Intel Core i3-2120 vs Intel Core i5-2400: What is the difference?
32points
Intel Core i3-2120
32points
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Core i5-2400
Why is Intel Core i3-2120 better than Intel Core i5-2400?
- 30W lower TDP?
65Wvs95W - Uses multithreading?
- 15.0 more performance per watt?
95.0vs80.0 - 2 higher clock multiplier?
33vs31
Why is Intel Core i5-2400 better than Intel Core i3-2120?
- 1.88x faster CPU speed?
4 x 3.1GHzvs2 x 3.3GHz - 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
1MBvs0.5MB - 49.32% higher PassMark result?
5801vs3885 - 3MB bigger L3 cache?
6MBvs3MB - 128KB bigger L1 cache?
256KBvs128KB - Has AES?
- 1.
64x higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
6743vs4122
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Celeron N3060
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
AMD A4-5300
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Celeron 1007U
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Celeron G1620
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Celeron G530
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Core i3-2100
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Core i3-2130
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Celeron G550
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Pentium J3710
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i3-2120
0 User reviews
Intel Core i3-2120
0.
0/10
0 User reviews
Intel Core i5-2400
3 User reviews
Intel Core i5-2400
5.3/10
3 User reviews
Features
Value for money
No reviews yet
6.7/10
3 votes
Gaming
No reviews yet
2.0/10
3 votes
Performance
No reviews yet
4.0/10
3 votes
Reliability
No reviews yet
4.7/10
3 votes
Energy efficiency
No reviews yet
5.0/10
3 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
2 x 3.3GHz
4 x 3.1GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
3.4GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.
L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1333MHz
1333MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
21GB/s
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i3-2120
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Core i5-2400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i3-2120
✔Intel Core i5-2400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Core i5-2400
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i5-2400 vs. Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Core i5-2400
The Intel Core i5-2400 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.40 GHz base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1155 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes.
Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Sandy Bridge S Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q1/2011
Intel Core i3-2120
The Intel Core i3-2120 operates with 2 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1155 CPU socket. This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Sandy Bridge S Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q1/2011
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i3-2120
Compare Detail
| 3.10 GHz | Frequency | 3.30 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 2 |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | No turbo |
| No turbo | Turbo (All Cores) | No turbo |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
1. 10 GHz |
GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| 32 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| 1.10 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| 10.1 | DirectX Version | 10.1 |
| 2 | Max. displays | 2 |
| DDR3-1066 DDR3-1333 |
Memory | DDR3-1066 DDR3-1333 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 6.00 MB | L3 Cache | 3.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 2.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| 32 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| LGA 1155 | Socket | LGA 1155 |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT |
| Q1/2011 | Release date | Q1/2011 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| Intel Core i5-2400 | Intel Core i3-2120 | |
| 95 W | Max TDP | 65 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
i3-2120 so với i5-2400 — The Talos Principle với R9 390X So sánh hiệu suất
R9 390X with
Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.
30GHz
The Talos Principle
R9 390X with
Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz
i3-2120
i5-2400
Multi-Thread Performance
3923 Pts
5953 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
1692 Pts
1747 Pts
The Talos Principle
i3-2120 vs i5-2400 trong The Talos Principle sử dụng R9 390X — CPU so sánh hiệu suất tại siêu, cao, trung bình, và thấp Cài đặt với độ phân giải 1080p, 1440p, độ phân giải 4K Chất lượng
i3-2120
i5-2400
Chất lượng cực
| Giải quyết | Khung hình/giây |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
56.9 FPS |
| 1080p |
81.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
42.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
60.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
24.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
34.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
35.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
50. |
9 FPSChất lượng cao
| Giải quyết | Khung hình/giây |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
97.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
133.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
75.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
102.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
46.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
63.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
65.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
88.8 FPS |
Chất lượng trung bình
| Giải quyết | Khung hình/giây |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
138.5 FPS |
| 1080p |
184.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
108.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
145.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
69.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
92.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
94. |
| w1440p |
126.7 FPS |
5 FPSChất lượng thấp
| Giải quyết | Khung hình/giây |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
220.0 FPS |
| 1080p |
286.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
175.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
230.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
113.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
151.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
153.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
202.5 FPS |
i3-2120
i5-2400
Compare i3-2120 vs i5-2400 specifications
i3-2120 vs i5-2400 Architecture
| i3-2120 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i3-2120 vs i5-2400 Cache
| i3-2120 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i3-2120 vs i5-2400 Cores
| i3-2120 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i3-2120 vs i5-2400 Features
| i3-2120 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i3-2120 vs i5-2400 Performance
| i3-2120 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i3-2120 vs i5-2400 Physical
| i3-2120 | i5-2400 |
|---|
Chia sẻ ý kiến của bạn 86
Compare i3-2120 vs i5-2400 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Total War: Attila
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Civilization: Beyond Earth
2014
Dragon Age: Inquisition
2014
Far Cry 4
2014
GRID Autosport
2014
Shadow of Mordor
2014
The Talos Principle
2014
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i3-2120
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i3-2120
Comparaison des caractéristiques techniques entre les processeurs, avec le Intel Core i5-2400 d’un côté et le Intel Core i3-2120 de l’autre.
Le premier est dédié au secteur ordinateur de bureau, il dispose de 4 coeurs, 4 threads, une fréquence maximale de 3,4 GHz. Le second est employé sur le segment ordinateur de bureau, il possède un total de 2 coeurs, 4 threads, sa fréquence turbo s’établit à 3,3 GHz. Le tableau suivant permet aussi de comparer la lithographie, le nombre de transistors (si indiqué), la quantité de mémoire cache, la capacité maximale de mémoire RAM, le type de mémoire accepté, la date de première diffusion, le nombre maximal de lignes PCIe, les valeurs obtenues dans Geekbench 4 et Cinebench R15.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.
Cette page contient des références aux produits d’un ou de plusieurs de nos annonceurs. Nous pouvons recevoir une compensation lorsque vous cliquez sur des liens vers ces produits. Pour une explication de notre politique publicitaire, veuillez visiter cette page.
Caractéristiques :
| Processeur | Intel Core i5-2400 | Intel Core i3-2120 | ||||||
| Marché (principal) | Ordinateur de bureau | Ordinateur de bureau | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Sandy Bridge | Sandy Bridge | ||||||
| Famille | Core i5-2000 | Core i3-2000 | ||||||
| Numéro(s) de pièce, S-Spec | BX80623I52400, BXC80623I52400, CM8062300834106, CM8062300834107, Q1ED, Q1HT, SR00Q |
BX80623I32120, BXC80623I32120, CM8062301044204, Q1FM, SR05Y |
||||||
| Date de lancement | Q1 2011 | Q1 2011 | ||||||
| Lithographie | 32 nm | 32 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 160.000.000 |
504.000.000 | ||||||
| Cœurs | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Fréquence de base | 3,1 GHz | 3,3 GHz | ||||||
| Fréquence turbo | 3,4 GHz | — | ||||||
| Vitesse du bus | 5 GT/s | 5 GT/s | ||||||
| Mémoire cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | ||||||
| Capacité mémoire maxi | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Types de mémoire | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR3 1066/1333 | ||||||
Nb. max. de canaux mémoire |
2 | 2 | ||||||
| Bande passante mémoire maxi | 21 GB/s | 21 GB/s | ||||||
| Lignes PCIe max | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| PDT | 95 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Alimentation système recommandée | Alimentation PC de 600W | Alimentation PC de 600W | ||||||
| GPU intégré | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | ||||||
| GPU, unités d’exécution | 6 | 6 | ||||||
| GPU, unités de calcul shader | 48 | 48 | ||||||
| GPU, cadence de base | 850 MHz | 850 MHz | ||||||
| GPU, cadence maxi | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
| GPU, point flottant FP32 | 110,4 GFLOPS | 110,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 | ||||||
| Carte mère compatible | Carte mère Socket LGA 1155 | Carte mère Socket LGA 1155 | ||||||
| Température maximale | 72. 6°C |
69.1°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z simple thread | 308 | 258 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1.212 | 808 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 simple thread | 119 | 109 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 421 | 272 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 simple thread | 620 | 662 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 2.351 | 1.703 | ||||||
| PassMark simple thread | 1.567 | 1.503 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 3. 811 |
1.902 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 simple cœur |
3.247 | 2.814 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-cœur |
9.282 | 5.355 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) Performance en GFLOPS |
139,74 GFLOPS | 54,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Performance multi-cœur / watt) Rapport performance / watt |
98 pts / W | 82 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.
On peut ainsi mieux comparer quelles sont les différences techniques entre les deux processeurs.
Alimentation système recommandée : on suppose que l’on possède une tour ATX, une carte graphique haut de gamme, 16GB de mémoire RAM, un disque SSD de 512GB, un disque dur HDD de 1TB, un lecteur Blu-Ray. Il faudra compter sur une alimentation plus puissante si on souhaite disposer de plusieurs cartes graphiques, plusieurs moniteurs, davantage de mémoire, etc.
Prix : pour des raisons techniques, nous ne pouvons pas afficher pour le moment un prix de moins de 24 heures, ou un prix en temps réel. C’est pourquoi on préfère pour l’instant ne pas faire apparaître de prix. Il faut vous référer aux boutiques en ligne respectives pour connaître le dernier prix, ainsi que la disponibilité.
Le processeur Intel Core i5-2400 a davantage de cœurs, la fréquence maximale du Intel Core i5-2400 est supérieure, que la puissance de dissipation thermique du Intel Core i3-2120 est moindre.
Les deux ont été produits au cours de la même année.
Performances :
Comparaison des performances entre les deux processeurs, pour cela on considère les résultats générés sur des logiciels de benchmarks tels que Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Score multi-thread & simple thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
308 1.212 |
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
258 808 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 19%. En multi-cœurs, le gap différentiel est de 50%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
CPU-Z est un logiciel d’information système qui fournit le nom du processeur, son numéro de modèle, le nom de code, les niveaux de cache, le package, le processus.
Il peut également délivrer des données sur la carte mère, la mémoire. Il fait des mesures en temps réel, avec enfin un benchmark pour le simple thread, ainsi que pour le multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Score multi-thread & simple thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
119 421 |
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
109 272 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 9%. En multi-cœurs, le gap différentiel est de 55%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Cinebench R15 permet d’évaluer les performances de calculs du CPU en restituant une scène 3D photoréaliste. La scène possède 2 000 objets, 300 000 polygones, utilise des reflets nets et flous, des zones lumineuses, des ombres, des shaders procéduraux, un antialiasing, etc.
Plus le rendu de la scène est rapidement créée, plus le PC est puissant, avec un nombre élevé de points.
| Cinebench R23 — Score multi-thread & simple thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
620 2.351 |
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
662 1.703 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de -6%. En multi-cœurs, le gap différentiel est de 38%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Cinebench R23 est un logiciel de test multi-plateformes qui permet d’évaluer les capacités matérielles d’un appareil tel qu’un ordinateur, une tablette, un serveur. Cette version de Cinebench prend en compte les évolutions récentes des processeurs avec de multiples cœurs et les dernières améliorations de techniques de rendu.
L’évaluation est au final encore plus pertinente. La scène de test contient pas moins de 2 000 objets et plus de 300 000 polygones au total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & simple thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
1.567 3.811 |
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
1.503 1.902 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 4%. En multi-cœurs, le gap différentiel est de 100%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
PassMark est un logiciel de benchmarks, qui fait plusieurs tests de performance, notamment, sur les nombres premiers, les nombres entiers, la virgule flottante, la compression, la physique, les instructions étendues, l’encodage, le triage.
Plus le score est élevé, plus l’appareil a des capacités importantes.
Sur Windows 64-bit :
| Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
3.247 9.282 |
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
2.814 5.355 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 15%. En multi-cœurs, le gap différentiel est de 73%.
Sur Linux 64-bit :
| Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
3.425 9.109 |
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
2.768 4.749 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 24%.
En multi-cœurs, le gap différentiel est de 92%.
Sur Mac OS X 64-bit :
| Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
3.040 8.635 |
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
2.990 5.640 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 2%. En multi-cœurs, le gap différentiel est de 53%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Geekbench 4 est une plateforme de benchmarks complète avec plusieurs types de tests, dont la compression de données, d’images, le cryptage en AES, l’encodage en SQL, en HTML, le rendu d’un fichier PDF, le calcul matriciel, de Transformation de Fourier rapide, la simulation d’objets en 3D, l’édition de photos, des tests sur la mémoire.
Cela nous permet de mieux visualiser la puissance respective de ces appareils. Pour chaque résultat, on a pris une moyenne de 250 valeurs sur le fameux logiciel de benchmarks.
Équivalence :
Intel Core i5-2400 équivalent AMDIntel Core i3-2120 équivalent AMD
Voir aussi :
Intel Core i5-2400S
Intel Core i3-2120T
CPU Sandybridge: Lohnt sich i3-2100 /-2120 oder doch i5-2400 etc.? | Die Hardware-Community für PC-Spieler
MRBrip
Komplett-PC-Aufrüster(in)
-
-
-
#1
FAZIT findet ihr hier (stand Juni 2011)
Liebe Community,
mich plagt schon seit Wochen die Frage, ob sich überhaupt ein i3-2100 (Edith: i3-2120 ist zu teuer) lohnt?
Edith APRIL 2011: JA, er lohnt sich, die Antwort bringt dieser Test hier: klick mich
==> für meine Bedürfnisse reicht der i3-2100 alle mal!
Ich selbst bin Gelegenheitsspieler (Starcraft2, Civ5, vielleicht dann Diablo3)und nutze als Grafikkarte eine MSI Cyclon Power, meine Auflösung würde ich immer gerne bei 1920 zu 1080 halten.
Edit: Arbeitspeicher = 8GB.
Da ich kein OCer bin, reicht wohl H67…
stand März 2011: In betracht der Zukunft kommt für mich zur Zeit nur Sandybridge-System in Frage.
AMD’s Bulldozer ist noch keine Diskussion, weil ich erstens keine Preise kenne und zweitens nicht nochmal ein halbes Jahr warten will.
Im Fokus (stand März 2011)
i3-2100: 2 Kerne / 4 Threads # 3MB L3 Cache # 3,1 GHz ca. € 96 ,—
Edith: der i3-2120 ist zu teuer, im Falle eines i3-2120 könnte man gleich einen i5 nehmen
i5-2400: 4 Kerne / 4 Threads # 6MB L3 Cache # 3,1 GHz mit Turbo 3,4 GHz ca. € 154,— ==> ca. 60 € teurer
zu den Frage: (Fragen die ich als beantwortet erkläre sind grün)
- Der i3 hat kein Turbo, was aber beim i3-2120 und 1-Kern unterstützung 3,3GHz ggü. i5-2400 3,4GHz mit Turbo, egal sein dürfte, richtig? siehe
- Ältere Spiele unterstützen nur einen Kern.
Damit ist der i3 konkurrenzgleich mit dem i5, richtig?siehe - Wenn ich zwei ältere Spiele paralle laufen lassen möchte, dann brauche ich, bzw wären 2 Kerne angebrachter, richtig?siehe
- Wie sieht es bei virtuell Desktop nutzung aus? siehe
- So wie ich das sehe, haben beide (i3 und i5) 4 Threads, aber eine unterschiedliche Anzahl von Kernen. D.h. der i3 arbeitet mir Hyperthreading der i5 nicht, stimmt das? Ist richtig siehe und damit ist 6. falsch
- Falls nein, was macht dann den i5 in Hinblick auf die 4 Kerne aus? Das der i5-2400 4x 3,4 GHz haben kann und der i3-2120 nur 2x 3,3GHz? falsch siehe
- Würde es beim i3 bedeuten, dass ein Kern für zwei Threats herhalten muss und damit einem Thread im schlimmsten Fall nur 50% der Leistung zur verfügung steht, während der i5 100% Leistung für jeden Thread geben kann? siehe
- Wann geht der i5 in den Turbo? Häufig oder selten? Gibt es da eine Regel? siehe
- Wieviel unterschied macht L3-Cache 6MB ggü.
3MB? siehe - Was passiert wenn ich mehrere Programm gleichzeitig laufen lasse? Bsp. Word, Excel, Firefox, VLC, Outlook, Paint.net, Skype, +1 Spiel, mehrere Youtube Videos gleichzeitig und und und. Zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt kommt mein Rechner ins schwitzen bei einem E2200 auch kein Wunder. Wie sieht es mit einem i3 aus? Das ein i5 das besser schafft, aufgrund mehrer Kerne, erklärt sich von selbst, oder? siehe
Hauptfrage:
In Hinblick auf meine Spielgewohnheit, geht es mir hier um 50€ die ich nicht leichtferitg aus dem Fenster schmeißen will. Bis ein Spiel kommt das ich gerne haben will und die Leistung braucht, vergeht bestimmt noch mal ein Jahr. Bis dahin ist vieles günstiger. Zu mal meine Grafikkarte dann auch nicht mehr ausreichen würde.
11. Kann ich also mit einem i3 oben genannte Spiel ohne weiteres Spielen? D.h. max Details und 1920×1080? siehe
Offtopic:
12.
Auf ein x-beliebiges H67 Motherboard kann ich später alle Sandybridge und Ivybridge upgraden, richtig?siehe
Würde mich freuen, wenn ihr zu den Antworten immer die Fragenummer dazuschreibt, das macht es fürs lesen einfacher
Falls es schon so einen Threat gibt der mir Antwort auf meine Fragen liefern kann, würde ich mich sehr über Links freuen.
Auch Benchmarks sind willkommen.
Vielen Dank
einige Benchsmarks:
Link 1
Link 2
Link 3
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
widder0815
Guest
-
-
-
-
#2
anstatt den i5 2400 150€ … lieber den i5 2500 169€
IvyBridge soll nicht auf jeden 1155ger Board 100% Laufen (wenn über haupt)
kuroi_saikoro
Komplett-PC-Aufrüster(in)
-
-
-
-
#3
Hallo MRBrip,
wenn du die 50 € nicht ausgeben willst dann tu es nicht! Aber wenn du jetzt aufrüsten willst, dann gleich richtig weil du dann auf der sicheren Seite bist.
Die Leistung die der Sandybridge bietet ist schon enorm da brauchst du auch lange nicht an ein upgrade denken. Da sind die momentan sogar nicht mal mehr 40 € mehr als gut investiert. Was die Auflösung in Spielen betrifft, das hängt ja eh von der Grafikkarte ab. Je höher die Auflösung desto weniger Einfluss hat die CPU.
Ich habe deine Frage jetzt zwar nicht nach der Nummerierung beantwortet aber das sollte dir etwas helfen.
€eld
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
-
#4
Arbeitspeicher = 8MB.
Zum Vergrößern anklicken….
Ich denke damit kannst du heutzutage gar nix mehr spielen
Dommerle
PCGHX-HWbot-Member (m/w)
-
-
-
-
#5
€eld schrieb:
Ich denke damit kannst du heutzutage gar nix mehr spielen
Zum Vergrößern anklicken.
…
Vielleicht einfach nur ein Schreibfehler…
Ich würde zu einem i5 greifen, denn der hat — wie du schon selbst erkannt hast — vier «echte» Kerne. Der i3 hat nur zwei Kerne und simuliert vier Stück. Prinzipiell eine gute Sache, aber ein i5 kostet nur so wenig mehr, dass sich ein i3 nicht lohnt.
PolzeR
Komplett-PC-Käufer(in)
-
-
-
-
#6
widder0815 schrieb:
anstatt den i5 2400 150€ .
.. lieber den i5 2500 169€
Zum Vergrößern anklicken….
wenn man nicht übertakten will hat der 2400er ein besseres P/L verhältnis als der 2500er
Bruce112
BIOS-Overclocker(in)
-
-
-
-
#7
I5 2400 ist Preis leistung am besten
MRBrip
Komplett-PC-Aufrüster(in)
-
-
-
-
#8
Dommerle schrieb:
Vielleicht einfach nur ein Schreibfehler…
Zum Vergrößern anklicken….
war ein Rechtschreibfehler und habe es gleich mal korrigiert.
Zum Thema:
Ihr sprecht alle nur vom i5.
Ist der i3 so schlecht? Ich habe keine Game-Benchmarks gesehen bis jetzt.
Wenn ich bei Passmark schaue, dann hat der i3-2100 = 3754Punkte, der i3-2120 = 3808Punkte
im Vergleich der i5-2400 = 6046Punkte.
Aber das sagt Passmark und die meisten halten nichst davon, da nur ein Game-Benchmark aussagekräftig sei.
Und bei Gamebenchmarks muss dazu gesagt werden, liegt die Dominanz nicht bei 50% mehr.
Orientiert man sich aber aber an Passmark,
dann könnte man sagen i3 ca. 4000Pkt und i5 ca. 6000Pkt, 1/3 weniger Leistung. (oder 50% mehr)
Deswegen im Vergleich zu 100€ und 150€ auch dafür 1/3 billiger (oder 50% teuer)
Letztlich wurden bisher nur Empfehlung ausgesprochen, allen voran den i5
und wenn man es so nimmt nur die Frage 7 und 12 annähernd beantwortet.
Ihr würdet mir wirklich helfen, wenn noch auf die anderen Fragen eingegangen wird.
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
MRBrip
Komplett-PC-Aufrüster(in)
-
-
-
-
#9
ich habe noch eben ein paar Benchmarks gefunden, die vielleicht den i3 in ein anderes Licht rücken.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/aid,8…i-Kernen-und-SMT-auf-dem-Pruefstand/CPU/Test/
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
MRBrip
Komplett-PC-Aufrüster(in)
-
-
-
-
#10
gibt es den niemanden der helfen möchte mir die oben genannten Fragen zu beantworten?
MRBrip
Komplett-PC-Aufrüster(in)
-
-
-
-
#11
Ich versuche es nochmal dieses Wochenende.
Bis jetzt spricht nichts dagegen einen i3 — 2100 zu holen. Aber anscheinend hat jeder bisher was dagegen.
Schrotti
Software-Overclocker(in)
-
-
-
-
#12
MRBrip schrieb:
Bis jetzt spricht nichts dagegen einen i3 — 2100 zu holen. Aber anscheinend hat jeder bisher was dagegen.
Zum Vergrößern anklicken….
Alles spricht dagegen.
Einen echten Quadcore kann SMT nicht herbei zaubern. Immer mehr Spiele setzen doch auf Quadsupport und da verliert der i3 2100 nun mal.
Bench — CPU — AnandTech :: Your Source for Hardware Analysis and News
PS: Noch ein Link -> The Sandy Bridge Review: Intel Core i7-2600K, i5-2500K and Core i3-2100 Tested — AnandTech :: Your Source for Hardware Analysis and News
MRBrip
Komplett-PC-Aufrüster(in)
-
-
-
-
#13
Schrotti schrieb:
Alles spricht dagegen.
Einen echten Quadcore kann SMT nicht herbei zaubern. Immer mehr Spiele setzen doch auf Quadsupport und da verliert der i3 2100 nun mal.
Zum Vergrößern anklicken….
Hi Schrotti,
danke für die sehr guten Benchmarks.
Ich weiß das in Zukunft alles dafür spricht. Ich weiß aber auch, dass ich in Zukunft kaum Zeit haben werde noch groß zum spielen zu kommen. Wenn dann meine alten Spiele. Daher meine erpichte Frage auf Singelcore Anwendungen.
Fraglich ist also auch ob sich dann die 60€ Mehrinvestition lohnen, oder ob man nicht erstmal i3 nimmt und zuwartet, die i5s werden ja auch irgendwann billiger.
Und die nächsten großen Spiel, die ICH erwarte kommen nicht vor 2012!
In erster Linie richtet sich dieses Problem an meine Fragen 1 — 3. Auf die ich noch keine Antwort habe.
Schrotti
Software-Overclocker(in)
-
-
-
-
#14
MRBrip schrieb:
zu den Frage:(Fragen die ich als beantwortet erkläre sind grün)
- Der i3 hat kein Turbo, was aber beim i3-2120 und 1-Kern unterstützung 3,3GHz ggü. i5-2400 3,4GHz mit Turbo, egal sein dürfte, richtig?
- Ältere Spiele unterstützen nur einen Kern. Damit ist der i3 konkurrenzgleich mit dem i5, richtig?
- Wenn ich zwei ältere Spiele parallel laufen lassen möchte, dann brauche ich, bzw wären 2 Kerne angebrachter, richtig?
Zum Vergrößern anklicken.
…
1. Ja
2. Ja
3. Wozu zwei Games gleichzeitig laufen lasse? Da ist der Quad im Vorteil denn Windows selbst benötigt auch noch etwas Rechenleistung.
Hansvonwurst
Lötkolbengott/-göttin
-
-
-
-
#15
Ich spreche mich mal für den i3 aus, owohl er P/L-mäßig schlechter ist als die Sandy-Quads!
Er zieht in so gut wie allen Spielen so gut wie alle AMDs ab und kann auch energiesparend im Office-Betrieb wie ein Fusion oder Atom eingestzt werden!
.
Mac
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
-
#16
Jop, hab mir auch erst einen i3-2100 gekauft, sicher kann der i3-2100 nicht mit den echten 4 Kern Sandys mithalten, ist aber eine günstige Alternative welche sehr stromsparend ist.
Schrotti
Software-Overclocker(in)
-
-
-
-
#17
Der i5 2400 verbraucht doch kaum mehr Strom.
Ich würde nicht den i3 nehmen.
MRBrip
Komplett-PC-Aufrüster(in)
-
-
-
-
#18
hmm bei allem dürfen wir nicht vergessen, dass die Benchmarks den i5 — 2500 zeigen der ist auch nochmal 10€ teurer, und wenn wir schon beim 2500er sind sollte man auch den K nehmen, und dann ist er 20€ teurer.
Preislich macht das einen unterschied ggü dem i3-2100 von knapp 100% aus.
Wobei es nicht mehr als 100% Leistungzuwachs ist.
Oder seht ihr das anders?
Schrotti
Software-Overclocker(in)
-
-
-
-
#19
40€ machen den Unterschied.
Ok ok.
.
Mac
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
#20
Schrotti schrieb:
40€ machen den Unterschied.
Ok ok.
Zum Vergrößern anklicken….
Er meint ja auch den 2500K und nicht den 2300, zwischen i3 2100 und i5 2500K liegt ein Unterschied von 75 €.
intel%20core%20i3%202120 datasheet & applicatoin notes
Top Results (6)
| Part | ECAD Model | Manufacturer | Description | Datasheet Download | Buy Part |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Texas Instruments |
Sync Buck for Intel IMVP6+ Atom | ||||
| PMP5800 |
Texas Instruments |
Sync Buck (1.05V @ 48A) for Intel X86 | |||
| PMP5783.3 |
Texas Instruments |
Synchronous Buck for Intel Core i3, i5, i7 Arrandale SV (5V @ 10A) | |||
| PMP5855.2 |
Texas Instruments |
Sync Buck for Intel Atom E6xx Tunnel Creek (1. 03V @ 5A) |
|||
| PMP5922.7 |
Texas Instruments |
Sync Buck for Intel Atom E6xx Tunnel Creek (1.5V @ 350mA) | |||
| PMP5783.6 |
Texas Instruments |
Synchronous Buck for Intel Core i3, i5, i7 Arrandale SV (1.8V @ 1A) |
intel%20core%20i3%202120 Datasheets Context Search
| Catalog Datasheet | MFG & Type | Document Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
Intel Component Data Catalog
Abstract: pentium 4 motherboard CIRCUIT diagram pentium MOTHERBOARD CIRCUIT diagram basic architecture of Pentium Processors PC intel MOTHERBOARD CIRCUIT diagram Intel Pentium 4 Processors intel MOTHERBOARD CIRCUIT diagram cut template DRAWING intel Intel Processors |
Original |
|
|
2007 — SR2500ALLXR
Abstract: AXXBASICRAIL SR2500 SR1550ALR 750-watt 750Watt SR1550AL AXXSASIOMOD SR2500ALBRPR SR1500ALSASR |
Original |
|
SR1500AL, SR1550AL, SR2500AL 0807/EOH/MS/XX/PDF 311913-002US SR2500ALLXR AXXBASICRAIL SR2500 SR1550ALR 750-watt 750Watt SR1550AL AXXSASIOMOD SR2500ALBRPR SR1500ALSASR |
1999 — intel 810 ver 4.2
Abstract: intel 815 SiI154 intel 815 dvo SiI164 810 ver 4.2 alpha date code System intel 810 810E bios function call definition |
Original |
|
Win95 Win98 intel 810 ver 4.  2intel 815 SiI154 intel 815 dvo SiI164 810 ver 4.2 alpha date code System intel 810 810E bios function call definition |
2007 — Sandy Bridge
Abstract: AMD BASED X86 K8 processor intel Sandy Bridge nvidia quadro fx SSE4 Intel Xeon 7000 INTEL PENRYN CPU Barracuda 7200 intel server board xeon lga 775 QX6850 |
Original |
|
1000MHz 64Bits/Cycle 128Bits/Cycle Sandy Bridge AMD BASED X86 K8 processor intel Sandy Bridge nvidia quadro fx SSE4 Intel Xeon 7000 INTEL PENRYN CPU Barracuda 7200 intel server board xeon lga 775 QX6850 |
2004 — intel pentium p5
Abstract: intel speedstep intel ia32 order number 241618 Intel 2003 «pentium M» AP-485 SmartDie pentium 241618 INTEL Pentium M 1.6GHz INTEL Pentium M intel p5 datasheet |
Original |
|
AP-485 com/design/xeon/applnots/241618 intel pentium p5 intel speedstep intel ia32 order number 241618 Intel 2003 «pentium M» SmartDie pentium 241618 INTEL Pentium M 1.  6GHzINTEL Pentium M intel p5 datasheet |
2010 — NH82801HBM
Abstract: LE82GME965 LE82GLE960 NH82801HEM 82GME965 GLE960 NH82801HB 82GLE960 LE82GME intel X3100 |
Original |
|
GME965 GLE960 0110/KSC/OCG/XX/PDF 316683-006US NH82801HBM LE82GME965 LE82GLE960 NH82801HEM 82GME965 NH82801HB 82GLE960 LE82GME intel X3100 |
2004 — FC-mPGA4
Abstract: E7520 RK80546KG0881M intel ia 32 |
Original |
|
E7520 0704/OCG/DLC/XX/PDF FC-mPGA4 E7520 RK80546KG0881M intel ia 32 |
2004 — «Ethernet Transceiver»
Abstract: LXT973 A3 IXP400 ixp425swr1 ethernet transceiver intel IXC1100 IXDP425 IXP421 IXP42X |
Original |
|
IXP42X IXC1100 LXT973 «Ethernet Transceiver» LXT973 A3 IXP400 ixp425swr1 ethernet transceiver intel IXDP425 IXP421 |
2010 — AXX6DRV3GEXP
Abstract: LSI 1078 LSi SAS2108 X5680 SR1695 AST2050 X5650 SR1630BCR BX80614X5670 W3680 |
Original |
|
0310/JS3/KAS/600 322234-003US AXX6DRV3GEXP LSI 1078 LSi SAS2108 X5680 SR1695 AST2050 X5650 SR1630BCR BX80614X5670 W3680 |
2001 — phoenix bios 4.0 release 6.0
Abstract: Motherboard dell c610 ATI Rage 3D MOBILITY-M1 ATI Radeon Mobility-M6 dell motherboard track Mobility Radeon M6 phoenix bios 4. |
Original |
|
|
macbook pro 13
Abstract: mb166 dell d630 ASUS eee PC 900 toshiba 8893 macbook AMD turion 64 X2 ASUS X50Z compaq 510 ACER Aspire JDW50 |
Original |
|
AOD150 KAV10) MS2229) JAT10) 3410T 3810T macbook pro 13 mb166 dell d630 ASUS eee PC 900 toshiba 8893 macbook AMD turion 64 X2 ASUS X50Z compaq 510 ACER Aspire JDW50 |
2009 — T9400
Abstract: 82801IR AV80577UG0093M AV80577SH0513M LE80537LF0214M AV80576SH0516M lf80537 intel core duo AW80577SH0513M SL9400 |
Original |
|
T9400, P8400, SL9400, SL9380, SP9300, SU9300, T7500, T7400, L7500, L7400 T9400 82801IR AV80577UG0093M AV80577SH0513M LE80537LF0214M AV80576SH0516M lf80537 intel core duo AW80577SH0513M SL9400 |
2007 — S3200SH-L
Abstract: S3200SHL manual intel n232 SR1530SH pcie riser S3200SH SR1530HSH MTBF SR1530HSH international cord set eee-1308 fan speed control using pwm |
Original |
|
SR1530SH SR1530HSH E23177-001 SR1530 S3200SH/S3210SH S3200SH-L S3200SHL manual intel n232 SR1530SH pcie riser S3200SH SR1530HSH MTBF SR1530HSH international cord set eee-1308 fan speed control using pwm |
2004 — RJ80536LC0172M
Abstract: 855GME Rj80536 E7501 Intel Embedded Products 3029* intel |
Original |
|
E7501 0604/DLC/OCG/XX/PDF 302905-001EN RJ80536LC0172M 855GME Rj80536 Intel Embedded Products 3029* intel |
2002 — INTEL FW82801BA
Abstract: Intel 815 FW82815 fw82801ba block diagram of pentium III PROCESSOR pin diagram of pentium III PROCESSOR FW82801AA FW82815 intel fw82801AA celeron 566 intel 815 agp pci |
Original |
|
815/815E USA/0502/LM/AvM/IL20707B/500 INTEL FW82801BA Intel 815 FW82815 fw82801ba block diagram of pentium III PROCESSOR pin diagram of pentium III PROCESSOR FW82801AA FW82815 intel fw82801AA celeron 566 intel 815 agp pci |
82571GB
Abstract: X520-DA2 82572GI X520-SR2 E10G41BFLR EXPI9400PTBLK EXPI9404PT EXPI9402PTBLK E1G42EF EXPI9402PT |
Original |
|
|
2009 — «pilot ii»
Abstract: SC5650 SC5650DP APP3RACKIT S5520hc ARIGRACK MB intel canada ices 003 SC5600 SC5650BRP SC5650BRPNA |
Original |
|
S5520HC SC5600 SC5650 0309/JH/MD/PDF 320936-001US «pilot ii» SC5650 SC5650DP APP3RACKIT ARIGRACK MB intel canada ices 003 SC5650BRP SC5650BRPNA |
2006 — TX300
Abstract: RX300 20050914 Intel xeon processor 5050 Xeon Processors E7520 DDR2-400 xeon 5000 5030 «Xeon Processors» Intel Technologies |
Original |
|
0506/KSW/OCG/PP/XK 312644-002US TX300 RX300 20050914 Intel xeon processor 5050 Xeon Processors E7520 DDR2-400 xeon 5000 5030 «Xeon Processors» Intel Technologies |
intel g41
Abstract: DG41TX Intel Desktop Board lga775 intel desktop boards LGA775 82801gb intel g41 chipset desktop board intel dg41tx Intel 82801GB |
Original |
|
DG41TX products/43605/Intel-Desktop-Board-DG41TX LGA775 i7-2630QM/i7-2635QM, i7-2670QM/i7-2675QM, i5-2430M/i5-2435M, i5-2410M/i5-2415M.  intel g41 DG41TX Intel Desktop Board lga775 intel desktop boards LGA775 82801gb intel g41 chipset desktop board intel dg41tx Intel 82801GB |
0 release 6.0 IBM PENTIUM DJSA-220 dell cpxPrevious
1
2
3
…
23
24
25
Next
Intel Core i3-2120 vs Intel Core i5-2400: What is the difference?
32 BALLLA
Intel Core i3-2120
32 Ballla
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
64 Facts compared to
Intel Core I3-2120
Intel Core i5-2400
why Is 2120 better than Intel Core i5-2400?
- 30W below TDP?
65W vs 95W - Multithreaded?
- 15.0 higher performance per watt?
95.0 vs 80.0 - 2 hour multiplier higher?
33 vs 31
Why is Intel Core i5-2400 better than Intel Core i3-2120?
- 1.88x higher CPU speed?
4 x 3.1GHz vs 2 x 3.3GHz - 0.
5MB more L2 cache?
1MB vs 0.5MB - 49.32% higher PassMark score?
5801 vs 3885 - 3MB more L3 cache?
6MB vs 3MB - 128KB more L1 cache?
256KB vs 128KB - Has AES?
- 1.64x higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
6743 vs 4122
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Celeron N3060
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel2 Core i3
0004 VS
AMD A4-5300
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Celeron 1007u 9000
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i3-2120
VS
Intel Celeron G1620
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
9000 INTEL Core Core INTEL CORE INTEC
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Celeron G530
Intel Core
Intel Core i3-2120
VS
Intel Core i3-2100
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i3-2120 9000
VS
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i3-2120
VS
Intel Celeron G550
Intel Core i5-2400
INTEL CORE I5-2400 vs
Intel Pentium J3710
Comparison prices
Users reviews
General rating
Intel Core i3-2120
0 Reviews of Users
Intel Core i3-2120 9000 0.
0 /0003
0 Reviews of users
Intel Core i5-2400
3 Reviews of users
Intel Core i5-2400
5.3 /10
3 Reviews of Users
Functions 9009,000
6.7 /10
3 VOTES
Games
Reviews not yet
2.0 /10
3 VOTES
0003
reviews yet there is no
4.0223 /10
3 Votes
Reliability
reviews yet there are no
4.7 /10
3 Votes
Energy
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
5.0 /10
3 votes
performance cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3. turbo clock speed
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
3.4GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has an unlocked multiplier of
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing you to get better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory to access each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1333MHz
1333MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
21GB/s
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports Memory Error Code
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides higher performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as like streams. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i3-2120
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Core i5-2400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7.
Has MMX
✔Intel Core i3-2120
✔Intel Core i5-2400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Core i5-2400
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i5-2400S or Intel Core i3-2120
- Home
- > 94
Core i5-2400S
54.
1 (+6.3%) Core i3-2120
50.7
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i5-2400S
56.3 (+1.6%)
Core i3-2120
55.4
Performance in day-to-day activities such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i5-2400S
29 (+8.6%)
Core i3-2120
26.5
Performance in resource intensive tasks loading up to 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
Core i5-2400S
50.8
Core i3-2120
51.4 (+1.2%)
Demanding games and tasks
Core i5-2400S
22.6 (+18.1%)
Core i3-2120
18.5
Extreme
Core i5-2400S
4.
5 (+20%) Core i3-2120
3.6
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Passmark
Intel Core i5-2400S
3106 (+38.8%)
Intel Core i3-2120
1901
Specifications
.
Basic
Manufacturer Intel Intel DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. 
Intel® Core™ i5-2400S Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.30 GHz) Intel® Core™ i3-2120 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Sandy Bridge Sandy Bridge Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 32 nm 32 nm Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 09-2016 09-2016 Model Official name. i5-2400S i3-2120 Cores The number of physical cores. 
4 2 ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 4 4 Multithreading TechnologyWith Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.
2.5 GHz 3.3 GHz Turbo FrequencyThe maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 3.3 GHz 3.3 GHz L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 6 MB 3 MB Instructions 64-bit 64-bit Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support.
SSE4.1/4.2, AVX SSE4.1/4.2, AVX Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No Yes Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 5 GT/s DMI 5 GT/s DMI Number of QPI links TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 65 W 65 W Cooling system specifications Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® HD Graphics 2000 Intel® HD Graphics 2000 GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 850 MHz 850 MHz Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. 1100 MHz 1100 MHz Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802. 11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
No data No data Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 2 2 RAM
Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 32 GB 32 GB Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR3 1066/1333 DDR3 1066/1333 RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available.
2 2 RAM bandwidth 21 GB/s 21 GB/s ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 2 2 PCI configuration options
Number of PCI lanes 16 Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data Decoration
Dimensions No data No data Supported sockets No data No data Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data Which is better
Intel Core i5-2400S
- On average, gaming performance is 3% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 1%.
- Faster and 1% better in complex multi-threaded applications.
- $73 down
- 2 more physical cores.
Intel Core i3-2120
- The base frequency is higher by 0.8 GHz.
How are they similar
- The number of threads is equal.
Comparison Intel Core i3-2120 vs Intel Core i5-2400 which is better?
Home / Intel Core i3-2120 VS Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i3-2120
3%
Devicelist
VS
Intel Core i5-2400
39%
9000
We compared the specifications of Intel Core i3-2120 and Intel Core i5-2400 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.
Benefits Intel Core i3-2120
Base frequency
3.3 GHz
0.2 GHz (6.5%) better than
vs
3.1 GHz
Number of transistors
504 million
503 million (50300%) better than
vs
1 million
Maximum core temperature
69°C
-4 °C (-5.
5%) better than
vs
73 °C
Power Demand (TDP)
65 W
-30 W (-31.6%) better than
vs
95 W
Benefits of Intel Core i5-2400
Comparison winner
Core
4
2 (100%) better than
vs
2
Maximum frequency
3.4 GHz
0.1 GHz (3%) better than
vs
3.3 GHz
Release price
$60
-35 $ (-36.8%) better than
vs
95 $
Value for money
83.2%
42.1% (102.4%) better than
vs
41.
1%
vPro
vs
Passmark
3797
1829 (92.9%) better than
vs
1968
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
5260
2610 (98.5%) better than
vs
2650
General Type
Desktop Desktop Architecture code name
Sandy Bridge Sandy Bridge Cores
A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications.
At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.2 4 2 (100%) better than
Threads
More threads help the cores process information more efficiently.
Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).
4 4 Base frequency
3.3 GHz Better than
at 0.2 GHz (6.5%)
3.1GHz Process
32 nm 32 nm Chip size
131 mm2 216 mm2 Number of transistors
504 million 503 million (50300%) better than
1 million Maximum frequency
Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.
3.3GHz 3.4 GHz Better than
at 0.1 GHz (3%)
Support 64 bit
Max.
number of processors per configuration
1 1 Socket
FCLGA1155 LGA1155 Series
n/a Core i5 (Desktop) Release price
95 $ $60 -35 $ (-36.8%) better than
Value for money
The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
41.1% 83.2% 42.1% (102.4%) better than
Maximum core temperature
69 °C -4 °C (-5.5%) better than
73 °C vPro
TXT
Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection.
For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.
PCI Express revision
2.0 2.0 Number of PCI-Express lanes
16 16 Identity Protection
+ + Flex Memory Access
+ + Quick Sync
+ + FDI
+ + Fast Memory Access
+ + Level 1 Cache
The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.
64 KB (per core) 64 KB (per core) Level 2 cache
256 KB (per core) 256 KB (per core) Level 3 cache
3 MB (total) 6144 Kb (total) Power Demand (TDP)
Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.65 W -30 W (-31.6%) better than
95 W EDB
+ + InTru 3D
+ + 3797 1829 (92.9%) better than
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
n/a 4425 Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
n/a 15344 x264 encoding pass 1
n/a 137 x264 encoding pass 2
n/a 27 TrueCrypt AES
n/a 2 3DMark06 CPU
n/a 5715 3DMark Fire Strike Physics
2650 5260 2610 (98.
5%) better than
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
n/a 3194 Technologies and additional instructions Advanced instructions
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AV60X Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX Turbo Boost
— 2.0 Idle States
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)
Technology from Intel that reduces the processor frequency to a minimum to save power when the processor is idle.
Thermal Monitoring
Hyper-Threading
Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core.
For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.
AES-NI
Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process.
n/a + AVX
The presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations
applications.RAM parameters RAM types
DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 Allowable memory
The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.
32 GB 32 GB Number of memory channels
2 2 Virtualization technologies EPT
VT-d
Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.
Integrated graphics 1.10 GHz Maximum number of monitors
2 2 Clear Video HD
Video core
The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card.
+ + Intel Core i5-2400S vs Intel Core i3-2120
- Main
- CPU comparison
 / 
 / 
Overall score
Issued
Q1/2011Issued
Q1/2011Overall score
Differences
Characteristics
Performance Tests
CommentsDifferences
Reasons to choose
Intel Core i3-2120Report a bug
-
Higher clock frequency
3.
30 GHz 2.50 GHz
About 24%
higher clock speed
Positions in benchmark results
Reasons to choose
Intel Core i5-2400SReport a bug
-
More cores
4 2
2 more cores
Positions in benchmark results
Features
List of technical specifications:
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Core i5-2400S
Processor generation and series
-
Segment
Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
-
Series
Intel Core i3 Intel Core i5
-
Generation
2 2
-
CPU group
Intel Core i 2000 Intel Core i 2000
CPU cores and base frequency
-
Frequency
3.
30 GHz 2.50 GHz
-
CPU Cores
2 4
-
Turbo (1 Core)
no turbo 3.30 GHz
-
Threads
4 4
-
Hypertrading
Yes No
-
Acceleration
No No
-
Kernel architecture
normal normal
Integrated graphics
-
GPU
Intel HD Graphics 2000 Intel HD Graphics 2000
-
GPU frequency
0.
85 GHz 0.85 GHz
-
GPU (Turbo)
1.10 GHz 1.10 GHz
-
Processing units
6 6
-
Shaders
48 48
-
Max. displays
2 2
-
Generation
6 6
-
DirectX Version
10.1 10.1
-
Tech. process
32 nm 32 nm
-
Issue
Q1/2011 Q1/2011
Hardware codec support
-
h365 / HEVC (8 bit)
No No
-
h365 / HEVC (10 bit)
No No
-
h364
Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
-
VP9
No No
-
VP8
No No
-
AV1
No No
-
AVC
Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
-
VC-1
Decode Decode
-
JPEG
No No
Memory and PCIe
Encryption
-
AES-NI
Yes Yes
Energy consumption
-
TDP (PL1)
65W 65W
Technical details
-
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
-
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT VT-x, VT-x EPT
-
ISA Extensions
SSE4.
1, SSE4.2, AVX SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
-
Cash L3
3.00 MB 6.00 MB
-
Architecture
Sandy Bridge S Sandy Bridge S
-
Tech. process
32 nm 32 nm
-
Socket
LGA 1155 LGA 1155
-
Issue
Q1/2011 Q1/2011
Used in devices
Performance benchmarks
Real CPUs benchmarks
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
iGPU — internal graphics processor performance in games. GFLOPS indicates the number of billions of operations per second that the iGPU is capable of performing.
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Core i5-2400S
Latest comparisons
AMD Epyc 7643
Intel Xeon Platinum 8354H
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
Intel Core i7-5500U
Intel Core i3-8100T
Intel Core i5-4310U
Intel Core i9-10940X
Intel Xeon Platinum 8253
Intel Pentium Gold G6400
Intel Xeon W-2123
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y
HiSilicon Kirin 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M
Intel Xeon W-1250
Intel Xeon E5-2650L v4
Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
Intel Xeon E-2278G
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Intel Core i9-10900KF
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Intel Core i3-3225
Intel Pentium G3258
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M
Intel Core i3-2120T vs Intel Core i5-2400 processor comparison in 3 benchmarks
Specification and benchmark comparison
VS
Intel Core i3-2120T 32 nm — 2.
60 GHz DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333Intel Core i5-2400 32 nm — 3.10 GHz DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333Intel Core i3-2120T
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i3-2120T vs. Intel Core i5-2400
Processor cores and base frequency
When comparing Intel Core i3-2120T and Intel Core i5-2400, you should choose a model with a large number of cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All functions affect system performance.
2/4
Streams of processor
4/4
YES
Hyper flow
NO
NO
Acceleration
2.60 GHZ
3.10 GHZ
NO TURBOO NO TURBO0003
turbo (1 core)
3.40 GHZ
No Turbo
turbo (2 nuclei)
No data
No data
turbo (4 nuclei)
No Turbo
Intel Core I3-2120T VS VS VS . Intel Core i5-2400
CPU generation and family
2
Processor cores
4
ca.
120 $
Market price
ca. 174 $
6
Generation
6
Intel Core i3-2120T vs. Intel Core i5-2400
Internal graphics
Some manufacturers include a graphics core in many processors, which is an added benefit. If you are using a graphics card separate from the CPU, we recommend that you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare the Intel Core i3-2120T to the Intel Core i5-2400 for integrated graphics.
Intel HD Graphics 2000
GPU name
Intel HD Graphics 2000
0.65 GHz
GPU frequency
0.85 GHZ
1.10 GHZ
GP (turbo)
1.10 GHZ
6
Fulfillment units
6
48
Shader
48
2
maximum. displays
2
6
generation
6
10.1
Direct X
10.1
32 NM
0003
Intel Core i3-2120T vs. Intel Core i5-2400
Hardware codec support
Please note the support of various technology options by processors.
Does not affect overall performance. In the interest of saving time, you can skip this section.
NO
H365 8 bits
No.
NO
H365 10 bits
No.
Decode / Encode
H364
003
No
No
9
No
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode
Decode
-1
Decode
No
JPEG
No
Intel Core i3 -2120T vs. Intel Core i5-2400
RAM and PCIe
Modern processors support multi-channel memory for fast data transfer and improved performance. The higher the clock speed of the RAM, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and the maximum amount in the system, the better it is.
2.0
PCI version
16
PCIe lanes
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3-133332 GB
Max. Memory
32 GB
2 9000 Intel Core i5-2400
Thermal managementHigh performance and powerful processors require a good power supply.
Here you will find out how many TDPs the Intel Core i3-2120T and Intel Core i5-2400 have. We recommend that you pay attention to the model with a lower TDP.
35 W
Called capacity
95 W
—
TDP up
—
—
TDP
—
—
Max compound.
—
Intel Core i3-2120T vs. Intel Core i5-2400
Technical details
Here is the basic information that can determine the best processor by comparing specifications. Thus, the higher the L2 and L3 cache, the better. The lower the CPU manufacturing process, the better it is. An important factor is the year of manufacture, which directly affects the terms of support by the manufacturer and the possibility of upgrading the system with minimal costs in the future.
3.00 MB
L3 cache
6.00 MB
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Sandy Bridge
32 NM
Technology
32 NM
VT-X, VT-X EPT
Virtualization
VT-X, VT-X EPT, VT-D
0004 LGA 1155
Socket
LGA 1155
Q3/2011
Release Date
Q1/2011
Intel Core i3-2120T vs.
Intel Core i5-2400
Devices that use this processorAfter completing the comparison between Intel Core i3-2120T and Intel Core i5-2400, you can find out which computer systems use these models.
Unknown
Used in
Unknown
Popular comparisons with these processors
one. Intel Core i5-2400 vs.
Intel Celeron 3215U2. Intel Core i5-2400 vs.
Intel Core i7-8500Y3. Intel Core i5-2400 vs.
AMD A8-7650Kfour. AMD A10-5700 vs.
Intel Core i5-24005. Intel Core i5-2400 vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF6. Intel Core i5-3340S vs.
Intel Core i5-24007. Intel Core i3-10100F vs.
Intel Core i3-2120TAMD Athlon 3000G vs. Intel Core i5-2400
AMD Athlon 3000G
AMD Athlon 3000G runs with 2 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.50 GHz base 3.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 35 W . The processor connects to an AM4 CPU socket This the version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16. Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Raven Ridge (Zen) architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q4/2019
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i5-2400 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.
40 GHz base No turbo all cores while TDP is set to 95 W . The processor connects to LGA 1155 CPU socket This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 RAM and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Sandy Bridge S Architecture is advanced over 32 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT . The product was launched Q1/2011
AMD Athlon 3000G
Intel Core i5-2400
Frequency 3.10 GHz 2 Cores 4 3.50 GHz Turbo (1 core) 3.40 GHz 3.50 GHz Turbo (all cores) No turbo Yes Hyper Threading No. Yes Overclocking No. normal Basic architecture normal AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
GPU Intel HD Graphics 2000
no turbo GPU (Turbo) 1. 10 GHz
14nm Technology 32nm No turbo GPU (Turbo) 1.10 GHz 12 DirectX version 10.1 3 Max. displays 2 DDR4-2666 memory size DDR3-1066
DDR3-13332 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory Yes ECC No. — L2 Cache — 4.00MB L3 Cache 6.00 MB 3.0 PCIe version 16 PCIe lanes 14nm Technology 32nm AM4 Connector LGA 1155 35W TDP 95W AMD-V, SVM Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT Q4/2019 Release date Q1/2011 Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark.