I5 2400 vs i7 3770: Intel Core i5-2400 vs i7-3770

Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i7-3770: What is the difference?

32points

Intel Core i5-2400

42points

Intel Core i7-3770

Comparison winner

64 facts in comparison

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i7-3770

Why is Intel Core i5-2400 better than Intel Core i7-3770?

200MHz faster GPU clock speed?
850MHzvs650MHz

Why is Intel Core i7-3770 better than Intel Core i5-2400?

9.68% faster CPU speed?
4 x 3.4GHzvs4 x 3.1GHz
267MHz higher ram speed?
1600MHzvs1333MHz
4 more CPU threads?
8vs4
32.4°C higher maximum operating temperature?
105°Cvs72.6°C
10nm smaller semiconductor size?
22nmvs32nm
1.63x higher PassMark result?
9460vs5801
0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3. 9GHzvs3.4GHz
18W lower TDP?
77Wvs95W

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-3770K

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-3770S

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-7400

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Intel Core i5-2400

3 User reviews

Intel Core i5-2400

5. 3/10

3 User reviews

Intel Core i7-3770

3 User reviews

Intel Core i7-3770

9.0/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

6.7/10

3 votes

8.7/10

3 votes

Gaming

2.0/10

3 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Performance

4.0/10

3 votes

10.0/10

3 votes

Reliability

4.7/10

3 votes

10.0/10

3 votes

Energy efficiency

5.0/10

3 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

4 x 3.1GHz

4 x 3.4GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

3.4GHz

3.9GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-3770

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1.5MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1333MHz

1600MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-3770

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-3770

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-3770

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-3770

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-3770

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-3770

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-3770

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i7-3770

Summary

Intel Core i5-2400

100%
Intel Core i7-3770

136%

Relative performance

Intel Core i5-2400

100%
Intel Core i7-3770

122%

Relative performance

Intel Core i5-2400

100%
Intel Core i7-3770

149%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-2400

None

Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-3770

Much higher single threaded performance (around 22% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.

Much higher multi threaded performance (around 49% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.

This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).

Around 36% higher average synthetic performance.

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-3770

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

Productivity

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-3770

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features

Intel Core i5-2400			Intel Core i7-3770
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
TXT
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
Hyper-Threading

Architecture

	Intel Core i5-2400		Intel Core i7-3770
Architecture	Intel_SandyBridge	vs	Intel_IvyBridge
Market	Desktop	vs	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR3	vs	DDR3
Codename	Sandy Bridge	vs	Ivy Bridge
Release Date	Jan 2011	vs	Apr 2012

Cores

	Intel Core i5-2400		Intel Core i7-3770
Cores	4	vs	4
Threads	4	vs	8
SMPs	1	vs	1
Integrated Graphics	Intel HD 2000	vs	Intel HD 4000

Cache

	Intel Core i5-2400		Intel Core i7-3770
L1 Cache	64 KB (per core)	vs	64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache	256 KB (per core)	vs	256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache	6144 KB (shared)	vs	8192 KB (shared)

Physical

	Intel Core i5-2400		Intel Core i7-3770
Socket	Intel Socket 1155	vs	Intel Socket 1155
Max Case Temp	unknown	vs	67°C
Package	FC-LGA10	vs	FC-LGA12C
Die Size	216mmÂ²	vs	160mmÂ²
Process	32 nm	vs	22 nm

Performance

	Intel Core i5-2400		Intel Core i7-3770
Cpu Frequency	3100 MHz	vs	3400 MHz
Turbo Clock	3400 MHz	vs	3900 MHz
Base Clock	100 MHz	vs	100 MHz
Voltage	unknown	vs	unknown
TDP	95 W	vs	77 W

Intel Core i5-2400

3400 points
Intel Core i7-3770

4017 points

Points — higher is better

Intel Core i5-2400

12400 points
Intel Core i7-3770

16809 points

Points — higher is better

Intel Core i5-2400

8204
Intel Core i7-3770

12469

points — higher is better

Intel Core i5-2400

2812
Intel Core i7-3770

3453

points — higher is better

Intel Core i5-2400

8872
Intel Core i7-3770

13338

points — higher is better

Intel Core i5-2400

2633
Intel Core i7-3770

3188

points — higher is better

Intel Core i5-2400 (simulated)

112. 11
Intel Core i7-3770 (simulated)

139

points — higher is better

Intel Core i5-2400 (simulated)

441.52
Intel Core i7-3770 (simulated)

647.94

points — higher is better

i5-2400 vs i7-3770 — Fortnite Battle Royale with GTX 1650 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1650 with

Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz

Fortnite Battle Royale

GTX 1650 with

Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz

i5-2400
i7-3770

Multi-Thread Performance

5953 Pts

9293 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1747 Pts

2068 Pts

Fortnite Battle Royale

i5-2400 vs i7-3770 in Fortnite Battle Royale using GTX 1650 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-2400
i7-3770

Ultra Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	36. 7 FPS
1080p	44.6 FPS
1440p	23.6 FPS
1440p	28.7 FPS
2160p	13.1 FPS
2160p	15.9 FPS
w1440p	19.6 FPS
w1440p	23.9 FPS

High Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	67.0 FPS
1080p	79.3 FPS
1440p	45.7 FPS
1440p	54.2 FPS
2160p	27.3 FPS
2160p	32.4 FPS
w1440p	38.9 FPS
w1440p	46.2 FPS

Medium Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	97. 3 FPS
1080p	114.0 FPS
1440p	67.8 FPS
1440p	79.7 FPS
2160p	41.5 FPS
2160p	48.8 FPS
w1440p	58.1 FPS
w1440p	68.5 FPS

Low Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	158.0 FPS
1080p	183.3 FPS
1440p	112.0 FPS
1440p	130.6 FPS
2160p	69.9 FPS
2160p	81.7 FPS
w1440p	96.7 FPS
w1440p	113.1 FPS

i5-2400

i7-3770

Compare i5-2400 vs i7-3770 specifications

Share Your Comments 0

2009

Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i5-2400 Comparison

Intel Core i7-3770

Buy on Amazon

Intel Core i5-2400

Buy on Amazon

Key Differences
Performance
Features
Miscellaneous
General info
Memory
Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-2400

Cores	4	4
CPU Threads	8	4
Base Clock Speed	3. 4GHz	3.1GHz
Turbo Clock Speed	3.9GHz	3.4GHz
TDP (THERMAL DESIGN POINT)	77W	95W
Has integrated graphics	Yes	Yes
Performance per watt	148. 0	80.0

CPU Speed & Cores	4 x 3.4GHz	4 x 3. 1GHz
Number of CPU Threads	8	4
L2 Cache Size	1MB	1MB
L3 Cache Size	8MB	6MB
Turbo Boost Frequency	3. 9GHz	3.4GHz
L1 Cache Size	256KB	256KB
L2 Core	0. 25MB/core	0.25MB/core
L3 Core	2MB/core	1. 5MB/core
Clock Multiplier	34	31
Does it have an unlocked multiplier	No	No
Uses ARM big. LITTLE tech	No	No
Uses ARM HMP	No	No

Has AES Support	Yes	Yes
Supports CPU Throttling	Yes	Yes
Supported SSE Version	4. 2	4.2
Has AVX Support	Yes	Yes
Has MMX Tech Support	Yes	Yes
Has F16C Support	Yes	No
Has Multithreading Tech Support	Yes	No
Has NX Processor Bit Support	Yes	Yes
Supports ARM TrustZone Tech	No	No
Has FMA4 Instructions Support	No	No
Has FMA3 Instructions Support	No	No

Geekbench Score	11417	7601
Cinebench 11. 5 Score	7.51	5.07
SysMark 2012 Score	223	169
CPU Data Work Score	261	189
Cinebench 11. 5 Score (Single Thread)	1.65	1.37
Media Creation Score	208	161
Web Dev Score	234	174
3D Modelling Score	255	172
Office Productivity Score	191	151
System Management Score	197	170
Height	37. 5mm	37.5mm
Width Size	37. 5mm	37.5mm

RAM Memory Speed	1600MHz	1333MHz
Max Memory Bandwidth	25. 6GB/s	21GB/s
Max Memory Channels	2	2
Supported Memory Size	32GB	32GB
Bus Bandwidth	5GT/s	5GT/s
ECC (Error-Correcting Code) Memory Support	No	No

PassMark Score	9460	5801
PassMark Score (Single Thread)	2073	1714
PassMark Score (Overclocked)	10410	6743
CPU Performance (Per Watt)	148. 0	80.0
Power Consumption Under High Load	Not Known	115. 2W

Similar Comparisons

Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i7-3770

Comparaison des caractéristiques techniques entre les processeurs, avec le Intel Core i5-2400 d’un côté et le Intel Core i7-3770 de l’autre. Le premier est dédié au secteur ordinateur de bureau, il dispose de 4 coeurs, 4 threads, une fréquence maximale de 3,4 GHz. Le second est employé sur le segment ordinateur de bureau, il possède un total de 4 coeurs, 8 threads, sa fréquence turbo s’établit à 3,9 GHz. Le tableau suivant permet aussi de comparer la lithographie, le nombre de transistors (si indiqué), la quantité de mémoire cache, la capacité maximale de mémoire RAM, le type de mémoire accepté, la date de première diffusion, le nombre maximal de lignes PCIe, les valeurs obtenues dans Geekbench 4 et Cinebench R15.

Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.

Cette page contient des références aux produits d’un ou de plusieurs de nos annonceurs. Nous pouvons recevoir une compensation lorsque vous cliquez sur des liens vers ces produits. Pour une explication de notre politique publicitaire, veuillez visiter cette page.

Caractéristiques :

Processeur	Intel Core i5-2400	Intel Core i7-3770
Marché (principal)	Ordinateur de bureau	Ordinateur de bureau
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Sandy Bridge	Ivy Bridge
Famille	Core i5-2000	Core i7-3000
Numéro(s) de pièce, S-Spec	BX80623I52400, BXC80623I52400, CM8062300834106, CM8062300834107, Q1ED, Q1HT, SR00Q	BX80637I73770, BXC80637I73770, CM8063701211600, SR0PK
Date de lancement	Q1 2011	Q2 2012
Lithographie	32 nm	22 nm
Transistors	1. 160.000.000	1.300.000.000
Cœurs	4	4
Threads	4	8
Fréquence de base	3,1 GHz	3,4 GHz
Fréquence turbo	3,4 GHz	3,9 GHz
Vitesse du bus	5 GT/s	5 GT/s
Mémoire cache	6 MB	8 MB
Capacité mémoire maxi	32 GB	32 GB
Types de mémoire	DDR3 1066/1333	DDR3 1333/1600
Nb. max. de canaux mémoire	2	2
Bande passante mémoire maxi	21 GB/s	25,6 GB/s
Lignes PCIe max	16	16
PDT	95 W	77 W
Alimentation système recommandée	Alimentation PC de 600W	Alimentation PC de 600W
GPU intégré	Intel HD Graphics 2000	Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU, unités d’exécution	6	16
GPU, unités de calcul shader	48	128
GPU, cadence de base	850 MHz	650 MHz
GPU, cadence maxi	1100 MHz	1150 MHz
GPU, point flottant FP32	110,4 GFLOPS	268,8 GFLOPS
Socket	LGA1155	LGA1155
Carte mère compatible	Carte mère Socket LGA 1155	Carte mère Socket LGA 1155
Température maximale	72. 6°C	105°C
CPU-Z simple thread	308	385
CPU-Z multi thread	1.212	1.871
Cinebench R15 simple thread	119	134
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	421	663
Cinebench R23 simple thread	620	753
Cinebench R23 multi-thread	2.351	3.692
PassMark simple thread	1.567	2.062
PassMark CPU Mark	3. 811	6.361
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 simple cœur	3.247	3.822
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-cœur	9.282	12.687
(SGEMM) Performance en GFLOPS	139,74 GFLOPS	164,7 GFLOPS
(Performance multi-cœur / watt) Rapport performance / watt	98 pts / W	165 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.

On peut ainsi mieux comparer quelles sont les différences techniques entre les deux processeurs.

Alimentation système recommandée : on suppose que l’on possède une tour ATX, une carte graphique haut de gamme, 16GB de mémoire RAM, un disque SSD de 512GB, un disque dur HDD de 1TB, un lecteur Blu-Ray. Il faudra compter sur une alimentation plus puissante si on souhaite disposer de plusieurs cartes graphiques, plusieurs moniteurs, davantage de mémoire, etc.

Prix : pour des raisons techniques, nous ne pouvons pas afficher pour le moment un prix de moins de 24 heures, ou un prix en temps réel. C’est pourquoi on préfère pour l’instant ne pas faire apparaître de prix. Il faut vous référer aux boutiques en ligne respectives pour connaître le dernier prix, ainsi que la disponibilité.

On voit que les deux processeurs ont un nombre équivalents de cœurs, la fréquence turbo du Intel Core i7-3770 est plus grande, que la puissance de dissipation thermique du Intel Core i7-3770 est moindre. Le Intel Core i7-3770 a été lancé plus récemment.

Performances :

Comparaison des performances entre les deux processeurs, pour cela on considère les résultats générés sur des logiciels de benchmarks tels que Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Score multi-thread & simple thread
Intel Core i7-3770	385 1.871
Intel Core i5-2400	308 1.212

En simple cœur, la différence est de 25%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 54%.

Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

CPU-Z est un logiciel d’information système qui fournit le nom du processeur, son numéro de modèle, le nom de code, les niveaux de cache, le package, le processus. Il peut également délivrer des données sur la carte mère, la mémoire. Il fait des mesures en temps réel, avec enfin un benchmark pour le simple thread, ainsi que pour le multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Score multi-thread & simple thread
Intel Core i7-3770	134 663
Intel Core i5-2400	119 421

En simple cœur, la différence est de 13%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 57%.

Cinebench R15 permet d’évaluer les performances de calculs du CPU en restituant une scène 3D photoréaliste. La scène possède 2 000 objets, 300 000 polygones, utilise des reflets nets et flous, des zones lumineuses, des ombres, des shaders procéduraux, un antialiasing, etc. Plus le rendu de la scène est rapidement créée, plus le PC est puissant, avec un nombre élevé de points.

	Cinebench R23 — Score multi-thread & simple thread
Intel Core i7-3770	753 3.692
Intel Core i5-2400	620 2.351

En simple cœur, la différence est de 21%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 57%.

Cinebench R23 est un logiciel de test multi-plateformes qui permet d’évaluer les capacités matérielles d’un appareil tel qu’un ordinateur, une tablette, un serveur. Cette version de Cinebench prend en compte les évolutions récentes des processeurs avec de multiples cœurs et les dernières améliorations de techniques de rendu. L’évaluation est au final encore plus pertinente. La scène de test contient pas moins de 2 000 objets et plus de 300 000 polygones au total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & simple thread
Intel Core i7-3770	2.062 6.361
Intel Core i5-2400	1.567 3.811

En simple cœur, la différence est de 32%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 67%.

PassMark est un logiciel de benchmarks, qui fait plusieurs tests de performance, notamment, sur les nombres premiers, les nombres entiers, la virgule flottante, la compression, la physique, les instructions étendues, l’encodage, le triage. Plus le score est élevé, plus l’appareil a des capacités importantes.

Sur Windows 64-bit :

	Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i7-3770	3.822 12.687
Intel Core i5-2400	3.247 9.282

En simple cœur, la différence est de 18%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 37%.

Sur Linux 64-bit :

	Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i7-3770	3.539 10.146
Intel Core i5-2400	3.425 9.109

En simple cœur, la différence est de 3%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 11%.

Sur Android 64-bit :

	Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Android 64-bit
Intel Core i5-2400	2.961 8.591
Intel Core i7-3770	1.622 2.710

En simple cœur, la différence est de 83%. En multi-cœurs, le gap différentiel est de 217%.

Sur Mac OS X 64-bit :

	Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Core i7-3770	3.881 12.905
Intel Core i5-2400	3.040 8.635

En simple cœur, la différence est de 28%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 49%.

Geekbench 4 est une plateforme de benchmarks complète avec plusieurs types de tests, dont la compression de données, d’images, le cryptage en AES, l’encodage en SQL, en HTML, le rendu d’un fichier PDF, le calcul matriciel, de Transformation de Fourier rapide, la simulation d’objets en 3D, l’édition de photos, des tests sur la mémoire. Cela nous permet de mieux visualiser la puissance respective de ces appareils. Pour chaque résultat, on a pris une moyenne de 250 valeurs sur le fameux logiciel de benchmarks.

Équivalence :

Intel Core i5-2400 équivalent AMDIntel Core i7-3770 équivalent AMD

Voir aussi :

Intel Core i5-2400S

Intel Core i7-3770KIntel Core i7-3770S

Intel Core i7-3770 vs.

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i7-3770

O Intel Core i7-3770 opera com 4 núcleos e 8 threads de CPU. É executado em 3.90 GHz base 3.90 GHz todos os núcleos enquanto o TDP está definido em 77 W .O processador está conectado ao soquete da CPU LGA 1155 Esta versão inclui 8.00 MB de cache L3 em um chip, suporta canais de 2 e recursos 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction mantém abaixo de — graus C. Em particular, Ivy Bridge S Arquitetura é aprimorada com 22 nm e suporta VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . O produto foi lançado em Q2/2012

Intel Core i5-2400

O Intel Core i5-2400 opera com 4 núcleos e 8 threads de CPU. É executado em 3.40 GHz base No turbo todos os núcleos enquanto o TDP está definido em 95 W .O processador está conectado ao soquete da CPU LGA 1155 Esta versão inclui 6.00 MB de cache L3 em um chip, suporta canais de 2 DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 e recursos PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction mantém abaixo de — graus C. Em particular, Sandy Bridge S Arquitetura é aprimorada com 32 nm e suporta VT-x, VT-x EPT . O produto foi lançado em Q1/2011

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-2400

Detalhes de comparação

3.40 GHz	Frequência	3.10 GHz
4	Núcleos	4
3.90 GHz	Turbo (1 núcleo)	3.40 GHz
3.90 GHz	Turbo (todos os núcleos)	No turbo
Yes	Hyperthreading	No
Yes	Overclocking	No
normal	Arquitetura Central	normal
Intel HD Graphics 4000	GPU	Intel HD Graphics 2000
1.15 GHz	GPU (Turbo)	1.10 GHz
22 nm	Tecnologia	32 nm
1.15 GHz	GPU (Turbo)	1.10 GHz
11.0	Versão DirectX	10.1
3	Máx. monitores	2
	Memória	DDR3-1066 DDR3-1333
2	Canais de memória	2
	Memória máxima
No	ECC	No
—	L2 Cache	—
8. 00 MB	L3 Cache	6.00 MB
3.0	Versão PCIe
16	PCIe lanes
22 nm	Tecnologia	32 nm
LGA 1155	Soquete	LGA 1155
77 W	TDP	95 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d	Virtualização	VT-x, VT-x EPT
Q2/2012	Data de lançamento	Q1/2011
Mostrar mais dados		Mostrar mais dados

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

O Cinebench R23 é o sucessor do Cinebench R20 e também é baseado no Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 é um software usado mundialmente para criar formas 3D. O teste de núcleo único usa apenas um núcleo de CPU, a quantidade de núcleos ou capacidade de hyperthreading não conta.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

O Cinebench R23 é o sucessor do Cinebench R20 e também é baseado no Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 é um software usado mundialmente para criar formas 3D. O teste multi-core envolve todos os núcleos da CPU e tira uma grande vantagem do hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

O Cinebench R20 é o sucessor do Cinebench R15 e também é baseado no Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 é um software usado mundialmente para criar formas 3D. O teste de núcleo único usa apenas um núcleo de CPU, a quantidade de núcleos ou capacidade de hyperthreading não conta.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

O Cinebench R20 é o sucessor do Cinebench R15 e também é baseado no Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 é um software usado mundialmente para criar formas 3D. O teste multi-core envolve todos os núcleos da CPU e tira uma grande vantagem do hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

O Cinebench R15 é o sucessor do Cinebench 11.5 e também é baseado no Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 é um software usado mundialmente para criar formas 3D. O teste de núcleo único usa apenas um núcleo de CPU, a quantidade de núcleos ou capacidade de hyperthreading não conta.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

O Cinebench R15 é o sucessor do Cinebench 11.5 e também é baseado no Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 é um software usado mundialmente para criar formas 3D. O teste multi-core envolve todos os núcleos da CPU e tira uma grande vantagem do hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 é um benchmark de plataforma cruzada que usa muito a memória do sistema. Uma memória rápida empurra muito o resultado. O teste de núcleo único usa apenas um núcleo de CPU, a quantidade de núcleos ou capacidade de hyperthreading não conta.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 é um benchmark de plataforma cruzada que usa muito a memória do sistema. Uma memória rápida empurra muito o resultado. O teste multi-core envolve todos os núcleos da CPU e tira uma grande vantagem do hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

O desempenho teórico de computação da unidade gráfica interna do processador com precisão simples (32 bits) em GFLOPS. GFLOPS indica quantos bilhões de operações de ponto flutuante o iGPU pode realizar por segundo.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

O Blender é um software gráfico 3D gratuito para renderizar (criar) corpos 3D, que também podem ser texturizados e animados no software. O benchmark Blender cria cenas predefinidas e mede o (s) tempo (s) necessário (s) para a cena inteira. Quanto mais curto for o tempo necessário, melhor. Selecionamos o bmw27 como cenário de referência.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 é um benchmark de plataforma cruzada que usa muito a memória do sistema. Uma memória rápida empurra muito o resultado. O teste de núcleo único usa apenas um núcleo de CPU, a quantidade de núcleos ou capacidade de hyperthreading não conta.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 é um benchmark de plataforma cruzada que usa muito a memória do sistema. Uma memória rápida empurra muito o resultado. O teste multi-core envolve todos os núcleos da CPU e tira uma grande vantagem do hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

O Cinebench 11.5 é baseado no Cinema 4D Suite, um software popular para gerar formulários e outras coisas em 3D. O teste de núcleo único usa apenas um núcleo de CPU, a quantidade de núcleos ou capacidade de hyperthreading não conta.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

O Cinebench 11.5 é baseado no Cinema 4D Suite, um software popular para gerar formulários e outras coisas em 3D. O teste multi-core envolve todos os núcleos da CPU e tira uma grande vantagem do hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

O Cinebench 11.5 é baseado no Cinema 4D Suite, um software popular para gerar formulários e outras coisas em 3D. O teste iGPU usa a unidade gráfica interna da CPU para executar comandos OpenGL.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Alguns dos CPUs listados abaixo foram testados por CPU-Comparison. No entanto, a maioria das CPUs não foi testada e os resultados foram estimados por uma fórmula proprietária secreta de CPU-Comparison. Como tal, eles não refletem com precisão os valores reais da marca Passmark CPU e não são endossados pela PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Estimativa de uso elétrico

Média de horas de uso por dia

Utilização média da CPU (0-100%)

Custo de energia, dólar por kWh

Estimativa de uso elétrico

Média de horas de uso por dia

Utilização média da CPU (0-100%)

Custo de energia, dólar por kWh

Intel Core i7-3770		Intel Core i5-2400
77 W	Max TDP	95 W
NA	Consumo de energia por dia (kWh)	NA
NA	Custo de funcionamento por dia	NA
NA	Consumo de energia por ano (kWh)	NA
NA	Custo de funcionamento por ano	NA

Comparação popular

Comments

Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i7-3770: What is the difference?

32 Ballla

Intel Core i5-2400

42 Ballla

Intel Core i7-3770 9000 Why is Intel Core i5-2400 better than Intel Core i7-3770?

GPU frequency 200MHz higher?
850MHz vs 650MHz

Why is Intel Core i7-3770 better than Intel Core i5-2400?

9. 68% higher CPU speed?
4 x 3.4GHz vs 4 x 3.1GHz
267MHz higher RAM speed?
1600MHz vs 1333MHz
4 more CPU threads?
8 vs 4
32.4°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
105°C vs 72.6°C
Smaller 10nm semiconductors?
22nm vs 32nm
1.63x higher PassMark score?
9460 vs 5801
0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.9GHz vs 3.4GHz
18W below TDP?
77W vs 95W

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD RYZEN 3 3250U

Intel Core i3-1115g4

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

Intel Core i3-1115g4

AMD Ryzen 7 5800h

VS 9000) AMD RYZEN 5 5500U

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 7 5700u

Intel Core i7-1165g7

AMD Ryzen 5 5500u

. 21 5 3500U

Intel Core i5-10210U

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Intel Core i5-10210U 9000U

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U 9000 VS 9000u 9000u 9000u

SOME

Overall rating

Intel Core i5-2400

3 User reviews

Intel Core i5-2400

5.3 /10

37 User reviews 90

Intel Core 7-3

3 reviews of users

Intel Core i7-3770

/10

3 Reviews of Users

Functions

6.7 /10 9000 10

3 Votes

Games

2.0 /10

3 VOTES

/10

3 VOTES

performance

4.0 /10 9

3 Votes

10.0 /10

3 Votes

Reliability

4.7 /10

3 VOTES

10.0 9000 /10

3 VOTES 9000

3 Votes

9.0 /10

3 Votes

Productivity

1. Skur -old processor

4 x 3. 1GHZ

4 x 3.4GHZ

The central processor speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be performed processor, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

3.4GHz

3.9GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Has unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-3770

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1.5MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1333MHz

1600MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

21GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports Memory Error Code

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-3770

Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770)

Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-3770

physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-3770

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-3770

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-3770

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

6 bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-3770

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-3770

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Compare Intel Core i7 3770 and Intel Core i5 2400

Intel Core i7 3770

3.4 GHz | 4 cores | LGA 1155

VS

Intel Core i5 2400

3. 1GHz | 4 cores | LGA 1155

Benchmark

General result

Based on 8 tests:

Intel Core i7 3770 faster than

Intel Core i7 3770

9000

9000 -core)
Intel Core i7 3770 is 50.93% faster

Intel Core i7 3770

12524 97%

Intel Core i7 3770

Intel Core i5 2400

5870

Passmark (Single Core)

I7 3770 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 3 Intel Core INTEL CORE INTELA i5 2400

1741

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 3770

Smaller CPU (22nm vs. operations that the processor performs in 1 second

Higher turbo frequency: 3.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz

More threads (8 vs 4) allows more processes to run simultaneously

More L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB) allows the processor access data faster

Larger L3 cache per core: 2MB/core vs. 4°C) allows the processor to work in more severe temperature conditions sse sse2 sse3 ssse3 sse4 sse41 SSE42 AVX AESS

Intel Core i7-3770

versus

Intel Core i5-2400

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-3770

Newer processor, release date difference 1 year(s) 3 month(s)

More threads: 4 vs 4
About 15% more clock speed: 3. 90 GHz vs 3.40 GHz

About 45% more maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 72.6°C

The newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 32 nm

Approximately 33% larger L3 cache, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access

Approximately 23% less power consumption: 77 Watt vs 95 Watt

PassMark — Single thread mark performance approximately 31% higher: 2073 vs 1579

Approximately 66% increase in PassMark — CPU mark performance: 6400 vs 3847

Approximately 20% increase in Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance: 798 vs 665

About 43% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 3074 vs 2147

About 63% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark: 3662 vs 2247

Performance in CompuBench 1.5 — FaceDetection Desktop Detection benchmark (mPixels/s) about 54% more: 4.603 vs 2.995

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 8.6x more performance: 80.961 vs 9.378

Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 61% better: 0.585 vs 0.364

Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 27% better: 2.179 vs 1.721

Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 46% better: 6.05 vs 4.139

Release date April 2012 vs January 2011

Number of threads 8 vs 4

Maximum frequency 3.90 GHz vs 3.40 GHz

Maximum core temperature 105°C vs 72.6°C

Process 22 nm vs 32 nm

Level 3 cache 8192 KB (shared) vs 6144 KB (shared)

Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt vs 95 Watt

PassMark — Single thread mark 2073 vs 1579

PassMark — CPU mark 6400 vs 3847

Geekbench 4 — Single Core 798 vs 665

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 3074 vs 2147

3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 3662 vs 2247

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.603 vs 2.995

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 80.961 vs 9.378

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.585 vs 0.364

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.179 vs 1.721

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 6.05 vs 4.139

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Core i7-3770
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-2400

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

80.961

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

Name Intel Core i7-3770 Intel Core i5-2400

PassMark — Single thread mark 2073 1579

PassMark — CPU mark 6400 3847

Geekbench 4 — Single Core 798 665

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 3074 2147

3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 3662 2247

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.603 2.995

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 80.961 9.378

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.585 0.364

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.179 1.721

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 6.05 4.139

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 2876

GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 2876

Feature comparison

configuration

Intel Core i7-3770 Intel Core i5-2400

Architecture name Ivy Bridge Sandy Bridge

Issue date April 2012 January 2011

Price at first issue date $324 $60

Ranking 1373 1969

Price now $159. 99 $83.99

Processor Number i7-3770 i5-2400

Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors

Status Discontinued Launched

Price/performance ratio (0-100) 17.10 20.89

Applicability Desktop Desktop

Support 64 bit

Base frequency 3. 40 GHz 3.10 GHz

Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI 5 GT/s DMI

Crystal area 160mm 216 mm

Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) 64 KB (per core)

Level 2 cache 256 KB (per core) 256 KB (per core)

Level 3 cache 8192 KB (shared) 6144 KB (shared)

Process 22 nm 32nm

Maximum case temperature (TCase) 67 °C

Maximum core temperature 105°C 72. 6°C

Maximum frequency 3.90 GHz 3.40 GHz

Number of cores 4 4

Number of threads 8 4

Number of transistors 1400 million 1160 million

Maximum number of memory channels 2 2

Maximum memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s 21 GB/s

Maximum memory size 32GB 32GB

Supported memory types DDR3 1333/1600 DDR3 1066/1333

Device ID 0x162 0x102

Graphics base frequency 650MHz 850MHz

Graphics max dynamic frequency 1. 15 GHz 1.10 GHz

Maximum GPU clock 1.15 GHz 1.1 GHz

Intel® Clear Video Technology HD

Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)

Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology

Intel® Quick Sync Video

Integrated graphics Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® HD Graphics 2000

Maximum number of monitors supported 3 2

WiDi support

Low Halogen Options Available

Maximum number of processors in 1 1

Package Size 37. 5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm

Supported sockets FCLGA1155 LGA1155

Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 95 Watt

Thermal Solution 2011D

Revision PCI Express 3.0 2.0

PCIe configurations up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4

Number of PCI Express lanes 16

Anti-Theft Technology

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)

Intel® Identity Protection Technology

Intel® Secure Key Technology

Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology

Flexible Display interface (FDI)

Idle States

Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX

Intel 64

Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)

Intel® AES New Instructions

Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology

Intel® TSX-NI

Intel® Turbo Boost Technology

Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility

Thermal Monitoring

Intel® Fast Memory Access

Intel® Flex Memory Access

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Compare Intel Core i5 4690S and Intel Core i7 3770T

Comparison of Intel Core i5-3570 and Intel Core i7-3770 processors by all known characteristics in categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphic interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization. Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Core i5-3570

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

Benchmark

General result

Based on 16 tests: Intel Core i5 3570K
Intel Core 3,000 3,0004 100000 9000 3000 3000 3000 3000 Core I5 3570K

100.89

Geekbench 3 (Multi-Core)

Intel Core i7 3770k faster than 27.03%

Intel Core I7 3770K

13098

Intel Core i Intel Core i Intel Core i Intel Core INTE0003

Intel Core i7 3770k

10.47 Megheshi/C

Intel Core i5 3570K

11. 75 Megheshi/C

Compubench 1.5 (T-REX) 9000 9000 3,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000% fast

1.67 FPS

Intel Core i5 3570k

1.23 FPS

PCMARK8HOME30ACC

Intel Core i7 3770K faster than 4.77%

3770K 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

003

As you can see from the table above, the main difference between the two processors is the use of Hyper-Threading technology, as well as the size of the L3 Cache. The i7-3770K has 33% more caching capability than the i5-3570K. Hyper-Threading from Intel allows you to «create» one virtual core for each physical one, thus increasing the possibility of simultaneously processing several resource-intensive tasks (multitasking). As for graphics, both tested «processors» are about the same in strength thanks to the Intel HD 4000 core.

Here’s what the test participants look like:

Intel Core i5-3570K

AND Intel Core i7-3770K

Overlocking

The overlocking process of the new Ivy Bridge CPU is identical to the predecessor of the Sandy Bridge CPU. As usual, we determined the frequency using the BCLK (Base Clock) x Multiplier running at 34×100 MHz for the i5-3570K. In the case of the i7-3770K, we decided to set it to 35x100MHz. The test results are disappointing for an older processor, which overclocks much worse. For reasons of objectivity and accuracy of comparison, for both products from Intel during the test, the maximum frequency was set to 4.5 GHz.

Programs such as Aida and CineBench were used to test the multitasking capabilities of processors. Both unconditionally gave the championship to 7-3770K. Note that it is the Hyper-Threading technology that allows the «seven» to achieve outstanding results. «Five» also suffers because of the small cache.

To test the speed of calculating the file structure and its compression, we decided to use WinRar and x264 HD Benchmark. Despite the fact that the results were predictable, they nevertheless turned out to be quite interesting. Of course, with a margin of 15 FPS, the i7-3770K won thanks to the same amount of memory. However, the results of the i5-3570K turned out to be quite on the level!

And then we wondered what would happen if we calculate the Pi calculation in conditions where Hyper-Threading technology is not involved. And got the following results using wPrime 1024m and Nexus PiFast. As you can see from the following scorecards, the overclocked i5-3570K @4.5 GHz successfully outperforms the stock i7-3770K in both tests.

Games have long been «ahead of the rest» in terms of the loads they create for the CPU and GFU of computers. That is why the game test is quite an indicative test. However, in this case, we encountered a result that confirmed, however, the conclusion that has already been repeatedly voiced: modern processors have enough power to pass gaming tests with a bang, and at the same time, Hyper-Threading technology has almost no effect on the result

Crysis 2, Metro 2033 and Hitman Absolution were used as reference games

Graphics

As you know, both processors have an integrated graphics solution — Intel HD 4000 GFU.

This is quite a budget offer that allows people who do not have the opportunity to spend additional funds on discrete graphics to work with rather demanding programs, as well as play many more modern games, although usually at the lowest settings, which, of course, does not allow you to enjoy many of the «graphic delights» of modern blockbusters like Battlefield 3 or Crysis.

Using the same GFU on different processors does not mean the same effect at all. GFU needs a matching CPU to take full advantage of its integrated graphics. However, in our case, the results are almost identical. This was shown by tests on 3DMark Vantage and 3DMark11. Of course, the «seven» is ahead again, but by insignificant 50-60 points.

Temperature

Temperature testing is an important part of testing. Here it turns out how long the processor is ready to dispose of its «superpower». And if in general the temperature regime on both processors without overclocking and load was quite acceptable, then after overclocking and properly “heated” i5-3570K CPU gave out as much as 83°C! Which, of course, is no good.

The Intel Core i5-3570K sells for $235.

Pros

Nice price

Excellent performance

Great potential for overclocking and overclocking

Low power consumption both idle and under load

Cons

Really high temperatures under load

iGPU performance is poor

Conclusion

The Intel Core i5-3570K is a performance processor worth every dollar paid for it. We can say that in terms of price-quality ratio, this is currently the best processor on the market. The absence of Hyper-Threading does not create any problems in games. However, the only serious problem of the «five» is too high temperatures with a serious load on the power.

Intel Core i7-3770K sells for $342.

Pros

High performance

Hyper-Threading Technology

Huge potential for overclocking and overlocking

Attractive price (considering CPU performance)

Low power consumption both in idle and under load

Cons 9000 3

Comparatively high temperature under load

· Poor iGPU performance

The advantage of Hyper-Threading and more cache enabled the Intel Core i7-3770K to outperform its smaller sibling. We can say that the «seven» is by far the most powerful processor on Ivy Bridge. The only problem with the i7-3770K is the weak budget iGPU. Let’s hope that already in the «Haswell» series, Intel will offer something more interesting and powerful as a graphics core.

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 3770K

High frequency (3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz) means more operations that the processor performs in 1 second

High turbo frequency: 3.9 GHz vs 3 .8 GHz

More threads (8 vs. 4) allows more processes to run simultaneously

More L3 cache (8MB vs. 6MB) allows the processor to access data faster

More L3 cache per core: 2MB/core vs 1.5MB/core
4 more threads: 8 vs 4

About 3% more clock speed: 3.90 GHz vs 3.80 GHz

About 56% more max core temperature: 105°C vs 67.4 °C

About 33% L3 cache more means more data can be stored in it for quick access

Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark about 2% more: 2072 vs 2037

Performance in PassMark — CPU mark about 31% more: 6369vs 4868

Approximately 2% increase in Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance: 798 vs 779

Approx. Physics Score approximately 29% higher: 3660 vs 2830

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) approximately 37% higher: 4.673 vs 3.405

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames) performance /s) 7.8 times more: 81.095 vs 10.336

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) approximately 41% faster performance: 0.589 vs 0.418

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) approximately 13% faster performance : 2.318 vs 2.045

Approximately 68% increase in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Frames): 2889 vs 1720

Approximately 68% increase in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) performance: 2809 vs 1722
PassMark — CPU mark 6369 vs 4868 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 798 vs 779 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 3074 vs 2537 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 3660 vs 2830 CompuBench 1. 50651 Extended instructions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX Intel
9065 Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology Intel® My WiFi Technology 0030

Family

Core i7-3770K
Compare

Core i7-3770
Compare

Family

Core i5-2400S
Core

i7-3770S

62.5 (+5.4%)

Core i5-2400

59.1

Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed in office use

Core i7-3770S

63.7 (+5.2%)

Core i5-2400

60.4

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed in heavy applications

Core i7-3770S

37.2 (+13.7%)

Core i5-2400

32.1

The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.

Speed of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Core i7-3770S

60.1 (+8.5%)

Core i5-2400

55

Demanding games and tasks

Core i7-3770S

34.8 (+19.5%)

Core i5-2400

28

Extreme

Core i7-3770S

8.5 (+35.3%)

Core i5-2400

5.5

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Passmark

Intel Core i7-3770S

6213 (+38.5%)

Intel Core i5-2400

3819

Specifications

.

Basic

Manufacturer Intel Intel

DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i7-3770S Processor (8M Cache, up to 3.90 GHz) Intel® Core™ i5-2400 Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.40 GHz)

ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Ivy Bridge Sandy Bridge

Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 22 nm 32 nm

Date of IssueMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 09-2016 09-2013

Model Official name. i7-3770S i5-2400

Cores The number of physical cores. 4 4

ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 8 4

Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). Missing

Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.1 GHz 3.1 GHz

Turbo Frequency The maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 3.9 GHz 3.4 GHz

L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 8 MB 6 MB

Instructions 64-bit 64-bit

Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. SSE4.1/4.2, AVX SSE4.1/4.2, AVX

Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No Yes

Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 5 GT/s DMI 5 GT/s DMI

Number of QPI links

TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 65 W 95 W

Cooling system specifications 2011C

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® HD Graphics 2000

GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 650 MHz 850 MHz

Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. 1150 MHz 1100MHz

Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802.11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. No data No data

Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 2

RAM

Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 32 GB 32 GB

Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR3 1333/1600 DDR3 1066/1333

RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2

RAM bandwidth 25.6 GB/s 21 GB/s

ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

PCI

configuration options

PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 2

PCI up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4

Number of PCI lanes No data up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4

Data Security

AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data

Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high-performance random number generator. No data No data

Decoration

Dimensions No data No data

Supported sockets No data No data

Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

Which is better

Intel Core i7-3770S

On average, gaming performance is 3% better.

The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 3%.

In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 3%.

The number of threads is 4 more.

Intel Core i5-2400

The price is $190 lower

What are the similarities of

The number of physical cores is the same.

The base frequency is equal.

What is better Intel Core i5-8600K or Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-8600k

Intel Core i7-3770

PASSMARK CPUS CPUS CPUS write speed and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all

9468

max 89379

Average: 6033.5

5932

max 89379

Average: 6033.5

Cinebench21.5 score (single)

A benchmark that measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

ten

max 51

Average: 5.6

max 51

Average: 5.6

3DMark06 test score

8715

max 18628

Average: 3892.6

max 18628

Average: 3892.6

Cinebench R11.5 /64bit test score (Multi-Core)

10.6056

max 45.3622

Average: 5.3

max 45.3622

Average: 5.3

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core) score

928

max 4614

Average: 638. 4

max 4614

Average: 638.4

Cinebench R15 score (Single-Core)

174

max 276

Average: 128.5

max 276

Average: 128.5

AES

Yes

Yes

Support for Intel Optane 9 memory0650

There is

No data

TERMOMONTROL TECHOM CONTROLS

is

Intel

Confidential Street

is

9000 9000 9000 Intel Trusted Execution Technology

Yes

Yes

Intel Boot Guard

Yes

N/A

Number of threads

The more threads, the better the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform multiple tasks at the same time.
Show all

6

max 256

Average: 10.7

eight

max 256

Average: 10.7

L1 cache size

A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all

384KB

max 4608

Average: 299.3 KB

256KB

max 4608

Average: 299.3 KB

L2 cache size

L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all

1.5MB

max 512

Average: 4. 5 MB

1MB

max 512

Average: 4.5 MB

L3 cache size

A large amount of L3 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all

9MB

max 768

Average: 16.3 MB

8MB

max 768

Average: 16.3 MB

Maximum clock speed in Turbo 9 mode0650

When the processor’s speed drops below its limit, it may jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all

4.3GHz

max 5.5

Average: 3.2 GHz

3.9GHz

max 5. 5

Average: 3.2 GHz

Number of cores

6

max 72

Mean: 5.8

four

max 72

Mean: 5.8

Processor base clock speed

3.6GHz

max 4.7

Average: 2.5 GHz

3.4GHz

max 4.7

Average: 2.5 GHz

Frequency with Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0

4.3GHz

max 5.1

Average: 3.5 GHz

3.9GHz

max 5.1

Average: 3. 5 GHz

Max. number of PCI Express lanes

16

max 64

Average: 22.7

max 64

Average: 22.7

PCI Express configurations

Up to 1×16. 2×8. 1×8+2×4

up to 1×16. 2×8. 1×8 & 2×4

Idle states

Yes

Yes

Unlocked processor multiplier

Some processors have an unlocked multiplier, thanks to which they work faster and improve the quality in games and other applications.
Full text

Yes

No data

Turbo Boost technology

Turbo Boost is a technology that allows the processor to operate at a frequency higher than the maximum. This increases its productivity (including when performing complex tasks)
Show all

2

Mean: 1. 9

2

Mean: 1.9
Max. graphics system frequency

1.15GHz

max 1.55

Average: 1.1 GHz

1.15GHz

max 1.55

Average: 1.1 GHz

Number of PCI-Express lanes

16

n/a

Max. number of processors in configuration

one

Mean: 1.3

one

Mean: 1.3

DDR version

four

Mean: 3.5

3

Mean: 3.5

Max. memory bandwidth

This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.

41.6GB/s

max 352

Average: 41.4 GB/s

25.6GB/s

max 352

Average: 41.4 GB/s

Memory frequency

RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all

2666MHz

max 4800

Average: 2106.2 MHz

1600MHz

max 4800

Average: 2106.2 MHz

Max. number of memory channels

2

max 16

Mean: 2. 9

2

max 16

Mean: 2.9

Max. memory capacity

Largest RAM memory capacity.

128GB

max 6000

Average: 404.4 GB

32GB

max 6000

Average: 404.4 GB

System bus frequency

Data between computer components and other devices is transferred via the bus.
Show all

8 GT/s

max 1600

Average: 156.1 GT/s

5 GT/s

max 1600

Average: 156.1 GT/s

ECC memory support

Memory debugging code is used when it is necessary to avoid data corruption in scientific computing or server startup. It finds possible errors and repairs data corruption.
Full display

No

No

Processor RAM

64 GB

max 128

Average: 34.8 GB

GB

max 128

Average: 34.8 GB

Max. Resolution (DP)

[Email Protected]

No data

VPRO

is

There are

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) 9000

4.5

max 4.6

Average: 4.1

max 4.6

Average: 4.1

Intel® AES-NI Commands

AES is needed to speed up encryption and decryption.

Yes

Yes

Hyper-Threading Technology

Many Intel processors use state-of-the-art hyper-threading technology. Thus, each processor core works simultaneously on two threads, which significantly increases performance. Most processors work on the principle: one thread per core, therefore, their performance is lower.
Show all

No

Yes

OpenGL

Used by some applications to harness GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all

4.5

max 4.6

Mean: 4.4

max 4.6

Mean: 4.4

AVX

AVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Show all

Yes

Yes

sse version

Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all

4.2

max 4.2

Average: 4.1

4.2

max 4.2

Average: 4.1

4K support

You can view images in the highest quality 9EPT

is

there is

Virtualization technology AMD

There is

No data

Quick Sync Video Clear Video HD

Yes

Yes

InTru 3D

Yes

Yes

Workflow

The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

14 nm

Average: 36. 8 nm

22 nm

Average: 36.8 nm

Heat dissipation (TDP)

Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all

95W

Average: 67.6 W

77W

Average: 67.6 W

PCI Express Edition

3

Mean: 2.9

3

Mean: 2.9

condition 0004 Specifications of the cooling system GPU base clock

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.

350MHz

max 2400

Average: 535.8 MHz

650MHz

max 2400

Average: 535.8 MHz

Supports 64-bit system

A 64-bit system can support more than 4 GB of RAM as opposed to a 32-bit system. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Full text

Yes

Yes

DirectX

Used in demanding games providing improved graphics

12

max 12.1

Average: 12

max 12.1

Average: 12

Maximum processor temperature

Reset may occur if the maximum temperature at which the processor operates is exceeded.
Show all

100°C

max 110

Average value: 96 °C

105°C

max 110

Average value: 96 °C

OpenGL

Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all

4.5

max 4.6

Mean: 4.4

max 4.6

Mean: 4.4

Turbo GPU

If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, then to improve performance, it can go to a high clock speed.
Show all

1150MHz

max 2100

Average: 1091 MHz

1150MHz

max 2100

Average: 1091 MHz

Monitor support

Multiple monitors can be connected to the device, making it easier to work by increasing the working space.