Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i7-4790K: What is the difference?
61points
Intel Core i5-9600K
51points
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i5-9600K
Intel Core i7-4790K
Why is Intel Core i5-9600K better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
- 38.75% faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.7GHzvs4 x 4GHz - 1066MHz higher ram speed?
2666MHzvs1600MHz - 25.96°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs74.04°C - 8nm smaller semiconductor size?
14nmvs22nm - 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
1.5MBvs1MB - 34.48% higher PassMark result?
10878vs8089 - 1MB bigger L3 cache?
9MBvs8MB - 128KB bigger L1 cache?
384KBvs256KB
Why is Intel Core i7-4790K better than Intel Core i5-9600K?
- 2 more CPU threads?
8vs6 - 7W lower TDP?
88Wvs95W - 0. 5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
2MB/corevs1.5MB/core - Uses multithreading?
- 100MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1250MHzvs1150MHz - 3 higher clock multiplier?
40vs37
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
vs
Intel Core i7-11800H
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
vs
Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i5-9600K
1 User reviews
Intel Core i5-9600K
10. 0/10
1 User reviews
Intel Core i7-4790K
2 User reviews
Intel Core i7-4790K
9.5/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
1 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Gaming
10.0/10
1 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
8.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.7GHz
4 x 4GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.6GHz
4.4GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8. L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
1.5MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2666MHz
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
41.6GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5. maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖Intel Core i5-9600K
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
303.7seconds
423.2seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
980.5seconds
1320.7seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i5-9600K
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K — Fortnite Battle Royale with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3. 60GHz
Fortnite Battle Royale
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz
i7-4790
i5-9600K
Multi-Thread Performance
9989 Pts
13352 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2283 Pts
2677 Pts
Fortnite Battle Royale
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K in Fortnite Battle Royale using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-4790
i5-9600K
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
76.3 FPS |
1080p |
87.0 FPS |
1440p |
49.8 FPS |
1440p |
56.8 FPS |
2160p |
26.9 FPS |
2160p |
30.7 FPS |
w1440p |
41.1 FPS |
w1440p |
46. 8 FPS |
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
125.4 FPS |
1080p |
140.1 FPS |
1440p |
87.1 FPS |
1440p |
97.5 FPS |
2160p |
51.2 FPS |
2160p |
57.4 FPS |
w1440p |
73.9 FPS |
w1440p |
82.6 FPS |
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
174.5 FPS |
1080p |
193.2 FPS |
1440p |
124.5 FPS |
1440p |
138.3 FPS |
2160p |
75.5 FPS |
2160p |
84.2 FPS |
w1440p |
106. 7 FPS |
w1440p |
118.4 FPS |
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
272.6 FPS |
1080p |
299.4 FPS |
1440p |
199.2 FPS |
1440p |
219.7 FPS |
2160p |
124.2 FPS |
2160p |
137.6 FPS |
w1440p |
172.3 FPS |
w1440p |
190.1 FPS |
i7-4790
- The i7-4790 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The i7-4790 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-9600K
- The i5-9600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The i5-9600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The i5-9600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
- The i5-9600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Compare i7-4790 vs i5-9600K specifications
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Architecture
i7-4790 | i5-9600K | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Haswell | Coffee Lake |
Generation | Core i7 (Haswell) |
Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Part# | unknown | SR3WZ |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | May 2014 | Oct 2018 |
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Cache
i7-4790 | i5-9600K | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 8MB (shared) | 9MB (shared) |
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Cores
i7-4790 | i5-9600K | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 4 | 6 |
# of Threads | 8 | 6 |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | N/A |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Features
i7-4790 | i5-9600K | |
---|---|---|
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4. 2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 vPro Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Performance
i7-4790 | i5-9600K | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Multiplier | 36.0x | 37.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
TDP | 84 W | 95 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 4 GHz | up to 4.6 GHz |
Voltage | unknown | variable |
i7-4790 vs i5-9600K Physical
i7-4790 | i5-9600K | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | 177 mm² | unknown |
Foundry | Intel | Intel |
Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
Process Size | 22 nm | 14 nm |
Socket | Intel Socket 1150 | Intel Socket 1151 |
Transistors | 1400 million | unknown |
tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 96
Compare i7-4790 vs i5-9600K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i7-4790
Summary
-
Intel Core i5-9600K
141%
-
Intel Core i7-4790
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i5-9600K
121%
-
Intel Core i7-4790
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i5-9600K
162%
-
Intel Core i7-4790
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-9600K |
Much higher single threaded performance (around 21% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 62% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Around 41% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-4790 |
None |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-9600K
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-9600K
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
Intel Core i5-9600K | Intel Core i7-4790 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMX | ||||
SSE | ||||
SSE2 | ||||
SSE3 | ||||
SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 2 | ||||
AVX | ||||
AVX2 | ||||
EIST | ||||
Intel 64 | ||||
XD bit | ||||
VT-x | ||||
VT-d | ||||
AES-NI | ||||
TSX | ||||
TXT | ||||
CLMUL | ||||
FMA3 | ||||
F16C | ||||
BMI1 | ||||
BMI2 | ||||
Boost 2.0 | ||||
HTT | ||||
vPro |
Architecture
Intel Core i5-9600K | Intel Core i7-4790 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | Intel_Coffelake | vs | Intel_Haswell | |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR3 | |
Codename | Coffee Lake | vs | Haswell | |
Release Date | Sep 2018 | vs | May 2014 |
Cores
Intel Core i5-9600K | Intel Core i7-4790 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cores | 6 | vs | 4 | |
Threads | 6 | vs | 8 | |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | vs | Intel HD 4600 |
Cache
Intel Core i5-9600K | Intel Core i7-4790 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
L3 Cache | 9216 KB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
Intel Core i5-9600K | Intel Core i7-4790 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | vs | Intel Socket 1150 | |
Max Case Temp | 72°C | vs | 72°C | |
Package | FC-LGA1151 | vs | ||
Die Size | unknown | vs | 177mm² | |
Process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
Intel Core i5-9600K | Intel Core i7-4790 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cpu Frequency | 3700 MHz | vs | 3500 MHz | |
Turbo Clock | 4500 MHz | vs | 3900 MHz | |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
Voltage | variable | vs | unknown | |
TDP | 95 W | vs | 84 W |
-
Intel Core i5-9600K
5400 points
-
Intel Core i7-4790
4368 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-9600K
26640 points
-
Intel Core i7-4790
18816 points
Points — higher is better
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
Intel Core i7-4790 vs.
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i7-4790
The Intel Core i7-4790 operates with 4 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.00 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 84 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2014
Intel Core i5-10400
The Intel Core i5-10400 operates with 6 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1200 CPU socket. This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Comet Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2020
Intel Core i7-4790
Intel Core i5-10400
Compare Detail
3.60 GHz | Frequency | 2.90 GHz |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4.00 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.30 GHz |
3.80 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 4.00 GHz |
Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
GPU |
Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
1.20 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.20 GHz |
22 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
1.20 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.20 GHz |
11.1 | DirectX Version | 12 |
3 | Max. displays | 3 |
DDR3-1600 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | No |
— | L2 Cache | — |
8. 00 MB | L3 Cache | 12.00 MB |
3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
16 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
22 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
LGA 1150 | Socket | LGA 1200 |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q2/2014 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Monero Hashrate kH/s
The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Intel Core i7-4790 | Intel Core i5-10400 | |
84 W | Max TDP | 65 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
CPU-Z Benchmark for Intel Core i7-4790 (1T)
Best CPU performance — 64-bit — October 2022
Intel Core i7-4790 (1T)
Back to validation
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i7-12700K
Intel Core i7-12700KF
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Intel Core i5-12600K
Intel Core i9-11900K
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Core i7-11700K
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-11700KF
Intel Core i5-11600K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i5-11600KF
Intel Core i7-11700
Intel Core i7-11700F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
Intel Core i5-11500
Intel Core i9-10900KF
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10850K
Intel Core i7-10700KF
Intel Core i5-11400
Intel Core i9-10900
Intel Core i5-11400F
Intel Core i5-11400H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
Intel Core i9-9900KF
Intel Core i7-9700KF
Intel Core i7-10700K
Intel Core i7-9700K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i5-10600KF
Intel Core i5-9600KF
Intel Core i7-10700
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i7-10700F
Intel Core i7-1165G7
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
Intel Core i7-9700F
Intel Core i7-9700
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel Core i5-9600K
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel Core i7-8700K
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Intel Core i5-8600K
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Intel Core i7-7700K
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Intel Core i7-10875H
Intel Core i5-7600K
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-8700
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Intel Core i7-10870H
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-10750H
Intel Core i3-10105F
Intel Core i3-9100F
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Core i5-8500
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
Intel Core i5-9400
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i3-10100F
Intel Core i5-6600K
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i5-10400F
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-9750H
Intel Core i5-8400
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel Core i7-7700
Intel Core i7-8750H
Intel Core i5-4690K
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i5-9300H
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i7-10510U
Intel Core i5-7500
Intel Core i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-4670K
Intel Core i7-8565U
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
(YOU) Intel Core i7-4790
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i5-10210U
Intel Core i5-4690
Intel Core i5-1035G1
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Core i7-4790
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i5-8265U
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core i3-1005G1
Intel Core i5-4590
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with
Intel Core i5-3570K
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core i7-3770K
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Core i7-8550U
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i3-7100
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Core i5-2500K
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i7-2600K
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
Intel Core i5-6400
Intel Core i3-6100
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
AMD Athlon 3000G
Intel Core i5-4440
Intel Core i3-4170
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel Pentium G4560
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i3-4160
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with
Intel Xeon E5-2689
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
Intel Core i7-7500U
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel Core i5-7200U
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i7-6500U
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-6300U
Intel Xeon E5450
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Core i5-3230M
Intel Core i3-2100
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i5 750
Intel Core i5-5200U
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Intel Core i5-2520M
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
Intel Core i5 650
Intel Core i5-3210M
Intel Core i7 920
AMD FX -8350
Intel Core i5-2450M
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
AMD FX -4300
AMD FX -8320
AMD FX -6300
Intel Core i5-2410M
AMD FX -8300
Intel Core i5-4210U
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Core i3-7020U
Pentium E5200
Intel Core i5-4200U
Intel Core i3-3110M
Intel Core i3-5005U
Intel Core i3-6006U
AMD Phenom II X4 955
Intel Core i3-4005U
Intel Core i7-4790 vs Intel Core i5-9600KF
|
|
|
Intel Core i7-4790 vs Intel Core i5-9600KF
Comparaison des caractéristiques techniques entre les processeurs, avec le Intel Core i7-4790 d’un côté et le Intel Core i5-9600KF de l’autre. Le premier est dédié au secteur ordinateur de bureau, il dispose de 4 coeurs, 8 threads, une fréquence maximale de 4,0 GHz. Le second est employé sur le segment ordinateur de bureau, il possède un total de 6 coeurs, 6 threads, sa fréquence turbo s’établit à 4,6 GHz. Le tableau suivant permet aussi de comparer la lithographie, le nombre de transistors (si indiqué), la quantité de mémoire cache, la capacité maximale de mémoire RAM, le type de mémoire accepté, la date de première diffusion, le nombre maximal de lignes PCIe, les valeurs obtenues dans Geekbench 4 et Cinebench R15.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.
Cette page contient des références aux produits d’un ou de plusieurs de nos annonceurs. Nous pouvons recevoir une compensation lorsque vous cliquez sur des liens vers ces produits. Pour une explication de notre politique publicitaire, veuillez visiter cette page.
Caractéristiques :
Processeur | Intel Core i7-4790 | Intel Core i5-9600KF | ||||||
Marché (principal) | Ordinateur de bureau | Ordinateur de bureau | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Haswell | Coffee Lake | ||||||
Nom de base | Haswell-DT | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
Famille | Core i7-4000 | Core i5-9000 | ||||||
Numéro(s) de pièce, S-Spec | BX80646I74790, BXC80646I74790, CM8064601560113, SR1QF, QF4D |
BX80684I59600KF, SRFAD |
||||||
Date de lancement | Q2 2014 | Q1 2019 | ||||||
Lithographie | 22 nm | 14 nm++ | ||||||
Transistors | 1. 400.000.000 | — | ||||||
Cœurs | 4 | 6 | ||||||
Threads | 8 | 6 | ||||||
Fréquence de base | 3,6 GHz | 3,7 GHz | ||||||
Fréquence turbo | 4,0 GHz | 4,6 GHz | ||||||
Vitesse du bus | 5 GT/s | 8 GT/s | ||||||
Mémoire cache | 8 MB | 9 MB | ||||||
Capacité mémoire maxi | 32 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
Types de mémoire | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
DDR4-2666 | ||||||
Nb. max. de canaux mémoire | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Bande passante mémoire maxi | 25,6 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
Lignes PCIe max | 16 | 16 | ||||||
PDT | 84 W | 95 W | ||||||
Alimentation système recommandée | Alimentation PC de 600W | Alimentation PC de 600W | ||||||
GPU intégré | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Aucun | ||||||
GPU, unités d’exécution | 20 | — | ||||||
GPU, unités de calcul shader | 160 | — | ||||||
GPU, cadence de base | 300 MHz | — | ||||||
GPU, cadence maxi | 1200 MHz | — | ||||||
GPU, point flottant FP32 | 352 GFLOPS | — | ||||||
Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1151 | ||||||
Carte mère compatible | Carte mère Socket LGA 1150 | Carte mère Socket LGA 1151 | ||||||
Température maximale | 72. 7°C | 100°C | ||||||
CPU-Z simple thread | 405 | 504 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 2.095 | 2.885 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 simple thread | 165 | 202 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 746 | 1.123 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 simple thread | 379 | 464 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1.716 | 2.527 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 simple thread | 884 | 1.437 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 4. 555 | 8.661 | ||||||
PassMark simple thread | 2.217 | 2.788 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 7.196 | 10.841 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 simple cœur |
4.319 | 5.782 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-cœur |
13.768 | 22.609 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 simple cœur |
986 | 1.226 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-cœur |
3.455 | 5.719 | ||||||
(SGEMM) Performance en GFLOPS |
215,5 GFLOPS | 397,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Performance multi-cœur / watt) Rapport performance / watt |
164 pts / W | 238 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.
On peut ainsi mieux comparer quelles sont les différences techniques entre les deux processeurs.
Alimentation système recommandée : on suppose que l’on possède une tour ATX, une carte graphique haut de gamme, 16GB de mémoire RAM, un disque SSD de 512GB, un disque dur HDD de 1TB, un lecteur Blu-Ray. Il faudra compter sur une alimentation plus puissante si on souhaite disposer de plusieurs cartes graphiques, plusieurs moniteurs, davantage de mémoire, etc.
Prix : pour des raisons techniques, nous ne pouvons pas afficher pour le moment un prix de moins de 24 heures, ou un prix en temps réel. C’est pourquoi on préfère pour l’instant ne pas faire apparaître de prix. Il faut vous référer aux boutiques en ligne respectives pour connaître le dernier prix, ainsi que la disponibilité.
Le processeur Intel Core i5-9600KF a un plus grand nombre de cœurs, la fréquence turbo du Intel Core i5-9600KF est plus grande, que le PDT du Intel Core i7-4790 est plus basse. Le Intel Core i5-9600KF a été lancé plus récemment.
Performances :
Comparaison des performances entre les deux processeurs, pour cela on considère les résultats générés sur des logiciels de benchmarks tels que Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Score multi-thread & simple thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF |
504 2.885 |
Intel Core i7-4790 |
405 2.095 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 24%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 38%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
CPU-Z est un logiciel d’information système qui fournit le nom du processeur, son numéro de modèle, le nom de code, les niveaux de cache, le package, le processus. Il peut également délivrer des données sur la carte mère, la mémoire. Il fait des mesures en temps réel, avec enfin un benchmark pour le simple thread, ainsi que pour le multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Score multi-thread & simple thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF |
202 1.123 |
Intel Core i7-4790 |
165 746 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 22%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 51%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Cinebench R15 permet d’évaluer les performances de calculs du CPU en restituant une scène 3D photoréaliste. La scène possède 2 000 objets, 300 000 polygones, utilise des reflets nets et flous, des zones lumineuses, des ombres, des shaders procéduraux, un antialiasing, etc. Plus le rendu de la scène est rapidement créée, plus le PC est puissant, avec un nombre élevé de points.
Cinebench R20 — Score multi-thread & simple thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF |
464 2.527 |
Intel Core i7-4790 |
379 1.716 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 22%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 47%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Cinebench R20 est un logiciel de test multi-plateformes qui permet d’évaluer les capacités matérielles d’un appareil tel qu’un ordinateur, une tablette, un serveur. Cette version de Cinebench prend en compte les évolutions récentes des processeurs avec de multiples cœurs et les dernières améliorations de techniques de rendu. L’évaluation est au final encore plus pertinente.
Cinebench R23 — Score multi-thread & simple thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF |
1.437 8.661 |
Intel Core i7-4790 |
884 4.555 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 63%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 90%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Cinebench R23 est un logiciel de test multi-plateformes qui permet d’évaluer les capacités matérielles d’un appareil tel qu’un ordinateur, une tablette, un serveur. Cette version de Cinebench prend en compte les évolutions récentes des processeurs avec de multiples cœurs et les dernières améliorations de techniques de rendu. L’évaluation est au final encore plus pertinente. La scène de test contient pas moins de 2 000 objets et plus de 300 000 polygones au total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & simple thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF |
2.788 10.841 |
Intel Core i7-4790 |
2.217 7.196 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 26%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 51%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
PassMark est un logiciel de benchmarks, qui fait plusieurs tests de performance, notamment, sur les nombres premiers, les nombres entiers, la virgule flottante, la compression, la physique, les instructions étendues, l’encodage, le triage. Plus le score est élevé, plus l’appareil a des capacités importantes.
Sur Windows 64-bit :
Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF |
5.782 22.609 |
Intel Core i7-4790 |
4.319 13.768 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 34%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 64%.
Sur Linux 64-bit :
Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF |
5.970 22.082 |
Intel Core i7-4790 |
4.893 16.323 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 22%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 35%.
Sur Mac OS X 64-bit :
Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF |
6.137 24.943 |
Intel Core i7-4790 |
4.570 15.280 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 34%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 63%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Geekbench 4 est une plateforme de benchmarks complète avec plusieurs types de tests, dont la compression de données, d’images, le cryptage en AES, l’encodage en SQL, en HTML, le rendu d’un fichier PDF, le calcul matriciel, de Transformation de Fourier rapide, la simulation d’objets en 3D, l’édition de photos, des tests sur la mémoire. Cela nous permet de mieux visualiser la puissance respective de ces appareils. Pour chaque résultat, on a pris une moyenne de 250 valeurs sur le fameux logiciel de benchmarks.
Sur Windows :
Geekbench 5 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Windows | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF |
1.226 5.719 |
Intel Core i7-4790 |
986 3.455 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 24%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 66%.
Sur Linux :
Geekbench 5 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Linux | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF |
1.372 6.213 |
Intel Core i7-4790 |
1.039 3.715 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 32%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 67%.
Sur macOS :
Geekbench 5 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — macOS | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF |
1.136 5.507 |
Intel Core i7-4790 |
998 3.849 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 14%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 43%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Geekbench 5 est un logiciel de mesure de performance d’un système informatique, pour appareils fixes, appareils mobiles, serveurs. Cette plateforme permet de mieux comparer la puissance du CPU, la puissance de calcul et de la comparer avec des systèmes similaires ou totalement différents. Geekbench 5 inclut de nouvelles charges de travail qui représentent des tâches de travail et des applications que l’on retrouve dans la réalité.
Équivalence :
Intel Core i7-4790 équivalent AMDIntel Core i5-9600KF équivalent AMD
Voir aussi :
Intel Core i7-4790KIntel Core i7-4790S
Intel Core i5-9600K
Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i7-4790K: What is the difference?
61 BALLLA
Intel Core i5-9600k
51 Ballla
Intel Core i7-4790k
64 Facts compared to
Intel i5-9600K
9000 9000 9000 9000 Is 9600K better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
- 38.75% higher CPU speed?
6 x 3.7GHz vs 4 x 4GHz - 1066MHz higher RAM speed?
2666MHz vs 1600MHz - 25.96°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 74. 04°C - Are 8nm semiconductors smaller?
14nm vs 22nm - 0.5MB more L2 cache?
1.5MB vs 1MB - 34.48% higher PassMark score?
10878 vs 8089 - 1MB more L3 cache?
9MB vs 8MB - 128KB more L1 cache?
384KB vs 256KB
- 2 more CPU threads?
8 vs 6 - 7W below TDP?
88W vs 95W - 0.5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
2MB/core vs 1.5MB/core - Uses multithreading?
- 100MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1250MHz vs 1150MHz - 3 higher hour multiplier?
40 vs 37
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i5-9600k
VS
Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i7-4790K
VS
Intel Core I5-46903
9000 9000 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i5-9600k
VS
Intel Core i7-7700k
Intel Core i7-4790k
VS
Intel Core I3-10100
INTEL Core
VS 9000 VS 9000) 9700k
Intel Core i7-4790k
VS
Intel Core i7-4930K
Intel Core i5-9600K
VS
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS
Intel Core i5-9600k
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
Intel Core i7-4790K
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core I5-9600K
VS
I5-9400F
I5-9400F
I5-9400F 4790k
VS
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-9600k
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600x
I7-47903
VS 9000 9600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i5-9600K
vs
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
AMD RYZEN 5 1600
Comparison prices
Users reviews
General rating
Intel Core i5-9600K
1 Reviews Users
Intel Core i5-9600K
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
004 1 reviews of users
Intel Core i7-4790K
2 Reviews of users
Intel Core i7-4790k
/10
2 Reviews of Users
9000 10
1 Votes
9. 5 /10
2 Votes
Games
10.0 /10
1 VOTES
/10
9000 2 VOTES
performance
10.0 /10
1 Votes
/10
2 Votes
Reliability
10.0 9000
1 VOTES
9000.000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9EL
Energy efficiency
8.0 /10
1 votes
10.0 /10
2 votes
2 CPU speed
820003
6 x 3.7GHz
4 x 4GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.6GHz
4.4GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1.5MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2666MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
41.6GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4. Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Intel Core i5-9600K
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5. Result Cinebench R20 (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender test result (bmw27)
303.7seconds
423.2seconds
The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
980.5seconds
1320.7seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i5-9600K
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i5-9600K
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i5-9600K or Intel Core i7-4790K
- Main page
- >
Core i5-9600K
81.1 (+12.5%)
Core i7-4790K
71
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i5-9600K
79. 4 (+8.3%)
Core i7-4790K
72.8
Performance in day-to-day activities such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i5-9600K
50.4 (+13.7%)
Core i7-4790K
43.5
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
Core i5-9600K
77.2 (+8.5%)
Core i7-4790K
70.6
Demanding games and tasks
Core i5-9600K
56.1 (+19.8%)
Core i7-4790K
45
Extreme
Core i5-9600K
13.7 (+18.2%)
Core i7-4790K
11.2
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i5-9600K
1276 (+16.2%)
Intel Core i7-4790K
1069
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i5-9600K
7301 (+32.4 %)
Intel Core i7-4790K
4936
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Core i5-9600K
481 (+14.6%)
Intel Core i7-4790K
411
Cinebench R20 Multi Core
Intel Core i5-9600k
2624 (+24.5%)
Intel Core i7-4790k
1982
Cinebench R15 Single Core
Intel Core I5-9600K
204 (+17. 2%)
Intel Core I7-479
Cinebench R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i5-9600K
1165 (+26.7%)
Intel Core i7-4790K
854
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i5-9600K
1256 (+14.6 %)
Intel Core i7-4790K
1073
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i5-9600K
5643 (+29.1%)
Intel Core i7-4790K
4001
Blender 2.81 bmw27
Intel Core i5-9600K
318.4
Intel Core i7-4790k
407 (+21.8%)
Geekbench 3 Single Core
Intel Core i5-9600k
5065 (+15.1%) Intel Core I7-4790K
000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000. Multi Core
Intel Core i5-9600k
23045 (+27.6%)
Intel Core i7-4790K
16686
Cinebench R11 -4790k
1.97
Cinebench R11.5
Intel Core i5-9600K
12.3 (+21.4%)
Intel Core i7-4790k
Cinebench R111.
5 -9600K
52.6 (+36.5%)
Intel Core i7-4790k
33.4
Passmark
Intel Core i5-9600k
10831 (+25.6%)
Intel Core i7-4790k
8062
Characteristics
9000 be skipped existing functions.
Basic
Manufacturer Intel Intel DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i5-9600K Processor (9M Cache, up to 4.60 GHz) Intel® Core™ i7-4790K Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.40 GHz) ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Coffee Lake Devil’s Canyon Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 14 nm 22 nm Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 02-2021 10-2016 Model Official name. i5-9600K i7-4790K Cores The number of physical cores. 6 4 ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 6 8 Multithreading TechnologyWith Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.7 GHz 4 GHz Turbo frequency The maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 4.6 GHz 4.4 GHz L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 9 MB 8 MB Instructions 64-bit 64-bit Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 8 GT/s DMI3 5 GT/s DMI2 Number of QPI links TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 95 W 88W Cooling system specifications PCG 2015D (130W) PCG 2013D Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® UHD Graphics 630 Intel® HD Graphics 4600 GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 350 MHz 350 MHz Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. 1150 MHz 1250MHz Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. No data Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 3 RAM
Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 64 GB 32 GB Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR4-2666 DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2 RAM bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 25.6 GB/s ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 3 PCI configuration options
Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Number of PCI lanes 16 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data Decoration
Dimensions No data No data Sockets supported No data No data Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data Which is better
Intel Core i5-9600K
- On average, gaming performance is 10% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 7%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 3%.
- 2 more physical cores.
Intel Core i7-4790K
- The price is 210 $ down.
- The number of streams is 2 more.
- The base frequency is 0.3 GHz higher.
Comparison of Intel Core i5-9600K and Intel Core i7-4790K
Comparative analysis of the Intel Core i5-9600K and Intel Core i7-4790K processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability , Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection ( mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining ( mHash/s).Intel Core i5-9600K
versus
Intel Core i7-4790K
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-9600K
- Newer processor, release date difference 5 year(s) 4 month(s)
more possibility
run more applications at the same time: 6 vs 4
- About 5% more clock speed: 4.60 GHz vs 4.40 GHz
- About 35% more maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 74.04°C
- A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with less power consumption: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- L1 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access 50% more, means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L3 cache is about 13% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Maximum memory size is 4 times more(s): 128 GB vs 32 GB
- Approximately 12% increase in PassMark — Single thread mark performance: 2766 vs 2464
- Approximately 34% increase in PassMark — CPU mark performance: 10775 vs 8058
- Approx. % more: 1249 vs 1070
- About 40% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 5603 vs 3995
- About 31% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark: 5805 vs 4416
- About 69% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2162 vs 1279
- About 69% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2162 vs 1279
- 2 more threads: 8 vs 6
- Approximately 8% less power consumption: 88 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Approx. 58% more: 2489 vs 1574
- About 16% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 3454 vs 2984
- About 58% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 2489vs 1574
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 16% more: 3454 vs 2984
- The i7-4790K has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- i7-4790K The i7-4790K is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
- The i5-9600K has a higher level 3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- The i5-9600K has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
- The i5-9600K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
- i5-9600K The i5-9600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
- Why is Intel Core i7-4790K better than Intel Core i7-6700?
- Why is Intel Core i7-6700 better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
- What are the most popular comparisons?
- General information
- performance
- Memory
- Functions
- Advantages
- reasons to choose the Intel Core i7-6700K
- Reasons Choose Intel Core I7-4790
- Comparison of Benchmarkov
- 17. 65% higher CPU clock speed
4 x 4GHz vs 4 x 3.4GHz - 128KB more L1 cache
- 533MHz higher ram speed
- Newer processor, release date difference 1 year(s) 4 month(s)
- Processor unlocked, unlocked multiplier allows easy overclocking
- Approximately 5% higher clock speed: 4.20 GHz vs 4.00 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Maximum memory size is 2 times larger: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark about 3% higher: 2354 vs 2282
- Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 11% higher: 11109 vs 9989
- Approximately 25% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 5337 vs 4268
- Approximately 29% improvement in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 17520 vs 13596
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 18% better: 6.218 vs 5.25
- Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 14% better: 101.876 vs 89.166
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 14% better: 0.744 vs 0.65
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — V >
- About 14% more max core temperature: 72.72°C vs 64°C
- Approximately 8% less power consumption: 84 Watt vs 91 Watt
- Performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) about 13% better: 3803 vs 3359
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 13% higher: 3803 vs 3359
- 1 Advantages
- 1.1 reasons to choose the Intel Core i5-4690k
- 1.2 reasons to select Intel Core i7-4770
- 2 Comparison of Benchmarks
- 3 Why Intel Core i5-4690k 4770?
- 4 Why Intel Core i7-4770 is better than Intel Core i5-46
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-4690K
- Newer processor, release date difference 1 year(s) 0 month(s)
- Processor unlocked, unlocked multiplier allows easy overclocking
- Approximately 11% improvement in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 4599 vs 4144
- Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 3% better: 6.449 vs 6.277
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 7% better: 1338 vs 1252
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) about 4% better: 4198 vs 4025
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) about 7% more: 1338 vs 1252
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 4% more: 4198 vs 4025
Features Issue date June 2014 vs June 2013 Unlocked Unlocked / Locked Benchmarks PassMark — Single thread mark 2235 vs 2227 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 4599 vs 4144 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 6.449vs 6.277 GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1338 vs 1252 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 4198 vs 4025 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1338 vs 1252 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 4198 vs 4025 Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-4770
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- The L3 cache is about 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Approximately 5% less power consumption: 84 Watt vs 88 Watt
- Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 25% higher: 9781 vs 7799
- Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance about 1% better: 13227 vs 13117
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 30% better: 5.229 vs 4.02
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 5% faster performance: 86.045 vs 81.973
- Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 39% better: 0.647 vs 0.467
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — V >
Features Number of threads 8 vs 4 Level 3 cache 8192 KB (shared) vs 6144 KB (shared) Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt vs 88 Watt Benchmarks PassMark — CPU mark 9781 vs 7799 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 13227 vs 13117 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.229 vs 4.02 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 86.045 vs 81.973 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.647 vs 0.467 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2. 542 vs 2.258 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 2385 vs 2335 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 2385 vs 2335 Benchmark comparison0K better than Intel Core i7-4770?
- 2.94% higher CPU clock speed
4 x 3.5GHz vs 4 x 3.4GHz - Has unlocked multiplier
Why is Intel Core i7-4770 better than Intel Core i5-4690K?
- 4 more CPU threads
What are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-46903
Intel Core I5-9600K
Intel Core i7-47770
,0003
,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,000 9000
,0003 Intel Core i5-4690K
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V3
Intel Core i5-4690k
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Intel Core i5-4690K
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-4690K
AMD Opteron 6328
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i5-46903
Intel Core
I7-4770 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Core i5-7400
General Information
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.
Intel Atom E3805
A smaller size indicates a newer chip manufacturing process.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
32-bit operating system can support up to 4 GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4 GB, which improves performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-4770
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Intel Core i7-4930MX
PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Performance
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
More L2 flash memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
Intel Xeon Phi 7290F
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
Intel Xeon Phi 7290F
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Intel Core i9-9900
More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
Intel Xeon Phi 7290F
Memory
Can support faster memory that speeds up system performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
Intel Xeon E7-8830
Features
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under light load.
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-4770
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-4770
It’s easier to get better quality using virtualization if it’s hardware supported.
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-4770
Many Intel processors use Hyperthreading technology, which means that each processor core can run on two threads at the same time, rather than most processors that run on a single thread for each core. This means you will get better quality in some applications.
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel’s advanced transistor technology for low power consumption and high speed.
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-4770
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
We have already got acquainted with Intel’s solutions, which belong to the lower half of the mass segment of desktop processors, having tested both Pentium and Core i3. It’s time to move higher, but for now we will not be tied to the possibilities for games — there will be tests with a discrete graphics card this year, but later. Today we will see what the company can offer to a wealthy, but not very concerned about games buyer ?
Test stand configuration
Processor Intel Core i3-4170 Intel Core i5-4690K Intel Core i7-4770K Intel Core i7-4785T Intel Core i7-4790K Kernel name Haswell Haswell Haswell Haswell Haswell Technology 22 nm 22 nm 22 nm 22 nm 22 nm Core frequency, GHz 3.7 3.5/3.9 3.5/3.9 2.2/3.2 4.0/4.4 Cores/Threads 2/4 4/4 4/8 4/8 4/8 L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 64/64 128/128 128/128 128/128 128/128 L2 cache, KB 2×256 4×256 4×256 4×256 4×256 L3 cache, MiB 3 6 8 8 8 RAM 2×DDR3-1600 2×DDR3-1600 2×DDR3-1600 2×DDR3-1600 2×DDR3-1600 TDP, W 53 88 84 35 88 Graphics HDG 4400 HDG 4600 HDG 4600 HDG 4600 HDG 4600 Quantity EU 20 20 20 20 20 Frequency std/max, MHz 350/1150 350/1200 350/1250 350/1200 350/1250 Price T-12515768 T-10887398 T-10384297 T-10820116 T-10820114 The minimum today will be the Core i3-4170, which at the same time remains almost the fastest Core i3 of the desktop line (models 4360 and 4370 surpass it only slightly, and we haven’t tested them using the new method yet). And since it is the fastest in its sub-line, it makes sense to test also the fastest Core i5 and i7 — 4690K and 4790K. The previous flagship of the line, namely the Core i7-4770K, will also come in handy for us — it runs at the same clock speeds as the i5-4690K, so a direct comparison of these models is very revealing. And one more processor — Core i7-4785T is also the fastest, but in its class. The fact is that the heat pack of this model is only 35 W, which is even better than many mobile processors. Naturally, this is not given for nothing, so it works at clock frequencies around 3 GHz, or even lower, but otherwise it is a full-fledged Core i7, and not all Pentium and Core i3. The truth is how this will affect — without tests it is not known. That’s what we’re going to do now.
As for other test conditions, they were equal, but not the same: all processors were tested exclusively using integrated graphics, and the frequency of RAM was the maximum supported by the specifications. But its volume (8 GB) and system drive (Toshiba THNSNh356GMCT, 256 GB) were the same for all subjects.
Test methodology
To evaluate performance, we used our performance measurement methodology using iXBT Application Benchmark 2015 and iXBT Game Benchmark 2015. We normalized all test results in the first benchmark against the results of the reference system, which this year will be the same for laptops , and for all other computers, which is designed to make it easier for readers to compare and choose:
Processor Intel Core i5-3317U Chipset Intel HM77 Express Memory 4 GB DDR3-1600 (dual channel) Graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 Accumulator SSD 128 GB Crucial M4-CT128M4SSD1 Operating system Windows 8 (64-bit) Intel graphics driver video driver version
9. 18.10.3186 iXBT Application Benchmark 2015
Result. Funny. Well, firstly, the Core i7-4785T turned out to be equal to the i5-4690K — even clock speeds did not help the latter. However, they should not be neglected either — the i7-4770K running on the same i5-4690K outperformed the i5-4690K by 22%, however, as we can see, sometimes the frequency can be exchanged for a “cramped case” without losing performance. And regarding both older Core i7s, you can see that they are about twice as fast as the Core i3-4170, which is not surprising: in terms of the processor component, i3 is just half the i7 about ?
However, it is not always possible to load all the cores and threads with work — especially when there are already eight of the latter (ie, as in desktop Core i7 or older representatives of the AMD FX line). Therefore, here the difference between 4770K and 4690K is reduced to 10% — Hyper-Threading is still not useless, but not as useful as in the previous group. Here are the «real» cores — as before they are useful: both in the first and in the second group of programs, the 4690K bypassed the i3-4370 by about one and a half times. And the 4785T in such conditions can only compete with the Core i3. However, it is still the fastest, but not so much that it is considered fundamental.
As we said last time, desktop Core i3 are the best processors for working with graphics when money matters the older Core i7 is now one and a half times faster, and this is a lot. But the older one is with its frequencies above 4 GHz. And the 4785T proves convincingly that multithreading alone in many programs is still not enough to get good results.
Especially when it comes to such «reserves of legacy code» — all that older Cores can oppose to younger ones is a slightly higher clock frequency. That’s when they can — something happens. And when they can’t, it’s all very sad.
Audition somehow scales, and it gets better with each version, but in practice this is noticeable only in the case of older Core i5 and i7. The 4785T is only slightly faster than the 4170, so we can assume that it has nothing to do in a «regular» case. And in a very small one, it may turn out to be a good solution, provided, of course, that the buyer does not find it possible to save money by buying one of the younger models of the “T” family: remember that the 4170T lagged behind the 4170 here by only 16%, which is not is fundamental ?
But if you can load all the cores, then, of course, there is nothing to catch even the Core i5, not to mention the Core i3: and the i5-4690K is still 10% behind the i7-4785T, i.e. the 35W limit isn’t too bad for a quad-core Haswell. On the other hand, it is clear that you only need to “clamp” like this if you really need it: in fact, the price of this processor is somewhere at the level of the Core i7-4770 (without indexes), and the performance in this case differs by 20%. Yes, and the Core i5-4690K is slower by 10%, but at the same time cheaper by one and a half times. In general, everything is good in moderation. In classic desktops, you can also use processors with TDP> 65 W (yes, even 150 W), in more compact computers, S and T should already be used: 65/45/35 W. The same 4785T, in principle, can already be packed in a liter case or less, i.e. to make something «NUC-shaped», but, nevertheless, very powerful. There would be demand ?
Archivers are still holding back the single-threaded process of unpacking data (and you have to do this much more often than packing them), so the performance of the test subjects against the background of the Core i3-4170 does not cause much reverence.
An easily explainable picture — in fact, the processors on the first three lines have approximately the same frequency when loading one or two cores, the 4785T has the lowest frequency among others (even in boost mode), and the 4790K has the highest.
In file operations, the only obvious outsider is 4785T again. And again, apparently, because of the clock frequency — «lazier» it exits idle mode.
Finally, we come to such a picture. The performance of modern processors depends on the price in a non-linear way, so paying twice as much for a Core i7 instead of a Core i3, you will get on average only one and a half times better performance. However, this is not so little, so if the financial aspect is not of decisive importance (especially since the difference becomes much smaller against the background of the cost of the entire computer), there is a point in acquiring a Core i5 or i7. But not everyone — i7-4785T is essentially a «thing in itself», loosely connected with the main line. But if you need something small, the buyer has no other way. However, the good news is that you can get the performance level of «regular» i3 and i5 in this case. Let it be expensive enough.
Gaming applications
For obvious reasons, for computer systems of this level, we limit ourselves to the minimum quality mode, not only in «full» resolution, but also with its reduction to 1366×768. Despite the fact that the integrated graphics of desktop processors of the A10 line is the best on the market, even it is not yet able to satisfy the demanding gamer in terms of picture quality. This is especially true for Intel processors, where graphics are even weaker in most models. But if you voluntarily agree to the «minimal wages», you can save a lot. We already know this well from previous tests, but today we’ll just see how our updated gaming set works on these processors.
Formally, the graphics core in all processors is the same — HDG 4600. In fact, the difference between Core i3 and older models is visible even in this game, which is not related to processor-dependent ones. But the difference is quantitative, not qualitative — for HD there is enough for everyone, for FHD no one.
As has been said more than once, single-threaded performance matters, and it is close for four out of five processors. However, at the minimum, all five are enough for FHD, so there is nothing more to find out here.
Another CPU-intensive game, but optimized for multiple threads. However, «several» and in her case is far from eight, so that all our subjects are approximately equal. Is the Core i3-4170 a little behind the others, but it is already enough for FHD resolution, and it is difficult to demand more from games on integrated graphics.
A quad-core processor would be better for Metro games too. They are also very demanding on the graphics adapter, but in general, as we can see, on the Core i5 / i7 there is a clear transition from quantity to quality — you can already play at least at a reduced resolution. However, if you have even an inexpensive video card, a Pentium is also suitable, and in FHD, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves, revealing the topic of one of the following materials ?
This is not the first time Hitman has been identical to Metro.
Well, for Thief, no integrated graphics solutions are yet suitable at all.
But Tomb Raider is able to “adapt” well to different hardware, so here again we are seeing a transition from Core i3 to Core i5, but in FHD.
What can not be said about these two games. The first simply does not lend itself to integrated Intel graphics, and the second can be played on Core i3 (but only in HD), and a more expensive processor does not fundamentally change anything.
In general, nothing unexpected, except that with the formal identity of the GPU in all the tested processors, the older models in terms of games are able to do what the younger ones are not capable of. On the other hand, the absolute performance indicators are such that. If you are interested in games, you should not limit yourself to integrated video. It is better to save on the processor than on the video card. In any case, this is true for four out of five processors. But the Core i7-4785T is a special case: as it has already been said more than once, it needs to work in harsh conditions (it is better to put a model with a “regular” heat pack in a regular PC), where it is hardly possible to use a discrete video card. So here the fact that in games it is not inferior to other top models is very pleasing.
Total
We haven’t learned anything fundamentally new today, since all these processors have been tested in one form or another before. In the Intel range, the Core i5 is slightly faster on average than the Core i3, but falls behind the Core i7. Considering the existence of Celeron and Pentium (including processors with low power consumption), the junior and senior models of desktop families differ by about an order of magnitude: the Pentium J2900 is about six times slower than the Core i7-4790K, but now it belongs to desktop processors and the slower Celeron J1800, which at one time lagged behind the J29 in our tests according to the previous version of the methodology00 a little more than one and a half times. And above there are also processors for LGA2011 with up to six or eight cores, which are even faster than representatives of the LGA1150 mass platform. In a word, everything is fine: from the point of view of the processor component, each buyer can find something suitable for himself both in terms of performance and price (the latter, by the way, also differs by 25 or 8 times even within the LGA1150, which quite noticeable). The only thing that still leaves much to be desired is the performance of the integrated graphics core, which even in older models does not allow you to fully play games. Something works, of course, but only at low resolutions and low image quality. So in some areas of application, one processor cannot be limited so far — you will have to purchase a discrete video card.
Only one processor, Core i7-4785T, turned out to be essentially new for us today. A very specific solution, which has an even lower TDP than most laptop quad-core processors, but its performance is adequate. However, any complaints can be made against it only when compared with the «regular» desktop models of the same family — as we saw today, on average it turns out to be approximately equal to the younger Core i5 models, and sometimes it overtakes the older ones. This allows you to create compact, but powerful enough computers based on the LGA1150, which increases the versatility of the platform. But, of course, these platforms will not be gaming — the graphics capabilities of the Core i7-4785T are as modest as those of «regular» models, and more or less decent gaming video cards make much more serious demands on the cooling system than any processors.
7
Issue date October 2018 vs 1 June 2013 Number of cores 6 vs 4 Maximum frequency 4.60 GHz vs 4.40 GHz Maximum core temperature 100°C vs 74.04°C Process 14 nm vs 22 nm Level 1 cache 64K (per core) vs 256KB Level 2 cache 256K (per core) vs 1MB Level 3 cache 9 MB (shared) vs 8 MB Maximum memory size 128 GB vs 32 GB PassMark — Single thread mark 2766 vs 2464 PassMark — CPU mark 10775 vs 8058 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 1249 vs 1070 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 5603 vs 3995 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 5805 vs 4416 GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2162 vs 1279 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2162 vs 1279 Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-4790K
Number of threads 8 vs 6 Power consumption (TDP) 88 Watt vs 95 Watt GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 2489 vs 1574 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3454 vs 2984 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 2489 vs 1574 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3454 vs 2984 Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-9600K
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4790KPassMark — Single thread mark CPU 1 CPU 2 PassMark — CPU mark CPU 1 CPU 2 Geekbench 4 — Single Core CPU 1 CPU 2 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core CPU 1 CPU 2 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) CPU 1 CPU 2 Name Intel Core i5-9600K Intel Core i7-4790K PassMark — Single thread mark 2766 2464 PassMark — CPU mark 10775 8058 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 1249 1070 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 5603 3995 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 5805 4416 GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2162 1279 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 1574 2489 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 2984 3454 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2162 1279 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 1574 2489 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 2984 3454 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5. 95 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 100.106 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.695 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.814 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.147 Performance comparison
Intel Core i5-9600K Intel Core i7-4790K Architecture name Coffee Lake Devil’s Canyon Issue date October 2018 June 1, 2013 Place in the rating 722 1006 Price now $279. 99 $306.99 Processor Number i5-9600K i7-4790K Series 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors Status Launched Discontinued Price/performance ratio (0-100) 14.04 10.73 Applicability Desktop Desktop Price at first issue date $339 Support 64 bit Base frequency 3. 70GHz 4.00 GHz Bus Speed 8 GT/s DMI3 5 GT/s DMI2 Level 1 cache 64K (per core) 256KB Level 2 cache 256K (per core) 1MB Level 3 cache 9 MB (shared) 8MB Technological process 14nm 22nm Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C 72 °C Maximum core temperature 100°C 74. 04°C Maximum frequency 4.60 GHz 4.40 GHz Number of cores 6 4 Number of threads 6 8 Unlocked Crystal area 177mm Number of transistors 1400 Million Maximum number of memory channels 2 2 Maximum memory bandwidth 41. 6 GB/s 25.6 GB/s Maximum memory size 128GB 32GB Supported memory types DDR4-2666 DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V Device ID 0x3E98 0x412 Graphics base frequency 350MHz 350MHz Graphics max dynamic frequency 1.15 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel® Clear Video Technology HD Intel® Clear Video Technology Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology Intel® Quick Sync Video Video memory size 64GB 2GB Integrated graphics Intel® UHD Graphics 630 Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Number of execution units 20 Maximum GPU clock 1. 25 GHz Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) Maximum number of monitors supported 3 3 DisplayPort DVI eDP HDMI VGA WiDi support 4K support Maximum resolution via DisplayPort [email protected] [email protected] Maximum resolution via eDP [email protected] [email protected] Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 [email protected] [email protected] Maximum resolution via VGA [email protected] DirectX 12 11.2/12 OpenGL 4.5 4.3 Maximum number of processors in configuration
1 1 Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm Sockets supported FCLGA1151 FCLGA1150 Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 88 Watt Thermal Solution PCG 2015D (130W) PCG 2013D Low Halogen Options Available Number of PCI Express lanes 16 16 PCI Express revision 3. 0 3.0 PCIe configurations Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Scalability 1S Only 1S Only Execute Disable Bit (EDB) Intel® Identity Protection Technology Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) Intel® OS Guard Intel® Secure Key Technology Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) Secure Boot Anti-Theft Technology Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology Idle States Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 Intel 64 Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) Intel® TSX-NI Intel® Turbo Boost Technology Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility Thermal Monitoring Flexible Display interface (FDI) Intel® My WiFi Technology Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) i7-4790K vs i5-9600K — Assassin’s Creed Valhalla vs R5 performance comparison
R5 with
Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4. 00GHz
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
R5 with
Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz
i7-4790K
i5-9600KMulti-Thread Performance
11183 Pts
13352 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2530 Pts
2677 Pts
2633
i7-4790K vs i5-9600K in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla using R5 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
i7-4790K
i5-9600K
Ultra quality
Resolution Frames per second 1080p 10.8 FPS
1080p 11.4 FPS
1440p 9.4 FPS
1440p 9.6 FPS
2160p 6.3 FPS
2160p 6. 4 FPS
w1440p 8.4 FPS
w1440p 8.6 FPS
High quality
Authorization Frames per second 1080p 23.0 FPS
1080p 24.2 FPS
1440p 20.4 FPS
1440p 20.8 FPS
2160p 14.3 FPS
2160p 14.5 FPS
w1440p 18.4 FPS
w1440p 18.8 FPS
Medium quality
Resolution Frames per second 1080p 35.3 FPS
1080p 36. 9 FPS
1440p 31.3 FPS
1440p 31.9 FPS
2160p 22.3 FPS
2160p 22.6 FPS
w1440p 28.5 FPS
w1440p 29.1 FPS
Low quality
Resolution FPS 1080p 59.7 FPS
1080p 62.4 FPS
1440p 53.3 FPS
1440p 54.2 FPS
2160p 38.2 FPS
2160p 38.7 FPS
w1440p 48.5 FPS
w1440p 49.5 FPS
i7-4790K
i5-9600K
Compare i7-4790K vs i5-9600K specifications
i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Architecture
i7-4790K i5-9600K Codename Haswell Coffee Lake Generation Core i7
(Haswell)Core i5
(Coffee Lake Refresh)Market Desktop Desktop Memory Support DDR3 DDR4 Part# unknown SR3WZ Production Status Active Active Released May 2014 Oct 2018 i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Cache
i7-4790K i5-9600K Cache L1 64K (per core) 64K (per core) Cache L2 256K (per core) 256K (per core) Cache L3 8MB (shared) 9MB (shared) i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Cores
i7-4790K i5-9600K # of Cores 4 6 # of Threads 8 6 Integrated Graphics Intel HD 4600 N/A SMP# CPUs 1 1 i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Features
i7-4790K i5-9600K MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Performance
i7-4790K i5-9600K Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz Frequency 4 GHz 3.7 GHz Multiplier 40.0x 37.0x Multiplier Unlocked No Yes TDP 88W 95W Turbo Clock up to 4.4 GHz up to 4.6 GHz Voltage unknown variable i7-4790K vs i5-9600K Physical
i7-4790K i5-9600K Die Size 177 mm² unknown Foundry Intel Intel Package FC-LGA1151 Process Size 22 nm 14 nm Socket Intel Socket 1150 Intel Socket 1151 Transistors 1400 million unknown tCaseMax 72°C 72°C Share your comments 93
Compare i7-4790K vs i5-9600K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Total War: Attila
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Dragon Age: Inquisition
2014
Far Cry 4
2014
GRID Autosport
2014
Shadow of Mordor
2014
The Talos Principle
2014
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
i7 6700 vs i7 4790
Contents
WHAT0K better than Intel Core i7-6700?
Why is Intel Core i7-6700 better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
What are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i7-4790k
Intel Core i5-9400f
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-7700K
I7-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-ARTEL
Intel Core i7-4790k
Intel Core i5-4690k
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i7-7700
Intel Core I7-47903
I7-47770 9000 9000 Core I7-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-477EN
Intel Core i5-9600K
Intel Core i7-4790k
Intel Core i7-9700k
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 5 2600x
Intel Core i7-47903
Intel Core I7-6700
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
Intel Core i7-47903
Intel Core I9900K
I7-67-6700
Core i7-4790K
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.
Intel Atom E3805
A smaller size indicates a newer chip manufacturing process.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
A 32-bit operating system can support up to 4 GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4 GB, which improves performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-6700
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Intel Core i7-4930MX
PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Performance
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
More L2 flash memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
Intel Xeon Phi 7290F
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
Intel Xeon Phi 7290F
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Intel Core i9-9900
More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
Intel Xeon Phi 7290F
Memory
Can support faster memory that speeds up system performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
Intel Xeon E7-8830
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Intel Xeon Gold 5115
The memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Intel Celeron G4930T
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-6700
Functions
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to save power and reduce noise when it is under light load.
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-6700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-6700
It’s easier to get higher quality using virtualization if it’s hardware supported.
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-6700
Many Intel processors use Hyperthreading technology, which means that each processor core can run on two threads at the same time, rather than most processors that run on a single thread for each core. This means you will get better quality in some applications.
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel’s advanced transistor technology for low power consumption and high speed.
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-6700
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
lightalex: it seems to be enough with a margin (and this is good), but I won’t give a tooth. There are all sorts of calculators for this)
The block itself is good, I have the same one on one of the PCs.
And your assembly is not budgetary, $2k is just the price of a very good self-assembly.PS when I was building a computer for myself, I took iron in different places — something in yulmart (out of habit + the guarantee works well for them), something in NIKS, and something in Regard. Regards usually have good prices, by the way, if something is not available in the place where you get the main one, it makes sense to look at them.
Comparison of Intel Core i7-6700K and Intel Core i7-479 processors0 for all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Picture-in-Graphics Quality, Graphics API Support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization. Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-6700K
Features Issue date 5 August 2015 vs 1 April 2014 Unlocked Unlocked / Locked Maximum frequency 4.20 GHz vs 4.00 GHz Process 14 nm vs 22 nm Maximum memory size 64 GB vs 32 GB Benchmarks PassMark — Single thread mark 2354 vs 2282 PassMark — CPU mark 11109 vs 9989 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 5337 vs 4268 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 17520 vs 13596 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.218 vs 5.25 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 101.876 vs 89.166 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.744 vs 0.65 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.978 vs 2.585 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.351 vs 6.435 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1759 vs 1231 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3153 vs 2175 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1759 vs 1231 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3153 vs 2175 Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-4790
Features Maximum core temperature 72.72°C vs 64°C Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt vs 91 Watt Benchmarks GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3803 vs 3359 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3803 vs 3359 Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-6700K
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4790I7 4770 vs i5 4690k • Web cheat sheet for internet entrepreneurs!
Content