Intel Core i3-3220 vs Intel Core i5-3470: What is the difference?
36points
Intel Core i3-3220
37points
Intel Core i5-3470
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-3470
Why is Intel Core i3-3220 better than Intel Core i5-3470?
- 22W lower TDP?
55Wvs77W - Uses multithreading?
- 10.0 more performance per watt?
118.0vs108.0
Why is Intel Core i5-3470 better than Intel Core i3-3220?
- 1.94x faster CPU speed?
4 x 3.2GHzvs2 x 3.3GHz - 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
1MBvs0.5MB - 1.56x higher PassMark result?
6606vs4232 - 3MB bigger L3 cache?
6MBvs3MB - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2 - 128KB bigger L1 cache?
256KBvs128KB - 8. 1% higher PassMark result (single)?
1908vs1765 - Has AES?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i3-3220
vs
AMD A6-5400K
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i3-3220
vs
AMD E-300
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i3-3220
vs
AMD E1-1200
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Core i3-3220
vs
AMD A4-3400
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i3-3220
vs
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
AMD FX-6300
Intel Core i3-3220
vs
Intel Pentium G3220
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i3-3220
vs
Intel Core M3-8100Y
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i3-3220
vs
AMD Athlon II X2 270
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i3-3220
vs
Intel Celeron 6305
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i3-3220
3 User reviews
Intel Core i3-3220
6. 7/10
3 User reviews
Intel Core i5-3470
3 User reviews
Intel Core i5-3470
8.3/10
3 User reviews
Features
Value for money
8.0/10
3 votes
9.0/10
3 votes
Gaming
5.0/10
3 votes
8.0/10
3 votes
Performance
6.0/10
3 votes
8.3/10
3 votes
Reliability
9.0/10
3 votes
9.3/10
3 votes
Energy efficiency
9.3/10
3 votes
9.3/10
3 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
2 x 3.3GHz
4 x 3.2GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2. CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-3220)
3.6GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i3-3220
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8. L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1600MHz
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
25.6GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖Intel Core i3-3220
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9. bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i3-3220
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✖Intel Core i3-3220
✔Intel Core i5-3470
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i3-3220
✔Intel Core i5-3470
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i3-3220
✔Intel Core i5-3470
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i3-3220
✔Intel Core i5-3470
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-3220
✖Intel Core i5-3470
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i5-3470 vs Intel Core i3-3220
Summary
-
Intel Core i5-3470
143%
-
Intel Core i3-3220
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i5-3470
113%
-
Intel Core i3-3220
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i5-3470
167%
-
Intel Core i3-3220
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-3470 |
13% higher single threaded performance. |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 67% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
Around 43% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i3-3220 |
None |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-3470
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-3470
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
Intel Core i5-3470 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMX | ||||
SSE | ||||
SSE2 | ||||
SSE3 | ||||
SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 2 | ||||
AVX | ||||
EIST | ||||
Intel 64 | ||||
XD bit | ||||
VT-x | ||||
VT-d | ||||
TXT | ||||
AES-NI | ||||
Hyper-Threading |
Architecture
Intel Core i5-3470 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | Intel_IvyBridge | vs | Intel_IvyBridge | |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 | |
Codename | Ivy Bridge | vs | Ivy Bridge | |
Release Date | Jun 2012 | vs | Sep 2012 |
Cores
Intel Core i5-3470 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cores | 4 | vs | 2 | |
Threads | 4 | vs | 4 | |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 | vs | Intel HD 2500 |
Cache
Intel Core i5-3470 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
L3 Cache | 6144 KB (shared) | vs | 3072 KB (shared) |
Physical
Intel Core i5-3470 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Socket | Intel Socket 1155 | vs | Intel Socket 1155 | |
Max Case Temp | 67°C | vs | 65°C | |
Package | FC-LGA12C | vs | FC-LGA12C | |
Die Size | 132mm² | vs | 94mm² | |
Process | 22 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
Intel Core i5-3470 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cpu Frequency | 3200 MHz | vs | 3300 MHz | |
Turbo Clock | 3600 MHz | vs | none | |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
Voltage | unknown | vs | unknown | |
TDP | 77 W | vs | 55 W |
-
Intel Core i5-3470
3708 points
-
Intel Core i3-3220
3399 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-3470
13184 points
-
Intel Core i3-3220
8157 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-3470
9192
-
Intel Core i3-3220
5325
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-3470
3142
-
Intel Core i3-3220
2685
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-3470
10006
-
Intel Core i3-3220
5706
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-3470
2894
-
Intel Core i3-3220
2466
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-3470
6179
-
Intel Core i3-3220
4019
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-3470
5006
-
Intel Core i3-3220
4626
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-3470
17192
-
Intel Core i3-3220
10193
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-3470
1. 51
-
Intel Core i3-3220
1.38
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-3470
5.57
-
Intel Core i3-3220
3.31
points — higher is better
i5-3470 vs i3-3220 — Call of Duty Modern Warfare with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-3470 @ 3.20GHz
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz
i5-3470
i3-3220
Multi-Thread Performance
6690 Pts
4235 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
1914 Pts
1758 Pts
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
i5-3470 vs i3-3220 in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i5-3470
i3-3220
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
81. 7 FPS |
1080p |
52.9 FPS |
1440p |
58.8 FPS |
1440p |
38.1 FPS |
2160p |
35.1 FPS |
2160p |
22.7 FPS |
w1440p |
50.3 FPS |
w1440p |
32.5 FPS |
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
132.9 FPS |
1080p |
91.8 FPS |
1440p |
100.5 FPS |
1440p |
69.2 FPS |
2160p |
64.5 FPS |
2160p |
44.2 FPS |
w1440p |
87.9 FPS |
w1440p |
60.3 FPS |
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
184. 0 FPS |
1080p |
130.6 FPS |
1440p |
142.1 FPS |
1440p |
100.3 FPS |
2160p |
93.9 FPS |
2160p |
65.7 FPS |
w1440p |
125.5 FPS |
w1440p |
88.2 FPS |
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
286.3 FPS |
1080p |
208.4 FPS |
1440p |
225.4 FPS |
1440p |
162.6 FPS |
2160p |
152.7 FPS |
2160p |
108.6 FPS |
w1440p |
200.7 FPS |
w1440p |
143.9 FPS |
i5-3470
- The i5-3470 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The i5-3470 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The i5-3470 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-3220
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The i3-3220 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
Compare i5-3470 vs i3-3220 specifications
i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Architecture
i5-3470 | i3-3220 | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
Generation | Core i5 (Ivy Bridge) |
Core i3 (Ivy Bridge) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Part# | SR0T8 | SR0RG |
Production Status | unknown | unknown |
Released | Jun 2012 | Sep 2012 |
i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Cache
i5-3470 | i3-3220 | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 6MB (shared) | 3MB (shared) |
i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Cores
i5-3470 | i3-3220 | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 4 | 2 |
# of Threads | 4 | 4 |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 | Intel HD 2500 |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Features
i5-3470 | i3-3220 | |
---|---|---|
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4. 2 AVX EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d TXT AES-NI |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX EIST Intel 64 HTT XD bit VT-x TXT |
i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Notes
i5-3470 | i3-3220 | |
---|---|---|
Intel HD 2500 frequency: 650-1100MHz | Intel HD 2500 frequency: 650-1050MHz |
i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Performance
i5-3470 | i3-3220 | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Multiplier | 32.0x | 33.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
TDP | 77 W | 55 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 3.6 GHz | N/A |
Voltage | unknown | unknown |
i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Physical
i5-3470 | i3-3220 | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | 132. 8 mm² | 94 mm² |
Foundry | Intel | Intel |
Package | FC-LGA12C | FC-LGA12C |
Process Size | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Socket | Intel Socket 1155 | Intel Socket 1155 |
Transistors | unknown | unknown |
tCaseMax | 67°C | 65°C |
Share Your Comments 89
Compare i5-3470 vs i3-3220 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i3-3220 vs Intel Core i5-3470
Análisis comparativo de los procesadores Intel Core i3-3220 y Intel Core i5-3470 para todas las características en las siguientes categorías: Esenciales, Desempeño, Memoria, Gráficos, Interfaces gráficas, Compatibilidad, Periféricos, Seguridad y fiabilidad, Tecnologías avanzadas, Virtualización.
Análisis de desempeño comparativo de procesadores: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i3-3220
Comprar en Amazon
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
Comprar en Amazon
Diferencias
Razones para considerar el Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumo de energía típico 40% más bajo: 55 Watt vs 77 Watt
- Alrededor de 1% mejor desempeño en GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 1527 vs 1515
- Alrededor de 1% mejor desempeño en GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps): 1527 vs 1515
Diseño energético térmico (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 77 Watt |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1527 vs 1515 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1527 vs 1515 |
Razones para considerar el Intel Core i5-3470
- 2 más núcleos, ejecuta más aplicaciones a la vez: 4 vs 2
- Una velocidad de reloj alrededor de 9% más alta: 3.60 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- Una temperatura de núcleo máxima 3% mayor: 67.4°C vs 65.3°C
- 2 veces más caché L1, más datos pueden ser almacenados en el caché L1 para un acceso más rápido luego
- 2 veces más caché L2, más datos pueden ser almacenados en el caché L2 para un acceso más rápido luego
- 2 veces más caché L3, más datos pueden ser almacenados en el caché L3 para un acceso más rápido luego
- Alrededor de 12% mejor desempeño en PassMark — Single thread mark: 1942 vs 1729
- 2. 1 veces mejor desempeño en PassMark — CPU mark: 4667 vs 2223
- Alrededor de 21% mejor desempeño en Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 734 vs 607
- Alrededor de 79% mejor desempeño en Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 2396 vs 1340
- Alrededor de 57% mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.217 vs 2.048
- Alrededor de 29% mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 9.637 vs 7.493
- Alrededor de 42% mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.393 vs 0.277
- Alrededor de 72% mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.821 vs 1.059
- 2.2 veces mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.424 vs 2.499
Número de núcleos | 4 vs 2 |
Frecuencia máxima | 3.60 GHz vs 3.3 GHz |
Temperatura máxima del núcleo | 67. 4°C vs 65.3°C |
Caché L1 | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
Caché L2 | 1024 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
Caché L3 | 6144 KB vs 3072 KB |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1942 vs 1729 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 4667 vs 2223 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 734 vs 607 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2396 vs 1340 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3. 217 vs 2.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.637 vs 7.493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.393 vs 0.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.821 vs 1.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.424 vs 2.499 |
Comparar referencias
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-3220
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3470
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nombre | Intel Core i3-3220 | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1729 | 1942 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 2223 | 4667 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 607 | 734 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1340 | 2396 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | 2692 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.048 | 3.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.493 | 9.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.277 | 0.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.059 | 1.821 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.499 | 5.424 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1527 | 1515 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1527 | 1515 |
Comparar especificaciones
Intel Core i3-3220 | Intel Core i5-3470 | |
---|---|---|
Nombre clave de la arquitectura | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
Fecha de lanzamiento | 8 April 2012 | 8 April 2012 |
Precio de lanzamiento (MSRP) | $117 | $184 |
Lugar en calificación por desempeño | 2116 | 1779 |
Precio ahora | $34. 90 | $112.06 |
Processor Number | i3-3220 | i5-3470 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Valor/costo (0-100) | 35.75 | 17.60 |
Segmento vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Soporte de 64 bits | ||
Base frequency | 3. 30 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
Troquel | 94 mm | 132.8 mm |
Caché L1 | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
Caché L2 | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
Caché L3 | 3072 KB | 6144 KB |
Tecnología de proceso de manufactura | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Temperatura máxima de la carcasa (TCase) | 65 °C | 67 °C |
Temperatura máxima del núcleo | 65. 3°C | 67.4°C |
Frecuencia máxima | 3.3 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
Número de núcleos | 2 | 4 |
Número de subprocesos | 4 | 4 |
Canales máximos de memoria | 2 | 2 |
Máximo banda ancha de la memoria | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Tamaño máximo de la memoria | 32 GB | 32 GB |
Tipos de memorias soportadas | DDR3 1333/1600 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Device ID | 0x152 | 0x152 |
Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 05 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
Frecuencia gráfica máxima | 1.05 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Tecnología Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Tecnología Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Procesador gráfico | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
Número de pantallas soportadas | 3 | 3 |
Soporte de pantalla inalámbrica (WiDi) | ||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Número máximo de CPUs en la configuración | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Zócalos soportados | FCLGA1155 | FCLGA1155 |
Diseño energético térmico (TDP) | 55 Watt | 77 Watt |
Thermal Solution | 2011C | 2011D |
Clasificación PCI Express | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 | up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 |
Tecnología Anti-Theft | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Tecnología Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Tecnología Intel® Secure Key | ||
Tecnología Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Tecnología Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Tecnología Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Tecnología Intel® My WiFi | ||
Tecnología Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Intel Core i3-3220 vs.
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i3-3220 ทำงานร่วมกับ 2 cores และ 4 เธรด CPU มันทำงานที่ No turbo base No turbo คอร์ทั้งหมดในขณะที่ TDP ถูกตั้งค่าที่ 55 Wโปรเซสเซอร์เชื่อมต่อกับ LGA 1155 CPU LGA 1155 เวอร์ชันนี้มี 3.00 MB บนชิปหนึ่งตัวรองรับช่องหน่วยความจำ 2 DDR3-1600 และคุณลักษณะ PCIe Gen เลน Tjunction รักษาให้ต่ำกว่า — องศา C โดยเฉพาะอย่างยิ่ง Ivy Bridge S สถาปัตยกรรมได้รับการปรับปรุงด้วย 22 nm และสนับสนุน VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d ผลิตภัณฑ์เปิดตัวเมื่อวันที่ Q3/2012
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i5-3470 ทำงานร่วมกับ 4 cores และ 4 เธรด CPU มันทำงานที่ 3.60 GHz base 3.60 GHz คอร์ทั้งหมดในขณะที่ TDP ถูกตั้งค่าที่ 77 Wโปรเซสเซอร์เชื่อมต่อกับ LGA 1155 CPU LGA 1155 เวอร์ชันนี้มี 6.00 MB บนชิปหนึ่งตัวรองรับช่องหน่วยความจำ 2 DDR3-1600 และคุณลักษณะ 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 เลน Tjunction รักษาให้ต่ำกว่า — องศา C โดยเฉพาะอย่างยิ่ง Ivy Bridge S สถาปัตยกรรมได้รับการปรับปรุงด้วย 22 nm และสนับสนุน VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d ผลิตภัณฑ์เปิดตัวเมื่อวันที่ Q2/2012
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-3470
เปรียบเทียบรายละเอียด
3. 30 GHz | ความถี่ | 3.20 GHz |
2 | แกน | 4 |
No turbo | เทอร์โบ (1 คอร์) | 3.60 GHz |
No turbo | เทอร์โบ (ทุกแกน) | 3.60 GHz |
Yes | ไฮเปอร์เธรด | No |
No | โอเวอร์คล็อก | No |
normal | สถาปัตยกรรมหลัก | normal |
Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
1.05 GHz | GPU (เทอร์โบ) | 1.10 GHz |
22 nm | เทคโนโลยี | 22 nm |
1.05 GHz | GPU (เทอร์โบ) | 1.10 GHz |
11.0 | เวอร์ชัน DirectX | 11.0 |
3 | สูงสุด แสดง | 3 |
DDR3-1600 | หน่วยความจำ | DDR3-1600 |
2 | ช่องหน่วยความจำ | 2 |
หน่วยความจำสูงสุด | ||
No | ECC | No |
— | L2 Cache | — |
3. 00 MB | L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
เวอร์ชัน PCIe | 3.0 | |
PCIe lanes | 16 | |
22 nm | เทคโนโลยี | 22 nm |
LGA 1155 | เบ้า | LGA 1155 |
55 W | TDP | 77 W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q3/2012 | วันที่วางจำหน่าย | Q2/2012 |
แสดงข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม |
แสดงข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 เป็นตัวตายตัวแทนของ Cinebench R20 และยังมีพื้นฐานมาจาก Cinema 4 Suite Cinema 4 เป็นซอฟต์แวร์ที่ใช้กันทั่วโลกในการสร้างแบบฟอร์ม 3 มิติ การทดสอบ single-core ใช้ CPU core เพียงตัวเดียวไม่นับจำนวนคอร์หรือความสามารถในการไฮเปอร์เธรด
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 เป็นตัวตายตัวแทนของ Cinebench R20 และยังมีพื้นฐานมาจาก Cinema 4 Suite Cinema 4 เป็นซอฟต์แวร์ที่ใช้กันทั่วโลกในการสร้างแบบฟอร์ม 3 มิติ การทดสอบแบบมัลติคอร์เกี่ยวข้องกับแกน CPU ทั้งหมดและใช้ประโยชน์จากไฮเปอร์เธรด
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 เป็นตัวตายตัวแทนของ Cinebench R15 และยังใช้ Cinema 4 Suite อีกด้วย Cinema 4 เป็นซอฟต์แวร์ที่ใช้กันทั่วโลกในการสร้างแบบฟอร์ม 3 มิติ การทดสอบ single-core ใช้ CPU core เพียงตัวเดียวไม่นับจำนวนคอร์หรือความสามารถในการไฮเปอร์เธรด
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 เป็นตัวตายตัวแทนของ Cinebench R15 และยังใช้ Cinema 4 Suite อีกด้วย Cinema 4 เป็นซอฟต์แวร์ที่ใช้กันทั่วโลกในการสร้างแบบฟอร์ม 3 มิติ การทดสอบแบบมัลติคอร์เกี่ยวข้องกับแกน CPU ทั้งหมดและใช้ประโยชน์จากไฮเปอร์เธรด
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 เป็นตัวตายตัวแทนของ Cinebench 11. 5 และยังมีพื้นฐานมาจาก Cinema 4 Suite Cinema 4 เป็นซอฟต์แวร์ที่ใช้กันทั่วโลกในการสร้างแบบฟอร์ม 3 มิติ การทดสอบ single-core ใช้ CPU core เพียงตัวเดียวไม่นับจำนวนคอร์หรือความสามารถในการไฮเปอร์เธรด
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 เป็นตัวตายตัวแทนของ Cinebench 11.5 และยังมีพื้นฐานมาจาก Cinema 4 Suite Cinema 4 เป็นซอฟต์แวร์ที่ใช้กันทั่วโลกในการสร้างแบบฟอร์ม 3 มิติ การทดสอบแบบมัลติคอร์เกี่ยวข้องกับแกน CPU ทั้งหมดและใช้ประโยชน์จากไฮเปอร์เธรด
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 เป็นเกณฑ์มาตรฐานข้ามแพลตฟอร์มที่ใช้หน่วยความจำของระบบอย่างมาก หน่วยความจำที่รวดเร็วจะผลักดันผลลัพธ์ได้มาก การทดสอบ single-core ใช้ CPU core เพียงตัวเดียวไม่นับจำนวนคอร์หรือความสามารถในการไฮเปอร์เธรด
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 เป็นเกณฑ์มาตรฐานข้ามแพลตฟอร์มที่ใช้หน่วยความจำของระบบอย่างมาก หน่วยความจำที่รวดเร็วจะผลักดันผลลัพธ์ได้มาก การทดสอบแบบมัลติคอร์เกี่ยวข้องกับแกน CPU ทั้งหมดและใช้ประโยชน์จากไฮเปอร์เธรด
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
ประสิทธิภาพการคำนวณตามทฤษฎีของหน่วยกราฟิกภายในของโปรเซสเซอร์ที่มีความแม่นยำอย่างง่าย (32 บิต) ใน GFLOPS GFLOPS ระบุจำนวนการดำเนินการจุดลอยตัวที่ iGPU สามารถดำเนินการได้ต่อวินาที
Blender 2.
81 (bmw27)
Blender เป็นซอฟต์แวร์กราฟิก 3 มิติที่ให้บริการฟรีสำหรับการเรนเดอร์ (สร้าง) ชิ้นส่วน 3 มิติซึ่งสามารถเป็นพื้นผิวและภาพเคลื่อนไหวในซอฟต์แวร์ได้ เกณฑ์มาตรฐาน Blender จะสร้างฉากที่กำหนดไว้ล่วงหน้าและวัดเวลาที่จำเป็นสำหรับทั้งฉาก ยิ่งต้องใช้เวลาสั้นเท่าไหร่ก็ยิ่งดีเท่านั้น เราเลือก bmw27 เป็นฉากมาตรฐาน
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 เป็นเกณฑ์มาตรฐานข้ามแพลตฟอร์มที่ใช้หน่วยความจำของระบบอย่างมาก หน่วยความจำที่รวดเร็วจะผลักดันผลลัพธ์ได้มาก การทดสอบ single-core ใช้ CPU core เพียงตัวเดียวไม่นับจำนวนคอร์หรือความสามารถในการไฮเปอร์เธรด
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 เป็นเกณฑ์มาตรฐานข้ามแพลตฟอร์มที่ใช้หน่วยความจำของระบบอย่างมาก หน่วยความจำที่รวดเร็วจะผลักดันผลลัพธ์ได้มาก การทดสอบแบบมัลติคอร์เกี่ยวข้องกับแกน CPU ทั้งหมดและใช้ประโยชน์จากไฮเปอร์เธรด
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 ใช้ Cinema 4D Suite ซึ่งเป็นซอฟต์แวร์ที่ได้รับความนิยมในการสร้างแบบฟอร์มและสิ่งอื่น ๆ ในรูปแบบ 3 มิติ การทดสอบ single-core ใช้ CPU core เพียงตัวเดียวไม่นับจำนวนคอร์หรือความสามารถในการไฮเปอร์เธรด
Cinebench R11.
5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 ใช้ Cinema 4D Suite ซึ่งเป็นซอฟต์แวร์ที่ได้รับความนิยมในการสร้างแบบฟอร์มและสิ่งอื่น ๆ ในรูปแบบ 3 มิติ การทดสอบแบบมัลติคอร์เกี่ยวข้องกับแกน CPU ทั้งหมดและใช้ประโยชน์จากไฮเปอร์เธรด
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 ใช้ Cinema 4D Suite ซึ่งเป็นซอฟต์แวร์ที่ได้รับความนิยมในการสร้างแบบฟอร์มและสิ่งอื่น ๆ ในรูปแบบ 3 มิติ การทดสอบ iGPU ใช้หน่วยกราฟิกภายในของ CPU เพื่อดำเนินการคำสั่ง OpenGL
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
ซีพียูบางตัวในรายการด้านล่างนี้ได้รับการเปรียบเทียบโดย CPU-Comparison อย่างไรก็ตามซีพียูส่วนใหญ่ยังไม่ได้รับการทดสอบและผลลัพธ์ได้รับการประมาณโดยสูตรลับเฉพาะของ CPU-Comparison ด้วยเหตุนี้จึงไม่สะท้อนค่าเครื่องหมาย CPU Passmark จริงอย่างถูกต้องและไม่ได้รับการรับรองโดย PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
ประมาณการการใช้ไฟฟ้า
ชั่วโมงการใช้งานเฉลี่ยต่อวัน
การใช้งาน CPU โดยเฉลี่ย (0-100%)
ค่าไฟฟ้าดอลลาร์ต่อกิโลวัตต์ชั่วโมง
ประมาณการการใช้ไฟฟ้า
ชั่วโมงการใช้งานเฉลี่ยต่อวัน
การใช้งาน CPU โดยเฉลี่ย (0-100%)
ค่าไฟฟ้าดอลลาร์ต่อกิโลวัตต์ชั่วโมง
Intel Core i3-3220 | Intel Core i5-3470 | |
55 W | Max TDP | 77 W |
NA | การใช้พลังงานต่อวัน (กิโลวัตต์ชั่วโมง) | NA |
NA | ค่าใช้จ่ายต่อวัน | NA |
NA | การใช้พลังงานต่อปี (กิโลวัตต์ชั่วโมง) | NA |
NA | ค่าใช้จ่ายต่อปี | NA |
การเปรียบเทียบยอดนิยม
Comments
Intel Xeon E7-4880 v2
2. 5 GHz (15 cores) |
7209 |
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
2.7 GHz (12 cores) |
7005 |
|
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
3.0 GHz (8 cores) |
6942 |
|
Intel Xeon E7-8895 v2
2.8 GHz (15 cores) |
6381 |
|
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
3.4 GHz (8 cores) |
6121 |
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2
3.5 GHz (6 cores) |
4799 |
|
Intel Core i7-3770K
3.5 GHz (4 cores) |
3335 |
|
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
3.7 GHz (4 cores) |
3206 |
|
Intel Xeon E3-1280 V2
3.6 GHz (4 cores) |
3116 |
|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
3.7 GHz (4 cores) |
3099 |
|
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
3. 5 GHz (4 cores) |
3087 |
|
Intel Core i7-3770
3.4 GHz (4 cores) |
3073 |
|
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2
3.4 GHz (4 cores) |
3020 |
|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
3.4 GHz (4 cores) |
2996 |
|
Intel Core i7-3940XM
3.0 GHz (4 cores) |
2987 |
|
Intel Xeon E3-1230V2
3.3 GHz (4 cores) |
2955 |
|
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
3.5 GHz (4 cores) |
2938 |
|
Intel Core i7-3770S
3.1 GHz (4 cores) |
2906 |
|
Intel Core i7-3840QM
2.8 GHz (4 cores) |
2895 |
|
Intel Core i5-3570K
3.4 GHz (4 cores) |
2808 |
|
Intel Core i7-3820QM
2.7 GHz (4 cores) |
2709 |
|
Intel Core i7-3720QM
2. 6 GHz (4 cores) |
2679 |
|
Intel Core i7-3740QM
2.7 GHz (4 cores) |
2603 |
|
Intel Core i7-3770T
2.5 GHz (4 cores) |
2595 |
|
Intel Core i7-3610QE
2.3 GHz (4 cores) |
2593 |
|
Intel Core i7-3615QM
2.3 GHz (4 cores) |
2559 |
|
Intel Core i5-3570
3.4 GHz (4 cores) |
2531 |
|
Intel Core i5-3550
3.3 GHz (4 cores) |
2520 |
|
Intel Core i7-3630QM
2.4 GHz (4 cores) |
2490 |
|
Intel Core i7-3610QM
2.3 GHz (4 cores) |
2456 |
|
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2
3.2 GHz (4 cores) |
2438 |
|
Intel Core i7-3635QM
2.4 GHz (4 cores) |
2428 |
|
Intel Core i5-3470
3. 2 GHz (4 cores) |
2413 |
|
Intel Core i5-3570S
3.1 GHz (4 cores) |
2387 |
|
Intel Core i5-3550S
3.0 GHz (4 cores) |
2361 |
|
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
3.1 GHz (4 cores) |
2354 |
|
Intel Core i5-3450
3.1 GHz (4 cores) |
2350 |
|
Intel Core i7-3632QM
2.2 GHz (4 cores) |
2319 |
|
Intel Core i5-3475S
2.9 GHz (4 cores) |
2312 |
|
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
2.5 GHz (4 cores) |
2307 |
|
Intel Core i7-3612QM
2.1 GHz (4 cores) |
2301 |
|
Intel Core i5-3470S
2.9 GHz (4 cores) |
2272 |
|
Intel Core i5-3340
3.1 GHz (4 cores) |
2240 |
|
Intel Core i5-3350P
3. 1 GHz (4 cores) |
2235 |
|
Intel Core i5-3450S
2.8 GHz (4 cores) |
2215 |
|
Intel Core i5-3570T
2.3 GHz (4 cores) |
2159 |
|
Intel Core i5-3330
3.0 GHz (4 cores) |
2151 |
|
Intel Core i5-3335S
2.7 GHz (4 cores) |
2104 |
|
Intel Core i5-3340S
2.8 GHz (4 cores) |
2087 |
|
Intel Core i5-3330S
2.7 GHz (4 cores) |
2060 |
|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
2.5 GHz (4 cores) |
1537 |
|
Intel Core i7-3540M
3.0 GHz (2 cores) |
1443 |
|
Intel Core i7-3520M
2.9 GHz (2 cores) |
1436 |
|
Intel Core i5-3380M
2.9 GHz (2 cores) |
1431 |
|
Intel Core i3-3250
3. 5 GHz (2 cores) |
1419 |
|
Intel Core i5-3470T
2.9 GHz (2 cores) |
1398 |
|
Intel Core i3-3225
3.3 GHz (2 cores) |
1383 |
|
Intel Core i5-3360M
2.8 GHz (2 cores) |
1371 |
|
Intel Core i3-3240
3.4 GHz (2 cores) |
1366 |
|
Intel Core i3-3245
3.4 GHz (2 cores) |
1342 |
|
Intel Core i3-3220
3.3 GHz (2 cores) |
1331 |
|
Intel Core i5-3320M
2.6 GHz (2 cores) |
1299 |
|
Intel Core i5-3340M
2.7 GHz (2 cores) |
1299 |
|
Intel Core i3-3210
3.2 GHz (2 cores) |
1296 |
|
Intel Core i7-3517UE
1.7 GHz (2 cores) |
1275 |
|
Intel Core i5-3230M
2. 6 GHz (2 cores) |
1264 |
|
Intel Core i5-3210M
2.5 GHz (2 cores) |
1234 |
|
Intel Core i7-3667U
2.0 GHz (2 cores) |
1229 |
|
Intel Core i7-3537U
2.0 GHz (2 cores) |
1226 |
|
Intel Core i3-3220T
2.8 GHz (2 cores) |
1187 |
|
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
2.3 GHz (2 cores) |
1175 |
|
Intel Pentium G2140
3.3 GHz (2 cores) |
1170 |
|
Intel Core i3-3240T
2.9 GHz (2 cores) |
1154 |
|
Intel Core i7-3687U
2.1 GHz (2 cores) |
1152 |
|
Intel Core i7-3517U
1.9 GHz (2 cores) |
1115 |
|
Intel Core i3-3130M
2.6 GHz (2 cores) |
1107 |
|
Intel Pentium G2130
3. 2 GHz (2 cores) |
1083 |
|
Intel Core i5-3427U
1.8 GHz (2 cores) |
1080 |
|
Intel Core i5-3437U
1.9 GHz (2 cores) |
1075 |
|
Intel Core i5-3337U
1.8 GHz (2 cores) |
1055 |
|
Intel Pentium G2120
3.1 GHz (2 cores) |
1036 |
|
Intel Core i3-3120M
2.5 GHz (2 cores) |
1024 |
|
Intel Core i5-3317U
1.7 GHz (2 cores) |
1012 |
|
Intel Pentium G2030
3.0 GHz (2 cores) |
1001 |
|
Intel Core i3-3110M
2.4 GHz (2 cores) |
971 |
|
Intel Pentium G2020
2.9 GHz (2 cores) |
967 |
|
Intel Pentium G2010
2.8 GHz (2 cores) |
957 |
|
Intel Celeron G1630
2. 8 GHz (2 cores) |
937 |
|
Intel Celeron G1620
2.7 GHz (2 cores) |
916 |
|
Intel Celeron G1610
2.6 GHz (2 cores) |
890 |
|
Intel Pentium G2030T
2.6 GHz (2 cores) |
880 |
|
Intel Pentium 2030M
2.5 GHz (2 cores) |
865 |
|
Intel Pentium G2020T
2.5 GHz (2 cores) |
834 |
|
Intel Pentium 2020M
2.4 GHz (2 cores) |
816 |
|
Intel Core i5-3339Y
1.5 GHz (2 cores) |
807 |
|
Intel Core i3-3227U
1.9 GHz (2 cores) |
778 |
|
Intel Core i3-3217U
1.8 GHz (2 cores) |
753 |
|
Intel Pentium 2127U
1.9 GHz (2 cores) |
667 |
|
Intel Celeron G1610T
2. 3 GHz (2 cores) |
664 |
|
Intel Celeron 1005M
1.9 GHz (2 cores) |
651 |
|
Intel Celeron 1000M
1.8 GHz (2 cores) |
634 |
|
Intel Celeron 1037U
1.8 GHz (2 cores) |
628 |
|
Intel Pentium 2117U
1.8 GHz (2 cores) |
621 |
|
Intel Celeron 1017U
1.6 GHz (2 cores) |
557 |
|
Intel Core i3-3229Y
1.4 GHz (2 cores) |
539 |
|
Intel Celeron 1007U
1.5 GHz (2 cores) |
537 |
|
Intel Pentium 2129Y
1.1 GHz (2 cores) |
391 |
|
Intel Celeron 1019Y
1.0 GHz (2 cores) |
304 |
|
Intel Core i3-3220 vs Intel Core i5-3470: What is the difference?
36 Ballla
Intel Core i3-3220
37 Ballla
Intel Core i5-3470 9000 Why is Intel Core i3-3220 better than Intel Core i5-3470?
- 22W below TDP?
55W vs 77W - Multi-threaded?
- 10. 0 higher performance per watt?
118.0 vs 108.0
- 1.94x higher CPU speed?
4 x 3.2GHz vs 2 x 3.3GHz - 0.5MB more L2 cache?
1MB vs 0.5MB - 1.56x higher PassMark score?
6606 vs 4232 - 3MB more L3 cache?
6MB vs 3MB - 1 is the PCI Express (PCIe) version newer?
3 vs 2 - 128KB more L1 cache?
256KB vs 128KB - 8.1% higher PassMark score (single)?
1908 vs 1765 - Has AES?
What are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i3-3220
vs
AMD A6-5400K
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i3-3220
VS
AMD E-300
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i3-3220 VS 9000
AMD E1-1200
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Core i3-3220
VS
AMD A4-3400
Intel Core i5-3470 9000 9000 Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i3-3220
VS
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
AMD FX-6300
Intel Core i3-3220
9000 9000
vs
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i3-3220
VS
Intel Core M3100Y
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core INTEL CORE
vs
AMD Athlon II X2 270
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i3-3220
VS
Intel Celeron 6305
VS
9000 core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core,
Price Matching
User Reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i3-3220
3 User Reviews
Intel Core i3-3220
6. 7 904 903 /10 User Reviews0003
Intel Core i5-3470
3 reviews of users
Intel Core i5-3470
8.3 /10
3 reviews of users
Functions
9000 VOTES
/10
3 Votes
Games
5.0219 /10
3 Votes
8.0 /10
3 VOTES
003
6.0 /10
3 Votes
8.3 /10
3 Votes
Reliability
/10
Votes
9000 9000 /10000 9000 /10000 Votes
The speed of the central processor shows how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, taking into account all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-3220)
3.6GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✖Intel Core i3-3220
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory to access each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1600MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
25.6GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports Memory Error Code
✖Intel Core i3-3220
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5. Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i3-3220
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides higher performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as like streams. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✖Intel Core i3-3220
✔Intel Core i5-3470
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i3-3220
✔Intel Core i5-3470
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔Intel Core i3-3220
✔Intel Core i5-3470
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i3-3220
✔Intel Core i5-3470
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-3220
✖Intel Core i5-3470
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-3220)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i5-3470 or Intel Core i3-3220
- Main page
- > 9002
Core i5-3470
60. 8 (+16.6%)
Core i3-3220
50.7
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i5-3470
62.1 (+9.3%)
Core i3-3220
56.3
Performance in day-to-day activities such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i5-3470
33.4 (+18.9%)
Core i3-3220
27.1
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
Core i5-3470
57.9 (+9.5%)
Core i3-3220
52.4
Demanding games and tasks
Core i5-3470
31.2 (+36.9%)
Core i3-3220
19. 7
Extreme
Core i5-3470
6.1 (+36.1%)
Core i3-3220
3.9
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the fuller the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R20 Multi Core
Intel Core i5-3470
1010 (+36. 7%)
Intel Core i3-3220
639 9000 %)
Intel Core i3-3220
1.38
Cinebench R11.5
Intel Core i5-3470
5.62 (+41.1%)
Intel Core I3-3220 9000 9000 4000 PASSMAM
3.31
PASSM i5-3470
4642 (+53.4%)
Intel Core i3-3220
2162
Specifications
The data is not yet complete, so tables may be missing information or existing features may be omitted.
Basic
Manufacturer Intel Intel DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i5-3470 Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.60 GHz) Intel® Core™ i3-3220 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Ivy Bridge Ivy Bridge Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 22 nm 22 nm Release dateMonth and year the processor was released. 09-2014 09-2016 Model Official name. i5-3470 i3-3220 Cores The number of physical cores. 4 2 ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 4 4 Multithreading TechnologyWith Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.2 GHz 3.3 GHz Turbo FrequencyThe maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 3.6 GHz 3.25 GHz L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 6 MB 3 MB Instructions 64-bit 64-bit Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. SSE4.1/4.2, AVX SSE4.1/4.2, AVX Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No Yes Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 5 GT/s DMI 5 GT/s DMI Number of QPI links TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 77W 55W Cooling system specifications 2011D 2011C Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Intel® HD Graphics 2500 GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 650 MHz 650 MHz Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. 1100MHz 1050MHz Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802.11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. No data No data Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 3 RAM
Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 32 GB 32 GB Supported type of RAM The type of RAM determines its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR3 1333/1600 DDR3 1333/1600 RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2 RAM bandwidth 25.6 GB/s 25.6 GB/s ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 2 PCI configuration options
up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 Number of PCI lanes No data up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 Data Protection
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data Decoration
Dimensions No data No data Supported sockets No data No data Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data Which is better
Intel Core i5-3470
- On average, gaming performance is 10% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 6%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 2%.
- $123 down
- 2 more physical cores.
Intel Core i3-3220
- Base frequency up by 0.1 GHz
How are they similar
- The number of threads is equal.
Comparison of Intel Core i3-3220 and Intel Core i5-3470
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-3220 and Intel Core i5-3470 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).Intel Core i3-3220
versus
Intel Core i5-3470
Advantages
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-3220
- less than 40% less energy consumption: 55 WATT VS 77 WATT
- Production in the GFXBENCH Benchmark 4.0-T-REX (FRAMS ) about 1% more: 1527 vs 1515
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) about 1% more: 1527 vs 1515
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt vs 77 Watt GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 1527 vs 1515 GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 1527 vs 1515 Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-3470
- 2 more cores, able to run more applications at the same time: 4 vs 2
- About 9% more clock speed: 3.60 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- About 3% more maximum core temperature: 67.4°C vs 65.3°C
- L1 cache is 2 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache is 2 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L3 cache by 2 times (a) more, so more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Approximately 12% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1942 vs 1729
- 2.1x greater performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 4667 vs 2223
- Approx. Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance 21% more: 734 vs 607
- About 79% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 2396 vs 1340
- About 57% more performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 3.217 vs 2.048
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) approximately 29% faster: 9.637 vs 7.493
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) approximately 42% faster: 0.393 1.821 vs 1.059
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 72% more performance vs 0.277
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.2x more performance : 5.424 vs 2.499
Number of cores 4 vs 2 Maximum frequency 3.60 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Maximum core temperature 67.4°C vs 65.3°C Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) Level 2 cache 1024 KB vs 256 KB (per core) Level 3 cache 6144 KB vs 3072 KB PassMark — Single thread mark 1942 vs 1729 PassMark — CPU mark 4667 vs 2223 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 734 vs 607 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2396 vs 1340 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.217 vs 2.048 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 9.637 vs 7.493 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.393 vs 0.277 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.821 vs 1.059 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 5.424 vs 2.499 Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-3220
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3470PassMark — Single thread mark CPU 1 CPU 2 PassMark — CPU mark CPU 1 CPU 2 Geekbench 4 — Single Core CPU 1 CPU 2 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) CPU 1 CPU 2 Name Intel Core i3-3220 Intel Core i5-3470 PassMark — Single thread mark 1729 1942 PassMark — CPU mark 2223 4667 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 607 734 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1340 2396 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 0 2692 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.048 3.217 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7.493 9.637 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.277 0.393 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.059 1.821 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.499 5.424 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 1527 1515 GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 1527 1515 Feature comparison
Intel Core i3-3220 Intel Core i5-3470 Architecture name Ivy Bridge Ivy Bridge Issue date April 8, 2012 April 8, 2012 Price at first issue date $117 $184 Place in the rating 2116 1779 Price now $34. 90 $112.06 Processor Number i3-3220 i5-3470 Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Status Launched Discontinued Price/performance ratio (0-100) 35.75 17.60 Application Desktop Desktop Support 64 bit Base frequency 3. 30 GHz 3.20 GHz Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI 5 GT/s DMI Crystal area 94mm 132.8mm Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) 64 KB (per core) Level 2 cache 256 KB (per core) 1024KB Level 3 cache 3072KB 6144KB Process 22 nm 22 nm Maximum case temperature (TCase) 65 °C 67 °C Maximum core temperature 65. 3°C 67.4°C Maximum frequency 3.3 GHz 3.60 GHz Number of cores 2 4 Number of threads 4 4 Maximum number of memory channels 2 2 Maximum memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s 25.6 GB/s Maximum memory size 32GB 32GB Supported memory types DDR3 1333/1600 DDR3 1333/1600 Device ID 0x152 0x152 Graphics base frequency 650MHz 650MHz Graphics max dynamic frequency 1. 05 GHz 1.10 GHz Maximum GPU clock 1.05 GHz 1.1 GHz Intel® Clear Video HD Technology Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology Intel® Quick Sync Video Integrated graphics Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Maximum number of monitors supported 3 3 WiDi support Low Halogen Options Available Maximum number of processors in configuration
1 1 Package Size 37. 5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm Supported sockets FCLGA1155 FCLGA1155 Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 77 Watt Thermal Solution 2011C 2011D PCI Express revision 2.0 3.0 PCIe configurations up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 Anti-Theft Technology Execute Disable Bit (EDB) Intel® Identity Protection Technology Intel® Secure Key Technology Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology Flexible Display interface (FDI) Idle States Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX Intel 64 Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology Intel® My WiFi Technology Intel® Turbo Boost Technology Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility Thermal Monitoring Intel® TSX-NI Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) i5-3470 vs i3-3220 — World War Z vs RX 5700 performance comparison
RX 5700 with
Intel Core i5-3470 @ 3. 20GHz
World War Z
RX 5700 with
Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz
i5-3470
i3-3220Multi-Thread Performance
6690 Pts
4235 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
1914 Pts
1758 Pts
World War Z
i5-3470 vs i3-3220 World War Z using RX 5700 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
i5-3470
i3-3220
Ultra quality
Resolution FPS 1080p 115.4 FPS
1080p 74.7 FPS
1440p 84.2 FPS
1440p 54.5 FPS
2160p 48.3 FPS
2160p 31.3 FPS
w1440p 70. 9 FPS
w1440p 45.9 FPS
High quality
Resolution FPS 1080p 177.7 FPS
1080p 123.1 FPS
1440p 136.3 FPS
1440p 94.1 FPS
2160p 84.9 FPS
2160p 58.4 FPS
w1440p 117.8 FPS
w1440p 81.3 FPS
Medium quality
Approval FPS 1080p 240.0 FPS
1080p 171.6 FPS
1440p 188.4 FPS
1440p 133. 8 FPS
2160p 121.5 FPS
2160p 85.5 FPS
w1440p 164.7 FPS
w1440p 116.6 FPS
Low quality
Resolution FPS 1080p 364.6 FPS
1080p 268.5 FPS
1440p 292.6 FPS
1440p 213.1 FPS
2160p 194.7 FPS
2160p 139.7 FPS
w1440p 258.5 FPS
w1440p 187.3 FPS
i5-3470
- The i5-3470 has a higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- The i5-3470 has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
- The i5-3470 has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
i3-3220
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- i3-3220 The i3-3220 is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
Compare i5-3470 vs i3-3220 specifications
i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Architecture
i5-3470 i3-3220 Codename Ivy Bridge Ivy Bridge Generation Core i5
(Ivy Bridge)Core i3
(Ivy Bridge)Market Desktop Desktop Memory Support DDR3 DDR3 Part# SR0T8 SR0RG Production Status unknown unknown Released Jun 2012 Sep 2012 i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Cache
i5-3470 i3-3220 Cache L1 64K (per core) 64K (per core) Cache L2 256K (per core) 256K (per core) Cache L3 6MB (shared) 3MB (shared) i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Cores
i5-3470 i3-3220 # of Cores 4 2 # of Threads 4 4 Integrated Graphics Intel HD 2500 Intel HD 2500 SMP # CPUs 1 1 i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Features
i5-3470 i3-3220 MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
TXT
AES-NIMMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
EIST
Intel 64
HTT
XD bit
VT-x
TXTi5-3470 vs i3-3220 Notes
i5-3470 i3-3220 Intel HD 2500 frequency: 650-1100MHz Intel HD 2500 frequency: 650-1050MHz i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Performance
i5-3470 i3-3220 Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz Frequency 3.2 GHz 3.3 GHz Multiplier 32.0x 33.0x Multiplier Unlocked No No TDP 77 W 55 W Turbo Clock up to 3.6 GHz N/A Voltage unknown unknown i5-3470 vs i3-3220 Physical
i5-3470 i3-3220 Die Size 132. 8 mm² 94 mm² Foundry Intel Intel Package FC-LGA12C FC-LGA12C Process Size 22 nm 22 nm Socket Intel Socket 1155 Intel Socket 1155 Transistors unknown unknown tCaseMax 67°C 65°C Share your comments 89
Compare i5-3470 vs i3-3220 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
F1 2018
2018
Far Cry 5
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Shadow of War
2017
Total War: Warhammer II
2017
Wolfenstein II
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
How to choose a processor from the Intel Core
line
Many marketers specializing in IT technologies are surprised to note that the majority of Russian PC users using INTEL products are in no hurry to change outdated processors for new ones that regularly enter the domestic market. On this account, experts responsibly declare that the point here is not at all the cost of the favorites of a certain CPU line, but the fact that an ordinary PC user does not see much difference between a 2-core Pentium and the same Corei3 CPU. That is why many do not really understand which processor is better and what new opportunities open up for the average PC user.
In addition, most obsolete «stones» still remain relevant for many personal computer configurations and do an excellent job with office, mail applications and the Internet, since the optimization of existing software for multi-core environments is rather slow.
In our subjective opinion, many users simply do not have the opportunity to compare the performance of computers with an updated version of the CPU, based on the same platform. We decided to break through the «information vacuum» in this area and review several of the most popular Intel Core I3 and Intel Core I5 processors.
The best place to start getting to know the features and capabilities of these CPUs is the 3000-series dual-core CPUs with Ivy Bridge design.
Core i3-3240
The Intel Core i3-3240 CPU is the oldest and most expensive model in the entire Ivy Bridge family. It runs at 3.4 GHz, which is quite comparable to high-end models that use 4 cores. Despite this clock speed, the i3-3240 has only two cores and only 3 MB of L3 cache. In addition, this processor model, although the most expensive in the line, does not have support for Turbo Boost technology and a serious graphics core. The younger version of Intel HD Graphics 2500 is integrated into this CPU.
For overclockers, this processor is also not of particular interest, since the possibility of increasing the multiplier is disabled, although it is possible to control the frequencies of DDR 3 memory. Based on this, we can say with confidence that the CPUi3-3240 can only operate at the nominal frequency. Estimated heat dissipation — 55 W. The cost declared by the manufacturer is 138 USD.
To objectively answer the question of how to choose a processor, one cannot limit oneself to the older model from the extensive line of 3,000-series processors. Let’s take a closer look at weaker CPUs made on the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture.
Core i3-3225
This device has two cores, each 100 MHz slower than the older model, which is 3.3 GHz. The L3 cache and heat dissipation remained unchanged, and are in line with the i3-3240, 3 MB and 55 watts. But the graphics accelerator implanted in this CPU model is much more productive. Intel HD Graphics 4000 operates at 1.05 GHz, but has 16 execution units, compared to 6 in the Intel HD Graphics 2500 graphics core integrated into the i3-3240. This provides a noticeable advantage, especially in applications that use 3D graphics and modeling. The declared cost is 134 USD.
Core i3-3220
The Core i3-3220 CPU is the entry-level Ivy Bridge design. It has (by tradition) 2 cores with a clock speed of 3.3 GHz each and an L3 cache of 3 MB. This device is made slower by the weak HD Graphics 2500 graphics core with 6 actuators. In addition, i3-3220 does not support Turbo Boost technology and has a locked multiplier, so it can only work at the standard frequency. Overclockers have long given up on this model, as it has no chance of overclocking. Heat dissipation is standard — 55 watts. The cost declared by the manufacturer is 117 USD. 9Intel Core i3-3225
Intel strictly adheres to the classification of its CPUs: all iCore 3 processors are dual-core with 3 MB L3 cache. Corei5 processors are quad-core, without Hyper-Threading support and L3 cache — 6 MB.
To make it easier for most desktop users to answer the question of how to choose the right processor and what characteristics to look for, we will consider three representatives of the 3000th generation CPU Corei5 of the mid-price segment, made on the same LGA 1155 platform, the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture.
Core i5-3570K
The Core i5-3570K is the top product in the 3,000th series with Ivy Bridge design. This device has 4 cores with a clock speed of 3.4 GHz each and a 6 MB L3 cache. In addition, the CPU of this model has an integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 graphics core with support for DirectX 11, OpenGL 4. 0 and OpenCL 1.1 interfaces. This video accelerator has high performance, which is especially noticeable when working with graphics and 3D applications. The heat dissipation level of this CPU is within 77 watts.
This «stone» is especially interesting for overclockers, thanks to the unlocked multiplier. With the capabilities of this CPU, the democratic cost of 225 USD makes it one of the most sold out on the domestic market.
Unsure of your choice? Trust our company! We will select the optimal processor, even if you need to bring it from other regions to Chelyabinsk.
Core i5-3550
This device is like two drops of water similar to the older model of the CPU. Traditional 4 cores, L3 at 6 MB. The difference is only in the clock speed of the processor, which is 3.3 GHz, and the graphics core of the younger version, HD Graphics 2500. It is the graphics that make it less interesting for many users working with graphics programs and 3D modeling. The heat dissipation of the device is 77 W. The recommended cost is 205 USD.
Those wishing to purchase this CPU should weigh the pros and cons, since the cost of this product is the same as that of the older model, i5-3570, and the clock speed is 100 MHz lower.
Core i5-3470
The i5-3470 CPU is the penultimate model in the line of devices made on the Ivy Bridge architecture. It has 4 cores with a frequency of 3.2 GHz each and L3 equal to 6 MB. It is a small difference in frequency with older CPUs of this series that will not “make the weather” for most users, but the cost of $ 180 will be a nice bonus.
The integrated HD Graphics 2500 is less powerful and runs at 1.1 GHz. The absence of the letter «K» in the processor marking makes it uninteresting for overclockers, as this «speaks» that the multiplier is locked. Heat dissipation is kept at around 77 watts.
Based on the ratio of features and cost, the best representative among those participating in the review is the Intel Core i5-3570K. It has a fairly high performance, has a high-performance graphics core, has the ability to overclock, with an average cost of 225 USD.
Intel Core i5-3470 vs. Intel Core i3-4150
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i5-3470 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.60 GHz base 3.60 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 77 W . LGA 1155 CPU socket This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1600 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Ivy Bridge S Architecture is advanced over 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q2/2012
Intel Core i3-4150
Intel Core i3-4150 runs with 2 and 4 CPU threads It runs on No turbo base No turbo all cores while TDP is set to 54 W .The processor connects to LGA 1150 CPU socket This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q2/2014
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i3-4150
Frequency 3.50 GHz 4 Cores 2 3.60GHz Turbo (1 core) No turbo 3.60GHz Turbo (all cores) No turbo No. Hyper Threading Yes No. Overclocking No. normal Basic architecture normal Intel HD Graphics 2500
GPU Intel HD Graphics 4400
1.10 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.15 GHz 22nm Technology 22 nm 1. 10 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.15 GHz 11.0 DirectX Version 11.1 3 Max. displays 3 DDR3-1600 memory size DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory No. ECC Yes — L2 Cache — 6.00MB L3 Cache 3.00 MB 3.0 PCIe version 3.0 16 PCIe lanes 16 22nm Technology 22 nm LGA 1155 Connector LGA 1150 77 W TDP 54W VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Q2/2012 Release date Q2/2014 Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.
5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula.