AMD HD 6770 Mobile 1GB DDR5 MXM 3 Laptop Video Card 216-0810001 Compeve Compenet AMD HD 6770 Mobile 1GB DDR5 MXM 3 Laptop Video Card 216-0810001 [HD 6770 Mobile]
CALL US : 866-546-7414
Categories |
DESCRIPTION
Condition: New REVIEWS |
© Copyright © 2022 Compeve Corporation.
Back to Top
AMD Radeon E9174 MXM vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9174 MXM and AMD Radeon HD 6770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
AMD Radeon E9174 MXM
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9174 MXM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 2.
2x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
- Around 79% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
Launch date | 3 October 2017 vs 4 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops vs 696.![]() |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770M
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9174 MXM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Name | AMD Radeon E9174 MXM | AMD Radeon HD 6770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 964 | |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 572 | |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 8338 | |
CompuBench 1.![]() |
4.817 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 234.842 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.475 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.71 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3044 | |
GFXBench 4.![]() |
3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9174 MXM | AMD Radeon HD 6770M | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Lexa | Whistler |
Launch date | 3 October 2017 | 4 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 945 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 696.![]() |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 716 million |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Interface | MXM-A (3.![]() |