Intel pentium g630 vs core i5: Intel Core i5-2400 vs Pentium G630

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-i5-2400-vs-pentium-g630%23technologies

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs


Radeon RX
580



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce RTX
4090



GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



Radeon RX
580

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i3
12100F

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
12400F



Core i3
1115G4



Core i3
12100F



EPYC
7h22








Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-i5-2400-vs-pentium-g630%23benchmarks

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs


Radeon RX
580



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce RTX
4090



GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



Radeon RX
580

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i3
12100F

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
12400F



Core i3
1115G4



Core i3
12100F



EPYC
7h22








Comparison of Intel Core i5-3570 and Intel Pentium G630

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-3570 and Intel Pentium G630 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Core i5-3570

versus

Intel Pentium G630

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-3570

  • Newer processor, release date difference 9 month(s)
  • more apps to run at the same time, run more apps at the same time: 2 cores vs. 2
  • 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
  • Approximately 41% more clock speed: 3. 80 GHz vs 2.7 GHz
  • Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 32 nm
  • L1 cache is 2x(s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • L2 cache is 2x(s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • L3 cache 2 times more means more data can be saved in it for quick access
  • Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is approximately 66% higher: 2046 vs 1236
  • Performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark is 3.8 times(a) more: 4914 vs 1295
  • Approximately 66% more Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance: 779 vs 469
  • 3x more Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance: 2537 vs 843
  • CompuBench performance 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.3 times bigger: 3.405 vs 1.017
  • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.1 times bigger: 0.418 vs 0.136
  • CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) performance in 2.93.3 times greater: 2.045 vs 0.698
  • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) performance 3.3 times greater: 6.089 vs 1.872
Release date June 2012 vs September 2011
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Number of threads 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 3.80 GHz vs 2.7 GHz
Process 22 nm vs 32 nm
Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 6144 KB (shared) vs 3072 KB (shared)
PassMark — Single thread mark 2046 vs 1236
PassMark — CPU mark 4914 vs 1295
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 779 vs 469
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2537 vs 843
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.405 vs 1.017
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.418 vs 0.136
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.045 vs 0.698
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 6.089 vs 1.872

Reasons to choose Intel Pentium G630

  • About 3% more maximum core temperature: 69.1°C vs 67.4 °C
  • About 18% less power consumption: 65 Watt vs 77 Watt
  • DesktopBench5 performance — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2.5 times bigger: 25.45 vs 10.336
Maximum core temperature 69. 1°C vs 67.4°C
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt vs 77 Watt
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 25.45 vs 10.336

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 2: Intel Pentium G630

PassMark — Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
10.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
Name Intel Core i5-3570 Intel Pentium G630
PassMark — Single thread mark 2046 1236
PassMark — CPU mark 4914 1295
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 779 469
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2537 843
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 2819
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.405 1.017
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 10.336 25.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.418 0.136
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.045 0.698
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 6.089 1.872
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 1602
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 1602

Performance comparison

Compare
  • Core i5 660
    Compare
  • Core i5 661
    Compare
  • Core i5 650
    Compare
    • Pentium G620 9000 9000) 38%)

      Pentium G630

      37. 2

      Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

      The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

      The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

      Speed ​​in office use

      Core i5 760

      54.7 (+23%)

      Pentium G630

      44.5

      Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

      The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

      Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

      Speed ​​in heavy applications

      Core i5 760

      27.8 (+46%)

      Pentium G630

      19.1

      Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading up to 8 cores.

      The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

      At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

      Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

      Speed ​​of numerical operations

    Intel Core i5-3570 Intel Pentium G630
    Architecture name Ivy Bridge Sandy Bridge
    Production date June 2012 September 2011
    Price at first issue date $231 $100
    Place in the ranking 1992 2669
    Price now $173. 63 $24.99
    Processor Number i5-3570 G630
    Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor
    Status Discontinued Discontinued
    Price/performance ratio (0-100) 12.05 27.96
    Applicability Desktop Desktop
    Support 64 bit
    Base frequency 3. 40 GHz 2.70 GHz
    Bus Speed ​​ 5 GT/s DMI 5 GT/s DMI
    Crystal area 133mm 131 mm
    Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) 64 KB (per core)
    Level 2 cache 256 KB (per core) 256 KB (per core)
    Level 3 cache 6144 KB (shared) 3072 KB (shared)
    Process 22 nm 32 nm
    Maximum case temperature (TCase) 67 °C
    Maximum core temperature 67. 4 °C 69.1°C
    Maximum frequency 3.80 GHz 2.7 GHz
    Number of cores 4 2
    Number of threads 4 2
    Number of transistors 504 million
    Maximum number of memory channels 2 2
    Maximum memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s 17 GB/s
    Maximum memory size 32GB 32GB
    Supported memory types DDR3 1333/1600 DDR3 1066
    Device ID 0x152
    Graphics base frequency 650MHz 850MHz
    Graphics max dynamic frequency 1. 15GHz 1.10 GHz
    Maximum GPU clock 1.15GHz 1.1 GHz
    Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
    Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
    Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
    Intel® Quick Sync Video
    Integrated graphics Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Intel HD Graphics
    Maximum number of monitors supported 3 2
    WiDi support
    Low Halogen Options Available
    Maximum number of processors in configuration 1 1
    Package Size 37. 5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
    Supported sockets FCLGA1155 FCLGA1155
    Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 65 Watt
    Thermal Solution 2011D
    PCI Express revision 3.0 2.0
    PCIe configurations up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4
    Anti-Theft Technology
    Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
    Intel® Identity Protection Technology
    Intel® Secure Key Technology
    Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
    Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
    Flexible Display interface (FDI)
    Idle States
    Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
    Intel 64
    Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
    Intel® AES New Instructions
    Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
    Intel® TSX-NI
    Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
    Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
    Thermal Monitoring
    Intel® Fast Memory Access
    Intel® Flex Memory Access
    Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
    Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
    Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

    Simple household tasks

    Core i5 760

    46.6 (+15%)

    Pentium G630

    40.5

    Demanding games and tasks

    Core i5 760

    22 (+108%)

    Pentium G630

    10.6

    Extreme

    Core i5 760

    4.4 (+110%)

    Pentium G630

    2. 1

    Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

    We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

    Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

    When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

    Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

    Benchmarks

    Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

    Passmark

    Intel Core i5 760

    2441 (+91%)

    Intel Pentium G630

    1276

    Characteristics

    Main

    SOCTUSTUSTUSTUSTISTUSTISTISTIONS OF MAINSTICAL PLACES WOST. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. LGA 1155
    Manufacturer Firm Intel Intel
    Code name of the Microarchitecture family. Lynnfield Sandy Bridge

    Performance

    Cores The total number of physical cores. 4 2
    ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 4 2
    Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Missing
    Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in case of corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 2.8 GHz 2.7 GHz
    TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 95 W 65 W

    Cache and RAM

    Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 16 GB 32 GB
    Supported type of RAM The type of RAM determines its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR3 1066/1333 DDR3
    Dual-channel
    RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2
    RAM bandwidth 21 GB/s 17 GB/s

    Video core

    PCI

    PCI-E PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 1×16, 2×8 Gen 3, 16 Lanes
    (CPU only)

    Details

    Model Official name. i5-760 G630
    ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Lynnfield Sandy Bridge
    Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. For Ryzen with a chiplet layout, the CCD process is implied. 45 nm 32 nm
    DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i5-760 Processor (8M Cache, 2.80 GHz) Intel® Pentium® Processor G630 (3M Cache, 2.70 GHz)
    Instructions 64-bit 64-bit
    Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations.

    2024 © All rights reserved