Intel Celeron N4000 Lower-End Laptop Processor – Laptop Processors
The Intel Celeron N4000 is a lower-end processor you can find in affordable laptop PCs. As a basic CPU, it has only two cores with a single computing thread per core. On the positive side, the Celeron N4000 has a decently high maximum clock speed of 2.6 GHz, an unusually large 4 MB cache for the budget processor category (as opposed to more common 1 MB or 2 MB), and a power-efficient design with a power consumption of 6 Watts. Furthermore, thanks to its good thermal characteristics the N4000 enables fully fan-less and totally quiet designs of notebooks with it.
Intel Celeron N4000 Benchmark
The Intel Celeron N4000 benchmark results indicate the chip is among slower notebook CPUs. Nevertheless, it is a decent solution for non-demanding day-to-day tasks. It’s suitable for light web browsing with a couple of browser tabs opened simultaneously, work in Microsoft Office programs, movie watching, or web conferencing. For heavier duties like video editing, notebooks with mid-range and high-end CPUs like the Intel Core i-series are recommended. But, these aren’t as cheap as the Celeron N4000-equipped laptops and they must use cooling fans.
The Intel UHD 600 graphics which is embedded in the N4000 is a very basic graphics processor. So, laptops with the Celeron N4000 / UHD 600 can run only the most basic PC games.
Note: The benchmark scores of the listed processors are averages measured across various devices with these processors. The scores and real-world performance of the Intel Celeron N4000 and compared CPUs may vary depending on the notebooks’ other components, settings, cooling, and other factors. However, the benchmark results are good indicators of the processors’ performance.
Below you can read and submit user reviews, questions, and answers about the processor. Thank you for your contribution.
Current rating: 4.25 out of 5 stars
×
Email address *
Please CLICK HERE to provide e-mail for receiving notifications when there are new replies
(The e-mail won’t be used for any other purposes.
)
Leave a Review
Ask a Question
Leave a Review
Please select stars to rate this itemPerfect Good Average Mediocre Poor
Title (optional)
Attach a photo or videoPhoto Video
Enter a URL (optional)
Choose a file
Name *
Email *
Ask a Question
Attach a photo or videoPhoto Video
Enter a URL (optional)
Choose a file
Name *
Email *
Intel Celeron N4000 vs N4100 vs N4120: What’s the difference?
Skip to main content
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Here’s how it works.
(Image credit: Shutterstock)
Audio player loading…
Celeron CPUs have been part and parcel of Intel’s processor family for more than two decades. They’ve played a vital role in the company’s product mix, despite not getting the sort of press coverage as its flagship CPU family, the Core series.
That’s partly due to the fact you can’t actually buy most Celeron models today.
A fair chunk are either sold as part of a motherboard (e.g. this Seeed motherboard ) or as part of a complete system — most likely a tablet or a laptop.
- We’ve built a list of the best mobile workstations on the market
- Check out our list of the best business computers right now
- Here’s our list of the best workstations available
Intel Celeron N4000 vs Celeron N4100
The N4000 is arguably one of the most sought after Intel processors. It was launched alongside the N4100 towards the end of 2017, nearly three years ago.
Both are Gemini Lake parts and built on a 14nm manufacturing process.
That’s not where the similarities end; they have a base speed of 1.1GHz, 4MB cache, a TDP of 6W, support up to 8GB of DDR4/LPDDR4 memory in dual channel mode, run an Intel UHD graphics subsystem with a base frequency of 200MHz and can drive up to three 4K displays.
The biggest difference is in the number of cores. The N4000 has two cores and two threads, while the N4100 has four cores and four threads. The latter also has a slightly lower boost frequency (2.4GHz vs 2.6GHz) and a slightly higher graphics burst frequency (700MHz vs 650MHz).
What this means is that the Celeron N4000 ends up being significantly slower than the N4100, not so much on single thread performance but more because it has half the number of physical cores.
Passmark numbers show that it is about 40% slower than the N4100. Even worse, is it hardly even competes with older processors, such as the Celeron N3450.
What about the Celeron N4120?
Although the N4120 was launched towards the end of last year, it bears a strong resemblance to its predecessors.
Based on the Gemini Lake refresh, it shares many common qualities with the N4100, except for a slightly higher boost frequency (2.6GHz vs 2.5GHz).
That should, in theory, give it a slim advantage when benchmarked. However, this hasn’t been demonstrated just yet, partly because it’s a new processor and not many systems have been tested with this CPU at the helm.
In conclusion, it’s best to avoid computers, tablets and laptops based on the N4000 and opt for those with either the N4100 or the N4120. These two are within touching distance of a 7th generation Intel Core i3 processor, which is to say they are quite nippy indeed when paired with an SSD and plenty of memory.
- Here’s our list of the best business laptops out there
Sign up to theTechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors
Désiré has been musing and writing about technology during a career spanning four decades.
He dabbled in website builders and web hosting when DHTML and frames were in vogue and started narrating about the impact of technology on society just before the start of the Y2K hysteria at the turn of the last millennium.
TechRadar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site .
©
Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street,
New York,
NY 10036.
Intel Core i3 1005G1 vs Celeron N4000:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i3 1005G1
Intel Celeron N4000
Which is better: Intel Core i3 1005G1 at 1.2 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 3.4) or Celeron N4000 at 1.1 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 0.0)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 2-core laptop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i3 1005g1
48
Celeron N4000
20,0003
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003
Core i3 1005g1
11
Celeron N4000
3
Energy efficiency
Energy Effect CHIP
Core i3 1005g1
64
Celeron
Demeter Core i3 1005G1
36
Celeron N4000
18
Key differences
What are the main differences between N4000 and 1005G1
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3 1005G1
- Supports up to 64 GB DDR4-3200
- 2.
4x faster in single core Geekbench v5 – 1028 and 421 points - 1 year 80 months later than standard0 PCI Express — 3.0
- More modern process technology — 10 vs. 14 nanometers
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i3 1005G1
+155%
1106
Celeron N4000
434
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i3 1005G1
+243%
2463
Celeron N4000
718
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i3 1005G1
+112%
2224
Celeron N4000
1047
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i3 1005G1
+257%
5067
Celeron N4000
1421
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i3 1005G1
+145%
1031
Celeron N4000
421
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i3 1005G1
+183%
2217
Celeron N4000
784
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full specifications of Intel Core i3 1005G1 and Celeron N4000
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | August 1, 2019 | December 11, 2017 |
| Type | For laptop | For laptop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Ice Lake | — |
| Model number | i3-1005G1 | N4000 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics G1 | UHD Graphics 600 |
Processor
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| threads | 4 | 2 |
| Frequency | 1. 2 GHz |
1.1 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 3.4 GHz | — |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Multiplier | 12x | — |
| Bus speed | 4 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 48KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 512KB (per core) | 4MB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 4MB (shared) | — |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Socket | BGA-1526 | BGA-1090 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15W | 6W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics G1 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| GPU frequency | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Shader blocks | 256 | 96 |
| TMUs | 32 | 12 |
| ROPs | 4 | 2 |
| Computer units | — | 12 |
| TGP | 15W | 5W |
Max. resolution |
5120×3200 — 60Hz | 3840×2160 — 30Hz |
Igpu Flops
Core i3 1005g1
N/D
Celeron N4000
0.14 Teraflops
Memory Support
| Memory type | Memorial type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400 | |
| Max. size | 64 GB | 8 GB | ||
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 | ||
| Max. bandwidth | — | 35.76 GB/s | ||
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i3 1005G1 | Site Intel Celeron N4000 |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | — | 6 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2, AVX-512 |
SSE4.2 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i3 1005G1
10 (55.6%)
Celeron N4000
8 (44.4%)
Total votes: 18
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i3 1115G4 or Intel Core i3 1005G1
2.
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 or Intel Core i3 1005G1
3.
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 or Intel Core i3 1005G1
4.
Intel Celeron N4020 or Intel Core i3 1005G1
5.
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 or Intel Core i3 1005G1
6.
Intel Celeron N5095 or Intel Core i3 1005G1
7.
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 or Intel Celeron N4000
8.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U or Intel Celeron N4000
9.
Intel Celeron N4120 or Intel Celeron N4000
10.
Intel Celeron N4500 or Intel Celeron N4000
Compare other CPUs (480+)
What will you choose: Intel Celeron N4000 or Core i3 1005G1?
Name
Message
Intel Core i3 1115G4 vs Celeron N4000:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i3 1115G4
Intel Celeron N4000
Which is better: Intel Core i3 1115G4 at 1.7-3.0 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.1) or Celeron N4000 at 1.1 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 0.0)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 2-core laptop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Core i3 1115g4
59
Celeron N4000
20,0003
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei are used
Coreg 23000
Coreg -it
Celeron N4000
3
Power Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Core i3 1115G4
69
Celeron N4000
50
NanoReview Rating
Final Processor Score
Core i3 1115G4
43
Celeron N4000 0 90 9002 18
Key differences
What are the main differences between N4000 and 1115G4
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3 1115G4
- Supports up to 64GB DDR4-3200
- 3 times faster in Geekbench v5 single core test — 1263 and 421 points
- Appeared 2 years and 9 months later than the rival
- New PCI Express standard — 4.
0 - More modern process technology — 10 vs. 14 nanometers
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i3 1115G4
+206%
1329
Celeron N4000
434
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i3 1115G4
+341%
3163
Celeron N4000
718
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i3 1115G4
+157%
2689
Celeron N4000
1047
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i3 1115G4
+337%
6212
Celeron N4000
1421
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i3 1115G4
+201%
1268
Celeron N4000
421
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i3 1115G4
+225%
2551
Celeron N4000
784
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full technical specifications of Intel Core i3 1115G4 and Celeron N4000
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | September 2, 2020 | December 11, 2017 |
| Type | For laptop | For laptop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake | — |
| Model number | i3-1115G4 | N4000 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics Xe G4 | UHD Graphics 600 |
Processor
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| threads | 4 | 2 |
| Frequency | 1. 7-3.0 GHz |
1.1 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.1 GHz | — |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| bus frequency | 100 MHz | — |
| Multiplier | 17-30x | — |
| Bus speed | 4 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 48KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 1280KB (per core) | 4MB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 6MB (shared) | — |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Socket | BGA-1449 | BGA-1090 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-28W | 6W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| GPU frequency | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1250 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Shader blocks | 384 | 96 |
| TMUs | 24 | 12 |
| ROPs | 12 | 2 |
| Computer units | 48 | 12 |
| TGP | 15W | 5W |
Max. resolution |
— | 3840×2160 — 30Hz |
Igpu Flops
Core i3 1115g4
0.84 Teraflops
Celeron N4000
0.14 Teraflops
Memory
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i3 1115G4 | Site Intel Celeron N4000 |
| PCI Express Version | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 6 |
| Extended instructions | — | SSE4.2 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i3 1115G4
2 (100%)
Celeron N4000
0 (0%)
Total votes: 2
Competitors
1.