Intel Atom N455 vs Intel Atom N450
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom N455 and Intel Atom N450 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
Intel Atom N455
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Atom N450
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom N455
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
| Launch date | 1 May 2010 vs 21 December 2009 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom N450
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 5.
5 Watt vs 6.5 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 276 vs 257
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 201 vs 179
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 80 vs 62
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 124 vs 94
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5.5 Watt vs 6.5 Watt |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 276 vs 257 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 201 vs 179 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 80 vs 62 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 124 vs 94 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom N455
CPU 2: Intel Atom N450
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom N455 | Intel Atom N450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 257 | 276 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 179 | 201 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 62 | 80 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 94 | 124 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom N455 | Intel Atom N450 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Pineview | Pineview |
| Launch date | 1 May 2010 | 21 December 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $64 | $64 |
| Place in performance rating | 2716 | 2710 |
| Processor Number | N455 | N450 |
| Series | Legacy Intel Atom® Processors | Legacy Intel Atom® Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1. 66 GHz |
1.66 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | 2.5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 66 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1. 66 GHz |
1.66 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 123 million | 123 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.800V-1.175V | |
| Max memory channels | 1 | 1 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR2/3 | DDR2 667 |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | Integrated | Integrated |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 22mm x 22mm | 22mm x 22mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA559 | FCBGA559 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6. 5 Watt |
5.5 Watt |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Atom N455 with others
Intel
Atom N455
vs
Intel
Atom Z520
Intel
Atom N455
vs
Intel
Core 2 Duo SL9600
Intel
Atom N455
vs
Intel
Atom Z670
Intel Atom N455 vs Intel Celeron N4500
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Atom N455 vs Intel Celeron N4500
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Atom N455 on one side and the Intel Celeron N4500 on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the netbook sector, It has 1 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 1,7GHz. The second is used on the entry-level notebook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Atom N455 | Intel Celeron N4500 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Netbook | Entry-level notebook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Bonnell | Tremont | ||||||
| Core name | Pineview | Jasper Lake | ||||||
| Family | Atom N | Celeron 4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | AU80610006237AA, Q4KN, SLBX9 |
DC8069704609907, SRKH0 |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2010 | Q1 2021 | ||||||
| Lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 123. 000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1,7 GHz | 1,1 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | 2,8 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 512 KB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 2 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR2/3 | DDR4-2933, LPDDR4x | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | — | 8 | ||||||
| TDP | 7 W | 6 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel GMA 3150 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16EU) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 16 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 16 | 128 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 200 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 200 MHz | 750 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 12,8 GFLOPS | 192 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA559 | BGA1338 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 105°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine | — | AES New Instructions | ||||||
| Security | Execute Disable Bit | OS Guard, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control |
||||||
| Max display resolution | — | 4096×2160@60Hz | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 247 | 1. 402 |
||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 153 | 1.955 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
475 | 2.570 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
603 | 3.950 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
71 | 598 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
124 | 1.093 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
1,53 GFLOPS | 28,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
93 pts / W | 658 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Celeron N4500 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron N4500 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Celeron N4500 is less. The Intel Celeron N4500 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
1.  4021.955 |
| Intel Atom N455 |
247 153 |
In single core, the difference is 468%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1178%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
2.570 3.950 |
| Intel Atom N455 |
475 603 |
In single core, the difference is 441%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 555%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
598 1.093 |
| Intel Atom N455 |
71 124 |
In single core, the difference is 742%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 781%.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
623 1.170 |
| Intel Atom N455 |
77 116 |
In single core, the difference is 709%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 909%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems.