i3-8100 vs i5-4460 — Call of Duty Modern Warfare with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz
i3-8100
i5-4460
Multi-Thread Performance
8094 Pts
6707 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2102 Pts
1944 Pts
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
i3-8100 vs i5-4460 in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i3-8100
i5-4460
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
95.6 FPS |
| 1080p |
81.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
68.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
58. |
| 2160p |
41.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
35.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
58.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
50.3 FPS |
High Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
151.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
132.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
114.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
100.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
73.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
64.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
100.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
87.9 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
207.8 FPS |
| 1080p |
184.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
160. |
| 1440p |
142.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
106.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
93.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
142.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
125.5 FPS |
9 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
320.0 FPS |
| 1080p |
286.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
252.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
225.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
172.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
152.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
225.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
200.7 FPS |
i3-8100
i5-4460
Compare i3-8100 vs i5-4460 specifications
Share Your Comments 2
Compare i3-8100 vs i5-4460 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-4460
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-8100 and Intel Core i5-4460 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i3-8100
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i5-4460
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-8100
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.
6 GHz vs 3.40 GHz - Around 38% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 72.72°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 84 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2237 vs 1903
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6166 vs 4843
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 965 vs 795
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 3121 vs 2529
- Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 3346 vs 2725
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.843 vs 3.471
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 87.079 vs 72.642
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.473 vs 0.404 - Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.403 vs 1.943
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.403 vs 5.623
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1830 vs 1128
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3671 vs 2353
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 6116 vs 3312
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1830 vs 1128
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3671 vs 2353
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 6116 vs 3312
| Launch date | January 2018 vs 1 June 2014 |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 6 GHz vs 3.40 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 72.72°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 32 GB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 84 Watt |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2237 vs 1903 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6166 vs 4843 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 965 vs 795 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3121 vs 2529 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3346 vs 2725 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
3.843 vs 3.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 87.079 vs 72.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.473 vs 0.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.403 vs 1.943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.403 vs 5.623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1830 vs 1128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3671 vs 2353 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
6116 vs 3312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1830 vs 1128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3671 vs 2353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 6116 vs 3312 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-8100
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4460
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-8100 | Intel Core i5-4460 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2237 | 1903 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6166 | 4843 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 965 | 795 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3121 | 2529 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3346 | 2725 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
3.843 | 3.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 87.079 | 72.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.473 | 0.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.403 | 1.943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.403 | 5.623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1830 | 1128 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3671 | 2353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 6116 | 3312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1830 | 1128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3671 | 2353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 6116 | 3312 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i3-8100 | Intel Core i5-4460 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Haswell |
| Launch date | January 2018 | 1 June 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 800 | 1295 |
| Price now | $129. 99 |
$184.79 |
| Processor Number | i3-8100 | i5-4460 |
| Series | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.33 | 10.69 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $182 | |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 60 GHz |
3.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 72. 72°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Die size | 177 mm | |
| Transistor count | 1400 Million | |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 25. 6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
| Device ID | 0x3E91/x92 | 0x412 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| Graphics max frequency | 1. 1 GHz |
|
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | [email protected] |
| Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | [email protected] |
| Max resolution over VGA | [email protected] | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2013D |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-4460
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-4460
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i3-8100 on one side and the Intel Core i5-4460 on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Core i3-8100 | Intel Core i5-4460 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Coffee Lake | Haswell | ||||||
| Core name | Coffee Lake-S | Haswell-DT | ||||||
| Family | Core i3-8000 | Core i5-4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | BX80684I38100, BXC80684I38100, CM8068403377308, SR3N5 |
BX80646I54460, BXC80646I54460, CM8064601560722, QF4J, SR1QK |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2017 | Q2 2014 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm++ | 22 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | — | 1. 400.000.000 |
||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,2 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 5 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 6 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 37,5 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 84 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 23 | 20 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 184 | 160 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 423,2 GFLOPS | 352 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1150 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 72. 7°C |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 422 | 337 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1.654 | 1.364 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 154 | 125 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 616 | 453 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 363 | 309 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1.408 | 1.158 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 707 | 840 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 2.745 | 3. 093 |
||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.231 | 1.886 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 6.120 | 4.785 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.327 | 3.713 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
12.377 | 10.533 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
962 | 823 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
3.031 | 2.466 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
225,6 GFLOPS | 202,1 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
190 pts / W | 125 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i3-8100 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Core i3-8100 is lower. The Intel Core i3-8100 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
422 1.654 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
337 1.364 |
In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
154 616 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
125 453 |
In single core, the difference is 23%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 36%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
363 1.408 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
309 1.158 |
In single core, the difference is 17%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 22%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
840 3.093 |
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
707 2.745 |
In single core, the difference is 19%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 13%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
2.231 6.120 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
1.886 4. |
In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 28%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
4.327 12.377 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
3.713 10.533 |
In single core, the difference is 17%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
4.665 12.104 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
3.461 8.426 |
In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 44%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
3.615 10.215 |
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
3.131 7.065 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 45%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
4.480 13.074 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
3.942 11.200 |
In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 17%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
962 3.031 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
823 2.466 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
1.027 3.272 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
911 2.852 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 15%.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
758 2.  391 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
765 2.364 |
In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8100 |
932 3.221 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 |
849 2.822 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 14%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers.
This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i3-8100 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-4460 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i3-8100BIntel Core i3-8100TIntel Core i3-8109U
Intel Core i5-4460S
Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-4570: ¿cuál es la diferencia?
53puntos
Intel Core i3-8100
39puntos
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Comparación de 64 características
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i5-4570
¿Por qué es Intel Core i3-8100 mejor que Intel Core i5-4570?
- Velocidad del procesador 12.5% mayor?
4 x 3.6GHzvs4 x 3.2GHz - 800MHz mayor velocidad de memoria ram?
2400MHzvs1600MHz - Temperatura máxima de funcionamiento 27.
28°C más alta?
100°Cvs72.72°C - 8nm menor tamaño de los semiconductores?
14nmvs22nm - Resultado 14.35% superior para PassMark?
8183vs7156 - 19W menor TDP (Potencia de Diseño Térmico)?
65Wvs84W - 12.8GB/s más memoria de banda ancha?
38.4GB/svs25.6GB/s - 0.9 versión más nueva de DirectX?
12vs11.1
¿Por qué es Intel Core i5-4570 mejor que Intel Core i3-8100?
¿Cuáles son las comparaciones más populares?
Intel Core i3-8100
vs
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i3-8100
vs
Intel Core M3-8100Y
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i3-8100
vs
Intel Core i3-8100T
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i3-8100
vs
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Celeron N3060
Intel Core i3-8100
vs
Intel Core i5-7500
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i3-8100
vs
Intel Celeron 6305
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
AMD FX-6300
Intel Core i3-8100
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i3-8100
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i3-8100
vs
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i3-8100
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i5-2400
Comparación de precios
Reseñas de usuarios
Rendimiento
1.
velocidad de la CPU
4 x 3.6GHz
4 x 3.2GHz
La velocidad de CPU indica cuantos ciclos de procesamiento por segundo puede ejecutar una CPU teniendo en cuenta todos sus núcleos (unidades de procesamiento). Se calcula sumando las frecuencias de reloj de cada núcleo o, en el caso de procesadores mutlinúcleo que emplean diferentes microarquitecturas, de cada grupo de núcleos.
2.hilos de la CPU
Un mayor número de hilos contribuye a mejorar el rendimiento y a una multitarea más eficiente.
3.velocidad de reloj del procesador turbo
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i3-8100)
3.6GHz
Cuando la CPU está funcionando por debajo de sus limitaciones, puede aumentar a una velocidad de reloj más alta con el fin de dar un mayor rendimiento.
4.Tiene un multiplicador desbloqueado
✖Intel Core i3-8100
✖Intel Core i5-4570
Algunos procesadores vienen con un multiplicador desbloqueado, lo que hace más sencilla la práctica overclocking, permitiendo obtener un mayor rendimiento en juegos y otras aplicaciones.
Esta práctica pretende alcanzar una mayor velocidad de reloj para un componente electrónico por encima de las especificaciones del fabricante.
5.caché L2
Un caché L2 más grande resulta en un rendimiento del sistema global y de la CPU más rápido.
6.caché L3
Un caché L3 más grande resulta en un rendimiento del sistema global y de la CPU más rápido.
7.caché L1
Un caché L1 más grande resulta en un rendimiento del sistema global y de la CPU más rápido.
8.núcleo L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
Más datos se pueden almacenar en la memoria caché L2 para el acceso de cada núcleo de la CPU.
9.núcleo L3
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
Más datos se pueden almacenar en la memoria caché L3 para el acceso de cada núcleo de la CPU.
Memoria
1.
velocidad de la memoria RAM
2400MHz
1600MHz
Puede soportar una memoria más rápida, lo que dará un rendimiento del sistema más rápido.
2.memoria máxima de ancho de banda
38.4GB/s
25.6GB/s
Esta es la velocidad máxima de datos que se pueden leer o almacenar en la memoria.
3.versión de memoria DDR
Memoria DDR (Double Data Rate) es el tipo de RAM más común. Las versiones más recientes de memoria DDR proporcionan velocidades máximas más altas y son energéticamente más eficientes.
4.canales de memoria
Más canales de memoria aumenta la velocidad de transferencia de datos entre la memoria y la CPU.
5.tamaño de memoria máxima
La cantidad máxima de memoria (RAM).
6.tasa de trasferencia bus
El bus es el responsable de la transferencia de datos entre los diferentes componentes de un ordenador o dispositivo.
7.Soporta memoria ECC
✔Intel Core i3-8100
✖Intel Core i5-4570
La corrección de errores de la memoria de código puede detectar y corregir la corrupción de datos. Se utiliza cuando es esencial evitar la corrupción, como en la computación científica o cuando se ejecuta un servidor.
8.versión de eMMC
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i3-8100)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Una versión de eMMC más avanzada permite interfaces de memoria más veloces, teniendo esto un impacto muy positivo en el funcionamiento general de un dispositivo. Por ejemplo, al transferir archivos desde tu ordenador a un disco duro a través de USB.
9.velocidad de bus
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i3-8100)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i5-4570)
El bus es el responsable de la transferencia de datos entre los diferentes componentes de un ordenador o dispositivo.
Benchmarks
1.resultado de PassMark
Esta prueba mide el rendimiento de la CPU con varios subprocesos.
2.resultado de PassMark (un solo procesador)
Esta prueba mide el rendimiento de la CPU con un solo hilo.
3.resultado de Geekbench 5 (varios)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Geekbench 5 es una referencia multiplataforma que mide el rendimiento de varios núcleos de un procesador. (Fuente: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.resultado de Cinebench R20 (varios)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i3-8100)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Cinebench R20 es una herramienta de referencia que mide el rendimiento de varios núcleos de una CPU renderizando una escena 3D.
5.resultado de Cinebench R20 (único)
Desconocido.
Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i3-8100)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Cinebench R20 es una herramienta de referencia que mide el rendimiento de núcleo único de una CPU renderizando una escena 3D.
6.Resultado de Geekbench 5 (único)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Geekbench 5 es una referencia multiplataforma que mide el rendimiento de un procesador de núcleo único (Fuente: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.resultado de Blender (bmw27)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i3-8100)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i5-4570)
La referencia Blender (bmw27) mide el rendimiento de un procesador renderizando una escena 3D. Los procesadores más potentes pueden renderizar la escena en menos tiempo.
8.resultado de Blender (Classroom)
Desconocido.
Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i3-8100)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i5-4570)
La referencia Blender (Classroom) mide el rendimiento de un procesador renderizando una escena 3D. Los procesadores más potentes pueden renderizar la escena en menos tiempo.
9.rendimiento por vatio
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i3-8100)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Esto significa que la CPU es más eficiente, dando una mayor cantidad de rendimiento para cada vatio de potencia utilizado.
Otras características
1.usa multihilo
✖Intel Core i3-8100
✖Intel Core i5-4570
La tecnología multihilo (como Hyperthreading de Intel o Simultaneous Multithreading de AMD) proporciona un mejor rendimiento al dividir cada uno de los núcleos físicos del procesador en núcleos virtuales, también conocidos como hilos.
De esta forma cada núcleo puede ejecutar dos hilos de instrucciones al mismo tiempo.
2.Tiene AES
✔Intel Core i3-8100
✔Intel Core i5-4570
El AES se utiliza para acelerar el cifrado y el descifrado.
3.Tiene AVX
✔Intel Core i3-8100
✔Intel Core i5-4570
AVX se utiliza para ayudar a acelerar los cálculos en aplicaciones multimedia, científicas y financieras, así como para mejorar el rendimiento del software RAID de Linux.
4.versión SSE
La SSE se utiliza para acelerar las tareas multimedia como la edición de imágenes o ajustar el volumen de audio. Cada nueva versión contiene nuevas instrucciones y mejoras.
5.Tiene F16C
✔Intel Core i3-8100
✔Intel Core i5-4570
F16C se utiliza para acelerar tareas como ajustar el contraste de una imagen o ajustar el volumen.
6.
bits ejecutados a la vez
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i3-8100)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i5-4570)
NEON proporciona una aceleración de procesamiento de medios, tales como escuchar música en MP3.
7.Tiene MMX
✔Intel Core i3-8100
✔Intel Core i5-4570
MMX se utiliza para acelerar tareas como ajustar el contraste de una imagen o ajustar el volumen.
8.Tiene TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-8100
✖Intel Core i5-4570
Una tecnología integrada en el procesador para asegurar el dispositivo para su uso con las características tales como los pagos móviles y el streaming de vídeo mediante la gestión de derechos digitales (DRM).
9.anchura del interfaz inicial
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i3-8100)
Desconocido. Ayúdanos sugiriendo un valor. (Intel Core i5-4570)
La CPU puede decodificar más instrucciones por ciclo de reloj (IPC), lo que significa que la CPU tiene un mejor rendimiento
Comparación de precios
Compartir
Cancelar
¿Cuáles son los/las mejores CPUs?
Intel Core i3-8100 vs.
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i3-8100 beroperasi dengan 4 dan thread CPU 4 Ini berjalan di No turbo base No turbo semua inti sementara TDP disetel di 65 W .Prosesor dipasang ke soket CPU LGA 1151-2 Versi ini menyertakan 6.00 MB cache L3 pada satu chip, mendukung saluran memori 2 DDR4-2400 RAM dan fitur 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes}. Tjunction tetap di bawah 100 °C derajat C. Secara khusus, Coffee Lake S ditingkatkan dengan 14 nm dan mendukung VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . Produk diluncurkan pada Q4/2017
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i5-4460 beroperasi dengan 4 dan thread CPU 4 Ini berjalan di 3.40 GHz base 3.30 GHz semua inti sementara TDP disetel di 84 W .Prosesor dipasang ke soket CPU LGA 1150 Versi ini menyertakan 6.00 MB cache L3 pada satu chip, mendukung saluran memori 2 DDR3-1600 RAM dan fitur 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes}. Tjunction tetap di bawah — derajat C. Secara khusus, Haswell S ditingkatkan dengan 22 nm dan mendukung VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . Produk diluncurkan pada Q2/2014
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i5-4460
Bandingkan Detail
3. 60 GHz |
Frekuensi | 3.20 GHz |
| 4 | Core | 4 |
| No turbo | Turbo (1 Inti) | 3.40 GHz |
| No turbo | Turbo (Semua Core) | 3.30 GHz |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Arsitektur Inti | normal |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| 1.10 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| 14 nm | Teknologi | 22 nm |
| 1.10 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| 12 | Versi DirectX | 11.1 |
| 3 | Max. menampilkan | 3 |
| DDR4-2400 | Penyimpanan | DDR3-1600 |
| 2 | Saluran memori | 2 |
| Memori maksimal | ||
| Yes | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
6. 00 MB |
L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| 3.0 | Versi PCIe | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 14 nm | Teknologi | 22 nm |
| LGA 1151-2 | Stopkontak | LGA 1150 |
| 65 W | TDP | 84 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualisasi | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q4/2017 | Tanggal rilis | Q2/2014 |
|
Tampilkan lebih banyak data |
Tampilkan lebih banyak data |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 adalah penerus Cinebench R15 dan juga didasarkan pada Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 adalah perangkat lunak yang digunakan di seluruh dunia untuk membuat bentuk 3D. Tes inti tunggal hanya menggunakan satu inti CPU, jumlah inti atau kemampuan hyperthreading tidak dihitung.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 adalah penerus Cinebench R15 dan juga didasarkan pada Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 adalah perangkat lunak yang digunakan di seluruh dunia untuk membuat bentuk 3D. Tes multi-core melibatkan semua core CPU dan memanfaatkan hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 adalah penerus Cinebench 11.5 dan juga didasarkan pada Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 adalah perangkat lunak yang digunakan di seluruh dunia untuk membuat bentuk 3D. Tes inti tunggal hanya menggunakan satu inti CPU, jumlah inti atau kemampuan hyperthreading tidak dihitung.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 adalah penerus Cinebench 11.5 dan juga didasarkan pada Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 adalah perangkat lunak yang digunakan di seluruh dunia untuk membuat bentuk 3D. Tes multi-core melibatkan semua core CPU dan memanfaatkan hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 adalah patokan cross-plattform yang banyak menggunakan memori sistem. Memori yang cepat akan mendorong banyak hasil. Tes inti tunggal hanya menggunakan satu inti CPU, jumlah inti atau kemampuan hyperthreading tidak dihitung.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 adalah patokan cross-plattform yang banyak menggunakan memori sistem. Memori yang cepat akan mendorong banyak hasil. Tes multi-core melibatkan semua core CPU dan memanfaatkan hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Kinerja komputasi teoretis dari unit grafis internal prosesor dengan akurasi sederhana (32 bit) di GFLOPS. GFLOPS menunjukkan berapa miliar operasi floating point yang dapat dilakukan iGPU per detik.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 adalah tolok ukur cross plattform yang banyak menggunakan memori sistem. Memori yang cepat akan mendorong banyak hasil. Tes inti tunggal hanya menggunakan satu inti CPU, jumlah inti atau kemampuan hyperthreading tidak dihitung.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 adalah tolok ukur cross plattform yang banyak menggunakan memori sistem. Memori yang cepat akan mendorong banyak hasil. Tes multi-core melibatkan semua core CPU dan memanfaatkan hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 didasarkan pada Cinema 4D Suite, perangkat lunak yang populer untuk menghasilkan formulir dan hal-hal lain dalam 3D. Tes inti tunggal hanya menggunakan satu inti CPU, jumlah inti atau kemampuan hyperthreading tidak dihitung.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 didasarkan pada Cinema 4D Suite, perangkat lunak yang populer untuk menghasilkan formulir dan hal-hal lain dalam 3D. Tes multi-core melibatkan semua core CPU dan memanfaatkan hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 didasarkan pada Cinema 4D Suite, perangkat lunak yang populer untuk menghasilkan formulir dan hal-hal lain dalam 3D. Pengujian iGPU menggunakan unit grafis internal CPU untuk menjalankan perintah OpenGL.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Beberapa CPU yang tercantum di bawah ini telah diukur dengan CPU-Comparison. Namun sebagian besar CPU belum diuji dan hasilnya telah diperkirakan oleh rumus kepemilikan rahasia CPU-Comparison.
Karena itu, mereka tidak secara akurat mencerminkan nilai tanda CPU Passmark yang sebenarnya dan tidak didukung oleh PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Perkiraan Penggunaan Listrik
Rata-rata jam penggunaan per hari
Pemanfaatan CPU Rata-rata (0-100%)
Biaya listrik, dolar per kWh
Perkiraan Penggunaan Listrik
Rata-rata jam penggunaan per hari
Pemanfaatan CPU Rata-rata (0-100%)
Biaya listrik, dolar per kWh
| Intel Core i3-8100 | Intel Core i5-4460 | |
| 65 W | Max TDP | 84 W |
| NA | Konsumsi daya per hari (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Biaya operasional per hari | NA |
| NA | Konsumsi daya per tahun (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Biaya operasional per tahun | NA |
Perbandingan Populer
Comments
Intel Core i3-8100 vs.
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i3-8100
El Intel Core i3-8100 opera con 4 núcleos y 4 subprocesos de CPU. Se ejecuta en No turbo base No turbo todos los núcleos mientras que el TDP se establece en 65 W .El procesador está conectado al LGA 1151-2 CPU LGA 1151-2. Esta versión incluye 6.00 MB de caché L3 en un chip, admite canales de 2 DDR4-2400 y cuenta con 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction mantiene por debajo de 100 °C grados C. En particular, Coffee Lake S arquitectura se mejora con la 14 nm y es compatible con la VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . El producto se lanzó el Q4/2017
Intel Core i5-4460
El Intel Core i5-4460 opera con 4 núcleos y 4 subprocesos de CPU. Se ejecuta en 3.40 GHz base 3.30 GHz todos los núcleos mientras que el TDP se establece en 84 W .El procesador está conectado al LGA 1150 CPU LGA 1150. Esta versión incluye 6.00 MB de caché L3 en un chip, admite canales de 2 DDR3-1600 y cuenta con 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction mantiene por debajo de — grados C. En particular, Haswell S arquitectura se mejora con la 22 nm y es compatible con la VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d .
El producto se lanzó el Q2/2014
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i5-4460
Comparar detalle
| 3.60 GHz | Frecuencia | 3.20 GHz |
| 4 | Núcleos | 4 |
| No turbo | Turbo (1 núcleo) | 3.40 GHz |
| No turbo | Turbo (todos los núcleos) | 3.30 GHz |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Arquitectura del núcleo | normal |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| 1.10 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| 14 nm | Tecnología | 22 nm |
| 1.10 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| 12 | Versión de DirectX | 11.1 |
| 3 | Max. muestra | 3 |
| DDR4-2400 | Memoria | DDR3-1600 |
| 2 | Canales de memoria | 2 |
| Memoria máxima | ||
| Yes | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
6. 00 MB |
L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| 3.0 | Versión PCIe | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 14 nm | Tecnología | 22 nm |
| LGA 1151-2 | Enchufe | LGA 1150 |
| 65 W | TDP | 84 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualización | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q4/2017 | Fecha de lanzamiento | Q2/2014 |
|
Mostrar más datos |
Mostrar más datos |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 es el sucesor de Cinebench R15 y también se basa en Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 es un software utilizado en todo el mundo para crear formas 3D. La prueba de un solo núcleo solo usa un núcleo de CPU, la cantidad de núcleos o la capacidad de hyperthreading no cuentan.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 es el sucesor de Cinebench R15 y también se basa en Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 es un software utilizado en todo el mundo para crear formas 3D. La prueba de múltiples núcleos involucra todos los núcleos de CPU y tiene una gran ventaja de hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 es el sucesor de Cinebench 11.5 y también se basa en Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 es un software utilizado en todo el mundo para crear formas 3D. La prueba de un solo núcleo solo usa un núcleo de CPU, la cantidad de núcleos o la capacidad de hyperthreading no cuentan.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 es el sucesor de Cinebench 11.5 y también se basa en Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 es un software utilizado en todo el mundo para crear formas 3D. La prueba de múltiples núcleos involucra todos los núcleos de CPU y tiene una gran ventaja de hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 es un banco de pruebas de plataformas cruzadas que utiliza en gran medida la memoria del sistema. Una memoria rápida empujará mucho el resultado.
La prueba de un solo núcleo solo usa un núcleo de CPU, la cantidad de núcleos o la capacidad de hyperthreading no cuentan.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 es un banco de pruebas de plataformas cruzadas que utiliza en gran medida la memoria del sistema. Una memoria rápida empujará mucho el resultado. La prueba de múltiples núcleos involucra todos los núcleos de CPU y tiene una gran ventaja de hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
El rendimiento informático teórico de la unidad gráfica interna del procesador con precisión simple (32 bits) en GFLOPS. GFLOPS indica cuántos miles de millones de operaciones de punto flotante puede realizar la iGPU por segundo.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 es un banco de pruebas de plataformas cruzadas que utiliza en gran medida la memoria del sistema. Una memoria rápida empujará mucho el resultado. La prueba de un solo núcleo solo usa un núcleo de CPU, la cantidad de núcleos o la capacidad de hyperthreading no cuentan.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 es un banco de pruebas de plataformas cruzadas que utiliza en gran medida la memoria del sistema. Una memoria rápida empujará mucho el resultado. La prueba de múltiples núcleos involucra todos los núcleos de CPU y tiene una gran ventaja de hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 se basa en Cinema 4D Suite, un software que es popular para generar formularios y otras cosas en 3D. La prueba de un solo núcleo solo usa un núcleo de CPU, la cantidad de núcleos o la capacidad de hyperthreading no cuentan.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 se basa en Cinema 4D Suite, un software que es popular para generar formularios y otras cosas en 3D. La prueba de múltiples núcleos involucra todos los núcleos de CPU y tiene una gran ventaja de hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 se basa en Cinema 4D Suite, un software que es popular para generar formularios y otras cosas en 3D.
La prueba de iGPU utiliza la unidad gráfica interna de la CPU para ejecutar comandos OpenGL.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Algunas de las CPU que se enumeran a continuación se han evaluado mediante CPU-Comparison. Sin embargo, la mayoría de las CPU no se han probado y los resultados se han estimado mediante la fórmula secreta patentada de una comparación de CPU. Como tales, no reflejan con precisión los valores reales de marca de la CPU de Passmark y no están respaldados por PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Estimación de uso eléctrico
Horas promedio de uso por día
Uso promedio de CPU (0-100%)
Costo de energía, dólar por kWh
Estimación de uso eléctrico
Horas promedio de uso por día
Uso promedio de CPU (0-100%)
Costo de energía, dólar por kWh
| Intel Core i3-8100 | Intel Core i5-4460 | |
| 65 W | Max TDP | 84 W |
| NA | Consumo de energía por día (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Coste corriente por día | NA |
| NA | Consumo de energía por año (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Costo de funcionamiento por año | NA |
Comparación popular
Comments
Comparison of Intel Core i3-8100 and Intel Core i5-4460
Comparative analysis of the Intel Core i3-8100 and Intel Core i5-4460 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphic interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability , Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i3-8100
versus
Intel Core i5-4460
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-8100
- Newer processor, approx. 3 year(s) 7 month(s) difference in release dates
- Approximately 38% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 72.72°C
- Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x more max memory size: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- About 29% less power consumption: 65 Watt vs 84 Watt
- About 18% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2237 vs 1903
- Approximately 27% increase in PassMark — CPU mark performance: 6166 vs 4843
- Approximately 21% increase in Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance: 965 vs 795
- Approx. 23% more: 3121 vs 2529
- About 23% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark: 3346 vs 2725
- About 11% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 3.843 vs 3.471
- benchmark CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 20% more: 87.079 vs 72.642
- Performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 17% more: 0.473 vs 0.404 - CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 24% more performance: 2.403 vs 1.943
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 14% more performance: 6.403 vs 5.623
- GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) performance about 62% faster: 1830 vs 1128
- GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Manhattan (Frames) performance about 56% faster: 3671 vs 2353
- About 85% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 6116 vs 3312
- About 62% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1830 vs 1128
- about 56% more in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 3671 vs 2353
- About 85% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) benchmark: 6116 vs 3312
frequency: 3.
6 GHz vs 3.40 GHz
| January 2018 vs 1 June 2014 | |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 6 GHz vs 3.40 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 72.72°C |
| Process | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 32 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 84 Watt |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2237 vs 1903 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6166 vs 4843 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 965 vs 795 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3121 vs 2529 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3346 vs 2725 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
3.843 vs 3.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 87.079 vs 72.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.473 vs 0.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.403 vs 1.943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.403 vs 5.623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1830 vs 1128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3671 vs 2353 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
6116 vs 3312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1830 vs 1128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3671 vs 2353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 6116 vs 3312 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-8100
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4460
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi Core |
|
|||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-8100 | Intel Core i5-4460 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2237 | 1903 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6166 | 4843 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 965 | 795 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3121 | 2529 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3346 | 2725 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
3.843 | 3.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 87.079 | 72.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.473 | 0.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.403 | 1.943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.403 | 5.623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1830 | 1128 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3671 | 2353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 6116 | 3312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1830 | 1128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3671 | 2353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 6116 | 3312 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Core i3-8100 | Intel Core i5-4460 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Coffee Lake | Haswell |
| Production date | January 2018 | June 1, 2014 |
| Place in the ranking | 800 | 1295 |
| Price now | $129. 99 |
$184.79 |
| Processor Number | i3-8100 | i5-4460 |
| Series | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 18.33 | 10.69 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price at first issue date | $182 | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 60 GHz |
3.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256KB |
| Level 2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1MB |
| Level 3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 6MB |
| Technological process | 14nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 72. 72°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Crystal area | 177mm | |
| Number of transistors | 1400 Million | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 25. 6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 64GB | 32GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
| Device ID | 0x3E91/x92 | 0x412 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350MHz | 350MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Video memory size | 64GB | 2GB |
| Integrated graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| Maximum GPU clock | 1. 1 GHz |
|
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | 3 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| WiDi support | ||
| 4K support | ||
| Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | [email protected] |
| Maximum resolution via eDP | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | [email protected] |
| Maximum resolution via VGA | [email protected] | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
| Supported sockets | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1150 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2013D |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Anti-Theft Technology | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technology | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
Intel Core i3-8100 vs.
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i3-8100 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs on No turbo base No turbo all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to LGA 1151- CPU socket 2 This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2400 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, Coffee Lake S architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2017
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i5-4460 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.40 GHz base 3.30 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 84 W .The processor connects to LGA 1150 CPU socket This the version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1600 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q2/2014
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i5-4460
20 GHz Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel HD Graphics 4600
00MB Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test.
A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive.
A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison.
However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Estimated energy use
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
| Intel Core i3-8100 | Intel Core i5-4460 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 65 W | Max TDP | 84W | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NA | Operating cost per day | NA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NA | Operating cost per year | NA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8%) 
Simple household tasks |
|
Core i3-8100T 58.6 (+1.9%) Core i5-4460 57.5 |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Core i3-8100T 32.1 (+5%) Core i5-4460 30.5 |
Extreme |
|
Core i3-8100T 6. Core i5-4460 6 |
4 (+6.3%) Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Core i3-8100t
320
Intel Core i5-4460
325 (+1.5%)
Core
22 Intel Core I3100TL Core INTEL Core INTEL CORE INTEL %)
Intel Core i5-4460
1177
Geekbench 3 Single Core
Intel Core i3-8100t
3302 (+5%)
Intel i5-4460 9000 3136 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
Intel Core i3-8100T
10500 (+3.
7%)
Intel Core i5-4460
10114
Cinebench R11.5
Intel Core i3-8100t
1.64 (+9.1%)
Intel Core i5-4460 9000 9000 9000
Cinebench R11.5
Intel Core i3-8100t
5.64 (+4.3%)
Intel Core i5-4460
5.4
Cinebench R11.5 IGPU, OpenGL
Intel Core INTEL COREN +48.7%)
Intel Core i5-4460
19.2
Passmark
Intel Core i3-8100T
5333 (+10%)
Intel Core i5-4460
4801
Characteristics Information in the table
may not be filled in yet existing features.
Basic
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i3-8100T Processor (6M Cache, 3.10 GHz) | Intel® Core™ i5-4460 Processor (6M Cache, up to 3. 40 GHz) |
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Coffee Lake | Haswell |
| Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 09-2020 | 09-2016 |
| Model Official name. | i3-8100T | i5-4460 |
| Cores The number of physical cores. | 4 | 4 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. |
4 | 4 |
| Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Missing | Missing |
| Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. |
3.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Instructions | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. |
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 |
| Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | Yes | No |
| Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Number of QPI links | ||
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. |
35 W | 84W |
| Cooling system specifications | PCG 2015A (35W) | PCG 2013D |
Video core
| Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| GPU base clockFrequency of 2D and idle operation. | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. |
1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802.11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | No data | |
| Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. | 3 | 3 |
RAM
| Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 64 GB | 32 GB |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM determines its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. |
DDR4-2400 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
| RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | 2 |
| RAM bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. |
3 | No data |
| PCI configuration options | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Number of PCI lanes | 16 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Data Protection
| AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | No data | No data |
| Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
| Dimensions | No data | No data |
| Supported sockets | No data | No data |
| Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Core i3-8100T
- On average, gaming performance is 2% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 1%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 0%.
- $117 down
Intel Core i5-4460
- The base frequency is higher by 0.1 GHz.
How are they similar
- The number of physical cores is the same.
- The number of threads is equal.
Answers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See all experts from Technology > Hardware
| Related questions |
Solved
How to enter bios on LENOVO ideapad 110
When you connect speakers to a laptop, the sound still comes from the laptop speakers, but the speakers are silent.
Solved
The computer freezes and starts to buzz
CDs and DVDs cannot be written
Solved
Tell me, I have a black desktop background all the time, the picture is not saved.
Use our application
Intel Core i3-4350T vs. Intel Core i5-4460
Cpu Benchmark with tests
| Intel Core i3-4350T | Intel Core i5-4460 | |
| 3.10GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| no turbo | Turbo (1 core) | 3.40 GHz |
| no turbo | Turbo (all cores) | 3.30 GHz |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| yes | Hyperthreading ? | No |
| No | Overclocking? | No |
| normal | Basic architecture | normal |
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
11. 1 |
DirectX Version | 11.1 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR3-1333 DDR3-1600 DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM |
memory size | DDR3-1600 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max. memory size | ||
| yes | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 4.00MB | L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 22nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| LGA 1150 | Socket | LGA 1150 |
| 35W | TDP | 84W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q2/2014 | Issue date | Q2/2014 |
| show more details | show more details |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have passed CPU-Benchmark testing. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Benchmark formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Popular comparison
Intel Core i3-4350T vs. Intel Core i5-4460 — Cpu Benchmark 9 specifications and test0003
5 of 45 rating(s)
i3 8100 vs i5 7400 gaming – Fytob
Based on 153,130 user benchmarks for the Intel Core i3-8100 and the Core i5-7400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,184 CPUs.
UserBenchmark: Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-7400
按一下以在 Bing 上檢視10:03
10/16/2017 Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-7400 Test in 8 Games World of Warships – https ://wgaffiliate.com/?a=2736&c=4692&s1= Games: Project Cars Battlefield 1 – 01:03 Grand
作者: Testing Games
按一下以在 Bing 上檢視4:15
10/25/2017 Buy Very Cheap PC Games Use the code ”bench” for 5% off: http://bit.
ly/2hAR3NW Intel i3-8100 vs i5-2400 Benchmark with GTX 1060 6GB. i3 8100 (3.6GHz) vs i5 7400 (3.3GHz) vs i5 7500 (3.6GHz) | Which is a Better Value For Money..?? In this Video I’ll Show You Workstation and Gaming Benchmarks of intel Core i3-8100 and Core i5-7400 and Core i5-7500 System Specs intel Core i3-8100
作者: NJ Tech
按一下以在 Bing 上檢視10:02
4/1/2018 Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-7500 Test in 7 Games (GTX 1060) World of Warships – https:// wgaffiliate.com/?a=2736&c=4692&s1= Games: PUBG Battlefield 1 – 01:01 Fal
作者: Testing Games
The i3–8100 processor is nearly the identical to the i5–7600 without the i5’s ability to turbo. So, of course it is faster than the i5-7400. I was never a fan of the i5–7400 and still think it is basically a senseless product that has no place in
| Which is better intel core i5 7400 (7th generation) or intel | 7/12/2018 |
| Whats better i5-7400 or i3-6100 ? | 7/10/2018 |
| What is the difference between i3 and i5 processor? | 15/6/2018 |
| Which is the best processor: i3 or i5? | 12/2/2018 |
Intel ha sostituito l’ i5 7500 con l’ i3 8100 che costa di meno quindi questo i3 8100 è migliore dell’ i5 7400 .
Io ti consiglio ddr4 3000 mhz oppure almeno 2666 mhz. Come marche: G.skill, Kingston, Corsair e Crucial.
10/5/2017 The Core i3-8100 4-Core and the Core i5-7400 3.0GHz both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming. Both the Intel Core i3-8100 4-Core 3.6GHz and the Intel Core i5-7400 3.0GHz have the same number of threads. Both CPUs have
按一下以在 Bing 上檢視27:15
10/25/2017 Merhaba Arkadaşlar. Bu videomuzda sizler için intel’in 8.nesil 4 çekirdekli core i3 8100 ve 6 çekirdekli core i5 8400 modellerini Palit GTX 1070 Super JetStream ekran kartı eşliğinde karşılaştırdık. 3 adet test programInda 9Previously, i3 Kaby Lake processors had two cores with hyperthreading, but now, i3 Coffee Lake processors have 4 cores and offer much better value for money in terms of dollars per core. With a performance profile that closely matches last years mid range Kaby Lake i5’s (the then go-to mid range gaming choice) and a price tag of just $120, the i3-8100 represents excellent value for money.
UserBenchmark: Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-8400
30/9/2019 i3-8100 vs i5-7600 specifications comparison The graphs below demonstrate the difference between i5-7600 and Core i3-8100 most important characteristics. These features, together with an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a microprocessor performs.
5/10/2017 The Core i3-8100 4-Core and the Core i5-7400 3.0GHz both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming. Both the Intel Core i3-8100 4-Core 3.6GHz and the Intel Core i5-7400 3.0GHz have the same number of threads. Both CPUs have
9/30/2019 Detailed side by side comparison of Intel Core i3-8100 vs Core i5-6400 specs can be found in the Specifications section below. Even more detailed comparison of low level features of both CPUs you will find in the CPUIDs section
9/30/2019 The charts below compare the most important Intel Core i5-7500 and i3-8100 features. These characteristics, as well as an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a processor performs.
The “Operating frequency” chart uses dark color to represent
7/17/2018 為何i3-8100跑分較i5-7400高，但售價卻較便宜? -為何 i3-8100 跑分 較 i5-7400 高 ， 售價 卻 較 較 便宜 便宜 便宜 好奇 向 大家 請教 第 八 代 效能 進步 那麼 多 ， 七 還 要 賣 賣 中央 中央 處理器 第 1 頁)
Core i3-8100 vs Ryzen 3 3200G Core i5-7400 vs Core i5-6500 Core i3-8100 vs Core i3-8300T de acuerdo o en desacuerdo con nuestras calificaciones o informar errores y imprecisiones en el sitio.
Core i3-8100 and Core i5-7500 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Core i3-8100 and Core i5-7500 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Intel ha sostituito l’ i5 7500 con l’ i3 8100 che costa di meno quindi questo i3 8100 è migliore dell’ i5 7400. Mancano le ram dato che servono per forza le ddr4. Io ti consiglio ddr4 3000 mhz oppure almeno 2666 mhz. Come marche: G.skill, Kingston, Corsair e Crucial.
6/12/2018 i3-8100 vs. i5-8400 for gaming? jacobha 15 months ago Title says it all , which is better for gaming , better bang for your buck, and is more future proof. Comments Sort by Gilroar 1 Build 15 months ago 2 points which is better for gaming Arguably the 8400 but
The i5 line really shines if you’re looking to get past 60 FPS in AAA games, or even break into 1440p gaming. The line is also great at multitasking and processor intensive tasks such as streaming and content creation. It ranges from $170-$260. Like the i3 line, the
6/12/2018 i3-8100 vs. i5-8400 for gaming? jacobha 15 months ago Title says it all , which is better for gaming , better bang for your buck, and is more future proof. Comments Sort by Gilroar 1 Build 15 months ago 2 points which is better for gaming Arguably the 8400 but
Intel i3-8100 for gaming? submitted 1 year ago by VivaLaTocs Hey guys, i’m thinking to buy the i3-8100 or the i5 7400/7500. Does it have better performance the i3?(Above all in gaming).
Also, who’s better on price/performance? PC SPECS: CPU: i3-8100/i5-7400
5/10/2017 The Core i3-8100 4-Core and the Core i5-7400 3.0GHz both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming. Both the Intel Core i3-8100 4-Core 3.6GHz and the Intel Core i5-7400 3.0GHz have the same number of threads. Both CPUs have
首先 i5 7500 最高 频率 3.8 且 只 能 用 100 系 200 系 主板 而 而 而 而 而 而 而 而 8100 主频 3.6 只 能 用 300 系 ， 架构 上 8 代 代 代 先进 但是 主频 低 0.2 ， 支持 上 8100为 2667，7500 为 2400 ， 领先后者 而 8 代酷睿 还 有 更 先进 全面 的 指令 ， 主频差 主频差 主频差 主频差 主频差 但是 依旧 依旧 代 超越 代。
The Intel i5–7400 is based on the kaby- Lake design, is a quad-core processor operating at 3GHz with turbo mode at 3.5Ghz, and has four 256MB L2 caches and a 6MB L3 cache. The CPU does not have hyperthreading but it can take advantage of asymmetric
1/11/2019 What is the difference between Intel Core i5-7400 and Intel Core i3-8100? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores. The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy
We compare the Intel Core i3-8100 with the Intel Core i3-7100 with a wide selection of benchmark tools and data to help you choose the right processor, for your computing needs.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Intel Core i3-8100 3. Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-7400 4. Intel Pentium G5400 vs Intel Core i3-8100 5. Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-8400 6 .Intel Core i5-8400 vs Intel Core i5-7500 7. Intel Pentium G4600 vs Intel Core i3-8100 8.
We compare the Intel Core i3-9100 with the Intel Core i3-8100 with a wide selection of benchmark tools and data to help you choose the right processor, for your computing needs.
(Inb4 the i5 7400 regret brigade arrives to say microstuttering is good for your bone strength) It will be a few percent (1-4%) Here’s a comparison of R5 2400 what’s just an APU version of 1400, vs i3 8100. Also, OCed 1400 consistently beats 8100. And it can
2/14/2017 · Benchmarks: Gaming. With a current retail price of $180, the Core i3 7350K is an expensive dual-core processor and for $20 more you can land the quad-core Core i5-7400. Given their similar prices, quite a few of you have asked which is the better buy between the
Intel Core i5 6400 vs i3 6100 older Released July, 2015 Intel Core i5 6400 2.
7 GHz Quad core Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 6400 The thing is: Intel Core i3 6100 have 3.7 GHz, but the Intel Core i5 6400 have 2.7 GHz, but if you want to i5 win, try looking for
The i3-8100 is at the level of a i5-7500. As a real quad core it is absolutely capable of gaming, it reaches good FPS in current games. It has a lower turbo but a higher base clock than the i5-7500, plus the IPC improvements from being from a newer generation
Should perform in-between the i5-7400 and 7500 with unavoidable issues in SOME ( not all ) games with stuttering ( horrible 1% and 0.1% lows ). level 1 Die4Ever 1 point 1 year ago the mobo price sucks right now, but the 8100 gets good gaming performance
Let’s see how good Core i3-8100 and Ryzen 3 2200G are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Core i3-8100 vs Core i3-8300T Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i5-4590 Core i3-8100 vs FX-8320 Advices and comments Here you can ask a question or
Intel Core i3 8100 czy Intel Core i5 7400? Sprawdź, ktory z produktów wypadnie lepiej w bezpośrednim pojedynku.