I5 8400 vs ryzen 5 2600x: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs Intel Core i5-8400

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs Intel Core i5-8400

28 May20|Techpowerup

Intel Core i5-10400F Review — Six …
8 % FarC5 21%, BFV 9%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 10%, MetroEx 13%, Sekiro 25%, Wolf2 14% SotTR 1%, Rage2 2%, ACO 9%
14 Nov19|PCGamer

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
6 % Hitm2 13%, FarC5 15%, TWarW2 5%, SotTR 13%, MetroEx 8%, MESoW 7% StrangeB 1%, ACO 4%, Divis2 2%
Memory

Avg. Memory Latency
88 Pts Lower memory latency.
+17%
75.2 Pts
1-Core

Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
114 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+8%
106 Pts
2-Core

Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
226 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+10%
205 Pts
4-Core

Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
441 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+16%
380 Pts
8-Core

Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
629 Pts 664 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+6%
Memory

OC Memory Latency
94. 5 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+9%
86.4 Pts
1-Core

OC Single Core Mixed Speed
120 Pts +1% 119 Pts
2-Core

OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
238 Pts +1% 235 Pts
4-Core

OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
467 Pts +3% 452 Pts
8-Core

OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
687 Pts 756 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+10%
Age

Newest
59 Months 53 Months More recent.
+10%
TDP

Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+32%
95 Watts
Cores

CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads

CPU Processing Threads
6 threads 12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography

Manufacturing process
14 nm 12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14%
Base Clock

Base Clock Speed
2.8 GHz 3.6 GHz Faster base frequency.
+29%
Turbo Clock

Turbo Clock Speed
4 GHz 4. 2 GHz +5%
64-Core

OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
689 Pts 1022 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+48%
64-Core

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
634 Pts 884 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+39%
Series

CPU Architecture
Coffee Lake Zen+
Socket

Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 AM4
Graphics

Integrated Graphics
UHD 630 None

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs Intel Core i5+8400: What is the difference?

44points

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

53points

Intel Core i5+8400

Comparison winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Intel Core i5+8400

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2600X better than Intel Core i5+8400?

  • 28. 57% faster CPU speed?
    6 x 3.6GHzvs6 x 2.8GHz
  • 267MHz higher ram speed?
    2933MHzvs2666MHz
  • 6 more CPU threads?
    12vs6
  • 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
    12nmvs14nm
  • 1.5MB bigger L2 cache?
    3MBvs1.5MB
  • 20.56% higher PassMark result?
    14087vs11685
  • 0.25GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    4.25GHzvs4GHz
  • 7MB bigger L3 cache?
    16MBvs9MB

Why is Intel Core i5+8400 better than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X?

  • 30W lower TDP?
    65Wvs95W
  • Has integrated graphics?
  • Has F16C?
  • Has FMA3?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i3-10100

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i3-9100F

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i5-8400T

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i3-8100

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i3-10105

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

Intel Core i7-7700

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 1700x

Intel Core i5+8400

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

2 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

9. 5/10

2 User reviews

Intel Core i5+8400

1 User reviews

Intel Core i5+8400

10.0/10

1 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.5/10

2 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Gaming

9.0/10

2 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

10.0/10

2 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Reliability

9.5/10

2 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Energy efficiency

10.0/10

2 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

6 x 3.6GHz

6 x 2.8GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.25GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✖Intel Core i5+8400

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

2.67MB/core

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2933MHz

2666MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

43.71GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✖Intel Core i5+8400

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✔Intel Core i5+8400

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✔Intel Core i5+8400

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✔Intel Core i5+8400

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✔Intel Core i5+8400

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✔Intel Core i5+8400

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✖Intel Core i5+8400

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600X: performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i5 8400

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

We compared two 6-core desktop CPUs: the 2. 8 GHz Intel Core i5 8400 against the 3.6 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 2600X. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i5 8400

55

Ryzen 5 2600X

56

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i5 8400

28

Ryzen 5 2600X

37

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i5 8400

44

Ryzen 5 2600X

46

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i5 8400

42

Ryzen 5 2600X

48

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 2600X and 8400

Advantages of Intel Core i5 8400

  • Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666 RAM
  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than the Ryzen 5 2600X – 65 vs 95 Watt
  • Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Has 7 MB larger L3 cache size
  • More modern manufacturing process – 12 versus 14 nanometers
  • Newer — released 7-months later
  • 5% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 2 GHz vs 4 GHz)
  • Around 2.11 GB/s (5%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i5 8400

1023

Ryzen 5 2600X
+6%

1086

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8400

5823

Ryzen 5 2600X
+29%

7489

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i5 8400

2392

Ryzen 5 2600X

2392

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8400

9130

Ryzen 5 2600X
+53%

13929

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i5 8400

1026

Ryzen 5 2600X
+1%

1039

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8400

4604

Ryzen 5 2600X
+26%

5792

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 8400 and AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

General

Vendor Intel AMD
Released October 5, 2017 April 19, 2018
Type Desktop Desktop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Zen+
Model number i5-8400
Socket LGA-1151 AM4
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 630 No

Performance

Cores 6 6
Threads 6 12
Base Frequency 2. 8 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency 4 GHz 4.2 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 28x 36x
Bus Bandwidth 8 GT/s
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 96K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) 512K (per core)
L3 Cache 9MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No Yes
Transistors 4.8 billions
Fabrication process 14 nm 12 nm
TDP 65 W 95 W
Max. temperature 100°C 95°C
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Base Clock 350 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1050 MHz
Shading Units 192
TMUs 24
ROPs 3
Execution Units 24
TGP 15 W
Max. Resolution 4096×2304 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i5 8400

0.38 TFLOPS

Ryzen 5 2600X

n/a

Memory support

Memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-2933
Memory Size 128 GB 64 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 43.71 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes
Official site Intel Core i5 8400 official page AMD Ryzen 5 2600X official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 20
Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i5 8400

4 (44.4%)

Ryzen 5 2600X

5 (55.6%)

Total votes: 9

Сompetitors

1.
Intel Core i5 8400 and Intel Core i5 12400

2.
Intel Core i5 8400 and Intel Core i5 12400F

3.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X or Intel Core i5 8400?

Name

Message

Promotion

Core i5-8400 vs Ryzen 5 2600X

Availability

Intel Core i5-8400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W

Buy on Amazon

$185

In Stock

Updated 49 minutes ago

Availability

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler — YD260XBCAFBOX

Buy on Amazon

$240

In Stock

Updated 49 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 196 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.

Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400

  • Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X — $185.0 vs $240.0

  • Up to 22% better value when playing VALORANT than Ryzen 5 2600X — $0.43 vs $0.55 per FPS

  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X — 65 vs 95 Watts

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

VALORANT

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i5-8400

Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017


FPS

433

99%

Value, $/FPS

$0.43/FPS

100%

Price, $

$185

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i5-8400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W

Buy for $185 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 49 minutes ago

Ryzen 5 2600X

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018


FPS

439

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0. 55/FPS

78%

Price, $

$240

77%

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler — YD260XBCAFBOX

Buy for $240 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 49 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i5-8400

Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017

Ryzen 5 2600X

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018

433

FPS

439

FPS

VALORANT

995

FPS

1009

FPS

League of Legends

248

FPS

251

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

270

FPS

274

FPS

Apex Legends

268

FPS

272

FPS

Fortnite

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Core i5-8400

Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017


Single-Core

1035

100%

Multi-Core

4520

81%

Ryzen 5 2600X

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018


Single-Core

1034

100%

Multi-Core

5610

100%

Intel Core i5-8400

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Oct 5th, 2017 Release Date

Apr 19th, 2018

Core i5 Collection Ryzen 5
Coffee Lake Codename Pinnacle Ridge
Intel Socket 1151 Socket AMD Socket AM4

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

6 Cores 6
6 Threads

12

2. 8 GHz Base Clock Speed

3.6 GHz

4.0 GHz Turbo Clock Speed

4.2 GHz

65 W

TDP 95 W
14 nm Process Size

12 nm

28.0x Multiplier

36.0x

None Integrated Graphics None
No Overclockable

Yes

Builds Using Core i5-8400 or Ryzen 5 2600X

VALORANT, 1080p, High

Lenovo Ideacentre 510A-15Icb 90HV001VUS Desktop PC

69 FPS

$10.13/FPS

UHD Graphics 630

Core i5-8400

8 GB, 128 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$699

In Stock

Updated 34 minutes ago

Skytech Archangel Gaming Computer PC

192 FPS

$10.41/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660

Ryzen 5 2600X

16 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,999

In Stock

Updated 42 minutes ago

Acer Nitro 50 Gaming Desktop PC

152 FPS

$11. 84/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Core i5-8400

16 GB, 256 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,799

In Stock

Updated 38 minutes ago

Acer Nitro 50 Gaming Desktop PC

152 FPS

$12.49/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Core i5-8400

24 GB, 256 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,899

In Stock

Updated 38 minutes ago

Acer Nitro 50 Gaming Desktop PC

152 FPS

$14.47/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Core i5-8400

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,199

In Stock

Updated 38 minutes ago

Alienware — Aurora R7 Desktop PC

228 FPS

$17.54/FPS

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

Core i5-8400

8 GB, 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$4,000

In Stock

Updated 42 minutes ago

Acer Nitro 50 Gaming Desktop PC

152 FPS

$17.76/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Core i5-8400

64 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,699

In Stock

Updated 38 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Ryzen 5 2600X

Pentium E2220

N/A Stock

Core i5-8400

Phenom X4 9550

$189.95

Ryzen 5 2600X

Core i5-450M

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 2600X

Phenom II X4 920

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 2600X

R-Series RX-427BB

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 2600X

Celeron 540

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 2600X

Xeon E5405

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 2600X

PRO A6-9500B

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 2600X

Sempron 145

i5-8400 vs Ryzen 5 3500 — Just Cause 4 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz

Just Cause 4

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 5 3500


i5-8400
Ryzen 5 3500

Multi-Thread Performance

11694 Pts

1655 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2334 Pts

2820 Pts

Just Cause 4

i5-8400 vs Ryzen 5 3500 in Just Cause 4 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-8400
Ryzen 5 3500


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

62. 2 FPS

1080p

65.2 FPS

1440p

46.0 FPS

1440p

48.2 FPS

2160p

23.9 FPS

2160p

25.1 FPS

w1440p

37.4 FPS

w1440p

39.2 FPS

High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

105.4 FPS

1080p

109.7 FPS

1440p

81.4 FPS

1440p

84.7 FPS

2160p

46.2 FPS

2160p

48.2 FPS

w1440p

68.1 FPS

w1440p

70.9 FPS

Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

148. 6 FPS

1080p

154.2 FPS

1440p

116.8 FPS

1440p

121.3 FPS

2160p

68.5 FPS

2160p

71.3 FPS

w1440p

98.8 FPS

w1440p

102.7 FPS

Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

235.0 FPS

1080p

243.2 FPS

1440p

187.6 FPS

1440p

194.4 FPS

2160p

113.1 FPS

2160p

117.6 FPS

w1440p

160.3 FPS

w1440p

166.2 FPS

i5-8400
  • The i5-8400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-8400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-8400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-8400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-8400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 5 3500
  • The Ryzen 5 3500 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 3500 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-8400 vs Ryzen 5 3500 specifications

i5-8400 vs Ryzen 5 3500 Architecture
i5-8400 Ryzen 5 3500
Codename Coffee Lake Zen 2
Generation Core i5
(Coffee Lake)
Ryzen 5
(Zen 2)
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
Part# SLAPL unknown
Production Status Active Active
Released Oct 2017 Jul 2019
i5-8400 vs Ryzen 5 3500 Cache
i5-8400 Ryzen 5 3500
Cache L1 64K (per core) 96K (per core)
Cache L2 256K (per core) 512K (per core)
Cache L3 9MB (shared) 32MB (shared)
i5-8400 vs Ryzen 5 3500 Cores
i5-8400 Ryzen 5 3500
# of Cores 6 6
# of Threads 6 12
Integrated Graphics N/A N/A
SMP # CPUs 1 1
i5-8400 vs Ryzen 5 3500 Features
i5-8400 Ryzen 5 3500
i5-8400 vs Ryzen 5 3500 Performance
i5-8400 Ryzen 5 3500
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 2. 8 GHz 3.6 GHz
Multiplier 28.0x 36.0x
Multiplier Unlocked No Yes
TDP 65 W 65 W
Turbo Clock up to 4 GHz up to 4.2 GHz
Voltage variable variable
i5-8400 vs Ryzen 5 3500 Physical
i5-8400 Ryzen 5 3500
Die Size unknown unknown
Foundry Intel TSMC
Package FC-LGA1151
Process Size 14 nm 7 nm
Socket Intel Socket 1151 AMD Socket AM4
Transistors unknown 4,800 million
tCaseMax 72°C unknown

Share Your Comments 90

Compare i5-8400 vs Ryzen 5 3500 in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need For Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Dawn of War III

2017

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016

Doom

2016

F1 2016

2016

Total War: Warhammer

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

Intel Core i5-8400 review: Still a great Ryzen 5 killer

When I first reviewed AMD’s Ryzen 5 2600 and 2600X CPUs, I called them the Intel Core i5 Coffee Lake killers. Specifically, I said they were Intel Core i5-8600K killers — and to some extent that’s still true. While not as fast as the Core i5-8600K when it comes to overall gaming performance, their lower price, bundled cooler and generally superior multi-tasking performance in everyday desktop tasks make them a compelling alternative for mid-range PC builders. But how do they stand up against Intel’s entry-level Core i5 CPU, the i5-8400? Priced much more closely to AMD’s rival pair of CPUs, this £185 / $212 processor might just be a potential Ryzen 5 killer. How about that for a twist in our best gaming CPU rankings, eh?

On paper, the i5-8400 looks like a pretty bad deal compared to AMD’s 2nd Gen Ryzen 5s. Not only does it have a lower base clock speed of 2.8GHz compared to the 2600’s 3.4GHz and the 2600X’s 3.6GHz, but its maximum Turbo Boost only stretches to 4.0GHz. That’s just ahead of the 2600’s top speed of 3.9GHz, but it’s still a relative chunk behind the 2600X’s max boost clock of 4. 2GHz.

Plus, despite having six cores like its AMD rivals, it still only has six threads due to its lack of Hyper Threading support. AMD’s Ryzen processors, on the other hand, have 12 apiece. And if all that weren’t enough, it’s more expensive, too, costing £60 / $60 more than the £125 / $150 2600 and around £15 / $20 more than the £185 / $230 2600X. It does, at least, have the good fortune to come with a bundled cooler, so you don’t have to factor in any additional costs here if you don’t fancy shelling out on something more substantial, but needless to say, it’s going to have to work pretty darn hard to earn its keep.

The RPS Test PC:
Motherboard:
Asus Prime Z370-P (Intel), Asus Prime X370-Pro (AMD)
Cooler: BeQuiet BK009 Pure Rock (Intel), AMD Wraith Prism (AMD)
RAM: 16GB Corsair Vengeance 2133MHz
GPU: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE
PSU: OCZ ZX850W

Thankfully, it does that in spades — at least when it comes to gaming performance. I have to admit, testing any CPU’s gaming performance is still a bit of a difficult undertaking. As our friends at Digital Foundry have explained in the past, a lot of benchmarks either don’t test your CPU properly, or simply aren’t very accurate in the first place. Fortunately, a handful of gaming benchmarks have got a lot better at this recently, with the likes of Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and more all providing an in-depth look at your CPU’s performance as well as what your graphics card’s doing.

That said, there are also several other factors that can impact gaming performance, such as your graphics card, the type of RAM you’ve got, and even what type of storage you’ve installed the game on. As a result, getting a truly accurate picture of a CPU’s gaming performance is tricky, but I’ve done the best I can with the equipment available to me.

I’ve also focused a lot more on gaming performance in this review than I have on, say, application performance or media creation bits and bobs because, well, I’m not really interested in that. I’ve included some cursory Cinebench scores as a basic indicator of what each CPU will be like for general desktop tasks, but really, my main goal here is to work out what CPU is the best for gaming and gaming alone.

And boy howdy does the Core i5-8400 deliver. At 1080p, it had a clear lead over AMD’s Ryzen 5 2600 and 2600X in everything except Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, and even then we’re only talking an average gap of 4fps with the 2600, and 7fps with the 2600X. At 1440p, the Core i5-8400 either closed the gap entirely, or blazed ahead again, so much so that it even gives Intel’s Core i5-8600K a run for its money as well. Of course, it’s difficult to say whether you’ll see exactly the same kind of performance jump on the kind of mid-range graphics cards you’re more likely to be pairing with a CPU like this, but in my eyes, it’s pretty clear which CPU is killing which here.

Or at least it is for those buying their gaming CPU in the UK. In the US, the non-X Ryzen 5 2600 is quite a chunk of change cheaper than the Core i5-8400, making it a much more tempting proposition for mid-range builders on a budget. Indeed, at £120 / $150, the Ryzen 5 2600 definitely still has an air of a Coffee Lake killer about it — particularly when you take into account its superior multi-tasking performance as well.

Cast an eye over its Cinebench scores, for instance, and while it’s only a smidge behind the Core i5-8400 on single core performance, it’s positively light years ahead when it comes to multicore performance. It’s so nippy, in fact, that it even beats Intel’s considerably more expensive Core i7-8700 CPU as well. This makes it much better equipped to deal with creative applications and the like if you’re into your photo or video editing, and is probably a better all-round CPU than its Intel rival as a result.

As such, I’d probably seriously consider getting the Ryzen 5 2600 if I was after a cheap do-it-all CPU that still had a decent amount of gaming oomph — but only if it remains at its current price of £125 / $150. Any higher, and you may as well just spend the extra on the Core i5-8400, especially if you’re not planning on using your PC for anything other than gaming and light desktop tasks such as web surfing and typing up the odd document.

Of course, if you’re willing to spend a bit more to get the Core i5-8400, the question then becomes, ‘Is it worth spending another teensy bit extra and getting the even quicker and brand spanking new Intel Core i5-9600K instead?’ Priced at £220 / $230, it’s currently a much better buy than its 8th Gen predecessor, the i5-8600K, and delivers even better gaming performance for just another £20 / $20 on top of the i5-8400. It doesn’t come with a cooler, mind, which will add even more onto its overall cost depending on what model you go for, but for the best gaming CPU money can buy around the £200 / $200-ish sort of mark, there’s no denying it’s a seriously tempting bit of kit.

Personally, I’d say it’s almost certainly worth stretching to the Core i5-9600K if you’ve got the cash and you don’t mind taking the extra cooler costs into account, but for those of you who’d rather keep things a bit simpler, the Core i5-8400 is still a fine choice for a mid-range gaming CPU. The Ryzen 5 2600 is also worth looking at if you can find it on the cheap, but if gaming is your number one concern, Intel’s Core i5s are still a pretty tough act to beat.

Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600X:

performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i5 8400

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Which is better: Intel Core i5 8400 at 2.8 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.0) or AMD Ryzen 5 2600X at 3.6 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 4.2)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 6-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

  1. Overview
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Features
  5. Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one nucleus

Core i5 8400

55

Ryzen 5 2600x

56

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003

Core i5 8400

28

RYZEN 5 2600X

37

Energy efficiency

EXPRESSITY ACTURISE CHIP

Core i5 8400

Ryzen 5 2600x

46

0002 0002 0002 000 0002 Rerel

Core i5 8400

42

Ryzen 5 2600X

48

Key differences

What are the main differences between 2600X and 8400

Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 8400

  • Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666
  • 32% lower than Ryzen 5 2600X peak power consumption — 65 vs 95 watts
  • Has integrated graphics accelerator Intel0 UHD 9012

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Has 7 MB more L3 cache
  • More modern process technology — 12 vs 14 nanometers
  • Arrived 7 months later than rival
  • 5% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 2 GHz vs 4 GHz)
  • 2.11 GB/s (5%) higher maximum memory bandwidth

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Core i5 8400

1023

Ryzen 5 2600X
+6%

1086

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Core i5 8400

5823

Ryzen 5 2600X
+29%

7489

Passmark CPU (single -core)

Core i5 8400

2392

Ryzen 5 2600x

2392

Passmark CPU (multi -core)

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000.000 RE
+53%

13929

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i5 8400

1026

Ryzen 5 2600X
+1%

1039

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i5 8400

4604

Ryzen 5 2600X
+26%

5792

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

List of full specifications for Intel Core i5 8400 and AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

General information

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Release date October 5, 2017 April 19, 2018
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Zen+
Model number i5-8400
Socket LGA-1151 AM4
Integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 No

Performance

Cores 6 6
Number of threads 6 12
Frequency 2. 8 GHz 3.6 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 4 GHz 4.2 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 28x 36x
Tire speed 8 GT/s
Level 1 cache 64KB (per core) 96KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 512KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 9MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier No Yes

Power consumption

Number of transistors 4.8 billion
Process 14 nanometers 12 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP) 65 W 95 W
Critical temperature 100°C 95°C
Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency 350 MHz
Boost GPU frequency 1050 MHz
Shader blocks 192
TMUs 24
ROPs 3
Computer units 24
TGP 15W
Max. resolution 4096×2304 — 60Hz

Igpu Flops

Core i5 8400

0.38 Teraflops

Ryzen 5 2600x

N/D

Memory Support

Memory type DDR4-2666 DDR4-2933
Max. size 128 GB 64 GB
Number of channels 2 2
Max. bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 43.71 GB/s
ECC support No Yes

Other

website

Official site Site Intel Core i5 8400 AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
PCI Express version 3.0 3.0
Max. PCI Express lanes 16 20
Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i5 8400

4 (44. 4%)

Ryzen 5 2600X

5 (55.6%)

Total votes: 9

Competitors

1.
Intel Core i5 8400 and Intel Core i5 12400

2.
Intel Core i5 8400 and Intel Core i5 12400F

3.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X or Intel Core i5 8400?

Name

Message

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs Intel Core i5-8400T: What is the difference?

44 BALLLA

AMD Ryzen 5 2600x

50 Ballla

Intel Core i5-8400t

Winner when comparing

VS

64 Facts compared to

AMD RYZEN 5 2600X

Intel Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL Is Ryzen 5 2600X better than Intel Core i5-8400T?

  • 2.12x higher CPU speed?
    6 x 3. 6GHz vs 6 x 1.7GHz
  • 267MHz higher RAM speed?
    2933MHz vs 2666MHz
  • 6 more CPU threads?
    12 vs 6
  • Are the semiconductors smaller than 2nm?
    12nm vs 14nm
  • 1.5MB more L2 cache?
    3MB vs 1.5MB
  • 1.9x higher PassMark score?
    14087 vs 7415
  • 0.95GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    4.25GHz vs 3.3GHz
  • 7MB more L3 cache?
    16MB vs 9MB

  • 60W below TDP?
    35W vs 95W
  • Does it have integrated graphics?
  • Has F16C?
  • Has FMA3?

What are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i5-8400t

VS

Intel Core i5+8400

AMD Ryzen 5 2600x

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5500u

Intel Core i5-8400t

VS

VS

REMENT

AMD RYZEN 5 2600X

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i5-8400t

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

AMD Ryzen 5 2600x

9000 ATEL

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 AMD Ryzen 5 5600 AMD Ryzen 5 -8400T

VS

Intel Core i5-8600t

AMD Ryzen 5 2600x

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i5-8400t

VS

Intel Core I5-

AMD Ry vs

AMD Ryzen 5 1600x

Intel Core i5-8400t

VS

Intel Core i5-9400t

AMD Ryzen 5 2600x

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

Intel Core INTEL Core INTEL Core INTEL Core INTEL Core INTEL Core INTEL

Intel Core i5-7400

AMD RYZEN 5 2600X

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i5-8400t

VS

Intel I7-7820EQ

AMD Ryzen 5 226002 AMD Ryzen 5 226002 AMD Ryzen 5 2222 AM Ryzen 7 5800x

Intel Core i5-8400t

VS

AMD RYZEN 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 2600x

VS

AMD Ryzen 7,1700x

Intel Core

9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 AMD 9000 AMD AMD

Comparison prices

Users reviews

General rating

AMD Ryzen 5 2600x

2 Reviews of Users

AMD Ryzen 5 2600x

/10

9000 0 User reviews

Intel Core i5-8400T

0. 0 /10

0 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.5 /10

2 Votes

Reviews yet not

Games

/10

2 Votes

Reviews still not

9000 9000 10.0 /10 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9 2 votes

No reviews yet

Reliability

9.5 /10

2 votes

No reviews yet

Energy efficiency0003

10.0 /10

2 Votes

Reviews yet there is no

performance

1. Ski -resistance of the central processor

6 x 3.6GHZ

6 X 1.7GHZ

9000 second can be performed by the processor, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.25GHz

3.3GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Has unlocked multiplier

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✖Intel Core i5-8400T

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 scratchpad results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

2.67MB/core

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory to access each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2933MHz

2666MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

43.71GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4 memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.Maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

7.Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✖Intel Core i5-8400T

The memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8400T)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8400T)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8400T)

Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8400T)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8400T)

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8400T)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✔Intel Core i5-8400T

processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✔Intel Core i5-8400T

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✔Intel Core i5-8400T

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

SSE 4th version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✔Intel Core i5-8400T

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6 bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8400T)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✔Intel Core i5-8400T

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

✖Intel Core i5-8400T

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8400T)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPU is better?

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i5-8400T

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i5-8400T — Th200

Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Features
  3. Tests
  4. Key differences
  5. Conclusion
  6. Comments

Processor

Processor

Introduction

We compared two processors: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs. Intel Core i5-8400T. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) generation desktop processor released on Apr 19th, 2018. Features 6 cores and 12 threads. Operates at a frequency of 3600 MHz and consumes up to 95 watts.

The Intel Core i5-8400T is a Core i5 (Coffee Lake) generation desktop processor released on Apr 2nd, 2018. It has 6 cores and 6 threads. Operates at a frequency of 1700 MHz and consumes up to 35 watts.

Characteristics

Generation

Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))

Core i5 (Coffee Lake)

Date Release

APR 19TH, 2018

APR 2ND, 2018

Heat 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 2 35 W

Frequency

ECC Memory

None

None

PCI-Express

Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

Instructions

EVP, AMD-V, AMD64, AVMIC, BMIC6, AVX , FMA3, MMX, Precision Boost 2, SHA, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3, XFR 2

AES-NI, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2 , Boost 2. 0, CLMUL, EIST, F16C, FMA3, Intel 64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.2, SSSE3, TSX, TXT, VT-d, VT-x, XD bit

Benchmarks

3DMark Physics

3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Intel Core i5-8400T

Blender bmw27

Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Intel Core i5-8400T

Geekbench 5 Multi-thread

GeekBench is a cross-platform performance benchmark that runs a series of benchmarks that simulate real-life tasks. There are two versions of the program. This is a multi-threaded version, i.e. all cores are used, making it suitable for evaluating server performance.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
+60%

Intel Core i5-8400T

Geekbench 5 Single-thread

GeekBench is a cross-platform benchmarking utility that runs a series of benchmarks that simulate real-life tasks. There are two versions of the program. This is a single threaded version. Most applications (MS Word, web browsers, games) rarely use more than one thread at a time, making it suitable for performance evaluation in everyday tasks.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
+26%

Intel Core i5-8400T

Key differences

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2600X better than Intel Core i5-8400T?

Newer — 17 days late release

More modern manufacturing process — 12 nm vs. 14 nm

Has 112% higher frequency — 3600 MHz vs. 1700 MHz 3300 MHz

Has 6 more threads — 12 vs 6

Why is Intel Core i5-8400T better than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X?

Consumes 64% less power — 35 W vs. 95 W

Conclusion

The Ryzen 5 2600X delivers 34% better performance, uses up to 172% more energy and has 1900 MHz higher frequency. According to our research, the Ryzen 5 2600X 3990X is more powerful than the Core i5-8400T. While the Ryzen 5 2600X is the winner in this comparison, the Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X comparison is worth paying attention to. The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is the fastest processor on the desktop market. 9Ol000

Ryzen 5 2600X, Ryzen 5 2600, Core i5-8400 and Core i3-8350K processor benchmarks in games

Contents

  • Introduction
  • Test results: performance comparison
    • Assassin’s Creed Origins
    • Crysis 3
    • Destiny 2
    • Far Cry 5
    • Hitman (2016)
    • Outlast 2
    • Subnautica
    • The Evil Within 2
    • Total War: Warhammer
    • Watch Dogs 2
  • Geometric mean results of processors in ten games
  • Conclusion
  • Test configuration
  • Instrumentation and Test Method

Introduction

This review will examine the performance of AMD’s new Pinnacle Ridge family processors — Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 5 2600. Opponents for them are:

  • Core i5-8600K;
  • Core i5-8400;
  • Core i3-8350K;
  • Core i7-7700K;
  • Core i5-7600K;
  • Core i3-7350K;
  • Ryzen 7 2700;
  • Ryzen 7 1700;
  • Ryzen 5 1600X;
  • Ryzen 5 1600;
  • Ryzen 5 1500X.

Let us remind you that you can get acquainted with the work of test benches, methodology and processing of test results by clicking on this link.

recommendations

Test results: performance comparison

Assassin’s Creed Origins



  • Version 1.4.2.
  • DirectX 11.
    • Viewing angle — 100.
    • Dynamic resolution — disabled.
    • Smoothing — high.
    • The quality of the shadows is the highest.
    • The quality of the environment is the highest.
    • Texture detail — high.
    • Tessellation — very high.
    • The quality of the relief is high.
    • The density of small objects is very high.
    • Fog quality — very high.
    • Water quality is very high.
    • The quality of full-screen reflections is very high.
    • Volume clouds — enabled.
    • The quality of the characters is the highest.
    • Volumetric illumination — very high.
    • Depth of field — enabled.


1920×1080

Rating (HT — on, SMT — on)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Overclocking (HT — off, SMT — on)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs


Minimum and average FPS

In Assassin’s Creed Origins, both new AMD products proved to be the best. In the nominal mode of operation, they are slightly ahead of their predecessors and were able to compete with such a rival as the Core i7-7700K. After overclocking, they fell slightly behind the Ryzen 7 1700, but showed equal results with the Core i7-7700K, Core i3-8350K and Core i5-7600K processors.

Crysis 3



  • Version 1.3.
  • DirectX 11.
    • Full screen anti-aliasing (MSAA) — 4.
    • Anisotropic filtering (AF) — 16.
    • Texture resolution — maximum.
    • Effects quality — maximum.
    • Quality of objects — maximum.
    • Particle quality — maximum.
    • Post-processing quality — maximum.
    • Shading quality — maximum.
    • Shadow quality — maximum.
    • Water quality — maximum.
    • The degree of blurring is high.
    • Glare — enabled.


1920×1080

Rating (HT — on, SMT — on)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Overclocking (HT — off, SMT — off)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs


Minimum and average FPS

In the famous Crysis 3, AMD processors showed perhaps the highest results in all tests. Both new products have seriously competed with such a powerful Intel representative as the Core i5-8600K.

Destiny 2



  • Version 1.1.2.
  • DirectX 11.
    • Field of view — 90.
    • Antialiasing — FXAA.
    • Complex shading — HDAO.
    • Anisotropic texture filtering — x16.
    • Texture quality — ultra high.
    • Shadow quality is high.
    • Depth of field quality is high.
    • Environment detail range — high.
    • The character detail range is high.
    • Foliage detail range — high.
    • Foliage shadow display range — ultra high.
    • The quality of the light rays is high.
    • Motion blur — enabled.
    • Gusts of wind — included.
    • Display resolution — 100%.
    • Chromatic aberration — enabled.
    • Film grain effect — enabled.


1920×1080

Rating (HT — on, SMT — on)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Overclocking (HT — off, SMT — off)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs


Minimum and average FPS

The Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 5 2600 processors sit in the middle of the standings in the fantasy shooter Destiny 2. The undoubted achievement for them was that they were able to compete with the «people’s» representative of Intel — Core i5-8400.

Far Cry 5



  • Version 1.4.0.
  • DirectX 11.
    • Texture filtering quality — maximum.
    • Shadow quality — maximum.
    • The quality of the geometry of the world and vegetation is the maximum.
    • The quality of the environment is maximum.
    • Water quality is high.
    • Landscape quality is high.
    • The quality of the volumetric fog is high.
    • Antialiasing — SMAA.
    • Motion blur — enabled.
    • Field of view scale — 90.
    • Resolution scale — 1.0.


1920×1080

Rating (HT — on, SMT — on)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Overclocking (HT — off, SMT — off)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs


Minimum and average FPS

In Far Cry 5, AMD processors were generally slower than Intel products. As a result, the novelties competed only with the junior representative of the competing line — Core i3-7350K.

Hitman (2016)



  • Version 1.13.2.
  • DirectX 11.
    • Anti-Aliasing Post-Effect — FXAA.
    • Anisotropic filtering — x16.
    • The level of detail is ultra high.
    • Texture quality is high.
    • Complex shading (SSAO) — enabled.
    • The quality of the shadows is ultra high.
    • Resolution quality — high.


1920×1080

Rating (HT — on, SMT — on)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Overclocking (HT — on, SMT — off)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs


Minimum and average FPS

In the game Hitman (2016), AMD representatives again achieved an impressive result, beating their rivals. As a result, the Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 5 2600 put an equal fight on the Core i5-8600K.

Outlast 2



  • Version 1.0.17518.0.
  • DirectX 11.
    • Texture quality is very high.
    • Texture filtering — 16x.
    • Shadow quality is high.
    • The quality of the relief is high.
    • Fog quality — high.
    • The quality of the effects is high.
    • Antialiasing — FXAA.


1920×1080

Rating (HT — on, SMT — on)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Overclocking (HT — off, SMT — off)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs


Minimum and average FPS

In the horror movie Outlast 2, a situation similar to the alignment of forces in the game Far Cry 5 has developed.

Continuation of material