Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Core i3-390M
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N2820 and Intel Core i3-390M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Celeron N2820
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i3-390M
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2820
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 4. 4x lower typical power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt
Launch date | 1 December 2013 vs 4 December 2010 |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
L2 cache | 1 MB vs 512 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-390M
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 2.66 GHz vs 2.39 GHz
- Around 14% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1096 vs 588
- 2. 5x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 1178 vs 480
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 386 vs 199
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 798 vs 348
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.66 GHz vs 2.39 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 112 KB |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1096 vs 588 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 1178 vs 480 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 386 vs 199 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 798 vs 348 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2820
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-390M
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron N2820 | Intel Core i3-390M |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 588 | 1096 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 480 | 1178 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 199 | 386 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 348 | 798 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1289 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1289 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron N2820 | Intel Core i3-390M | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Arrandale |
Launch date | 1 December 2013 | 4 December 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $39 |
Place in performance rating | 2320 | 2013 |
Price now | $209. 99 | $38.95 |
Processor Number | N2820 | i3-390M |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.32 | 16.49 |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2. 13 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
L1 cache | 112 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA |
Maximum frequency | 2.39 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
VID voltage range | 0. 40V – 1.14V | |
Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | |
Die size | 81 mm2 | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 2500 MHz | |
L3 cache | 3072 KB | |
Transistor count | 382 million | |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1066 | DDR3 800/1066 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17. 1 GB/s | |
Graphics base frequency | 313 MHz | 500 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 756 MHz | 667 MHz |
Graphics max frequency | 756 MHz | 667 MHz |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | rPGA 37. 5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.5 W | |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | BGA1288, PGA988 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | 16 |
Number of USB ports | 5 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
USB revision | 3. 0 and 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | 1×16 | |
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Smart Connect | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Intel Core i3-8100H vs Intel Celeron N2820
Comparing technical specs and benchmarks
VS
Intel Core i3-8100H 14 nm — 3. 00 GHz DDR4-2666
Intel Celeron N2820 22 nm — 2.13 GHz DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
Intel Core i3-8100H
Intel Celeron N2820
Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In comparison between Intel Core i3-8100H and Intel Celeron N2820, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.
4 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
2 / 2
No
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
No
3.00 GHz
Frequency
2.13 GHz
No turbo
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
2.39 GHz
no data
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
2.39 GHz
No turbo
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
no data
Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820
CPU generation and family
4
CPU Cores
2
ca. 225 $
Market price
9.5
Generation
7
Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820
Internal Graphics
Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Core i3-8100H to Intel Celeron N2820 across a built-in video card.
Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU name
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
0.35 GHz
GPU frequency
0.31 GHz
1.00 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
0.76 GHz
24
Execution units
4
192
Shader
32
3
Max. displays
2
9.5
Generation
7
12
Direct X
11.2
14 nm
Technology
22 nm
Q4/2017
Release date
Q3/2013
Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820
Hardware codec support
Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.
Decode / Encode
h365 8bit
No
Decode / Encode
h365 10bit
No
Decode / Encode
h364
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP8
No
Decode / Encode
VP9
No
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode
Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820
Memory & PCIe
Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.
3.0
PCIe version
2.0
16
PCIe lanes
4
DDR4-2666
Memory type
DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
64 GB
Max. Memory
2
Memory channels
2
Yes
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
No
Intel Core i3-8100H vs.
Intel Celeron N2820
Thermal Management
High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Core i3-8100H and Intel Celeron N2820 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.
45 W
TDP
7.5 W
—
TDP up
—
35 W
TDP down
—
100 °C
Tjunction max.
—
Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820
Technical details
Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.
6.00 MB
L3-Cache
1.00 MB
Coffee Lake
Architecture
Bay Trail-T
14 nm
Technology
22 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, Vt-d
Virtualization
VT-x
BGA 1440
Socket
BGA 1170
Q3/2018
Release date
Q4/2013
Intel Core i3-8100H vs.
Intel Celeron N2820
Devices using this processor
In completing the comparison between Intel Core i3-8100H and Intel Celeron N2820, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.
Unknown
Used in
Unknown
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
78 (100 %)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
141 (100 %)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3. 00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
37 (100 %)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
73 (100 %)
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)
384 (100 %)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
48 (12 %)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
199 (100 %)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3. 00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
347 (100 %)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
896 (100 %)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
1560 (100 %)
Cinebench R11. 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
38 (100 %)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
80 (100 %)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3. 00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
55 (100 %)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.
Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
1127 (100 %)
Popular comparisons with these processors
1. |
Intel Celeron N2820 vs. Intel Core i3-6100T |
|
2. |
Intel Xeon Silver 4210T vs. Intel Celeron N2820 |
|
3. |
Intel Core i5-4202Y vs. Intel Celeron N2820 |
|
4. |
Intel Celeron N2820 vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
5. |
AMD A10-5745M vs. Intel Celeron N2820 |
|
6. |
AMD A8-3510MX vs. Intel Core i3-8100H |
|
7. |
Intel Atom Z3740 vs. Intel Core i3-8100H |
Intel Celeron N2820 vs. AMD E-300
Intel Celeron N2820
The Intel Celeron N2820 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 2.39 GHz base 2.39 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 7.5 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1170 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Bay Trail Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q4/2013
AMD E-300
The AMD E-300 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 18 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 413 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Zacate (Bobcat) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2011
Intel Celeron N2820
AMD E-300
Compare Detail
2.13 GHz | Frequency | 1.30 GHz |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2.39 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | No turbo |
2.39 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | No turbo |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) |
GPU |
AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
0.76 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
22 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
0.76 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
11. 2 | DirectX Version | 11 |
2 | Max. displays | 2 |
DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM | Memory | DDR3-1066 |
2 | Memory channels | 1 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | No |
— | L2 Cache | — |
1.00 MB | L3 Cache | 1.00 MB |
2.0 | PCIe version | |
4 | PCIe lanes | |
22 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
BGA 1170 | Socket | BGA 413 |
7.5 W | TDP | 18 W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT | Virtualization | AMD-V |
Q4/2013 | Release date | Q3/2011 |
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Intel Celeron N2820 | AMD E-300 | |
7.5 W | Max TDP | 18 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Pentium B970 — CPU Specs & Benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron N2820
Intel Pentium B970
Which to select
It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Pentium B970? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
Who will win between Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Pentium B970. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.
2.13 GHz
Frequency
2.30 GHz
2
CPU Cores
2
2.39 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
No turbo
2
CPU Threads
2
2.39 GHz
Turbo (2 Cores)
No turbo
No
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
No
CPU generation and family
Internal Graphics
Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner — Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Pentium B970.
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
GPU name
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)
0.31 GHz
GPU frequency
0.65 GHz
0.76 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
1.15 GHz
7
Generation
6
11.2
DirectX Version
10.1
4
Execution units
6
32
Shader
48
8 GB
Max. Memory
—
2
Max. displays
2
22 nm
Technology
32 nm
Q3/2013
Release date
Q2/2011
Hardware codec support
Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.
Decode / Encode
h364
Decode / Encode
Decode
JPEG
No
No
h365 8bit
No
No
h365 10bit
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
AVC
No
Memory & PCIe
These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.
DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333
Max. Memory
16 GB
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
2.0
PCIe version
2.0
4
PCIe lanes
16
Encryption
Data encryption support
No
AES-NI
No
Memory & AMP; PCIe
Thermal Management
The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.
7.5 W
TDP
35 W
—
Tjunction max.
85 °C
—
TDP up
—
—
TDP down
—
Technical details
1.00 MB
L3-Cache
2.00 MB
22 nm
Technology
32 nm
Bay Trail-T
Architecture
Sandy Bridge
VT-x
Virtualization
None
BGA 1170
Socket
PGA 988
Q4/2013
Release date
Q1/2012
Devices using this processor
You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.
Unknown
Used in
Unknown
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and employs various testing scenarios
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
38 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11. 5 carries out simultaneous cross-platform tests on all the processor’s cores. By running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will reveal all the potential of your Intel or AMD single-unit processor
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
80 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
55 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn’t count. It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
37 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
73 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2. 30 GHz (No turbo)
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. It is the software used to create 3D forms. The benchmark runs for single-core test procedure without counting of hyperthreading ability.
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
78 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 — the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for multi-core processor performance benchmark tests and hyperthreading ability.
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
141 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is the benchmark for Intel and AMD 64-bit processors. It employs a new power estimation system for a single CPU core. This software carries out the modeling of real scenarios to provide accurate results
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
896 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows obtaining the real comparative CPU potential
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
1560 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2. 30 GHz (No turbo)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
199 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor. Here the hyperthreading ability is counted.
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
347 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
1127 (100 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode
Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
48 (43 %)
Intel Pentium B970
2x 2. 30 GHz (No turbo)
110 (100 %)
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
1. |
Intel Core i3-7102E vs. Intel Pentium B970 |
|
2. |
Intel Celeron N2820 vs. Intel Core i3-6100T |
|
3. |
AMD Phenom II X2 B59 vs. Intel Pentium B970 |
|
4. |
AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Pentium B970 |
|
5. |
Intel Core i5-4202Y vs. Intel Celeron N2820 |
|
6. |
AMD E2-6110 vs. Intel Celeron N2820 |
|
7. |
Intel Celeron N2820 vs. Intel Pentium B950 |
|
8. |
Intel Celeron N2820 vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
9. |
Intel Core i3-9100TE vs. Intel Celeron N2820 |
|
10. |
Intel Celeron N2820 vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7 |
|
11. |
Intel Pentium B970 vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
12. |
AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Pentium B970 |
|
13. |
AMD A10-4655M vs. Intel Pentium B970 |
|
14. |
AMD A10-4600M vs. Intel Pentium B970 |
|
15. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Pentium B970 |
Core i5-11400F vs Celeron N2820
Availability
Intel® Core™ i5-11400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy on Amazon
$158.99
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Celeron N2820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2662 days newer than Celeron N2820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
Advantages of Intel Celeron N2820
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
708
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$158.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $158.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Celeron N2820
Mobile • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
421
32%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron N2820
Mobile • Dec 1st, 2013
289
FPS
170
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
311
FPS
185
FPS
Fortnite
318
FPS
179
FPS
Apex Legends
1150
FPS
702
FPS
League of Legends
504
FPS
298
FPS
VALORANT
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1465
100%
Multi-Core
6931
100%
Celeron N2820
Mobile • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
198
-540%
Multi-Core
343
-1821%
Intel Core i5-11400F |
vs |
Intel Celeron N2820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 |
Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Bay Trail |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1170 |
Desktop |
Segment |
Mobile |
6 |
Cores | 2 |
12 |
Threads | 2 |
2. 6 GHz |
Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz |
Turbo Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP |
7 W |
14 nm |
Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | Not Available |
None | Integrated Graphics |
HD Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i5-11400F or Celeron N2820
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, 1080p, High
iBUYPOWER SlateMR 500AD Gaming Desktop PC
318 FPS
$1.88/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Core i5-11400F
8 GB, 500 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$599
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC
401 FPS
$2.24/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 480 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899. 99
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
CYBERPOWERPC Gamer Xtreme VR Gaming PC
401 FPS
$2.24/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060
Core i5-11400F
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899.99
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
YEYIAN Katana X10 Gaming PC
504 FPS
$2.28/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,149
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Skytech Blaze II Gaming PC
449 FPS
$2.34/FPS
Radeon RX 6600
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,049.99
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
YEYIAN SHOGE X11 Gaming PC
404 FPS
$2.35/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Core i5-11400F
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$949
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
CUK Mantis Professional Student Desktop PC
385 FPS
$2. 47/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Core i5-11400F
32 GB, 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$949.99
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Skytech Blaze 3.0 Gaming PC
449 FPS
$2.51/FPS
Radeon RX 6600
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,129
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
HP Pavilion Gaming PC
287 FPS
$2.57/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400F
8 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$739
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
MSI Codex R (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC
504 FPS
$2.58/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,299
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Core i5-10400F
N/A Stock
Core i5-11400F
$158.99
Core i3-10100F
N/A Stock
Core i5-11400F
$158.99
Xeon E5-2696 v3
N/A Stock
Core i5-11400F
$158.99
Core i5-8400
Core i5-11400F
$158.99
Core i5-11400F
$158.99
E2-6110
N/A Stock
Core i5-11400F
$158.99
Atom x7-Z8700
N/A Stock
Core i5-11400F
$158.99
Xeon W-3265M
N/A Stock
Core i5-11400F
$158.99
Pentium G840
N/A Stock
Core i5-11400F
$158.99
Phenom II X3 B75
$49.95
CPU — Prozessor Vergleich und Benchmarks
Intel Celeron N2820 | Intel Core i3-4010U | |
2.13 GHz | Taktfrequenz | 1.70 GHz |
2.39 GHz | Turbo (1 Kern) | Kein Turbo |
2. 39 GHz | Turbo (alle Kerne) | Kein Turbo |
2 | Kerne | 2 |
Nein | Hyperthreading | Ja |
Nein | Übertaktbar ? | Nein |
1 MB | Cache | 3 MB |
Intel HD Graphics | Grafik | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
0.76 GHz | Grafiktakt | 0.20 GHz |
Kein Turbo | Grafiktakt (Turbo) | 1.00 GHz |
7 | Generation | 7.5 |
11.0 | DirectX Version | 11.1 |
2 | Max. Bildschirme | 3 |
4 | Einheiten | 20 |
Nein | Codec h364 | Dekodieren |
Dekodieren | Codec JPEG | Dekodieren |
Nein | Codec h365 8bit | Nein |
Nein | Codec h365 10bit | Nein |
Nein | Codec VP8 | Nein |
Nein | Codec VP9 | Nein |
Nein | Codec VC-1 | Dekodieren |
Nein | Codec AVC | De- / Enkodieren |
DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM | Arbeitsspeicher | DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM |
2 | Speicherkanäle | 2 |
Nein | ECC | Nein |
2. 0 | PCIe Version | 2.0 |
4 | PCIe Leitungen | 12 |
Bay Trail-T | Architektur | Haswell |
22nm | Fertigung | 22nm |
BGA 1170 | Sockel | BGA 1168 |
7.5W | TDP | 15W |
Nein | AES-NI | Ja |
VT-x | Virtualisierung | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q4/2013 | Erscheinungsdatum | Q3/2013 |
Preis suchen | Preis | ca. 195 Euro |
|
|
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench R11. 5 ist ein Benchmark zur Leistungsmessung des Prozessors. Er basiert auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
2x 1.7 GHz HT
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 ist ein Benchmark zur Leistungsmessung des Prozessors. Er basiert auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
2x 1.7 GHz HT
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU)
Beim iGPU-Test wird die Prozessoreigene Grafikeinheit benutzt um per OpenGL Berechnungen durchzuführen.
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
2x 1.7 GHz HT
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 ist die Weiterentwicklung von Cinebench 11.5 und basiert ebenso auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
2x 1.7 GHz HT
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 ist die Weiterentwicklung von Cinebench 11.5 und basiert ebenso auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
2x 1.7 GHz HT
Passmark CPU Mark
Beim PassMark CPU Mark werden unter anderem Primzahlberechnungen durchgeführt um die Leistung des Prozessors zu bestimmen. Es werden alle CPU-Kerne sowie Hyperthreading benutzt.
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
2x 1.7 GHz HT
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Der Geekbench 3 Benchmark misst die Leistung des Prozessors und bezieht dabei auch den Arbeitsspeicher mit ein. Ein schnellerer Arbeitsspeicher kann das Ergebnis stark verbessern. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
2x 1.7 GHz HT
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Der Geekbench 3 Benchmark misst die Leistung des Prozessors und bezieht dabei auch den Arbeitsspeicher mit ein. Ein schnellerer Arbeitsspeicher kann das Ergebnis stark verbessern. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
2x 1.7 GHz HT
Die häufigsten Vergleiche mit diesen Prozessoren
Zurück zum CPU-Vergleich
Hinweis: Wir übernehmen keine Gewähr für die Richtigkeit der hier angezeigten Informationen.
Comparison of Intel Celeron N2820 and Intel Core i3-330M
Comparative analysis of the Intel Celeron N2820 and Intel Core i3-330M processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Intel Celeron N2820
versus
Intel Core i3-330M
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Celeron N2820
- Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 10 month(s)
- Approximately 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA
- A newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x larger L2 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- 4.4x lower power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt
approx. 2.39 GHz vs 2.13 GHz
Release date | 1 December 2013 vs 10 January 2010 |
Maximum frequency | 2.39GHz vs 2.13GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA |
Process | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
Level 2 cache | 1MB vs 512KB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7. 5 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-330M
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Approximately 38% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 813 vs 588
- Performance in PassMark — CPU mark 2.1 times more: 1000 vs 480
- About 59% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 317 vs 199
- About 9 times more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark8% more: 689 vs 348
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 813 vs 588 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 1000 vs 480 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 317 vs 199 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 689 vs 348 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2820
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-330M
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Multi Core |
|
Name | Intel Celeron N2820 | Intel Core i3-330M |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 588 | 813 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 480 | 1000 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 199 | 317 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 348 | 689 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1289 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.641 |
Performance comparison
Intel Celeron N2820 | Intel Core i3-330M | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Bay Trail | Arrandale |
Production date | December 1, 2013 | 10 January 2010 |
Price at first issue date | $107 | $49 |
Ranking | 2320 | 2370 |
Price now | $209. 99 | $48.56 |
Processor Number | N2820 | i3-330M |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 1.32 | 10.85 |
Applicability | Mobile | Mobile |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 2. 13 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
Level 1 cache | 112KB | |
Level 2 cache | 1MB | 512KB |
Process | 22nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA |
Maximum frequency | 2.39 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Permissible core voltage | 0. 40V — 1.14V | |
Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | |
Crystal area | 81 mm2 | |
System bus (FSB) | 2500MHz | |
Level 3 cache | 3072KB | |
Number of transistors | 382 million | |
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory size | 8GB | 8GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1066 | DDR3 800/1066 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17. 1 GB/s | |
Graphics base frequency | 313MHz | 500MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 756MHz | 667 MHz |
Maximum GPU clock | 756MHz | 667 MHz |
Intel® Clear Video Technology HD | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Intel® Clear Video Technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Maximum number of monitors supported | 2 | 2 |
WiDi support | ||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Maximum number of processors per configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | rPGA 37. 5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.5W | |
Supported sockets | FCBGA1170 | BGA1288, PGA988 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 4 | 16 |
Number of USB ports | 5 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
USB revision | 3. 0 and 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | 1×16 | |
Anti-Theft Technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage Technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Smart Connect | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Comparison of Intel Core i3-9000 and Intel Celeron N2820
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-9000 and Intel Celeron N2820 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Peripherals.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i3-9000
versus
Intel Celeron N2820
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-9000
- Newer processor, release date difference 4 year(s) 9 month(s)
- Approximately 55% more clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 2.39 GHz
- Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- L1 cache is 2.3 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
9019 More cores, ability to run more cores applications simultaneously: 4 vs 2
Release date | September 2018 vs 1 December 2013 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3. 7 GHz vs 2.39GHz |
Process | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Level 1 cache | 64K (per core) vs 112KB |
Reasons to choose Intel Celeron N2820
- 8.1 times less power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 65 Watt
Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-9000
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N2820
Name | Intel Core i3-9000 | Intel Celeron N2820 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 588 | |
PassMark — CPU mark | 480 | |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 199 | |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 348 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1289 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1289 |
Performance comparison
Intel Core i3-9000 | Intel Celeron N2820 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Coffee Lake | Bay Trail |
Production date | September 2018 | December 1, 2013 |
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2320 |
Applicability | Desktop | Mobile |
Price at first issue date | $107 | |
Price now | $209. 99 | |
Processor Number | N2820 | |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | |
Status | Launched | |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 1.32 | |
Support 64 bit | ||
Level 1 cache | 64K (per core) | 112KB |
Level 2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1MB |
Level 3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | |
Process | 14nm | 22nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Maximum frequency | 3. 7 GHz | 2.39 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Base frequency | 2.13 GHz | |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Permissible core voltage | 0.40V — 1.14V | |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3L 1066 |
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory size | 8GB | |
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 7. 5 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.5W | |
Supported sockets | FCBGA1170 | |
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Anti-Theft Technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage Technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Smart Connect | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Graphics base frequency | 313MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 756MHz | |
Maximum GPU clock | 756MHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Maximum number of monitors supported | 2 | |
WiDi support | ||
Number of PCI Express lanes | 4 | |
Number of USB ports | 5 | |
PCI Express revision | 2. 0 | |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Core i3-6100U: What is the difference?
29points
Intel Celeron N2840
43points
Intel Core i3-6100U
Comparison Winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Celeron N2840
Intel Core i3-6100U
- 0.5MB more L2 cache?
1MB vs 0.5MB - 7.5W below TDP?
7.5W vs 15W - 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i3-6100U better than Intel Celeron N2840?
- 6. 48% higher CPU speed?
2 x 2.3GHz vs 2 x 2.16GHz - 800MHz higher RAM speed?
2133MHz vs 1333MHz - 2 more CPU threads?
4 vs 2 - Are 8nm semiconductors smaller?
14nm vs 22nm - 2.61x higher PassMark result?
2628 vs 1006 - 1 Is the PCI Express (PCIe) version newer?
3 vs 2 - 16KB more L1 cache? more memory bandwidth?
34.1GB/s vs 21.32GB/s
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Celeron N2840
vs
Intel Core i3-5157U
Intel Core i3-6100U
vs
Intel Celeron N4000
Intel Celeron N2840
vs
Intel Core i3-8109U
Intel Core i3-6100U
vs
Intel Pentium Gold 5405U
Intel Celeron N2840
vs
Intel Celeron N4020
Intel Core i3-6100U
VS
AMD E2-9000
Intel Celeron N2840
VS
Intel Core i3-5010u
Intel Core i3-6100u
VS
Intel Celeron N2402
INTEL CELERO N240003
vs
Intel Celeron N3060
Intel Core i3-6100U
vs
Intel Celeron N4100
Intel Celeron N2840
vs
Intel Celeron N3350
Intel Core i3-6100U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Intel Celeron N2840
VS
Intel Celeron N4000
Intel Core i3-6100U
VS
A4 Pro-3350B
Intel Celeron N2840
VS VS
Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel Core i3-6100U
vs
Intel Pentium N3710
Intel Celeron N2840
vs
Intel Core i3-2365M
Intel Core i3-6100U
vs
Intel Core i5-4200U
Intel Core i3-6100U
VS
Intel Core i3-10110U
Costs of prices
total0003
Intel Celeron N2840
10. 0 /10
Reviews of users
Intel Core i3-6100u
0 Reviews of Users
Intel Core i3-6100u
9000 9000 9,0004 /10,0004 /10000. Functions
Price and quality ratio
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Reviews yet not
Games
8.0 /10
1 Votes
reviews yet not
performance
7.0 /10
1 Votes
reviews yet there are no
Reliability
10.0 /10
1 votes 9000
Energy efficiency
10.0 /10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.cpu speed
2 x 2.16GHz
2 x 2.3GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
2.58GHz
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✖Intel Celeron N2840
✖Intel Core i3-6100U
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9. L3 core
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1st RAM speed
1333MHz
2133MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
21.32GB/s
34.1GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3rd version of DDR memory
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Intel Celeron N2840
✖Intel Core i3-6100U
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
1469.12seconds
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.power per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Celeron N2840
✔Intel Core i3-6100U
processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✖Intel Celeron N2840
✔Intel Core i3-6100U
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✖Intel Celeron N2840
✔Intel Core i3-6100U
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✖Intel Celeron N2840
✔Intel Core i3-6100U
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Celeron N2840
✔Intel Core i3-6100U
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. TrustZone enabled
✖Intel Celeron N2840
✖Intel Core i3-6100U
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through digital rights management (DRM) technology .
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Celeron N2820 processor — specifications, benchmarks, comparison
Home / Processors / Intel Celeron N2820
- Issue date: November, 2013;
- Number of cores: 2;
- Frequency: 2. 13 GHz;
- Power Consumption (TDP): 7.5W;
- Maximum RAM: 8,192 MB.
Characteristics Intel Celeron N2820
General parameters
Clock frequency | 2.13 GHz |
---|---|
Maximum clock frequency | 2.39 GHz |
Cores | 2 |
Socket | BGA 1170 |
Unlock cores | No |
Functions
NX-bit (XD-bit) available | Yes |
---|---|
Trusted computing support | No |
Virtualization support | Yes |
Instructions supported | EM64T |
Support for dynamic frequency scaling (CPU Throttling) | Yes |
Power consumption
Power consumption | 7.5W |
---|---|
Annual cost of electricity (NON-commercial use) | 1. 81 $/year |
Output per W | 7.97pt/W |
Average energy consumption | 6.09W |
Bus
Architecture | FSB |
---|---|
Parts and Features
Architecture | x86-64 |
---|---|
Threads | 2 |
L2 cache | 1MB |
Second level cache per core (L2) | 0.5 MB/core |
Process | 22 nm |
Maximum processors | 1 |
Celeron N2820 Overclock
Overclock Clock | 2.4 GHz |
---|---|
Water-cooled boost clock | 2.13 GHz |
Air cooled boost clock | 2.4 GHz |
Integrated graphics
Graphics core | GPU |
---|---|
Grade | Intel® HD Graphics |
Number of displays supported | 2 |
Graphics core clock speed | 313MHz |
Maximum clock frequency | 756MHz |
Memory module
Memory controller | Integrated |
---|---|
Memory type | DDR3L-1066 |
Channels | Double channel |
ECC support (error correction) | No |
Maximum flow | 12,800 MB/s |
Maximum memory |
Benchmarks Celeron N2820
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core)
Celeron N2820 | 1. 514 |
---|---|
E1 2100 | 912 |
Celeron N3050 | 1.584 |
GeekBench 3 (Single core)
Celeron N2820 | 867 |
---|---|
E1 2100 | 529 |
Celeron N3050 | 879 |
GeekBench 3 (AES single core)
Celeron N2820 | 56,000 MB/s |
---|---|
E1 2100 | 494,700 MB/s |
Celeron N3050 | 350.4 MB/s |
GeekBench (32-bit)
Celeron N2820 | 1.452 |
---|---|
E1 2100 | 855 |
Celeron N3050 | n/a |
GeekBench
Celeron N2820 | 1.452 |
---|---|
E1 2100 | 855 |
Celeron N3050 | n/a |
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Celeron N2820 | 18. 9 |
---|---|
E1 2100 | 13.7 |
Celeron N3050 | 18.5 |
PassMark
Celeron N2820 | 960 |
---|---|
E1 2100 | 627 |
Celeron N3050 | 885 |
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron N2820 | 513 |
---|---|
E1 2100 | 363 |
Celeron N3050 | 467 |
Video reviews
Let’s talk about the N2840 processor
Laptop Lenovo IdeaPad G5030 Celeron N2820 2. 13GHz
Intel Celeron vs. Intel Core i3 vs. i5 Que portatil comprar en Colombia para 2018?
Celeron N2820 reviews
+WELOVELECTRONICS W. L.E.
here I have Win 10 and in chrome it does not show 4k on YouTube (slows down) But Microsoft Edge shows 4k on YouTube without problems.
Task Manager shows that Edge at 4k loads percent by 30-60%, while chrome loads percent by 100%
Celeron 1000m processor with integrated graphics (650-1000 peak Mhz graphics core)
Can you please tell me how 4k behaves in YouTube on Windows 10 in Microsoft Edge browser
it will not pull i3, because the board does not support, the maximum that you can put is the intel Qvard core N3540 2.16GHz, it is the most normal, I have it in the same laptop, I still I plugged in 8 gigs of RAM, and the laptop is full of norms, it will run the game more than anything, you just need to buy a cooling stand so that the percentage does not overheat, it just has a passive cooling system!
It’s not worth talking about games, even i3 is not suitable for games, only for some junk. One important point was not taken into account here, the celeron TDP is only 7 watts, while the i3 has as much as 17 watts. So even in idle i3 will eat the battery somewhere twice as fast. And since a laptop is primarily about mobility, it’s silly to say that celeron is not worth the money, just because it is weaker.
Tags:2.13 GHz, 7.5W, Celeron N2820, CPU, Intel
Intel Core i3-4030U vs. Intel Celeron N2840
Intel Core i3-4030U
Intel Core i3-4030U runs with 2 and 4 CPU threads It runs on No turbo base No turbo all cores while TDP is set to 15W .CPU connects to BGA 1168 CPU socket This the version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM, DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM, LPDDR3-1333, LPDDR3-1600 RAM, and supports 2.0 PCIe Gen 12. Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, Haswell U architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q2/2014
Intel Celeron N2840
Intel Celeron N2840 runs with 2 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 2.58 GHz base 2. 58 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 7.5 W .CPU connects to BGA 1170 CPU socket This version includes 1.00 MB L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM RAM, and supports 2.0 PCIe Gen 4 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Bay Trail Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT . The product was launched Q2/2014
Intel Core i3-4030U
Intel Celeron N2840
Intel HD Graphics 4400
Intel HD Graphics (Baytrail GT1)
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
LPDDR3-1333
LPDDR3-1600
Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Intel Core i3-4030U | Intel Celeron N2840 | |
15W | Max TDP | 7.5W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Operating cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Operating cost per year | NA |
Popular comparison
Comments0001
VS
Which one to choose?
It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in Intel Core i3-10110Y vs Intel Celeron N2840 comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!
Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor
Who will win in the comparison of Intel Core i3-10110Y and Intel Celeron N2840. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.
1.10 GHZ
Tact frequency
2.16 GHZ
2
Number
2
4 GHz
Turbo (2 Cores)
2.58 GHz
Yes
0015
Internal graphics
It’s hard to compare Intel Core i3-10110Y vs Intel Celeron N2840 when graphics card function and specifications matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.
Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)
GPU name
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
0.30 GHz
GPU frequency
0.31 GHz
1.00 GHZ
GPU (TURBO)
0.79 GHZ
9.5
Generation
7,0002 12
version DirectX
11.2
24
Executive blocks
4000 4000 4000 4000
32
—
Maximum memory
8 GB
3
Number of monitors
2
14 nm
Technology
0003
22 nm
Q3/2019
Release date
Q3/2013
Hardware codec support
Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.
Decode / Encode
h364
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode
Decode / Encode
h365 8bit
No
Decode / Encode
h365 10bit
No
Decode / Encode
VP8
No
Decode / Encode
VP9
No
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode
RAM and PCIe
These are memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.
LPDDR3-2133
Type of memory
DDR3L-1333 SO-Dimm
16 GB
Maximum memory
2
Memory Chanels
2
NO
ECC
9000 9000 3,000 3.0 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 PCIe
2.0
10
PCIE Lines
4
Crystick
Support for data encryption
YES
AES-Ni
NO
Memory & amp; PCIe
Thermal management and TDP
Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and workloads that, as a result, unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between Intel Core i3-10110Y and Intel Celeron N2840, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).
7 W
TDP
7.5 W
100 °C
Maximum Temperature
—
9 W
Maximum TDP
—
5. 5 W
TDP Download
—
Technical details
4 Y
Architecture
Bay Trail
VT-X, VT-X EPT, VT-D
Virtualization
VT-X
BGA 1200
SOCK (connector)
BGA 1170
9000 q3/2019
/2019
Release date
Q2/2014
ca. 185 $
Price
Compatible devices with this processor
You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.
Unknown
Used in
Unknown
Popular CPU Comparisons
one. |
Intel Core i3-10110Y Intel Core i5-6500 |
|
2. |
Intel Core i3-10110Y AMD A9-9420 |
|
3. |
Intel Core i3-10110Y Intel Celeron N2840 |
|
four. |
Intel Core i3-10110Y Intel Core i5-9300HF |
|
5. |
Intel Core i3-10110Y Intel Core i5-9500T |
|
6. |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs. Intel Core i7-4930MX |
|
7. |
Intel Core i3-10110Y Intel Core i3-7100H |
|
eight. |
AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Celeron N2840 |
|
9. |
Intel Core i3-10110Y Intel Core i5-8269U |
|
ten. |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
eleven. |
AMD A6-9220C vs. Intel Celeron N2840 |
|
12. |
AMD G-T56E vs. Intel Celeron N2840 |
|
13. |
AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Celeron N2840 |
|
fourteen. |
AMD A10-4600M vs.
|