Intel Core i3-9100 vs Intel Core i5-9400: What is the difference?
54points
Intel Core i3-9100
57points
Intel Core i5-9400
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i3-9100
Intel Core i5-9400
Why is Intel Core i3-9100 better than Intel Core i5-9400?
- Supports ECC memory?
- 2 higher clock multiplier?
31vs29
Why is Intel Core i5-9400 better than Intel Core i3-9100?
- 20.83% faster CPU speed?
6 x 2.9GHzvs4 x 3.6GHz - 266MHz higher ram speed?
2666MHzvs2400MHz - 2 more CPU threads?
6vs4 - 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
1.5MBvs1MB - 42.1% higher PassMark result?
9548vs6719 - 3MB bigger L3 cache?
9MBvs6MB - 128KB bigger L1 cache?
384KBvs256KB - 4.
1GB/s more memory bandwidth?
41.6GB/svs37.5GB/s
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i3-9100
vs
Intel Core i3-9100F
Intel Core i5-9400
vs
Intel Core i7-7700
Intel Core i3-9100
vs
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i5-9400
vs
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i3-9100
vs
Intel Core i5-8500
Intel Core i5-9400
vs
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i3-9100
vs
Intel Core i3-9100T
Intel Core i5-9400
vs
Intel Celeron N4500
Intel Core i3-9100
vs
Intel Core i5+8400
Intel Core i5-9400
vs
Intel Core i5-9500
Intel Core i3-9100
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i5-9400
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i3-9100
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i5-9400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core i3-9100
vs
Intel Pentium Gold G5420
Intel Core i5-9400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i3-9100
vs
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i5-9400
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i3-9100
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core i5-9400
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
Price comparison
Cheap alternatives
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i3-9100
4 User reviews
Intel Core i3-9100
9.
3/10
4 User reviews
Intel Core i5-9400
2 User reviews
Intel Core i5-9400
10.0/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.8/10
4 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Gaming
9.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
9.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Reliability
9.5/10
4 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
9.5/10
4 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
4 x 3.6GHz
6 x 2.9GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.2GHz
4.1GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i3-9100
✖Intel Core i5-9400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.
L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2400MHz
2666MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
37.5GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✖Intel Core i5-9400
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9400)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-9100)
349.4seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-9100)
1065.9seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✔Intel Core i5-9400
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✔Intel Core i5-9400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✔Intel Core i5-9400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✔Intel Core i5-9400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9400)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✔Intel Core i5-9400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-9100
✖Intel Core i5-9400
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9400)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i5 9400 vs i3 9100: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 9400
Intel Core i3 9100
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core i5 9400 with 6-cores against the 3.6 GHz i3 9100 with 4-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i5 9400
57
Core i3 9100
57
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i5 9400
28
Core i3 9100
19
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i5 9400
49
Core i3 9100
51
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i5 9400
44
Core i3 9100
41
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 9100 and 9400
Advantages of Intel Core i5 9400
- Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666 RAM
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 3 MB larger L3 cache size
- Around 4.
1 GB/s (11%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Advantages of Intel Core i3 9100
- 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.2 GHz vs 4.1 GHz)
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i5 9400
n/a
Core i3 9100
1049
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 9400
n/a
Core i3 9100
3685
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i5 9400
2476
Core i3 9100
+2%
2514
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i5 9400
+42%
9400
Core i3 9100
6622
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i5 9400
1040
Core i3 9100
+1%
1049
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 9400
+34%
4588
Core i3 9100
3434
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 9400 and i3 9100
General
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | January 7, 2019 | April 23, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Model number | i5-9400 | i3-9100 |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | LGA-1151 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
Performance
| Cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Base Frequency | 2. 9 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 37x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 9MB (shared) | 6MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Max. temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Shading Units | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| ROPs | 3 | 3 |
| Execution Units | 24 | 24 |
| TGP | 15 W | 15 W |
Max. Resolution |
4096×2304 — 60 Hz | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i5 9400
0.38 TFLOPS
Core i3 9100
0.38 TFLOPS
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2400 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i5 9400 official page | Intel Core i3 9100 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i5 9400
13 (54.2%)
Core i3 9100
11 (45.8%)
Total votes: 24
ompetitors
1.
Intel Core i5 12400 and Intel Core i5 9400
So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i3 9100 or i5 9400?
Name
Message
Promotion
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 — Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i3-9100 @ 3.60GHz
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz
i3-9100
i5-9400
Multi-Thread Performance
9095 Pts
11750 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2411 Pts
2377 Pts
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i3-9100
i5-9400
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
227. |
| 1080p |
241.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
189.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
201.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
170.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
180.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
192.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
204.3 FPS |
7 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
311.9 FPS |
| 1080p |
327.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
268.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
281.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
246.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
258.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
272.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
285.4 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
396. |
| 1080p |
412.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
347.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
362.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
321.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
335.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
351.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
366.5 FPS |
2 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
564.6 FPS |
| 1080p |
584.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
505.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
523.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
472.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
490.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
510.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
528.8 FPS |
i3-9100
i5-9400
Compare i3-9100 vs i5-9400 specifications
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Architecture
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR3XQ | SR3X5 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Sep 2018 | Oct 2018 |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Cache
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 6MB (shared) | 9MB (shared) |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Cores
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 4 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD 630 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Performance
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3. 7 GHz |
2.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37.0x | 29.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Turbo Clock | N/A | up to 4.1 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | variable |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Physical
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | FC-LGA1151 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare i3-9100 vs i5-9400 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 — Battlefield 1 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i3-9100 @ 3.
60GHz
Battlefield 1
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz
i3-9100
i5-9400
Multi-Thread Performance
9095 Pts
11750 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2411 Pts
2377 Pts
Battlefield 1
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 in Battlefield 1 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i3-9100
i5-9400
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
99.5 FPS |
| 1080p |
105.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
74.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
78.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
41.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
43.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
61.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
65. |
4 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
156.9 FPS |
| 1080p |
164.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
122.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
128.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
73.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
77.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
104.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
110.0 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
214.3 FPS |
| 1080p |
224.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
171.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
178.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
106.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
111.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
147. |
| w1440p |
154.6 FPS |
6 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
329.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
342.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
267.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
279.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
172.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
179.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
233.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
243.8 FPS |
i3-9100
i5-9400
Compare i3-9100 vs i5-9400 specifications
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Architecture
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR3XQ | SR3X5 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Sep 2018 | Oct 2018 |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Cache
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 6MB (shared) | 9MB (shared) |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Cores
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 4 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD 630 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Performance
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3. 7 GHz |
2.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37.0x | 29.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Turbo Clock | N/A | up to 4.1 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | variable |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Physical
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | FC-LGA1151 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare i3-9100 vs i5-9400 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i3-9100 vs Intel Core i5-9400T
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i3-9100 vs Intel Core i5-9400T
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i3-9100 on one side and the Intel Core i5-9400T on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the all-in-one pc segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Core i3-9100 | Intel Core i5-9400T | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | All-in-One PC | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Coffee Lake-S | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | Core i3-9000 | Core i5-9000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | BX80684I39100, BX80684I39100, CM8068403377319 SR3XQ |
CM8068403358915, QP70, QRNR, SR3X8 |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2019 | Q2 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm++ | 14 nm++ | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 6 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,6 GHz | 1,8 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,2 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 6 MB | 9 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2666 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 37,5 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 35 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | — | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 23 | — | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 184 | — | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1100 MHz | 1050 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 423,2 GFLOPS | — | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 100°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 375 | 382 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1. 551 |
2.149 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 181 | 149 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 668 | 736 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 456 | 364 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1.688 | 1.780 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.497 | 2.054 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 6.874 | 7.803 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.785 | 4.002 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
13. 388 |
15.253 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
1.053 | 905 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
3.166 | 4.019 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
201,8 GFLOPS | 260 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
206 pts / W | 436 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i5-9400T has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i3-9100 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-9400T is less. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9400T |
382 2.  149 |
| Intel Core i3-9100 |
375 1.551 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 39%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9400T |
149 736 |
| Intel Core i3-9100 |
181 668 |
In single core, the difference is 21%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9400T |
364 1.780 |
| Intel Core i3-9100 |
456 1.688 |
In single core, the difference is 25%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 5%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9400T |
2.054 7.803 |
| Intel Core i3-9100 |
2.497 6.874 |
In single core, the difference is 22%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9400T |
4.002 15.253 |
| Intel Core i3-9100 |
4.785 13.388 |
In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9400T |
4.349 15.247 |
| Intel Core i3-9100 |
5.214 15.114 |
In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9400T |
905 4.019 |
| Intel Core i3-9100 |
1.053 3.166 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 27%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-9100 |
1.198 3.747 |
| Intel Core i5-9400T |
749 2.870 |
In single core, the difference is 60%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 31%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9400T |
823 3.835 |
| Intel Core i3-9100 |
1.020 3.379 |
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 13%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i3-9100 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-9400T AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i3-9100FIntel Core i3-9100T
Intel Core i5-9400Intel Core i5-9400FIntel Core i5-9400H
Intel Core i5-9400 vs Intel Core i3-9100
Summary
-
Intel Core i5-9400
116%
-
Intel Core i3-9100
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i5-9400
109%
-
Intel Core i3-9100
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i5-9400
123%
-
Intel Core i3-9100
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-9400 |
| 9% higher single threaded performance. |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 23% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| Around 16% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i3-9100 |
| None |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-9400
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-9400
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| Intel Core i5-9400 | Intel Core i3-9100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
| SSE4.2 | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| AVX2 | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| VT-d | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| TSX | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
| F16C | ||||
| BMI1 | ||||
| BMI2 | ||||
Boost 2. 0 |
||||
Architecture
| Intel Core i5-9400 | Intel Core i3-9100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Intel_Coffelake | vs | Intel_Coffelake | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR4 | |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | vs | Coffee Lake | |
| Release Date | Sep 2018 | vs | Sep 2018 |
Cores
| Intel Core i5-9400 | Intel Core i3-9100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | vs | 4 | |
| Threads | 6 | vs | 4 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | vs | UHD Graphics 630 |
Cache
| Intel Core i5-9400 | Intel Core i3-9100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 9216 KB (shared) | vs | 6144 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Core i5-9400 | Intel Core i3-9100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | vs | Intel Socket 1151 | |
| Max Case Temp | 72°C | vs | 72°C | |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | vs | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Die Size | unknown | vs | unknown | |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Performance
| Intel Core i5-9400 | Intel Core i3-9100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 2900 MHz | vs | 3700 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 4100 MHz | vs | none | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | variable | vs | variable | |
| TDP | 65 W | vs | 65 W |
-
Intel Core i5-9400
4920 points
-
Intel Core i3-9100
4440 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-9400
20880 points
-
Intel Core i3-9100
17760 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-9400 (simulated)
174.
25 -
Intel Core i3-9100 (simulated)
159.31
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-9400 (simulated)
972.54
-
Intel Core i3-9100 (simulated)
790.21
points — higher is better
Intel Core i3-9100 vs Intel Core i5-9400: What is the difference?
54 BALLLA
Intel Core i3-9100
57 Ballla
Intel Core i5-9400 9000 Why is Intel Core i3-9100 better than Intel Core i5-9400?
- Supports memory troubleshooting code?
- 2 higher hour multiplier?
31 vs 29
Why is Intel Core i5-9400 better than Intel Core i3-9100?
- 20.83% higher CPU speed?
6 x 2.9GHz vs 4 x 3.6GHz - 266MHz higher RAM speed?
2666MHz vs 2400MHz - 2 more CPU threads?
6 vs 4 - 0.
5MB more L2 cache?
1.5MB vs 1MB - 42.1% higher PassMark score?
9548 vs 6719 - 3MB more L3 cache?
9MB vs 6MB - 128KB more L1 cache?
384KB vs 256KB - 4.1GB/s more memory bandwidth?
41.6GB/s vs 37.5GB/s
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i3-9100
vs
Intel Core i3-9100F
Intel Core i5-9400
VS
Intel Core i7-7700
Intel Core i3-9100
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i5-9400
VS
INTEL CORE
Intel Core i3-9100
VS
Intel Core i5-8500
Intel Core i5-9400
Intel Core i7-6700
9000 9100T
Intel Core i5-9400
VS
Intel Celeron N4500
Intel Core i3-9100
VS
Intel Core i5+8400
Intel Core i5-9400
VS
Intel I5-9500
9000 9000 9000
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i5-9400
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i3-9100
Intel Core i3-10100
vs
AMD RYZEN 5 1600
Intel Core i3-9100
VS
Intel Pentium Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Core I5-9400
9000 INTEL Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i5-9400
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i3-9100
VS
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core I5-9000 9000
Intel Core i5-7400
Comparison of prices
cheaper
users reviews
General rating
Intel Core i3-9100
4 Reviews of users
Intel Core i3-9100
9.
3 /10 9000 9000 4 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 i5-9400
2 User reviews
Intel Core i5-9400
10.0 /10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.8 /10
4 Votes
10.0 /10
2 Votes
Games
/10
4 VOTES
10.0 /10
9000 2 VOTES 9000
9.0 /10
4 Votes
10.0 /10
2 VOTES
Reliability
/10
VOTES
10.0 /10 9000
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
004 2 Votes
Energy efficiency
9.5 /10
4 Votes
10.0 /10
2 Votes
performance
1.
Ski Roster
4 X 3.6GHZ
6 X 2.9GHZ
The speed of the central processor indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, taking into account all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.2GHz
4.1GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i3-9100
✖Intel Core i5-9400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2400MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
37.
5GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports Memory Error Code
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✖Intel Core i5-9400
Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9400)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9400)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-9100)
349.4seconds
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-9100)
1065.9seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✔Intel Core i5-9400
physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✔Intel Core i5-9400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✔Intel Core i5-9400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✔Intel Core i5-9400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9400)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i3-9100
✔Intel Core i5-9400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-9100
✖Intel Core i5-9400
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-9100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9400)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i5 9400 vs i3 9100:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 9400
Intel Core i3 9100
Which is better: 6-core Intel Core i5 9400 at 2.
9 GHz or i3 9100 with 4 cores at 3.6 GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Core i5 9400
57
Core i3 9100
57
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei
Core 9000 9000 are involved 28
Core i3 9100
19
Energy efficiency
Efficiency of energy consumption by chip
Core i5 9400
49
Core i3 9100
51
Rating NanoreView
Final rating of the processor
Core I5 9400
44 9000 9000
Key differences
What are the main differences between 9100 and 9400
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 9400
- Supports up to 128GB DDR4-2666
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 3 MB more L3 cache
- 4.
1 GB/s (11%) more maximum memory bandwidth
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3 9100
- 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.2 GHz vs 4.1 GHz)
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i5 9400
n/d
Core i3 9100
1049
Cinebench R23 (multi -core)
Core I5 9400
N/D
Core I3 9100
3685
Passmark CPU 9000 CEE 9400
2476
Core i3 9100
+2%
2514
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i5 9400
+42%
9400
Core i3 9100
6622
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i5 9400
1040
Core i3 9100
+1%
1049
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i5 9400
+34%
4588
Core i3 9100
3434
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications of the Intel Core i5 9400 and i3 9100
General
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | January 7, 2019 | April 23, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Model number | i5-9400 | i3-9100 |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | LGA-1151 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
Capacity
| Number of cores | 6 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 6 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2. 9 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 37x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 256KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 9MB (shared) | 6MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Power consumption
| Process | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Shader blocks | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| ROPs | 3 | 3 |
| Computer units | 24 | 24 |
| TGP | 15W | 15W |
Max. resolution |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | 4096×2304 — 60Hz |
Igpu Flops
Core i5 9400
0.38 Teraflops
Core I3 9100
0.38 Teraflops
Support for memory
| DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2400 | |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i5 9400 | Intel Core i3 9 website100 |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i5 9400
13 (54.
2%)
Core i3 9100
11 (45.8%)
Total votes: 24
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i5 12400 or Intel Core i5 9400
What will you choose: Intel Core i3 9100 or i5 9400?
Name
Message
Intel Core i5-9400 or Intel Core i3-9100
Core i3-9100
70.1
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Office speed
Core i5-9400
73.7 (+1.2%)
Core i3-9100
72.8
Performance in day-to-day activities such as browsing and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i5-9400
45.4 (+12.6%)
Core i3-9100
39.7
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Core i5-9400 69.8 Core i3-9100 69. |
8
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Core i5-9400 48.8 (+15.4%) Core i3-9100 41.3 |
Extreme |
|
Core i5-9400 11.9 (+31.9%) Core i3-9100 8.1 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings.
Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i5-9400
987 (+33.1%)
Intel Core i3-9100
660
9000 9000
Intel Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE %)
Intel Core i3-9100
1069
Blender 2.81 BMW27
Intel Core i5-9400
378.1
Intel Core I3-9100
634 (+40.4%)
PASSMEM 9000) -9400
9496 (+29.3%)
Intel Core i3-9100
6710
Specifications
Data is not yet complete, so tables may be missing information or existing features.
Basic
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i5-9400 Processor | Intel® Core™ i3-9100 Processor |
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. |
||
| Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 05-2021 | 08-2021 |
| Model Official name. | i5-9400 | i3-9100 |
| Cores The number of physical cores. | 6 | 4 |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 6 | 4 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. |
Missing | Missing |
| Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Turbo FrequencyThe maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. |
4.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 9 MB | 6 MB |
| Instructions | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. |
No | No |
| Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Number of QPI links | ||
| TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 65 W | 65 W |
| Cooling system specifications | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. |
Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 |
| GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. |
3 | 3 |
RAM
| Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2400 |
| RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | 2 |
| RAM bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s |
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. |
No data | No data |
PCI
| PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 3 | 3 |
| PCI | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Number of PCI lanes | 16 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. |
No data | No data |
| Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
| Dimensions | No data | No data |
| Supported sockets | No data | No data |
| Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Core i5-9400
- On average, gaming performance is 4% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 1%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 4%.
- $39 down
- 2 more physical cores.
- 2 more threads.
Intel Core i3-9100
- The base frequency is 0.7 GHz higher.
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 — Battlefield 1 vs GTX 1660 performance comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i3-9100 @ 3.60GHz
Battlefield 1
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz
i3-9100
i5-9400
Multi-Thread Performance
9095 Pts
11750 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2411 Pts
2377 Pts
Battlefield 1
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 in Battlefield 1 using GTX 1660 — CPU performance comparison at Quality settings with Ultra, High, Medium and Low resolutions 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
i3-9100
i5-9400
Ultra quality
| Resolution | FPS |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
99. |
| 1080p |
105.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
74.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
78.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
41.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
43.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
61.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
65.4 FPS |
5 FPS High quality
| Resolution | FPS |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
156.9 FPS |
| 1080p |
164.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
122.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
128.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
73.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
77.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
104.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
110. |
0 FPS Medium quality
| Resolution | FPS |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
214.3 FPS |
| 1080p |
224.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
171.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
178.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
106.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
111.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
147.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
154.6 FPS |
Low quality
| Resolution | FPS |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
329.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
342.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
267.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
279.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
172. |
| 2160p |
179.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
233.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
243.8 FPS |
0 FPS i3-9100
i5-9400
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR3XQ | SR3X5 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Sep 2018 | Oct 2018 |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Cache
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 6MB (shared) | 9MB (shared) |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Cores
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 4 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD 630 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Performance
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3. |
2.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37.0x | 29.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
| TDP | 65W | 65W |
| Turbo Clock | N/A | up to 4.1 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | variable |
i3-9100 vs i5-9400 Physical
| i3-9100 | i5-9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | FC-LGA1151 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share your comments 0
Compare i3-9100 vs i5-9400 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need for Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Comparison of Intel Core i5-9400F and Intel Core i3-9100
Comparative analysis of the Intel Core i5-9400F and Intel Core i3-9100 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Image quality in graphics , Graphics API support.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i5-9400F
versus
Intel Core i3-9100
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-9400F
- 2 more cores, run more applications simultaneously: 69 vs 4
- more threads: 69 vs 4
- more:
- Maximum memory size is 2x larger: 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Performance in PassMark — CPU mark about 44% higher: 9538 vs 6632
- About 1% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 1083 vs 1068
- About 45% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 4737 vs 3267
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-9100
- About 2% more clock speed: 4.
20 GHz vs 4.10 GHz
- PassMark — Single thread mark performance about 2% more: 2514 2465
-
Maximum frequency 4.20 GHz vs 4.10 GHz PassMark — Single thread mark 2514 vs 2465 Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-9400F
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-9100PassMark — Single thread mark CPU 1 CPU 2 PassMark — CPU mark CPU 1 CPU 2 Geekbench 4 — Single Core CPU 1 CPU 2 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core CPU 1 CPU 2 Name Intel Core i5-9400F Intel Core i3-9100 PassMark — Single thread mark 2465 2514 PassMark — CPU mark 9538 6632 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 1083 1068 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 4737 3267 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 5085 GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
1602 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 2758 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 5007 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1602 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 2758 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 5007 Feature comparison
Intel Core i5-9400F Intel Core i3-9100 Architecture name Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Issue date Q1’19 23 Apr 2019 Place in the rating 727 630 Processor Number i5-9400F i3-9100 Series 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors 9th Generation Intel Core i3 Processors Status Launched Launched Applicability Desktop Desktop Price at first issue date $122 Support 64 bit Base frequency 2. 90 GHz
3.60 GHz Bus Speed 8 GT/s DMI3 8 GT/s Process 14nm 14nm Maximum core temperature 100°C 100°C Maximum frequency 4.10 GHz 4.20 GHz Number of cores 6 4 Number of threads 6 4 Level 1 cache 256KB Level 2 cache 1MB Level 3 cache 6MB Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C Maximum number of memory channels 2 2 Maximum memory bandwidth 41. 6 GB/s
37.5 GB/s Maximum memory size 128GB 64GB Supported memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-2400 ECC support Maximum number of processors in configuration
1 1 Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm Supported sockets FCLGA1151 FCLGA1151 Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 65 Watt Thermal Solution PCG 2015C (65W) PCG 2015C (65W) Number of PCI Express lanes 16 16 PCI Express revision 3. 0
3.0 PCIe configurations Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Scalability 1S Only 1S Only Execute Disable Bit (EDB) Intel® Identity Protection Technology Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) Intel® OS Guard Intel® Secure Key Technology Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) Secure Boot Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology Idle States Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 Intel 64 Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) Intel® TSX-NI Intel® Turbo Boost Technology Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility Thermal Monitoring Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) Device ID 0x3E91 Graphics base frequency 350 MHz Graphics max dynamic frequency 1. 10 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology Intel® Clear Video Technology Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology Intel® Quick Sync Video Video memory size 64GB Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Maximum number of monitors supported 3 4K support Maximum resolution via DisplayPort [email protected] Maximum resolution via eDP [email protected] Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4
[email protected] DirectX 12 OpenGL 4.5 Intel Core i3-10100 vs. Intel Core i5-9400
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i3-10100 runs with 4 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.30 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W . LGA 1200 CPU socket This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. Specifically, the Comet Lake S architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q2/2020
Intel Core i5-9400
Intel Core i5-9400 runs with 6 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.
10 GHz base 3.90 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .The processor connects to LGA 1151- CPU socket 2 This version includes 9.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. Specifically, Coffee Lake S Refresh Architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q2/2019
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i5-9400
Frequency 2.90 GHz 4 Cores 6 4.30 GHz Turbo (1 core) 4.10 GHz 4.10GHz Turbo (all cores) 3.90 GHz Yes Hyper Threading No. No. Overclocking No. normal Basic architecture normal Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
1. 10GHz
GPU (Turbo) 1.05 GHz 14nm Technology 14nm 1.10 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.05 GHz 12 DirectX Version 12 3 Max. displays 3 DDR4-2666 memory size DDR4-2666 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory No. ECC No. — L2 Cache — 6.00MB L3 Cache 9.00 MB 3.0 PCIe version 3.0 16 PCIe lanes 16 14nm Technology 14nm LGA 1200 Connector LGA 1151-2 65 W TDP 65W VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Q2/2020 Release date Q2/2019 Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result.
The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.