Intel Celeron N4000 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games
Build a PC
2 | 2 | 1.1 GHz |
Cores | Threads | Base Frequency |
---|
Geekbench 5 Single-Core
391
14%
Geekbench 5 Multi-Core
690
2%
Availability
No items available
Graphics Card
Resolution
Select game resolution
Graphics Settings
Select game graphics
Offset
…
Apply Offset
Value Rating
Performance Rating
Value per FPS
You will receive
… FPS
TOP 6 Games With Intel Celeron N4000
186
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
762
FPS
League of Legends
459
FPS
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
325
FPS
VALORANT
1025
FPS
Minecraft
198
FPS
Apex Legends
Alternatives For Celeron N4000
1080p, High
No alternatives — this is the best option
Specifications
General | |
---|---|
Release Date | Unknown |
Socket | FCBGA1090 |
Codename | Gemini Lake |
Performance | |
---|---|
Cores | 2 |
Threads | 2 |
Base Frequency | 1. 1 GHz |
Other | |
---|---|
Power Consumption | 6 W |
Overclockable | No |
Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
Find out which of the 2 CPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.
Celeron N4000
N/A Stock
Core i7-1165G7
N/A Stock
Celeron N4000
N/A Stock
Core i7-1165G7
N/A Stock
Celeron N4000
N/A Stock
Core i9-10910
N/A Stock
Celeron N4000
N/A Stock
Core i9-10910
N/A Stock
Celeron N4000
N/A Stock
Xeon E-2288G
N/A Stock
Celeron N4000
N/A Stock
Xeon E-2288G
N/A Stock
Refine results to filter 1678 processors by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a CPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.
Calculation Parameters
Graphics Card
Resolution
Select game resolution
Graphics Settings
Select game graphics
Sort By
Popularity
Filters
Performance Rating
Value Rating
CPU Type
Desktop
25
Mobile
0
Server
0
Found 1678 CPUs.
Popularity
Processor
Performance
Ryzen 5 5600X
Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$166 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-12700K
Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$254.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
$569.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Apr 20th, 2022
Performance Rating
$323 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5700X
Apr 4th, 2022
Performance Rating
$188 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5800X
Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$215.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$354.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 5600G
Apr 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
$128. 97 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$317.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
$417.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5700G
Apr 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
$178 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
$319.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 5600
Apr 20th, 2022
Performance Rating
$139.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-12700KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$277.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 7700X
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
$338.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-11700K
Mar 16th, 2021
Performance Rating
$245. 53 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 7950X
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
$580 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-13600KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
$296.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
$398.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
$241.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-12400
Jan 4th, 2022
Performance Rating
$182.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 5500
Apr 4th, 2022
Performance Rating
Core i5-12600K
Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$231.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
$568.74 on Amazon
In Stock
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- . ..
- 66
- 67
- 68
- Next
HomeMade DIY HowTo Make: Acer Intel Celeron N4000 Review
Acer Intel Celeron N4000 Review — Game List
Most people have a very negative perception towards the celeron processors due to its past poor reputations. It was indeed slow and not useable for heavy games or software application task. But time has changed and the Intel Celeron N4000 proves that it can run above average heavy games and below is the test review conducted for each software and games based on Acer Aspire 3 A315-32-C6sE.
Software and game list for Intel Celeron N4000 Acer Aspire 3 A315-32-C6SE
Software / Game List | Plaftorm | Status | Review |
---|---|---|---|
Lego Marvel Avengers PC | PC Version | Yes | Youtube |
Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 3 Full Burst | Bandai (PC) | Yes but laggy | Youtube |
SIM 4 | Origin | Yes | Youtube |
Football Manager 2020 | Steam | Yes | Youtube |
Steambirds Alliance | Steam | Yes | Youtube |
Minecraft | Microsoft Game | Yes | Youtube |
Roblox | Microsoft Game | Yes | Youtube |
League of Legends | Steam | Yes | Youtube |
Dota 2 | Steam | Yes | Youtube |
Asphalt Legend | Microsoft Store | Yes | Youtube |
Dungeon Hunter 5 | Steam | Yes | Youtube |
Neverwinter | Steam | Yes | Youtube |
CS:GO Counter Strike Global Offensive | Steam | No | |
Path of Exile | Steam | No | |
Mechwarrior Online Solaris | Steam | No | |
CS:GO free | Microsoft Store | Yes | Youtube |
Fortnite | Steam | No | |
DJ Serato Pro (Music Remix Software) | Windows 10 Home 64 Bit | Yes | Youtube |
Dissidia Final Fantasy NT Free Edition | Steam | No | |
Team Fortress 2 | Steam | Yes | Youtube |
AutoDesk Autocad 2018 | Windows 10 Home 64 Bit | Yes | Youtube |
BrawlHalla | Steam | Yes | Youtube |
King Arthur’s Gold | Steam | Yes | Youtube |
Sniper Fury | Microsoft Store | Yes | Youtube |
Zombie Anarchy | Microsoft Store | Yes | Youtube |
https://youtu. be/T2VUAZh3-4k
Home
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Guitar Chords of Borneo
1 month ago
-
Bang Sind’a Bidoyoh Jagoi
8 months ago
-
♥♥ Amy’s Sweet Bite ♥♥
1 year ago
-
Forex & Stock Trading Investment
1 year ago
-
Rate PosLaju Post Office Service
2 years ago
-
Post Office | Tracking Package | Shipping Delivery
3 years ago
-
iPhone How To
5 years ago
-
My everyday life health
6 years ago
-
Kuching’s Clinics
7 years ago
-
Karik Oni Oni
7 years ago
Intel Celeron N4000 — what is it capable of in games?
Component selection
Greetings, dear friends! The reason for writing today’s short post was my friend, who urgently needed a laptop. He did not have a large amount on hand, so he was looking for an inexpensive, but productive device for simple tasks. His choice fell on a model with an Intel Celeron N4000 processor, 4 GB of RAM (DDR-4), an Intel HD Graphics 600 video card and a 128 GB SSD, in general, a simple laptop for everyday tasks.
The comrade was satisfied with the purchase, for films, «Word», «YouTube» such characteristics are quite enough. But the question of entertainment became, and we decided to test the laptop in several games (although we understand that our model is far from gaming).
Tests
What happened after our testing? And here’s what:
- in World of Tanks on low settings you can get up to 30 FPS;
- in War Thunder (at low) you can play at 23-25 frames;
- in LoL you can hope for 30 FPS at the minimum;
- in Minecraft at medium settings, the device produced about 50 frames per second;
- it will be possible to play CS:GO only on 20 frames;
- Low settings in Dota 2 will give about 20 frames;
- in STALKER the situation is better, at medium settings you can get about 35 FPS;
- in Skyrim, you can play at a maximum of 20 frames if you set the settings to Low.
See the system requirements of the upcoming game half-Life — Akyx — https://forzapc.ru/sistemnye-trebovaniya-half-life-alyx.html
d3dx9_43.dll error pops up in games? Then read our tips on how to fix it.
Results
If you buy an inexpensive laptop, then you should not expect graphic beauties, you can count on the minimum settings and 20-30 frames in online games. It will be possible to play normally in undemanding games or projects of 10-12 years ago. Good luck, we hope you find our information useful!
Categories
- Selection of accessories
- Games and software
- News
- LINUX OS
- Help for gamers
- Troubleshooting
- Tips for beginners
- Social networks
Recent posts
- Tinkoff Bank had a failure — 99% of users received complaints
- What is neural networks >
- Windows flash drive
- LINUX OS — why users around the world are abandoning Windows
- What is Linux Mint – how to download ⌛ and use it for free?
- How to put a password on a USB flash drive — step by step instructions
- How to download any video from the Internet? 3 ways
Interested in your opinion:
Loading . ..
Celeron N4000 processor [in 15 benchmarks]
Intel
Celeron N4000
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
Intel started Intel Celeron N4000 sales on December 11, 2017 at a suggested price of $107. This is a notebook processor based on the Gemini Lake architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured using 14nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 2600MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an FCBGA1090 socket processor with a TDP of 6W. It supports DDR4, DDR4 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
1.19%
from the leader which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC
9654
Compare
General information
Celeron N4000 quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
Nuclei | 2 | |||
2 | 0143 | + | ||
Free multiplier |
compatibility compatibility compatibility compatibility
compatibility
Information on Celeron N4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.
Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their rated TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.
9011 9011 9011 901IS
Technologies embedded in the Celeron N4000 that improve system security, such as those designed to protect against hacking.
2
20129
3
General parameters of the video card built into Celeron N4000.
Video core | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | ||||
Video memory size |
4K support | + |
Built-in video — API support
APIs supported by Celeron N4000 integrated graphics card, including their versions.
Benchmark tests
These are the results of Celeron N4000 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The total score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
Overall performance in tests
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Celeron N4000
1.19
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- WinRAR 4.0
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Celeron N4000
1472
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Celeron N4000
325
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Celeron N4000
531
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Celeron N4000
2152
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron N4000
4030
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron N4000
2259
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Celeron N4000
2
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all CPU threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Celeron N4000
138
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Celeron N4000
71
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old Maxon development benchmark. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Celeron N4000
0.9
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Celeron N4000
1
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Celeron N4000
9
x264 encoding pass 1
The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the sample video in HD (720p). Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Celeron N4000
47
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Celeron N4000
760
Relative capacity
Celeron N4000 overall performance compared to its nearest competitor in notebook processors.
AMD A4-6210
100.84
Intel Core i5-4300Y
100.84
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
100
Intel Celeron N4000
100
Intel Celeron 5205U
99.16
AMD A6-3430MX
98.32
AMD Phenom II X2 N640
98.32
Competitor from AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Celeron N4000 from AMD is A4-6210, which is faster by 1% and higher by 7 positions in our rating on average.
A4
6210
Compare
Here are some of AMD’s Celeron N4000 closest competitors:
AMD A9-9410
102.52
AMD A9-9420
102.52
AMD A4-6210
100. 84
Intel Celeron N4000
100
AMD A6-3430MX
98.32
AMD Phenom II X2 N640
98.32
AMD A6-8500P
97.48
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Celeron
5205U
Compare
Celeron
3955U
Compare
Celeron
3867U
Compare
A9
9420
Compare
A6
8500P
Compare
A9
9410
Compare
Best graphics cards for Celeron N4000
We have 6237 configurations based on Celeron N4000 in our database.
According to statistics, these cards are most often used with Celeron N4000:
UHD
Graphics 600
72.4%
HD
Graphics 4000
4.9%
UHD
Graphics 630
3%
UHD
Graphics 620
2.7%
UHD
Graphics
1.7%
GeForce
MX110
1.5%
UHD
Graphics 605
0.7%
HD
Graphics 500
0.6%
HD
Graphics 620
0. 6%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
0.6%
Here are the most powerful video cards used with Celeron N4000 according to user statistics:
GeForce RTX
4090
0.2% (10/6237)
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
0.08% (5/6237)
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
0.1% (9/6237)
GeForce RTX
3090
0.08% (5/6237)
GeForce RTX
3070 Ti
0.02% (1/6237)
GeForce RTX
3070
0.03% (2/6237)
GeForce RTX
2080 Ti
0.