I38100 vs i58400: Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-8400

Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5+8400: What is the difference?

53points

Intel Core i3-8100

53points

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

64 facts in comparison

Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i5+8400

Why is Intel Core i3-8100 better than Intel Core i5+8400?

  • Supports ECC memory?
  • 8 higher clock multiplier?
    36vs28

Why is Intel Core i5+8400 better than Intel Core i3-8100?

  • 16.67% faster CPU speed?
    6 x 2.8GHzvs4 x 3.6GHz
  • 266MHz higher ram speed?
    2666MHzvs2400MHz
  • 2 more CPU threads?
    6vs4
  • 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
    1.5MBvs1MB
  • 42.8% higher PassMark result?
    11685vs8183
  • 3MB bigger L3 cache?
    9MBvs6MB
  • 128KB bigger L1 cache?
    384KBvs256KB
  • 3. 2GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    41.6GB/svs38.4GB/s

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core M3-8100Y

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i3-8100T

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i3-9100F

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Pentium Gold G5400

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Celeron 6305

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i5-8400T

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i3-10105

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i7-7700

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i3-8100

vs

Intel Core i3-10100

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Intel Core i3-8100

0 User reviews

Intel Core i3-8100

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

Intel Core i5+8400

1 User reviews

Intel Core i5+8400

10.0/10

1 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

1 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

1 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

1 votes

Energy efficiency

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

4 x 3.6GHz

6 x 2.8GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Core i3-8100

✖Intel Core i5+8400

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1.5MB/core

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2400MHz

2666MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

38.4GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✖Intel Core i5+8400

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9. bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5+8400

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5+8400

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5+8400

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5+8400

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Core i3-8100

✔Intel Core i5+8400

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i3-8100

✖Intel Core i5+8400

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-8100)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i5 8400 vs i3 8100: performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i5 8400

Intel Core i3 8100

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2. 8 GHz Intel Core i5 8400 with 6-cores against the 3.6 GHz i3 8100 with 4-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i5 8400

55

Core i3 8100

51

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i5 8400

28

Core i3 8100

18

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i5 8400

44

Core i3 8100

44

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i5 8400

42

Core i3 8100

37

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 8100 and 8400

Advantages of Intel Core i5 8400

  • Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666 RAM
  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • Has 3 MB larger L3 cache size
  • Around 4. 1 GB/s (11%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i5 8400
+10%

1023

Core i3 8100

927

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8400
+63%

5823

Core i3 8100

3571

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i5 8400
+8%

2392

Core i3 8100

2222

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8400
+49%

9130

Core i3 8100

6129

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i5 8400
+8%

1026

Core i3 8100

946

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8400
+39%

4604

Core i3 8100

3314

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 8400 and i3 8100

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released October 5, 2017 October 5, 2017
Type Desktop Desktop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Model number i5-8400 i3-8100
Socket LGA-1151 LGA-1151
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630

Performance

Cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Base Frequency 2. 8 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency 4 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 28x 28x
Bus Bandwidth 8 GT/s 8 GT/s
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) 256K (per core)
L3 Cache 9MB (shared) 6MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No
Fabrication process 14 nm 14 nm
TDP 65 W 65 W
Max. temperature 100°C 100°C
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Base Clock 350 MHz 350 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1050 MHz 1100 MHz
Shading Units 192 192
TMUs 24 24
ROPs 3 3
Execution Units 24 24
TGP 15 W 15 W
Max. Resolution 4096×2304 — 60 Hz 4096×2304 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i5 8400

0.38 TFLOPS

Core i3 8100

0.38 TFLOPS

Memory support

Memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-2400
Memory Size 128 GB 64 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 37.5 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes
Official site Intel Core i5 8400 official page Intel Core i3 8100 official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 16
Extended instructions SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i5 8400

14 (70%)

Core i3 8100

6 (30%)

Total votes: 20

Сompetitors

1.
Core i5 12400 and Core i5 8400

2.
Core i5 12400F and Core i5 8400

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i3 8100 or i5 8400?

Name

Message

Promotion

i3-8100 vs i5-8400 — Red Dead Redemption 2 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz

Red Dead Redemption 2

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz


i3-8100
i5-8400

Multi-Thread Performance

8094 Pts

11694 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2102 Pts

2334 Pts

Red Dead Redemption 2

i3-8100 vs i5-8400 in Red Dead Redemption 2 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-8100
i5-8400


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

36. 9 FPS

1080p

39.3 FPS

1440p

30.1 FPS

1440p

32.1 FPS

2160p

19.1 FPS

2160p

20.4 FPS

w1440p

26.3 FPS

w1440p

28.1 FPS

High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

67.3 FPS

1080p

71.1 FPS

1440p

56.5 FPS

1440p

59.7 FPS

2160p

38.0 FPS

2160p

40.3 FPS

w1440p

50.2 FPS

w1440p

53.2 FPS

Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

97. 8 FPS

1080p

102.9 FPS

1440p

82.8 FPS

1440p

87.3 FPS

2160p

56.9 FPS

2160p

60.1 FPS

w1440p

74.1 FPS

w1440p

78.3 FPS

Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

158.7 FPS

1080p

166.5 FPS

1440p

135.5 FPS

1440p

142.5 FPS

2160p

94.7 FPS

2160p

99.8 FPS

w1440p

122.0 FPS

w1440p

128.5 FPS

i3-8100
    i5-8400

      Compare i3-8100 vs i5-8400 specifications

      Share Your Comments 2

      Compare i3-8100 vs i5-8400 in more games

      Elden Ring

      2022

      God of War

      2022

      Overwatch 2

      2022

      Forza Horizon 5

      2021

      Halo Infinite

      2021

      Battlefield 2042

      2021

      Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

      2020

      Microsoft Flight Simulator

      2020

      Valorant

      2020

      Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

      2020

      Death Stranding

      2020

      Marvel’s Avengers

      2020

      Godfall

      2020

      Cyberpunk 2077

      2020

      Apex Legends

      2019

      Anthem

      2019

      Far Cry New Dawn

      2019

      Resident Evil 2

      2019

      Metro Exodus

      2019

      World War Z

      2019

      Gears of War 5

      2019

      F1 2019

      2019

      GreedFall

      2019

      Borderlands 3

      2019

      Call of Duty Modern Warfare

      2019

      Red Dead Redemption 2

      2019

      Need For Speed: Heat

      2019

      Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

      2018

      Battlefield V

      2018

      Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

      2018

      Final Fantasy XV

      2018

      Shadow of the Tomb Raider

      2018

      Forza Horizon 4

      2018

      Fallout 76

      2018

      Hitman 2

      2018

      Just Cause 4

      2018

      Monster Hunter: World

      2018

      Strange Brigade

      2018

      Assassin’s Creed Origins

      2017

      Dawn of War III

      2017

      Ghost Recon Wildlands

      2017

      Destiny 2

      2017

      PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

      2017

      Fortnite Battle Royale

      2017

      Need For Speed: Payback

      2017

      For Honor

      2017

      Project CARS 2

      2017

      Forza Motorsport 7

      2017

      Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

      2016

      Battlefield 1

      2016

      Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

      2016

      Doom

      2016

      F1 2016

      2016

      Total War: Warhammer

      2016

      Overwatch

      2016

      Dishonored 2

      2016

      Grand Theft Auto V

      2015

      Rocket League

      2015

      Need For Speed

      2015

      Project CARS

      2015

      Rainbow Six Siege

      2015

      Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

      2012

      League of Legends

      2009

      Minecraft

      2009

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs.

      Intel Core i5-8400

      Intel Core i3-8100

      The Intel Core i3-8100 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1151-2 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Coffee Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q4/2017

      Intel Core i5-8400

      The Intel Core i5-8400 operates with 6 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 4.00 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1151-2 CPU socket. This version includes 9.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Coffee Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q4/2017

      Intel Core i3-8100

      Intel Core i5-8400

      Compare Detail

      3.60 GHz Frequency 2.80 GHz
      4 Cores 6
      No turbo Turbo (1 Core) 4.00 GHz
      No turbo Turbo (All Cores) 3.80 GHz
      No Hyperthreading No
      No Overclocking No
      normal Core Architecture normal

      Intel UHD Graphics 630

      GPU

      Intel UHD Graphics 630

      1.10 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.15 GHz
      14 nm Technology 14 nm
      1.10 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.15 GHz
      12 DirectX Version 12
      3 Max. displays 3
      DDR4-2400 Memory DDR4-2666
      2 Memory channels 2
      Max memory
      Yes ECC No
      L2 Cache
      6. 00 MB L3 Cache 9.00 MB
      3.0 PCIe version 3.0
      16 PCIe lanes 16
      14 nm Technology 14 nm
      LGA 1151-2 Socket LGA 1151-2
      65 W TDP 65 W
      VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
      Q4/2017 Release date Q4/2017

      Show more data

      Show more data

      Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

      Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

      Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

      Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

      Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

      Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

      Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

      Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

      iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

      The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

      Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

      Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

      Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

      Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

      Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

      Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

      Electric Usage Estimate

      Average hours of use per day

      Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

      Power cost, dollar per kWh

      Electric Usage Estimate

      Average hours of use per day

      Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

      Power cost, dollar per kWh

      Intel Core i3-8100 Intel Core i5-8400
      65 W Max TDP 65 W
      NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
      NA Running cost per day NA
      NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
      NA Running cost per year NA

      Popular Comparision

      Comments

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-8400








      Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-8400

      Comparaison des caractéristiques techniques entre les processeurs, avec le Intel Core i3-8100 d’un côté et le Intel Core i5-8400 de l’autre. Le premier est dédié au secteur ordinateur de bureau, il dispose de 4 coeurs, 4 threads, une fréquence maximale de 3,6 GHz. Le second est employé sur le segment ordinateur de bureau, il possède un total de 6 coeurs, 6 threads, sa fréquence turbo s’établit à 4,0 GHz. Le tableau suivant permet aussi de comparer la lithographie, le nombre de transistors (si indiqué), la quantité de mémoire cache, la capacité maximale de mémoire RAM, le type de mémoire accepté, la date de première diffusion, le nombre maximal de lignes PCIe, les valeurs obtenues dans Geekbench 4 et Cinebench R15.

      Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.

      Cette page contient des références aux produits d’un ou de plusieurs de nos annonceurs. Nous pouvons recevoir une compensation lorsque vous cliquez sur des liens vers ces produits. Pour une explication de notre politique publicitaire, veuillez visiter cette page.

      Caractéristiques :

      Processeur

      Intel Core i3-8100

      Intel Core i5-8400
      Marché (principal)

      Ordinateur de bureau

      Ordinateur de bureau
      ISA

      x86-64 (64 bit)

      x86-64 (64 bit)
      Microarchitecture

      Coffee Lake

      Coffee Lake
      Nom de base

      Coffee Lake-S

      Coffee Lake-S
      Famille

      Core i3-8000

      Core i5-8000
      Numéro(s) de pièce, S-Spec

      BX80684I38100,
      BXC80684I38100,
      CM8068403377308,
      SR3N5

      BX80684I58400,
      BXC80684I58400,
      CM8068403358811,
      BOC80684I58400,
      BO80684I58400,
      SR3QT, QNMN

      Date de lancement

      Q4 2017

      Q4 2017
      Lithographie

      14 nm++

      14 nm++
      Cœurs

      4

      6
      Threads

      4

      6
      Fréquence de base

      3,6 GHz

      2,8 GHz
      Fréquence turbo

      4,0 GHz
      Vitesse du bus

      8 GT/s

      8 GT/s
      Mémoire cache

      6 MB

      9 MB
      Capacité mémoire maxi

      64 GB

      64 GB
      Types de mémoire

      DDR4-2400

      DDR4-2666
      Nb. max. de canaux mémoire

      2

      2
      Bande passante mémoire maxi

      37,5 GB/s

      41,6 GB/s
      Lignes PCIe max

      16

      16
      PDT

      65 W

      65 W
      Alimentation système recommandée

      Alimentation PC de 600W

      Alimentation PC de 600W
      GPU intégré

      Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)

      Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)
      GPU, unités d’exécution

      23

      23
      GPU, unités de calcul shader

      184

      184
      GPU, cadence de base

      350 MHz

      350 MHz
      GPU, cadence maxi

      1100 MHz

      1050 MHz
      GPU, point flottant FP32

      423,2 GFLOPS

      423,2 GFLOPS
      Socket

      LGA1151

      LGA1151
      Carte mère compatible

      Carte mère Socket LGA 1151 

      Carte mère Socket LGA 1151 
      Température maximale

      100°C

      100°C
      CPU-Z simple thread

      422

      442
      CPU-Z multi thread

      1. 654

      2.666
      Cinebench R15 simple thread

      154

      169
      Cinebench R15 multi-thread

      616

      954
      Cinebench R23 simple thread

      707

      1.017
      Cinebench R23 multi-thread

      2.745

      5.839
      PassMark simple thread

      2.231

      2.401
      PassMark CPU Mark

      6.120

      9.206
      (Windows 64-bit)
      Geekbench 4 simple cœur

      4.327

      4.765
      (Windows 64-bit)
      Geekbench 4 multi-cœur

      12. 377

      18.154
      (SGEMM)
      Performance en GFLOPS

      225,6 GFLOPS

      299,4 GFLOPS
      (Performance multi-cœur / watt)
      Rapport performance / watt

      190 pts / W

      279 pts / W
      Amazon


      eBay


      Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.

      On peut ainsi mieux comparer quelles sont les différences techniques entre les deux processeurs.

      Alimentation système recommandée : on suppose que l’on possède une tour ATX, une carte graphique haut de gamme, 16GB de mémoire RAM, un disque SSD de 512GB, un disque dur HDD de 1TB, un lecteur Blu-Ray. Il faudra compter sur une alimentation plus puissante si on souhaite disposer de plusieurs cartes graphiques, plusieurs moniteurs, davantage de mémoire, etc.

      Prix : pour des raisons techniques, nous ne pouvons pas afficher pour le moment un prix de moins de 24 heures, ou un prix en temps réel. C’est pourquoi on préfère pour l’instant ne pas faire apparaître de prix. Il faut vous référer aux boutiques en ligne respectives pour connaître le dernier prix, ainsi que la disponibilité.

      Le processeur Intel Core i5-8400 a un plus grand nombre de cœurs, la fréquence turbo du Intel Core i5-8400 est plus grande, que leurs PDT respectifs sont du même ordre. Les deux ont été produits au cours de la même année.

      Performances :

      Comparaison des performances entre les deux processeurs, pour cela on considère les résultats générés sur des logiciels de benchmarks tels que Geekbench 4.





      CPU-Z — Score multi-thread & simple thread
      Intel Core i5-8400

      442

      2. 666
      Intel Core i3-8100

      422

      1.654

      En simple cœur, la différence est de 5%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 61%.

      Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
      moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

      CPU-Z est un logiciel d’information système qui fournit le nom du processeur, son numéro de modèle, le nom de code, les niveaux de cache, le package, le processus. Il peut également délivrer des données sur la carte mère, la mémoire. Il fait des mesures en temps réel, avec enfin un benchmark pour le simple thread, ainsi que pour le multi thread.





      Cinebench R15 — Score multi-thread & simple thread
      Intel Core i5-8400

      169

      954
      Intel Core i3-8100

      154

      616

      En simple cœur, la différence est de 10%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 55%.

      Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
      moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

      Cinebench R15 permet d’évaluer les performances de calculs du CPU en restituant une scène 3D photoréaliste. La scène possède 2 000 objets, 300 000 polygones, utilise des reflets nets et flous, des zones lumineuses, des ombres, des shaders procéduraux, un antialiasing, etc. Plus le rendu de la scène est rapidement créée, plus le PC est puissant, avec un nombre élevé de points.





      Cinebench R23 — Score multi-thread & simple thread
      Intel Core i5-8400

      1.017

      5.839
      Intel Core i3-8100

      707

      2. 745

      En simple cœur, la différence est de 44%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 113%.

      Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
      moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

      Cinebench R23 est un logiciel de test multi-plateformes qui permet d’évaluer les capacités matérielles d’un appareil tel qu’un ordinateur, une tablette, un serveur. Cette version de Cinebench prend en compte les évolutions récentes des processeurs avec de multiples cœurs et les dernières améliorations de techniques de rendu. L’évaluation est au final encore plus pertinente. La scène de test contient pas moins de 2 000 objets et plus de 300 000 polygones au total.





      PassMark — CPU Mark & simple thread
      Intel Core i5-8400

      2. 401

      9.206
      Intel Core i3-8100

      2.231

      6.120

      En simple cœur, la différence est de 8%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 50%.

      Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
      moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

      PassMark est un logiciel de benchmarks, qui fait plusieurs tests de performance, notamment, sur les nombres premiers, les nombres entiers, la virgule flottante, la compression, la physique, les instructions étendues, l’encodage, le triage. Plus le score est élevé, plus l’appareil a des capacités importantes.

      Sur Windows 64-bit :





      Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Windows 64-bit
      Intel Core i5-8400

      4. 765

      18.154
      Intel Core i3-8100

      4.327

      12.377

      En simple cœur, la différence est de 10%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 47%.

      Sur Linux 64-bit :





      Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Linux 64-bit
      Intel Core i5-8400

      5.100

      18.750
      Intel Core i3-8100

      4.665

      12.104

      En simple cœur, la différence est de 9%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 55%.

      Sur Android 64-bit :





      Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Android 64-bit
      Intel Core i5-8400

      4.145

      14. 898
      Intel Core i3-8100

      3.131

      7.065

      En simple cœur, la différence est de 32%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 111%.

      Sur Mac OS X 64-bit :





      Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Mac OS X 64-bit
      Intel Core i5-8400

      5.098

      20.285
      Intel Core i3-8100

      4.480

      13.074

      En simple cœur, la différence est de 14%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 55%.

      Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
      moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

      Geekbench 4 est une plateforme de benchmarks complète avec plusieurs types de tests, dont la compression de données, d’images, le cryptage en AES, l’encodage en SQL, en HTML, le rendu d’un fichier PDF, le calcul matriciel, de Transformation de Fourier rapide, la simulation d’objets en 3D, l’édition de photos, des tests sur la mémoire. Cela nous permet de mieux visualiser la puissance respective de ces appareils. Pour chaque résultat, on a pris une moyenne de 250 valeurs sur le fameux logiciel de benchmarks.

      Équivalence :

      Intel Core i3-8100 équivalent AMDIntel Core i5-8400 équivalent AMD

      Voir aussi :

      Intel Core i3-8100BIntel Core i3-8100TIntel Core i3-8109U

      Intel Core i5-8400HIntel Core i5-8400T

      Intel Core i5-8400 Benchmarks — Geekbench Browser

      Intel Core i9-9900KS

      4.0 GHz (8 cores)

      9103

       

      Intel Core i9-9900KF

      3.6 GHz (8 cores)

      8562

       

      Intel Core i9-9900K

      3.6 GHz (8 cores)

      8485

       

      Intel Core i9-9900

      3.1 GHz (8 cores)

      7593

       

      Intel Xeon E-2288G

      3.7 GHz (8 cores)

      7237

       

      Intel Core i7-9700K

      3. 6 GHz (8 cores)

      7171

       

      Intel Core i7-9700KF

      3.6 GHz (8 cores)

      7108

       

      Intel Core i7-8086K

      4.0 GHz (6 cores)

      7004

       

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      3.7 GHz (6 cores)

      6483

       

      Intel Core i7-9700F

      3.0 GHz (8 cores)

      6436

       

      Intel Core i7-9700

      3.0 GHz (8 cores)

      6352

       

      Intel Xeon E-2136

      3.3 GHz (6 cores)

      5911

       

      Intel Xeon E-2146G

      3.5 GHz (6 cores)

      5837

       

      Intel Core i7-8700

      3.2 GHz (6 cores)

      5782

       

      Intel Core i7-8700B

      3.2 GHz (6 cores)

      5705

       

      Intel Core i5-9600KF

      3.7 GHz (6 cores)

      5617

       

      Intel Core i5-9600K

      3. 7 GHz (6 cores)

      5526

       

      Intel Core i5-8600K

      3.6 GHz (6 cores)

      5431

       

      Intel Xeon E-2276M

      2.8 GHz (6 cores)

      5121

       

      Intel Core i7-9700T

      2.0 GHz (8 cores)

      5098

       

      Intel Core i5-9600

      3.1 GHz (6 cores)

      4997

       

      Intel Core i7-9850H

      2.6 GHz (6 cores)

      4885

       

      Intel Core i5-8600

      3.1 GHz (6 cores)

      4836

       

      Intel Core i7-9750H

      2.6 GHz (6 cores)

      4832

       

      Intel Core i9-8950HK

      2.9 GHz (6 cores)

      4823

       

      Intel Core i7-8700T

      2.4 GHz (6 cores)

      4764

       

      Intel Core i5-8500B

      3.0 GHz (6 cores)

      4675

       

      Intel Core i5-9500

      3. 0 GHz (6 cores)

      4592

       

      Intel Core i5-8500

      3.0 GHz (6 cores)

      4580

       

      Intel Core i5-9400F

      2.9 GHz (6 cores)

      4556

       

      Intel Xeon E-2176M

      2.7 GHz (6 cores)

      4500

       

      Intel Core i5-8400

      2.8 GHz (6 cores)

      4497

       

      Intel Core i5-9400

      2.9 GHz (6 cores)

      4495

       

      Intel Core i7-8750H

      2.2 GHz (6 cores)

      4437

       

      Intel Core i7-8850H

      2.6 GHz (6 cores)

      4370

       

      Intel Core i3-9350KF

      4.0 GHz (4 cores)

      4064

       

      Intel Core i5-9500T

      2.2 GHz (6 cores)

      4026

       

      Intel Core i7-8569U

      2.8 GHz (4 cores)

      3995

       

      Intel Core i7-8559U

      2. 7 GHz (4 cores)

      3989

       

      Intel Core i3-8350K

      4.0 GHz (4 cores)

      3856

       

      Intel Core i5-8500T

      2.1 GHz (6 cores)

      3838

       

      Intel Core i5-8400T

      1.7 GHz (6 cores)

      3734

       

      Intel Core i5-8259U

      2.3 GHz (4 cores)

      3702

       

      Intel Core i5-8279U

      2.4 GHz (4 cores)

      3591

       

      Intel Core i5-8257U

      1.4 GHz (4 cores)

      3581

       

      Intel Core i5-9300HF

      2.4 GHz (4 cores)

      3475

       

      Intel Core i7-8557U

      1.7 GHz (4 cores)

      3455

       

      Intel Core i5-8400H

      2.5 GHz (4 cores)

      3404

       

      Intel Core i5-9300H

      2.4 GHz (4 cores)

      3299

       

      Intel Core i3-9100

      3. 6 GHz (4 cores)

      3282

       

      Intel Core i5-8300H

      2.3 GHz (4 cores)

      3263

       

      Intel Core i3-9100F

      3.6 GHz (4 cores)

      3246

       

      Intel Core i3-8100

      3.6 GHz (4 cores)

      3027

       

      Intel Core i3-8300

      3.7 GHz (4 cores)

      3023

       

      Intel Core i3-9100T

      3.1 GHz (4 cores)

      2832

       

      Intel Core i3-8100T

      3.1 GHz (4 cores)

      2675

       

      Intel Pentium Gold G5400

      3.7 GHz (2 cores)

      2068

       

      Intel Core i3-8109U

      3.0 GHz (2 cores)

      2027

       

      Intel Pentium Gold G5500

      3.8 GHz (2 cores)

      1941

       

      Intel Celeron G4900

      3.1 GHz (2 cores)

      1334

       

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5+8400: What is the difference?

      53 BALLLA

      Intel Core i3-8100

      53 BALLLA

      Intel Core i5+8400

      VS

      64 Facts compared to

      Intel Core i3-8100

      Intel Core i5+8400 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Is 8100 better than Intel Core i5+8400?

      • Supports memory troubleshooting code?
      • 8 higher hour multiplier?
        36 vs 28

      Why is Intel Core i5+8400 better than Intel Core i3-8100?

      • 16. 67% faster CPU speed?
        6 x 2.8GHz vs 4 x 3.6GHz
      • 266MHz higher RAM speed?
        2666MHz vs 2400MHz
      • 2 more CPU threads?
        6 vs 4
      • 0.5MB more L2 cache?
        1.5MB vs 1MB
      • 42.8% higher PassMark score?
        11685 vs 8183
      • 3MB more L3 cache?
        9MB vs 6MB
      • 128KB more L1 cache?
        384KB vs 256KB
      • 3.2GB/s more memory bandwidth?
        41.6GB/s vs 38.4GB/s

      Which comparisons are the most popular?

      Intel Core i3-8100

      vs

      Intel Core i5-6500

      Intel Core i5+8400

      vs

      Intel Core i3-10100

      Intel Core i3-8100

      VS

      Intel Core M3100Y

      Intel Core i5+8400

      VS

      Intel Core i7-37770

      Intel Core i3-8100T

      Intel Core i5+8400

      vs

      Intel Core i3-9100F

      Intel Core i3-8100

      vs

      Intel Pentium Gold G5400

      Intel Core i5+8400

      vs

      AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

      Intel Core i3-8100

      VS

      Intel Core i5-7500

      Intel Core i5+8400

      VS

      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      VS

      Intel CELERN Intel Core i5+8400

      VS

      Intel Core i5-8400t

      Intel Core i3-8100

      Intel Core i7-4770

      Intel I5+8400

      Intel Core i3-8100

      VS

      Intel Core i7-3770

      Intel Core i5+8400

      VS

      Intel Core i7-7700

      Intel Core i3-8100

      VS

      Intel Core I7-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-ARDEL 8400

      VS

      AMD Ryzen 5 2600

      Intel Core i3-8100

      VS

      Intel Core i3-10100

      Comparisements users

      Intel Core i3-8100

      0. 0 /10

      0 reviews of users

      Intel Core i5+8400

      1 reviews of users

      Intel Core I5+8400

      10.0 9021 /10 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

      Functions

      The price ratio

      reviews is not

      10.0 /10

      1 Votes

      reviews yet there are no

      4 x 3.6GHz

      6 x 2.8GHz

      CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

      2nd processor thread

      More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

      3. turbo clock speed

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

      When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

      4. Unlocked

      ✖Intel Core i3-8100

      ✖Intel Core i5+8400

      Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

      5.L2 cache

      More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

      6.L3 cache

      More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

      7.L1 cache

      More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

      8.core L2

      0.25MB/core

      0.25MB/core

      More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

      9.core L3

      1.5MB/core

      1.5MB/core

      More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory to access each processor core.

      Memory

      1.RAM speed

      2400MHz

      2666MHz

      Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

      2.max memory bandwidth

      38.4GB/s

      41.6GB/s

      This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

      3. DDR version

      DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

      4 memory channels

      More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

      5.maximum memory capacity

      Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

      6.bus baud rate

      The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

      7.Supports memory error code

      ✔Intel Core i3-8100

      ✖Intel Core i5+8400

      Memory error code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

      8.eMMC version

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

      A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

      9.bus frequency

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

      The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

      Geotagging

      1. PassMark result

      This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

      2. PassMark result (single)

      This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

      3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

      Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

      4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

      Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

      5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

      Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

      6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

      Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

      7. Blender test result (bmw27)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

      The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

      8.Blender result (classroom)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

      The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

      9. performance per watt

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

      This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.

      Functions

      1.uses multithreading

      ✖Intel Core i3-8100

      ✔Intel Core i5+8400

      physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

      2. Has AES

      ✔Intel Core i3-8100

      ✔Intel Core i5+8400

      AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

      3. Has AVX

      ✔Intel Core i3-8100

      ✔Intel Core i5+8400

      AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

      4. Version SSE

      SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

      5. Has F16C

      ✔Intel Core i3-8100

      ✔Intel Core i5+8400

      F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

      6.bits transmitted at the same time

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

      NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

      7. Has MMX

      ✔Intel Core i3-8100

      ✔Intel Core i5+8400

      MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

      8.Has TrustZone

      ✖Intel Core i3-8100

      ✖Intel Core i5+8400

      The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming using digital rights management technology ( DRM).

      9.interface width

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-8100)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5+8400)

      The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

      Price comparison

      Cancel

      Which CPUs are better?

      Intel Core i5 8400 vs i3 8100:

      performance comparison

      VS

      Intel Core i5 8400

      Intel Core i3 8100

      Which is better: 6-core Intel Core i5 8400 at 2.8 GHz or i3 8100 with 4 cores at 3.6 GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

      1. Overview
      2. Differences
      3. Performance
      4. Features
      5. Comments

      Overview

      Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

      Single -flow performance

      Rating in tests using one kernel

      Core i5 8400

      55

      Core i3 8100

      51

      Multi -flow performance

      Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei

      Core 8400 9000 9000 28

      Core i3 8100

      18

      Energy efficiency

      Efficiency of energy consumption by chip

      Core i5 8400

      44

      Core i3 8100

      44

      Rating NanoreView

      Final rating of the processor

      Core i5 8400

      42 9000 9000 9000

      Key differences

      What are the main differences between 8100 and 8400

      Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 8400

      • Supports up to 128GB DDR4-2666
      • Has 2 more physical cores
      • Has 3 MB more L3 cache
      • 4. 1 GB/s (11%) more maximum memory bandwidth

      Benchmark tests

      Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

      Cinebench R23 (single core)

      Core i5 8400
      +10%

      1023

      Core i3 8100

      927

      Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

      Core i5 8400
      +63%

      5823

      Core i3 8100

      3571

      Passmark CPU (single core)

      Core i5 8400
      +8%

      2392

      Core i3 8100

      2222

      Passmark CPU (multi-core)

      Core i5 8400
      +49%

      9130

      Core i3 8100

      6129

      Geekbench 5 (single core)

      Core i5 8400
      +8%

      1026

      Core i3 8100

      946

      Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

      Core i5 8400
      +39%

      4604

      Core i3 8100

      3314

      ▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

      Specifications

      List of full specifications of Intel Core i5 8400 and i3 8100

      General information

      Manufacturer Intel Intel
      Release date October 5, 2017 October 5, 2017
      Type Desktop Desktop
      Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
      Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
      Model number i5-8400 i3-8100
      Socket LGA-1151 LGA-1151
      Integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630

      Performance

      Cores 6 4
      Number of threads 6 4
      Frequency 2. 8 GHz 3.6 GHz
      Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 4 GHz
      Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
      Multiplier 28x 28x
      Tire speed 8 GT/s 8 GT/s
      Level 1 cache 64KB (per core) 64KB (per core)
      Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 256KB (per core)
      Level 3 cache 9MB (shared) 6MB (shared)
      Unlocked multiplier No No

      Power consumption

      Process 14 nanometers 14 nanometers
      Power consumption (TDP) 65 W 65 W
      Critical temperature 100°C 100°C
      Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel UHD Graphics 630
      GPU frequency 350 MHz 350 MHz
      Boost GPU frequency 1050 MHz 1100 MHz
      Shader blocks 192 192
      TMUs 24 24
      ROPs 3 3
      Compute units 24 24
      TGP 15W 15W
      Max. resolution 4096×2304 — 60Hz 4096×2304 — 60Hz

      iGPU FLOPS

      Core i5 8400

      0.38 teraflops

      Core i3 8100

      0.38 teraflops

      DDR4-2666 DDR4-2400 Max. size 128 GB 64 GB Number of channels 2 2 Max. throughput 41.6 GB/s 37.5 GB/s ECC support No Yes

      Other

      Official site Site Intel Core i5 8400 Site Intel Core i3 8100
      PCI Express version 3.0 3.0
      Max. PCI Express lanes 16 16
      Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

      Poll

      What processor do you think is the best?

      Core i5 8400

      14 (70%)

      Core i3 8100

      6 (30%)

      Total votes: 20

      Competitors

      1.
      Core i5 12400 vs Core i5 8400

      2.
      Core i5 12400F vs. Core i5 8400

      What will you choose: Intel Core i3 8100 or i5 8400?

      Name

      Message

      Intel Core i5-8400 or Intel Core i3-8100

      • Main Page
      • >
      • Processors
      • >
      • Comparison
      • >
      • Intel Core i5-8400 VS Intel Core i3-8100

      Family

      • Core i3-8100
        Complete
      • Family 8300

        Compare

      • Core i5-8400
        Compare

      Speed ​​in games

      Core i5-8400

      72.7 (+9.4%)

      Core i3-8100 9000.9 9000

      9000 our tests.

      The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

      The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

      Speed ​​in office use

      Core i5-8400

      72 (+5.7%)

      Core i3-8100

      67.9

      Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

      The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

      Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

      Speed ​​in heavy applications

      Core i5-8400

      44.1 (+15.6%)

      Core i3-8100

      37.2

      The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

      At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

      Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

      Speed ​​of numerical operations

      Simple household tasks

      Core i5-8400

      68.2 (+5.7%)

      Core i3-8100

      64.3

      Demanding games and tasks

      Core i5-8400

      46.9 (+22.8%)

      Core i3-8100

      36.2

      Extreme

      Core i5-8400

      11.4 (+37.7%)

      Core i3-8100

      7.1

      Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

      We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

      Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

      When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

      Data obtained from tests of users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the fuller the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

      Benchmarks

      Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

      Cinebench R20 Single Core

      Intel Core i5-8400

      411 (+11.4%)

      Intel Core i3-8100

      364

      Cinebench R20 Multi 9000

      Intel Core 84000004 2291 (+37%)

      Intel Core i3-8100

      1444

      Cinebench R15 Single Core

      Intel Core i5-8400

      163 (+5.5%)

      Intel Core i3-8100 9000 9000

      Cinebench R15 Multi Core

      Intel Core i5-8400

      925 (+33.4%)

      Intel Core i3-8100

      616

      Geekbench 5 Single Core

      105000 9000

      Intel Core i3-8100

      971

      Geekbench 3 Single Core

      Intel Core i5-8400

      4020 (+4. 6%)

      Intel Core i3-8100

      3834

      Geekbench 3 Multi Core

      Intel Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL %)

      Intel Core i3-8100

      12193

      Cinebench R11.5

      Intel Core i5-8400

      1.86

      Intel Core I3-8100

      1.91 (+2.6%)

      Cine

      Intel Core i5-8400

      9.97 (+34.3%)

      Intel Core i3-8100

      6.55

      Cinebench R11.5 Igpu, Opengl

      Intel Core i5-8400

      52.6 (+28.9%)

      9000 37.4

      Passmark

      Intel Core i5-8400

      9224 (+33.5%)

      Intel Core i3-8100

      6137

      Descriptions

      Data are not yet filled, so the existing information may not be completed in the tables. functions.

      Basic

      Manufacturer Intel Intel
      DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i5-8400 Processor (9M Cache, up to 4. 00 GHz) Intel® Core™ i3-8100 Processor (6M Cache, 3.60 GHz)
      ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
      Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 14 nm 14 nm
      Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 09-2020 09-2020
      Model Official name. i5-8400 i3-8100
      Cores The number of physical cores. 6 4
      ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 6 4
      Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technologies, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Missing
      Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 2.8 GHz 3.6 GHz
      Turbo FrequencyThe maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 4 No data
      L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 9 MB 6 MB
      Instructions 64-bit 64-bit
      Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. SSE4.1/4.2, AVX2 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX2
      Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No
      Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 8 GT/s DMI3 8 GT/s DMI3
      Number of QPI links
      TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 65 W 65 W
      Cooling system specifications PCG 2015C (65W) PCG 2015C (65W)

      Video core

      Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® UHD Graphics 630 Intel® UHD Graphics 630
      GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 350 MHz 350 MHz
      Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. 1050 MHz 1100 MHz
      Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802.11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
      Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 3

      RAM

      Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 64 GB 64 GB
      Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR4-2666 DDR4-2400
      RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2
      RAM bandwidth
      ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

      PCI

      configuration options

      PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 3
      PCI Up to 1×16 or 2×8 or 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16 or 2×8 or 1×8+2×4
      Number of PCI lanes 16 Up to 1×16 or 2×8 or 1×8+2×4

      Data Security

      AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data
      Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data

      Decoration

      Dimensions No data No data
      Supported sockets No data No data
      Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

      Which is better

      Intel Core i5-8400

      • On average, gaming performance is 7% better.
      • The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 4%.
      • In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 4%.
      • The number of physical cores is 2 more.
      • The number of threads is 2 more.

      Intel Core i3-8100

      • Price down $25
      • Base frequency up 0.8 GHz.

      Intel core i3 8100 vs i5 8400

      Why is Intel Core i3-8100T better than Intel Core i5-8400T?

      • 21.57% higher CPU clock speed
        4 x 3.1GHz vs 6 x 1.7GHz
      • 50MHz faster GPU turbo speed

      Why is Intel Core i5-8400T better than Intel Core i3-8100T?

      • 266MHz higher ram speed

      What are the most popular comparisons?

      Intel Core i3-8100t

      AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

      Intel Core i5-8400t

      AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

      Intel Core I3-8100t

      000. RYZEN 5 2400GE

      Intel Core i3-8100t

      AMD Ryzen 5 2600

      Intel Core i5-8400t

      AMD Ryzen 5 2600

      Intel Core i3-8100t

      AMD Ryzen 5 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400 2400G0003

      Intel Core i5-8400t

      Intel Core i5-9400t

      Intel Core i3-8100t

      Intel Core i5-8400t

      AMD RYZEN 3 2200G

      Intel Core I3-8100TEL Core

      Intel Core i5-8400t

      Intel Core i5-9400f

      Intel Core i3-8100t

      Intel Core i3-2100

      Intel Core i5-8400t

      I7-3820

      Intel Core I3100t

      Intel Core I3100t Core i5-6500T

      Intel Core i5-8400T

      AMD RYZEN 5 3400G

      Intel Core i3-8100t

      Intel Core i5-8500T

      Intel Core i5-8400t

      Intel Core

      Intel Core I3-9100

      Intel Pentium Gold G5400

      The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

      AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

      A smaller size indicates a newer chip manufacturing process.

      AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

      DirectX is used in games with a newer version supporting better graphics.

      AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE

      32-bit operating system can support up to 4 GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4 GB, which improves performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.

      Intel Core i3-8100T

      Intel Core i5-8400T

      The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.

      Intel Atom E3805

      When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

      Intel Core i7-4930MX

      Performance

      AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

      More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

      Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

      Memory

      Can support faster memory that speeds up system performance.

      AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

      This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

      More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

      Intel Atom x5-Z8350

      Maximum amount of memory (RAM).

      Intel Xeon E7-8830

      The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

      Intel Xeon Gold 5115

      The memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

      Intel Core i3-8100T

      Intel Core i5-8400T

      Features

      AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

      Intel Core i3-8100T

      Intel Core i5-8400T

      It’s easier to get better quality using virtualization if it’s hardware supported.

      Intel Core i3-8100T

      Intel Core i5-8400T

      Many Intel processors use Hyperthreading technology, which means that each processor core can run on two threads at the same time, and not like most processors that run on a single thread for each core. This means you will get better quality in some applications.

      Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-8100 and Intel Core i5-8400 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Image quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization. Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).

      Benefits

      Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-8100

      • Newer processor, release date difference 0 year(s) 11 month(s)
      • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 16% better: 87.079 vs 75.127
      Features
      Issue date January 2018 vs 5 January 2017
      Benchmarks
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 87.079 vs 75.127
      GFXBench 4.0 – Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1840 vs 1835
      GFXBench 4.0 – Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1840 vs 1835

      Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-8400

      • 2 more cores, run more applications simultaneously: 6 vs 4
      • 2 more threads: 6 vs 4
      • Approximately 11% higher clock speed: 4. 00 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
      • The L3 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
      • Maximum memory size is 2x larger: 128 GB vs 64 GB
      • Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark about 11% better: 2331 vs 2097
      • Performance in PassMark — CPU mark about 44% higher: 11564 vs 8005
      • Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance by about 9% more: 1051 vs 961
      • Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance about 49% better: 4587 vs 3072
      • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 50% better: 5.755 vs 3.843
      • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – T-Rex (Frames/s) about 60% better: 0.759 vs 0.473
      • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – V >
      Features
      Number of cores 6 vs 4
      Number of threads 6 vs 4
      Maximum frequency 4. 00 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
      Level 3 cache 9 MB vs 6144 KB (shared)
      Maximum memory size 128 GB vs 64 GB
      Benchmarks
      PassMark – Single thread mark 2331 vs 2097
      PassMark — CPU mark 11564 vs 8005
      Geekbench 4 — Single Core 1051 vs 961
      Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 4587 vs 3072
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.755 vs 3.843
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.759 vs 0.473
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.769 vs 2.403
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10.348 vs 6.403
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3762 vs 3670
      GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 6201 vs 6070
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3762 vs 3670
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 6201 vs 6070

      Benchmark comparison

      CPU 1: Intel Core i3-8100
      CPU 2: Intel Core i5-8400

      A few days ago we published an article about the opposition of the Intel Pentium Gold G5400 + GeForce GT 4-core Intel Core i3-8100 with its video core, and then compared the capabilities of these processors paired with the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

      The main goal of the test is to investigate the feasibility of buying video cards like the GeForce GT 1030. On the one hand, they are still better than the iGPU from Intel, so in games you can count on a performance bonus and a better picture. On the other hand, after buying such a video accelerator, you have less money left for the processor, so you have to take a simpler model. And the overall computing power of the system and the possibility of an upgrade will suffer from this. And then the GeForce GT 1030 will need to be sold to someone, and this is an extra worry and a loss of some resources. In a word, you can’t figure it out without tests.

      In this case, they will run with the participation of a 4-core Intel Core i3-8100 processor, which, in conjunction with a GeForce GT 1030, costs a little more than a 6-core Intel Core i5-8400. And in order to reduce the time for preparing the material and make the test bench closer to budget reality, we used some of the components of our «exotic assembly». We had a BIOSTAR RACING B360GT3S motherboard and a 320GB Colorful SL500 SSD with the system installed and demanding games. RAM is represented by two 4 GB EXCELERAM RED KUDOS sticks in dual-channel mode at the corresponding processor frequencies, and PCCOOLER S129 was used to cool the processorsx4.

      To begin with, we paired the Core i3 with an MSI GeForce GT 1030 video card with one fan and 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, and then simulated an upgrade and moved to a MAXSUN GeForce GTX 1060 Terminator 3G. All components were assembled in a Vinga CS207B case and powered by a block from Seasonic.

      And now it’s time for the tests. We will not bore you with synthetics, but we will stop at two diverse benchmarks. Cinebench shows the visualization and rendering capabilities well. In CPU mode, the 6-core outperforms the 4-core by an impressive 51%, and the transition to OpenGL with the connection of a video adapter radically changes the situation — now the Core i3 and GeForce GT 1030 bundle is ahead by 80%.

      Universal RealBench allows you to evaluate the work with poorly optimized for multithreading software, the speed of video encoding and scene calculation using the graphics core, as well as test a heavy multitasking mode in one pass. In the overall standings, the victory remained for the Core i5 with a 35% margin.

      Only two, but universal, comprehensive benchmarks confirm that in most everyday tasks, choosing a more powerful processor provides a performance bonus. Therefore, the rejection of a GeForce GT1030-level card looks quite justified.

      Now let’s move on to games. In most cases, we deliberately switched to a resolution of 1366 x 768, because the capabilities of both graphics adapters are limited, and sometimes it will be possible to achieve acceptable speed only by lowering the resolution.

      Due to the nuances of the software on the video capture system, let’s start with World of Tanks Encore at Full HD and minimum settings. Pairing with GeForce GT 1030 provides 2-3 times faster speeds than UHD Graphics 630, which paves the way for higher graphics quality. But you can also ride comfortably on the built-in, especially since the improved textures and animation only distract many players.

      More than a twofold advantage is also observed in the Rainbow Six Siege benchmark: if a system with an iGPU produces only 30-40 frames / s, then with a GeForce GT 1030 with a Core i3-8100, you can count on 77-117 FPS .

      The abundance of smoke effects in the CS: GO benchmark even at low settings lowers the statistics of rare and very rare frames to the plinth level on UHD Graphics 630. Although in reality you can even play in Full HD. And if you prefer a system with a plug, then the speeds rise by 2-3 times.

      The Intel Core i5-8400 is a good processor, but PUBG won’t pull it on its own — as long as these are different weight categories. The resulting 12-25 FPS will hardly make you happy, so either we give ourselves a break before buying the right video card, or we put the GeForce GT 1030. s Creed Origins : The average speed does not rise above 11 frames / s — this is unlikely to be endured even by the most ardent and hardened fans of the series. A bundle of Intel Core i3-8100 with GeForce GT 1030 makes the gameplay playable at 30-40 FPS.

      Benchmark Far Cry 5 is less demanding, so objectively the figures are higher, but the real profit was made only by a bundle with the GeForce GT 1030, which produces 35-45 FPS. But the iGPU, although it raises the frame rate to 12-15 FPS, but the benefits of this are like mittens from a fish.

      In general, the situation in games is as follows: UHD Graphics 630 will not go far, but fans of online projects, turn-based strategies and casual games will be able to survive these harsh times. At the same time, take a break from heavy games like PUBG and Assassin’s Creed, and go through the delayed hit adventure games. In a word, you won’t be completely without games, but you will have to temporarily forget about demanding projects. If the breaking time is limited to a maximum of days, then look towards the plug, but do not rely on a particularly high quality picture.

      Now imagine that the winter of your sadness is over, and you are already bringing your beloved 3-gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 into the house. How will both processors behave with it? Can you tell the final difference between the systems again based on the results of the gameplay test? Comments are open for your predictions!

      In the meantime, we’ll give you some time to think and start again with two diverse synthetic benchmarks. In the CineBench CPU test, the Intel Core i5-8400 outperformed by 56%. Connecting a video card in this case does not change the balance of power: the leadership of the bundle with the 6-core is measured at 14%.

      RealBench is also without surprises: the config with a more powerful processor has a 31% higher total.

      Moving on to games where all tests were run in Full HD.

      World of Tanks Encore at ultra settings does not feel the difference between systems with 4- and 6-core processors. In both cases, you can count on completely comfortable performance.

      In Rainbow Six Siege , the maximum gap is observed in the 0.1% Low parameter — in a system with Core i5 it is 18% higher. On the other hand, we are talking about the range of 60-70 FPS, so this will not particularly affect the convenience of the gameplay.

      In the benchmark Counter Strike : Global Offensive The average stability was more than the rest of the CORE with CORE. with Core i5, which is important.

      A similar situation is observed in GTA V : 6 cores and a bonus of 100 MHz to their frequency did not allow the system with Intel Core i5-8400 to celebrate the victory in the average frame rate. But there are no questions about the rest of the statistics: the preponderance reaches 37%.

      But in PUBG , everything is a little different. No, the Core i5 connection remains in the lead, but now the maximum increase of 18% is fixed for the average frame rate, and the rest of the statistics do not change much. Although this is a network game, so the comparison error is large.

      If your willpower won when choosing a config, and you stopped at the 6-nuclear warner, then after adding GTX 1063 Assassin S Creed Origins more, more than 22% more, more. than in the case of Core i3.

      But for fans of Far Cry 5 in a system with 8 GB of RAM and a GeForce GTX 1063 video card, a 4-core is enough, because the Core i5-8400 gives a bonus of only 2.

      Results

      And now let’s sum up the results of the gameplay test and check your predictions: the average speed in conjunction with the Core i5-8400 turned out to be only 2% higher, and the statistics of 1 and 0.1% Low rose by 9-14 %. In some games, everything rests on the processor, while in others, the power of the GPU, the size of the video buffer and 8 GB of RAM may not be enough. But it is in heavy new and under-optimized projects that the 6-core provides a smoother Frame Time graph and lower drawdowns, which will add comfort to the gameplay in the future.

      The results of the first comparison with the Pentium G5400 and Core i3-8100 were unequivocal, but here there are already some nuances and reservations. We still consider the GeForce GT 1030 video card and similar plugs to be a little useful purchase for a gaming system. If you are an undemanding gamer, but UHD Graphics 630 is not enough for you, then the AMD Ryzen APU looks better or you can take a chance and buy a video card on the used market.

      The Intel Core i3-8100 in such a system looks very worthy even in conjunction with the GeForce GTX 1063, but heavy game novelties and people from early access are more difficult for it, which is clearly hinted at by the statistics of rare and very rare events. But the Intel Core i5-8400 is slowed down by 8 GB of RAM and a 3 GB video buffer. Of course, playing on it is even more comfortable, but it’s better to take at least a GeForce GTX 1066 or Radeon RX 588 and 16 GB of RAM in a pair with it.

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs. Intel Core i5-8400

      Intel Core i3-8100

      Intel Core i3-8100 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs on No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set to 65 W . The processor connects to CPU socket LGA 1151-2 This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2400 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, the Coffee Lake S architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2017

      Intel Core i5-8400

      Intel Core i5-8400 runs with 6 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 4.00 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .The processor connects to LGA 1151- CPU socket 2 This version includes 9.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Coffee Lake S architecture has been advanced over 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2017

      Intel Core i3-8100

      Intel Core i5-8400

      Frequency 2.80 GHz 4 Cores 6 no turbo Turbo (1 core) 4. 00 GHz no turbo Turbo (all cores) 3.80 GHz No. Hyper Threading No. No. Overclocking No. normal Basic architecture normal

      Intel UHD Graphics 630

      GPU

      Intel UHD Graphics 630

      1.10GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.15 GHz 14nm Technology 14nm 1.10 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.15 GHz 12 DirectX Version 12 3 Max. displays 3 DDR4-2400 memory size DDR4-2666 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory Yes ECC No. — L2 Cache — 6.00MB L3 Cache 9.00 MB 3.0 PCIe version 3.0 16 PCIe lanes 16 14nm Technology 14nm LGA 1151-2 Connector LGA 1151-2 65 W TDP 65W VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Q4/2017 Release date Q4/2017

      Show more details

      Show more details

      Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

      Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

      Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

      Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

      Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

      Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.

      Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

      Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

      Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.

      Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

      Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

      Estimated energy use

      Average hours of use per day

      Average CPU usage (0-100%)

      Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

      Estimated energy use

      Average hours of use per day

      Average CPU usage (0-100%)

      Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

      Popular comparison

      Comments

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-8400 — Benchmark and comparison — Orașul Löbau

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-8400 — Benchmark and comparison — Orașul Löbau — document PDF

      liblib.ro

      Benchmark results, test and cpu comparison in Cinebench R23, Geekbench 5 and other benchmarks.

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-8400 — Benchmark and comparison

      Benchmark results, test and cpu comparison in Cinebench R23, Geekbench 5 and other benchmarks.

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-7400 — Benchmark and comparison

      Benchmark results, test and cpu comparison in Cinebench R23, Geekbench 5 and other benchmarks.

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5+8400: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i3-8100 and Intel Core i5+8400? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Comparing Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz vs Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz vs AMD Phenom 9550 Quad Core.

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-8400 — CPU-World

      26 Feb. 2022 … i3-8100 vs i5-8400 specifications comparison ; The number of cores/threads. 7.5.6. 4.2. 2.8. 1.4. 0.4.6. Higher is better. Operating …

      UserBenchmark: Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-8400

      Based on 424336 user benchmarks for the Intel Core i3-8100 and the Core i5-8400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best …

      Intel Core i5 8400 vs i3 8100: 9 performance comparison0003

      We compared Intel Core i5 8400 (2.8 GHz) and i3 8100 (3.6 GHz) in games and benchmarks. Find out which one showed the best performance.

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i5-7400: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i3-8100 and Intel Core i5-7400? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz vs Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.00GHz

      Comparing Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz vs Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.00GHz.

      AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs. Intel Core i5-8400 and Core i5-8600

      Again, from the review of the older Ryzen 5 2600X, we already know that the overclocked 12 Pinnacle Ridge threads are on par, or even ahead of the nominal 6 cores …

      Core i5-8400 vs Core i3-8100 [in 3 benchmarks] — Technical City

      UserBenchmark: Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-7400

      Based on 353757 user benchmarks for the Intel Core i3-8100 and the Core i5-7400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best .. .

      Intel Core i3-8100 vs i5-7400 — CPU-World

      Apr 8 2022 … The graphs below compare the most important characteristics of the Intel i5-7400 and Intel i3-8100 processors. These features, along with an . Favorable prices for in the network of DNS stores. Can be bought on credit or …

      Bloc de sistem MCS Intel Core i5-8400 2. 8 GHz/8GB/120 GB SSD/1 …

      Bloc de sistem MCS Intel Core i5-8400 2.8GHz/8GB/120 GB SSD/1 TB HDD/GF GTX1060 6Gb Bloc de sistem.

      Intel Core i5-9300H vs Intel Core i7-9750H: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i7-9750H and Intel Core i5-9300H? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Intel Core i5-8250U vs Intel Core i7-8550U: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i7-8550U and Intel Core i5-8250U? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Intel Core i7-8550U @ 1.80GHz vs Intel Core i5-8250U @ 1.60GHz

      Comparing Intel Core i7-8550U @ 1.80GHz vs Intel Core i5-8250U @ 1.60GHz.

      Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs Intel Core i7-8550U: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i5-1135G7 and Intel Core i7-8550U? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Intel Core i3-9100F vs Intel Core i5-9400F: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i5-9400F and Intel Core i3-9100F? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Intel Core i7-9700K vs Intel Core i9-9900K: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i9-9900K and Intel Core i7-9700K? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Intel Core i7-7500U vs Intel Core i5-7200U — Benchmark and comparison … .

      Comparison of Intel Core i5-8300H and Intel Core i7-8750H — AskGeek.io

      Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-8750H 2 more cores, able to run more applications simultaneously: 6 vs 4 4 more threads: 12 vs 8 Approximately 2 …

      Intel Core i7-8750H @ 2.20GHz vs Intel Core i5-8300H @ 2.30GHz

      Comparing Intel Core i7-8750H @ 2.20GHz vs Intel Core i5-8300H @ 2.30GHz.

      Intel Core i5-8300H vs Intel Core i7-8750H: What is the difference? — Version

      What is the difference between the Intel Core i7-8750H and the Intel Core i5-8300H? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      www.techradar.com/in/news/intel-core-i7-9700k-vs-intel-core-i7-8700k

      Intel Core i5-9300H @ 2. 40GHz vs Intel Core i7-9750H @ 2.60GHz

      Comparing Intel Core i5-9300H @ 2.40GHz vs Intel Core i7-9750H @ 2.60GHz.

      Intel Core i7-7700HQ vs Intel Core i7-8550U: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i7-7700HQ and Intel Core i7-8550U? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Core i7-7700K: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i7-7700K and Intel Core i5-9400F? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Intel Core i7-6700 vs Intel Core i7-7700K: What is the difference? — Versus

      9736vs8045; 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed… Intel Core i7-7700K. vs. AMD Ryzen 5 1600X … Intel BX80662I76700K 4512 Core i7 6700K .

      Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz vs Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz

      Comparing Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz vs Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz.

      Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Core i5-9600K: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i5-9600K and Intel Core i5-9400F? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Intel Core i5-6400 vs Intel Core i5-6402P: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i5-6402P and Intel Core i5-6400? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Intel Core i5-3570 vs Intel Core i5-3570K: What is the difference? — Versus

      What is the difference between Intel Core i5-3570K and Intel Core i5-3570? Find out which one is better and their overall CPU scores.

      Intel Core i5 7400 vs i3 8100: performance comparison

      Which is better: Intel Core i5 7400 at 3.0 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 3.5) or i3 8100 at 3.6 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 0.0)? To find out, read our comparison…

      Procesor Intel Core i5 i5-8400/ 2.80 GHz — 4.00 GHz — ENTER Online

      Comandă pe site-ul ▷ Enter Online ▣ Procesor Intel Core i5 i5-8400/ 2.80 GHz — 4.00 GHz, la un preț optim și cu livrare express prin Chisinau și …

      UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5-8400

      Based on 1063214 user benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and the Intel Core i5-8400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the .

      2022 © All rights reserved
      Intel Core i3-8100 Intel Core i5-8400
      65 W Max TDP 65W
      N. A. Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
      NA Operating cost per day NA
      NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
      NA Cost per year NA