I7 4790 vs i5 9600k: Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz vs Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3.60GHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i7-4790K: What is the difference?

61points

Intel Core i5-9600K

51points

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

64 facts in comparison

Intel Core i5-9600K

Intel Core i7-4790K

Why is Intel Core i5-9600K better than Intel Core i7-4790K?

  • 38.75% faster CPU speed?
    6 x 3.7GHzvs4 x 4GHz
  • 1066MHz higher ram speed?
    2666MHzvs1600MHz
  • 25.96°C higher maximum operating temperature?
    100°Cvs74.04°C
  • 8nm smaller semiconductor size?
    14nmvs22nm
  • 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
    1.5MBvs1MB
  • 34.48% higher PassMark result?
    10878vs8089
  • 1MB bigger L3 cache?
    9MBvs8MB
  • 128KB bigger L1 cache?
    384KBvs256KB

Why is Intel Core i7-4790K better than Intel Core i5-9600K?

  • 2 more CPU threads?
    8vs6
  • 7W lower TDP?
    88Wvs95W
  • 0. 5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
    2MB/corevs1.5MB/core
  • Uses multithreading?
  • 100MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1250MHzvs1150MHz
  • 3 higher clock multiplier?
    40vs37

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

vs

Intel Core i7-11800H

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

vs

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i3-1115G4

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Intel Core i5-9600K

1 User reviews

Intel Core i5-9600K

10. 0/10

1 User reviews

Intel Core i7-4790K

2 User reviews

Intel Core i7-4790K

9.5/10

2 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

1 votes

9.5/10

2 votes

Gaming

10.0/10

1 votes

9.5/10

2 votes

Performance

10.0/10

1 votes

9.5/10

2 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

1 votes

9.5/10

2 votes

Energy efficiency

8.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

2 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

6 x 3.7GHz

4 x 4GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.6GHz

4.4GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1.5MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2666MHz

1600MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

41.6GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✖Intel Core i7-4790K

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

303.7seconds

423.2seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

980.5seconds

1320.7seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✖Intel Core i7-4790K

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

i7-4790 vs i5-9600K — Fortnite Battle Royale with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3. 60GHz

Fortnite Battle Royale

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz


i7-4790
i5-9600K

Multi-Thread Performance

9989 Pts

13352 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2283 Pts

2677 Pts

Fortnite Battle Royale

i7-4790 vs i5-9600K in Fortnite Battle Royale using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-4790
i5-9600K


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

76.3 FPS

1080p

87.0 FPS

1440p

49.8 FPS

1440p

56.8 FPS

2160p

26.9 FPS

2160p

30.7 FPS

w1440p

41.1 FPS

w1440p

46. 8 FPS

High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

125.4 FPS

1080p

140.1 FPS

1440p

87.1 FPS

1440p

97.5 FPS

2160p

51.2 FPS

2160p

57.4 FPS

w1440p

73.9 FPS

w1440p

82.6 FPS

Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

174.5 FPS

1080p

193.2 FPS

1440p

124.5 FPS

1440p

138.3 FPS

2160p

75.5 FPS

2160p

84.2 FPS

w1440p

106. 7 FPS

w1440p

118.4 FPS

Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

272.6 FPS

1080p

299.4 FPS

1440p

199.2 FPS

1440p

219.7 FPS

2160p

124.2 FPS

2160p

137.6 FPS

w1440p

172.3 FPS

w1440p

190.1 FPS

i7-4790
  • The i7-4790 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i7-4790 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-9600K
  • The i5-9600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-9600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-9600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-9600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i7-4790 vs i5-9600K specifications

i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Architecture
i7-4790 i5-9600K
Codename Haswell Coffee Lake
Generation Core i7
(Haswell)
Core i5
(Coffee Lake Refresh)
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR3 DDR4
Part# unknown SR3WZ
Production Status Active Active
Released May 2014 Oct 2018
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Cache
i7-4790 i5-9600K
Cache L1 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
Cache L2 256K (per core) 256K (per core)
Cache L3 8MB (shared) 9MB (shared)
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Cores
i7-4790 i5-9600K
# of Cores 4 6
# of Threads 8 6
Integrated Graphics Intel HD 4600 N/A
SMP # CPUs 1 1
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Features
i7-4790 i5-9600K
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
vPro
Boost 2.0
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Performance
i7-4790 i5-9600K
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 3.6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Multiplier 36.0x 37.0x
Multiplier Unlocked No Yes
TDP 84 W 95 W
Turbo Clock up to 4 GHz up to 4.6 GHz
Voltage unknown variable
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Physical
i7-4790 i5-9600K
Die Size 177 mm² unknown
Foundry Intel Intel
Package FC-LGA1151
Process Size 22 nm 14 nm
Socket Intel Socket 1150 Intel Socket 1151
Transistors 1400 million unknown
tCaseMax 72°C 72°C

Share Your Comments 96

Compare i7-4790 vs i5-9600K in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need For Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Dawn of War III

2017

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016

Doom

2016

F1 2016

2016

Total War: Warhammer

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i7-4790

Summary

  • Intel Core i5-9600K

    141%

  • Intel Core i7-4790

    100%

Relative performance

  • Intel Core i5-9600K

    121%

  • Intel Core i7-4790

    100%

Relative performance

  • Intel Core i5-9600K

    162%

  • Intel Core i7-4790

    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-9600K
Much higher single threaded performance (around 21% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 62% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Around 41% higher average synthetic performance.
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-4790
None

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-9600K

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.


Productivity

HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-9600K

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features
Intel Core i5-9600K Intel Core i7-4790
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
HTT
vPro

Architecture
Intel Core i5-9600K Intel Core i7-4790
Architecture Intel_Coffelake vs Intel_Haswell
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 vs DDR3
Codename Coffee Lake vs Haswell
Release Date Sep 2018 vs May 2014

Cores
Intel Core i5-9600K Intel Core i7-4790
Cores 6 vs 4
Threads 6 vs 8
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics UHD Graphics 630 vs Intel HD 4600

Cache
Intel Core i5-9600K Intel Core i7-4790
L1 Cache 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache 9216 KB (shared) vs 8192 KB (shared)

Physical
Intel Core i5-9600K Intel Core i7-4790
Socket Intel Socket 1151 vs Intel Socket 1150
Max Case Temp 72°C vs 72°C
Package FC-LGA1151 vs
Die Size unknown vs 177mm²
Process 14 nm vs 22 nm

Performance
Intel Core i5-9600K Intel Core i7-4790
Cpu Frequency 3700 MHz vs 3500 MHz
Turbo Clock 4500 MHz vs 3900 MHz
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 100 MHz
Voltage variable vs unknown
TDP 95 W vs 84 W
  • Intel Core i5-9600K

    5400 points

  • Intel Core i7-4790

    4368 points

Points — higher is better

  • Intel Core i5-9600K

    26640 points

  • Intel Core i7-4790

    18816 points

Points — higher is better

points — higher is better

points — higher is better

Intel Core i7-4790 vs.

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i7-4790

The Intel Core i7-4790 operates with 4 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.00 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 84 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2014

Intel Core i5-10400

The Intel Core i5-10400 operates with 6 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1200 CPU socket. This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Comet Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2020

Intel Core i7-4790

Intel Core i5-10400

Compare Detail

3.60 GHz Frequency 2.90 GHz
4 Cores 6
4.00 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 4.30 GHz
3.80 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 4.00 GHz
Yes Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking No
normal Core Architecture normal

Intel HD Graphics 4600

GPU

Intel UHD Graphics 630

1.20 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.20 GHz
22 nm Technology 14 nm
1.20 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.20 GHz
11.1 DirectX Version 12
3 Max. displays 3
DDR3-1600 Memory DDR4-2666
2 Memory channels 2
Max memory
No ECC No
L2 Cache
8. 00 MB L3 Cache 12.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 3.0
16 PCIe lanes 16
22 nm Technology 14 nm
LGA 1150 Socket LGA 1200
84 W TDP 65 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q2/2014 Release date Q2/2020

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Intel Core i7-4790 Intel Core i5-10400
84 W Max TDP 65 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

CPU-Z Benchmark for Intel Core i7-4790 (1T)

Best CPU performance — 64-bit — October 2022

Intel Core i7-4790 (1T)

Back to validation

Intel Core i9-12900KF

Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Core i7-12700K

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Intel Core i5-12600KF

Intel Core i5-12600K

Intel Core i9-11900K

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Intel Core i7-11700K

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i7-11700KF

Intel Core i5-11600K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i5-11600KF

Intel Core i7-11700

Intel Core i7-11700F

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

Intel Core i5-11500

Intel Core i9-10900KF

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i7-11800H

Intel Core i9-10900K

Intel Core i9-10850K

Intel Core i7-10700KF

Intel Core i5-11400

Intel Core i9-10900

Intel Core i5-11400F

Intel Core i5-11400H

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

Intel Core i9-9900KF

Intel Core i7-9700KF

Intel Core i7-10700K

Intel Core i7-9700K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600H

Intel Core i9-9900K

Intel Core i5-10600KF

Intel Core i5-9600KF

Intel Core i7-10700

Intel Core i5-10600K

Intel Core i7-10700F

Intel Core i7-1165G7

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT

Intel Core i7-9700F

Intel Core i7-9700

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Intel Core i5-9600K

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Intel Core i7-8700K

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

Intel Core i5-8600K

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

Intel Core i7-7700K

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

Intel Core i7-10875H

Intel Core i5-7600K

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-8700

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 5 3500

Intel Core i7-10870H

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-10750H

Intel Core i3-10105F

Intel Core i3-9100F

Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i3-10100F

Intel Core i5-6600K

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i5-10400F

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core i5-8400

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Intel Core i7-7700

Intel Core i7-8750H

Intel Core i5-4690K

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i5-9300H

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i7-10510U

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i5-8300H

Intel Core i5-4670K

Intel Core i7-8565U

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

(YOU) Intel Core i7-4790

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-10210U

Intel Core i5-4690

Intel Core i5-1035G1

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

Intel Core i7-4790

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

Intel Core i7-6700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Intel Core i7-4770

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

Intel Core i5-8265U

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Intel Core i3-1005G1

Intel Core i5-4590

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with

Intel Core i5-3570K

Intel Core i5-7400

Intel Core i7-3770K

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

Intel Core i7-8550U

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i3-7100

AMD Ryzen 3 1200

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Core i5-2500K

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

Intel Core i5-8250U

Intel Core i5-7300HQ

Intel Core i5-6400

Intel Core i3-6100

AMD Ryzen 5 1400

Intel Core i5-4460

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3

Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3

AMD Athlon 3000G

Intel Core i5-4440

Intel Core i3-4170

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2

Intel Core i5-2500

Intel Pentium G4560

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i3-4160

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with

Intel Xeon E5-2689

Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2

Intel Core i5-3330

Intel Core i5-7200U

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i7-6500U

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i5-6300U

Intel Xeon E5450

Intel Core i3-2120

Intel Core i5-3230M

Intel Core i3-2100

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel Core i5 750

Intel Core i5-5200U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Intel Core i5-2520M

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500

Intel Core i5 650

Intel Core i5-3210M

Intel Core i7 920

AMD FX -8350

Intel Core i5-2450M

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400

AMD FX -4300

AMD FX -8320

AMD FX -6300

Intel Core i5-2410M

AMD FX -8300

Intel Core i5-4210U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600

Intel Core i3-7020U

Pentium E5200

Intel Core i5-4200U

Intel Core i3-3110M

Intel Core i3-5005U

Intel Core i3-6006U

AMD Phenom II X4 955

Intel Core i3-4005U

Intel Core i7-4790 vs Intel Core i5-9600KF








Intel Core i7-4790 vs Intel Core i5-9600KF

Comparaison des caractéristiques techniques entre les processeurs, avec le Intel Core i7-4790 d’un côté et le Intel Core i5-9600KF de l’autre. Le premier est dédié au secteur ordinateur de bureau, il dispose de 4 coeurs, 8 threads, une fréquence maximale de 4,0 GHz. Le second est employé sur le segment ordinateur de bureau, il possède un total de 6 coeurs, 6 threads, sa fréquence turbo s’établit à 4,6 GHz. Le tableau suivant permet aussi de comparer la lithographie, le nombre de transistors (si indiqué), la quantité de mémoire cache, la capacité maximale de mémoire RAM, le type de mémoire accepté, la date de première diffusion, le nombre maximal de lignes PCIe, les valeurs obtenues dans Geekbench 4 et Cinebench R15.

Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.

Cette page contient des références aux produits d’un ou de plusieurs de nos annonceurs. Nous pouvons recevoir une compensation lorsque vous cliquez sur des liens vers ces produits. Pour une explication de notre politique publicitaire, veuillez visiter cette page.

Caractéristiques :

Processeur

Intel Core i7-4790

Intel Core i5-9600KF
Marché (principal)

Ordinateur de bureau

Ordinateur de bureau
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Haswell

Coffee Lake
Nom de base

Haswell-DT

Coffee Lake-S
Famille

Core i7-4000

Core i5-9000
Numéro(s) de pièce, S-Spec

BX80646I74790,

BXC80646I74790,

CM8064601560113,

SR1QF, QF4D

BX80684I59600KF,

SRFAD

Date de lancement

Q2 2014

Q1 2019
Lithographie

22 nm

14 nm++
Transistors

1. 400.000.000


Cœurs

4

6
Threads

8

6
Fréquence de base

3,6 GHz

3,7 GHz
Fréquence turbo

4,0 GHz

4,6 GHz
Vitesse du bus

5 GT/s

8 GT/s
Mémoire cache

8 MB

9 MB
Capacité mémoire maxi

32 GB

128 GB
Types de mémoire

DDR3-1333/1600,

DDR3L-1333/1600

DDR4-2666
Nb. max. de canaux mémoire

2

2
Bande passante mémoire maxi

25,6 GB/s

41,6 GB/s
Lignes PCIe max

16

16
PDT

84 W

95 W
Alimentation système recommandée

Alimentation PC de 600W

Alimentation PC de 600W
GPU intégré

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Aucun
GPU, unités d’exécution

20


GPU, unités de calcul shader

160


GPU, cadence de base

300 MHz


GPU, cadence maxi

1200 MHz


GPU, point flottant FP32

352 GFLOPS


Socket

LGA1150

LGA1151
Carte mère compatible

Carte mère Socket LGA 1150 

Carte mère Socket LGA 1151 
Température maximale

72. 7°C

100°C
CPU-Z simple thread

405

504
CPU-Z multi thread

2.095

2.885
Cinebench R15 simple thread

165

202
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

746

1.123
Cinebench R20 simple thread

379

464
Cinebench R20 multi-thread

1.716

2.527
Cinebench R23 simple thread

884

1.437
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

4. 555

8.661
PassMark simple thread

2.217

2.788
PassMark CPU Mark

7.196

10.841
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 simple cœur

4.319

5.782
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-cœur

13.768

22.609
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 simple cœur

986

1.226
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-cœur

3.455

5.719
(SGEMM)
Performance en GFLOPS

215,5 GFLOPS

397,2 GFLOPS
(Performance multi-cœur / watt)
Rapport performance / watt

164 pts / W

238 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.

On peut ainsi mieux comparer quelles sont les différences techniques entre les deux processeurs.

Alimentation système recommandée : on suppose que l’on possède une tour ATX, une carte graphique haut de gamme, 16GB de mémoire RAM, un disque SSD de 512GB, un disque dur HDD de 1TB, un lecteur Blu-Ray. Il faudra compter sur une alimentation plus puissante si on souhaite disposer de plusieurs cartes graphiques, plusieurs moniteurs, davantage de mémoire, etc.

Prix : pour des raisons techniques, nous ne pouvons pas afficher pour le moment un prix de moins de 24 heures, ou un prix en temps réel. C’est pourquoi on préfère pour l’instant ne pas faire apparaître de prix. Il faut vous référer aux boutiques en ligne respectives pour connaître le dernier prix, ainsi que la disponibilité.

Le processeur Intel Core i5-9600KF a un plus grand nombre de cœurs, la fréquence turbo du Intel Core i5-9600KF est plus grande, que le PDT du Intel Core i7-4790 est plus basse. Le Intel Core i5-9600KF a été lancé plus récemment.

Performances :

Comparaison des performances entre les deux processeurs, pour cela on considère les résultats générés sur des logiciels de benchmarks tels que Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Score multi-thread & simple thread
Intel Core i5-9600KF

504

2.885
Intel Core i7-4790

405

2.095

En simple cœur, la différence est de 24%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 38%.

Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

CPU-Z est un logiciel d’information système qui fournit le nom du processeur, son numéro de modèle, le nom de code, les niveaux de cache, le package, le processus. Il peut également délivrer des données sur la carte mère, la mémoire. Il fait des mesures en temps réel, avec enfin un benchmark pour le simple thread, ainsi que pour le multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Score multi-thread & simple thread
Intel Core i5-9600KF

202

1.123
Intel Core i7-4790

165

746

En simple cœur, la différence est de 22%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 51%.

Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

Cinebench R15 permet d’évaluer les performances de calculs du CPU en restituant une scène 3D photoréaliste. La scène possède 2 000 objets, 300 000 polygones, utilise des reflets nets et flous, des zones lumineuses, des ombres, des shaders procéduraux, un antialiasing, etc. Plus le rendu de la scène est rapidement créée, plus le PC est puissant, avec un nombre élevé de points.





Cinebench R20 — Score multi-thread & simple thread
Intel Core i5-9600KF

464

2.527
Intel Core i7-4790

379

1.716

En simple cœur, la différence est de 22%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 47%.

Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

Cinebench R20 est un logiciel de test multi-plateformes qui permet d’évaluer les capacités matérielles d’un appareil tel qu’un ordinateur, une tablette, un serveur. Cette version de Cinebench prend en compte les évolutions récentes des processeurs avec de multiples cœurs et les dernières améliorations de techniques de rendu. L’évaluation est au final encore plus pertinente.





Cinebench R23 — Score multi-thread & simple thread
Intel Core i5-9600KF

1.437

8.661
Intel Core i7-4790

884

4.555

En simple cœur, la différence est de 63%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 90%.

Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

Cinebench R23 est un logiciel de test multi-plateformes qui permet d’évaluer les capacités matérielles d’un appareil tel qu’un ordinateur, une tablette, un serveur. Cette version de Cinebench prend en compte les évolutions récentes des processeurs avec de multiples cœurs et les dernières améliorations de techniques de rendu. L’évaluation est au final encore plus pertinente. La scène de test contient pas moins de 2 000 objets et plus de 300 000 polygones au total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & simple thread
Intel Core i5-9600KF

2.788

10.841
Intel Core i7-4790

2.217

7.196

En simple cœur, la différence est de 26%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 51%.

Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

PassMark est un logiciel de benchmarks, qui fait plusieurs tests de performance, notamment, sur les nombres premiers, les nombres entiers, la virgule flottante, la compression, la physique, les instructions étendues, l’encodage, le triage. Plus le score est élevé, plus l’appareil a des capacités importantes.

Sur Windows 64-bit :





Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i5-9600KF

5.782

22.609
Intel Core i7-4790

4.319

13.768

En simple cœur, la différence est de 34%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 64%.

Sur Linux 64-bit :





Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i5-9600KF

5.970

22.082
Intel Core i7-4790

4.893

16.323

En simple cœur, la différence est de 22%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 35%.

Sur Mac OS X 64-bit :





Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Core i5-9600KF

6.137

24.943
Intel Core i7-4790

4.570

15.280

En simple cœur, la différence est de 34%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 63%.

Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

Geekbench 4 est une plateforme de benchmarks complète avec plusieurs types de tests, dont la compression de données, d’images, le cryptage en AES, l’encodage en SQL, en HTML, le rendu d’un fichier PDF, le calcul matriciel, de Transformation de Fourier rapide, la simulation d’objets en 3D, l’édition de photos, des tests sur la mémoire. Cela nous permet de mieux visualiser la puissance respective de ces appareils. Pour chaque résultat, on a pris une moyenne de 250 valeurs sur le fameux logiciel de benchmarks.

Sur Windows :





Geekbench 5 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Windows
Intel Core i5-9600KF

1.226

5.719
Intel Core i7-4790

986

3.455

En simple cœur, la différence est de 24%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 66%.

Sur Linux :





Geekbench 5 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Linux
Intel Core i5-9600KF

1.372

6.213
Intel Core i7-4790

1.039

3.715

En simple cœur, la différence est de 32%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 67%.

Sur macOS :





Geekbench 5 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — macOS
Intel Core i5-9600KF

1.136

5.507
Intel Core i7-4790

998

3.849

En simple cœur, la différence est de 14%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 43%.

Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.

Geekbench 5 est un logiciel de mesure de performance d’un système informatique, pour appareils fixes, appareils mobiles, serveurs. Cette plateforme permet de mieux comparer la puissance du CPU, la puissance de calcul et de la comparer avec des systèmes similaires ou totalement différents. Geekbench 5 inclut de nouvelles charges de travail qui représentent des tâches de travail et des applications que l’on retrouve dans la réalité.

Équivalence :

Intel Core i7-4790 équivalent AMDIntel Core i5-9600KF équivalent AMD

Voir aussi :

Intel Core i7-4790KIntel Core i7-4790S

Intel Core i5-9600K

Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i7-4790K: What is the difference?

61 BALLLA

Intel Core i5-9600k

51 Ballla

Intel Core i7-4790k

64 Facts compared to

Intel i5-9600K

9000 9000 9000 9000 Is 9600K better than Intel Core i7-4790K?

  • 38.75% higher CPU speed?
    6 x 3.7GHz vs 4 x 4GHz
  • 1066MHz higher RAM speed?
    2666MHz vs 1600MHz
  • 25.96°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
    100°C vs 74. 04°C
  • Are 8nm semiconductors smaller?
    14nm vs 22nm
  • 0.5MB more L2 cache?
    1.5MB vs 1MB
  • 34.48% higher PassMark score?
    10878 vs 8089
  • 1MB more L3 cache?
    9MB vs 8MB
  • 128KB more L1 cache?
    384KB vs 256KB

  • 2 more CPU threads?
    8 vs 6
  • 7W below TDP?
    88W vs 95W
  • 0.5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
    2MB/core vs 1.5MB/core
  • Uses multithreading?
  • 100MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1250MHz vs 1150MHz
  • 3 higher hour multiplier?
    40 vs 37

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Intel Core i5-9600k

VS

Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i7-4790K

VS

Intel Core I5-46903

9000 9000 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-9600k

VS

Intel Core i7-7700k

Intel Core i7-4790k

VS

Intel Core I3-10100

INTEL Core

VS 9000 VS 9000) 9700k

Intel Core i7-4790k

VS

Intel Core i7-4930K

Intel Core i5-9600K

VS

AMD RYZEN 5 3600

VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS

Intel Core i5-9600k

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

Intel Core i7-4790K

VS

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core I5-9600K

VS

I5-9400F

I5-9400F

I5-9400F 4790k

VS

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i5-9600k

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600x

I7-47903

VS 9000 9600K

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

AMD RYZEN 5 1600

Comparison prices

Users reviews

General rating

Intel Core i5-9600K

1 Reviews Users

Intel Core i5-9600K

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

004 1 reviews of users

Intel Core i7-4790K

2 Reviews of users

Intel Core i7-4790k

/10

2 Reviews of Users

9000 10

1 Votes

9. 5 /10

2 Votes

Games

10.0 /10

1 VOTES

/10

9000 2 VOTES

performance

10.0 /10

1 Votes

/10

2 Votes

Reliability

10.0 9000

1 VOTES

9000.000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9EL

Energy efficiency

8.0 /10

1 votes

10.0 /10

2 votes

2 CPU speed

820003

6 x 3.7GHz

4 x 4GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.6GHz

4.4GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1.5MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2666MHz

1600MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

41.6GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4. Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✖Intel Core i7-4790K

Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5. Result Cinebench R20 (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender test result (bmw27)

303.7seconds

423.2seconds

The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

980.5seconds

1320.7seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✖Intel Core i7-4790K

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Intel Core i5-9600K or Intel Core i7-4790K

  • Main page
  • >

    Core i5-9600K

    81.1 (+12.5%)

    Core i7-4790K

    71

    Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

    The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

    The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

    Speed ​​in office use

    Core i5-9600K

    79. 4 (+8.3%)

    Core i7-4790K

    72.8

    Performance in day-to-day activities such as browsers and office applications.

    The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

    Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

    Speed ​​in heavy applications

    Core i5-9600K

    50.4 (+13.7%)

    Core i7-4790K

    43.5

    Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

    The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

    At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

    Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

    Speed ​​of numerical operations

    Simple household tasks

    Core i5-9600K

    77.2 (+8.5%)

    Core i7-4790K

    70.6

    Demanding games and tasks

    Core i5-9600K

    56.1 (+19.8%)

    Core i7-4790K

    45

    Extreme

    Core i5-9600K

    13.7 (+18.2%)

    Core i7-4790K

    11.2

    Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

    We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

    Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

    When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

    Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

    Benchmarks

    Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

    Cinebench R23 Single Core

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    1276 (+16.2%)

    Intel Core i7-4790K

    1069

    Cinebench R23 Multi Core

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    7301 (+32.4 %)

    Intel Core i7-4790K

    4936

    Cinebench R20 Single Core

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    481 (+14.6%)

    Intel Core i7-4790K

    411

    Cinebench R20 Multi Core

    Intel Core i5-9600k

    2624 (+24.5%)

    Intel Core i7-4790k

    1982

    Cinebench R15 Single Core

    Intel Core I5-9600K

    204 (+17. 2%)

    Intel Core I7-479

    Cinebench R15 Multi Core

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    1165 (+26.7%)

    Intel Core i7-4790K

    854

    Geekbench 5 Single Core

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    1256 (+14.6 %)

    Intel Core i7-4790K

    1073

    Geekbench 5 Multi Core

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    5643 (+29.1%)

    Intel Core i7-4790K

    4001

    Blender 2.81 bmw27

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    318.4

    Intel Core i7-4790k

    407 (+21.8%)

    Geekbench 3 Single Core

    Intel Core i5-9600k

    5065 (+15.1%) Intel Core I7-4790K

    000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000. Multi Core

    Intel Core i5-9600k

    23045 (+27.6%)

    Intel Core i7-4790K

    16686

    Cinebench R11 -4790k

    1.97

    Cinebench R11.5

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    12.3 (+21.4%)

    Intel Core i7-4790k

    Cinebench R111.

    5 -9600K

    52.6 (+36.5%)

    Intel Core i7-4790k

    33.4

    Passmark

    Intel Core i5-9600k

    10831 (+25.6%)

    Intel Core i7-4790k

    8062

    Characteristics

    9000 be skipped existing functions.

    Basic

    Manufacturer Intel Intel
    DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i5-9600K Processor (9M Cache, up to 4.60 GHz) Intel® Core™ i7-4790K Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.40 GHz)
    ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Coffee Lake Devil’s Canyon
    Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 14 nm 22 nm
    Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 02-2021 10-2016
    Model Official name. i5-9600K i7-4790K
    Cores The number of physical cores. 6 4
    ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 6 8
    Multithreading TechnologyWith Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS).
    Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.7 GHz 4 GHz
    Turbo frequency The maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 4.6 GHz 4.4 GHz
    L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 9 MB 8 MB
    Instructions 64-bit 64-bit
    Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
    Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No
    Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 8 GT/s DMI3 5 GT/s DMI2
    Number of QPI links
    TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 95 W 88W
    Cooling system specifications PCG 2015D (130W) PCG 2013D

    Video core

    Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® UHD Graphics 630 Intel® HD Graphics 4600
    GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 350 MHz 350 MHz
    Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. 1150 MHz 1250MHz
    Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. No data
    Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 3

    RAM

    Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 64 GB 32 GB
    Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR4-2666 DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V
    RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2
    RAM bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
    ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

    PCI

    configuration options

    PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 3
    PCI Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
    Number of PCI lanes 16 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4

    Data Security

    AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data
    Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data

    Decoration

    Dimensions No data No data
    Sockets supported No data No data
    Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

    Which is better

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    • On average, gaming performance is 10% better.
    • The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 7%.
    • In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 3%.
    • 2 more physical cores.

    Intel Core i7-4790K

    • The price is 210 $ down.
    • The number of streams is 2 more.
    • The base frequency is 0.3 GHz higher.

    Comparison of Intel Core i5-9600K and Intel Core i7-4790K

    Comparative analysis of the Intel Core i5-9600K and Intel Core i7-4790K processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability , Technology, Virtualization.
    Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection ( mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining ( mHash/s).

    Intel Core i5-9600K

    versus

    Intel Core i7-4790K

    Benefits

    Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-9600K

    • Newer processor, release date difference 5 year(s) 4 month(s)

      more possibility

      run more applications at the same time: 6 vs 4

    • About 5% more clock speed: 4.60 GHz vs 4.40 GHz
    • About 35% more maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 74.04°C
    • A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with less power consumption: 14 nm vs 22 nm
    • L1 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access 50% more, means more data can be stored in it for quick access
    • L3 cache is about 13% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
    • Maximum memory size is 4 times more(s): 128 GB vs 32 GB
    • Approximately 12% increase in PassMark — Single thread mark performance: 2766 vs 2464
    • Approximately 34% increase in PassMark — CPU mark performance: 10775 vs 8058
    • Approx. % more: 1249 vs 1070
    • About 40% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 5603 vs 3995
    • About 31% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark: 5805 vs 4416
    • About 69% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2162 vs 1279
    • About 69% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2162 vs 1279
    • 7

      Issue date October 2018 vs 1 June 2013 Number of cores 6 vs 4 Maximum frequency 4.60 GHz vs 4.40 GHz Maximum core temperature 100°C vs 74.04°C Process 14 nm vs 22 nm Level 1 cache 64K (per core) vs 256KB Level 2 cache 256K (per core) vs 1MB Level 3 cache 9 MB (shared) vs 8 MB Maximum memory size 128 GB vs 32 GB PassMark — Single thread mark 2766 vs 2464 PassMark — CPU mark 10775 vs 8058 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 1249 vs 1070 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 5603 vs 3995 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 5805 vs 4416 GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2162 vs 1279 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2162 vs 1279

      Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-4790K

      • 2 more threads: 8 vs 6
      • Approximately 8% less power consumption: 88 Watt vs 95 Watt
      • Approx. 58% more: 2489 vs 1574
      • About 16% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 3454 vs 2984
      • About 58% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 2489vs 1574
      • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 16% more: 3454 vs 2984
      Number of threads 8 vs 6
      Power consumption (TDP) 88 Watt vs 95 Watt
      GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 2489 vs 1574
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3454 vs 2984
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 2489 vs 1574
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3454 vs 2984

      Benchmark comparison

      CPU 1: Intel Core i5-9600K
      CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4790K

      PassMark — Single thread mark
      CPU 1
      CPU 2
      PassMark — CPU mark
      CPU 1
      CPU 2
      Geekbench 4 — Single Core
      CPU 1
      CPU 2
      Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core
      CPU 1
      CPU 2
      3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score
      CPU 1
      CPU 2
      GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
      CPU 1
      CPU 2
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)
      CPU 1
      CPU 2
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
      CPU 1
      CPU 2
      GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
      CPU 1
      CPU 2
      GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)
      CPU 1
      CPU 2
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)
      CPU 1
      CPU 2
      Name Intel Core i5-9600K Intel Core i7-4790K
      PassMark — Single thread mark 2766 2464
      PassMark — CPU mark 10775 8058
      Geekbench 4 — Single Core 1249 1070
      Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 5603 3995
      3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 5805 4416
      GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2162 1279
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 1574 2489
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 2984 3454
      GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2162 1279
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 1574 2489
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 2984 3454
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5. 95
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 100.106
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.695
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.814
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.147

      Performance comparison

      configuration

      Intel Core i5-9600K Intel Core i7-4790K
      Architecture name Coffee Lake Devil’s Canyon
      Issue date October 2018 June 1, 2013
      Place in the rating 722 1006
      Price now $279. 99 $306.99
      Processor Number i5-9600K i7-4790K
      Series 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors
      Status Launched Discontinued
      Price/performance ratio (0-100) 14.04 10.73
      Applicability Desktop Desktop
      Price at first issue date $339
      Support 64 bit
      Base frequency 3. 70GHz 4.00 GHz
      Bus Speed ​​ 8 GT/s DMI3 5 GT/s DMI2
      Level 1 cache 64K (per core) 256KB
      Level 2 cache 256K (per core) 1MB
      Level 3 cache 9 MB (shared) 8MB
      Technological process 14nm 22nm
      Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C 72 °C
      Maximum core temperature 100°C 74. 04°C
      Maximum frequency 4.60 GHz 4.40 GHz
      Number of cores 6 4
      Number of threads 6 8
      Unlocked
      Crystal area 177mm
      Number of transistors 1400 Million
      Maximum number of memory channels 2 2
      Maximum memory bandwidth 41. 6 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
      Maximum memory size 128GB 32GB
      Supported memory types DDR4-2666 DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V
      Device ID 0x3E98 0x412
      Graphics base frequency 350MHz 350MHz
      Graphics max dynamic frequency 1.15 GHz 1.25 GHz
      Intel® Clear Video Technology HD
      Intel® Clear Video Technology
      Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
      Intel® Quick Sync Video
      Video memory size 64GB 2GB
      Integrated graphics Intel® UHD Graphics 630 Intel® HD Graphics 4600
      Number of execution units 20
      Maximum GPU clock 1. 25 GHz
      Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
      Maximum number of monitors supported 3 3
      DisplayPort
      DVI
      eDP
      HDMI
      VGA
      WiDi support
      4K support
      Maximum resolution via DisplayPort [email protected] [email protected]
      Maximum resolution via eDP [email protected] [email protected]
      Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 [email protected] [email protected]
      Maximum resolution via VGA [email protected]
      DirectX 12 11.2/12
      OpenGL 4.5 4.3
      Maximum number of processors in 1 1
      Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
      Sockets supported FCLGA1151 FCLGA1150
      Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 88 Watt
      Thermal Solution PCG 2015D (130W) PCG 2013D
      Low Halogen Options Available
      Number of PCI Express lanes 16 16
      PCI Express revision 3. 0 3.0
      PCIe configurations Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
      Scalability 1S Only 1S Only
      Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
      Intel® Identity Protection Technology
      Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX)
      Intel® OS Guard
      Intel® Secure Key Technology
      Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
      Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
      Secure Boot
      Anti-Theft Technology
      Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
      Idle States
      Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
      Intel 64
      Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
      Intel® AES New Instructions
      Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
      Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
      Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
      Intel® TSX-NI
      Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
      Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
      Thermal Monitoring
      Flexible Display interface (FDI)
      Intel® My WiFi Technology
      Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
      Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
      Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
      AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

      i7-4790K vs i5-9600K — Assassin’s Creed Valhalla vs R5 performance comparison

      R5 with

      Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4. 00GHz

      Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

      R5 with

      Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz


      i7-4790K
      i5-9600K

      Multi-Thread Performance

      11183 Pts

      13352 Pts

      Single-Thread Performance

      2530 Pts

      2677 Pts

      2633

      i7-4790K vs i5-9600K in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla using R5 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K

      i7-4790K
      i5-9600K


      Ultra quality
      Resolution Frames per second
      1080p

      10.8 FPS

      1080p

      11.4 FPS

      1440p

      9.4 FPS

      1440p

      9.6 FPS

      2160p

      6.3 FPS

      2160p

      6. 4 FPS

      w1440p

      8.4 FPS

      w1440p

      8.6 FPS

      High quality
      Authorization Frames per second
      1080p

      23.0 FPS

      1080p

      24.2 FPS

      1440p

      20.4 FPS

      1440p

      20.8 FPS

      2160p

      14.3 FPS

      2160p

      14.5 FPS

      w1440p

      18.4 FPS

      w1440p

      18.8 FPS

      Medium quality
      Resolution Frames per second
      1080p

      35.3 FPS

      1080p

      36. 9 FPS

      1440p

      31.3 FPS

      1440p

      31.9 FPS

      2160p

      22.3 FPS

      2160p

      22.6 FPS

      w1440p

      28.5 FPS

      w1440p

      29.1 FPS

      Low quality
      Resolution FPS
      1080p

      59.7 FPS

      1080p

      62.4 FPS

      1440p

      53.3 FPS

      1440p

      54.2 FPS

      2160p

      38.2 FPS

      2160p

      38.7 FPS

      w1440p

      48.5 FPS

      w1440p

      49.5 FPS

      i7-4790K
      • The i7-4790K has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
      • In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
      • i7-4790K The i7-4790K is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
      i5-9600K
      • The i5-9600K has a higher level 3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
      • The i5-9600K has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
      • The i5-9600K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
      • i5-9600K The i5-9600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.

      Compare i7-4790K vs i5-9600K specifications

      i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Architecture
      i7-4790K i5-9600K
      Codename Haswell Coffee Lake
      Generation Core i7
      (Haswell)
      Core i5
      (Coffee Lake Refresh)
      Market Desktop Desktop
      Memory Support DDR3 DDR4
      Part# unknown SR3WZ
      Production Status Active Active
      Released May 2014 Oct 2018
      i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Cache
      i7-4790K i5-9600K
      Cache L1 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
      Cache L2 256K (per core) 256K (per core)
      Cache L3 8MB (shared) 9MB (shared)
      i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Cores
      i7-4790K i5-9600K
      # of Cores 4 6
      # of Threads 8 6
      Integrated Graphics Intel HD 4600 N/A
      SMP# CPUs 1 1
      i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Features
      i7-4790K i5-9600K
      MMX
      SSE
      SSE2
      SSE3
      SSSE3
      SSE4. 2
      AVX
      AVX2
      EIST
      Intel 64
      XD bit
      VT-x
      VT-d
      HTT
      AES-NI
      TSX
      TXT
      CLMUL
      FMA3
      F16C
      BMI1
      BMI2
      Boost 2.0
      MMX
      SSE
      SSE2
      SSE3
      SSSE3
      SSE4.2
      AVX
      AVX2
      EIST
      Intel 64
      XD bit
      VT-x
      VT-d
      AES-NI
      TSX
      TXT
      CLMUL
      FMA3
      F16C
      BMI1
      BMI2
      Boost 2.0
      i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Performance
      i7-4790K i5-9600K
      Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
      Frequency 4 GHz 3.7 GHz
      Multiplier 40.0x 37.0x
      Multiplier Unlocked No Yes
      TDP 88W 95W
      Turbo Clock up to 4.4 GHz up to 4.6 GHz
      Voltage unknown variable
      i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Physical
      i7-4790K i5-9600K
      Die Size 177 mm² unknown
      Foundry Intel Intel
      Package FC-LGA1151
      Process Size 22 nm 14 nm
      Socket Intel Socket 1150 Intel Socket 1151
      Transistors 1400 million unknown
      tCaseMax 72°C 72°C

      Share your comments 93

      Compare i7-4790K vs i5-9600K in more games

      Elden Ring

      2022

      God of War

      2022

      Overwatch 2

      2022

      Forza Horizon 5

      2021

      Halo Infinite

      2021

      Battlefield 2042

      2021

      Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

      2020

      Microsoft Flight Simulator

      2020

      Valorant

      2020

      Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

      2020

      Death Stranding

      2020

      Marvel’s Avengers

      2020

      Godfall

      2020

      Cyberpunk 2077

      2020

      Apex Legends

      2019

      Anthem

      2019

      Far Cry New Dawn

      2019

      Resident Evil 2

      2019

      Metro Exodus

      2019

      World War Z

      2019

      Gears of War 5

      2019

      F1 2019

      2019

      GreedFall

      2019

      Borderlands 3

      2019

      Call of Duty Modern Warfare

      2019

      Red Dead Redemption 2

      2019

      Need For Speed: Heat

      2019

      Forza Horizon 4

      2018

      Fallout 76

      2018

      Hitman 2

      2018

      Just Cause 4

      2018

      Monster Hunter: World

      2018

      Strange Brigade

      2018

      PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

      2017

      Fortnite Battle Royale

      2017

      Need For Speed: Payback

      2017

      For Honor

      2017

      Project CARS 2

      2017

      Forza Motorsport 7

      2017

      Ashes of the Singularity

      2016

      Hitman

      2016

      Rise of the Tomb Raider

      2016

      The Division

      2016

      Overwatch

      2016

      Dishonored 2

      2016

      DiRT Rally

      2015

      Grand Theft Auto V

      2015

      The Witcher 3

      2015

      Total War: Attila

      2015

      Rocket League

      2015

      Need For Speed ​​

      2015

      Project CARS

      2015

      Rainbow Six Siege

      2015

      Dragon Age: Inquisition

      2014

      Far Cry 4

      2014

      GRID Autosport

      2014

      Shadow of Mordor

      2014

      The Talos Principle

      2014

      Battlefield 4

      2013

      Crysis 3

      2013

      Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

      2012

      League of Legends

      2009

      Minecraft

      2009

      i7 6700 vs i7 4790

      Contents

      1. Why is Intel Core i7-4790K better than Intel Core i7-6700?
      2. Why is Intel Core i7-6700 better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
      3. What are the most popular comparisons?
      4. General information
      5. performance
      6. Memory
      7. Functions
      8. Advantages
      9. reasons to choose the Intel Core i7-6700K
      10. Reasons Choose Intel Core I7-4790
      11. Comparison of Benchmarkov
      12. WHAT0K better than Intel Core i7-6700?

        • 17. 65% higher CPU clock speed
          4 x 4GHz vs 4 x 3.4GHz
        • 128KB more L1 cache

        Why is Intel Core i7-6700 better than Intel Core i7-4790K?

        • 533MHz higher ram speed

        What are the most popular comparisons?

        Intel Core i7-4790K

        Intel Core i7-4770K

        Intel Core i7-6700

        Intel Core i5-9400F

        Intel Core i7-4790k

        Intel Core i5-9400f

        Intel Core i7-6700

        Intel Core i5-7400

        Intel Core i7-4790K

        Intel Core i7-7700K

        I7-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-ARTEL

        Intel Core i7-4790k

        Intel Core i5-4690k

        Intel Core i7-6700

        Intel Core i7-7700

        Intel Core I7-47903

        I7-47770 9000 9000 Core I7-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-477EN

        Intel Core i5-9600K

        Intel Core i7-4790k

        Intel Core i7-9700k

        Intel Core i7-6700

        AMD Ryzen 5 2600x

        Intel Core i7-47903

        Intel Core I7-6700

        9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

        Intel Core i7-3770

        Intel Core i7-6700

        AMD Ryzen 7 2700x

        Intel Core i7-47903

        Intel Core I9900K

        I7-67-6700

        Core i7-4790K

        AMD Ryzen 7 1700

        Intel Core i7-6700

        AMD Ryzen 7 2700

        The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

        AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

        The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.

        Intel Atom E3805

        A smaller size indicates a newer chip manufacturing process.

        AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

        A 32-bit operating system can support up to 4 GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4 GB, which improves performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.

        Intel Core i7-4790K

        Intel Core i7-6700

        When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

        Intel Core i7-4930MX

        PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.

        AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

        Performance

        Intel Xeon Platinum 9282

        More L2 flash memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

        Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

        More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

        AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

        More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

        Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

        When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

        Intel Core i9-9900

        More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

        Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

        Memory

        Can support faster memory that speeds up system performance.

        AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

        This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

        More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

        Intel Atom x5-Z8350

        Maximum amount of memory (RAM).

        Intel Xeon E7-8830

        The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

        Intel Xeon Gold 5115

        The memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

        Intel Celeron G4930T

        Intel Core i7-4790K

        Intel Core i7-6700

        Functions

        Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to save power and reduce noise when it is under light load.

        Intel Core i7-4790K

        Intel Core i7-6700

        AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

        Intel Core i7-4790K

        Intel Core i7-6700

        It’s easier to get higher quality using virtualization if it’s hardware supported.

        Intel Core i7-4790K

        Intel Core i7-6700

        Many Intel processors use Hyperthreading technology, which means that each processor core can run on two threads at the same time, rather than most processors that run on a single thread for each core. This means you will get better quality in some applications.

        Intel Core i7-4790K

        Intel Core i7-6700

        Intel’s advanced transistor technology for low power consumption and high speed.

        Intel Core i7-4790K

        Intel Core i7-6700

        SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

        lightalex: it seems to be enough with a margin (and this is good), but I won’t give a tooth. There are all sorts of calculators for this)
        The block itself is good, I have the same one on one of the PCs.
        And your assembly is not budgetary, $2k is just the price of a very good self-assembly.

        PS when I was building a computer for myself, I took iron in different places — something in yulmart (out of habit + the guarantee works well for them), something in NIKS, and something in Regard. Regards usually have good prices, by the way, if something is not available in the place where you get the main one, it makes sense to look at them.

        Comparison of Intel Core i7-6700K and Intel Core i7-479 processors0 for all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Picture-in-Graphics Quality, Graphics API Support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization. Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).

        Benefits

        Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-6700K

        • Newer processor, release date difference 1 year(s) 4 month(s)
        • Processor unlocked, unlocked multiplier allows easy overclocking
        • Approximately 5% higher clock speed: 4.20 GHz vs 4.00 GHz
        • A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 22 nm
        • Maximum memory size is 2 times larger: 64 GB vs 32 GB
        • Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark about 3% higher: 2354 vs 2282
        • Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 11% higher: 11109 vs 9989
        • Approximately 25% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 5337 vs 4268
        • Approximately 29% improvement in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 17520 vs 13596
        • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 18% better: 6.218 vs 5.25
        • Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 14% better: 101.876 vs 89.166
        • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 14% better: 0.744 vs 0.65
        • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — V >
        Features
        Issue date 5 August 2015 vs 1 April 2014
        Unlocked Unlocked / Locked
        Maximum frequency 4.20 GHz vs 4.00 GHz
        Process 14 nm vs 22 nm
        Maximum memory size 64 GB vs 32 GB
        Benchmarks
        PassMark — Single thread mark 2354 vs 2282
        PassMark — CPU mark 11109 vs 9989
        Geekbench 4 — Single Core 5337 vs 4268
        Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 17520 vs 13596
        CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.218 vs 5.25
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 101.876 vs 89.166
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.744 vs 0.65
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.978 vs 2.585
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.351 vs 6.435
        GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1759 vs 1231
        GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3153 vs 2175
        GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1759 vs 1231
        GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3153 vs 2175

        Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-4790

        • About 14% more max core temperature: 72.72°C vs 64°C
        • Approximately 8% less power consumption: 84 Watt vs 91 Watt
        • Performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) about 13% better: 3803 vs 3359
        • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 13% higher: 3803 vs 3359
        Features
        Maximum core temperature 72.72°C vs 64°C
        Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt vs 91 Watt
        Benchmarks
        GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3803 vs 3359
        GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3803 vs 3359

        Benchmark comparison

        CPU 1: Intel Core i7-6700K
        CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4790

        I7 4770 vs i5 4690k • Web cheat sheet for internet entrepreneurs!

        Content

        • 1 Advantages
          • 1.1 reasons to choose the Intel Core i5-4690k
          • 1.2 reasons to select Intel Core i7-4770
          • 2 Comparison of Benchmarks
          • 3 Why Intel Core i5-4690k 4770?
          • 4 Why Intel Core i7-4770 is better than Intel Core i5-46

            Benefits

            Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-4690K

            • Newer processor, release date difference 1 year(s) 0 month(s)
            • Processor unlocked, unlocked multiplier allows easy overclocking
            • Approximately 11% improvement in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 4599 vs 4144
            • Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 3% better: 6.449 vs 6.277
            • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 7% better: 1338 vs 1252
            • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) about 4% better: 4198 vs 4025
            • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) about 7% more: 1338 vs 1252
            • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 4% more: 4198 vs 4025
            Features
            Issue date June 2014 vs June 2013
            Unlocked Unlocked / Locked
            Benchmarks
            PassMark — Single thread mark 2235 vs 2227
            Geekbench 4 — Single Core 4599 vs 4144
            CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 6.449vs 6.277
            GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1338 vs 1252
            GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 4198 vs 4025
            GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1338 vs 1252
            GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 4198 vs 4025

            Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-4770

            • 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
            • The L3 cache is about 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
            • Approximately 5% less power consumption: 84 Watt vs 88 Watt
            • Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 25% higher: 9781 vs 7799
            • Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance about 1% better: 13227 vs 13117
            • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 30% better: 5.229 vs 4.02
            • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 5% faster performance: 86.045 vs 81.973
            • Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 39% better: 0.647 vs 0.467
            • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — V >
            Features
            Number of threads 8 vs 4
            Level 3 cache 8192 KB (shared) vs 6144 KB (shared)
            Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt vs 88 Watt
            Benchmarks
            PassMark — CPU mark 9781 vs 7799
            Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 13227 vs 13117
            CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.229 vs 4.02
            CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 86.045 vs 81.973
            CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.647 vs 0.467
            CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2. 542 vs 2.258
            GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 2385 vs 2335
            GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 2385 vs 2335

            Benchmark comparison0K better than Intel Core i7-4770?

            • 2.94% higher CPU clock speed
              4 x 3.5GHz vs 4 x 3.4GHz
            • Has unlocked multiplier

            Why is Intel Core i7-4770 better than Intel Core i5-4690K?

            • 4 more CPU threads

            What are the most popular comparisons?

            Intel Core i5-4690K

            Intel Core i7-4790K

            Intel Core i7-4770

            Intel Core i5-4690K

            Intel Core i7-3770

            Intel Core i7-4770

            Intel Core i7-3770

            Intel Core i5-46903

            Intel Core I5-9600K

            Intel Core i7-47770

            ,0003

            ,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,000 9000

            ,0003 Intel Core i5-4690K

            AMD Ryzen 5 2600

            Intel Core i7-4770

            Intel Xeon E3-1220 V3

            Intel Core i5-4690k

            AMD Ryzen 5 2600

            Intel Core i5-4690K

            Intel Core i7-4770K

            Intel Core i7-4770

            Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3

            Intel Core i5-4690K

            AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

            Intel Core i7-4770

            Intel Core i5-4690K

            AMD Opteron 6328

            Intel Core i7-4770

            Intel Core i7-4770K

            Intel Core i5-46903

            Intel Core

            I7-4770 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Core i5-7400

            General Information

            The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

            AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

            The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.

            Intel Atom E3805

            A smaller size indicates a newer chip manufacturing process.

            AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

            32-bit operating system can support up to 4 GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4 GB, which improves performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.

            Intel Core i5-4690K

            Intel Core i7-4770

            When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

            Intel Core i7-4930MX

            PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.

            AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

            Performance

            Intel Xeon Platinum 9282

            More L2 flash memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

            Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

            More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

            AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

            More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

            Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

            When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

            Intel Core i9-9900

            More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

            Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

            Memory

            Can support faster memory that speeds up system performance.

            AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

            This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

            More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

            Intel Atom x5-Z8350

            Maximum amount of memory (RAM).

            Intel Xeon E7-8830

            Features

            Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under light load.

            Intel Core i5-4690K

            Intel Core i7-4770

            AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

            Intel Core i5-4690K

            Intel Core i7-4770

            It’s easier to get better quality using virtualization if it’s hardware supported.

            Intel Core i5-4690K

            Intel Core i7-4770

            Many Intel processors use Hyperthreading technology, which means that each processor core can run on two threads at the same time, rather than most processors that run on a single thread for each core. This means you will get better quality in some applications.

            Intel Core i5-4690K

            Intel Core i7-4770

            Intel’s advanced transistor technology for low power consumption and high speed.

            Intel Core i5-4690K

            Intel Core i7-4770

            SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

            We have already got acquainted with Intel’s solutions, which belong to the lower half of the mass segment of desktop processors, having tested both Pentium and Core i3. It’s time to move higher, but for now we will not be tied to the possibilities for games — there will be tests with a discrete graphics card this year, but later. Today we will see what the company can offer to a wealthy, but not very concerned about games buyer 🙂

            Test stand configuration

            Processor Intel Core i3-4170 Intel Core i5-4690K Intel Core i7-4770K Intel Core i7-4785T Intel Core i7-4790K
            Kernel name Haswell Haswell Haswell Haswell Haswell
            Technology 22 nm 22 nm 22 nm 22 nm 22 nm
            Core frequency, GHz 3.7 3.5/3.9 3.5/3.9 2.2/3.2 4.0/4.4
            Cores/Threads 2/4 4/4 4/8 4/8 4/8
            L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 64/64 128/128 128/128 128/128 128/128
            L2 cache, KB 2×256 4×256 4×256 4×256 4×256
            L3 cache, MiB 3 6 8 8 8
            RAM 2×DDR3-1600 2×DDR3-1600 2×DDR3-1600 2×DDR3-1600 2×DDR3-1600
            TDP, W 53 88 84 35 88
            Graphics HDG 4400 HDG 4600 HDG 4600 HDG 4600 HDG 4600
            Quantity EU 20 20 20 20 20
            Frequency std/max, MHz 350/1150 350/1200 350/1250 350/1200 350/1250
            Price T-12515768 T-10887398 T-10384297 T-10820116 T-10820114

            The minimum today will be the Core i3-4170, which at the same time remains almost the fastest Core i3 of the desktop line (models 4360 and 4370 surpass it only slightly, and we haven’t tested them using the new method yet). And since it is the fastest in its sub-line, it makes sense to test also the fastest Core i5 and i7 — 4690K and 4790K. The previous flagship of the line, namely the Core i7-4770K, will also come in handy for us — it runs at the same clock speeds as the i5-4690K, so a direct comparison of these models is very revealing. And one more processor — Core i7-4785T is also the fastest, but in its class. The fact is that the heat pack of this model is only 35 W, which is even better than many mobile processors. Naturally, this is not given for nothing, so it works at clock frequencies around 3 GHz, or even lower, but otherwise it is a full-fledged Core i7, and not all Pentium and Core i3. The truth is how this will affect — without tests it is not known. That’s what we’re going to do now.

            As for other test conditions, they were equal, but not the same: all processors were tested exclusively using integrated graphics, and the frequency of RAM was the maximum supported by the specifications. But its volume (8 GB) and system drive (Toshiba THNSNh356GMCT, 256 GB) were the same for all subjects.

            Test methodology

            To evaluate performance, we used our performance measurement methodology using iXBT Application Benchmark 2015 and iXBT Game Benchmark 2015. We normalized all test results in the first benchmark against the results of the reference system, which this year will be the same for laptops , and for all other computers, which is designed to make it easier for readers to compare and choose:

            graphics driver video driver version

            Processor Intel Core i5-3317U
            Chipset Intel HM77 Express
            Memory 4 GB DDR3-1600 (dual channel)
            Graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000
            Accumulator SSD 128 GB Crucial M4-CT128M4SSD1
            Operating system Windows 8 (64-bit)
            Intel 9. 18.10.3186

            iXBT Application Benchmark 2015

            Result. Funny. Well, firstly, the Core i7-4785T turned out to be equal to the i5-4690K — even clock speeds did not help the latter. However, they should not be neglected either — the i7-4770K running on the same i5-4690K outperformed the i5-4690K by 22%, however, as we can see, sometimes the frequency can be exchanged for a “cramped case” without losing performance. And regarding both older Core i7s, you can see that they are about twice as fast as the Core i3-4170, which is not surprising: in terms of the processor component, i3 is just half the i7 about 🙂

            However, it is not always possible to load all the cores and threads with work — especially when there are already eight of the latter (ie, as in desktop Core i7 or older representatives of the AMD FX line). Therefore, here the difference between 4770K and 4690K is reduced to 10% — Hyper-Threading is still not useless, but not as useful as in the previous group. Here are the «real» cores — as before they are useful: both in the first and in the second group of programs, the 4690K bypassed the i3-4370 by about one and a half times. And the 4785T in such conditions can only compete with the Core i3. However, it is still the fastest, but not so much that it is considered fundamental.

            As we said last time, desktop Core i3 are the best processors for working with graphics when money matters the older Core i7 is now one and a half times faster, and this is a lot. But the older one is with its frequencies above 4 GHz. And the 4785T proves convincingly that multithreading alone in many programs is still not enough to get good results.

            Especially when it comes to such «reserves of legacy code» — all that older Cores can oppose to younger ones is a slightly higher clock frequency. That’s when they can — something happens. And when they can’t, it’s all very sad.

            Audition somehow scales, and it gets better with each version, but in practice this is noticeable only in the case of older Core i5 and i7. The 4785T is only slightly faster than the 4170, so we can assume that it has nothing to do in a «regular» case. And in a very small one, it may turn out to be a good solution, provided, of course, that the buyer does not find it possible to save money by buying one of the younger models of the “T” family: remember that the 4170T lagged behind the 4170 here by only 16%, which is not is fundamental 🙂

            But if you can load all the cores, then, of course, there is nothing to catch even the Core i5, not to mention the Core i3: and the i5-4690K is still 10% behind the i7-4785T, i.e. the 35W limit isn’t too bad for a quad-core Haswell. On the other hand, it is clear that you only need to “clamp” like this if you really need it: in fact, the price of this processor is somewhere at the level of the Core i7-4770 (without indexes), and the performance in this case differs by 20%. Yes, and the Core i5-4690K is slower by 10%, but at the same time cheaper by one and a half times. In general, everything is good in moderation. In classic desktops, you can also use processors with TDP> 65 W (yes, even 150 W), in more compact computers, S and T should already be used: 65/45/35 W. The same 4785T, in principle, can already be packed in a liter case or less, i.e. to make something «NUC-shaped», but, nevertheless, very powerful. There would be demand 🙂

            Archivers are still holding back the single-threaded process of unpacking data (and you have to do this much more often than packing them), so the performance of the test subjects against the background of the Core i3-4170 does not cause much reverence.

            An easily explainable picture — in fact, the processors on the first three lines have approximately the same frequency when loading one or two cores, the 4785T has the lowest frequency among others (even in boost mode), and the 4790K has the highest.

            In file operations, the only obvious outsider is 4785T again. And again, apparently, because of the clock frequency — «lazier» it exits idle mode.

            Finally, we come to such a picture. The performance of modern processors depends on the price in a non-linear way, so paying twice as much for a Core i7 instead of a Core i3, you will get on average only one and a half times better performance. However, this is not so little, so if the financial aspect is not of decisive importance (especially since the difference becomes much smaller against the background of the cost of the entire computer), there is a point in acquiring a Core i5 or i7. But not everyone — i7-4785T is essentially a «thing in itself», loosely connected with the main line. But if you need something small, the buyer has no other way. However, the good news is that you can get the performance level of «regular» i3 and i5 in this case. Let it be expensive enough.

            Gaming applications

            For obvious reasons, for computer systems of this level, we limit ourselves to the minimum quality mode, not only in «full» resolution, but also with its reduction to 1366×768. Despite the fact that the integrated graphics of desktop processors of the A10 line is the best on the market, even it is not yet able to satisfy the demanding gamer in terms of picture quality. This is especially true for Intel processors, where graphics are even weaker in most models. But if you voluntarily agree to the «minimal wages», you can save a lot. We already know this well from previous tests, but today we’ll just see how our updated gaming set works on these processors.

            Formally, the graphics core in all processors is the same — HDG 4600. In fact, the difference between Core i3 and older models is visible even in this game, which is not related to processor-dependent ones. But the difference is quantitative, not qualitative — for HD there is enough for everyone, for FHD no one.

            As has been said more than once, single-threaded performance matters, and it is close for four out of five processors. However, at the minimum, all five are enough for FHD, so there is nothing more to find out here.

            Another CPU-intensive game, but optimized for multiple threads. However, «several» and in her case is far from eight, so that all our subjects are approximately equal. Is the Core i3-4170 a little behind the others, but it is already enough for FHD resolution, and it is difficult to demand more from games on integrated graphics.

            A quad-core processor would be better for Metro games too. They are also very demanding on the graphics adapter, but in general, as we can see, on the Core i5 / i7 there is a clear transition from quantity to quality — you can already play at least at a reduced resolution. However, if you have even an inexpensive video card, a Pentium is also suitable, and in FHD, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves, revealing the topic of one of the following materials 🙂

            This is not the first time Hitman has been identical to Metro.

            Well, for Thief, no integrated graphics solutions are yet suitable at all.

            But Tomb Raider is able to “adapt” well to different hardware, so here again we are seeing a transition from Core i3 to Core i5, but in FHD.

            What can not be said about these two games. The first simply does not lend itself to integrated Intel graphics, and the second can be played on Core i3 (but only in HD), and a more expensive processor does not fundamentally change anything.

            In general, nothing unexpected, except that with the formal identity of the GPU in all the tested processors, the older models in terms of games are able to do what the younger ones are not capable of. On the other hand, the absolute performance indicators are such that. If you are interested in games, you should not limit yourself to integrated video. It is better to save on the processor than on the video card. In any case, this is true for four out of five processors. But the Core i7-4785T is a special case: as it has already been said more than once, it needs to work in harsh conditions (it is better to put a model with a “regular” heat pack in a regular PC), where it is hardly possible to use a discrete video card. So here the fact that in games it is not inferior to other top models is very pleasing.

            Total

            We haven’t learned anything fundamentally new today, since all these processors have been tested in one form or another before. In the Intel range, the Core i5 is slightly faster on average than the Core i3, but falls behind the Core i7. Considering the existence of Celeron and Pentium (including processors with low power consumption), the junior and senior models of desktop families differ by about an order of magnitude: the Pentium J2900 is about six times slower than the Core i7-4790K, but now it belongs to desktop processors and the slower Celeron J1800, which at one time lagged behind the J29 in our tests according to the previous version of the methodology00 a little more than one and a half times. And above there are also processors for LGA2011 with up to six or eight cores, which are even faster than representatives of the LGA1150 mass platform. In a word, everything is fine: from the point of view of the processor component, each buyer can find something suitable for himself both in terms of performance and price (the latter, by the way, also differs by 25 or 8 times even within the LGA1150, which quite noticeable). The only thing that still leaves much to be desired is the performance of the integrated graphics core, which even in older models does not allow you to fully play games. Something works, of course, but only at low resolutions and low image quality. So in some areas of application, one processor cannot be limited so far — you will have to purchase a discrete video card.

            Only one processor, Core i7-4785T, turned out to be essentially new for us today. A very specific solution, which has an even lower TDP than most laptop quad-core processors, but its performance is adequate. However, any complaints can be made against it only when compared with the «regular» desktop models of the same family — as we saw today, on average it turns out to be approximately equal to the younger Core i5 models, and sometimes it overtakes the older ones. This allows you to create compact, but powerful enough computers based on the LGA1150, which increases the versatility of the platform. But, of course, these platforms will not be gaming — the graphics capabilities of the Core i7-4785T are as modest as those of «regular» models, and more or less decent gaming video cards make much more serious demands on the cooling system than any processors.