Intel celeron n2820 vs i3: Intel Celeron N2820 vs Core i3-3217U

Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Core i3-390M


Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N2820 and Intel Core i3-390M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Celeron N2820

Buy on Amazon


vs

Intel Core i3-390M

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2820

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 4. 4x lower typical power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt






Launch date 1 December 2013 vs 4 December 2010
Maximum core temperature 105°C vs 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 32 nm
L2 cache 1 MB vs 512 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-390M

  • 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
  • Around 11% higher clock speed: 2.66 GHz vs 2.39 GHz
  • Around 14% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 86% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1096 vs 588
  • 2. 5x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 1178 vs 480
  • Around 94% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 386 vs 199
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 798 vs 348








Number of threads 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 2.66 GHz vs 2.39 GHz
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 112 KB
PassMark — Single thread mark 1096 vs 588
PassMark — CPU mark 1178 vs 480
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 386 vs 199
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 798 vs 348

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2820
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-390M





PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1
CPU 2







Name Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Core i3-390M
PassMark — Single thread mark 588 1096
PassMark — CPU mark 480 1178
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 199 386
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 348 798
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 1289
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 1289

Compare specifications (specs)
































































Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Core i3-390M
Architecture codename Bay Trail Arrandale
Launch date 1 December 2013 4 December 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $107 $39
Place in performance rating 2320 2013
Price now $209. 99 $38.95
Processor Number N2820 i3-390M
Series Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Launched Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 1.32 16.49
Vertical segment Mobile Mobile
64 bit support
Base frequency 2. 13 GHz 2.66 GHz
L1 cache 112 KB 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 1 MB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 32 nm
Maximum core temperature 105°C 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA
Maximum frequency 2.39 GHz 2.66 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 4
VID voltage range 0. 40V – 1.14V
Bus Speed

2.5 GT/s DMI
Die size

81 mm2
Front-side bus (FSB)

2500 MHz
L3 cache

3072 KB
Transistor count

382 million
Max memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory size 8 GB 8 GB
Supported memory types DDR3L 1066 DDR3 800/1066
Maximum memory bandwidth

17. 1 GB/s
Graphics base frequency 313 MHz 500 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 756 MHz 667 MHz
Graphics max frequency 756 MHz 667 MHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics Intel HD Graphics Intel HD Graphics
Intel® Clear Video technology

Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)

Number of displays supported 2 2
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 25mm x 27mm rPGA 37. 5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm
Scenario Design Power (SDP) 4.5 W
Sockets supported FCBGA1170 BGA1288, PGA988
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 7.5 Watt 35 Watt
Max number of PCIe lanes 4 16
Number of USB ports 5
PCI Express revision 2.0 2.0
Total number of SATA ports 2
USB revision 3. 0 and 2.0
PCIe configurations

1×16
Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST)
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Smart Connect
Flexible Display interface (FDI)

Instruction set extensions

Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2
Intel® Fast Memory Access

Intel® Flex Memory Access

Physical Address Extensions (PAE)

36-bit
Thermal Monitoring

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Intel Core i3-8100H vs Intel Celeron N2820

Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

VS

Intel Core i3-8100H 14 nm — 3. 00 GHz DDR4-2666 

Intel Celeron N2820 22 nm — 2.13 GHz DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM 

Intel Core i3-8100H

Intel Celeron N2820

Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Core i3-8100H and Intel Celeron N2820, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

4 / 4

CPU Cores / Threads

2 / 2

No

Hyperthreading

No

No

Overclocking

No

3.00 GHz

Frequency

2.13 GHz

No turbo

Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

2.39 GHz

no data

Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)

2.39 GHz

No turbo

Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)

no data

Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820

CPU generation and family

4

CPU Cores

2

ca. 225 $

Market price

9.5

Generation

7

Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Core i3-8100H to Intel Celeron N2820 across a built-in video card.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

GPU name

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)

0.35 GHz

GPU frequency

0.31 GHz

1.00 GHz

GPU (Turbo)

0.76 GHz

24

Execution units

4

192

Shader

32

3

Max. displays

2

9.5

Generation

7

12

Direct X

11.2

14 nm

Technology

22 nm

Q4/2017

Release date

Q3/2013

Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820

Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

Decode / Encode

h365 8bit

No

Decode / Encode

h365 10bit

No

Decode / Encode

h364

Decode / Encode

Decode / Encode

VP8

No

Decode / Encode

VP9

No

Decode / Encode

AVC

Decode / Encode

Decode

VC-1

Decode

Decode / Encode

JPEG

Decode

Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820

Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0

PCIe version

2.0

16

PCIe lanes

4

DDR4-2666

Memory type

DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM

64 GB

Max. Memory

2

Memory channels

2

Yes

ECC

No

Yes

AES-NI

No

Intel Core i3-8100H vs.

Intel Celeron N2820
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Core i3-8100H and Intel Celeron N2820 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

45 W

TDP

7.5 W

TDP up

35 W

TDP down

100 °C

Tjunction max.

Intel Core i3-8100H vs. Intel Celeron N2820

Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

6.00 MB

L3-Cache

1.00 MB

Coffee Lake

Architecture

Bay Trail-T

14 nm

Technology

22 nm

VT-x, VT-x EPT, Vt-d

Virtualization

VT-x

BGA 1440

Socket

BGA 1170

Q3/2018

Release date

Q4/2013

Intel Core i3-8100H vs.

Intel Celeron N2820
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Core i3-8100H and Intel Celeron N2820, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown

Used in

Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

78 (100 %)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

141 (100 %)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3. 00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

37 (100 %)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

73 (100 %)

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)

384 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

48 (12 %)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

199 (100 %)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3. 00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

347 (100 %)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

896 (100 %)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

1560 (100 %)

Cinebench R11. 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

38 (100 %)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

80 (100 %)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3. 00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

55 (100 %)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.

Intel Core i3-8100H
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

1127 (100 %)

Popular comparisons with these processors

1. Intel Celeron N2820 vs.
Intel Core i3-6100T
2. Intel Xeon Silver 4210T vs.
Intel Celeron N2820
3. Intel Core i5-4202Y vs.
Intel Celeron N2820
4. Intel Celeron N2820 vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
5. AMD A10-5745M vs.
Intel Celeron N2820
6. AMD A8-3510MX vs.
Intel Core i3-8100H
7. Intel Atom Z3740 vs.
Intel Core i3-8100H

Intel Celeron N2820 vs. AMD E-300

Intel Celeron N2820

The Intel Celeron N2820 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 2.39 GHz base 2.39 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 7.5 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1170 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Bay Trail Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q4/2013

AMD E-300

The AMD E-300 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 18 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 413 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Zacate (Bobcat) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2011

Intel Celeron N2820

AMD E-300

Compare Detail

2.13 GHz Frequency 1.30 GHz
2 Cores 2
2.39 GHz Turbo (1 Core) No turbo
2.39 GHz Turbo (All Cores) No turbo
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking No
normal Core Architecture normal

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)

GPU

AMD Radeon HD 6310

0.76 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
22 nm Technology 32 nm
0.76 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
11. 2 DirectX Version 11
2 Max. displays 2
DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM Memory DDR3-1066
2 Memory channels 1
Max memory
No ECC No
L2 Cache
1.00 MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB
2.0 PCIe version
4 PCIe lanes
22 nm Technology 32 nm
BGA 1170 Socket BGA 413
7.5 W TDP 18 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT Virtualization AMD-V
Q4/2013 Release date Q3/2011

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Intel Celeron N2820 AMD E-300
7.5 W Max TDP 18 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Pentium B970 — CPU Specs & Benchmark

VS

Intel Celeron N2820

Intel Pentium B970

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Pentium B970? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between Intel Celeron N2820 vs  Intel Pentium B970. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

2.13 GHz

Frequency

2.30 GHz

2

CPU Cores

2

2.39 GHz

Turbo (1 Core)

No turbo

2

CPU Threads

2

2.39 GHz

Turbo (2 Cores)

No turbo

No

Hyperthreading

No

No

Overclocking

No

CPU generation and family

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner — Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Pentium B970. 

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)

GPU name

Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)

0.31 GHz

GPU frequency

0.65 GHz

0.76 GHz

GPU (Turbo)

1.15 GHz

7

Generation

6

11.2

DirectX Version

10.1

4

Execution units

6

32

Shader

48

8 GB

Max. Memory

2

Max. displays

2

22 nm

Technology

32 nm

Q3/2013

Release date

Q2/2011

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

Decode / Encode

h364

Decode / Encode

Decode

JPEG

No

No

h365 8bit

No

No

h365 10bit

No

No

VP8

No

No

VP9

No

Decode

VC-1

Decode

Decode / Encode

AVC

No

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM

Memory type

DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333

Max. Memory

16 GB

2

Memory channels

2

No

ECC

No

2.0

PCIe version

2.0

4

PCIe lanes

16

Encryption

Data encryption support

No

AES-NI

No

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

7.5 W

TDP

35 W

Tjunction max.

85 °C

TDP up

TDP down

Technical details

1.00 MB

L3-Cache

2.00 MB

22 nm

Technology

32 nm

Bay Trail-T

Architecture

Sandy Bridge

VT-x

Virtualization

None

BGA 1170

Socket

PGA 988

Q4/2013

Release date

Q1/2012

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown

Used in

Unknown

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and employs various testing scenarios

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

38 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11. 5 carries out simultaneous cross-platform tests on all the processor’s cores. By running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will reveal all the potential of your Intel or AMD single-unit processor

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

80 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

55 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn’t count. It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

37 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

73 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2. 30 GHz (No turbo)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. It is the software used to create 3D forms. The benchmark runs for single-core test procedure without counting of hyperthreading ability.

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

78 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 — the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for multi-core processor performance benchmark tests and hyperthreading ability.

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

141 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is the benchmark for Intel and AMD 64-bit processors. It employs a new power estimation system for a single CPU core. This software carries out the modeling of real scenarios to provide accurate results

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

896 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows obtaining the real comparative CPU potential

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

1560 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2. 30 GHz (No turbo)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

199 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor. Here the hyperthreading ability is counted.

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

347 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

1127 (100 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo)

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode

Intel Celeron N2820
2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)

48 (43 %)

Intel Pentium B970
2x 2. 30 GHz (No turbo)

110 (100 %)

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Core i3-7102E vs.
Intel Pentium B970
2. Intel Celeron N2820 vs.
Intel Core i3-6100T
3. AMD Phenom II X2 B59 vs.
Intel Pentium B970
4. AMD A6-9225 vs.
Intel Pentium B970
5. Intel Core i5-4202Y vs.
Intel Celeron N2820
6. AMD E2-6110 vs.
Intel Celeron N2820
7. Intel Celeron N2820 vs.
Intel Pentium B950
8. Intel Celeron N2820 vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
9. Intel Core i3-9100TE vs.
Intel Celeron N2820
10. Intel Celeron N2820 vs.
Intel Core i7-1160G7
11. Intel Pentium B970 vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
12. AMD A10-5750M vs.
Intel Pentium B970
13. AMD A10-4655M vs.
Intel Pentium B970
14. AMD A10-4600M vs.
Intel Pentium B970
15. AMD A10-5700 vs.
Intel Pentium B970

Core i5-11400F vs Celeron N2820

Availability

Intel® Core™ i5-11400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W

Buy on Amazon

$158.99

In Stock

Updated 24 minutes ago

Availability

No items available

Key Differences

In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Celeron N2820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2662 days newer than Celeron N2820.

Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F

Advantages of Intel Celeron N2820

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i5-11400F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

708

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.22/FPS

100%

Price, $

$158.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel® Core™ i5-11400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W

Buy for $158.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 24 minutes ago

Celeron N2820

Mobile • Dec 1st, 2013


FPS

421

32%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i5-11400F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

Celeron N2820

Mobile • Dec 1st, 2013

289

FPS

170

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

311

FPS

185

FPS

Fortnite

318

FPS

179

FPS

Apex Legends

1150

FPS

702

FPS

League of Legends

504

FPS

298

FPS

VALORANT

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Core i5-11400F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

1465

100%

Multi-Core

6931

100%

Celeron N2820

Mobile • Dec 1st, 2013


Single-Core

198

-540%

Multi-Core

343

-1821%

Intel Core i5-11400F

vs

Intel Celeron N2820

Mar 16th, 2021

Release Date Dec 1st, 2013
Core i5 Collection Celeron
Rocket Lake Codename Bay Trail
Intel Socket 1200 Socket Intel BGA 1170

Desktop

Segment

Mobile

6

Cores 2

12

Threads 2

2. 6 GHz

Base Clock Speed 2.1 GHz

4.4 GHz

Turbo Clock Speed 2.4 GHz
65 W TDP

7 W

14 nm

Process Size 22 nm
26.0x Multiplier Not Available
None Integrated Graphics

HD Graphics

No Overclockable No

Builds Using Core i5-11400F or Celeron N2820

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, 1080p, High

iBUYPOWER SlateMR 500AD Gaming Desktop PC

318 FPS

$1.88/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Core i5-11400F

8 GB, 500 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$599

In Stock

Updated 10 minutes ago

iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC

401 FPS

$2.24/FPS

GeForce RTX 2060

Core i5-11400F

16 GB, 480 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$899. 99

In Stock

Updated 18 minutes ago

CYBERPOWERPC Gamer Xtreme VR Gaming PC

401 FPS

$2.24/FPS

GeForce RTX 2060

Core i5-11400F

8 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$899.99

In Stock

Updated 19 minutes ago

YEYIAN Katana X10 Gaming PC

504 FPS

$2.28/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Core i5-11400F

16 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,149

In Stock

Updated 9 minutes ago

Skytech Blaze II Gaming PC

449 FPS

$2.34/FPS

Radeon RX 6600

Core i5-11400F

16 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,049.99

In Stock

Updated 14 minutes ago

YEYIAN SHOGE X11 Gaming PC

404 FPS

$2.35/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Core i5-11400F

8 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$949

In Stock

Updated 15 minutes ago

CUK Mantis Professional Student Desktop PC

385 FPS

$2. 47/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Core i5-11400F

32 GB, 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$949.99

In Stock

Updated 14 minutes ago

Skytech Blaze 3.0 Gaming PC

449 FPS

$2.51/FPS

Radeon RX 6600

Core i5-11400F

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$1,129

In Stock

Updated 17 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming PC

287 FPS

$2.57/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Core i5-11400F

8 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$739

In Stock

Updated 19 minutes ago

MSI Codex R (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC

504 FPS

$2.58/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Core i5-11400F

16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,299

In Stock

Updated 18 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Core i5-10400F

N/A Stock

Core i5-11400F

$158.99

Core i3-10100F

N/A Stock

Core i5-11400F

$158.99

Xeon E5-2696 v3

N/A Stock

Core i5-11400F

$158.99

Core i5-8400

Core i5-11400F

$158.99

Core i5-11400F

$158.99

E2-6110

N/A Stock

Core i5-11400F

$158.99

Atom x7-Z8700

N/A Stock

Core i5-11400F

$158.99

Xeon W-3265M

N/A Stock

Core i5-11400F

$158.99

Pentium G840

N/A Stock

Core i5-11400F

$158.99

Phenom II X3 B75

$49.95

CPU — Prozessor Vergleich und Benchmarks



Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Core i3-4010U
2.13 GHz Taktfrequenz 1.70 GHz
2.39 GHz Turbo (1 Kern) Kein Turbo
2. 39 GHz Turbo (alle Kerne) Kein Turbo
2 Kerne 2
Nein Hyperthreading Ja
Nein Übertaktbar ? Nein
1 MB Cache 3 MB
Intel HD Graphics Grafik Intel HD Graphics 4400
0.76 GHz Grafiktakt 0.20 GHz
Kein Turbo Grafiktakt (Turbo) 1.00 GHz
7 Generation 7.5
11.0 DirectX Version 11.1
2 Max. Bildschirme 3
4 Einheiten 20
Nein Codec h364 Dekodieren
Dekodieren Codec JPEG Dekodieren
Nein Codec h365 8bit Nein
Nein Codec h365 10bit Nein
Nein Codec VP8 Nein
Nein Codec VP9 Nein
Nein Codec VC-1 Dekodieren
Nein Codec AVC De- / Enkodieren
DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM Arbeitsspeicher DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
2 Speicherkanäle 2
Nein ECC Nein
2. 0 PCIe Version 2.0
4 PCIe Leitungen 12
Bay Trail-T Architektur Haswell
22nm Fertigung 22nm
BGA 1170 Sockel BGA 1168
7.5W TDP 15W
Nein AES-NI Ja
VT-x Virtualisierung VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q4/2013 Erscheinungsdatum Q3/2013
Preis suchen Preis ca. 195 Euro





Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11. 5 ist ein Benchmark zur Leistungsmessung des Prozessors. Er basiert auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.


2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)


2x 1.7 GHz HT

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 ist ein Benchmark zur Leistungsmessung des Prozessors. Er basiert auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.


2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)


2x 1.7 GHz HT

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU)

Beim iGPU-Test wird die Prozessoreigene Grafikeinheit benutzt um per OpenGL Berechnungen durchzuführen.


2x 2. 13 GHz (2.39 GHz)


2x 1.7 GHz HT

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 ist die Weiterentwicklung von Cinebench 11.5 und basiert ebenso auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.


2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)


2x 1.7 GHz HT

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 ist die Weiterentwicklung von Cinebench 11.5 und basiert ebenso auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.


2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)


2x 1.7 GHz HT

Passmark CPU Mark

Beim PassMark CPU Mark werden unter anderem Primzahlberechnungen durchgeführt um die Leistung des Prozessors zu bestimmen. Es werden alle CPU-Kerne sowie Hyperthreading benutzt.


2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)


2x 1.7 GHz HT

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Der Geekbench 3 Benchmark misst die Leistung des Prozessors und bezieht dabei auch den Arbeitsspeicher mit ein. Ein schnellerer Arbeitsspeicher kann das Ergebnis stark verbessern. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.


2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)


2x 1.7 GHz HT

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Der Geekbench 3 Benchmark misst die Leistung des Prozessors und bezieht dabei auch den Arbeitsspeicher mit ein. Ein schnellerer Arbeitsspeicher kann das Ergebnis stark verbessern. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.


2x 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)


2x 1.7 GHz HT






Die häufigsten Vergleiche mit diesen Prozessoren




Zurück zum CPU-Vergleich

Hinweis: Wir übernehmen keine Gewähr für die Richtigkeit der hier angezeigten Informationen.

Comparison of Intel Celeron N2820 and Intel Core i3-330M

Comparative analysis of the Intel Celeron N2820 and Intel Core i3-330M processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s).

Intel Celeron N2820

versus

Intel Core i3-330M

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Celeron N2820

  • Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 10 month(s)
  • approx. 2.39 GHz vs 2.13 GHz

  • Approximately 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA
  • A newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 32 nm
  • 2x larger L2 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • 4.4x lower power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt
Release date 1 December 2013 vs 10 January 2010
Maximum frequency 2.39GHz vs 2.13GHz
Maximum core temperature 105°C vs 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA
Process 22 nm vs 32 nm
Level 2 cache 1MB vs 512KB
Power consumption (TDP) 7. 5 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-330M

  • 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
  • Approximately 38% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 813 vs 588
  • Performance in PassMark — CPU mark 2.1 times more: 1000 vs 480
  • About 59% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 317 vs 199
  • About 9 times more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark8% more: 689 vs 348
Number of threads 4 vs 2
PassMark — Single thread mark 813 vs 588
PassMark — CPU mark 1000 vs 480
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 317 vs 199
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 689 vs 348

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2820
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-330M

PassMark — Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
Name Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Core i3-330M
PassMark — Single thread mark 588 813
PassMark — CPU mark 480 1000
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 199 317
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 348 689
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 1289
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 1289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.641

Performance comparison

Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Core i3-330M
Architecture name Bay Trail Arrandale
Production date December 1, 2013 10 January 2010
Price at first issue date $107 $49
Ranking 2320 2370
Price now $209. 99 $48.56
Processor Number N2820 i3-330M
Series Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Launched Discontinued
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 1.32 10.85
Applicability Mobile Mobile
Support 64 bit
Base frequency 2. 13 GHz 2.13 GHz
Level 1 cache 112KB
Level 2 cache 1MB 512KB
Process 22nm 32 nm
Maximum core temperature 105°C 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA
Maximum frequency 2.39 GHz 2.13 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 4
Permissible core voltage 0. 40V — 1.14V
Bus Speed ​​ 2.5 GT/s DMI
Crystal area 81 mm2
System bus (FSB) 2500MHz
Level 3 cache 3072KB
Number of transistors 382 million
Maximum number of memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory size 8GB 8GB
Supported memory types DDR3L 1066 DDR3 800/1066
Maximum memory bandwidth 17. 1 GB/s
Graphics base frequency 313MHz 500MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 756MHz 667 MHz
Maximum GPU clock 756MHz 667 MHz
Intel® Clear Video Technology HD
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics Intel HD Graphics
Intel® Clear Video Technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Maximum number of monitors supported 2 2
WiDi support
Low Halogen Options Available
Maximum number of processors per configuration 1 1
Package Size 25mm x 27mm rPGA 37. 5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm
Scenario Design Power (SDP) 4.5W
Supported sockets FCBGA1170 BGA1288, PGA988
Power consumption (TDP) 7.5 Watt 35 Watt
Number of PCI Express lanes 4 16
Number of USB ports 5
PCI Express revision 2.0 2.0
Total number of SATA ports 2
USB revision 3. 0 and 2.0
PCIe configurations 1×16
Anti-Theft Technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Rapid Storage Technology (RST)
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Smart Connect
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) 36-bit
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Comparison of Intel Core i3-9000 and Intel Celeron N2820

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-9000 and Intel Celeron N2820 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Peripherals.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Core i3-9000

versus

Intel Celeron N2820

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-9000

  • Newer processor, release date difference 4 year(s) 9 month(s)
  • 9019 More cores, ability to run more cores applications simultaneously: 4 vs 2

  • Approximately 55% more clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 2.39 GHz
  • Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 22 nm
  • L1 cache is 2.3 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
Release date September 2018 vs 1 December 2013
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 3. 7 GHz vs 2.39GHz
Process 14 nm vs 22 nm
Level 1 cache 64K (per core) vs 112KB

Reasons to choose Intel Celeron N2820

  • 8.1 times less power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 65 Watt
Power consumption (TDP) 7.5 Watt vs 65 Watt

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Core i3-9000
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N2820

Name Intel Core i3-9000 Intel Celeron N2820
PassMark — Single thread mark 588
PassMark — CPU mark 480
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 199
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 348
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 1289
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 1289

Performance comparison

Intel Core i3-9000 Intel Celeron N2820
Architecture name Coffee Lake Bay Trail
Production date September 2018 December 1, 2013
Place in the ranking not rated 2320
Applicability Desktop Mobile
Price at first issue date $107
Price now $209. 99
Processor Number N2820
Series Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series
Status Launched
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 1.32
Support 64 bit
Level 1 cache 64K (per core) 112KB
Level 2 cache 256K (per core) 1MB
Level 3 cache 6 MB (shared)
Process 14nm 22nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C
Maximum frequency 3. 7 GHz 2.39 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Base frequency 2.13 GHz
Maximum core temperature 105°C
Number of threads 2
Permissible core voltage 0.40V — 1.14V
Supported memory types DDR4 DDR3L 1066
Maximum number of memory channels 2
Maximum memory size 8GB
Maximum number of processors in configuration 1 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 7. 5 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size 25mm x 27mm
Scenario Design Power (SDP) 4.5W
Supported sockets FCBGA1170
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Anti-Theft Technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Rapid Storage Technology (RST)
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Smart Connect
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Graphics base frequency 313MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 756MHz
Maximum GPU clock 756MHz
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics
Maximum number of monitors supported 2
WiDi support
Number of PCI Express lanes 4
Number of USB ports 5
PCI Express revision 2. 0
Total number of SATA ports 2
USB revision 3.0 and 2.0

Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Core i3-6100U: What is the difference?

29points

Intel Celeron N2840

43points

Intel Core i3-6100U

Comparison Winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core i3-6100U

  • 0.5MB more L2 cache?
    1MB vs 0.5MB
  • 7.5W below TDP?
    7.5W vs 15W
  • 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core

Why is Intel Core i3-6100U better than Intel Celeron N2840?

  • 6. 48% higher CPU speed?
    2 x 2.3GHz vs 2 x 2.16GHz
  • 800MHz higher RAM speed?
    2133MHz vs 1333MHz
  • 2 more CPU threads?
    4 vs 2
  • Are 8nm semiconductors smaller?
    14nm vs 22nm
  • 2.61x higher PassMark result?
    2628 vs 1006
  • 1 Is the PCI Express (PCIe) version newer?
    3 vs 2
  • 16KB more L1 cache? more memory bandwidth?
    34.1GB/s vs 21.32GB/s

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Core i3-5157U

Intel Core i3-6100U

vs

Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Core i3-8109U

Intel Core i3-6100U

vs

Intel Pentium Gold 5405U

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Celeron N4020

Intel Core i3-6100U

VS

AMD E2-9000

Intel Celeron N2840

VS

Intel Core i3-5010u

Intel Core i3-6100u

VS

Intel Celeron N2402

INTEL CELERO N240003

vs

Intel Celeron N3060

Intel Core i3-6100U

vs

Intel Celeron N4100

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Celeron N3350

Intel Core i3-6100U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Intel Celeron N2840

VS

Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Core i3-6100U

VS

A4 Pro-3350B

Intel Celeron N2840

VS VS

Intel Core i5-8250U

Intel Core i3-6100U

vs

Intel Pentium N3710

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Core i3-2365M

Intel Core i3-6100U

vs

Intel Core i5-4200U

Intel Core i3-6100U

VS

Intel Core i3-10110U

Costs of prices

total0003

Intel Celeron N2840

10. 0 /10

Reviews of users

Intel Core i3-6100u

0 Reviews of Users

Intel Core i3-6100u

9000 9000 9,0004 /10,0004 /10000. Functions

Price and quality ratio

10.0 /10

1 Votes

Reviews yet not

Games

8.0 /10

1 Votes

reviews yet not

performance

7.0 /10

1 Votes

reviews yet there are no

Reliability

10.0 /10

1 votes 9000

Energy efficiency

10.0 /10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

1.cpu speed

2 x 2.16GHz

2 x 2.3GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

2.58GHz

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✖Intel Core i3-6100U

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9. L3 core

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1st RAM speed

1333MHz

2133MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

21.32GB/s

34.1GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3rd version of DDR memory

DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.Maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

7.Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✖Intel Core i3-6100U

Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

1469.12seconds

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.power per watt

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✔Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i3-6100U

processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i3-6100U

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i3-6100U

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i3-6100U

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i3-6100U

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. TrustZone enabled

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✖Intel Core i3-6100U

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through digital rights management (DRM) technology .

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100U)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Intel Celeron N2820 processor — specifications, benchmarks, comparison

Home / Processors / Intel Celeron N2820

  • Issue date: November, 2013;
  • Number of cores: 2;
  • Frequency: 2. 13 GHz;
  • Power Consumption (TDP): 7.5W;
  • Maximum RAM: 8,192 MB.

Characteristics Intel Celeron N2820

General parameters

Clock frequency 2.13 GHz
Maximum clock frequency 2.39 GHz
Cores 2
Socket BGA 1170
Unlock cores No

Functions

NX-bit (XD-bit) available Yes
Trusted computing support No
Virtualization support Yes
Instructions supported EM64T
Support for dynamic frequency scaling (CPU Throttling) Yes

Power consumption

Power consumption 7.5W
Annual cost of electricity (NON-commercial use) 1. 81 $/year
Output per W 7.97pt/W
Average energy consumption 6.09W

Bus

Architecture FSB

Parts and Features

Architecture x86-64
Threads 2
L2 cache 1MB
Second level cache per core (L2) 0.5 MB/core
Process 22 nm
Maximum processors 1

Celeron N2820 Overclock

Overclock Clock 2.4 GHz
Water-cooled boost clock 2.13 GHz
Air cooled boost clock 2.4 GHz

Integrated graphics

Graphics core GPU
Grade Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2
Graphics core clock speed 313MHz
Maximum clock frequency 756MHz

Memory module

Memory controller Integrated
Memory type DDR3L-1066
Channels Double channel
ECC support (error correction) No
Maximum flow 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory

Benchmarks Celeron N2820

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core)

Celeron N2820 1. 514
E1 2100 912
Celeron N3050 1.584

GeekBench 3 (Single core)

Celeron N2820 867
E1 2100 529
Celeron N3050 879

GeekBench 3 (AES single core)

Celeron N2820 56,000 MB/s
E1 2100 494,700 MB/s
Celeron N3050 350.4 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit)

Celeron N2820 1.452
E1 2100 855
Celeron N3050 n/a

GeekBench

Celeron N2820 1.452
E1 2100 855
Celeron N3050 n/a

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Celeron N2820 18. 9
E1 2100 13.7
Celeron N3050 18.5

PassMark

Celeron N2820 960
E1 2100 627
Celeron N3050 885

PassMark (Single Core)

Celeron N2820 513
E1 2100 363
Celeron N3050 467

Video reviews

Let’s talk about the N2840 processor

Laptop Lenovo IdeaPad G5030 Celeron N2820 2. 13GHz

Intel Celeron vs. Intel Core i3 vs. i5 Que portatil comprar en Colombia para 2018?

Celeron N2820 reviews

+WELOVELECTRONICS W. L.E.
here I have Win 10 and in chrome it does not show 4k on YouTube (slows down) But Microsoft Edge shows 4k on YouTube without problems.
Task Manager shows that Edge at 4k loads percent by 30-60%, while chrome loads percent by 100%
Celeron 1000m processor with integrated graphics (650-1000 peak Mhz graphics core)
Can you please tell me how 4k behaves in YouTube on Windows 10 in Microsoft Edge browser

it will not pull i3, because the board does not support, the maximum that you can put is the intel Qvard core N3540 2.16GHz, it is the most normal, I have it in the same laptop, I still I plugged in 8 gigs of RAM, and the laptop is full of norms, it will run the game more than anything, you just need to buy a cooling stand so that the percentage does not overheat, it just has a passive cooling system!

It’s not worth talking about games, even i3 is not suitable for games, only for some junk. One important point was not taken into account here, the celeron TDP is only 7 watts, while the i3 has as much as 17 watts. So even in idle i3 will eat the battery somewhere twice as fast. And since a laptop is primarily about mobility, it’s silly to say that celeron is not worth the money, just because it is weaker.


Tags:2.13 GHz, 7.5W, Celeron N2820, CPU, Intel

Intel Core i3-4030U vs. Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core i3-4030U

Intel Core i3-4030U runs with 2 and 4 CPU threads It runs on No turbo base No turbo all cores while TDP is set to 15W .CPU connects to BGA 1168 CPU socket This the version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM, DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM, LPDDR3-1333, LPDDR3-1600 RAM, and supports 2.0 PCIe Gen 12. Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, Haswell U architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q2/2014

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N2840 runs with 2 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 2.58 GHz base 2. 58 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 7.5 W .CPU connects to BGA 1170 CPU socket This version includes 1.00 MB L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM RAM, and supports 2.0 PCIe Gen 4 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Bay Trail Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT . The product was launched Q2/2014

Intel Core i3-4030U

Intel Celeron N2840

Frequency 2.16 GHz 2 Kernels 2 no turbo Turbo (1 core) 2.58 GHz no turbo Turbo (all cores) 2.58 GHz Yes Hyper Threading No. No. Acceleration No. normal Basic architecture normal

Intel HD Graphics 4400

GPU

Intel HD Graphics (Baytrail GT1)

1. 00GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.79 GHz 22nm Technology 22nm 1.00GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.79 GHz 11.1 DirectX Version 11.2 3 Max. displays 2 DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
LPDDR3-1333
LPDDR3-1600 memory size DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory size No. ECC No. — L2 Cache — 3.00MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB 2.0 PCIe version 2.0 12 PCIe lanes 4 22nm Technology 22nm BGA 1168 Connector BGA 1170 15W TDP 7. 5W VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT Q2/2014 Release date Q2/2014

Show more details

Show more details

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Intel Core i3-4030U Intel Celeron N2840
15W Max TDP 7.5W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Operating cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Operating cost per year NA

Popular comparison

Comments0001

VS

Which one to choose?

It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in Intel Core i3-10110Y vs Intel Celeron N2840 comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!

Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor

Who will win in the comparison of Intel Core i3-10110Y and Intel Celeron N2840. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.

1.10 GHZ

Tact frequency

2.16 GHZ

2

Number

2

4 GHz

Turbo (2 Cores)

2.58 GHz

Yes

0015

Internal graphics

It’s hard to compare Intel Core i3-10110Y vs Intel Celeron N2840 when graphics card function and specifications matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.

Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)

GPU name

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)

0.30 GHz

GPU frequency

0.31 GHz

1.00 GHZ

GPU (TURBO)

0.79 GHZ

9.5

Generation

7,0002 12

version DirectX

11.2

24

Executive blocks

4000 4000 4000 4000

32

Maximum memory

8 GB

3

Number of monitors

2

14 nm

Technology

0003

22 nm

Q3/2019

Release date

Q3/2013

Hardware codec support

Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.

Decode / Encode

h364

Decode / Encode

Decode / Encode

JPEG

Decode

Decode / Encode

h365 8bit

No

Decode / Encode

h365 10bit

No

Decode / Encode

VP8

No

Decode / Encode

VP9

No

Decode

VC-1

Decode

Decode / Encode

AVC

Decode / Encode

RAM and PCIe

These are memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.

LPDDR3-2133

Type of memory

DDR3L-1333 SO-Dimm

16 GB

Maximum memory

2

Memory Chanels

2

NO

ECC

9000 9000 3,000 3.0 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 PCIe

2.0

10

PCIE Lines

4

Crystick

Support for data encryption

YES

AES-Ni

NO

Memory & amp; PCIe

Thermal management and TDP

Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and workloads that, as a result, unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between Intel Core i3-10110Y and Intel Celeron N2840, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).

7 W

TDP

7.5 W

100 °C

Maximum Temperature

9 W

Maximum TDP

5. 5 W

TDP Download

Technical details

4 Y

Architecture

Bay Trail

VT-X, VT-X EPT, VT-D

Virtualization

VT-X

BGA 1200

SOCK (connector)

BGA 1170

9000 q3/2019

/2019

Release date

Q2/2014

ca. 185 $

Price

Compatible devices with this processor

You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.

Unknown

Used in

Unknown

Popular CPU Comparisons

one. Intel Core i3-10110Y
Intel Core i5-6500
2. Intel Core i3-10110Y
AMD A9-9420
3. Intel Core i3-10110Y
Intel Celeron N2840
four. Intel Core i3-10110Y
Intel Core i5-9300HF
5. Intel Core i3-10110Y
Intel Core i5-9500T
6. Intel Celeron N2840 vs.
Intel Core i7-4930MX
7. Intel Core i3-10110Y
Intel Core i3-7100H
eight. AMD A6-9225 vs.
Intel Celeron N2840
9. Intel Core i3-10110Y
Intel Core i5-8269U
ten. Intel Celeron N2840 vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
eleven. AMD A6-9220C vs.
Intel Celeron N2840
12. AMD G-T56E vs.
Intel Celeron N2840
13. AMD A10-5750M vs.
Intel Celeron N2840
fourteen. AMD A10-4600M vs.

2022 © All rights reserved