Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs Intel Core i5-2520M: What is the difference?
39points
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
32points
Intel Core i5-2520M
Comparison winner
vs
67 facts in comparison
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Intel Core i5-2520M
Why is Intel Atom x5-Z8350 better than Intel Core i5-2520M?
- 15.2% faster CPU speed?
4 x 1.44GHzvs2 x 2.5GHz - 267MHz higher ram speed?
1600MHzvs1333MHz - 18nm smaller semiconductor size?
14nmvs32nm - 1.5MB bigger L2 cache?
2MBvs0.5MB - 33W lower TDP?
2Wvs35W - 96KB bigger L1 cache?
224KBvs128KB - 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core - 1 newer version of DirectX?
11.1vs10.1
Why is Intel Core i5-2520M better than Intel Atom x5-Z8350?
- 10°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs90°C - 450MHz faster GPU clock speed?
650MHzvs200MHz - 1.
28GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.2GHzvs1.92GHz - 1.74x higher PassMark result?
2247vs1289 - 8.5GB/s more memory bandwidth?
21.3GB/svs12.8GB/s - 14GB larger maximum memory amount?
16GBvs2GB - Uses multithreading?
- Has AVX?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Celeron N3350
Intel Core i5-2520M
vs
Intel Core i5-2540M
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Celeron N2807
Intel Core i5-2520M
vs
Intel Core i7-2670QM
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Celeron J4105
Intel Core i5-2520M
vs
Intel Core i5-4300U
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
Intel Core i5-2520M
vs
Intel Core i5-3210M
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Core i3-7020U
Intel Core i5-2520M
vs
Intel Core i5-6300U
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Celeron N4020
Intel Core i5-2520M
vs
Intel Core i3-2310M
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Core i5-8200Y
Intel Core i5-2520M
vs
Intel Core i3-3110M
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Core M3-8100Y
Intel Core i5-2520M
vs
Intel Core i7-2620M
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Atom Z3735F
Intel Core i5-2520M
vs
Intel Core i7-2640M
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Celeron G4900
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
1 User reviews
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
10.
0/10
1 User reviews
Intel Core i5-2520M
0 User reviews
Intel Core i5-2520M
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
CPU speed
4 x 1.44GHz
2 x 2.5GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
1.92GHz
3.2GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✖Intel Core i5-2520M
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
L3 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Benchmarks
PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2520M)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2520M)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2520M)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
200MHz
650MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
GPU turbo
500MHz
1300MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
GPU execution units
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.
supported displays
Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.
DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
texture mapping units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2520M)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
render output units (ROPs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2520M)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
1600MHz
1333MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
12.8GB/s
21.3GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Supports ECC memory
✔Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✖Intel Core i5-2520M
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2520M)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
bus speed
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2520M)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Features
uses multithreading
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i5-2520M
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
Has AES
✔Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i5-2520M
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i5-2520M
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✖Intel Core i5-2520M
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2520M)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
Has MMX
✔Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i5-2520M
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✖Intel Core i5-2520M
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2520M)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Miscellaneous
OpenGL ES version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
OpenGL ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. Newer versions support better graphics.
Price comparison
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Atom processors vs. Intel Xeon processors for server clusters
Categories
:
Appliance
When it comes to server processors, bigger and faster isn’t always better. Linux Magazine has published an article about how using less powerful processors (but more of them) can actually be a smarter decision than using top-of-the-line CPUs.
The author of the article, Douglas Eadline, compares building a cluster with Intel Xeon processors to creating one with Intel Atom CPUs. The Xeon is more powerful and more expensive than the Atom, but requires substantially more power.
Eadline calculates the advantages of building with one processor over another. The Price of one Xeon/Price of one Atom ratio is 22 while the Performance of one Xeon/Performance of one Atom ratio is only 7.7. That means that, while you may pay 22 times more for a Xeon than an Atom processor, you are only getting 7 times the performance of the lesser expensive CPU. This comparison suggests that, based on these parameters alone, buying servers with Atoms may be a better choice than purchasing systems with Xeons.
But the matter is not so simple. While each Atom processor draws drastically lower quantities of power than a Xeon processor, these savings are negligible when one looks at the bigger picture. The Thermal Design Power (TDP)/Performance ratios of the processors, Eadline calculates, are about equal, meaning the two processors do not differ much in terms of power consumption.
Also, Eadline observes that while you may get better performance for every dollar with an Atom than a Xeon, this only holds true when comparing strictly processor prices. But, a cluster with Atoms will typically have more motherboards and memory DIMMs than an equally-powerful cluster with Xeon processors. To calculate whether Atoms are really a better deal than Xeons, one has also has to figure in the cost of those extra pieces of hardware.
In addition, some server functions are better performed by Atom processors than others. The Web hosting industry, which does not run large databases or complex modelling software, typically only needs to store and access web pages, a relatively simple function. Clusters with Intel Atom processors are well-suited for such functions. SeaMicro, a manufacturer of large server units, has built a 10U server system with 512 Atom processors that only consumes as much power as four desktop computers, reports ServerWatch.com. The individual Atom systems, which have smaller motherboards, werere-engineeredto have a compact design which is not possible to achieve with clusters running more powerful processors.
So Atom clusters may be a viable solution for individuals or companies whose servers do simple functions. Even then, one must compare a variety of factors to determine whether «»cheap in quantity»» over «»expensive with quality»» is the wiser way to go. In any case, Atom clusters are definitely an option to be considered, especially for hosting companies.
Tags
:
Efficient ComputingHostingProcessors
Categories
:
Appliance
When it comes to server processors, bigger and faster isn’t always better. Linux Magazine has published an article about how using less powerful processors (but more of them) can actually be a smarter decision than using top-of-the-line CPUs.
The author of the article, Douglas Eadline, compares building a cluster with Intel Xeon processors to creating one with Intel Atom CPUs. The Xeon is more powerful and more expensive than the Atom, but requires substantially more power.
Eadline calculates the advantages of building with one processor over another. The Price of one Xeon/Price of one Atom ratio is 22 while the Performance of one Xeon/Performance of one Atom ratio is only 7.7. That means that, while you may pay 22 times more for a Xeon than an Atom processor, you are only getting 7 times the performance of the lesser expensive CPU. This comparison suggests that, based on these parameters alone, buying servers with Atoms may be a better choice than purchasing systems with Xeons.
But the matter is not so simple. While each Atom processor draws drastically lower quantities of power than a Xeon processor, these savings are negligible when one looks at the bigger picture. The Thermal Design Power (TDP)/Performance ratios of the processors, Eadline calculates, are about equal, meaning the two processors do not differ much in terms of power consumption.
Also, Eadline observes that while you may get better performance for every dollar with an Atom than a Xeon, this only holds true when comparing strictly processor prices.
But, a cluster with Atoms will typically have more motherboards and memory DIMMs than an equally-powerful cluster with Xeon processors. To calculate whether Atoms are really a better deal than Xeons, one has also has to figure in the cost of those extra pieces of hardware.
In addition, some server functions are better performed by Atom processors than others. The Web hosting industry, which does not run large databases or complex modelling software, typically only needs to store and access web pages, a relatively simple function. Clusters with Intel Atom processors are well-suited for such functions. SeaMicro, a manufacturer of large server units, has built a 10U server system with 512 Atom processors that only consumes as much power as four desktop computers, reports ServerWatch.com. The individual Atom systems, which have smaller motherboards, werere-engineeredto have a compact design which is not possible to achieve with clusters running more powerful processors.
So Atom clusters may be a viable solution for individuals or companies whose servers do simple functions.
Even then, one must compare a variety of factors to determine whether «»cheap in quantity»» over «»expensive with quality»» is the wiser way to go. In any case, Atom clusters are definitely an option to be considered, especially for hosting companies.
Tags
:
Efficient ComputingHostingProcessors
Compare Intel Atom E3815 vs Intel Pentium 4 2.5
| Intel Atom E3815 | Intel Pentium 4 2.5 |
|---|---|
| both processors from Intel | both |
| in the processors of the processes in the processes core | |
| CPU have the same 2nd cache 512 kilobytes | |
| ATOM E3815 is significantly behind in terms of basic frequency, 1467 megagez versus 2500 MHz | Pentium 4 2. 5 Significantly wins in terms of clock frequency, 2500 megagers |
ATOM EDUCIALY wins, its technological process is 22 nanometers, in comparison with 130 nanometers of the competitor Pentium 4 2.5 | Pentium 4 2.5 is less technologically advanced, since its technological process is noticeably larger and is 130 nanometers |
| Atom E3815 outperforms in terms of thermal power, its TDP is lower than its rival at 5W | The Pentium 4 2.5 processor will need a more powerful cooling system, since its TDP is 61W |
| Pentium 4 2.5 core temperatures are noticeably higher and reach 70 degrees Celsius. And this is a weighty argument0017 | |
| ATOM E3815 supports the architecture X64 | N/A |
L1 cache size in the CPU ATOM E3815 is much larger compared to Pentium 4 2. 5 and equals 56 KB |
Kesh of the 1st level in CPU 4 2.5 is much smaller than Atom E3815 and is 20 Kb |
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| Name of technology or instruction | Intel Atom E3815 | Intel Pentium 4 2.5 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep) | — | Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology. | |
| Stop Grant state | — | Energy saving status. | |
| Sleep state | — | ||
| AutoHalt state | — | Auto stop status. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Atom E3815 | Intel Pentium 4 2. 5 |
Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | |||
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Streaming SIMD processor extension. | ||
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 2. | ||
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | — | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3. | |
| SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) | — | Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3. | |
| EM64T (Extended Memory 64-bit Technology) | — | 64-bit extended memory technology. |
|
| NX (Execute disable bit) | — | Execution inhibit bit. | |
| SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4) | — | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4. | |
| AES (Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions) | — | Command set extension. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Atom E3815 | Intel Pentium 4 2.5 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| VT-x (Virtualization technology) | — | Virtualization technology. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Atom E3815 | Intel Pentium 4 2. 5 |
Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyper-Threading | — | ||
| SMM (System Management mode) | — | System control mode. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account data such as test results in programs, technology, number of cores and threads, frequency, release year, temperature data, instructions, structure, socket , as well as other data. In the overall rating, both processors are close: Pentium 4 2.5 scores 183.85 points, while its rival Atom E3815 scores 182.45 points. In general, in terms of performance rating, both models are identical. nine0140
PassMark CPU Mark
Perhaps the most popular benchmark on the Internet. Almost all processors presented on our site have been tested in PassMark.
The benchmark has a wide range of tests for a comprehensive assessment of the performance of computers, in particular the CPU. Among them are game physics calculations, extended instruction checking, encryption, floating point calculations, compression, integer calculations, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. In particular, it is possible to compare the obtained indicators with the rest of the configurations in the database. The Performance Test showed a slightly better performance of the Pentium 4 2.5 processor (160 points) over the Atom E3815 (151 points). The Atom E3815 falls slightly behind in this test. nine0140
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
This benchmark for testing processors and video cards is now very outdated. It is possible to test many processor systems. The main performance testing mode is multi-level reflections, spatial lights, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, working with light, simulating global illumination, as well as procedural shaders.
The test is carried out on Windows and Mac operating systems. Uses the ray tracing method. The Single-Core version uses only one rendering thread and one core in its work. Released by MAXON, it is based on the Cinema 4D 3D editor. nine0140
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread version is another test option in Cinebench R10 that already uses multi-thread and multi-core test mode. It is important to note that the number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-threaded version of the CINEBENCH 11.5 test, it has the ability to load the processor to the full, using all cores and threads. Unlike previous versions of the program, 64 threads will be used here. Testing Atom E3815 in Cinebench version R11.5 gave 0.25 points, which indicates a higher performance of this model. While the Pentium 4 2.5 gets 0.19points, much inferior to his opponent in this test.
Cinebench 11.
5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Excellent fully functional Cinebench R11.5 from Maxon. In testing, the ray tracing process is also used, a highly detailed three-dimensional room is calculated with a large number of translucent and crystalline and glass spheres. In this case, Single-Core tests occur using one core and one thread. His tests are still up to date. The result of the test is the «frames per second» parameter. The single-thread test results for the Atom E3815 in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, its score was 0.25 points. But the Pentium 4 2.5 itself scored 0.19 in this testpoints, far behind him.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-thread test
Multi Core Cinebench 15 — will load your assembly completely, showing what it is capable of. All CPU cores and threads are involved when rendering complex 3D objects. The program is suitable for modern multi-threaded CPUs from AMD and Intel, as it is capable of using 256 threads.
The Atom E3815 with a score of 23.7 scores unconditionally more points in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its competitor Pentium 4 2.5 lags far behind with 16.83 points in the test. nine0140
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench Release R15 is the latest benchmark from the Finnish Maxon development team. A complex 3D scene is rendered with many highly detailed objects, lights and reflections. In this version of Single Core, one thread is involved in rendering. It produces a system test: both processors and video cards. For processors, the result of the calculation is the number of PTS points, and for video cards, the number of frames per second FPS. The single-threaded test of the Atom E3815 processor in the Cinebench R15 program indicates its high performance, the result is 23.62 points. Compared to it, its Pentium 4 2.5 competitor fails this test with a score of 16.83 points. nine0140
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
This is already a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 test.
It is the wide cross-platform support for different operating systems and devices that makes Geekbench tests the most common now. In Geekbench 4, the 64-bit multi-core Atom E3815 received a score of 713, well above the Pentium 4 2.5. In this test, the Pentium 4 2.5 gets a very low score of 399.29 compared to the Atom E3815. nine0140
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
For the first time in this version of the program, mobile devices on Android and iOS operating systems are also supported. The program, like its earlier versions, runs on systems: Linux, Mac OS, Windows. The current single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing laptops and desktops. The Single-Core check uses one processor thread. The Atom E3815 scored higher in the Geekbench 4.0 single-thread test, with a score of 770. But its competitor Pentium 4 2.5 is doing much worse — 401.61 points. nine0140
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core version of Geekbench 3 — will allow you to make a big test on the «reliability» of your assembly and demonstrate the stability of your system.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
Single Core version of the benchmark loads one thread and one processor core. The Geekbench multi-platform benchmark is usually used to evaluate a Mac system, although it can run on both Windows and Linux. The basic purpose is to test the performance of the CPU. nine0140
Geekbench 2
On our site you can find almost 200 CPU models that have test data in this program. An outdated version of the Geekbench 2 tester. To date, there are more recent updates: the fourth and fifth.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In fact, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD files to the new H.264 format, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. The number of frames processed per second is the result of the check. This test is faster than Pass 2 because the encoding is done at the same speed. This is the most appropriate test for multithreaded processors and many cores. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Atom E3815 is much higher and amounts to 6.
38 FPS. But the Pentium 4 2.5 coped poorly with the task, its speed was 4.78 FPS. nine0140
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. You need to understand that a real task is simulated, and the x264 codec is used in many video encoders. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but encoding is already done at a non-constant rate. The final figure is also determined by frames per second. The result is a better quality video file. And this means that the results of testing really reflect the effectiveness of the platform. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Atom E3815 processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 1.4 Frames / s. Its competitor Pentium 4 2.5 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 1.06 FPS. nine0140
3DMark06 CPU
Processors are tested by 2 methods: artificial intelligence calculates the pathfinding, and the second test emulates the system using PhysX. This benchmark is very often used by fans of overclocking processors and overclockers and gamers.
Created using the DirectX library by the Finnish company Futuremark. Benchmark to check the CPU, and video system. The Atom E3815 performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, scoring 319.16 points. The Pentium 4 2.5 processor coped worse with this task, receiving 251.19score.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Approximately 2 hundred processors on our site have 3DMark Physics test data. It includes an exact test that calculates in-game physics.
WinRAR 4.0
A familiar archiver. The speed of RAR compression by the algorithm was checked, for this large volumes of randomly generated files were taken. The resulting speed during compression «kilobytes per second» — this is the result of the test. The tests were performed under the Windows operating system. Atom E3815 has a clear advantage in WinRAR data compression and packing speed, the result of file processing was 177.69Kb/s. The Pentium 4 2.5 was far behind it, the speed of which did not exceed 138.
36 Kb/s.
TrueCrypt AES
This is not really a tester, but the results of its use will help to evaluate the performance of the system. Our website shows the results of encryption speed in Gb / s using the AES algorithm. The program has a built-in function for fast encryption of disk partitions. It can fully function in different operating systems: Linux, Windows and Mac OS X. It so happened that support for this program was stopped in 2014. nine0140
Which processor is better Intel Atom or Intel Celeron?
Modern society is distinguished by the mobility of life, which also requires mobility from technology. Increasingly, netbooks, tablets and powerful smartphones are being purchased, for which Intel has developed several specialized series of processors. One of the most budget versions are Atom and Celeron. They are similar in many characteristics. That is why, when choosing a platform, the question arises which processor to give preference to. nine0140
Specifications Intel Atom
Intel Atom — a range of microprocessors.
The Intel Atom family is represented on the market by a series of several platforms with one, two and four computing cores. Processors have three positive parameters: speed, price and energy efficiency. The Intel Atom is an improved version of the Intel Pentium. It is designed according to a system that allows you to significantly reduce the cost of installing some elements and, accordingly, reduce the price of the final product. This was facilitated by the location of the memory controller and video card on the same chip. nine0140
The power of Intel Atom allows you to optimally use netbooks, nettops and other mobile devices. One of the main advantages of Atom is low power consumption, the calculated power of which does not exceed 40 W . Initially, Atom included two series of platforms: Z for tablets and nettops, and N for netbooks. They are manufactured using the 45nm process technology. Models also support Hyper-Threading.
Intel Celeron 9 specifications0004
The
Intel Celeron is a large range of Intel processors.
The Celeron platform is positioned as a low-budget series. They are designed for small computers, tablets and powerful smartphones. The low price of the processor is due to the artificial decrease in clock speed and cache memory. The dual-core Celeron processor is equipped with a two-level cache system. The size of the first level includes only 16 Kb , and the second — 256 Kb . This negatively affects the efficiency of the computer platform as a whole. nine0140
The creation of this series of processors was based on the architecture of the Pentium platform. Intel Celerons are distinguished by three characteristics: two-channel cache memory, internal clock frequency and external bus frequency. The Intel Celeron series consists of two and four core processors.
Similarity of Intel Atom and Intel Celeron
- The processors are in the same price category.
- Both platforms have the same amount of cache memory.
- The technological process of the platforms is the same and equal to 14HM. nine0515
- Maximum TDP — an indicator showing heat dissipation is identical, equal to 6 watts.
- The performance of Atom and Celeron processors with four cores is almost the same.
- Tests that measure performance across all cores and threads and in game and application mode showed similar results across platforms.
- The speed of work in complex applications is identical.
Differences between Intel Atom and Intel Celeron
- Comparing the performance of Intel Atom and Intel, you can highlight the level of power consumption. Celeron consumes from 150 W electricity. The big advantage of Atom is the power consumption of the processor at a maximum of 40 W .
- outperforms the Celeron in overall clock speed (Atom 4*1.4 GHz and Celeron 2*1.
6 GHz ). Atom also has more threads: 4 vs. 2. This contributes to increased productivity and faster multi-tasking. - However, the GPU clock speed is higher on the Intel Celeron platform. Unlike Atom which has 200 HMz clock frequency, Celeron frequency is 320 HMz .
- Performance of Intel Celeron in games exceeds the Atom platform by 5%, and for work in office programs by 8%. This is due to the difference in turbo frequency, where Atom has 2.3 GHz and Celeron 1.7 GHz. This mode allows the processor to increase the frequency of cores under greater load, increasing the speed of operation.
The Intel Atom
Scope
nine0002 If we consider the full line of Intel Atom and Intel Celeron processors, then it is necessary to clarify the technique, where these platforms are used and for what purpose. The Intel Celeron is great for laptops, netbooks, and even desktops.
Atom is intended for netbooks, communicators, tablet computers and powerful smartphones.
The integrated Intel Atom graphics adapter is great for watching videos, browsing websites and working with office programs. However, editing HD graphics and using multiple programs at the same time significantly slows down the processor. The Intel Atom is quite ergonomic. That is why a nettop based on this processor operates almost silently and spends little energy. These advantages make it possible to use the platform for work in office premises with many workplaces. nine0140
The Intel Celeron processor is great for office tasks such as watching videos, browsing the Internet and working with documents. However, the platform is not suitable for modern games. Games are designed for four thread processors, so they will load slowly or will not start at all. Compared to the Pentium platform, these processors are less productive and are designed for office or home use.