I7 3820 review: $285 Quad-Core Sandy Bridge E

$285 Quad-Core Sandy Bridge E

by Anand Lal Shimpion December 29, 2011 2:28 AM EST

  • Posted in
  • CPUs
  • Intel
  • Sandy Bridge
  • Sandy Bridge E

84 Comments
|

84 Comments

The Chip & OverclockingWindows 7 Application PerformanceGaming PerformancePower ConsumptionFinal Words


If you are a normal desktop user or even a power user with plans to run at over 4GHz, the vanilla LGA-1155 Sandy Bridge platform is good enough. You get some of the fastest CPUs on the market today paired with reasonably priced motherboards and the ability to use Quick Sync to transcode video…er…quickly. If that’s not enough, Intel launched a higher end platform last month: the LGA-2011 Sandy Bridge E.


Take a regular Sandy Bridge, add PCIe 3. 0 support, increase the number of PCIe lanes that branch off of the CPU (from 16 to 40 lanes), double the number of memory channels (4 x 64-bit DDR3 memory controllers) and you’ve got Sandy Bridge E and its LGA-2011/X79 platform. SNB-E is currently available in two forms: a $999 6-core Extreme Edition part (Core i7 3960X) and a $555 6-core unlocked version (Core i7 3930K). Neither is exactly cheap but if you need the PCIe lanes, core count and memory bandwidth, they are your only ticket.



LGA-2011 SNB-E (left) vs. LGA-1155 SNB (right)


Sandy Bridge E is a fairly niche platform to begin with, but what about the niche within the niche (extremeception?) of users who just need the LGA-2011 platform but not necessarily a 6-core behemoth? For those users, there’s the Core i7 3820:



LGA-2011 SNB-E (left) vs. LGA-1155 SNB (right)


The Core i7 3820 is the first (and only) quad-core Sandy Bridge E CPU. It’s so new that the chip isn’t even available for sale nor will it be until early 2012. Unlike the relationship between the 3960X and 3930K, the 3820 is an entirely new die.


The chip features four Sandy Bridge cores and is paired with a 10MB L3 cache, giving it a slight advantage over the highest end LGA-1155 Sandy Bridge CPUs on the market today. The result is a die that’s bigger than a regular SNB but significantly smaller than a 6-core SNB-E:
















CPU Specification Comparison

CPU

Manufacturing Process

Cores

Transistor Count

Die Size

AMD Bulldozer 8C

32nm

8

1. 2B

315mm2

AMD Thuban 6C

45nm

6

904M

346mm2

AMD Deneb 4C

45nm

4

758M

258mm2

Intel Gulftown 6C

32nm

6

1.17B

240mm2

Intel Sandy Bridge E (6C)

32nm

6

2. 27B

435mm2

Intel Sandy Bridge E (4C)

32nm

4

1.27B

294mm2

Intel Nehalem/Bloomfield 4C

45nm

4

731M

263mm2

Intel Sandy Bridge 4C

32nm

4

995M

216mm2

Intel Lynnfield 4C

45nm

4

774M

296mm2

Intel Clarkdale 2C

32nm

2

384M

81mm2

Intel Sandy Bridge 2C (GT1)

32nm

2

504M

131mm2

Intel Sandy Bridge 2C (GT2)

32nm

2

624M

149mm2


There’s a small improvement in base clock frequency over the fastest SNB (3. 6GHz vs. 3.5GHz) but max turbo remains unchanged at 3.9GHz. For single threaded applications the 3820 should be just as fast as a Core i7 2700K or a 3960X. The same is true for if all heavily threaded workloads, at least when compared to other quad-core parts (the 3960/3930 still maintain an advantage because of their two additional cores).











Processor

Core Clock

Cores / Threads

L3 Cache

Max Turbo

Max Overclock Multiplier

TDP

Price

Intel Core i7 3960X

3. 3GHz

6 / 12

15MB

3.9GHz

57x

130W

$990

Intel Core i7 3930K

3.2GHz

6 / 12

12MB

3.8GHz

57x

130W

$555

Intel Core i7 3820

3. 6GHz

4 / 8

10MB

3.9GHz

43x

130W

$285

Intel Core i7 2700K

3.5GHz

4 / 8

8MB

3.9GHz

57x

95W

$332

Intel Core i7 2600K

3. 4GHz

4 / 8

8MB

3.8GHz

57x

95W

$317

Intel Core i7 2600

3.4GHz

4 / 8

8MB

3.8GHz

42x

95W

$294

Intel Core i5 2500K

3. 3GHz

4 / 4

6MB

3.7GHz

57x

95W

$216

Intel Core i5 2500

3.3GHz

4 / 4

6MB

3.7GHz

41x

95W

$205


There’s no on-die GPU, no heatsink/fan in the box and this isn’t a fully unlocked part so the 3820 is actually cheaper than most of the high-end Sandy Bridge CPUs: it’s priced at $285. If it weren’t for the fact that you’ll still need to spend over $200 on a motherboard I would say that the 3820 is a steal.


Overclocking


Let’s start with the basics. All Sandy Bridge CPUs are clock locked by default, they can’t operate at frequencies other than what they’re sold at. There are two exceptions to this rule. All Sandy Bridge CPUs that support Turbo Boost are partially unlocked. Not only can they turbo up to frequencies that are higher than their default clock, but they can also be overclocked to frequencies even higher than their turbo speeds. By default, all Turbo enabled Sandy Bridge CPUs can be set to run at up to four bins (4 * bclk or 400MHz by default) higher than their standard turbo frequencies:


The second exception is any of the K or X-series SKUs. If your Sandy Bridge model number ends in a K or X, then the chip is fully unlocked and can be overclocked up to 5. 7GHz using only clock multiplier adjustments.


The Core i7 3960X and 3930K fall into the latter category, which makes overclocking them a breeze. The 3820 on the other hand is partially unlocked, which means that we can run it at up to 4.3GHz using multiplier adjustments alone. Note that the 4.3GHz limit only applies to the 1-core active state, in the worst case scenario of all cores active with no room to turbo the highest operating frequency of the chip when overclocked would be 4.0GHz.



The max 3820 overclock without touching bclk settings


While these aren’t bad targets, they’re not all that exciting either. Thankfully Sandy Bridge E makes it even easier to overclock through the use of a few higher bclk frequencies. By default Sandy Bridge uses a 100MHz bclk, but SNB-E allows for 125MHz, 166MHz and 250MHz options as well. The 166/250MHz settings are a bit too aggressive, but the 125MHz bclk setting proved to be the perfect companion for the 3820.


Intel’s DX79SI makes it extremely easy to overclock, especially with the latest BIOS update. There are built in overclocking profiles for each bclk setting that you can choose from. I simply selected the 1.25x (125MHz) profile option and then went through the list of target frequencies until I found one that seemed promising. I also went in and tweaked some of the settings myself to get a bit more clock speed (4.63GHz is the fastest profile this board allows by default) and improve stability. In the end I was fairly pleased with what the 3820 could do: 4.75GHz with Intel’s RTS2011LC closed loop cooling system.



Now we’re talking


I couldn’t get the 3820 as stable as I would like at 4.88GHz and 5GHz was unfortunately out of the reach of my sample. I can’t really complain about 4.75GHz from a $285 chip though, especially without resorting to anything too exotic from a cooling standpoint. Overclocking is also extremely effortless thanks to the new bclk options on SNB-E. Although the Core i7 3820 isn’t an unlocked part, that doesn’t limit how far (or how easily) it can be overclocked. A big part of the ease of overclocking is due to how good of a job Intel did on the DX79SI BIOS options, but from what we’ve seen the third party boards also do a decent job of simplifying the process.


To keep the review length manageable we’re presenting a subset of our results here. For all benchmark results and even more comparisons be sure to use our performance comparison tool: Bench.









Motherboard:

ASUS P8Z68-V Pro (Intel Z68)

ASUS Crosshair V Formula (AMD 990FX)

Intel DX79SI (Intel X79)

Hard Disk:

Intel X25-M SSD (80GB)

Crucial RealSSD C300

Memory:

4 x 4GB G. Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-1600 9-9-9-20

Video Card:

ATI Radeon HD 5870 (Windows 7)

Video Drivers:

AMD Catalyst 11.10 Beta (Windows 7)

Desktop Resolution:

1920 x 1200

OS:

Windows 7 x64


 

Windows 7 Application Performance
The Chip & OverclockingWindows 7 Application PerformanceGaming PerformancePower ConsumptionFinal Words

Tweet

PRINT THIS ARTICLE

Intel Core i7-3930K And Core i7-3820: Sandy Bridge-E, Cheaper

Editor’s Note: As you’ll see by the end of this story, we liked the Core i7-3930K for its specific purpose quite a bit. It’s a pleasure, then, to offer four of these CPUs to our readers. Of course, we realize that the platform is still pricey, so we also have a quartet of Intel DX79SI motherboards and as many 120 GB SSD 320 drives. Four lucky winners will walk away with a trio of parts to get them started on their next machine. Read to the end of this story for your chance to win!

We love to lust after the latest hardware, no matter the cost. But when it comes time to buy, sexy takes a back seat to sensible. That’s why a thousand-dollar processor like Intel’s Core i7-3960X doesn’t really add up. According to Intel’s official price list, you can get the Core i7-3930K for exactly $416 dollars less, sacrificing 3 MB of shared L3 cache and 100 MHz in the process. There’s an Epic Meal Time phrase I could use to illustrate the intelligence of that trade-off, but I’ll just leave it as: smart.

And so today’s story is brought to you by a couple of different ideas. First, we got our hands on the other two LGA 2011-based parts: Core i7-3930K and Core i7-3820. We’ll give you the performance data on those chips running at their stock settings.

The former launched alongside Core i7-3960X, although it looks like Intel took a look at the competitive landscape, realized there wasn’t anything to contend with Sandy Bridge-E, and tacked an extra $10 onto its -3960X and $33 to its -3930K. As a result, the $550 I cited in my launch coverage is now officially $583, but closer to $600 once the online guys add their mark-up.

The latter wasn’t as easy to track down. Although Core i7-3820’s specifications are known, it’s not officially available until 2012. But since we’ve heard that a lot of really sensitive stuff gets left behind at bars, we’ve been drinking ourselves silly, hoping to scoop up a lonely Sandy-E with only half of her faculties intact.

The darnest things wind up in bars…

Sandy Bridge-E finds itself in a tough position no matter which model you flag for its potential superiority over the other two, though. Stepping away from Intel’s flagship platform, you’re faced with Sandy Bridge, the mainstream architecture we’ve praised over the last 11 months for its stock performance, reasonable cost, efficiency, and overclockability. At $1000, $600, and an undisclosed third price (a bar fly suggested $285), it’s hard to see any conceivable way to have a serious discussion about Sandy Bridge-E’s value compared to unlocked alternatives like Core i5-2500K and Core i7-2600K.

And then there’s Ivy Bridge, expected to land in the first half of next year. Informed enthusiasts have to be wary of buying into Sandy Bridge-E knowing that Ivy Bridge could deliver better performance in basic desktop applications.

How much of a threat will the quad-core Ivy Bridge-based chips be to six-core Sandy Bridge-E processors? It’s too early to say for sure, since production-quality hardware is still months away. But we were able to scoop up an Ivy Bridge-based 55 W Core i3 at the very same watering hole and run a handful of tests. My numbers are quite a bit lower than what Intel suggests on these leaked slides though, so we’re going to wait and see how the early processors evolve before posting charts. Should enthusiasts worry that Ivy Bridge will usurp their Sandy Bridge-E-based systems? I don’t think so. It kind of sucks that the high-end crowd has to wait another year or so for Ivy Bridge-E, but these two segments want different things, and a 77 W quad-core CPU isn’t going to displace a 130 W hexa-core processor in those environments.

Besides, I’m not 100% convinced that the Ivy Bridge/6-series chipset compatibility story is going to end as harmoniously as many folks with P67 and Z68 boards hope.  

Deriving Value From The High-End?

I read all of the comments from my review of Core i7-3960X proclaiming Sandy Bridge-E fodder for chumps with too much spare change. And although I agree insofar as Intel’s flagship isn’t the right model to buy for maximizing bang for your buck, you simply have to concede that, in threaded applications, it’s faster than both the Core i7-990X it replaces and the four-core Core i7-2600K to which it’s so easily compared. As a result, there will be affluent early adopters and professionals eager to pay top dollar for the fastest single-processor system available.

Here’s the thing, though. Having the money to spend shouldn’t compel anyone to blow it. Now that the Sandy Bridge-E launch is history and prices are publically available on sites like Newegg and TigerDirect, we can add up the cost of the parts we used and consider scaling back to save some cash.

The Intel DX79SI motherboard we used for our launch piece (and continue to use today) just hit Newegg’s virtual shelves at $280. Add to that $1050 for a Core i7-3960X and $800 for two 16 GB DDR3-1333 kits from Crucial, and you’re looking at a total of $2130 for the three platform-specific components. Now, it’s clear that the insane price of high-density memory is throwing that number off. So let’s avoid sensationalizing the bottom line and swap over to the 16 GB DDR3-2133 kit from G.Skill that I used to test memory scaling in the original story. At $180, we end up with a (relatively) more palatable $1530.

Can we pare back the parts list to make Sandy Bridge-E a better buy for a larger group of enthusiasts…without sacrificing performance? I’ll explore the benchmarks shortly, but here’s the parts list that I’m going to use on my quest:

Components From Today’s Experiment Price on Newegg
Intel Core i7-3930K $600
ASRock X79 Extreme4-M $225
G.Skill F3-12800CL9Q-8GBRL (4 x 2 GB DDR3-1600) $55
Total: $880

At $225, ASRock’s X79 Extreme4-M is the least-expensive (and conveniently microATX-sized) X79-based motherboard available. G.Skill’s 8 GB, DDR3-1600 Ripjaws kit isn’t particularly flashy, but it gets the job done at a capacity point we’d still consider beefy. And of course, the Core i7-3930K gets us as close to Intel’s flagship as possible without giving up any cores. The grand total? $885. That’s an almost $650 chunk off of the original setup after dropping the high-density memory kit.

Although you’re still paying nearly $400 more than the cheapest Z68-based board, the same 8 GB memory kit, and a Core i7-2700K, six cores simply aren’t available in the mainstream space. Suddenly, the prospects of a fast hexa-core beast look a lot rosier for the folks who skipped over Sandy Bridge entirely in anticipation of higher-end hardware.

  • 1

Current page:
Core i7-3930K And -3820 Get Reviewed

Next Page Overclocking Sandy Bridge-E On A Budget

Chris Angelini is an Editor Emeritus at Tom’s Hardware US. He edits hardware reviews and covers high-profile CPU and GPU launches.

Intel Core i7-3820 Review — PCGameBenchmark

Intel CPU review. Latest product shots, rating, price and Core i7-3820 specs. Gaming CPU benchmarked against the biggest PC games like Fortnite, Minecraft and PUBG Should you buy this Intel CPU?

The processor, also known as the CPU, is the most important component on any gaming PC motherboard. It works alongside the graphics card to power your PC games. This Intel CPU has 4 cores, 8 threads and runs at a clock speed of 3.6 GHz.

PCGameBenchmark rates processors by how many of the top 1,000 PC games the chip can run.This Intel CPU can run 868 of the top 1000 games — so we give it a 86% rating.

Games that this CPU can run include Fortnite, Apex Legends, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA V, League of Legends, Overwatch and Rainbow Six Siege.

For a full list of the games that this CPU will run and the chance to compare it to other Intel and AMD processors check our CPU comparison tool. We have benchmarked every AMD and Intel CPU and track the best prices too. No need to wait for Intel Core i7-3820 Black Friday 2022 deals or some other sale to get the lowest prices!

Check out best deals on cheap processors and the latest deals on Amazon.

Intel Core i7-3820
PCGameBenchmark Rating: 76%

Best Price: $228. 85

Check latest prices


Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.

Intel Core i7-3820 Specs

CPU
Intel Core i7-3820
Weight
0.92 lb (416.75 g)
Dimensions (L x W x H)
12.7 cm x 14.48 cm x 8.13 cm
5 in x 5.7 in x 3.2 in
Brand
Intel
Model Number
BX80619I73820
Cores
4 Cores
Threads
8 Threads
Clock Speed (Frequency)
3. 6 GHz
Best Price: $228.85

Check latest prices


Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.

Intel Core i7-3820 PC Gaming Performance

This processor will run 764 of the top PC games. Use PCGameBenchmark’s Rate My PC service to test your current set up and set how it compares.

Can It Run GTA 5?

This Intel processor doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for GTA 5 but it can play the game with lowered settings.

Can It Run Fortnite?

This Intel processor doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for Fortnite but it can play the game with lowered settings.

Can It Run Apex Legends?

This Intel processor doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for Apex Legends but it can play the game with lowered settings.

Intel Core i7-3820 Features

  • Intel Core i7-3820 3.6GHz, up to 3.8GHz with Max Turbo Frequency
  • 10MB Intel Smart Cache
  • 44 Bus/Core ratio
  • 5 GT/s DMI

Intel Core i7-3820 DEALS — BEST prices

Best Price: $228.85

Check latest prices


Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.

Other Intel processors

Here are a few other options…

Good

Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Review

27% Rating

$169.95

Better

Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 Review

28% Rating

$119. 95

Best

Intel Xeon E5606 Review

39% Rating

$7.99

Latest Processor Reviews
  • Intel BX8070110600K Review
  • AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Review
  • AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
  • AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Review
  • AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Review
  • Intel Core i3-10100F Review
  • Intel Core i9-10850K Review
  • AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT Review
  • AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Review
  • AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Review

Gaming Laptop DealsRate my PC

Game System Requirements: Trending

FIFA 23 System Requirements

GTA 5 System Requirements

Valorant System Requirements

Elden Ring System Requirements

Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered System Requirements

Red Dead Redemption 2 System Requirements

Call of Duty: Warzone System Requirements

Fortnite System Requirements

Genshin Impact System Requirements

Apex Legends System Requirements

CSGO System Requirements

Microsoft Flight Simulator System Requirements

Minecraft System Requirements

FIFA 22 System Requirements

Stray System Requirements

Fall Guys System Requirements

Tower of Fantasy System Requirements

Farthest Frontier System Requirements

Cult of the Lamb System Requirements

MultiVersus System Requirements

Review: Intel Core i7-3820 — CPU

Intel muscled into its own high-end desktop CPU territory when it launched the Sandy Bridge E (SNB-E) chips in November 2011. Expanding on the specifications of the excellent mainstream second-generation Core chips by throwing more cores, cache and memory bandwidth into the equation, SNB-E was always destined to be good.

But having performance hegemony at the high end means Intel dictates release schedules as it sees fit. There’s no obvious pressure on the chip giant from AMD, the competition minnow, so the SNB-E roll-out is more calculated than rushed. And while we applaud the devastating speed achievable by the Core i7-3960X or 3930K CPUs, the need to purchase a new, expensive motherboard — X79 boards start at £170 — quad-channel memory and a £450-plus chip price combine to make Intel’s speediest desktop platform also its most expensive.

Indeed, SNB-E’s pricing juxtaposes with the comparative value offered by mainstream Core i5/i7 chips, where the capable Core i5-2500K, overclockable to near-5GHz, can be picked up for £150, with compatible LGA1155 motherboards on sale for significantly below £100.

Cheaper SNB-E

What SNB-E needs, therefore, is a cheaper chip that may tempt potential purchasers into opting for an X79-based platform; motherboard manufacturers would assuredly welcome such a move that’ll stimulate sales. While not yet appearing on the firm’s website, Intel has slipped in the four-core, eight-threaded Core i7-3820 LGA2011 chip, priced at a tantalising $286 (£250).

Unashamedly borrowing a table from the Core i7-3960X review, here’s how the 3820 fits in.

Model number Cores / Threads Clock Speed
(GHz)
Max Turbo
(GHz)
IGP Process Cache Interface Memory channels TDP Turbo tech Socket Price
Intel Core
i7-3960X
6/12 3. 30 3.90 N/A 32nm
(Sandy Bridge-E)
1.5MB L2
15MB L3
DMI 2.0 Quad
DDR3-1,600
130W 2.0

LGA2011

X79

$999
Intel Core
i7-3930K
6/12 3.20 3.80 N/A 32nm
(Sandy Bridge-E)
1.5MB L2
12MB L3
DMI 2.0 Quad
DDR3-1,600
130W 2.0

LGA2011

X79

$564
Intel Core
i7-3820
4/8 3.60 3.90 N/A 32nm
(Sandy Bridge-E)
1MB L2
10MB L3
DMI 2. 0 Quad
DDR3-1,600
130W 2.0

LGA2011

X79

$286
Intel Core
i7-2700K
4/8 3.50 3.90 Intel HD 3000 32nm
(Sandy Bridge)
1MB L2
8MB L3
DMI 2.0 Dual
DDR3-1,333
95W 2.0

LGA1155

H, P, Z 6-series

$332
Intel Core
i7-990X EE
6/12 3.46 3.73 N/A 32nm
(Westmere)
1.5MB L2
12MB L3
QPI Triple
DDR3-1,066
130W 1.0

LGA1366

X58

$999
Intel Core
i7-970
6/12 3. 20 3.46 N/A 32nm
(Westmere)
1.5MB L2
12MB L3
QPI Triple
DDR3-1,066
130W 1.0

LGA1366

X58

$583
Intel Core
i7-950
4/8 3.06 3.33 N/A 45nm
(Bloomfield)
1MB L2
8MB L3
QPI Triple
DDR3-1,066
130W 1.0

LGA1366

X58

$294

What you’re looking at is three generations of Intel CPUs. The first three entries all belong to SNB-E, the Core i7-2700K calls SNB home, while the bottom trio highlight what’s best about the previous high-end desktop generation.

The same, but not the same

The Core i7-3820 is both the same and different from its SNB-E siblings. It uses the same LGA2011 form factor and slots right into any X79 board. There’s no on-board video, it’s specified with a 130W TDP, and communicates with the IO via a DMI interface.

But the differences are what make it stand out, and the first obvious pointer that this is a cheaper derivative rests with fewer cores/threads. Dropping down from the 6/12 setup of Core i7-3960X/3930K, the baby LGA2011 chip runs standard four-core, eight-thread processing. And understanding just how Intel arranges cores and caches, L2, which is 256KB per core, drops down to 1MB and L3 to 10MB (it’s roughly set at 2.5MB per core, though it is shared amongst cores).

Fewer cores and less cache spell lower performance. Intel ameliorates some of the damage by clocking the chip in at 3.60GHz, which is higher than both six-core parts, though overall Turbo Boost speed is a 3960X-matching 3.90GHz. Really, the default clock is kind of irrelevant on a chip that Turbos so effectively, and Intel is making the 3820 look better than it perhaps is: the top-line duo both Turbo by 300MHz when under all-core load. In fact, the following table fleshes it out.

Model number/cores active Native speed One core Two cores Three cores Four cores Five cores Six cores
Intel Core
i7-3960X
3.30GHz 3.90GHz 3.90GHz 3.70GHz 3.70GHz 3.60GHz 3.60GHz
Intel Core
i7-3930K
3.20GHz 3.80GHz 3.80GHz 3.60GHz 3.60GHz 3.50GHz 3.50GHz
Intel Core
i7-3820
3.60GHz 3.90GHz 3.80GHz 3.80GHz 3.70GHz
Intel Core
i7-2600K
3. 40GHz 3.80GHz 3.70GHz 3.60GHz 3.50GHz

You see, under load — one to six cores — the 3820 is pretty much the same speed as other high-end chips: the default clock is semi-meaningless.

Intel Core i7-3820 processor review: CPU specs, performance benchmarks

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-3820 processor released by Intel; release date: February 2012. At the time of release, the processor cost $400. The processor is designed for desktop-computers and based on Sandy Bridge E microarchitecture.

CPU is locked to prevent overclocking. Total number of cores — 4, threads — 8. Maximum CPU clock speed — 3.80 GHz. Maximum operating temperature — 66.8°C. Manufacturing process technology — 32 nm. Cache size: L1 — 64 KB (per core), L2 — 256 KB (per core), L3 — 10240 KB (shared).

Supported memory types: DDR3 1066/1333/1600. Maximum memory size: 64.23 GB.

Supported socket types: FCLGA2011. Maximum number of processors in a configuration — 1. Power consumption (TDP): 130 Watt.

Benchmarks











PassMark
Single thread mark

Top 1 CPU
This CPU


PassMark
CPU mark

Top 1 CPU
This CPU

118142


Geekbench 4
Single Core

Top 1 CPU
This CPU


Geekbench 4
Multi-Core

Top 1 CPU
This CPU


3DMark Fire Strike
Physics Score

Top 1 CPU
This CPU


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop
Face Detection

Top 1 CPU
This CPU

56.680 mPixels/s

4.665 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Ocean Surface Simulation

Top 1 CPU
This CPU

741.453 Frames/s

84.218 Frames/s

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
T-Rex

Top 1 CPU
This CPU

3. 237 Frames/s

0.606 Frames/s

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Video Composition

Top 1 CPU
This CPU

49.002 Frames/s

2.267 Frames/s

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Bitcoin Mining

Top 1 CPU
This CPU

218.231 mHash/s

5. 758 mHash/s












Name Value
PassMark — Single thread mark 1738
PassMark — CPU mark 5776
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 756
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 3163
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 3318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection 4.665 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation 84. 218 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex 0.606 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition 2.267 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining 5.758 mHash/s

Specifications (specs)
























































Architecture codename Sandy Bridge E
Launch date February 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $400
Place in performance rating 1577
Price now $199. 99
Processor Number i7-3820
Series Intel® Core™ X-series Processors
Status Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 13.26
Vertical segment Desktop
64 bit support
Base frequency 3.60 GHz
Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI2
Die size 294 mm
L1 cache 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 256 KB (per core)
L3 cache 10240 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 67 °C
Maximum core temperature 66. 8°C
Maximum frequency 3.80 GHz
Number of cores 4
Number of threads 8
Transistor count 1270 million
VID voltage range 0.600V – 1.350V

Max memory channels 4
Maximum memory bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
Maximum memory size 64. 23 GB
Supported memory types DDR3 1066/1333/1600
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1
Package Size 52.5mm x 45.0mm
Sockets supported FCLGA2011
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt
Max number of PCIe lanes 40
PCI Express revision 2.0
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4. 2, Intel® AVX
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Smart Response technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Core i7-3820 with others




Intel
Core i7-3820



vs



AMD
Phenom II X3 B73




Intel
Core i7-3820



vs



AMD
Athlon II X3 420e




Intel
Core i7-3820



vs



Intel
Core i7-2600K




Intel
Core i7-3820



vs



Intel
Core i7-990X




Intel
Core i7-3820



vs



Intel
Core i3-2125




Intel
Core i7-3820



vs



AMD
A10-5800B

Core i7-3820 [in 4 benchmarks]


Intel
Core i7-3820

Buy

  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution

Summary

Intel started Intel Core i7-3820 sales on February 2012 at a recommended price of $400. This is Sandy Bridge-E architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, and is based on 32 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3800 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is FCLGA2011 processor with a TDP of 130 Watt and a maximum temperature of 67 °C. It supports DDR3 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at


5.73%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.


Core i7
3820

vs


EPYC
7h22

General info


Core i7-3820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating 1145
Value for money 2. 32
Market segment Desktop processor
Architecture codename Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Release date February 2012 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $400 of 305 (Core i7-870)
Current price $177 (0.4x MSRP) of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs


Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores 4 (Quad-Core)
Threads 8
Base clock speed 3.6 GHz of 4.7 (FX-9590)
Boost clock speed 3.8 GHz of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K)
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401)
L2 cache 256 KB (per core) of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
L3 cache 10240 KB (shared) of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998)
Chip lithography 32 nm of 5 (Apple M1)
Die size 294 mm2
Maximum core temperature 67 °C of 110 (Atom x7-E3950)
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 67 °C of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ)
Number of transistors 1270 million of 57000 (Apple M1 Max)
64 bit support +
Windows 11 compatibility
Unlocked multiplier

Compatibility


Information on Core i7-3820 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket FCLGA2011
Thermal design power (TDP) 130 Watt of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technologies and extensions


Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3820. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI +
AVX +
vPro
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) +
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) +
Turbo Boost Technology 2. 0
Hyper-Threading Technology +
Idle States +
Thermal Monitoring +
Smart Response +
Demand Based Switching

Security technologies


Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT
EDB +
Identity Protection +

Virtualization technologies


Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

VT-d +
VT-x +
EPT +

Memory specs


Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Core i7-3820’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory types DDR3 of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X)
Maximum memory size 64.23 GB of 786 (Xeon E5-2670 v3)
Max memory channels 4 of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)
Maximum memory bandwidth 51.2 GB/s of 281.6 (Xeon Platinum 9221)
ECC memory support

Peripherals


Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

PCIe version 2.0 of 5 (Core i9-12900K)
PCI Express lanes 40 of 128 (EPYC 7551P)

Benchmark performance


Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Core i7-3820. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


i7-3820
5.73

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%


i7-3820
5776

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%


i7-3820
731

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%


i7-3820
3101

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%


i7-3820
6240


Mining hashrates


Cryptocurrency mining performance of Core i7-3820. Usually measured in megahashes per second.


Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 5.8 Mh/s  

Relative perfomance


Overall Core i7-3820 performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.



Intel Core i7-4770T
102.44


Intel Pentium Gold G7400T
101.92


Intel Core i3-8300T
101.22


Intel Core i7-3820
100


AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
99.48


Intel Core i5-7440EQ
98.78


Intel Core i5-6500
97.91

AMD equivalent


We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-3820 by AMD is Phenom II X6 1100T BE, which is slower by 1% and lower by 5 positions in our rating.


Phenom II
X6 1100T BE


Compare


Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i7-3820:


AMD FX-9370
104. 19


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
104.19


AMD FX-8350
102.79


Intel Core i7-3820
100


AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
99.48


AMD FX-8320
93.72


AMD FX-8370E
92.32

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.


Phenom II
X6 1100T BE


Compare


Core i7
4770T


Compare


Core i5
4690K


Compare


Core i7
2700K


Compare


FX
8350


Compare


Core i5
4690


Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with Core i7-3820 according to our statistics.


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

8.2%


GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

7%


GeForce GTX
1060 3 GB

5.1%


GeForce GTX
970

4.4%


GeForce GTX
660

4.2%


GeForce GTX
960

3.1%


GeForce GTX
1050

2.8%


GeForce GTX
1070 Ti

2. 3%


GeForce GTX
750 Ti

2.3%


GeForce GTX
680

2.2%

User rating


Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


Questions and comments


Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Intel Core i7-3820 — 59 secret facts, review, specifications, reviews.


PassMark CPU score

The PassMark benchmark considers read speed, write speed, and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all

5935

max 89379

Average: 6033. 5

89379


AES

Yes


Temperature control technologies

Yes


Intel Privacy Protection Technology

Yes


Function Execute override bit

Yes


Intel Trusted Execution Technology

No


Number of threads

The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all

eight

max 256

Average: 10.7

256


L2 Cache Size

L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all

1MB

max 512

Average: 4. 5 MB

512MB


L3 cache size

Large amount of L3 memory accelerates results in CPU and system performance settings
Show all

10MB

max 768

Average: 16.3 MB

768MB


Maximum Turbo Clock Speed ​​

When the processor speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all

3.8GHz

max 5.5

Average: 3.2 GHz

5.5GHz


Number of cores

four

max 72

Mean: 5.8

72


Processor base clock speed

3. 6GHz

max 4.7

Average: 2.5 GHz

4.7GHz


Frequency with Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0

3.8GHz

max 5.1

Average: 3.5 GHz

5.1GHz


Max. number of PCI Express lanes

40

max 64

Average: 22.7

64


Idle states

Yes


Turbo Boost Technology

Turbo Boost is a technology that allows the processor to operate at a frequency higher than the maximum. This increases its productivity (including when performing complex tasks)
Show all

2

Mean: 1.9

2


Number of PCI-Express lanes

40


Max. number of processors in configuration

one

Mean: 1.3

8


Version DDR

3

Mean: 3.5

5


Max. memory bandwidth

This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.

51.2GB/s

max 352

Average: 41.4 GB/s

352GB/s


Memory frequency

The RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all

1600MHz

max 4800

Average: 2106.2 MHz

4800MHz


Max. number of memory channels

The greater their number, the higher the data transfer rate from memory to processor

four

max 16

Mean: 2. 9

16


Max. memory size

The largest amount of RAM memory.

64.23GB

max 6000

Average: 404.4 GB

6000GB


System bus frequency

Data between computer components and other devices is transferred via the bus.
Show all

5 GT/s

max 1600

Average: 156.1 GT/s

1600 GT/s


Memory support ECC

Memory debugging code is used when it is necessary to avoid data corruption during scientific computing or server startup. It finds possible errors and repairs data corruption.
Show all

No


vPro

No


Enhanced Speed ​​Step (EIST)

Yes


Intel® AES-NI Commands

AES is required to speed up encryption and decryption.

Yes


Hyper-Threading Technology

Many Intel processors use state-of-the-art hyper-threading technology. Thus, each processor core works simultaneously on two threads, which significantly increases performance. Most processors work on the principle: one thread per core, therefore, their performance is lower.
Show all

Yes


AVX

AVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Show all

Yes


Version sse

Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as adjusting the sound intensity). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all

4.2

max 4.2

Average: 4. 1

4.2


Socket

FCLGA2011


Thermal Monitoring

Yes


Smart Response

Yes


Demand Based Switching

No


TXT

No


EDB

Yes


Identity Protection

Yes


VT-d

Yes


VT-x

Yes


EPT

Yes


Manufacturing process

The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

32 nm

Average: 36.8 nm

5nm


Number of transistors

2270 million

max 57000

Average: 1517. 3 million

57000 million


Thermal Dissipation (TDP)

Thermal Dissipation Requirements (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all

130W

Average: 67.6 W

0.025W


PCI Express Revision

2

Mean: 2.9

5


Status

Discontinued


Release date

01/01/2012


Embedded options available

No


Case size

52.5mm x 45.0mm


Supports 64-bit system

A 64-bit system, unlike a 32-bit system, can support more than 4 GB of RAM. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Show all

Yes


Code name

Sandy Bridge E


Maximum temperature Tcase

66.8°C

max 105

Average: 75.1 °C

105°C


Purpose

Desktop

Review of the Intel Core i7-3820 processor: characteristics, tests in benchmarks

The Core i7-3820 processor was released by Intel, release date: February 2012. At the time of release, the processor cost $400. The processor is designed for desktop computers and is built on the Sandy Bridge E architecture.

Processor blocked for overclocking. The total number of cores is 4, threads are 8. The maximum clock frequency of the processor is 3.80 GHz. The maximum temperature is 66.8°C. Technological process — 32 nm. Cache size: L1 — 64 KB (per core), L2 — 256 KB (per core), L3 — 10240 KB (shared).

Supported memory type: DDR3 1066/1333/1600. Maximum supported memory size: 64.23 GB.

Supported socket type: FCLGA2011. The maximum number of processors in the configuration is 1. Power consumption (TDP): 130 Watt.

Benchmarks

PassMark
Single thread mark
Top1 CPU
This CPU
PassMark
CPU mark
Top1 CPU
This CPU
118142
Geekbench 4
Single Core
Top1 CPU
This CPU
Geekbench 4
Multi-Core
Top1 CPU
This CPU
3DMark Fire Strike
Physics Score
Top1 CPU
This CPU
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop
Face Detection
Top1 CPU
This CPU
56.680 mPixels/s
4.665 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Ocean Surface Simulation
Top1 CPU
This CPU
741.453 Frames/s
84.218 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
T-Rex
Top1 CPU
This CPU
3. 237 Frames/s
0.606 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Video Composition
Top1 CPU
This CPU
49.002 Frames/s
2.267 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Bitcoin Mining
Top1 CPU
This CPU
218.231 mHash/s
5. 758 mHash/s
Name Meaning
PassMark — Single thread mark 1738
PassMark — CPU mark 5776
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 756
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 3163
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 3318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection 4.665 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation 84. 218 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex 0.606 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition 2.267 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining 5.758 mHash/s

Features

configuration

Architecture name Sandy Bridge E
Issue date February 2012
Price at first issue date $400
Place in rating 1577
Price now $199. 99
Processor Number i7-3820
Series Intel® Core™ X-series Processors
Status Discontinued
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 13.26
Applicability Desktop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency 3.60 GHz
Bus Speed ​​ 5 GT/s DMI2
Crystal area 294 mm
Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 10240 KB (shared)
Process 32 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 67 °C
Maximum core temperature 66. 8°C
Maximum frequency 3.80 GHz
Number of cores 4
Number of threads 8
Number of transistors 1270 million
Permissible core voltage 0.600V — 1.350V
Maximum number of memory channels 4
Maximum memory bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
Maximum memory size 64. 23GB
Supported memory types DDR3 1066/1333/1600
Low Halogen Options Available
Maximum number of processors in 1
Package Size 52.5mm x 45.0mm
Supported sockets FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt
Number of PCI Express lanes 40
PCI Express revision 2.0
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 2, Intel® AVX
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Smart Response Technology
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Navigation

Select processor

Processor comparison

Intel Core i7-3820 vs.

other processors

Intel
Core i7-3820

versus

AMD
Phenom II X3 B73

Intel
Core i7-3820

versus

AMD
Athlon II X3 420e

Intel
Core i7-3820

versus

Intel
Core i7-2600K

Intel
Core i7-3820

versus

Intel
Core i7-990X

Intel
Core i7-3820

versus

Intel
Core i3-2125

Intel
Core i7-3820

versus

AMD
A10-5800B

Review and testing of the i7 processor 3820

Intel decided to simultaneously release three processor models at once: Core i7-3930K, i7-3960X and Core i7 3820. Initially, many users were perplexed by the fact that the latest model appeared on the current market. Presumably, the reason for this was the reduction in the cost of the entrance fee to the LGA 2011 club.

As a result, this processor excludes the presence of a free multiplier and is fundamentally different from other models. What is this model? The Core i7 3820 was essentially used as a direct competitor to the top representatives of the LGA 1155 platform, which included models such as the i7-2700 K and i7-2600K. These devices have proven themselves well in terms of overclocking. They were able to work at frequencies close to 5 GHz without any difficulty. At the same time, the level of productivity practically reached the level unattainable at that time.

Given that these devices have been on the market for a long time. It was quite difficult for the new model to make its way. In particular, the popularization of previous models was attended by a free multiplier. They themselves have a good overclocking potential. The Core i7 3820 looked like a dark horse against their background. It is worth noting that all competing devices, including the FX-8120 model from AMD, provided performance above 4500 and 2133 MHz for the processor and memory.

An engineering sample of the Core i7 3820 will be used for comparison. This device will be as close as possible to those that eventually went to retail. However, the characteristics of the test sample are brought to the ideal, and this fact must be taken into account. If you look at the processors themselves, the different position of all components immediately catches your eye. The point is that the 3930K is based on a monolithic eight-core crystal.

This model disables two cores and a certain part of the cache. If we talk about the Core i7 3820 model, then the situation is radically different here. As a basis, this processor uses a crystal of four cores. In fact, it represents only 50% of what is offered in the other two models. PCI and memory controllers have not been affected by the changes. As a result, the operation is carried out in the same modes, providing approximately the same set of options.

Core i7 3820 versus 2600K and FX-8120

If we look at the FX-8120 and 2600K models, we can say that they are standard production samples, the only advantage of which is that in terms of their frequency potential they approach the previous couple. Models i7 3820 and 2600R have similar characteristics. However, they have some parameters that differ significantly from each other. In addition, these models use a different design. The updated model does not have a free multiplier and an integrated video core. Instead, a dedicated quad-channel memory controller and forty PCI-e 3.0 lanes are included.

Peculiarities of using

We have already mentioned that this processor does not have a free multiplier. In fact, this does not limit the ability of this model to overclock the maximum frequency at all. It is known that the LGA 2011 platform provides for the possibility of changing the bus coefficients. Due to this, you can set the value of the maximum frequency in the range from 125 to 133 MHz. In this case, we are considering a threshold value of 130, but if we multiply this value by the limiting coefficient of the processor, then we can say that, in the end, the overclocking potential allows us to reach a frequency of up to 5720 MHz.

Thus, in the end, the Core i7 3820 will have the same limit as the processors on the standard LGA 1155 platform. Today, hardly anyone can be surprised by the results at 5000 MHz. Even when the Core i7 3820 processor was released, there were users who overclocked existing models to this value. For this reason, many immediately thought about the question of whether it would be realistic for the new Core i7 3820 to achieve the same results with a theoretically identical milestone.

Core i7 3820: overclocking

Special attention should be paid to the fact that these models have different thermal packages. If the 2600K model has a thermal package of 95 W, then in the new device it is increased to 130 W. These figures, of course, do not make it possible to reliably determine the overclocking potential. However, at the same time, they indirectly make it possible to determine how much heat these devices can emit. Among other things, this information indicates that in order to reach a frequency of 500 MHz for the 2600 K model, it will be enough to bring an additional air cooling system, but in the Core i7 3820 model it will be necessary to use specialized liquid installations.

Tested by one of the leading Thermalright Silver Arrow coolers. The multiplier cap is 44. For this reason, the bus can be instantly increased to 125. After using a factor of 37, we managed to achieve a frequency value of 4625 MHz. However, in the future it was necessary to use a water cooling system.

Sandy Bridge E Model

This model is a high-end processor. It is intended for enthusiasts. With the help of such a processor, it is possible to solve problems of extremely high complexity. This product was manufactured using process 32 for platforms that use the updated LGA 2011 processor socket.

How much has the performance been increased? It is quite logical that many users have a natural question: how did the developers manage to increase the performance of the device? The answer lies in the processor circuitry. The standard CPU crystal was completely freed from the graphics component. It can hardly be called relevant for modern high-end class systems, for this reason, two additional computing cores were placed in its place, with the help of which two threads could be processed simultaneously. Based on this technology, the result was a modification of the Core i7 3820, which used the Sandy Bridge-E architecture.

At the same time, the total number of cores has been increased, and other components have been reorganized. This product is noticeably superior in its characteristics to 3820. However, the device has a higher cost. This is an important factor for many users. Still, the price of the Core i7 3820 is somewhat lower. It is a fairly budget model, which is available among devices based on the Sandy Bridge-E architecture.

Core i7 3820: box version

The standard version of the Core i7 3820 does not have a cooling system at all. Such a decision is not surprising for the simple reason that a person who decides to purchase such a productive device most likely has his own views on the process of providing cooling. The rest of the equipment is pretty standard. In the package, in addition to the processor itself, the user will find only an additional information booklet. Externally, the processor does not have any critical differences from similar solutions. The only distinguishing feature is the rather large dimensions. The device is significantly larger than other desktop options. On the production cover, the user will be able to find a marking that indicates the clock frequency of the device, model and country of manufacture.

Core i7 3820: specs

The Core i7 3820 has pretty impressive specs. This model can be quite attributed to solutions for productive systems, which should mainly perform most of the tasks that are typical for a modern user. The main difference of this line is the presence of a four-channel memory controller. The processor also supports DDR3-1600 memory modules. This reflects quite well on the capabilities of this device.

Users may have noticed this while testing the 3930K. An additional utility makes it possible to confirm all the characteristics of the device. The Core i7 3820 belongs to the Sandy-Bridge-E family. The processor is manufactured using the 32 nm process technology. The device in the nominal mode operates at a frequency of 3600 MHz. It is also worth noting the fact that in this case the value of the core voltage is 1.2 V. Support for Turbo Boost 2.0 technology is a traditional addition to such performance.

This technology provides the ability to dynamically increase the frequency at peak load times. This leads to an increase in the total system power by about 2-4%. Without additional overclocking, the maximum allowed clock frequency is 3900 MHz.

Core i7 3820: cache

The cache in the Core i7 3820 processor is distributed as follows. The first cache level per core is approximately 64 KB. 32 KB of them are allocated for caching various data. The rest is for instructions. The value of the second level of memory reaches 256 KB per core. The volume of the third level is 10 MB. It is also worth noting the fact that for the cache of the first and second levels, a characteristic feature is the presence of eight association lines. The third level memory provides for the use of sixteen association lines. The quad-channel controller provides support for DDR-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1066 memory modules. Testing was traditionally carried out using DDDR3-1333 memory. This is due to the need to achieve results comparable to the performance results of similar processors.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we can say that the Core i7 3820 processor is a very relevant solution for the modern component market. The performance of this processor is quite consistent with the requirements of most modern applications and games. For this reason, this processor does not lose popularity even today and continues to be actively used to assemble budget computers intended for use in various fields of activity. Recently, there are more and more games that have fairly high system requirements. Not all modern computers correspond to them, and this is not to mention devices that are several years old. This processor is quite suitable for meeting the requirements of modern gamers. With this processor, you can run various processes at minimum requirements or medium settings. Everything will depend on the gaming tastes and preferences of the user.

Review and testing of the Intel Core i7-3820

Our first acquaintance with the microarchitecture Sandy Bridge-E left a double impression. On the one hand, we were convinced that the X79 Express chipset and the Sandy Bridge-E processors demonstrate impressive performance indicators, and on the other hand, we were faced with the fact that not always available applications are able to unleash the potential of this architecture in deed.

Our today’s material is the final part of our acquaintance with Sandy Bridge-E and is dedicated to the quad-core processor Core i7-3820 , which also has an LGA 2011 design. This processor will be opposed by its closest direct competitor — Intel Core i7-2700K (LGA 1155 ). The specifications of the two processors are shown in one comparison table below.

In the comparison table, the advantages of a particular model are highlighted in bold text. So the Core i7-3820 has a higher base clock speed, but it’s lower in Turbo Boost mode. It also has more L3 cache, 4 memory channels supporting DDR3-1600 memory, more memory bandwidth and more PCI-Express 2. 0 lanes and lower cost. At the same time, its multiplier is only partially unlocked (x44 maximum) and the processor has a higher level of heat dissipation.

This time we will not talk about other architectural differences, as they were covered in the first two articles, which you can read here and here. Therefore, we will go directly to the testing itself. As mentioned, the results of the first Sandy Bridge-E tests were mixed. Somewhere we observed a significant advantage of the Core i7-3930K over the Core i7-2600K , and somewhere the six-core was inferior. This time around, we expanded the number of tests we ran, eventually pushing the 100 mark. Given the fact that both processors under consideration today have the same number of cores, this will allow us to dot the i’s and understand which of the two platforms is better.

Testing

Testing was carried out on two stands, the differences of which were only in processors and motherboards.

Configuration 1:
— Processor: Intel Core i7-3820
— Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5
— RAM: 4×2 GB GeIL Evo TWO DDR3-2133 CL10-11-11-30 1.5V
— Disk storage: SSD ADATA S511 120 GB
— Video card: 1024 MB Gainward GTX 560 Ti Phantom
— Power supply: Cougar SX850
— Cooling system: Scythe Yasya

Configuration 2:
— Processor: Intel Core i7-2700K
— Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
— RAM: 4×2 GB GeIL Evo TWO DDR3-2133 CL10-11-11-30 1.5V
— Disk storage: SSD ADATA S511 120 GB
— Video card: 1024 MB Gainward GTX 560 Ti Phantom
— Power supply: Cougar SX850
— Cooling system: Scythe Yasya

Processors were tested in several modes:
1. At nominal
2. Overclocked to 4.2 GHz (100×42) with memory in DDR3-1600 and DDR3-2133 modes

3. For Core i7-3820 additional modes: 4.25 GHz (125×34), memory frequencies DDR3-1666 and DDR3-2333 MHz.

Clock speeds have been fixed for all processors, Turbo Boost technology has been disabled.

Test results

The first diagram shows performance in the following programs: SuperPi 1M, PiFast, wPrime 1.55 1024 M. The graph reflects the speed of mathematical calculations, and accordingly, the less time the processor spent on calculations, the faster it is.

In almost all modes and disciplines, the Intel Core i7-3820 is faster than its rival, the Core i7-2700K. The latter bypasses the i7-3820 only in two modes wPrime 1.55 1024M. The reason for this may be the operating system, which at the time of testing may have been loaded more than usual, and this test is very sensitive to the state of the operating system.

The next test that our processors were subjected to is a very bearded, but still relevant benchmark PCMark 2005 .

Despite the fact that the Corei7-3820 processor sometimes loses in overall scores in PCMark2005, its closest competitor i7-2700K is not possible to outperform the memory subsystem performance tests (PCMark 2005 MemoryScore). Only in a couple of cases did the 2700K manage to marginally outperform the 3820 in CPU tests (PCMark 2005 CPUScore).

But the new PCMark 7 , apparently, does not favor a four-channel memory controller, therefore, in all cases, the Core i7-2700K processor became the leader.

CineBench R11.5 x64 test renders a 3D scene in real time. Accordingly, the more points the processor scores, the higher its performance indicators.

According to the test results, the Core i7-3820 is inferior to the i7-2700K in only one case.

The next test is x264 HD Benchmark 4.0 . Thanks to this test, you can find out how many frames per second the processor can process when encoding video.

The results of this test are practically the same as the previous ones — in most cases, the Core i7-3820 is faster. The Intel Core i7-2700K processor was able to slightly outperform its rival after overclocking to 4. 2 GHz.

Performance in the Winrar 4.11 x64 archiver largely depends on the clock frequency of the RAM, as well as timings.

Next in line is the popular DirectX 10 benchmark 3DMark Vantage. This test determines the relative performance of the system as a whole in DirectX 10 applications.

The results of this benchmark do not violate the integrity of the picture. Performance indicators in this test, in general, repeat the alignment of forces in previous tests: the Core i7-3820 is faster than its rival in almost all cases.
Like 3DMark Vantage, 3DMark 2011 provides an overall assessment of the gaming performance of the system, however, the graphics tests use the DirectX11 API, and the CPU tests use the calculation of physics.

Since this test is not heavily dependent on processor performance, the overall 3DMark 2011 score is approximately equal in all modes. But if you pay attention to the 3DMark 2011 Physics sub-test, then the indisputable leadership of the Core i7-3820 in all modes becomes clear.

The following diagrams are the results of testing the memory subsystem. The first one is MaxxMem.

As in our first acquaintance with Sandy Bridge-E, the performance of «regular» Sandy Bridge (LGA 1155) in this test is much higher. This concerns memory read/copy/write operations and memory latency. In fact, MaxxMem does not have optimizations for working with multi-channel memory. The following results, which reflect the performance of processors when working with RAM, were obtained in tests of memory SiSoft Sandra 2012 .

The very first test, the memory interface bandwidth test, clearly demonstrates the full power of the four-channel memory controller that the Core i7-3820 uses. The Core i7-2700K processor is left behind, because. he can not oppose anything to his «brother» of the Sandy Bridge-E family.

Despite the defeat of the Core i7-2700K in the previous test, it is still faster in memory latency tests. Apparently, the Sandy Bridge-E memory controller is less responsive than that of Sandy Bridge.

The last test reflects the throughput between the «Cache memory» bundle. Core i7-3820 is again the undisputed leader.

Results

It is clear that for the end user, the purchase of Core i7-3820 is the most appropriate solution than the purchase of 2700K or even 2600K. The Corei7-3820 leads most of the time at the same/lower price. If we talk about the role of this processor, then it is a kind of «adapter» to the world of productive solutions for the LGA 2011 and X79 socketexpress. Of course, the Intel X79 platform itself is generally not cheap, however, a decent motherboard for the LGA 1155 is slightly cheaper, if not more expensive, than entry-level boards for the LGA 2011 socket. At the same time, they retain the status of an older platform and will be the carrier of future processors known as Ivy Bridge-E. The Core i7-3820 The won’t appeal to amateur overclockers using air-cooled systems due to its heat dissipation and only partially unlocked multiplier. At the same time Intel Core i7-3820 demonstrates quite decent overclocking potential using liquid nitrogen.

Advantages of the Intel Core i7-3820 processor:
— cost that allows to make the promising Intel X79 Express platform more affordable
— performance
— four memory channels
— 40 PCI Express lanes
— DDR3-1600 memory support at the controller level

Minuses of the Intel Core i7-3820 processor:
— heat dissipation level of 130 W
— partially unlocked multiplier

The author would like to thank:
— Gigabyte for the board provided for testing;
— White Wind Company for the provided processor ;

Author: Evgeny Vologodsky aka daMMned

review of Core i7-4960X and Core i7-4930K processors

0003 LGA2011 . The platform for the most demanding enthusiasts received processors with the Ivy Bridge-E architecture, which are manufactured using a 22-nanometer process technology. We offer you to get acquainted with the capabilities of new products using the example of top six-core models — Intel Core i7-4960X and Core i7-4930K .

Desktop platform with Socket LGA2011 processor socket was introduced by Intel back in November 2011. The domesticated version of the server platform hasn’t changed much since then. A serious technical foundation, originally laid by the manufacturer, allowed it to remain very relevant. LGA2011 initially received six-core processors, which are still exclusive to this platform.

Course

Full Stack distribution

Learn to follow a flexible schedule to become a universal expert in Back-end and Front-end knowledge. Earn $1300 per month

REGISTER!

What are the new processors for the LGA2011 platform? The Ivy Bridge-E is a milestone for the introduction of progressive technological norms in CPU manufacturing, according to Intel’s processor timing, which alternates between a transition to a new microarchitecture and the use of a thinner manufacturing process. Tectonic changes at the microarchitecture level are not expected in this case. If we recall the announcement of Ivy Bridge chips for the LGA1155 platform, then a serious modernization of the internal blocks of these CPUs primarily concerned integrated graphics, which is not expected to be available in LGA2011 processors at all.

As for the production technology, the transition from 32 nm to 22 nm manufacturing process in this case is difficult to overestimate. Especially if you remember that it was at this stage that Intel began to use the so-called 3D-transistors Tri-Gate with multiple gates instead of planar ones, which can reduce parasitic leakage currents and increase switching speed. In addition, they allow you to increase the density of the layout of elements.

These features have made it possible to radically reduce the die area of ​​the new CPUs. No joke, the Ivy Bridge-E six-core processor is based on a 257 mm² silicon wafer, while the Sandy Bridge-E predecessors use a 435 mm² chip.

In fairness, it must be said that not only a more progressive process technology led to such phenomenal results. The fact is that for the six-core Sandy Bridge-E, silicon blanks for the eight-core Xeon processors are used. In the desktop version of the chips, two of the eight cores are disabled by the manufacturer, although they are physically present on the chip. In the era of the dawn of Sandy Bridge-E, it was unprofitable to produce separate crystals for them, it was cheaper to waste eight-core server Sandy Bridge-EPs, with a couple of cores disabled. For the quad-core model Core i7-3820, which appeared later, a different chip with a reduced die area is used.

In the case of Ivy Bridge-E, the situation with the discreteness of cores on a chip has changed somewhat. Those who followed the events of the recent IDF 2013 forum probably already know that as part of this event, Intel introduced Ivy Bridge-EP server chips, which can include up to 12 cores and have up to 30 MB of cache memory. The company now has two key silicon blanks that contain 12 and 6 cores. In this case, it is quite logical that the processors for the LGA2011 desktop platform got just the last ones. Thus, the six-core Ivy Bridge-E dropped the extra «ballast».

After a significant reduction in the area of ​​the crystal, much more chips can be grown on one silicon wafer, and given that the 22-nanometer process technology has been mastered by Intel for a long time, we assume that the production cost of Ivy Bridge-E is much lower than that of Sandy Bridge E.

Zmist

  • 1 Lineup
  • 2 LGA2011 platform
  • 3 Overclocking
  • 4 Performance
  • 5 Power consumption
  • 6 Heating
  • 7 Results
    • 7.1 Processors for testing provided by the representative office of Intel in Ukraine, www.intel.ua

Lineup

Intel immediately introduced three models of processors based on Ivy BridgeEv. The six-core flagship Core i7-4960X has a frequency formula of 3. 6 / 4.0 GHz and is equipped with a common L3 cache for computing units of 15 MB . Note that the older model of the Sandy Bridge-E family is Core i7-3970X — could also be accelerated to 4 GHz, but the base frequency for it is 3.5 GHz. This suggests that at peak loads, when all computing units are involved, the new processor will operate at a frequency of at least 100 MHz higher. And this is actually a guarantee that the i7-4960X will be faster than the i7-3970X even without architectural improvements. Another advantage of the novelty, lying on the surface, is the declared thermal package. The top Ivy Bridge-E received a TDP of 130 W, while for the i7-3970X it is 150W. Traditionally, the flagship of the line of processors for LGA2011 costs less than $1000. Although only for $1.

Model Core i7-4930K The replaces the Core i7-3930K. This is also a six-core processor, which received the frequency formula 3.4 / 3.9 GHz , while the predecessor was content with a more modest combination — 3. 2 / 3.8 GHz. In this case, the CPU received 12 MB L3 cache, which is 3 MB less than the flagship. The thermal package is defined at the level of 130 W. Core i7-4930K is the most affordable six-core chip for LGA2011. It is significantly cheaper than the top model, but at a price of $583, for obvious reasons, it does not pretend to be a budget solution.

Another new model is Core i7-4820K . This is a quad-core processor, with frequency frames 3.7 / 3.9 GHz . The manufacturer defines this model as a successor for the Core i7-3820. Moreover, unlike the latter, the new CPU received a free frequency multiplier, which is reflected in the name of the chip, where the letter “K” appeared. The decision is absolutely logical, given that we are talking about a platform for enthusiasts. In addition to disabling some of the computing units, this model also had up to 10 MB Reduced cache size. TDP is declared at the same level — 130 watts. Those who wish to acquire such a model need to prepare a fairly round sum, although against the backdrop of the cost of six-core chips, the price of the Core i7-4820K does not seem intimidating — $323. Quite at the level of the older quad-core model for the LGA1150. The quad-core Ivy Bridge-E model uses the same die as the six-core ones, but a couple of processors and part of the L3 cache are disabled by the manufacturer.

Core i7-4960X
Core i7-4930K Core i7-3970X Core i7-3930K
Core i7-4770K
Codename Ivy Bridge-E Ivy Bridge-E Sandy Bridge-E Sandy Bridge-E Haswell
Manufacturing process, nm 22 22 32 32 22
Chip area, mm² 257 257 435 435 177
Platform LGA2011 LGA2011 LGA2011 LGA2011 LGA1150
Number of cores/threads 6/12 6/12 6/12 6/12 4/8
Base frequency, GHz 3. 6 3.4 3.5 3.2 3.5
Max. frequency Turbo Boost 2.0, GHz 4.0 3.9 4.0 3.8 3.9
L3 cache size, MB 15 12 15 12 8
Hyper-Threading 9 support0537

+ + + + +
Memory support 4 channels, DDR3-1866 4 channels, DDR3-1866 4 channels, DDR3-1600 4 channels, DDR3-1600 2 channels, DDR3-1600
TDP, W 130 130 150 130 84
Price $999 $583 $999 583 $339

Like all processors of the Core i7 family, the presented models support the Hyper-Threading technology, which in some situations allows one physical core to process two data streams. Among the innovations of Ivy Bridge-E, it is worth noting the official support for the PCI Express 3.0 bus. The processors have 40 PCI-E 3.0 lanes that can be used in various combinations. For example, this number of channels is enough to create configurations with four video cards (Quad SLI/CrossFire). The x16+x8+x8+x8 mode eliminates losses when synchronizing the operation of so many graphics adapters. This is an important feature of LGA2011 solutions. Recall that Haswell chips for LGA1150 have 16 PCI-E 3.0 lanes at their disposal, so multi-adapter systems with more than two video cards (especially with NVIDIA chips) require motherboards with additional bridge chips that increase the number of PCI-E lanes.

Ivy Bridge-E processors received official support for DDR3-1866 , while DDR3-1600 is standard for Sandy Bridge-E. All processors for LGA2011 have a quad-channel RAM controller that doubles the memory bandwidth compared to dual-channel mode. This is also a unique feature of this platform, which is rooted in server solutions, where high bandwidth is very important. Within desktop systems, the advantages of the quad-channel mode are not always obvious — for typical user tasks, the speed of reading / writing memory is not so critical, therefore, a noticeable effect from the quad-channel mode can be seen in quite rare cases. Ivy Bridge-E also supports XMP 1.3 profiles which make RAM settings easier. Note that motherboards with an LGA2011 connector often have eight DIMM slots, so the total amount of RAM can potentially be increased to 64 GB .

Retail processors will be offered in fairly compact boxes. The standard cooler is not included in the delivery. The manufacturer considered that the “boxed” cooler would certainly not be in demand by the owner of $1000 processors. And therefore there is no need to litter the dwelling of such a revered person, and the logistics can be simplified — two birds with one stone. Choosing a suitable cooling system for a CPU with a TDP of 130 W is not difficult. There are quite a few coolers on the market that can cope with heat dissipation from such processors. As one of the options, the manufacturer offers a liquid system — Intel Liquid Cooling TS13X .

A similar CBO based on one of Asetek’s developments will cost about $100. With a similar amount, you can choose very efficient liquid systems or air supercoolers.

LGA2011 platform

Intel X79 Express is still responsible for the peripheral wiring in the case of Ivy Bridge-E. The time-tested chipset was introduced by the company at the launch of the LGA2011 platform.

If we evaluate the possibilities of this solution after almost two years, then it cannot be called modern. The Intel X79 provides six SATA links, but only two of them have a bandwidth of 6 Gb / s, the rest are 3 Gb / s. At the same time, the chipset is not equipped with a USB 3. 0 controller. Perhaps it is these factors that cause the main criticism.

Two USB 3.0 ports were also added to the Intel 7-Series chipsets for LGA1155, while the latest Intel 8-Series for LGA1150 does support six USB 3.0 and the same amount of SATA 6 Gb / s. Against the background of these solutions Intel X79at the end of 2013, it already looks a bit unsightly. Of course, if you look at motherboards with this chipset, then you definitely won’t have to experience the lack of USB 3.0/SATA 6 Gb/s. With the help of additional controllers from third-party manufacturers, such ports are often in abundance. Yes, Intel’s integrated solutions, all other things being equal, are still preferable, but you can still use high-speed peripherals and drives anyway.

Motherboards with LGA2011 processor socket are fully compatible with new CPUs. The only thing that is needed in this case is to update the firmware. Leading board manufacturers have already introduced BIOS versions that allow you to use Ivy Bridge-E, with no exceptions for certain models. But, in order to avoid unpleasant surprises, before buying, you should still make sure on the manufacturer’s website that a new firmware is released for the selected device.

Some manufacturers quite reasonably considered it logical to offer several new models based on Intel X79 for the announcement of Ivy Bridge-E. It is unlikely that something serious will surprise you, but still, almost two years have passed since the announcement of the LGA2011 platform, so it will not hurt to refresh the line of motherboards a little. In this case, a new chipset with support for USB 3.0 and more SATA 6 Gb / s ports would come in handy, which would allow new solutions to support the status of the ultimate platform. The compatibility of Ivy Bridge-E with existing boards is, of course, commendable, in this case, with a high probability, users who have just decided to purchase such a platform will become the owners of new CPUs.

Curiously, for the first time in recent years, with the announcement of new processors for desktop systems, Intel did not offer its own motherboards. The manufacturer follows the previously outlined plan, curtailing the production of devices for desktop solutions, relying entirely on its partners in this segment.

For our experiments, we used the ASUS P9X79 DELUXE board, which successfully recognized Ivy Bridge-E after a firmware update.

Acceleration

Considering the positioning of the LGA2011 platform, the possibilities for self-tuning the system in general, and forcing processors in particular, are very important. What’s new in Ivy Bridge-E for those who didn’t originally plan to use the CPU in normal mode? First of all, it should be said that as a thermal interface, which is necessary for contacting the crystal and the heat-dissipating processor cover, canonical solder is used, and not thermal paste, as is the case with Ivy Bridge and Haswell processors. In the current conditions, this can already be considered an advantage of the CPU. Special solder is able to provide excellent thermal conductivity, which will avoid the scalping of processor covers, which is carried out by desperate enthusiasts who want to improve the overclocking performance of Haswell chips.

In the case of the Ivy Bridge-E, the maximum frequency multiplier has been increased from 57 to 63. Such an initiative is commendable, but has any meaning only for extreme overclockers using liquid nitrogen. When tuning the processor, you can now force frequencies and multipliers more actively without rebooting the system. The memory frequency can be increased in steps of 266 MHz. Multipliers (1.25, 1.67) are available to allow higher system bus frequencies to be used.

Exploring in practice the possibilities of the Core i7-4960X, we were able to increase the base frequency of the chip to 4500 MHz . For stable operation of the CPU in this mode, it was necessary to increase the supply voltage to 1.42 V .

The use of solder as a thermal interface pays off. Despite a significant increase in the supply voltage and operating frequency, the processor temperature rose at maximum computing load to moderate 75–81 C.

The frequency potential of the Core i7-4930K chip turned out to be slightly higher. CPUs submitted 4600 MHz , while the supply voltage was enough to increase to 1.41 V . The processor warmed up to 80–83 C under peak load. We can only say that the achieved figures approximately correspond to those obtained on six-core Sandy Bridge-E chips with air CO, and this is already quite good. Of course, in this case we are talking about the basic version of overclocking. Serious enthusiasts with liquid nitrogen flowing from a tap instead of water are already approaching 6 GHz in six-core mode with Hyper-Threading enabled.

Performance

To evaluate the capabilities of the new Ivy Bridge-E chips, we included in the test the base six-core model of the previous generation — Core i7-3930K (Sandy Bridge-E), as well as the top quad-core processor for the LGA1150 platform — Core i7 -4770K (Haswell).

Processor test (Fire Strike, Physics) from the new 3DMark package favors Ivy Bridge-E. The leadership of the i7-4960X is obvious, while the difference between the i7-4930K and i7-3930K is about 9%. This is clearly more than the difference in the clock frequencies of the models.

The PCMark 8 test sessions, although the winner is again the Core i7-4960X, the difference between the processors is very small. Moreover, the quad-core Core i7-4770K does not seem like a pale shadow here next to the six-core brothers. Typical office applications are not well optimized for multithreading. Therefore, a processor with a more advanced architecture can compete on equal terms with a CPU with a large number of computing units. Not by number, but by skill.

Moreover, with the task of calculating the number Pi, which is single-threaded, the Haswell processor coped much faster than the CPU for LGA2011.

The Cinebench 11.5 processor test, which simulates the process of rendering scenes, is perfectly optimized for multi-threaded execution. In this case, six-core CPUs «come off» to their fullest. The Core i7-4930K is 6.5% ahead of the i7-3930K, while the difference with the i7-4770K is already 32.4%.

WinRAR and 7-Zip archivers also favor processors with six cores. Curiously, in WinRAR the gap is Core i7-4960X from lower models is almost 10%. In this case, not only the number of processing cores and frequency play a role, but also a huge cache buffer. The speed indicators of Core i7-4930K and Core i7-3930K are almost equal in WinRAR, but in Z-Zip the newcomer is 5% quicker. The quad-core Haswell is 27-35% behind the younger six-cores here.

When encoding video, the gap between the flagship and the Core i7-4930K is not so convincing, while the latter copes with tasks about 8% faster than its predecessor from the Sandy Bridge-E family. A quad-core Core i7-4770K needs 20-28% more time. However, let’s pay attention to the fact that the Haswell processor has an integrated graphics core. It’s unnecessary on a powerful desktop system, but the integrated GPU provides support for Quick Sync technology. Video transcoding applications that can use this tool can be of great help to owners of Haswell chips, dramatically reducing the waiting time for a long procedure.

The built-in benchmark of the wPrime multi-threaded application that calculates square roots once again demonstrates the advantage of six-core chips and generally reflects the general situation when software can use almost all hardware resources.

Alas, games are still very far from this level of engine optimization. Intel’s six-core chips do offer impressive performance in multi-threaded tasks, but in games, the Core i7-4770K system has a minimal advantage.

We fully admit that in configurations with four video cards the situation may be in favor of the LGA2011 platform, but with one GeForce GTX 780 the results are on the charts. We hope that future game projects will make better use of multi-core CPUs. We have been waiting for this bright future for several years. Perhaps more active progress in this direction will appear with the imminent announcement of the next generation of game consoles.

Energy consumption

What really pleased me was the reduced level of energy consumption. Given the identical declared thermal packs of 130 W, all other things being equal Core i7-4930K under load turned out to be about 25-30 W more economical than the Core i7-3930K. Moreover, even the top i7-4960X is preferable in this respect. Of course, a comparison with the energy efficiency of a Haswell system leaves no chance for Ivy Bridge-E, but representatives of these platforms are still processors of different «weight» categories. But against the backdrop of Sandy Bridge-E, progress is obvious.

Perhaps the very fact that processors have become more economical is not the strongest argument in favor of new products when it comes to de facto the most productive systems for enthusiasts. On the other hand, if the manufacturer managed to achieve this, while not only maintaining, but also slightly increasing the performance of processors, then this is a nice bonus. Even in a typical desktop system, a 30W reduction in power consumption means less heat, and as a result, the ability to reduce cooling efficiency requirements or use modes with less noise. One can imagine how desirable the increase in energy efficiency is for server solutions, where such an improvement in efficiency translates into very serious savings in the end.

Heating

Taking into account that the processors are supplied without a standard cooler, such a definition as “CPU heating” is rather conditional. The temperature regime of the chip in this case depends entirely on the cooling system used. For experiments, we used a very efficient Thermalright Archon Rev.A air cooler. This cooler allowed us to keep the temperature of the Core i7-4960X operating in normal mode at the level of 56-62 C (depending on the core). These values ​​were achieved on an open bench after a 20-minute processor warm-up using the OCCT utility.

In idle mode, the processor did not warm up above 35 degrees. We got similar results during the Core i7-4930K test. The only difference is that the temperature of the younger six-core model rose at the peak to 55-60 C.

Results

In this case, you should not even try to make scrupulous calculations and build graphs that reflect the price / performance ratio, which turn out to be very indicative in terms of comparing devices for familiar popular solutions. The LGA2011 platform in general and the top processors for it in particular are out of categories. It is obvious that in such ratings they will not look so attractive. At the same time, these CPUs in a number of tasks can offer performance that is unattainable for other solutions. The lack of alternatives allows the manufacturer not to restrain himself too much when setting prices for processors, because the highest-speed chips are very expensive. We fully admit that, taking into account the reduced cost of manufacturing CPUs, Intel could well reduce the retail prices of processors, but from a commercial point of view, it would not be entirely logical to break the built and working profit model. In addition, the absence of competitors in this segment does not have to reduce the cost for no apparent reason.

With the release of Ivy Bridge-E processors, the target audience of the LGA2011 platform has not changed in any way. These are still the most demanding and very wealthy enthusiasts. People who want the most powerful solution available on the market and are willing to pay any price for it.

Intel identifies three main groups of users who may be interested in Ivy Bridge-E systems in the first place. First of all, these are people who work quite seriously on creating media content. Six processing cores with up to 12 threads, and up to 64GB of quad-channel memory access can dramatically reduce video encoding, image processing, or scene rendering time. The second category is serious overclockers, for whom overclocking is a calling, and the desire to see oneself among the leaders of world ratings in various disciplines is a goal to strive for. Well, the third group is the most demanding gamers who are infected with the idea of ​​​​creating a gaming platform with several of the most powerful video cards. In this case, the 40 PCI-Express 3.0 bus lanes available for Ivy Bridge-E will serve well.

Ivy Bridge-E will be in demand in such use cases. It makes no sense for Sandy Bridge-E owners to urgently upgrade the system, unless someone expected to replace the quad-core Core i7-3820 processor with a six-core Ivy Bridge-E. If you just decided to buy such a system, then, of course, it is better to focus on new chips. For the same money, 22nm CPUs provide slightly better performance, are noticeably more energy efficient and have good frequency potential.

For less demanding and economical users, the LGA1150 platform, coupled with Haswell chips, is a more versatile and flexible solution. It allows you to create an optimal system for most of the tasks that are typical for a typical home desktop use model at a reasonable price.

Processors for testing are provided by the representative office of Intel in Ukraine, www.intel.ua

Intel Core i7-3820 | 64 factors

36points

Intel Core i7-3820

Intel Core i7-3820

Why is Intel Core i7-3820 better than others?

  • CPU speed?
    4 x 3. 6GHz vs 12.47GHz
  • Maximum memory bandwidth?
    51.2GB/s vs 37.63GB/s
  • Memory channels?
    4 vs 2.08
  • L3 core?
    2.5MB/core vs 1.78MB/core
  • Hour multiplier?
    36 vs 26.23

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Intel Core i7-3820

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-3820

AMD A8-5500

VS

9000.9000.S. AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i7-3820

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i7-3820

VS

Intel Core i3-9320

Intel Core i7-3820

VS

Intel Core i7-4820K

Intel Core i7-3820

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

9000 I7 -320I

VS

AMD RYZEN 7 3700X

Intel Core i7-3820

VS

Intel Core i7-11700K

Complexation prices

Reviews of users

General rating

ntTel Core I7-38200005

Intel Core i7-3820

10. 0 /10

2 reviews of users

Functions

Price and quality ratio

9.0 /10

9000 2 VOTES

2 Votes

performance

10.0 /10

2 Votes

Reliability

10.0 /10

9000 2 VOTES

Energy efficiency

9 9000

10.0 /10

2 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

4 x 3.6GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor (including all its processors) can perform. It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

3.8GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4.Unlocked multiplier

✔Intel Core i7-3820

Some processors come with unlocked multiplier and can be overclocked more easily, allowing you to get better quality in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

2.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1600MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

51.2GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.DDR version

DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.max memory

64.23GB

Max memory (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory error recovery code

✖Intel Core i7-3820

Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price.

A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price.

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multithreading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price.

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price.

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price.

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price.

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price.

Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price.

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9. power per watt

Unknown. Help us offer a price.

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔Intel Core i7-3820

known as streams. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔Intel Core i7-3820

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔Intel Core i7-3820

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✖Intel Core i7-3820

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6 bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price.

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔Intel Core i7-3820

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8.