Intel Pentium B950 vs Intel Core i5-560M
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium B950 and Intel Core i5-560M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Pentium B950
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i5-560M
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium B950
- CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 6. 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.154 vs 0.479
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.145 vs 0.072
Launch date | 15 May 2011 vs 1 September 2010 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.154 vs 0.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.145 vs 0.072 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-560M
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 52% higher clock speed: 3.20 GHz vs 2.1 GHz
- Around 24% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 85C
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1252 vs 940
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 1890 vs 992
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 446 vs 344
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 950 vs 649
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 25.197 vs 19.451
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.133 vs 2.037
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.20 GHz vs 2.1 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 85C |
L3 cache | 3072 KB vs 2048 KB |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1252 vs 940 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 1890 vs 992 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 446 vs 344 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 950 vs 649 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 25.197 vs 19.451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.133 vs 2.037 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium B950
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-560M
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Pentium B950 | Intel Core i5-560M |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 940 | 1252 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 992 | 1890 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 344 | 446 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 649 | 950 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.154 | 0.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.451 | 25.197 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.145 | 0.072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.683 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.037 | 2.133 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Pentium B950 | Intel Core i5-560M | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Arrandale |
Launch date | 15 May 2011 | 1 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 2501 | 2370 |
Processor Number | B950 | i5-560M |
Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Launch price (MSRP) | $225 | |
Price now | $89. 97 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.47 | |
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.10 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 2.5 GT/s DMI |
Die size | 149 mm | 81 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB | 3072 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 85C | 105°C |
Maximum frequency | 2. 1 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 624 Million | 382 million |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 2500 MHz | |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | 17.1 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR3 800/1066 |
Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 500 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 10 GHz | 766 MHz |
Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | 766 MHz |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
CRT | ||
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 |
SDVO | ||
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37. 5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) | rPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm |
Sockets supported | PGA988 | BGA1288, PGA988 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCIe configurations | 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 2×4 | 1×16 |
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Pentium B950 vs Core i5-11260H
Availability
No items available
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms Pentium B950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 3614 days newer than Pentium B950.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 44% better in League of Legends than Pentium B950 — 1088 vs 753 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium B950 — 12 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium B950
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
FPS
753
69%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
FPS
1088
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium B950
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
183
FPS
273
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
322
FPS
476
FPS
VALORANT
753
FPS
1088
FPS
League of Legends
1014
FPS
1449
FPS
Minecraft
199
FPS
294
FPS
Fortnite
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium B950
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Single-Core
363
28%
Multi-Core
659
12%
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Single-Core
1304
100%
Multi-Core
5681
100%
Intel Pentium B950 |
vs |
Intel Core i5-11260H |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date |
May 11th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile |
Segment |
Mobile |
2 | Cores |
6 |
2 | Threads |
12 |
2. 66
/FPS GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Core i5-11260H 16 GB, 512 GB SSD Buy on Amazon $1,099 In Stock Updated 37 minutes ago Asus TUF 17.3″ 144Hz FHD Gaming Laptop 413 FPS $ 2.54 /FPS GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Core i5-11260H 32 GB, N/A Storage Buy on Amazon $1,049.98 In Stock Updated 37 minutes ago Asus TUF 17.3″ 144Hz FHD Gaming Laptop 413 FPS $ 2.35 /FPS GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Core i5-11260H 16 GB, N/A Storage Buy on Amazon $968. 98 In Stock Updated 36 minutes ago ASUS TUF Gaming F17 Laptop 413 FPS $ 2.8 /FPS GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Core i5-11260H 32 GB, 1 TB SSD Buy on Amazon $1,158 In Stock Updated 37 minutes ago ASUS 2022 TUF FX706HE Gaming Laptop 413 FPS $ 3.27 /FPS GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Core i5-11260H 32 GB, 1 TB SSD Buy on Amazon $1,349.99 In Stock Updated 35 minutes ago Asus TUF 17.3″ 144Hz FHD Gaming Laptop 413 FPS $ 1. 98 /FPS GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Core i5-11260H 8 GB, N/A Storage Buy on Amazon $816 In Stock Updated 37 minutes ago ASUS TUF Gaming F17 Laptop 413 FPS $ 2.42 /FPS GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Core i5-11260H 8 GB, 512 GB SSD Buy on Amazon $999.99 In Stock Updated 36 minutes ago 2022 Asus TUF FX706HE Gaming Laptop 413 FPS $ 3.15 /FPS GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Core i5-11260H 32 GB, 1 TB SSD Buy on Amazon $1,299 In Stock Updated 36 minutes ago 2022 ASUS TUF FX706HE Gaming Laptop 413 FPS $ 3. |