
Video card AMD Radeon HD 8670
Home / Video cards / AMD Radeon HD 8670
- Date of issue: January, 2013;
- Video card memory size: 2048 MB;
- Video memory type: GDDR5;
- GPU clock: 1,000 MHz.
Features AMD Radeon HD 8670
GPU
| GPU manufacturer | AMD |
|---|---|
| GPU name | Oland XT |
| Platform | Desktop |
| Clock frequency | 1. 000 MHz |
| Turbo clock speed | 1.050 MHz |
| Two processors | No |
| Reference card | No |
Performance
| Number of shaders | 384 |
|---|---|
| Number of texture units (TMU) | 24 |
| Number of ROPs | 8 |
| Computer units | 6 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.4GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 25.2 GTexel/s |
| Number of floating point operations (FLOPS) | 806.4GFLOPS |
Memory
| Memory clock | 1.150 MHz |
|---|---|
| Effective memory frequency | 4.600 MHz |
| Memory bus width | 128bit |
| Video memory size | 2.048 MB |
| Memory type | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 73. 6 GB/s |
Energy consumption
| Power consumption | 75W |
|---|
Benchmarks Radeon HD 8670
3DMark 11 Graphics
| Radeon HD 8670 | 2.700 |
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7750 | 3.240 |
| Radeon R7 250 | 2.775 |
3DMark Vantage Graphics
| Radeon HD 8670 | 10.190 |
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7750 | 11.070 |
| Radeon R7 250 | 10.708 |
3DMark06
| Radeon HD 8670 | 10.760 |
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 250 | 16.215 |
| Radeon HD 7750 | 12.730 |
Test Fire Strike
| Radeon HD 8670 | 18.96 |
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 250 | 15.71 |
| Radeon HD 7750 | 18. 46 |
Sky Diver test
| Radeon HD 8670 | 165.96 |
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 250 | 148.57 |
| Radeon HD 7750 | 160.35 |
Cloud Gate test
| Radeon HD 8670 | 13.61 |
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 250 | 11.94 |
| Radeon HD 7750 | 13.74 |
Video Reviews
Test AMD Radeon HD 8670M 2GB DDR3 on GTA 5
Battlefield 1 On AMD Radeon HD 8670M (First Mission)
Reviews of the Radeon HD 8670
I have a laptop on it intel graphic 4000 and hd radeon 8730 2 gb 4 i7 processors at 2.
1 GHz it accelerates to 3.1 GHz 8GB of RAM put Windows 8 on it and gaming where there is nothing superfluous it already has direct 11 and freework 3.5 sewn in and this is the only Windows on which all the drivers become without errors on the vidyuhu, the latest ones from the AMD website got up and it was not necessary to set the factory ones at the beginning and everything works, there is AMD networking and the catalyst are perfectly synchronized with each other, in general, everything is like should be no problem. through msconfig set max memory and 4 cores at boot. in short, in games everything is cooler than your crisis and the house is all on the tower and flies and I xs why do people buy expensive laptops if on my 2013 everything flies at high settings, for example, battlefield 1 is set to ultra and does not lag, but I play at high not to fuck the system. I recommend everyone to install Windows 8 game.
Shutdown Chanel, WD2 anniversaries will be optimized, but you’re wasting your time on the first one.
The guy changed the paste, he asked to put the subject on the beech asus, i3 1.8 GHz, gf 720m, well, the darkness of the fucking krch. I thought a fucking stress test, ok. With an active stand, the minimum preset is 15-25 fps, average 18, top 37 in an alley on foot, for such a weak stuffing, it’s even more of a feat. But anyway, not bad for this shit0004
You forgot to say that after each tightening, you need to run an application that will load the card, and look at the stability and temperature, if everything is ok, then pull further and so on until artifacts appear, the main thing is not to burn the card xD
P.S. if there are still people who have a radeon r7 200 series, tell me how much it turned out to overclock, I got to 1050 in memory and 1000 in the core, it doesn’t give further, but I think this is not the limit, because the software allows you to drive further …
O , this is an eternal problem with switching) If the clachic methods do not help (power mode is maximum), in Catalyst also select high performance for the necessary game, then try this, in Catalyst, set the game to power saving (HD400), start the game, and how as soon as it starts to load, turn it through Alt + Tab, and change it to discrete in the catalyst.
