I5 9600k vs i7 8700k: Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i7-8700K: What is the difference?

Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i7-8700K: What is the difference?

61points

Intel Core i5-9600K

59points

Intel Core i7-8700K

vs

64 facts in comparison

Intel Core i5-9600K

Intel Core i7-8700K

Why is Intel Core i5-9600K better than Intel Core i7-8700K?

Why is Intel Core i7-8700K better than Intel Core i5-9600K?

  • 6 more CPU threads?
    12vs6
  • 49.57% higher PassMark result?
    16270vs10878
  • 3MB bigger L3 cache?
    12MBvs9MB
  • 0.5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
    2MB/corevs1.5MB/core
  • Uses multithreading?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Intel Core i7-8700K

vs

Intel Core i5-12400

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

Intel Core i7-7700K

Intel Core i7-8700K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

Intel Core i7-9700K

Intel Core i7-8700K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-8700K

vs

Intel Core i7-9700K

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i7-8700K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-8700K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

Intel Core i7-8700K

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i7-8700K

vs

Apple M1 Max

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Core i7-8700K

vs

Apple M1

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Overall Rating

Intel Core i5-9600K

1 User reviews

Intel Core i5-9600K

10. 0/10

1 User reviews

Intel Core i7-8700K

1 User reviews

Intel Core i7-8700K

10.0/10

1 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Gaming

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Energy efficiency

8.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

6 x 3.7GHz

6 x 3.7GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.6GHz

4.7GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1.5MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2666MHz

2666MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

41.6GB/s

42.7GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✖Intel Core i7-8700K

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

303.7seconds

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

980.5seconds

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✖Intel Core i7-8700K

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i7 8700K vs i5 9600K: performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i7 8700K

Intel Core i5 9600K

We compared two 6-core desktop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz Intel Core i7 8700K against the 3.7 GHz i5 9600K. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i7 8700K

66

Core i5 9600K

65

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i7 8700K

41

Core i5 9600K

33

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i7 8700K

41

Core i5 9600K

46

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i7 8700K

51

Core i5 9600K

48

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 9600K and 8700K

Advantages of Intel Core i7 8700K

  • Has 3 MB larger L3 cache size
  • 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 7 GHz vs 4.6 GHz)

Advantages of Intel Core i5 9600K

  • Newer — released 1-year and 1-month later

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i7 8700K
+2%

1219

Core i5 9600K

1196

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i7 8700K
+34%

8881

Core i5 9600K

6624

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i7 8700K

2781

Core i5 9600K

2794

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i7 8700K
+28%

13898

Core i5 9600K

10883

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i7 8700K
+3%

1251

Core i5 9600K

1214

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i7 8700K
+17%

6690

Core i5 9600K

5707

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 8700K and i5 9600K

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released October 5, 2017 October 8, 2018
Type Desktop Desktop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Model number i7-8700K i5-9600K
Socket LGA-1151 LGA-1151
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630

Performance

Cores 6 6
Threads 12 6
Base Frequency 3. 7 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency 4.7 GHz 4.6 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 37x 37x
Bus Bandwidth 8 GT/s 8 GT/s
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) 256K (per core)
L3 Cache 12MB (shared) 9MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes
Fabrication process 14 nm 14 nm
TDP 95 W 95 W
Max. temperature 100°C 100°C
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Base Clock 350 MHz 350 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1200 MHz 1150 MHz
Shading Units 192 192
TMUs 24 24
ROPs 3 3
Execution Units 24 24
TGP 15 W 15 W
Max. Resolution 4096×2304 — 60 Hz 4096×2304 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i7 8700K

0.38 TFLOPS

Core i5 9600K

0.38 TFLOPS

Memory support

Memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666
Memory Size 128 GB 128 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 41.6 GB/s
ECC Support No No
Official site Intel Core i7 8700K official page Intel Core i5 9600K official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 16
Extended instructions SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i7 8700K

23 (60.5%)

Core i5 9600K

15 (39.5%)

Total votes: 38

Сompetitors

1.
Core i7 8700K vs Ryzen 5 5600X

2.
Core i7 8700K vs Core i9 12900K

3.
Core i7 8700K vs Core i7 12700K

4.
Core i7 8700K vs Core i5 12600K

5.
Core i7 8700K vs Core i5 12400F

6.
Core i5 9600K vs Core i5 12600K

7.
Core i5 9600K vs Core i5 12400

i7-8700K vs i5-9600K — Just Cause 4 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz

Just Cause 4

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3. 70GHz


i7-8700K
i5-9600K

Multi-Thread Performance

15970 Pts

13352 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2703 Pts

2677 Pts

Just Cause 4

i7-8700K vs i5-9600K in Just Cause 4 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-8700K
i5-9600K


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

67.1 FPS

1080p

66.5 FPS

1440p

49.6 FPS

1440p

49.2 FPS

2160p

25.8 FPS

2160p

25.6 FPS

w1440p

40.3 FPS

w1440p

40.0 FPS

High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

112. 4 FPS

1080p

111.6 FPS

1440p

86.8 FPS

1440p

86.2 FPS

2160p

49.4 FPS

2160p

49.1 FPS

w1440p

72.7 FPS

w1440p

72.2 FPS

Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

157.7 FPS

1080p

156.6 FPS

1440p

124.1 FPS

1440p

123.3 FPS

2160p

73.0 FPS

2160p

72.5 FPS

w1440p

105.0 FPS

w1440p

104.4 FPS

Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

248. 4 FPS

1080p

246.8 FPS

1440p

198.6 FPS

1440p

197.4 FPS

2160p

120.2 FPS

2160p

119.4 FPS

w1440p

169.7 FPS

w1440p

168.8 FPS

i7-8700K
  • The i7-8700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i7-8700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i7-8700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-9600K

    Compare i7-8700K vs i5-9600K specifications

    i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Architecture
    i7-8700K i5-9600K
    Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
    Generation Core i7
    (Coffee Lake)
    Core i5
    (Coffee Lake Refresh)
    Market Desktop Desktop
    Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
    Part# SR3QR SR3WZ
    Production Status Active Active
    Released Oct 2017 Oct 2018
    i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Cache
    i7-8700K i5-9600K
    Cache L1 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
    Cache L2 256K (per core) 256K (per core)
    Cache L3 12MB (shared) 9MB (shared)
    i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Cores
    i7-8700K i5-9600K
    # of Cores 6 6
    # of Threads 12 6
    Integrated Graphics UHD Graphics 630 N/A
    SMP # CPUs 1 1
    i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Features
    i7-8700K i5-9600K
    MMX
    SSE
    SSE2
    SSE3
    SSSE3
    SSE4. 2
    AVX
    AVX2
    EIST
    Intel 64
    XD bit
    VT-x
    VT-d
    HTT
    AES-NI
    TSX
    TXT
    CLMUL
    FMA3
    F16C
    BMI1
    BMI2
    Boost 2.0
    MMX
    SSE
    SSE2
    SSE3
    SSSE3
    SSE4.2
    AVX
    AVX2
    EIST
    Intel 64
    XD bit
    VT-x
    VT-d
    AES-NI
    TSX
    TXT
    CLMUL
    FMA3
    F16C
    BMI1
    BMI2
    Boost 2.0
    i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Notes
    i7-8700K i5-9600K
    This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.
    i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Performance
    i7-8700K i5-9600K
    Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
    Frequency 3.7 GHz 3.7 GHz
    Multiplier 37. 0x 37.0x
    Multiplier Unlocked Yes Yes
    TDP 95 W 95 W
    Turbo Clock up to 4.7 GHz up to 4.6 GHz
    Voltage variable variable
    i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Physical
    i7-8700K i5-9600K
    Die Size unknown unknown
    Foundry Intel Intel
    Package FC-LGA1151 FC-LGA1151
    Process Size 14 nm 14 nm
    Socket Intel Socket 1151 Intel Socket 1151
    Transistors unknown unknown
    tCaseMax 72°C 72°C

    Share Your Comments 98

    Compare i7-8700K vs i5-9600K in more games

    Elden Ring

    2022

    God of War

    2022

    Overwatch 2

    2022

    Forza Horizon 5

    2021

    Halo Infinite

    2021

    Battlefield 2042

    2021

    Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

    2020

    Microsoft Flight Simulator

    2020

    Valorant

    2020

    Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

    2020

    Death Stranding

    2020

    Marvel’s Avengers

    2020

    Godfall

    2020

    Cyberpunk 2077

    2020

    Apex Legends

    2019

    Anthem

    2019

    Far Cry New Dawn

    2019

    Resident Evil 2

    2019

    Metro Exodus

    2019

    World War Z

    2019

    Gears of War 5

    2019

    F1 2019

    2019

    GreedFall

    2019

    Borderlands 3

    2019

    Call of Duty Modern Warfare

    2019

    Red Dead Redemption 2

    2019

    Need For Speed: Heat

    2019

    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

    2018

    Battlefield V

    2018

    Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

    2018

    Final Fantasy XV

    2018

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider

    2018

    Forza Horizon 4

    2018

    Fallout 76

    2018

    Hitman 2

    2018

    Just Cause 4

    2018

    Monster Hunter: World

    2018

    Strange Brigade

    2018

    Assassin’s Creed Origins

    2017

    Dawn of War III

    2017

    Ghost Recon Wildlands

    2017

    Destiny 2

    2017

    PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

    2017

    Fortnite Battle Royale

    2017

    Need For Speed: Payback

    2017

    For Honor

    2017

    Project CARS 2

    2017

    Forza Motorsport 7

    2017

    Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

    2016

    Battlefield 1

    2016

    Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

    2016

    Doom

    2016

    F1 2016

    2016

    Total War: Warhammer

    2016

    Overwatch

    2016

    Dishonored 2

    2016

    Grand Theft Auto V

    2015

    Rocket League

    2015

    Need For Speed

    2015

    Project CARS

    2015

    Rainbow Six Siege

    2015

    Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

    2012

    League of Legends

    2009

    Minecraft

    2009

    Intel i5-9600K Review vs.

    R7 2700, R5 2600, i7-8700K, et al. | GamersNexus

     

    Test Components

    Tested CPUs primarily include the below list:

    • Intel i9-9900K
    • AMD R7 2700
    • AMD R7 2700X
    • Intel i7-8700K
    • AMD R5 2600
    • AMD R5 2600 OC (2600X stand-in)
    • Intel i5-8600K
    • Intel i9-7900X
    • Intel i9-7960X
    • AMD R7 1700
    • Intel i7-4790K

    Motherboards used for testing are as follows:

    • ASUS Maximus XI Hero Z390
    • Gigabyte Gaming 9 Z370
    • Gigabyte Z97X Gaming G1 BK
    • ASUS Crosshair VII Hero X470
    • ASUS Crosshair VI Hero X370
    • Gigabyte X299 Gaming 9

    Constants used are as follows:

    • All desktop platforms: 2x 8GB 3200MHz Corsair Vengeance LPX 16-18-18-36 DDR4
    • (Exception: Z97X uses HyperX Savage 2133MHz DDR3)
    • All quad-channel HEDT platforms: 4x 8GB 3200MHz Corsair Vengeance LPX 16-18-18-36 DDR4
    • Corsair AX1600i PSU
    • NZXT Kraken X62 at 100% speeds

    Windows 10 version 1803 was used for all testing with Windows Update disabled. PresentMon is used for framerate data logging, with custom scripts for capturing data accurately.

    Intel i5-9600K Benchmark vs. R7 2700, R5 2600, i7-8700K – Far Cry 5

    Far Cry 5 is where the i5 CPUs really start to fall apart. This game is an interesting one to start with a frametime plot instead of an FPS chart, as the frametime performance metrics are the most important to illustrate player experience.

    At 1080p/Normal, the 9600K slams into a wall at 100ms three times throughout the course of the test. To explain how this is bad, consider that a single frame at 60FPS takes 16.67ms to present. At 100ms, you’re waiting for 1/10 of a second until you get an update to your game. That’s noticeable. We have other frames that are hitting 40ms and 20ms. 20ms on its own wouldn’t be horrible, but it would need to be a constant 20ms. To bounce between 7ms and 20ms is observable to the user and means that you feel more stuttering playback in the game. This is noticeably jarring performance in Far Cry, and it’s happening even on a 5. 2GHz overclock. That shows us that Far Cry wants those extra cores – at least, in theory.

    Here’s a closer look at just the 9600K when running stock, no overclock this time: We can really only fit a few lines on this chart due to the nature of it, so with just 4 passes plotted, we can see that two of them exhibit similarly bad frametime consistency behavior. Two of the lines spike hard, to a point where it becomes noticeable in gameplay, while the other two are perfectly fine. The curious thing here is that the behavior is sporadic, but is consistently spurious on just the lower thread-count CPUs.

    Let’s convert this back into a normal FPS chart for easier comparative data.

    This is exactly why we say FPS plots are of limited usefulness in some cases: If you look at the 9600K’s stock result, it averages out to 59FPS for 0.1% lows, or 91FPS for the 1% lows. Those are both good numbers and are completely acceptable. In reality, that’s from averaging results that are all over the place and outside of normal error margins. It’s jumping around between 25FPS 0.1% and 100FPS 0.1%, resulting in an average that looks reasonable, but a gameplay experience that is 50% bad. If 50% of the experience is bad, it is, by definition, not a good experience. Averages have limited usefulness here, but the AVG FPS is about 139 and 152 when overclocked, comparable to the 8700K at both stock and overclocked levels. The difference is that the 8700K has better frametime consistency and is observably better in gameplay. As for the R7 2700, that ends up at around 111FPS AVG at 4.2GHz, with lows measuring within a range of 71FPS to 87FPS. Still a wide range of variability in the title, but nothing like what we saw a moment ago. The stock performance is about 102FPS AVG.

    All of this said, before the AMD fans run to post absolutes about how Ryzen is more “fluid” or “smoother” 100% of the time, note that this is not true in every instance. In many games, as you’ll see today, the 9600K doesn’t have this issue and is technically superior in raw gaming performance. Far Cry seems to be somewhat anomalous in its behavior. That’s not to downplay the issue at all or downplay Ryzen’s positioning, but people often get carried away from a single chart and draw sweeping conclusions that are untrue when considering the broader scope.

    At 1440p, these performance results largely sustain: We see spurious performance across the i5 CPUs, including the stock 9600K – now averaging lower in the 0.1% department than previously – and the overclocked variant. The 8600K is in the same boat. None of the i7, i9, R7, or R5 CPUs seem to experience this behavior. The R7 2700 is, again, at about 102FPS AVG when stock, or about 111FPS when overclocked to 4.2GHz all-core.

    Intel i5-9600K Benchmark — Assassin’s Creed: Origins

    In Assassin’s Creed: Origins at 1080p/Medium, the Intel i5-9600K operates at about 106FPS AVG when stock, with lows at 71FPS and 53FPS. The immediate competitor is the R7 2700 at 4.2GHz, at about 104FPS AVG and being within error margins (indicated by the error bars on the chart). The top half is dominated by Intel CPUs, indicating that, although this game does make more use of cores than others, frequency is still king here. The R5 series CPUs run at around 87-92FPS AVG, depending on overclock. The R5 2600 would be the more traditional head-to-head competitor if considering launch MSRP of the Ryzen 5 CPUs, but given the perspective of price, the R7 2700 is a more directly priced competitor. For the 9600K and 2700 at parity in cost, performance is also at rough parity; that is, until you overclock the 9600K: Overclocking the 9600K to 5.2GHz pushes it up to 115FPS AVG, a stark climb that increases distance from Ryzen in this game.

    Let’s get a frametime plot on the screen:

    As a reminder, these are the most important charts when analyzing performance, as FPS distances itself from the core metric of time between frames. Ultimately, high FPS is pointless if the consistency of delivery is spurious, with time between frames getting smoothed over in averaging and being poor representations of user experience.

    In this frametime plot, lower is better and more consistent is better than lower. 16ms would be about 60FPS. Both the R7 2700 and i5-9600K are of relative consistency with frame throughput. Neither has excessive spikes. The worst spike is about 17ms, which is an unnoticeable 3ms jump over the frame prior. This plot looks perfectly fine for each CPU. Although the 9600K does maintain a lead in maintaining lower frame-to-frame intervals, the question is how noticeable this is to most users.

    We retested the 2700 at 1440p with this review, as we noticed it had a spurious 0.1% frame dip that seemed uncharacteristic of performance elsewhere. With these new numbers, the R7 2700 operates at 90FPS stock, with lows reasonably timed at 56 and 45. The 9600K runs at 103FPS AVG, about the same as before, and the overclock is about 108FPS AVG. Not much of a drop, as we’re becoming more GPU limited at this point.

    Intel i5-9600K vs. 2700, 8700K, 9900K — CIV VI Turn Time Benchmark

    For Civilization VI turn time testing, we’re looking at the period of time it takes for an AI player to process its actions, tested for 15 iterations and then averaged. The i5-9600K ends up at 12.6 seconds turn time when stock, which is comparable to the i7-8700K at stock performance. Civilization has never really leveraged cores as much as it has frequency, although our chart-topping 7980XE does prove that cores can still be leveraged, even if in a less exaggerated fashion.

    Overclocking the 9600K gets it to 11.7 seconds per turn, cutting off about 1 second per player for a net 5-second reduction across a full turn pass. The R7 2700 at 4.2GHz is about tied with the stock 9600K at 12.7 seconds, and is at about 13.8 seconds stock. Again, comparing this to the 2600, you can see that the cores aren’t as desirable as the slightly higher base clock on the 2600. We are also within some reasonable error, here, so the difference is insignificant between the R5 and R7.

    Intel i5-9600K Benchmark — F1 2018

    F1 2018 at 1080p/High is up next. This game makes for a good CPU benchmark, as illustrated by our maximum FPS of over 300 with the 7980XE OC CPU. The 9600K ends up at 257FPS AVG when stock, with the overclocked 5.2GHz 9600K at 272FPS AVG. That’s a sizable gain, but in the scope of hundreds of frames per second, we do enter territory where fewer people care about this level of speed. The R7 2700 at 4.2GHz runs 212FPS AVG, or about 200FPS when stock.

    At 1440p, scaling is similar but truncated by the GPU. The 9600K stock ends up at 230FPS AVG, with the 8600K at about 226FPS AVG – no real changes generationally. Note that error margins are wider on the 1% and 0.1% lows due to the extremely high framerates we’re dealing with.

    Intel i5-9600K Blender Benchmarks

    The i5 CPUs really aren’t ideal for production tasks, but if you’re primarily a gamer and occasionally do some rendering work, this data might be helpful. Blender is extremely thread-intensive for its tile-based approach to rendering, where each CPU thread is tasked with one section of the scene. For our renders, we typically use optimized tile sizes of roughly 16×16 pixels on CPUs. GPUs tend to do better with sizes like 256×256 or higher.

    The 9600K ends up taking approximately 44 minutes to render the GN logo, our most intensive animation, which is roughly tied with last year’s GN award winning R5 1600 at 44 minutes. This is where, unlike in frequency-bound gaming use cases, losing hyperthreading really starts to hurt the i5. Overclocking the 9600K to 5.2GHz does significantly bolster its performance, to be fair, and lands it at around the same point as the R5 1600 when overclocked to 3.9GHz. It’s 38 minutes for the 9600K and 38.8 minutes for the 1600 OC – but note that we’re sorted by the monkey head render.

    Speaking of, the monkey head render has the 9600K at 37.5 minutes, which isn’t much of an improvement on the 8600K. This is slower than the R5 1600’s render of the monkey heads by about 2 minutes per frame. Just for perspective, the same-priced R7 2700 ends up at 32 minutes for the GN logo render, which puts it on par with the 8700K. This is a significant performance increase over the same-priced i5-9600K, even when it’s overclocked. Stock-to-stock, the R7 2700 reduces render time by about 28%. That’s absolutely noticeable and, if you do any amount of 3D rendering workloads on the CPU, it’s worth going for the R7 instead. If this never happens, the 9600K might still be in the running. The 9600K will be advantaged in applications like Adobe Premiere, where frequency is more important than threads.

    Conclusion: Is the i5-9600K Worth It?

    By name and by marketing (and original MSRP), the i5 CPU is most comparable to the R5 CPUs. The R5 2600’s current $160 price-point makes it a less direct comparison, and the 2600X, which would perform about where an overclocked 2600 performs, is about $220. This is also cheaper, but still closer to compare. Even closer is the R7 2700, which is $270 normally (or ~$250 during current sales). This is the closest comparison.

    We would favor an i7-8700K if you must go Intel – like for systems with the highest refresh rate possible – while staying below the price of the i9-9900K. We would favor an R7 2700 in heavily-threaded applications or games which are more dependent upon threads than the mean (e.g. Far Cry 5). The 9600K is still often superior in raw framerate, but does suffer frametime consistency hits in games like Far Cry 5. In those instances, it would be a worse experience insofar as its consistency of frame delivery. In the other games we tested, the 9600K holds a lead in gaming performance. It also suffers in Blender, the side-effect of fewer cores, making the R7 a better choice for anyone legitimately using the heavy multithreading in tile-based rendering applications. If you’re just gaming, the 9600K is often better – but not always, and that inconsistency is the key to our inability to offer a firm recommendation. We’d favor an i7-8700K (if budget can stretch) for pure gaming workloads, but the i5-9600K and R7 2700 choice requires more nuance. For anyone working with Blender in addition to gaming, the R7 2700 is a better choice. For pure gaming, the 9600K is “better” in most the games we tested, but that frametime inconsistency in some games causes us to hesitate.

    The i5 remains hard to justify, even with its two-core increase. Intel remains the best option for gaming-only builds in the i7 class, but struggles to prove consistent value in the i5 class. That’s a problem – if the value is inconsistent, it is sometimes better to opt for a more consistent (if sometimes weaker) alternative, if only because the experience is then predictable.

    Editorial, Testing: Steve Burke
    Video: Andrew Coleman, Keegan Gallick

    Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i5-9600K








    Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i5-9600K

    Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-8700K on one side and the Intel Core i5-9600K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,7GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

    Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

    This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

    Specifications:

    Processor

    Intel Core i7-8700K

    Intel Core i5-9600K
    Market (main)

    Desktop

    Desktop
    ISA

    x86-64 (64 bit)

    x86-64 (64 bit)
    Microarchitecture

    Coffee Lake

    Coffee Lake
    Core name

    Coffee Lake-S

    Coffee Lake-S
    Family

    Core i7-8000

    Core i5-9000
    Part number(s), S-Spec

    BX80684I78700K,
    BXC80684I78700K,
    CM8068403358220,
    SR3QR, QNMK

    BX80684I59600K,
    BXC80684I59600K,
    CM8068403874404,
    SRELU

    Release date

    Q4 2017

    Q4 2018
    Lithography

    14 nm++

    14 nm++
    Transistors

    3. 000.000.000


    Cores

    6

    6
    Threads

    12

    6
    Base frequency

    3,7 GHz

    3,7 GHz
    Turbo frequency

    4,7 GHz

    4,6 GHz
    Bus speed

    8 GT/s

    8 GT/s
    Cache memory

    12 MB

    9 MB
    Max memory capacity

    128 GB

    128 GB
    Memory types

    DDR4-2666

    DDR4-2666
    Max # of memory channels

    2

    2
    Max memory bandwidth

    41,6 GB/s

    41,6 GB/s
    Max PCIe lanes

    16

    16
    TDP

    95 W

    95 W
    Suggested PSU

    600W ATX Power Supply

    600W ATX Power Supply
    GPU integrated graphics

    Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)

    Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)
    GPU execution units

    23

    23
    GPU shading units

    184

    184
    GPU base clock

    350 MHz

    350 MHz
    GPU boost clock

    1200 MHz

    1150 MHz
    GPU FP32 floating point

    423,2 GFLOPS

    423,2 GFLOPS
    Socket

    LGA1151

    LGA1151
    Compatible motherboard

    Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 

    Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 
    Maximum temperature

    100°C

    100°C
    Crypto engine

    AES New Instructions,

    Secure Key


    Security

    Software Guard Extensions,

    Memory Protection Extensions,

    OS Guard,

    Trusted Execution Technology,

    Execute Disable Bit,

    Boot Guard


    Max display resolution

    4096 x [email protected]


    CPU-Z single thread

    475

    522
    CPU-Z multi thread

    3. 693

    2.968
    Cinebench R15 single thread

    194

    196
    Cinebench R15 multi-thread

    1.402

    1.071
    Cinebench R20 single thread

    500

    467
    Cinebench R20 multi-thread

    3.618

    2.518
    Cinebench R23 single thread

    1.216

    1.175
    Cinebench R23 multi-thread

    8.985

    6.582
    PassMark single thread

    2.775

    2.773
    PassMark CPU Mark

    13. 883

    10.817
    (Windows 64-bit)
    Geekbench 4 single core

    6.100

    5.820
    (Windows 64-bit)
    Geekbench 4 multi-core

    24.045

    22.766
    (Windows)
    Geekbench 5 single core

    1.320

    1.183
    (Windows)
    Geekbench 5 multi-core

    6.646

    5.225
    (SGEMM)
    GFLOPS performance

    453,8 GFLOPS

    405,3 GFLOPS
    (Multi-core / watt performance)
    Performance / watt ratio

    253 pts / W

    240 pts / W
    Amazon


    eBay


    Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

    We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

    Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

    Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

    We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-8700K is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i5-9600K was started more recently.

    Performances :

    Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





    CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    475

    3.693
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    522

    2.968

    In single core, the difference is -9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 24%.

    Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
    average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

    CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





    Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    194

    1. 402
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    196

    1.071

    In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 31%.

    Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
    average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

    Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





    Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    500

    3. 618
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    467

    2.518

    In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 44%.

    Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
    average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

    Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.





    Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    1.216

    8. 985
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    1.175

    6.582

    In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 37%.

    Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
    average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

    Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





    PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    2. 775

    13.883
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    2.773

    10.817

    In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 28%.

    Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
    average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

    PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

    On Windows 64-bit:





    Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    6.100

    24. 045
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    5.820

    22.766

    In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 6%.

    On Linux 64-bit:





    Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    6.115

    27.677
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    6.081

    22.092

    In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 25%.

    On Android 64-bit:





    Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    5.646

    21.101
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    4. 060

    11.767

    In single core, the difference is 39%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 79%.

    On Mac OS X 64-bit:





    Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    6.084

    28.485
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    5.844

    23.368

    In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 22%.

    Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
    average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

    Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

    On Windows:





    Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    1.320

    6.646
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    1.183

    5.225

    In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 27%.

    On Linux:





    Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    1.314

    5.720
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    1.257

    5.459

    In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.

    On macOS:





    Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
    Intel Core i7-8700K

    1.080

    6.572
    Intel Core i5-9600K

    1.119

    5.555

    In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.

    Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
    average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

    Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

    Equivalence:

    Intel Core i7-8700K AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-9600K AMD equivalent

    See also:

    Intel Core i7-8700Intel Core i7-8700BIntel Core i7-8700T

    Intel Core i5-9600Intel Core i5-9600KFIntel Core i5-9600T

    i5 8600K vs i7 8700k For Gaming — Review

    Since I wrote this article back in 2018, the 9th gen CPUs have been released.  Due to this I no longer recommend you consider the i5 8600k unless you are on a really tight budget.

    It is still an awesome chip but you are much better off getting the new i5 9600k over the old i5 8600k.  However, if you can stretch to the i7 8700k I highly recommend you do so.  It has dropped in price recently thanks to the release of the new 9th gen CPUs.

    Lets dive into the differences between these two chips with a direct i5 8600k vs i7 8700k comparison.

    i7 8700k

    The best option overall providing killer value and still giving years of future proofing.

    Check Prices

    Best Overall

    i5 9600k

    Fantastic budget option. But if you can drop that extra money on the i7 8700k its worth it.

    Check Prices

    Budget Choice

    Lets Talk Specifications

    The i5 8600k is the cheaper of the two 8th generation chips built upon the 14nm architecture. It has a stock clock speed of 3.6 GHz which boosts to 4.1GHz for all six cores, 4.2 GHz for dual/quad cores and around 4.3Ghz for single core. If you have the 7th generation i5 7600k you can expect a speed increase of around 15%.

    The i7 8700k is the pricey top of the range option with the same 14nm architecture. Intel have been following AMD’s path by increasing the cores and threads across their CPUs. The i7 8700k is Intel’s first CPU with 6 cores and 12 threads to be considered a mainstream processor.

    The stock clock of the i7 8700k comes in at 3. 7 GHz which can be overclocked to 4.7 GHz with some users achieving up to 5.0 GHz depending on the chip. It boasts 12MB of (L3) cache and 2 channels of DDR4 RAM.

    Compared to previous generations the main performance improvements come from the higher core count. You can expect up to a 50% performance improvement over the 7th generation i7s.

    Related: Best CPU Cooler For The i5 8600k & i7 8700k

    i5 8600k vs i7 8700k For Gaming

    If you are purely looking to upgrade your CPU for gaming then you can’t go wrong with the cheaper i5 8600k. The price per performance of the i5 8600k is considerably higher than the i7 8700k because it’s around $100 dollars cheaper.

    It is always worth considering the price per performance ratio of any component you are looking to upgrade. RAM for example is extremely expensive at the moment so its price per performance is very high. Unless you are upgrading from 8GB -> 16GB then that would be a solid price per performance compared to 16GB – > 32GB.

    The i5 8600k will run any current game without any struggles and perform any rendering or high CPU intensive task with ease.

    With that said why even consider the i7 8700k then? Why did I choose it over the i5 8600k? I was upgrading from an i5 3570 which at the time was a solid CPU and can still hold its own today with most games at medium settings.

    The problem was I have a GTX 1070 and my CPU was bottlenecking my system so I needed to upgrade. I could have gone with the i5 and this would have been a good fit. However, I wanted my rig to be future proof and choosing the i7 probably gives me a few years more legroom compared to the i5.

    So for an extra $100 I get a few years more out of my build without needing to upgrade again. I don’t see myself needing to upgrade again for the foreseeable future since my rig is now able to play anything at max settings at a steady 144 frames.

    If you are a fan of VR, have a VR kit or looking to potentially join the VR craze in the near future then this should definitely be a deciding factor when choosing between these two chips. Both are labelled and marketed for being VR ready but I would definitely recommend the i7 8700k over the i5 8600k.

    When it comes to VR frames are even more important because a low frame rate ruins your immersion and can cause nausea and disorientation. The i7 8700k will be able to manage any VR experience alongside a solid GPU and will provide you with a better experience overall compared to the i5 8600k.

    There are a few things to consider before biting the bullet and grabbing yourself a new 8th gen CPU. You may already be aware but for those of you who aren’t you can’t just buy a 8th gen CPU and slot it into your motherboard.

    A CPU is only compatible with certain motherboard chipsets which means they can only be used with motherboards with the correct socket. For the i5 8600k and i7 8700k you will need to buy a new 300 series motherboard.

    Luckily for you I did the research on which motherboard is best! There are a huge range of Z370 boards on the market from Asus, MSI, Gigabyte and more. There is a great resource that has benchmarked and assessed each of them to give you an idea of the ones to consider and the ones to avoid. Check it out here. 

    If there is one component to never cheap out on in your rig it’s the motherboard. A poor motherboard can cause serious problems and can even bring down other components which can result in an expensive malfunction.

    When it comes to picking a motherboard you want to choose one with all the ports you require, a solid heatsink, good power phases and VRMs (for overclocking) and an easy to use BIOS interface.

    After researching the different top midrange to top bracket of boards I ended up narrowing down my selection to the ASRock Z370 Extreme 4 and MSI Z370 Gaming M5.

    I picked the slightly more expensive MSI Z370 Gaming M5 because it had all the ports I needed, has great overclocking potential and I like the aesthetics considering I also have an MSI red and black GTX 1070 Gaming X GPU.

    The BIOS GUI is also really straight forward and easy to use.   Overclocking the chip has been really easy and alongside my MSI GPU I can definitely recommend the MSI Z370 Gaming M5 motherboard you see above.

    What About RAM?

    Unfortunately there is another upgrade you will have to making along with the your new 8th generation CPU and 300 series motherboard. 

    Your motherboard will only support DDR4 RAM so unless you have DDR4 ram with your current setup then you will have to buy new RAM.

    RAM comes in various speeds and can also be overclocked to provide better speeds. I ended up going with two Corsair Vengeance 3000MHz LPX 8GB sticks. They are a solid choice with good overclocking potential.

    I would recommend you grab at least 16GB.  Nowadays 8GB isn’t quite enough to run some games at max settings and if you already have a top end CPU and GPU you are wasting away the performance they provide if you only opt for 8GB of RAM.

    The Final Word

    The decision you make comes down to your budget. If you can afford the extra $100 for the i7 8700k then I fully recommend you pick one up. It will provide more longevity to your rig and you can be sure that you can run any game at max settings alongside a solid GPU.

    If you are on a tighter budget and you want price per performance then go with the i5 9600k. It will hold its own close enough to the i7 8700k but you might end up upgrading your rig slightly sooner than you think.

    Consider VR as well because a better CPU will provide you a with more immersive VR experience.

    Don’t go for the older 8th gen i5 8600k its no longer worth your money now that the i5 9600k is out.

     

    Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i7-8700K: What is the difference?

    61 BALLLA

    Intel Core i5-9600k

    59 Ballla

    Intel Core i7-8700k

    64 Facts compared to

    Intel I5-9600K

    9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Is 9600K better than Intel Core i7-8700K?

    Why is Intel Core i7-8700K better than Intel Core i5-9600K?

    • 6 more CPU threads?
      12 vs 6
    • 49. 57% higher PassMark score?
      16270 vs 10878
    • 3MB more L3 cache?
      12MB vs 9MB
    • 0.5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
      2MB/core vs 1.5MB/core
    • Uses multithreading?

    What are the most popular comparisons?

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    vs

    AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

    Intel Core i7-8700K

    VS

    Intel Core i5-12400

    Intel Core i5-9600k

    VS

    Intel Core i7-7700K

    Intel Core I7-8700K

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x 9000 9000 AMD Ryzen 5 5600x 9000

    VS

    Intel Core i7-9700k

    Intel Core i7-8700K

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 5 5500u

    Intel Core I5-9600K

    VS

    9000 AMD RYZEN 5 3600 9000 9000 Core

    vs

    Intel Core i7-9700k

    Intel Core i5-9600k

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    Intel Core i7-8700k

    INTEL Core INTEL Core INTEL CORE

    Intel Core i5-9400f

    Intel Core i7-8700K

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    VS

    9000 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

    Intel Core i5-9600k

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

    Intel Core i7-8700K

    VS

    Apple M1 MAX

    9000. STEL INTEL INTEL INTL Intel Core i7-8700K

    VS

    Apple M1

    Comparison of prices

    cheaper

    Users reviews

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    1 Reviews of Users

    Intel Core I.600k

    10.0 /10

    1 reviews of users

    Intel Core i7-8700K

    1 Reviews of users

    Intel Core i7-8700k

    10.0 /10 9000 9000 Prices and quality

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    Games

    10.0 /10

    1 VOTES

    10.0 /10

    1 votes

    performance

    10.0183 /10

    1 Votes

    10.0 /10

    1 VOTES

    9000

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    Energy efficiency

    8.0 /10

    1 VOTES

    10.0 /10

    1 VOTES

    Production

    performance

    0019

    1.CPU speed

    6 x 3.7GHz

    6 x 3. 7GHz

    CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

    2nd processor thread

    More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

    3.speed turbo clock

    4.6GHz

    4.7GHz

    When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    4. Unlocked

    ✔Intel Core i5-9600K

    ✔Intel Core i7-8700K

    Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

    5.L2 cache

    More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    6.L3 cache

    More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    7.L1 cache

    More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    8.core L2

    0.25MB/core

    0.25MB/core

    More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

    9.core L3

    1.5MB/core

    2MB/core

    More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

    Memory

    1.RAM speed

    2666MHz

    2666MHz

    Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    41.6GB/s

    42.7GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3. DDR version

    DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

    4.Memory channels

    More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

    5.maximum memory capacity

    Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

    6.bus baud rate

    The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

    7. Supports memory troubleshooting code

    ✖Intel Core i5-9600K

    ✖Intel Core i7-8700K

    Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    8. eMMC version

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

    A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

    9.bus frequency

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

    The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

    Geotagging

    1. PassMark result

    This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

    2. PassMark result (single)

    This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

    3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

    Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

    4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

    Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

    5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

    Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

    6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

    Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

    7. Blender test result (bmw27)

    303.7seconds

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

    The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

    8.Blender result (classroom)

    980.5seconds

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

    The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

    9.performance per watt

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

    This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.

    Functions

    1.uses multithreading

    ✖Intel Core i5-9600K

    ✔Intel Core i7-8700K

    physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

    2. Has AES

    ✔Intel Core i5-9600K

    ✔Intel Core i7-8700K

    AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

    3. Has AVX

    ✔Intel Core i5-9600K

    ✔Intel Core i7-8700K

    AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

    4.Version SSE

    SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

    5. Has F16C

    ✔Intel Core i5-9600K

    ✔Intel Core i7-8700K

    F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

    6.bits transmitted at the same time

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

    NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

    7. Has MMX

    ✔Intel Core i5-9600K

    ✔Intel Core i7-8700K

    MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

    8. Has TrustZone

    ✖Intel Core i5-9600K

    ✖Intel Core i7-8700K

    The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).

    9.interface width

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

    The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

    Price comparison

    Cancel

    Which CPUs are better?

    Intel Core i7 8700K vs i5 9600K:

    performance comparison

    VS

    Intel Core i7 8700K

    Intel Core i5 9600K

    Which is better: Intel Core i7 8700K at 3. 7 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.7) or i5 9600K at 3.7 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.6)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 6-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

    1. Overview
    2. Differences
    3. Performance
    4. Features
    5. Comments

    Overview

    Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

    Single -flow performance

    Rating in tests using one core

    Core i7 8700k

    66

    Core i5 9600k

    65

    Multi -flow performance

    Tests in benchmarks where all the nucleus

    Core Core Core Core 8,0004 41

    Core i5 9600K

    33

    Energy efficiency

    Efficiency of energy consumption chip

    Core i7 8700k

    41

    Core i5 9600k

    46 9000

    Key differences

    What are the main differences between 9600K and 8700K

    Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 8700K

    • Has 3MB more L3 cache
    • 2% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4. 7 GHz vs. 4.6 GHz)

    Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 9600K

    • Launched 1 year and 1 month later than rival

    Benchmark tests

    Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

    Cinebench R23 (single core)

    Core i7 8700K
    +2%

    1219

    Core i5 9600K

    1196

    Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

    Core i7 8700K
    +34%

    8881

    Core i5 9600k

    6624

    Passmark CPU (single -core)

    Core I7 8700K

    2781

    Core I5 ​​9600K

    2794

    9000 PASSMARK CPU (Multichemer)
    +28%

    13898

    Core i5 9600K

    10883

    Geekbench 5 (single core)

    Core i7 8700K
    +3%

    1251

    Core i5 9600K

    1214

    Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

    Core i7 8700K
    +17%

    6690

    Core i5 9600K

    5707

    ▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

    Specifications

    List of full specifications of Intel Core i7 8700K and i5 9600K

    General information

    Manufacturer Intel Intel
    Release date October 5, 2017 October 8, 2018
    Type Desktop Desktop
    Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
    Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
    Model number i7-8700K i5-9600K
    Socket LGA-1151 LGA-1151
    Integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630

    Performance

    Cores 6 6
    Number of threads 12 6
    Frequency 3. 7 GHz 3.7 GHz
    Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 4.7 GHz 4.6 GHz
    Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
    Multiplier 37x 37x
    Tire speed 8 GT/s 8 GT/s
    Level 1 cache 64KB (per core) 64KB (per core)
    Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 256KB (per core)
    Level 3 cache 12MB (shared) 9MB (shared)
    Unlocked multiplier Yes Yes

    Power consumption

    Process 14 nanometers 14 nanometers
    Power consumption (TDP) 95 W 95 W
    Critical temperature 100°C 100°C
    Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel UHD Graphics 630
    GPU clock 350 MHz 350 MHz
    Boost GPU frequency 1200 MHz 1150 MHz
    Shader blocks 192 192
    TMUs 24 24
    ROPs 3 3
    Computer units 24 24
    TGP 15W 15W
    Max. resolution 4096×2304 — 60Hz 4096×2304 — 60Hz

    Igpu Flops

    Core i7 8700k

    0.38 Teraflops

    Core I5 ​​9600K

    0.38 Teraflops

    DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666
    Max. size 128 GB 128 GB
    Number of channels 2 2
    Max. bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 41.6 GB/s
    ECC support No No

    Other

    Official site Site Intel Core i7 8700K Site Intel Core i5 9600K
    PCI Express version 3.0 3.0
    Max. PCI Express lanes 16 16
    Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

    Poll

    What processor do you think is the best?

    Core i7 8700K

    23 (60. 5%)

    Core i5 9600K

    15 (39.5%)

    Total votes: 38

    Competitors

    1.
    Core i7 8700K vs Ryzen 5 5600X

    2.
    Core i7 8700K vs Core i9 12900K

    3.
    Core i7 8700K vs Core i7 12700K

    4.
    Core i7 8700K vs. Core i5 12600K

    5.
    Core i7 8700K vs. Core i5 12400F

    6.
    Core i5 9600K vs. Core i5 12600K

    7.
    Core i5 9600K vs. Core i5 12400

    What will you choose: Intel Core i5 9600K or i7 8700K?

    Name

    Message

    Intel Core i5-9600K or Intel Core i7-8700K

    • 0003

      79.4

      Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

      The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

      The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

      Office speed

      Core i5-9600K

      79.4

      Core i7-8700K

      79.4

      Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

      The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

      Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

      Speed ​​in heavy applications

      Core i5-9600K

      50.4

      Core i7-8700K

      53.5 (+5.8%)

      Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

      The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

      At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

      Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

      Speed ​​of numerical operations

      Simple household tasks

      Core i5-9600K

      77.2 (+0.6%)

      Core i7-8700K

      76.7

      Demanding games and tasks

      Core i5-9600K

      56.1

      Core i7-8700K

      57.5 (+2.4%)

      Extreme

      Core i5-9600K

      13. 7

      Core i7-8700K

      18.5 (+25.9%)

      Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

      We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

      Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

      When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

      Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

      Benchmarks

      Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

      Cinebench R23 Single Core

      Intel Core i5-9600K

      1276 (+5.3%)

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      1209

      Cinebench R23 Multi Core

      Intel Core i5-9600K

      7301

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      8960 (+18. 5%)

      Cinebench R20 Single Core

      Intel Core i5-9600K

      481

      487)

      Intel Core i5-9600k

      2624

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      3689 (+28.9%)

      Cinebench R15 Single Core

      Intel Core I5-9600K

      204

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      )

      Cinebench R15 Multi Core

      Intel Core i5-9600K

      1165

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      1447 (+19.5%)

      Geekbench 5 Single Core

      Intel Core i5-9600K

      1256

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      1283 (+2.1%)

      Geekbench 5 Multi Core

      Intel Core i5-9600k

      5643

      Intel Core i7-8700k

      6693 (+15.7%)

      BLENDER 2.81 BLENDER 2.81 BLENDER 2.81 BLEP 9600k

      318.4 (+27%)

      Intel Core i7-8700k

      232.4

      Geekbench 3 Single Core

      Intel Core I5-9600K

      5065

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      5330)

      Geekbench 3 Multi Core

      Intel Core i5-9600k

      23045

      Intel Core i7-8700k

      27445 (+16%)

      Cinebench R11.

      5

      Intel Core I5-9600K

      2.45

      Intel Core I7-Net (+1.2%)

      Cinebench R11.5

      Intel Core i5-9600k

      12.3

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      15.96 (+22.9%)

      Cinebench R111.5 IGPU, Opengl 9008 9000 Сores -9600K

      52.6

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      53.2 (+1.1%)

      Passmark

      Intel Core i5-9600K

      10831

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      13906 (+22.1%)

      characteristics of characteristics of the characteristics of the characteristics of the characteristics of them. missing information or missing existing features.

      Basic

      Manufacturer Intel Intel
      DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i5-9600K Processor (9M Cache, up to 4.60 GHz) Intel® Core™ i7-8700K Processor (12M Cache, up to 4. 70 GHz)
      ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
      Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 14 nm 14 nm
      Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 02-2021 10-2020
      Model Official name. i5-9600K i7-8700K
      Cores The number of physical cores. 6 6
      ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 6 12
      Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS).
      Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.7 GHz 3.7 GHz
      Turbo FrequencyThe maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 4.6 GHz 4.7 GHz
      L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 9 MB 12 MB
      Instructions 64-bit 64-bit
      Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX2
      Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No
      Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 8 GT/s DMI3 8 GT/s DMI3
      Number of QPI links
      TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 95 W 95 W
      Cooling system specifications PCG 2015D (130W) PCG 2015C (130W)

      Video core

      Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® UHD Graphics 630 Intel® UHD Graphics 630
      GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 350 MHz 350 MHz
      Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. 1150MHz 1200MHz
      Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
      Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 3

      RAM

      Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 64 GB 64 GB
      Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666
      RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2
      RAM bandwidth 41.6 GB/s
      ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

      PCI

      configuration options

      PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 3
      PCI Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
      Number of PCI lanes 16 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4

      Data Security

      AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data
      Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data

      Decoration

      Dimensions No data No data
      Supported sockets No data No data
      Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

      Which is better

      Intel Core i5-9600K

      • On average, gaming performance is 2% better.
      • $90 down

      Intel Core i7-8700K

      • Faster and 5% better in complex multi-threaded applications.
      • The number of threads is 6 more.

      What are similar

      • The speed of work in office applications and browsers is approximately equal.
      • The number of physical cores is equal.
      • The base frequency is equal.

      i7-8700K vs i5-9600K — Metro Exodus vs GTX 1660 performance comparison

      GTX 1660 with

      Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz

      Metro Exodus

      GTX 1660 with

      Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz


      i7-8700K
      i5-9600K

      Frames per second 1080p

      46.5 FPS

      1080p

      46.1 FPS

      1440p

      36.1 FPS

      1440p

      35.8 FPS

      2160p

      22.7 FPS

      2160p

      22.5 FPS

      w1440p

      31. 5 FPS

      w1440p

      31.2 FPS

      High quality
      Resolution Frames per second
      1080p

      82.2 FPS

      1080p

      81.6 FPS

      1440p

      66.1 FPS

      1440p

      65.6 FPS

      2160p

      44.2 FPS

      2160p

      43.8 FPS

      w1440p

      58.7 FPS

      w1440p

      58.2 FPS

      Medium quality
      Resolution Frames per second
      1080p

      117.8 FPS

      1080p

      117.0 FPS

      1440p

      96. 1 FPS

      1440p

      95.4 FPS

      2160p

      65.7 FPS

      2160p

      65.2 FPS

      w1440p

      86.0 FPS

      w1440p

      85.3 FPS

      Low quality
      Resolution Frames per second
      1080p

      189.2 FPS

      1080p

      187.9 FPS

      1440p

      156.0 FPS

      1440p

      155.0 FPS

      2160p

      108.6 FPS

      2160p

      107.9 FPS

      w1440p

      140.4 FPS

      w1440p

      139.4 FPS

      i7-8700K
      • The i7-8700K has a higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
      • The i7-8700K has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
      • The i7-8700K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
      i5-9600K

        Compare i7-8700K vs i5-9600K specifications

        i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Architecture
        i7-8700K i5-9600K
        Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
        Generation Core i7
        (Coffee Lake)
        Core i5
        (Coffee Lake Refresh)
        Market Desktop Desktop
        Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
        Part# SR3QR SR3WZ
        Production Status Active Active
        Released Oct 2017 Oct 2018
        i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Cache
        i7-8700K i5-9600K
        Cache L1 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
        Cache L2 256K (per core) 256K (per core)
        Cache L3 12MB (shared) 9MB (shared)
        i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Cores
        i7-8700K i5-9600K
        # of Cores 6 6
        # of Threads 12 6
        Integrated Graphics UHD Graphics 630 N/A
        SMP # CPUs 1 1
        i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Features
        i7-8700K i5-9600K
        MMX
        SSE
        SSE2
        SSE3
        SSSE3
        SSE4. 2
        AVX
        AVX2
        EIST
        Intel 64
        XD bit
        VT-x
        VT-d
        HTT
        AES-NI
        TSX
        TXT
        CLMUL
        FMA3
        F16C
        BMI1
        BMI2
        Boost 2.0
        MMX
        SSE
        SSE2
        SSE3
        SSSE3
        SSE4.2
        AVX
        AVX2
        EIST
        Intel 64
        XD bit
        VT-x
        VT-d
        AES-NI
        TSX
        TXT
        CLMUL
        FMA3
        F16C
        BMI1
        BMI2
        Boost 2.0
        i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Notes
        i7-8700K i5-9600K
        This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.
        i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Performance
        i7-8700K i5-9600K
        Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
        Frequency 3. 7 GHz 3.7 GHz
        Multiplier 37.0x 37.0x
        Multiplier Unlocked Yes Yes
        TDP 95W 95W
        Turbo Clock up to 4.7 GHz up to 4.6 GHz
        Voltage variable variable
        i7-8700K vs i5-9600K Physical
        i7-8700K i5-9600K
        Die Size unknown unknown
        Foundry Intel Intel
        Package FC-LGA1151 FC-LGA1151
        Process Size 14 nm 14 nm
        Socket Intel Socket 1151 Intel Socket 1151
        Transistors unknown unknown
        tCaseMax 72°C 72°C

        Share your comments 98

        Compare i7-8700K vs i5-9600K in more games

        Elden Ring

        2022

        God of War

        2022

        Overwatch 2

        2022

        Forza Horizon 5

        2021

        Halo Infinite

        2021

        Battlefield 2042

        2021

        Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

        2020

        Microsoft Flight Simulator

        2020

        Valorant

        2020

        Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

        2020

        Death Stranding

        2020

        Marvel’s Avengers

        2020

        Godfall

        2020

        Cyberpunk 2077

        2020

        Apex Legends

        2019

        Anthem

        2019

        Far Cry New Dawn

        2019

        Resident Evil 2

        2019

        Metro Exodus

        2019

        World War Z

        2019

        Gears of War 5

        2019

        F1 2019

        2019

        GreedFall

        2019

        Borderlands 3

        2019

        Call of Duty Modern Warfare

        2019

        Red Dead Redemption 2

        2019

        Need for Speed: Heat

        2019

        Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

        2018

        Battlefield V

        2018

        Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

        2018

        Final Fantasy XV

        2018

        Shadow of the Tomb Raider

        2018

        Forza Horizon 4

        2018

        Fallout 76

        2018

        Hitman 2

        2018

        Just Cause 4

        2018

        Monster Hunter: World

        2018

        Strange Brigade

        2018

        Assassin’s Creed Origins

        2017

        Dawn of War III

        2017

        Ghost Recon Wildlands

        2017

        Destiny 2

        2017

        PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

        2017

        Fortnite Battle Royale

        2017

        Need For Speed: Payback

        2017

        For Honor

        2017

        Project CARS 2

        2017

        Forza Motorsport 7

        2017

        Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

        2016

        Battlefield 1

        2016

        Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

        2016

        Doom

        2016

        F1 2016

        2016

        Total War: Warhammer

        2016

        Overwatch

        2016

        Dishonored 2

        2016

        Grand Theft Auto V

        2015

        Rocket League

        2015

        Need For Speed ​​

        2015

        Project CARS

        2015

        Rainbow Six Siege

        2015

        Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

        2012

        League of Legends

        2009

        Minecraft

        2009

        Testing the Intel Core i5-9600K processor in twenty games

        Table of contents

        • Introduction
        • Test results: performance comparison
          • Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
          • Battlefield V
          • Call of Cthulhu
          • Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
          • Conan Exiles
          • Fallout 4
          • Fallout 76
          • Far Cry 5
          • For Honor
          • Grand Theft Auto V
          • Hitman 2
          • Just Cause 4
          • Monster Hunter World
          • Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden
          • Overkill’s The Walking Dead
          • PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
          • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
          • The Witcher 3 Wild Hunt
          • Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege
          • Total War Saga Thrones of Britannia
        • Geometric mean results of processors in twenty games and the attractiveness of their purchase
        • Conclusion
        • Test configuration
        • Instrumentation and Test Method

        Introduction

        In this review, we will study the performance of the new Intel processor representing the Coffee Lake family — the Core i5-9600K.

        The following CPU models became its rivals:

        • Core i7-8700K;
        • Core i7-8700;
        • Core i5-8600K;
        • Core i5-8600;
        • Core i7-7700K;
        • Core i5-7600K;
        • Ryzen 7 2700X;
        • Ryzen 7 2700;
        • Ryzen 5 2600X;
        • Ryzen 7 1800X;
        • Ryzen 7 1700X.

        Recall that you can learn about the work of test benches, methodology and processing of results from a detailed story about testing components in games. A description of the test configurations is given at the end of the material.

        recommendations

        Test results: performance comparison

        Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

        • Version 1.1.1.
        • DirectX 11.
          • Permission modifier — 100%.
          • Viewing angle — 100%.
          • Smoothing — high.
          • The quality of the shadows is ultra high.
          • The quality of the environment is ultra high.
          • Texture detail — high.
          • The quality of the relief is high.
          • The density of small objects is very high.
          • Fog quality — high.
          • Water quality is very high.
          • The quality of full-screen reflections is high.
          • The quality of volumetric clouds is ultra high.
          • The quality of the characters is ultra high.
          • The quality of volumetric lighting is very high.
          • Depth of field quality is high.

          Battlefield V

          • Version 1.0.68.26495.
          • DirectX 11.
            • Field of view on machinery — 95.
            • Motion blur — 50%.
            • Depth of field effects — enabled.
            • Chromatic aberration — enabled.
            • Image graininess — enabled.
            • Vignetting — enabled.
            • Optical distortion — enabled.
            • Resolution — 100%.
            • Frame rate limit — 200.
            • Rendering of subsequent frames — enabled.
            • GPU memory limit — enabled.
            • Texture quality — ultra high.
            • Texture filtering — ultra high.
            • Lighting quality — ultra high.
            • The quality of the effects is ultra high.
            • Post-processing quality — ultra high.
            • Mesh quality — ultra high.

              In the Battlefield V shooter, the Core i5-9600K processor is confidently located in the group of leaders.

              Call of Cthulhu

              • Version 1. 0 build 58053.
              • DirectX 11.
                • Vision range — maximum.
                • Smoothing quality — ultra high.
                • Post-processing quality — ultra high.
                • The quality of the shadows is ultra high.
                • Texture quality — ultra high. 9The 600K took second place, sharing it with the Core i7-8700. And after overclocking, he overtook the leader Core i7-8700K.

                  Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

                  • Version 1.10.
                  • DirectX 11.
                    • Shader preloading — enabled.
                    • Texture quality is very high.
                    • Texture filtering quality is high.
                    • The quality of special effects is high.
                    • The quality of the models is high.
                    • The quality of static reflections is high.
                    • Screen space reflections — enabled.
                    • Display range of objects is high.
                    • Shadow quality is very high.
                    • Dynamic shadows — all enabled.
                    • Special effects shadows included.
                    • Weapon shading — enabled.
                    • Global shading — enabled.
                    • Smoothing quality — very high.
                    • The shading quality is very high.
                    • Speed ​​effect — enabled.

                      Conan Exiles

                      • Version 1.0 build 104617.
                      • DirectX 11.
                        • Viewing angle — 90.
                        • Smoothing — x4.
                        • Vision range — maximum.
                        • Post-processing — maximum.
                        • Shadow quality — maximum.
                        • Effects quality — maximum.
                        • Texture quality — maximum.
                        • Foliage quality — maximum.
                        • DirectX 11.
                          • Antialiasing — FXAA.
                          • Anisotropic filtering — x16.
                          • Texture detail — ultra high.
                          • Shadow detail — ultra high.
                          • Shadow rendering detail — ultra high.
                          • Extra texture detail — ultra high.
                          • Lighting detail — ultra high.
                          • Sunburst detail — ultra high.
                          • Depth of field — the best quality.
                          • Volume Light — HBAO+.
                          • Reflections — enabled.
                          • Humidity — enabled.
                          • Volume rain — included.
                          • Motion blur — enabled.
                          • Glare — enabled.
                        • Render distance:
                          • Objects — maximum.
                          • Characters — maximum.
                          • items — maximum.
                          • Herbs — maximum.

                            Fallout 76

                            • Version 1.0. 4.13.
                            • DirectX 11.
                              • Texture quality — ultra high.
                              • Water quality is high.
                              • Lighting quality is high.
                              • The quality of the shadows is ultra high.
                              • Shadow rendering distance is too high.
                              • Depth of field quality — ultra high.
                              • Field of view — 100.
                              • Character drawing distance — maximum.

                                Far Cry 5

                                • Version 1.0.11.
                                • DirectX 11.
                                  • Texture filtering quality — maximum.
                                  • Shadow quality — maximum.
                                  • The quality of the geometry of the world and vegetation is the maximum.
                                  • The quality of the environment is maximum.
                                  • Water quality is high.
                                  • Landscape quality is high.
                                  • The quality of the volumetric fog is high.

                                    In the game Far Cry 5 in normal operation, the newcomer shared second place with the Core i7-8700 and Core i7-7700K processors. And after overclocking, the Core i5-9600K caught up with the leading Core i7-8700K.

                                    For Honor

                                    • Version 70.15.
                                    • DirectX 11.
                                      • Viewing angle — 90.
                                      • Antialiasing — FXAA.
                                      • Anisotropic texture filtering — x16.
                                      • Scaling — 100%.
                                      • Detail quality is very high.
                                      • Texture quality is high.
                                      • The quality of dynamic shadows is very high.
                                      • The quality of rendering the relief is high.
                                      • Volumetric lighting — MHBAO.
                                      • The quality of dynamic reflections is very high.
                                      • Blur effect — enabled.
                                      • Smoothing oversampling — disabled.

                                    1920×1080 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti)

                                    Rating

                                    Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

                                    Overclocking

                                    Turn on JavaScript to see graphs Theft Auto V

                                    • Version 1.0.1180.1.
                                    • DirectX 11.
                                      • FXAA — enabled.
                                      • Anisotropic filtering — X16.
                                      • Ignore proposed memory limit — enabled.
                                      • City population — maximum.
                                      • Variety of population — maximum.
                                      • Focus scale — maximum.
                                      • Texture quality is very high.
                                      • Shader quality is very high.
                                      • Shadow quality is very high.
                                      • The quality of reflections is the highest possible.
                                      • MSAA for reflections — disabled.
                                      • Water quality is very high.
                                      • Particle quality is very high.
                                      • Grass quality — standard.
                                      • Soft shadows — as soft as possible.
                                      • Special effects settings — maximum high.
                                      • Motion blur level — maximum.
                                      • Depth of field effect — enabled.
                                      • The quality of complex shading (AO) is high.
                                      • Tessellation quality is very high.
                                      • Texture quality is high.
                                      • Texture filtering — anisotropic x16.
                                      • Complex shading (SSAO) — enabled.
                                      • The quality of the shadows is ultra high.
                                      • Simulation quality is the best.

                                    1920×1080 (GeForce RTX 2080 TI)

                                    Nominal

                                    Turn on JavaScript to see graphics

                                    Acceleration

                                    0183

                                    Minimum and average FPS

                                    In the new game about agent 47 and in Just Cause 4, the Core i5-9600K processor is confidently among the leaders.