AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-8700K: What is the difference?
61points
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
59points
Intel Core i7-8700K
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-8700K
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600 better than Intel Core i7-8700K?
- 534MHz higher ram speed?
3200MHzvs2666MHz - 7nm smaller semiconductor size?
7nmvs14nm - 1.5MB bigger L2 cache?
3MBvs1.5MB - 9.77% higher PassMark result?
17860vs16270 - 30W lower TDP?
65Wvs95W - 20MB bigger L3 cache?
32MBvs12MB - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
4vs3 - 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i7-8700K better than AMD Ryzen 5 3600?
- 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs95°C - 0. 5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.7GHzvs4.2GHz - Has integrated graphics?
- 5.53% higher PassMark result (single)?
2728vs2585
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i7-8700K
vs
Intel Core i5-12400
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-8700K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-8700K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i7-8700K
vs
Intel Core i7-9700K
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-8700K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
Intel Core i7-8700K
vs
Intel Core i5-9600K
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Core i7-8700K
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i7-8700K
vs
Apple M1 Max
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core i7-8700K
vs
Apple M1
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Price comparison
Cheap alternatives
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
5 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
9. 0/10
5 User reviews
Intel Core i7-8700K
1 User reviews
Intel Core i7-8700K
10.0/10
1 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.2/10
5 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Gaming
8.8/10
4 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
9.0/10
5 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Reliability
9.2/10
5 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Energy efficiency
9.3/10
4 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.6GHz
6 x 3.7GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.2GHz
4.7GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8. L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
5.33MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
3200MHz
2666MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
47.68GB/s
42.7GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-8700K
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
235seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
705.9seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-8700K
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i7 8700K vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 8700K
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
We compared two 6-core desktop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz Intel Core i7 8700K against the 3.6 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 3600. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i7 8700K
66
Ryzen 5 3600
65
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i7 8700K
41
Ryzen 5 3600
47
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i7 8700K
41
Ryzen 5 3600
61
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i7 8700K
51
Ryzen 5 3600
58
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 3600 and 8700K
Advantages of Intel Core i7 8700K
- Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 12% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Has 20 MB larger L3 cache size
- More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 14 nanometers
- Newer — released 1-year and 10-months later
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than the Core i7 8700K – 65 vs 95 Watt
- Newer PCI Express version – 4.0
- Around 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700K
1219
Ryzen 5 3600
+7%
1299
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700K
8881
Ryzen 5 3600
+8%
9574
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700K
+7%
2781
Ryzen 5 3600
2588
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700K
13898
Ryzen 5 3600
+29%
17907
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700K
1251
Ryzen 5 3600
1254
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700K
6690
Ryzen 5 3600
+7%
7156
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 8700K and AMD Ryzen 5 3600
General
Vendor | Intel | AMD |
Released | October 5, 2017 | July 7, 2019 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Coffee Lake | Matisse |
Model number | i7-8700K | — |
Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
Cores | 6 | 6 |
Threads | 12 | 12 |
Base Frequency | 3. 7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 37x | 36x |
Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | — |
L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Transistors | — | 3.8 billions |
Fabrication process | 14 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 95 W | 65 W |
Max. temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | — |
GPU Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | — |
Shading Units | 192 | — |
TMUs | 24 | — |
ROPs | 3 | — |
Execution Units | 24 | — |
TGP | 15 W | — |
Max. Resolution | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 8700K
0.38 TFLOPS
Ryzen 5 3600
n/a
Memory support
Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
ECC Support | No | Yes |
Official site | Intel Core i7 8700K official page | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 official page |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i7 8700K
34 (18%)
Ryzen 5 3600
155 (82%)
Total votes: 189
ompetitors
1.
Core i9 12900K or Core i7 8700K
2.
Core i5 12600K or Core i7 8700K
3.
Ryzen 5 5600X or Ryzen 5 3600
4.
Ryzen 5 5600G or Ryzen 5 3600
5.
Core i5 12400 or Ryzen 5 3600
6.
Core i3 12100 or Ryzen 5 3600
7.
Ryzen 7 5700X or Ryzen 5 3600
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 — Minecraft with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz
Minecraft
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
i7-8700K
Ryzen 5 3600
Multi-Thread Performance
15970 Pts
19634 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2703 Pts
2900 Pts
Minecraft
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 in Minecraft using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-8700K
Ryzen 5 3600
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
671. 1 FPS |
1080p |
665.2 FPS |
1440p |
309.7 FPS |
1440p |
307.0 FPS |
2160p |
154.9 FPS |
2160p |
153.5 FPS |
w1440p |
248.6 FPS |
w1440p |
246.4 FPS |
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
738.0 FPS |
1080p |
733.0 FPS |
1440p |
400.5 FPS |
1440p |
397.6 FPS |
2160p |
227.1 FPS |
2160p |
225.4 FPS |
w1440p |
335.1 FPS |
w1440p |
332.7 FPS |
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
804. 9 FPS |
1080p |
800.8 FPS |
1440p |
491.2 FPS |
1440p |
488.3 FPS |
2160p |
299.3 FPS |
2160p |
297.3 FPS |
w1440p |
421.6 FPS |
w1440p |
419.0 FPS |
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
938.8 FPS |
1080p |
936.4 FPS |
1440p |
672.7 FPS |
1440p |
669.5 FPS |
2160p |
443.8 FPS |
2160p |
441.2 FPS |
w1440p |
594.6 FPS |
w1440p |
591.6 FPS |
i7-8700K
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The i7-8700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 5 3600
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Compare i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 specifications
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Architecture
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen 2 |
Generation | Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Part# | SR3QR | unknown |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | Oct 2017 | Jul 2019 |
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cache
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cores
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 6 | 6 |
# of Threads | 12 | 12 |
Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | N/A |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Features
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Notes
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3. 7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Multiplier | 37.0x | 36.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
TDP | 95 W | 65 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 4.7 GHz | up to 4.2 GHz |
Voltage | variable | variable |
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Physical
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | unknown | unknown |
Foundry | Intel | TSMC |
Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
Process Size | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket AM4 |
Transistors | unknown | 4,800 million |
tCaseMax | 72°C | unknown |
Share Your Comments 98
Compare i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i7-8700K vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
|
|
|
Intel Core i7-8700K vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-8700K on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,7GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | Intel Core i7-8700K | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Coffee Lake | Zen 2 | ||||||
Core name | Coffee Lake-S | Matisse | ||||||
Family | Core i7-8000 | Ryzen 5 3000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec | BX80684I78700K, BXC80684I78700K, CM8068403358220, SR3QR, QNMK |
100-000000031, 100-000000031BOX |
||||||
Release date | Q4 2017 | Q3 2019 | ||||||
Lithography | 14 nm++ | 7 nm FinFET | ||||||
Transistors | 3. 000.000.000 | 4.800.000.000 | ||||||
Cores | 6 | 6 | ||||||
Threads | 12 | 12 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,7 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 4,7 GHz | 4,2 GHz | ||||||
Cache memory | 12 MB | 32 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 | ||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 41,6 GB/s | 47,68 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 20 | ||||||
TDP | 95 W | 65 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | None | ||||||
GPU execution units | 23 | — | ||||||
GPU shading units | 184 | — | ||||||
GPU base clock | 350 MHz | — | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1200 MHz | — | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 423,2 GFLOPS | — | ||||||
Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 100°C | 95°C | ||||||
Crypto engine | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
— | ||||||
Security | Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard |
— | ||||||
Max display resolution | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | — | ||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 475 | 509 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 3. 693 | 4.039 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 194 | 195 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.402 | 1.564 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.216 | 1.215 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 8.985 | 9.109 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.775 | 2.570 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 13.883 | 17.842 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
6.100 | 5.470 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
24. 045 | 27.530 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
453,8 GFLOPS | 484 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
253 pts / W | 424 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-8700K is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is less. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
509 4.039 |
Intel Core i7-8700K |
475 3.693 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 9%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
195 1.564 |
Intel Core i7-8700K |
194 1.402 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
1.215 9.109 |
Intel Core i7-8700K |
1.216 8.985 |
In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
2.570 17.842 |
Intel Core i7-8700K |
2.775 13.883 |
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 29%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.470 27.530 |
Intel Core i7-8700K |
6.100 24.045 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.782 30.309 |
Intel Core i7-8700K |
6.115 27.677 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.610 27.268 |
Intel Core i7-8700K |
5.646 21.101 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 29%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700K |
6. 084 28.485 |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.540 28.445 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 0%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i7-8700K AMD equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 3600 Intel equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i7-8700Intel Core i7-8700BIntel Core i7-8700T
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-8700K
Summary
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
106%
-
Intel Core i7-8700K
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
102%
-
Intel Core i7-8700K
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
111%
-
Intel Core i7-8700K
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
11% higher multi threaded performance. |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Around 6% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-8700K |
Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD Ryzen 5 3600. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-8700K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMX | ||||
SSE | ||||
SSE2 | ||||
SSE3 | ||||
SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4A | ||||
SSE4. 1 | ||||
SSE4.2 | ||||
AES | ||||
AVX | ||||
AVX2 | ||||
BMI1 | ||||
BMI2 | ||||
SHA | ||||
F16C | ||||
FMA3 | ||||
AMD64 | ||||
EVP | ||||
AMD-V | ||||
SMAP | ||||
SMEP | ||||
SMT | ||||
Precision Boost 2 | ||||
EIST | ||||
Intel 64 | ||||
XD bit | ||||
VT-x | ||||
VT-d | ||||
HTT | ||||
AES-NI | ||||
TSX | ||||
TXT | ||||
CLMUL | ||||
Boost 2. 0 |
Architecture
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-8700K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | AMD Zen 2 | vs | Intel_Coffelake | |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR4 | |
Codename | Zen 2 | vs | Coffee Lake | |
Release Date | Mar 2019 | vs | Oct 2017 |
Cores
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-8700K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cores | 6 | vs | 6 | |
Threads | 12 | vs | 12 | |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
Integrated Graphics | No | vs | Intel UHD 630 |
Cache
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-8700K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | vs | 12288 KB (shared) |
Physical
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-8700K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | Intel Socket 1151 | |
Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | 72°C | |
Package | vs | FC-LGA1151 | ||
Die Size | unknown | vs | 151mm² | |
Process | 7 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Performance
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-8700K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cpu Frequency | 3600 MHz | vs | 3700 MHz | |
Turbo Clock | 4400 MHz | vs | 4700 MHz | |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
Voltage | variable | vs | unknown | |
TDP | 65 W | vs | 95 W |
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
4928 points
-
Intel Core i7-8700K
5640 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
29514 points
-
Intel Core i7-8700K
31968 points
Points — higher is better
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs I7 8700K Benchmarks Reveal Major Performance
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has just been released and it is similar in specifications to the Intel 8700K. Here we are going to look at the performance benchmarks of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs the Intel i7 8700K and see which CPU performs better.
While the AMD and Intel CPUs have similar specifications the AMD chip has more cache supports PCIe Gen 4 and is priced lower. Before we get into the benchmarks, check out the specifications of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs I7 8700K below:
CPU | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7 8700K |
Socket | AM4 | LGA 1151 |
Cores/Threads | 6 Cores / 12 Threads | 6 Cores / 12 Threads |
Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
Fabrication | 7nm FinFET TSMC | 12nm FinFET TSMC |
Cache | 32 MB | 12 MB |
PCIe | PCIe 4. 0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Memory | DDR4 3200 MHz | DDR4 2666 MHz |
TDP | 65W | 95W |
Price | $199 | $329 |
For these tests, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and I7 8700K were paired with an RTX 2080 Ti and 16 GB of RAM. The games that we have tested were running at 1080p. You can check out the benchmarks in different games below.
Assassins Creed Odyssey
Let’s start off with the latest Assassin’s Creed game. Here we see that the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is able to pull ahead. This difference might be a minor one but keep in mind that the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a much cheaper CPU.
Crysis 3
But can it run Crysis? Sure it can. The performance of the AMD chip is much better than that of the Intel 8700. Hence the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is great value for money.
Dirt Rally
Here we have another CPU intensive game and the AMD Ryzen 3 3600 is not only able to keep up with the 8700K but is able to outperform it by a few FPS as well. The difference is small but as mentioned above, this is a very cheaper CPU.
The Division
If you have played this game then you know how much stress it can put in the CPU. The numbers speak for themselves. The AMD chip is able to beat the Intel CPU in this game as well.
Doom
Doom is a very fast-paced game and to have the ideal experience you need a CPU that can handle all those FPS and keep up with the graphics card. In this game, it is a tie between the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and the Intel 8700 CPUs.
Final Fantasy XV
FF XV is a tie as well. This is still in favor of AMD because the Intel CPU is more than $100 higher in price.
For Honor
Intel does take the lead here but the AMD CPU is not far behind.
Deus Ex Mankind Divided
Moving on to Mankind Divided. We can see that team Red pulls back into the lead.
Project Cars 2
Intel claims the lead in Project Cars 2.
PUBG
Moving on to PUBG. The AMD Ryzen 3600 simply blows the 8700K out of the water.
Rainbow Six Siege
Team Red manages to keep in front in this title as well.
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Intel is on AMD’s tail here but the AMD Ryzen 3600 is not giving up without a fight.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Moving on the latest installment in the franchise. AMD strengthens its lead here and moves further ahead in the race.
The Witcher 3
This is a classic and I am sure that some people are still interested in knowing how well modern CPUs can run the Witcher 3. The performance is pretty similar but the AMD Ryzen CPU does have a small edge over the Intel 8700.
Overall Performance
In these benchmarks, we have already seen that the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 pulls ahead even though it is a much cheaper CPU. If you are still interested in overall performance numbers then you can check out the figure below:
Price To Performance
The difference might not seem like much but once you add price into the mix you see the real difference. You can check out the price to performance numbers below:
Verdict
There you have it folks. The new AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a great CPU and the benchmarks show that it can easily take on the Intel 8700K. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 benchmarks also reveal that overall it is a better chip when it comes to gaming and that it is exceptionally great value for money when compared to the 8700K.
All this is great and we know that AMD is also powering the upcoming PS5 and Xbox Scarlett, so it is going to be a great year for the company.
Intel Core i7 8700K vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 8700K
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Which is better: Intel Core i7 8700K at 3. 7 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.7) or AMD Ryzen 5 3600 at 3.6 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 4.2)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 6-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments (1)
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i7 8700k
66 66
Ryzen 5 3600
65
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003
Core i7 8700k
41
Ryzen 5 3600
47
Energy Equality
Energy Effect CHIP
Core I7 8700k
Ryzen 5 3600
61 9000,0002 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61 9000 61
Core i7 8700K
51
Ryzen 5 3600
58
Key differences
What are the main differences between 3600 and 8700K
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 8700K
- There is an integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 12% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4. 7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Has 20 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 7 vs. 14 nanometers
- Launched 1 year and 10 months later than rival Core i7 8700K peak power consumption — 65 vs 95 Watts
- New PCI Express — 4.0 standard
- 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 8700K
1219
Ryzen 5 3600
+7%
1299
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 8700K
8881
Ryzen 5 3600
+8%
9574
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 8700K
+7%
2781
Ryzen 5 3600
2588
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 8700K
13898
Ryzen5 3
+29%
17907
Geekbench 5 (single -core)
Core i7 8700k
1251
Ryzen 5 3600
1254
Geekbench 5 (multi -core)
9000 Core i7 8700k
6690
Ryzen 5 3600
+7%
7156
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 8700K and AMD Ryzen 5 3600
General information
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Release date | October 5, 2017 | July 7, 2019 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Coffee Lake | Matisse |
Model number | i7-8700K | — |
Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
Cores | 6 | 6 |
Number of threads | 12 | 12 |
Frequency | 3. 7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 37x | 36x |
Bus speed | 8 GT/s | — |
Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Power consumption
Number of transistors | — | 3.8 billion |
Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 W | 65 W |
Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
Boost GPU frequency | 1200 MHz | — |
Shader blocks | 192 | — |
TMUs | 24 | — |
ROPs | 3 | — |
Computer units | 24 | — |
TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution | 4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 8700K
0.38 teraflops
Ryzen 5 3600
n/a
Memory support
DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 | |
Max. size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. throughput | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
Site Intel Core i7 8700K | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 website | |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 8700K
34 (18%)
Ryzen 5 3600
155 (82%)
Total votes: 189
Competitors
1.
Core i9 12900K or Core i7 8700K
2.
Core i5 12600K or Core i7 8700K
3.
Ryzen 5 5600X or Ryzen 5 3600
4.
Ryzen 5 5600G or Ryzen 5 3600
5.
Core i5 12400 or Ryzen 5 3600
6.
Core i3 12100 or Ryzen 5 3600
7.
Ryzen 7 5700X or Ryzen 5 3600
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i7 8700K?
Name
Message
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i7-8700K: What is the difference?
61 Ballla
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
59 Ballla
Intel Core i7-8700k
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
Intel Core I7-870023 Better AMD RYZEN WHAT Intel Core i7-8700K?
- 534MHz higher RAM speed?
3200MHz vs 2666MHz - Is 7nm semiconductor smaller?
7nm vs 14nm - 1. 5MB more L2 cache?
3MB vs 1.5MB - 9.77% higher PassMark score?
17860 vs 16270 - 30W below TDP?
65W vs 95W - 20MB more L3 cache?
32MB vs 12MB - 1 Is the PCI Express (PCIe) version newer?
4 vs 3 - 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i7-8700K better than AMD Ryzen 5 3600?
- 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 95°C - 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.7GHz vs 4.2GHz - Does it have integrated graphics?
- 5.53% higher PassMark score (single)?
2728 vs 2585
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i7-8700k
VS
Intel Core i5-12400
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS Core i7-8700K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
Intel Core i7-8700k
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500u
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000.
VS
Intel Core INTEL CORE INTEL Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE Core i7-8700K
VS
Intel Core i7-9700k
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-8700K
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD 3600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
Intel Core i7-8700k
VS
Intel Core i5-9600k
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Core, vs
AMD RYZEN 7 3700X
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
VS
Intel Core i5-9400f
Intel Core i7-8700k
Apple M1 Max
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000 9000 VSIZEN 5 3600 9000 VS Core i3-12100
Intel Core i7-8700k
10.0 /10
1 reviews of users
Functions
Quality ratio
9.2 /10
5 Votes
9000 9000 9000 9000 1 Votes
Games
8.8 /10
4 Votes
10.0.0 /10
1 Votes
performance
/10
5 VOTES
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 10. 0 9.0 9.0 /10
1 Votes
Reliability
9.2 /10
5 Votes
10.0841 /10
1 VOTES
Energy
9.3 /10 9000 VOTES 4 Votes /10
1 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.6GHz
6 x 3.7GHz
). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.2GHz
4.7GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
5.33MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
3200MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2. max memory bandwidth
47.68GB/s
42.7GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-8700K
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
235seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
705.9seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-8700K
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i7-8700K or AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Home
- >
Gaming speed
Core i7-8700K
79.4 (+7.7%)
Ryzen 5 3600
73.3
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i7-8700K
79.4 (+6.7%)
Ryzen 5 3600
74.1
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i7-8700K
53. 5 (+3%)
Ryzen 5 3600
51.9
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
Core i7-8700K 76.7 (+7.4%) Ryzen 5 3600 71 |
Demanding games and tasks |
Core i7-8700K 57. 5 (+1%) Ryzen 5 3600 56.9 |
Extreme |
Core i7-8700K 18.5 Ryzen 5 3600 19.4 (+4.6%) |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i7-8700K
1209
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
1250 (+3.3%)
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-8700K
8960
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
9150 (+2.1%)
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Core i7-8700k
487 (+3.1%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
472
222 Corebench R20 Multi MulTi i7-8700K
3689 (+3.2%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
3570
Cinebench R15 Single Core
Intel Core i7-8700K
208 (+5.3%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
197
Cinebench R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-8700K
1447
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
1578 (+8.3%)
Geekbench 5 Single Core
I7-8700K 1283 (+7.3700K 1283 ( AMD Ryzen 5 3600
1183
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-8700K
6693
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
6821 (+1.9%)
Blender 2.81 bmw27
Intel Core i7-8700K
232. 4
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
235.7 (+1.4%)
Passmark
Intel Core i7-8700K
13906
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
17863 (+22.2%)
characteristics of
DAYS OF THE PLA missing information or missing existing features.
Main
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i7-8700K Processor (12M Cache, up to 4.70 GHz) | |
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Coffee Lake | |
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 | No data |
Date of Issue The month and year the processor was released. | 10-2020 | 11-2021 |
Model Official name. | i7-8700K | |
Cores The number of physical cores. | 6 | 6 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 12 | 12 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). | SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3.7GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | 4.7 GHz | 4.15 GHz |
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 12 | No data |
Instructions | 64-bit | |
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX2 | |
Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No | No |
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
Number of QPI links | ||
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 95 | No data |
Cooling system specifications | PCG 2015C (130W) |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | |
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | 350 | No data |
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | 1200 | No data |
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802.11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. | 3 |
RAM
Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 64 | No data |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4-2666 | |
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | |
RAM bandwidth | ||
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 3 | No data |
PCI configuration options | Up to 1×16 or 2×8 or 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16 or 2×8 or 1×8+2×4 |
Number of PCI lanes | 16 | Up to 1×16 or 2×8 or 1×8+2×4 |
Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | No data | No data |
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
Dimensions | No data | No data |
Supported sockets | No data | No data |
Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Core i7-8700K
- On average, gaming performance is 6% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 5%.
- The base frequency is 0.1 GHz higher.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Faster and 1% better in complex multi-threaded applications.
- The price is $111 lower.
How are they similar?
- The number of physical cores is the same.
- The number of threads is equal.
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 — Minecraft vs GTX 1660 performance comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz
minecraft
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
i7-8700K
Ryzen 5 3600
Multi-Thread Performance
671.1 FPS
665.2 FPS
309.7 FPS
307.0 FPS
154.9 FPS
153. 5 FPS
248.6 FPS
246.4 FPS
High quality
Resolution | FPS |
---|---|
1080p |
738.0 FPS |
1080p |
733.0 FPS |
1440p |
400.5 FPS |
1440p |
397.6 FPS |
2160p |
227.1 FPS |
2160p |
225.4 FPS |
w1440p |
335.1 FPS |
w1440p |
332.7 FPS |
Medium quality
Resolution | FPS |
---|---|
1080p |
804.9 FPS |
1080p |
800.8 FPS |
1440p |
491. 2 FPS |
1440p |
488.3 FPS |
2160p |
299.3 FPS |
2160p |
297.3 FPS |
w1440p |
421.6 FPS |
w1440p |
419.0 FPS |
Low quality
Resolution | FPS |
---|---|
1080p |
938.8 FPS |
1080p |
936.4 FPS |
1440p |
672.7 FPS |
1440p |
669.5 FPS |
2160p |
443.8 FPS |
2160p |
441.2 FPS |
w1440p |
594.6 FPS |
w1440p |
591.6 FPS |
i7-8700K
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- The i7-8700K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
Ryzen 5 3600
- Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher level 2 cache. Data/instructions that need to be processed can be loaded from fast L2 and the CPU doesn’t have to wait for very slow DDR 9 RAM0012
- Ryzen 5 3600 has higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- Ryzen 5 3600 The Ryzen 5 3600 is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
- Ryzen 5 3600 The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
Compare i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 specifications
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Architecture
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen 2 |
Generation | Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Part# | SR3QR | unknown |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | Oct 2017 | Jul 2019 |
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cache
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cores
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 6 | 6 |
# of Threads | 12 | 12 |
Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | N/A |
SMP# CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Features
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Notes
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3. 7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Multiplier | 37.0x | 36.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
TDP | 95 W | 65 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 4.7 GHz | up to 4.2 GHz |
Voltage | variable | variable |
i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Physical
i7-8700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | unknown | unknown |
Foundry | Intel | TSMC |
Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
Process Size | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket AM4 |
Transistors | unknown | 4,800 million |
tCaseMax | 72°C | unknown |
Share your comments 98
Compare i7-8700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need for Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need for Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Testing AMD Ryzen processors to work with KOMPAS-3D / Sudo Null IT News
Last summer, AMD released the third generation of Ryzen processors, and we couldn’t miss this event. Our technical support often receives questions about the operation of KOMPAS-3D on a certain hardware, or users are asked to recommend the optimal computer configuration. Therefore, we turned to AMD with a proposal to test their processors. Stanislav Ermokhin, head of the technical support and training department of the ASCON-Volga Regional Center, talks about the test results.
In this post, we will look at the tests of AMD 3rd generation processors that are currently available, compare them with processors of previous generations, and also, to understand the general situation, compare them with competitive solutions.
The speed of KOMPAS-3D on a particular computer depends on the characteristics of individual components, including the processor, which is responsible for processing the file when it is opened, rebuilding models, calculating and forming arrays, and forming types of associative drawing. Therefore, it can be argued that KOMPAS-3D, like any other CAD, is a processor-dependent application. It is important for us and our users to understand how the choice of processor affects the performance of the system.
Our internal test, created in the KOMPAS Laboratory, allows you to evaluate and compare different hardware on a sequence of a set of identical tests.
This set contains commands and actions that most of our users have to perform when modeling parts and assemblies in 3D:
- the first is opening an experimental model;
- after opening the model, it may be necessary to rebuild it to update the changes made and recalculate the mass-center characteristics. After all, as in the first stage, one does not always want to wait a long time for the model to be rebuilt;
- during the construction process, the model constantly has to be moved and rotated, and this is the third stage of testing, when the model rotates and moves in all possible variants of its display (wireframe, grayscale, etc.).
The experimental model itself deserves special attention, which contains all the basic solid-state operations (extrusion, rotation, along a trajectory and along sections), plane and spatial curves. It also contains more than a dozen arrays that excite our users so much.
So, fresh 3rd generation Ryzen processors were available for testing:
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
An interesting situation regarding the solutions of the previous two generations, namely:
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
And as a trigger for competitive solutions, we will consider three Intel processors:
Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i5-9600K
Intel Core i7-9700K
The rating of our automatic test should be viewed through the following scores:
- 800 or less points — a frankly weak result for a processor;
- to 1000 points — average result;
- over 1000 points is a good result for a processor that allows solving problems of its level.
A few words about the benchmark from the developers:
Turchin Roman , Head of Testing Department KOMPAS-3D
Alexey Nikonov , Analyst Engineer KOMPAS-3D:Processor rating consists of two indicators: model opening time and model rebuilding time. Due to the longer duration, the rebuild is the main contributor to the CPU score.
Value ranges — good, medium, weak — obtained by experience.
The testing department has at its disposal “weak”, “medium” and “good” test machines respectively.
A car’s belonging to a category is generated on the basis of a comprehensive assessment that takes into account time indicators when working with sets of models — both custom and synthetic. The scenario and the model itself embedded in the benchmark confirm this comprehensive assessment with relatively good reliability.
The ranges of values are adjusted for each new version of the benchmark (the benchmark version is the same as the major version of KOMPAS-3D).
When analyzing the results, the focus should be on comparing the results of different configurations, and not on belonging to a certain range.
There are plans to further develop the benchmark to increase the convergence of its results with real user activity, in particular, adding new scenarios, taking into account the influences of other PC components (RAM, etc. ).
So, we have made a description of our benchmark, it’s time to acquaint you with the test results. For each of the processors, we performed several attempts and took the overall average result.
As you can see from the graph, all processors (with the exception of the lowest AMD Ryzen 5 3400G) not only passed the 1000 points mark, but also showed a significant margin, not lower than 1500 points.
Compared to competitors, we can say that AMD’s estimates turned out to be very correct: AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X showed a result comparable to the Intel Core i7-9700K, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 showed a result similar to the Intel Core i7-8700K and Intel Core i5-9600K.
It is worth noting that the Intel Core i7-8700K is one of the most common among the processors on which we and our users performed testing.
Next, let’s compare the different generations of AMD Ryzen processors available for our testing.
The junior model of the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G processor showed an 11.5% increase in performance compared to its previous generation counterpart.
The average AMD Ryzen 5 3600 achieved a 22.4% improvement over the second generation processor.
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X was compared with the previous two generations. It turned out that between AMD Ryzen 7 1700 and AMD Ryzen 7 2700 the difference is + 21.3%. Between AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and AMD Ryzen 7 2700 — already 23.4%. The difference between AMD Ryzen 5 3700X and AMD Ryzen 5 2700X is 13.4%, which is similar to the bottom model. Apparently, these processors are groping for the performance limit of the current generation and cannot boast of a large performance increase.
Graphs and ranking scores are nice, but what do they mean to the end user? After all, just an increase of 11.5% or 22.4% points does not say anything special. And these figures mean that the speed of opening KOMPAS-3D documents from disk has increased by an average of 11. 5% or 22.4%, operations and model rebuilding will be faster. And, of course, arrays, where without them, will also run faster.
At the same time, it should be recalled that the CPU is responsible for the process of generating views of an associative drawing, and an increase in processor performance directly affects the speed of generating these views. The formation of views can be done in parallel, provided that you have a multi-core processor, and AMD Ryzen 5 has six such cores, while AMD Ryzen 7 already has eight.
What conclusions do we draw:
- AMD processors can be used in graphic stations to work in KOMPAS-3D.
- All processors showed good results, but AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is especially worth highlighting. This processor shows consistently good results at a low cost and can be used to build graphic stations when working in KOMPAS-3D.
- The latest generation of AMD processors is on the same level with Intel processors, that is, the picture below is also valid for KOMPAS-3D.
In the near future, Intel will take a step and release an updated line of 10th generation processors. We expect, we will test and release a detailed report on new processors.
ASCON company expresses its gratitude to AMD and personally to Konstantin Voron for their help in preparing the material.
INTEL AND AMD PROCESSORS |1A.EE
234.90
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen 5 5600X BOX, 3.7GHz, AM4, 32MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3.7 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
32 MB
Delivery
Pickup
334.90
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 3.8GHz 32MB BOX 100-100000063WOF, 3. 8GHz, AM4, 32MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3.8 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
32 MB
Delivery
Pickup
221.90
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel® Core™ i5-12400F BOX, 2.50GHz, LGA 1700, 18MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
2.50 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
18 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
123.90
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen™ 5 3600 BOX, 3.60GHz, AM4, 32MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3. 60 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
32 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
737.99
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i9-12900K BOX, 3.2GHz, LGA 1700, 30MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
3.2 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
16 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
30 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
361.99
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i7-10700K, 3.8GHz, LGA 1200, 16MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
3. 8 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
16MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
319.00
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel Intel Core i5 12600KF, 3.70GHz, LGA 1700, 20MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
3.70 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
10 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
20 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
290.99
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i5-12600 BOX, 3.30GHz, LGA 1700, 18MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
3. 30 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
18 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
247.54
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i5-11500 BOX, 2.70GHz, LGA 1200, 12MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
2.70 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
12 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
132.99
€
/ PCS.
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen™ 5 5500 BOX, 3.60GHz, AM4, 16MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3. 60 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
16MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
183.25
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen™ 5 4600G BOX, 3.70GHz, AM4, 8MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3.70 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
8MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
300.17
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i5-11600K 3.90 GHz 12MB BOX, 3.9GHz, LGA 1200, 12MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
3. 9 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
12 MB
Delivery
Pickup
406.02
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i7-9700 CM8068403874521, 3GHz, LGA 1151, 12MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1151 -
CPU frequency:
3 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
12 MB
Delivery
Pickup
486.69
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Processor 2.50GHz 16 MB BOX, 2.5GHz, LGA 1200, 16MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
2.5 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
16MB
Delivery
Pickup
145. 99
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i5-10400F 2.9GHz 12MB BOX, 2.9GHz, LGA 1200, 12MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
2.9 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
12 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
423.99
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel Intel Core i7-12700 BX8071512700, 2.1GHz, LGA 1700, 25MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
2.1 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
12 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
25 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
297. 14
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor AMD 5700G, 3.8GHz, AM4, 16MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3.8 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
16MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
84.99
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i3-10100F 3.6GHz 6MB BOX BX8070110100F, 3.6GHz, LGA 1200, 6MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
3.6 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
4 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
6MB
Delivery
Pickup
166.90
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel 11400F Intel Core i5-11400F Tray, 2.60GHz, LGA 1200, 12MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
2.60 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
12 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
132.99
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel® Core™ i3-10100, 3.6GHz, LGA 1200, 6MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
3.6 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
4 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
6MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
124. 99
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen™ 5 4500 BOX, 3.60GHz, AM4, 8MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3.60 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
8MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
33.99
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel G3220 Intel Pentium G3220 3.00Ghz 3MB Tray, 3.00GHz, LGA 1150, 3MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1150 -
CPU frequency:
3.00 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
2 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
3MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
12. 19€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor Intel E2140 Intel Pentium E2140 1.60Ghz 1MB Tray, 1.60GHz, LGA 775, 1MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 775 -
CPU frequency:
1.60 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
2 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
1MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
211.90
€
/ PCS.
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen™ 5 5600X, 3.70GHz, AM4, 32MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3.70 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
32 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
329. 00
€
/ PCS.
In stock
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 3.8GHz 32MB 100-000000063, 3.8GHz, AM4, 32MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3.8 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
32 MB
Delivery
Pickup
339.90
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i5-12600K BOX, 3.7GHz, LGA 1700, 20MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
3.7 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
10 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
20 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
494.00
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-12700K BOX, 3.6GHz, LGA 1700, 25MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
3.6 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
12 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
25 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
449.90
€
/ PCS.
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 3.7GHz 64MB 100-100000061WOF, 3.7GHz, AM4, 64MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3.7 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
12 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
64 MB
Delivery
Pickup
126.92
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i3-12100F BOX, 3. 30GHz, LGA 1700, 12MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
3.30 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
4 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
12 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
249.00
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i5-10600KF 4.1GHz 12MB BX8070110600KF, 4.1GHz, LGA 1200, 12MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
4.1 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
12 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
649.00
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel Core i9-12900KF, 3. 20GHz, LGA 1700, 30MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
3.20 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
16 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
30 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
579.00
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i9-12900F BOX, 2.40GHz, LGA 1700, 30MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
2.40 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
16 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
30 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
460.99
€
/ PCS.
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 100-100000651WOF, 3. 4GHz, AM4, 96MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3.4 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
96 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
480.00
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i9-11900K Processor 3.50GHz 16 MB BOX, 3.5GHz, LGA 1200, 16MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
3.5 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
16MB
Delivery
Pickup
440.00
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i9-10900K 3.7GHz 20MB BX8070110900K, 3. 7GHz, LGA 1200, 20MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
3.7 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
10 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
20 MB
Delivery
Pickup
415.99
€
/ PCS.
Intel® Core™ i9 processor-10900KF 3.7GHz 20MB BX8070110900KF, 3.7GHz, LGA 1200, 20MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
3.7 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
10 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
20 MB
Delivery
Pickup
258.90
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i5-12500, 3.0GHz, LGA 1700, 18MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
3. 0 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
18 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
281.99
€
/ PCS.
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen™ 7 5700X BOX, 3.40GHz, AM4, 32MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3.40 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
32 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
471.20
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i7-12700KF BOX, 3.6GHz, LGA 1700, 25MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
3. 6 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
12 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
25 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
194.90
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i5-11400F 2.6GHz 12MB BOX, 2.6GHz, LGA 1200, 12MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
2.6 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
12 MB
Delivery
Pickup
389.00
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-12700F BOX, 2.10GHz, LGA 1700, 25MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1700 -
CPU frequency:
2.10 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
12 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
25 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
319. 99
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i7-11700KF 3.60GHz 16MB BOX, 3.6GHz, LGA 1200, 16MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
3.6 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
16MB
Delivery
Pickup
174.99
€
/ PCS.
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen™ 5 5600 BOX, 3.50GHz, AM4, 32MB
-
Processor socket type:
AM4 -
CPU frequency:
3.50 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
32 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
314.90
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i7-11700F Processor 2. 50GHz 16 MB BOX, 2.5GHz, LGA 1200, 16MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
2.5 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
16MB
Delivery
Pickup
275.12
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i5-10600K 4.1GHz 12MB BX8070110600K, 4.1GHz, LGA 1200, 12MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
4.1 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
6 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
12 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
353.99
€
/ PCS.
Processor Intel Intel® Core™ i7-11700K 3. 60GHz 16MB BOX, 3.6GHz, LGA 1200, 16MB
-
Processor socket type:
LGA 1200 -
CPU frequency:
3.6 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
8 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
16MB -
Integrated graphics card:
Yes
Delivery
Pickup
7,790.00
€
/ PCS.
New
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 5995WX BOX, 2.70GHz, sWRX8, 256MB
-
Processor socket type:
SWRX8 -
CPU frequency:
2.70 GHz -
Number of processor cores:
64 -
Buffer memory (Cache):
256 MB -
Integrated graphics card:
No
Delivery
Pickup
3,990.00
€
/ PCS.
New
Processor AMD AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 5975WX BOX, 3.