Intel Xeon E5-2690 vs Intel Xeon E7-4870: What is the difference?
42points
Intel Xeon E5-2690
32points
Intel Xeon E7-4870
Comparison winner
vs
61 facts in comparison
Intel Xeon E5-2690
Intel Xeon E7-4870
Why is Intel Xeon E5-2690 better than Intel Xeon E7-4870?
- 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2 - 1GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.8GHzvs2.8GHz - 11 higher clock multiplier?
29vs18 - 267MHz higher ram speed?
1600MHzvs1333MHz - 1.6GT/s faster bus transfer rate?
8GT/svs6.4GT/s - Has AVX?
Why is Intel Xeon E7-4870 better than Intel Xeon E5-2690?
- 4 more CPU threads?
20vs16 - 50.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
102GB/svs51.2GB/s - 10MB bigger L3 cache?
30MBvs20MB - 0. 56MB bigger L2 cache?
2.56MBvs2MB - 1664GB larger maximum memory amount?
2048GBvs384GB - 330million more transistors?
2600 millionvs2270 million - 0.5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
3MB/corevs2.5MB/core
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Epyc 7742
vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
Intel Xeon Gold 6128
vs
Intel Xeon Silver 4110
Intel Xeon E3-1260L
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1270
Intel Xeon E5-2620
vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6130
AMD Epyc 7763
vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
Intel Xeon Bronze 3106
vs
Intel Xeon Silver 4110
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
Intel Xeon Gold 5218
vs
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R
Intel Xeon Gold 6154
vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160M
AMD Epyc 7501
vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6150
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Xeon E5-2690
1 User reviews
Intel Xeon E5-2690
9. 0/10
1 User reviews
Intel Xeon E7-4870
0 User reviews
Intel Xeon E7-4870
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
9.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
7.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.CPU speed
8 x 2.9GHz
10 x 2.4GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.8GHz
2.8GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
5.L1 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L2 cache
2.56MB
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.26MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
8.clock multiplier
The clock multiplier controls the speed of the CPU.
9.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Xeon E5-2690
✖Intel Xeon E7-4870
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
Memory
1.Supports ECC memory
✔Intel Xeon E5-2690
✔Intel Xeon E7-4870
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
51.2GB/s
102GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.maximum memory amount
2048GB
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
5.RAM speed
1600MHz
1333MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
6.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
7.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2690)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
8.bus transfer rate
6.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
9.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2690)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Xeon E5-2690
✔Intel Xeon E7-4870
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
3.Has AES
✔Intel Xeon E5-2690
✔Intel Xeon E7-4870
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
4.Has AVX
✔Intel Xeon E5-2690
✖Intel Xeon E7-4870
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
5.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2690)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
6.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2690)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
7.Has F16C
✖Intel Xeon E5-2690
✖Intel Xeon E7-4870
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has FMA3
✖Intel Xeon E5-2690
✖Intel Xeon E7-4870
FMA3 is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
9. Has FMA4
✖Intel Xeon E5-2690
✖Intel Xeon E7-4870
FMA4 is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Benchmarks
1.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2690)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
2.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2690)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2690)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2690)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
5.PassMark result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
6.PassMark result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
7.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
8.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2690)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2690)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E7-4870)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best Enterprise CPUs?
Intel Melds Xeon E5 And E7 With Skylake
We have been saying for the past two year that the impending “Skylake” Xeon processors represented the biggest platform architectural change in the Xeon processor business at Intel since the transformational “Nehalem” Xeon 5500s that debuted back in March 2009 into the gaping maw of the Great Recession.
There is no global recession breathing down the IT sector’s neck like a hungry wolf here in 2017, eight years and seven chip generations later. But Intel is facing competitive pressures from AMD’s Naples Opterons, IBM’s Power9, and the ARM collective (mainly Cavium and Qualcomm at this point, but Applied Micro is still in there), and it is also trying to stretch the Xeon’s across more diverse customers and workloads, and that means the Skylakes warranted something more than just coming out with new cores coming in a refined 14 nanometer process and slapping the Xeon E5 and E7 labels on them. As it turns out, the Skylake Xeons will make a break with the past and change in the way that CPUs – and sometimes adjacent accelerators for compute and network – will be engineered and sold.
The Wall Between DP And MP Comes Down
For as long as Intel has been peddling processors for the datacenter, it has chips aimed at different segments of the market, starting with the “Foster” generation of Xeons back in 2001, which came in DP variants for two-socket servers and MP variants aimed at four-socket boxes. Intel sold processors for two-socket machines before then, but allowing greater SMP scalability required different chipsets (often done by third party chipset makers but also by Intel) and changes to the cache structure on the die as well as different ratios of cores, cache and main memory, and peripheral I/O as these were all scaled up by Moore’s Law manufacturing advances.
In the mid-2000s, Intel broke the server processor line into three chunks, with the Xeon 3000 series being aimed at single socket machines, the Xeon 5000s being aimed at machines with two sockets, and the Xeon 7000s for machines that had four sockets and sometimes more with the help of third party chipsets. These divisions more or less correspond to the current Xeon E3, E5, and E7 categories that Intel has used since the Nehalem days but which became a regular, predictable pattern starting with the “Sandy Bridge” Xeon processors. Sometimes Intel offered versions of the E7 that scaled down to two sockets as well as to four or eight sockets or E5s that scaled up to four sockets to address specific needs – the latter for a cheap, dense virtualization and database engine. But generally, this pattern has held. Intel has then offered specific tweaks within the E5 and E7 groups that had fewer cores and higher clock speeds or more cores and lower clock speeds than the standard parts, and indeed, within the latest several generations of the E5 there are multiple distinct chips. With the “Broadwell” generation for instance, there are three different E5 chips that top out at 10, 15, or 24 cores on the dies as well as a single E7 chip with a maximum of 24 cores; the E7s are more ruggedized and have memory subsystems that have buffer chips on them to support large main memory and high bandwidth.
With the Skylakes Xeons, Intel is doing one important thing that will make life easier for both server makers and their customers, and it is something we told you about two years ago. And that is that it is moving from two distinct motherboard sockets – the Socket R3 aimed at dual-processor Haswell and Broadwell Xeon E5s and the Socket R1 aimed at the Haswell and Broadwell Xeon E7s – to a single Socket P that will be used by all of the Skylake Xeons that might otherwise have been given the Xeon E5 and E7 brands. By moving to a single socket design, motherboard makers will be able to design fewer motherboards to support what we presume will be a more diverse set of processors, and this should cut costs for all parties – from motherboard makers to system sellers to end user customers.
This converged Xeon E5 and Xeon E7 platform, as we have discussed in the past, is code-named “Purley” by Intel, and it will scale from two sockets up through four and on to eight without requiring any external chipsets from third parties. (It is not clear if third parties will make chipsets to scale out Skylake Xeons beyond eight sockets, but rest assured we will find out.) From what we know, the Skylake Xeons will top out at 28 cores, and as best we can figure, this is what the top bin part will look like:
Starting with the Skylake Xeons, which will be called the Xeon Processor Scalable Family, there will be four distinct flavors of Xeon processors, and the chip maker is going Olympic and then some on its naming conventions:
It would be tempting to think that these four different categories – Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum – will roughly correspond to the three different Xeon E5 variations – Low Core Count, Middle Core Count, and High Core Count as they are called internally – and one Xeon E7 variant that we have seen in the past. Intel is not saying precisely what features will be on what metallic level of the Skylake Xeons, but what we know for sure is that the Skylake cores in this Xeon Scalable family will support larger on-chip L1 and L2 caches per core as well as the normal bump in L3 cache size that comes with a redesign. Lisa Spelman, general manager of the Xeon Products and Datacenter Marketing Group at Intel, tells The Next Platform that the Xeon E3, which was upgraded to the Skylake cores more than a year ago and which was just recently upgraded to the Kaby Lake cores, and the Xeon-D system on chip that was created for hyperscalers that is an amalgam of sorts between a Xeon E3 and Xeon E5 chip, will remain distinct from this converged Xeon E5 and E7 family. As far as we know, there will be no formal single-socket version of these Skylake Xeons, but there will be nothing that will prevent a motherboard maker from creating a single socket board if they want to sell it.
Spelman also confirmed that the entire Skylake family – meaning all four variants of what is called the Skylake-SP to distinguish it from the Skylake-H used in the Xeon E3 v5 family – would launch at the same time, and that there would not be a staggered rollout as we have seen in the past, with the two-socket Xeon E5s coming first, followed by the Xeon E7s, and then the four-socket Xeon E5s. This is good for a number of reasons. For one, server makers and buyers will be able to select the systems that meet their very precise needs right then, and not have to guess what might be coming down the pike in the rest of the family. This will also help Intel get on an annual cadence for both processor generations and process iterations, something that the company has said it wants to do and something that is necessary if the Xeon server chips will move to the front of the process line, as is the plan starting with the 7 nanometer manufacturing ramp.
Intel has a lot of different toggles it can switch on and off within this Skylake-SP processor family to generate a wide and deep SKU stack, and we expect it to do just that. Intel can ramp the cores up and down and turn HyperThreading on and off as it has done in the past. As far as we know, each Skylake-SP chip has six channels of DDR4 memory per socket, with registered and load-reduced DIMMs as options. The processor will support 2. 67 GHz memory with one DIMM per channel and 2.13 GHz or 2.4 GHz at two DIMMs per channel; three DIMMs per channel, which was supported on the prior “Grantley” server platform based on the Haswell Xeon E5 v3 and the Broadwell Xeon E5 v4 processors, is not available on the Purley. Intel could distinguish the Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum processors in the Skylake-SP Xeon family by memory speed as well as the number of DIMMs supported. The Bronze entry performance chips could have support only for slower memory, and less of it, while the Platinum versions aimed at high performance could have the fastest memory and more of it. It is not clear if Intel is keeping the buffered memory that has been part of the Xeon E7 architecture but not in the Xeon E7. Spelman did not reveal Intel’s plan here. This is an annoyance to add to the server platform, but it does allow for main memory to scale up on large four-socket and eight-socket NUMA machines. What is clear from what Intel has said is that the Skylake Gold processors will have fast memory, more interconnect and accelerator engines, while the Skylake Platinums will have the highest performance (by which Intel no doubt means throughput) as well as hardware enhanced security.
Our guess is that there might be three different versions of the Skylake-SP chips, roughly corresponding to the Xeon E5 LCC, MCC, and HCC variants and that Intel has actually collapsed the Xeon E5 HCC and Xeon E7 capabilities into the Skylake Platinum variant. The Gold and Platinum chips are distinguished by which features are turned on and off with the Skylake die and the broader Purley platform.
For instance, it is not a foregone conclusion that the AVX-512 vector instructions, which made their debut with the “Knights Landing” Xeon Phi processor last year and which doubles the floating point performance of each core, will be included on all variants of the Skylake-SP chips. That said, machine learning inference is still largely done on CPUs, not GPUs or FPGAs, and this will be important for the hyperscalers as well as for the HPC crowd. Some variants will have integrated Omni-Path network controllers or FPGA accelerators (over time), for instance; all will have integrated 10 Gb/sec Ethernet controllers. It looks like the top-bin Platinum parts will have integrated QuickAssist encryption and decryption engines.
In general, there is a rough correlation in socket count with the different Skylake-SP variants, too. The Bronze level has two-sockets, and Spelman says this might be used in a storage controller or as a Web server, while the four socket and above machines will be based on the Platinum variant. Intel is moving to a technology it calls UltraPath Interconnect, or UPI, with the Skylakes, which is an upgraded version of the QuickPath Interconnect that links sockets to each other in a NUMA shared memory setup that made its initial debut back with the Nehalem Xeons in 2009.
As far as we know, each Skylake-SP chip will have two or three UPI channels, running at 9.6 GT/sec (same as the top end Broadwells) or a faster 10.4 GT/sec. You burn two channels to make a tightly coupled two-socket NUMA system or to make a slightly less tightly coupled four-socket server and you burn three channels to make a tightly coupled four-socket box or a slightly less tightly coupled eight-socket machine.
If the design has not changed, then each Skylake-SP has a pair of PCI-Express controllers that together have 48 lanes, and two years ago, this was supposed to be at PCI-Express 3.0 speeds but Intel may have pushed to get PCI-Express 4.0 speeds in here. Intel could crimp some of the lanes on the lower-end Skylake-SP chips to encourage those with more peripheral expansion to move up the stack. We shall see.
The Purley platform will build out from here with flash and Optane 3D XPoint memory as well as external FPGA and Nervana neural networking co-processors, and the Xeon Phi is thrown in for good measure, too.
It will be interesting to see if the aggregate SKU count goes up, down, or sideways by moving to this new way of packaging Xeon chips for the core datacenter workloads. In the past, Intel has dozens of SKUs that it sells into the broad market, plus additional custom SKUs that it does for hyperscalers, database makers, and HPC shops that need some further optimization to minimize their total cost of ownership.
“We took this opportunity to be thoughtful about our SKUs,” says Spelman. “We don’t want a never-ending explosion of SKUs. We are always looking at what is being accepted by the market and then cull the line. But when you do start to add in new integrations, like Omni-Path, those are net new SKUs even if you have managed down the rest of the product line. So don’t expect to see a dramatic difference, but don’t expect to see an explosion.”
There will still be custom variants that do not end up on the official price list, by the way, because Intel still wants to not leave this engineering and money on the table.
Sign up to our Newsletter
Featuring highlights, analysis, and stories from the week directly from us to your inbox with nothing in between.
Subscribe now
Difference Between Xeon E5 and E7 Processor: Which One to Choose?
Intel E5 and E7 processors are costly and demand a comprehensive analysis before choosing one of them to buy. So, today I will talk about the significant differences between E5 and E7 processors.
E5 processors can run on single, dual, or even quad sockets. In comparison, E7 processors can run on a quad and Octo sockets. E5 processors support AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions), and E7 processors support SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions). Remember, E5 doesn’t support SSE, and E7 doesn’t support AVX.
Would you like to know about the differences in detail? Then be my guest through the end of the article. So, shall we begin?
Quick Navigation
What are E5 and E7 Processors?
E5 is one of Intels’ Xeon processors mainly built for server management. It has ×86 microprocessors and supports multi-socket configuration. Intel E5 Xeon processors have 4 to 22 cores on different variants with CMOS technology.
Intel E5 Xeon processors consist of 3,200,000,000~7,000,000,000 transistors. E5 can operate at 1.7GHz~3.6GHz. The whole E5 series is built on Broadwell microarchitectural pattern. E5 has 16MB~50MB of cache size.
Until 2016, before the release of Intel Platinum, E7 used to be the most premium Xeon processor. Like E5, E7 has ×86 microprocessors. E7 supports up to Octo socket sockets configuration. E7 performs at 1.9GHz~2.9GHz with 3,200,000,000~7,000,000,000 transistors.
E7 processors have 24MB~60MB of smart cache and build on Broadwell microarchitectural pattern. Now that you know about E5 and E7 processors specification, let’s talk about their jurisdiction.
Intel has designed E5 and E7 processors to handle large data servers, cloud computing, simulation, and advanced security technology. Not just that, cloud hosting, I/O connectivity, and advanced analytics are the areas of Xeon processors’ expertise.
What are the Differences Between E5 and E7 Processors?
Have you got some ideas about E5 and E7? If so, let’s draw a line between them to compare.
Socket Compatibility
Intel Xeon E5 processors run with single, dual, or quad-socket configurations. On the other hand, E7 processors support single, dual, quad, and even Octo socket configurations. You can select the compatible motherboards to run corresponding E5/E7 processors with these configurations.
Smart Cache Size
With additional cache size, PC tends to operate faster—a lesser cache stores less operating information. So, heavy tasks like data management and simulation require the extra cache to perform smoothly. E5 processors have 16MB~50MB smart cache, and E7 processors have 24~60MB smart cache size.
Core Count
As Xeon processors manage big data, advanced security, or cloud computing, they are built with more cores than consumer processors. E5 processors have 4 to 22 cores in their build. On the contrary, E7 processors have up to 24 cores.
Clock Speed
Xeon processors have a lower clock speed than the “Core i” series. Because Xeon processors have more cores to handle diversified tasks. Core i series has fewer cores. That’s why each core has to perform at its peak.
E5 has a base clock speed of 2.3GHz and can be boosted up to 3.6GHz, with an underclocking speed of 1.7GHz. E7 has a base clock speed of 2.4GHz and 2.9GHz with turbo-boosting. In addition to that, E7 has an underclocking speed of 1.9GHz.
E5 vs E7: Which One Should I Choose?
Unarguably, E7 has better features than E5. But when choosing between them, it’s better to compare the value for money proposition rather than just the features. Well, the choice primarily depends on several factors. Let’s discuss them.
Memory Bandwidth
So, it’s already been discussed that E5 and E7 are for server management. If you want to build B-B business data storage or an extensive data server, E7 is ideal. E7 offers 25% more memory bandwidth than an E5 processor.
E7 supports DDR3-1333 and has a maximum memory bandwidth of 85 GB/s. It does 1600 MT/s and has 8 memory channels. E5 v3 platform has a maximum memory bandwidth of 64 GB/s and supports DDR4-1600.
CPU Performance
If you want to build a B-C business server or advanced security server, E5 will edge out an E7 processor. 2xE5 has 10% better CPU performance than a 1xE7 processor.
But why have I taken 2xE5 processors and one E7? Well, both of the settings have an equal price range. So, it’s better to go for 2xE5 processors than a single E7.
Power Consumption
While building a server, nobody cares for electricity bills, right? But what if you can save extra money by choosing a more power-efficient processor?
E5 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 85 watts. E7 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 130 watts. With more cores, E7 is bound to consume more power.
But, I would not recommend you choose a processor solely based on power consumption. Performance and memory bandwidth should be a priority.
Then again, you would need more than one processor to build an efficient server. So, power consumption may be a secondary priority, but you shouldn’t ignore the fact.
FAQs
Is Xeon E5 better than i7?
If used for cloud computing or extensive analytical research, Xeon E5 is better than i7. But for gaming and video editing, i7 offers a better value for money proposition than Xeon E5.
Is Xeon OK For Gaming?
Yes, Xeon is OK for gaming. But it will be overkill to use a Xeon processor for gaming. Xeon processors are designed and built for extensive data management.
Is Xeon Slower Than i7?
While multitasking, Xeon processors are faster than i7. But for the single or dual threaded tasks, i7 is more rapid than Xeon.
Can Xeon Processors be Used in Desktop?
Yes, Xeon processors can be used on desktops. But as Xeons are built for heavy data management, it is recommended to use them in servers and workstations.
What is Intel Xeon Equivalent to?
In terms of clock speed, Intel Xeon processors are equivalent to i7/i9. But it is entirely wrong to compare Xeon processors and core i series. Because both the lineup have completely different fields of work.
Conclusion
E7 is an automatic pick for heavy data management and cloud computing with a more smart cache size and superior memory bandwidth. But for better CPU performance, 2xE5 is the to go for. Simulation and advanced security setup require better CPU output than memory size. So, make your decision and choose your priority.
I hope my articles have helped you. If you have any further questions, drop them in the comment section.
Xeon E5 vs. Core i7
Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/634
Written on May 15, 2015 by Matt Bach
Share:
Always look at the date when you read a hardware article. Some of the content in this article is most likely out of date, as it was written on May 15, 2015. For newer information, see our more recent articles.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- CPU Specifications
- CPU Features
- Motherboard Compatibility
- Xeon vs. Core i7 Performance
- Conclusion
Introduction
If you take a close look at the certified configurations we offer here at Puget Systems you will find that while we are a high-end custom PC builder, we actually only have a single system (the Deluge XL) that utilizes the Intel Core i7 High End processors. We don’t have any problems with the Core i7 High End CPUs, we simply feel that there is a better option in most situations: the Intel Xeon E5 CPUs.
A number of years ago, we started moving more of our systems over to the Xeon E5 CPUs to the point that all of our Genesis systems (which are designed primarily for content creation) now exclusively use Xeon processors. Every once in a while, we get a customer who asks us why we are using server CPUs instead of the «faster» Core i7 CPUs. This is an understandable question since Intel puts a lot of money into marketing the Core i7 processor lines to consumers, but almost nothing on marketing the Xeon CPUs to that same demographic.
The short of the matter is that — core vs core and frequency vs frequency — Xeon CPUs are just as fast as Core i7 CPUs. There are differences in the product lines that may make either Xeon or Core i7 a better choice for your situation, but if you take a Xeon E5 CPU and a Core i7 CPU that have the same specs the performance in any task will be identical.
In addition to backing up this claim by examining a set of benchmarks, in this article we are also going to go over the differences between Xeon E5 and Core i7 High End CPUs to help you understand when one or the other would be the better choice for your system.
CPU Specifications
To start off, we are going to take a look at the basic specifications of the High End Core i7-5XXX, single socket Xeon E5 v3, and dual socket Xeon E5 v3 CPUs (which can be used as either a single CPU or in a dual CPU configuration). There are other product lines out there (including quad socket Xeon E5, Xeon E7, and low voltage models) but for this article we are going to focus just on the standard CPUs from these three product lines:
Product Line | # of Models | Cores | Base Frequency | Max Boost Frequency | Smart Cache | TDP | ~MSRP |
High End Core i7-5XXX | 3 | 6-8 | 3-3.5 GHz | 3.5-3.7 GHz | 15-20 MB | 140W | $389-$999 |
Single Socket Xeon E5 v3 | 5 | 4-8 | 3-3.7 GHz | 3.5-3.8 GHz | 10-20 MB | 140W | $294-$1,723 |
Dual Socket Xeon E5 v3 | 20 | 4-18 | 1.6-3.5 GHz | 1.6-3.7 GHz | 10-45 MB | 85-160W | $213-$3,888 |
The chart above is a huge simplification of these product lines, but it is much easier to see the main product line differences when it is compressed like this. Alternatively, we have a chart that lists the individual specifications for all 28 CPUs collapsed below the chart. If you want to see all the full specs for each CPU, you can view them at the Intel Ark pages:
- Intel Ark High-end Core i7 Compare
- Intel Ark Xeon E5 Single Socket Compare
- Intel Ark Xeon E5 Dual Socket Compare
The main thing we want to point out here is simply the shear amount of options Xeon E5 CPUs give you. Compared to the three Core i7 CPUs, there are five single socket Xeon E5 v3 and twenty dual socket Xeon E5 v3 CPUs. Where you are limited to either six or eight cores and a frequency range of just 3-3.5GHz with the Core i7 CPUs, you can choose from between four and eighteen cores and a frequency range of 1.6-3.7GHz with the Xeon E5 v3 CPUs.
If you look at the individual models, you will also see that the Core i7 CPU are not even really unique. The i7-5960X has the same specs as the E5-1660 v3 and the i7-5930K has almost the same specs as the E5-1630 v3 (just a . 1GHz lower maximum Turbo Boost). Even price-wise they are not that different. The i7-5930K and E5-1650 v3 have the exact same $593 MSRP and the Core i7-5960X is only about $80 cheaper than the Xeon E5-1660 v3.
Really, the only unique Core i7 CPUs is the i7-5820K — not because it is better, but because it only has 28 PCI-E lanes versus the 40 PCI-E lanes all the other CPUs have.
CPU Features
Looking at just the specifications, it would appear that there is not much that differentiates a Core i7 and Xeon CPU. This is because the main differences are not spec-based, but rather the features found in each product line:
Product Line | Overclocking Support | Max CPUs | Max Memory | ECC RAM Support | VPro | VT-x/VT-d | TXT |
High End Core i7 | Yes | 1 | 64GB | No | No | Yes | No |
Single Socket Xeon E5 v3 | No | 1 | 768 GB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Dual Socket Xeon E5 v3 | No | 2 | 768 GB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Really, the one advantage the Core i7 CPUs have is that they support CPU overclocking. The Xeon CPUs can use twelve times as much memory as the Core i7 CPUs, support ECC RAM, and include support for vPro and TXT. While vPRO and TXT may not be that important for most users, the ability to utilize large amounts of ECC RAM is extremely useful in certain situations.
Motherboard Compatibility
After explaining to a customer how the only advantage of Core i7 CPUs is that they support overclocking, the next question is often: «but what if I don’t want to use a server board?» Many server boards don’t have features like onboard audio, USB 3.0, SLI support, or have more than a handful of USB ports. Luckily, you do not need a server board in order to use a Xeon E5 v3 CPU.
While most desktop boards will not have support for vPro and TXT, we have been able to use Xeon E5 v3 CPUs and registered ECC memory on every ASUS and ASRock X99 board we have tried without few, if any, problems. The eight RAM slots on most X99 boards will limit you to a maximum of 256GB (8x32GB) of RAM instead of the 768GB the Xeon CPUs technically support, but that is the only issue we’ve seen. In fact, we are currently using Xeon E5 v3 CPUs on the ASUS X99 Deluxe motherboard on all of our Genesis I and Genesis I Quiet Edition systems. This lets us have up to 18 cores and 256GB of RAM in a workstation without giving up desktop features like USB 3.0, onboard audio, or WiFi.
The only caveat is that X99 motherboards may not officially list support for Xeon E5 v3 CPUs or registered ECC memory. For example, the Asus X99 Deluxe board we use lists only a handful of Xeon E5 CPUs as being supported, and never mentions anything about registered ECC RAM. We know they work on that board since we have thoroughly tested it, but it is entirely possible another brand or model may use a BIOS that does not allow for Xeon or Registered ECC memory to be used.
Xeon vs. Core i7 Performance
After looking at the specifications and features of Xeon and Core i7 CPUs, it is clear that you can get the same or higher operating frequency and core count from a Xeon CPU. However, even though the Core i7-5XXX and Xeon E5 v3 CPUs use the same architecture we sometimes hear claims that Core i7 CPUs are «optimized for speed» while Xeon CPUs are «optimized for reliability».
The reliability aspect is pretty easy for us to address — we have only had a single Core i7-5XXX CPU fail and no Xeon E5 v3 CPUs fail from the hundreds we have sold so both are extremely reliable. The question of whether Core i7 CPU’s are faster, however, requires a little bit more work. To debunk this myth, we ran a set of benchmarks on a Core i7-5960X and a Xeon E5-1660 v3. These are actually the only Core i7 and Xeon E5 CPU that are completely identical in terms of specifications. Both of these CPUs have 8 cores, 3.0GHz base frequency, 3.3 GHz all core Turbo Boost, and 3.5 GHz maximum turbo boost.
For our test system, we used the following hardware:
Xeon CPUs are typically used with ECC or Reg ECC RAM which is technically slightly slower than standard memory. In order to see if Reg ECC RAM affects performance, we will be testing the Xeon E5-1660 v3 with both standard RAM and Reg ECC RAM. This will allow us to test if — core for core and GHz for GHz — a Core i7 CPU is faster than a Xeon E5 v3 CPU or not.
We are not going to delve too deep into these results since they are pretty straight-forward. There is anywhere from a 0-2% variance in performance across our tests, but which CPU is faster changes from benchmark to benchmark. The funny thing is that the Core i7-5960X was actually not the faster CPU. Most of the time, the E5-1660 v3 was actually a hair faster (although the difference is arguably within the margin of error for these kinds of benchmarks).
If you average out all these results, the E5-1660 v3 with standard RAM was overall the fastest, followed by the i7-5960X with about a .25% performance drop. Lastly, the E5-1660 v3 with Reg ECC memory was about .4% slower than the E5-1660 v3 with standard RAM (or about .16% slower than the i7-5960X). According to our benchmarks, this means that the E5-1660 v3 is actually overall faster than the Core i7-5960X. However, the difference is so minuscule that the difference we saw is likely to be caused by normal testing variations or minor differences in manufacturing batches.
Conclusion
To sum up this article, there are four main points we want to make:
- Clock-per-clock, Core i7-5XXX and Xeon E5 v3 CPUs have identical performance
- Xeon E5 v3 CPUs have a much wider range of models than Core i7-5XXX CPUs allowing for higher (and lower) core counts and a wider range of operating frequencies
- Xeon E5 v3 CPUs have much higher RAM capacity through the use of Registered ECC memory (768GB versus 64GB)
- You do not need a server board to use a Xeon E5 v3 CPU. Most X99 motherboards work great even with Reg ECC memory (although Reg ECC memory is usually not officially supported)
So why would you ever buy a Core i7-5XXX CPU instead of a Xeon E5 v3? What it comes down to is that Core i7 CPUs are usually slightly cheaper than their Xeon E5 v3 counterparts and they allow for CPU overclocking. If you do not plan on overclocking, we highly recommend you consider using a Xeon instead of a Core i7 CPU. You get a much wider range of options — which allows you to get exactly the core count and frequency that is best for your application — and the capability to have huge amounts of system RAM. Even if you don’t ever anticipate needing more than 64GB of RAM, having the option for future upgrades is almost never a bad thing.
Tags: Xeon, Core i7
Intel Xeon E7-4820 vs Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3
- Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3 Processor’s has 10 Cores.
- Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3 Processor’s has 20 Threads.
Essential Details
CPU Name | Intel Xeon E7-4820 | Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
CPU Code Name | Products formerly Westmere EX | Products formerly Haswell |
Generation | Intel Xeon E7 Family | Intel Xeon E5 v3 Family |
Device Category | Server | Server |
Processor No | E7-4820 | E5-4620V3 |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
CPU Release Date | 2011-04-01 | 2015-04-01 |
Lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
CPU Price |
$1446 |
Check Price |
Product Url | Intel Xeon E7-4820 | Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
Graphics Specifications
Processor Graphics | N/A | N/A |
Graphics Base Frequency | N/A | N/A |
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency | N/A | N/A |
Graphics Video Max Memory | N/A | N/A |
Graphics Output | N/A | N/A |
4K Support | N/A | N/A |
Max Resolution (HDMI 1. 4) | N/A | N/A |
Max Resolution (DP) | N/A | N/A |
Max Resolution (eDP — Integrated Flat Panel) | N/A | N/A |
Max Resolution (VGA) | N/A | N/A |
DirectX* Support | N/A | N/A |
OpenGL* Support | N/A | N/A |
No of Displays Supported | N/A | N/A |
Memory Specifications
Max Memory | 2 TB | 768 GB |
Memory Type | DDR3 800/978/1066/1333 (Max Speed 1066 MHz) | DDR4 |
Max No of Memory Channels | 4 | 4 |
ECC Memory Supported | Yes | Yes |
Package Specifications
Mother Board Socket Type | LGA1567 | FCLGA2011-3 |
Max CPU Configuration | 4 | 4 |
Thermal Solution Specification | N/A | N/A |
Max Temprature | 64°C | 77. 7°C |
Package Size | 49.17mm x 56.47mm | 52.5mm x 51mm |
Performance
No of Cores | 8 | 10 |
No of Threads | 16 | 20 |
Processor Clock Speed | 2. 00 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
Processor Turbo Speed | 2.27 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
TDP | 105 W | 105 W |
L1 Cache | 18 MB Intel Smart Cache | 25 MB |
L2 Cache | N/A | N/A |
L3 Cache | N/A | N/A |
Advanced Technologies
Turbo Boost Technology | 1. 0 | 2.0 |
vPro Technology | N/A | N/A |
Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | Yes | Yes |
Bit Width | Yes | Yes |
Thermal Monitoring Technologies | Yes | Yes |
Instruction Set Extensions | Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2 | Intel AVX2 |
Expansion Options
Scalability | S4S | 4S |
PCI Express Revision | N/A | 3. 0 |
PCI Express Configurations | N/A | x4, x8, x16 |
Max No of PCI Express Lanes | N/A | 40 |
Security & Reliability
Secure Key | N/A | Yes |
Execute Disable Bit | Yes | Yes |
Intel Xeon E7-2870 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E7-2870 and Intel Xeon E5-2650 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
Intel Xeon E7-2870
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2650
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E7-2870
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 10 vs 8
- 4 more threads: 20 vs 16
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 1 TB vs 384 GB
Number of cores | 10 vs 8 |
Number of threads | 20 vs 16 |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB vs 384 GB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Around 12% higher maximum core temperature: 77. 4°C vs 69°C
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 130 Watt
Maximum core temperature | 77.4°C vs 69°C |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E7-2870
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5-2650
Name | Intel Xeon E7-2870 | Intel Xeon E5-2650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1253 | |
PassMark — CPU mark | 12999 | |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 471 | |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3527 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Xeon E7-2870 | Intel Xeon E5-2650 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Westmere EX | Sandy Bridge EP |
Launch date | Q2’11 | March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1446 |
Processor Number | E7-2870 | E5-2650 |
Series | Intel® Xeon® Processor E7 Family | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 Family |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Launch price (MSRP) | $91 | |
Price now | $130. 43 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.91 | |
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 6.4 GT/s QPI | 8 GT/s QPI |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 69°C | 77.4°C |
Maximum frequency | 2. 80 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
Number of cores | 10 | 8 |
Number of threads | 20 | 16 |
Die size | 435 mm | |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | |
L3 cache | 20480 KB (shared) | |
Number of QPI Links | 2 | |
Transistor count | 2270 million | |
VID voltage range | 0. 60V-1.35V | |
Max memory channels | 4 | 4 |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 384 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3 800/978/1066/1333 (Max Speed 1066 MHz) | DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600 |
ECC memory support | ||
Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
Package Size | 49. 17mm x 56.47mm | 52.5mm x 45.0mm |
Sockets supported | LGA1567 | FCLGA2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
Scalability | S2S | 2S Only |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 40 | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AVX |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Xeon E7-2870 with others
Intel
Xeon E7-2870
vs
Intel
Xeon E7-2830
Intel
Xeon E7-2870
vs
Intel
Xeon E7-2850
Intel
Xeon E7-2870
vs
Intel
Xeon E7-2860
Intel Xeon E5-2667 vs Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4: What is the difference?
Smartphone-graphic wire headphones
38 ballla
Intel Xeon E5-2667
50 Ballla
Intel Xeon E7-8893 V4
Winner Xeon E7-8893 v4
Why is Intel Xeon E5-2667 better than Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4?
- 4 more CPU threads?
12 vs 8 - 10W below TDP?
130W vs 140W - 35. 94% higher CPU speed?
6 x 2.9GHz vs 4 x 3.2GHz - 256KB more L1 cache?
384KB vs 128KB - 0.5MB more L2 cache?
1.5MB vs 1MB - 0.05MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.25MB/core vs 0.2MB/core
Why is Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4 better than Intel Xeon E5-2667?
- 50.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
102GB/s vs 51.2GB/s - Are 18nm semiconductors smaller?
14nm vs 32nm - 45MB more L3 cache?
60MB vs 15MB - 3 higher hour multiplier?
32 vs 29 - 2322GB more than maximum memory?
3072GB vs 750GB - 266MHz higher RAM speed?
1866MHz vs 1600MHz - 12.5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
15MB/core vs 2.5MB/core - 1. 6GT/s higher transfer rate?
9.6GT/s vs 8GT/s
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Xeon E5-2667
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2670
Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4
VS
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180
Intel Xeon E5-2667
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2643
Intel Xeon E7-8893
9000 VS
Intel XEON E5-2637 INTEL XEON ENTEL XEON ENTELA E5-2667
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2660
Intel Xeon E5-2667
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2637
INTEL XEON E5-2667
VS
Intel E5-1620 9000 9000 9000 Xeon E5-2667
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2650
Intel Xeon E5-2667
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2665
Intel Xeon E5-2667
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2620
Intel XEN
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2643 V4
Intel Xeon E5-2667
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2699 V4
Reviews of users
Total rating
9
INTEL ENTL 1 User reviews
Intel Xeon E5-2667
8. 0 /10
1 reviews of users
Intel Xeon E7-8893 V4
0 Reviews of Users
Intel E7-8893 V4 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
10.0 /10
1 votes
reviews yet there are no
performance
8.0 /10 9 9 9 99
1 votes
reviews yet there is no
Reliability
8.0216 /10
1 Votes
Reviews yet there are no
Energy Efficiency
6.0 /10
1 Votes 9000 9000. none
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 2.9GHz
4 x 3.2GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
3.5GHz
3.5GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
5.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
8.hour multiplier
The hour multiplier controls the processor speed.
9. Unlocked
✖Intel Xeon E5-2667
✖Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
Memory
1.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✔Intel Xeon E5-2667
✔Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
2.max memory bandwidth
51.2GB/s
102GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3rd DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Max memory
3072GB
Maximum memory (RAM).
5.RAM speed
1600MHz
1866MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
6.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
7.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
4.8GHz
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
8.baud rate bus
9.6GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
9.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
The newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Xeon E5-2667
✔Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4
each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2nd version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
3. Has AES
✔Intel Xeon E5-2667
✔Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
4. Has AVX
✔Intel Xeon E5-2667
✔Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
5. bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
6.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
7.Has F16C
✖Intel Xeon E5-2667
✖Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4
used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has FMA3
✖Intel Xeon E5-2667
✖Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4
FMA3 is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
9. Has FMA4
✖Intel Xeon E5-2667
✖Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4
FMA4 is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Geotagging
1. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
2.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
5. PassMark result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
This test measures processor performance using multithreading.
6. PassMark result (single)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
7.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
8. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9. Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2667)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E7-8893 v4)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Price Match
Cancel
Which Enterprise Processors are Best?
This page is currently only available in English.
Intel Xeon Processor Lineup: Performance Comparison
New Intel Xeon server processor models often receive minor improvements and lineup updates are delayed (compared to Intel Core). However, thanks to the presence of three rulers (E3/E5/E7), you can easily choose the right option. Let’s see what their features are and what their differences are. In addition, after the release of the new Xeon Scalable, the cost of these processors has slightly decreased.
Intel Xeon E3
This line is an inexpensive processor designed for use in entry-level servers. So, all processors of the line are equipped with 4 cores with a clock frequency of up to 4.2 Ghz. This is enough for comfortable operation of a web server or an application server (with a small number of users).
It is worth noting that they are updated more often than the older Xeon E5 and Xeon E7 lines, but the changes in the latest versions were small — a gradual evolution.
—
350$
339$
Q2’15
Q4’15
Q1’17
/Streams
4/8
4/8
4/8
clock frequency
3.5 GHZ
000.000 GHZ
000 3000 GHZ
000 3000 GHZ 9000 GHZ 9000 3000 GHZ 9000 GHZ 9000 GHZ 9000 GHZ 9000 GHZ 9000 GHZ 9000 GHZ0550 DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866
As you can see, no revolution has taken place — the clock frequency has slightly increased, heat dissipation has decreased, and the amount of cache memory has changed. Thus, productivity growth was about 5-10%, and the cost remained at the same level. Support for DDR4 RAM can be considered a significant change, but for many users, the capabilities of the previous generation are enough.
Intel Xeon E5
The widest range of Intel Xeon server processors. For example, the latest generation of Broadwell includes 38 processors, among which it is easy to choose the right model.
So, two variants of processors are presented here:
- A small number of cores (4-8) with a high clock frequency (from 3 Ghz). Basically, these are E5- 1 XXX processors, but there are several models from the E5- 2 XXX series. They are suitable for servers that are demanding on the speed of performing one task, for example, a 1C server.
- A large number of cores (from 10 to 22), with a slightly reduced clock speed (2.1-2.4 Ghz). Such a processor is great for tasks that work efficiently with a large number of cores. For example, a database server or a terminal server.
It is worth noting that on the basis of Xeon E5 you can build a configuration with 1, 2 or 4 processors. The latest generation of Xeon E5 was based on Broadwell, which means there are no improvements that appeared in Slylake and Kaby Lake. However, this allows Intel to test innovations more thoroughly, releasing the most stable products.
As you can see, the Xeon E5 processors are notable for their variability, and in terms of server scalability, they are almost as good as the new Xeon Scalable.
Intel Xeon E7
This line represents the most productive models of Intel server processors. Thus, the Xeon E7 includes significantly fewer models than the Xeon E5 — only 12 in the latest generation. Most 4th generation Xeon E7 processors have more cores (10+), but there is also a 4-core model — E7-8893v4. This processor runs at 3.2 Ghz and contains 60 Mb of cache memory. It is worth noting that due to the high performance, the processors of this line are characterized by high heat dissipation. So, the calculated TDP of all possible models is from 105 W. This should definitely be taken into account when designing a server and choosing a cooling system.
In fact, when choosing a processor, you are limited to such options: either just powerful or very powerful. Let’s compare two such processors.
In addition, the new processors provide several benefits:
- the ability to scale the server in the future;
- high frequency DDR4 RAM support;
- availability of some integrated solutions (Intel VMD, Intel Vitrual Raid on CPU, RDMA).
Final choice
As you can see, even with the release of new Scalable processors, the previous generation of Intel Xeon has not lost its relevance. So, processors from the Xeon E3 line are great for creating an inexpensive server. For example, it can be used as a web server or 1C application server.
Xeon E5 processors are suitable for more tasks:
- 1C application server;
- terminal server;
- database server.
Thanks to a wide range of models, you can easily change the processor to a more efficient one, because all models within the same generation use a single socket. Using the Xeon E7 allows you to get maximum performance at a significant cost. However, in the future there may be problems with increasing productivity, because new models will not be released. Therefore, it is more rational to use the new Xeon Scalable Gold. For example, the Gold 6132 processor provides a high level of performance (14 cores at 2.6 Ghz), and if necessary, it can be easily replaced with another Gold / Platinum model or the next generation of Xeon Scalable.
Comparison of Intel Xeon E7-2820 and Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E7-2820 and Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Xeon E7-2820
versus
Intel Xeon E5-2670 V2
Advantages
reasons to choose Intel Xeon E7-2820
- The maximum size of 33% more: 1 TB VS 768 GB
- about 10% less power consumption: 105 Watt vs 115 Watt
Maximum memory size | 1TB vs 768GB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Reasons to choose Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
- 2 more cores, able to run more applications simultaneously: 10 vs 8
- 4 more threads: 20 vs 16
- About 45% more clock speed: 3. GHz vs 2.27 GHz
- Approximately 28% higher maximum core temperature: 82°C vs 64°C
- A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 32 nm
Number of cores | 10 vs 8 |
Number of threads | 20 vs 16 |
Maximum frequency | 3.30 GHz vs 2.27 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 82°C vs 64°C |
Process | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E7-2820
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
Name | Intel Xeon E7-2820 | Intel Xeon E5-2670v2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1629 | |
PassMark — CPU mark | 20395 | |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 546 | |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 6174 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.749 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.994 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.413 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.303 |
Performance comparison
Intel Xeon E7-2820 | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Westmere EX | Ivy Bridge EP |
Production date | Q2’11 | September 2013 |
Place in the rating | not rated | 1263 |
Processor Number | E7-2820 | E5-2670V2 |
Series | Intel® Xeon® Processor E7 Family | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v2 Family |
Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Applicability | Server | Server |
Price at first issue date | $927 | |
Price now | $489 | |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 9. 03 | |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5.86 GT/s QPI | 8 GT/s QPI |
Process | 32nm | 22nm |
Maximum core temperature | 64°C | 82°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.27 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 10 |
Number of threads | 16 | 20 |
Crystal area | 160mm | |
Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
Level 2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | |
Level 3 cache | 25600 KB (shared) | |
Number of QPI Links | 2 | |
Number of transistors | 1400 million | |
Permissible core voltage | 0. 65–1.30V | |
Maximum number of memory channels | 4 | 4 |
Maximum memory size | 1TB | 768GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3 800/978/1066/1333 (Max Speed 1066 MHz) | DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600/1866 |
ECC support | ||
Maximum memory bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Maximum number of processors in | 2 | 2 |
Package Size | 49. 17mm x 56.47mm | 52.5mm x 45mm |
Supported sockets | LGA1567 | FCLGA2011 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 115 Watt |
Scalability | 2S | 2S Only |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 40 | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
PCIe configurations | x4, x8, x16 | |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AVX |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 46-bit | |
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Comparison Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3 vs Intel Xeon E7-4870 v20573
5 GT/s DMI
Technology or instruction name | Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3 | Intel Xeon E7-4870 v2 | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep) | Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology. |
Technology or instruction name | Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3 | Intel Xeon E7-4870 v2 | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. | ||
SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Processor streaming SIMD extension. | ||
SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2. | ||
SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3. | ||
SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) | Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3. | ||
EM64T (Extended Memory 64-bit Technology) | 64-bit extended memory technology. | ||
NX (Execute disable bit) | Execution inhibit bit. | ||
SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4. | ||
AES (Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions) | Command system extension. | ||
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) | Command system extension. | ||
AVX 2.0 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2.0) | — | Command set extension 2.0. | |
BMI1, BMI2 (Bit manipulation instructions sets) | — | X86 bit control command set. | |
F16C (16-bit Floating-Point conversion) | 16-bit floating point conversion. | ||
FMA3 (Fused Multiply-Add 3) | — | Multiply Add with Round One (FMA3). |
Technology or instruction name | Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3 | Intel Xeon E7-4870 v2 | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology) | Trusted execution technology. |
Technology or instruction name | Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3 | Intel Xeon E7-4870 v2 | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
VT-x (Virtualization technology) | Virtualization technology. | ||
VT-d (Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O) | Virtualization technology for directed I/O. |
Technology or instruction name | Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3 | Intel Xeon E7-4870 v2 | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
Hyper-Threading | — | Hyperthreading technology. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The summary rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account indicators such as test results for all programs, structure, release year, overclocking technologies, instructions, socket, temperature data, clock frequency, number of cores and streams and much more. The results of the overall rating showed that Xeon E5-2666 v3 outperforms its rival Xeon E7-4870 v2 in most parameters. The Xeon E7-4870 v2 barely scores 13162.73 points compared to its competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
The benchmark has a large set of tools for a comprehensive evaluation of personal computer data, in particular the CPU. Among them are extended instruction checking, compression, floating point calculations, game physics calculations, encryption, integer calculations, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. In particular, it is possible to compare the obtained indicators with other configurations in a common database. Perhaps the most popular benchmark on the Internet. Almost all CPUs presented on our site have been tested in PassMark. Performance Test showed a clear advantage of the Xeon E5-2666 v3 processor (15239points) over Xeon E7-4870 v2 (11017 points). The Xeon E7-4870 v2 with a score of 11017 clearly loses in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
MAXON has appeared, and is based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. The ray tracing method is used. It is possible to check many processor systems. The Single-Thread version in its test uses just one rendering thread and one core. This benchmark for processors and video cards is already outdated by now. The main performance testing mode is a photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, working with light, simulated global illumination, spatial light sources, multilevel reflections, and procedural shaders. The test is carried out in operating systems Mac OS X, Windows.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread is another test option in Cinebench R10 that already uses multi-thread and multi-core testing method. Please note that the number of threads in this version of the program is limited to sixteen.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-thread test
64-bit version of CINEBENCH R11.5 benchmark, it can load the processor at 100 percent, including all threads and cores. Unlike previous versions, 64 threads will be involved here. Testing the Xeon E5-2666 v3 in the Cinebench 11.5 benchmark showed a result of 16.3 points, slightly ahead of its competitor. At this time, the Xeon E7-4870 v2 gets its 13.11 points, which fully justifies their close positions in the ranking.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Good old fully functional Cinebench version 11.5 from Maxon. His tests are still relevant today. In this Single-Core variant, tests occur through the use of one core and one thread. In checks, as before, the ray tracing method is used, a high-polygonal three-dimensional room is rendered with many translucent and glass and crystalline balls. The result of the test is the «frames per second» parameter. The single-thread test results for the Xeon E5-2666 v3 in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, its score was 1.54 points. But the Xeon E7-4870 v2 itself, scoring 0.83 points in this test, is far behind it.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core version Cinebench 15 — will fully load your assembly, showing everything it can do. The benchmark is ideal for new multi-threaded CPUs from AMD and Intel, as it can use 256 computation threads. The test will use all threads and CPU cores in the process of rendering complex 3D objects. The Xeon E5-2666 v3, with a score of 1488.58 points, unconditionally scores more points in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its competitor Xeon E7-4870 v2 is far behind with a score of 1154.71 points in the test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench Release R15 is the most up-to-date tester from Finns from Maxon. It tests the entire system: both CPU and video cards. For processors, the result of the calculation is the value of PTS points, and for video cards, the value of frames per second FPS. In the Single Core version, one thread is involved in rendering. A complex 3D scene is rendered with many light sources, detailed objects and reflections. The single-threaded test of the Xeon E5-2666 v3 processor in the Cinebench R15 program indicates its high performance, the result is 131. 11 points. Compared to it, its Xeon E7-4870 v2 competitor fails this test with a score of 68.07 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded benchmark
This is already a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 benchmark. It supports various operating systems and devices, making Geekbench benchmarks the most popular to date. In Geekbench 4, the 64-bit multi-core Xeon E5-2666 v3 received a score of 31342, slightly higher than the Xeon E7-4870 v2. In this test, the Xeon E7-4870 v2 scores its 27602.07 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single thread test
The program, like its earlier versions, can be run on operating systems: Mac OS, Linux, Windows. The current single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing home PCs and laptops. The Single-Core version uses 1 processor thread. For the first time ever, iOS and Android smartphones are also supported in this version of the tester. The Xeon E5-2666 v3 scored higher in the Geekbench 4.0 single-thread test with a score of 3963. But its competitor Xeon E7-4870 v2 is doing much worse — 2161.47 points.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Geekbench 3 Multi-Thread
Multi-Thread Benchmark — can provide a strong «reliability» test of your build and demonstrate how stable your OS is.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded benchmark
Cross-platform Geekbench is often used to test a system under Mac, but it can work on both Linux and Windows. The main purpose is to test CPU performance. The 32-bit version of the program loads only one CPU core and one thread.
Geekbench 2
Today, there are newer options, the current fourth and 5v. We have archived up to 200 processor models that have test results in this benchmark. Outdated version of Geekbench 2 tester.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In fact, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD video files to H.264 format, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. The frame rate processed per second is the result of the test. Ideal test for multi-threaded CPUs and multi-cores. This test is faster than Pass 2 because it encodes at a constant rate. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Xeon E5-2666 v3 is slightly higher than that of the Xeon E7-4870 v2, and amounted to 407.35 FPS. The Xeon E7-4870 v2 managed to score 330.85 FPS, slightly behind the first processor.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. As a result, we get a better quality video file. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the rendering is already happening at a non-constant rate. It is important to understand that the real task is being carried out, and the x264 codec is used in many video encoders. The result obtained is also determined by frames per second. Therefore, the test results really reflect the efficiency of the system. While encoding a video file with a Xeon E5-2666 v3 processor into mpeg4 format — a processing speed of 9 was obtained0.6 FPS While the Xeon E7-4870 v2 is slightly behind with a score of 73. 22 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
This test is very often used by overclockers, gamers and overclockers. Benchmark to evaluate the performance of the central processor, and video system. CPUs are tested in 2 ways: the game AI calculates the pathfinding, and the other test emulates the physics engine using PhysX. Based on DirectX 9.0 by Futuremark. The Xeon E5-2666 v3 showed itself slightly faster in the gaming physics and pathfinding tests, scoring up to 20660.85 points. The Xeon E7-4870 v2 also coped with these tasks, showing a good result of 17242.75 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Approximately 200 processors on our site have 3DMark Physics test data. This is a test that makes calculations in game physics.
WinRAR 4.0
A well-known data archiver. The tests were carried out under Windows OS. The speed of compression into the RAR format was tested, for these purposes huge volumes of randomly generated files were used. The resulting speed in the process of compression «kilobytes per second» — this is the result of testing. Xeon E5-2666 v3 is slightly ahead of the competitor in WinRAR file compression speed, the result of data encoding was 11492.31 Kb/s. The Xeon E7-4870 v2 delivered an encoding rate of 9525.32 Kbps.
TrueCrypt AES
Not exactly a tester, but the results of its use can evaluate the performance of the system. It has a built-in disk partition encryption function on the fly. Unfortunately support for this project was discontinued in 2014. Our site presents the results of encryption speed in Gb / s using the AES algorithm. The program can fully function in operating systems Mac OS X, Linux and Windows.
3DNews Technologies and IT market. News servers, clusters, supercomputers, industrial… Intel already ships Xeon E5/… The most interesting in the reviews
11/24/2015 [07:20], Anton Testov Although Intel’s Xeon E5 and E7 Generation Broadwell CPUs for multiprocessor systems are scheduled to be officially launched next year, select Intel customers are already receiving the new chips. According to the vice president of the company, many cloud service providers and operators of large data centers require the performance of next-generation processors with 22 to 24 cores now.
«[Customers] are putting pressure on us to get them the next generation of processors as fast as we can,» said Diane Bryant, Senior Vice President and General Manager, Data Division Center Group of Intel Corporation during a meeting with the company’s investors. « So we are already supplying 14nm [Xeon] Broadwell to some cloud service providers and some customers from segment HPC, although the actual launch of [Xeon] Broadwell [ c will stop] early next year.” Intel Xeon E7 Intel has not disclosed the names of customers who already receive Broadwell Generation Intel Xeon v4 multi-core processors. The company also did not specify the characteristics of the supplied CPUs.
The vast majority of cloud service providers and large data center operators — companies like Amazon Web Services, Facebook*, Google, Microsoft — use a significant number of custom-built Intel Xeon processors. Such chips may have unusual configurations of cores, clock speeds, I/O technologies, specific features, and other optimizations that a particular large customer can benefit from. The characteristics of such CPUs may differ from the specifications of chips that are sold on the open market. However, Intel Xeon processors based on Broadwell-EP and Broadwell-EX cores for select customers will have much in common with conventional CPUs, and most importantly, contain up to 24 cores (versus 18 for current Intel Xeon chips). Intel Xeon E5 According to unofficial information, Intel Xeon E5 v4 2600 generation Broadwell-EP processors for two-socket servers will be released in the first quarter of 2016, while Intel Xeon E5 v4 4600 chips for four-socket machines will be released in the second quarter of next year. As expected, the new Xeon E5 v4 will have up to 22 general-purpose cores, 55 MB of cache, a quad-channel DDR4 memory controller (with support for clock speeds up to 2400 MHz) and dissipate from 55 to 160 watts of heat. More advanced Intel Xeon E7 v4 CPUs for mission critical servers, HPC, real-time analytics and other applications with two, four or even eight sockets will be released later in the second quarter of 2016. It is expected that these CPUs will integrate up to 24 cores, up to 60 MB of cache, two dual-channel DDR3 / DDR4 controllers that will work with memory modules using special “scalable” memory buffers (scalable memory buffer, SMB) at frequencies up to 1866 MHz and other hardware. Intel Xeon E7 The Intel Xeon E5 v4 and Intel Xeon E7 v4 microprocessors will be compatible with existing Grantley and Brickland server platforms but require a motherboard BIOS update to install. While the overall microarchitecture of Broadwell is not much different from Haswell, the new processors will significantly increase the number of cores, bring support for TSX instructions (which can increase the performance of multi-threaded applications), support faster memory and reduce power consumption. The full set of advantages of the Intel Xeon Broadwell generation seems significant enough for data center operators with tens of thousands of machines to start installing new processors in their servers. “They’re even willing to take [a product with potential bugs] just to get their hands on it sooner,” Ms. Bryant said. * Included in the list of public associations and religious organizations in respect of which the court has made a final decision to liquidate or ban their activities on the grounds provided for by Federal Law No. 114-FZ of July 25, 2002 «On counteracting extremist activity.» Source:
If you notice an error, select it with the mouse and press CTRL+ENTER. Related materials Permanent URL: https://3dnews.ru/ 3 Headings: Tags: ← |
Intel Xeon E7-2870 v2 vs.
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Intel Xeon E7-2870 v2
Intel Xeon E7-2870 v2 runs with 15 and 30 CPU threads It runs at 2.90 GHz base 2.90 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 130 W . Processor plugs into LGA 2011 CPU socket This version includes 30.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 4 to support DDR3-1600 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Ivy Bridge EX Architecture has been advanced over 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q1/2014
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 runs with 6 and 30 CPU threads It runs at 3.20 GHz base 2.80 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 85 W .Processor connects to LGA CPU socket 2011-3 This version includes 15.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 4 to support DDR4-2133 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 40 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell E Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2014
Intel Xeon E7-2870 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Compare Parts
Frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
15 | Cores | 6 |
2.90GHz | Turbo (1 core) | 3.20 GHz |
2.90GHz | Turbo (all cores) | 2.80 GHz |
Yes | Hyper Threading | Yes |
No. | Overclocking | No. |
normal | Basic architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
no turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
22nm | Technology | 22nm |
no turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
Max. displays | ||
DDR3-1600 | memory size | DDR4-2133 |
4 | Memory channels | 4 |
Maximum memory | ||
Yes | ECC | Yes |
— | L2 Cache | — |
30.00 MB | L3 Cache | 15.00MB |
PCIe version | 3.0 | |
PCIe lanes | 40 | |
22nm | Technology | 22nm |
LGA 2011 | Connector | LGA 2011-3 |
130W | TDP | 85W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q1/2014 | Release date | Q3/2014 |
Show more details |
Show more details |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D.