AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-4790K: What is the difference?
51points
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
52points
Intel Core i7-4790K
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i7-4790K
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 2700X better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
- 1.85x faster CPU speed?
8 x 3.7GHzvs4 x 4GHz - 1333MHz higher ram speed?
2933MHzvs1600MHz - 8 more CPU threads?
16vs8 - 10.96°C higher maximum operating temperature?
85°Cvs74.04°C - 10nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs22nm - 3MB bigger L2 cache?
4MBvs1MB - 2.18x higher PassMark result?
17623vs8089 - 8MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs8MB
Why is Intel Core i7-4790K better than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X?
- 17W lower TDP?
88Wvs105W - Has integrated graphics?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-4690K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i7-4770K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i7-4930K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i7-7700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
2 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
9. 0/10
2 User reviews
Intel Core i7-4790K
2 User reviews
Intel Core i7-4790K
9.5/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
8.5/10
2 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Gaming
8.0/10
2 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Performance
8.0/10
2 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Reliability
9.5/10
2 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
7.5/10
2 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
8 x 3.7GHz
4 x 4GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.3GHz
4.4GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8. L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5. maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9. bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5. Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
423.2seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
1320.7seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X — Battlefield V with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz
Battlefield V
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
i7-4790K
Ryzen 7 2700X
Multi-Thread Performance
11183 Pts
16960 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2530 Pts
2190 Pts
Battlefield V
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X in Battlefield V using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-4790K
Ryzen 7 2700X
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
86. 9 FPS |
1080p |
82.5 FPS |
1440p |
69.7 FPS |
1440p |
66.1 FPS |
2160p |
37.6 FPS |
2160p |
35.6 FPS |
w1440p |
57.4 FPS |
w1440p |
54.5 FPS |
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
140.0 FPS |
1080p |
134.0 FPS |
1440p |
116.1 FPS |
1440p |
111.0 FPS |
2160p |
68.4 FPS |
2160p |
65.3 FPS |
w1440p |
98.4 FPS |
w1440p |
94.1 FPS |
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
193. 0 FPS |
1080p |
185.4 FPS |
1440p |
162.5 FPS |
1440p |
155.9 FPS |
2160p |
99.3 FPS |
2160p |
95.0 FPS |
w1440p |
139.4 FPS |
w1440p |
133.8 FPS |
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
299.2 FPS |
1080p |
288.3 FPS |
1440p |
255.3 FPS |
1440p |
245.7 FPS |
2160p |
161.0 FPS |
2160p |
154.3 FPS |
w1440p |
221.4 FPS |
w1440p |
213.1 FPS |
i7-4790K
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The i7-4790K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The i7-4790K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 7 2700X
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Compare i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X specifications
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Architecture
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Haswell | Zen |
Generation | Core i7 (Haswell) |
Ryzen 7 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Part# | unknown | unknown |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | May 2014 | Apr 2018 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cache
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 8MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cores
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 4 | 8 |
# of Threads | 8 | 16 |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | N/A |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Features
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4. 2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 XFR 2 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Performance
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Multiplier | 40.0x | 37.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
TDP | 88 W | 105 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 4.4 GHz | up to 4.35 GHz |
Voltage | unknown | variable |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Physical
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | 177 mm² | 192 mm² |
Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
Package | µOPGA-1331 | |
Process Size | 22 nm | 12 nm |
Socket | Intel Socket 1150 | AMD Socket AM4 |
Transistors | 1400 million | 4800 million |
tCaseMax | 72°C | unknown |
Share Your Comments 93
Compare i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-4790K
Availability
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler — YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy on Amazon
$274. 99
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Availability
Intel Core i7 i7-4790K Quad-core (4 Core) 4 GHz Processor — Socket h4 LGA-1150 Pack CM8064601710501
Buy on Amazon
$245
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4790K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4790K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1449 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4790K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790K
-
Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X — $245.0 vs $274.99
-
Up to 7% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Ryzen 7 2700X — $0.99 vs $1.07 per FPS
-
Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X — 88 vs 105 Watts
-
Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn’t have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1. 07/FPS
92%
Price, $
$274.99
89%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler — YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for $274.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Core i7-4790K
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
248
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$245
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7 i7-4790K Quad-core (4 Core) 4 GHz Processor — Socket h4 LGA-1150 Pack CM8064601710501
Buy for $245 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Core i7-4790K
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
256
FPS
248
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
446
FPS
433
FPS
VALORANT
1026
FPS
995
FPS
League of Legends
280
FPS
270
FPS
Apex Legends
277
FPS
267
FPS
Fortnite
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1039
98%
Multi-Core
6842
100%
Core i7-4790K
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1059
100%
Multi-Core
3944
27%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
vs |
Intel Core i7-4790K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 |
Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
8 |
Cores | 4 |
16 |
Threads | 8 |
3. 7 GHz | Base Clock Speed |
4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed |
4.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP |
88 W |
12 nm |
Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier |
40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics |
Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Ryzen 7 2700X or Core i7-4790K
Grand Theft Auto V, 1080p, High
Skytech Blaze II Gaming Computer PC
146 FPS
$9.1/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,328.87
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Skytech Chronos Gaming PC
152 FPS
$13.16/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,999. 99
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Dell Inspiron High Performance Gaming Desktop PC
93 FPS
$20.42/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, 256 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,899
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Core i5-4690K
$118.68
Core i7-4790K
Ryzen 7 2700X
$274.99
E1-6015
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 2700X
$274.99
A8-3870
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 2700X
$274.99
Pentium G2120
$74.99
Ryzen 7 2700X
$274.99
Sempron 3850
$69.95
Ryzen 7 2700X
$274.99
Core i7-6820EQ
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 2700X
$274.99
E2-3800
N/A Stock
Core i7-4790K
Core 2 Duo E7500
$99. 63
Ryzen 7 2700X
$274.99
Xeon E5-2603 v4
N/A Stock
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-4790K
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-4790K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X on one side and the Intel Core i7-4790K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,3GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | Intel Core i7-4790K | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Haswell | ||||||
Core name | Pinnacle Ridge | Devil’s Canyon | ||||||
Family | Ryzen 7 2000 | Core i7-4000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec | YD270XBGM88AF | BX80646I74790K, CM8064601710501, SR219 |
||||||
Release date | Q2 2018 | Q2 2014 | ||||||
Lithography | 12 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 4. 800.000.000 | 1.400.000.000 | ||||||
Cores | 8 | 4 | ||||||
Threads | 16 | 8 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,7 GHz | 4,0 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 4,3 GHz | 4,4 GHz | ||||||
Cache memory | 16 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 43,71 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 105 W | 88 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ||||||
GPU execution units | — | 20 | ||||||
GPU shading units | — | 160 | ||||||
GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | — | 1250 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | — | 352 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | LGA1150 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 85°C | 74°C | ||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 476 | 473 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 5. 031 | 2.444 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 180 | 173 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.828 | 836 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.118 | 964 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 11.289 | 5.090 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.428 | 2.459 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 17.584 | 8.047 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.823 | 4.928 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
26. 797 | 15.801 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
384,3 GFLOPS | 267,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
255 pts / W | 180 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-4790K is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-4790K is less. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
476 5.031 |
Intel Core i7-4790K |
473 2.444 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 106%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
180 1.828 |
Intel Core i7-4790K |
173 836 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 119%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
1.118 11.289 |
Intel Core i7-4790K |
964 5.090 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 122%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
2.428 17.584 |
Intel Core i7-4790K |
2.459 8.047 |
In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 119%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.823 26.797 |
Intel Core i7-4790K |
4.928 15.801 |
In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 70%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
5.027 26.264 |
Intel Core i7-4790K |
5.354 17.597 |
In single core, the difference is -6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 49%.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-4790K |
5.836 19.848 |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.044 13.431 |
In single core, the difference is 44%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 48%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4. 820 26.430 |
Intel Core i7-4790K |
4.923 16.431 |
In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 61%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-4790K AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Ryzen 7 2700EAMD Ryzen 7 2700U
Intel Core i7-4790Intel Core i7-4790S
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs.
Intel Core i7-4790K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X operates with 8 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base 3.85 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 105 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) Architecture is enhanced with 12 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q2/2018
Intel Core i7-4790K
The Intel Core i7-4790K operates with 4 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 4.40 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 88 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Devils Canyon S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2014
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i7-4790K
Compare Detail
3.70 GHz | Frequency | 4.00 GHz |
8 | Cores | 4 |
4.30 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.40 GHz |
3.85 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 4.20 GHz |
Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
Yes | Overclocking | Yes |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 1.25 GHz |
12 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 1.25 GHz |
DirectX Version | 11.1 | |
Max. displays | 3 | |
DDR4-2933 | Memory | |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
Yes | ECC | No |
— | L2 Cache | — |
16. 00 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
20 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
12 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
AM4 | Socket | LGA 1150 |
105 W | TDP | 88 W |
AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q2/2018 | Release date | Q2/2014 |
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Monero Hashrate kH/s
The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | Intel Core i7-4790K | |
105 W | Max TDP | 88 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Intel Core i7-4790K vs.
Intel Core i7-5960X
Cpu Benchmark with benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790K | Intel Core i7-5960X | |
4.00 GHz | Frequency | 3.00 GHz |
4.40 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.50 GHz |
4.20 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.20 GHz |
4 | Cores | 8 |
Yes | Hyperthreading ? | Yes |
Yes | Overclocking ? | Yes |
normal | Core architecture | normal |
Intel HD Graphics 4600 | GPU | no iGPU |
11.1 | DirectX Version | |
3 | Max. displays | |
Memory | DDR4-2133 | |
2 | Memory channels | 4 |
Max. Memory | ||
No | ECC | No |
— | L2 Cache | — |
8. 00 MB | L3 Cache | 20.00 MB |
3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
16 | PCIe lanes | 40 |
22 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
LGA 1150 | Socket | LGA 2011-3 |
88 W | TDP | 140 W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q2/2014 | Release date | Q3/2014 |
show more detail | show more detail |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Benchmark. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Benchmark’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Popular Comparision
Intel Core i7-4790K vs. Intel Core i7-5960X — Cpu Benchmark Specs & Test
4.2 of 44 rating(s)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-4790K: What is the difference?
51 ballla
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
52 BALLLA
Intel Core i7-4790k
Winner when comparing
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core INTEL Core INTEL Core INTEL CORE INTEL Is Ryzen 7 2700X better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
- 1.85x higher CPU speed?
8 x 3.7GHz vs 4 x 4GHz - 1333MHz higher RAM speed?
2933MHz vs 1600MHz - 8 more CPU threads?
16 vs 8 - 10.96°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
85°C vs 74.04°C - Are 10nm smaller semiconductors?
12nm vs 22nm - 3MB more L2 cache?
4MB vs 1MB - 2. 18x higher PassMark score?
17623 vs 8089 - 8MB more L3 cache?
16MB vs 8MB
- 17W below TDP?
88W vs 105W - Does it have integrated graphics?
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-4690k
AMD RYZEN 7 2700X
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-4790k
AMD Ry AMD RYOT AMD RYZEN 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-4790K
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
Intel Core i7-47-47990K i7-4930k
AMD RYZEN 7 2700X
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5700x
Intel Core i7-4790k
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD RYZEN 7 2700X
VS
9000 AMD RYOT RYOT RYOT RYT Core i7-4790K
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Intel Core i7-4790K
AM 9000 7 2700X
VS
Intel Core i9-9900k
Intel Core i7-4790K
VS
Intel Core i7-7700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
VS
9000 AMD RYZEN 5 2600 9000 9000 I7
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-4790k
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
conspications
Respons0021
General rating
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
2 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
/10
2 Reviews of users 9000 -4790k
9. 5 /10
2 Reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
8.5 /10
2 VOTES
8 9.5 /10
2 Votes
Games
8.0 /10
2 VOTES
/10
2 VOTES 9000 9.5 /10
2 Votes
Reliability
/10
2 VOTES
/10
003
2 Votes
10.0 /10
2 Votes
Productivity
1. Skur -old processor
8 x 3.7GHZ
4 x 4GHZ 9000 , considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.3GHz
4.4GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
423.2seconds
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
1320.7seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X — Battlefield V vs GTX 1660 performance comparison
GTX 1660 with
i7-4790K
Ryzen 7 2700X
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
86. 9 FPS |
1080p |
82.5 FPS |
1440p |
69.7 FPS |
1440p |
66.1 FPS |
2160p |
37.6 FPS |
2160p |
35.6 FPS |
w1440p |
57.4 FPS |
w1440p |
54.5 FPS |
High quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
140.0 FPS |
1080p |
134.0 FPS |
1440p |
116.1 FPS |
1440p |
111.0 FPS |
2160p |
68.4 FPS |
2160p |
65.3 FPS |
w1440p |
98.4 FPS |
w1440p |
94. 1 FPS |
Medium quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
193.0 FPS |
1080p |
185.4 FPS |
1440p |
162.5 FPS |
1440p |
155.9 FPS |
2160p |
99.3 FPS |
2160p |
95.0 FPS |
w1440p |
139.4 FPS |
w1440p |
133.8 FPS |
Low quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
299.2 FPS |
1080p |
288.3 FPS |
1440p |
255.3 FPS |
1440p |
245. 7 FPS |
2160p |
161.0 FPS |
2160p |
154.3 FPS |
w1440p |
221.4 FPS |
w1440p |
213.1 FPS |
i7-4790K
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- i7-4790K The i7-4790K is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
- The i7-4790K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
Ryzen 7 2700X
- Ryzen 7 2700X has higher level 2 cache. The data/instructions that need to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU doesn’t have to wait for the very slow DDR
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has a higher level 3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
- Ryzen 7 2700X has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
- Ryzen 7 2700X The Ryzen 7 2700X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
RAM
Compare i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X specifications
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Architecture
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Haswell | Zen |
Generation | Core i7 (Haswell) |
Ryzen 7 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Part# | unknown | unknown |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | May 2014 | Apr 2018 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cache
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 8MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cores
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 4 | 8 |
# of Threads | 8 | 16 |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | N/A |
SMP# CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Features
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4. 2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 XFR 2 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Performance
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Multiplier | 40.0x | 37.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
TDP | 88W | 105W |
Turbo Clock | up to 4.4 GHz | up to 4.35 GHz |
Voltage | unknown | variable |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Physical
i7-4790K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | 177 mm² | 192 mm² |
Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
Package | µOPGA-1331 | |
Process Size | 22 nm | 12 nm |
Socket | Intel Socket 1150 | AMD Socket AM4 |
Transistors | 1400 million | 4800 million |
tCaseMax | 72°C | unknown |
Share your comments 93
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need for Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Rating of the best CPUs for gaming PCs in 2019 / Habr
In 2019, the desktop processor market became interesting. For many years, Intel dominated here, but AMD released Ryzen 7 — direct competitors to the Intel i7 models. Then a series of blows Ryzen 3 and 5 against Intel i3 and i5 — and finishing off a competitor with sledgehammers Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and 3970X. However, these monsters are not for the gaming market, but for other HEDT applications.
With 24/32-core Threadripper, AMD has become a technology leader. Intel has nothing to say about the fastest AMD processors, but is trying to compete in the second tier of cheaper CPUs. To do this, Intel had to drastically cut prices. Intel also continues to manipulate its compiler, which slows down the execution of programs on alternative processors (see below in the section «Cheating the Intel Compiler»).
What now? What are the best gaming CPUs in different price categories? In late November-early December 2019, AnandTech, WePC, PC Gamer, Digital Trends, Tom’s Hardware, PC World published their recommendations. Let’s see what happens on the gaming scene?
Here are the recommendations of the AnandTech publication, which broke the gaming market into six concise segments (prices are current at the time of writing):
Segment | Recommendation | |||
Best Choice | Competitor | |||
Top Gaming PC | Intel Core i9-9900KS | $599 | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | $749 |
$1500 game machine | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | $355 | Intel Core i7-9700 | $323 |
$1000 game machine | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | $235 | — | — |
$700 game machine | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | $120 | Intel Core i3-8100 | $130 |
$500 game machine | AMD Ryzen 3 3400G | $130 | — | — |
$300 minimum game | AMD Athlon 3000G | $49 | — | — |
What are you waiting for | Intel Comet Lake? |
These recommendations try to find the best balance between price and performance.
The winner in the top category is a different story. Intel announced that 9The 900KS will only be available for a limited time. An octa-core CPU up to 5 GHz can now be found on sale for about $600, and Intel’s wholesale price in quantities of 1,000 units is $513. Experts warn that the chip gets very hot (heat dissipation up to 172 W at peak), it is better to fork out for an expensive cooling system.
3DNews writes that the whole story with the appearance of the Core i9-9900KS on the market from the very beginning causes a feeling of deja vu. «Why? Yes, it’s very simple, we saw similar events sixteen years ago, when AMD released its revolutionary Athlon 64 and Athlon 64 FX processors with the Hammer microarchitecture. Then, in order to rebuff these novelties, Intel urgently organized the release of Pentium 4 Extreme Edition processors equipped with a 2-megabyte L3 cache, hastily converted from Xeon MP server chips. Now, of course, the situation is developing in a slightly different scenario, but the overall plot outline has remained the same. Not being able to symmetrically respond to the competitor’s daring encroachments, Intel gets out as best it can and instead of a new product family offers temporary flagship «quick response» processors. Core i9The -9900KS is just such a hand-crafted answer to third-gen Ryzen.»
It’s clear why the Core i9-9900KS is a limited edition. This is a special overclocked version of the Core i9-9900K, built on selected semiconductor chips that are capable of operating at even higher clock speeds. In this case, 5 GHz. By definition, there are a limited number of «selected» crystals.
Alternatively, look at the basic i9-9900K (wholesale price $488) or a competitor from AMD — the flagship Ryzen 9 3950X processor based on the Zen 2 architecture. Although it costs more ($749), it is already a new generation processor: a 16-core CPU manufactured using a 7 nm process, and not the old intel 14 nm.
The Ryzen 9 3950X may be inferior to Intel processors in single-threaded performance tests, but due to the larger number of cores, it efficiently performs other tasks in the background. This makes sense: today, many gamers run chat programs with colleagues, video broadcasts, and other applications in parallel. So not only performance in games is important, but also multithreading.
The Ryzen 9 3950X went on sale on November 25, 2019 (November 30 in Japan), and immediately caused an unprecedented stir. Japanese media reported that stores lined up hours before the opening, and stocks of the Ryzen 9 3950X sold out on the first day.
Line in front of the Computer Shop ARK in Tokyo, September 30, 2019
In addition to the top category, AMD processors are recommended in all other segments, starting with the cheapest, dual-core AMD Athlon 3000G with integrated Vega 3 graphics at the price of everything $49.
CPU hierarchy in games
PC Gamer has published a performance rating of different CPUs in games with a top-end RTX 2080 Ti graphics card.
Other results
Below is the CPU hierarchy according to Tom’s Hardware. Processors sorted by gaming performance. Unfortunately, recent changes in tests and security patches for the CPU have affected the results, so there are a lot of gaps in the table. For many CPUs, old results are shown, where the maximum result corresponds to a score of 100%, and the rest were evaluated relative to it.
In general, the table is sorted by average performance in games (there were eight games in the test set), some cheaper processors cost more than more expensive ones.
Also includes an app performance rating. The test set included archivers, HandBrake, Blender and Adobe Creative Cloud Suite.
Games | Applications | Architecture | cores/threads | Main /turbo | TDP | |
Intel Core i9-9900K | ~ | ~ | Coffee Lake-R | 8 / 16 | 3. 6 / 5.0 GHz | 95W |
Intel Core i9-9900KF | ~ | ~ | Coffee Lake-R | 8 / 16 | 3.6 / 5.0 GHz | 95W |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | ~ | ~ | Zen 2 | 16 / 32 | 3.5 / 4.7 GHz | 105W |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | ~ | ~ | Zen 2 | 12 / 24 | 3.8 / 4.6 GHz | 105W |
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | ~ | ~ | Zen 2 | 8 / 16 | 3.9 / 4.5 GHz | 105W |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | ~ | ~ | Zen 2 | 8 / 16 | 3. 6 / 4.4 GHz | 65W |
Intel Core i7-9700K | ~ | ~ | Coffee Lake-R | 8 / 8 | 3.6 / 4.9 GHz | 95W |
Intel Core i7-8700K | 100 | 70.4 | Coffee Lake | 6 / 12 | 3.7 / 4.7 GHz | 95W |
Intel Core i7-8700 | 99.98 | 61.1 | Coffee Lake | 6 / 12 | 3.2 / 4.6 GHz | 65W |
Intel Core i9-7960X | 99.97 | 96.9 | Skylake | 16 / 32 | 2.8 / 4.2 GHz | 165W |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | ~ | ~ | Zen 2 | 6 / 12 | 3. 8 / 4.4 GHz | 95W |
Intel Core i5-9600K | ~ | ~ | Coffee Lake-R | 6 / 6 | 3.7 / 4.6 GHz | 95W |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | ~ | ~ | Zen 2 | 6 / 12 | 3.6 / 4.2 | 65W |
Intel Core i5-8600K | 99.91 | 56.1 | Coffee Lake | 6 / 6 | 3.6 / 4.3 GHz | 95W |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | 98.2 | 57.9 | Zen+ | 6 / 12 | 3.6 / 4.2 GHz | 95W |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | 97.2 | 70 | Zen+ | 8 / 16 | 3. 7 / 4.3 GHz | 105W |
Intel Xeon W-3175X | ~ | ~ | Skylake | 28 / 56 | 3.1 / 4.3 GHz | |
Intel Core i9-10980XE | ~ | ~ | Cascade Lake-X | 18 / 36 | 3.0 / 4.8 | 165W |
Intel Core i9-9980XE | ~ | ~ | Skylake | 18 / 36 | 4.4 / 4.5 GHz | 165W |
AMD Threadripper 3960X | ~ | ~ | Zen 2 | 24 / 48 | 3.8 / 4.5 GHz | 280W |
AMD Threadripper 3970X | ~ | ~ | Zen 2 | 32 / 64 | 3.7 / 4.5 GHz | 280W |
Intel Core i9-7980XE | 97 | 99. 9 | Skylake | 18 / 36 | 2.6 / 4.2 GHz | 165W |
Intel Core i9-7900X | 96 | 75 | Skylake | 10 / 20 | 3.3 / 4.3 GHz | 140W |
Intel Core i5-8600 | ~ | ~ | Coffee Lake | 6 / 6 | 3.1 / 4.3 GHz | 65W |
Intel Core i7-7700K | 96.6 | 45.4 | Kaby Lake | 4 / 8 | 4.2 / 4.5 GHz | 91W |
Intel Core i5-8500 | ~ | ~ | Coffee Lake | 6 / 6 | 3.0 / 4.1 GHz | 65W |
Core i5-9400 / i5-9400F | ~ | ~ | Coffee Lake | 6 / 6 | 2. 9 / 4.1 GHz | 65W |
Intel Core i5-8400 | 95.6 | 45.8 | Coffee Lake | 6 / 6 | 2.8 / 4.0 GHz | 65W |
AMD Threadripper 2950X (GM) | 94 | 100 | Zen + | 16 / 32 | 3.5 / 4.4 GHz | 180W |
Intel Core i7-7820X | 93.1 | 71.7 | Skylake | 8 / 16 | 3.6 / 4.3 GHz | 140W |
Intel Core i3-8350K | 93.0 | 34.3 | Coffee Lake | 4 / 4 | 4.0 / — GHz | 91W |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | 92. 9 | 69 | Zen+ | 8 / 16 | 3.2 / 4.1 GHz | 65W |
AMD Threadripper 1900X (GM) | 92.8 | 60 | Zen | 8 / 16 | 3.8 / 4.0 GHz | 180W |
Intel Core i7-7700 | 92.7 | 41.6 | Kaby Lake | 4 / 8 | 3.6 / 4.2 GHz | 65W |
Threadripper 2990WX (GM) | 92.4 | 99.6 | Zen+ | 32 / 64 | 3.0 / 4.2 GHz | 250W |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | 91.5 | 50.6 | Zen+ | 6 / 12 | 3. 4 / 3.9GHz | 65W |
Intel Core i7-7800X | 88.7 | 70 | Skylake | 6 / 12 | 3.5 / 4.0 GHz | 140W |
Intel Core i5-7600K | 87.1 | 40 | Kaby Lake | 4 / 4 | 3.8 / 4.2 GHz | 91W |
AMD Threadripper 1950X (GM) | 86.7 | 88 | Zen | 16 / 32 | 3.4 / 4.0 GHz | 180W |
AMD Threadripper 1920X (GM) | 86.4 | 77.5 | Zen | 12 / 24 | 3.5 / 4.0 GHz | 180W |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | 86. 1 | 59.2 | Zen | 8 / 16 | 3.6 / 4.0 GHz | 95W |
Intel Core i5-7600 | 85.9 | 57 | Kaby Lake | 4 / 4 | 3.5 / 4.1 GHz | 65W |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | 85.7 | 55 | Zen | 8 / 16 | 3.8 / 3.9 GHz | 95W |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | 84.8 | 48 | Zen | 6 / 12 | 3.6 / 4.0 GHz | 95W |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | 82.6 | 46.5 | Zen | 6 / 12 | 3. 2 / 3.6 GHz | 65W |
Intel Core i3-8300 | ~ | ~ | Coffee Lake | 4 / 4 | 3.7 / — GHz | 62W |
Intel Core i3-8100 | 85.7 | 29.9 | Coffee Lake | 4 / 4 | 3.6 / — GHz | 65W |
Intel Core i5-7500 | 79.9 | 32 | Kaby Lake | 4 / 4 | 3.4 / 3.8 GHz | 65W |
Intel Core i5-7400 | 76.7 | 30.9 | Kaby Lake | 4 / 4 | 3.0 / 3.5 GHz | 65W |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | 75. 9 | 52 | Zen | 8 / 16 | 3.0 / 3.8 GHz | 65W |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | 75.7 | 35.4 | Zen | 4 / 8 | 3.5 / 3.7 GHz | 65W |
Intel Core i3-7350K | 74.2 | 24 | Kaby Lake | 2 / 4 | 4.2 / — GHz | 60W |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | 72.0 | 34.2 | Zen+ | 4 / 8 | 3.6 / 3.9 GHz | 65W |
Intel Core i3-7300 | 69.8 | 23.3 | Kaby Lake | 2 / 4 | 4. 0 / — GHz | 51W |
Intel Core i3-7100 | 67.5 | 22 | Kaby Lake | 2 / 4 | 3.9 / — GHz | 51W |
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | 67.4 | 31.8 | Zen | 4 / 8 | 3.2 / 3.4 GHz | 65W |
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | 66.7 | 26.4 | Zen | 4 / 4 | 3.5 / 3.7 GHz | 65W |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | 65.5 | 26.3 | Zen+ | 4 / 4 | 3.5 / 3.7 GHz | 65W |
AMD Athlon 240GE | ~ | ~ | Zen | 2 / 4 | 3. 5 / — GHz | 35W |
AMD Athlon 220GE | ~ | ~ | Zen | 2 / 4 | 3.4 / — GHz | 35W |
AMD Athlon 200GE | ~ | ~ | Zen | 2 / 4 | 3.2 / — GHz | 35W |
Intel Pentium G5600 | ~ | ~ | Coffee Lake | 2 / 4 | 3.9 / — GHz | 54W |
Intel Pentium G5400 | ~ | ~ | Coffee Lake | 2 / 4 | 3.7 / — GHz | 54W |
Intel Pentium G4620 | 65.0 | 18. 2 | Kaby Lake | 2 / 4 | 3.7 / — GHz | 54W |
Intel Pentium G4560 | 61.5 | 17.5 | Kaby Lake | 2 / 4 | 3.5 / — GHz | 54W |
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | 61.1 | 22.7 | Zen | 4 / 4 | 3.1 / 3.2 GHz | 65W |
However, the results of benchmarks should be treated critically.
Intel optimizations
Tests and benchmarks of processors are a topic for a separate discussion. The fact is that many programs can indeed run slower on AMD processors, because they are compiled with the Intel compiler or use highly optimized Intel libraries, which greatly slow down the execution of programs on alternative processors.
The reason is that the compiler or library generates multiple versions of the code, each optimized for a particular processor and instruction set, such as SSE2, SSE3, etc. The system includes a function that determines the type of processor it is running on. and selects the optimal code path for that processor. This is called the CPU manager. However, the Intel Processor Manager not only checks which instruction set is supported by the processor, but also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string says «GenuineIntel», then it uses the optimal code path. If the processor is not from Intel, then in most cases it will run the slowest version of the code, even if the processor is fully compatible with the best version .
This situation has been discussed since 2005, but Intel still refuses to change the CPU manager. If the company officially announced that its compiler is compatible only with Intel processors, then there would be no complaints about it. The problem is that they are trying to hide what is happening. Many software developers believe that this compiler is compatible with AMD processors, and this is actually the case, although it uses a «biased» CPU manager, which selects code degradation whenever it sees a non-Intel processor, unbeknownst to the programmer. If programmers knew this fact, they would probably use a different compiler. Who wants to create software that doesn’t run very well on AMD processors?
However, the problem still exists. Some experts are of the opinion that the biased CPU manager from the compiler affects the results of standard benchmarks, which compare the performance of Intel and AMD processors.
For example, comparing the performance of Matlab on Threadripper 3970X and Cascade Lake X processors shows a significant superiority of Intel processors.
The problem turned out to be that Matlab uses Intel’s Math Kernel Library (MKL), which deliberately slows down code execution on AMD processors. If it sees an Intel processor, it deliberately switches to the slowest SSE1 instruction set, regardless of which more efficient instruction sets the processor supports (AVX2, etc. ).
If you force MKL_DEBUG_CPU_TYPE=5
to be set in the system environment variables, then the speed of calculations on AMD processors increases several times.
It is important that software and game developers be aware of the problem and use Intel compilers carefully by reviewing x86 and x86-64 processor optimization tutorials.
Best sellers on Amazon
The top 10 most popular processors on Amazon consist entirely of AMD models:
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6 Core — $189.99
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600 — $119.99
- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X — $189.99
- AMD Ryzen 3 2200G with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics — $77.98
- AMD Ryzen 7 2700 — $167.39
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600X — $149.00
- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8 Core — $309.99
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6 Core — $239.99
- AMD Ryzen
X, 12 cores — $579.99
- AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8 Core — $379. 99
Only in 11th place in popularity is the first representative of Intel — the Core i9-9900K processor for $ 489.99.
Hashrate of Intel and AMD processors according to the GhostRider algorithm, Raptoreum cryptocurrency Exchange news
Posted
The hash rate of the GhostRider mining algorithm is highly dependent not only on the number of cores, but also on the size and speed of the processor cache, so more expensive enthusiast-oriented processor models have a significant advantage over budget and mid-budget models.
Help the site grow by clicking on the ad below
GhostRider hashrate for Intel processors
Processor | 4236 | Ryzen 5 5600 | 889 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ryzen 9 3900XT | 3781 | Ryzen 5 4750 | 872 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ryzen 9 3900X | 3555 | Ryzen 5 4600 | 675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ryzen 9 3900 | 3601 | Ryzen 5 3600X | 1857 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ryzen 7 5800X | 2111 | Ryzen 5 3600 | 1756 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ryzen 7 3800X
Output : AMD processors continue to lead the cryptocurrency mining tasks regardless of the mining algorithm chosen. If you have a powerful enough processor like Ryzen 5800X, mining income can be 1.6-1.8 USD per day, which is quite a lot by CPU mining standards. At these rates, a processor can pay for itself in less than a year. For comparison, video cards, given the inflated prices, now pay for themselves in 1.5-2 years. Related postsHelp the site to develop, click on advertising below Raptoreum Exchange cryptocurrency mining Share with friends characteristics AMD Ryzen 5 2600, competitors, competitors
Processor Ryzen 5 2600, price new on amazon and ebay — 290 USD Marked by the manufacturer as: YD2600BBAFBOX. Number of cores — 6. With SMT technology, the number of threads is 12, which is twice the number of physical cores and improves the performance of multi-threaded applications and games. Ryzen 5 2600 base clock — 3.4 GHz. The maximum frequency in AMD Turbo Core mode reaches 3.8 GHz. Price in RussiaWant to buy Ryzen 5 2600 cheap? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city. family
AMD Ryzen 5 Benchmarks 2600Game Speed Based on our tests Performance. The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores. The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important. Speed in office usePerformance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications. The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest. Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance. Speed in heavy applicationsPerformance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores. The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly. At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor. Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor. Speed of numerical operations
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario. We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS. Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance. When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads. Data obtained from tests of users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the fuller the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems. BenchmarksBenchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version. Cinebench R23 Single CoreIntel Core i5-8500 1052 Intel Core i5-10210U 1049 Intel Core i3-100G1 1047 Intel Core I5 -600K0003 1041 Intel Core i5-6600 1041 AMD RYZEN 5 2600 1040 Intel Core i7-8650U 1037 AMD 1950x
9000 nttel Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core, 1032 Intel Core i3-10110u 1028 AMD Ryzen 5 2500x 1028 Cinebench R23 Multi CoreIntel Core 8164 INTEL CORE INTEL CORE0003 AMD Ryzen 7 1700 8065 AMD Ryzen 5 4600U 8044 Intel Core i7-8700 7969 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 7555 AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 7514 Intel Core i7-10850h 7455 Intel Core i7-10750H 7314 Intel Core i5-9600K 7301 Intel Core I5-9600KF 224 Cinebench R20 Singench R20 Singench0003387 Intel Core i7-4790 384 AMD Ryzen 7 1800x 381 Intel Core i5-6600 381
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 AMD 374 Intel Core i5-4670k 371 Intel Celeron G5920 368 Intel Core i3-6100 368 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U 9000 9000 AMD RYEN0003 Cinebench R20 Multi CoreIntel Core i5-10600T 2993 Intel Core i7-10850H 2839 Intel Core i5-10500T 2829 Intel Core i7-7800X 2809 AMD Ryzen 5 1600x 2764 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 2736 Intel Core i7-10750H 2732 AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 2684 Intel Core I7-9750H 9000 20002 Intel Core i7-9850H 2653 AMD Ryzen 5 3500X 2652 Cinebench R15 Single CoreIntel Pentium Gold G6400 166 Intel Core i5-6600 166 Intel Core i3-1115G4 165 Intel Core i5-1035g1 164 AMD Ryzen 7 2700 164 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 164 Intel Core i5-1035g1 003164 Intel Core i5-8400 163 AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 163 Intel Pentium Gold G5500 163 Cinebench R15 Multi CoreAMD Ryzen 5 2600X 1380 Intel Core i7-5960x 1360 Intel Core i5-10400 1341 Intel Core i5-10400F 1341 Intel Core i5-10600t 1324 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 9000 910 | 03
Intel Core i7-7800x 1285 Intel Core i9-8950HK 1269 Intel Core i7-10850h 1265 Intel I5-10500T 1245 AMD RYZEN Geekbench 5 Single CoreIntel Core i7-5930K 984 Intel Core i7-5775R 984 Intel Core i7-6700 983 Intel Core i5-4670K 978 Intel Core i5 -7500 977 AMD RYZEN 5 2600 977 Intel Core i5-7500 977 Intel Core i7-6950x Intel Core I5-8259U 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000. 973 Intel Core i3-8100 971 Geekbench 5 Multi CoreIntel Core i5-10500T 5496 Intel Core i7-11375H 5465 Intel Core i7-11370H 5465 Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 5441 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U 5437 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 5351 AMD Ryzen 5 3500X 5311 AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 5266 Intel Xeon E5-2630 V3 5246 AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 5241 AMD Ryzen 5 1600x 5220 Blender 2.81 BMW279000 INTEL XEON E5-16550222222 2000 600KF 315. 5 Intel Core i7-5930K 313.2 AMD Ryzen 5 1600 313 Intel Core i7-9750H 307 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 292.5 Intel Core i7-9700KF 288.4 Intel Core i7-6850K 279.7 AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 278.4 Intel Core i7-5960X 254.1 Intel Core i9-9980HK 251.2 Geekbench 3 Single CoreIntel Core i7-7700t 4314 Intel Xeon E3-1230 V5 4309 Intel Core i7-4790K 4302 Intel Core I3-7350k
AMD RYZAN AMD Ryzen 5 2600 4280 Intel Core i7-7567U 4267 Intel Core i3-8350K 4260 Intel Core i7-4940MX 4260 Intel Core i7-7660U 4240 Intel Core i5-8300H 4235 Geekbench 3 Multi CoreIntel Core i5-9600KF 23045 Intel Core i5-9600K 23045 AMD Ryzen 7 1700 22974 AMD Ryzen 5 2600x 22745 Intel Core i7-4930K 22600 AMD RYZEN 5 2600 21714 Intel Core i5-9600 21699 Intel Core I5-9500 9 9000 9000 9000 AMD RYZEN 5 1600X 21366 Intel Core i5-9400f 21065 Intel Core i5-9400 21065 Cinebench R111. 97 Intel Core i7-8565U 1.97 Intel Core i7-4790k 1.97 Intel Core i3-8300 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
,0004,0004,000 0031.94 Intel Pentium Gold G5400 1.94 Intel Core i5-8265U 1.94 Intel Pentium G4620 1.94 Intel Core i3-6300 1.94 Cinebench R11.5AMD Ryzen 7700 15.63 Intel Xeon E5-2690 V2 14.66 AMD Ryzen 5 2600x 14,0002 Intel Core i7-7800x 14.11 Intel Core i9-8950HK 9000 9 9 9 AMD RYZEN 5 2600 13.92 Intel Core i7-5960x 13. 18 Intel Xeon E5-2670 V2 12.93 INTEL CORETEL COREN Intel Core i5-9600KF 12.3 PassmarkIntel Core i7-9700F 13612 Intel Core i7-11375H 13548 Intel Core i7-9700 13479 AMD Ryzen 5 3500X 13409 Intel Core i5-10500 13273 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 13219 Intel Core i7-10700t INTEL XEON E5-269 V2 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 13079 AMD Ryzen 5 1600x 13063 AMD RYZEN 5 3500 12862 Tests in the GamesFPS measured in popular games at AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and compliance with systemic requirements. Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay. The most popular config: motherboard for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 — MSI B450 Tomahawk, graphics card — Radeon HD 7800M, RAM — Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB, SSD — A400 240GB. CharacteristicsThe data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted. Basic
Video coreRAMPCIData protectionDesignCompetitorsPlease note that competitors are selected automatically based on performance in a particular task. Therefore, some may puzzle you. We are improving our selection algorithm, treat with understanding. CompareAMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5-6600K AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-4770K AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-7700K AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-8750H AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-4930K AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-4960X AMD Ryzen 5 3600 processor — review, specifications and 10 user reviews — Top rated 2021-2022 with owner ratingsBrief overview of Buy AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 specifications Yandex. Market data
Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Yandex.Market data Rating: 5 out of 5 Eugene Sh. Advantages: Disadvantages: Comment: February 23, 2020, Moscow Score: 5 out of 5 Maxim Lashchinin Score: 5 out of 5 Disadvantages: Comment: July 22, 2019, Chelyabinsk Rating: 5 out of 5 Alexey L. Advantages: Disadvantages: Comment: October 11, 2019, Moscow Rating: 5 out of 5 Insurance Rating: 5 out of 5 Disadvantages: Comment: August 7, 2019, Moscow Score: 5 out of 5 IA78 Estimates: 5 of 5 Ivan B. Estimates: 5 of 5 Jeanseek Score: 5 of 5 Ilya P . Advantages: Disadvantages: |
---|