I7 4790k vs ryzen 7 2700x: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-4790K

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-4790K: What is the difference?

51points

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

52points

Intel Core i7-4790K

Comparison winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Intel Core i7-4790K

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 2700X better than Intel Core i7-4790K?

  • 1.85x faster CPU speed?
    8 x 3.7GHzvs4 x 4GHz
  • 1333MHz higher ram speed?
    2933MHzvs1600MHz
  • 8 more CPU threads?
    16vs8
  • 10.96°C higher maximum operating temperature?
    85°Cvs74.04°C
  • 10nm smaller semiconductor size?
    12nmvs22nm
  • 3MB bigger L2 cache?
    4MBvs1MB
  • 2.18x higher PassMark result?
    17623vs8089
  • 8MB bigger L3 cache?
    16MBvs8MB

Why is Intel Core i7-4790K better than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X?

  • 17W lower TDP?
    88Wvs105W
  • Has integrated graphics?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

Intel Core i5-4690K

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

Intel Core i7-4770K

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

Intel Core i3-10100

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

Intel Core i7-4930K

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

Intel Core i7-4770

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

Intel Core i9-9900K

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

Intel Core i7-7700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

2 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

9. 0/10

2 User reviews

Intel Core i7-4790K

2 User reviews

Intel Core i7-4790K

9.5/10

2 User reviews

Features

Value for money

8.5/10

2 votes

9.5/10

2 votes

Gaming

8.0/10

2 votes

9.5/10

2 votes

Performance

8.0/10

2 votes

9.5/10

2 votes

Reliability

9.5/10

2 votes

9.5/10

2 votes

Energy efficiency

7.5/10

2 votes

10.0/10

2 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

8 x 3.7GHz

4 x 4GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.3GHz

4.4GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

2MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2933MHz

1600MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

43.71GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✖Intel Core i7-4790K

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9. bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5. Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

423.2seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

1320.7seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✖Intel Core i7-4790K

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X — Battlefield V with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz

Battlefield V

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X


i7-4790K
Ryzen 7 2700X

Multi-Thread Performance

11183 Pts

16960 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2530 Pts

2190 Pts

Battlefield V

i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X in Battlefield V using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-4790K
Ryzen 7 2700X


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

86. 9 FPS

1080p

82.5 FPS

1440p

69.7 FPS

1440p

66.1 FPS

2160p

37.6 FPS

2160p

35.6 FPS

w1440p

57.4 FPS

w1440p

54.5 FPS

High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

140.0 FPS

1080p

134.0 FPS

1440p

116.1 FPS

1440p

111.0 FPS

2160p

68.4 FPS

2160p

65.3 FPS

w1440p

98.4 FPS

w1440p

94.1 FPS

Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

193. 0 FPS

1080p

185.4 FPS

1440p

162.5 FPS

1440p

155.9 FPS

2160p

99.3 FPS

2160p

95.0 FPS

w1440p

139.4 FPS

w1440p

133.8 FPS

Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

299.2 FPS

1080p

288.3 FPS

1440p

255.3 FPS

1440p

245.7 FPS

2160p

161.0 FPS

2160p

154.3 FPS

w1440p

221.4 FPS

w1440p

213.1 FPS

i7-4790K
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i7-4790K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i7-4790K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 7 2700X
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X specifications

i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Architecture
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
Codename Haswell Zen
Generation Core i7
(Haswell)
Ryzen 7
(Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR3 DDR4
Part# unknown unknown
Production Status Active Active
Released May 2014 Apr 2018
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cache
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
Cache L1 64K (per core) 96K (per core)
Cache L2 256K (per core) 512K (per core)
Cache L3 8MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cores
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
# of Cores 4 8
# of Threads 8 16
Integrated Graphics Intel HD 4600 N/A
SMP # CPUs 1 1
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Features
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
XFR 2
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Performance
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 4 GHz 3.7 GHz
Multiplier 40.0x 37.0x
Multiplier Unlocked No Yes
TDP 88 W 105 W
Turbo Clock up to 4.4 GHz up to 4.35 GHz
Voltage unknown variable
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Physical
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
Die Size 177 mm² 192 mm²
Foundry Intel GlobalFoundries
Package µOPGA-1331
Process Size 22 nm 12 nm
Socket Intel Socket 1150 AMD Socket AM4
Transistors 1400 million 4800 million
tCaseMax 72°C unknown

Share Your Comments 93

Compare i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need For Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Dawn of War III

2017

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016

Doom

2016

F1 2016

2016

Total War: Warhammer

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-4790K

Availability

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler — YD270XBGAFBOX

Buy on Amazon

$274. 99

In Stock

Updated 64 minutes ago

Availability

Intel Core i7 i7-4790K Quad-core (4 Core) 4 GHz Processor — Socket h4 LGA-1150 Pack CM8064601710501

Buy on Amazon

$245

In Stock

Updated 64 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4790K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4790K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1449 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4790K.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790K

  • Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X — $245.0 vs $274.99

  • Up to 7% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Ryzen 7 2700X — $0.99 vs $1.07 per FPS

  • Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X — 88 vs 105 Watts

  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn’t have integrated graphics

Grand Theft Auto V

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Ryzen 7 2700X

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018


FPS

256

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1. 07/FPS

92%

Price, $

$274.99

89%

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler — YD270XBGAFBOX

Buy for $274.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 64 minutes ago

Core i7-4790K

Desktop • May 1st, 2014


FPS

248

97%

Value, $/FPS

$0.99/FPS

100%

Price, $

$245

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i7 i7-4790K Quad-core (4 Core) 4 GHz Processor — Socket h4 LGA-1150 Pack CM8064601710501

Buy for $245 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 64 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Ryzen 7 2700X

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018

Core i7-4790K

Desktop • May 1st, 2014

256

FPS

248

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

446

FPS

433

FPS

VALORANT

1026

FPS

995

FPS

League of Legends

280

FPS

270

FPS

Apex Legends

277

FPS

267

FPS

Fortnite

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Ryzen 7 2700X

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018


Single-Core

1039

98%

Multi-Core

6842

100%

Core i7-4790K

Desktop • May 1st, 2014


Single-Core

1059

100%

Multi-Core

3944

27%

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

Intel Core i7-4790K

Apr 19th, 2018

Release Date May 1st, 2014
Ryzen 7 Collection Core i7
Pinnacle Ridge Codename Haswell
AMD Socket AM4 Socket Intel Socket 1150

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

8

Cores 4

16

Threads 8
3. 7 GHz Base Clock Speed

4.0 GHz

4.3 GHz Turbo Clock Speed

4.4 GHz

105 W TDP

88 W

12 nm

Process Size 22 nm
37.0x Multiplier

40.0x

None Integrated Graphics

Intel HD 4600

Yes Overclockable Yes

Builds Using Ryzen 7 2700X or Core i7-4790K

Grand Theft Auto V, 1080p, High

Skytech Blaze II Gaming Computer PC

146 FPS

$9.1/FPS

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

Ryzen 7 2700X

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$1,328.87

In Stock

Updated 48 minutes ago

Skytech Chronos Gaming PC

152 FPS

$13.16/FPS

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

Ryzen 7 2700X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,999. 99

In Stock

Updated 49 minutes ago

Dell Inspiron High Performance Gaming Desktop PC

93 FPS

$20.42/FPS

Radeon RX 580

Ryzen 7 2700X

16 GB, 256 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,899

In Stock

Updated 53 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Core i5-4690K

$118.68

Core i7-4790K

Ryzen 7 2700X

$274.99

E1-6015

N/A Stock

Ryzen 7 2700X

$274.99

A8-3870

N/A Stock

Ryzen 7 2700X

$274.99

Pentium G2120

$74.99

Ryzen 7 2700X

$274.99

Sempron 3850

$69.95

Ryzen 7 2700X

$274.99

Core i7-6820EQ

N/A Stock

Ryzen 7 2700X

$274.99

E2-3800

N/A Stock

Core i7-4790K

Core 2 Duo E7500

$99. 63

Ryzen 7 2700X

$274.99

Xeon E5-2603 v4

N/A Stock

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-4790K








AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-4790K

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X on one side and the Intel Core i7-4790K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,3GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Intel Core i7-4790K
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Zen+

Haswell
Core name

Pinnacle Ridge

Devil’s Canyon
Family

Ryzen 7 2000

Core i7-4000
Part number(s), S-Spec

YD270XBGM88AF

BX80646I74790K,
CM8064601710501,
SR219

Release date

Q2 2018

Q2 2014
Lithography

12 nm

22 nm
Transistors

4. 800.000.000

1.400.000.000
Cores

8

4
Threads

16

8
Base frequency

3,7 GHz

4,0 GHz
Turbo frequency

4,3 GHz

4,4 GHz
Cache memory

16 MB

8 MB
Max memory capacity

64 GB

32 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2933

DDR3-1333/1600,

DDR3L-1333/1600

Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

43,71 GB/s

25,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

20

16
TDP

105 W

88 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

None

Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU execution units

20
GPU shading units

160
GPU base clock

350 MHz
GPU boost clock

1250 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

352 GFLOPS
Socket

AM4, PGA-1331

LGA1150
Compatible motherboard

Socket AM4 Motherboard 

Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

85°C

74°C
CPU-Z single thread

476

473
CPU-Z multi thread

5. 031

2.444
Cinebench R15 single thread

180

173
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

1.828

836
Cinebench R23 single thread

1.118

964
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

11.289

5.090
PassMark single thread

2.428

2.459
PassMark CPU Mark

17.584

8.047
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

4.823

4.928
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

26. 797

15.801
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

384,3 GFLOPS

267,4 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

255 pts / W

180 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-4790K is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-4790K is less. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

476

5.031
Intel Core i7-4790K

473

2.444

In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 106%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

180

1.828
Intel Core i7-4790K

173

836

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 119%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

1.118

11.289
Intel Core i7-4790K

964

5.090

In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 122%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

2.428

17.584
Intel Core i7-4790K

2.459

8.047

In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 119%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

4.823

26.797
Intel Core i7-4790K

4.928

15.801

In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 70%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

5.027

26.264
Intel Core i7-4790K

5.354

17.597

In single core, the difference is -6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 49%.

On Android 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
Intel Core i7-4790K

5.836

19.848
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

4.044

13.431

In single core, the difference is 44%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 48%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

4. 820

26.430
Intel Core i7-4790K

4.923

16.431

In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 61%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-4790K AMD equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Ryzen 7 2700EAMD Ryzen 7 2700U

Intel Core i7-4790Intel Core i7-4790S

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs.

Intel Core i7-4790K

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X operates with 8 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base 3.85 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 105 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) Architecture is enhanced with 12 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q2/2018

Intel Core i7-4790K

The Intel Core i7-4790K operates with 4 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 4.40 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 88 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Devils Canyon S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2014

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Intel Core i7-4790K

Compare Detail

3.70 GHz Frequency 4.00 GHz
8 Cores 4
4.30 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 4.40 GHz
3.85 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 4.20 GHz
Yes Hyperthreading Yes
Yes Overclocking Yes
normal Core Architecture normal
no iGPU GPU

Intel HD Graphics 4600

No turbo GPU (Turbo) 1.25 GHz
12 nm Technology 22 nm
No turbo GPU (Turbo) 1.25 GHz
DirectX Version 11.1
Max. displays 3
DDR4-2933 Memory
2 Memory channels 2
Max memory
Yes ECC No
L2 Cache
16. 00 MB L3 Cache 8.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 3.0
20 PCIe lanes 16
12 nm Technology 22 nm
AM4 Socket LGA 1150
105 W TDP 88 W
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q2/2018 Release date Q2/2014

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Intel Core i7-4790K
105 W Max TDP 88 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

Intel Core i7-4790K vs.

Intel Core i7-5960X


Cpu Benchmark with benchmarks

Intel Core i7-4790K Intel Core i7-5960X
4.00 GHz Frequency 3.00 GHz
4.40 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 3.50 GHz
4.20 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 3.20 GHz
4 Cores 8
Yes Hyperthreading ? Yes
Yes Overclocking ? Yes
normal Core architecture normal
Intel HD Graphics 4600 GPU no iGPU
11.1 DirectX Version
3 Max. displays
Memory DDR4-2133
2 Memory channels 4
Max. Memory
No ECC No
L2 Cache
8. 00 MB L3 Cache 20.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 3.0
16 PCIe lanes 40
22 nm Technology 22 nm
LGA 1150 Socket LGA 2011-3
88 W TDP 140 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q2/2014 Release date Q3/2014
show more detail show more detail

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Benchmark. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Benchmark’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Popular Comparision

Intel Core i7-4790K vs. Intel Core i7-5960X — Cpu Benchmark Specs & Test

4.2 of 44 rating(s)

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-4790K: What is the difference?

51 ballla

AMD Ryzen 7 2700x

52 BALLLA

Intel Core i7-4790k

Winner when comparing

VS

64 Facts compared to

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Intel Core INTEL Core INTEL Core INTEL CORE INTEL Is Ryzen 7 2700X better than Intel Core i7-4790K?

  • 1.85x higher CPU speed?
    8 x 3.7GHz vs 4 x 4GHz
  • 1333MHz higher RAM speed?
    2933MHz vs 1600MHz
  • 8 more CPU threads?
    16 vs 8
  • 10.96°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
    85°C vs 74.04°C
  • Are 10nm smaller semiconductors?
    12nm vs 22nm
  • 3MB more L2 cache?
    4MB vs 1MB
  • 2. 18x higher PassMark score?
    17623 vs 8089
  • 8MB more L3 cache?
    16MB vs 8MB

  • 17W below TDP?
    88W vs 105W
  • Does it have integrated graphics?

What are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i7-4790K

vs

Intel Core i5-4690k

AMD RYZEN 7 2700X

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-4790k

AMD Ry AMD RYOT AMD RYZEN 7 5800X

Intel Core i7-4790K

VS

Intel Core i3-10100

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600g

Intel Core i7-47-47990K i7-4930k

AMD RYZEN 7 2700X

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5700x

Intel Core i7-4790k

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD RYZEN 7 2700X

VS

9000 AMD RYOT RYOT RYOT RYT Core i7-4790K

VS

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 5900x

Intel Core i7-4790K

AM 9000 7 2700X

VS

Intel Core i9-9900k

Intel Core i7-4790K

VS

Intel Core i7-7700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

VS

9000 AMD RYZEN 5 2600 9000 9000 I7

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AMD Ryzen 7 2700x

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-4790k

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

conspications

Respons0021

General rating

AMD Ryzen 7 2700x

2 Reviews of users

AMD Ryzen 7 2700x

/10

2 Reviews of users 9000 -4790k

9. 5 /10

2 Reviews of users

Functions

Price and quality ratio

8.5 /10

2 VOTES

8 9.5 /10

2 Votes

Games

8.0 /10

2 VOTES

/10

2 VOTES 9000 9.5 /10

2 Votes

Reliability

/10

2 VOTES

/10

003

2 Votes

10.0 /10

2 Votes

Productivity

1. Skur -old processor

8 x 3.7GHZ

4 x 4GHZ 9000 , considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.3GHz

4.4GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

2MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2933MHz

1600MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

43.71GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

7.Supports memory troubleshooting code

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✖Intel Core i7-4790K

Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

423.2seconds

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

1320.7seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✔Intel Core i7-4790K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

✖Intel Core i7-4790K

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X — Battlefield V vs GTX 1660 performance comparison

GTX 1660 with

i7-4790K
Ryzen 7 2700X


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

86. 9 FPS

1080p

82.5 FPS

1440p

69.7 FPS

1440p

66.1 FPS

2160p

37.6 FPS

2160p

35.6 FPS

w1440p

57.4 FPS

w1440p

54.5 FPS

High quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

140.0 FPS

1080p

134.0 FPS

1440p

116.1 FPS

1440p

111.0 FPS

2160p

68.4 FPS

2160p

65.3 FPS

w1440p

98.4 FPS

w1440p

94. 1 FPS

Medium quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

193.0 FPS

1080p

185.4 FPS

1440p

162.5 FPS

1440p

155.9 FPS

2160p

99.3 FPS

2160p

95.0 FPS

w1440p

139.4 FPS

w1440p

133.8 FPS

Low quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

299.2 FPS

1080p

288.3 FPS

1440p

255.3 FPS

1440p

245. 7 FPS

2160p

161.0 FPS

2160p

154.3 FPS

w1440p

221.4 FPS

w1440p

213.1 FPS

i7-4790K
  • In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
  • i7-4790K The i7-4790K is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i7-4790K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
Ryzen 7 2700X
  • Ryzen 7 2700X has higher level 2 cache. The data/instructions that need to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU doesn’t have to wait for the very slow DDR
  • RAM

  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has a higher level 3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
  • Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
  • Ryzen 7 2700X has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
  • Ryzen 7 2700X The Ryzen 7 2700X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.

Compare i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X specifications

i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Architecture
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
Codename Haswell Zen
Generation Core i7
(Haswell)
Ryzen 7
(Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR3 DDR4
Part# unknown unknown
Production Status Active Active
Released May 2014 Apr 2018
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cache
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
Cache L1 64K (per core) 96K (per core)
Cache L2 256K (per core) 512K (per core)
Cache L3 8MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cores
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
# of Cores 4 8
# of Threads 8 16
Integrated Graphics Intel HD 4600 N/A
SMP# CPUs 1 1
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Features
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
XFR 2
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Performance
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 4 GHz 3.7 GHz
Multiplier 40.0x 37.0x
Multiplier Unlocked No Yes
TDP 88W 105W
Turbo Clock up to 4.4 GHz up to 4.35 GHz
Voltage unknown variable
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 7 2700X Physical
i7-4790K Ryzen 7 2700X
Die Size 177 mm² 192 mm²
Foundry Intel GlobalFoundries
Package µOPGA-1331
Process Size 22 nm 12 nm
Socket Intel Socket 1150 AMD Socket AM4
Transistors 1400 million 4800 million
tCaseMax 72°C unknown

Share your comments 93

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need for Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Dawn of War III

2017

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016

Doom

2016

F1 2016

2016

Total War: Warhammer

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed ​​

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

Rating of the best CPUs for gaming PCs in 2019 / Habr

In 2019, the desktop processor market became interesting. For many years, Intel dominated here, but AMD released Ryzen 7 — direct competitors to the Intel i7 models. Then a series of blows Ryzen 3 and 5 against Intel i3 and i5 — and finishing off a competitor with sledgehammers Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and 3970X. However, these monsters are not for the gaming market, but for other HEDT applications.

With 24/32-core Threadripper, AMD has become a technology leader. Intel has nothing to say about the fastest AMD processors, but is trying to compete in the second tier of cheaper CPUs. To do this, Intel had to drastically cut prices. Intel also continues to manipulate its compiler, which slows down the execution of programs on alternative processors (see below in the section «Cheating the Intel Compiler»).

What now? What are the best gaming CPUs in different price categories? In late November-early December 2019, AnandTech, WePC, PC Gamer, Digital Trends, Tom’s Hardware, PC World published their recommendations. Let’s see what happens on the gaming scene?

Here are the recommendations of the AnandTech publication, which broke the gaming market into six concise segments (prices are current at the time of writing):

Segment Recommendation
Best Choice Competitor
Top Gaming PC Intel Core i9-9900KS $599 AMD Ryzen 9 3950X $749
$1500 game machine AMD Ryzen 7 3800X $355 Intel Core i7-9700 $323
$1000 game machine AMD Ryzen 5 3600X $235
$700 game machine AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $120 Intel Core i3-8100 $130
$500 game machine AMD Ryzen 3 3400G $130
$300 minimum game AMD Athlon 3000G $49
What are you waiting for Intel Comet Lake?

These recommendations try to find the best balance between price and performance.

The winner in the top category is a different story. Intel announced that 9The 900KS will only be available for a limited time. An octa-core CPU up to 5 GHz can now be found on sale for about $600, and Intel’s wholesale price in quantities of 1,000 units is $513. Experts warn that the chip gets very hot (heat dissipation up to 172 W at peak), it is better to fork out for an expensive cooling system.

3DNews writes that the whole story with the appearance of the Core i9-9900KS on the market from the very beginning causes a feeling of deja vu. «Why? Yes, it’s very simple, we saw similar events sixteen years ago, when AMD released its revolutionary Athlon 64 and Athlon 64 FX processors with the Hammer microarchitecture. Then, in order to rebuff these novelties, Intel urgently organized the release of Pentium 4 Extreme Edition processors equipped with a 2-megabyte L3 cache, hastily converted from Xeon MP server chips. Now, of course, the situation is developing in a slightly different scenario, but the overall plot outline has remained the same. Not being able to symmetrically respond to the competitor’s daring encroachments, Intel gets out as best it can and instead of a new product family offers temporary flagship «quick response» processors. Core i9The -9900KS is just such a hand-crafted answer to third-gen Ryzen.»

It’s clear why the Core i9-9900KS is a limited edition. This is a special overclocked version of the Core i9-9900K, built on selected semiconductor chips that are capable of operating at even higher clock speeds. In this case, 5 GHz. By definition, there are a limited number of «selected» crystals.

Alternatively, look at the basic i9-9900K (wholesale price $488) or a competitor from AMD — the flagship Ryzen 9 3950X processor based on the Zen 2 architecture. Although it costs more ($749), it is already a new generation processor: a 16-core CPU manufactured using a 7 nm process, and not the old intel 14 nm.

The Ryzen 9 3950X may be inferior to Intel processors in single-threaded performance tests, but due to the larger number of cores, it efficiently performs other tasks in the background. This makes sense: today, many gamers run chat programs with colleagues, video broadcasts, and other applications in parallel. So not only performance in games is important, but also multithreading.

The Ryzen 9 3950X went on sale on November 25, 2019 (November 30 in Japan), and immediately caused an unprecedented stir. Japanese media reported that stores lined up hours before the opening, and stocks of the Ryzen 9 3950X sold out on the first day.

Line in front of the Computer Shop ARK in Tokyo, September 30, 2019

In addition to the top category, AMD processors are recommended in all other segments, starting with the cheapest, dual-core AMD Athlon 3000G with integrated Vega 3 graphics at the price of everything $49.

CPU hierarchy in games

PC Gamer has published a performance rating of different CPUs in games with a top-end RTX 2080 Ti graphics card.

Other results

Below is the CPU hierarchy according to Tom’s Hardware. Processors sorted by gaming performance. Unfortunately, recent changes in tests and security patches for the CPU have affected the results, so there are a lot of gaps in the table. For many CPUs, old results are shown, where the maximum result corresponds to a score of 100%, and the rest were evaluated relative to it.

In general, the table is sorted by average performance in games (there were eight games in the test set), some cheaper processors cost more than more expensive ones.

Also includes an app performance rating. The test set included archivers, HandBrake, Blender and Adobe Creative Cloud Suite.

Games Applications Architecture cores/threads Main /turbo TDP
Intel Core i9-9900K ~ ~ Coffee Lake-R 8 / 16 3. 6 / 5.0 GHz 95W
Intel Core i9-9900KF ~ ~ Coffee Lake-R 8 / 16 3.6 / 5.0 GHz 95W
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X ~ ~ Zen 2 16 / 32 3.5 / 4.7 GHz 105W
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ~ ~ Zen 2 12 / 24 3.8 / 4.6 GHz 105W
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X ~ ~ Zen 2 8 / 16 3.9 / 4.5 GHz 105W
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ~ ~ Zen 2 8 / 16 3. 6 / 4.4 GHz 65W
Intel Core i7-9700K ~ ~ Coffee Lake-R 8 / 8 3.6 / 4.9 GHz 95W
Intel Core i7-8700K 100 70.4 Coffee Lake 6 / 12 3.7 / 4.7 GHz 95W
Intel Core i7-8700 99.98 61.1 Coffee Lake 6 / 12 3.2 / 4.6 GHz 65W
Intel Core i9-7960X 99.97 96.9 Skylake 16 / 32 2.8 / 4.2 GHz 165W
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ~ ~ Zen 2 6 / 12 3. 8 / 4.4 GHz 95W
Intel Core i5-9600K ~ ~ Coffee Lake-R 6 / 6 3.7 / 4.6 GHz 95W
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 ~ ~ Zen 2 6 / 12 3.6 / 4.2 65W
Intel Core i5-8600K 99.91 56.1 Coffee Lake 6 / 6 3.6 / 4.3 GHz 95W
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 98.2 57.9 Zen+ 6 / 12 3.6 / 4.2 GHz 95W
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 97.2 70 Zen+ 8 / 16 3. 7 / 4.3 GHz 105W
Intel Xeon W-3175X ~ ~ Skylake 28 / 56 3.1 / 4.3 GHz
Intel Core i9-10980XE ~ ~ Cascade Lake-X 18 / 36 3.0 / 4.8 165W
Intel Core i9-9980XE ~ ~ Skylake 18 / 36 4.4 / 4.5 GHz 165W
AMD Threadripper 3960X ~ ~ Zen 2 24 / 48 3.8 / 4.5 GHz 280W
AMD Threadripper 3970X ~ ~ Zen 2 32 / 64 3.7 / 4.5 GHz 280W
Intel Core i9-7980XE 97 99. 9 Skylake 18 / 36 2.6 / 4.2 GHz 165W
Intel Core i9-7900X 96 75 Skylake 10 / 20 3.3 / 4.3 GHz 140W
Intel Core i5-8600 ~ ~ Coffee Lake 6 / 6 3.1 / 4.3 GHz 65W
Intel Core i7-7700K 96.6 45.4 Kaby Lake 4 / 8 4.2 / 4.5 GHz 91W
Intel Core i5-8500 ~ ~ Coffee Lake 6 / 6 3.0 / 4.1 GHz 65W
Core i5-9400 / i5-9400F ~ ~ Coffee Lake 6 / 6 2. 9 / 4.1 GHz 65W
Intel Core i5-8400 95.6 45.8 Coffee Lake 6 / 6 2.8 / 4.0 GHz 65W
AMD Threadripper 2950X (GM) 94 100 Zen + 16 / 32 3.5 / 4.4 GHz 180W
Intel Core i7-7820X 93.1 71.7 Skylake 8 / 16 3.6 / 4.3 GHz 140W
Intel Core i3-8350K 93.0 34.3 Coffee Lake 4 / 4 4.0 / — GHz 91W
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 92. 9 69 Zen+ 8 / 16 3.2 / 4.1 GHz 65W
AMD Threadripper 1900X (GM) 92.8 60 Zen 8 / 16 3.8 / 4.0 GHz 180W
Intel Core i7-7700 92.7 41.6 Kaby Lake 4 / 8 3.6 / 4.2 GHz 65W
Threadripper 2990WX (GM) 92.4 99.6 Zen+ 32 / 64 3.0 / 4.2 GHz 250W
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 91.5 50.6 Zen+ 6 / 12 3. 4 / 3.9GHz 65W
Intel Core i7-7800X 88.7 70 Skylake 6 / 12 3.5 / 4.0 GHz 140W
Intel Core i5-7600K 87.1 40 Kaby Lake 4 / 4 3.8 / 4.2 GHz 91W
AMD Threadripper 1950X (GM) 86.7 88 Zen 16 / 32 3.4 / 4.0 GHz 180W
AMD Threadripper 1920X (GM) 86.4 77.5 Zen 12 / 24 3.5 / 4.0 GHz 180W
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 86. 1 59.2 Zen 8 / 16 3.6 / 4.0 GHz 95W
Intel Core i5-7600 85.9 57 Kaby Lake 4 / 4 3.5 / 4.1 GHz 65W
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 85.7 55 Zen 8 / 16 3.8 / 3.9 GHz 95W
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 84.8 48 Zen 6 / 12 3.6 / 4.0 GHz 95W
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 82.6 46.5 Zen 6 / 12 3. 2 / 3.6 GHz 65W
Intel Core i3-8300 ~ ~ Coffee Lake 4 / 4 3.7 / — GHz 62W
Intel Core i3-8100 85.7 29.9 Coffee Lake 4 / 4 3.6 / — GHz 65W
Intel Core i5-7500 79.9 32 Kaby Lake 4 / 4 3.4 / 3.8 GHz 65W
Intel Core i5-7400 76.7 30.9 Kaby Lake 4 / 4 3.0 / 3.5 GHz 65W
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 75. 9 52 Zen 8 / 16 3.0 / 3.8 GHz 65W
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 75.7 35.4 Zen 4 / 8 3.5 / 3.7 GHz 65W
Intel Core i3-7350K 74.2 24 Kaby Lake 2 / 4 4.2 / — GHz 60W
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G 72.0 34.2 Zen+ 4 / 8 3.6 / 3.9 GHz 65W
Intel Core i3-7300 69.8 23.3 Kaby Lake 2 / 4 4. 0 / — GHz 51W
Intel Core i3-7100 67.5 22 Kaby Lake 2 / 4 3.9 / — GHz 51W
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 67.4 31.8 Zen 4 / 8 3.2 / 3.4 GHz 65W
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X 66.7 26.4 Zen 4 / 4 3.5 / 3.7 GHz 65W
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 65.5 26.3 Zen+ 4 / 4 3.5 / 3.7 GHz 65W
AMD Athlon 240GE ~ ~ Zen 2 / 4 3. 5 / — GHz 35W
AMD Athlon 220GE ~ ~ Zen 2 / 4 3.4 / — GHz 35W
AMD Athlon 200GE ~ ~ Zen 2 / 4 3.2 / — GHz 35W
Intel Pentium G5600 ~ ~ Coffee Lake 2 / 4 3.9 / — GHz 54W
Intel Pentium G5400 ~ ~ Coffee Lake 2 / 4 3.7 / — GHz 54W
Intel Pentium G4620 65.0 18. 2 Kaby Lake 2 / 4 3.7 / — GHz 54W
Intel Pentium G4560 61.5 17.5 Kaby Lake 2 / 4 3.5 / — GHz 54W
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 61.1 22.7 Zen 4 / 4 3.1 / 3.2 GHz 65W

However, the results of benchmarks should be treated critically.

Intel optimizations

Tests and benchmarks of processors are a topic for a separate discussion. The fact is that many programs can indeed run slower on AMD processors, because they are compiled with the Intel compiler or use highly optimized Intel libraries, which greatly slow down the execution of programs on alternative processors.

The reason is that the compiler or library generates multiple versions of the code, each optimized for a particular processor and instruction set, such as SSE2, SSE3, etc. The system includes a function that determines the type of processor it is running on. and selects the optimal code path for that processor. This is called the CPU manager. However, the Intel Processor Manager not only checks which instruction set is supported by the processor, but also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string says «GenuineIntel», then it uses the optimal code path. If the processor is not from Intel, then in most cases it will run the slowest version of the code, even if the processor is fully compatible with the best version .

This situation has been discussed since 2005, but Intel still refuses to change the CPU manager. If the company officially announced that its compiler is compatible only with Intel processors, then there would be no complaints about it. The problem is that they are trying to hide what is happening. Many software developers believe that this compiler is compatible with AMD processors, and this is actually the case, although it uses a «biased» CPU manager, which selects code degradation whenever it sees a non-Intel processor, unbeknownst to the programmer. If programmers knew this fact, they would probably use a different compiler. Who wants to create software that doesn’t run very well on AMD processors?

However, the problem still exists. Some experts are of the opinion that the biased CPU manager from the compiler affects the results of standard benchmarks, which compare the performance of Intel and AMD processors.

For example, comparing the performance of Matlab on Threadripper 3970X and Cascade Lake X processors shows a significant superiority of Intel processors.

The problem turned out to be that Matlab uses Intel’s Math Kernel Library (MKL), which deliberately slows down code execution on AMD processors. If it sees an Intel processor, it deliberately switches to the slowest SSE1 instruction set, regardless of which more efficient instruction sets the processor supports (AVX2, etc. ).

If you force MKL_DEBUG_CPU_TYPE=5 to be set in the system environment variables, then the speed of calculations on AMD processors increases several times.

It is important that software and game developers be aware of the problem and use Intel compilers carefully by reviewing x86 and x86-64 processor optimization tutorials.

Best sellers on Amazon

The top 10 most popular processors on Amazon consist entirely of AMD models:

  1. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6 Core — $189.99
  2. AMD Ryzen 5 2600 — $119.99
  3. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X — $189.99
  4. AMD Ryzen 3 2200G with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics — $77.98
  5. AMD Ryzen 7 2700 — $167.39
  6. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X — $149.00
  7. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8 Core — $309.99
  8. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6 Core — $239.99
  9. AMD Ryzen

    X, 12 cores — $579.99

  10. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8 Core — $379. 99

Only in 11th place in popularity is the first representative of Intel — the Core i9-9900K processor for $ 489.99.

Hashrate of Intel and AMD processors according to the GhostRider algorithm, Raptoreum cryptocurrency Exchange news

Posted

The hash rate of the GhostRider mining algorithm is highly dependent not only on the number of cores, but also on the size and speed of the processor cache, so more expensive enthusiast-oriented processor models have a significant advantage over budget and mid-budget models.

Help the site grow by clicking on the ad below

GhostRider hashrate for Intel processors

Processor 4236 Ryzen 5 5600 Г 889
Ryzen 9 3900XT 3781 Ryzen 5 4750 Г 872
Ryzen 9 3900X 3555 Ryzen 5 4600 Ч 675
Ryzen 9 3900 3601 Ryzen 5 3600X 1857
Ryzen 7 5800X 2111 Ryzen 5 3600 1756
Ryzen 7 3800X

Output : AMD processors continue to lead the cryptocurrency mining tasks regardless of the mining algorithm chosen. If you have a powerful enough processor like Ryzen 5800X, mining income can be 1.6-1.8 USD per day, which is quite a lot by CPU mining standards. At these rates, a processor can pay for itself in less than a year. For comparison, video cards, given the inflated prices, now pay for themselves in 1.5-2 years.

Related posts

Help the site to develop, click on advertising below

Raptoreum Exchange cryptocurrency mining

Share with friends

characteristics AMD Ryzen 5 2600, competitors, competitors

  • Home
  • Main
  • AMD
  • >
  • Ryzen 5 2600

Processor Ryzen 5 2600, price new on amazon and ebay — 290 USD Marked by the manufacturer as: YD2600BBAFBOX.

Number of cores — 6. With SMT technology, the number of threads is 12, which is twice the number of physical cores and improves the performance of multi-threaded applications and games.

Ryzen 5 2600 base clock — 3.4 GHz. The maximum frequency in AMD Turbo Core mode reaches 3.8 GHz.

Price in Russia

Want to buy Ryzen 5 2600 cheap? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.

family

  • Ryzen 5 2600X
  • Ryzen 7 2700
  • Ryzen 7 2700X
  • Ryzen 5 1600AF

AMD Ryzen 5 Benchmarks 2600

Game Speed ​​

Based on our tests Performance.

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed ​​in office use

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed ​​in heavy applications

Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Minimum Average Maximum
72

Memory

84. 8

96 1 core: 109 119

1 core

53.4

183 2 cores: 214 236

2 cores

53.1

Demanding games and tasks

Minimum Average Maximum
333 4 Cores: 412 462

4 cores

51. 9

581 8 cores: 680 769

8 cores

43.9

9613

Extreme

Minimum Average Maximum
741 All cores: 888

All cores

16.3

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests of users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the fuller the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Core i5-8500

1052

Intel Core i5-10210U

1049

Intel Core i3-100G1

1047

Intel Core I5 ​​-600K0003

1041

Intel Core i5-6600

1041

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

1040

Intel Core i7-8650U

1037

AMD 1950x

9000 nttel Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core, 1032

Intel Core i3-10110u

1028

AMD Ryzen 5 2500x

1028

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Core

8164

INTEL CORE INTEL CORE0003

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

8065

AMD Ryzen 5 4600U

8044

Intel Core i7-8700

7969

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

7555

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

7514

Intel Core i7-10850h

7455

Intel Core i7-10750H

7314

Intel Core i5-9600K

7301

Intel Core I5-9600KF 224

Cinebench R20 Singench R20 Singench0003

387

Intel Core i7-4790

384

AMD Ryzen 7 1800x

381

Intel Core i5-6600

381

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 AMD 374

Intel Core i5-4670k

371

Intel Celeron G5920

368

Intel Core i3-6100

368

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

9000 9000

AMD RYEN0003

Cinebench R20 Multi Core

Intel Core i5-10600T

2993

Intel Core i7-10850H

2839

Intel Core i5-10500T

2829

Intel Core i7-7800X

2809

AMD Ryzen 5 1600x

2764

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

2736

Intel Core i7-10750H

2732

AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF

2684

Intel Core I7-9750H

9000 20002 Intel Core i7-9850H

2653

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

2652

Cinebench R15 Single Core

Intel Pentium Gold G6400

166

Intel Core i5-6600

166

Intel Core i3-1115G4

165

Intel Core i5-1035g1

164

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

164

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

164

Intel Core i5-1035g1

003

164

Intel Core i5-8400

163

AMD Ryzen 7 1800X

163

Intel Pentium Gold G5500

163

Cinebench R15 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

1380

Intel Core i7-5960x

1360

Intel Core i5-10400

1341

Intel Core i5-10400F

1341

Intel Core i5-10600t

1324

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 9000 910

03

Intel Core i7-7800x

1285

Intel Core i9-8950HK

1269

Intel Core i7-10850h

1265

Intel I5-10500T

1245

AMD RYZEN

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Core i7-5930K

984

Intel Core i7-5775R

984

Intel Core i7-6700

983

Intel Core i5-4670K

978

Intel Core i5 -7500

977

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

977

Intel Core i5-7500

977

Intel Core i7-6950x

Intel Core I5-8259U

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000.

973

Intel Core i3-8100

971

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Core i5-10500T

5496

Intel Core i7-11375H

5465

Intel Core i7-11370H

5465

Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2

5441

AMD Ryzen 5 5600U

5437

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

5351

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

5311

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X

5266

Intel Xeon E5-2630 V3

5246

AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF

5241

AMD Ryzen 5 1600x

5220

Blender 2.81 BMW27

9000 INTEL XEON E5-16550222222 2000

600KF

315. 5

Intel Core i7-5930K

313.2

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

313

Intel Core i7-9750H

307

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

292.5

Intel Core i7-9700KF

288.4

Intel Core i7-6850K

279.7

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

278.4

Intel Core i7-5960X

254.1

Intel Core i9-9980HK

251.2

Geekbench 3 Single Core

Intel Core i7-7700t

4314

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V5

4309

Intel Core i7-4790K

4302

Intel Core I3-7350k

AMD RYZAN

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

4280

Intel Core i7-7567U

4267

Intel Core i3-8350K

4260

Intel Core i7-4940MX

4260

Intel Core i7-7660U

4240

Intel Core i5-8300H

4235

Geekbench 3 Multi Core

Intel Core i5-9600KF

23045

Intel Core i5-9600K

23045

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

22974

AMD Ryzen 5 2600x

22745

Intel Core i7-4930K

22600

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

21714

Intel Core i5-9600

21699

Intel Core I5-9500

9 9000 9000 9000

AMD RYZEN 5 1600X

21366

Intel Core i5-9400f

21065

Intel Core i5-9400

21065

Cinebench R11

1. 97

Intel Core i7-8565U

1.97

Intel Core i7-4790k

1.97

Intel Core i3-8300

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

,0004,0004,000

003

1.94

Intel Pentium Gold G5400

1.94

Intel Core i5-8265U

1.94

Intel Pentium G4620

1.94

Intel Core i3-6300

1.94

Cinebench R11.5

AMD Ryzen 7700

15.63

Intel Xeon E5-2690 V2

14.66

AMD Ryzen 5 2600x

14,0002 Intel Core i7-7800x

14.11

Intel Core i9-8950HK 9000 9 9 9

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

13.92

Intel Core i7-5960x

13. 18

Intel Xeon E5-2670 V2

12.93

INTEL CORETEL COREN

Intel Core i5-9600KF

12.3

Passmark

Intel Core i7-9700F

13612

Intel Core i7-11375H

13548

Intel Core i7-9700

13479

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

13409

Intel Core i5-10500

13273

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

13219

Intel Core i7-10700t

INTEL XEON E5-269 V2

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

13079

AMD Ryzen 5 1600x

13063

AMD RYZEN 5 3500

12862

Tests in the Games

FPS measured in popular games at AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and compliance with systemic requirements. Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay.

The most popular config: motherboard for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 — MSI B450 Tomahawk, graphics card — Radeon HD 7800M, RAM — Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB, SSD — A400 240GB.

Characteristics

The data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted.

Basic

Manufacturer AMD
Date of IssueMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 09-2020
Cores The number of physical cores. 6
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 12
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS).
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.4 GHz
Turbo Frequency The maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 3.8 GHz
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No

Video core

RAM

PCI

Data protection

Design

Competitors

Please note that competitors are selected automatically based on performance in a particular task. Therefore, some may puzzle you. We are improving our selection algorithm, treat with understanding.

Compare

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5-6600K

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-4770K

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-7700K

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-8750H

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-4930K

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-4960X

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 processor — review, specifications and 10 user reviews — Top rated 2021-2022 with owner ratings

Brief overview of

Buy AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 specifications

Yandex. Market data

lanes

General characteristics
Socket AM4
Play yes
Core
Core Matisse
Number of cores 6
Process 7 nm
Frequency response
Clock frequency 3600 MHz
Maximum frequency with Turbo Boost 4200 MHz
Number of threads 12
Built-in memory controller yes
Memory type DDR4
Memory frequency 3200 MHz
Maximum number of memory channels 2
Cache
L1 cache size 384 KB
L2 cache size 3 MB
L3 cache size 32 MB
Optional
Typical heat dissipation 65 W
Maximum operating temperature 95°C
Max. number of PCI Express 16

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Yandex.Market data

Rating: 5 out of 5

Eugene Sh.

Advantages:
Fast on dry data. Assembly on a budget MSI B350 Tomahawk (board with a very mediocre power supply). DDR4 on Hynix-AFR chips overclocked by calculator up to 3800MHZ FCLK 1900 and a one-to-one divisor. Proc took 4400MHZ across all cores at 1,250 volts, but running Prime95 is stable and adequate in temperatures at 4300MHZ at 1.2000v. Windows 10 with all the latest updates. Cooler from Noctua NH-U12A. Fresh, at the time of writing the review, drivers and a stripped-down BIOS (Click Beta Bios). The processor wound up on the motherboard without dancing with tambourines. The performance increase from the previous processor (R5 1600) is about 25 percent, which is very noticeable in games and rendering. Prots is hot, but taking into account the fact that he is overclocked. With the same performance as the R5, the 1600 will be icy, so you can customize the temperature / performance ratio. I also checked the effect of memory overclocking on performance — from 3200MHZ XMP to 3800 on the calculator, the increase was more than 15 percent. The stress temperature of Aida64 for the entire system, together with the video card in the case with 5 fans and 2 on the cooler, averaged 68 degrees. Primary performance measurements: Assassin’s Creed Origins 13100 (maximum settings, but 50 percent rendering. Test without focusing on the video card) Assassin’s Creed Origins 11400 (1920×1080, maximum settings) Cinebench R20 3981 points

Disadvantages:
There are no disadvantages. There is a feature of the architecture that would be nice to know. I put it in and forgot it doesn’t work very well here, you need to play around with the handles a bit so that everything is completely fine. Details added to the comment.

Comment:
There was a lot of contradictory information that the processor was hot like infernal heat, they talked about the incompatibility of components … In my opinion, it turned out to be an excellent processor that closes 90 percent of the user’s PC needs. A very important point — the VRM of the motherboard does not heat up at all … I did not believe the monitoring indicators, opened the case cover, touched the motherboard with my hand, where it was painful to touch before — it was barely warm there, which is simply excellent! The temperature is 40 degrees according to the sensors. In the drain of percents, in my case, use is a stupid topic. «Put it in and forget it» does not work here, because the voltage applied to the processor is prohibitively high, which is completely unjustified, and, accordingly, the cooler starts to go crazy with temperatures. After disabling the PBO, clamping the voltage to 1. 250, setting all cores to 4400, and manually adjusting the fan curve, the system runs fabulous. After a couple of days of fiddling with overclocking: I noticed that after resetting the BIOS to default settings, the fans do not make as much noise as when the processor was first started. There is a suspicion that initially the firewood for the chipset did not fully rise, now the voltages do not jump to 1.450, which leads to the conclusion that the story with «inserted and forgot» may be quite appropriate here, but if it is possible to overclock, it is better to do it , the profit is tangible. A week later: I managed to stabilize the processor at a frequency of 4300mhz at 1.2000v and at LLC2, the memory wound up at 3800mhz 1900 FCLK at 1.45v and LLC2 with 16-18-19-19-40 and reduced secondary timings, the result is excellent for these chips (HYNIX-AFR). 53000 read, latency 65 ns. Stability tested for 8 hours in Prime95 in custom mode with memory and processor stress. It is pointless to take 4400mhz on the CPU, in my case, it was not possible to stabilize the system at this frequency, because the voltage is 1. 3000 volts, the temperatures are above the permissible ones, so I stopped at 4300. UPD: Still, this memory does not work higher than 3600. 3800 prime 9no hours pass.

February 23, 2020, Moscow

Score: 5 out of 5

Maxim Lashchinin

Score: 5 out of 5
Excellent performance. 4.125 for all cores out of the box. Cold stone. 6 cores / 12 threads which is currently the unspoken minimum. Games paired with 1070 fly at maximum speed. A significant increase in performance compared to zen and zen+ In games, it is not inferior to the 2700x in many tasks. 35mb cache. Works on old motherboards based on b350

Disadvantages:
Already overclocked to the maximum from the factory, in terms of price / performance, buying a 3600X does not make any sense, especially with a price difference of about 5k. The retail price in our stores leaves much to be desired. After some time, prices will drop, so I advise you to wait for the hype to subside. Since the maximum tdp is already almost squeezed out of the processor, still not the indicated 65, so the complete cooler could be cram more interesting, but thanks for that. It will work, you can play, but without heavy tasks. While liquid bios.

Comment:
3600 Box, MSI Tomahawk b450, 16gb Corsair 3200mhz, Asus cerberus 1070ti. I got the 3600 by accident, I myself have a ryzen zen + 2700 (without X) after comparing the two processors, I was pleasantly surprised, the 3600 bypassed the 2700 in games by about 20 percent and in some by 30, after which I decided to keep the new 3600. Inexpensive gammaxx 300 cooler deal with it easily. In general, at the moment, he has no competitor. Prots really turned out to be very suitable and even being a relatively budget segment, it will find its fans among both gamers and streamers and just people with work needs. I advise you to buy.

July 22, 2019, Chelyabinsk

Rating: 5 out of 5

Alexey L.

Advantages:
That feeling when in Folych 4 with 200+ mods you stand in the center of Boston and you finally have 60+ fps, and flying on a turntable over the city does not turn into a slide show. Before that, there was a legendary i7 2600k in conjunction with 1080. The increase in games (depending on the engine) is 20-30 fps. For example, the benchmark of the first Division.

Disadvantages:
There are none for this value for money.

Comment:
Of course, I do not recommend installing a box cooler. In the stress test, my temperature rose to 80 degrees. I installed an ordinary, inexpensive tower with good thermal paste and, as a result, 62 degrees at the peak, but just in games, the peak is 56 degrees. Most importantly, do not be fooled by the nonsense that they write on the forums, they say, high voltages on the processor in auto mode! It is advised to manually set up to 1. 35. DO NOT do this as it will result in a significant performance degradation. All you need to do is set the power mode to «AMD Ryzen Balanced» in Windows and monitor the voltage only with the CPU-Z program! And you will see that in idle time the voltages drop right down to 0.5. During the stress test, the voltage is kept at just 1.37! When you use programs like «Command Center MSI», they constantly access the processor and it does not go into idle mode. There is a large interview on the Internet with an AMD employee on this topic, where, if he translates his diplomatic statement, he says that they are still specialists, unlike couch experts, and they know what high-tech product they are releasing and warned about the above.

October 11, 2019, Moscow

Rating: 5 out of 5

Insurance

Rating: 5 out of 5
Decent performance for the money. 6 cores / 12 threads, large cache. In many tests and computational workloads, it is faster than the more expensive Intel 9600k, 8700k processors. In games, the lag is within 5-20%. By cumulative performance, taking into account the cost (12794 rubles for the OEM version at the beginning of August 2019d) is the best choice.

Disadvantages:
The performance in SuperPI is less and the memory latencies are greater than the Intel Core I7-4790k, a 2014 processor. Perhaps for someone it is critical.

Comment:
Switched from Intel Core i7-4790k to AMD Ryzen 5 3600 in my home PC. The processor is powered by MSI X570-A PRO motherboard with 32Gb DDR4 3333MHz Kingston HyperX Predator (HX433C16PB3K2/32) (2×16 KIT) memory and Zalman CNPS9 coolerX Optima. I installed the OS and Office 2013 — for several days the PC has been working stably. I do not plan to overclock the processor, so I do not rate it for overclocking. I chose the motherboard (mp) according to the criterion of maximum compatibility with the processor and memory. MSI says they have tested over 1,200 memory modules for compatibility with the new X570 chipset. At first I thought to take m.p. based on B450-X470 chipsets, reviewed a large amount of material on mp on these chipsets, almost already decided to buy ASUS ROG STRIX B450-E GAMING (top mp on the B450 chipset), but the need to spend time and money on flashing the BIOS (you need to have / buy an old processor or go somewhere and pay money for a BIOS update) stopped me from buying m.p. on B450-X470. In addition, there is a risk that, in 2020, when the ZEN 3 architecture (the 4th generation of RYZEN) is released, the old mp. will not work with them, which will close the possibility of replacing the processor without changing the mp. A resource with information on more than 265 motherboards based on X570/X470/X370/B450/B350/A320 chipsets for socket AM4: https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/x570-x470-x370-b450-b350-a320- motherboards-am4-socket-for-amd-ryzen-cpus-sortable-comparison-tables.3110172/

August 7, 2019, Moscow

Score: 5 out of 5

IA78

Estimates: 5 of 5

Ivan B.

Estimates: 5 of 5

Jeanseek

Score: 5 of 5

Ilya P .

Advantages:
Real performance gain per core after previous series. As an example, I can cite the XMRIG CPU processor miner. The top 2700x had 700 hashes, and the 3600 had as many as 800, although it has 4 fewer threads and 40 watts less heat dissipation. The temperature with Gammax 400 in stress is about 70-75 C, in games — no more than 60 C. In idle and low-demanding tasks — 45-55 C. Of course, the difference can be noticed with previous ryzens only in the most demanding applications. In undemanding applications and games, it is essentially idle. For example, in Overwatch, the percentage is loaded no more than 25%. I don’t see much point in switching even from 1700 Ryzen to this one. Only if you successfully sell one. I would still consider this an evolution of Ryzen, albeit a very successful one, but not a revolution.

Disadvantages:
— Easy overpayment for novelty.

2022 © All rights reserved