Intel celeron n2840 vs i5: Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Core i5-8250U: What is the difference?

Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Core i5-8250U: What is the difference?

29points

Intel Celeron N2840

49points

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

64 facts in comparison

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core i5-8250U

Why is Intel Celeron N2840 better than Intel Core i5-8250U?

  • 7.5W lower TDP?
    7.5Wvs15W
  • 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core

Why is Intel Core i5-8250U better than Intel Celeron N2840?

  • 48.15% faster CPU speed?
    4 x 1.6GHzvs2 x 2.16GHz
  • 1067MHz higher ram speed?
    2400MHzvs1333MHz
  • 6 more CPU threads?
    8vs2
  • 8nm smaller semiconductor size?
    14nmvs22nm
  • 5.91x higher PassMark result?
    5941vs1006
  • 0.82GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    3. 4GHzvs2.58GHz
  • 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
    3vs2
  • 144KB bigger L1 cache?
    256KBvs112KB

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Core i3-5157U

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Core i3-8109U

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Celeron N4020

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

Intel Core i3-1005G1

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Core i3-5010U

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 2200U

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Celeron N3060

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

Intel Core i7-6500U

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Celeron N3350

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Core i3-6100U

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Core i3-2365M

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

Intel Core i5-7200U

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Intel Celeron N2840

1 User reviews

Intel Celeron N2840

10. 0/10

1 User reviews

Intel Core i5-8250U

5 User reviews

Intel Core i5-8250U

7.4/10

5 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

1 votes

7.4/10

5 votes

Gaming

8.0/10

1 votes

6.6/10

5 votes

Performance

7.0/10

1 votes

7.4/10

5 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

1 votes

8.8/10

5 votes

Energy efficiency

10.0/10

1 votes

6.4/10

5 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

2 x 2.16GHz

4 x 1.6GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

2.58GHz

3.4GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✖Intel Core i5-8250U

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1333MHz

2400MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

21.32GB/s

34.1GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✖Intel Core i5-8250U

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-8250U)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-8250U)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

771.41seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

2852.02seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i5-8250U

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i5-8250U

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i5-8250U

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i5-8250U

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-8250U)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i5-8250U

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✖Intel Core i5-8250U

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-8250U)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Core i5-4210U








Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Core i5-4210U

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Celeron N2840 on one side and the Intel Core i5-4210U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the entry-level notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,6GHz. The second is used on the ultrabook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core i5-4210U
Market (main)

Entry-level notebook

Ultrabook
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Silvermont

Haswell
Core name

Bay Trail-M

Haswell-ULT
Family

Celeron N2000

Core i5-4000
Part number(s), S-Spec

FH8065301903600,

SR1YJ

CL8064701477802,

SR1EF

Release date

Q3 2014

Q2 2014
Lithography

22 nm

22 nm
Transistors

1. 400.000.000
Cores

2

2
Threads

2

4
Base frequency

1,6 GHz

1,7 GHz
Turbo frequency

2,6 GHz

2,7 GHz
Cache memory

1 MB

3 MB
Max memory capacity

8 GB

16 GB
Memory types

DDR3L 1333

DDR3L 1333/1600,

LPDDR3 1333/1600

Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

21,32 GB/s

25,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

4

12
TDP

8 W

15 W
GPU integrated graphics

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)

Intel HD Graphics 4400 Mobile
GPU execution units

4

20
GPU shading units

32

160
GPU base clock

311 MHz

200 MHz
GPU boost clock

792 MHz

1000 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

42,69 GFLOPS

304 GFLOPS
Socket

BGA1170

BGA1168
Maximum temperature

100°C

100°C
CPU-Z single thread

90

229
CPU-Z multi thread

173

627
Cinebench R15 single thread

40

100
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

80

235
Cinebench R20 single thread

78

134
Cinebench R20 multi-thread

128

315
PassMark single thread

659

1. 365
PassMark CPU Mark

568

2.280
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

1.142

2.752
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

1.804

4.978
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core

205

574
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core

359

1.168
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

14,08 GFLOPS

71,4 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

241 pts / W

332 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-4210U is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Celeron N2840 is lower. Both were produced in the same year.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-4210U

229

627
Intel Celeron N2840

90

173

In single core, the difference is 154%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 262%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-4210U

100

235
Intel Celeron N2840

40

80

In single core, the difference is 150%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 194%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-4210U

134

315
Intel Celeron N2840

78

128

In single core, the difference is 72%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 146%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i5-4210U

1.365

2.280
Intel Celeron N2840

659

568

In single core, the difference is 107%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 301%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i5-4210U

2.752

4.978
Intel Celeron N2840

1.142

1.804

In single core, the difference is 141%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 176%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i5-4210U

3.183

5.135
Intel Celeron N2840

978

1.402

In single core, the difference is 225%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 266%.

On Android 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
Intel Core i5-4210U

3.211

5.592
Intel Celeron N2840

1.269

2.000

In single core, the difference is 153%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 180%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i5-4210U

574

1.168
Intel Celeron N2840

205

359

In single core, the difference is 180%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 225%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i5-4210U

625

1.238
Intel Celeron N2840

234

422

In single core, the difference is 167%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 193%.

On Android:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i5-4210U

656

1.269
Intel Celeron N2840

240

436

In single core, the difference is 173%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 191%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

Intel Celeron N2840 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-4210U AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i5-4210HIntel Core i5-4210M

Intel Celeron N2840 vs. Intel Celeron 1007U

Intel Celeron N2840

The Intel Celeron N2840 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 2.58 GHz base 2.58 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 7.5 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1170 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Bay Trail Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q2/2014

Intel Celeron 1007U

The Intel Celeron 1007U operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 17 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1023 CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM, DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 105 °C degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge U Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2013

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron 1007U

Compare Detail

2. 16 GHz Frequency 1.50 GHz
2 Cores 2
2.58 GHz Turbo (1 Core) No turbo
2.58 GHz Turbo (All Cores) No turbo
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking No
normal Core Architecture normal

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)

GPU

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)

0.79 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.00 GHz
22 nm Technology 22 nm
0.79 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.00 GHz
11.2 DirectX Version 11.0
2 Max. displays 3
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM Memory DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
2 Memory channels 2
Max memory
No ECC No
L2 Cache
1. 00 MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB
2.0 PCIe version 2.0
4 PCIe lanes 16
22 nm Technology 22 nm
BGA 1170 Socket BGA 1023
7.5 W TDP 17 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q2/2014 Release date Q1/2013

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Intel Celeron N2840 Intel Celeron 1007U
7.5 W Max TDP 17 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 — VsRank

Advantages
General information
Technical specifications
RAM Built-in GPU Advanced technologies
Cinebench tests Geekbench tests Other tests

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N2840 win!

Number of points: 5452

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 lost!

Number of points: 4583

  1. +60 MHz processor clock speed advantage
  2. +2580 MHz processor turbo clock advantage
  3. By 27 W less power consumption
  4. By 23 nm less technological process
  5. +8 GB RAM advantage
  6. +1333 MHz RAM clock advantage
  7. By 2 channels more for RAM
  8. +1 MB advantage L2 cache

Information about the series and architecture of Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Core 2 Duo T6570, as well as the release date of these processors.

Celeron

Core 2 Duo

Bay Trail-M

Penryn

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

2014-05-22

2009-01-01

2.0

3.0

The main technical characteristics of Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 processors.

2

2

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (64)

2

2

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (128)

2160 MHz

2100 MHz

Leader — Intel Core i7-10810U 4900 MHz

2580 MHz

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-10980HK (5300)

2 MB

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702P (32)

8 W

35 W

Leader — AMD Epyc 7h22 (280)

22 nm

45 nm

Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (7)

Information about the type and the maximum possible RAM capacity support, as well as the maximum frequency and number of channels.

8 GB

No data

Leader — AMD Epyc 7282 (4000)

1333 MHz

No data

Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS (4266)

2

No data

Leader — AMD Epyc 7351P (8)

DDR3L

No data

Characteristics of an integrated graphics processing unit. Support of 4K, clock speed, as well as video core memory capacity.

HD Graphics (Bay Trail)

Iris Pro Graphics P580

311 MHz

350 MHz

Leader — Intel Core i7-8706G (931)

0.9 GHz

1.15 GHz

Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 2 MHz

No data

64 GB

Leader — Intel Xeon E-2176G (128)

1920×[email protected]

4096×[email protected]

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

11

12_1

4. 0

4.4

Support by processors of such advanced technologies as multithreading, Turbo mode, AES cryptographic algorithm, and x86 AVX command system extension.

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Cinebench benchmark is a widely known and free computer performance test (testing a CPU and a video card). The program has been developed based upon MAXON Cinema 4D – a professional application for creating 3D animation.

76

No data

Leader — Intel Core i7-6700K (8800)

38

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (216)

0. 89

1.22

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (41)

0.44

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (2)

2533

4276

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (61667)

1331

2274

Leader — Intel Core i5-8500 (8606)

Geekbench is a synthetic computer performance test. The program performs a number of test tasks that simulate real scenarios that a computer has to deal with in everyday work.

1688

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (80967)

957

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (4875)

A number of different tests including 3DMark06 CPU, SuperPI, Octane and many others.

1510

1820

Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (106435)

No data

25.06

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (7)

No data

1344

Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (410)

No data

36.83

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)

No data

1169.83

Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (38)

No data

No data

Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (50)

7486

No data

Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (48268)

Intel Celeron N2830 / N2840 / N2820 CPU Review with Benchmark, Gaming, and Specs – Laptop Processors

The Intel Celeron N2830 and N2840, alongside the less frequently used N2820, are among the lowest-end processors you can find in laptops these days. But, they are also among the widest adopted ones, since they’re included in numerous budget notebooks.

You can find the Celeron N2830, N2840, and N2820 dual-core chips in the 250-dollar systems such as the Acer Aspire E 15 ES1-511-C590, Asus X551MAV-RCLN06, or Lenovo G50-30. With arrival of laptop PCs with Windows 8.1 Bing edition, you can expect even greater number of available choices with these “Bay Trail” based chips.

Intel’s “Bay Trail” processor family is known for its affordability and low power consumption. The N2830, N2840 and N2820 are no exception. They consume only up to 7.5 Watts of power. For comparison, the popular Intel Core i5-4200U/4210U/4300U which are the typical mid-range mainstream laptop processors consume up to 17W.

But, for the average home laptop user performance is more important than power-efficiency of a processor. On the N2830 / N2840 / N2820 it’s sacrificed big time for the interest of lower costs and power saving. To be honest, low power consumption doesn’t mean that laptops with these Celerons will have a great battery life, since PC makers often put smaller-capacity batteries in them in order to further lower the cost and decrease weight a bit. For instance, the Lenovo G50-30 with the N2830 has a low-capacity 32 Whr battery in it, resulting in a mediocre battery life of the laptop of up to four hours.

PassMark Performance Test and Real World Use

PassMark has a comprehensive and pretty much accurate database of CPU benchmark results. According to the tests done by users on various Windows machines, the N2830, N2840, and N2820 score about 1,000-1,100 benchmark points. With these results, their speed is in line with the Intel Atom processors used in affordable Windows tablets. In comparison to the Intel Core i5 with scores of more than 3000 points, the Celerons lag a lot.

In the real world use, the Celerons are satisfactory only for the usual daily chores, such as web surf with a handful of browser tabs opened, writing essays in Word, Excel calculations, and video and music playback. For more complex duties like video production or professional photography editing, the Intel Core i3, i5, and i7 series are the way to go.

In the video below, you can see the N2830 running in real time Windows 8.1 and some random programs, with multitasking involved. The test was done on an Acer Aspire ES1-series 15.6″ notebook with 4GB RAM and a mechanical 5,400rpm hard drive. Check out 1080p YouTube video playback in Internet Explorer, some basic editing of a 5-megapixel photo in Paint.net application, rich text processing in WordPad, and switching between apps via ALT+TAB key combination. Everything worked pretty much smoothly. In everyday work, I experienced occasional slowdowns, but they were rather caused by the slow hard drive than the CPU.

 

Gaming

MMORPGs (massively multiplayer online role-playing games) are the most popular type of games on the PC platform. We have tested some of them on the N2830, namely League of Legends and DOTA 2. These titles don’t require exceptional hardware, so they run nicely on 720p resolution which is close to 1366×768 pixel count on the usual laptop display. LoL can be played at frame rates of about 25 fps on medium graphics settings, while in DOTA 2 you have to dial down settings to low to achieve ~25fps.

 

 

Another very popular game which can be played on the reviewed processor is Minecraft. It should be put on lower settings to achieve a fair smoothness at 720p. Still, some serious frame rate drops to ~15fps occur occasionally.

 

When it comes to first person shooters, the Intel HD is capable of running some less demanding titles, such as those based on the Source 3D engine. For instance, Counter Strike: Global Offensive at 720p and low graphics details can be played mostly at about 25 fps, with occasional drops to ~20, depending on the scene. You can set Team of Fortress 2 on medium and get between 25 and 40 fps (around 30 fps most of the time).

 

By the way, simple non-3D games such as Plants vs Zombies or Angry Birds run without a glitch.

Overall, the included Intel HD graphics processing unit performs about the same as the Intel HD of the Intel Atom processors. They’re far cry from the popular HD 4400 series which can run even the latest demanding 3D games on lower settings.

Temperatures

As expected, the tested processor ran quite cool. On our Acer Aspire ES1 laptop, the temperature of the CPU when idle was about 40 degrees Celsius. Under heavy load, in particular LoL gameplay, the temperatures never exceeded 62 degrees. This helped the laptop stay almost inaudible even under high stress, since the cooling fans didn’t need to kick in at high rotating speeds.

Specs and Differences

As for differences between the N2830, N2840 and N2820, they’re minor. The 2830 and 40 run at speeds of between 2.16-2.41 GHz and 2.16-2.58 GHz, respectively while the 2820 runs at 2.13-2.39 GHz. Furthermore, the N2830 and N2840 support DDR3L RAM memory at up to 1,333MHz, while the N2820 supports up to 1,066MHz. These differences however don’t noticeably affect benchmark results and overall performance. As a side note, Intel’s specs sheets of the N2830 and N2840 say they support QuickSync technology, which speeds up video editing if done in QuickSync-compatible programs. But, since the cores of the CPUs are under-powered, it still can’t be recommended for video editing on daily basis.

Besides the Intel HD graphics, the chips have 1MB of cache and support 64-bit operating systems and software. As same as the other Bay Trail chips, they are built using 22-nanometer technology.

Here are the CPU-Z and GPU-Z infos for the tested 2830:

Note: This review was originally posted in early August and updated with new info late September and October.

Check out laptops the Intel Celeron N2820, N2830, and N2840.

Note: The benchmark scores of the listed processors are averages measured across various devices with these processors. The scores and real-world performance of the Intel Celeron N2830 / N2840 / N2820 and compared CPUs may vary depending on the notebooks’ other components, settings, cooling, and other factors. However, the benchmark results are good indicators of the processors’ performance.

Intel Core i7-7700K vs Intel Celeron N2840

Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

VS

Intel Core i7-7700K 14 nm — 4.20 GHz DDR4-2400 

Intel Celeron N2840 22 nm — 2.16 GHz DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM 

Intel Core i7-7700K

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core i7-7700K vs.

Intel Celeron N2840
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Core i7-7700K and Intel Celeron N2840, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

4 / 8

CPU Cores / Threads

2 / 2

Yes

Hyperthreading

No

Yes

Overclocking

No

4.20 GHz

Frequency

2.16 GHz

4.50 GHz

Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

2.58 GHz

no data

Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)

2.58 GHz

4.40 GHz

Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)

no data

Intel Core i7-7700K vs. Intel Celeron N2840

CPU generation and family

4

CPU Cores

2

ca. 350 $

Market price

9.5

Generation

7

Intel Core i7-7700K vs. Intel Celeron N2840

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Core i7-7700K to Intel Celeron N2840 across a built-in video card.

Intel HD Graphics 630

GPU name

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)

0.35 GHz

GPU frequency

0.31 GHz

1.15 GHz

GPU (Turbo)

0.79 GHz

24

Execution units

4

192

Shader

32

3

Max. displays

2

9.5

Generation

7

12

Direct X

11.2

14 nm

Technology

22 nm

Q2/2016

Release date

Q3/2013

Intel Core i7-7700K vs. Intel Celeron N2840

Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

Decode / Encode

h365 8bit

No

Decode / Encode

h365 10bit

No

Decode / Encode

h364

Decode / Encode

Decode / Encode

VP8

No

Decode / Encode

VP9

No

Decode / Encode

AVC

Decode / Encode

Decode

VC-1

Decode

Decode / Encode

JPEG

Decode

Intel Core i7-7700K vs.

Intel Celeron N2840
Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0

PCIe version

2.0

16

PCIe lanes

4

DDR4-2400

Memory type

DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM

64 GB

Max. Memory

2

Memory channels

2

No

ECC

No

Yes

AES-NI

No

Intel Core i7-7700K vs. Intel Celeron N2840

Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Core i7-7700K and Intel Celeron N2840 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

91 W

TDP

7.5 W

TDP up

TDP down

Tjunction max.

Intel Core i7-7700K vs. Intel Celeron N2840

Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

8.00 MB

L3-Cache

1.00 MB

Kaby Lake

Architecture

Bay Trail

14 nm

Technology

22 nm

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

Virtualization

VT-x

LGA 1151

Socket

BGA 1170

Q1/2017

Release date

Q2/2014

Intel Core i7-7700K vs. Intel Celeron N2840

Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Core i7-7700K and Intel Celeron N2840, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown

Used in

Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4.20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

466 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

It is the most actual version of the Cinebench R23 benchmark for testing processors in the single-core using mode. Like all the company’s versions, it uses a brand app for testing.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4.20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

1216 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4. 20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

2257 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4.20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

200 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2. 16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

42 (21 %)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4.20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

995 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

81 (8 %)

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4.20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

442 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

51 (11 %)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4.20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

1229 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4. 20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

4719 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Universal benchmark Blender 2.81 (bmw27) starts processor testing in rendering animated 3D images. The faster the processor copes with the task, the higher the overall performance estimation is.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4.20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

3358 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2. 16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4.20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

5130 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

966 (18 %)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4.20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

18702 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

1702 (9 %)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4.20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

236 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

41 (17 %)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4.20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

1094 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

86 (7 %)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4. 20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

426 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

57 (13 %)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.

Intel Core i7-7700K
4x 4. 20 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

12089 (100 %)

Intel Celeron N2840
2x 2.16 GHz (2.58 GHz)

1239 (10 %)

Popular comparisons with these processors

1. Intel Core i7-7700K vs.
Intel Core i9-9900K
2. Intel Core i3-10110Y vs.
Intel Celeron N2840
3. Intel Core i5-2390T vs.
Intel Core i7-7700K
4. Intel Core i7-7700K vs.
Intel Core i7-3970X
5. Intel Core i7-7700K vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
6. Intel Celeron N2840 vs.
Intel Core i7-4930MX
7. AMD A6-9225 vs.
Intel Core i7-7700K

0023 0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core

Why is Intel Core i5-8250U better than Intel Celeron N2840?

  • 48.15% higher CPU speed?
    4 x 1.6GHz vs 2 x 2.16GHz
  • 1067MHz higher RAM speed?
    2400MHz vs 1333MHz
  • 6 more CPU threads?
    8 vs 2
  • Are 8nm semiconductors smaller?
    14nm vs 22nm
  • 5.91x higher PassMark result?
    5941 vs 1006
  • 0.82GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    3. 4GHz vs 2.58GHz
  • 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
    3 vs 2
  • 144KB more L1 cache?
    256KB vs 112KB

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Intel Celeron N2840

VS

Intel Core i3-5157U

Intel Core i5-8250U

VS

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Intel Celeron N2840

9000u 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000u 9000u

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3500u

Intel Celeron N2840

VS

Intel Celeron N4020

Intel Core i5-8250U

INTEL CELE0003

Intel Core i3-5010U

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 2200U

Intel Celeron N2840

vs

Intel Celeron N3060

Intel Core i5-8250U

vs

Intel Core i7-6500u

Intel Celeron N2840

VS

Intel Celeron N3350

Intel Core i5-8250U

VS

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

Intel Celeron N2840

000 N2000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000. 0000003

Intel Core i5-8250u

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2500u

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core i3-6100u

Intel Core 9000 3,0004 VS 9000 RYUS Celeron N2840

VS

Intel Core i3-2365M

Intel Core i5-8250U

VS

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Core

Intel Core INTEL CORE

Reviews of users

General rating

Intel Celeron N2840

1 Reviews of users

Intel Celeron N2840

10.0 9000 /10 9000 Core i5-8250U

7.4 /10

5 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0 /10

1 votes

7.4 /10

5 Votes

Games

8.0 /10

1 Votes

6.6 /10

VOTES 9000

1 Votes

7.4 /10

5 Votes

Reliability

10.0 /10

1 VOTES

8.8 /10

VOTES

Energy Energy Energy Energy0003

10. 0 /10

1 Votes

6.4 /10

5 Votes

Productivity

1. Sprayer of the central processor

2 x 2.16GHZ

4 x 1.6GHZ

9000 how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

2.58GHz

3.4GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Has unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✖Intel Core i5-8250U

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9. L3 core

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1333MHz

2400MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

21.32GB/s

34.1GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4 memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.max memory

Maximum amount of memory (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory debug code

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✖Intel Core i5-8250U

Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8250U)

A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8250U)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

771.41seconds

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

2852.02seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✔Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i5-8250U

processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i5-8250U

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i5-8250U

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i5-8250U

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8250U)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔Intel Celeron N2840

✔Intel Core i5-8250U

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. TrustZone enabled

✖Intel Celeron N2840

✖Intel Core i5-8250U

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming .

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Celeron N2840)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8250U)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Compare Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Core i5 2520M

Intel Celeron N2840

2. 16 GHz | 2 cores

VS

Intel Core i5 2520M

2.5GHz | 2 cores | RPGA 9888B

Benchmark

General result

Based on 5 tests:

Intel Core i5 2520m faster 826%

Intel Celeron N2840

,0004000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 core)

Intel Core i5 2520M 202.12% faster

Intel Celeron N2840

1649

  • High frequency (2.5 GHz vs 2.16 GHz) means more operations that the processor performs in 1 second
  • High frequency in turbo mode: 3.2 GHz vs 2.58 GHz
  • More threads (4 vs. 2) allows more processes to run simultaneously
  • High internal video processor frequency: 650 MHz vs. 311 MHz

Features

Intel Celeron N2840

sse3
ssse3
sse4
sse41
sse42
avx
aes

Integrated video

678

Architecture FSB DMI

Comparison of Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Core i5-2467M

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Core i5-2467M processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Celeron N2840

versus

Intel Core i5-2467M

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Celeron N2840

  • Newer processor, release dates difference 2 year(s) 10 month(s)
  • 2.58 GHz vs 2.30 GHz

  • A newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 32 nm
  • L2 cache is 2 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • 2. 1 times less power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 17 Watt ) 3 times more: 1.793 vs 0.595
Release date 22 May 2014 vs 28 June 2011
Maximum frequency 2.58 GHz vs 2.30 GHz
Process 22 nm vs 32 nm
Level 2 cache 1MB vs 512KB
Power consumption (TDP) 7.5 Watt vs 17 Watt
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.793 vs 0.595

Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-2467M

  • 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
  • Approximately 14% more L1 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • Performance in PassMark — Single benchmark thread mark about 25% more: 838 vs 668
  • 2. 5 times better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 1439 vs 583
  • About 71% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 355 vs 207
  • Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance about 13% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 1.26 vs 1.114
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames) benchmark /s) 3.5 times more: 21.987 vs 6.194
  • 2.1 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.154 vs 0.074
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 48 % more: 1.393 vs 0.939
Number of threads 4 vs 2
Level 1 cache 128 KB vs 112 KB
Maximum memory size 8.01GB vs 8GB
PassMark — Single thread mark 838 vs 668
PassMark — CPU mark 1439 vs 583
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 355 vs 207
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 762 vs 370
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.26 vs 1.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 21.987 vs 6.194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.154 vs 0.074
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.393 vs 0.939

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2840
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-2467M

PassMark — Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
21.987
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
Name Intel Celeron N2840 Intel Core i5-2467M
PassMark — Single thread mark 668 838
PassMark — CPU mark 583 1439
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 207 355
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 370 762
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.114 1.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6.194 21.987
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.074 0.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.793 0.595
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 0.939 1.393
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 1383
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 1383

Feature comparison

Intel Celeron N2840 Intel Core i5-2467M
Architecture name Bay Trail Sandy Bridge
Issue date 22 May 2014 28 June 2011
Place in the rating 2554 2567
Processor Number N2840 i5-2467M
Series Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Launched Launched
Applicability Mobile Mobile
Price at first issue date $250
Support 64 bit
Base frequency 2. 16 GHz 1.60 GHz
Level 1 cache 112KB 128KB
Level 2 cache 1MB 512KB
Process 22nm 32 nm
Maximum core temperature 100°C 100 °C
Maximum frequency 2.58 GHz 2.30 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 4
Bus Speed ​​ 5 GT/s DMI
Crystal area 149 mm
Level 3 cache 3072KB
Number of transistors 624 Million
Maximum number of memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 21. 32 GB/s 21.3 GB/s
Maximum memory size 8GB 8.01GB
Supported memory types DDR3L 1333 DDR3 1066/1333
Graphics base frequency 311 MHz 350MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 792MHz 1.15 GHz
Maximum GPU clock 792 MHz 1.15 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 3000
Device ID 0x116
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Maximum number of monitors supported 2 2
WiDi support
CRT
DisplayPort
eDP
HDMI
SDVO
Low Halogen Options Available
Maximum number of processors per configuration 1 1
Package Size 25mm x 27mm 31. 0mm x 24.0mm (BGA1023)
Scenario Design Power (SDP) 4.5W
Supported sockets FCBGA1170 FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP) 7.5 Watt 17 Watt
Number of PCI Express lanes 4 16
Number of USB ports 5
PCI Express revision 2.0 2.0
PCIe configurations 1×4 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 2×4
Total number of SATA ports 2
USB revision 3. 0 and 2.0
Anti-Theft Technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Secure Key Technology
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Smart Connect
4G WiMAX Wireless
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Extended instructions Intel® AVX
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® My WiFi Technology
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed ​​in office use

Core i5-4210U

48 (+37.9%)

Celeron N2840

29.8

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed ​​in heavy applications

Core i5-4210U

23.3 (+43.3%)

Celeron N2840

13.2

The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Core i5-4210U

43.5 (+42.5%)

Celeron N2840

25

Demanding games and tasks

Core i5-4210U

14.8 (+68.2%)

Celeron N2840

4.7

Extreme

Core i5-4210U

2.9 (+69%)

Celeron N2840

0.9

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Cinebench R11.5 Igpu, Opengl

Intel Core i5-4210u

14.8 (+61.5%)

Intel Celeron N2840

22 22 9000 9000 9000 Intel Core I5-210u INTEL CORE I5-210u 9000 INTEL CORE I5210US

Intel Celeron N2840

584

Specifications

Data is not yet complete, so tables may be missing information or existing features may be omitted.

Basic

Manufacturer Intel Intel
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i5-4210U Processor (3M Cache, up to 2.70 GHz) Intel® Celeron® Processor N2840 (1M Cache, up to 2.58 GHz)
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Haswell Bay Trail
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 22 nm 22 nm
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 10-2017 10-2017
Model Official name. i5-4210U N2840
Cores The number of physical cores. 2 2
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 4 2
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). Missing
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 1.7 GHz 2.16 GHz
Turbo FrequencyThe maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 2.7 GHz 2.15 GHz
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 3 No data
Instructions 64-bit 64-bit
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 5 GT/s DMI2
Number of QPI links
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 15W 7. 5W
Cooling system specifications

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® HD Graphics 4400 Intel® HD Graphics
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 200 MHz 311MHz
Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. 1000 MHz 792MHz
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802. 11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. No data No data
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 2

RAM

Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 16 GB 8 GB
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 DDR3L 1333
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2
RAM bandwidth 25.6 GB/s 21.32 GB/s
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

PCI

configuration options

PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 2 2
PCI 4×1, 2×4 4×1, 2×4
Number of PCI lanes 12 4×1, 2×4

Data Security

AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data

Decoration

Dimensions No data No data
Supported sockets No data No data
Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

Which is better

Intel Core i5-4210U

  • On average, gaming performance is 18% better.
  • The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 18%.
  • In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 2%.
  • 2 more threads.

Intel Celeron N2840

  • The base frequency is 0.46 GHz higher.

What are similar

  • Prices for new processors are approximately equal.
  • The number of physical cores is equal.

Intel Celeron N2840 vs. Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N2840 runs with 2 and 2 CPU threads It runs at 2.58 GHz base 2.58 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 7.5 W .CPU connects to BGA 1170 CPU socket This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM RAM, and supports 2.0 PCIe Gen 4. Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Bay Trail Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT . The product was launched Q2/2014

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i5-9400F runs with 6 and 2 CPU threads It runs at 4. 10 GHz base 3.90 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .The processor connects to LGA 1151- CPU socket 2 This version includes 9.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. Specifically, Coffee Lake S Refresh Architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q1/2019

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Core i5-9400F

Frequency 2.90 GHz
2 Cores 6
2.58GHz Turbo (1 core) 4.10 GHz
2.58GHz Turbo (all cores) 3.90 GHz
No Hyper Threading No.
No. Overclocking No.
normal Basic architecture normal

Intel HD Graphics (Baytrail GT1)

GPU no iGPU
0. 79GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
22nm Technology 14nm
0.79GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
11.2 DirectX Version
2 Max. displays
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM memory size DDR4-2666
2 Memory channels 2
Maximum memory
No. ECC No.
L2 Cache
1.00 MB L3 Cache 9.00 MB
2.0 PCIe version 3.0
4 PCIe lanes 16
22nm Technology 14nm
BGA 1170 Connector LGA 1151-2
7. 5W TDP 65W
VT-x, VT-x EPT Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q2/2014 Release date Q1/2019

Show more details

Show more details

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU benchmark uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Intel Celeron N2840 Intel Core i5-9400F
7. 5W Max TDP 65W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Operating cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Cost per year NA

Popular comparison

Comments

Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Celeron N4000 — VsRank

Benefits
General information
Specifications
RAM Integrated video core Advanced technologies
Cinebench 9 benchmarks1634 Geekbench tests Other tests

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N2840 won!

Number of points: 5452

Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Celeron N4000 lost!

Score: 4286

  1. +1060 MHz CPU clock advantage
  2. +20 MHz CPU turbo clock advantage
  3. +3 MB advantage of L2 cache
  4. 2 W less power consumption
  5. 8 nm less process technology
  6. +1067 MHz RAM clock advantage
  7. Supports virtualization technology
  8. AES command set extension available

Information about the series and architecture of the Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Celeron N4000, as well as the release date of the processors.

Celeron

Gemini Lake

Bay Trail-M

Gemini Lake

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N4000

2014-05-22

2017-12-11

2.0

3.0

Main technical characteristics of Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Celeron N4000 processors.

2

2

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (64)

2

2

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (128)

2160 MHz

1100 MHz

Leader — Intel Core i7-10810U 4900 MHz

2580 MHz

2600 MHz

Leader — Intel Core i9-10980HK (5300)

4MB

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702P (32)

8W

6W

Leader — AMD Epyc 7h22 (280)

22 nm

14 nm

Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (7)

Information about the type and support of the maximum amount of RAM, as well as the maximum frequency and number of channels.

8GB

8GB

Leader — AMD Epyc 7282 (4000)

1333 MHz

2400 MHz

Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS (4266)

2

2

Leader — AMD Epyc 7351P (8)

DDR3L

DDR4

Integrated GPU specifications. Support for 4K, clock speed, as well as the amount of video core memory.

HD Graphics (Bay Trail)

UHD Graphics 600

311 MHz

300 MHz
Leader — Intel Core i7-8706G (931)

0.9 GHz

0.75 GHz

Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 2 MHz

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N4000

The Cinebench benchmark is a widely known and free test of computer performance (processor and video card). The program was developed on the basis of MAXON Cinema 4D — a professional application for creating 3D animation.

n/a

273

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (8857)

No data

160

Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (514)

76

138

Leader — Intel Core i7-6700K (8800)

38

70.9

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (216)

0.89

1.65

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (41)

0. 44

0.89

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (2)

2533

4030

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (61667)

1331

2152

Leader — Intel Core i5-8500 (8606)

Geekbench is a synthetic computer performance test. The program performs a series of test tasks that simulate real scenarios that a computer encounters in everyday work.

n/a

791

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (16376)

No data

434

Leader — Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1301)

No data

3219

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (55569)

No data

1862

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (6308)

1688

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (80967)

957

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (4875)

A range of benchmarks including 3DMark06 CPU, SuperPI, Octane and many other benchmarks.

1510

2259

Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (106435)

No data

25.31

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (7)

No data

1295.28

Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (410)

No data

31.94

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)

No data

1006.88

Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (38)

No data

760

Leader — Intel Core i7-6950X (8450)

No data

47. 3

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (279)

n/a

9.49

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (167)

No data

0.79

Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (27)

No data

0.91

Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (20)

No data

0.13

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (3)

No data

0. 09

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)

No data

4736

Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (111)

No data

2298

Leader — Intel Core i5-1035G1 (9643)

No data

4114

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (

)

No data

47.3

Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (50)

7486

15679

Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (48268)

No data

46.