I3 4130 vs i5 4460: Intel Core i3-4130 vs i5-4460

Intel Core i5-4460 vs Intel Core i3-4130








Intel Core i5-4460 vs Intel Core i3-4130

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-4460 on one side and the Intel Core i3-4130 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,4GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

Intel Core i5-4460

Intel Core i3-4130
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Haswell

Haswell
Core name

Haswell-DT

Haswell-DT
Family

Core i5-4000

Core i3-4000
Part number(s), S-Spec

BX80646I54460,

BXC80646I54460,

CM8064601560722,

QF4J, SR1QK

BX80646I34130,

BXC80646I34130,

CM8064601483615,

SR1NP

Release date

Q2 2014

Q3 2013
Lithography

22 nm

22 nm
Transistors

1. 400.000.000

1.400.000.000
Cores

4

2
Threads

4

4
Base frequency

3,2 GHz

3,4 GHz
Turbo frequency

3,4 GHz


Bus speed

5 GT/s

5 GT/s
Cache memory

6 MB

3 MB
Max memory capacity

32 GB

32 GB
Memory types

DDR3-1333/1600,

DDR3L-1333/1600

DDR3-1333/1600,

DDR3L-1333/1600

Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

25,6 GB/s

25,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

16

16
TDP

84 W

54 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU execution units

20

20
GPU shading units

160

160
GPU base clock

350 MHz

350 MHz
GPU boost clock

1100 MHz

1150 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

352 GFLOPS

368 GFLOPS
Socket

LGA1150

LGA1150
Compatible motherboard

Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard 

Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

72. 7°C

72°C
CPU-Z single thread

337

330
CPU-Z multi thread

1.364

906
Cinebench R15 single thread

125

130
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

453

330
Cinebench R20 single thread

309

300
Cinebench R20 multi-thread

1.158

760
Cinebench R23 single thread

840

557
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

3. 093

1.698
PassMark single thread

1.886

1.871
PassMark CPU Mark

4.785

3.258
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

3.713

3.578
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

10.533

6.620
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core

823

735
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core

2.466

1.581
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

202,1 GFLOPS

95,84 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

125 pts / W

123 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core i5-4460 has more cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i3-4130 is less. The Intel Core i5-4460 was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-4460

337

1.364
Intel Core i3-4130

330

906

In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 51%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-4460

125

453
Intel Core i3-4130

130

330

In single core, the difference is -4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 37%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-4460

309

1.158
Intel Core i3-4130

300

760

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 52%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-4460

840

3.093
Intel Core i3-4130

557

1.698

In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 82%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i5-4460

1.886

4.785
Intel Core i3-4130

1.871

3. 258

In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 47%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i5-4460

3.713

10.533
Intel Core i3-4130

3.578

6.620

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 59%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i5-4460

3.461

8.426
Intel Core i3-4130

3.556

6.361

In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 32%.

On Android 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
Intel Core i5-4460

3.615

10.215
Intel Core i3-4130

3.888

6.294

In single core, the difference is -7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 62%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Core i5-4460

3. 942

11.200
Intel Core i3-4130

3.754

7.070

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 58%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i5-4460

823

2. 466
Intel Core i3-4130

735

1.581

In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 56%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i5-4460

911

2.852
Intel Core i3-4130

613

1.058

In single core, the difference is 49%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 170%.

On Android:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i5-4460

765

2.364
Intel Core i3-4130

621

1.228

In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 93%.

On macOS:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
Intel Core i5-4460

849

2.822
Intel Core i3-4130

796

1.657

In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 70%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

Intel Core i5-4460 AMD equivalentIntel Core i3-4130 AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i5-4460S

Intel Core i3-4130T

Intel Core i3-4130 vs Intel Core i5-4440: What is the difference?

39points

Intel Core i3-4130

42points

Intel Core i5-4440

Comparison winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Core i5-4440

Why is Intel Core i3-4130 better than Intel Core i5-4440?

  • 5.64% higher PassMark result?
    4965vs4700
  • 30W lower TDP?
    54Wvs84W
  • 8.55% higher PassMark result (single)?
    2018vs1859
  • Supports ECC memory?
  • 3 higher clock multiplier?
    34vs31

Why is Intel Core i5-4440 better than Intel Core i3-4130?

  • 1. 82x faster CPU speed?
    4 x 3.1GHzvs2 x 3.4GHz
  • 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
    1MBvs0.5MB
  • 3MB bigger L3 cache?
    6MBvs3MB
  • 128KB bigger L1 cache?
    256KBvs128KB

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Core i3-4130

vs

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i5-4440

vs

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i3-4130

vs

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i5-4440

vs

Intel Core i3-7100

Intel Core i3-4130

vs

Intel Pentium G3220

Intel Core i5-4440

vs

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i3-4130

vs

Intel Core i5-3330

Intel Core i5-4440

vs

AMD FX-6100

Intel Core i3-4130

vs

AMD A8-7600

Intel Core i5-4440

vs

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i3-4130

vs

AMD A10-8780P

Intel Core i5-4440

vs

Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i3-4130

vs

Intel Core i3-4130T

Intel Core i5-4440

vs

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i3-4130

vs

Intel Celeron N3060

Intel Core i5-4440

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i3-4130

vs

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i5-4440

vs

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i3-4130

vs

AMD A6-7480

Intel Core i5-4440

vs

Intel Core i7-4790K

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Intel Core i3-4130

1 User reviews

Intel Core i3-4130

7. 0/10

1 User reviews

Intel Core i5-4440

0 User reviews

Intel Core i5-4440

0.0/10

0 User reviews

Features

Value for money

8.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

 

Gaming

6.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

 

Performance

8.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

 

Reliability

7.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

 

Energy efficiency

7.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

 

Performance

1.CPU speed

2 x 3.4GHz

4 x 3.1GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

3.3GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Core i3-4130

✖Intel Core i5-4440

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1.5MB/core

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1600MHz

1600MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

25.6GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4440)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✔Intel Core i3-4130

✖Intel Core i5-4440

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4440)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4440)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4440)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4. Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4440)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4440)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4440)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

737.83seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

2425.46seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4440)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔Intel Core i3-4130

✔Intel Core i5-4440

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔Intel Core i3-4130

✔Intel Core i5-4440

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔Intel Core i3-4130

✔Intel Core i5-4440

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔Intel Core i3-4130

✔Intel Core i5-4440

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4440)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Core i3-4130

✔Intel Core i5-4440

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i3-4130

✖Intel Core i5-4440

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-4130)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4440)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i3-4130 Benchmarks — Geekbench Browser

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3

2. 6 GHz (14 cores)

9553

 

Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3

2.3 GHz (16 cores)

9456

 

Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3

2.1 GHz (18 cores)

9256

 

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3

2.6 GHz (12 cores)

8511

 

Intel Xeon E5-4667 v3

2.0 GHz (16 cores)

8468

 

Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3

2.0 GHz (14 cores)

8210

 

Intel Xeon E5-4660 v3

2.1 GHz (14 cores)

8030

 

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3

2.5 GHz (12 cores)

8008

 

Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3

2.2 GHz (12 cores)

7774

 

Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3

3.0 GHz (8 cores)

7687

 

Intel Xeon E5-2675 v3

1. 8 GHz (16 cores)

7229

 

Intel Xeon Processor E5-1680 v3

3.2 GHz (8 cores)

6971

 

Intel Xeon E5-4650 v3

2.1 GHz (12 cores)

6768

 

Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3

2.6 GHz (10 cores)

6682

 

Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3

2.3 GHz (8 cores)

6543

 

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3

2.3 GHz (10 cores)

5979

 

Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3

2.6 GHz (10 cores)

5561

 

Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3

3.5 GHz (6 cores)

5305

 

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3

2.4 GHz (8 cores)

5061

 

Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3

1.8 GHz (8 cores)

4645

 

Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3

3. 5 GHz (4 cores)

4078

 

Intel Core i7-4790K

4.0 GHz (4 cores)

3954

 

Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3

3.7 GHz (4 cores)

3718

 

Intel Core i7-4770K

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

3675

 

Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

3589

 

Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

3525

 

Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

3497

 

Intel Core i7-4790

3.6 GHz (4 cores)

3472

 

Intel Xeon E3-1281 v3

3.7 GHz (4 cores)

3447

 

Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3

3.6 GHz (4 cores)

3442

 

Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3

3. 5 GHz (4 cores)

3432

 

Intel Core i7-4771

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

3397

 

Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3

3.6 GHz (4 cores)

3392

 

Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3

3.4 GHz (4 cores)

3386

 

Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3

3.4 GHz (4 cores)

3378

 

Intel Core i7-4770

3.4 GHz (4 cores)

3372

 

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

3.4 GHz (4 cores)

3352

 

Intel Core i7-4910MQ

2.9 GHz (4 cores)

3340

 

Intel Core i7-4790S

3.2 GHz (4 cores)

3310

 

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3

3.3 GHz (4 cores)

3304

 

Intel Core i7-4980HQ

2.8 GHz (4 cores)

3257

 

Intel Core i7-4940MX

3. 1 GHz (4 cores)

3247

 

Intel Core i5-4690K

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

3218

 

Intel Core i7-4770S

3.1 GHz (4 cores)

3205

 

Intel Core i7-4870HQ

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

3129

 

Intel Xeon E3-1275L v3

2.7 GHz (4 cores)

3125

 

Intel Core i7-4930MX

3.0 GHz (4 cores)

3120

 

Intel Core i5-4670K

3.4 GHz (4 cores)

3119

 

Intel Core i7-4770HQ

2.2 GHz (4 cores)

3038

 

Intel Core i7-4900MQ

2.8 GHz (4 cores)

3034

 

Intel Core i7-4790T

2.7 GHz (4 cores)

3020

 

Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

3009

 

Intel Xeon E3-1285L v3

3. 1 GHz (4 cores)

2997

 

Intel Core i5-4690

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

2912

 

Intel Core i7-4770T

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

2904

 

Intel Core i7-4810MQ

2.8 GHz (4 cores)

2903

 

Intel Core i7-4800MQ

2.7 GHz (4 cores)

2869

 

Intel Core i5-4670

3.4 GHz (4 cores)

2860

 

Intel Core i7-4722HQ

2.4 GHz (4 cores)

2822

 

Intel Core i5-4690S

3.2 GHz (4 cores)

2820

 

Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3

3.2 GHz (4 cores)

2816

 

Intel Core i7-4712MQ

2.3 GHz (4 cores)

2806

 

Intel Core i5-4590

3.3 GHz (4 cores)

2800

 

Intel Core i7-4720HQ

2. 6 GHz (4 cores)

2765

 

Intel Core i7-4785T

2.2 GHz (4 cores)

2755

 

Intel Core i7-4700HQ

2.4 GHz (4 cores)

2745

 

Intel Core i5-4590S

3.0 GHz (4 cores)

2729

 

Intel Xeon E3-1268L v3

2.3 GHz (4 cores)

2721

 

Intel Core i5-4570

3.2 GHz (4 cores)

2714

 

Intel Core i7-4710MQ

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

2714

 

Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3

3.1 GHz (4 cores)

2706

 

Intel Core i7-4710HQ

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

2700

 

Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3

3.1 GHz (4 cores)

2672

 

Intel Xeon E3-1230L v3

1. 8 GHz (4 cores)

2662

 

Intel Core i7-4700MQ

2.4 GHz (4 cores)

2645

 

Intel Core i7-4702HQ

2.2 GHz (4 cores)

2639

 

Intel Core i5-4670S

3.1 GHz (4 cores)

2633

 

Intel Core i5-4570S

2.9 GHz (4 cores)

2581

 

Intel Core i7-4702MQ

2.2 GHz (4 cores)

2572

 

Intel Core i5-4460

3.2 GHz (4 cores)

2563

 

Intel Core i7-4765T

2.0 GHz (4 cores)

2534

 

Intel Core i4-4690T

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

2534

 

Intel Core i5-4440

3.1 GHz (4 cores)

2485

 

Intel Core i7-4700EQ

2.4 GHz (4 cores)

2463

 

Intel Core i7-4712HQ

2. 3 GHz (4 cores)

2461

 

Intel Core i5-4430

3.0 GHz (4 cores)

2455

 

Intel Core i5-4460S

2.9 GHz (4 cores)

2372

 

Intel Core i5-4670T

2.3 GHz (4 cores)

2298

 

Intel Core i5-4430S

2.7 GHz (4 cores)

2272

 

Intel Core i5-4590T

2.0 GHz (4 cores)

2181

 

Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3

1.6 GHz (6 cores)

2001

 

Intel Core i5-4460T

1.9 GHz (4 cores)

1880

 

Intel Core i3-4360

3.7 GHz (2 cores)

1877

 

Intel Core i3-4350

3.6 GHz (2 cores)

1877

 

Intel Core i3-4370

3.8 GHz (2 cores)

1872

 

Intel Core i3-4330

3. 5 GHz (2 cores)

1790

 

Intel Core i3-4160

3.6 GHz (2 cores)

1715

 

Intel Core i3-4170

3.7 GHz (2 cores)

1714

 

Intel Core i3-4340

3.6 GHz (2 cores)

1703

 

Intel Core i5-4308U

2.8 GHz (2 cores)

1673

 

Intel Core i3-4360T

3.2 GHz (2 cores)

1661

 

Intel Core i5-4570T

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

1655

 

Intel Core i3-4150

3.5 GHz (2 cores)

1643

 

Intel Core i7-4558U

2.8 GHz (2 cores)

1634

 

Intel Core i7-4600M

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

1625

 

Intel Core i3-4130

3.4 GHz (2 cores)

1603

 

Intel Core i7-4610M

3. 0 GHz (2 cores)

1600

 

Intel Core i7-4578U

3.0 GHz (2 cores)

1582

 

Intel Core i3-4170T

3.2 GHz (2 cores)

1581

 

Intel Core i5-4340M

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

1575

 

Intel Core i5-4200H

2.8 GHz (2 cores)

1557

 

Intel Core i3-4350T

3.1 GHz (2 cores)

1550

 

Intel Core i5-4278U

2.6 GHz (2 cores)

1545

 

Intel Core i5-4210H

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

1531

 

Intel Core i3-4160T

3.1 GHz (2 cores)

1514

 

Intel Core i5-4310M

2.7 GHz (2 cores)

1512

 

Intel Core i3-4150T

3.0 GHz (2 cores)

1505

 

Intel Core i3-4330T

3. 0 GHz (2 cores)

1496

 

Intel Pentium G3258

3.2 GHz (2 cores)

1495

 

Intel Core i5-4210M

2.6 GHz (2 cores)

1483

 

Intel Core i5-4288U

2.6 GHz (2 cores)

1482

 

Intel Core i5-4300M

2.6 GHz (2 cores)

1460

 

Intel Core i3-4130T

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

1443

 

Intel Core i5-4200M

2.5 GHz (2 cores)

1394

 

Intel Core i5-4258U

2.4 GHz (2 cores)

1389

 

Intel Pentium G3460

3.5 GHz (2 cores)

1386

 

Intel Core i7-4510U

2.0 GHz (2 cores)

1340

 

Intel Core i7-4600U

2.1 GHz (2 cores)

1316

 

Intel Pentium G3430

3. 3 GHz (2 cores)

1297

 

Intel Core i7-4500U

1.8 GHz (2 cores)

1266

 

Intel Pentium G3420

3.2 GHz (2 cores)

1253

 

Intel Core i5-4310U

2.0 GHz (2 cores)

1248

 

Intel Core i3-4100M

2.5 GHz (2 cores)

1243

 

Intel Core i7-4650U

1.7 GHz (2 cores)

1242

 

Intel Pentium G3250

3.2 GHz (2 cores)

1233

 

Intel Core i5-4300U

1.9 GHz (2 cores)

1230

 

Intel Pentium G3260

3.3 GHz (2 cores)

1224

 

Intel Core i5-4260U

1.4 GHz (2 cores)

1216

 

Intel Pentium G3440

3.3 GHz (2 cores)

1207

 

Intel Core i5-4250U

1. 3 GHz (2 cores)

1157

 

Intel Pentium G3240

3.1 GHz (2 cores)

1153

 

Intel Core i5-4210U

1.7 GHz (2 cores)

1149

 

Intel Pentium G3220

3.0 GHz (2 cores)

1143

 

Intel Core i3-4000M

2.4 GHz (2 cores)

1126

 

Intel Core i5-4200U

1.6 GHz (2 cores)

1121

 

Intel Pentium G3250T

2.8 GHz (2 cores)

1114

 

Intel Pentium G3450

3.4 GHz (2 cores)

1111

 

Intel Celeron G1850

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

1109

 

Intel Pentium G3260T

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

1055

 

Intel Pentium G3470

3.6 GHz (2 cores)

1053

 

Intel Celeron G1840

2. 8 GHz (2 cores)

1021

 

Intel Pentium G3240T

2.7 GHz (2 cores)

1013

 

Intel Celeron G1820

2.7 GHz (2 cores)

1006

 

Intel Core i7-4610Y

1.7 GHz (2 cores)

994

 

Intel Core i3-4025U

1.9 GHz (2 cores)

974

 

Intel Celeron G1830

2.8 GHz (2 cores)

951

 

Intel Pentium G3220T

2.6 GHz (2 cores)

947

 

Intel Core i3-4030U

1.9 GHz (2 cores)

947

 

Intel Celeron G1840T

2.5 GHz (2 cores)

947

 

Intel Pentium 3560M

2.4 GHz (2 cores)

946

 

Intel Core i5-4220Y

1.6 GHz (2 cores)

913

 

Intel Core i3-4005U

1. 7 GHz (2 cores)

860

 

Intel Core i3-4010U

1.7 GHz (2 cores)

856

 

Intel Core i5-4210Y

1.5 GHz (2 cores)

819

 

Intel Core i3-4020Y

1.5 GHz (2 cores)

781

 

Intel Core i5-4202Y

1.6 GHz (2 cores)

769

 

Intel Core i5-4300Y

1.6 GHz (2 cores)

719

 

Intel Pentium 3556U

1.7 GHz (2 cores)

685

 

Intel Core i3-4010Y

1.3 GHz (2 cores)

681

 

Intel Core i3-4030Y

1.6 GHz (2 cores)

675

 

Intel Core i5-4350U

1.4 GHz (2 cores)

615

 

Intel Celeron 2955U

1.4 GHz (2 cores)

513

 

Intel Pentium 3560Y

1. 2 GHz (2 cores)

484

 

Intel Core i3-4130 vs. Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i3-4130

The Intel Core i3-4130 operates with 2 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 54 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket. This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM, DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2013

Intel Core i5-3470

The Intel Core i5-3470 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.60 GHz base 3.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 77 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1155 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features 3. 0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2012

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Core i5-3470

Compare Detail

3.40 GHz Frequency 3.20 GHz
2 Cores 4
No turbo Turbo (1 Core) 3.60 GHz
No turbo Turbo (All Cores) 3.60 GHz
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking No
normal Core Architecture normal

Intel HD Graphics 4400

GPU

Intel HD Graphics 2500

1.15 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.10 GHz
22 nm Technology 22 nm
1.15 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1. 10 GHz
11.1 DirectX Version 11.0
3 Max. displays 3
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
Memory DDR3-1600
2 Memory channels 2
Max memory
Yes ECC No
L2 Cache
3.00 MB L3 Cache 6.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 3.0
16 PCIe lanes 16
22 nm Technology 22 nm
LGA 1150 Socket LGA 1155
54 W TDP 77 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q3/2013 Release date Q2/2012

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Intel Core i3-4130 Intel Core i5-3470
54 W Max TDP 77 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

CPU-Z Benchmark for Intel Core i3-4130 (1T)

Best CPU performance — 64-bit — September 2022

Intel Core i3-4130 (1T)

Back to validation

Intel Core i9-12900KF

Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Core i7-12700K

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Intel Core i5-12600K

Intel Core i5-12600KF

Intel Core i9-11900K

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Intel Core i7-11700K

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i7-11700KF

Intel Core i5-11600K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i5-11600KF

Intel Core i7-11700

Intel Core i7-11700F

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

Intel Core i5-11500

Intel Core i9-10900KF

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i7-11800H

Intel Core i9-10900K

Intel Core i9-10850K

Intel Core i5-11400

Intel Core i7-10700KF

Intel Core i9-10900

Intel Core i5-11400F

Intel Core i5-11400H

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

Intel Core i9-9900KF

Intel Core i7-9700KF

Intel Core i7-10700K

Intel Core i7-9700K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600H

Intel Core i9-9900K

Intel Core i5-10600KF

Intel Core i5-9600KF

Intel Core i7-10700

Intel Core i5-10600K

Intel Core i7-10700F

Intel Core i7-1165G7

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT

Intel Core i7-9700F

Intel Core i7-9700

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Intel Core i5-9600K

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Intel Core i7-8700K

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

Intel Core i5-8600K

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

Intel Core i7-7700K

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

Intel Core i7-10875H

Intel Core i5-7600K

Intel Core i7-8700

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 5 3500

Intel Core i7-10870H

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-10750H

Intel Core i3-10105F

Intel Core i3-9100F

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i5-9400

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel Core i3-10100F

Intel Core i5-6600K

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i5-10400F

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core i5-8400

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Intel Core i7-7700

Intel Core i5-4690K

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i7-8750H

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i5-9300H

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i7-10510U

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i5-8300H

Intel Core i5-4670K

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Intel Core i7-8565U

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-10210U

Intel Core i5-4690

Intel Core i5-1035G1

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

Intel Core i7-4790

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

Intel Core i7-6700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Intel Core i7-4770

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

Intel Core i5-8265U

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Intel Core i3-1005G1

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with

Intel Core i5-4590

Intel Core i7-3770K

Intel Core i5-3570K

Intel Core i5-7400

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

Intel Core i7-8550U

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i3-7100

AMD Ryzen 3 1200

Intel Core i5-2500K

Intel Core i5-3570

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

Intel Core i5-8250U

Intel Core i5-7300HQ

Intel Core i5-6400

Intel Core i3-6100

AMD Ryzen 5 1400

Intel Core i5-4460

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3

Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3

Intel Core i5-4440

AMD Athlon 3000G

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2

Intel Core i3-4170

(YOU) Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Core i5-2500

Intel Pentium G4560

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i3-4160

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with

Intel Xeon E5-2689

Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2

Intel Core i5-3330

Intel Core i5-7200U

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i7-6500U

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i5-6300U

Intel Xeon E5450

Intel Core i3-2120

Intel Core i5-3230M

Intel Core i3-2100

Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Intel Core i5 750

Intel Core i5-5200U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Intel Core i5-2520M

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500

Intel Core i5 650

Intel Core i5-3210M

Intel Core i7 920

AMD FX -8350

Intel Core i5-2450M

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400

AMD FX -4300

AMD FX -8320

AMD FX -6300

Intel Core i5-2410M

Intel Core i5-4210U

AMD FX -8300

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600

Intel Core i3-7020U

Pentium E5200

Intel Core i5-4200U

Intel Core i3-3110M

Intel Core i3-5005U

Intel Core i3-6006U

AMD Phenom II X4 955

Intel Core i3-4005U

Intel Pentium G3240 vs.

Intel Core i3-4130


Cpu Benchmark with benchmarks

Intel Pentium G3240 Intel Core i3-4130
3.10 GHz Frequency 3.40 GHz
No turbo Turbo (1 Core) No turbo
No turbo Turbo (All Cores) No turbo
2 Cores 2
No Hyperthreading ? Yes
No Overclocking ? No
normal Core architecture normal
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell GT1) GPU Intel HD Graphics 4400
11.1 DirectX Version 11.1
3 Max. displays 3
DDR3-1333 Memory DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
2 Memory channels 2
Max. Memory
Yes ECC Yes
L2 Cache
3.00 MB L3 Cache 3.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 3.0
16 PCIe lanes 16
14 nm Technology 22 nm
LGA 1150 Socket LGA 1150
54 W TDP 54 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q2/2014 Release date Q3/2013
show more detail show more detail

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Benchmark. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Benchmark’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Popular Comparision

Intel Pentium G3240 vs. Intel Core i3-4130 — Cpu Benchmark Specs & Test

4.2 of 44 rating(s)

i3-4130 vs i5-4460 — Metro Exodus vs GT 1030

performance comparison

GT 1030 with

Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz

Metro Exodus

GT 1030 with

Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz


i3-4130
i5-4460

Multi-Thread Performance

4795 Pts

6707 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1961 Pts

1944 Pts

900 Exus

i3-4130 vs i5-4460 in Metro Exodus using GT 1030 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K

i3-4130
i5-4460


Ultra quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

5.2 FPS

1080p

7.1 FPS

1440p

4. 0 FPS

1440p

5.5 FPS

2160p

2.5 FPS

2160p

3.4 FPS

w1440p

3.5 FPS

w1440p

4.8 FPS

High quality
Authorization Frames per second
1080p

12.0 FPS

1080p

15.9 FPS

1440p

9.5 FPS

1440p

12.7 FPS

2160p

6.2 FPS

2160p

8.2 FPS

w1440p

8.4 FPS

w1440p

11.2 FPS

Medium quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

18. 9 FPS

1080p

24.7 FPS

1440p

15.0 FPS

1440p

19.8 FPS

2160p

10.0 FPS

2160p

13.1 FPS

w1440p

13.4 FPS

w1440p

17.6 FPS

Low quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

32.5 FPS

1080p

42.2 FPS

1440p

26.1 FPS

1440p

34.1 FPS

2160p

17.5 FPS

2160p

22.7 FPS

w1440p

23.3 FPS

w1440p

30. 4 FPS

i3-4130
    i5-4460

      i3-4130 i5-4460
      i3-4130 vs i5-4460 Cache
      i3-4130 i5-4460
      i3-4130 vs i5-4460 Cores
      i3-4130 i5-4460
      i3-4130 vs i5-4460 Features
      i3-4130 i5-4460
      i3-4130 vs i5-4460 Performance
      i3-4130 i5-4460
      i3-4130 vs i5-4460 Physical
      i3-4130 i5-4460

      Share your comments 91

      Compare i3-4130 vs i5-4460 in more games

      Elden Ring

      2022

      God of War

      2022

      Overwatch 2

      2022

      Forza Horizon 5

      2021

      Halo Infinite

      2021

      Battlefield 2042

      2021

      Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

      2020

      Microsoft Flight Simulator

      2020

      Valorant

      2020

      Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

      2020

      Death Stranding

      2020

      Marvel’s Avengers

      2020

      Godfall

      2020

      Cyberpunk 2077

      2020

      Apex Legends

      2019

      Anthem

      2019

      Far Cry New Dawn

      2019

      Resident Evil 2

      2019

      Metro Exodus

      2019

      World War Z

      2019

      Gears of War 5

      2019

      F1 2019

      2019

      GreedFall

      2019

      Borderlands 3

      2019

      Call of Duty Modern Warfare

      2019

      Red Dead Redemption 2

      2019

      Need for Speed: Heat

      2019

      Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

      2018

      Battlefield V

      2018

      Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

      2018

      Final Fantasy XV

      2018

      Shadow of the Tomb Raider

      2018

      Forza Horizon 4

      2018

      Fallout 76

      2018

      Hitman 2

      2018

      Just Cause 4

      2018

      Monster Hunter: World

      2018

      Strange Brigade

      2018

      Assassin’s Creed Origins

      2017

      Dawn of War III

      2017

      Ghost Recon Wildlands

      2017

      Destiny 2

      2017

      PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

      2017

      Fortnite Battle Royale

      2017

      Need for Speed: Payback

      2017

      For Honor

      2017

      Project CARS 2

      2017

      Forza Motorsport 7

      2017

      Ashes of the Singularity

      2016

      Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

      2016

      Battlefield 1

      2016

      Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

      2016

      Doom

      2016

      F1 2016

      2016

      Hitman

      2016

      Rise of the Tomb Raider

      2016

      The Division

      2016

      Total War: Warhammer

      2016

      Overwatch

      2016

      Dishonored 2

      2016

      DiRT Rally

      2015

      Grand Theft Auto V

      2015

      The Witcher 3

      2015

      Rocket League

      2015

      Need For Speed ​​

      2015

      Project CARS

      2015

      Rainbow Six Siege

      2015

      Battlefield 4

      2013

      Crysis 3

      2013

      Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

      2012

      League of Legends

      2009

      Minecraft

      2009

      Intel Core i3-4130 vs Intel Core i5-4440: What is the difference?

      Smartphone-graphic Cartoques Naushniki

      39 BALLA

      Intel Core i3-4130

      42 BALLLA

      Intel Core i5-44440

      Winter when compared to

      9000 VS

      64 facts compared to 9 facts compared to 9 facts compared to 9 facts in comparison

      Intel Core i3-4130

      Intel Core i5-4440

      Why is Intel Core i3-4130 better than Intel Core i5-4440?

      • 5. 64% higher PassMark score?
        4965 vs 4700
      • 30W below TDP?
        54W vs 84W
      • 8.55% higher PassMark score (single)?
        2018 vs 1859
      • Supports memory debug code?
      • 3 higher hour multiplier?
        34 vs 31

      Why is Intel Core i5-4440 better than Intel Core i3-4130?

      • 1.82x higher CPU speed?
        4 x 3.1GHz vs 2 x 3.4GHz
      • 0.5MB more L2 cache?
        1MB vs 0.5MB
      • 3MB more L3 cache?
        6MB vs 3MB
      • 128KB more L1 cache?
        256KB vs 128KB

      Which comparisons are the most popular?

      AMD RYZEN 5 5500U

      VS

      Intel Core i5-1135g7

      AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

      VS

      Intel Core I3-1115g4

      15000 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

      vs

      Intel Core i7-11800H

      AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

      vs

      Intel Core i3-1115G4

      AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

      vs

      Intel Core i7-1165G7

      AMD Ryzen 55500U

      VS

      Intel Core i5-10210u

      AMD Ryzen 5 3500u

      VS

      Intel Core i5-10210u

      Intel Core I3-115G4

      VS

      u

      30002 INTEL I5-102102 AMD

      vs

      Intel Core i5-10210U

      Price Comparison

      User Reviews

      Overall Rating

      Intel Core i3-4130

      1 User Reviews

      Intel Core02

      31044 7. 0 /10

      1 Reviews Users

      Intel Core i5-44440

      0 Reviews of Users

      Intel Core i5-44440

      0.0 /10

      Reviews of users

      9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9

      8.0 /10

      1 votes

      reviews yet there is no

      Games

      6.0 /10

      1 Votes

      Reviews yet

      9Ol000 /10

      1 votes

      No reviews yet

      Performance

      1.CPU speed

      2 x 3.4GHz

      4 x 3.1GHz

      The speed of the central processor shows how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, taking into account all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

      2nd processor thread

      More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

      3.speed turbo clock

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      3.3GHz

      When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

      4. Unlocked

      ✖Intel Core i3-4130

      ✖Intel Core i5-4440

      Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

      5.L2 cache

      More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

      6.L3 cache

      More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

      7.L1 cache

      More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

      8.core L2

      0. 25MB/core

      0.25MB/core

      More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

      9.core L3

      1.5MB/core

      1.5MB/core

      More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory to access each processor core.

      Memory

      1.RAM speed

      1600MHz

      1600MHz

      Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

      2.max memory bandwidth

      25.6GB/s

      25.6GB/s

      This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

      3.DDR version

      DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

      4.Memory channels

      More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

      5.Maximum memory

      Maximum memory (RAM).

      6.bus baud rate

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4440)

      The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

      7. Supports memory troubleshooting code

      ✔Intel Core i3-4130

      ✖Intel Core i5-4440

      Memory troubleshooting code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

      8.eMMC version

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4440)

      A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

      9.bus frequency

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4440)

      The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

      Geotagging

      1. PassMark result

      This test measures CPU performance using multithreading.

      2. PassMark result (single)

      This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

      3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4440)

      Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

      4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4440)

      Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

      5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4440)

      Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

      6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4440)

      Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

      7. Blender test result (bmw27)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      737. 83seconds

      The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

      8.Blender result (classroom)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      2425.46seconds

      The Blender benchmark (classroom) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

      9.performance per watt

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4440)

      This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

      Functions

      1.uses multithreading

      ✔Intel Core i3-4130

      ✔Intel Core i5-4440

      physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

      2. Has AES

      ✔Intel Core i3-4130

      ✔Intel Core i5-4440

      AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

      3. Has AVX

      ✔Intel Core i3-4130

      ✔Intel Core i5-4440

      AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

      4.Version SSE

      SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

      5. Has F16C

      ✔Intel Core i3-4130

      ✔Intel Core i5-4440

      F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

      6 bits transmitted at the same time

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4440)

      NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

      7. Has MMX

      ✔Intel Core i3-4130

      ✔Intel Core i5-4440

      MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

      8. Has TrustZone

      ✖Intel Core i3-4130

      ✖Intel Core i5-4440

      The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).

      9.interface width

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4440)

      The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

      Price comparison

      Cancel

      Which CPUs are better?

      This page is currently only available in English.

      Intel LGA 1150 platform in 2022 GECID.com.

      ::>Processors
      >2022
      > Intel Core i3-4170 vs. Core i5-4460: Intel LGA 1150 platform in 2022

      20-09-2022

      . We announce an extensive test cycle of Intel Haswell on the LGA 1150 platform. Let’s start with the Core i3 and Core i5 processors. We will compare them in every possible way, play online and single games, and run them in heavy benchmarks. And in the next reviews we will visit Xeon and Core i7 — let’s see what maximum can be squeezed out of this platform and whether it is possible to comfortably play modern games with it. There are a lot of all these processors on the used market — you need to understand whether it is worth starting to hunt for them in the current realities.

      We found these and other CPUs in the online store tera-flops.com.ua. There is a bunch of different hardware from which you can assemble a whole retro system, and still get a fairly generous guarantee for each component. Although, if desired, you can supply something from the modern assortment to the venerable iron. There are also new components with an official guarantee. In general, click on the link — you will surely find something interesting for yourself.

      And we are back to the LGA1150 platform. It appeared in 2013 along with Haswell 22nm microarchitecture processors. The series itself was called the 4000th, where there was a whole bunch of «pebbles» — from dual-core Celerons to 8-thread i7. In this review, we are interested in the golden mean of this family.

      • Intel Core i3 4130 — 3.4GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=3MB, TDP 54W, Intel HD Graphics 4400
      • Intel Core i3 4130T — 2.9GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=3MB, TDP 35W, Intel HD Graphics 4400
      • Intel Core i3 4150 — 3.5GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=3MB, TDP 54W, Intel HD Graphics 4400
      • Intel Core i3 4150T — 3.0GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=3MB, TDP 35W, Intel HD Graphics 4400
      • Intel Core i3 4160 — 3. 6GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=3MB, TDP 54W, Intel HD Graphics 4400
      • Intel Core i3 4160T — 3.1GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=3MB, TDP 35W, Intel HD Graphics 4400
      • Intel Core i3 4170 — 3.7GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=3MB, TDP 54W, Intel HD Graphics 4400
      • Intel Core i3 4170T — 3.2GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=3MB, TDP 35W, Intel HD Graphics 4400
      • Intel Core i3 4330 — 3.5 GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=4 MB, TDP 54 W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i3 4330T — 3.0GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=4MB, TDP 35W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i3 4340 — 3.6GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=4MB, TDP 54W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i3 4350 — 3.6GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=4MB, TDP 54W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i3 4350T — 3.1GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=4MB, TDP 35W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i3 4360 — 3.7GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=4MB, TDP 54W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i3 4360T — 3. 2GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=4MB, TDP 35W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i3 4370 — 3.8 GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=4 MB, TDP 54 W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i3 4370T — 3.3GHz, 2 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=4MB, TDP 35W, Intel HD Graphics 4600

      We are no longer interested in everything that cannot be done in 4 streams, if you want something more than typing text. Therefore, we will start with the Core i3 line, namely the Core i3 4170 model. They say that it is now one of the most popular, because for a very small surcharge it has a noticeably higher frequency compared to the youngest representative of the series, while being noticeably cheaper than the most available Core i5 . Brothers differ insignificantly. For example, the powerful Core i3 4370 has only 100 MHz higher frequency and 1 MB more L3 cache. Not too big of a difference. Therefore, if you like the hero of the review, you will find out what to ask Google.

      As a result, the Core i3 4170 has 2 cores and 4 threads running at up to 3.7 GHz. Third level cache — 3 MB. RAM is supported by DDR3 at a recommended frequency of 1600 MHz. And the interface version for the video card is, of course, PCIe 3.0. The processor came out only at the beginning of 2015.

      • Intel Core i5 4430 — 3.0 GHz (up to 3.2 GHz), 4 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache = 6 MB, TDP 84 W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i5 4440 — 3.1GHz (up to 3.3GHz), 4 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=6MB, TDP 84W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i5 4460 — 3.2 GHz (up to 3.4 GHz), 4 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache = 6 MB, TDP 84 W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i5 4570 — 3.2GHz (up to 3.6GHz), 4 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=6MB, TDP 84W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i5 4590 — 3.3GHz (up to 3.7GHz), 4 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=6MB, TDP 84W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i5 4670 — 3.4 GHz (up to 3. 8 GHz), 4 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=6 MB, TDP 84 W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i5 4670K — 3.4GHz (up to 3.8GHz), 4 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=6MB, TDP 84W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i5 4690 — 3.5GHz (up to 3.9GHz), 4 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache=6MB, TDP 84W, Intel HD Graphics 4600
      • Intel Core i5 4690K — 3.5 GHz (up to 3.9 GHz), 4 cores, 4 threads, L3 cache = 6 MB, TDP 84 W, Intel HD Graphics 4600

      The second processor for comparison is the Core i5-4460. To understand what 4 full-fledged cores will give if you pay extra. He has a list of neighbors in the line a little less than the difference between them. All stones, at first glance, differ only in the maximum frequency. Our hero is in third place. By the way, in one of the subsequent reviews we will also look at the Intel Core i5 4690K. Let’s find out what gives an increased frequency in current games.

      In general, compared to the Core i3 4170, the Core i5 4460 has 2 more real cores, twice the L3 cache, 55% higher TDP, but 400 MHz lower maximum frequency. It will be interesting to know the difference in performance. But first, we traditionally look at what kind of hardware surrounded our processors.

      Test platform

      Let’s just say that we have built the system with a margin. Because we have one at once for a whole cycle of processors, including Xeon and i7 with overclocking.

      The motherboard is very charged — ASRock Z97 Extreme6. It supports memory overclocking up to 3200 MHz, and the processors are powered by a 12-phase scheme.

      Will keep our test subjects from boiling over Be quiet! Pure Loop 2FX 360mm. It has just hit the market along with a couple of new products for the 20th anniversary of Be quiet! Vodyanka received high-speed Light Wings PWM fans with high static pressure and PWM control. The latter advantage allows for a better balance between cooling efficiency and silence.

      The RAM was supplied by G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2400 — 2 modules of 8 GB each. In this review, they were running at 1600 MHz.

      They took a video card so that the processors would think — «oooh, you can’t be stupid next to it»! ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti OC Edition with the world’s fastest GDDR6X video memory in an unrealistic 24 GB. You can not tell anything about her — this is the queen of all video cards. As they say — nowhere else!

      The operating system, supporting software and benchmarks were installed on a 512 GB Kingston KC600. It features support for a comprehensive security package that includes 256-bit hardware encryption.

      The main pool of games was launched from Kingston A400 with 960 GB. Read and write speeds for drives in the region of 500 MB / s.

      When choosing the power supply power, we relied on Nvidia’s recommendations for the 3090 Ti — this is 850 watts. They were supplied by Seasonic Prime PX-850. At partial load, its efficiency is 92%, which guarantees minimal losses for air heating. Power quality, in particular, ensures the internal cable-free connection of the rear panel to the PCB.

      Well, everything was assembled in the Cougar MX660 Mesh RGB case. It has a fully perforated side on the front and three fans included. The backlight of the latter can be connected to compatible motherboards to synchronize colors with other system components.

      Synthetic comparison

      Before starting the comparison, I would like to know at what level these processors are relative to more or less modern CPUs. To do this, we compared their results in CineBench R23. The first thing that adds optimism is the double advantage of the 2-core i3 over the 6-core AMD FX-6300 in single thread, even in the overall result it is 27% faster. Well, the Core i5 was marked by the fact that it almost catches up with the state employees of the red 2019 release. At the same time, the Core i3-10100 loses a significant 62% in multithreading. The balance of power with more modern counterparts can be roughly understood. Let’s compare our heroes now fully.

      The biggest gap between the Core i5-4460 and the younger one was recorded in 7-ZIP Benchmark — from 37 to 44% increase in the speed of packing and unpacking archives.

      3DMark Time Spy also likes real i5 cores more than virtual i3 ones. In this connection, he gave the first advantage of 42%, despite the lower frequency.

      True, in the same CineBench R23, the lower megahertz still go sideways to the 4-core. In single-core mode, it is 7% weaker than its younger brother. Fortunately, multithreading puts everything in its place — 40% of the bonus is already on the side of the Core i5.

      On average, according to the results of all tests, the Core i5-4460 is 19% better than the Core i3-4170. Not the highest result, which was spoiled by the low frequency of the cores. But nothing, games love real 4 cores, so we are sure that now Core i5 will show who is in charge here . .. Or not?

      Assassin’s Creed Valhalla with ultra graphics settings will now set the direction. So what do we see? First of all, if you look at the main counter, which displays the current value, then the Core i5 is somewhere around 48-50% better most of the time. But if you look at the indicator of very rare events, then the advantage is not so significant — in difficult moments, the difference is only 13%. The younger one has 23 fps, and the older one has 26 fps. And both processors catch strong freezes — the benchmark literally freezes for 1-2 seconds.

      Starting Cyberpunk 2077 also with maximum graphics, but without ray tracing. We are not animals. Core i3-4170 held up almost the entire benchmark very well. Dear friends, once again, this 7-year-old processor has only 2 real cores, only 3 megabytes of L3 cache and a rather modest frequency — 3.7 GHz. Even in the loaded scene, he certainly sank into the red numbers, but did not go into the slideshow — well done. As for the Core i5, it is 27-52% better. Despite the fact that all the time it was far from its declared 3400 MHz and TDP of 84 watts.

      Checked out the RTX 3090 Ti and Far Cry 6 by setting all the toggle switches to ultra, leaving only the trace. In terms of average frequency, there are quite good indicators. The Core i3 has 43 fps, while the «fifth» has 53, or 23% more. But drawdowns are not encouraging — 16 and 24 fps, respectively, which in absolute units is 50% of the difference.

      Now Forza Horizon 5 and the maximum picture, which in this game is called extreme. Hey developers! You would somehow come to a single standard. And then some have high, others have epic, others have ultra graphics. Forza has revealed the Core i5 to the fullest. His very rare events are exactly twice as good as those of the younger one: 14 vs. 28 fps. And the average frequency is better by 37%. And this despite the fact that the Core i3 rested on 100% load and was boosted to all its 3. 7 GHz. And the Core i5 did not perform at full capacity, running 700 MHz slower. Here is the power of real 4 cores, against 4 virtual ones.

      And finally, our CPU devourer Total War Saga: Troy , this time just with ultra-graphics. The heaviest benchmark for both processors and low scores on the counters. Here the «five» turned out to be the best by 31-46%. Maybe here the processors did not have enough RAM speed?

      In general, according to the results of all benchmarks, the Core i5-4460 comes out the winner with an average margin of 31-46%. As expected, this is not 19% in synthetics.

      Well, we have already comprehensively assessed the difference in numbers between the heroes of the review. Now I want to understand how it manifests itself in real games. How often will a Core i3 be unplayable while a Core i5 will pull well? We are launching 10 popular projects, many of which are network ones, and let’s go!

      Apex Legends ran on the Olympus map at maximum picture. What can I say, both processors provide quite comfortable gameplay. Only the Core i3 got used to the environment a little for the first half a minute — it looked closely. And then he ran much more confidently. The i5 did not need such a warm-up. On average, the «five» is better by 32-67%.

      It seemed like such a good start, but then Battlefield 2042 broke in in 128 player mode and broke the Core i3 through the knee even on the minimum graphics. And Battle doesn’t care that we probably caught the real magic of numbers here for the first time during the tests — in Apex, the i5 had very rare events that were the best by 66.66667% and in Battle we got the same figure to the last digit — filigree accuracy. But once again, Batlu does not care — she chewed up the Core i3 like an Orbit and spit it out. Of course, Core i5 also got it, but there is still hope that such gameplay will be normal for some percentage of players. Especially when there will be 64 of them, not 128.

      Usually, after the violence of «Battles», CoD: Warzone comes to pleasure on the maximum graphics. But this time, something didn’t quite work out for her. What is on the left, what is on the right — the video sequence is a little lacking in smoothness, there are blunting. Although, of course, they are not as critical as they were a minute ago, so you can try to play.

      It’s good that Dota 2 is a balm for the soul with its maximum graphics. On average 61 and 114 fps respectively. The difference is almost double. At the same time, the Core i3 sags noticeably more during a big cut — in the region of 30-40 fps. The Core i5 allows itself to dive to a depth of 50-60 fps, so the action on the screen feels smoother. We think if you reset the settings a little, then the «troika» will show the same level of comfort.

      In Fortnite ran with epic DX12 graphics settings. Despite the big difference in the average frame rate, the processors feel about the same — it’s relatively comfortable to play, but you need to be prepared for freezes. They happen in the same places, probably due to asset loading. Well, very rare events confirm our feelings — about 10 frames per second both to the right and to the left.

      The Grand Theft Auto V was also rolled with the best possible image on the screen. Core i5 has better performance by 31-33% and this is exactly the margin that saves from noticeable drawdowns up to 30 fps, which gives Core i3. At the same time, the control does not suffer, you just see how the picture before your eyes becomes less smooth for a while. We think if you reset the so-called processor settings a little, everything will be fine.

      In Halo Infinite Multiplayer, hit the «Fragmentation» map on ultra settings. Really unexpected, but the Core i3 with two cores of Hyper Threading is enough to play this game normally. Only sometimes there are slight twitches, which does not spoil a fairly smooth video sequence. With the Core i5 it just feels a little better, which can be summed up as a 19-33% bonus.

      Very interesting PUBG with ultra graphics. There are no questions about management, but there are smoothness. To play on these processors, you will have to put up with constant twitches. With Core i3 there are more of them, they are more noticeable, and with Core i5 — on the contrary.

      Red Dead Redemption 2 and ultra graphics. Core i3 walks right along the border — dives below 30 fps and sometimes slows down noticeably. But at the same time it retains obedient control, so you can play. But reducing the quality of graphics is pointless — it almost does not change the performance. As for the Core i5, it is getting better both in terms of monitoring figures and in terms of the smoothness of the video sequence.

      And finally Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six: Siege with traditional settings — ultra graphics and full resolution rendering. Here, both processors are enough for a comfortable game, in every sense. Core i5 is better by 29-41%.

      Results

      So, what is the result? The Core i3-4170 is usually well done, as for a 7-year-old 2-core, it passed all the heavy benchmarks on ultra-graphics and perfectly pulled easy online: Apex Legends, Dota 2 or Rainbow Six: Siege or something like that.

      Also Halo unexpectedly performed quite well. But to advise the 4th generation Core i3 as a gaming CPU is still not willing. Because with other projects you are already lucky: maybe a slideshow like in «Battle» or you will have to get used to constant dullness.

      Core i5-4460 is another matter. It is 19% better than work tasks and 31-46% better on average in heavy benchmarks.

      Of course, it is also not perfect, some unpleasant little things often come out, which, fortunately, are much less likely to become critical. Thanks to two additional cores and twice as much L3 cache.

      Therefore, if you suddenly sit on a Core i3 Haswell and a neighbor offers to remove the Core i5 for a beer or juice — take it without a doubt! And whether to bypass this option on the used market, decide for yourself.

      Better yet, wait for the following materials, in which we will answer the most interesting questions: how do these 4-cores of the LGA1150 platform pull games at frequencies beyond 4 GHz, which is useful for multithreading, and what can be squeezed out of this platform? So stay with us and wait for the update.

      Author: Denis Koziolek
      Translation: Lilia Masyuk 9000 9000

      We also suggest reading:
      Intel Core i3-12100F versus Core i3-10100, Core i5-12400 and Ryzen 5 2600: the new king of budget systems?
      Intel Core i5-12400 vs Core i5-11400, Core i5-12600K and Ryzen 5 5600X: price/features
      Intel Core i7-980X test in 20 games in 2022: is LGA1366 alive after 12 years?

      Intel Core i3-4130 vs.

      Intel Core i5-3470

      Intel Core i3-4130

      Intel Core i3-4130 runs with 2 and 4 CPU threads It runs on No turbo base No turbo all cores while TDP is set to 54 W . LGA 1150 CPU socket This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache per die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM, DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, Haswell S architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2013

      Intel Core i5-3470

      Intel Core i5-3470 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.60 GHz base 3.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 77 W .The processor connects to an LGA 1155 CPU socket This the version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1600 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Ivy Bridge S Architecture is advanced over 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q2/2012

      Intel Core i3-4130

      Intel Core i5-3470

      Frequency 3.20 GHz 2 Cores 4 no turbo Turbo (1 core) 3.60 GHz no turbo Turbo (all cores) 3.60 GHz Yes Hyper Threading No. No. Acceleration No. normal Basic architecture normal

      Intel HD Graphics 4400

      GPU

      Intel HD Graphics 2500

      1.15GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.10 GHz 22nm Technology 22 nm 1.15 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.10 GHz 11.1 DirectX Version 11. 0 3 Max. displays 3 DDR3-1333
      DDR3-1600
      DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
      DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM memory size DDR3-1600 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory Yes ECC No. — L2 Cache — 3.00MB L3 Cache 6.00 MB 3.0 PCIe version 3.0 16 PCIe lanes 16 22nm Technology 22 nm LGA 1150 Connector LGA 1155 54W TDP 77W VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Q3/2013 Release date Q2/2012

      Show more details

      Show more details

      Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

      Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

      Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

      Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

      Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

      Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.

      Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.

      Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

      Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

      Energy usage estimate

      Average hours of use per day

      Average CPU usage (0-100%)

      Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

      Energy usage estimate

      Average hours of use per day

      Average CPU usage (0-100%)

      Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

      • Core i3-4150
        Compare
      • Core i3-4160
        Compare

      The speed in games

      9000 Core i5-4460

      9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 and similar applications, according to our tests.

      The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

      The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

      Speed ​​in office use

      Core i5-4460

      62.1 (+2.7%)

      Core i3-4170

      60.4

      Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

      The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

      Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

      Speed ​​in heavy applications

      Core i5-4460

      33.4 (+11.4%)

      Core i3-4170

      29.6

      Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

      The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

      At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

      Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

      Speed ​​of numerical operations

      Intel Core i3-4130 Intel Core i5-3470
      54W Max TDP 77W
      NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
      NA Operating cost per day NA
      NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
      NA Operating cost per year NA

      Simple household tasks

      Core i5-4460

      57.5

      Core i3-4170

      58.2 (+1.2%)

      Demanding games and tasks

      Core i5-4460

      30.5 (+23.3%)

      Core i3-4170

      23.4

      Extreme

      Core i5-4460

      6 (+23. 3%)

      Core i3-4170

      4.6

      Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

      We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

      Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

      When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

      Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

      Benchmarks

      Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

      Passmark

      Intel Core i5-4460

      4801 (+24.6%)

      Intel Core i3-4170

      3619

      Features

      .

      Basic

      Manufacturer Intel Intel
      DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i5-4460 Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.40 GHz) Intel® Core™ i3-4170 Processor (3M Cache, 3.70 GHz)
      ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Haswell Haswell
      Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 22 nm 22 nm
      Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 09-2016 09-2017
      Model Official name. i5-4460 i3-4170
      Cores The number of physical cores. 4 2
      ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 4 4
      Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS).
      Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.2 GHz 3.7 GHz
      Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 3.4 GHz 3.7 GHz
      L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 6 MB 3 MB
      Instructions 64-bit 64-bit
      Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
      Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No
      Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 5 GT/s DMI2 5 GT/s DMI2
      Number of QPI links
      TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 84 W 54W
      Cooling system specifications PCG 2013D PCG 2013C

      Video core

      Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Intel® HD Graphics 4400
      GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 350 MHz 350 MHz
      Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. 1100 MHz 1150MHz
      Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802. 11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. No data No data
      Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 3

      RAM

      Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 32 GB 32 GB
      Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V
      RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2
      RAM bandwidth 25.6 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
      ECC Memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

      PCI

      PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. No data No data
      PCI configuration options Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
      Number of PCI lanes 16 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4

      Data Security

      AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data
      Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data

      Decoration

      Dimensions No data No data
      Supported sockets No data No data
      Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

      Which is better

      Intel Core i5-4460

      • On average, gaming performance is 6% better.
      • 2% faster performance in office applications and browsers.
      • In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and 1% better.
      • The price is 3 $ lower.
      • The number of physical cores is 2 more.

      What are similar

      • The number of threads is equal.

      Intel Core i5-4460 vs. AMD A8-6600K


      Cpu Benchmark with tests

      Intel Core i5-4460 AMD A8-6600K
      3.20GHz Frequency 3.90 GHz
      3.40 GHz Turbo (1 core) 4.20 GHz
      3.30 GHz Turbo (all cores) 4.20 GHz
      4 Cores 4
      No Hyperthreading ? No
      No Overclocking? yes
      normal Basic architecture normal
      Intel HD Graphics 4600 GPU AMD Radeon HD 8570D
      11.1 DirectX Version 11. 2
      3 Max. displays 2
      DDR3-1600 memory size DDR3-1866
      2 Memory channels 2
      Max. memory size
      No ECC No
      L2 Cache
      6.00MB L3 Cache 4.00 MB
      3.0 PCIe version
      16 PCIe lanes
      22nm Technology 32 nm
      LGA 1150 Socket FM2
      84 W TDP 100W
      VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization AMD-V
      Q2/2014 Issue date Q2/2013
      show more details show more details

      Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

      Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

      Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

      Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

      Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.