AMD Ryzen 5 2500U vs Intel Core i7-8550U
Análisis comparativo de los procesadores AMD Ryzen 5 2500U y Intel Core i7-8550U para todas las características en las siguientes categorías: Esenciales, Desempeño, Memoria, Gráficos, Interfaces gráficas, Soporte de APIs gráficas, Compatibilidad, Periféricos, Tecnologías avanzadas, Virtualización, Calidad de imagen de los gráficos, Seguridad y fiabilidad.
Análisis de desempeño comparativo de procesadores: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Comprar en Amazon
vs
Intel Core i7-8550U
Comprar en Amazon
Diferencias
Razones para considerar el AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- El CPU es más nuevo: fue lanzado al mercado 2 mes(es) después
- Alrededor de 50% más caché L1; más datos pueden ser almacenados en el caché L1 para un acceso más rápido luego
- 2 veces más caché L2, más datos pueden ser almacenados en el caché L2 para un acceso más rápido luego
- Alrededor de 10% mejor desempeño en PassMark — CPU mark: 6524 vs 5951
- Alrededor de 33% mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.657 vs 3.494
- 4.2 veces mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 270.96 vs 65.027
- 4 veces mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 0.464 - 13.5 veces mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.115 vs 1.792
- 20.2 veces mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.733 vs 4.384
| Fecha de lanzamiento | 26 October 2017 vs 21 August 2017 |
| Caché L1 | 384 KB vs 256 KB |
| Caché L2 | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6524 vs 5951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.657 vs 3.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270. 96 vs 65.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 vs 0.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 vs 1.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 vs 4.384 |
Razones para considerar el Intel Core i7-8550U
- Una velocidad de reloj alrededor de 11% más alta: 4.00 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
- Una temperatura de núcleo máxima 5% mayor: 100°C vs 95°C
- 2 veces más caché L3, más datos pueden ser almacenados en el caché L3 para un acceso más rápido luego
- Alrededor de 13% mejor desempeño en PassMark — Single thread mark: 2063 vs 1825
- Alrededor de 23% mejor desempeño en Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 814 vs 661
- Alrededor de 5% mejor desempeño en Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 2456 vs 2341
- 2.
7 veces mejor desempeño en GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1724 vs 638 - 3.7 veces mejor desempeño en GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3395 vs 925
- 2.4 veces mejor desempeño en GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 5482 vs 2240
- 2.7 veces mejor desempeño en GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1724 vs 638
- 3.7 veces mejor desempeño en GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3395 vs 925
- 2.4 veces mejor desempeño en GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 5482 vs 2240
| Frecuencia máxima | 4.00 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
| Temperatura máxima del núcleo | 100°C vs 95°C |
| Caché L3 | 8 MB vs 4 MB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2063 vs 1825 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 814 vs 661 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2456 vs 2341 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
1724 vs 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3395 vs 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 5482 vs 2240 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1724 vs 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3395 vs 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 5482 vs 2240 |
Comparar referencias
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-8550U
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nombre | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | Intel Core i7-8550U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1825 | 2063 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6524 | 5951 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 661 | 814 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2341 | 2456 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | 2686 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
4.657 | 3.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 270.96 | 65.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | 0.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.115 | 1.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 | 4.384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 638 | 1724 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
925 | 3395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 2240 | 5482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 638 | 1724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 925 | 3395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2240 | 5482 |
Comparar especificaciones
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | Intel Core i7-8550U | |
|---|---|---|
| Nombre clave de la arquitectura | Zen | Kaby Lake R |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | |
| Fecha de lanzamiento | 26 October 2017 | 21 August 2017 |
| OPN Tray | YM2500C4T4MFB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Lugar en calificación por desempeño | 982 | 940 |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Segmento vertical | Laptop | Mobile |
| Precio de lanzamiento (MSRP) | $409 | |
| Processor Number | i7-8550U | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Soporte de 64 bits | ||
| Base frequency | 2 GHz | 1. 80 GHz |
| Troquel | 246 mm | 123 mm |
| Caché L1 | 384 KB | 256 KB |
| Caché L2 | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| Caché L3 | 4 MB | 8 MB |
| Tecnología de proceso de manufactura | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Temperatura máxima del núcleo | 95°C | 100°C |
| Frecuencia máxima | 3.6 GHz | 4. 00 GHz |
| Número de núcleos | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Número de subprocesos | 8 | 8 |
| Número de transistores | 4500 Million | |
| Desbloqueado | ||
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | |
| Temperatura máxima de la carcasa (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Canales máximos de memoria | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
| Tipos de memorias soportadas | DDR4 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 |
| Máximo banda ancha de la memoria | 34. 1 GB/s |
|
| Tamaño máximo de la memoria | 32 GB | |
| Frecuencia gráfica máxima | 1100 MHz | |
| Número de núcleos iGPU | 8 | |
| Procesador gráfico | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 620 |
| Device ID | 0x5917 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 15 GHz |
|
| Tecnología Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Tecnología Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Memoria de video máxima | 32 GB | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Número de pantallas soportadas | 3 | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4. 4 |
|
| Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | |
| Número máximo de CPUs en la configuración | 1 | 1 |
| Zócalos soportados | FP5 | FC-BGA1356 |
| Diseño energético térmico (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | |
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 2. 00 GHz |
|
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 42mm X 24mm | |
| Clasificación PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Número máximo de canales PCIe | 12 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1×4, 2×2, 1×2+2×1 and 4×1 | |
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The «Zen» Core Architecture | ||
| Video Core Next (VCN) | ||
| Tecnología Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
|
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Tecnología Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Tecnología Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Tecnología Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Tecnología Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Soporte de resolución 4K | ||
| Máxima resolución por DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Máxima resolución por eDP | [email protected] | |
Máxima resolución por HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Tecnología Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Tecnología Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Tecnología Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) |
Intel Core i7-8550U vs.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS
Intel Core i7-8550U
The Intel Core i7-8550U operates with 4 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.00 GHz base 2.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1356 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Kaby Lake U Refresh Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2017
AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS operates with 6 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.20 GHz base 3.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 35 W.The processor is attached to the FP6 CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200LPDDR4-4266 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 105 °C degrees C. In particular, Cezanne (Zen 3) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM.
The product was launched on Q2/2021
Intel Core i7-8550U
AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS
Compare Detail
| 1.80 GHz | Frequency | 3.00 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4.00 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.20 GHz |
| 2.40 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.50 GHz |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
GPU |
AMD Radeon 6 Graphics (Renoir) |
| 1.15 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 14 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| 1.15 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM | Memory | DDR4-3200LPDDR4-4266 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | 4. 00 MB |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 12 | PCIe lanes | 12 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| BGA 1356 | Socket | FP6 |
| 15 W | TDP | 35 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q3/2017 | Release date | Q2/2021 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D.