I7 3930k c2 stepping: Intel Core i7-3960X and i7-3930K CPUs Transitioning to C2 stepping in January

Dann kann ich davon ausgehen das diese jetzt im Handel angekommen sind? Und keine alten «C1-Reste» verschickt wurden?

Edit:
OK, zumindest bei MF scheint es sich noch um das alte C1-Stepping zu handeln.

Intel Core i7 3930K C2 Stepping@MF Forum

http://forum.mindfactory.de/schwer-lieferbare-artikel/66695-intel-core-i7-3930k-c2-stepping.html

Zuletzt bearbeitet: 15. Dezember 2011

Intel Xeon W-2255 vs.

Intel Core i7-3930k

Cpu Benchmark with benchmarks

Intel Xeon W-2255		Intel Core i7-3930k
3.70 GHz	Frequency	3.20 GHz
4.70 GHz	Turbo (1 Core)	3.80 GHz
4.40 GHz	Turbo (All Cores)	3.80 GHz
10	Cores	6
Yes	Hyperthreading ?	Yes
No	Overclocking ?	Yes
normal	Core architecture	normal
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
	DirectX Version
	Max. displays
DDR4-2933	Memory	DDR3-1600
4	Memory channels	4
	Max. Memory
Yes	ECC	No
—	L2 Cache	—
19. 25 MB	L3 Cache	12.00 MB
3.0	PCIe version
48	PCIe lanes
14 nm	Technology	32 nm
LGA 2066	Socket	LGA 2011
165 W	TDP	130 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d	Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d (C2 Stepping)
Q4/2019	Release date	Q4/2011
show more detail		show more detail

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Benchmark. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Benchmark’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Popular Comparision

Intel Xeon W-2255 vs. Intel Core i7-3930k — Cpu Benchmark Specs & Test

4. 1 of 43 rating(s)

Core i7-3930K [in 4 benchmarks]

Intel
Core i7-3930K

Buy

• Interface
• Core clock speed
• Max video memory
• Memory type
• Memory clock speed
• Maximum resolution

Summary

Intel started Intel Core i7-3930K sales 14 November 2011 at a recommended price of $611. This is Sandy Bridge-E architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, and is based on 32 nm manufacturing technology, with a max turbo frequency of 3800 MHz and an unlocked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is FCLGA2011 processor with a TDP of 130 Watt and a maximum temperature of 67 °C. It supports DDR3 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

8. 18%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

Core i7
3930K

vs

EPYC
7h22

General info

Core i7-3930K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating	830
Value for money	3.77
Market segment	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Release date	14 November 2011 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$611	of 305 (Core i7-870)
Current price	$168 (0. 3x MSRP)	of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

• 0
• 50
• 100

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	12
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	of 4.7 (FX-9590)
Boost clock speed	3. 8 GHz	of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K)
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
L3 cache	12 MB (shared)	of 32 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998)
Chip lithography	32 nm	of 5 (Apple M1)
Die size	435 mm2
Maximum core temperature	67 °C	of 110 (Atom x7-E3950)
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	67 °C	of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ)
Number of transistors	2,270 million	of 57000 (Apple M1 Max)
64 bit support	+
Windows 11 compatibility	—
Unlocked multiplier	+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3930K compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3930K. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI	+
AVX	+
vPro	—
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2. 0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+
Idle States	+
Thermal Monitoring	+
Smart Response	+
Demand Based Switching	—

Security technologies

Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Core i7-3930K’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Peripherals

Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Core i7-3930K. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3930K
8.18

• Passmark
• GeekBench 5 Single-Core
• GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
• 3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-3930K
8250

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

i7-3930K
778

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

i7-3930K
4574

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

i7-3930K
12240

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Core i7-3930K. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Relative perfomance

Overall Core i7-3930K performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.

Intel Core i5-8600T
100.61

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
100.24

Intel Core i5-9500T
100.24

Intel Core i7-3930K
100

Apple M1
99.51

Intel Core i3-10305T
98.66

Intel Core i3-10300T
98.41

AMD equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-3930K from AMD is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 4 positions in our rating.

Ryzen 5
PRO 3400GE

Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i7-3930K:

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
101. 83

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B
101.1

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
100.24

Intel Core i7-3930K
100

AMD Ryzen 5 1400
94.38

AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
93.4

AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
92.91

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Core i7
3970X

Compare

Core i7
4790K

Compare

Core i7
3960X

Compare

Core i7
4790

Compare

Core i7
4770K

Compare

Core i7
990X

Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with Core i7-3930K according to our statistics.

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

7.9%

Radeon RX
570

5.7%

GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

5.4%

GeForce GTX
1070

4.5%

GeForce GTX
1060 3 GB

4.5%

GeForce GTX
680

3.1%

Radeon RX
580

2.8%

GeForce GTX
660

2. 5%

GeForce GTX
670

2.5%

GeForce GTX
970

2.3%

User rating

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3930K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Pre Marriage Counselling Sydney | Pre Marrital Counselling

About Relationship Counselling

Couple relationships predictably enter a phase of conflict or stress. In fact, relationship experts predict a conflict phase in most romantic long term relationships. Frequently the issues are sorted out and the relationship progresses or returns to its previous state. Often, however, when the issues can not be resolved, you may find that your relationship escalates into anger and resentment, avoidance of the core issues, sadness, emptiness or a lack of hope for the future.
Couple counselling promotes open communication between the partners. Each partner is given the chance to clearly state their view and the couple learns new skills for communication and intimacy. If both parties become willing participants, conflict can often be resolved, trust can be restored and past resentments can be overcome.

Relationship Counselling Helps You Stop Fighting & Gets You Really Relating

Relationship counselling is an opportunity for a fighting or dissatisfied couple to share their concerns in a safe and secure environment. While this sounds simple, it can be a powerful and life-changing experience for a dissatisfied couple to learn to hear and attend to each other’s concerns without defensiveness or conflict.
An experienced couple’s counsellor acts as a relationship mediator and teacher. He or she will help you talk openly and honestly about your issues, she will make sure both sides of the story are ‘heard’. She will train you to become better communicators and active listeners. She will help you identify the underlying frustrations behind your arguments, and help you to reconnect and rekindle lost intimacy.

Initially, your relationship counsellor will likely ask you each to share your view of the problem you are having. Your counsellor may also enquire about relevant aspects of your history as a couple, and any relevant individual history (for example, previous relationships, mental or physical health issues, past traumas). She will listen to each side of the story, helping each person to understand the other’s point of view, and helping to elucidate and clarify any misunderstandings in the way you communicate as a couple. This is often an essential insight because the vast majority of dissatisfied couples find that it is misunderstood communication that is at the heart of their problems. For example, he says “I’m just going to clean up the kitchen” and she hears it as “You’re doing a bad job keeping the kitchen clean”. The therapist may clarify what the message being sent was intended to convey. This may for example be “I am going to clean the kitchen, I would love to spend some time with you. Can you come be with me while I do it.”

By clarifying the underlying needs represented by each partners everyday communications, the therapist is able to show the couple a new more compassionate way of looking at the issues which include each partner’s desires and vulnerabilities, as well as practical strategies for improving the situation at home.

Why not to put off Relationship Counselling

Couples seek out relationship counselling for a variety of reasons and at different times or phases during their relationship. Many couples wait too long before seeking help. They avoid the problem, or fail to recognise it until they are really unhappy, or they are too embarrassed to admit that their relationship just isn’t working. This is a shame, most relationship problems are caused by small communication issues which eventually escalate and fester over time. Bad communication can lead to ongoing misunderstandings and arguments.  The couple may start to limit communication leading to further feelings of disconnectedness and a lack of intimacy. Sexual difficulties are a natural result of such dynamics.

The issues we work with as Relationship Counsellors

Issues frequently presented by couples who attend counselling are:

• Arguments that recur often with neither party being clear about the underlying issue
• Arguments about a repeated disappointment with the other person such as their lack of attention, cleanliness, care, intelligence or commitment.
• Trust issues following infidelity or because of unresolved issues of jealousy
• Sexual issues, such as a discrepancy between the partner’s sexual desire, a lack of sexual intimacy, or frustration with the lack of one partner’s willingness to initiate sex
• The impact of significant life changes, such as the birth of a baby, illness or a big move
• Conflict with other family members, including children, step-families and in-laws
• Cultural or religious difference or conflict
• Personal issues impacting the relationship, such as depression or addiction
• Financial worry

What is Family Therapy?

Most issues that affect a couple affect their children as well. Family therapy is an opportunity for the entire family to seek assistance from a counsellor. The therapy works in a similar way to couples therapy, providing the opportunity to air grievances and concerns, develop communication skills and improve relationships.

Commonly, family therapy involves teenage and adult children only. Family therapy acknowledges that the children of a relationship are commonly impacted emotionally by the issues experienced by their parents, and the family meetings facilitate a solution that works for all members concerned. At other times, family therapy can be useful for solving issues between adult family members, such as disagreements over business decisions, deceased estates or care of elderly parents.

Selecting your couples therapist

Associated Counsellors offers access to a range of experienced and professional relationship & marriage counsellors at all of our locations. Our counsellors are trained in various modalities that have been shown to help you address your relationship issues. Likewise, all our couples counsellors are members of professional associations such as the APS, the AASW and PCAFA. This means that you can feel assured that your relationship is in safe hands. To discuss how our service might need your particular needs, please contact us via this website or at our phone number.

We welcome your enquiry.

ASSOCIATED RELATIONSHIP & MARRIAGE COUNSELLORS SYDNEY

TEL: (02) 8002 1020

Marriage Counselling across Sydney at:
Sydney CBD, Surry Hills, Bondi Junction, Glebe, Cremorne & at Gosford on the Central Coast.

Intel i7 3930k

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs. Intel Core i7-3930k

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 2. 60 GHz base 2.30 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 80 W .Processor connects to LGA 2011 CPU socket This version includes 15.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 4 to support DDR3-1600 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 40 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Ivy Bridge EP Architecture has been improved over 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2013

Intel Core i7-3930k

Intel Core i7-3930k runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 3.80 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 130 W . The processor connects to an LGA 2011 CPU socket This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 4 to support DDR3-1600 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Sandy Bridge E Architecture is advanced beyond 32 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d (C2 Stepping) . The product was launched Q4/2011

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2

Intel Core i7-3930k

Compare parts

Frequency	3. 20 GHz
6	Kernels	6
2.60GHz	Turbo (1 core)	3.80 GHz
2.30GHz	Turbo (all cores)	3.80 GHz
Yes	Hyper Threading	Yes
No.	Acceleration	Yes
normal	Basic architecture	normal
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
no turbo	GPU (Turbo)	No turbo
22 nm	Technology	32nm
no turbo	GPU (Turbo)	No turbo
	DirectX Version
	Max. displays
DDR3-1600	memory size	DDR3-1600
4	Memory channels	4
	Maximum memory size
Yes	ECC	No.
—	L2 Cache	—
15.00MB	L3 Cache	12.00 MB
3.0	PCIe version
40	PCIe lanes
22 nm	Technology	32nm
LGA 2011	Connector	LGA 2011
80W	TDP	130W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d	Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d (C2 Stepping)
Q3/2013	Release date	Q4/2011
Show more details		Show more details

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Popular comparison

Comments

Intel Core i7-3770K vs Intel Core i7-3930K: what’s the difference?

47 Ballla

Intel Core i7-3770K

43 BALLLA

Intel Core i7-3930K

VS

64 Facts compared to

I7-3770K

Intel Core I7-0002 Intel Core I7-0002 Intel Core I700022 Is 3770K better than Intel Core i7-3930K?

• Smaller 10nm semiconductors?
  22nm vs 32nm
• 53W below TDP?
  77W vs 130W
• 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
  3 vs 2
• Has integrated graphics?
• 21. 26% higher PassMark score (single)?
  2082 vs 1717
• 0.9 newer version of DirectX?
  11 vs 10.1
• 6.32% better than Cinebench R20 (single core)?
  286 vs 269
• 10.04% higher Geekbench 5 single core result?
  866 vs 787

Why Intel Core i7-39Is 30K better than Intel Core i7-3770K?

• 37.14% higher CPU speed?
  6 x 3.2GHz vs 4 x 3.5GHz
• 4 more CPU threads?
  12 vs 8
• 0.5MB more L2 cache?
  1.5MB vs 1MB
• 25.04% higher PassMark score?
  8070 vs 6454
• 4MB more L3 cache?
  12MB vs 8MB
• 128KB more L1 cache? more memory bandwidth?
  51.2GB/s vs 25.6GB/s
• 32GB more max memory?
  64GB vs 32GB

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Intel Core i7-3770K

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-3930K

vs

Intel Core i7-4790k

Intel Core i7-3770k

VS

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i7-3930K

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 1600x

I7-370K

VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 3570k

Intel Core i7-3930k

VS

Intel Atom C3958

Intel Core i7-3770K

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

I7-39302 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000

Intel Core i7-3770K

VS

Intel Core i7-3770S

Intel Core i7-3930K

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-37703

VS

Intel Core22 Intel Core22 Intel Core22 Intel Core22 Intel Core22 Intel Core222 3930k

VS

Intel Core i7-8086k

Intel Core i7-3770K

VS

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core I7-39303

VS

Intel Celeron B815 9000. TEL CELEN

vs

Intel Pentium Silver N5000

Intel Core i7-3930k

VS

Intel Core i7-8700

Intel Core i7-3770k

VS

INTEL Core I5-3470

vs

Intel Core i5-9600k

Intel Core i7-3770k

VS

Intel Core i5-4570

Reviews of users

Calitable rating

Intel Core I7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777ETL CORE CORE I7-INTEL CORE Core I7-NTEL CORE Core I7777777777777777777777777777ATEL Core 20003

Intel Core i7-3770k

10.0 /10

1 reviews of users

Intel Core i7-3930K

0 Reviews of Users

Intel Core i7-3930K

0.0 /10 9,000 9,000 9,000 9000 /

Functions

The price ratio

/10

1 Votes

reviews is not

Games

/10

1 Votes

reviews yet not

performance

8. 0 /10

1 Votes

reviews yet not

Reliability

10.0 /10

Votes

Reviews yet

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

Energy efficiency

9.0 /10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

1.cpu speed

4 x 3.5GHz

6 x 3.2GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2.processor thread of execution

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

3.9GHz

3.8GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✔Intel Core i7-3770K

✔Intel Core i7-3930K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 scratchpad results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

2MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1600MHz

1600MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

25.6GB/s

51.2GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.Maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖Intel Core i7-3770K

✖Intel Core i7-3930K

Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3930K)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3930K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender test result (bmw27)

577.2seconds

419.8seconds

The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

2186.2seconds

1292.8seconds

The Blender benchmark (classroom) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✔Intel Core i7-3770K

✔Intel Core i7-3930K

Multi-threading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔Intel Core i7-3770K

✔Intel Core i7-3930K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔Intel Core i7-3770K

✔Intel Core i7-3930K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔Intel Core i7-3770K

✖Intel Core i7-3930K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6 bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3930K)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔Intel Core i7-3770K

✔Intel Core i7-3930K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i7-3770K

✖Intel Core i7-3930K

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management ( DRM).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3930K)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Intel Core i7-3930K and Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition processors for the LGA2011 platform

What was 2011 supposed to bring to the platform market? Exactly three major events were planned: Intel’s LGA1155 at the beginning of the year, the new AMD Bulldozer architecture in the middle of it, and another new Intel platform, namely LGA2011, towards the end. The first happened right on schedule — quad-core processors for LGA1155 appeared in January, and spring and summer added dual-core models to the list, which allowed this platform to quickly take a dominant position in the market, especially since its characteristics were very conducive to this. Bulldozer moved from summer to autumn, along the way gave birth to a new platform (initially there were hopes for full compatibility of AM3 + and AM3, but had to be content with only partial — in one direction), but eventually arrived. He disappointed many, because a real revolution was promised, but it did not happen. Many, on the contrary, liked it — a reserve for the future and the correction of some problems of the old Stars. But, in general, the matter is already in the past.

In addition, AMD managed to please (really please everyone, not just fans) with the practical implementation of the long-voiced Fusion strategy — «hybrid» APUs, which include both a good processor part and excellent (for integrated) graphics. However, this direction also turned out to be niche, not universal — for some, the processor component is not enough, but there is a lot of graphics, for some it’s the other way around, for some it’s not enough of both 🙂 Although there is certainly a market for such systems, and huge. And APU variants with very low power consumption (for netbooks or tablets) were introduced even earlier than the mainstream and quickly managed to squeeze Atom out of their niches. The latter was also slightly modified, finally switching to 32 nm manufacturing standards and mastering high-definition video decoding. In general, the year turned out to be very eventful, but now it’s time to get acquainted with its last «gift» — the Intel LGA2011 platform.

Unlike the LGA1155 or Bulldozer, everything was clear with it from the very beginning — no mind-blowing achievements were planned. At the beginning of the year, Intel specifically limited the upcoming LGA1155 to a price segment of up to $350 (and the number of cores to four), leaving the old LGA1366 higher (which, by the way, is almost three years old). Before, everything was simpler: LGA775 blocked the entire processor market — from $40 to $1,000. Yes, and LGA1156 tried to push LGA1366 a little in the upper segment. And LGA1155 did not even try to do this. But the replacement of solutions for LGA1366 suggested itself after the very first tests of processors of the new Sandy Bridge architecture, and now we got it in the person of LGA2011.

In fact, not only her — in fact, the new platform has little in common with LGA1366 at all. It is much closer even to LGA1156/1155 — the same two-chip (in the desktop segment) layout, where the processor is fully integrated with the former «northbridge». However, this escape is «grafted» to the server LGA1567, from which support for multiprocessor (and not just one-two-processor) configurations, and a four-channel memory controller are inherited. However, for now, these two platforms will live together — LGA1567 appeared only last year, and debuted with 45nm (although Intel has already started to ship 32nm processors with might and main for other market segments) six- and eight-core Nehalem-EX. A 32-nanometer Westmere-EX with up to 10 cores appeared less than a year ago. For the server market, this is not a deadline at all — they don’t like too abrupt changes there. That is why Sandy Bridge-EX (aka Xeon E5 4xxx) will appear only next year, and even to prevent intra-company competition, at first it will have no more than eight cores. But Sandy Bridge-E (Core i7-3000) and Sandy Bridge-EP (Xeon E5 2000) will be released this year — LGA1366 is somewhat healed on the market. Moreover, its three-channel memory controller looks like an obvious anachronism in all market segments, and the three-chip layout is even more obvious on the desktop.

But if SB-EPs have up to eight cores, then the desktop-extreme SB-E will still be six-core. More precisely, even, such models — two out of three. The younger one, namely the Core i7-3820, is generally quad-core, and in terms of its main technical characteristics, except for the capacity of the third-level cache memory and packaging, it is similar to the Core i7-2700K. But unlike the latter, it has only “partially unlocked” multipliers (like all “regular” Core i5 / i7 — you can increase them only to the MaxTurbo level), so the only outlet for overclockers will be to increase the clock frequency — unlike LGA1155 , LGA2011 allows this with ease. In addition, the 3820 is even cheaper than the 2600K/2700K — at the level of the usual 2600. In a word, it turned out to be such an SB-E «for the poor», which, nevertheless, allows you to use all the advantages of the platform.

And there are without bus overclocking — for example, 40 PCIe lines, which allows you to use Triple SLI or Quad CrossFire. If we limit ourselves to two video cards, then each will be given a total of 16 lines, which is unthinkable within the LGA1155 without additional crutches, and it had some limitations on the LGA1366. And the possible amount of memory has increased: a four-channel controller makes it possible to use eight memory slots with virtually no loss of stability at full clock speed, which right now allows you to install as many as 64 GB in a computer, and 32 GB will cost less than on LGA1155, since they can be typed in completely ordinary modules of 4 GB instead of looking for expensive 8 GB ones. In addition, unlike LGA1366 (but similar to LGA1155), LGA2011 also has full support for a pair of SATA600 ports. Moreover, by the forces of the chipset, and not by useless discrete controllers, which could not always cope with a normal SATA300.

free multipliers and more cores will be added to them. We will talk in detail about the characteristics of the Core i7-3900 a little later, but in the meantime, we note that both are six-core. Just like Core i7-900 on Gulftown, i.e. there was no increase in the number of cores in Intel desktop processors. Just 10 months of this year, the company offered either a new architecture, but in the amount of four cores — or six cores, but old ones. This made the choice very difficult, since in low-threaded applications (which are the vast majority among desktop software), the Sandy Bridge architecture won, but in some tasks, with the help of brute force, the “oldies” came out ahead. Now you don’t have to be torn between smart and beautiful — the new Core i7-3 32 nm 32 nm 32 nm 32 nm Nuclear frequency (STD/MAX), GHC 3.4/3.8 3.47/3.73 3 2/3.8 3.3/3.9 The starting coefficient of multiplication 34 26 33 Work scheme TURBO BOOST

4-2- 1 2-1-1-1-1-1 6-5-4-3-2-1(?) 6-5-4-3-2-1(?) Know-in-line core/calculation flows 4/8 6/12 6/12 6/12 Cache L1, I/D, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB, KB /32 32/32 32/32 Cache L2, KB 4 × 256

6 × 256 6 × 256

6 8 12 12 15 UnCore frequency, GHz 130 W 130 W Price $ 340 (32) N/D (2) $ 546 (12) N/D (2)

participation of only four processors — two new and two old. Such a limited set is quite justified in both cases. The Core i7-3820 has not yet fallen into our hands, and, as mentioned above, nothing particularly interesting should be expected from it. But the Core i7-3930K and 3960X, on the contrary, are very curious. And both: as you can see, Intel decided not to limit itself to just different clock frequencies (it is almost the same for both models — it differs by only 100 MHz, that is, only 3%), and they also divided the processors by L3 cache capacity, so that you can’t turn a junior into a senior, despite the free multipliers.

By the way, as for the frequency, let’s draw your attention to the fact that the new extremal has lower frequencies than the old one. The starting one differs by 166 MHz, while the working one is still more interesting. Unfortunately, at the moment we do not know the exact scheme of how Turbo Boost works, but the version most similar to the truth is «6-5-4-3-2-1», i.e. one «bin» at full load, and then each the kernel that has gone into hibernation adds one more. Thus, when all cores are fully loaded, the maximum clock speed is 3960X will be 200 MHz lower than 990X — 3.4 versus 3.6. Let’s remember this fact — somewhere it can affect. But when the cores are not fully loaded, everything is fine in the 3900 due to the fact that the aggressiveness of Turbo Boost is brought almost to the level of Core i7 under LGA1156: one core is generally able to “overclock” by 600 MHz, so 3930K catches up, and 3960X completely overtakes even the Core i7-2600, let alone the 990X.

In general, comparisons within this four promise to be very interesting. And we don’t need any more processors for testing. Indeed, this pair was previously the fastest for Intel. Now, of course, the 2700K has appeared, but it has not yet fallen into our hands, and it differs from the 2600 in normal mode by only 100 MHz. And the top AMD models in the overall standings are still heroically fighting Core i5 or old Core i7, so adding them to an article where the slowest and cheapest processor is the Core i7-2600 can only be in the role of «whipping boys» (which only the price can excuse. We will not be doing this.

Testing

Traditionally, we divide all tests into a number of groups, and show the average result for a group of tests/applications on the diagrams (detailed testing methodology can be found in a separate article). The results on the diagrams are given in points, the performance of the iXBT.com reference test system of the 2011 sample is taken as 100 points. It is based on the AMD Athlon II X4 620 processor, but the amount of memory (8 GB) and the video card (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 1280 MB by Palit) are standard for all tests of the «main line» and can only be changed as part of special studies. Those who are interested in more detailed information are again traditionally invited to download a table in Microsoft Excel format, in which all the results are shown both in converted points and in «natural» form.

Interactive work in 3D packages

As expected, the i7-990X turned out to be an obvious outsider — six cores are not required here, while Sandy Bridge architecture processors have higher performance per megahertz, and these same megahertz due to aggressive Turbo Boost more. But here they are all approximately equal here, which is also not a surprise — the same number of cores actually work, what is there, what is there. And the frequencies are comparable.

Final rendering of 3D scenes

We expected the SB-E to have a slightly larger lead over Gulftown, but didn’t account for the difference in clock speeds. However, even the «extra» 300 MHz did not allow the 990X to at least catch up with the 3930K, but the 3960X is even faster. In general, albeit small, but a step forward. For less money — after all, the direct competitor of the 3930K in terms of price is the 980, not the 990X. And the Core i7-2600 was left far behind — among this four it is the only quad-core, which previously could not be fully compensated for by an improved architecture. Moreover, it does not help the competition with the same Sandy Bridge, but six-core.

Packing and unpacking

7-Zip’s ability to divide work into at least 16 threads and the love of decompression tests for cache memory capacity previously allowed the 990X to bypass the 2600 in the overall standings, but now its time is over — 3930K is the same in terms of the number of cores and volume L3. And a slightly lower clock frequency against the background of an improved architecture is lost. The 3960X is even faster — it has an «extra» 100 MHz and 3 MiB L3.

Audio Encoding

A pure multi-threaded load test that doesn’t appreciate Sandy Bridge architecture improvements too much. But what’s there is enough to beat the higher clocked Gulftown.

Compilation

As we have already noted more than once, compilers are generally satisfied with old microarchitectures, so here the gain from the new one is even less. But it is also there, so our newcomers once again take the first and second places, respectively 🙂 refers to a large amount of cache memory. Therefore, here the beginners even managed to noticeably bypass 2600, and about superiority over 990X is not worth mentioning — it has not shone here before.

Raster graphics

Some of the tests have multi-threaded optimization (of varying degrees of success), but earlier this did not allow six old cores to beat four new ones by the total score. But six new ones, of course, again defeat everyone.

Vector graphics

There are no noticeable gains compared to the i7-2600 — 3930K turned out to be even slower, and 3960X only caught up with the no longer older processor for LGA1155. On the other hand, we did not count on them — applications are single-threaded, high cache memory capacity is not needed, RAM requirements are also small. So the main question was: “How much faster are the new processors Core i7-990X?» We see that it is about the same as the i7-2600 is faster, and we calm down on this.

Video encoding

But in this group, six cores were faster than four. However, architectural improvements should not be neglected either — thanks to them, the 2600 was not so far behind the 990X, and the difference from the 970 was generally purely symbolic. But the SB-E has six cores and a new architecture with a clear bottom line. Again — despite the lower clock frequency, which should not be forgotten.

Office software

Only FineReader supports multiple computation threads, but it is enough for multi-core processors to win, other things being equal. But with unequal — not enough 🙂 However, as we have said more than once, when testing processors more expensive than one and a half to two hundred dollars, this diagram is purely illustrative — in fact, a sufficient level of performance (for the naked eye of a simple user) is demonstrated by much simpler and cheap appliances. So let’s just state the obvious fact that the new six-core processors are doing just as well here as the new quad-core processors; and in general — everything is better with new processors than with old ones, which we calm down on.

Java

Java-machine, as we already know very well, can utilize more than 12 threads, and it likes “real” cores more than Hyper-Threading. That’s why the 990X outperformed the 2600 earlier in this test. Well, now it lags just as noticeably behind the 3930K and 3690X, since the architectural improvements that improve the performance of each thread are no less important than the number of threads. Note, by the way, that this is almost the only case of almost linear scaling in terms of the number of cores — if all applications were like this, Intel’s skepticism about increasing the number of cores in mainstream processors could be considered unjustified. However, since there are very few such examples, we quite share it 🙂

Games

Here is just a striking counterexample — in fact, all of our subjects are too powerful for the task, so you can only find the difference between them with a microscope. However, one of the advantages of LGA2011 over LGA1155 is the support for a large number of PCIe lanes, which encourages the use of multi-GPUs, and in this case, you can already look for any differences. At least, there is reason to believe this, if you look at the results of optional tests with low graphics quality. However, even there we are talking about only about 10%, and even then — mainly due to applications where there is already “a lot” of performance: such as Batman or the old FarCry2. Thus, the gaming sphere is still not the best field for the use of six-core processors. And the only positive thing is that now the six-core models are at least as good as the quad-core ones.

Multitasking environment

And again we turn to one of the «experimental» tests of the methodology — it’s interesting 🙂 cache capacity. So let’s see — does it matter? The essence of the test is simple: five benchmarks are launched almost simultaneously (with a pause of 15 seconds), while all tasks are assigned a “background” status (no window is active). The result is the geometric mean of the execution times of all tests. More detailed information can be obtained from the description of the testing methodology, but for now let’s just look at the results.

What’s interesting is that the increased cache capacity only gets in the way. And the difference between the new and old architectures is extremely small. Those. in a multitasking environment, brute force is still a good way to solve problems. Naturally, in the case when we are talking about competition «at the top»: as we remember, the budget segment has its own nuances — the new Pentiums almost catch up with the old Core i3, although the latest computation threads have more. But the old Core i7 already easily bypass the new Core i5. And a little higher in the rankings is enough . .. just to have six cores. Or more. But which one doesn’t really matter.

Total

The good thing about evolution is that it gives everyone a reason to rejoice 🙂 Progress lovers will note with deep satisfaction the fact that new top processors are faster than old ones, both Core i7-2000 and Core i7 -900. Those who have already bought a processor from one of the mentioned families, on the contrary, will be happy because the superiority of the new products is not so radical, i.e. the purchase made cannot be considered unjustified. The man who was torn between the desire to buy a Core i7-2600K or a Core i7-980 can now, with a clear conscience, go to the store and purchase a Core i7-3930K — the choice is no longer ambiguous. And those who stared at the 990X, but could only afford 980, will be pleased with the appearance of a model with the performance of the first processor and the price of the second. The true enthusiast, who has always preferred Intel’s extreme models over the cheaper ones, will surely rejoice in the fact that the «high-end» upgrade is now even more significant than the transition from 975 to 9 was. 80X — the second sometimes lost to the first, but now there is no such thing (well, castling like 965-975 or 980X-990X is not worth mentioning). Nobody offended even AMD fans — they can still be glad that their favorite company is ready to sell them cheap six-core and even «eight-core» processors, while Intel’s multi-core processors have not become more affordable (albeit they have become more fast). In the end, you can drink champagne, if only because the standard cooler mounting system in LGA2011 is human — the idiocy of plastic legs LGA775 (later inherited by both LGA1366 and LGA1156/1155) did not affect this platform. In a word, from which side you do not look — everything is wonderful 🙂

Seriously, this is really just an example of normal evolution. The «dual power» in the top desktop segment is over — LGA2011 combines all the advantages of both LGA1155 (new architecture, free multiplier cheaper than $1,000) and LGA1366 (up to six cores, bus overclocking, a large number of PCIe lanes). True, some shortcomings of current platforms from Intel (in particular, the lack of built-in support for USB 3.0 or SATA at once “two degrees of freshness”) also have not gone away, but everything is clear with them — if everything is done perfectly right away, then there will be nothing to improve in next year. The same is true with regard to clock speeds: it is obvious that Intel could easily «throw» a couple of hundred megahertz more on both processor models, but this is left for future improvements in the line. In general, the platform turned out to be successful. Albeit only for those who really need all its advantages and, most importantly, are ready to pay for just one processor an amount equal to the price of an average computer, but successful. Although not revolutionary, but, as we already wrote, we like this evolution even more 🙂

We would like to thank Corsair , G.Skill and Palit
for their help in setting up the test benches.

Steppings in processors — what is it and what is it for

• Computer store
• Blog
• Processors for PCs and servers
  (koval@andpro. ru)

  Published: 8 August 2022

  Let’s take a closer look at today’s article.

  What is stepping

  Translated from English, “stepping” sounds like “step-by-step change”. In the digital world, stepping refers to the version number of a PC part or certain software. The existing changes, which have different markings, are not cardinal. They look like some edits to fix minor bugs.

  Processor stepping is called the revision of the kernel on which it is based. In other words, during the manufacture of one CPU core, it is refined and some parameters are changed: they increase the level of energy saving, reduce the amount of heat dissipation, introduce new functionality and increase overclocking potential. The rule is appropriate here: the higher the stepping, the better the computer works.

  Note that as a result of stepping, the manufacturing technology and architecture of the core do not change. Therefore, you should pay attention to the information in the CPU article, which indicates the serial number of the stepping. When making minor edits, the serial number changes according to the principle from C0 to C1 — that is, a number increased by one is assigned. And with large changes, another letter designation is already indicated — from G0 to E0. The result is a different series of upgrades. And when the CPU has been produced for a long time and is constantly being upgraded by the manufacturer, then R0 can also be found.

  Is there any benefit from stepping

  Global modernization entails significant changes. During them, the following may happen:

  • the number of cores increases;
  • new graphics cores are added;
  • controllers are improving;
  • CPU form factor changes;
  • there is a new socket connection option.

  As a result of minor updates, there is a certain polishing of an already released platform. It does not affect the external and internal characteristics. In this case, developers can refine the chip production technology on the existing technical process and fix security bugs in hardware. Such actions will not change the power parameters of the CPU, but minor flaws will be optimized at the hardware level.

  Stepping allows you to stabilize the cores in the process of reaching the peak clock speed and get support for new options. But it should be said that the new stepping does not always bring a positive result. In particular, for ordinary users. And if for a corporate consumer the implemented security patches turn out to be the right solution, then for an ordinary user these changes will be superfluous. In addition, these actions can reduce the computing power of the «gems» in certain applications.

  But there is another situation when the new stepping does not have a negative effect. Indeed, in solving some problems, it will become useful. For example, R0 for Coffee Lake Refresh took a small share of the performance from the chips, but at the same time increased the overclocking potential of the cores and the memory controller. After the implemented changes, the CPUs began to function more stable at maximum frequencies with the multithreading technology installed. In addition, the results in overclocking RAM have improved.

  A striking example of an updated revision is the release of the B2 stepping for the Ryzen line. Model 7 5800X3D with a hybrid cache has started to be produced on the basis of B2 stepping silicon. According to experts who worked with the new chip and compared its capabilities with the initial version, the new stepping provides reduced leakage currents. Whence follows the conclusion that the work of transistors in the upgraded chip is performed clearly and without errors, even at low voltage.

  And if the Ryzen 7 5800X stepping B0 requires at least 1.0-1.462 V for normal operation under heavy load, then the updated Ryzen 7 5800X3D on silicon version B2 needs only 0.95-1.281 V. This leads to lower temperatures, increased energy efficiency and increases overclocking margin.

  How to find out the stepping

  This moment is usually determined when choosing a processor. That is, the characteristics that the chip will have in the final assembly are studied in advance. You can find out the revision by the external indicators of the part. For example, an Intel CPU has a special code that is located on the heat spreader cover and begins with SR-. By this code you can find information about the amendments made. But it is not advertised on public platforms and you will have to read specialized resources like thematic forums.

  But the stepping code for the AMD processor is not written on the cover. To find out, you need a special program. Specialists use CPU-Z. This utility knows best about CPU parameters. You can download it from the official website, then install it on your computer and run it. The necessary information about stepping is in the sections Stepping and Revision. Note that this method is also suitable for Intel processors.

  Output

  Sepping is good first of all for those who are just going to purchase a new platform and are determined with the best option. It will not give significant advantages to experienced users in their work. It should also be borne in mind that the CPU based on the new stepping requires motherboard updates to the latest BIOS version.

  • All posts
  • KVM equipment (equipment)
  • Powerline adapters
  • security
  • Wireless adapters
  • Power supplies
  • Video cards (videocard)
  • Video surveillance (CCTV)
  • HDDs and Solid State SSDs
  • Disk shelves (JBOD)
  • Sound cards
  • Instruments
  • Uninterruptible power supplies (UPS, UPS)
  • Cables and patch cords
  • Switches
  • Computer peripherals (computer peripherals)
  • Computers (PC)
  • Controllers (RAID, HBA, Expander)
  • PC Cases
  • PC Motherboards
  • Multifunction devices (MFPs)
  • Memory modules for PCs, laptops and servers
  • Monitors
  • Monoblocks (All-in-one PC)
  • Desktop storage systems (NAS)
  • Notebooks (notebook, laptop)
  • General help
  • Cooling
  • Tablets
  • Plotters
  • Printers
  • Software
  • Software for corporate consumer
  • Projectors
  • Processors for PCs and servers
  • Workstations (workstation)
  • Power Distribution Unit (PDU)
  • Consumables for office equipment
  • Wi-Fi extenders (repeaters, repeaters)
  • Routers (routers)
  • Servers and server hardware
  • Network cards
  • Scanners
  • Telecommunication cabinets and racks
  • Telephony (phone)
  • Thin Clients
  • Transceivers
  • Smart watch

  Core i7-3930K [in 4 benchmarks]

  Intel
  Core i7-3930K

  • Interface
  • Core frequency
  • Video memory size
  • Memory type
  • Memory frequency
  • Maximum resolution

  Description

  Intel started Intel Core i7-3930K sales on November 14, 2011 at a suggested price of $611. This is a desktop processor based on the Sandy Bridge-E architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 6 cores and 12 threads and is manufactured using 32nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3800MHz, the multiplier is unlocked.

  In terms of compatibility, this is an FCLGA2011 socket processor with a TDP of 130W and a maximum temperature of 67°C. It supports DDR3 memory.

  It provides poor benchmark performance at

  8.18%

  from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

  
  Core i7
  3930K
  

  or

  
  EPYC
  7h22
  

  General information

  Information about the type (for desktops or laptops) and architecture of the Core i7-3930K, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

  place in the performance rating	830
  price-quality	3. 77		$ 168 (0.3x)	of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

  Price-quality 9000

  We compare the cost of the process of processors and their costs.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

  Features

  Quantitative parameters Core i7-3

  Compatible

  Information on Core i7-3930K compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.

  Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor. — Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) + Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) + Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 0390 + Thermal Monitoring + Smart Response + Demand Based Switching —

  Safety technology

  Technologies built into the Core i7-3930K that enhance system security, such as hack protection.

  Benchmark tests

  These are the results of the Core i7-3930K performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.

  ---

  Overall performance in tests

  This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

  i7-3930K
  8.18

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Physics

  Passmark

  Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

  Benchmark coverage: 68%

  i7-3930K
  8250

  GeekBench 5 Single-Core

  GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

  Benchmark coverage: 37%

  i7-3930K
  778

  GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

  GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

  Benchmark coverage: 37%

  i7-3930K
  4574

  3DMark Fire Strike Physics

  Benchmark coverage: 4%

  i7-3930K
  12240

  ---

  Mining hashrates

  Core i7-3930K performance in cryptocurrency mining. Usually the result is measured in mhash / s — the number of millions of solutions generated by the video card in one second.

  Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)

  29 Mh/s

  Relative capacity

  Overall Core i7-3930K performance compared to its nearest competitor desktop processors.

  ---

  Intel Core i5-8600T
  100.61

  AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
  100.24

  Intel Core i5-9500T
  100.24

  Intel Core i7-3930K
  100

  Apple M1
  99.51

  Intel Core i3-10305T
  98.66

  Intel Core i3-10300T
  98.41

  Competitor from AMD

  We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-3930K from AMD is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE, which is roughly equal in speed and lower by 4 positions in our rating.

  
  Ryzen 5
  PRO 3400GE
  

  Compare

  Here are some of AMD’s closest competitors to the Core i7-3930K:

  AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
  101.83

  AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B
  101. 1

  AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
  100.24

  Intel Core i7-3930K
  100

  AMD Ryzen 5 1400
  94.38

  AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
  93.4

  AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
  92.91

  Other processors

  Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

  
  Core i7
  3970X
  

  Compare

  
  Core i7
  4790K
  

  Compare

  
  Core i7
  3960X
  

  Compare

  
  Core i7
  4790
  

  Compare

  
  Core i7
  4770K
  

  Compare

  
  Core i7
  990X
  

  Compare

  Recommended graphics cards

  According to our statistics, these cards are most often used with Core i7-3930K:

  
  GeForce GTX
  1050 Ti
  

  7. 9%

  
  Radeon RX
  570
  

  5.7%

  
  GeForce GTX
  1060 6GB
  

  5.4%

  
  GeForce GTX
  1070
  

  4.5%

  
  GeForce GTX
  1060 3GB
  

  4.5%

  
  GeForce GTX
  680
  

  3.1%

  
  Radeon RX
  580
  

  2.8%

  
  GeForce GTX
  660
  

  2.5%

  
  GeForce GTX
  670
  

  2.5%

  
  GeForce GTX
  970
  

  2.3%

  User rating

  Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.