Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs Intel Core i3-6320: What is the difference?
36points
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
52points
Intel Core i3-6320
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Intel Core i3-6320
Why is Intel Atom x5-Z8350 better than Intel Core i3-6320?
- 1.5MB bigger L2 cache?
2MBvs0.5MB - 49W lower TDP?
2Wvs51W - 96KB bigger L1 cache?
224KBvs128KB - 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i3-6320 better than Intel Atom x5-Z8350?
- 35.42% faster CPU speed?
2 x 3.9GHzvs4 x 1.44GHz - 533MHz higher ram speed?
2133MHzvs1600MHz - 10°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs90°C - 150MHz faster GPU clock speed?
350MHzvs200MHz - 4.
48x higher PassMark result?
5773vs1289 - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2 - 21.3GB/s more memory bandwidth?
34.1GB/svs12.8GB/s - 5.29x higher PassMark result (single)?
2202vs416
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Core i3-4020Y
Intel Core i3-6320
vs
AMD A6-5400K
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Core i3-6100TE
Intel Core i3-6320
vs
Intel Core i5-3550
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Core i5-2520M
Intel Core i3-6320
vs
Intel Core i5-4670
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Celeron N3350
Intel Core i3-6320
vs
AMD A10-7860K
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Core i7-8500Y
Intel Core i3-6320
vs
AMD E-350
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
Intel Core i3-6320
vs
AMD A10-8700P
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Core M 5Y10
Intel Core i3-6320
vs
AMD A4-5300
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Intel Core i3-6320
vs
AMD A6-4455M
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
vs
Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel Core i3-6320
vs
AMD A6-9550
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
1 User reviews
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
10.
0/10
1 User reviews
Intel Core i3-6320
0 User reviews
Intel Core i3-6320
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
CPU speed
4 x 1.44GHz
2 x 3.9GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
1.92GHz
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✖Intel Core i3-6320
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
0.
5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
L3 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Benchmarks
PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
200MHz
350MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
GPU turbo
500MHz
1150MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
GPU execution units
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.
supported displays
Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.
DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing.
Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
texture mapping units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
render output units (ROPs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
1600MHz
2133MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
12.
8GB/s
34.1GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Supports ECC memory
✔Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i3-6320
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption.
It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Features
uses multithreading
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i3-6320
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads.
This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
Has AES
✔Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i3-6320
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i3-6320
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i3-6320
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
Has MMX
✔Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i3-6320
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✖Intel Core i3-6320
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6320)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Miscellaneous
OpenGL ES version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
OpenGL ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. Newer versions support better graphics.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
A Different Perspective On Intel’s Bay Trail (NASDAQ:INTC)
- Long Ideas
- Tech
Jul. 11, 2013 2:36 PM ETIntel Corporation (INTC)AMD, MSFT, NVDA, QCOM61 Comments
Justin Jaynes
448 Followers
Recently benchmarks were leaked showing what is believed to be Intel’s (NASDAQ:INTC) Bay Trail-T running circles around the competition. Since the benchmarks have been released, two articles on Seeking Alpha have been published here and here, and a few others on various websites.
I would like to point out that making conclusions based on one benchmark is probably never the right answer. Let me demonstrate why. I will summarize all the technical jargon at the end of the next section for those who do not enjoy the details.
A Deeper Look into Various Benchmarks
Image taken from ArsTechnica.
com
Image taken from here.
Image taken from here.
Intel’s Bay Trail is supposed to have 2-3x the performance over Clover Trail, and based on the leaked benchmark showing the Bay Trail-T scoring roughly 43,000 in AnTuTu, the claimed performance increase is believable.
But AnTuTu is only one benchmark. From what we have seen, Intel’s CPUs and SoCs seem to fare a little worse in GeekBench. For comparison, Intel’s Clover Trail+ z2580 is beaten by Tegra 3, and has roughly half the performance of Qualcomm’s (QCOM) Snapdragon 600 SoC, or roughly one-third the performance of Nvidia’s (NVDA) Tegra 4 and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 800. So you can see that if Intel hits its metric of 2-3x performance gain, this will put Intel in line with the best the competition has to offer in GeekBench, but ahead in AnTuTu.
Also noteworthy, Intel’s ULV Ivy Bridge i3 scores roughly 3600-4600 in GeekBench (depending on 32 bit vs 64 bit). So if Bay Trail does indeed offer 3x the performance over Clover Trail generation Atom, this will mean that Bay Trail performance should be on par with Intel’s lower priced Core i3 CPUs.
One of the biggest advantages of Haswell is battery life and power consumption. I would like to remind those reading that Bay Trail is targeted specifically at lower TDP designs — meaning smartphones and tablets. To make my point, look at the TDPs of Bay Trail and Haswell CPUs. The Core i5-4200u is a 15w TDP part. For comparison, Intel’s Bay Trail-T will most likely be at 7w or below. So given comparable battery sizes, the frugal power consumption of Bay Trail may also make normalized battery life of Bay Trail competitive/better than with the more expensive Haswells. Now notice the price of the i5-4200u? It has a tray price of $287, but if you figure OEMs pay half of this price if they’re buying in bulk, that corresponds to a price of $143.50. I do not believe Intel has published any pricing information for the i3 Haswell CPUs, so here I will assume OEMs pay roughly $100 for an i3 CPU. If Intel maintains prices between generations of Atom processors, and we ignore any bulk discounts OEMs may receive on Atom processors, this means Intel is offering a similarly performing processor, both in processing power and power consumption, to its Core i3 at roughly 40% of the price.
The Core i3’s advantage will most likely show up mainly in graphics performance, but this is a guess on my part.
Lastly, I would like to point out that based on AnTuTu, Clover Trail+ to Bay Trail performance increased by roughly 70% (26000 vs 43000). Applying a 70% increase to Clover Trail+ to come up with a GeekBench score yields 1426*1.70 = 2424. Adjusting by 1,200 points to account for the shift to a 64 bit environment yields roughly 3600, still behind Tegra 4 and Snapdragon 800. Here I’m not trying to contradict myself but rather calling to light 1 of 2 scenarios. If Bay Trail reaches its claimed performance increase, this brings credibility to the possible cannibalizing of higher end CPU sales. If Intel misses the performance mark with Bay Trail, it will not be a runaway victory over the competition.
Point — Bay Trail does indeed appear to come out ahead of the competition in the AnTuTu benchmark, but will most likely be on par or behind the competition in GeekBench. But the most important benchmarks for mobile applications are missing — battery life, power consumption and real world user experience.
These chips are targeted at lower power devices, so comparing performance without power consumption is fairly pointless. And given the fact that Bay Trail is targeted for lower TDPs, its battery life will likely be on par with Intel’s more expensive Haswell CPUs, and possibly at similar performance levels of Intel’s Core i3 ULV parts. Most likely the only large advantage most users will care about will be graphics for the i3.
What if Intel Outperforms the Competition?
Recently an article published on Semiwiki made the case that the smartphone sector is seeing much of its growth with cheaper devices in developing countries. With these devices selling for between $50-$75, there is no room for OEMs to offer better performance by placing a $40 SoC in their products. If Intel does decide to go after this segment, they are going to be competing on price with highly integrated, cheaper ARM variants. And, in my mind at least, it does not make much sense to spend the budget on processor performance, given what most people use their smartphones for.
To differentiate its products, it is my belief that the money would be better spent on a better display, or slightly larger battery. For an idea, here is a cost breakdown of a few Samsung smartphones. Notice the price of the SoC is at or below $30? The price of the Snapdragon 600 is listed at only $20. These are not low cost smartphones. So you can see why I assume that Bay Trail will be relegated to more expensive devices. And for my final point, think about the components that go into making a phone. Bay Trail graphics will likely be on par with an iPad 4, meaning it doesn’t make sense to pair Bay Trail with a cheaper screen. Regarding CPU performance, it would not make sense to pair Bay Trail with bargain RAM, creating a memory bottle neck. Same for storage. If OEMs use Bay Trail, they are more than likely going to have to use more expensive components elsewhere in the phone, driving the BOM even higher. Although I am focusing mainly on tablets, the smart phone discussion is still relevant for tablets.
While Apple has been at the forefront of the tablet revolution, the current market expansion has been increasingly fueled by low-cost Android devices. In 2013, the worldwide average selling price (ASP) for tablets is expected to decline -10.8% to $381.
Taken from BGR.com
As tablet prices drop, and given the fact that a Snapdragon 600 should offer somewhere around 60-80% of the performance of Bay Trail at half the price, this will put some pressure on Intel. Intel’s biggest advantage in this scenario is the ability to run x86 software.
Lastly, the most recent numbers I have seen on PC sales have a decline of 7.9% YoY. Fellow contributor Ashraf Eassa calculated roughly an average ASP of $120 for Intel’s PC chips. Also according to his article, Intel shipped 280M PC chips last year. If we assume that IDC was off, and PC Sales decline by 5% vice 7.9%, this would mean that Intel’s PC division sees a decline of 14M units YoY. To make up this loss with Bay Trail, Intel would have to ship 42M Bay Trail units, assuming OEMs are paying roughly $40 per Intel’s ARK website, which puts them at the high end of the price range.
If Intel competes on price, and Bay Trail has an ASP of $30, this number balloons to 56M. If IDC numbers hold true and Bay Trail has an ASP of $30, the number is closer to 90M. For comparison, roughly 58M iPads were sold in FY 2012. Given the fact that we’re already over halfway through 2013, and we have not seen any design wins in the realm of an iPad or an iPhone, I believe Intel has little chance of making up for lost revenue via smartphones and tablets, at least in 2013 if IDC numbers are to be believed.
Bay Trail vs. the Competition
I have shown why I feel that even if Bay Trail beats the competition in the AnTuTu benchmark I do not consider this a clear victory given the fact that performance will most likely be on par in GeekBench, we have not seen any real world battery life metrics, and that even if Bay Trail’s lead holds in real world performance over the competition, that gives Intel roughly a 20% performance advantage over the competition. I will say the average user may not notice a 20% performance increase.
2. Also noteworthy is keeping in mind everything that is integrated on the chip.
So Intel packing more transistors in a given area could allow it to lower manufacturing cost, but given the fact we have not seen Bay Trail die size yet, this is not a given. Also, above I have shown that while Intel leads in the AnTuTu benchmark, it could lag in the GeekBench suite. Meaning Intel’s process lead in this case may only give them a power consumption advantage, not a performance advantage. And we also have not seen the cost of Bay Trail.
Ashraf does great research, and I look forward to reading his articles when we have more real world information on Bay Trail to get a good analysis of performance, cost and die area.
Conclusion
With PC sales apparently still on the decline and Intel’s current low power, low cost offering to compete being based on Clover Trail for yet a couple more months, Intel may be hard pressed to make up the revenue decline. Using Ashraf’s ASP of $120, and a 5% decline of PC sales YoY, Intel’s PC group could possibly lose $1.
7B in revenue or more.
Looking at Intel’s IA group’s operation, we can see it actually operated at a loss of $1.3B last year.
Image and quote taken from INTC.com:
Net revenue for the Other IA operating segments decreased by $627 million, or 13%, in 2012 compared to 2011. The decrease was primarily due to lower IMC average selling prices and lower netbook platform volume. To a lesser extent, lower netbook platform average selling prices contributed to the decrease. These decreases were partially offset by higher ISG platform average selling prices.
So if Intel is competing for more than half the year with the older generation Atom, Intel will be hard pressed to make up for lost revenue this year with Clover Trail based Atoms. However, Clover Trail design wins help pave the inroad for Intel into mobile. Intel also has more than just mobile to make up for declining revenue, which you can read about here.
Intel faces more competition in the mobile sector than they’re accustom to in the PC space.
Intel needs a couple high volume (think iPad or similar) design wins. But my optimism for Intel lies with cheap Windows 8 tablets. For example, the Acer Iconia W3. According to the Microsoft Store’s website, the W3 comes pre-loaded with Office Home and Student, and the 64 GB version sports a $399 price tag. Not terrible given the inclusion of Office. The downside to the W3 is that it only includes 2 GB of ddr2 memory, and it’s powered by z2760, so graphics will not be very strong. Swap that z2760 for Bay Trail, and give me 4 GB ddr3, and I’d open my wallet in a heart beat. I would gladly pay an extra $30 to cover an upgraded SoC and better RAM in this instance too. The Office preload is a major step in shifting tablets from consumption to productivity. This could also greatly benefit Microsoft (MSFT) longs. We’re seeing $400 Win 8 tabs with MS Office. Office Home and Student retails for $140.
If investors believe in Intel’s ability to dominate the mobile sector with Bay Trail, this year could present several good entry points to initiate or add to long positions.
If you’re more skeptical, the declining PC market could provide the opportunity to be patient and watch from the sidelines and wait, without missing too much upside, especially if the big boy analysts keep swatting down the price for us little guys.
Disclosure: I am long AMD. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: I may initiate a long position in INTC, QCOM, or MSFT at any time.
This article was written by
Justin Jaynes
448 Followers
Comments (61)
Recommended For You
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding.
Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.
0026
90°C vs 85°C
22nm vs 32nm
2MB vs 0.5MB
4W vs 35W
224KB vs 128KB
0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i3-2350M better than Intel Atom Z3735F?
- GPU frequency 339MHz higher?
650MHz vs 311MHz - 5.09x higher PassMark result?
2692 vs 529 - 10.7GB/s more memory bandwidth?
21.3GB/s vs 10.6GB/s - 2.78x higher PassMark score (single)?
1108 vs 398 - 14GB more max memory?
16GB vs 2GB - 1 more memory channels?
2 vs 1 - Uses multithreading?
- Has AVX?
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD RYZEN 3 3250U
VS
Intel Core i3-1115g4
AMD Ryzen 7 5800h
VS
Intel Core i7-11800h
AMD Ryzen 7 6800h
VS 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 Core, 9000 COR AMD RYZEN 7 5700U
VS
Intel Core i7-1165g7
AMD Ryzen 5 3500u
VS
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 7 5700u
Intel Core INTEL Core INTEL CORE 5 5600X
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5700x
Intel Core i3-1115g4
VS
Intel Core i5-1135g7
Comers 2 x 2.
3GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
1.83GHz
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier of
✖Intel Atom Z3735F
✖Intel Core i3-2350M
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing you to get better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
More L3 scratchpad results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
311MHz
650MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
Turbo GPU
646MHz
1150MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Executors
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
By using multiple displays, you can increase your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Some applications use OpenCL to take advantage of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
TMUs take texture units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
1333MHz
1333MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
10.6GB/s
21.3GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory recovery code
✖Intel Atom Z3735F
✖Intel Core i3-2350M
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
from Intel or Simultaneous Multithreading from AMD) delivers faster performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔Intel Atom Z3735F
✖Intel Core i3-2350M
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✖Intel Atom Z3735F
✔Intel Core i3-2350M
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume.
Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✖Intel Atom Z3735F
✖Intel Core i3-2350M
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔Intel Atom Z3735F
✔Intel Core i3-2350M
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖Intel Atom Z3735F
✖Intel Core i3-2350M
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom Z3735F)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2350M)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs Intel Core i3-6320: What is the difference?
36 points
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
52 BALLLA
Intel Core i3-6320
Winter with
VS
64 Facts compared to
Intel ATOM X5-Z8350
Intel Core i3-6320 9000
Why Intel Atom X5-Z8350 i3-6320?
- 1.5MB more L2 cache?
2MB vs 0.5MB - 49W below TDP?
2W vs 51W - 96KB more L1 cache?
224KB vs 128KB - 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.
5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
- 35.42% higher CPU speed?
2 x 3.9GHz vs 4 x 1.44GHz - 533MHz higher RAM speed?
2133MHz vs 1600MHz - 10°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 90°C - GPU clock 150MHz higher?
350MHz vs 200MHz - 4.48x higher PassMark score?
5773 vs 1289 - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3 vs 2 - 21.3GB/s more memory bandwidth?
34.1GB/s vs 12.8GB/s - 5.29x higher PassMark score (single)?
2202 vs 416
What are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Atom X5-Z8350
VS
Intel Core i3-4020Y
Intel Core i3-6320
VS
AMD A6-5400k 9000 Intel Core i5-35500003
VS
Intel Core i5-4670
Intel ATOM X5-Z8350
VS
Intel Celeron N3350
AMD A10-7860K 9000.
STEM X vs
Intel Core i7-8500Y
Intel Core i3-6320
VS
AMD E-350
Intel ATOM X5-Z8350
VS
Intel Atom X7-Z8700
9000 INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEC vs
AMD A10-8700P
Intel Atom X5-Z8350
VS
Intel Core M 5Y10
Intel Core i3-6320
AMD A4-5300
Intel ATOM X5-Z8350
VS
9000 INTEL INTEL INTL
Intel Core i3-6320
VS
AMD A6-44555M
Intel ATOM X5-Z8350
Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel Core i3-6320 9000
VS
AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD Price comparison
users reviews
General rating
Intel Atom X5-Z8350
1 Reviews of Users
Intel ATOM X5-Z8350
10.0 9000
9000
Intel Core i3-6320
0.0 /10
0 User reviews0004 1 votes
reviews not yet
Games
10.
0 /10
1 Votes 9000
Reliability
10.0 /10
1 VOTES
Reviews not yet
Energy efficiency
10.0 /10 9 9 9
1 votes
No votes yet
Performance
cpu speed
4 x 1.44GHz
2 x 3.9GHz
2 x 3.9GHz CPU speed shows how many processing cycles of its 4 cores
900 900 shows how many processing cycles of its cores in a second (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
1.92GHz
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✖Intel Core i3-6320
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing you to get better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender result (classroom)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
The Blender (classroom) test measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
200MHz
350MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
500MHz
1150MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Executors
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
By using multiple displays, you can increase your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
version of DirectX
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
The newer the OpenGL version, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
Some applications use OpenCL to take advantage of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric location of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
1600MHz
2133MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
12.8GB/s
34.1GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR memory version
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory recovery code
✔Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i3-6320
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions
uses multithreading
, Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) delivers faster performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i3-6320
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i3-6320
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✖Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i3-6320
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6320)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔Intel Atom x5-Z8350
✔Intel Core i3-6320
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.