GeForce 6700 XL [in 1 benchmark]
NVIDIA
GeForce 6700 XL
Buy
- Interface PCIe 1.0 x16
- Core clock speed 525 MHz
- Max video memory 128 MB
- Memory type GDDR3
- Memory clock speed 1100 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Summary
NVIDIA started GeForce 6700 XL sales 14 November 2004. This is Curie architecture desktop card based on 110 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 128 MB of GDDR3 memory clocked at 1.1 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 17.6 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is single-slot card attached via PCIe 1.0 x16 interface. 1x 6-pin power connector is required.
We have no data on GeForce 6700 XL benchmark results.
General info
Of GeForce 6700 XL’s architecture, market segment and release date.
| Place in performance rating | not rated | |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | |
| GPU code name | NV43 A2 | |
| Market segment | Desktop | |
| Release date | 14 November 2004 (17 years ago) | |
| Current price | $535 | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Technical specs
GeForce 6700 XL’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce 6700 XL’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Core clock speed | 525 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Number of transistors | 146 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
| Texture fill rate | 4. 200 |
of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce 6700 XL’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
| Width | 1-slot | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce 6700 XL: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
| Memory bandwidth | 17. 6 GB/s |
of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 6700 XL. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA |
API support
APIs supported by GeForce 6700 XL, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
| OpenCL | N/A | |
| Vulkan | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of GeForce 6700 XL.
Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
- Passmark
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
6700 XL
95
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with GeForce 6700 XL according to our statistics.
Core i5
2300
12.
5%
Ryzen 7
PRO 3700
12.5%
Core 2
Duo E6600
12.5%
EPYC
7763
12.5%
Athlon II
X4 635
12.5%
Core i5
4590
12.5%
Core i5
3570
12.5%
Athlon II
X3 455
12.5%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about GeForce 6700 XL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT review: Nvidia wins this round
- Entertainment
Unless AMD actually sells them for $479, of course
By Sean Hollister / @StarFire2258
|
Share this story
Photo by Tom Warren / The Verge
Photo by Tom Warren / The Verge
AMD and Nvidia are pretending they live in a fantasy world, one where you can buy a state-of-the-art graphics card for under $700. Heck, a fantasy world where you can buy a new AMD GPU at all — though AMD has repeatedly promised it would stock additional RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT graphics cards at its website for $579 and $649 respectively, I’ve seen no evidence the company has ever replenished those supplies since those cards first debuted four months ago.
Today, the company’s launching a GPU that might change that: the $479 Radeon RX 6700 XT. AMD tells The Verge it will have “significantly more GPUs available” when it goes on sale tomorrow morning. If that’s true — if this is the moment the clouds part, the GPU shortage recedes, and you can actually buy a RX 6700 XT for $479 for even a limited time — you absolutely should. It’s a solid performer at 1440p.
But amusingly, in the fantasy world where we’re pretending a $400 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and $500 RTX 3070 still exist, the RX 6700 XT actually feels outgunned. It’s not the clear-cut Nvidia competitor you might have hoped for.
6Verge Score
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
$479
The Good
- Good 1440p performance in most of today’s games
- AMD says you’ll be able to buy this one
The Bad
- Slightly larger than Nvidia equivalents
- Worse ray tracing performance
- Still has 650W power supply requirement
- No DLSS equivalent
$479.
00 at AMD Direct
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT comes with a simple pitch: a way to max out your 2560 x 1440 monitor with the latest games at maximum settings, all for $100 less than the RX 6800 I reviewed late last year. If that sounds familiar, that’s because it’s the same playbook Nvidia used last fall, where its $400 RTX 3060 Ti undercut the $500 RTX 3070 by the same amount.
So in our fantasy world where those prices held, this would be the lay of the land:
Mid-range desktop gaming GPUs in 2021
| $399 | Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti | Solid 1440p |
| $479 | AMD RX 6700 XT | Maxed 1440p |
| $499 | Nvidia RTX 3070 | Maxed 1440p / entry-level 4K |
| $579 | AMD RX 6800 | Maxed 1440p / decent 4K |
Given those prices, I’d expect a $480 AMD card to soundly thrash a $400 Nvidia card. (That’s what the $580 Radeon RX 6800 did to the $500 RTX 3070, after all.
) I’d also expect it to be within spitting distance of the $500 Nvidia card if there were only a $20 bill between the two.
But running AMD’s card through my 15-game gauntlet on my own 1440p monitor, AMD’s new card sometimes lost to Nvidia’s 3060 Ti — sometimes by a lot — and it can even lose to Nvidia’s vanilla $329 RTX 3060 in tests where I had ray tracing turned on.
1440p gaming (with Core i7-7700K, 32GB DDR4)
| AC: Odyssey | 57 | 66 | 58 | 72 | No |
| AC: Valhalla | 50 | 63 | 75 | 70 | Yes |
| Arkham Knight | 126 | 147 | 140 | 156 | No |
| Borderlands 3 (Badass) | 50 | 65 | 82 | 81 | Yes |
| Borderlands 3 (Ultra) | 55 | 69 | 87 | 86 | Yes |
| CS: GO | 231 | 236 | 225 | 238 | No |
| Control | 50 | 63 | 65 | 76 | Not quite |
| Control (RT) | 29 | 37 | 25 | 42 | Definitely no |
| Control (RT+DLSS) | 51 | 64 | N/A | 68 | N/A |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 38 | 49 | 52 | 55 | Yes |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (RT) | 18 | 22 | N/A | 27 | No AMD RT support yet |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (RT+DLSS) | 39 | 45 | N/A | 52 | N/A |
| COD: Warzone | 87 | 102 | 114 | 120 | Yes |
| DX: Mankind Divided | 57 | 74 | 89 | 88 | Yes |
| Metro Exodus (Extreme) | 27 | 37 | 38 | 44 | No |
| Metro Exodus (Ultra+RT) | 35 | 47 | 46 | 64 | No |
| Metro Exodus (RT+DLSS) | 46 | 61 | N/A | 72 | N/A |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 78 | 99 | 105 | 105 | Yes |
| SotR (RT) | 47 | 59 | 55 | 72 | No |
| SotR (RT+DLSS) | 57 | 72 | N/A | 82 | N/A |
| Star Wars Squadrons | 125 | 151 | 167 | 165 | Yes |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 46 | 61 | 64 | 70 | Not quite |
| WD: Legion (RT) | 27 | 35 | 25 | 42 | Definitely no |
| WD: Legion (RT+DLSS) | 50 | 62 | N/A | 62 | N/A |
| Valheim | 60 | 81 | 70 | 89-91 | Definitely no |
Frames per second; all games tested at highest graphical preset unless specified.
As you’ll see in the chart above, AMD does notch some wins, and in many cases lives up to its promise of maxed settings at 1440p. Shadow of the Tomb Raider looks glorious on my G-Sync / FreeSync monitor at an average 105 frames per second with all the eye candy turned up, and the difference between 120 frames and 114 frames in Call of Duty: Warzone at max settings (probably) isn’t worth quibbling about.
With a beefier processor, you should be able to get 60+ frames per second in a maxed-out Cyberpunk 2077 experience, too — I’m still testing with my old Core i7-7700K, which is more than good enough for most of the games on this list (SotR shows I’m 100 percent GPU-bound), but a few titles like Microsoft Flight Simulator and Cyberpunk are still notoriously CPU limited and more cores could help. As another example, my colleague Tom Warren saw identical framerates to me in Watch Dogs: Legion and Metro Exodus pairing the 6700 XT with a far newer Intel chip, but slightly higher in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla.
Is that a 3060 Ti or 3070 on the left? Both can beat the RX 6700 XT in some games.
But look at Valheim. Look at Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. Look at Control. How is AMD underperforming or merely tying these lower tier cards? Things aren’t any rosier at 4K resolution, in case you’re wondering: while I still recommend Nvidia’s 3070 for entry-level 4K, the 6700 XT just doesn’t have the same oomph. In games like Control and Metro Exodus, I had to drop the settings to a comparatively dull “low,” where the 3070 managed to play those games at 4K and medium-spec without trouble. And of course, AMD doesn’t yet have a DLSS competitor if you’re a fan of AI-upscaled resolution.
It’s not like AMD is winning in any other particular way, either. While I’m actually fond of the company’s new two-slot design (clearly inspired by a certain late 1960s muscle car) and I don’t hugely mind going from three to two axial fans, the RX 6700 XT is just as chunky and nearly as power-hungry as the RX 6800 (230W vs.
250W) without as much to show for it. AMD still recommends a 650W power supply, a pricey proposition for those of us with tall PC cases, and you’ll need both 6 and 8-pin PCIe connectors, while Nvidia’s comparable cards make do with a single 8-pin.
I also saw the 6700 XT hit 89 degrees Celsius on one occasion. While I don’t have enough evidence to say that’s a problem, I’ve yet to see Nvidia’s 3070 cross 82 degrees C even with my case fans unplugged.
But as I alluded to in my intro, very little of this will matter if you can actually find this card for $479.
All modern AMD and Nvidia cards have plenty of display support, with one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPorts.
In December, I reported that the true street price of a $399 Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti was actually $675, and that the street price of an $499 RTX 3070 was actually $819. Those were the average prices people actually paid on eBay that month.
If you think that sounds unbelievable, hear this: the street price of the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070 are now approaching $1,200 each.
People are paying triple for what should have been Nvidia’s bang-for-the-buck graphics card now, and the launch of a “$329” RTX 3060 didn’t slow that at all.
To me, this indicates two things: First, AMD probably isn’t going to be able to make anywhere near enough RX 6700 XTs to hit anywhere near that $479 price for the vast majority of buyers, even if it produces “significantly” more cards. I wouldn’t expect today to play out any differently than any previous GPU launch since the pandemic began. It’s a well-established pattern now. Second, none of these fantasyland prices will necessarily keep the RX 6700 XT from being a hit if the supply is there. As you can see from the similar street prices for the 3060 Ti and 3070, the market has a way of balancing prices out.
If you miraculously see this card for its list price, buy it, because you won’t get anything better for anywhere near that price in the near future. But it feels inferior to every Nvidia GPU that can compare — and I wouldn’t trade my 3060 Ti for one.
Most Popular
-
Google is shutting down Stadia
-
Google is trying to reinvent search — by being more than a search engine
-
Apple fires exec after he made crude jokes on the expensive car guy’s TikTok
-
Sonos Sub Mini review: low end for a lower price
-
Meta’s new text-to-video AI generator is like DALL-E for video
Radeon™ RX 6700 XT GAMING OC 12G Key Features | Graphics Card
Key Feature
Windforce 3X
RGB
BUILT STRONG
AORUS ENGINE
WINDFORCE
3X
COOLING SYSTEM
The WINDFORCE 3X cooling system features 3x 80mm unique blade fans, alternate spinning, 5 composite copper heat pipes direct touch GPU, 3D active fan and Screen cooling, which together provide high efficiency heat dissipation.
WINDFORCE 3X COOLING SYSTEM
The WINDFORCE 3X cooling system features 3x 80mm unique blade fans, alternate spinning, 5 composite copper heat pipes direct touch GPU, 3D active fan and Screen cooling, which together provide high efficiency heat dissipation.
SCREEN COOLING
Extended heatsink design allows air flow to pass through, providing better heat
dissipation.
HEAT PIPES DIRECT TOUCH
The shape of the pure copper heat pipe maximizes the direct contact area with the GPU. The heat pipe also covers the VRAM through a large metal plate contact to ensure proper cooling.
PROTECTION METAL BACK PLATE
The metal back plate not only provides an aesthetical shape, but also enhances the
structure of the graphics card to provide complete protection.
POWER INDICATOR
When experiencing any power supply abnormality, the indicator will alert gamers by flashing light.
EXTREME DURABILITY AND OVERCLOCKING
The graphics card uses the better power phase design to allow the MOSFET to operate at
lower temperature, and over-temperature protection design and load balancing for each
MOSFET, plus the Ultra Durable certified chokes and capacitors, to provide excellent
performance and longer system life.
FRIENDLY PCB DESIGN
Fully automated production process ensures top quality of the circuit boards and
eliminates sharp protrusions of the solder connectors seen on the conventional PCB
surface.
This friendly design prevents your hands from getting cut or inadvertently
damaging components when making your build.
AORUS ENGINE
The cutting edge intuitive interface allows you to adjust the clock speed, voltage, fan
performance and power target in real-time according to your game’s requirements.
DOWNLOAD
AMD FreeSync™ Technology
Radeon™ Software
No stuttering. No tearing. Just gaming. AMD FreeSync™ technology puts an end to choppy gameplay and broken frames with fluid, artifact-free performance at virtually any framerate
Minimize input-lag so you can game like a champion.
Delivers extra performance and responsiveness when you need it most.
Improves in-game visuals with virtually no impact on performance.
FOOTNOTES
* “Boost Clock” is the maximum frequency achievable on the GPU running a bursty workload. Boost clock achievability, frequency, and sustainability will vary based on several factors, including but not limited to: thermal conditions and variation in applications and workloads.
* “Game Clock” is the expected GPU clock when running typical gaming applications, set to typical TGP (Total Graphics Power). Actual individual game clock results may vary.
* All the images in this page are for illustration only.
* Product specifications and product appearance may differ from country to country. We recommend that you check with your local dealers for the specifications and appearance of the products available in your country. Colors of products may not be perfectly accurate due to variations caused by photographic variables and monitor settings so it may vary from images shown on this site.
Although we endeavor to present the most accurate and comprehensive information at the time of publication, we reserve the right to make changes without prior notice.
* GIGABYTE graphics cards, except those labeled “Mining Series”, are intended only for use with desktop PCs. Other types of use, such as blockchain computing or cryptocurrency mining, will render the product warranty void.
AMD RX 6700 XT vs Nvidia RTX 3070: Full Comparison with Specs, Price, and More
As it seems, we might be coming out of the GPU shortage, and with that, it is time to start shopping for graphics cards again. Hopefully, now with reasonable pricing. Let’s look at the mid-range cards for the red and green brands. Nvidia is offering the RTX 3070, and AMD has the RX 6700 XT; in their own right, they are amazing cards and offer excellent performance. When it comes down to it though, most people can only buy one, so which one is your best option?
Let’s break down each of these cards separately for a bit.
The AMD RX 6700 XT definitely doesn’t stand out as much as the RTX 3000 series, but it does offer excellent performance and, as long as everything continues to move in the right direction, a great price. AMD describes this card as “The new addition to the AMD Radeon™ RX 6000 Series family is engineered to deliver ultra-high frame rates and the ultimate 1440p gaming experience. Powering the next generation of games with a blend of raytracing, compute, and rasterized effects, the AMD Radeon™ RX 6700 XT graphics cards bring new levels of visual fidelity.” AMD also likes to tout that this architecture is behind the new generations of consoles, including the PS5 and Xbox Series X.
RTX graphics cards, unlike AMD, use Tensor cores for their graphics cards.
The Nvidia RTX 3070 is part of the new family of RTX 3000 cards. It sits right in the middle of price to performance of this range, being topped out by the RTX 3090. So, I like to refer to it as the goldilocks card. It’s not overly expensive, and the performance is excellent as long as you are not trying to break any records.
Nvidia describes this card as “The GeForce RTXTM 3070 Ti and RTX 3070 graphics cards are powered by Ampere—NVIDIA’s 2nd gen RTX architecture. Built with enhanced Ray Tracing Cores and Tensor Cores, new streaming multiprocessors, and high-speed memory, they give you the power you need to rip through the most demanding games.”
Sale
2021 Newest AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 12GB GDDR6, + AllyFlex HDMI
- Chipset: AMD RX 6700 XT
- Memory: 12GB GDDR6
- Boost Clock: Up To 2615MHz
- Cooling: AMD Reference Design
Sale
NVIDIA — GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8GB GDDR6X PCI Express 4.0 Graphics Card — Dark Platinum and Black
- Seamless functionality
- Unparalleled performance
- Packed with features
- Compact construction
While the prices are getting better on both of these cards, they are still not back at their launch MSRP.
Nvidia originally released the RTX 3070 in October 2020 at $500. Now, you can find it for around $600 if you want to buy a new one, or take a chance on a used one for as low as $450.
AMD released the RX 6700 XT in March 2021 at $475. Now, you can find it for as low as $499 new or used for as low as $330.
Gaming/ Creative Application Benchmarks
At the end of the day, price doesn’t mean a lot if the card doesn’t perform to its mark. The RTX 3070 outperforms its previous generation by 45% which is a pretty unprecedented jump considering that it was released at around the same MSRP as the 2070. In comparison, the RX 6700 XT outperforms its previous generation by 30%, still a respectable number. Most of the time, these numbers come from non-real-world benchmarks, so let’s look at a table comparing the two cards in some real-world benchmarks.
Besides Metro: Exodus, these results are neck and neck. We get a real difference when Ray Tracing is turned on. Nvidia cards now also sport a feature called DLSS or Deep Learning Super Sampling; this allows the GPU to boost the performance from 30%-50% without a loss in image quality.
With DLSS being supported in more games and game engines, it is hard to recommend the 6700 XT strictly on gaming performance.
However, AMD does have an answer to DLSS. They call their’s FidelityFX Super Resolution or FSR for short; in typical AMD fashion, their acronyms are entirely nonsensical when read as the full name. While FSR is an impressive feature, unfortunately, at the time of writing, only 47 games support FSR, whereas over 150 support DLSS.
*chart provided by the author
Gaming isn’t the end all be all when it comes to declaring a graphics card better than another. For example, using these cards in a workstation for video editing, photo editing, or 3D rendering is a great choice. Regarding video editing, Puget Systems, a reputable computer builder specializing in creators’ workstations, recommends sticking with Nvidia. Using Adobe Premiere, Nvidia GPUs see improved performance across the board than AMD. Take this with a grain of salt because that doesn’t necessarily mean that the Nvidia GPU is physically better than the AMD.
A lot of video CODECs are more compatible with Nvidia architecture than AMD. When it comes to 3D rendering, I am taking benchmarks from Blender, specifically the BMW and Classroom Render.
Now, while the RTX 3070 does beat out the RX 6700 XT in these render tests, if you are coming from an older generation of GPU, these numbers are still quite impressive. With that being said, if you are building or upgrading your system to be your new creative workstation, it is probably best to go with the RTX 3070. Not only does it outperform in these tests, but as mentioned, Nvidia’s systems are more compatible with more programs than AMD’s
*chart provided by the author
Something that is quickly growing as a feature to look for GPUs is the streaming capability. Nowadays, everyone and their grandmother are streaming in some way, whether that is on Facebook, YouTube, or Twitch. GPUs play a significant role in that process; OBS (Open Broadcast Software) offers GPU encoding for streaming and recording to take a load off your CPU.
Nvidia has leaned into this market and has launched a whole streaming suite that comes along with their cards. Their proprietary encoder NVENC (Nvidia Encoder) claims to free up resources on your computer to be able to play triple-A games while still streaming full-quality at 1080p. While these tend to be more than just claims, the RTX 3070 does have a mid-range performance compared to its bigger siblings.
AMD does have an encoder; while it does perform well compared to x264 with a lower performance CPU, it does not hold a candle to NVENC, and it seems like AMD knows that. It looks like AMD is focusing on getting more raw performance out of their cards and then concentrating on the extra bits later, whereas Nvidia is now trying to see what else they can do. Something to keep in mind with both of these encoders is that, if you are just streaming your camera to hang out, they will outperform the x264 encoder handily. So, if you are a streamer that likes the chat and occasionally plays some light games, both AMD and Nvidia are going to give you similar results.
Sale
2021 Newest AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 12GB GDDR6, + AllyFlex HDMI
- Chipset: AMD RX 6700 XT
- Memory: 12GB GDDR6
- Boost Clock: Up To 2615MHz
- Cooling: AMD Reference Design
Sale
NVIDIA — GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8GB GDDR6X PCI Express 4.0 Graphics Card — Dark Platinum and Black
- Seamless functionality
- Unparalleled performance
- Packed with features
- Compact construction
Let’s take a look at thermals and power consumption. For both cards, the TDP is around 220W under a gaming load. Of course, thermals are dependent on which version of the card you purchase. Still, for the gigabyte gaming OC model for each of these cards, the temperature averaged around 70℃, which is very respectable for both, so, if your primary concern is a quiet and cool machine, these cards will fit excellently.
If you are looking at these two cards for overclocking, they are not going to benefit noticeably. Pushing them both to their max overclock, which is unstable at best for both cards, you will see around a 10% gain in FPS. However, this may seem like a good size jump for these cards that already both perform well it won’t make a real-world difference for you.
In terms of IO for both cards, they are relatively similar to most modern cards, with three display ports and one HDMI 2.1 port. If you are an aesthetic person and want to show off your balling PC to all your friends, both of these cards feature tons of different designs from the usual round-up of GPU manufacturers. Although, if we are just comparing the two “founder’s” editions (I say founder’s in quotes because AMD does not have a brand name for their internally produced cards), I will lean toward the RTX 3070. The big future-looking brick goes well with anything you put next to it, while the RX 6700 XT from AMD looks like it could have come out six years ago and not look timeless.
Now, keep in mind that this is just a personal preference. The look of it doesn’t affect the performance at all.
Conclusion
You can look at these stats all day long and still not make a decision, but ultimately these cards are both incredible feats of engineering, and now that the GPU shortage seems to be coming to an end, we should celebrate! You will enjoy playing new games and creating to your heart’s desire no matter which one of these you choose. If you have made it all the way down here, I have one request of you. Please don’t scalp or let your friends, family, coworkers, or even strangers scalp these cards; otherwise, we are going to have to keep talking about the “Great GPU Shortage” for years to come, and I, for one, want to buy a GPU at MSRP.
Last update on 2022-09-30 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs. Radeon RX 6700 XT
We recently compared the GeForce RTX 3070 against the Radeon RX 6700 XT in a 50 game head-to-head battle and the GeForce got the better of the exchanges.
It was a close battle for the most part, but the RTX 3070 was faster and considering the feature set, it seemed like the way to go, assuming pricing is competitive.
Some readers were upset with that comparison though, claiming the 6700 XT was designed to compete with the RTX 3060 Ti, a comparison we were always going to make anyway.
Technically speaking, the 6700 XT is priced closer to the RTX 3070 based on MSRP. But no need to lose sleep over that one as today we have another 50 game benchmark comparing the RTX 3060 Ti and 6700 XT, so we can put that debate to rest.
The RTX 3060 Ti is meant to be available for $400 and the RTX 3070 for $500, with the 6700 XT at $480. Actual pricing is higher and all of these GPUs have been priced well over MSRP for the bulk of their existence.
As of writing, the RTX 3070 is closer to $750, while the 6700 XT is down at $600. A 25% price premium for the Nvidia GPU is steep, and a little hard to justify, even with the aid of DLSS and much better ray tracing performance.
If anything, that was a favorable matchup for AMD fans who were unhappy with the previous comparison. The RTX 3060 Ti is much more affordable than the RTX 3070 and slightly less than the 6700 XT at $570.
In a best case scenario for AMD, the 6700 XT and 3060 Ti occupy the same price point, so that being the case it will be interesting to see how they stack up across a massive range of games.
For testing we’ve used our AMD Ryzen 9 5950X test system with 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 dual-rank, dual-channel memory. Both GPUs were tested at 1080p, 1440p and 4K across 50 games, using Windows 11 with Resizable Bar enabled, that means SAM was enabled for the Radeon GPU.
The driver versions used were Radeon Adrenalin 22.3.1 and GeForce Game Ready Driver 512.15, as these were the latest available drivers when we started testing a week ago.
Let’s take a look at results for some of the highlight games and then we’ll check out how these two GPUs perform across all 50 games in a single comparison graph.
Benchmarks
Starting with Dying Light 2, the Radeon 6700 XT is slightly faster than the RTX 3060 Ti. We’re talking about an 8% margin at 1080p, 9% at 1440p, and 12% at 4K.
Usually we’d expect the margin to shrink in Nvidia’s favor at the higher resolutions, but that wasn’t the case in this game, though admittedly there’s little difference between an 8% and 12% margin. Strong performance from the 6700 XT, even if it didn’t blow the 3060 Ti away.
Next we have Total War Warhammer III, and here the results swing slightly in Nvidia’s favor with the RTX 3060 Ti offering 5% more frames at 1080p, 8% more at 1440p, and then 17% more at 4K, though neither GPU provided particularly playable performance at 4K.
If you’re after a 60 fps+ experience in this title using the ultra quality settings, then 1080p is the optimal resolution for this class of GPU, though we assume most of you would tune the quality settings for 60 fps at 1440p.
The 6700 XT performs really well in Call of Duty Warzone, pumping out well over 100 fps at 1080p and that made it 13% faster than the 3060 Ti.
The Radeon GPU maintained the lead at 1440p and while not a massive difference, you will at times notice the extra 13% performance. Once again, neither are ideal for 4K gaming, with under 60 fps on average.
Forza Horizon 5 runs very well on Radeon GPUs, especially with Resizable Bar enabled. The 6700 XT enjoys a strong performance lead at 1080p and 1440p where it was 16% and 14% faster, respectively, and then at 4K the margins close right up and here the Radeon GPU was just 4% faster, so basically the same level of performance was seen at this high resolution.
The God of War results are very competitive. Here the RTX 3060 Ti was slightly faster at 1080p, then we saw the same performance at 1440p and 4K.
The 4K results were quite good and it wouldn’t take much to ensure frame rates stay above 60 fps on both camps.
Oh, boy, did Far Cry 6 stir the pot in our last benchmark. We mentioned how AMD fans didn’t like us comparing the 6700 XT against the RTX 3070, but then Nvidia radicals did not like us enabling the HD texture back in Far Cry 6 either.
Despite the fact that 6700 XT can deliver over 60 fps at 4K with HD textures enabled, we were told it’s highly unrealistic and we did that to make the GeForce GPU look bad.
Truth is, we’ve always tested games that offer HD texture packs with them enabled, especially when testing mid to high-end hardware. This was nothing new and HD textures shouldn’t impact performance assuming you have enough VRAM. It’s a free visual upgrade and for most gamers well worth using… again, if you have enough VRAM, which you should when spending $500+ on a graphics card.
Those playing Far Cry 6 at 1080p or 1440p with either the 6700 XT or RTX 3060 Ti need not worry about VRAM in this title, even with the HD texture pack, both worked really well despite the Radeon GPU offering up to 10% more performance. At 4K however, it does become a problem for the 3060 Ti as it’s unable to deliver playable performance, while the 6700 XT sailed along without issue thanks to its larger 12GB VRAM buffer.
In our opinion, 12GB VRAM should be the minimum at this price point. Bizarrely, Nvidia’s slower RTX 3060 (the non-Ti version) does pack a 12GB VRAM buffer. Go figure.
Moving on to F1 2021, this game enables ray tracing when using the ‘Ultra High’ quality preset, so we’ve left it enabled as we like to test with presets where possible.
This setting saw both GPUs render 116 fps on average at 1080p, but at 1440p the RTX 3060 Ti edged ahead by an 8% margin and then took a commanding lead at 4K by a 14% margin. Ideally, you’ll want to lower the visual quality settings to boost frame rates, but if you keep ray tracing enabled the GeForce will reign supreme.
Metro Exodus Enhanced is another title that enables ray tracing by default. In this particular case, RT hardware support is required to launch the ‘Enhanced’ version of the game.
This is a bad title for AMD with the RTX 3060 Ti dominating the 6700 XT, offering 27% more performance at 1080p, 31% more at 1440p, and then 40% more at 4K, though neither GPU was suitable at this resolution.
Moving on, we have Rainbow Six Extraction where performance is very similar. The 6700 XT was slightly faster at 1080p, then we see basically identical performance at 1440p, and at 4K the 3060 Ti nudged ahead, though performance overall was much the same.
Frame rates in Apex Legends were also similar, though the RTX 3060 Ti did provide the best performance at all tested resolutions. We’re only talking about a 4% difference at 1080p and 1440p with a 6% margin seen at 4K.
Fortnite’s chapter three, season two was recently released and with it a number of performance related issues. That said, the game now appears to be in a pretty good shape, though Radeon owners will want to make sure they’re running the game in the DX12 mode as it’s basically broken using DX11.
Typically, Fortnite gamers will want to opt for medium level quality settings for that competitive advantage, but doing so for a GPU comparison makes it more of a CPU benchmark. Also, scaling for Radeon and GeForce GPUs is very similar.
The 6700 XT did provide noticeably better frame time performance with the latest update and this was evident at 1080p. Even at 1440p, the 1% lows were 25% higher using the 6700 XT which is a significant margin. By the time we reach 4K though any and all performance differences were neutralized.
Cyberpunk 2077 is another competitive title for the RTX 3060 Ti and 6700 XT. The Radeon GPU was a whisker faster at 1080p and 1440p, but the margins aren’t worth getting excited over. Performance was basically the same as you won’t be able to tell the difference between 87 and 91 fps.
Performance Summary
Based on the dozen or so games we just looked at, the RTX 3060 Ti and 6700 XT appear to be very close in terms of performance. There were a few titles that did heavily favor one over the other, but for the most part performance was similar.
We did spend a week testing through 50 games, so let’s go check out that data…
Starting with the 1080p expanded benchmark data, we see that the RTX 3060 Ti was just 2% slower on average across the 50 games tested.
The big wins for Nvidia came in Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition, PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds, Warhammer Vermintide 2, War Thunder and Resident Evil Village. For AMD, the 6700 XT was most dominant in Sniper Elite 4, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, Horizon Zero Dawn, Borderlands 3, Forza Horizon 5, Warzone and The Division 2.
Moving to 1440p, we found a tie between the 6700 XT and RTX 3060 Ti, though that hardly means they delivered the same performance across all titles. It simply signals the margins are balanced out overall.
Of the 50 games tested, the margin was less than 10% in either direction for 39 of them. Then for 22 of the games tested the margin was 5% or less which we deem a tie.
The only outlier was Metro Exodus, the rest of the games were within a 14% margin. For those gaming at 1440p, the 6700 XT and 3060 Ti will deliver a similar experience overall.
For those gaming at 4K, the results are a little more interesting as the RTX 3060 Ti is typically faster unless you run out of VRAM.
This only happened on a single game we tested though we’ve also seen this in Ghost Recon Breakpoint, and to an extent Doom using the highest quality settings. Besides Metro Exodus, Nvidia enjoyed solid wins in Vermintide 2, Warhammer III, PUBG, Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, and Star Wars Jedi Fallen order.
Who Wins?
This comparison is as straightforward as they come. The only advantage the Radeon RX 6700 XT has over the RTX 3060 Ti right now is the larger VRAM buffer, jumping from 8GB to 12GB. This is an advantage that will certainly serve the 6700 XT well in the future, but right now there are very few instances where VRAM becomes relevant in terms of raw performance output.
In other words, this is not an issue for the RTX 3060 Ti, and where it might be, the workaround is easy to apply and doesn’t impact visuals significantly.
While we’d have preferred the RTX 3060 Ti to pack more VRAM, it’s got enough to get the job done. The advantages of the RTX 3060 Ti include superior ray tracing performance — which personally I don’t care for too much at this performance tier — but still you can enjoy RT effects if you want, typically at much higher frame rates than you’ll get with the 6700 XT.
The RTX 3060 Ti also supports DLSS which is a key advantage at the moment. AMD is now hard at work to reduce its significance, but they’ve still got some way to go.
It’s possible DLSS won’t be a critical feature in a few years, but we never like to heavily weigh our recommendations on what could be, rather we prefer to focus on the here and now, and right now DLSS is a strong selling point of GeForce RTX GPUs.
With rasterization performance essentially the same, we don’t see many reasons for buying the 6700 XT over the RTX 3060 Ti, especially when the GeForce GPU costs the same or even a little less.
We’re still tracking GPU pricing closely and our recommendation remains to hold out a little longer before making any purchase if possible. But if you want to buy right now, and have ~$600 to spend, we’d go for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.
Shopping Shortcuts:
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon
- AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT on Amazon
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 on Amazon
- AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT on Amazon
- AMD Ryzen 9 5950X on Amazon
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti: Which GPU is better?
The Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti is one of the most affordable 30-Series graphics cards available right now, offering solid ray tracing performance at 1080p.
But, how does it compare to the similarly priced AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT?
The RX 6700 XT launched earlier this year, and is currently the cheapest RDNA 2 graphics card in AMD’s lineup. It targets a slightly higher 1440p resolution and features ray tracing, but is also noticeably more expensive than the RTX 3060 Ti.
So, how does the RX 6700 XT compare with the RTX 3060 Ti? Read on to discover what the two graphics cards have in common – and how they differ from each other.
Price and availability
The RTX 3060 Ti has the lower RRP of the two GPUs at £369 to the RX 6700 XT’s £419.99 price. That makes the RTX 3060 Ti just £50 cheaper.
However, you’ll likely struggle to find these graphics cards at their original prices due to the current silicon shortage. Many models are sold out, reselling at higher prices, so you may find the AMD card for less depending on availability.
Specs and features
The RX 6700 XT is based on AMD’s RDNA 2 architecture, which is the latest offering from the brand and supports features such as ray tracing.
The RTX 3060 Ti, on the other hand, is based on Nvidia’s Ampere architecture.
The RX 6700 XT has a boost frequency of 2.6GHz and a base frequency of 2.3GHz. The RTX 3060 Ti has a boost clock speed of 1.67GHz and a base clock speed of 1.41GHz, making the AMD GPU noticeably faster here.
However, the RX 6700 XT also has a higher recommended system power of 650W when compared to the RTX 3060 Ti’s 600W. The AMD card also features 12GB GDDR6 memory, while the RTX 3060 Ti sports 8GB GDDR6 memory.
When it comes to features, the RTX 3060 Ti offers support for both ray tracing and DLSS. The former is a light-rendering technology that creates more realistic light, reflections and shadows, while the latter can boost frame rates and improve image quality using AI.
The RX 6700 XT also supports ray tracing, but won’t work with DLSS since it’s an Nvidia technology. However, it will work with FSR (Fidelity FX Super Resolution) instead, which does a very similar job.
Performance
As far as performance is concerned, the RX 6700 XT is designed for Quad HD and Full HD gaming, which means it isn’t quite powerful enough to handle modern AAA games in 4K.
We found the AMD GPU performed well in Horizon Zero Dawn, reaching 116fps in Full HD and 94fps in Quad HD; but it dropped to 49fps in 4K. While running The Division 2, the GPU managed to reach 126fps in Full HD, 84fps in Quad HD and 43fps in 4K.
You might like…
Meanwhile, the RTX 3060 Ti is designed to support 1080p Full HD gaming for those who aren’t interested in paying for 4K support.
To compare the RTX 3060 Ti with the RX 6700 XT directly, the GPU hit 101fps in Full HD, 86fps in Quad HD and 54fps in 4K for Horizon Zero Dawn. And for The Division 2, the Nvidia GPU can hit 128fps in Full HD, 87fps in Quad HD and 46fps in 4K running The Division 2.
There really isn’t much difference between these two graphics cards in terms of performance, although the RX 6700 XT does seem to have the edge for games such as Borderlands 3 and Doom Eternal. You can see the full breakdown by checking out our AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT review.
Verdict
The Radeon RX 6700 XT and Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti are both great graphics cards, excelling at Full HD and Quad HD resolutions, while also being able to hit 4K with less demanding games.
The Radeon RX 6700 XT seems to have a slight advantage in terms of performance power, with slightly better results in our gaming benchmarks. But the RTX 3060 Ti features DLSS which can close the gap without compromising on visual quality with select games.
Ultimately, it comes down to what price you’re able to buy the graphics card for. The RTX 3060 Ti has the cheaper RRP, making it a better value option, but it may well be the case that the AMD is cheaper due to the price fluctuations caused by the silicon shortage.
You can find the RTX 3060 Ti and other GPUs in our guide to the best graphics cards.
Hannah joined Trusted Reviews as a staff writer in 2019 after graduating with a degree in English from Royal Holloway, University of London. She’s also worked and studied in the US, holding positions …
Editorial independence
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest.
To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
Professional conduct
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
GeForce 6700 XL video card [in 1 benchmark]
NVIDIA
GeForce 6700XL
- PCIe 1.0 x16 interface
- Core frequency 525 MHz
- Video memory size 128 MB
- Memory type GDDR3
- Memory frequency 1100 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Description
NVIDIA started GeForce 6700 XL sales 14 November 2004. This is Curie architecture desktop card based on 110 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. It has 128 MB of GDDR3 memory at 1.1 GHz, and coupled with a 128-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 17.
60 Gb / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a single-slot PCIe 1.0 x16 card. An additional 1x 6-pin power cable is required for connection.
We don’t have any test results for the GeForce 6700 XL.
General
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of GeForce 6700 XL, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
| Performance ranking | $535 | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Features
GeForce 6700 XL’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak about GeForce 6700 XL’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Core clock | 525 MHz |
Compatibility and dimensions
Information on GeForce 6700 XL compatibility with other computer components.
Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).
90 Ti)
video exit
21
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 6700 XL. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
| Video connectors | ||
| OpenCL | N/A | |
| VULKAN | N/A 9003 |
The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment. 
5% 
110 nm process. The frequency of the graphics core is 525 MHz. In terms of memory, 0.1 GB is installed here. DDR3, frequency 550 MHz and with a maximum bandwidth of 17.6 Gb / s. The texture size is 4.2 GTexels/s.
This parameter is lower than 70% 
5 MHz
1
1 GB. 
56 TFLOPS over FLOPS? 
000 NELSISTRESS 9000. RTX 3080 
More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster. 
| GeForce2 Go | 0x0112 |
| GeForce2 Integrated GPU | 0x01A0 |
| GeForce2 MX 100/200 | 0x0111 |
| GeForce2 MX/MX 400 | 0x0110 |
| GeForce3 | 0x0200 |
| GeForce3 Ti 200 | 0x0201 |
| GeForce3 Ti 500 | 0x0202 |
| GeForce4 410 Go 16M | 0x017D |
| GeForce4 4200 Go | 0x0286 |
| GeForce4 420 Go | 0x0175 |
| GeForce4 420 Go 32M | 0x0176 |
| GeForce4 440 Go | 0x0174 |
| GeForce4 440 Go 64M | 0x0179 |
| GeForce4 460 Go | 0x0177 |
| GeForce4 MX 4000 | 0x0185 |
| GeForce4 MX 420 | 0x0172 |
| GeForce4 MX 420 with AGP8X | 0x0183 |
| GeForce4 MX 440 | 0x0171 |
| GeForce4 MX 440-SE | 0x0173 |
| GeForce4 MX 440SE with AGP8X | 0x0182 |
| GeForce4 MX 440 with AGP8X | 0x0181 |
| GeForce4 MX 460 | 0x0170 |
| GeForce4 MX Integrated GPU | 0x01F0 |
| GeForce4 Ti 4200 | 0x0253 |
| GeForce4 Ti 4200 with AGP8X | 0x0281 |
| GeForce4 Ti 4400 | 0x0251 |
| GeForce4 Ti 4600 | 0x0250 |
| GeForce4 Ti 4800 | 0x0280 |
| GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | 0x0282 |
| GeForce 6100 | 0x0242 |
| GeForce 6150 | 0x0240 |
| GeForce 6150 LE | 0x0241 |
| GeForce 6200 | 0x00F3 |
| GeForce 6200 | 0x014F |
| GeForce 6200 LE | 0x0163 |
| GeForce 6200 TurboCache™ | 0x0161 |
| GeForce 6500 | 0x0160 |
| GeForce 6600 | 0x00F2 |
| GeForce 6600 | 0x0141 |
| GeForce 6600/GeForce 6600 GT | 0x00F1 |
| GeForce 6600 GT | 0x0140 |
| GeForce 6600 LE | 0x00F4 |
| GeForce 6600 LE | 0x0142 |
| GeForce 6600 VE | 0x0143 |
| GeForce 6610 XL | 0x0145 |
| GeForce 6700 XL | 0x0147 |
| GeForce 6800 | 0x0041 |
| GeForce 6800 | 0x00C1 |
| GeForce 6800 | 0x0211 |
| GeForce 6800/GeForce 6800 Ultra | 0x00F0 |
| GeForce 6800GS | 0x0047 |
| GeForce 6800GS | 0x00C0 |
| GeForce 6800GS | 0x00F6 |
| GeForce 6800 GT | 0x0045 |
| GeForce 6800 GT | 0x0046 |
| GeForce 6800 GT | 0x0215 |
| GeForce 6800 LE | 0x00C2 |
| GeForce 6800 LE | 0x0212 |
| GeForce 6800 Ultra | 0x0040 |
| GeForce 6800 Ultra | 0x00F9 |
| GeForce 6800 XE | 0x0043 |
| GeForce 6800XT | 0x0044 |
| GeForce 6800XT | 0x0048 |
| GeForce 6800XT | 0x00C3 |
| GeForce 6800XT | 0x0218 |
| GeForce 7300 GS | 0x01DF |
| GeForce 7300 GT | 0x0393 |
| GeForce 7300 LE | 0x01D1 |
| GeForce 7300 SE | 0x01D3 |
| GeForce 7600GS | 0x02E1 |
| GeForce 7600GS | 0x0392 |
| GeForce 7600 GT | 0x0391 |
| GeForce 7800GS | 0x0093 |
| GeForce 7800GS | 0x00F5 |
| GeForce 7800 GT | 0x0092 |
| GeForce 7800 GTX | 0x0090 |
| GeForce 7800 GTX | 0x0091 |
| GeForce 7800 GTX 512 | 0x0090 |
| GeForce 7900 GS | 0x0292 |
| GeForce 7900 GT | 0x0291 |
| GeForce 7900 GTX | 0x0290 |
| GeForce FX 5100 | 0x0327 |
| GeForce FX 5200 | 0x0320 |
| GeForce FX 5200 | 0x0322 |
| GeForce FX 5200LE | 0x0323 |
| GeForce FX 5200 Ultra | 0x0321 |
| GeForce FX 5500 | 0x0326 |
| GeForce FX 5600 | 0x0312 |
| GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | 0x0311 |
| GeForce FX 5600XT | 0x0314 |
| GeForce FX 5700 | 0x0342 |
| GeForce FX 5700LE | 0x0343 |
| GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | 0x0341 |
| GeForce FX 5700VE | 0x0344 |
| GeForce FX 5800 | 0x0302 |
| GeForce FX 5800 Ultra | 0x0301 |
| GeForce FX 5900 | 0x0331 |
| GeForce FX 5900 Ultra | 0x0330 |
| GeForce FX 5900XT | 0x0332 |
| GeForce FX 5900ZT | 0x0334 |
| GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | 0x0333 |
| GeForce FX Go5100 | 0x032D |
| GeForce FX Go5200 | 0x0324 |
| GeForce FX Go5200 32M/64M | 0x0328 |
| GeForce FX Go5250 | 0x0325 |
| GeForce FX Go53xx | 0x032C |
| GeForce FX Go5600 | 0x031A |
| GeForce FX Go5650 | 0x031B |
| GeForce FX Go5700 | 0x0347 |
| GeForce FX Go5700 | 0x0348 |
| GeForce Go 6200 | 0x0164 |
| GeForce Go 6200 | 0x0167 |
| GeForce Go 6400 | 0x0166 |
| GeForce Go 6400 | 0x0168 |
| GeForce Go 6600 | 0x0144 |
| GeForce Go 6600 | 0x0148 |
| GeForce Go 6600 GT | 0x0149 |
| GeForce Go 6600 TE/6200 TE | 0x0146 |
| GeForce Go 6800 | 0x00C8 |
| GeForce Go 6800 Ultra | 0x00C9 |
| GeForce Go 7300 | 0x01D7 |
| GeForce Go 7400 | 0x01D8 |
| GeForce Go 7600 | 0x0398 |
| GeForce Go 7800 | 0x0098 |
| GeForce Go 7800 GTX | 0x0099 |
| GeForce PCX 4300 | 0x00FF |
| GeForce PCX 5750 | 0x00FA |
| GeForce PCX 5900 | 0x00FB |
| Quadro2 MXR/EX/Go | 0x0113 |
| Quadro4 380 XGL | 0x018B |
| Quadro4 500 GoGL | 0x017C |
| Quadro4 550 XGL | 0x0178 |
| Quadro4 580 XGL | 0x0188 |
| Quadro4 700 GoGL | 0x028C |
| Quadro4 700 XGL | 0x025B |
| Quadro4 750 XGL | 0x0259 |
| Quadro4 780 XGL | 0x0289 |
| Quadro4 900 XGL | 0x0258 |
| Quadro4 980 XGL | 0x0288 |
| Quadro DCC | 0x0203 |
| Quadro FX 1000 | 0x0309 |
| Quadro FX 1100 | 0x034E |
| Quadro FX 1300 | 0x00FE |
| Quadro FX 1400 | 0x00CE |
| Quadro FX 1500 | 0x029E |
| Quadro FX 1500M | 0x029B |
| Quadro FX 2000 | 0x0308 |
| Quadro FX 2500M | 0x029A |
| Quadro FX 3000 | 0x0338 |
| Quadro FX 330/GeForce PCX 5300 | 0x00FC |
| Quadro FX 3400 | 0x00F8 |
| Quadro FX 3450/4000 SDI | 0x00CD |
| Quadro FX 350M | 0x01DC |
| Quadro FX 3500 | 0x029D |
| Quadro FX 4000 | 0x004E |
| Quadro FX 4400 | 0x00F8 |
| Quadro FX 4500 | 0x009D |
| Quadro FX 4500 | 0x029F |
| Quadro FX 4500 X2 | 0x029F |
| Quadro FX 5500 | 0x029C |
| Quadro FX 350 | 0x01DE |
| Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | 0x032B |
| Quadro FX 540 | 0x014E |
| Quadro FX 550 | 0x014C |
| Quadro FX 560 | 0x039E |
| Quadro FX 700 | 0x033F |
| Quadro FX Go1000 | 0x034C |
| Quadro FX Go1400 | 0x00CC |
| Quadro FX Go700 | 0x031C |
| Quadro NVS | 0x017A |
| Quadro NVS 110M | 0x01D7 |
| Quadro NVS 110M | 0x01DA |
| Quadro NVS 120M | 0x01DB |
| Quadro NVS 280 PCI | 0x032A |
| Quadro NVS 280 PCI-E/Quadro FX 330 | 0x00FD |
| Quadro NVS 285 | 0x0165 |
| Quadro NVS 440 | 0x014A |
| Quadro NVS 50 PCI | 0x018C |
| Quadro NVS with AGP8X | 0x018A |
GTX 1080 Ti with i7-6700 benchmarks in Ultra quality quality settings
Compare with
Select.
.AMD Radeon HD 6850 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6870 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6950 — RUB 16,398AMD Radeon HD 6970 — RUB 19,619 ₽ 45,847AMD Radeon HD 7750 — ₽ 9, 183AMD Radeon HD 7750M — ₽ 56,276AMD Radeon HD 7790 — ₽ 9,773AMD Radeon HD 7850 — ₽ 16,332AMD Radeon HD 7850M — ₽ 63,229AMD Radeon HD 7950 — ₽ 9.773AMD RADEON HD 7950M — ₽ 67.09.09MARI AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition — RUB 19,611AMD Radeon HD 7970M — RUB 70,772AMD Radeon HD 7990 — RUB 65,524AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile — RUB 128,491 6,231AMD Radeon R7 265 — RUB 9,773AMD Radeon R7 370 — RUB 13,249AMD Radeon R9 270 — RUB 18,037AMD Radeon R9280 — ₽ 22,957AMD Radeon R9 280X — ₽ 22,957AMD Radeon R9 285 — ₽ 24,924AMD Radeon R9 290 — ₽ 20,333AMD Radeon R9 290X — ₽ 26,170AMD Radeon R9 295X2 — ₽ 98,319AMD Radeon R9 380 — ₽ 19,611AMD Radeon R9 380X — ₽ 15,020AMD Radeon R9 390 — ₽ 30,499AMD Radeon R9 390X — ₽ 32,467AMD Radeon R9 FURY — ₽ 36,009AMD Radeon R9 FURY X — ₽ 42,568AMD Radeon R9 M270X — ₽ 66,639AMD Radeon R9 M280X — ₽ 70,181AMD Radeon R9 M280X 2GB — RUB 70,181AMD Radeon R9 M290X — RUB 79,298AMD Radeon R9 M380 — RUB 70,444AMD Radeon R9 Nano — RUB 100,287AMD Radeon RX 460 — RUB 9,183AMD Radeon RX 470 — RUB 22,432AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile — RUB 78,905AMD Radeon RX 480 — RUB 26,170AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile — RUB 83,627AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile — RUB 42,306AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile — RUB 60,540AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB — RUB 11,085AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile — RUB 60,540AMD Radeon RX 560 — RUB 6,493AMD Radeon RX 560 RX 6D Mobile — RUB 6,493 — RUB 18,300AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — RUB 42,043AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — RUB 64,737AMD Radeon RX 570 — RUB 8,068AMD Radeon RX 570 Mobile — RUB 82,643AMD Radeon RX 5700 — RUB 22.
89AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — RUB 85,726 AMD Radeon RX 590 — RUB 14,036 AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT4 — RUB 14,036 AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT4 — RUB 14,036 XT — RUB 31,418AMD Radeon RX 6800 — RUB 37,977AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — RUB 42,568AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — RUB 65,524AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — RUB 41,453AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3 — RX VEGA AMD 37.1 AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — RUB 39,420AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — RUB 17,644AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile — RUB 103,567AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — RUB 27,482AMD Radeon VII — RUB 43,552ATI Radeon HD 4870 — RUB 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — ₽ 84,086NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — ₽ 49,193NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — ₽ 69,657NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — ₽ 83,299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — ₽ 57,457NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — ₽ 11,150NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — ₽ 10,429 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q — RUB 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — RUB 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — RUB 21,579NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — Rs.
72,543NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — Rs. 102,255NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — Rs. 121,801NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — ₽ 9,773NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — ₽ 81,266NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — ₽ 75,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — ₽ 10,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — ₽ 15,020NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — $18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — $77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — $115,307NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — $29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — ₽ 42,568NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — ₽ 10,035NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — ₽ 22,891NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — ₽ 3,214NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — ₽ 4,198NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — $11,085NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — $5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — $19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — ₽ 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — ₽ 31,811NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — ₽ 71,034NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — ₽ 28,794 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — ₽ 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — ₽ 20,989NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — ₽ 67,951NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — ₽ 11,741NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — ₽ 72,149NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — ₽ 23,285NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — ₽ 26,892NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — ₽ 69,919NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — ₽ 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — ₽ 40,600NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — ₽ 42,634NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — ₽ 65,524NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — ₽ 72,083 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — $22.
891NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — ₽ 72,411NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — ₽ 26,236NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — ₽ 30,762NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — ₽ 99,434NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — ₽ 113,077NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — ₽ 45,454NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — ₽ 116,226NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — ₽ 127,376NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — ₽ 77,855NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $16,332NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — ₽ 39,288NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 — ₽ 21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $163,909NVIDIA TITAN V — $196,704NVIDIA TITAN Xp — ₽ 78,642
Change CPU to
Select.
.AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — RUB 6555.7AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — RUB 1967AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — RUB 8523.4 — RUB 23609.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — RUB 30168.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — RUB 21742.4AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 6DAM56 5400+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 5400+ X2 Dual Core 5600+ — RUB 9835.2AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — RUB 1639.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — RUB 3013.9AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — RUB 17050.1AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — RUB 3935.4 AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 6231.1AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 786.4AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 2111.3 II X2 255 — RUB 4277.8AMD Athlon II X2 260 — RUB 1311.1AMD Athlon II X2 265 — RUB 5436.1AMD Athlon II X2 270 — RUB 1573.5AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — RUB 2358AMD Athlon II X2AMD II2 X20. — ₽ 3217.2AMD Athlon II X3 425 — ₽ 6835.1AMD Athlon II X3 435 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon II X3 440 — ₽ 3079.5AMD ATHLON II X3 445 — ₽ 5968.7AMD athlon II X3 450 — ₽ 2622.
9AMD ATHLON II X3 455 — ₽ 7664.2AMD ATHLON II X3 460 — ₽ 3278.8AMD ATHO X4 620 — ₽ 3932.1AMD ATHLON 28 Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 5247.2AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 4588AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 5243.9AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 6001.5 — ₽ 18168.4AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — ₽ 3017.1AMD Athlon X4 840 — ₽ 5164.6AMD Athlon X4 845 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon X4 860K — ₽ 4196.4AMD ATHLON X4 870K — ₽ 5246.5AMD Athlon X4 880K — ₽ 5902.4AMD ATHLON X4 950 — ₽ 3934.7AMD E2-3200 APU — ₽ 524.1AMD FX -4100 Quad -Core — ₽ 8526AMD FX -4130 QUAD -₽ 4984. FX-4170 Quad-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — RUB 14968.3AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — RUB 3501.9AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — RUB 22297.3FX -6300 Six-Core — RUB 3869.2AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — RUB 25153.8AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — RUB 5285.9AMD 8320 Eight-Core — ₽ 5214.4AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — ₽ 6484.9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — RUB 5246.5 AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — RUB 8853.
3AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — RUB 11805.5 Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — ₽ 3082.1AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — ₽ 1964.4AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — ₽ 221830AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — ₽ 6887AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — ₽ 3934.7AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — ₽ 3276.2AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — ₽ 9654.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — ₽AMD-Core 360 ₽ 3932.1AMD Phenom 9850 Quad -Core — ₽ 3279.5AMD Phenom 9950 Quad -Core — ₽ 11804.9AMD Phenom II X2 545 — ₽ 2884.6AMD Phenom II X2 550 — ₽ 3278.8AMD PHENOM II X2 555 — ₽ 9323AMD PEN 1967AMD Phenom II X2 B550.6AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — ₽ 4919.3AMD Phenom II X4 805 — ₽ 11412AMD Phenom II X4 810 — ₽ 7607.8AMD Phenom II X4 820 — ₽ 4916AMD Phenom II X4 840 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X4 905E — ₽ 13 905E — ₽ 13 910 — ₽ 65559AMD Phenom II X4 910e — ₽ 10297AMD Phenom II X4 920 — ₽ 4393.
9AMD Phenom II X4 925 — ₽ 10493.7AMD Phenom II X4 940 — ₽ 7870.1AMD PHENOM II X4 945 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd AMD Phenom II X4 960T — RUB 8854 AMD Phenom II X4 965 — RUB 3902.6AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — RUB 4784.8AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — ₽ 12396.5AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — ₽ 11478.3AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — ₽ 12134.2AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — ₽ 17052.7AMD PHENOM II X6 1090T — ₽ 259978.90T — ₽ 259978.90T ₽ 13117.3AMD Phenom X3 8550 — ₽ 11147AMD RYZEN 3 1200 — ₽ 6230.4AMD RYZEN 3 1300X — ₽ 8198.1AMD RYZEN 3 2200G — ₽ 6427.2AMD RYZEN 3 3100 — ₽ 5903.1AMD RYZEN 3 3200G — ₽ 6493.4AMD RYZEN 3300 — AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 8789.1AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 9503.3AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 10165.8AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 11701.3837.8AMD RYZEN 5 2600X — ₽ 13773.2AMD RYZEN 5 3400G — ₽ 9837.8AMD RYZEN 5 3500 — ₽ 9707.3AMD RYZEN 5 3500X — ₽ 10527.2AMD RYZEN 5 3600 — ₽ 13052.4AMD RYZEN 5 3600X — ₽ 16331.
AMD RYZEN 5 5600X — ₽ 19611.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700 — ₽ 12461.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700X — ₽ 13117.3AMD RYZEN 7 1800X — ₽ 16396.8AMD RYZEN 7 2700 — ₽ 16347AMD RYZEN 7 2700X — ₽ 20004.3AMD RYZEN 7, 3700X — ₽ ₽ ₽ ¦ 3800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — RUB 19676.3AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — RUB 29514.8AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — ₽ 49192.5AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — ₽ 46568.9AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — ₽ 22955.8AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — ₽ 27547.1AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — ₽ 44600.5 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — ₽ 59030.3AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — ₽ 112814.1Intel Core i3-10100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-10300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-11100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-11300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-12100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-12300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3934.7Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 3804.2Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 5246.5Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 1967.7Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 13052.
2Intel Core0 @ 3.40GHz — $ 4590.6Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — $ 2289.1Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 5246.5 Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz — $ 6230.4 Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9181.9 3.60GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — Rs. 9837.8Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 11805.5Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 3.70GHz — $18361.9Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — $29513.5Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — $1311.8Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — $1377.4Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — $1377.4 Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 1966.4Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8772Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — RUB 10895.2Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — RUB 9Intel Core i3-7320 @ 3.90GHz Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8526 i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz — $ 6886.3Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 10625.6Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.00GHz — $ 14691.537.4 Intel Core i5-10600K — $15533.7 Intel Core i5-11400 — $11937.4 Intel Core i5-11600K — $ 17184.
6 ₽ 5246.5Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 5245.9Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 12806.4Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ tel5 Core508.9 2400S @ 2.50GHz — $4309.3 Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — $10783Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — $ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — $6886.3 Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — ₽ 4918.6Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — Rs. 8526Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — Rs. 2.80GHz — $ 9837.8 Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6 Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 8394.9 Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9188.5 Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9412.2 GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 9444.3Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz — RUB 18693.2Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 11805.5Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core05 @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 30366.2Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.
90GHz — $ 43288.7 Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — $14536.7 Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — $12133.5Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — $12986.2 3.40GHz — ₽ 16396.8Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 18102.8Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 13117.3Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — Rs. @ 3.10GHz — $ 26235.3 Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 13117.3 Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 12461.4 Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 3934.7 Intel Core i5-660 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 3213.9 Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 14429.148.3Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — Rs. 5902.4Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 2.67GHz — $ 10527.2 Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 13773.2 Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 15739.6 Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $16396.8 Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $15676 GHz — ₽ 24770.1Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.
90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 18364.5 i7-11700K — $ 26891.9Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 30826.6Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9837.2 -2700K @ 3.50GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $11740Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz — $16330.6Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3820 13117.3Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 26169.1Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — RUB 52471.3Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — RUB 62572.2Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 15740.9Intel Core i7-4770K 20tel Core135 3.20GHz — RUB 22470.5 Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — RUB 32794.3 Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 26169.1514.8Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — RUB 19676.3Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — RUB 32728.1Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — RUB 50503.6Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 28444 Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 27547.1 Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — RUB 36073.8 Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 21325.3 Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz — RUB 23283.8 Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.
30GHz — RUB 22890.3 GHz — ₽ 60998Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — Rs. Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.70GHz -930 @ 2.80GHz — $3934.7Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — $4637.2Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — $16069.6Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — $6558.3Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9181.9Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9837.2Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 21644 Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 11805.5 Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 13116.7 Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.33GHz — RUB 14428.5 ₽ 38698.1Intel Core i9-11900K — ₽ 32007.9Intel Core i9-12900K — ₽ 38697.4Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.30GHz — ₽ .5Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz — $ 71932.6 Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz — $ 78191.2 Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz — $ 131179.3 i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 54767Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz — ₽ 10359.9Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2.00GHz — ₽ 587Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz — ₽ 2622.9Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 10359.9Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz — ₽ 6559Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz — ₽ 852Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.
86GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 1308.5Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 980.6Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 983.2Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 849.4Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz — ₽ 4919.3 Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz — $1311.1 Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz — $1901.5 Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz — $ 983.2 Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2.83GHz — RUB 1311.1Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 642.1Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz — RUB 2622.9Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 73788.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 98119.4Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 17292.1Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 59621.3 Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 105531Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 118452.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 2622.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2950.
9Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 1507.9Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz — RUB 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz — RUB 6526.2Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2228.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 21972.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 2295Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 12462.1Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 3213.3Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 4576.9Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 2288.4Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 2155.3Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 2688.5Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3016.5Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 7867.5Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5246.5Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 7214.2Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 11693.4Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 6886.3Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 7214.2Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 10490.5Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3.
40GHz — ₽ 6558.3Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 18903Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 6840.4Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 5246.5Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 5592.2Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 7273.3Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 6763.6Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 6558.3Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz — ₽ 6943.4Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 1639.1Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 6231.1Intel Pentium G840 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 2295Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 6362.2Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz — ₽ 8123.3Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3.80GHz — ₽ 6580Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz — ₽ 6618
Change Variant To
Select..ASL GTX 1080 TiASL GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionASL GTX 1080 Ti God of WarASUS GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionASUS ROG POSEIDON GTX 1080 Ti PlatinumASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1080 Ti Assassins Creed Origins EditionASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1080 Ti GAMINGAS TiUS ROG STR08IX GTX 10 OCASUS TURBO GTX 1080 TiAlienware GTX 1080 TiColorful GTX 1080 TiColorful GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti CustomizationColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti KUDANColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti Neptune WColorful iGame Tifull iGame GTX 1080 Ti RNG EditionColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti RNG EditionColorful iGame GTX 1080 AD8 AD8 AD80 LEColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti Vulcan XColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti Vulcan X OCCorsair Hydro GFX GTX 1080 TiDigital Alliance GTX 1080 Ti GameRock PremiumDigital Alliance GTX 1080 Ti Super JetStreamELSA GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionELSA GTX 1080 Ti S.
A.CELSA GTX 1080 Ti STEMTEK0 XENEMON8 XENON GTX 1080 Ti Super JetStreamEMTEK XENON GTX 1080 Ti Super JetStream TONE+EVGA GTX 1080 TiEV GA GTX 1080 Ti Black Edition w/ iCX CoolerEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 DT w/ iCX CoolingEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 ELITE BlackEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 ELITE WhiteEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 ELITE w/ iCX CoolerEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 HYBRIDEVGA GTX 1080 Hydro CopperEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 w/ iCX CoolerEVGA GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionEVGA GTX 1080 Ti Kingpin EditionEVGA GTX 1080 Ti Kingpin Hydro CopperEVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC Black Edition w/ iCX CoolerEVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC Hydro CopperEVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2 ELITE BlueEVGA GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1080 Ti 1080 Ti EXOCGALAX GTX 1080 Ti EXOC WhiteGALAX GTX 1080 Ti European VersionGALAX GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionGALAX GTX 1080 Ti GeneralGALAX GTX 1080 Ti HOFGALAX GTX 1080 Ti HOF Limited EditionGALAX GTX 1080 Ti HOF OC Lab EditionG ALAX GTX 1080 Ti HOF WatercooledGIGABYTE AORUS GTX 1080 TiGIGABYTE AORUS GTX 1080 Ti WATERFORCE WB XTREME EditionGIGABYTE AORUS GTX 1080 Ti WATERFORCE XTREMEGIGABYTE AORUS GTX 1080 Ti XTREME EditionGIGABYTE GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionGIGABYTE GTX 1080 Ti GamingGIGABYTE GTX 1080 Ti Gaming OCGIGABYTE GTX 1080 Ti Gaming OC BLACKGIGABYTE GTX 1080 Ti TurboGainward DuraPro GTX 1080 Ti HurricaneGainward GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionGainward GTX 1080 Ti Golden SampleGainward GTX 1080 Ti PhoenixGainward GTX 1080 Ti Phoenix Golden SampleInno3D GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionInno3D GTX 1080 Ti Gaming OCInno3D GTX 1080 Ti Jet-FanInno3D GTX 1080 Ti X2Inno3D iChill GTX 1080 Ti BlackInno3D iChill GTX 1080 Ti X3Inno3D iChill GTX 1080 Ti X3 UltraInno3D iChill GTX 1080 Ti X4Inno3D iChill GTX 1080 Ti X4 UltraKFA2 GTX 1080 TiKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti EXOCKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti EXOC WhiteKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti HOFKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti HOF 8 Pack ApprovedKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti HOF 8 Pack EditionKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti HOF Limited EditionKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti EXOC WhiteKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti GALAKURO HOFKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti GALAKURO HOF Limited EditionKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti GALAKURO HOF WATERKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti OCLeadtek WinFast GTX 1080 TiLeadtek WinFast GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionLeadtek WinFast GTX 1080 Ti HurricaneMAXSUN GTX 1080 Ti Super JetStreamMSI GTX 1080 TI GAMING X TRIOMSI GTX 1080 Ti AEROMSI GTX 1080 Ti AERO OCMSI GTX 1080 Ti ARMORMSI GTX 1080 Ti ARMOR OCMSI GTX 1080 Ti DUKEMSI GTX 1080 Ti DUKE OCMSI GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionMSI GTX 1080 Ti GAMINGMSI GTX 1080 Ti GAMING TRIOMSI GTX 1080 Ti GAMING XMSI GTX 1080 Ti GAMING X w/ USB Type-CMSI GTX 1080 Ti LIGHTNINGMSI GTX 1080 Ti LIGHTNING XMSI GTX 1080 Ti LIGHTNING ZMSI GTX 1080 Ti SEA HAWKMSI GTX 1080 Ti SEA HAWK XMSI GTX 1080 Ti SEA HAWK X EKManli GTX 1080 Ti F369GManli GTX 1080 Ti GallardoManli GTX 1080 Ti Gallardo with RGB Lights 1080 Ti Gaming OC V2Palit GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionPalit GTX 1080 Ti GameRockPalit GTX 1080 Ti GameRock PremiumPalit GTX 1080 Ti JetStreamPalit GTX 1080 Ti Super JetStreamZOTAC GTX 1080 TiZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti AMP!ZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti AMP! ExtremeZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti AMP! Extreme Core EditionZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti ArcticStormZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti ArcticStorm MiniZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti Extreme Plus OCZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti MiniZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti PGFZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti PGF Extreme OC
Desired tuning quality
Select.
.Ultra quality — MSAA, HBAO, and advanced shadowsHigh quality — No MSAA, HBAO, or advanced shadowsMedium qualityLow quality
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT review —
graphics card review The 6750 XT is a new graphics card that is an overclocked AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT with faster memory. The core clock has increased by 19MHz and the memory bandwidth has increased by 12.5% over last year’s RX 6700 XT. The increase in board power was 9% up to 180 W. The retail price has also gone up, from $480 to $550.
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X Trio and Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ were taken for testing. All AMD and Nvidia graphics cards have been tested at official clock speeds, so no factory overclocking is required. All data was collected using a Ryzen 7 5800X3D processor with 32GB dual rank DDR4-3200 CL14 dual channel memory on an Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Extreme motherboard using the latest BIOS that supports AGESA 1207.
The RX 6750 XT is expected to cost $570, making it very close to the RTX 3060 Ti in terms of price, and it’s 8% faster in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Extraction.
Compared to the RTX 3070, it’s only 2% slower, but we estimate it’s about 19% cheaper.
Even so, the RX 6750 XT is only 7% faster than the RX 6700 XT, so a 15% price increase isn’t exactly what you’d expect.
NVIDIA GeForce cards perform better at 1440p, where the RX 6750 XT can only match the 3060 Ti, while the RTX 3070 is 13% faster. Most disappointing is that the RX 6750 XT is only 4% faster than the RX 6700 XT.
In resolution, things change again, the RX 6750 XT is 8% faster than the RX 6700 XT and again equals the RTX 3060 Ti, this time only 5% slower than the RTX 3070.
Watch Dogs : Legion
Watch Dogs: Legion RX 6750 XT is impressive compared to GeForce graphics cards, though not impressive compared to RX 6700 XT as it was only 4% faster. It was also faster than the RTX 3070 at 22% faster.
The gap narrowed at 1440p, but the RX 6750 XT was still 13% faster than the RTX 3070, which is a great result considering how much cheaper it is.
As usual, Nvidia’s Ampere architecture is much better used at 4K resolution, while the reverse is true for RNDA2. As a result, the RTX 3070 now matches the RX 6750 XT, which was 6% faster than the RX 6700 XT.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
In Shadow of the Tomb Raider at 1080p, the RX 6750 XT performed well with 139
At 1440p, the RX 6750 XT gained a 9% lead over the RX 6700 XT to keep it on par with the RTX 3070
At 4K, the RTX 3070 takes the lead as the RX 6750 XT is 5% behind and is now on par with the RTX 3060 Ti. It was only 8% faster than the RX 6700 XT.
The Outer Worlds
As with many Unreal Engine 4 games, this game favors NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards. Therefore, even the RTX 3060 Ti was faster than the RX 6750 XT, which was only 7% faster than the RX 6700 XT.
At 1440p, the situation is even more in favor of NVIDIA cards. The RX 6750 XT is now 6% slower than the RTX 3060 Ti and 14% slower than the RTX 3070.
However, it was 7% faster than the RX 6700 XT.
At 4K resolution, the GeForce cards are further behind, and the RX 6750 XT is now 7% slower than the RTX 3060 Ti and 18% slower than the RTX 3070. Unfortunately, the faster GDDR6 memory didn’t help it much, as we see only a 4% lead over the RX 6700 XT.
F1 2021
In F1 2021 at 1080p, the RX 6750 XT was only 5% slower than the RTX 3070 and 7% faster than the RX 6700 XT and RTX 3060 Ti it was 7% slower than the RTX 3070, 3% faster than the 3060 Ti, and 9% faster than the RX 6700 XT.
The 4K results are very different: here even the RTX 3060 Ti is slightly faster than the RX 6750 XT, and the RTX 3070 is 20% faster. Meanwhile, the RX 6750 XT was only 5% faster than the RX 6700 XT.
Power consumption
A quick look at total power consumption shows that the system with the RX 6700 XT was drawing 336 watts, and the RX 6750 XT increased the system power consumption by 13%, which is a significant increase, considering not a huge increase in performance.
However, compared to the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070, the power consumption of the RX 6750 XT is normal.
Average FPS in 11 games
In terms of performance, the Radeon RX 6750 XT looks good compared to the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070 in several of the games we just reviewed, but the lead over the RX 6700 XT isn’t impressive.
Starting at 1080p, the RX 6750 XT is 6% faster than the RX 6700 XT, which isn’t great given the 15% price increase. It’s slightly faster than the much more expensive RTX 3070 and only slightly slower than the even more expensive RTX 3070 Ti.
However, the RX 6700 XT is obviously a better option given the MSRP, especially since you can simply overclock it yourself to the performance of the RX 6750 XT
At 1440p, the RX 6750 XT and RTX 3070 perform the same, while the RX 6750 XT is 5% faster than the RX 6700 XT.
Then in 4K, the RX 6750 XT was 6% faster than the RX 6700 XT and 6% slower than the RTX 3070.