I34170T: Intel Core i3-4170T Benchmarks — Geekbench

5 июля, 2023

Intel Core i3-4170T Benchmarks — Geekbench

Intel Xeon Processor E5-1680 v3

3.2 GHz (8 cores)

 7709

 
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3

3.0 GHz (8 cores)

 7403

 
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3

2.6 GHz (14 cores)

 7283

 
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3

2.6 GHz (12 cores)

 6784

 
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3

2.3 GHz (16 cores)

 6769

 
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3

2.5 GHz (12 cores)

 6543

 
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3

2.3 GHz (18 cores)

 6408

 
Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3

2.6 GHz (10 cores)

 6153

 
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3

2.0 GHz (14 cores)

 6142

 
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3

2. 6 GHz (10 cores)

 5894

 
Intel Xeon E5-2685 v3

2.6 GHz (12 cores)

 5554

 
Intel Xeon E5-2675 v3

1.8 GHz (16 cores)

 5545

 
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3

2.3 GHz (10 cores)

 5430

 
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3

3.5 GHz (6 cores)

 5174

 
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3

2.4 GHz (8 cores)

 4813

 
Intel Core i7-4790K

4.0 GHz (4 cores)

 4389

 
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3

1.8 GHz (8 cores)

 4261

 
Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3

3.6 GHz (4 cores)

 4027

 
Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

 4020

 
Intel Core i7-4770K

3. 5 GHz (4 cores)

 4005

 
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3

3.7 GHz (4 cores)

 3988

 
Intel Core i7-4771

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

 3873

 
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3

3.6 GHz (4 cores)

 3836

 
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

 3824

 
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

 3803

 
Intel Core i7-4790

3.6 GHz (4 cores)

 3798

 
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

 3788

 
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

3.4 GHz (4 cores)

 3782

 
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3

3.4 GHz (4 cores)

 3765

 
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3

3. 4 GHz (4 cores)

 3707

 
Intel Core i7-4940MX

3.1 GHz (4 cores)

 3693

 
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3

3.3 GHz (4 cores)

 3668

 
Intel Core i7-4770

3.4 GHz (4 cores)

 3658

 
Intel Xeon E3-1281 v3

3.7 GHz (4 cores)

 3646

 
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

 3645

 
Intel Core i7-4790S

3.2 GHz (4 cores)

 3613

 
Intel Core i5-4690K

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

 3606

 
Intel Core i7-4980HQ

2.8 GHz (4 cores)

 3589

 
Intel Core i7-4770S

3.1 GHz (4 cores)

 3546

 
Intel Core i5-4670K

3.4 GHz (4 cores)

 3485

 
Intel Core i7-4930MX

3. 0 GHz (4 cores)

 3430

 
Intel Core i7-4870HQ

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

 3412

 
Intel Core i5-4690S

3.2 GHz (4 cores)

 3374

 
Intel Xeon E3-1275L v3

2.7 GHz (4 cores)

 3331

 
Intel Core i7-4910MQ

2.9 GHz (4 cores)

 3279

 
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

 3273

 
Intel Core i7-4790T

2.7 GHz (4 cores)

 3269

 
Intel Xeon E3-1268L v3

2.3 GHz (4 cores)

 3250

 
Intel Core i5-4690

3.5 GHz (4 cores)

 3236

 
Intel Core i7-4770HQ

2.2 GHz (4 cores)

 3230

 
Intel Core i5-4670S

3. 1 GHz (4 cores)

 3190

 
Intel Core i5-4670

3.4 GHz (4 cores)

 3182

 
Intel Core i5-4590

3.3 GHz (4 cores)

 3117

 
Intel Core i7-4710MQ

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

 3116

 
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3

3.2 GHz (4 cores)

 3097

 
Intel Core i7-4810MQ

2.8 GHz (4 cores)

 3066

 
Intel Core i7-4700HQ

2.4 GHz (4 cores)

 3060

 
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3

3.1 GHz (4 cores)

 3041

 
Intel Core i7-4770T

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

 2992

 
Intel Core i7-4900MQ

2.8 GHz (4 cores)

 2989

 
Intel Core i5-4570

3.2 GHz (4 cores)

 2986

 
Intel Core i7-4720HQ

2. 6 GHz (4 cores)

 2975

 
Intel Core i7-4785T

2.2 GHz (4 cores)

 2974

 
Intel Core i7-4700MQ

2.4 GHz (4 cores)

 2941

 
Intel Core i5-4590S

3.0 GHz (4 cores)

 2905

 
Intel Core i5-4460

3.2 GHz (4 cores)

 2891

 
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3

3.1 GHz (4 cores)

 2875

 
Intel Core i7-4710HQ

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

 2854

 
Intel Core i7-4702HQ

2.2 GHz (4 cores)

 2849

 
Intel Core i5-4570S

2.9 GHz (4 cores)

 2847

 
Intel Core i7-4765T

2.0 GHz (4 cores)

 2840

 
Intel Core i4-4690T

2.5 GHz (4 cores)

 2827

 
Intel Core i7-4800MQ

2. 7 GHz (4 cores)

 2822

 
Intel Core i5-4440

3.1 GHz (4 cores)

 2820

 
Intel Core i7-4702MQ

2.2 GHz (4 cores)

 2806

 
Intel Core i5-4670T

2.3 GHz (4 cores)

 2776

 
Intel Core i5-4430

3.0 GHz (4 cores)

 2730

 
Intel Core i5-4460S

2.9 GHz (4 cores)

 2724

 
Intel Core i5-4430S

2.7 GHz (4 cores)

 2662

 
Intel Core i7-4712HQ

2.3 GHz (4 cores)

 2537

 
Intel Core i7-4712MQ

2.3 GHz (4 cores)

 2510

 
Intel Core i5-4590T

2.0 GHz (4 cores)

 2475

 
Intel Core i3-4370

3.8 GHz (2 cores)

 2388

 
Intel Core i3-4350

3. 6 GHz (2 cores)

 2325

 
Intel Core i3-4360

3.7 GHz (2 cores)

 2285

 
Intel Core i5-4460T

1.9 GHz (4 cores)

 2096

 
Intel Core i3-4330

3.5 GHz (2 cores)

 2066

 
Intel Core i3-4360T

3.2 GHz (2 cores)

 2065

 
Intel Core i3-4170

3.7 GHz (2 cores)

 2056

 
Intel Core i7-4610M

3.0 GHz (2 cores)

 2056

 
Intel Core i5-4308U

2.8 GHz (2 cores)

 2048

 
Intel Core i3-4150

3.5 GHz (2 cores)

 2016

 
Intel Core i5-4570T

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

 1987

 
Intel Core i3-4160

3.6 GHz (2 cores)

 1912

 
Intel Core i7-4600M

2. 9 GHz (2 cores)

 1885

 
Intel Core i3-4130

3.4 GHz (2 cores)

 1873

 
Intel Core i5-4210H

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

 1858

 
Intel Core i3-4170T

3.2 GHz (2 cores)

 1846

 
Intel Xeon E5-2618L v3

2.3 GHz (8 cores)

 1824

 
Intel Core i3-4130T

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

 1801

 
Intel Core i3-4150T

3.0 GHz (2 cores)

 1772

 
Intel Core i5-4210M

2.6 GHz (2 cores)

 1751

 
Intel Core i5-4340M

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

 1733

 
Intel Core i5-4310M

2.7 GHz (2 cores)

 1732

 
Intel Core i3-4160T

3.1 GHz (2 cores)

 1732

 
Intel Core i5-4278U

2. 6 GHz (2 cores)

 1729

 
Intel Core i5-4300M

2.6 GHz (2 cores)

 1715

 
Intel Core i5-4200H

2.8 GHz (2 cores)

 1692

 
Intel Core i5-4200M

2.5 GHz (2 cores)

 1675

 
Intel Core i5-4288U

2.6 GHz (2 cores)

 1632

 
Intel Core i7-4510U

2.0 GHz (2 cores)

 1595

 
Intel Core i5-4258U

2.4 GHz (2 cores)

 1584

 
Intel Core i7-4558U

2.8 GHz (2 cores)

 1546

 
Intel Core i3-4100M

2.5 GHz (2 cores)

 1532

 
Intel Core i7-4600U

2.1 GHz (2 cores)

 1525

 
Intel Core i5-4260U

1.4 GHz (2 cores)

 1491

 
Intel Core i5-4300U

1. 9 GHz (2 cores)

 1472

 
Intel Core i5-4310U

2.0 GHz (2 cores)

 1470

 
Intel Core i5-4250U

1.3 GHz (2 cores)

 1462

 
Intel Core i7-4650U

1.7 GHz (2 cores)

 1425

 
Intel Core i3-4000M

2.4 GHz (2 cores)

 1391

 
Intel Core i7-4500U

1.8 GHz (2 cores)

 1390

 
Intel Core i5-4210U

1.7 GHz (2 cores)

 1390

 
Intel Core i5-4200U

1.6 GHz (2 cores)

 1353

 
Intel Core i7-4578U

3.0 GHz (2 cores)

 1320

 
Intel Core i3-4025U

1.9 GHz (2 cores)

 1181

 
Intel Core i3-4030U

1.9 GHz (2 cores)

 1149

 
Intel Pentium G3258

3. 2 GHz (2 cores)

 1086

 
Intel Core i3-4010U

1.7 GHz (2 cores)

 1075

 
Intel Pentium G3440

3.3 GHz (2 cores)

 1018

 
Intel Core i3-4005U

1.7 GHz (2 cores)

 1015

 
Intel Pentium G3260

3.3 GHz (2 cores)

 996

 
Intel Core i5-4300Y

1.6 GHz (2 cores)

 995

 
Intel Pentium G3250

3.2 GHz (2 cores)

 980

 
Intel Pentium G3240

3.1 GHz (2 cores)

 962

 
Intel Pentium G3450

3.4 GHz (2 cores)

 957

 
Intel Core i5-4202Y

1.6 GHz (2 cores)

 946

 
Intel Celeron G1850

2.9 GHz (2 cores)

 941

 
Intel Pentium G3220

3. 0 GHz (2 cores)

 905

 
Intel Pentium G3250T

2.8 GHz (2 cores)

 901

 
Intel Pentium G3420

3.2 GHz (2 cores)

 880

 
Intel Core i3-4020Y

1.5 GHz (2 cores)

 870

 
Intel Celeron G1840

2.8 GHz (2 cores)

 861

 
Intel Core i5-4210Y

1.5 GHz (2 cores)

 848

 
Intel Pentium G3240T

2.7 GHz (2 cores)

 848

 
Intel Celeron G1820

2.7 GHz (2 cores)

 838

 
Intel Pentium G3220T

2.6 GHz (2 cores)

 819

 
Intel Pentium 3560M

2.4 GHz (2 cores)

 818

 
Intel Pentium 3556U

1.7 GHz (2 cores)

 584

 
Intel Celeron 2955U

1. 4 GHz (2 cores)

 412

 

Core i3-4170T [in 3 benchmarks]

Summary

Intel started Core i3-4170T sales 1 January 2015. This is desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems.

Compatibility-wise, this is FCLGA1150 processor with a TDP of 35 Watt. It supports DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at


2.53%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 9654.

EPYC9654

Compare

General info


Core i3-4170T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance ranking 1617
Value for money 1.20
Market segment Desktop processor
Release date 1 January 2015 (8 years old)
Current price $51 of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Technical specs


Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores 2 (Dual-core)
Threads 4
Base clock speed 3.2 GHz of 4.7 (FX-9590)
L3 cache 3 MB of 768 (EPYC 7373X)
Chip lithography 22 nm of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS)
Maximum core temperature 66 °C of 110 (Atom x7-E3950)
64 bit support +
Windows 11 compatibility —
Unlocked multiplier —

Compatibility


Information on Core i3-4170T compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technologies and extensions


Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4170T. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI +
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) +
Turbo Boost Technology —
Hyper-Threading Technology +
TSX —
Idle States +
Thermal Monitoring +
SIPP —

Security technologies


Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT —
EDB +
Secure Key +

Virtualization technologies


Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

VT-d —
VT-x +
EPT +

Memory specs


Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Core i3-4170T’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory types DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600 of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS)
Maximum memory size 32 GB of 786 (Xeon E5-2670 v3)
Max memory channels 2 of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)
Maximum memory bandwidth 25. 6 GB/s of 460.8 (EPYC 9124)
ECC memory support +

Graphics specifications


General parameters of a GPU integrated into Core i3-4170T.

Integrated graphics card Intel HD Graphics 4400
Max video memory 2 GB
Quick Sync Video +
Clear Video HD +
Graphics max frequency 1.15 GHz
InTru 3D +

Graphics interfaces


Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4170T’s integrated GPU.

Number of displays supported 3
eDP +
DisplayPort +
HDMI +
DVI +
VGA +

Graphics image quality


Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4170T’s integrated GPU, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 4096×2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP 3840×2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort 3840×2160@60Hz
Max resolution over VGA 1920×1200@60Hz

Graphics API support


APIs supported by Core i3-4170T’s integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX 11.1/12
OpenGL 4.3

Peripherals


Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

PCIe version Up to 3.0 of 5 (Core i9-12900K)
PCI Express lanes 16 of 128 (EPYC 7551P)

Benchmark performance


Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Core i3-4170T. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


i3-4170T
2.53

    Passmark

    Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

    Benchmark coverage: 68%


    i3-4170T
    3194

    GeekBench 5 Single-Core

    GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

    Benchmark coverage: 37%


    i3-4170T
    966

    GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

    GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

    Benchmark coverage: 37%


    i3-4170T
    1846

    Relative perfomance


    Overall Core i3-4170T performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.


    Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
    100


    Intel Core i7-950
    100


    AMD A10-6800K
    100


    Intel Core i3-4170T
    100


    AMD A10-7800
    100


    AMD PRO A12-9800E
    99. 6


    AMD A8-7670K
    99.6

    AMD equivalent


    According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Core i3-4170T is A10-6800K, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 3 positions in our ranking.

    A106800K

    Compare


    Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i3-4170T:


    AMD A10-7700K
    100.4


    AMD A10-7800
    100


    AMD A10-6800K
    100


    Intel Core i3-4170T
    100


    AMD PRO A12-9800E
    99.6


    AMD A8-7670K
    99.6


    AMD A10-6700
    98.42

    Similar processors

    Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

    A107800

    Compare

    A106800K

    Compare

    Core i54570T

    Compare

    A87670K

    Compare



    A10
    7700K




    PRO A12
    9800E

    Recommended GPUs

    People consider these graphics cards to be good for Core i3-4170T, according to our PC configuration statistics.



    HD
    Graphics 4400

    15.7%



    GeForce GTX
    750 Ti

    13.6%



    GeForce
    840M

    11.4%



    Radeon R7
    M360

    5%



    GeForce GTX
    1050 Ti

    4. 3%



    GeForce GT
    710

    3.6%



    Radeon RX
    550

    3.6%



    GeForce GTX
    860M

    2.1%



    Radeon R5
    M330

    2.1%



    GeForce GTX
    560 Ti

    2.1%

    These are the fastest graphics cards for Core i3-4170T in our user configuration statistics.

    There is a total of 140 configurations based on Core i3-4170T in our database.



    GeForce RTX
    4090

    0.7% (1/140)



    GeForce RTX
    3090 Ti

    0.7% (1/140)



    GeForce RTX
    3080 Ti

    0. 7% (1/140)



    GeForce RTX
    3080

    0.7% (1/140)



    GeForce RTX
    3060 Ti

    0.7% (1/140)



    GeForce RTX
    2070

    0.7% (1/140)



    GeForce GTX
    1060 3 GB

    0.7% (1/140)



    Radeon RX
    590

    0.7% (1/140)



    Radeon RX
    5500

    0.7% (1/140)



    GeForce GTX
    1650

    0.7% (1/140)

    User ratings: view and submit


    Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.

    Questions and comments


    Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4170T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

    Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

    Intel Core i3-4170T, i3-4370T and i3-4170 processors

    We recently tested Intel Core i3 processors under LGA1150, and this family has not become faster since then, but we need to return to the topic again for two reasons. Firstly, updating the testing methodology entails the inevitability of a new stage of collecting information — the old results are no longer relevant. Secondly, the «tops» of the sub-line with a TDP of 35 W fell into our hands, testing of which is interesting in itself. Especially if you remember that last time we managed to get acquainted with similar Pentiums, and not with similar ones either.

    Test bench configuration

    9 0007

    9000 8 2/4

    Processor Intel Pentium G3470 Intel Core i3-4170T Intel Core i3-4370T Intel Core i3-4170
    Core name Haswell Haswell Haswell Haswell
    Technology 22 nm 22 nm 22 nm 22 nm
    Core frequency, GHz 9No. of cores/threads 2/2 2/4 2/4
    L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 8

    L2 cache, KB 2×256 2×256 2×256 2×256
    L3 Cache, MiB 3 3 4 9memory 2×DDR3-1600
    TDP, W 53 35 35 53
    Graphics HDG HDG 4400 HDG 4400
    Qty EU 10 20 20 20
    Frequency std/max, MHz 350/1100 200/1150 200/1150 350/1150
    Price N/A T-12515778 T-12515785 T -12515768

    The Core i3-4370 continues to be the top of the line “in general”, which we have already tested using the old method, so we will not return to it for now. But the younger “regular” and energy-efficient sub-series (traditionally differing from “regular” ones for processors without Turbo Boost support only in frequency) were updated this spring — the older models in them were 4170, 4170T and 4370T, respectively. Note that, as in the case of the Pentium, the clock speeds of the “T” family have almost reached the values ​​that were once standard for “regular” models, but here the situation is slightly aggravated by the fact that the Core i3 are somewhat more diverse in terms of video core and cache capacity. third level memory. But how this all affects performance — only tests can show. And we cannot do without comparisons with the older Pentium.

    Processor AMD A10-7800
    Core name Kaveri
    Technology 28 nm
    Core clock std/max, GHz 3.5/3 ,9
    Number of cores (modules)/threads 2/4
    L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 192/64
    L2 cache, KB 2×2048
    L3 cache, MiB —
    RAM 2×DDR3-2133
    TDP, W 65/45
    Graphics Radeon R7
    Number of GPUs 512
    Frequency std/max, MHz 720
    Price $154(66), T-10674780 9 0009

    But not only with him — recently we got to know each other closely with the AMD A10 line, of which the A10-7800 is the most suitable for today’s testing. Fortunately, its minimum heat pack is somewhere between the “T” family and conventional models under the LGA1150, and the “standard” one is a little higher. But the graphics core is much more powerful — nothing has changed here yet, and it is unlikely that it will change in the desktop segment on these platforms.

    As for other test conditions, they were equal, but not the same: all processors were tested exclusively using integrated graphics, and the frequency of RAM was the maximum supported by the specifications. But its volume (8 GB) and system drive (Toshiba THNSNh356GMCT, 256 GB) were the same for all subjects.

    Test methodology

    To evaluate performance, we used our performance measurement methodology using iXBT Application Benchmark 2015 and iXBT Game Benchmark 2015. All test results in the first benchmark were normalized relative to the results of the reference system, which this year will be the same for laptops , and for all other computers, which is designed to make it easier for readers to compare and choose:

    Processor Intel Core i5-3317U
    Chipset Intel HM77 Express
    Memory 90 009

    		4 GB DDR3-1600 (Dual Channel)
    Graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000
    Drive SSD 128 GB Crucial M4-CT128M4SSD1
    Operating system Windows 8 (64-bit)
    Intel graphics driver version 9. 18.10.3186

    iXBT Application Benchmark 2015

    Both applications included in the group «load» all processor cores, and the second one also significantly depends on the performance of the GPU, so Pentium (and Celer) are obvious outsiders here on) , but above — not everything is clear. The best AMD processor with a TDP of 45 W is already steadily behind the Core i3-«T», and the situation can only be corrected by expanding the heat pack; read — milder operating conditions. However, not too much, therefore, although the A10-7800 is faster here than the “T” family, it already lags behind the older regular Core i3, although the heat pack of the latter is still lower. And the most interesting thing from the point of view of intracompany competition is that the energy-efficient Core i3 is much faster than the «regular» Pentium.

    Fewer requirements for the graphics core, worse multithreading support, so it’s hard for everyone to compete even with Pentium. But «worse» does not mean «missing», so the Core i3 is still faster. It is curious that in the case of the A10, «narrowing» the heat pack by 20 W leads to a decrease in performance by 12%, and for the Core i3 (if we compare 4170 and 4170T) — by 14%, but the heat pack also decreases not by 20, but by 18 W. In general, Kaveri in terms of scaling in terms of heat pack is in no way inferior (or even superior) even to Haswell — for which it was created. The only pity, of course, is that the absolute performance indicators in his case are lower.

    Updating the Photoshop version and improving the test, as well as adding a multi-threaded test method in ACDSee did not benefit the Pentium — if earlier these processors were at the level of A8 / A10 and lost to Core i3 at comparable frequencies of 30 percent, now they are already lagging behind the latter starts approaching the doubling. Another wake up call — “just” two cores are becoming insufficient in an increasing number of tasks. You need multithreading, which both Intel and AMD have, but not in all processors. Well, in the end, this translates into a kind of triumph for economical Core i3 models, so a compact computer on which you can work with graphics is already quite possible.

    Two groups (more precisely, two applications) that have not been processed since the time of the total domination of dual-core models such as Core 2 Duo and others like them, because everything is fast anyway. It is clear that in such conditions today Pentiums look the most profitable, while other processors either do not give anything at all (they only cost more), or generally work much slower regardless of the price — the first option is true for the same architecture, the second for .. .other 🙂

    Despite the fact that it’s hard to blame this program for poor multithreading support, the Pentium G3470 looks good at first glance. But only in the first place — only a high clock frequency “rescues” it, which, nevertheless, does not allow it to overtake even energy-efficient Core i3 models, although it makes it possible to compete with dual-module AMD processors. Well, then — more.

    Packing data is a multi-threaded operation with all the consequences. And if intercompany competition is quite possible for the Pentium, it loses heavily to its higher-class counterparts. Note — even at a lower clock frequency of the latter.

    When actively working with files, the platform generally comes out on top, and within one platform, as we see, if anything can be required from the processor, it is a couple of cores, but the maximum frequency .

    The overall result is simple — the Core i3 is better than the Pentium even at a lower frequency. Moreover, today the Core i3 frequency is low only with a limited heat pack. Such i3s easily overtake both Pentium and AMD processors in the overall standings. Well, if we consider the models of «regular» families, the clock frequencies are higher there, so the gap increases to about 20%. Somewhere this is just what can be considered a net gain from Hyper-Threading on average — a considerable amount of software is still able to effectively use only a couple of cores, which limits the usefulness of this technology. On the other hand, with its active use and even the use of the GPU (which is twice as powerful in the Core i3 as in the Pentium), you can get a twofold difference in performance — we also saw this above.

    Gaming applications

    For obvious reasons, for computer systems of this level, we limit ourselves to the minimum quality mode, not only in «full» resolution, but also with its reduction to 1366×768. Despite the fact that the integrated graphics of desktop processors of the A10 line is the best on the market, even it is not yet able to satisfy the demanding gamer in terms of picture quality. This is especially true for Intel processors, where graphics are even weaker in most models. But if you voluntarily agree to the «minimal wages», you can save a lot. We already know this well from previous tests, but today we’ll just see how our updated gaming set works on these processors.

    If you can play FullHD on the A10, then you can only play on the Core i3, and even lowering the resolution does not save the Pentium: as expected. The only interesting thing is that the 4170 is slower than the 4370T, but this is understandable: the heat pack is set for the entire processor, so when the heat emission from the processor cores is reduced (by lowering their frequency), the graphics get more (and Turbo Boost is supported by the GPU of all processors Intel — regardless of the line). We will see this more than once, but we will not dwell on this moment in detail.

    «Tanchiki» is an ideal game for Intel processors, but, nevertheless, the weakness of the graphics part makes them lag behind AMD products in FHD. But not too much — even a Pentium is enough for the game, not to mention higher-level models.

    Another example of a very processor dependent game, where, nevertheless, the weakness of HD Graphics is still felt. Unfortunately, we can’t see the Pentium results here, since the benchmark (not a game!) requires mandatory support for AVX, but in general everything is clear — AMD solutions provide much more gaming comfort than Core i3.

    These games can be played on the A10 at least with a lower resolution, but with Intel processors everything is worse — in HD their performance is only at the level of AMD in FHD.

    Clinical case — so far no integrated graphics can handle this game.

    Initially, everything is suitable for the Tomb Raider, but the question is quality — on the A10, even in FHD, there is some margin for improving the picture, but on the Core i3 in FHD it is still impossible to play at all. On the Pentium, however, things are even worse, but this is not the case when it is worth choosing between these two families.

    And again the situation when you can play at least somehow on A10, but not at all on HDG.

    Unlike Pentium, Core i3 «pulls out» at least HD-resolution, which is lost against the background of the fact that AMD processors have already «taken» FHD in principle.

    Total

    In principle, we are already familiar with Core i3 processors for LGA1150, so today’s testing was necessary only because the methodology was updated. But not the results 🙂 Only models with a reduced heat pack were new for us, but their frequencies have almost reached the lower representatives of the «regular» series — and, consequently, the performance too. And if we compare it with the Core i3 of previous families, it turns out that the older models of the latter are already giving in to new economical processors. But there is nothing new here — both AMD and Intel have long been betting on efficiency, since mobile solutions have already occupied more than half of the market. Moreover, nothing has changed in the distribution of “specialization” of processors for a long time: Intel solutions are better suited for general-purpose tasks, and AMD processors are for those gamers who cannot or do not want to use a discrete graphics card. However, for games, both of them are only conditionally suitable, but the question of comparing gaming (at least budget) systems is a separate one. We will start working on them a little later.

    Price guide

    June 12, 2015

    News

    • turned out to be problematic. The company has suspended deliveries of some models of Xeon Sapphire Rapids

      June 29, 2023

    • Intel sneaked up on Nvidia where they didn’t expect it. AI accelerator Intel Gaudi2 can compete with Nvidia A100 and h200

      June 28, 2023

    • AMD has unveiled the world’s largest adaptive FPGA-based single-chip system. Versal Premium VP1902 for emulation and prototyping

      June 27, 2023

    News section >

    Core i3-4170T [in 3 benchmarks]

    Description

    Intel started Core i3-4170T sales on January 1, 2015. This is a desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems.

    In terms of compatibility, this is an FCLGA1150 socket processor with a TDP of 35W. It supports DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600 memory.

    It provides poor benchmark performance at

    2.53%

    from the leader AMD EPYC 9654

    Information about the type (for desktops or laptops) and architecture of the Core i3-4170T, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

    90 008 1.20

    9 0007

    Performance ranking 1617
    Value for money
    Type Desktop
    Release date January 1, 2015 (8 years ago)
    Price now 51$ out of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

    Value for money

    To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors .

    Features

    Core i3-4170T quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.

    9000 8 Process
    Core 2
    Thread 4
    Base frequency 3.20 GHz of 4.7 (FX-9590)
    L3 Cache 3MB of 768 (EPYC 7373X)
    22 nm out of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS)
    Max Core Temp 66°C out of 110 7-E3950)
    Support 64 bit +
    Windows 11 compatible —
    Free multiplier —

    Compatible

    Information on Core i3-4170T compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.

    Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.

    Max. number of processors per configuration 1 of 8 (Opteron 842)
    Socket FCLGA1150 90 433
    TDP 35 W of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

    Technology and additional instructions

    Technology solutions supported by the Core i3-4170T and additional instruction sets are listed here. This information is needed if the processor is required to support specific technologies.

    Extended instructions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
    AES -NI +
    Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) +
    Turbo Boost Technology 09
    Hyper-Threading Technology +
    8 Idle States +
    SIPP —

    Safety Technology

    Technologies built into the Core i3-4170T that enhance system security, such as hack protection.

    TXT —
    EDB + 90 433
    Secure Key virtualization technologies

    Technologies supported by Core i3-4170T that speed up virtual machines are listed.

    VT-d —
    VT-x + +

    Memory support

    Types, maximum size and channels of RAM supported by Core i3-4170T. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.

    9 0175

    Integrated video — specifications

    General parameters of the integrated video card in Core i3-4170T.

    RAM types DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600 of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS)
    Allowable memory 32 GB of 786 (Xeon E5-2670 v3)
    Number of memory channels 2 of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)
    Memory bandwidth 25. 6 Gb/s of 460.8 (EPYC 9124)
    ECC support +

    900 08 2 GB

    Video core Intel HD Graphics 4400
    Video memory
    Quick Sync Video +
    Clear Video HD +
    Max GPU Clock 1.15 GHz
    InTru 3D +

    Integrated video interfaces

    Interfaces and connections supported by the integrated graphics card in the Core i3-4170T.

    Maximum number of monitors 3
    eDP +
    HDMI 900 +
    09

    		+
    DVI 0009

    		+

    Integrated video — image quality

    The resolution available for the graphics card built into the Core i3-4170T, including through various interfaces.

    Maximum resolution via HDMI 1.4 4096×2304@24Hz
    Maximum resolution via eDP 3840×2160@60Hz
    Maximum resolution via DisplayPort 3840×2160@60Hz
    Maximum resolution via VGA 1920×1 200@60Hz

    Integrated video — API support

    APIs supported by the Core i3-4170T graphics card, including their versions.

    DirectX 11.1/12
    OpenGL 4.3

    Peripherals

    Core i3-4170T supported peripherals and how to connect them.

    PCI Express revision to 3.0 of 5 (Core i9-12900K)
    Number of PCI-Express lanes 16 out of 128 (EPYC 7551P)

    Benchmark tests

    These are the results of the Core i3-4170T performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.

    Overall performance in tests

    This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

    i3-4170T
    2.53