Intel core 2 extreme qx9650 vs i7: Intel Core i7-6700K vs Core2 Quad Q9650

max 105

Average: 75.1 °C

°C

max 105

Average: 75.1 °C

Purpose

Desktop

Mobile

FAQ

Can Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Intel Core i7-1265U run in 4K mode?

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 — Not available. Intel Core i7-1265U — Not available.

How many PCIe lanes

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 — Not available. Intel Core i7-1265U — 20.

How much RAM is supported?

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 supports No GB data. Intel Core i7-1265U supports 64GB.

How fast are the processors?

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 runs at 3 GHz.

How many cores does the processor have?

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 has 4 cores. The Intel Core i7-1265U has 10 cores.

Do the processors support ECC memory?

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 — Not available. Intel Core i7-1265U — no.

Does the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 have integrated graphics?

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 — Not available. Intel Core i7-1265U — Intel Iris Xe

What kind of RAM does

support? Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 supports DDR No data available. The Intel Core i7-1265U supports DDR5.

What is the socket of the processors?

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 uses LGA775 to install. The FCBGA1744 is used to install the Intel Core i7-1265U.

What architecture is being used?

The Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is based on the Yorkfield architecture. The Intel Core i7-1265U is built on the Alder Lake architecture.

Is the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 multiplier unlocked?

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 — Not available. Intel Core i7-1265U — Not available.

How do processors perform in benchmarks?

PassMark Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 scored No data points. The Intel Core i7-1265U scored No data points.

What is the maximum frequency of the processors?

The maximum frequency of the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 reaches No data Hz. The maximum frequency of the Intel Core i7-1265U reaches 4.8 Hz.

How much energy do they consume?

The power consumption of the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 can be up to 130 watts. The Intel Core i7-1265U has up to 130 watts.

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q7600

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200S

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400S

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400S

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550S

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Core i3-2115C

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Core i5-750S

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Core i7-3910K

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Pentium 4 1. 3

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Pentium 4 1.4

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Pentium 4 1.5

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Pentium 4 1.6

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Pentium 4 1.7

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Pentium 4 1.80

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Pentium 4 1.8A

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Pentium 4 1.9

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Pentium 4 2. 26

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Intel Pentium 4 2.40

VS

Intel Core i7-1265U

Comparison Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs Intel Core i7-4820K » BNAME.RU

9650 seriously loses in terms of the number of threads, 4 vs. 8 Core i7-4820K significantly outperforms in terms of the number of threads, 8 vs. 4 The Core i7-4820K is not much faster in terms of clock speed, 3700 MHz versus 3000 MHz for the rival N/a The Core i7-4820K has standard overclocking tools. (Unlocked multiplier) Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is less technologically advanced, since its technical process is much larger and is 45 nm Extreme QX9650 Core 2 Extreme QX9650 has significantly fewer transistors, 820 million vs.0576

Comparison of instructions and technologies0566

Energy saving technologies

Technology or instruction name	Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650	Intel Core i7-4820K	Short description
EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep)			Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology.
Stop Grant state		—	Energy saving status.
Extended Stop Grant State		—	Energy saving status (Advanced technology).
Sleep state		—	Sleep state.
Deep Sleep state		—	Deep sleep state.
Deeper Sleep state		—	Deeper sleep state.
Extended HALT state		—	Extended stop state.
HALT state		—	Stop status.
Thermal Monitoring	—		Temperature monitoring.
Idle States	—		Idle states.

Standard extension set

Technology or instruction name	Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650	Intel Core i7-4820K	Short description
MMX (Multimedia Extensions)			Multimedia extensions.
SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions)			Processor streaming SIMD extension.
SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2)			Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2.
SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3)			Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3.
SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3)			Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3.
EM64T (Extended Memory 64-bit Technology)			64-bit extended memory technology.
NX (Execute disable bit)			Execution inhibit bit.
SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4)	—		Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4.
AES (Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions)	—		Command system extension.
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions)	—		Command system extension.
F16C (16-bit Floating-Point conversion)	—		16-bit floating point conversion.
SSE4.1 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4.1)		—	Processor Streaming SIMD 4.1 Extension.

Safety Technology

Technology or instruction name	Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650	Intel Core i7-4820K	Short description
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology)	—		Trusted execution technology.
Identity Protection	—		Personal protection.
EDB (Execute Disable Bit)	—		Execute disable bit.

Other technologies and instructions

Technology or instruction name	Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650	Intel Core i7-4820K	Short description
Hyper-Threading	—		Hyperthreading technology.
vPro	—		Intel Technology Suite, vPro is a marketing term.
DBS (Demand Based Switching)	—		Switching on request.
Smart Response Technology	—		Smart Response caching technology.

Benchmarks

Overall performance rating

The main rating is calculated by the formula, taking into account all the data: test results in all programs, base frequency, architecture, release year, number of cores, threads, temperature, instructions, technology automatic overclocking, socket, and other characteristics. The results of the overall rating showed that the Core i7-4820K surpasses its rival Core 2 Extreme QX9 in most parameters.650. The Core 2 Extreme QX9650 barely scores 2956.5 points compared to its competitor.

PassMark CPU Mark

Almost all of our processors have been tested in PassMark. Perhaps the most popular benchmark tester on the Internet. The benchmark includes a wide range of tools for a comprehensive assessment of the performance of a personal computer, in particular the CPU. Among which are game physics calculations, extended instructions checking, compression, encryption, integer calculations, floating point calculations, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. At the same time, it is possible to compare the received data with other configurations in the database. Performance Test showed a clear advantage of the Core i7-4820K processor (6475 points) over the Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (2447 points). The Core 2 Extreme QX9650 with a score of 2447 clearly loses in this test.

Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

This benchmark for testing video cards and processors is obsolete by now. The test is carried out in Mac OS X, Windows. The Single-Core version in its test uses only one core and one thread for rendering. The ray tracing method is used. The basic test mode for speed is spatial light sources, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, multi-level reflections, working with light, global illumination simulation, and procedural shaders. Released by MAXON, it is based on the Cinema 4D 3D editor. It is possible to test multi-processor systems.

Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test

The Multi-Thread version is another test option in Cinebench R10 that already uses multi-thread and multi-core testing mode. It should be noted that the number of threads in this version is limited to 16.

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

Multi-threaded version of the CINEBENCH R11.5 benchmark, — has the ability to load the CPU to the full, including all cores and threads. It differs from older versions, 64 threads are already used here. Testing the Core i7-4820K in the Cinebench R11.5 benchmark gave 7.68 points, which indicates a higher performance of this model. While Core 2 Extreme QX9The 650 gets 2.91 points, far behind its rival in this test.

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single thread test

Excellent fully functional Cinebench R11.5 from the Maxon team. In this Single-Core variant, tests occur using one core and one thread. In tests, the ray tracing process is also used, a high-polygonal 3D room is calculated with a large number of glass and crystalline and translucent spheres. His tests are still relevant. Test indicators — the value of «frames per second». The single-thread test results for the Core i7-4820K in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, its score was 1.85 points. But the Core 2 Extreme QX9 itselfThe 650 scores 0.69 in this test and is far behind.

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

Multi Core version Cinebench R15 — will check your assembly completely, showing what it is capable of. All threads and CPU cores are involved in the process of rendering detailed 3D models. Cinebench R15 is ideal for modern multi-threaded processors from AMD and Intel, as it can use 256 computation threads. With a score of 667, the Core i7-4820K unequivocally scores higher in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its rival Core 2 Extreme QX9The 650 is far behind with a score of 256.3 in the test.

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Cinebench Release 15 is the latest benchmark from the Finnish team Maxon. Thanks to its use, they test the entire system: both video cards and CPU. For the CPU, the result of the analysis is the value of PTS points, and for graphics adapters, the value of frames per second. FPS. A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of detailed objects, light sources and reflections. In this version of the Single Core program, only 1 thread is involved in rendering. The single-threaded test of the Core i7-4820K processor in the Cinebench R15 program indicates its high performance, the result is 141 points. Compared to it, its competitor in the face of the Core 2 Extreme QX9650 fails this test with a score of 58. 03.

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded benchmark

Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-threaded benchmark. It’s cross-platform multi-device and OS support makes Geekbench benchmarks the most valuable right now. That’s already In Geekbench 4, the 64-bit multi-core Core i7-4820K received a score of 17712, well above the Core 2 Extreme QX9650. In this test, the Core 2 Extreme QX9650 gets a very low score of 6122.4 compared to the Core i7-4820K.

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

The current single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing laptops and home PCs. This benchmark, like its earlier versions, runs on OS: Linux, Windows, Mac OS. For the first time ever, this version of the tester also supports mobile devices running iOS and Android. The Single-Core check uses 1 thread. The Core i7-4820K scored higher in the Geekbench 4.0 single-thread test with a score of 4774. But its competitor Core 2 Extreme QX9650 things are much worse — 2162. 84 points.

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test

Multi Core version of the Geekbench 3 benchmark — will allow you to make a strong «reliability» test of your processor and show the stability of your system.

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

The 32-bit version of the test loads only one thread and one CPU core. Multi-platform Geekbench is usually used to test the system under Mac, but it can work on both Linux and Windows. The basic purpose is to check the speed of processors.

Geekbench 2

A severely outdated version of Geekbench 2. There are newer updates available today, 5v and 4v. Our archive contains up to two hundred CPU models that have test results in this benchmark.

X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1

This is a practical test of system performance by transcoding HD files to H.264, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This test is faster than Pass 2 because encoding is done at the same speed. An ideal test for many thread processors and many core ones. Frame rate processed per sec. — result of checking. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Core i7-4820K is significantly higher at 192.16 FPS But the Core 2 Extreme QX9650 did a poor job, its speed was 73.43 FPS.

X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2

This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The result is a higher quality video. You need to understand that a very real task is being carried out, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of video programs. The resulting value is also measured in frames per second. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the processing is performed at a non-constant rate. Therefore, the results of the checks realistically reflect the effectiveness of the platform. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Core i7-4820K processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 43.39FPS Its rival Core 2 Extreme QX9650 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 16. 19 FPS.

3DMark06 CPU

This benchmark is often used by overclockers and gamers and those who like to overclock processors. CPUs are tested in two ways: the game AI does the pathfinding, and the other test simulates the engine using PhysX. Created using the DirectX library by Futuremark. Benchmark to evaluate the performance of the video system, and the CPU. The Core i7-4820K performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, and scores 9116.69 points. The processor Core 2 Extreme QX9650 coped worse with this task with 3858.64 points.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

We can say that approximately 200 processors on our site have data in the 3DMark Fire Strike Physics test. It includes a test that calculates game physics.

WinRAR 4.0

A well-known data archiver. The checks were carried out under the control of the Windows operating system. The speed of compression by the RAR algorithm was tested, for this large volumes of randomly generated data were used.