Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5 vs Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3: What is the difference?
41points
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
41points
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
256GB Intel i5256GB Intel i7
vs
239 facts in comparison
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
Why is Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5 better than Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3?
- 4GB more RAM memory?
8GBvs4GB - 26.67% faster CPU speed?
2 x 1.9GHzvs2 x 1.5GHz - 64GB more internal storage?
128GBvs64GB - 0.3 newer version of OpenGL?
4.3vs4 - 250MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1100MHzvs850MHz - 4 higher clock multiplier?
19vs15 - 20 more GPU execution units?
40vs20 - 1. 72x higher PassMark result?
2502vs1456
Why is Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3 better than Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5?
- 64KB bigger L1 cache?
128KBvs64KB - 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.3GHzvs2.9GHz - 3.5W lower TDP?
11.5Wvs15W
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Lenovo Tab P11
vs
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022)
Apple iPad Air (2022)
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8
Apple iPad (2021)
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite LTE
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE
Huawei MatePad 11 (2021)
vs
Xiaomi Pad 5
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.4″ (2020)
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Huawei MatePad 10. 4 (2021)
vs
Xiaomi Pad 5
Price comparison
User reviews
Display
1.screen size
The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
2.Has an OLED or AMOLED display
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
OLED (Organic Light-Emitting Diode) displays are formed of organic materials that emit light. They have higher contrast ratios and wider viewing angles compared to LCDs. AMOLED and POLED are types of OLED displays.
3.has an IPS screen
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of conventional twisted nematic TFT displays: limited viewing angles and low-quality color reproduction. PLS (Plane-to-Line Switching) is a type of IPS screen developed by Samsung, with increased brightness and lower production costs.
4.resolution
2160 x 1440px
2160 x 1440px
Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen’s image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. The resolution is given as a compound value, comprised of horizontal and vertical pixels.
5.pixel density
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3)
Pixel density is a measurement of a screen’s resolution, expressed as the number of pixels per inch (PPI) on the screen. A higher pixel density translates into more clarity and sharpness for the images rendered on the screen, thus improving the quality of the viewing experience.
6.refresh rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3)
The frequency at which the screen is refreshed. Higher frequency results in less flickering (less noise) and more natural movement representation in action-intense scenes.
7.has branded damage-resistant glass
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
Damage-resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontrail Glass) is thin, lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
8.has anti-reflection coating
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
This helps to reduce the reflection from your device.
9.has an HDR10-enabled display
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
The display supports HDR10, which is an HDR (high dynamic range) video technology. Compared to standard dynamic range (SDR) video, HDR10 video has greater contrast and color depth, resulting in more realistic images.
Performance
1.internal storage
The internal storage refers to the built-in storage space available in a device for system data, apps, and user-generated data. With a large amount of internal storage, you can save more files and apps on your device.
Random-access memory (RAM) is a form of volatile memory used to store working data and machine code currently in use. It is a quick-access, temporary virtual storage that can be read and changed in any order, thus enabling fast data processing.
3.CPU speed
2 x 1.9GHz (Intel Core i5-4300U)
2 x 1.5GHz (Intel Core i3-4020Y)
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
4. has an external memory slot
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) that enables you to extend the built-in internal storage with affordable memory modules, or easily retrieve data, such as photographs, from the memory card.
5.semiconductor size
22nm (Intel Core i5-4300U)
22nm (Intel Core i3-4020Y)
Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its performance.
6.Supports 64-bit
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5 (Intel Core i5-4300U)
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3 (Intel Core i3-4020Y)
A 32-bit operating system can only support up to 4GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4GB, giving increased performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit apps.
7.maximum amount of external memory supported
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3)
The maximum amount of external storage memory supported by the the device.
8.Has integrated LTE
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
The system on a chip (SoC) has an integrated LTE cellular chip. LTE is capable of downloading at faster speeds than older, 3G technology.
9.Uses big.LITTLE technology
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
Using big.LITTLE technology, a chip can switch between two sets of processor cores to maximize performance and battery life. For example, when playing a game the more powerful cores will be used to increase performance, whereas checking email will use the less powerful cores to maximize battery life.
Cameras
1.megapixels (main camera)
The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. However, the megapixel count is not the only important element determining the quality of an image.
2.megapixels (front camera)
The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the front camera. A higher megapixel count means that the front camera is capable of capturing more details, an essential factor for taking high-resolution selfies.
3.video recording (main camera)
1080 x 30fps
1080 x 30fps
The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions.
4.has a flash
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
A flash is good for low-light environments, and can sometimes be used as flashlight.
5.has a front camera
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
A front camera, also called secondary camera, can be used for video chats/selfies.
6.has a built-in HDR mode
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).
7.Can create panoramas in-camera
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
It allows you to take multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene, and then joins them together into a single photo.
8.supports slow-motion video recording
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
Slow-motion is an artistic video effect that makes time seem to go slower. It is achieved by recording a video at a higher frame-rate than the standard playback rate of 24fps or 30fps. Depending on camera capabilities, frame rates for slow-motion videos vary between 60fps and 960fps.
9.has touch autofocus
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
The autofocus is immediately set to the subject by just touching it on the touch screen.
Audio
1.Has Bluetooth aptX
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
aptX is a codec used for transmitting audio wirelessly with Bluetooth. It is developed by Qualcomm, and supports 16-bit audio at a bit rate of 384kbps.
2.has aptX HD
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
aptX HD is an audio codec for Bluetooth devices that is developed by Qualcomm. It supports high quality 24-bit audio (at a bit rate of 576kbps).
3.has LDAC
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
LDAC is a codec developed by Sony for Bluetooth audio. It is capable of a very high bitrate of 990kbps, which provides high resolution audio. It can also automatically adjust to a lower bitrate of 330kbps or 660kbps to increase stability.
4.has aptX Low Latency
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
aptX Low Latency is a codec developed by Qualcomm. It uses Bluetooth 5.0 technology to provide low latency audio (around 40ms), which is useful when you want to avoid audio lag (e. g. when playing games).
5.has aptX Adaptive
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
aptx Adaptive is an audio codec for Bluetooth devices that is developed by Qualcomm. It has a variable bit rate (between 279kbps and 420kbps), which means it can adjust the bit rate for different scenarios, such as listening to HD audio or reducing interference from other devices.
6.has stereo speakers
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound from independent channels on both left and right sides, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
7.has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones.
8.number of microphones
More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.
9.Has a radio
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
A built-in FM radio tuner allows you to listen to most of the live-broadcasted FM radio stations without using the internet.
Battery
1.battery power
5547mAh
5547mAh
Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life.
2.Battery life
The device’s battery life (when in use) as given by the manufacturer. With a longer battery life you have to charge the device less often.
3.Supports fast charging
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
Fast charging technologies, like Qualcomm’s Quick Charge or MediaTek’s Pump Express, are used to reduce the time it takes to charge a device. For example, with Quick Charge 3.0, the battery can be charged to 50% in just 30 minutes.
4.has wireless charging
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
It supports a wireless charging standard such as Qi. To charge the device, you simply put it down on a compatible charging pad.
5.charge time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3)
The time it takes to fully charge the battery.
6.operating power consumption
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3)
How much power the device consumes when it’s switched on.
7. has a battery level indicator
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
An indicator shows you when the device has low battery.
8.has a rechargeable battery
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
The battery can be recharged and used over again.
9.has a removable battery
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
Features
1.supports Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
Wi-Fi 6, released in 2019, is based on the IEEE 802.11ax wireless LAN standard. Designed to operate in all frequency bands between 1 and 6 GHz, it offers higher data rates and lower latency compared to previous Wi-Fi technologies.
2.supports Wi-Fi 6E
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
Wi-Fi 6E was announced in 2020 and has several advantages compared to Wi-Fi 6. In addition to the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands, it can operate on the 6GHz band, which provides faster speeds and extremely low latency.
3.has Mail Privacy Protection
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
Mail Privacy Protection is a feature built into the default email app that blocks senders from using “tracking pixels” to see when you’ve read an email. It also hides your IP address from senders.
4.has on-device machine learning
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
On-device machine learning is used to recognize people, places, and more in the Photos app. The algorithms run on the device, where this sensitive data is then kept. Competing services upload the photos and perform this on their servers, which requires the sharing of personal data.
5.has clipboard warnings
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
This privacy feature alerts you with a small notification when an app copies data from your clipboard.
6.has location privacy options
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
This privacy feature allows you to share your approximate location with an app instead of your precise location.
7.has camera/microphone privacy options
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
You can enable or disable an app’s access to the camera or microphone on your device. There are also indication icons to show you when an app uses the camera or microphone.
8.can block app tracking
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
Some apps track your activity even when the app is not in use. This privacy feature allows you to block this tracking, either across all apps or on a per-app basis.
9.blocks cross-site tracking
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
This setting (in the default browser) allows you to block cross-site tracking cookies and data to help protect your privacy.
Miscellaneous
1.Blender (bmw27) result
1689.5seconds (Intel Core i5-4300U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
2.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
499 (Intel Core i5-4300U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
3.Cinebench R20 (single) result
184 (Intel Core i5-4300U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
4.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
1238 (Intel Core i5-4300U)
779 (Intel Core i3-4020Y)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
5.Geekbench 5 result (single)
582 (Intel Core i5-4300U)
348 (Intel Core i3-4020Y)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
6.DDR memory version
3 (Intel Core i5-4300U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
7.uses multithreading
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5 (Intel Core i5-4300U)
✔Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3 (Intel Core i3-4020Y)
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
8.has a dual-lens (or multi-lens) front camera
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 128GB Intel i5
✖Microsoft Surface Pro 3 64GB Intel i3
A dual-lens or multi-lens camera takes two or more photos and overlays the captured images. Multi-lens front cameras produce sharper images, especially in low light conditions, and are great for selfies.
9.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best tablets?
The $799 Microsoft Surface Pro 3 with Core i3
Earlier this Summer Microsoft released Surface Pro 3, a fully equipped Haswell ULT based tablet in a chassis that was much more in line with what you’d expect from a tablet. From a hardware standpoint, Surface Pro 3 is the chassis design that Microsoft needed from the very start. If you’ve ever been tempted by the Surface Pro story, the latest model was bound to push you over the edge.
Unlike previous generations however, Microsoft delivered multiple CPU/GPU options with Surface Pro 3. The device’s price range extends both lower and higher than any prior iteration. While the original Surface Pro launched at $899 and $999, the second version offered increased storage options that drove the max price up to $1799. Surface Pro 3 starts at just $799 and can be configured at up to $1949. In our review we were sampled one of the launch versions of the tablet, a $1299 configuration featuring Intel’s Core i5-4300U. Until next month the Core i5 models are the only ones available, however starting on August 1st you’ll be able to purchase cheaper Surface Pro 3s with a Core i3-4020Y or more expensive versions with a Core i7-4650U.
We just got our hands on the $799 entry level Core i3 configuration and are in the midst of a full review of the device. Battery life testing alone will take a few days, but I wanted to share some of my initial performance data since there is a pretty substantial difference between the Core i3 and i5 models. For a quick refresher, this is what the Surface Pro 3 lineup looks like:
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Configuration Options |
|||||||||||
Configuration |
$799 |
$999 |
$1299 |
$1549 |
$1949 |
||||||
CPU |
Intel Core i3-4020Y |
Intel Core i5-4300U |
Intel Core i5-4300U |
Intel Core i7-4650U |
Intel Core i7-4650U |
||||||
SDP/TDP |
6W/11. 5W |
-/15W |
-/15W |
-/15W |
-/15W |
||||||
Cores/Threads |
2/4 |
2/4 |
2/4 |
2/4 |
2/4 |
||||||
Frequency Base/Max Turbo |
1.5GHz/- |
1.9/2.9GHz |
1.9/2.9GHz |
1.7/3.3GHz |
1. 7/3.3GHz |
||||||
GPU |
Intel HD 4200 |
Intel HD 4400 |
Intel HD 4400 |
Intel HD 5000 |
Intel HD 5000 |
||||||
GPU EUs |
20 |
20 |
20 |
40 |
40 |
||||||
GPU Frequency Base/Max Turbo |
200/850MHz |
200/1100MHz |
200/1100MHz |
200/1100MHz |
200/1100MHz |
||||||
Storage |
64GB SSD |
128GB SSD |
256GB SSD |
256GB SSD |
512GB SSD |
||||||
RAM |
4GB |
4GB |
8GB |
8GB |
8GB |
To hit the $799 price point Microsoft went to a 64GB M. 2 SATA SSD. Interestingly enough, the CPU doesn’t actually save Microsoft any money. The Core i3-4020Y carries the same 1000Ku price as the i5-4300U ($281). The Y at the end of the part number implies a Haswell ULx SKU, the only Haswell type to ship with a SDP as well as a TDP rating. Even using the same workload, the Y-series parts weigh in with a lower TDP than the more typically used U-series parts (11.5W vs. 15W). Given the substantial reduction in chassis thickness, I suspect the Y-series parts may have been a better fit for the design to begin with.
You do give up performance in the process however. Since this is a Core i3 processor Intel disables turbo boost in addition to lowering the base frequency of the chip in order to hit its 11.5W TDP. At 1.5GHz without turbo, peak single threaded performance could be as little as half of the Core i5 models. The GPU performance story is arguably more interesting. Although there’s a decrease in max GPU turbo, I wonder if the lower TDP may help improve sustained performance in games. I ran a few tests to see how things change with the move to a Core i3. Let’s start with a look at the CPU.
Single/Multithreaded Performance — Cinebench 11.5
One of the benefits of a Surface Pro is the ability to run heavy PC workloads just as well as lighter tablet workloads. The device can behave as a tablet, notebook or even a desktop. We’ll start with Cinebench 11.5, an offline 3D renderer that is largely CPU bound. The single threaded incarnation of this benchmark should give us a good look at the worst case scenario performance delta between the Core i3 and Core i5 Surface Pro 3s:
Without the ability to boost above its 1.5GHz base clock, the Core i3-4020Y comes in substantially slower than the Core i5-4300U model. It turns out a 1.5GHz Haswell core is around the performance of a 2.3GHz AMD Piledriver core.
With both cores (and all four threads) active, the gap between the Core i3 and Core i5 parts doesn’t really shrink any. It’s clear that if you’re after running heavier PC workloads on your Surface Pro 3, you’ll want to spring for the Core i5.
General Usage Performance — PCMark 8 v2
Cinebench may overstate the difference you’ll see between the $799 and $999/$1299 models in regular usage, so we turn to PCMark 8 v2 and PCMark 7 to give us a better look at real world performance differences when running lighter tasks. PCMark 8 v2 runs through a bunch of usage driven application scenarios grouped into home, creative and work usage flows.
From Futuremark’s description of the Home test:
«The PCMark 8 Home benchmark includes workloads that reflect common tasks for a typical home user. These workloads have low computational requirements making PCMark 8 Home suitable for testing the performance of low-cost tablets, notebooks and desktops. Home includes workloads for web browsing, writing, gaming, photo editing, and video chat. The results are combined to give a PCMark 8 Home score for your system. «
A 20% increase in performance is what the Home suite shows for the i3->i5 upgrade, and that seems fairly reasonable. The Core i3 model ends up performing quite similarly to the original Surface Pro, but in a much more appealing chassis.
Next up is the Creative test:
«The PCMark 8 Creative benchmark includes workloads typical of enthusiasts and professionals who work with media and entertainment content. With more demanding requirements than the Home benchmark, this benchmark is suitable for mid-range computer systems. PCMark 8 Creative includes web browsing, photo editing, video editing, group video chat, media transcoding, and gaming workloads.»
The creative suite shows a larger 34% advantage for the Core i5 vs. Core i3. Once again the i3 performs within 10% of the original Surface Pro, but for heavier use cases the Core i5 is necessary if you want Ultrabook/Macbook Air-class performance in a Surface Pro 3.
Finally we have the Work test:
«The PCMark 8 Work benchmark test measures your system’s ability to perform basic office work tasks, such as writing documents, browsing websites, creating spreadsheets and using video chat. The Work benchmark is suitable for measuring the performance of typical office PC systems that lack media capabilities. The results from each workload are combined to give an overall PCMark 8 Work score for your system.»
Here we see another 33% advantage for the Core i5, and surprisingly enough a pretty similar gap between the Core i3 SP3 and the original Surface Pro. It’s really the lighter workloads that will understandably show less of a gap between the i3 and i5.
PCMark 7
I’m also including PCMark 7 results which tend to fall in between the PCMark 8 v2 results, here showing a 26% advantage for the Core i5 model.
GPU Performance — 3DMarks
I’ll split our look at PC GPU performance into two sections, first let’s look at peak theoretical performance using 3DMark. The Core i5-4300U has a 29% higher peak GPU clock compared to the Core i3-4020Y so we could see gains of up to that in any GPU bound scenario.
The heaviest 3DMark 2013 test here is Fire Strike and we see a 27% advantage for the Core i5 vs. Core i3 model. Note that the i3 is still substantially quicker than the original Surface Pro.
In lighter graphics workloads the gap narrows, with the Core i5 model holding a 21% performance advantage over the Core i3. The entry level Surface Pro 3 still delivers substantially better GPU performance than the original Surface Pro.
The Ice Storm test seems to provide a good mix of CPU and GPU bound work for the platforms, which contributes to the largest gap we’ve seen thus far in our GPU tests of 30%.
Looking at 3DMark 11 there’s virtually no performance difference between the two platforms. This ends up being a bit more strenuous of a test, likely forcing the Surface Pro 3 into a thermally constrained situation where GPU clocks can’t remain at max for long.
PC Gaming Performance — Dota 2
In our original Surface Pro 3 review I asked Ryan Smith to put together a reasonable Dota 2 benchmark to better illustrate what a prolonged light graphics workload would do to the system. In the end I found that the thermal constraints and default fan profile of Surface Pro 3 can contribute to lower sustained performance vs. Surface Pro 2. Our Dota 2 benchmark did a great job of showcasing a real world scenario where SP3 could be appreciably slower than SP2.
With the Core i3 version I was curious as to whether the better binning and overall power reduction would result in a device that would be able to sustain a higher level of performance for longer than the Core i5 version. I ran the Core i3 model through the exact same Dota 2 workload and came away with some interesting results:
Whereas the Core i5 model couldn’t make it through a single run of our test without stepping down in performance, the first run on the Core i3 system came very close to the performance of the Surface Pro 2. Subsequent runs however did drop to performance similar to the Core i5 model, although the i3 is able to sustain higher performance.
SSD Performance
My original review sample featured a 256GB Samsung PM851 (an OEM version of the SSD 840 EVO) SSD. The $799 Core i3 model I received features a 64GB SSD, and in my case it’s an SK Hynix drive. SK Hynix is a fully vertically integrated NAND and controller manufacturer thanks to its acquisition of Link A Media. The HFS064G3AMNB-2200A in my Core i3 based Surface Pro 3 uses a LAMD 87800 controller like the Corsair Neutron/Neutron GTX and Seagate SSD 600 series of SSDs. Both of those drives proved to be highly consistent performers, even when running in a full state. I’m not sure if all 64GB models will use the Hynix/LAMD drive, but given how little free space is available on the 64GB drive I would hope as many of them are this configuration as possible. After installing my relatively limited suite of tests for this review I had 10GB free on the device, with Windows telling me that another 10. 5GB was taken up by things I’d installed.
PCMark 8 v2’s storage test gives us a good look at high level performance, and here there’s no real difference between the 64GB and 256GB drives:
However this is a bit of an optimistic look, I turned to Crystal Disk Mark to give us a quick idea of peak sequential and random performance:
64GB Hynix SSD (left) vs. 256GB Samsung SSD (right)
Testing over a 4GB span there’s clearly a reduction in sequential and random IO performance but both are quite solid on the 64GB model. I don’t expect users to store large files on a 64GB Surface Pro 3 so the reduction in sequential read/write speed isn’t a huge deal. Overall I’m quite pleased with the performance of the 64GB drive in my i3 sample.
Tablet Performance
Last but not least, I wanted to look at how the Core i3 would perform in a lighter set of benchmarks we typically run our ARM based tablets through. Surface Pro has always ended up at the top of these tests, but we’ve never had a Surface Pro clocked as low as the Core i3 SP3. At 1.5GHz this also gives us an interesting look into the IPC comparison between Haswell and Apple’s Cyclone cores as the iPad Air runs at a similar frequency (1.4GHz). Do keep in mind that there’s a fairly large difference in platform power between a Surface Pro 3 and an iPad Air however.
The light workload js benchmarks end up being great measures of single threaded performance, which is why we see such a substantial difference between the Core i5 and i3 models here. That being said, the i3 based Surface Pro 3 still ends up being faster than any of the traditional ARM tablets. The iPad Air comes dangerously close though.
Kraken tells a similar story, although here we see a larger gap between the i3 based Surface Pro 3 and the iPad Air.
The GPU performance story is no different than in our earlier tests. The i3 model takes a hit, but GPU performance is understandably much better than any other tablet you’d come across.
Final Words
Subjectively, the entry level Surface Pro 3 feels pretty quick. Even running at only 1.5GHz, a pair of Haswell cores are plenty fast. The real question is whether or not the extra $200 is worth the increase in performance. For anyone looking to use the Surface Pro 3 like a real PC and less like a tablet, the $200 Core i5 upgrade is a wise investment. Lighter tasks and more tablet oriented usage models however may not merit the extra expense. In a lot of lighter tasks we’re looking at a 20 — 30% advantage to the Core i5 for a 25% increase in system cost. Ultimately I feel like the increase in storage capacity in addition to CPU performance may be what really justifies the larger expenditure for users who don’t necessarily need the extra CPU performance.
The big unanswered question at this point is whether there are any gains in battery life. I’m working on producing that data now and I’ll post a follow up once it’s complete. Updated: Battery life results are in.
Tweet
Surface Pro 3 i5 vs i7 — Is the Upgrade Worth the Money?
If you’re in the market to buy a Surface Pro 3, you might have noticed the abundance of choices available to you.
The Surface Pro 3 is now available in i3, i5, and i7 processor versions.
If you’re on a budget or you know you don’t need a really powerful machine, you’re probably going to opt for the less expensive i3 version. However, if you need more power, you might be wondering how much more power and whether you can get away with the less expensive i5 or if you have to jump all the way up to the most expensive i7 version.
If that’s the quandary you’re in, then this post is for you, as I’m going to do a performance comparison of the two versions (i5 and i7) rather than the more esoteric things like OS, size, weight, or screen resolutions…. all of the Surface Pro 3 models are identical in those aspects anyway.
Let’s get started…
Surface Pro 3 i5 vs i7: Performance/Price Comparison
One of the main reasons you would probably pick an i7 over an i5 (or i3-for that matter) is because you’re worried about computing power. You may have a high-intensity application you want to run and you want to make sure your SP3 has the power to do it, right? Either that or you want to play games. (Hey, I’m a gamer too. I’m not judging!)
To that end, I’m using a couple of online benchmark data-sets to create a performance vs price comparison. I figure it’s the best way to quantify the differences between the models. For the benchmarks I’m using the following data-sets:
- The Hardware Channel from Futuremark. They keep track of how different devices ran their Ice Storm Extreme gaming benchmark
- The Passmark CPU benchmark database. They keep track of how various CPUs stack up against each other.
OK, now that you know what data I’m using, below is a table where I list the price against the performance gains of each version.
Model | Price | 3D Mark | Passmark | Perf Avg | Price Compare in $$ | Perf vs Price (bang for your $) |
Intel i5 128GB | $999.00 | 47191 | 3773 | 100%(base) | base | base |
Intel i5 256GB | $1299.00 | 47191 | 3773 | same as base | +30% | 77% of base |
Intel i7 256GB | $1549.00 | 54019 | 4185 | 14% better than base | +55% | 74% of base |
Intel i7 512GB | $1949.00 | 54019 | 4185 | 14% better than base | +95% | 59% of base |
I used the i5 with the 128GB drive as the “base model” so that I could normalize the data and make it easier to compare. As you can see, and probably as expected, i7 versions have better performance than the i5 versions. However, the interesting part is that the ratios for performance don’t keep up with the price jumps between each model.
Below is a chart that (I hope) better highlights the differences (the longer the line, the more performance you get for your money):
This means that if you look at performance scores vs price, you only get 59% of the performance for each dollar spent on a SP3 i7 512GB as opposed to the i5 128GB version. Interesting, huh?
Surface Pro 3 i5 vs i7: 4GB or 8GB of RAM for the i5 Model
If you’ve been wondering whether you need 4GB or 8GB of RAM in your Surface with an i5 CPU, consider the fact that the Surface comes with a solid state drive.
More RAM usually means better performance because your computer doesn’t have to page as often and paging can cause some performance issues because of the difference in speed between RAM and a disk drive.
However, since the Surface has a solid state hard drive in it, you won’t see as big of performance hit from disk paging as you would with an older platter-type hard drive.
There will be a performance hit with the 4GB model when compared to the 8GB model but, it won’t be nearly as much as you might fear unless you’re doing something like rendering 3D video while performing a full virus scan.
KTech Tips has a YouTube video you can check out if you want more information on the differences.
Surface Pro 3 i5 vs i7: Storage Space
To expand on the Price/Performance section, I’m highlighting the price differences vs the different drive capacities with the i5 and i7 models. I’m doing it because it’s important to know how much more you’re paying to get more internal hard dive space, especially since you can very cheaply expand the space to your Surface Pro 3 by adding a SDCard.
Model | Cost | Cost/GB |
Intel i5 128 GB | $999.00 | $7.80 |
Intel i5 256 GB | $1,299.00 | $5.07 |
Intel i7 256 GB | $1,549.00 | $6.05 |
Intel i7 512 GB | $1,949.00 | $3.81 |
This time, there’s no baseline. It’s a straight comparison of price vs hard drive capacity for your reference.
EDIT (11/14/14): I’d like to thank a few readers (Waters, Jeff, and Cody who correctly pointed out that I had some bad information in this section as I had inadvertently inverted my numbers. I have since corrected the error and adjusted the section accordingly.
Surface Pro 3 i5 vs i7: Battery Life
Now let’s look at the difference in up-time between the i5 and i7 versions. As you might recall, I did a Surface Pro 3 battery life comparison in July against our i5 Surface Pro 3.
So, for this post, I performed the “Everyday Use” test against both the i5 and i7 versions of the Surface Pro 3. For your reference, here are my test conditions:
TEST DETAILS:
- The power option for all 3 configurations was set to the default Balanced setting then again in the default Power Saver configuration
- The tests were performed 5 times and the results averaged
- Both tablets had all updates installed as of September 12th, 2014
- I was connected to WiFi the entire time the tablets were awake
- I surfed the web, checked my email, and played a few games
- The tablets were allowed to sleep when I wasn’t actively using them but, I did not turn them off
- All of my tests started at 7:30 AM and ended when the devices auto powered down at around 5% remaining battery life. At that point, I simply calculated the number of minutes elapsed
- Results are rounded to the nearest minute
You might have expected the i5 version to have more battery life than the i7 but, that doesn’t seem to be the case. Apparently, the i7 has better power management features than you might expect.
You might also notice that the i5 did slightly better than it did during the testing in July. I attribute that to improvements in power management.
Surface Pro 3 i5 vs i7: Heat
This is a bit (OK,fine, it’s a lot) more subjective than the sections above. As you may know, heat has been an ongoing problem with the SP3 i7 models so, this factor is important to consider.
Unfortunately, I didn’t have the equipment to accurately measure the temperature differences so, to try to quantify the differences, I enlisted a small group of 6 people to rate the heat they felt while running benchmark tests from 3D Mark. I feel this is a good way to do it since “my Surface gets hot” is a fairly subjective statement anyway.
I simply asked each tester to rate how hot the tablet got during the tests on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being the hottest. Here are the results we came up with:
Despite having the same TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating of 15W, The i7-4650U processor in the SP3 gets noticeably hotter than the i5-4300U version. During our testing, all of the testers said the i7 version got uncomfortably hot at times. Especially in the upper right corner of the screen.
You might assume that the CPU is located in that location and you would be right. I put together the (somewhat accurate) illustration below to show you where some of the major components ate located inside the SP3 case. If you want a more detailed view of the internals of the SP3 then hop over to iFixit and look at their tear down of the SP3.
Personally, I’d say the i5 128GB has the best bang for the buck (except for internal drive size) but, your needs may lead you to pick one of the other models.
To that end, I hope this post proves useful to you if you’re trying to decide between a Surface Pro 3 i5 or i7 model. I tried to give you straight comparison of important factors so that you could make your decision based on (mostly) quantifiable facts.
If you found this post useful and not too confusing. If you think I missed something important, please let me know.
Tim
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 12″ Intel Core i3 64GB Tablet (Renewed) : Electronics
4.0 out of 5 stars
802 ratings
Climate Pledge Friendly
New Price: | $729.00$729.00 |
Price: | $272.00$272.00 |
You Save: | $457.00$457.00 (62%) |
Local Business
This item is sold by Tek Galaxy, a local business to your delivery zip code.
Local Business
Processor Description:
Intel core i3
Hard Disk Size:
64 GB
The product is refurbished, fully functional, and in excellent condition.
Backed by the 90-day Amazon Renewed Guarantee.
— This pre-owned product has been professionally inspected, tested and cleaned by Amazon qualified vendors.
— This product is in «Excellent condition». The screen and body show no signs of cosmetic damage visible from 12 inches away.
— When present, batteries have a capacity that exceeds 80% of the new equivalent.
— Accessories may not be original, but will be compatible and fully functional. Product may come in generic box.
— This product is eligible for a replacement or refund within 90 days of receipt if it does not work as expected. See terms here.
Brand | Microsoft |
Series | Surface Pro |
Memory Storage Capacity | 64 GB |
Screen Size | 12 Inches |
Display Resolution Maximum | 1920 x 1080 |
- Make sure this fits by entering your model number.
- The tablet that can replace your laptop. The 12-inch Surface Pro 3 is the thinnest and lightest in our Pro family, at 1.76 pounds.
- Pre-loaded with Windows 8.1 Pro, you can install your favorite desktop software, including the full Microsoft Office Suite (sold separately).
- Offering unmatched versatility, you can go from tablet to laptop in a snap with the multi-position Kickstand. Multiple ports: A full-size USB 3.0, microSD card reader, and Mini DisplayPort.
- Includes Surface Pen and comes pre-installed with Flipboard, Skype Wi-Fi,Skype, OneNote MX, Solitaire, Mahjong, Sudoku/Microsoft Number Puzzle, Fresh Paint
This fits your .
See more product details
This product is also available in New condition for $457.00 more than the current Renewed price.
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (4GB RAM 64 GB SSD, Intel Core i3, Windows 8.1) $729.00
(403)
Only 5 left in stock — order soon.
Note: Products with electrical plugs are designed for use in the US. Outlets and voltage differ internationally and this product may require an adapter or converter for use in your destination. Please check compatibility before purchasing.
Intel Core i7-4650U vs i5-4300U vs i3-4020Y – Laptoping
Although I believed the Intel Core i3 and i7 processors inside the Microsoft Surface Pro 3 tablet will be from the next generation Intel Broadwell chip family, it turned out that they’ll be actually the current Haswell chips. Namely the Intel Core i7-4650U and i3-4020Y. They will accompany the i5-4300U as the already known option.
That’s according to CNet’s source at Microsoft. To remind you, the company announced the i5-4300U and unnamed i3 and i7 as the Surface Pro 3 CPU options. Since we now know thier SKUs – the i7-4650U and i3-4020Y – we can compare processors of the new tablet. At least their specifications and PassMark benchmark scores.
Naturally, the Core i7-4650U will be the fastest among the trio. It has some more advanced specs over similar i7 Haswells. The main is inclusion of the Intel HD 5000 series integrated graphics instead of the HD 4400. That should bring a bit faster graphics rendering, but still without big performance leap.
The i5-4300U is already in use in the Surface Pro 2. As a mid-range chip, it’s quite suitable for office and home tasks and is frequently used in various laptop and tablet models. It has the Intel HD 4400 IGP.
The Intel Core i3-4020Y is the slowest among them. Not just because the i3 is generally positioned lower in the CPU hierarchy, but also because of its lower power consumption. It’s an “Y” part with maximal thermal design power of 11.5 Watts, down from 15W of the “U” chips. Therefore, power-efficiency is the main selling point of this option. Hopefully, the i3 Surface Pro 3 will have a longer battery life than the i5 and i7. At expense of lower computing speed. The integrated HD 4200 IGP in it is a tad slower than the 4400 series.
Here are the benchmark results of these processors, taken from PassMark benchmark database. It contains test results of the processors used in various Windows-based laptop and tablet models available on the market.
The chart shows advantage of the i7, not only over the i5 and i3 Surface Pro 3 options, but also over the commonly used i7-4500U chip. Of course, the full-blown quad-core i7-4700MQ for high-performance and gaming laptops is far ahead. The i5 appears to hit the sweet spot between performance and cost, while the i3 is satisfactory for the most of home and office use scenarios. It should be avoided if you plan to use the SP3 mostly for demanding professional photo editing, video production or similar tasks. For these purposes, the i7 is recommended.
In the table below you can see the most important specifications points of the CPUs. The differences are highlighted in red color.
Processor Name |
Intel Core i7-4650U | Intel Core i5-4300U | Intel Core i3-4020Y |
Code Name | Haswell | Haswell | Haswell |
Status | Launched | Launched | Launched |
Launch Date | Q3’13 | Q3’13 | Q3’13 |
# of Cores | 2 | 2 | 2 |
# of Threads | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Clock Speed | 1. 7 GHz | 1.9 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Max Turbo Frequency |
3.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz | Not available |
Cache | 4 MB | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Instruction Set |
64-bit | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Instruction Set Extensions |
SSE 4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 | SSE 4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 | SSE 4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 |
Lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Max TDP | 15 W | 15 W | 11.5 W |
Recommended Customer Price |
TRAY: $426.00 | TRAY: $281.00 | TRAY: $281.00 |
Processor Graphics |
Intel HD graphics 5000 |
Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
Intel HD Graphics 4200 |
Graphics Base Frequency |
200 MHz | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency |
1. 1 GHz | 1.1 GHz | 850 MHz |
Quick Sync Video |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Turbo Boost Technology |
2.0 | 2.0 | No |
vPro Technology |
Yes | Yes | No |
Hyper-Threading | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Virtualization (VT-x) |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
Yes | Yes | No |
Intel TSX-NI | Yes | Yes | No |
AES New Instructions |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Secure Key | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Trusted Execution |
Yes | Yes | No |
Execute Disable Bit |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Anti-Theft Technology |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
The most important difference between the i3 and other two parts is absence of TurboBoost technology on the former. That’s one of the causes of the lower benchmark scores of it. As already noted, another big difference is the lower TDP on the i3. Intel has also omitted some technologies important for business use on this chip, such as vPro system management. The i5 and i7 are pretty much similar, with graphics being the main difference.
Share this page:
Microsoft Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic
Edition
IN
- IN
- US
Tue, Sep 13, 2022 | Updated 07.47AM IST
- Tech News
- Laptops
- Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic Price In India
Last Updated: September 13, 2022
FacebookTwitterLinkedin
Explore More Microsoft laptops
Gadgets
- Microsoft-Surface-Pro-3-Laptop-intel-Core-i3-4th-Gen-4020Y-Intel-HD-4200-4GB-128GB-SSD-Windows-10-Home-Basic
- HP Victus 16 Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5800H Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 32GB 1TB SSD Windows 10
- Dell Inspiron 15 3593 (C560510WIN9) Laptop (Core i5 10th Gen/8 GB/1 TB 256 GB SSD/Windows 10/2 GB)
- HP 14s-fq1030AU Laptop AMD Ryzen 5 5500U AMD Radeon 8GB 512GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic
- HP 15(2021) 15s-eq2040au Laptop 5th Gen AMD Ryzen 5 5500U AMD Radeon 8GB 512GB SSD Windows 10
Overview
Specifications
User Review
View Photos (1)
Rate & Review
Compare
Related Laptops
About Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic
Buy the Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic that is engineered for long-lasting performance. This laptop offers smooth processing and comes with a stylish design. The laptop is equipped with a powerful intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y with 1.5 GHz clock speed that lets you accomplish your tasks without any interruptions and lags. In addition to this, you can easily this laptop in your backpack due to its lightweight and compact design. The dimensions of the laptop are 201 x 292 x 9.14 mm and it weighs around 1 KG.
You get a sturdy, full-length, and ergonomically designed Detachable Keyboard in the Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic so that you can working with the utmost convenience for long working hours. Also, the laptop is powered with a high-quality Li-Ion. Therefore, there zero chances of battery overheating or swelling
Hence, you can enjoy an exceptional audio-visual experience.
The Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic in India is available at Rs 58,990. Furthermore, you get a warranty of 1 Year from the manufacturer from the date of purchase.
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic Price In India
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic laptop price in India is Rs 58,990.
Summary
storage128 GB SSD
display12 inches
processorintel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y
performanceIntel HD 4200
ram4 GB
batteryLi-Ion
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic Specifications
general information (8)
brand | Microsoft |
---|---|
type | Notebook |
model | Surface Pro 3 |
os | Windows 10 Home Basic |
operating system type | 64-bit |
dimensions wxhxd | 201 x 292 x 9. 14 mm |
weight | 1 KG |
colors | Black |
storage (2)
hdd capacity | 128 GB SSD |
---|---|
hdd type | SATA |
display details (5)
display size | 12 inches |
---|---|
display resolution | 2160 x 1440 pixels |
display type | LED |
display features | Full HD LED Backlit Anti-Glare Display |
display touchscreen | No |
performance (3)
processor | intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y |
---|---|
graphic processor | Intel HD 4200 |
clock speed | 1.5 GHz |
memory (4)
capacity | 4 GB |
---|---|
ram type | DDR4 |
memory slots | 1 |
memory layout | 1×4 Gigabyte |
battery (2)
battery cell | 2 cell |
---|---|
battery type | Li-Ion |
networking (9)
secondary camrearfacing | No |
---|---|
bluetooth | Yes |
bluetooth version | v4. 2 |
usb 20 slots | 1 |
usb 30 slots | 3 |
wireless lan | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
inbuilt microphone | Yes |
webcam | Yes |
speakers | Dual Speakers |
ports (2)
headphone jack | Yes |
---|---|
microphone jack | Yes |
peripherals (4)
keyboard | Detachable Keyboard |
---|---|
backlit keyboard | Yes |
pointing device | Touchpad with Multi-Touch Gestures Enabled |
optical drive | No |
others (2)
sales package | Laptop, Battery, AC Adapter, User Guide |
---|---|
warranty | 1 Year |
general (1)
price in india | 58990 |
---|
!Disclaimer: Some of the information on the page is subject to change.
Be the First one to review
Rate & Review
Similar Products
HP Victus 16 Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5800H Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 32GB 1TB SSD Windows 10
Dell Inspiron 15 3593 (C560510WIN9) Laptop (Core i5 10th Gen/8 GB/1 TB 256 GB SSD/Windows 10/2 GB)
HP 14s-fq1030AU Laptop AMD Ryzen 5 5500U AMD Radeon 8GB 512GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic
HP 15(2021) 15s-eq2040au Laptop 5th Gen AMD Ryzen 5 5500U AMD Radeon 8GB 512GB SSD Windows 10
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0101AX (167W1PA) Laptop (AMD Quad Core Ryzen 5/8 GB/1 TB/Windows 10/4 GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic FAQ
What is the display size of Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic ?
Display size of Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic is 12 inches
Which OS Type does Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic support ?
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Laptop intel Core i3 4th Gen-4020Y Intel HD 4200 4GB 128GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic supports Windows 10 Home Basic
Recent Comparision
Microsoft Surface Book vsDell XPS 13 9350vsApple MacBook Pro ME866HN/A Ultrabook
Microsoft Surface Pro 8 Laptop Intel Core i5-1135G7 vsMicrosoft Surface Studio
Microsoft Surface 3 1867 vsMicrosoft Surface Book 3
Microsoft Surface Pro 3vsXiaomi Mi Notebook 14 Horizon Laptop
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 vsMicrosoft Surface Pro 7 M1866 vsMicrosoft Surface Pro 8 Laptop Intel Core i5-1135G7
Microsoft Surface Go 2 Intel Gold Processor 4425Y 10. 5 Inch 2-in-1 Laptop vsMicrosoft Surface Laptop Go — 12.4″ Touchscreen — Intel Core i5 — 8GB Memory — 256GB SSD — SandstonevsMicrosoft Surface Pro X
Microsoft Surface Book 2 1832 vsMicrosoft Surface Book
Microsoft Surface Pro 6 1796 vsToshiba Portege R930-X3310 Laptop
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go THJ00023 Laptop Intel Core i5 10th Gen-1035G1 Intel UHD 8GB 256GB SSD Windows 10 Home BasicvsMicrosoft Surface Pro 7 M1866
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go — 12.4″ Touchscreen — Intel Core i5 — 8GB Memory — 256GB SSD — SandstonevsMicrosoft Surface Pro 3
Microsoft SlideShows
Start Slideshow
Microsoft adds new titles to Xbox Game Pass: Here’s a list
Microsoft Videos
01:40
Microsoft Surface Pro X: Price, specifications and more
02:28
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4: Price, features and more
01:09
How to use Skype’s Meet Now feature
end of article
Trending Gadgets
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 82LN00A3IN Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5700U AMD Radeon 16GB 512GB SSD Windows 10
HP Victus 16 Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5800H Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 32GB 1TB SSD Windows 10
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 Laptop 11th gen Intel Core i9-11900H GeForce RTX 3070 48GB 2TB SSD Windows 10
Lenovo Ideapad S145 (81MV0096IN) Laptop (Core i5 8th Gen/8 GB/1 TB/Windows 10)
Dell Inspiron 15 3593 (C560510WIN9) Laptop (Core i5 10th Gen/8 GB/1 TB 256 GB SSD/Windows 10/2 GB)
Acer Swift X Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5800U Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 16GB 1TB SSD Windows 10
Asus ROG Strix G531GT-AL150T Laptop (Core i7 9th Gen/16 GB/1 TB SSD/Windows 10/4 GB)
Dell Inspiron 3501 15-inch FHD Laptop (11th Gen i5-1135G7/8GB/1TB HDD/256GB SSD/Win 10 + MS Office/2GB Graphics/Black)
HP Probook 440 G8 364C1PA Laptop Intel Core i5 11th Gen-1135G7 Intel UHD 8GB 512 GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic
Dell Vostro 3500 Laptop 11th Gen Intel Core i5-1135G7 Integrated 8GB 512GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic
More Trending Gadgets
Microsoft News
Popular Gadgets
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 82LN00A3IN Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5700U AMD Radeon 16GB 512GB SSD Windows 10
HP Victus 16 Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5800H Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 32GB 1TB SSD Windows 10
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 Laptop 11th gen Intel Core i9-11900H GeForce RTX 3070 48GB 2TB SSD Windows 10
Lenovo Ideapad S145 (81MV0096IN) Laptop (Core i5 8th Gen/8 GB/1 TB/Windows 10)
Dell Inspiron 15 3593 (C560510WIN9) Laptop (Core i5 10th Gen/8 GB/1 TB 256 GB SSD/Windows 10/2 GB)
Acer Swift X Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5800U Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 16GB 1TB SSD Windows 10
Asus ROG Strix G531GT-AL150T Laptop (Core i7 9th Gen/16 GB/1 TB SSD/Windows 10/4 GB)
Dell Inspiron 3501 15-inch FHD Laptop (11th Gen i5-1135G7/8GB/1TB HDD/256GB SSD/Win 10 + MS Office/2GB Graphics/Black)
HP Probook 440 G8 364C1PA Laptop Intel Core i5 11th Gen-1135G7 Intel UHD 8GB 512 GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic
Dell Vostro 3500 Laptop 11th Gen Intel Core i5-1135G7 Integrated 8GB 512GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic
More Popular Gadgets
UP NEXT
Intel Core i3-10100 vs Intel Core i5-3470: What is the difference?
51 BALLLA
Intel Core i3-10100
37 Ballla
Intel Core i5-3470 9000 Why is Intel Core i3-10100 better than Intel Core i5-3470?
- 12. 5% faster CPU speed?
4 x 3.6GHz vs 4 x 3.2GHz - 1066MHz higher RAM speed?
2666MHz vs 1600MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8 vs 4 - 32.6°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 67.4°C - Are 8nm semiconductors smaller?
14nm vs 22nm - 35.85% higher PassMark score?
8974 vs 6606 - 0.7GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.3GHz vs 3.6GHz - 12W below TDP?
65W vs 77W
Why is Intel Core i5-3470 better than Intel Core i3-10100?
- GPU frequency 300MHz higher?
650MHz vs 350MHz - 44.8 higher performance per watt?
108.0 vs 63.2
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i3-10100
VS
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i7-3770
-3-10100
VS 9000 NTL Core 10105
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 3 4100
VS
9000 Core, 9000)
Intel Core i3-10100
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
AMD FX-6300
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Intel Intel I33333333333
VS
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i3-10100
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core400040004 ° Intel Intel Core 4000400040004 ° Intel Core
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
VS
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core I3-1115G4
+ Intel Core I3-10100
VS 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000) 8400
Price comparison
cheaper
users reviews
General rating
Intel Core i3-10100
5 Reviews of users
Intel Core i3-10100
/10
333333
3 User reviews
Intel Core i5-3470
8. 3 /10
3 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.4 /10
5 Votes
/10
3 Votes
/10
5 VOTES
8.0 /10 9000
9000 9.4 /10
5 Votes
8.3 /10
3 Votes
Reliability
/10
5 VOTES
/10 9000
3 VOTES
9000 9000
Energy efficiency
/10
5 Votes
9 processor cycles shows how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.3GHz
3.6GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i3-10100
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2666MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
41.6GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports Memory Error Code
✖Intel Core i3-10100
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i3-10100
✖Intel Core i5-3470
physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔Intel Core i3-10100
✔Intel Core i5-3470
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i3-10100
✔Intel Core i5-3470
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i3-10100
✔Intel Core i5-3470
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i3-10100
✔Intel Core i5-3470
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-10100
✖Intel Core i5-3470
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Summary tests of Intel Core i7, Core i5, Core i3 3000 series processors in twenty games
Contents
- Introduction
- Test results: performance comparison
- ADR1FT
- Assassin’s Creed III
- Batman: Arkham Origins
- Borderlands 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
- Dirt 3
- Dragon Age II
- F1 2015
- Far Cry Primal
- Grid Autosport
- Hitman: Absolution
- Just Cause 2
- Mad Max
- Mafia 2
- Medal of Honor: Warfighter
- Project CARS
- Risen
- Saints Row: The Third
- Shift 2: Unleashed
- The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
- Geometric mean results of processors in twenty games
- Test configuration
- Instrumentation and Test Method
Introduction
This material opens a new line of articles devoted to the tests of components that have entered the gaming PC market over the past seven years. The heroes of the review were the following Intel processors of the Ivy Bridge generation:
- Core i7-3770K;
- Core i7-3770;
- Core i5-3570K;
- Core i5-3570;
- Core i5-3550;
- Core i5-3470;
- Core i5-3450;
- Core i5-3330;
- Core i3-3250;
- Core i3-3240;
- Core i3-3220.
The review contains summary diagrams of processor performance and their geometric mean results in twenty games. This direction of the articles is for reference only, there are no comments, since each reader will be able to independently obtain the information he needs.
Let us remind you that you can get acquainted with the work of test benches, methodology and processing of test results by clicking on this link.
YouTube fans can watch a seven-minute video version of the material containing a maximum of useful information:
Test configurations are described at the end of the material.
recommendations
Test results: performance comparison
ADR1FT
- Version 1.2.9.20854.
- DirectX 11.
- Smoothing — epic.
- The final quality is epic.
- Shadow quality is epic.
- Texture quality is epic.
- The VFX quality is epic.
1920×1080
Rating
Enable JavaScript to see charts
Overclock to see charts
9022 Enable JavaScript to see charts
0230
Minimum and average FPS
Assassin’s Creed III
- Version 1. 06.
- DirectX 11.
- The quality of the rendering of the area is very high.
- Texture quality is high.
- Anti-aliasing quality (FXAA) — high.
- Shadow quality is very high.
1920×1080
Denomination
Please enable JavaScript to see graphs
Acceleration
Turn on JavaScript to see graphs
Minimum and Middle FPS
BATMAN: Arkham Origins
- 9022 9
- DirectX 11.
- Antialiasing — FXAA high.
- Geometry detail — DirectX 11 improved.
- Dynamic shadows — DirectX 11 improved.
- Motion blur — enabled.
- Depth of field effect — DirectX 11 improved.
- Distortion — enabled.
- Lens flare — enabled.
- Light pillars — included.
- Reflections — enabled.
- Reflected lighting — DirectX 11 enhanced.
- Nvidia PhysX hardware acceleration — disabled.
1920×1080
Denomination
Please enable JavaScript to see charts
Overclocking
Enable JavaScript to see graphs
Minimum and average FPS
Borderlands 2
- 90.23 Version.
- DirectX 9.
- Fast anti-aliasing — enabled.
- Volumetric lighting — included.
- Depth of field — enabled.
- Anisotropic Filtering (AF) 16.
- There are many bullet holes.
- Vegetation rendering distance — maximum. 98 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
- Version 1.1.9.461.
- DirectX 9.
- Full screen anti-aliasing (MSAA) — x4.
- Texture size — extra high.
- Normal map size — extra high.
- Highlight map size — extra high.
- Shadows — included.
- Glare maps — enabled.
- Depth of field — enabled.
- Smoke smoothing — enabled.
- Damage model — included.
- Night illumination — high.
- Shadows — very high.
- Particles — high.
- Reflections — very high.
- Spectators — high.
- Ground surface — high.
- Cars in the distance — high.
- Objects — very high.
- Trees — very high.
- Reflections on cars — very high.
- Water — high.
- Post-processing — high (DX11).
- Brake marks — included.
- Anisotropic Filtering (AF) — 16.
- Graphics detail — very high.
- High resolution textures — included.
- Ambient Light Block — Enabled.
- Depth of field for blur — enabled.
- High quality blur — enabled.
0029
1920×1080
Nominal
Enable JavaScript to see graphs
Overclocking
Enable JavaScript to see charts
Minimum and Average FPS
F1 2015
- Version 1.0.22.4646.
- DirectX 11.
- FSAA — 4X SMAA.
- Detail preset — very high.
- Lighting quality is high.
- Post-processing quality is high.
- Shadow quality is very high.
- The quality of smoke shadows is high.
- Particle quality is very high.
- The quality of the viewers is high.
- The quality of the characters is high.
- The quality of cars is high.
- The quality of the environment is high.
- The quality of complex shading is high.
- The quality of reflections is very high.
- The quality of the weather effects is high.
- Surface quality is very high.
- The quality of brake marks is high.
9007
- The quality of post-effects is high.
- Geometry quality — ultra high.
- The quality of the land is very high.
- Water quality is very high.
- The quality of the environment is high.
- The quality of the volumetric fog is high.
- Motion blur — enabled.
1920×1080
Denomination
Enable JavaScript to see charts
Overclocking
Enable JavaScript to see graphs
Minimum and Average FPS
Grid Autosport
Enable JavaScript to see charts
Overclock to see charts
9022 Enable JavaScript to see charts
0230
Minimum and average FPS
Continued material
Previous materials Phoenix
Subscribe to our channel in Yandex.Zen or telegram channel @overclockers_news — these are convenient ways to follow new materials on the site. With pictures, extended descriptions and no ads.
Why Intel Core i5 is actually Core i9, or what is processor binning
Processors
Binning
Binning
Intel
AMD
Apple
Why Intel Core i5 is actually Core i9, or what is processor binning
Egor Morozov
—
We are already accustomed to the fact that desktop processors in each generation are not one or two, but sometimes a dozen. They differ in the number of cores, frequencies, cache sizes, integrated graphics and many other parameters, which suggests that manufacturers are forced to create a separate production line for each CPU, which is expensive and rather difficult.
However, in fact, no matter how surprising it may sound, all modern Intel or AMD processors are made from the same crystals. Yes, physically 8-core Core i9 and 6-core Core i5 are as close as possible. Even Apple does the same. But how and why do manufacturers do this? Let’s figure it out.
It all starts with silicon wafers
Most processors we’re familiar with start with a standard 300mm silicon wafer called a wafer. It is made of highly purified silicon, so that in their production all workers wear not only masks, but also special suits in order to pollute the premises as little as possible.
Subsequently, layers of metallization, insulation and, in fact, the semiconductors themselves are etched on such wafers using lasers and masks — this is how beautiful silicon wafers appear, which we sometimes see at presentations:
The cost of one such wafer is simply fabulous and often is several hundred thousand dollars, and the process of its production can take months. On such a plate, hundreds of processors can be etched, which are subsequently cut out of it and sold. However, in reality, everything is more complicated.
At least part of the wafer (5-15%) immediately goes to waste: as we remember, CPU dies are rectangular or square, but the wafer is round. It will not work to make it square — the technological process of its production involves the creation of precisely cylinders with pyramids at the ends:
So it turns out that some part of the plate is guaranteed not to contain a CPU and immediately goes for processing.
Okay, but the rest of the wafer can certainly be cut into separate processor chips, put them on substrates and sold? In fact, again, no.
Our world is not perfect
No matter how hard the engineers try, it will not be possible to make a perfect wafer and perfectly “burn out” processors on it. There will always be a marriage — somewhere due to silicon inhomogeneities, somewhere due to dust on the wafer surface during laser operation.
Therefore, the plates after production are tested for defects by various methods, and as a result, some part of the wafers is marked for further analysis — binning (binning). Yes, it can literally be translated as «digging in the trash», and in fact, this is not far from the truth.
Let’s return, for example, to the same Rocket Lake. The top representative of this line, Core i9-11900K, has 8 cores, three levels of caches, various controllers and integrated graphics:
8 rectangles in the center are cores, the cache is located between them, the dark area on the left is integrated graphics.
These crystals should ideally be obtained. But what to do if the flaw detector detects that one core is not working in some processor chip? The easiest option is to simply throw out such a marriage after cutting the wafer into separate crystals with a laser cutter.
But, as we remember, such wafers are very expensive and take a long time to produce, so a few decades ago, engineers came up with a simple idea: let’s turn off defective blocks and create cheaper processors from such crystals.
Marriage in integrated graphics? Disable it and mark such a processor with an F index — it will still work, but a discrete video card is required to display the image. Stuck one or two cores? Let’s disable them along with the cache, and call such a Frankenstein already Core i5, not Core i7 or Core i9.
So it turns out that such «digging in the trash» is bearing fruit — only those crystals that are not at all lucky are really thrown away: for example, they have a defective L3 cache common to all cores or a ring bus. And the rest are cut and put on sale on the principle of «waste into income.»
Even Apple does not disdain this: for example, the company sells its SoC M1 in two versions, with 7 and 8 GPU cores. In fact, from a physical point of view, the crystals in both versions are, of course, the same, the company just does not want to scrap almost working SoCs. Given that not everyone needs high graphics performance, this solution makes sense:
Semi-rejected products can also be sold
It would seem that now everything has fallen into place: simpler CPU lines are a rejection from older ones. But what about, for example, Core i7 and Core i9 in the latest generation of Intel processors? The same Core i7-11700K differs from the Core i9-11900K only in frequencies, just like the Core i5-11500 and Core i5-11600K:
How is it possible? It’s simple: there is such a thing as the purity of silicon: the closer the crystal cut from the wafer to its center, the cleaner the silicon will be in it. This affects the so-called leakage currents: the smaller they are, the weaker the processor will heat up, but the worse it will overclock.
Therefore, companies select chips with high leakage currents to create high-frequency CPUs: yes, they will heat up more, but they will also take higher frequencies. Well, for simple solutions, especially without overclocking, you can take crystals with low leakage currents, which at the same time will reduce the power consumption of such CPUs.
Is there a real difference in achievable frequencies between such CPUs? With well-established technical processes, such as 14 or 7 nanometers, no: for example, if the Core i9-11900K accelerates to 5. 1 GHz on average, then the Core i7-11700K stops around 4.8-4.9GHz. A difference of 200 MHz at such frequencies gives less than 5% of real performance.
Reluctant marriage
No, it’s not what you think. It’s no secret that the younger lines of processors, such as Core i3 or Core i5, are sold more actively than older Core i7 and especially Core i9. But the first is marriage, you say. Is it possible that more than half of them are defective in the production of crystals?!
Of course not. Manufacturers usually do not disclose exact figures, but in fact, the proportion of defective wafers is unlikely to exceed 10-15%. Where does b 9 come from then?1286 o Most of the representatives of the basic CPU lines?
From a full Core i7 or Core i9. Yes, manufacturers software or hardware disable fully working cores or integrated graphics, and label such processors as Core i3 and Core i5. But what is the benefit then? After all, representatives of older lines are more expensive than the base ones, that is, companies are depriving themselves of profits?
Due to pruning errors, it also happens that the 4-core Ryzen 3 1200 got all 8 cores.
Of course not. This is where the economy comes into play. Let’s say one chip from a wafer costs Intel $50. You can sell it as a Core i9 for $400, cutting it down to a Core i5 for only $200. That is, by selling one representative of the older line, the company will earn only $ 350. Therefore, it is more profitable to sell 5 representatives of the mid-level line and earn only $150 on each of them, but in total it is already $750.
The magic of unlocking
And this, perhaps, has already prompted some users to think: since AMD and Intel often block absolutely working cores, why not try to unlock them?
And sometimes it really works. So, more than ten years ago, AMD released dual-core Athlon and three- and four-core Phenom. And often, right in the BIOS, you could try to unlock Athlon to Phenom, that is, get a processor with twice as many cores for the same money. Of course, this was not always possible, but there are also enough lucky ones on the Internet.
Athlon turns… Athlon turns… into a complete Phenom!
Or, for example, not so long ago, about 5 years ago, due to an Intel error on motherboards with the Z170 chipset, it was possible to overclock 6th generation processors with a locked multiplier via the bus. As a result, the base Core i5-6400 with a frequency of only about 3 GHz could be «fired up» up to 4 GHz and sometimes even higher. Of course, the Core i5-6600K, which initially supported overclocking, took frequencies higher — as we already understood, it’s all about leakage currents — but still a free performance bonus of up to 30% is never superfluous.
Foreshadowing questions — no, you won’t be able to «unlock» AMD Ryzen and the latest generations of Intel Core. Companies have become smarter, and now special jumpers are initially created in the crystals, which are cut during “forced” rejection. So it will no longer be possible to programmatically activate disabled kernels.
Summing up
What is the result? Companies will never miss their profits, and they will literally squeeze all the juice out of silicon, sometimes selling chips where almost half of the computing units are disabled. On the other hand, it’s better for us: the more active binning is, the less money companies lose on marriage, and the lower the cost of chips for us. So, when buying a Core i5 in the future, know that in his heart he dreamed of being a Core i9He just got unlucky.
iGuides in Yandex.Zen — zen.yandex.ru/iguides.ru
iGuides on Telegram — t.me/igmedia
Buy advertising
Recommendations
-
Samsung Pay no longer exists
-
Banks refuse to take dollars and euros. What are the concerns?
-
Telegram may be removed from the Apple App Store
- Share:
Section: Components, ArticlesTags: Intel, components,
processors Testing dual and quad-core Intel Core i3 and Core i5 processors in comparison with similar AMD Athlon and Ryzen
Testing Intel Core i7 processors from 2700K to 10700K: closing the LGA115x
page Last fall, we managed to refresh our knowledge about the performance of Intel Core i7 from the second to the tenth generation, and a little later we approached the story from a different angle, taking up Celeron and Pentium. We came to a logical conclusion: in different segments the pace of progress is different. The quantitative characteristics of Celeron have not fundamentally changed since the LGA775 years before last ( how fast time flies! :)) decades: these are still «just» dual-core processors. For a long time, Pentiums were exactly the same, but in 2017 they gained support for Hyper-Threading. Microarchitectures have not changed since 2015 — accordingly, in the Celeron family there is only an increase in clock frequencies (there is a margin, since they have always been underestimated relative to «adult» models), and in the Pentium family there is one small qualitative change. Desktop Core i7s have been quad-core «eight-thread» since their inception, but since the same year 2017, the «nuclear formula» has doubled. Therefore, performance has grown more seriously than in the budget segment.
Testing AMD Athlon for AM4 and Intel Celeron and Pentium for LGA115x
Which Intel processors can boast the same? «Middle peasants» of the Core i3 family. For most of their history, they were like modern Pentiums: two cores / four threads, no Turbo Boost. As part of the «second version» of the LGA1151 platform, they first received four cores, and then a turbo mode, turning into Core i5 analogues for the first incarnation of LGA1151. Modern Core i3 for LGA1200 exactly repeat the Core i7 of the first half of 2017. Also doubling.
Naturally, both the stagnation and its end did not happen without the participation of AMD. More precisely, while this «participation» was largely absent, Intel was in no hurry, gradually polishing the architecture and moving from one process technology to another, but without changing the number of cores in desktop families. And 2017 turned out to be a turning point due to the coincidence of two conditions. Firstly, problems began with the development of the 10 nm process technology, which did not end the next year, and in 2019, and partially remained even in 2020. New microarchitectures were tied to the development of new production standards, so they were also postponed. Initially, the company considered the problems temporary, hoping to quickly sort out both of them without a significant correction of plans. AMD returned to the market in a dual position: the Zen microarchitecture was significantly superior to its previous designs, but lagged behind the already existing Intel solutions. The gap was about one generation: Intel had already had Skylake for two years, and AMD had caught up with Haswell. The technical processes turned out to be of the same length “in parrots”, but in fact they correlated approximately the same as the architectures of that period. Therefore, AMD had no choice but to unleash a “core war”, in each segment offering more computational threads (and even physical cores) simultaneously executing than Intel. Intel also had to get involved in the race. And a couple of years ago (after the advent of Zen2, it was already no worse than Skylake without a head start) I had to run twice as fast as before. Practical problems by that time had not yet been resolved, and keep up with Ryzen 9did not work, even by significantly reducing the prices of processors for LGA2066. Therefore, AMD is now firmly entrenched in the high-performance segment, a precarious balance is “on top” of the mass market, but Intel feels fine below: AMD has not upgraded its Athlon, APUs of the 4000th line are limited, and even with “pure” Ryzen 3, not everything is going smoothly (for example, the pompously announced «elite» Ryzen 3 3300X has long been very difficult to buy).
In general, last year’s Pentium and Core i3 turned out to be so good from the market point of view that they will not change in the coming year. In the sense that the new models are also the tenth generation Core (which will no longer be indicated on the stickers), but the Comet Lake Refresh families: not Comet Lake, but not Rocket Lake either. We will start testing them soon, since the need is long overdue.
Today is a slightly different topic. As mentioned above, the most serious changes occurred around the period 2017-2018. Solutions of that time are still found even in stores, not to mention the secondary market and user desktops. By the way, the proposals of AMD and Intel were slightly different, and AMD has not formally changed the platform at all since then (in fact, there are problems with the compatibility of old processors with new boards — and no one promised compatibility in this direction). So the then processors in one form or another and now often «live» as budget solutions. Therefore, it would be nice to compare them directly with each other — the benefit is still relevant.
Test participants
Intel Pentium G4620 Intel Core i3-6100 Intel Core i3-7350K Intel Core i5-7400 Intel Core i5-7600K Kernel name Kaby Lake Skylake Kaby Lake Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Production technology 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm Core frequency, GHz 3.7 3.7 4. 2 3.0/3.5 3.8/4.2 Number of cores/threads 2/4 2/4 2/4 4/4 4/4 L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 64/64 64/64 64/64 128/128 128/128 L2 cache, KB 2×256 2×256 2×256 4×256 4×256 L3 cache, MiB 3 4 4 6 6 RAM 2×DDR4-2400 2×DDR4-2133 2×DDR4-2400 2×DDR4-2400 2×DDR4-2400 TDP, W 51 51 60 65 91 Number of PCIe 3.0 lanes 16 16 16 16 16 Integrated GPU HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630 In fact, the main characters are five processors for the first version of LGA1151. It was then that the Pentium “coincided” with the Core i3 in terms of characteristics. But not for everyone — limited support for new command sets (although the same AVX is no longer new) is still preserved. Therefore, it is interesting to compare it with the slowest Core i3 for this platform. Moreover, models of the 6000th family still maintain a steady demand in the secondary market — largely due to the fact that they are the last ones with full official support for Windows 7 (up to the presence of official video drivers). The Core i3-7350K is an aria from another opera: it’s a high-frequency dual-core with unlocked multipliers. Causing the feeling that Intel is doing everything right — but belatedly. Indeed, if it had been the 6350K a year or two earlier, everything would have been completely different. But in 2017, a similar processor at a price at the level of the younger Core i5 or even Ryzen 5 looked very strange. Although it does not interfere with testing — and it is curious to evaluate the actually best processor with the 2C / 4T formula. Recall — now «Pentium-Athlon», but not without nuances.
Intel Pentium Gold G5500 Intel Core i3-8100 Intel Core i3-8350K Intel Core i3-9100F Kernel name Coffee Lake Coffee Lake Coffee Lake Coffee Lake Refresh Production technology 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm Core frequency, GHz 3.8 3.6 4.0 3.6/4.2 Number of cores/threads 2/4 4/4 4/4 4/4 L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 64/64 128/128 128/128 128/128 L2 cache, KB 2×256 4×256 4×256 4×256 L3 cache, MiB 4 6 8 6 RAM 2×DDR4-2400 2×DDR4-2400 2×DDR4-2400 2×DDR4-2400 TDP, W 54 65 91 65 Number of PCIe 3. 0 lanes 16 16 16 16 Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630 no A trio of models for the second version of LGA1151 — where only Pentium remained dual-core. Instead of the Core i3-8350K, the 9350K would be more suitable for us, but the first one was at hand, and the second one would have to be looked for specially. And for a qualitative assessment — and that’s enough.
Athlon 3000G AMD Ryzen 3 2200G AMD Ryzen 5 1400 AMD Ryzen 5 2400G AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Kernel name Raven Ridge Raven Ridge Summit Ridge Raven Ridge Picasso Production technology 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm 12 nm Core frequency, GHz 3. 5 3.5/3.7 3.2/3.4 3.6/3.9 3.7/4.2 Number of cores/threads 2/4 4/4 4/8 4/8 4/8 L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 128/64 256/128 256/128 256/128 256/128 L2 cache, KB 2×512 4×512 4×512 4×512 4×512 L3 cache, MiB 4 4 8 4 4 RAM 2×DDR4-2667 2×DDR4-2933 2×DDR4-2666 2×DDR4-2933 2×DDR4-2933 TDP, W 35 65 65 65 65 Number of PCIe 3.0 lanes 4 12 20 12 12 Integrated GPU Vega 3 Vega 8 no Vega 11 Vega 11 A motley group of AMD processors — also five models. We have not tested quad-core Athlons yet, but there is no great need — their processor part is the same as the quad-core Ryzen 3 of the first generations. Here is the graphics — still the same Vega 3 as in other Athlons, so Ryzen is preferable without a discrete graphics card. And Ryzen 5 is better right away. There will be three of them: 3400G has already been tested before, 2400G was added for the company, and 1400 is simply the junior desktop Ryzen 5. At one time it competed with the Core i5-6400/7400, and then with the older Core i3 of the eighth and ninth generation, so today it will have to be in place.
Other environments traditional: AMD Radeon Vega 56 graphics card, SATA SSD and 16 GB DDR4 memory, maximum frequency according to specifications.
Test Method
Methodology for testing computer systems of the 2020 sample
The testing methodology is described in detail in a separate article, and the results of all tests are available in a separate table in Microsoft Excel format. Directly in the articles, we use the processed results: normalized with respect to the reference system (Intel Core i5-9600K with 16 GB of memory, AMD Radeon Vega 56 graphics card and SATA SSD) and grouped by computer application. Accordingly, on all diagrams related to applications, dimensionless points, so here “more is better” everywhere. And starting from this year, we are finally transferring game tests to an optional status (the reasons for which are discussed in detail in the description of the test methodology), so that only specialized materials will be available for them. In the main lineup there are only a couple of «processor-dependent» games in low resolution and medium quality — synthetic, of course, but conditions close to reality for testing processors are not suitable, since nothing depends on them in such conditions.
iXBT Application Benchmark 2020
All Intel processors run four threads, but it’s one thing to do it with four cores, and another with two with Hyper-Threading. The result is visible to the naked eye. It is also clear that after the Core i3 upgrade, SMT support has become a weak help for Ryzen 5 — just compensating for the lag in the microarchitecture. And you can also pay attention to how even the advantage in clock frequency still does not allow the Pentium to catch up with the Core i3-6100. The reason is stated above. And, perhaps, in vain, Intel is still indulging in this — it was justified only in 2017.
The picture is almost the same — only here the Ryzen 5 2400G / 3400G are at least steadily ahead of «purely quad-core» Intel processors, but the 1400 was still «hanging out» at their level — but in 2017 it was quite forgivable.
We have repeatedly noted that other things being equal, AMD processors up to Zen2 inclusive are slower than Skylake in these tasks. This is all the more true for the original Zen — however, the tactic of throwing cores three or four years ago worked fine. At a minimum, providing parity of 1400 with 6400/7400 — and at a lower level, AMD processors looked better at all.
Unlike photo processing, where is difficult to flash with nuclei — not too much and you need a large number of them. Therefore, even the older dual-core Intel models once looked fine — but not the Pentium. Reducing the price of four cores by converting the old Core i5 to the new Core i3 completely consolidated Intel’s leadership. True, only in such a private group. And both manufacturers are now not considering such a level of performance for new processors as something interesting, having “moved up” both Ryzen 3 and Core i3. And to compete with the Pentium, quad-core Athlons are enough.
The best agitation for multithreading: no matter what, the main thing is more. As expected — simple integer code that breaks perfectly into any reasonable number of threads. The only thing that darkens the idyll a little is that four old single-threaded AMD cores are not much better (and not always better) than two dual-threaded ones from Intel. But, since the company is already positioning this as a competitor not like Pentium, and sometimes Celeron, it’s okay.
As well as in this case, a small lag (where it exists at all) can be neglected in practice. For its time, the performance was sufficient, later new models appeared. Perhaps a slightly faster and sharper «devaluation» of the APU would not hurt — but a specific choice was still always made according to the totality of characteristics, and not for any specific task.
Especially since they are different. Although, in general, it still turns out that the quad-core Ryzen 5 already and two or three years ago became competitors only to the Core i3. And now we remember that just then AMD began to rely on six-core models in almost all segments, except for the budget one. Formulas 4C/4T and 4C/8T remained only in APU and some OEM models. But APUs were promoted in many ways as a universal integrated solution — primarily due to a “good” GPU, and not some outstanding processor performance.
In general, you can already start forgetting about the dual-core Skylake (not to mention the earlier processors). In the Pentium form, they continue their life — but in those segments where it is generally not customary to think too much about performance. All the other heroes of yesterday who took part in today’s testing will still live — if they have already been bought and are satisfied for now. But nothing more — the owners of the Core i5 at the beginning of the decade for several years could afford to grumble about the fact that there is nothing to change their processors for, because manufacturers do not understand what they are doing. Those who took similar (albeit one and a half times faster) models at the “depletion” did not have time for this. Competition unfolded, and … In the segment of top solutions, this increased both performance and prices. But lower — productivity grew, but prices fell. If in the first quarter of 2017 Intel could afford to set the recommended price of $242 for the Core i5-7600K, then in the second quarter of 2019th it turned into about Core i3-9100 — already for $122. And for two and a half hundred completely different processors began to be sold. Actually, the Ryzen 5 1400 at the time of the announcement «cost» $169 (and it was quite justified) — just six months later, you had to think three times before choosing its Core i3-8100 for $117. Whether this is good or bad is a philosophical question. For new buyers — has fallen in price , those who had time to buy something earlier could develop complexes 🙂 Although not necessarily, of course — users of various Core 2 Quad and the first Phenom still roam the expanses of the network in places — and (seemingly) don’t suffer much.
Power Consumption and Energy Efficiency
That’s what you can’t take away from the Intel processors of that time — the appetites were very modest. The subsequent race for performance in this regard spoiled everything — the architectures and the technical process remained the same. So now it remains only to shed a tear, looking at the Core i5-7400 with Athlon-level power consumption.
So everything was very good with energy efficiency, which in 2017-2018 was considered as one of the key advantages. Now already of interest only from a research point of view — the struggle has been going on for a long time on other floors of and between completely different processors. Modern AMD solutions have improved significantly since then, Intel did not succeed — with all the consequences.
Games
As already mentioned in the description of the methodology, it makes no sense to keep the «classic approach» to testing gaming performance — since video cards have long been determining not only it, but also significantly affect the cost of the system, you need to «dance» exclusively from them. And from the games themselves — too: in modern conditions, fixing a game set for a long time does not make sense, since literally everything can change with the next update. But we will carry out a brief test in (albeit) relatively synthetic conditions — using a couple of games in the «processor-dependent» mode.
There are no new discoveries — this is another key advantage of the Intel in those years: as it turned out, the number of cores can not compensate for their «quality» in all applications. Now games have already begun to appear that are “cramped” on any quad-core processor. True, this is usually observed only in a pair with a top-end video card (which will almost never be in such a system), and just only with “lightweight” settings. If at least one point is not met, then on a modern Pentium we are guaranteed to get a «emphasis» on the video card. Not to mention other test participants. But if we talk only about its results, then everything is simple: Core i5 sample of 2017 or Core i3 2018-2019(which is basically the same thing) are better suited for games than the budget Ryzen of the same time. In some cases — and than non-budgetary of that time too. But in a modern high-level gaming computer, neither one, nor the other, nor the third has anything to do. Even if you want to save money, there are new Core i3 and Ryzen 3, which are noticeably better.
Total
After testing the older and younger models of Intel and AMD processors according to the new method, we were “drawn” to medium ones. It is difficult to expect fundamentally new results from them, but sometimes it is just useful to refresh your memory. Moreover, some models have not changed since then — for example, Pentiums remain and will remain the same all this year. Quad-core Athlons have appeared, but they are identical to the “old” quad-core Ryzen 3, so they don’t pull on a new word either. And in general, AMD has not modified the platform too much since then, so «historical» models are sometimes interesting even in quality new purchase . Especially if these are the “older” APUs of the Ryzen 5 family: as we have already seen, in games they do not differ too much from the “new” APUs and / or budget “gags” video cards, therefore, as an entry-level solution, they have the right to life. On the other hand, the popular three years ago «gaming store» configuration of the Core i3-7100 paired with the GeForce GTX 1050 is also not to say worse. In general, the stone age did not end because the stones ran out: just now other processors are already being sold for the same money. But previously purchased processors continue to be used and suit many. Moreover, with the exception of prices, there are no major changes: we looked at how the Core i3 of 2017 works; what is Core i3 2018-2019gg. equivalent to the Core i5 of the first half of 2017 — once again convinced. But after all, the Core i3 of 2020-2021 is, in a first approximation, the Core i7 of the same first half of 2017. Yes, and modern Ryzen 3 — they are the same. The current Core i5 and Ryzen 5 3000 line, in turn, strongly resemble the Core i7 already at the end of 2017, and the Core i7 before the release of Rocket Lake is the Core i9 of 2018. That is, the rate of increase in productivity has increased. But real new products usually come out in the top segment, which is gradually becoming more expensive: Intel’s cheaper solutions are «updated» by renaming more expensive ones.