AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs Intel Core i5-10400: What is the difference?
72points
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
65points
Intel Core i5-10400
Comparison winner
i5-10400F
vs
66 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Intel Core i5-10400
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 3700X better than Intel Core i5-10400?
- 1.66x faster CPU speed?
8 x 3.6GHzvs6 x 2.9GHz - 534MHz higher ram speed?
3200MHzvs2666MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
16vs12 - 7nm smaller semiconductor size?
7nmvs14nm - 2.5MB bigger L2 cache?
4MBvs1.5MB - 1.82x higher PassMark result?
22724vs12495 - 20MB bigger L3 cache?
32MBvs12MB - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
4vs3
Why is Intel Core i5-10400 better than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X?
- 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs95°C - Has integrated graphics?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Core i5-10400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i5-10400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i5-10400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i5-10400
vs
Intel Core i7-7700
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Intel Core i5-10400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Intel Core i5-10400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i5-10400
vs
Intel Core i5-11400
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Core i5-10400
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
Intel Core i7-10700K
Intel Core i5-10400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Intel Core i5-10400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G
Price comparison
Cheap alternatives
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
7 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
9. 9/10
7 User reviews
Intel Core i5-10400
7 User reviews
Intel Core i5-10400
9.6/10
7 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.4/10
7 votes
8.7/10
7 votes
Gaming
9.9/10
7 votes
10.0/10
7 votes
Performance
9.6/10
7 votes
9.6/10
7 votes
Reliability
9.9/10
7 votes
9.6/10
7 votes
Energy efficiency
9.1/10
7 votes
9.1/10
7 votes
Performance
CPU speed
8 x 3.6GHz
6 x 2.9GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
4.4GHz
4.3GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
✖Intel Core i5-10400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
0.
5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
L3 core
4MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Benchmarks
PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender (bmw27) result
170.7seconds
256.8seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
509.9seconds
820.4seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
∅
Not applicable
350MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
GPU turbo
∅
Not applicable
1100MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
GPU execution units
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10400)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.
supported displays
∅
Not applicable
Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.
DirectX version
∅
Not applicable
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenGL version
∅
Not applicable
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10400)
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
texture mapping units (TMUs)
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10400)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
render output units (ROPs)
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10400)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
3200MHz
2666MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
47.68GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
✖Intel Core i5-10400
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10400)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Features
uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
✔Intel Core i5-10400
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads.
This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
✔Intel Core i5-10400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
✔Intel Core i5-10400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
✔Intel Core i5-10400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3700X)
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10400)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
✔Intel Core i5-10400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
✖Intel Core i5-10400
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10400)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i5 10400 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 10400
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.
9 GHz Intel Core i5 10400 with 6-cores against the 3.6 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 3700X with 8-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i5 10400
53
Ryzen 7 3700X
59
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i5 10400
30
Ryzen 7 3700X
47
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i5 10400
57
Ryzen 7 3700X
64
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i5 10400
44
Ryzen 7 3700X
56
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 3700X and 10400
Advantages of Intel Core i5 10400
- Newer — released 10-months later
- Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Has 20 MB larger L3 cache size
- More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 14 nanometers
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Newer PCI Express version – 4.
0 - Around 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
- 11% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1279 vs 1155 points
- 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz)
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i5 10400
1133
Ryzen 7 3700X
+19%
1345
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 10400
7616
Ryzen 7 3700X
+60%
12213
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i5 10400
2598
Ryzen 7 3700X
+3%
2677
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i5 10400
12361
Ryzen 7 3700X
+84%
22802
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i5 10400
1160
Ryzen 7 3700X
+11%
1284
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 10400
5848
Ryzen 7 3700X
+45%
8486
Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 10400 and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | May 1, 2020 | July 7, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Comet Lake | — |
| Model number | i5-10400 | — |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
| P-Cores | 6 | 8 |
| P-Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 2. 9 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Total Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Total Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 36x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | — |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |
Package
| Transistors | — | 3. 8 billions |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Socket | LGA-1200 | AM4 |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Peak temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | — |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | — |
| Shading Units | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Execution Units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15 W | — |
Max. Resolution |
4096×2304 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i5 10400
0.38 TFLOPS
Ryzen 7 3700X
n/a
Memory Support
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i5 10400 official page | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i5 10400
9 (28.
1%)
Ryzen 7 3700X
23 (71.9%)
Total votes: 32
Сompetitors
1.
Intel Core i5 10400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
2.
Intel Core i5 10400 vs Intel Core i3 12100
3.
Intel Core i5 10400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
4.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
5.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
6.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
7.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Compare other CPUs (480+)
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X or Intel Core i5 10400?
Name
Message
Intel Core i5 10400 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 10400
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Which is better: 6-core Intel Core i5 10400 at 2. 9 GHz or AMD Ryzen 7 3700X with 8 cores at 3.6 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i5 10400
53
Ryzen 7 3700x
59
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus
9 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000
Core i5 10400
30
Ryzen 7 3700x
47
Energy Equality
Energy Effects Chip
Core I5 10400
57
Ryzen 7 3700x
64 9000
Core i5 10400
44
Ryzen 7 3700X
56
Key differences
What are the main differences between 3700X and 10400
nine0003
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 10400
- Appeared 10 months later than the rival
- Integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Has 20 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 7 vs 14 nanometers
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 2 physical cores more than 9001 Express 9011 New standard Express 9001 nine0012
- 6.
08 GB/s (15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
- 11% faster in Geekbench v5 single-core test — 1279 and 1155 points
- 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz)
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i5 10400
1133
Ryzen 7 3700X
+19%
1345
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i5 10400
7616
Ryzen 7 3700X
+60%
12213
Passmark CPU (Single Core)
Core i5 10400
2598
Ryzen 7 3700X
+3%
2677
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i5 10400
12361
Ryzen 7 3700X
+84%
22802
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i5 10400
1160
Ryzen 7 3700X
+11%
1284
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i5 10400
5848
Ryzen 7 3700X
+45%
8486
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full specifications for Intel Core i5 10400 and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
General
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | May 1, 2020 | July 7, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Comet Lake | |
| Model number | i5-10400 | — |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Processor
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| threads | 12 | 16 |
| Frequency | 2. |
3.6 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 36x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 512KB (per core) | |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
| Number of transistors | — | 3.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Socket | LGA-1200 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1100 MHz | — |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15W | — |
| Max. |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i5 10400
0.38 teraflops
Ryzen 7 3700X
n/a
901 memory support0186
| Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. throughput | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC 9 support0192 | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i5 10400 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i5 10400
9 (28. 1%)
Ryzen 7 3700X
23 (71.9%)
Total votes: 32
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i5 10400 or AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
2.
Intel Core i5 10400 or Intel Core i3 12100
3.
Intel Core i5 10400 or AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
4.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X or AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
5.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X or AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
6.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X or AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
7.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X or AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Compare other CPUs (480+)
Intel Core i5 10400F vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 10400F
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Which is better: 6-core Intel Core i5 10400F at 2.9 GHz or AMD Ryzen 7 3700X with 8 cores at 3.6 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Core i5 10400f
52 52
Ryzen 7 3700x
59
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmars where all nucleus
Core 2 30
Ryzen 7 3700X
47
Power Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Core i5 10400f
57
Ryzen 7 3700x
64
Rating NanoreView
Final rating of the processor
Core I5 10400F
44
Ryzen 7 3700x
56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56
Key differences
What are the main differences between 3700X and 10400F
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 10400F
- Launched 10 months later than rival
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Has 20 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 7 vs.
14 nanometers
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 2 more physical cores
- New PCI Express standard — 4.0
- 1 faster in single core Geekbench v5 — 1279 and 1106 points
- 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
- 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz)
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i5 10400F
1111
Ryzen 7 3700X
+21%
1345
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i5 10400F
7611
Ryzen 7 3700X
+60%
12213
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i5 10400F
2571
Ryzen 7 3700X
+4%
2677
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i5 10400F
12456
Ryzen 7 3700X
+83%
22802
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i5 10400F
1116
Ryzen 7 3700X
+15%
1284
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i5 10400F
6101
Ryzen 7 3700X
+39%
8486
Add your Cinebench R23 results
nine0003
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i5 10400F and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | May 1, 2020 | July 7, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Comet Lake | — |
| Model number | i5-10400F | — |
| Integrated graphics | No | No |
Processor
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| threads | 12 | 16 |
| Frequency | 2. |
3.6 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 36x |
| Tire speed | — | |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
| Number of transistors | — | 3.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Socket | LGA-1200 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
Memory support
| Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. |