AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Intel Core i5-7500: What is the difference?
56points
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
50points
Intel Core i5-7500
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core i5-7500
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 1600 better than Intel Core i5-7500?
- 41.18% faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.2GHzvs4 x 3.4GHz - 267MHz higher ram speed?
2667MHzvs2400MHz - 8 more CPU threads?
12vs4 - 2MB bigger L2 cache?
3MBvs1MB - 1.51x higher PassMark result?
12398vs8201 - 10MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs6MB - 320KB bigger L1 cache?
576KBvs256KB - Has an unlocked multiplier?
Why is Intel Core i5-7500 better than AMD Ryzen 5 1600?
- 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs95°C - 0.
2GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.8GHzvs3.6GHz - Has integrated graphics?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i5-7500
vs
AMD A6-7480
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i5-7500
vs
Intel Core i3-7100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Core i5-7500
vs
Intel Core i5-6500
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i5-7500
vs
Intel Core i3-8100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i5-7500
vs
Intel Core i5-6600
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i5-7500
vs
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i5-7500
vs
Intel Core i7-7700
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
Intel Core i3-10100F
Intel Core i5-7500
vs
AMD A8-9600
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i5-7500
vs
Intel Core i3-6100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i5-7500
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
10.
0/10
1 User reviews
Intel Core i5-7500
0 User reviews
Intel Core i5-7500
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
7.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.2GHz
4 x 3.4GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.6GHz
3.8GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖Intel Core i5-7500
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.
25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
2.67MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2667MHz
2400MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
42.7GB/s
38.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖Intel Core i5-7500
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7500)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7500)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7500)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7500)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7500)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7500)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
310.8seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7500)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
948.6seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7500)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7500)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖Intel Core i5-7500
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5-7500
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5-7500
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5-7500
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7500)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5-7500
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖Intel Core i5-7500
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7500)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i5 7500 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 7500
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.4 GHz Intel Core i5 7500 with 4-cores against the 3.2 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 1600 with 6-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i5 7500
53
Ryzen 5 1600
49
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i5 7500
19
Ryzen 5 1600
32
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i5 7500
44
Ryzen 5 1600
44
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i5 7500
38
Ryzen 5 1600
43
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 1600 and 7500
Advantages of Intel Core i5 7500
- Includes an integrated GPU Intel HD Graphics 630
- 6% higher Turbo Boost frequency (3.
8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Has 10 MB larger L3 cache size
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Around 3.98 GB/s (11%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i5 7500
n/a
Ryzen 5 1600
902
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 7500
n/a
Ryzen 5 1600
6269
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i5 7500
+10%
2293
Ryzen 5 1600
2090
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i5 7500
6102
Ryzen 5 1600
+103%
12399
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i5 7500
+1%
950
Ryzen 5 1600
939
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 7500
3360
Ryzen 5 1600
+52%
5111
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 7500 and AMD Ryzen 5 1600
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | January 3, 2017 | April 11, 2017 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake | Zen |
| Model number | i5-7500 | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 4 GHz |
3.2 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 34x | 32x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | — |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 6MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |
| Transistors | — | 4.8 billions |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
Max. temperature |
100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | — |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | — |
| Shading Units | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Execution Units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15 W | — |
| Max. Resolution | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i5 7500
0.44 TFLOPS
Ryzen 5 1600
n/a
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2666 |
| Memory Size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Max. Memory Channels |
2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 35.76 GB/s | 39.74 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i5 7500 official page | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 20 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i5 7500
3 (25%)
Ryzen 5 1600
9 (75%)
Total votes: 12
ompetitors
1.
Core i5 10400 and Core i5 7500
2.
Core i5 6500 and Core i5 7500
3.
Core i5 12500 and Core i5 7500
4.
Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 1600
5.
Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 5 1600
6.
Ryzen 5 2600 and Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-7500 — Minecraft with GTX 1050 Ti Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1050 Ti with
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Minecraft
GTX 1050 Ti with
Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz
Ryzen 5 1600
i5-7500
Multi-Thread Performance
12265 Pts
8028 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
1821 Pts
2113 Pts
Minecraft
Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-7500 in Minecraft using GTX 1050 Ti — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Ryzen 5 1600
i5-7500
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
277. |
| 1080p |
297.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
128.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
137.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
64.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
68.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
102.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
110.2 FPS |
4 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
366.3 FPS |
| 1080p |
387.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
193.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
205.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
108.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
114.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
161.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
171.0 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
455. |
| 1080p |
477.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
259.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
273.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
152.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
160.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
219.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
231.7 FPS |
3 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
633.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
658.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
391.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
409.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
239.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
252.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
336.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
353.2 FPS |
Ryzen 5 1600
- The Ryzen 5 1600 has higher Level 2 Cache.
Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM - The Ryzen 5 1600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Ryzen 5 1600 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The Ryzen 5 1600 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
i5-7500
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The i5-7500 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-7500 specifications
Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-7500 Architecture
| Ryzen 5 1600 | i5-7500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Zen | Kaby Lake |
| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen) |
Core i5 (Kaby Lake) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | YD1600BBM6IAEYD1600BBAEBOX | SR335 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Apr 2017 | Jan 2017 |
Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-7500 Cache
| Ryzen 5 1600 | i5-7500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 16MB (shared) | 6MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-7500 Cores
| Ryzen 5 1600 | i5-7500 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 4 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | HD 630 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-7500 Features
| Ryzen 5 1600 | i5-7500 | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.  1SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 vPro Boost 2.0 |
Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-7500 Notes
| Ryzen 5 1600 | i5-7500 |
|---|
Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-7500 Performance
| Ryzen 5 1600 | i5-7500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32.0x | 34.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 3.6 GHz | up to 3.8 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | unknown |
Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-7500 Physical
| Ryzen 5 1600 | i5-7500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | 192 mm² | unknown |
| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Package | µPGA | FC-LGA1151 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | 4800 million | unknown |
| tCaseMax | unknown | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-7500 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF vs Intel Core i5-7500
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF vs Intel Core i5-7500
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF on one side and the Intel Core i5-7500 on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF | Intel Core i5-7500 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Kaby Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Pinnacle Ridge | Kaby Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 5 1000 | Core i5-7000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | YD1600BBAFBOX | CM8067702868012, BXC80677I57500, BX80677I57500, SR335 |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2020 | Q1 2017 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm+ | ||||||
| Cores | 6 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 12 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,2 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,8 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2667 | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 39,74 GB/s | 38,4 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel HD Graphics 630 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1100 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 384 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | LGA1151 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 95°C | 100°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 445 | 414 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 3. 689 |
1.563 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 154 | 155 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.245 | 605 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 915 | 1.050 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 6.603 | 4.004 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.088 | 2.273 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 12.346 | 6.057 | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-7500 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
445 3.689 |
| Intel Core i5-7500 |
414 1.563 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 136%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
154 1.  245 |
| Intel Core i5-7500 |
155 605 |
In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 106%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
915 6.  603 |
| Intel Core i5-7500 |
1.050 4.004 |
In single core, the difference is -13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 65%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
2.  08812.346 |
| Intel Core i5-7500 |
2.273 6.057 |
In single core, the difference is -8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 104%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF Intel equivalentIntel Core i5-7500 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i5-750Intel Core i5-7500T
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X vs. Intel Core i5-7500
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
The AMD Ryzen 5 3500X operates with 6 cores and 6 CPU threads.
It run at 4.10 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 32.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Matisse (Zen 2) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q4/2019
Intel Core i5-7500
The Intel Core i5-7500 operates with 4 cores and 6 CPU threads. It run at 3.80 GHz base 3.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1151 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Kaby Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2017
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Intel Core i5-7500
Compare Detail
3. 60 GHz |
Frequency | 3.40 GHz |
| 6 | Cores | 4 |
| 4.10 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.80 GHz |
| 4.00 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.60 GHz |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| 7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| DirectX Version | 12 | |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Memory | DDR4-2400 | |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
32. 00 MB |
L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA 1151 |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q4/2019 | Release date | Q1/2017 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms.
The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory.
A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Monero Hashrate kH/s
The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | Intel Core i5-7500 | |
| 65 W | Max TDP | 65 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X and 1600 vs.
i5-7600K and 7500
After releasing the extensively reviewed 8-core 16-thread Ryzen 7 CPUs last month, AMD marked April as the month of the Ryzen 5 processors. This tier of the Zen microarchitecture-based CPUs includes 4-core and 6-core hyper threaded processors, in a price range of $169-$249.
Today, we will compare the Ryzen 5 1600X ($250) and 1600 ($220) to their price equivalents from Intel: the i5-7600K ($240) and i5-7500 ($200).
Specifications-wise, the Ryzen 5 processors are much closer to the i7-6800K and i7-6850K, which are Intel’s enthusiast X99-platform based 6-core 12-thread CPUs. On the other hand, price-wise, the AMD parts are much closer to the Kaby Lake 4-core 4-thread i5 line-up.
The Ryzen 5 1600X and the 1600 are based on the same chip, with slightly different configurations. It is possible to overclock both of these CPUs to similar clockspeeds with little to no benefit to performance from the XFR (extended frequency range) the 1600X offers.
The benefit of the 1600 is that it comes with AMD’s Wraith Spire stock cooler, which is actually decent. The Wraith Spire is rated to dissipate up to 95W of power, and is quiet. High-level overclocking (100+ W) will be problematic with this cooler, but a moderate OC to the base level of the 1600X is possible.
Non-gaming benchmarks
Because the 1600X and 1600 utilize 6 cores with 12 threads, it’s safe to assume that many modern non-gaming applications are able to leverage the performance Ryzen 5 offers. This is especially nice at this price, since the competition from Intel only offers for non-hyperthreaded cores.
Both the 1600X and 1600 handily beat the i5-7600K and i5-7500 in multi-threaded workloads. Applications that scale better with clock speed will prefer the higher clocked, higher IPC Intel CPUs. For most content creation (such as video editing) and code compiling, Ryzen 5 is the new best choice.
Handbrake and X264 encoding brings the Ryzen 5 CPUs significantly ahead of the Intel price-equivalents.
Source: PCPer
In Audacity MP3 encoding on the other hand, which is mostly a single-threaded application, the higher-clocked Intel processors are significantly faster than Ryzen 5 (lower is better in this graph). Source: PCPer
Gaming benchmarks
With gaming, the story is far more interesting. Ryzen 5 has the advantage in multi-threaded applications, because all of Intel’s i5 CPUs in this price range only have 4 cores and 4 threads. But a lot of games are still heavily dependent on higher clock speeds over multiple threads. That’s where Intel still has the upper-hand.
Nevertheless, GamersNexus, HardwareUnboxed and other reviewers tend to agree that due to multiple factors, the Ryzen 5 processors compare favorably to Intel’s price equivalents, both in terms of value and performance.
GamersNexus shows how even though the overclocked Ryzen 5 1600X average framerate is lower than the i5 7600K’s, the 1% and 0.1% lowest recorded framerates are higher on Ryzen, leading to a generally smoother and more consistent experience.
Source: GamersNexus
Ashes of The Singularity is a great example of how multi-threaded games with many units can leverage the full potential that Ryzen has to offer. Source: HardwareUnboxed
Depending on the game, many reviewers show the Ryzen 5 1600X being on par or slightly (~7%) below the i5-7600K, while the Ryzen 5 1600 was mostly on par or beating the locked i5-7500.
Depending on how well the game is optimized for Ryzen (some games already have “Ryzen patches” meant to better leverage the performance of the new AMD CPUs), the trophy is still in Intel’s hands. But other interesting facts come into play.
AM4 platform specifications.
Even though the AM4 platform is being actively patched by both AMD and motherboard vendors, it is here to stay for at least three years. That means you can buy an AM4-based platform now and upgrade later without the need to get a new motherboard.
Also, all Ryzen CPUs are unlocked, including the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600. Overclocking this CPU to around the 1600X levels brings it far above the locked i5-7500 in terms of performance.
It also comes with a decent stock cooler, so that’s another $20+ saved.
The i5-7600K and Ryzen 5 1600X both require an aftermarket cooler. But the Intel chip also needs a more expensive Z270 motherboard, while Ryzen CPUs can be overclocked on cheaper B350 motherboards. Looking at CPU usage graphs, it is also evident that the i5 is mostly pegged at 100% usage, meaning there is nowhere for the processor to grow, while the Ryzen 5 processors show CPU usage hovering mostly in the 50-60% range, leaving room for developers to get more out of them with better multi-threading.
Ghost Recon: Wildlands maxing out what the 7600K has to offer, while the 6-core 12-thread still has some performance to spare. Source: JokerProductions
Ryzen does need faster RAM to perform best. Faster DDR4 costs more, which can negate the cost savings of Ryzen’s cheaper motherboards.
The Ryzen 5 1600 is an easy recommendation over the i5-7500. Choosing between the Ryzen 5 1600X and i5-7600K is more difficult, but for most people the 1600X is a better option.
The extra threads are very useful when they can be used, and the single-threaded performance deficit isn’t too large.
The best value can be had by overclocking the Ryzen 5 1600 processor ($219) on a $100 motherboard. This offers a $70 savings compared to a 1600X or an i5-7600K system (factoring in the extra price for the processor and the aftermarket cooler), while achieving comparable gaming performance.
It feels like it is finally time for the mainstream to move on from 4 cores and 4 threads. It is possible to get significantly better multi-threaded and comparable gaming performance for cheaper with Ryzen 5.
The Ryzen 5 CPUs can be found in our Great and Excellent tiers.
Sources:
- PCPerspective
- GamersNexus
- HardwareUnboxed
- JokerProductions
Intel Core i5 7500 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 7500
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Which is better: 4-core Intel Core i5 7500 at 3.
4 GHz or AMD Ryzen 5 1600 with 6 cores at 3.2 GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i5 7500
53
Ryzen 5 1600
49
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003
Core i5 7500
19,0003
Ryzen 5 1600
32
Energy efficiency
Energy consumption chip
Core i5 7500
44
Ryzen 5 1600
44
Rating Nanoreview Reign Nanoreview
Core i5 7500
38
Ryzen 5 1600
43
Key differences
What are the main differences between 1600 and 7500
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 7500
- There is an integrated graphics accelerator Intel HD Graphics 630
- 6% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (3.
8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Has 10 MB more L3 cache
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 2 physical cores more
- 3.98 GB/s (11%) more maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single -core)
Core i5 7500
N/D
Ryzen 5 1600
902
Cinebench R23 (multi -core)
Core I5 7500
N/D 9000 Ryzen 5 16269
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i5 7500
+10%
2293
Ryzen 5 1600
2090
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i5 7500
6102
Ryzen 5 1600
+103%
12399
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i5 7500
+1%
950
Ryzen 5 1600
939
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i5 7500
3360
Ryzen 5 2
+52%
5111
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i5 7500 and AMD Ryzen 5 1600
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | January 3, 2017 | April 11, 2017 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake | Zen |
| Model number | i5-7500 | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | HD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Number of cores | 4 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 12 |
| Frequency | 3. 4 GHz |
3.2 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 3.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 34x | 32x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 6MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | — | 4.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1100 MHz | — |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i5 7500
0.44 teraflops
Ryzen 5 1600
n/a
Memory support
| Memory type | DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max. size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 35.76 GB/s | 39.74 GB/s |
| ECC 9 support0184 | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i5 7500 | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 website |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i5 7500
3 (25%)
Ryzen 5 1600
9 (75%)
Total votes: 12
Competitors
1.
Core i5 10400 vs Core i5 7500
2.
Core i5 6500 vs. Core i5 7500
3.
Core i5 12500 vs Core i5 7500
4.
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600
5.
Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen 5 1600
6.
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 1600 or Intel Core i5 7500?
Name
Message
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Intel Core i5-7500: What is the difference?
56 Ballla
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
50 BALLLA
Intel Core i5-7500
Winter when comparing
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 9000 9000 9002 Is Ryzen 5 1600 better than Intel Core i5-7500?
- 41.18% higher CPU speed?
6 x 3.2GHz vs 4 x 3.4GHz - 267MHz higher RAM speed?
2667MHz vs 2400MHz - 8 more CPU threads?
12 vs 4 - 2MB more L2 cache?
3MB vs 1MB - 1.
51x higher PassMark score?
12398 vs 8201 - 10MB more L3 cache?
16MB vs 6MB - 320KB more L1 cache?
576KB vs 256KB - Has an unlocked multiplier?
Why is Intel Core i5-7500 better than AMD Ryzen 5 1600?
- 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 95°C - 0.2GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.8GHz vs 3.6GHz - Does it have integrated graphics?
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
VS
Intel Core i3-1115g4
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
VS
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 7 5700u
Intel Core i7-11655000 AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD vs
Intel Core i5-10210u
AMD Ryzen 5 5500u
VS
Intel Core i3-1115g4
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
VS
Intel Core 9000u
Intel Core i5-7500
0.
0 /10
0 reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
7.0 /10
9000 1 votes
Reviews yet no
10.0 /10
1 votes
reviews yet there is no
performance
10.0 /10
1 votes
reviews yet not
Reliability
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Reviews not yet
Energy
10.0 /10
9000 1 Votes
Reviews still not 9000 .CPU speed
6 x 3.2GHz
4 x 3.4GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.
speed turbo clock
3.6GHz
3.8GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖Intel Core i5-7500
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2.67MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory to access each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2667MHz
2400MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
42.7GB/s
38.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory debug code
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖Intel Core i5-7500
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7500)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
(Intel Core i5-7500)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7500)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7500)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7500)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7500)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
310.8seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7500)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
948.6seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7500)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7500)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖Intel Core i5-7500
processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5-7500
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5-7500
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume.
Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5-7500
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7500)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5-7500
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖Intel Core i5-7500
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-7500)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 or Intel Core i5-7500
- Home
- >
Gaming speed
Ryzen 5 1600
62.9
Core i5-7500
64.2 (+2%)
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Ryzen 5 1600
63.
8
Core i5-7500
67 (+4.8%)
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Ryzen 5 1600
42.9 (+14.9%)
Core i5-7500
36.5
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking.
Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Ryzen 5 1600 58.4 Core i5-7500 63.8 (+8.5%) |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Ryzen 5 1600 44.7 (+20.1%) Core i5-7500 35.7 |
Extreme |
|
Ryzen 5 1600 15.4 (+54.5%) Core i5-7500 7 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum).
A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R15 Single Core
AMD RYZEN 5 1600
147 9000 9000
Intel Core i5-7500
162 (+9.3%)
Cine-4TALTI CORE 9000 9000
AMD Ryzen 5178
AMD
Intel Core i5-7500
617
Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
894
Intel Core i5-7500
977 (+8.5%)
Blender 2.81 bmw27
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
313
Intel Core i5-7500
638.4 (+51%)
Geekbench 3 Single Core
AMD RYZEN 5 1600
9000 3920
Intel Core i5-7500
4055 (+3.3%) 9000 GEEK Core
AMD RYZEN 5 1600
20754 (+41.
4%)
Intel Core i5-7500
12167
Cinebench R11.5
ENTEL COREN (+9%)
Cinebench R11.5
AMD RYZEN 5 1600
12.09 (+45.9%)
Intel Core i5-7500
6.54
Passmark
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
12366 (+50.9%) 9000 6067
Characteristics
The data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or omit existing functions.
Basic
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i5-7500 Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.80 GHz) | |
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Kaby Lake | |
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. |
No data | 14 |
| Date of Issue The month and year the processor was released. | 09-2019 | 09-2019 |
| Model Official name. | i5-7500 | |
| Cores The number of physical cores. | 6 | 4 |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 12 | 4 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technologies, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. |
SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). | Missing |
| Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. |
No data | 3.8 |
| L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | No data | 6 |
| Instructions | 64-bit | |
| Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 | |
Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. |
No | No |
| Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Number of QPI links | No data | |
| TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | No data | 65 |
| Cooling system specifications | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. |
Intel® HD Graphics 630 | |
| GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | No data | 350 |
| Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | No data | 1100 |
| Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802.11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. |
3 |
RAM
| Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | No data | 64 |
| Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | |
| RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | |
| RAM bandwidth | ||
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. |
No data | No data |
PCI
| PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | No data | 3 |
| PCI configuration options | ||
| Number of PCI lanes | No data |
Data security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. |
No data | No data |
| Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
| Dimensions | No data | No data |
| Supported sockets | No data | No data |
| Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 8%.
- $96 down
- 2 more physical cores.
- 8 more threads.
- Work speed in office applications and browsers is increased by 3%.
- The base frequency is 0.2 GHz higher.
Intel Core i5-7500 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core i5-7500
Intel Core i5-7500 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.80 GHz base 3.60 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to socket CPU LGA 1151 This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2400 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Kaby Lake S Architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q1/2017
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 runs with 6 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.60 GHz base 3.40 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to AM4 CPU socket This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 20 . Tjunction is kept below 95°C degrees C.
In particular, the Summit Ridge (Zen) architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q1/2017
Intel Core i5-7500
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Compare details
| 4GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 3.80GHz | Turbo (1 core) | 3.60 GHz |
| 3.60GHz | Turbo (all cores) | 3.40 GHz |
| No. | Hyper Threading | Yes |
| No. | Acceleration | Yes |
| normal | Basic architecture | normal |
|
Intel HD Graphics 630 |
GPU | no iGPU |
| 1.10GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 14nm | Technology | 14nm |
1. 10 GHz |
GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | |
| 3 | Max. displays | |
| DDR4-2400 | memory size | |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Maximum memory | ||
| No. | ECC | Yes |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 6.00MB | L3 Cache | 16.00MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| 14nm | Technology | 14nm |
| LGA 1151 | Connector | AM4 |
| 65W | TDP | 65W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q1/2017 | Release date | Q1/2017 |
|
Show more details |
Show more details |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result.
The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Monero Hashrate kH/s
Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019of the year. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only be computed efficiently using either a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a large number of CPU cores, cache, and fast memory connectivity through as many memory channels as possible.
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
| Intel Core i5-7500 | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
| 65W | Max TDP | 65W |
N. A. |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Operating cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Operating cost per year | NA |
Popular comparison0001
Compare with
Select..AMD Radeon HD 6850 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6870 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6950 — RUB 16,398AMD Radeon HD 6970 — RUB 19,619 ₽ 45,847AMD Radeon HD 7750 — ₽ 9,183AMD Radeon HD 7750M — ₽ 56,276AMD Radeon HD 7790 — ₽ 9,773AMD RADEON HD 7850 — ₽ 16,332AMD RADEON HD 7850M — ₽ 63,229AMD RADEON HD 7950 — ₽ ₽ 9.77350 — ₽ ₽ ₽ ₽ ₽ 9.77350 — ₽ ₽ ₽ ₽ 9,773M 67,099AMD Radeon HD 7970 — ₽ 19,611AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition — ₽ 19AMD Radeon HD 7970M — RUB 70,772AMD Radeon HD 7990 — RUB 65,524AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile — RUB 128,491AMD Radeon R5 — RUB 46,569AMD Radeon R5 — RUB 45,979AMD Radeon R7 250 — RUB 6,273AMD AMD Radeon R7 370 — ₽ 13,249AMD Radeon R9 270 — ₽ 18,037AMD Radeon R9 280 — ₽ 22.
957AMD RADEON R9 280X — ₽ 22,957AMD RADEON R9 285 — ₽ 24,924AMD RADEON R9 290 — ₽ 20,333AMD RADEON RADEON RADEN Radeon R9 295X2 — RUB 98,319AMD Radeon R9 380 — RUB 19,611AMD Radeon R9 380X — RUB 15,020AMD Radeon R9390 — ₽ 30,4999AMD Radeon R9 390X — ₽ 32,467AMD Radeon R9 Fury — ₽ 36,009AMD Radeon R9 Fury X — ₽ 42,568AMD Radeon R9 M270X — ₽ 66,639AMD RADEN RADEN RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEN R9 M290X — RUB 79,298AMD Radeon R9 M380 — RUB 70,444AMD Radeon R9 Nano — RUB 100,287AMD Radeon RX 460 — RUB 9,183AMD Radeon RX 470 — RUB 22,432AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile — RUB 78,905AMD Radeon RX1 AMD02 RX 480 Mobile — RUB 83,627AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile — RUB 42,306AMD Radeon RX 550 — RUB 4,854AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile — RUB 60,540AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB — RUB 11,085AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB3 550X Mobile — RUB 60,540AMD Radeon RX 560 — RUB 6.493AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile — RUB 64,737 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT — RUB 18,300 AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — RUB 42,043AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — RUB 64,737 RX 5700 XT — RUB 26,170AMD Radeon RX 580 — RUB 9,904AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile — RUB 85,726AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — RUB 85,726AMD Radeon RX 590 — RUB 14,036AMD Radeon RX 6600 RX -67XT AMD Radeon RX 6800 — RUB 37,977 AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — RUB 42,568 AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — $65,524AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — $41,453AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3 — $37,190AMD Radeon RX VEGA 6 — $73,395AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — $39,420AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — $17.
64 Radeon RX Vega 56 — $17.64 Mobile — ₽ 103,567AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — ₽ 27,482AMD Radeon VII — ₽ 43,552ATI Radeon HD 4870 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — ₽ 84,086NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — ₽ 49,193NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — ₽ 69,657NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — ₽ 83,299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — ₽ 57,457NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — ₽ 11,150NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — ₽ 10,429NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q — ₽ 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — ₽ 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — ₽ 21,579NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — ₽ 72,543NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — ₽ 102,255NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — $32,992NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 — $34,238NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q — $128,229NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile — ₽ 121,801NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti — ₽ 52,931NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — ₽ 9,773NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — ₽ 81,266NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — ₽ 75,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — ₽ 10,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — ₽ 15,020NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — ₽ 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — ₽ 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — ₽ 115,307NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — ₽ 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — ₽ 42,568NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — ₽ 10,035NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — ₽ 22,891NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — ₽ 3,214NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — ₽ 4,198NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — ₽ 11,085NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — ₽ 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — ₽ 31,811NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — ₽ 71,034NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — ₽ 28,794 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — ₽ 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — ₽ 20,989NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — ₽ 67,951NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — ₽ 11,741NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — ₽ 72,149NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — ₽ 23,285NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — ₽ 26,892NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — ₽ 69,919NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — ₽ 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — ₽ 40,600NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — ₽ 42,634NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — ₽ 65,524NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — ₽ 72,083 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — $22.
891NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — ₽ 72,411NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — ₽ 26,236NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — ₽ 30,762NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — ₽ 99,434NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — ₽ 113,077NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — ₽ 45,454NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — ₽ 116,226NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — ₽ 127,376NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — ₽ 77,855NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $16,332NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — ₽ 39,288NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 — ₽ 21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $163,909NVIDIA TITAN V — $196,704NVIDIA TITAN Xp — RUB 78,642
Change CPU to
Select.
.AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — RUB 6555.7AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — RUB 1967AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — RUB 8523.4 — RUB 23609.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — RUB 30168.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — RUB 21742.4AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 6DAM56 5400+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 5400+ X2 Dual Core 5600+ — RUB 9835.2AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — RUB 1639.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — RUB 3013.9AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — RUB 17050.1AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — RUB 3935.4 AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 6231.1AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 786.4AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 2111.3 II X2 255 — RUB 4277.8AMD Athlon II X2 260 — RUB 1311.1AMD Athlon II X2 265 — RUB 5436.1AMD Athlon II X2 270 — RUB 1573.5AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — RUB 2358AMD Athlon II X2AMD II2 X20. — ₽ 3217.2AMD Athlon II X3 425 — ₽ 6835.1AMD Athlon II X3 435 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon II X3 440 — ₽ 3079.5AMD ATHLON II X3 445 — ₽ 5968.7AMD athlon II X3 450 — ₽ 2622.
9AMD ATHLON II X3 455 — ₽ 7664.2AMD ATHLON II X3 460 — ₽ 3278.8AMD ATHO X4 620 — ₽ 3932.1AMD ATHOLON 28 Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 5247.2AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 4588AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 5243.9AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 6001.5 — ₽ 18168.4AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — ₽ 3017.1AMD Athlon X4 840 — ₽ 5164.6AMD Athlon X4 845 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon X4 860K — ₽ 4196.4AMD ATHLON X4 870K — ₽ 5246.5AMD Athlon X4 880K — ₽ 5902.4AMD ATHLON X4 950 — ₽ 3934.7AMD E2-3200 APU — ₽ 524.1AMD FX -4100 Quad -Core — ₽ 8526AMD FX -4130 QUAD -₽ 4984. FX-4170 Quad-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — RUB 14968.3AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — RUB 3501.9AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — RUB 22297.3FX -6300 Six-Core — RUB 3869.2AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — RUB 25153.8AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — RUB 5285.9AMD 8320 Eight-Core — ₽ 5214.4AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — ₽ 6484.9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — RUB 5246.5 AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — RUB 8853.
3AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — RUB 11805.5 Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — ₽ 3082.1AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — ₽ 1964.4AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — ₽ 221830AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — ₽ 6887AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — ₽ 3934.7AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — ₽ 3276.2AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — ₽ 9654.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — ₽AMD-Core 360 ₽ 3932.1AMD Phenom 9850 Quad -Core — ₽ 3279.5AMD Phenom 9950 Quad -Core — ₽ 11804.9AMD Phenom II X2 545 — ₽ 2884.6AMD Phenom II X2 550 — ₽ 3278.8AMD PHENOM II X2 555 — ₽ 9323AMD PEN 1967AMD Phenom II X2 B550.6AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — ₽ 4919.3AMD Phenom II X4 805 — ₽ 11412AMD Phenom II X4 810 — ₽ 7607.8AMD Phenom II X4 820 — ₽ 4916AMD Phenom II X4 840 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X4 905E — ₽ 13 905E — ₽ 13 910 — ₽ 65559AMD Phenom II X4 910e — ₽ 10297AMD Phenom II X4 920 — ₽ 4393.
9AMD Phenom II X4 925 — ₽ 10493.7AMD Phenom II X4 940 — ₽ 7870.1AMD PHENOM II X4 945 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd AMD Phenom II X4 960T — RUB 8854 AMD Phenom II X4 965 — RUB 3902.6AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — RUB 4784.8AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — ₽ 12396.5AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — ₽ 11478.3AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — ₽ 12134.2AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — ₽ 17052.7AMD PHENOM II X6 1090T — ₽ 259978.90T — ₽ 259978.90T ₽ 13117.3AMD Phenom X3 8550 — ₽ 11147AMD RYZEN 3 1200 — ₽ 6230.4AMD RYZEN 3 1300X — ₽ 8198.1AMD RYZEN 3 2200G — ₽ 6427.2AMD RYZEN 3 3100 — ₽ 5903.1AMD RYZEN 3 3200G — ₽ 6493.4AMD RYZEN 3300 — AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 8789.1AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 9503.3AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 10165.8AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 11701.3837.8AMD RYZEN 5 2600X — ₽ 13773.2AMD RYZEN 5 3400G — ₽ 9837.8AMD RYZEN 5 3500 — ₽ 9707.3AMD RYZEN 5 3500X — ₽ 10527.2AMD RYZEN 5 3600 — ₽ 13052.4AMD RYZEN 5 3600X — ₽ 16331.
AMD RYZEN 5 5600X — ₽ 19611.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700 — ₽ 12461.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700X — ₽ 13117.3AMD RYZEN 7 1800X — ₽ 16396.8AMD RYZEN 7 2700 — ₽ 16347AMD RYZEN 7 2700X — ₽ 20004.3AMD RYZEN 7, 3700X — ₽ ₽ ₽ ¦ 3800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — RUB 19676.3AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — RUB 29514.8AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — ₽ 49192.5AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — ₽ 46568.9AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — ₽ 22955.8AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — ₽ 27547.1AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — ₽ 44600.5 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — ₽ 59030.3AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — ₽ 112814.1Intel Core i3-10100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-10300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-11100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-11300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-12100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-12300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3934.7Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 3804.2Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 5246.5Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 1967.7Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 13052.
2Intel Core0 @ 3.40GHz — $ 4590.6Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — $ 2289.1Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 5246.5 Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz — $ 6230.4 Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9181.9 3.60GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — Rs. 9837.8Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 11805.5Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 3.70GHz — $18361.9Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — $29513.5Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — $1311.8Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — $1377.4Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — $1377.4 Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 1966.4Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8772Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — RUB 10895.2Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — RUB 9Intel Core i3-7320 @ 3.90GHz Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8526 i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz — $ 6886.3Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 10625.6Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.00GHz — $ 14691.537.4 Intel Core i5-10600K — $15533.7 Intel Core i5-11400 — $11937.4 Intel Core i5-11600K — $ 17184.
6 ₽ 5246.5Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 5245.9Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 12806.4Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ tel5 Core508.9 2400S @ 2.50GHz — $4309.3 Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — $10783Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — $ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — $6886.3 Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — ₽ 4918.6Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — Rs. 8526Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — Rs. 2.80GHz — $ 9837.8 Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6 Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 8394.9 Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9188.5 Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9412.2 GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 9444.3Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz — RUB 18693.2Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 11805.5Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core05 @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 30366.2Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.
90GHz — $ 43288.7 Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — $14536.7 Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — $12133.5Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — $12986.2 3.40GHz — ₽ 16396.8Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 18102.8Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 13117.3Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — Rs. @ 3.10GHz — $ 26235.3 Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 13117.3 Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 12461.4 Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 3934.7 Intel Core i5-660 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 3213.9 Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 14429.148.3Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — Rs. 5902.4Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 2.67GHz — $ 10527.2 Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 13773.2 Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 15739.6 Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $16396.8 Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $15676 GHz — ₽ 24770.1Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.
90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 18364.5 i7-11700K — $ 26891.9Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 30826.6Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9837.2 -2700K @ 3.50GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $11740Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz — $16330.6Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3820 13117.3Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 26169.1Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — RUB 52471.3Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — RUB 62572.2Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 15740.9Intel Core i7-4770K 20tel Core135 3.20GHz — RUB 22470.5 Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — RUB 32794.3 Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 26169.1514.8Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — RUB 19676.3Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — RUB 32728.1Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — RUB 50503.6Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 28444 Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 27547.1 Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — RUB 36073.8 Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 21325.3 Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz — RUB 23283.8 Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.
30GHz — RUB 22890.3 GHz — ₽ 60998Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — Rs. Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.70GHz -930 @ 2.80GHz — $3934.7Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — $4637.2Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — $16069.6Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — $6558.3Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9181.9Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9837.2Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 21644 Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 11805.5 Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 13116.7 Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.33GHz — RUB 14428.5 ₽ 38698.1Intel Core i9-11900K — ₽ 32007.9Intel Core i9-12900K — ₽ 38697.4Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.30GHz — ₽
86GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 1308.5Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 980.6Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 983.2Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 849.4Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz — ₽ 4919.3 Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz — $1311.1 Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz — $1901.5 Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz — $ 983.2 Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2.83GHz — RUB 1311.1Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 642.1Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz — RUB 2622.9Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 73788.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 98119.4Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 17292.1Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 59621.3 Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 105531Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 118452.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 2622.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2950.
9Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 1507.9Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz — RUB 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz — RUB 6526.2Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2228.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 21972.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 2295Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 12462.1Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 3213.3Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 4576.9Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 2288.4Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 2155.3Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 2688.5Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3016.5Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 7867.5Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5246.5Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 7214.2Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 11693.4Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 6886.3Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 7214.2Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 10490.5Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3.
40GHz — ₽ 6558.3Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 18903Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 6840.4Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 5246.5Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 5592.2Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 7273.3Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 6763.6Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 6558.3Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz — ₽ 6943.4Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 1639.1Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 6231.1Intel Pentium G840 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 2295Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 6362.2Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz — ₽ 8123.3Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3.80GHz — ₽ 6580Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz — ₽ 6618
Change Variant To
Select..AREZ EXPEDITION RX 570AREZ EXPEDITION RX 570 OCAREZ EXPEDITION RX 570 OC 8 GBAREZ STRIX RX 570 GAMINGAREZ STRIX RX 570 GAMING OCASRock Phantom Gaming D RX 570ASRock Phantom Gaming D RX 570 OC 8 GBASRock Phantom Gaming X RX 570 OCASRock Phantom Gaming X RX 570 OC 8 ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 8GASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 OC 4GASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 OC 8GBIOSTAR RX 570BIOSTAR RX 570 AvengerColorFire RX 570 UstormDataland RX 570 Dual CoolDataland RX 570 X-SerialDataland RX 570 X-Serial WarDataland RX 570 X-Serial War GBGIGABYTE AORUS RX 570GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 570 4GGIGABYTE RX 570 GAMINGGIGABYTE RX 570 GAMING MININGGIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING MINING Rev.
1.1GIGABYTE Radeon RX 570 Gaming 4GGIGABYTE Radeon RX 570 Gaming 4G MIGIGABYTE Radeon RX 570 Gaming 8GGIGABYTE Radeon RX 570 Gaming 8G MIHIS RX 570 IceQ X2 OCHIS RX 570 IceQX2 TurboKUROTOSHIKOU RX 570MAXSUN RX 570 GiantMSI RX 570 ARMORMSI RX 570 ARMOR 8 GBMSI RX 570 ARMOR MK2MSI RX 570 ARMOR MK2 OCMSI RX 570 ARMOR OCMSI RX 570 ARMOR OC 8 GBMSI RX 570 GAMINGMSI RX 570 GAMING 8 GBMSI RX 570 GAMING XMSI RX 570 GAMING X 8 GBMSI RX 570 MECH 2 OC 8 GBMSI Radeon RX 570 Armor Radeon RX 570 Armor Radeon RX 570 OCMSI Radeon RX 570 Armor 8GMSI Radeon RX 570 Armor 8G OCMSI Radeon RX 570 Armor MK2 8GMSI Radeon RX 570 Armor MK2 8G OCMSI Radeon RX 570 Gaming 4GMSI Radeon RX 570 Gaming 8GMSI Radeon RX 570 Gaming X 4GMSI Radeon RX 570 Gaming X 8GMSI Radeon RX 570 Mech 2 8G OCONDA RX 570 ModelPowerColor Red Devil RX 570 OCPowerColor Red Dragon RX 570 OCPowerColor Red Dragon RX 570 OC 8 GBSapphire NITRO+ RX 570Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GBSapphire PULSE RX 570Sapphire PULSE RX 570Sapphire PULSE RX 570 ire PULSE RX 570 ITX MINIVisionTek RX 570 OverclockedXFX RS RX 570 Black EditionXFX RS RX 570 Black Edition 8 GBXFX RS RX 570 XXXYeston RX 570 GAMEACE
Desired tuning quality
Select.
.Ultra quality — MSAA, HBAO, and advanced shadows High quality — No MSAA, HBAO, or advanced shadows
- Material Information
- Published: 11/11/2021, 04:55
Mining on CPUs is not as popular as mining on video cards or ASICs, but even in spite of this, there are new projects focused specifically on mining using the CPU. One such new project is the Raptoreum cryptocurrency with a hybrid proof-of-work system, i.e. There are two ways to get Raptoreum cryptocurrency using mining and staking (POS&POS). Raptoreum cryptocurrency mining is based on the unique GhostRider algorithm with protection against mining on video cards and ASICs. If you are interested in mining cryptocurrencies on processors, then you should definitely pay attention to this project, because. to date the profitability of mining is approximately 3 times higher than mining of the popular Monero cryptocurrency, which is also based on the CPU-based RandomX algorithm.
Hashrate on the GhostRider mining algorithm is highly dependent not only on the number of cores, but also on the size and speed of the cache memory of the processor itself, so more expensive enthusiast-oriented processor models have a significant advantage compared to budget and mid-budget models.
Hashrate of Intel processors based on the GhostRider algorithm
| Processor | Hashrate | Processor | Hashrate |
| Core i9 12900K | 2291 | Core i5 11400 | 751 |
| Core i9 10900K | 1339 | Core i5 10600K | 744 |
| Core i9 9900K | 1166 | Core i5 10310U | 269 |
| Core i7 10870H | 754 | Core i5 7500 | 395 |
| Core i7 9700K | 862 | Core i5 7500U | 233 |
| Core i7 9750H | 419 | Core i5 5250U | 171 |
| Core i7 8700K | 742 | Core i5 3337U | 37 |
| Core i7 8550U | 286 | Core i5 520M | 100 |
| Core i7 8250U | 284 | Core i3 10100 | 455 |
| Core i7 6700 | 541 | Core i3 4160T | 172 |
| Core i7 4790K | 559 | Core i3 5005U | 120 |
| Core i7 4770 | 323 | XEON E3 1245V5 | 476 |
| Core i7 3770 | 495 | XEON E5 2699 | 1673 |
| Core i7 2600K | 486 | XEON E5 2620v2 | 630 |
| Core i7 2640m | 179 | XEON E3 1230v6 | 509 |
AMD processor hashrate based on the GhostRider algorithm:
| Processor | Hashrate | Processor | Hashrate |
| Ryzen 9 5950X | 4247 | Ryzen 5 5600X | 1699 |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | 3557 | Ryzen 5 5600H | 827 |
| Ryzen 9 3950X | 4236 | Ryzen 5 5600G | 889 |
| Ryzen 9 3900XT | 3781 | Ryzen 5 4750G | 872 |
| Ryzen 9 3900X | 3555 | Ryzen 5 4600H | 675 |
| Ryzen 9 3900 | 3601 | Ryzen 5 3600X | 1857 |
| Ryzen 7 5800X | 2111 | Ryzen 5 3600 | 1756 |
| Ryzen 7 3800X | 2038 | Ryzen 5 1600 | 872 |
| Ryzen 7 3700X | 1636 | Ryzen 5 1400 | 410 |
| Ryzen 7 3700U | 331 | Threadripper 3970X | 8587 |
| Ryzen 7 2700X | 1192 | Threadripper 2990W | 3126 |
| Ryzen 7 2700U | 335 | Threadripper 2950X | 2395 |
| Ryzen 7 1700X | 841 | Threadripper 1950X | 1574 |
| EPYC 7413 | 5937 | ||
| EPYC 7742 | 17750 |
Raptoreum mining calculator on processors:
To calculate the profit from mining on the Raptoreum cryptocurrency processor, it is not enough to know only the hashrate on the GhostRider algorithm.
To do this, you also need to know the cryptocurrency rate, the complexity of the network, as well as the size and time of the block. To simplify these calculations, there are mining calculators that take all the necessary data automatically, you only need to specify your hashrate. To calculate the profitability of Raptoreum cryptocurrency mining on processors, you can use the calculator profit-mine.com and mineraptorum.com
Mining wallet can be obtained on the exchange dex-trade.com
Conclusion: AMD processors, as before, continue to hold leadership in tasks related to cryptocurrency mining, regardless of the chosen mining algorithm. If you have a powerful enough processor, for example Ryzen 5800X, then the mining income can be 1.6-1.8 USD per day, which is quite a lot by the standards of mining on processors. With such indicators, the processor can pay for itself in less than a year. For comparison, video cards, given the inflated prices, now pay off in 1.