Intel celeron n4000 for gaming: Intel Celeron N4000 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games

Intel Celeron N4000 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games

Build a PC


2 2 1.1 GHz
Cores Threads Base Frequency

Geekbench 5 Single-Core

391

14%

Geekbench 5 Multi-Core

690

2%

Availability

No items available

Graphics Card

Resolution

Select game resolution

Graphics Settings

Select game graphics

Offset

Apply Offset

Value Rating

Performance Rating

Value per FPS

You will receive

… FPS

TOP 6 Games With Intel Celeron N4000

186

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

762

FPS

League of Legends

459

FPS

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

325

FPS

VALORANT

1025

FPS

Minecraft

198

FPS

Apex Legends

Alternatives For Celeron N4000

1080p, High

No alternatives — this is the best option

Specifications

General
Release Date Unknown
Socket FCBGA1090
Codename Gemini Lake
Performance
Cores 2
Threads 2
Base Frequency 1. 1 GHz
Other
Power Consumption 6 W
Overclockable No
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 600

Find out which of the 2 CPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.

Celeron N4000

N/A Stock

Core i7-1165G7

N/A Stock

Celeron N4000

N/A Stock

Core i7-1165G7

N/A Stock

Celeron N4000

N/A Stock

Core i9-10910

N/A Stock

Celeron N4000

N/A Stock

Core i9-10910

N/A Stock

Celeron N4000

N/A Stock

Xeon E-2288G

N/A Stock

Celeron N4000

N/A Stock

Xeon E-2288G

N/A Stock

Refine results to filter 1678 processors by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a CPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.

Calculation Parameters


Graphics Card

Resolution

Select game resolution

Graphics Settings

Select game graphics

Sort By

Popularity

Filters


Performance Rating


Value Rating

CPU Type

Desktop

25

Mobile

0

Server

0

Found 1678 CPUs.

Popularity

Processor

Performance

Ryzen 5 5600X

Nov 5th, 2020


Performance Rating


$166 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i7-12700K

Nov 4th, 2021


Performance Rating


$254.14 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i9-13900K

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$569.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Apr 20th, 2022


Performance Rating


$323 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 5700X

Apr 4th, 2022


Performance Rating


$188 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 5800X

Nov 5th, 2020


Performance Rating


$215.82 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i9-12900K

Nov 4th, 2021


Performance Rating


$354.05 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 5600G

Apr 13th, 2021


Performance Rating


$128. 97 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 9 5900X

Nov 5th, 2020


Performance Rating


$317.53 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i7-13700K

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$417.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 5700G

Apr 13th, 2021


Performance Rating


$178 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i5-13600K

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$319.84 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 5600

Apr 20th, 2022


Performance Rating


$139.79 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i7-12700KF

Nov 4th, 2021


Performance Rating


$277.96 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 7700X

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$338.13 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 3600

Jul 7th, 2019


Performance Rating


$109 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i7-11700K

Mar 16th, 2021


Performance Rating


$245. 53 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 9 7950X

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$580 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i5-13600KF

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$296.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i7-13700KF

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$398.88 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 7600X

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$241.95 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i5-12400

Jan 4th, 2022


Performance Rating


$182.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 5500

Apr 4th, 2022


Performance Rating



Core i5-12600K

Nov 4th, 2021


Performance Rating


$231.76 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i9-13900KF

Sep 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$568.74 on Amazon

In Stock


  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • . ..
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • Next

HomeMade DIY HowTo Make: Acer Intel Celeron N4000 Review

Acer Intel Celeron N4000 Review — Game List

Most people have a very negative perception towards the celeron processors due to its past poor reputations. It was indeed slow and not useable for heavy games or software application task. But time has changed and the Intel Celeron N4000 proves that it can run above average heavy games and below is the test review conducted for each software and games based on Acer Aspire 3 A315-32-C6sE.

Software and game list for Intel Celeron N4000 Acer Aspire 3 A315-32-C6SE

Software / Game List Plaftorm Status Review
Lego Marvel Avengers PC PC Version Yes Youtube
Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 3 Full Burst Bandai (PC) Yes but laggy Youtube
SIM 4 Origin Yes Youtube
Football Manager 2020 Steam Yes Youtube
Steambirds Alliance Steam Yes Youtube
Minecraft Microsoft Game Yes Youtube
Roblox Microsoft Game Yes Youtube
League of Legends Steam Yes Youtube
Dota 2 Steam Yes Youtube
Asphalt Legend Microsoft Store Yes Youtube
Dungeon Hunter 5 Steam Yes Youtube
Neverwinter Steam Yes Youtube
CS:GO Counter Strike Global Offensive Steam No
Path of Exile Steam No
Mechwarrior Online Solaris Steam No
CS:GO free Microsoft Store Yes Youtube
Fortnite Steam No
DJ Serato Pro (Music Remix Software) Windows 10 Home 64 Bit Yes Youtube
Dissidia Final Fantasy NT Free Edition Steam No
Team Fortress 2 Steam Yes Youtube
AutoDesk Autocad 2018 Windows 10 Home 64 Bit Yes Youtube
BrawlHalla Steam Yes Youtube
King Arthur’s Gold Steam Yes Youtube
Sniper Fury Microsoft Store Yes Youtube
Zombie Anarchy Microsoft Store Yes Youtube

https://youtu. be/T2VUAZh3-4k

Home

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

  • Guitar Chords of Borneo

    1 month ago

  • Bang Sind’a Bidoyoh Jagoi

    8 months ago

  • ♥♥ Amy’s Sweet Bite ♥♥

    1 year ago

  • Forex & Stock Trading Investment

    1 year ago

  • Rate PosLaju Post Office Service

    2 years ago

  • Post Office | Tracking Package | Shipping Delivery

    3 years ago

  • iPhone How To

    5 years ago

  • My everyday life health

    6 years ago

  • Kuching’s Clinics

    7 years ago

  • Karik Oni Oni

    7 years ago

Intel Celeron N4000 — what is it capable of in games?

Component selection

Greetings, dear friends! The reason for writing today’s short post was my friend, who urgently needed a laptop. He did not have a large amount on hand, so he was looking for an inexpensive, but productive device for simple tasks. His choice fell on a model with an Intel Celeron N4000 processor, 4 GB of RAM (DDR-4), an Intel HD Graphics 600 video card and a 128 GB SSD, in general, a simple laptop for everyday tasks.

The comrade was satisfied with the purchase, for films, «Word», «YouTube» such characteristics are quite enough. But the question of entertainment became, and we decided to test the laptop in several games (although we understand that our model is far from gaming).

Tests

What happened after our testing? And here’s what:

  • in World of Tanks on low settings you can get up to 30 FPS;
  • in War Thunder (at low) you can play at 23-25 ​​frames;
  • in LoL you can hope for 30 FPS at the minimum;
  • in Minecraft at medium settings, the device produced about 50 frames per second;
  • it will be possible to play CS:GO only on 20 frames;
  • Low settings in Dota 2 will give about 20 frames;
  • in STALKER the situation is better, at medium settings you can get about 35 FPS;
  • in Skyrim, you can play at a maximum of 20 frames if you set the settings to Low.

See the system requirements of the upcoming game half-Life — Akyx — https://forzapc.ru/sistemnye-trebovaniya-half-life-alyx.html

d3dx9_43.dll error pops up in games? Then read our tips on how to fix it.

Results

If you buy an inexpensive laptop, then you should not expect graphic beauties, you can count on the minimum settings and 20-30 frames in online games. It will be possible to play normally in undemanding games or projects of 10-12 years ago. Good luck, we hope you find our information useful!

Categories

  • Selection of accessories
  • Games and software
  • News
  • LINUX OS
  • Help for gamers
  • Troubleshooting
  • Tips for beginners
  • Social networks

Recent posts

  • Tinkoff Bank had a failure — 99% of users received complaints
  • What is neural networks >
  • Windows flash drive
  • LINUX OS — why users around the world are abandoning Windows
  • What is Linux Mint – how to download ⌛ and use it for free?
  • How to put a password on a USB flash drive — step by step instructions
  • How to download any video from the Internet? 3 ways

Interested in your opinion:

Loading . ..

Celeron N4000 processor [in 15 benchmarks]

Intel
Celeron N4000

  • Interface
  • Core frequency
  • Video memory size
  • Memory type
  • Memory frequency
  • Maximum resolution

Description

Intel started Intel Celeron N4000 sales on December 11, 2017 at a suggested price of $107. This is a notebook processor based on the Gemini Lake architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured using 14nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 2600MHz, the multiplier is locked.

In terms of compatibility, this is an FCBGA1090 socket processor with a TDP of 6W. It supports DDR4, DDR4 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

1.19%

from the leader which is AMD EPYC 9654.


EPYC
9654

Compare

General information

Celeron N4000 quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.

Nuclei 2
2 0143

+
Free multiplier

compatibility compatibility compatibility compatibility

compatibility
Information on Celeron N4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.

Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their rated TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor. Turbo Boost Technology Hyper-Threading Technology Idle States + Thermal Monitoring + Smart Response0143

+ TURBO BOOST MAX 3. 0

9011 9011 9011 901IS
Technologies embedded in the Celeron N4000 that improve system security, such as those designed to protect against hacking. Secure Key + MPX + Identity Protection + SGX Yes with Intel® ME OS Guard + Anti -Theft

2

20129 of 281.6 (Xeon Platinum 9221) ECC -memory support

–DITENTIONALY CENTIONALY

3

General parameters of the video card built into Celeron N4000.

990 28 GB0013

The resolution available for the Celeron N4000 integrated graphics card, including through various interfaces.

Video core Intel UHD Graphics 600
Video memory size
4K support +

Built-in video — API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000 integrated graphics card, including their versions. 12 UART +

Benchmark tests

These are the results of Celeron N4000 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The total score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.


Overall performance in tests

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000
1.19

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
  • 3DMark06 CPU
  • Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
  • TrueCrypt AES
  • x264 encoding pass 2
  • x264 encoding pass 1
  • WinRAR 4.0
Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

Celeron N4000
1472

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Celeron N4000
325

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Celeron N4000
531

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron N4000
2152

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N4000
4030

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N4000
2259

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron N4000
2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all CPU threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron N4000
138

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron N4000
71

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old Maxon development benchmark. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron N4000
0.9

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N4000
1

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Celeron N4000
9

x264 encoding pass 1

The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the sample video in HD (720p). Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Celeron N4000
47

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Celeron N4000
760


Relative capacity

Celeron N4000 overall performance compared to its nearest competitor in notebook processors.


AMD A4-6210
100.84

Intel Core i5-4300Y
100.84

Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
100

Intel Celeron N4000
100

Intel Celeron 5205U
99.16

AMD A6-3430MX
98.32

AMD Phenom II X2 N640
98.32

Competitor from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Celeron N4000 from AMD is A4-6210, which is faster by 1% and higher by 7 positions in our rating on average.


A4
6210

Compare

Here are some of AMD’s Celeron N4000 closest competitors:

AMD A9-9410
102.52

AMD A9-9420
102.52

AMD A4-6210
100. 84

Intel Celeron N4000
100

AMD A6-3430MX
98.32

AMD Phenom II X2 N640
98.32

AMD A6-8500P
97.48

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.


Celeron
5205U

Compare


Celeron
3955U

Compare


Celeron
3867U

Compare


A9
9420

Compare


A6
8500P

Compare


A9
9410

Compare

Best graphics cards for Celeron N4000

We have 6237 configurations based on Celeron N4000 in our database.

According to statistics, these cards are most often used with Celeron N4000:


UHD
Graphics 600

72.4%


HD
Graphics 4000

4.9%


UHD
Graphics 630

3%


UHD
Graphics 620

2.7%


UHD
Graphics

1.7%


GeForce
MX110

1.5%


UHD
Graphics 605

0.7%


HD
Graphics 500

0.6%


HD
Graphics 620

0. 6%


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

0.6%

Here are the most powerful video cards used with Celeron N4000 according to user statistics:


GeForce RTX
4090

0.2% (10/6237)


GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

0.08% (5/6237)


GeForce RTX
3080 Ti

0.1% (9/6237)


GeForce RTX
3090

0.08% (5/6237)


GeForce RTX
3070 Ti

0.02% (1/6237)


GeForce RTX
3070

0.03% (2/6237)


GeForce RTX
2080 Ti

0.