Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs Intel Pentium 4 1.80
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-1115G4 and Intel Pentium 4 1.80 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Pentium 4 1.80
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-1115G4
- CPU is newer: launch date 19 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 128% higher clock speed: 4.10 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- Around 28% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 78°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 10 nm SuperFin vs 180 nm
- 24x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 10x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 6. 3x better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2685 vs 429
- 39x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6235 vs 160
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs August 2001 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 4.10 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 78°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm SuperFin vs 180 nm |
L1 cache | 192 KB vs 8 KB |
L2 cache | 2.5 MB vs 256 KB |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2685 vs 429 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6235 vs 160 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-1115G4
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4 1. 80
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Core i3-1115G4 | Intel Pentium 4 1.80 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2685 | 429 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6235 | 160 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | Intel Pentium 4 1. 80 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Tiger Lake | Willamette |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | August 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 439 | 2506 |
Processor Number | i3-1115G4 | |
Series | 11th Generation Intel Core i3 Processors | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Desktop |
64 bit support | ||
Bus Speed | 4 GT/s | 400 MHz FSB |
L1 cache | 192 KB | 8 KB |
L2 cache | 2. 5 MB | 256 KB |
L3 cache | 6 MB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm SuperFin | 180 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 78°C |
Maximum frequency | 4.10 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Number of threads | 4 | |
Base frequency | 1. 80 GHz | |
Die size | 217 mm2 | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 78 °C | |
Transistor count | 42 million | |
VID voltage range | 1.575V-1.75V | |
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | DDR1, DDR2 |
Device ID | 0x9A78 | |
Execution Units | 48 | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 25 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors | |
Number of displays supported | 4 | |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | |
DirectX | 12. 1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Configurable TDP-down | 12 Watt | |
Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 1.70 GHz | |
Configurable TDP-up | 28 Watt | |
Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 3.00 GHz | |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 46. 5×25 | 53.3mm x 53.3mm |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1449 | PPGA478, PPGA423 |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66.7 Watt | |
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Mode-based Execute Control (MBE) | ||
Secure Boot | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2, Intel AVX-512 | |
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD) | ||
Speed Shift technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i3-1115G4 with others
Intel
Core i3-1115G4
vs
AMD
EPYC 3201
Intel
Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel
Core i7-9750HF
Intel
Core i3-1115G4
vs
AMD
Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel
Core i3-1115G4
vs
AMD
Ryzen Embedded V2718
Intel
Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel
Core i5-11300H
Intel
Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel
Core i7-1185G7E
Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs Intel Pentium 4417U: What is the difference?
56points
Intel Core i3-1115G4
41points
Intel Pentium 4417U
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Intel Pentium 4417U
Why is Intel Core i3-1115G4 better than Intel Pentium 4417U?
- 30. 43% faster CPU speed?
2 x 3GHzvs2 x 2.3GHz - 1600MHz higher ram speed?
3733MHzvs2133MHz - 4nm smaller semiconductor size?
10nmvs14nm - 2MB bigger L2 cache?
2.5MBvs0.5MB - 2.84x higher PassMark result?
6401vs2257 - 4MB bigger L3 cache?
6MBvs2MB - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
4vs3 - 64KB bigger L1 cache?
192KBvs128KB
Why is Intel Pentium 4417U better than Intel Core i3-1115G4?
- 13W lower TDP?
15Wvs28W
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Pentium 4417U
vs
Intel Core i5-8305G
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
Intel Pentium 4417U
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Pentium 4417U
vs
Intel Celeron N4020
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Intel Pentium 4417U
vs
AMD A8-4555M
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Intel Pentium 4417U
vs
Intel Celeron N4100
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
Intel Pentium 4417U
vs
Intel Core i3-1005G1
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel Core i3-1005G1
Intel Pentium 4417U
vs
Intel Core i3-7020U
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel Core i3-10110U
Intel Pentium 4417U
vs
Intel Core i5-2430M
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel Pentium 4417U
vs
Intel Core i7-3635QM
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel Core i5-1035G1
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i3-1115G4
9 User reviews
Intel Core i3-1115G4
9. 6/10
9 User reviews
Intel Pentium 4417U
0 User reviews
Intel Pentium 4417U
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.6/10
9 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
8.6/10
9 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
9.3/10
9 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
9.7/10
9 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
8.5/10
8 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.CPU speed
2 x 3GHz
2 x 2.3GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2. CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.1GHz
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i3-1115G4
✖Intel Pentium 4417U
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
1.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
3MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
3733MHz
2133MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-1115G4)
34.1GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖Intel Core i3-1115G4
✖Intel Pentium 4417U
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-1115G4)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-1115G4)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-1115G4)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-1115G4)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-1115G4)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i3-1115G4
✔Intel Pentium 4417U
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔Intel Core i3-1115G4
✔Intel Pentium 4417U
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i3-1115G4
✖Intel Pentium 4417U
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i3-1115G4
✖Intel Pentium 4417U
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-1115G4)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i3-1115G4
✔Intel Pentium 4417U
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-1115G4
✖Intel Pentium 4417U
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-1115G4)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium 4417U)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Pentium 4 vs Intel Core i3-1115G4
|
|
|
Intel Pentium 4 vs Intel Core i3-1115G4
Compare the technical characteristics between the group of processors Intel Pentium 4 and the processor Intel Core i3-1115G4, but also with the respective performance in the benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Intel Pentium 4 650 | 2005 Q1 | 90 nm | 1 | 2 | 3. 4 | 3.4 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 84 | 66.6 | 74 | 136 | 60 | 50 | 677 | 304 | 1045 | 1094 | 254 | 299 | ||||||||
Intel Pentium 4 631 | 2006 Q1 | 65 nm | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 86 | 64. 1 | 69 | 137 | 58 | 48 | 956 | 833 | 989 | 1110 | 154 | 190 | ||||||||
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | 2020 Q3 | 10 nm SuperFin | 2 | 4 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 6 | 64 | 16 | 28 | 100 | 494 | 1338 | 197 | 378 | 496 | 953 | 688 | 3224 | 2842 | 6309 | 5495 | 11647 | 1175 | 2306 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
This comparative table allows us to better appreciate the differences between the various processors. The performance for Geekbench 4 single-core and multi-core are established by default on the Windows operating system, on Linux if there is at least one server processor present in the comparison, on Mac OS X if we make a parallel with at least one Apple branded processor on Linux and Android if a smartphone processor other than Apple is present. Each time, in 64-bit version.
Performances:
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
494 1. 338 |
Intel Pentium 4 631 |
69 137 |
Intel Pentium 4 650 |
74 136 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
197 378 |
Intel Pentium 4 650 |
60 50 |
Intel Pentium 4 631 |
58 48 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
496 953 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
688 3.224 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
2.842 6.309 |
Intel Pentium 4 631 |
956 833 |
Intel Pentium 4 650 |
677 304 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
5.495 11.647 |
Intel Pentium 4 631 |
989 1.110 |
Intel Pentium 4 650 |
1.045 1.094 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
1.175 2.306 |
Intel Pentium 4 650 |
254 299 |
Intel Pentium 4 631 |
154 190 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i3-1115G4 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Pentium GoldIntel Pentium IIIntel Pentium IIIIntel Pentium Silver
Intel Core i3-1115G4EIntel Core i3-1115GRE
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U vs Core i3 5005U: performance comparison
VS
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U
Intel Core i3 5005U
We compared two 2-core laptop CPUs: the 2.3 GHz Intel Pentium Gold 4417U against the 2.0 GHz Core i3 5005U. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Pentium Gold 4417U
30
Core i3 5005U
27
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Pentium Gold 4417U
7
Core i3 5005U
6
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Pentium Gold 4417U
63
Core i3 5005U
58
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Pentium Gold 4417U
25
Core i3 5005U
24
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 5005U and 4417U
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold 4417U
- Newer — released 4-years later
- Supports up to 32 GB DDR4-2133 RAM
- Newer PCI Express version – 3. 0
- Around 8.5 GB/s (33%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
- 11% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 543 vs 488 points
Advantages of Intel Core i3 5005U
- Has 1 MB larger L3 cache size
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Pentium Gold 4417U
544
Core i3 5005U
n/a
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Pentium Gold 4417U
1230
Core i3 5005U
n/a
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Pentium Gold 4417U
+16%
1333
Core i3 5005U
1151
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Pentium Gold 4417U
+13%
2264
Core i3 5005U
2010
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Pentium Gold 4417U
+11%
542
Core i3 5005U
487
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Pentium Gold 4417U
+15%
1244
Core i3 5005U
1080
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Pentium Gold 4417U and Core i3 5005U
General
Vendor | Intel | Intel |
Released | January 1, 2019 | January 5, 2015 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Kaby Lake R | Broadwell |
Model number | 4417U | i3-5005U |
Socket | BGA-1356 | BGA-1168 |
Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 610 | HD Graphics 5500 |
Performance
Cores | 2 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base Frequency | 2. 3 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | — |
Multiplier | — | 20x |
Bus Bandwidth | 4 GT/s | 5 GT/s |
L1 Cache | 256K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 1MB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 2MB (shared) | 3MB (shared) |
Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
TDP | 15 W | 15 W |
Max. temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
GPU Base Clock | 200 MHz | — |
GPU Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
Shading Units | 96 | — |
TMUs | 12 | — |
ROPs | 2 | — |
Execution Units | 12 | — |
TGP | 5 W | — |
Max. Resolution | 4096×2304 — 30 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Pentium Gold 4417U
0.06 TFLOPS
Core i3 5005U
n/a
Memory support
Memory types | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L-1600, LPDDR3-1600 |
Memory Size | 32 GB | 16 GB |
Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
ECC Support | No | No |
Official site | Intel Pentium Gold 4417U official page | Intel Core i3 5005U official page |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 12 |
Extended instructions | SSE4. 1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Pentium Gold 4417U
4 (100%)
Core i3 5005U
0 (0%)
Total votes: 4
ompetitors
1.
Intel Core i3 5005U vs Celeron J4125
2.
Intel Core i3 5005U vs Pentium Silver N5030
So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i3 5005U or Pentium Gold 4417U?
Name
Message
Promotion
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 vs Core i3 1115G4: performance comparison
VS
Intel Pentium Gold 7505
Intel Core i3 1115G4
We compared two 2-core laptop CPUs: the 2.0 GHz Intel Pentium Gold 7505 against the 1.7-3.0 GHz Core i3 1115G4. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Pentium Gold 7505
53
Core i3 1115G4
67
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Pentium Gold 7505
14
Core i3 1115G4
15
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Pentium Gold 7505
77
Core i3 1115G4
74
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Pentium Gold 7505
42
Core i3 1115G4
47
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 1115G4 and 7505
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold 7505
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than the Core i3 1115G4 – 15 vs 28 Watt
Advantages of Intel Core i3 1115G4
- Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size
- Newer PCI Express version – 4. 0
- 28% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1263 vs 983 points
- 17% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz)
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Pentium Gold 7505
n/a
Core i3 1115G4
1359
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Pentium Gold 7505
n/a
Core i3 1115G4
2517
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Pentium Gold 7505
2294
Core i3 1115G4
+16%
2672
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Pentium Gold 7505
5334
Core i3 1115G4
+17%
6251
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Pentium Gold 7505
982
Core i3 1115G4
+28%
1260
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Pentium Gold 7505
2235
Core i3 1115G4
+13%
2523
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Pentium Gold 7505 and Core i3 1115G4
General
Vendor | Intel | Intel |
Released | October 17, 2020 | September 2, 2020 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Tiger Lake | Tiger Lake UP3 |
Model number | 7505 | i3-1115G4 |
Socket | BGA-1449 | BGA-1449 |
Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48 EUs | UHD Graphics Xe G4 |
Performance
Cores | 2 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base Frequency | 2. 0 GHz | 1.7-3.0 GHz |
Turbo Boost Frequency | 3.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 20x | 17-30x |
Bus Bandwidth | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s |
L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 1256K (per core) | 1280K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 4MB (shared) | 6MB (shared) |
Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Fabrication process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
TDP | 15 W | 12-28 W |
Max. temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48 EUs | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 |
GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
GPU Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
TMUs | 24 | 24 |
ROPs | 12 | 12 |
Execution Units | 48 | 48 |
TGP | 15 W | 15 W |
iGPU FLOPS
Pentium Gold 7505
0. 84 TFLOPS
Core i3 1115G4
0.84 TFLOPS
Memory support
Memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-3733 |
Memory Size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
ECC Support | No | No |
Official site | Intel Pentium Gold 7505 official page | Intel Core i3 1115G4 official page |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express Lanes | — | 16 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Pentium Gold 7505
394 (60.6%)
Core i3 1115G4
256 (39. 4%)
Total votes: 650
ompetitors
1.
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 and Core i5 1135G7
2.
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 and Core i3 1125G4
3.
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 and Celeron N4020
4.
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
5.
Intel Core i3 1115G4 and AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
6.
Intel Core i3 1115G4 and i5 1035G1
7.
Intel Core i3 1115G4 and AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
8.
Intel Core i3 1115G4 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i3 1115G4 or Pentium Gold 7505?
Name
Message
Promotion
Intel Pentium vs i3: Which should you choose in 2022?
Intel’s Pentium and i3 lines have always been neck-to-neck with each other. They’re both light processors for casual everyday use. And they’re both cost-effective. But some minor differences aren’t apparent to everyone. So, in this comparison, we will put these processors side by side and decide which processor is best for what application.
Pentium vs i3
Intel is the world’s leading manufacturer of microprocessors. Intel chips are present in many laptops and PCs.
Two of their microprocessors, the Pentium and the i3, stand out as the most popular CPUs. Intel’s Pentium series is a vast line of processors, ranging from low-power to high-power. In contrast, Intel’s Core i3 is mostly targeted towards those with a lower budget.
Features | Intel Pentium | Intel Core i3 |
---|---|---|
Cores | 2 and 4 | 2 and 4 |
Threads | 2 and 4 | 4 and 8 |
Cache | L2 and L3 | L2 |
Highest Base Frequency | 4. 30 GHz | 4.40 GHz |
TDP range | 5-58 W | 15-65 W |
Max memory size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Graphics | HD and UHD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics |
Intel Pentium
Intel Pentium
Check Price on Amazon
Pros
- Lower heat production
- Suitable for light browsing
- Best for light gaming
- More affordable
Cons
- Not for higher-power applications
- Cannot handle basic programming
Intel i3
Intel Core i3
Check Price on Amazon
Pros
- Good for basic programming
- Made for light use in homes and offices
- Better architecture
- Features hyperthreading
Cons
- Higher heat production
- More expensive than the Pentium
Key Specifications
Cores
You may have heard the terms “quad-core” and “octa-core”. But what does that mean? Cores are like the building blocks of microprocessors. Each core works independently to handle various applications.
Microprocessors can be found in single-core, dual-core, quad-core, Hexa-core, octa-core, and deca-core. Generally, the more cores there are the more processing power and tasks the processor can handle.
Intel Pentium’s Gold Series can only be bought with 2 cores, which is suitable considering it’s only for general-purpose everyday use. Pentium’s Silver Series, on the other hand, is mostly available as quad-core processors, save for the A1030, which has 2 cores. But, again, the choice is suitable since the Silver series is designed to handle heavier applications.
The Intel Core i3, however, is available as both dual-core and quad-core processors. The core choices on both processors (Pentium and Core i3) are quite useful for most applications. However, some heavier applications will require an octa-core processor. And neither of these series provides that.
Clock Speed
Every computer has an internal clock. This clock controls how fast the processor runs and how long it takes to execute instructions. Clock speeds are getting faster day by day, and both of these processors have kept up in that regard. The higher the clock speed, the better. But that entirely depends on your application.
The Intel Pentium Gold Series offers a wide range of clock speed choices, ranging from 1.10 GHz to 4.30 GHz. Intel’s Pentium Silver Series, however, does not allow for a lot of choices. The lowest clock speed choice is 1.10 GHz, and the highest is 2.00 GHz. It’s good for less “needy” applications, but for anything remotely CPU intensive, consider a different series.
If you want a wide range of processors with higher clock speeds, then the Core i3 series is best for you. It offers a clock speed range of 3.50 GHz to 4.40 GHz.
Threads
Threads are the virtual CPU cores that enable the processor to execute multiple tasks at once. Each CPU core can have a maximum of two threads. So a quad-core processor can have 4 to 8 threads. And an octa-core processor can have 8 to 16 threads. The more threads you have, the more tasks the CPU can execute at one time.
Since Intel’s Pentium Gold uses 2 cores, it has 4 threads with 2 threads on each core. However, the Intel Pentium Silver series only uses 1 thread on each core. This reduces its efficiency, but the actual effect of that depends on how you intend to use the processor.
Moreover, the Intel Core i3 series of microprocessors has both 4 and 8 thread options. All processors have 2 threads on each core. Threads and cores go hand in hand, so you can get an idea of which processor has more processing power.
Socket
When you’re connecting a microprocessor to the motherboard, you don’t want to have to solder it. Soldering would likely damage the CPU (if done incorrectly) and make the connection semi-permanent. Therefore, a socket is used instead and it sits atop the motherboard.
Technically, the socket is not a big deal. However, you need to know what type of socket the processor uses to avoid buying the wrong one. For example, most Pentium processors use Socket 478.
Most Pentium Gold CPUs use the FCLGA1200 Socket. And most Pentium Silver processors use the FCBGA1090 Socket. As for the Intel Core i3, most processors use the FCBGA1449 Socket, though some use the FCBGA1598 Socket. The type of socket used is specific to the CPU, so be sure to compare the official datasheet with the motherboard you intend to use.
Cache
Your CPU has many types of memories, including RAM and cache. RAM is the memory that temporarily holds information and is readily available. But when the CPU needs information immediately, it uses the cache memory. The cache is what helps websites and pictures load faster.
Most Intel Pentium Gold CPUs have 4 MBs of cache memory, though a few have 2 MB. Additionally, some of the CPUs use Intel Smart Cache. In this, there is an individual cache for one core and a shared cache for the other. It’s also called L2 cache.
Intel’s Pentium Silver CPUs all have 4 MBs of cache. And some use the L3 technology, which features 3 caches instead of the inferior 2. Despite this, the L2 cache is faster than the L3 cache.
The Intel Core i3 CPUs make a bigger leap. They use 8 MBs of cache instead of just 4. And the Intel Core i3-11100B even uses 12 MBs of cache. Moreover, they use L2 cache.
Integrated Graphics
Intel’s CPUs feature integrated graphics. This lets you view images, render 3D pictures and games, and stream videos. Of course, you can replace the graphics with a discrete GPU of your own choice if you like. But having an integrated graphics option means you don’t necessarily have to buy a separate GPU. That’s especially useful if you need the computer for day-to-day use.
Pentium Gold uses UHD Graphics 610, 615, and 630. These are the most commonly found on this line of processors, but some also use the Intel HD Graphics 610 and 615. Moreover, most of these have a max dynamic frequency of 1. 10 GHz, with the highest being 1.25 GHz. In addition to that, all of them support 4K graphics.
Pentium’s Silver series uses a lower-powered graphics technology. Most of these processors use Intel Graphics UHD 605. And the highest burst frequency you can find in this range is 900 MHz, a far cry from the Gold’s 1.25 GHz. Additionally, the dedicated video memory is only 8 GB. All of them support 4K graphics.
As for the Intel Core i3 processors, all of them have integrated graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors. It’s a lot faster and more advanced than the other graphics processors. Additionally, the max dynamic frequency ranges from 1.20 GHz to up to 1.40 GHz. And all the processors support 4K graphics.
In a nutshell, in order of inferior to superior graphics, we have the Pentium Silver, Pentium Gold, and Core i3.
Ram Compatibility
Typically, higher RAM is desirable for more advanced games and applications. And this is especially so for those that feature 3D models.
In that respect, the Intel Pentium Gold has a max memory size ranging from 16 GB to 128 GB. This is only the max memory that it can support. Also, the actual amount of memory you can implement depends on the motherboard. Furthermore, most of the RAM is available as DDR4, though some do support DDR3 variants.
The Intel Pentium Silver has a lower max memory support of 8 GB, with two processors supporting up to 16 GB. However, all of the processors only work with DDR4 memory or variants of it.
Finally, the Intel Core i3 has a max memory capability ranging from 16 GB to 128 GB. And almost all of the processors support DDR4 memory or its variants.
In conclusion, both the Intel Pentium Gold and the Intel Core i3 are perfect for high-RAM applications. But if you don’t need a lot of RAM, Pentium Silver may be right for you. It even supports DDR4 technology for all of its processors.
TDP
CPUs generate heat, and to dissipate that heat, the CPU has Thermal Design Power (TDP). It’s a measure of the maximum amount of heat dissipated through the CPU. Ideally, we want this number to be as low as possible. This is because heat kills electronic components and can lead to performance issues. However, it should be noted that this is the maximum amount of heat generated during normal use.
Since the Pentium Gold has 27 processors in its line, the TDP range is quite wide. Typical values range from 35 W to up to 58 Watts. However, a select few processors have a lower TDP of only 5-6 Watts. In contrast to that, the Pentium Silver processors have a lower TDP, ranging from 6 to 15 Watts. Most Intel Core i3 processors have a TDP of 65 W, except two, which are rated at 15 Watts.
As stated earlier, lower TDP is generally better. However, how manufacturers measure the TDP for their processors is inconsistent. And hence, TDP values that are not too far off can never truly be compared.
Additionally, consider that lower TDP usually signifies a CPU with lower specs. If you want a higher-spec CPU, you will almost always have to deal with a higher TDP. It’s better to implement a good cooling system instead of trying to find a high-spec low-TDP processor.
Manufacturing Process
The process of manufacturing a microprocessor is highly rigorous. And as such, keeping in mind the design process of the processor is highly important. The architecture and fabrication method can change the game with microprocessors.
Intel’s Pentium Gold and Silver microprocessors use a low-power microarchitecture. They are used on two of Intel’s most famous architectures, Kaby Lake and Coffee Lake.
Without getting too technical, the Coffee Lake architecture is better than Kaby Lake. It has higher Turbo frequencies, more cores, and can support DDR4-2666 memory. However, there is one major drawback in that it’s slightly slower than the Kaby Lake architecture due to the higher number of cores. But the Turbo Boost feature allows one core to run faster than the others, which prevents the other cores from needing to be overclocked.
Moving on to the Intel Core i3 processors, they are also available in Kaby Lake and Coffee Lake architectures. However, the 10th Gen processors use a newer architecture, called Comet Lake. It has more cores, more threads, better overclocking management, and higher clock frequencies.
Unique Features
The Pentium and i3 processors differ in many aspects. But are there some technologies that are absent in the Pentium and vice versa? Yes, and these are just a few of them.
Overclocking
One of the most significant leaps that the Core i3 processors take is concerning overclocking. If you don’t know, each CPU has two frequencies– the base frequency and the max frequency. Most low-demand processes run on the base frequency. However, when hardware requires higher performance, the CPU will start running at a higher frequency. The absolute limit to this is the max frequency.
Now, overclocking is not an ideal situation. For example, it can occur during gaming or when running high-power applications. And it generates a lot of heat, which can be detrimental to the CPU.
But Intel’s Core i3 processors use a special technology called Turbo Boost. Turbo Boost allows only one core to run at max frequency at a time, which means lesser heat production. This means that you can safely overclock the system without worrying about overheating.
Cache Memory
Most people don’t bother to check the type of cache used on the CPU. But it’s crucial to faster loading and time efficiency. Unfortunately, Intel’s processors only have 2 levels of cache. The first level is the primary cache, which is fast but small. And the second is the secondary or L2 cache, which is a bit more capacious.
That’s all well and good, but some of the Pentium processors use a third level, called the L3 cache. This improves the performance of the lower levels since it can be shared across cores. The result? Faster loading and better performance.
Cooling
Most of Intel’s Core i3 processors produce a lot of heat and use as much as 65 watts. On the other hand, Pentium’s processors, at the highest TDP, only produce 58 W. Now, the difference may not seem significant. But it means you don’t have to put as much work into a cooling system with the Core i3 as with a Pentium.
Example Comparison:
Intel Core i3-7100 vs Intel Pentium G4560
Comparing two CPUs wouldn’t be justified without taking an example comparison. So, here we will compare the Intel Core i3-7100 vs the Intel Pentium G4560.
The Intel Core i3-7100 is a 7th Gen processor that has been designed for use on desktops. It features 2 cores with 4 threads and a base frequency of 3.90 GHz. Additionally, it has a maximum memory size of 64 GB with 3 MBs of two-level cache. And the TDP is around 51 W.
Intel Core i3 7100
Check Price on Amazon
Compare that with the Pentium G4560. It’s a dual-core 4-thread processor from the Pentium G collection, which has now been discontinued. It too features a max RAM of 64 GB and a 3 MB cache. However, the cache on this CPU is merely single-level and not as fast or efficient as the dual-level cache used on the i3-7100.
Additionally, it has a slightly lower base speed of 3.50 GHz. And since it’s from the older Pentium series, it does not feature Turbo Boost, which makes overclocking processor-safe. The TDP, however, is similar to that of the i3-7100 at 54 W.
Intel Pentium G4560
Check Price on Amazon
As you can see, the two processors are very similar but differ in performance. One has a faster cache while the other is of inferior performance.
Conclusion
In conclusion, whether you should use the Intel Pentium vs i3 is entirely up to what your requirements are.
The Core i3 is one of the best for web development, programming, and it runs a lot cooler.
If you don’t need all of that and need a CPU for light office work, the Intel Pentium should suffice.
Comparison of Intel Core i3-3220 and Intel Pentium 4 2.
60
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-3220 and Intel Pentium 4 2.60 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i3-3220
versus
Intel Pentium 4 2. 60
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-3220
- Newer processor, release date difference 9 year(s) 8 month(s)
more ability to run cores
more applications at the same time: 2 vs 1
- Approx. 27% more clock speed: 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 130 nm
- L1 cache is 16 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Approximately 15% less power consumption: 55 Watt vs 62.6 Watt
- Performance in the PassMark benchmark — Single thread mark 2.7 times a) more: 1730 vs 637
- 7.7 times more performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 2227 vs 288
Release date 8 April 2012 vs August 2002 Number of cores 2 vs 1 Maximum frequency 3. 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Process 22 nm vs 130 nm Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 8 KB Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt vs 62.6 Watt PassMark — Single thread mark 1730 vs 637 PassMark — CPU mark 2227 vs 288 Reasons to choose Intel Pentium 4 2.60
- About 7% more maximum core temperature: 70°C vs 65.3°C
Maximum core temperature 70°C vs 65.3°C Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-3220
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4 2. 60PassMark — Single thread mark CPU 1 CPU 2 PassMark — CPU mark CPU 1 CPU 2 Name Intel Core i3-3220 Intel Pentium 4 2.60 PassMark — Single thread mark 1730 637 PassMark — CPU mark 2227 288 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 607 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1340 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 0 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.048 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7.493 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.277 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.059 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.499 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 1527 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 1527 Performance comparison
Intel Core i3-3220 Intel Pentium 4 2. 60 Architecture name Ivy Bridge Northwood Production date 8 April 2012 August 2002 Price at first issue date $117 Place in the ranking 2116 2195 Price now $34.90 Processor Number i3-3220 Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor Status Launched Discontinued Price/performance ratio (0-100) 35. 75 Applicability Desktop Desktop Support 64 bit Base frequency 3.30 GHz 2.60 GHz Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI 400 MHz FSB Crystal area 94mm 131 mm2 Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) 8KB Level 2 cache 256 KB (per core) 512KB Level 3 cache 3072KB Process 22nm 130nm Maximum case temperature (TCase) 65 °C Maximum core temperature 65. 3°C 70°C Maximum frequency 3.3 GHz 2.6 GHz Number of cores 2 1 Number of threads 4 Number of transistors 55 million Permissible core voltage 1.345V-1.525V Maximum number of memory channels 2 Maximum memory bandwidth 25. 6 GB/s Maximum memory size 32GB Supported memory types DDR3 1333/1600 DDR1, DDR2 Device ID 0x152 Graphics base frequency 650MHz Graphics max dynamic frequency 1.05 GHz Maximum GPU clock 1.05 GHz Intel® Clear Video Technology HD Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology Intel® Quick Sync Video Integrated graphics Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Maximum number of monitors supported 3 WiDi support Low Halogen Options Available Maximum number of processors in configuration
1 1 Package Size 37. 5mm x 37.5mm 35mm x 35mm Sockets supported FCLGA1155 PPGA478 Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 62.6 Watt Thermal Solution 2011C PCI Express 9 revision0040 2.0 PCIe configurations up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 Anti-Theft Technology Execute Disable Bit (EDB) Intel® Identity Protection Technology Intel® Secure Key Technology Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology Flexible Display interface (FDI) Idle States Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX Intel 64 Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology Intel® My WiFi Technology Intel® Turbo Boost Technology Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility Thermal Monitoring Parity FSB Intel® Demand Based Switching Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) Comparison Intel Pentium 4 630 vs Intel Core i3-2328M which is better?
Home / Intel Pentium 4 630 VS Intel Core i3-2328M
Intel Pentium 4 630
2%
Devicelist
VS
Intel Core I3-2328M
25% 9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% We compared the specifications of Intel Pentium 4 630 and Intel Core i3-2328M and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.
Benefits of Intel Pentium 4 630
Maximum frequency
3 GHz
At 0.8 GHz (36.4%) better than
vs
2.2 GHz
Maximum core temperature
67°C
-18°C (-21.2%) better than
vs
85 °C
Benefits of Intel Core i3-2328M
Comparison winner
Core
2
1 (100%) better than
vs
1
threads
4
2 (100%) better
vs
2
Process
32 nm
-58 nm (-64.4%) better than
vs
90 nm
Power Demand (TDP)
35 W
-60 W (-63. 2%) better than
vs
95 W
Passmark
1286
1014 (372.8%) better than
vs
272
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
2880
At 1275 (79.4%) better than
vs
1605
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
6475
4500 (227.8%) better than
vs
1975
General Type
Desktop For laptops Architecture code name
Prescott 2M Sandy Bridge Cores
A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications.
At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.1 2 1 (100%) better than
Threads
More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).
2 4 2 (100%) better than
Base frequency
n/a 2.2 GHz Process
90 nm 32 nm -58 nm (-64.4%) better than
Crystal size
n/a 149 mm2 Number of transistors
n/a 624 million Maximum frequency
Higher clock speed processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.
3GHz Better than
at 0.8 GHz (36.4%)
2.2 GHz Support 64 bit
Max. number of processors in the configuration
n/a 1 Socket
PLGA775 FCPGA988 AMD-V
Series
Pentium 4 Intel Core i3 Release price
n/a 225 $ Value for money
The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
n/a 66.5% Bus
800 MHz n/a Maximum core temperature
67 °C -18 °C (-21. 2%) better than
85 °C vPro
TXT
Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.
PCI Express revision
no data 2.0 Number of PCI-Express lanes
n/a 16 Demand Based Switching
— — Identity Protection
n/a + Flex Memory Access
n/a + Quick Sync
n/a + eDP
n/a + HDMI
n/a + FMA
n/a + My WiFi
n/a + FDI
n/a + Anti-Theft
n/a + Fast Memory Access
n/a + CRT
n/a + FSB parity
— n/a Level 1 cache
The fastest level of cache that works directly with the kernel. The larger the cache, the better the performance.
n/a 64K (per core) Level 2 cache
n/a 256K (per core) Level 3 cache
n/a 3 MB (total) Power Demand (TDP)
Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.95 W 35 W -60 W (-63.2%) better than
EDB
+ + InTru 3D
n/a + DisplayPort
n/a + Permissible core voltage
1. 2V-1.4V n/a SDVO
n/a + 1286 1014 (372.8%) better than
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
1605 2880 1275 (79.4%) better than
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
1975 6475 4500 (227.8%) better than
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
n/a 2003 x264 encoding pass 1
n/a 62 x264 encoding pass 2
n/a 12 3DMark06 CPU
n/a 2697 Geekbench 2
n/a 4255 Technology and additional instructions Extended instructions
n/a Intel® AVX Turbo Boost
— — Idle States
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)
Intel’s technology that allows the processor to slow down to its lowest frequency to conserve power when the processor is idle.
Thermal Monitoring
Hyper-Threading
A hardware technology from Intel that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.
AVX
The presence of AVX instructions improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations
applications.RAM parameters RAM types
n/a DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 Allowable memory
The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.
no data 16 GB Number of memory channels
n/a 2 Virtualization technologies EPT
VT-d
Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.
Integrated graphics Maximum GPU frequency
n/a 1.10 GHz Maximum number of monitors
n/a 2 Clear Video HD
Video core
The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card.
- GPU frequency 500MHz higher?
850MHz vs 350MHz - 10.03% higher PassMark result?
3885 vs 3531 - Has AVX?
- 10.07% higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
4122 vs 3745
- 6.06% higher CPU speed?
2 x 3.5GHz vs 2 x 3.3GHz - 1067MHz higher RAM speed?
2400MHz vs 1333MHz - 30. 9°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 69.1°C - Are 18nm semiconductors smaller?
14nm vs 32nm - 11W below TDP?
54W vs 65W - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2 - 17.4GB/s more memory bandwidth?
38.4GB/s vs 21GB/s - 25.84% higher PassMark score (single)?
2123 vs 1687
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Celeron N3060
Intel Pentium G4560
vs
Intel Core i7-7500U
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
AMD A4-5300
Intel Pentium G4560
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Intel Core i3-2120
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Pentium G4560
VS
9000
INTEL CORE I3-71100
INTEL CORE I3-2100
INTEL CORE I3-71100
INTL VS
Intel Celeron 1007u
Intel Pentium G4560
VS
Intel Pentium Gold G6405
Intel Core i3-2120
VS
Intel Pentel Pentel Pentel Pentel Pentel Pentel Pentel Pentel Pentel Pentel Pentel Pentel Pentel Pentel0003
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i3-2120
VS
Intel Core i3-2100
Intel Pentium G4560
VS
VS
Intel Core 2120
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Pentium G4560
vs
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i3-2120
vs
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Pentium G4560
vs
Intel Celeron N3350
Intel Core i3-2120
VS
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Pentium G4560
VS
Intel Core i5-3450
20000220 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000) Pentium G4560
vs
Intel Core i9-7900X
Price Comparison
User Reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i3-2120
02 User Reviews
03
0. 0 /10
0 reviews of users
Intel Pentium G4560
3 Reviews of users
Intel Pentium G4560
8.3 /10
9000 3 Reviews
Functions
Functions No reviews yet
7.7 /10
3 votes0003
3 Votes
performance
reviews yet not
7.0 /10
3 Votes
Reliability
Reviews yet there are no
/10
3 VOTES
Energy effectiveness
Energy effectiveness
No reviews yet
10.0 /10
3 votes
Performance
1.cpu speed
2 x 3.3GHz0003
2 x 3.5GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Pentium G4560
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8. core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1333MHz
2400MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
21GB/s
38.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3rd DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4. Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports Memory Error Code
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Pentium G4560
Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
The Blender (classroom) test measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i3-2120
✔Intel Pentium G4560
processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✔Intel Pentium G4560
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Pentium G4560
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Pentium G4560
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i3-2120
✔Intel Pentium G4560
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-2120
✖Intel Pentium G4560
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM) technology .
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-2120)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
This page is currently only available in English.
Intel Pentium N4200 vs Core i3 1005G1: 9 performance comparison0001
VS
Intel Pentium N4200
Intel Core i3 1005G1
Which is better: 4-core Intel Pentium N4200 at 1.1 GHz or Core i3 1005G1 with 2 cores at 1.2 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these notebook processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Pentium N4200
18
Core i3 1005g1
55
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nucleus 9000 9000
Pentium N423 Pentium N423
Core i3 1005G1
13
Energy efficiency
Efficiency of energy consumption by chip
Pentium N4200
58
Core i3 1005g1
71
Rating NanoreView
Pentium N4200
Key differences
What are the main differences between 1005G1 and N4200
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium N4200
- 60% lower than Core i3 1005G1 peak power consumption — 6 vs 15 Watts
- Has 2 more physical cores
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3 1005G1
- Supports up to 64 GB DDR4-3200
- 3. 1 times faster in Geekbench v5 single-core test — 1028 and 337 points
- Launched 2 years and 11 months later than standard 9029 PCI Express — 3.0
- More modern process technology — 10 vs. 14 nanometers
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Pentium N4200
306
Core i3 1005G1
+259%1099
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Pentium N4200
967
Core i3 1005G1
+152%2440
Passmark CPU (single core)
Pentium N4200
852
Core i3 1005G1
+164%2249
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Pentium N4200
2123
Core i3 1005G1
+142%5144
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Pentium N4200
335
Core i3 1005G1
+204%1018
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Pentium N4200
1145
Core i3 1005G1
+93%2210
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications of Intel Pentium N4200 and Core i3 1005G1
General information
Manufacturer Intel Intel Release date August 30, 2016 August 1, 2019 Type For laptop For laptop Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64 Codename Apollo Lake Ice Lake Model number N4200 i3-1005G1 Socket BGA-1296 BGA-1526 Integrated graphics HD Graphics 505 UHD Graphics G1 Performance
Cores 4 2 Number of threads 4 4 Frequency 1. 1 GHz 1.2 GHz Max. frequency in Turbo Boost — 3.4 GHz Multiplier — 12x Bus speed — 4 GT/s Level 1 cache 96KB (per core) 96KB (per core) Level 2 cache 2MB (per core) 512KB (per core) Level 3 cache — 4MB (shared) Unlocked multiplier No No Power consumption
Process technology 14 nanometers 10 nanometers Power consumption (TDP) 6 W 15 W Critical temperature 105°C 100°C Integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 505 Intel UHD Graphics G1 GPU frequency 250 MHz 300 MHz Boost GPU frequency 750 MHz 900 MHz Shader blocks 144 256 TMUs 18 32 ROPs 3 4 Computer units 18 — TGP 10W 15 W Max. resolution 3840×2160 — 30Hz 5120×3200 — 60 Hz Igpu Flops
Pentium N4200
0.23 teraflops
Core i3 1005g1
N/D
memory
DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 Max. size 8 GB 64 GB Number of channels 2 2 Max. bandwidth 38.4 GB/s — ECC support No No Other
Official site Site Intel Pentium N4200 Site Intel Core i3 1005G1 PCI Express Version 2.0 3.0 Max. PCI Express lanes 6 — Extended instructions — SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2, AVX-512 Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Pentium N4200
3 (25%)
Core i3 1005G1
9 (75%)
Total votes: 12
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i5 5200U vs Pentium N42002.
Intel Core i3 6006U vs. Pentium N42003.
Intel Core i5 1135G7 vs i3 1005G14.
Intel Core i3 1115G4 vs i3 1005G15.
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U vs Intel Core i3 1005G16.
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 vs Core i3 1005G17.
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 vs. Core i3 1005G18.
Intel Celeron N4020 vs. Core i3 1005G19.
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 vs Core i3 1005G1What will you choose: Intel Core i3 1005G1 or Pentium N4200?
Name
Message
Which processor is better for an Intel Core i3 or Intel Pentium laptop: TOP 5 options
Contents
- 1 Pentium N5000 and Nvidia MX110
- 1.4 Intel Core M3-8100Y
- 1.5 Intel Core i3-8130U
- 1. 6 video-comparison Core i3 8130U with 7130U, 7100U and 6006U with a discrete video card GeForce MX150
- 1.7 Intel Core i3-8145U
- 2 Which processor in the laptop to choose: options for configurations
- 2.1 for study and subsequent work 900 900 900 2.2 For entertainment
- 2.3 For work and play
- 3 About Intel
- 4 The main characteristics by which the processor
- is chosen 5 Results
- 6 Voting: the best Intel processors
-
- 6.0.1 Intel Core i3-8145U
- 6.0.2 Intel Core i3-8130U
- 6.0.3 Intel Core M3100Y
- 6.0.4 Intel Pentel Pentium N4200 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 900
- 6.0.0.5ET
Top Intel
Photo Title Rank Price #1 Intel Core i3-8145U ⭐ 5 / 5 17 — votes
Ask for a price #2 Intel Core i3-8130U ⭐ 4. 95 / 5 10 — votes
Ask for a price #3 Intel Core M3-8100Y ⭐ 4.8 / 5 3 — votes
Ask for a price #4 Intel Pentium N5000 ⭐ 4.65 / 5 10 — votes
Ask for a price #5 Intel Pentium N4200 ⭐ 4.6 / 5 3 — votes
Ask for a price Which Intel processor would you choose or recommend?
Take the survey
Intel Pentium N4200
ASUS X541NA laptop with Intel Pentium N4200
The N4200 model of the Pentium series opens the rating, which is a quad-core processor with four threads installed in low-cost laptops. The chip operates at a clock frequency of 1.1-2.5 GHz, and it is built on the Apollo Lake platform.
The predecessor — N3700 — was built on a different platform — Braswell, but both processors are manufactured according to the same process technology — 14 nm.
Integrated HD Graphics 505 operates at clock speeds up to 750 MHz. In terms of performance, the 505th is similar to the HD Graphics 5300, which is enough to run older games smoothly. In addition, there is support for DirectX 12.
The RAM controller supported by the processor belongs to the DDR3L series.
The
Apollo Lake has been completely redesigned, primarily in terms of design. This will increase the CPU performance by approximately 30% compared to Braswell-based processors. This allows this model to fully compete with the AMD A8-7410.
The TDP of the chip is 6 W, which indicates its very low heat dissipation. This allows you to install it in thin netbooks and ultrabooks, where there can be not only active, but even passive cooling.
This model offers the potential user a fairly good performance, with which office applications and the browser, as well as undemanding games, will work better. True, with this processor it will not be possible to engage in video editing or play online games.
Pros
- Thin manufacturing process (14 nm).
- Low power consumption (only 6 W).
- AES-NI technology that improves the performance of the ransomware.
- Lower cost.
- Good for work tasks.
Cons
- Not suitable for games, except for old ones.
ASUS X541NAIntel Pentium N5000
Lenovo 330-15IGM laptop with Intel Pentium N5000
Next is another quad-core model from the Pentium series — the older model for the N4200. It operates at a clock frequency of 1.1-2.7 GHz, and is built on an even fresher platform than the N4200 — Gemini Lake. The technical process, however, remained the same, but for laptops it is enough in full.
There are many differences from processors on Apollo Lake. For example, point improvements in processor cores, a doubled second-level cache and an integrated, albeit partially, Wi-Fi chip. In addition, there is some support for DDR4 and DirectX 12.
The performance of the Pentium N5000 is quite good. The clock speed is increased by 200 MHz compared to the N4200, which makes office and other light tasks, such as writing text, leisurely Internet surfing and watching videos, a little faster.
The UHD Graphics 605 integrated graphics core is on par with the HD Graphics 5300 (Apollo Lake) in terms of power and performance and slightly outperforms the HD Graphics 505 (previously mentioned in the N4200 description).
As is already clear, the TDP of the chip has not changed, just as the technical process has not changed, which once again affects this parameter. Like the N4200, this model has a TDP of 6 W, which is more than enough for laptops with passive cooling.
Notebooks based on this processor are usually classified as ultra-budget options for study or office work.
Pros
- Thin manufacturing process (14 nm).
- Low power consumption (only 6 W).
- Low cost.
- Suitable for work tasks with a bang.
- Increased clock frequency.
- Improved graphics core.
Cons
- Not suitable for games, except for old ones.
Video — Gaming tests on laptop with Intel Pentium N5000 and Nvidia MX110
Lenovo 330-15IGMIntel Core M3-8100Y
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 12.5″ (2019) with Intel Core M3-8100Y
Bronze goes to a representative of the Core M processor series (m3, m5, m7). The series itself appeared not so long ago — just a couple of years ago.
This series, in principle, will always be aimed at compact and long-lived notebooks, since the main feature of the Core M series of processors is minimal power consumption. That’s what became what Core M is loved for. 10-12 hours without recharging is a really good indicator. Such «resistance» could cause low heat generation — the process does not consume a lot of electricity, and therefore there is nothing for it to warm up. Modest appetite — modest performance. By the way, about her.
14nm dual-core chip based on the Amber Lake generation, clocked at 1.1-3.4GHz. It has a quite good for such a processor integrated graphics core Intel HD Graphics 615 at a clock frequency of up to 950 MHz, as well as a dual-channel memory controller with support for DDR3-1866. This configuration allows you to easily run most games, provided that the graphics settings are set to low.
This model has hardware support for the H. 265/HEVC Main10 decoder (color depth — 10 bits), as well as the VP9 codecprovided by Google.
The TDP of this processor is 5W, but it may vary slightly up or down.
Pros
- Thin manufacturing process (14 nm).
- Low power consumption (only 5 W).
- AES-NI technology that improves the performance of the ransomware.
- Support for VP9 and H.265 video decoders.
- Good for work tasks.
Cons
- Not suitable for games, except for old ones.
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 12.5″ 2019Intel Core i3-8130U
HP Pavilion x360 Notebook with Intel Core i3-8130U
Moving on to silver, the second place goes to the i3-8130U model. This is the youngest model of the eighth generation in the Core i3 line from Intel. This model «pleases» with its two cores and four threads. The clock frequency is 2.2 GHz and can be overclocked up to 3.4 GHz depending on the scenario. A more modern processor, of course, has a large heat dissipation of 15 watts, although more is more common. You can also highlight dual-channel support for RAM up to 32 GB and the presence of a built-in video processor — Intel HD Graphics 620 with a clock speed of up to 1000 MHz. Yes, playing with such a card in modern games will not work, but in older ones it is quite possible.
However, the fact that the processor has two cores does not prevent it from being as powerful as the i7 6000s. In general, this processor is suitable for work, study and web surfing.
Pros
- Thin manufacturing process (14 nm).
- Power consumption is not too high for a modern processor (only 15 W).
- Overclocking to 3.4 GHz.
- A relatively good video card, albeit an integrated one.
- Good for work tasks.
Cons
- Not suitable for new games, except for old ones.
Video-Comparison Core i3 8130U with 7130U, 7100U and 6006U with a discrete video card GeForce MX150
Loading…
Intel Pentium and Core i3: dual-core optimality
After the announcement of the LGA1155 platform, Intel is methodically updating its processor lines. Starting with top-end CPUs, the manufacturer is moving to Sandy Bridge and more affordable solutions — Core i3 and Pentium. The latter are intended for systems of initial and intermediate levels. Models costing «about $ 100» have always been the objects of close attention from users who are used to looking for the best options when completing a system. Often people who choose a processor from this price category approach this issue even more responsibly than those who are willing to pay any price for maximum performance. Let’s see what the new Intel products are capable of in comparison with their predecessors and alternative solutions from the main competitor.
Help
ZMIST
- 1 Core i3
- 2 Pentium
- 3 Acceleration
- 4 Results
Core I3
From a technical point of view, the most important difference of Core i3 from Core i5/i7 chips is that they are based on an initially dual-core crystal, and not a quad-core one with deactivated computing units. That is, no tricky tricks with unlocking will work here, however, Intel chips did not provide such an opportunity before. The area has decreased from 216 to 131 mm2, therefore, there are much more blanks from one silicon wafer, and the cost of their production is lower. Accordingly, Intel has a chance to offer interesting retail prices, continuing to make money even on budget processors.
What changes have taken place in terms of functional equipment? The amount of L1 and L2 cache is identical for all Sandy Bridge models (64 KB and 256 KB per core), but the L3 buffer in Core i3 has decreased in proportion to the number of cores — from 6 to 3 MB. The compact die, made using 32-nanometer technology, allows you to count on good power consumption. The TDP for the second generation Core i3 is 65W, while the predecessors from the Clarkdale family had this parameter in the range of 73W.
3DMark 06 CPU Test Score System power consumption, W PCMark 7 Computation scenario scores Fritz chess Benchmark 4.2, thousand kn/s x264 HD Benchmark 4.0 fps WinRAR 4.0 KB/s CineBench 11.5 points Resident Evil 5, 1920×1080, DX9, medium quality, fps Colin McRae: DiRT 3, 1920×1080, medium quality, fps Far Cry 2, 1920×1080, medium quality, fps Intel HD Graphics 2000 with 6 compute units integrated on-chip. The nominal frequency of the video core is 850 MHz, while during operation it can dynamically increase up to 1.1 GHz. Support for Quick Sync, a powerful video transcoding tool, has been retained. The advantage of the Core i3 is also the Hyper Threading technology, which adds a couple more virtual ones to the two physical cores. In multi-threaded applications, this function sometimes plays a very important role, allowing you to use CPU resources more efficiently. We also note the ability of the processor to execute instructions from the AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) set, which, with the proper degree of optimization, will help speed up floating point calculations, which are actively used in multimedia software.
Alas, Core i3 does not support Turbo Boost, which is to some extent compensated by high standard values. Given the positioning of the CPUs of this family, there are also no AES encryption instructions here.
The current line of processors consists of four models. The younger Core i3-2100 with a clock speed of 3.1 GHz is offered for $117. The Core i3-2120 runs at 3.3GHz and costs $20 more. Intel also provided an economical version of the i3-2100T with a TDP of 35W. As a rule, it is possible to reduce the power consumption of the CPU by reducing the operating clock frequency and supply voltage. Motherboards that allow the user to downclock themselves and lower the voltage below the recommended values often achieve similar results. But in the event that this is not possible, the purchase of energy-efficient models will be justified. Core i3-2100T operates at 2.5 GHz, and the frequency of the graphics unit is reduced from 850 to 650 MHz, while it can dynamically increase to 1.1 GHz.
Chips with reduced power consumption will be in demand for systems with compact packages that have a small volume and, accordingly, limited options for choosing a cooling system.
Core i3-2105 stands apart in the series. This model has identical clock speeds with the i3-2100, but differs from other devices in the family by using more powerful graphics Intel HD Graphics 3000. Returning to the topology of the crystal, we note that the graphics component occupies a significant part of it — about a quarter. In turn, the lion’s share of space is given to computing units. Therefore, taking into account the fact that most budget models will have HD Graphics 2000 with 6 blocks, not 12, Intel developers rightly considered that the banal deactivation of half of the computers is not a very rational solution. Therefore, from a technological point of view, it turned out to be more profitable to have two designs of dual-core crystals. The version with more powerful graphics has a slightly larger area (149mm2), but in terms of power consumption, it also fits into 65 watts. As we saw earlier, the performance of HD Graphics 2000 and 3000 is noticeably different: depending on the tasks, the latter turns out to be 1.5-2 times faster, while seriously competing with budget discrete video cards. Paying $14 extra for the faster graphics upgrade makes sense if you’re determined to use integrated video and the HD Graphics 2000’s capabilities seem inadequate for the intended tasks.
Unlike mobile solutions, where even dual-core processors can be offered under the Core i7 brand, among desktop Core models with the Sandy Bridge architecture, there is currently a fairly clear segmentation by the number of computing units (physical and virtual): Core i7 — 4 cores and Hyper Threading, Core i5 — 4 cores without HT, Core i3 — 2 cores and Hyper Threading.
Pentium
If we move down the current Intel processor differentiation scale, Pentium chips follow Core i3. With the advent of the Core architecture, it’s no exaggeration to say that the legendary brand has been used to denote fairly affordable CPUs with a traditionally good price/performance ratio. The modernization of this line has been asking for a long time. Recently, models for the still relevant LGA775 platform have not been easy to hold back the onslaught of inexpensive solutions from AMD, especially to compete on equal terms with the tri-core Athlon II X3, which at a similar price often offered higher performance. Pentiums on the Clarkdale core for the LGA1156 connector have not received significant distribution. The market situation at the time of the release of this platform was such that it was primarily positioned by Intel as a solution for mid-range and high-end systems. Therefore, even after expanding the initial range of processors, the minimum cost of an entrance ticket here remained quite high. Retail price of the most affordable Pentium G6950 is about $100, which is expensive for an entry-level PC. It is easy to assume that Pentium for LGA1156, combining two crystals (CPU and GPU), has a higher cost. Therefore, it is quite difficult to seriously reduce the price of these processors. In addition, in this case we are talking about budget chips of mass production. And boards cheaper than $80-90 for LGA1156 actually appeared only after Sandy Bridge was announced.
The updated Pentium modifications are the result of a simple simplification of the dual-core chips used for the Core i3. First of all, Pentiums lost Hyper Threading technology, as well as the ability to execute AVX instructions. However, the amount of cache memory is identical to those for the Core i3. The new chips of the Pentium family also use Intel HD Graphics 2000 graphics, although with a number of restrictions regarding the support of proprietary technologies. In particular, Quick Sync, Intel Clear Video HD visual enhancement and stereoscopic image output (Intel InTru 3D) do not work here.
At the initial stage, the line includes four models: Pentium G850 (2.9 GHz), G840 (2.8), G620 (2.6 GHz) and G620T (2.2 GHz). As you might guess, the latter refers to economical modifications, the power consumption level of which does not exceed 35 watts. In addition to the clock frequency reduced to 2.2 GHz, like the energy-efficient Core i3-2100T model, it also has the nominal frequency of the graphics core reduced to 650 MHz with a limit value of 1.1 GHz.
As you can see, the new Pentium processors, compared to the Core i3, are mostly lightweight in terms of functionality, while the basic characteristics should provide a decent level of performance. The Sandy Bridge microarchitecture used promises a good increase in performance, which we will try to verify during practical tests. As for the price, in wholesale lots the cost of the CPU family lies in the range of $64-86. The retail price will be somewhat higher, but it is obvious that Pentiums will cost less than not only the Core i3, but also their predecessors with the Clarkdale core.
Updated Pentium models were introduced quite recently — at the end of May. And almost immediately appeared in retail sales in Ukraine. Intel has a good practice of bringing its products to market when they become available to customers either at the same time as the global launch or as soon as possible after.
Specifications for processors
Model Core i3-2120 Core i3-530 Pentium G620/G850 Pentium G6950 Athlon II X3 455 Phenom II X4 955 Codename Sandy Bridge Clarkdale Sandy Bridge Clarkdale Rana Deneb Number of cores (threads), pcs. 2 (4) 2 (4) 2 2 3 4 Clock frequency, GHz 3.3 2.93 2.6/2.9 2.8 3.3 3.2 L3 cache size 3 4 3 3 – 6 Integrated graphics (core clock) Intel HD Graphics
2000 (850/1100)Intel HD
Graphics (733)Intel HD Graphics 2000 (850/1100) Intel HD
Graphics (533)– – Production technology
, nm32 32 + 45 32 32 + 45 45 45 Processor socket LGA 1155 LGA 1156 LGA 1155 LGA 1156 AM3 AM3 Power consumption (TDP), W 65 73 65 73 95 125 MSRP, $ 138 ~105* 64 87 76 117 * According to Hotline. ua catalog Overclocking
Overclocking is quite a popular pastime for many enthusiasts. Someone in this way is trying to increase the performance of the system in the hope of delaying the next upgrade. For some, this is a hobby, a sport, or a way to satisfy idle curiosity by exploring the possibilities and hidden potential of the CPU.
Unfortunately, fans of experimenting with overclocking will be slightly disappointed this time. Taking into account the specifics of the clock generator operation in the new platform and the blocked processor multiplier in the considered chips, it is obvious that the room for maneuver here is seriously limited. Even despite the relatively high multipliers (+100–150 MHz), this is all that can be squeezed out after increasing the carrier bus to 103–106 MHz, at which current motherboards remain stable. Of course, these are not the indicators that we would like to get, especially considering that the older Sandy Bridge models, even in air, often take frequencies of 4500 MHz and higher. Alas, the new Pentium and Core i3 are absolutely not designed for overclocking. You will have to come to terms with this fact and take it into account when buying. At the same time, it is also important not to forget that these chips are noticeably more productive than their predecessors even in normal mode, which can offset the difference in frequencies.
Modifications with unlocked multipliers among Core i3 and Pentium, in our opinion, can not be expected. Models with the K index so beloved by overclockers will be available only in the lines of more expensive Core i5/i7.
Results
As the test results show, the new Intel processors in the middle price category in terms of performance have a noticeable superiority over their predecessors. Under conditions of good multi-threaded optimization of programs, AMD chips with a large number of physical computing units can sometimes show serious resistance. For example, if you look at the performance of the Athlon II X3 455 and Pentium G620, which are now offered at about the same price, then a three-core CPU has a certain advantage in applications where calculations can be performed in parallel. Even despite the fact that the core performance in terms of megahertz in AMD products with the K10.5 architecture is noticeably lower than in Intel chips based on Sandy Bridge, brute force is often quite effective in such software, although this is achieved by increasing energy costs by a factor of 1.5. However, we must admit that this is an ideal case when all processor cores are used as efficiently as possible. In real applications, this is, alas, not often. In games, the unconditional superiority of the new Intel solutions. As we could see earlier, the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture perfectly copes with such loads, and the gap between both its predecessors and competitor models is maximum here.
The new Pentiums are on average 20% more productive than the LGA1156 CPUs of the same name and compete almost equally with the Core i3 based on the Clarkdale core, which are noticeably more expensive. The simplification of the functional part of these chips did not affect their performance too much. Therefore, these models can be recommended for creating universal systems and entry-level gaming platforms. In turn, the second-generation Core i3 also noticeably accelerated. Of course, it is difficult to compete with the quad-core Core i5, but high clock speeds and support for Hyper Threading technology allow them to demonstrate very good results, including in applications with multi-threaded optimization. Well, in games, they sometimes look preferable to the quad-core AMD Phenom II X4. Given that these processors have retained the functionality of older models, they may be of interest for creating both mid-range gaming PCs and powerful multimedia systems.
This time, Intel has done everything to make the LGA1155 platform truly universal. The existing infrastructure allows you to create both a top-end system and an inexpensive entry-level PC. For powerful configurations on the market, motherboards based on Intel Z68 and P67 chipsets are enough, and for the most affordable solutions, models based on Intel H61 can be used. The Intel processor line now looks very even. There are no distortions or obvious competition between solutions of different families. So far, one brick is missing — the most affordable CPU models. Celeron is also scheduled to move to 32nm process rails and progressive microarchitecture soon. Presumably, these chips will appear in the third quarter of this year, at the same time the range of other lines on Sandy Bridge will be expanded.
Test bench configuration Motherboards ASUS P8P67, ASUS P7P55D Premium,
ASRock 890GX Extreme4 R2.0RAM Kingston HyperX Genesis KHX2133C9AD3X2K2/4GX Video card Inno3D GTX560 Ti iChill HDD WD WD1001FALS 1TB Power supply be Quiet! Dark Power Pro 1000W Products provided by ASUS MTI, www.