AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-9700F: What is the difference?
61points
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
55points
Intel Core i7-9700F
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-9700F
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600 better than Intel Core i7-9700F?
- 534MHz higher ram speed?
3200MHzvs2666MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
12vs8 - 7nm smaller semiconductor size?
7nmvs14nm - 1MB bigger L2 cache?
3MBvs2MB - 29.29% higher PassMark result?
17860vs13814 - 20MB bigger L3 cache?
32MBvs12MB - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
4vs3 - Has an unlocked multiplier?
Why is Intel Core i7-9700F better than AMD Ryzen 5 3600?
- 11.11% faster CPU speed?
8 x 3GHzvs6 x 3.6GHz
- 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs95°C - 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.7GHzvs4.2GHz - 128KB bigger L1 cache?
512KBvs384KB - 9.86% higher PassMark result (single)?
2840vs2585
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-9700F
vs
Intel Core i7-9700K
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-9700F
vs
Intel Core i5-9400F
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-9700F
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i7-9700F
vs
Intel Core i7-9700T
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i7-9700F
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Core i7-9700F
vs
Intel Core i7-8700
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i7-9700F
vs
Intel Core i7-7700K
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core i7-9700F
vs
Intel Core i7-9700
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i7-9700F
vs
Intel Core i5-11400
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Price comparison
Cheap alternatives
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
5 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
9.
0/10
5 User reviews
Intel Core i7-9700F
0 User reviews
Intel Core i7-9700F
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.2/10
5 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
8.8/10
4 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
9.0/10
5 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
9.2/10
5 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
9.3/10
4 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.6GHz
8 x 3GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.2GHz
4.7GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-9700F
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.
25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
5.33MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
3200MHz
2666MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
47.68GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-9700F
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9700F)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9700F)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
235seconds
299.4seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
705.9seconds
1005.2seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700F
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads.
This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700F
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700F
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700F
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9700F)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700F
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-9700F
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9700F)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i7 9700F vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 9700F
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.
0 GHz Intel Core i7 9700F with 8-cores against the 3.6 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 3600 with 6-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i7 9700F
64
Ryzen 5 3600
65
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i7 9700F
40
Ryzen 5 3600
46
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i7 9700F
51
Ryzen 5 3600
61
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i7 9700F
53
Ryzen 5 3600
58
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 3600 and 9700F
Advantages of Intel Core i7 9700F
- Has 2 more physical cores
- 12% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Has 20 MB larger L3 cache size
- More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 14 nanometers
- Unlocked multiplier
- Newer PCI Express version – 4.0
- Around 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i7 9700F
1176
Ryzen 5 3600
+10%
1294
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 9700F
8524
Ryzen 5 3600
+10%
9418
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i7 9700F
+9%
2786
Ryzen 5 3600
2550
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i7 9700F
13377
Ryzen 5 3600
+32%
17721
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i7 9700F
1203
Ryzen 5 3600
+4%
1247
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 9700F
6764
Ryzen 5 3600
+5%
7100
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 9700F and AMD Ryzen 5 3600
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | April 23, 2019 | July 7, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Matisse |
| Model number | i7-9700F | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
Performance
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 0 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 30x | 36x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | — |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |
| Transistors | — | 3.8 billions |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
Max. temperature |
100°C | 95°C |
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i7 9700F official page | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i7 9700F
40 (31.
5%)
Ryzen 5 3600
87 (68.5%)
Total votes: 127
ompetitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 5600X
2.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 5500U
3.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 5600G
4.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Apple M1
5.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i5 12400
6.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i5 12400F
7.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i3 12100
8.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i3 12100F
9.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 7 5700X
10.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i7-9700F vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-9700F and AMD Ryzen 5 3600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
Intel Core i7-9700F
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-9700F
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 4.70 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2787 vs 2570
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 7069 vs 7017
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 1207 vs 1196
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs March 2019 |
| Maximum frequency | 4. 70 GHz vs 4.4 GHz |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2787 vs 2570 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 7069 vs 7017 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 1207 vs 1196 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 8 more threads: 16 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 17819 vs 13440
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 6759 vs 6657
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 8 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) vs 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) vs 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) vs 12 MB |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 17819 vs 13440 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 6759 vs 6657 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-9700F
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 3600
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|
||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-9700F | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2787 | 2570 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 13440 | 17819 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 7069 | 7017 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 1207 | 1196 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 6657 | 6759 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i7-9700F | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Zen 2 |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | March 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $323, $335 | |
| Place in performance rating | 527 | 542 |
| Processor Number | i7-9700F | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 00 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 4. 70 GHz |
4.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 16 |
| Transistor count | 4800 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | AM4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3. 0 |
|
| PCIe configurations | 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 |
|
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
Intel Core i7-9700F vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Summary
-
Intel Core i7-9700F
100%
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
112%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i7-9700F
100%
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
101%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i7-9700F
100%
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
122%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-9700F |
| None |
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 22% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| Around 12% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| Intel Core i7-9700F | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
| SSE4.2 | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| AVX2 | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| VT-d | ||||
| HTT | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| TSX | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
| F16C | ||||
| BMI1 | ||||
| BMI2 | ||||
Boost 2. 0 |
||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| SSE4.1 | ||||
| AES | ||||
| SHA | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| EVP | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| SMAP | ||||
| SMEP | ||||
| SMT | ||||
| Precision Boost 2 | ||||
Architecture
| Intel Core i7-9700F | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Intel_Coffelake | vs | AMD Zen 2 | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR4 | |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | vs | Zen 2 | |
| Release Date | Apr 2019 | vs | Mar 2019 |
Cores
| Intel Core i7-9700F | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | vs | 6 | |
| Threads | 8 | vs | 12 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
| Intel Core i7-9700F | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | vs | 96K (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | vs | 512K (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | vs | 16MB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Core i7-9700F | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | vs | AMD Socket AM4 | |
| Max Case Temp | 72°C | vs | unknown | |
| Package | FC-LGA14C | vs | ||
| Die Size | unknown | vs | unknown | |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 7 nm |
Performance
| Intel Core i7-9700F | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3000 MHz | vs | 3600 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 4700 MHz | vs | 4400 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | unknown | vs | variable | |
| TDP | 65 W | vs | 65 W |
-
Intel Core i7-9700F
5640 points
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
4928 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-9700F
28800 points
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
29514 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-9700F (simulated)
203.
35 -
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (simulated)
206.31
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-9700F (simulated)
1285
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (simulated)
1575.75
points — higher is better
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 — Assassin’s Creed Odyssey with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-9700F @ 3.00GHz
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
i7-9700F
Ryzen 5 3600
Multi-Thread Performance
17589 Pts
19634 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2834 Pts
2900 Pts
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-9700F
Ryzen 5 3600
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
44. |
| 1080p |
43.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
35.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
34.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
25.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
24.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
32.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
31.9 FPS |
7 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
79.4 FPS |
| 1080p |
78.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
64.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
64.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
48.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
47.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
60.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
59.4 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
114. |
| 1080p |
112.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
94.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
93.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
71.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
70.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
87.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
86.9 FPS |
2 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
183.6 FPS |
| 1080p |
181.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
153.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
151.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
118.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
116.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
143.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
141.8 FPS |
i7-9700F
- The i7-9700F is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The i7-9700F has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen 5 3600
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 specifications
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Architecture
| i7-9700F | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen 2 |
| Generation | Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | unknown | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Apr 2019 | Jul 2019 |
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cache
| i7-9700F | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cores
| i7-9700F | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 8 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance
| i7-9700F | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3 GHz | 3. 6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 30.0x | 36.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.7 GHz | up to 4.2 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | variable |
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Physical
| i7-9700F | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |
| Package | FC-LGA14C | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Transistors | unknown | 4,800 million |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | unknown |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600
Availability
Intel Core i7-9700F Desktop Processor 8 Core 3 GHz speed (Up to 4.
7 GHz) Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W (BX80684I79700F)
Buy on Amazon
$375
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Availability
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy on Amazon
$139.49
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 75 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Performs up to 0% better in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive than Core i7-9700F — 658 vs 656 FPS
-
Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-9700F — $139.49 vs $375.0
-
Up to 63% better value when playing Counter-Strike: Global Offensive than Core i7-9700F — $0.
21 vs $0.57 per FPS -
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F — 12 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
656
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
-71%
Price, $
$375
37%
Intel Core i7-9700F Desktop Processor 8 Core 3 GHz speed (Up to 4.7 GHz) Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W (BX80684I79700F)
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 3600
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
658
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.49
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy for $139.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Ryzen 5 3600
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
1068
FPS
1072
FPS
League of Legends
466
FPS
468
FPS
VALORANT
293
FPS
294
FPS
Apex Legends
267
FPS
268
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
245
FPS
245
FPS
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1203
100%
Multi-Core
6469
97%
Ryzen 5 3600
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1206
100%
Multi-Core
6669
100%
|
Intel Core i7-9700F |
vs |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date |
Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
|
8 |
Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads |
12 |
3. 0 GHz |
Base Clock Speed |
3.6 GHz |
|
4.7 GHz |
Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size |
7 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier |
36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable |
Yes |
Builds Using Core i7-9700F or Ryzen 5 3600
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, 1080p, High
Gaming PC
335 FPS
$0.3/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$99.99
In Stock
Updated 40178 minutes ago
iBUYPOWER Gaming PC
288 FPS
$2.08/FPS
Radeon RX 5500 XT
Ryzen 5 3600
8 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$599.99
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Skytech Blaze 3. 0 Black Gaming PC
424 FPS
$2.59/FPS
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,099.99
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Skytech Azure Gaming PC
499 FPS
$2.61/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,299.99
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Centaurus Andromeda A8 Gaming Computer PC
400 FPS
$2.65/FPS
Radeon RX 6600
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,058
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
SkyTech Archangel Gaming Computer PC
335 FPS
$2.69/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Ryzen 5 3600
8 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$899.99
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
CLX Set Gaming Desktop PC
454 FPS
$2.75/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,249.
49
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
SkyTech Shadow 3.0 Gaming Computer PC
354 FPS
$2.82/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$999.99
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Skytech Chronos Mini Gaming PC
354 FPS
$2.82/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$999.99
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Skytech Archangel Gaming Computer PC
354 FPS
$2.82/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$999.99
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Ryzen 5 2600X
Ryzen 5 3600
$139.49
Core i7-10700
$289.
99
Ryzen 5 3600
$139.49
Ryzen 3 1200
Ryzen 5 3600
$139.49
Ryzen 5 3600
$139.49
Core i5-10600
Ryzen 5 3600
$139.49
Xeon E5-2670 v3
N/A Stock
Ryzen 5 3600
$139.49
Core M-5Y51
N/A Stock
Ryzen 5 5600G
$132.65
Ryzen 5 3600
$139.49
Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 5 3600
$139.49
Ryzen 5 5600X
$193.56
Ryzen 5 3600
$139.49
Intel Core i7 9700F vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 9700F
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Which is better: 8-core Intel Core i7 9700F at 3.0 GHz or AMD Ryzen 5 3600 with 6 cores at 3.6 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i7 9700f
64
Ryzen 5 3600
65
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus
9 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000
Core i7 9700f
40
Ryzen 5 3600
46
Energy Equality
Energy Effects Chip
Core I7 9700F
51
Ryzen 5 3600
Renting Nanoreview Nanoreview.
Core i7 9700F
53
Ryzen 5 3600
58
Key differences
What are the main differences between 3600 and 9700F
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 9700F
- Has 2 more physical cores
- 12% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Has 20 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 7 vs 14 nanometers
- Unlocked multiplier
- 15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 9700F
1176
Ryzen 5 3600
+10%
1294
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 9700F
8524
Ryzen 5 3600
+10%
9418
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 9700F
+9%
2786
Ryzen 5 3600
2550
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 9700F
13377
Ryzen 5 3600
+32%
17721
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 9700F
1203
Ryzen 5 3600
+4%
1247
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 9700F
6764
Ryzen 5 3600
+5%
7100
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 9700F and AMD Ryzen 5 3600
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | April 23, 2019 | July 7, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Matisse |
| Model number | i7-9700F | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | No | No |
Performance
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 12 |
| Frequency | 3. 0 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 30x | 36x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | — | 3.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
Memory support
| Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
Max. size |
128 GB | 128 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i7 9700F | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 website |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 9700F
40 (31.5%)
Ryzen 5 3600
87 (68.5%)
Total votes: 127
Competitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 5600X
2.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 5500U
3.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 5600G
4.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Apple M1
5.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i5 12400
6.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i5 12400F
7.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i3 12100
8.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i3 12100F
9.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 7 5700X
10.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 5500
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i7 9700F?
Name
Message
Intel Core i7 9700 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 9700
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Which is better: 8-core Intel Core i7 9700 at 3.
0 GHz or AMD Ryzen 5 3600 with 6 cores at 3.6 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single-threaded performance
Single-core rating
Core i7 9700
64
Ryzen 5 3600
65
Multi-threaded performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei are involved in all the nuclei
Core i7 9700
40
Ryzen 5 3600
46
Energy efficiency
Energy Effects Chip
Core 9700
Ryzen 5 3000 61 61
NanoReview rating
Final processor score
Core i7 9700
51
Ryzen 5 3600
58
Key differences
What are the main differences between 3600 and 9700
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 9700
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 12% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4.
7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Has 20 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 7 vs 14 nanometers
- Unlocked multiplier
- New PCI Express 4.0 standard
- 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 9700
1190
Ryzen 5 3600
+9%
1294
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 9700
8524
Ryzen 5 3600
+10%
9418
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 9700
+8%
2762
Ryzen 5 3600
2550
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 9700
13256
3 Ryzen 3
+34%
17721
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 9700
1210
Ryzen 5 3600
+3%
1247
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 9700
6692
Ryzen 5 3600
+6%
7100
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 9700 and AMD Ryzen 5 3600
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | April 23, 2019 | July 7, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Matisse |
| Model number | i7-9700 | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 12 |
| Frequency | 3. 0 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 30x | 36x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | — | 3.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1200 MHz | — |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
Igpu Flops
Core i7 9700
0.38 Teraflops
Ryzen 5 3600
N/D
Memory Support
| Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i7 9700 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 website |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 9700
29 (34.
1%)
Ryzen 5 3600
56 (65.9%)
Total votes: 85
Competitors
1.
Core i5 12600K vs Core i7 9700
2.
Core i7 8700 vs Core i7 9700
3.
Ryzen 5 5500U vs Ryzen 5 3600
4.
Apple M1 vs Ryzen 5 3600
5.
Core i5 12400F vs Ryzen 5 3600
6.
Core i3 12100F vs Ryzen 5 3600
7.
Ryzen 5 5500 vs Ryzen 5 3600
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i7 9700?
Name
Message
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i7-9700F: What is the difference?
61 Ballla
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
55 BALLLA
Intel Core i7-9700f
Winner when comparing
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
Intel Core I7-9700F
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600 better than Intel Core i7-9700F?
- 534MHz higher RAM speed?
3200MHz vs 2666MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
12 vs 8 - Smaller 7nm semiconductors?
7nm vs 14nm - 1MB more L2 cache?
3MB vs 2MB - 29.
29% higher PassMark score?
17860 vs 13814 - 20MB more L3 cache?
32MB vs 12MB - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
4 vs 3 - Has an unlocked multiplier?
Why is Intel Core i7-9700F better than AMD Ryzen 5 3600?
- 11.11% higher CPU speed?
8 x 3GHz vs 6 x 3.6GHz - 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 95°C - 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.7GHz vs 4.2GHz - 128KB more L1 cache?
512KB vs 384KB - 9.86% higher PassMark score (single)?
2840 vs 2585
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
VS
Intel Core i3-1115g4
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
VS
Intel Core i3-1115g4
AMD Ryzen 7 5700u
VS
VS
9000 AMD RYZAN
Intel Core i5-10210u
AMD Ryzen 5 5500u
VS
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
VS
Intel Core I5-10g
Intel
Intel
Intel
Intel
Intel
Intel
Intel Core
INTE
0 Reviews of users
Intel Core i7-9700f
0.
0 /10
0 Reviews of Users
Functions
Cost ratio
/10 9000 9000 5 VOTES
Reviews Until Net 9000
Games
8.8 /10
4 Votes
Reviews yet not
performance
/10
5 Votes
reviews yet there is no
Reliability
9.2 /10
5 Votes
Reviews yet there are no
Energy efficiency
9.3 /10
4 VOTES
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 2
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.6GHz
8 x 3GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.2GHz
4.7GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-9700F
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
5.33MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
3200MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
47.68GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-9700F
The memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9700F)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9700F)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender test result (bmw27)
235seconds
299.4seconds
The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
705.9seconds
1005.2seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multi-threading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700F
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700F
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700F
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume.
Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700F
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9700F)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700F
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-9700F
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through Digital Rights Management (DRM) ).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9700F)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-9700: What is the difference?
61points
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
57 ballla
Intel Core i7-9700
Winter with
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core I7-9700
Why AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is better than Intel Core 9700?
- 534MHz higher RAM speed?
3200MHz vs 2666MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
12 vs 8 - Smaller 7nm semiconductors?
7nm vs 14nm - 1MB more L2 cache?
3MB vs 2MB - 31.
7% higher PassMark score?
17860 vs 13561 - 20MB more L3 cache?
32MB vs 12MB - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
4 vs 3 - Has an unlocked multiplier?
Why is Intel Core i7-9700 better than AMD Ryzen 5 3600?
- 11.11% higher CPU speed?
8 x 3GHz vs 6 x 3.6GHz - 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 95°C - 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.7GHz vs 4.2GHz - 128KB more L1 cache?
512KB vs 384KB - Does it have integrated graphics?
- 8.7% higher PassMark score (single)?
2810 vs 2585
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD RYZEN 5 5500U
VS
Intel Core i5-1135g7
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
VS
Intel Core I3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
VS 9000) AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
vs
Intel Core i7-1165G7
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD RYZEN 5 5500U
VS
Intel Core i3-1115g4
AMD Ryzen 5 3500u
VS
Intel Core i5-10210u
I3-115G4
VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS
AMD RYZEN 7 5800H
VS
Intel Core i7-11800H
Intel Celeron N4020
VS
Intel Core i3-1005g1
Comparison of
cheaper users
Reviews
0179 General rating
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
5 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
9.
0 /10
5 Users
Intel Core i7-9700
9000 1 Reviews of Users
I7- 9700
8.0 /10
1 reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
1 Votes
Games
8.8 /10
4 Votes
7.0 /10
1 Votes
performance
/10 9000
5 Votes
9
1 Votes
Reliability
9.2 /10
5 Votes
9.0 /10
1 Votes
Energy efficiency
9.3 /10
4 Votes 9
1. CPU speed
6 x 3.6GHz
1 votes cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.
speed turbo clock
4.2GHz
4.7GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-9700
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
5.33MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
3200MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
47.68GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory debug code
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-9700
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9700)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark 9 result0003
This test measures processor performance using multithreading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender test result (bmw27)
235seconds
293.1seconds
The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
705.9seconds
884.8seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-9700
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides higher performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as flows.
Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9700)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-9700
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-9700
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9700)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i7-9700F or AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Home
- >
- On average, gaming performance is 7% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 5%.
- 2 more physical cores.
- Faster and 2% better in complex multi-threaded applications.
- The price is 31 $ lower.
- The number of streams is 4 more.
- The base frequency is 0.6 GHz higher.
- i7-9700F The i7-9700F is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
- i7-9700F The i7-9700F has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
- Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher level 2 cache. The data/instructions that need to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU doesn’t have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher level 3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- Ryzen 5 3600 has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
- Ryzen 5 3600 has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
Core i7-9700F
80.3 (+8.7%)
Ryzen 5 3600
73.3
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i7-9700F
78.6 (+5.7%)
Ryzen 5 3600
74.1
Performance in day-to-day tasks like browsing and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i7-9700F
55.
4 (+6.3%)
Ryzen 5 3600
51.9
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Core i7-9700F 75.9 (+6.5%) Ryzen 5 3600 71 |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Core i7-9700F 63. Ryzen 5 3600 56.9 |
3 (+10.1%)
Extreme |
|
Core i7-9700F 17.4 Ryzen 5 3600 19.4 (+10.3%) |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16.
Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i7-9700F
1181
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
1250 (+5.5%)
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-9700F
8540
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
9150 (+6.7%)
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Core i7-9700F
465
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
472 (+1.5%)
9000 9000 Cinebench R20 mullti i7-9700F
3644 (+2%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
3570
Cinebench R15 SINGLE CORE
Intel Core i7-9700f
209
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-9700f
1491
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
1578 (+5.5%)
Geekbench 5 Single Core 9000
%1218 (+2.
9700f 1218 ( AMD Ryzen 5 3600
1183
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-9700F
6714
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
6821 (+1.6%)
Passmark
Intel Core i7-9700F
13612
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
17863 (+23.8%)
Characteristics
The data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted.
Basic
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i7-9700F Processor | |
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | ||
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. |
14 | No data |
| Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 09-2021 | 10-2021 |
| Model Official name. | i7-9700F | |
| Cores The number of physical cores. | 8 | 6 |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 8 | 12 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. |
Missing | SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
| Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. |
4.7GHz | 4.15 GHz |
| L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 12 | No data |
| Instructions | 64-bit | |
| Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. |
No | No |
| Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Number of QPI links | ||
| TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 65 | No data |
| Cooling system specifications | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. |
||
| GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | No data | No data |
| Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | No data | No data |
| Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. |
RAM
| Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 128 | No data |
| Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4-2666 | |
| RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | |
| RAM bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. |
No data | No data |
PCI
| PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 3 | No data |
| PCI configuration options | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Number of PCI lanes | 16 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. |
No data | No data |
| Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
| Dimensions | No data | No data |
| Supported sockets | No data | No data |
| Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Core i7-9700F
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 — Destiny 2 with GTX 1080 performance comparison
GTX 1080 with
Intel Core i7-9700F @ 3.00GHz
Destiny 2
GTX 1080 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
i7-9700F
Ryzen 5 3600
Multi-Thread Performance
175891
172.1 FPS
169.4 FPS
138.9 FPS
137.9 FPS
70.0 FPS
69.5 FPS
111.
7 FPS
111.0 FPS
High quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
247.8 FPS |
| 1080p |
244.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
207.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
206.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
116.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
115.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
172.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
172.0 FPS |
Medium quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
323.5 FPS |
| 1080p |
319.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
276. |
| 1440p |
274.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
163.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
162.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
234.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
233.0 FPS |
0 FPS Low quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
474.9 FPS |
| 1080p |
470.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
413.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
411.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
256.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
254.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
356.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
355.0 FPS |
i7-9700F
Ryzen 5 3600
Compare i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 specifications
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Architecture
| i7-9700F | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen 2 |
| Generation | Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | unknown | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Apr 2019 | Jul 2019 |
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cache
| i7-9700F | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cores
| i7-9700F | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 8 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance
| i7-9700F | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3 GHz | 3.
|