Nvidia 6700: NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL Specs

GeForce 6700 XL [in 1 benchmark]

GeForce 6700 XL


  • Interface PCIe 1.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 525 MHz
  • Max video memory 128 MB
  • Memory type GDDR3
  • Memory clock speed 1100 MHz
  • Maximum resolution


NVIDIA started GeForce 6700 XL sales 14 November 2004. This is Curie architecture desktop card based on 110 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 128 MB of GDDR3 memory clocked at 1.1 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 17.6 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is single-slot card attached via PCIe 1.0 x16 interface. 1x 6-pin power connector is required.

We have no data on GeForce 6700 XL benchmark results.

General info

Of GeForce 6700 XL’s architecture, market segment and release date.

Place in performance rating not rated
Architecture Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name NV43 A2
Market segment Desktop
Release date 14 November 2004 (17 years ago)
Current price $535 of 49999 (A100 SXM4)

Technical specs

GeForce 6700 XL’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce 6700 XL’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Core clock speed 525 MHz of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Number of transistors 146 million of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology 110 nm of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti)
Texture fill rate 4. 200 of 939.8 (h200 SXM5)

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce 6700 XL’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16
Width 1-slot
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin


Parameters of memory installed on GeForce 6700 XL: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width 128 Bit of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed 1100 MHz of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti)
Memory bandwidth 17. 6 GB/s of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 6700 XL. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x VGA

API support

APIs supported by GeForce 6700 XL, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX 9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model 3.0
OpenGL 2.1 of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile)
OpenCL N/A
Vulkan N/A

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance of GeForce 6700 XL. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

  • Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

6700 XL

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce 6700 XL according to our statistics.

Core i5

12. 5%

Ryzen 7
PRO 3700


Core 2
Duo E6600




Athlon II
X4 635


Core i5


Core i5


Athlon II
X3 455


User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about GeForce 6700 XL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT review: Nvidia wins this round

  • Entertainment

Unless AMD actually sells them for $479, of course

By Sean Hollister / @StarFire2258


Share this story

Photo by Tom Warren / The Verge

Photo by Tom Warren / The Verge

AMD and Nvidia are pretending they live in a fantasy world, one where you can buy a state-of-the-art graphics card for under $700. Heck, a fantasy world where you can buy a new AMD GPU at all — though AMD has repeatedly promised it would stock additional RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT graphics cards at its website for $579 and $649 respectively, I’ve seen no evidence the company has ever replenished those supplies since those cards first debuted four months ago.  

Today, the company’s launching a GPU that might change that: the $479 Radeon RX 6700 XT. AMD tells The Verge it will have “significantly more GPUs available” when it goes on sale tomorrow morning. If that’s true — if this is the moment the clouds part, the GPU shortage recedes, and you can actually buy a RX 6700 XT for $479 for even a limited time — you absolutely should. It’s a solid performer at 1440p.

But amusingly, in the fantasy world where we’re pretending a $400 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and $500 RTX 3070 still exist, the RX 6700 XT actually feels outgunned. It’s not the clear-cut Nvidia competitor you might have hoped for.

6Verge Score

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT


The Good

  • Good 1440p performance in most of today’s games
  • AMD says you’ll be able to buy this one

The Bad

  • Slightly larger than Nvidia equivalents
  • Worse ray tracing performance
  • Still has 650W power supply requirement
  • No DLSS equivalent

$479. 00 at AMD Direct

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT comes with a simple pitch: a way to max out your 2560 x 1440 monitor with the latest games at maximum settings, all for $100 less than the RX 6800 I reviewed late last year. If that sounds familiar, that’s because it’s the same playbook Nvidia used last fall, where its $400 RTX 3060 Ti undercut the $500 RTX 3070 by the same amount. 

So in our fantasy world where those prices held, this would be the lay of the land:

Mid-range desktop gaming GPUs in 2021

$399 Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti Solid 1440p
$479 AMD RX 6700 XT Maxed 1440p
$499 Nvidia RTX 3070 Maxed 1440p / entry-level 4K
$579 AMD RX 6800 Maxed 1440p / decent 4K

Given those prices, I’d expect a $480 AMD card to soundly thrash a $400 Nvidia card. (That’s what the $580 Radeon RX 6800 did to the $500 RTX 3070, after all. ) I’d also expect it to be within spitting distance of the $500 Nvidia card if there were only a $20 bill between the two. 

But running AMD’s card through my 15-game gauntlet on my own 1440p monitor, AMD’s new card sometimes lost to Nvidia’s 3060 Ti — sometimes by a lot — and it can even lose to Nvidia’s vanilla $329 RTX 3060 in tests where I had ray tracing turned on. 

1440p gaming (with Core i7-7700K, 32GB DDR4)

AC: Odyssey 57 66 58 72 No
AC: Valhalla 50 63 75 70 Yes
Arkham Knight 126 147 140 156 No
Borderlands 3 (Badass) 50 65 82 81 Yes
Borderlands 3 (Ultra) 55 69 87 86 Yes
CS: GO 231 236 225 238 No
Control 50 63 65 76 Not quite
Control (RT) 29 37 25 42 Definitely no
Control (RT+DLSS) 51 64 N/A 68 N/A
Cyberpunk 2077 38 49 52 55 Yes
Cyberpunk 2077 (RT) 18 22 N/A 27 No AMD RT support yet
Cyberpunk 2077 (RT+DLSS) 39 45 N/A 52 N/A
COD: Warzone 87 102 114 120 Yes
DX: Mankind Divided 57 74 89 88 Yes
Metro Exodus (Extreme) 27 37 38 44 No
Metro Exodus (Ultra+RT) 35 47 46 64 No
Metro Exodus (RT+DLSS) 46 61 N/A 72 N/A
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78 99 105 105 Yes
SotR (RT) 47 59 55 72 No
SotR (RT+DLSS) 57 72 N/A 82 N/A
Star Wars Squadrons 125 151 167 165 Yes
Watch Dogs: Legion 46 61 64 70 Not quite
WD: Legion (RT) 27 35 25 42 Definitely no
WD: Legion (RT+DLSS) 50 62 N/A 62 N/A
Valheim 60 81 70 89-91 Definitely no

Frames per second; all games tested at highest graphical preset unless specified.

As you’ll see in the chart above, AMD does notch some wins, and in many cases lives up to its promise of maxed settings at 1440p. Shadow of the Tomb Raider looks glorious on my G-Sync / FreeSync monitor at an average 105 frames per second with all the eye candy turned up, and the difference between 120 frames and 114 frames in Call of Duty: Warzone at max settings (probably) isn’t worth quibbling about.

With a beefier processor, you should be able to get 60+ frames per second in a maxed-out Cyberpunk 2077 experience, too — I’m still testing with my old Core i7-7700K, which is more than good enough for most of the games on this list (SotR shows I’m 100 percent GPU-bound), but a few titles like Microsoft Flight Simulator and Cyberpunk are still notoriously CPU limited and more cores could help. As another example, my colleague Tom Warren saw identical framerates to me in Watch Dogs: Legion and Metro Exodus pairing the 6700 XT with a far newer Intel chip, but slightly higher in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla.

Is that a 3060 Ti or 3070 on the left? Both can beat the RX 6700 XT in some games.

But look at Valheim. Look at Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. Look at Control.  How is AMD underperforming or merely tying these lower tier cards? Things aren’t any rosier at 4K resolution, in case you’re wondering: while I still recommend Nvidia’s 3070 for entry-level 4K, the 6700 XT just doesn’t have the same oomph. In games like Control and Metro Exodus, I had to drop the settings to a comparatively dull “low,” where the 3070 managed to play those games at 4K and medium-spec without trouble. And of course, AMD doesn’t yet have a DLSS competitor if you’re a fan of AI-upscaled resolution.

It’s not like AMD is winning in any other particular way, either. While I’m actually fond of the company’s new two-slot design (clearly inspired by a certain late 1960s muscle car) and I don’t hugely mind going from three to two axial fans, the RX 6700 XT is just as chunky and nearly as power-hungry as the RX 6800 (230W vs. 250W) without as much to show for it. AMD still recommends a 650W power supply, a pricey proposition for those of us with tall PC cases, and you’ll need both 6 and 8-pin PCIe connectors, while Nvidia’s comparable cards make do with a single 8-pin.

I also saw the 6700 XT hit 89 degrees Celsius on one occasion. While I don’t have enough evidence to say that’s a problem, I’ve yet to see Nvidia’s 3070 cross 82 degrees C even with my case fans unplugged.

But as I alluded to in my intro, very little of this will matter if you can actually find this card for $479. 

All modern AMD and Nvidia cards have plenty of display support, with one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPorts.

In December, I reported that the true street price of a $399 Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti was actually $675, and that the street price of an $499 RTX 3070 was actually $819. Those were the average prices people actually paid on eBay that month. 

If you think that sounds unbelievable, hear this: the street price of the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070 are now approaching $1,200 each. People are paying triple for what should have been Nvidia’s bang-for-the-buck graphics card now, and the launch of a “$329” RTX 3060 didn’t slow that at all.

To me, this indicates two things: First, AMD probably isn’t going to be able to make anywhere near enough RX 6700 XTs to hit anywhere near that $479 price for the vast majority of buyers, even if it produces “significantly” more cards. I wouldn’t expect today to play out any differently than any previous GPU launch since the pandemic began. It’s a well-established pattern now. Second, none of these fantasyland prices will necessarily keep the RX 6700 XT from being a hit if the supply is there. As you can see from the similar street prices for the 3060 Ti and 3070, the market has a way of balancing prices out.

If you miraculously see this card for its list price, buy it, because you won’t get anything better for anywhere near that price in the near future. But it feels inferior to every Nvidia GPU that can compare — and I wouldn’t trade my 3060 Ti for one.

Most Popular

  1. Google is shutting down Stadia

  2. Google is trying to reinvent search — by being more than a search engine

  3. Apple fires exec after he made crude jokes on the expensive car guy’s TikTok

  4. Sonos Sub Mini review: low end for a lower price

  5. Meta’s new text-to-video AI generator is like DALL-E for video

Radeon™ RX 6700 XT GAMING OC 12G Key Features | Graphics Card

Key Feature

Windforce 3X






The WINDFORCE 3X cooling system features 3x 80mm unique blade fans, alternate spinning, 5 composite copper heat pipes direct touch GPU, 3D active fan and Screen cooling, which together provide high efficiency heat dissipation.


The WINDFORCE 3X cooling system features 3x 80mm unique blade fans, alternate spinning, 5 composite copper heat pipes direct touch GPU, 3D active fan and Screen cooling, which together provide high efficiency heat dissipation.


Extended heatsink design allows air flow to pass through, providing better heat


The shape of the pure copper heat pipe maximizes the direct contact area with the GPU. The heat pipe also covers the VRAM through a large metal plate contact to ensure proper cooling.


The metal back plate not only provides an aesthetical shape, but also enhances the
structure of the graphics card to provide complete protection.


When experiencing any power supply abnormality, the indicator will alert gamers by flashing light.


The graphics card uses the better power phase design to allow the MOSFET to operate at
lower temperature, and over-temperature protection design and load balancing for each
MOSFET, plus the Ultra Durable certified chokes and capacitors, to provide excellent
performance and longer system life.


Fully automated production process ensures top quality of the circuit boards and
eliminates sharp protrusions of the solder connectors seen on the conventional PCB
surface. This friendly design prevents your hands from getting cut or inadvertently
damaging components when making your build.


The cutting edge intuitive interface allows you to adjust the clock speed, voltage, fan
performance and power target in real-time according to your game’s requirements.


AMD FreeSync™ Technology

Radeon™ Software

No stuttering. No tearing. Just gaming. AMD FreeSync™ technology puts an end to choppy gameplay and broken frames with fluid, artifact-free performance at virtually any framerate

Minimize input-lag so you can game like a champion.

Delivers extra performance and responsiveness when you need it most.

Improves in-game visuals with virtually no impact on performance.

* “Boost Clock” is the maximum frequency achievable on the GPU running a bursty workload. Boost clock achievability, frequency, and sustainability will vary based on several factors, including but not limited to: thermal conditions and variation in applications and workloads.
* “Game Clock” is the expected GPU clock when running typical gaming applications, set to typical TGP (Total Graphics Power). Actual individual game clock results may vary.

* All the images in this page are for illustration only.

* Product specifications and product appearance may differ from country to country. We recommend that you check with your local dealers for the specifications and appearance of the products available in your country. Colors of products may not be perfectly accurate due to variations caused by photographic variables and monitor settings so it may vary from images shown on this site. Although we endeavor to present the most accurate and comprehensive information at the time of publication, we reserve the right to make changes without prior notice.

* GIGABYTE graphics cards, except those labeled “Mining Series”, are intended only for use with desktop PCs. Other types of use, such as blockchain computing or cryptocurrency mining, will render the product warranty void.

AMD RX 6700 XT vs Nvidia RTX 3070: Full Comparison with Specs, Price, and More

As it seems, we might be coming out of the GPU shortage, and with that, it is time to start shopping for graphics cards again. Hopefully, now with reasonable pricing. Let’s look at the mid-range cards for the red and green brands. Nvidia is offering the RTX 3070, and AMD has the RX 6700 XT; in their own right, they are amazing cards and offer excellent performance. When it comes down to it though, most people can only buy one, so which one is your best option? 

Let’s break down each of these cards separately for a bit. The AMD RX 6700 XT definitely doesn’t stand out as much as the RTX 3000 series, but it does offer excellent performance and, as long as everything continues to move in the right direction, a great price. AMD describes this card as “The new addition to the AMD Radeon™ RX 6000 Series family is engineered to deliver ultra-high frame rates and the ultimate 1440p gaming experience. Powering the next generation of games with a blend of raytracing, compute, and rasterized effects, the AMD Radeon™ RX 6700 XT graphics cards bring new levels of visual fidelity.” AMD also likes to tout that this architecture is behind the new generations of consoles, including the PS5 and Xbox Series X. 

RTX graphics cards, unlike AMD, use Tensor cores for their graphics cards.

The Nvidia RTX 3070 is part of the new family of RTX 3000 cards. It sits right in the middle of price to performance of this range, being topped out by the RTX 3090. So, I like to refer to it as the goldilocks card. It’s not overly expensive, and the performance is excellent as long as you are not trying to break any records. Nvidia describes this card as “The GeForce RTXTM 3070 Ti and RTX 3070 graphics cards are powered by Ampere—NVIDIA’s 2nd gen RTX architecture. Built with enhanced Ray Tracing Cores and Tensor Cores, new streaming multiprocessors, and high-speed memory, they give you the power you need to rip through the most demanding games.” 


2021 Newest AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 12GB GDDR6, + AllyFlex HDMI

  • Chipset: AMD RX 6700 XT
  • Memory: 12GB GDDR6
  • Boost Clock: Up To 2615MHz
  • Cooling: AMD Reference Design


NVIDIA — GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8GB GDDR6X PCI Express 4.0 Graphics Card — Dark Platinum and Black

  • Seamless functionality
  • Unparalleled performance
  • Packed with features
  • Compact construction

While the prices are getting better on both of these cards, they are still not back at their launch MSRP. Nvidia originally released the RTX 3070 in October 2020 at $500. Now, you can find it for around $600 if you want to buy a new one, or take a chance on a used one for as low as $450.

AMD released the RX 6700 XT in March 2021 at $475. Now, you can find it for as low as $499 new or used for as low as $330. 

Gaming/ Creative Application Benchmarks

At the end of the day, price doesn’t mean a lot if the card doesn’t perform to its mark. The RTX 3070 outperforms its previous generation by 45% which is a pretty unprecedented jump considering that it was released at around the same MSRP as the 2070. In comparison, the RX 6700 XT outperforms its previous generation by 30%, still a respectable number.  Most of the time, these numbers come from non-real-world benchmarks, so let’s look at a table comparing the two cards in some real-world benchmarks. 

Besides Metro: Exodus, these results are neck and neck. We get a real difference when Ray Tracing is turned on. Nvidia cards now also sport a feature called DLSS or Deep Learning Super Sampling; this allows the GPU to boost the performance from 30%-50% without a loss in image quality. With DLSS being supported in more games and game engines, it is hard to recommend the 6700 XT strictly on gaming performance.

However, AMD does have an answer to DLSS. They call their’s FidelityFX Super Resolution or FSR for short; in typical AMD fashion, their acronyms are entirely nonsensical when read as the full name. While FSR is an impressive feature, unfortunately, at the time of writing, only 47 games support FSR, whereas over 150 support DLSS.

*chart provided by the author

Gaming isn’t the end all be all when it comes to declaring a graphics card better than another. For example, using these cards in a workstation for video editing, photo editing, or 3D rendering is a great choice. Regarding video editing, Puget Systems, a reputable computer builder specializing in creators’ workstations, recommends sticking with Nvidia. Using Adobe Premiere, Nvidia GPUs see improved performance across the board than AMD. Take this with a grain of salt because that doesn’t necessarily mean that the Nvidia GPU is physically better than the AMD. A lot of video CODECs are more compatible with Nvidia architecture than AMD. When it comes to 3D rendering, I am taking benchmarks from Blender, specifically the BMW and Classroom Render.  

Now, while the RTX 3070 does beat out the RX 6700 XT in these render tests, if you are coming from an older generation of GPU, these numbers are still quite impressive. With that being said, if you are building or upgrading your system to be your new creative workstation, it is probably best to go with the RTX 3070. Not only does it outperform in these tests, but as mentioned, Nvidia’s systems are more compatible with more programs than AMD’s 

*chart provided by the author

Something that is quickly growing as a feature to look for GPUs is the streaming capability. Nowadays, everyone and their grandmother are streaming in some way, whether that is on Facebook, YouTube, or Twitch. GPUs play a significant role in that process; OBS (Open Broadcast Software) offers GPU encoding for streaming and recording to take a load off your CPU. Nvidia has leaned into this market and has launched a whole streaming suite that comes along with their cards. Their proprietary encoder NVENC (Nvidia Encoder) claims to free up resources on your computer to be able to play triple-A games while still streaming full-quality at 1080p. While these tend to be more than just claims, the RTX 3070 does have a mid-range performance compared to its bigger siblings.

AMD does have an encoder; while it does perform well compared to x264 with a lower performance CPU, it does not hold a candle to NVENC, and it seems like AMD knows that. It looks like AMD is focusing on getting more raw performance out of their cards and then concentrating on the extra bits later, whereas Nvidia is now trying to see what else they can do. Something to keep in mind with both of these encoders is that, if you are just streaming your camera to hang out, they will outperform the x264 encoder handily.  So, if you are a streamer that likes the chat and occasionally plays some light games, both AMD and Nvidia are going to give you similar results.  


2021 Newest AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 12GB GDDR6, + AllyFlex HDMI

  • Chipset: AMD RX 6700 XT
  • Memory: 12GB GDDR6
  • Boost Clock: Up To 2615MHz
  • Cooling: AMD Reference Design


NVIDIA — GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8GB GDDR6X PCI Express 4.0 Graphics Card — Dark Platinum and Black

  • Seamless functionality
  • Unparalleled performance
  • Packed with features
  • Compact construction

Let’s take a look at thermals and power consumption. For both cards, the TDP is around 220W under a gaming load. Of course, thermals are dependent on which version of the card you purchase. Still, for the gigabyte gaming OC model for each of these cards, the temperature averaged around 70℃, which is very respectable for both, so, if your primary concern is a quiet and cool machine, these cards will fit excellently.  

If you are looking at these two cards for overclocking, they are not going to benefit noticeably. Pushing them both to their max overclock, which is unstable at best for both cards, you will see around a 10% gain in FPS. However, this may seem like a good size jump for these cards that already both perform well it won’t make a real-world difference for you.

In terms of IO for both cards, they are relatively similar to most modern cards, with three display ports and one HDMI 2.1 port. If you are an aesthetic person and want to show off your balling PC to all your friends, both of these cards feature tons of different designs from the usual round-up of GPU manufacturers. Although, if we are just comparing the two “founder’s” editions (I say founder’s in quotes because AMD does not have a brand name for their internally produced cards), I will lean toward the RTX 3070. The big future-looking brick goes well with anything you put next to it, while the RX 6700 XT from AMD looks like it could have come out six years ago and not look timeless. Now, keep in mind that this is just a personal preference. The look of it doesn’t affect the performance at all. 


You can look at these stats all day long and still not make a decision, but ultimately these cards are both incredible feats of engineering, and now that the GPU shortage seems to be coming to an end, we should celebrate! You will enjoy playing new games and creating to your heart’s desire no matter which one of these you choose. If you have made it all the way down here, I have one request of you. Please don’t scalp or let your friends, family, coworkers, or even strangers scalp these cards; otherwise, we are going to have to keep talking about the “Great GPU Shortage” for years to come, and I, for one, want to buy a GPU at MSRP.  

Last update on 2022-09-30 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs. Radeon RX 6700 XT

We recently compared the GeForce RTX 3070 against the Radeon RX 6700 XT in a 50 game head-to-head battle and the GeForce got the better of the exchanges. It was a close battle for the most part, but the RTX 3070 was faster and considering the feature set, it seemed like the way to go, assuming pricing is competitive.

Some readers were upset with that comparison though, claiming the 6700 XT was designed to compete with the RTX 3060 Ti, a comparison we were always going to make anyway.

Technically speaking, the 6700 XT is priced closer to the RTX 3070 based on MSRP. But no need to lose sleep over that one as today we have another 50 game benchmark comparing the RTX 3060 Ti and 6700 XT, so we can put that debate to rest.

The RTX 3060 Ti is meant to be available for $400 and the RTX 3070 for $500, with the 6700 XT at $480. Actual pricing is higher and all of these GPUs have been priced well over MSRP for the bulk of their existence.

As of writing, the RTX 3070 is closer to $750, while the 6700 XT is down at $600. A 25% price premium for the Nvidia GPU is steep, and a little hard to justify, even with the aid of DLSS and much better ray tracing performance.

If anything, that was a favorable matchup for AMD fans who were unhappy with the previous comparison. The RTX 3060 Ti is much more affordable than the RTX 3070 and slightly less than the 6700 XT at $570.

In a best case scenario for AMD, the 6700 XT and 3060 Ti occupy the same price point, so that being the case it will be interesting to see how they stack up across a massive range of games.

For testing we’ve used our AMD Ryzen 9 5950X test system with 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 dual-rank, dual-channel memory. Both GPUs were tested at 1080p, 1440p and 4K across 50 games, using Windows 11 with Resizable Bar enabled, that means SAM was enabled for the Radeon GPU.

The driver versions used were Radeon Adrenalin 22.3.1 and GeForce Game Ready Driver 512.15, as these were the latest available drivers when we started testing a week ago.

Let’s take a look at results for some of the highlight games and then we’ll check out how these two GPUs perform across all 50 games in a single comparison graph.


Starting with Dying Light 2, the Radeon 6700 XT is slightly faster than the RTX 3060 Ti. We’re talking about an 8% margin at 1080p, 9% at 1440p, and 12% at 4K.

Usually we’d expect the margin to shrink in Nvidia’s favor at the higher resolutions, but that wasn’t the case in this game, though admittedly there’s little difference between an 8% and 12% margin. Strong performance from the 6700 XT, even if it didn’t blow the 3060 Ti away.

Next we have Total War Warhammer III, and here the results swing slightly in Nvidia’s favor with the RTX 3060 Ti offering 5% more frames at 1080p, 8% more at 1440p, and then 17% more at 4K, though neither GPU provided particularly playable performance at 4K.

If you’re after a 60 fps+ experience in this title using the ultra quality settings, then 1080p is the optimal resolution for this class of GPU, though we assume most of you would tune the quality settings for 60 fps at 1440p.

The 6700 XT performs really well in Call of Duty Warzone, pumping out well over 100 fps at 1080p and that made it 13% faster than the 3060 Ti. The Radeon GPU maintained the lead at 1440p and while not a massive difference, you will at times notice the extra 13% performance. Once again, neither are ideal for 4K gaming, with under 60 fps on average.

Forza Horizon 5 runs very well on Radeon GPUs, especially with Resizable Bar enabled. The 6700 XT enjoys a strong performance lead at 1080p and 1440p where it was 16% and 14% faster, respectively, and then at 4K the margins close right up and here the Radeon GPU was just 4% faster, so basically the same level of performance was seen at this high resolution.

The God of War results are very competitive. Here the RTX 3060 Ti was slightly faster at 1080p, then we saw the same performance at 1440p and 4K.

The 4K results were quite good and it wouldn’t take much to ensure frame rates stay above 60 fps on both camps.

Oh, boy, did Far Cry 6 stir the pot in our last benchmark. We mentioned how AMD fans didn’t like us comparing the 6700 XT against the RTX 3070, but then Nvidia radicals did not like us enabling the HD texture back in Far Cry 6 either.

Despite the fact that 6700 XT can deliver over 60 fps at 4K with HD textures enabled, we were told it’s highly unrealistic and we did that to make the GeForce GPU look bad.

Truth is, we’ve always tested games that offer HD texture packs with them enabled, especially when testing mid to high-end hardware. This was nothing new and HD textures shouldn’t impact performance assuming you have enough VRAM. It’s a free visual upgrade and for most gamers well worth using… again, if you have enough VRAM, which you should when spending $500+ on a graphics card.

Those playing Far Cry 6 at 1080p or 1440p with either the 6700 XT or RTX 3060 Ti need not worry about VRAM in this title, even with the HD texture pack, both worked really well despite the Radeon GPU offering up to 10% more performance. At 4K however, it does become a problem for the 3060 Ti as it’s unable to deliver playable performance, while the 6700 XT sailed along without issue thanks to its larger 12GB VRAM buffer.

In our opinion, 12GB VRAM should be the minimum at this price point. Bizarrely, Nvidia’s slower RTX 3060 (the non-Ti version) does pack a 12GB VRAM buffer. Go figure.

Moving on to F1 2021, this game enables ray tracing when using the ‘Ultra High’ quality preset, so we’ve left it enabled as we like to test with presets where possible.

This setting saw both GPUs render 116 fps on average at 1080p, but at 1440p the RTX 3060 Ti edged ahead by an 8% margin and then took a commanding lead at 4K by a 14% margin. Ideally, you’ll want to lower the visual quality settings to boost frame rates, but if you keep ray tracing enabled the GeForce will reign supreme.

Metro Exodus Enhanced is another title that enables ray tracing by default. In this particular case, RT hardware support is required to launch the ‘Enhanced’ version of the game.

This is a bad title for AMD with the RTX 3060 Ti dominating the 6700 XT, offering 27% more performance at 1080p, 31% more at 1440p, and then 40% more at 4K, though neither GPU was suitable at this resolution.

Moving on, we have Rainbow Six Extraction where performance is very similar. The 6700 XT was slightly faster at 1080p, then we see basically identical performance at 1440p, and at 4K the 3060 Ti nudged ahead, though performance overall was much the same.

Frame rates in Apex Legends were also similar, though the RTX 3060 Ti did provide the best performance at all tested resolutions. We’re only talking about a 4% difference at 1080p and 1440p with a 6% margin seen at 4K.

Fortnite’s chapter three, season two was recently released and with it a number of performance related issues. That said, the game now appears to be in a pretty good shape, though Radeon owners will want to make sure they’re running the game in the DX12 mode as it’s basically broken using DX11.

Typically, Fortnite gamers will want to opt for medium level quality settings for that competitive advantage, but doing so for a GPU comparison makes it more of a CPU benchmark. Also, scaling for Radeon and GeForce GPUs is very similar.

The 6700 XT did provide noticeably better frame time performance with the latest update and this was evident at 1080p. Even at 1440p, the 1% lows were 25% higher using the 6700 XT which is a significant margin. By the time we reach 4K though any and all performance differences were neutralized.

Cyberpunk 2077 is another competitive title for the RTX 3060 Ti and 6700 XT. The Radeon GPU was a whisker faster at 1080p and 1440p, but the margins aren’t worth getting excited over. Performance was basically the same as you won’t be able to tell the difference between 87 and 91 fps.

Performance Summary

Based on the dozen or so games we just looked at, the RTX 3060 Ti and 6700 XT appear to be very close in terms of performance. There were a few titles that did heavily favor one over the other, but for the most part performance was similar.

We did spend a week testing through 50 games, so let’s go check out that data…

Starting with the 1080p expanded benchmark data, we see that the RTX 3060 Ti was just 2% slower on average across the 50 games tested. The big wins for Nvidia came in Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition, PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds, Warhammer Vermintide 2, War Thunder and Resident Evil Village. For AMD, the 6700 XT was most dominant in Sniper Elite 4, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, Horizon Zero Dawn, Borderlands 3, Forza Horizon 5, Warzone and The Division 2.

Moving to 1440p, we found a tie between the 6700 XT and RTX 3060 Ti, though that hardly means they delivered the same performance across all titles. It simply signals the margins are balanced out overall.

Of the 50 games tested, the margin was less than 10% in either direction for 39 of them. Then for 22 of the games tested the margin was 5% or less which we deem a tie.

The only outlier was Metro Exodus, the rest of the games were within a 14% margin. For those gaming at 1440p, the 6700 XT and 3060 Ti will deliver a similar experience overall.

For those gaming at 4K, the results are a little more interesting as the RTX 3060 Ti is typically faster unless you run out of VRAM. This only happened on a single game we tested though we’ve also seen this in Ghost Recon Breakpoint, and to an extent Doom using the highest quality settings. Besides Metro Exodus, Nvidia enjoyed solid wins in Vermintide 2, Warhammer III, PUBG, Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, and Star Wars Jedi Fallen order.

Who Wins?

This comparison is as straightforward as they come. The only advantage the Radeon RX 6700 XT has over the RTX 3060 Ti right now is the larger VRAM buffer, jumping from 8GB to 12GB. This is an advantage that will certainly serve the 6700 XT well in the future, but right now there are very few instances where VRAM becomes relevant in terms of raw performance output.

In other words, this is not an issue for the RTX 3060 Ti, and where it might be, the workaround is easy to apply and doesn’t impact visuals significantly.

While we’d have preferred the RTX 3060 Ti to pack more VRAM, it’s got enough to get the job done. The advantages of the RTX 3060 Ti include superior ray tracing performance — which personally I don’t care for too much at this performance tier — but still you can enjoy RT effects if you want, typically at much higher frame rates than you’ll get with the 6700 XT.

The RTX 3060 Ti also supports DLSS which is a key advantage at the moment. AMD is now hard at work to reduce its significance, but they’ve still got some way to go.

It’s possible DLSS won’t be a critical feature in a few years, but we never like to heavily weigh our recommendations on what could be, rather we prefer to focus on the here and now, and right now DLSS is a strong selling point of GeForce RTX GPUs.

With rasterization performance essentially the same, we don’t see many reasons for buying the 6700 XT over the RTX 3060 Ti, especially when the GeForce GPU costs the same or even a little less.

We’re still tracking GPU pricing closely and our recommendation remains to hold out a little longer before making any purchase if possible. But if you want to buy right now, and have ~$600 to spend, we’d go for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.

Shopping Shortcuts:
  • Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT on Amazon
  • Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon
  • Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 9 5950X on Amazon

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti: Which GPU is better?

The Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti is one of the most affordable 30-Series graphics cards available right now, offering solid ray tracing performance at 1080p. But, how does it compare to the similarly priced AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT?

The RX 6700 XT launched earlier this year, and is currently the cheapest RDNA 2 graphics card in AMD’s lineup. It targets a slightly higher 1440p resolution and features ray tracing, but is also noticeably more expensive than the RTX 3060 Ti.

So, how does the RX 6700 XT compare with the RTX 3060 Ti? Read on to discover what the two graphics cards have in common – and how they differ from each other. 

Price and availability 

The RTX 3060 Ti has the lower RRP of the two GPUs at £369 to the RX 6700 XT’s £419.99 price. That makes the RTX 3060 Ti just £50 cheaper. 

However, you’ll likely struggle to find these graphics cards at their original prices due to the current silicon shortage. Many models are sold out, reselling at higher prices, so you may find the AMD card for less depending on availability. 

Specs and features 

The RX 6700 XT is based on AMD’s RDNA 2 architecture, which is the latest offering from the brand and supports features such as ray tracing. The RTX 3060 Ti, on the other hand, is based on Nvidia’s Ampere architecture.

The RX 6700 XT has a boost frequency of 2.6GHz and a base frequency of 2.3GHz. The RTX 3060 Ti has a boost clock speed of 1.67GHz and a base clock speed of 1.41GHz, making the AMD GPU noticeably faster here. 

However, the RX 6700 XT also has a higher recommended system power of 650W when compared to the RTX 3060 Ti’s 600W. The AMD card also features 12GB GDDR6 memory, while the RTX 3060 Ti sports 8GB GDDR6 memory.

When it comes to features, the RTX 3060 Ti offers support for both ray tracing and DLSS. The former is a light-rendering technology that creates more realistic light, reflections and shadows, while the latter can boost frame rates and improve image quality using AI.

The RX 6700 XT also supports ray tracing, but won’t work with DLSS since it’s an Nvidia technology. However, it will work with FSR (Fidelity FX Super Resolution) instead, which does a very similar job.


As far as performance is concerned, the RX 6700 XT is designed for Quad HD and Full HD gaming, which means it isn’t quite powerful enough to handle modern AAA games in 4K.  

We found the AMD GPU performed well in Horizon Zero Dawn, reaching 116fps in Full HD and 94fps in Quad HD; but it dropped to 49fps in 4K. While running The Division 2, the GPU managed to reach 126fps in Full HD, 84fps in Quad HD and 43fps in 4K.

You might like…

Meanwhile, the RTX 3060 Ti is designed to support 1080p Full HD gaming for those who aren’t interested in paying for 4K support. 

To compare the RTX 3060 Ti with the RX 6700 XT directly, the GPU hit 101fps in Full HD, 86fps in Quad HD and 54fps in 4K for Horizon Zero Dawn. And for The Division 2, the Nvidia GPU can hit 128fps in Full HD, 87fps in Quad HD and 46fps in 4K running The Division 2.

There really isn’t much difference between these two graphics cards in terms of performance, although the RX 6700 XT does seem to have the edge for games such as Borderlands 3 and Doom Eternal. You can see the full breakdown by checking out our AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT review.


The Radeon RX 6700 XT and Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti are both great graphics cards, excelling at Full HD and Quad HD resolutions, while also being able to hit 4K with less demanding games.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT seems to have a slight advantage in terms of performance power, with slightly better results in our gaming benchmarks. But the RTX 3060 Ti features DLSS which can close the gap without compromising on visual quality with select games.

Ultimately, it comes down to what price you’re able to buy the graphics card for. The RTX 3060 Ti has the cheaper RRP, making it a better value option, but it may well be the case that the AMD is cheaper due to the price fluctuations caused by the silicon shortage.

You can find the RTX 3060 Ti and other GPUs in our guide to the best graphics cards.

Hannah joined Trusted Reviews as a staff writer in 2019 after graduating with a degree in English from Royal Holloway, University of London. She’s also worked and studied in the US, holding positions …

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.

GeForce 6700 XL video card [in 1 benchmark]

GeForce 6700XL

  • PCIe 1.0 x16 interface
  • Core frequency 525 MHz
  • Video memory size 128 MB
  • Memory type GDDR3
  • Memory frequency 1100 MHz
  • Maximum resolution


NVIDIA started GeForce 6700 XL sales 14 November 2004. This is Curie architecture desktop card based on 110 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. It has 128 MB of GDDR3 memory at 1.1 GHz, and coupled with a 128-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 17. 60 Gb / s.

In terms of compatibility, this is a single-slot PCIe 1.0 x16 card. An additional 1x 6-pin power cable is required for connection.

We don’t have any test results for the GeForce 6700 XL.


Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of GeForce 6700 XL, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

Performance ranking $535 of 49999 (A100 SXM4)


GeForce 6700 XL’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak about GeForce 6700 XL’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Core clock 525 MHz

Compatibility and dimensions

Information on GeForce 6700 XL compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).

90 Ti) Memorial capacity 17.60 GB/s of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)

video exit


Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 6700 XL. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

903 903 902

903 903 903

These are the results of GeForce 6700 XL rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.

  • Passmark

This is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the card a thorough evaluation, running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11, and 12 (the latter being done at 4K resolution whenever possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute.

Benchmark coverage: 26%


Other video cards

Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

Recommended processors

According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the GeForce 6700 XL.

Core i5

12.5% ​​

Ryzen 7
PRO 3700

12. 5% ​​

Core 2
Duo E6600

12.5% ​​


12.5% ​​

Athlon II
X4 635

12.5% ​​

Core i5

12.5% ​​

Core i5

12.5% ​​

Athlon II
X3 455

12.5% ​​

User rating

Here you can see the rating of the video card by users, as well as put your own rating.

Tips and comments

Here you can ask a question about the GeForce 6700 XL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL — 22 secret facts, review, specifications, reviews.

NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL — 22 secret facts, review, specifications, reviews.

Top specifications and features

  • Passmark score
  • GPU base clock
  • RAM
  • Memory Bandwidth
  • Effective memory speed

Passmark score

NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL:
Best score:


NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL:
Best score:


NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL:
Best score:

General Information

NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL:
Best score:


NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL:
Best score:


NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL graphics card based on Curie architecture has 146 million transistors, tech. 110 nm process. The frequency of the graphics core is 525 MHz. In terms of memory, 0.1 GB is installed here. DDR3, frequency 550 MHz and with a maximum bandwidth of 17.6 Gb / s. The texture size is 4.2 GTexels/s.

In tests, the NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL video card performed as follows — according to the Passmark benchmark, the model scored 93 points. At the same time, the maximum number of points for today is 260261 points.
Directx version — 9. OpenGL version — 2.
In our tests, the video card scores 3233 points.

Why NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL is better than others

No merits

  • Passmark score of 93 . This setting is lower than 58%
  • Base GPU clock speed 525 MHz. This parameter is lower than 72%
  • RAM 0.1 GB. This parameter is lower than that of 77%
  • Memory bandwidth 17.6 GB/s. This parameter is lower than 68%
  • Effective memory speed 1100 MHz. This parameter is lower than 55%
  • GPU memory frequency 550 MHz. This parameter is lower than 70%
  • Process 110 nm. This parameter is higher than 89%
  • GDDR Memory Version 3 . This parameter is lower than that of 72%

NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL Review



general information



Tests in benchmarks

NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL Review: Highlights

GPU base clock

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.


max 2457

Average: 938 MHz


GPU memory frequency

This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth


max 16000

Average: 1326.6 MHz

16000 MHz

Texture size

A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all

4.2 GTexels/s

max 756.8

Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

756.8 GTexels/s

Architecture name


GPU name


Memory bandwidth

This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.


max 2656

Average: 198.3 GB/s


Effective memory speed

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all


max 19500

Average: 6984. 5 MHz




max 128

Average: 4.6 GB


GDDR Memory Versions

Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates for improved overall performance
Show in full


Average: 4.5


Memory bus width

A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all


max 8192

Average: 290.1bit

8192 bit

Release date

2004-11-14 00:00:00

Mean value:

Process technology

The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

110 nm

Average: 47.5 nm


Number of transistors

146 million

max 80000

Average: 5043 million

80000 million

PCIe version

Considerable speed of the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals is provided. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all


Mean: 2.8





Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics


max 12.2

Average: 11. 1


opengl version

Later versions provide quality game graphics


max 4.6

Average: 4


Shader model version


max 6.6

Average: 5.5


DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI


Mean: 1.4




Passmark test score


max 29325

Average: 7628.6



How much RAM does NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL have

NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL has 0. 1 GB.

What version of RAM does NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL

NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL support GDDR3.

What is the architecture of NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL


How NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL performs in benchmarks

The video card scored 93 points in the Passmark benchmark.

What version of PCIe does it support?

PCIe version 1.

Which version of DirectX does the NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL support?

DirectX 9.

Does the NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL support DVI?

When was the NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL released?

2004-11-14 00:00:00.

leave your feedback

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080: What is the difference?

64 points

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

70 points

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

Founders Edition


54 facts in comparison

  • GPU frequency 881MHz higher?
    2321MHz vs 1440MHz
  • 90W below TDP?
    230W vs 320W
  • 812MHz faster memory speed?
    2000MHz vs 1188MHz
  • 20% more VRAM?
    12GB vs 10GB
  • 871MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    2581MHz vs 1710MHz
  • Semiconductor size 1nm smaller?
    7nm vs 8nm
  • 18mm narrower?
    267mm vs 285mm

  • 16. 56 TFLOPS over FLOPS?
    29.77 TFLOPS vs 13.21 TFLOPS
  • 3000MHz higher effective clock speed?
    19000MHz vs 16000MHz
  • 52.1 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
    760GB/s vs 384GB/s
  • 128bit wider memory bus?
    320bit vs 192bit
  • 6144 more stream processors?
    8704 vs 2560
  • 10800million more transistors?
    28000 million vs 17200 million
  • 112 more texture units (TMUs)?
    272 vs 160

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT


Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080


AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT


AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080


Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT


AMD Radeon RX 580

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080


Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT


Asus Radeon RX 6800

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080


Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT


MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming X

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080


AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT


AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT




AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

  • 9000 VS


    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080


    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 12GB

    AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT


    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080


    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090

    AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT


    Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080


    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

    User Reviews Price Match


    General rating

    AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

    3 Reviews of users

    AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

    9 /10

    3 reviews of users

    NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 3080 9000. 000 NELSISTRESS 9000. RTX 3080

    0.0 /10

    0 User Reviews


    Value for Money

    8.5 /10

    900 votes0002 reviews yet there are no



    9 /10

    3 Votes

    reviews yet there are no


    8 9.3 /10

    9000 3 VOTES

    reviews yet

    ,0002 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Fan noise

    7.7 /10

    3 Votes

    Reviews still not


    9 /10

    9000 3 VOTES

    No reviews yet


    1.GPU clock speed



    The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

    2.turbo GPU



    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel speed

    165.2 GPixel/s

    164.2 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.


    13.21 TFLOPS

    29.77 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    413 GTexels/s

    465.1 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed



    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.


    1.memory effective speed



    The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth



    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.


    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width



    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5.GDDR memory versions

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

    ✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.


    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a newer version that supports better graphics.

    OpenGL version 2.

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

    ✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5. GPU boot temperature

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080)

    Lower boot temperature — this means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

    ✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

    ✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

    ✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.


    1.has HDMI output

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

    ✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI 3.Version

    HDMI 2.1

    HDMI 2.1

    New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    Mini DisplayPort 6 outputs

    Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

    Price match


    Which graphics cards are better?

    Product Support List|NVIDIA

  • Video connectors
    OpenCL N/A
    VULKAN N/A 9003
    GeForce2 Go 0x0112
    GeForce2 Integrated GPU 0x01A0
    GeForce2 MX 100/200 0x0111
    GeForce2 MX/MX 400 0x0110
    GeForce3 0x0200
    GeForce3 Ti 200 0x0201
    GeForce3 Ti 500 0x0202
    GeForce4 410 Go 16M 0x017D
    GeForce4 4200 Go 0x0286
    GeForce4 420 Go 0x0175
    GeForce4 420 Go 32M 0x0176
    GeForce4 440 Go 0x0174
    GeForce4 440 Go 64M 0x0179
    GeForce4 460 Go 0x0177
    GeForce4 MX 4000 0x0185
    GeForce4 MX 420 0x0172
    GeForce4 MX 420 with AGP8X 0x0183
    GeForce4 MX 440 0x0171
    GeForce4 MX 440-SE 0x0173
    GeForce4 MX 440SE with AGP8X 0x0182
    GeForce4 MX 440 with AGP8X 0x0181
    GeForce4 MX 460 0x0170
    GeForce4 MX Integrated GPU 0x01F0
    GeForce4 Ti 4200 0x0253
    GeForce4 Ti 4200 with AGP8X 0x0281
    GeForce4 Ti 4400 0x0251
    GeForce4 Ti 4600 0x0250
    GeForce4 Ti 4800 0x0280
    GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE 0x0282
    GeForce 6100 0x0242
    GeForce 6150 0x0240
    GeForce 6150 LE 0x0241
    GeForce 6200 0x00F3
    GeForce 6200 0x014F
    GeForce 6200 LE 0x0163
    GeForce 6200 TurboCache™ 0x0161
    GeForce 6500 0x0160
    GeForce 6600 0x00F2
    GeForce 6600 0x0141
    GeForce 6600/GeForce 6600 GT 0x00F1
    GeForce 6600 GT 0x0140
    GeForce 6600 LE 0x00F4
    GeForce 6600 LE 0x0142
    GeForce 6600 VE 0x0143
    GeForce 6610 XL 0x0145
    GeForce 6700 XL 0x0147
    GeForce 6800 0x0041
    GeForce 6800 0x00C1
    GeForce 6800 0x0211
    GeForce 6800/GeForce 6800 Ultra 0x00F0
    GeForce 6800GS 0x0047
    GeForce 6800GS 0x00C0
    GeForce 6800GS 0x00F6
    GeForce 6800 GT 0x0045
    GeForce 6800 GT 0x0046
    GeForce 6800 GT 0x0215
    GeForce 6800 LE 0x00C2
    GeForce 6800 LE 0x0212
    GeForce 6800 Ultra 0x0040
    GeForce 6800 Ultra 0x00F9
    GeForce 6800 XE 0x0043
    GeForce 6800XT 0x0044
    GeForce 6800XT 0x0048
    GeForce 6800XT 0x00C3
    GeForce 6800XT 0x0218
    GeForce 7300 GS 0x01DF
    GeForce 7300 GT 0x0393
    GeForce 7300 LE 0x01D1
    GeForce 7300 SE 0x01D3
    GeForce 7600GS 0x02E1
    GeForce 7600GS 0x0392
    GeForce 7600 GT 0x0391
    GeForce 7800GS 0x0093
    GeForce 7800GS 0x00F5
    GeForce 7800 GT 0x0092
    GeForce 7800 GTX 0x0090
    GeForce 7800 GTX 0x0091
    GeForce 7800 GTX 512 0x0090
    GeForce 7900 GS 0x0292
    GeForce 7900 GT 0x0291
    GeForce 7900 GTX 0x0290
    GeForce FX 5100 0x0327
    GeForce FX 5200 0x0320
    GeForce FX 5200 0x0322
    GeForce FX 5200LE 0x0323
    GeForce FX 5200 Ultra 0x0321
    GeForce FX 5500 0x0326
    GeForce FX 5600 0x0312
    GeForce FX 5600 Ultra 0x0311
    GeForce FX 5600XT 0x0314
    GeForce FX 5700 0x0342
    GeForce FX 5700LE 0x0343
    GeForce FX 5700 Ultra 0x0341
    GeForce FX 5700VE 0x0344
    GeForce FX 5800 0x0302
    GeForce FX 5800 Ultra 0x0301
    GeForce FX 5900 0x0331
    GeForce FX 5900 Ultra 0x0330
    GeForce FX 5900XT 0x0332
    GeForce FX 5900ZT 0x0334
    GeForce FX 5950 Ultra 0x0333
    GeForce FX Go5100 0x032D
    GeForce FX Go5200 0x0324
    GeForce FX Go5200 32M/64M 0x0328
    GeForce FX Go5250 0x0325
    GeForce FX Go53xx 0x032C
    GeForce FX Go5600 0x031A
    GeForce FX Go5650 0x031B
    GeForce FX Go5700 0x0347
    GeForce FX Go5700 0x0348
    GeForce Go 6200 0x0164
    GeForce Go 6200 0x0167
    GeForce Go 6400 0x0166
    GeForce Go 6400 0x0168
    GeForce Go 6600 0x0144
    GeForce Go 6600 0x0148
    GeForce Go 6600 GT 0x0149
    GeForce Go 6600 TE/6200 TE 0x0146
    GeForce Go 6800 0x00C8
    GeForce Go 6800 Ultra 0x00C9
    GeForce Go 7300 0x01D7
    GeForce Go 7400 0x01D8
    GeForce Go 7600 0x0398
    GeForce Go 7800 0x0098
    GeForce Go 7800 GTX 0x0099
    GeForce PCX 4300 0x00FF
    GeForce PCX 5750 0x00FA
    GeForce PCX 5900 0x00FB
    Quadro2 MXR/EX/Go 0x0113
    Quadro4 380 XGL 0x018B
    Quadro4 500 GoGL 0x017C
    Quadro4 550 XGL 0x0178
    Quadro4 580 XGL 0x0188
    Quadro4 700 GoGL 0x028C
    Quadro4 700 XGL 0x025B
    Quadro4 750 XGL 0x0259
    Quadro4 780 XGL 0x0289
    Quadro4 900 XGL 0x0258
    Quadro4 980 XGL 0x0288
    Quadro DCC 0x0203
    Quadro FX 1000 0x0309
    Quadro FX 1100 0x034E
    Quadro FX 1300 0x00FE
    Quadro FX 1400 0x00CE
    Quadro FX 1500 0x029E
    Quadro FX 1500M 0x029B
    Quadro FX 2000 0x0308
    Quadro FX 2500M 0x029A
    Quadro FX 3000 0x0338
    Quadro FX 330/GeForce PCX 5300 0x00FC
    Quadro FX 3400 0x00F8
    Quadro FX 3450/4000 SDI 0x00CD
    Quadro FX 350M 0x01DC
    Quadro FX 3500 0x029D
    Quadro FX 4000 0x004E
    Quadro FX 4400 0x00F8
    Quadro FX 4500 0x009D
    Quadro FX 4500 0x029F
    Quadro FX 4500 X2 0x029F
    Quadro FX 5500 0x029C
    Quadro FX 350 0x01DE
    Quadro FX 500/600 PCI 0x032B
    Quadro FX 540 0x014E
    Quadro FX 550 0x014C
    Quadro FX 560 0x039E
    Quadro FX 700 0x033F
    Quadro FX Go1000 0x034C
    Quadro FX Go1400 0x00CC
    Quadro FX Go700 0x031C
    Quadro NVS 0x017A
    Quadro NVS 110M 0x01D7
    Quadro NVS 110M 0x01DA
    Quadro NVS 120M 0x01DB
    Quadro NVS 280 PCI 0x032A
    Quadro NVS 280 PCI-E/Quadro FX 330 0x00FD
    Quadro NVS 285 0x0165
    Quadro NVS 440 0x014A
    Quadro NVS 50 PCI 0x018C
    Quadro NVS with AGP8X 0x018A

    GTX 1080 Ti with i7-6700 benchmarks in Ultra quality quality settings

    Compare with
    Select. .AMD Radeon HD 6850 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6870 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6950 — RUB 16,398AMD Radeon HD 6970 — RUB 19,619 ₽ 45,847AMD Radeon HD 7750 — ₽ 9, 183AMD Radeon HD 7750M — ₽ 56,276AMD Radeon HD 7790 — ₽ 9,773AMD Radeon HD 7850 — ₽ 16,332AMD Radeon HD 7850M — ₽ 63,229AMD Radeon HD 7950 — ₽ 9.773AMD RADEON HD 7950M — ₽ 67.09.09MARI AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition — RUB 19,611AMD Radeon HD 7970M — RUB 70,772AMD Radeon HD 7990 — RUB 65,524AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile — RUB 128,491 6,231AMD Radeon R7 265 — RUB 9,773AMD Radeon R7 370 — RUB 13,249AMD Radeon R9 270 — RUB 18,037AMD Radeon R9280 — ₽ 22,957AMD Radeon R9 280X — ₽ 22,957AMD Radeon R9 285 — ₽ 24,924AMD Radeon R9 290 — ₽ 20,333AMD Radeon R9 290X — ₽ 26,170AMD Radeon R9 295X2 — ₽ 98,319AMD Radeon R9 380 — ₽ 19,611AMD Radeon R9 380X — ₽ 15,020AMD Radeon R9 390 — ₽ 30,499AMD Radeon R9 390X — ₽ 32,467AMD Radeon R9 FURY — ₽ 36,009AMD Radeon R9 FURY X — ₽ 42,568AMD Radeon R9 M270X — ₽ 66,639AMD Radeon R9 M280X — ₽ 70,181AMD Radeon R9 M280X 2GB — RUB 70,181AMD Radeon R9 M290X — RUB 79,298AMD Radeon R9 M380 — RUB 70,444AMD Radeon R9 Nano — RUB 100,287AMD Radeon RX 460 — RUB 9,183AMD Radeon RX 470 — RUB 22,432AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile — RUB 78,905AMD Radeon RX 480 — RUB 26,170AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile — RUB 83,627AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile — RUB 42,306AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile — RUB 60,540AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB — RUB 11,085AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile — RUB 60,540AMD Radeon RX 560 — RUB 6,493AMD Radeon RX 560 RX 6D Mobile — RUB 6,493 — RUB 18,300AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — RUB 42,043AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — RUB 64,737AMD Radeon RX 570 — RUB 8,068AMD Radeon RX 570 Mobile — RUB 82,643AMD Radeon RX 5700 — RUB 22. 89AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — RUB 85,726 AMD Radeon RX 590 — RUB 14,036 AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT4 — RUB 14,036 AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT4 — RUB 14,036 XT — RUB 31,418AMD Radeon RX 6800 — RUB 37,977AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — RUB 42,568AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — RUB 65,524AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — RUB 41,453AMD ​​Radeon RX VEGA 3 — RX VEGA AMD 37.1 AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — RUB 39,420AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — RUB 17,644AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile — RUB 103,567AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — RUB 27,482AMD Radeon VII — RUB 43,552ATI Radeon HD 4870 — RUB 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — ₽ 84,086NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — ₽ 49,193NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — ₽ 69,657NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — ₽ 83,299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — ₽ 57,457NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — ₽ 11,150NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — ₽ 10,429 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q — RUB 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — RUB 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — RUB 21,579NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — Rs. 72,543NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — Rs. 102,255NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — Rs. 121,801NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — ₽ 9,773NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — ₽ 81,266NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — ₽ 75,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — ₽ 10,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — ₽ 15,020NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — $18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — $77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — $115,307NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — $29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — ₽ 42,568NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — ₽ 10,035NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — ₽ 22,891NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — ₽ 3,214NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — ₽ 4,198NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — $11,085NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — $5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — $19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — ₽ 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — ₽ 31,811NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — ₽ 71,034NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — ₽ 28,794 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — ₽ 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — ₽ 20,989NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — ₽ 67,951NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — ₽ 11,741NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — ₽ 72,149NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — ₽ 23,285NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — ₽ 26,892NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — ₽ 69,919NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — ₽ 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — ₽ 40,600NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — ₽ 42,634NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — ₽ 65,524NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — ₽ 72,083 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — $22. 891NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — ₽ 72,411NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — ₽ 26,236NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — ₽ 30,762NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — ₽ 99,434NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — ₽ 113,077NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — ₽ 45,454NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — ₽ 116,226NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — ₽ 127,376NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — ₽ 77,855NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $16,332NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — ₽ 39,288NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 — ₽ 21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $163,909NVIDIA TITAN V — $196,704NVIDIA TITAN Xp — ₽ 78,642

    Change CPU to
    Select. .AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — RUB 6555.7AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — RUB 1967AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — RUB 8523.4 — RUB 23609.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — RUB 30168.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — RUB 21742.4AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 6DAM56 5400+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 5400+ X2 Dual Core 5600+ — RUB 9835.2AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — RUB 1639.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — RUB 3013.9AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — RUB 17050.1AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — RUB 3935.4 AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 6231.1AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 786.4AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 2111.3 II X2 255 — RUB 4277.8AMD Athlon II X2 260 — RUB 1311.1AMD Athlon II X2 265 — RUB 5436.1AMD Athlon II X2 270 — RUB 1573.5AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — RUB 2358AMD Athlon II X2AMD II2 X20. — ₽ 3217.2AMD Athlon II X3 425 — ₽ 6835.1AMD Athlon II X3 435 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon II X3 440 — ₽ 3079.5AMD ATHLON II X3 445 — ₽ 5968.7AMD athlon II X3 450 — ₽ 2622. 9AMD ATHLON II X3 455 — ₽ 7664.2AMD ATHLON II X3 460 — ₽ 3278.8AMD ATHO X4 620 — ₽ 3932.1AMD ATHLON 28 Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 5247.2AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 4588AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 5243.9AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 6001.5 — ₽ 18168.4AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — ₽ 3017.1AMD Athlon X4 840 — ₽ 5164.6AMD Athlon X4 845 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon X4 860K — ₽ 4196.4AMD ATHLON X4 870K — ₽ 5246.5AMD Athlon X4 880K — ₽ 5902.4AMD ATHLON X4 950 — ₽ 3934.7AMD E2-3200 APU — ₽ 524.1AMD FX -4100 Quad -Core — ₽ 8526AMD FX -4130 QUAD -₽ 4984. FX-4170 Quad-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — RUB 14968.3AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — RUB 3501.9AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — RUB 22297.3FX -6300 Six-Core — RUB 3869.2AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — RUB 25153.8AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — RUB 5285.9AMD 8320 Eight-Core — ₽ 5214.4AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — ₽ 6484.9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — RUB 5246.5 AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — RUB 8853. 3AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — RUB 11805.5 Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — ₽ 3082.1AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — ₽ 1964.4AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — ₽ 221830AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — ₽ 6887AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — ₽ 3934.7AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — ₽ 3276.2AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — ₽ 9654.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — ₽AMD-Core 360 ₽ 3932.1AMD Phenom 9850 Quad -Core — ₽ 3279.5AMD Phenom 9950 Quad -Core — ₽ 11804.9AMD Phenom II X2 545 — ₽ 2884.6AMD Phenom II X2 550 — ₽ 3278.8AMD PHENOM II X2 555 — ₽ 9323AMD PEN 1967AMD Phenom II X2 B550.6AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — ₽ 4919.3AMD Phenom II X4 805 — ₽ 11412AMD Phenom II X4 810 — ₽ 7607.8AMD Phenom II X4 820 — ₽ 4916AMD Phenom II X4 840 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X4 905E — ₽ 13 905E — ₽ 13 910 — ₽ 65559AMD Phenom II X4 910e — ₽ 10297AMD Phenom II X4 920 — ₽ 4393. 9AMD Phenom II X4 925 — ₽ 10493.7AMD Phenom II X4 940 — ₽ 7870.1AMD PHENOM II X4 945 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd AMD Phenom II X4 960T — RUB 8854 AMD Phenom II X4 965 — RUB 3902.6AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — RUB 4784.8AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — ₽ 12396.5AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — ₽ 11478.3AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — ₽ 12134.2AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — ₽ 17052.7AMD PHENOM II X6 1090T — ₽ 259978.90T — ₽ 259978.90T ₽ 13117.3AMD Phenom X3 8550 — ₽ 11147AMD RYZEN 3 1200 — ₽ 6230.4AMD RYZEN 3 1300X — ₽ 8198.1AMD RYZEN 3 2200G — ₽ 6427.2AMD RYZEN 3 3100 — ₽ 5903.1AMD RYZEN 3 3200G — ₽ 6493.4AMD RYZEN 3300 — AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 8789.1AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 9503.3AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 10165.8AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 11701.3837.8AMD RYZEN 5 2600X — ₽ 13773.2AMD RYZEN 5 3400G — ₽ 9837.8AMD RYZEN 5 3500 — ₽ 9707.3AMD RYZEN 5 3500X — ₽ 10527.2AMD RYZEN 5 3600 — ₽ 13052.4AMD RYZEN 5 3600X — ₽ 16331. AMD RYZEN 5 5600X — ₽ 19611.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700 — ₽ 12461.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700X — ₽ 13117.3AMD RYZEN 7 1800X — ₽ 16396.8AMD RYZEN 7 2700 — ₽ 16347AMD RYZEN 7 2700X — ₽ 20004.3AMD RYZEN 7, 3700X — ₽ ₽ ₽ ¦ 3800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — RUB 19676.3AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — RUB 29514.8AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — ₽ 49192.5AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — ₽ 46568.9AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — ₽ 22955.8AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — ₽ 27547.1AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — ₽ 44600.5 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — ₽ 59030.3AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — ₽ 112814.1Intel Core i3-10100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-10300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-11100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-11300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-12100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-12300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3934.7Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 3804.2Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 5246.5Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 1967.7Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 13052. 2Intel Core0 @ 3.40GHz — $ 4590.6Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — $ 2289.1Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 5246.5 Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz — $ 6230.4 Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9181.9 3.60GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — Rs. 9837.8Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 11805.5Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 3.70GHz — $18361.9Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — $29513.5Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — $1311.8Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — $1377.4Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — $1377.4 Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 1966.4Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8772Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — RUB 10895.2Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — RUB 9Intel Core i3-7320 @ 3.90GHz Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8526 i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz — $ 6886.3Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 10625.6Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.00GHz — $ 14691.537.4 Intel Core i5-10600K — $15533.7 Intel Core i5-11400 — $11937.4 Intel Core i5-11600K — $ 17184. 6 ₽ 5246.5Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 5245.9Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 12806.4Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ tel5 Core508.9 2400S @ 2.50GHz — $4309.3 Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — $10783Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — $ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — $6886.3 Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — ₽ 4918.6Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — Rs. 8526Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — Rs. 2.80GHz — $ 9837.8 Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6 Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 8394.9 Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9188.5 Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9412.2 GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 9444.3Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz — RUB 18693.2Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 11805.5Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core05 @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 30366.2Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2. 90GHz — $ 43288.7 Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — $14536.7 Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — $12133.5Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — $12986.2 3.40GHz — ₽ 16396.8Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 18102.8Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 13117.3Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — Rs. @ 3.10GHz — $ 26235.3 Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 13117.3 Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 12461.4 Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 3934.7 Intel Core i5-660 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 3213.9 Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 14429.148.3Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — Rs. 5902.4Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 2.67GHz — $ 10527.2 Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 13773.2 Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 6558.3 ​​Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 15739.6 Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $16396.8 Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $15676 GHz — ₽ 24770.1Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2. 90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 18364.5 i7-11700K — $ 26891.9Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 30826.6Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9837.2 -2700K @ 3.50GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $11740Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz — $16330.6Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3820 13117.3Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 26169.1Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — RUB 52471.3Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — RUB 62572.2Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 15740.9Intel Core i7-4770K 20tel Core135 3.20GHz — RUB 22470.5 Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — RUB 32794.3 Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 26169.1514.8Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — RUB 19676.3Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — RUB 32728.1Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — RUB 50503.6Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 28444 Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 27547.1 Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — RUB 36073.8 Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 21325.3 Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz — RUB 23283.8 Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4. 30GHz — RUB 22890.3 GHz — ₽ 60998Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — Rs. Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.70GHz -930 @ 2.80GHz — $3934.7Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — $4637.2Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — $16069.6Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — $6558.3Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9181.9Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9837.2Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 21644 Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 11805.5 Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 13116.7 Intel Core i7-980X @ ​​3.33GHz — RUB 14428.5 ₽ 38698.1Intel Core i9-11900K — ₽ 32007.9Intel Core i9-12900K — ₽ 38697.4Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.30GHz — ₽ .5Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz — $ 71932.6 Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz — $ 78191.2 Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz — $ 131179.3 i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 54767Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz — ₽ 10359.9Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2.00GHz — ₽ 587Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz — ₽ 2622.9Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 10359.9Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz — ₽ 6559Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz — ₽ 852Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1. 86GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 1308.5Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 980.6Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 983.2Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 849.4Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz — ₽ 4919.3 Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz — $1311.1 Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz — $1901.5 Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz — $ 983.2 Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2.83GHz — RUB 1311.1Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 642.1Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz — RUB 2622.9Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 73788.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 98119.4Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 17292.1Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 59621.3 Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 105531Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 118452.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 2622.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2950. 9Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 1507.9Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz — RUB 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz — RUB 6526.2Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2228.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 21972.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 2295Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 12462.1Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 3213.3Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 4576.9Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 2288.4Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 2155.3Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 2688.5Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3016.5Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 7867.5Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5246.5Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 7214.2Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 11693.4Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 6886.3Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 7214.2Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 10490.5Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3. 40GHz — ₽ 6558.3Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 18903Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 6840.4Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 5246.5Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 5592.2Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 7273.3Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz — ₽ 6763.6Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 6558.3Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz — ₽ 6943.4Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 1639.1Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 6231.1Intel Pentium G840 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 2295Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 6362.2Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz — ₽ 8123.3Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3.80GHz — ₽ 6580Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz — ₽ 6618

    Change Variant To
    Select..ASL GTX 1080 TiASL GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionASL GTX 1080 Ti God of WarASUS GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionASUS ROG POSEIDON GTX 1080 Ti PlatinumASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1080 Ti Assassins Creed Origins EditionASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1080 Ti GAMINGAS TiUS ROG STR08IX GTX 10 OCASUS TURBO GTX 1080 TiAlienware GTX 1080 TiColorful GTX 1080 TiColorful GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti CustomizationColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti KUDANColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti Neptune WColorful iGame Tifull iGame GTX 1080 Ti RNG EditionColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti RNG EditionColorful iGame GTX 1080 AD8 AD8 AD80 LEColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti Vulcan XColorful iGame GTX 1080 Ti Vulcan X OCCorsair Hydro GFX GTX 1080 TiDigital Alliance GTX 1080 Ti GameRock PremiumDigital Alliance GTX 1080 Ti Super JetStreamELSA GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionELSA GTX 1080 Ti S. A.CELSA GTX 1080 Ti STEMTEK0 XENEMON8 XENON GTX 1080 Ti Super JetStreamEMTEK XENON GTX 1080 Ti Super JetStream TONE+EVGA GTX 1080 TiEV GA GTX 1080 Ti Black Edition w/ iCX CoolerEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 DT w/ iCX CoolingEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 ELITE BlackEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 ELITE WhiteEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 ELITE w/ iCX CoolerEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 HYBRIDEVGA GTX 1080 Hydro CopperEVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 w/ iCX CoolerEVGA GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionEVGA GTX 1080 Ti Kingpin EditionEVGA GTX 1080 Ti Kingpin Hydro CopperEVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC Black Edition w/ iCX CoolerEVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC Hydro CopperEVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2 ELITE BlueEVGA GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1080 Ti 1080 Ti EXOCGALAX GTX 1080 Ti EXOC WhiteGALAX GTX 1080 Ti European VersionGALAX GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionGALAX GTX 1080 Ti GeneralGALAX GTX 1080 Ti HOFGALAX GTX 1080 Ti HOF Limited EditionGALAX GTX 1080 Ti HOF OC Lab EditionG ALAX GTX 1080 Ti HOF WatercooledGIGABYTE AORUS GTX 1080 TiGIGABYTE AORUS GTX 1080 Ti WATERFORCE WB XTREME EditionGIGABYTE AORUS GTX 1080 Ti WATERFORCE XTREMEGIGABYTE AORUS GTX 1080 Ti XTREME EditionGIGABYTE GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionGIGABYTE GTX 1080 Ti GamingGIGABYTE GTX 1080 Ti Gaming OCGIGABYTE GTX 1080 Ti Gaming OC BLACKGIGABYTE GTX 1080 Ti TurboGainward DuraPro GTX 1080 Ti HurricaneGainward GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionGainward GTX 1080 Ti Golden SampleGainward GTX 1080 Ti PhoenixGainward GTX 1080 Ti Phoenix Golden SampleInno3D GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionInno3D GTX 1080 Ti Gaming OCInno3D GTX 1080 Ti Jet-FanInno3D GTX 1080 Ti X2Inno3D iChill GTX 1080 Ti BlackInno3D iChill GTX 1080 Ti X3Inno3D iChill GTX 1080 Ti X3 UltraInno3D iChill GTX 1080 Ti X4Inno3D iChill GTX 1080 Ti X4 UltraKFA2 GTX 1080 TiKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti EXOCKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti EXOC WhiteKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti HOFKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti HOF 8 Pack ApprovedKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti HOF 8 Pack EditionKFA2 GTX 1080 Ti HOF Limited EditionKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti EXOC WhiteKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti GALAKURO HOFKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti GALAKURO HOF Limited EditionKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti GALAKURO HOF WATERKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1080 Ti OCLeadtek WinFast GTX 1080 TiLeadtek WinFast GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionLeadtek WinFast GTX 1080 Ti HurricaneMAXSUN GTX 1080 Ti Super JetStreamMSI GTX 1080 TI GAMING X TRIOMSI GTX 1080 Ti AEROMSI GTX 1080 Ti AERO OCMSI GTX 1080 Ti ARMORMSI GTX 1080 Ti ARMOR OCMSI GTX 1080 Ti DUKEMSI GTX 1080 Ti DUKE OCMSI GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionMSI GTX 1080 Ti GAMINGMSI GTX 1080 Ti GAMING TRIOMSI GTX 1080 Ti GAMING XMSI GTX 1080 Ti GAMING X w/ USB Type-CMSI GTX 1080 Ti LIGHTNINGMSI GTX 1080 Ti LIGHTNING XMSI GTX 1080 Ti LIGHTNING ZMSI GTX 1080 Ti SEA HAWKMSI GTX 1080 Ti SEA HAWK XMSI GTX 1080 Ti SEA HAWK X EKManli GTX 1080 Ti F369GManli GTX 1080 Ti GallardoManli GTX 1080 Ti Gallardo with RGB Lights 1080 Ti Gaming OC V2Palit GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionPalit GTX 1080 Ti GameRockPalit GTX 1080 Ti GameRock PremiumPalit GTX 1080 Ti JetStreamPalit GTX 1080 Ti Super JetStreamZOTAC GTX 1080 TiZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti AMP!ZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti AMP! ExtremeZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti AMP! Extreme Core EditionZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti ArcticStormZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti ArcticStorm MiniZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti Extreme Plus OCZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti Founders EditionZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti MiniZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti PGFZOTAC GTX 1080 Ti PGF Extreme OC

    Desired tuning quality
    Select. .Ultra quality — MSAA, HBAO, and advanced shadowsHigh quality — No MSAA, HBAO, or advanced shadowsMedium qualityLow quality

    AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT review —

    graphics card review The 6750 XT is a new graphics card that is an overclocked AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT with faster memory. The core clock has increased by 19MHz and the memory bandwidth has increased by 12.5% ​​over last year’s RX 6700 XT. The increase in board power was 9% up to 180 W. The retail price has also gone up, from $480 to $550.

    MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X Trio and Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ were taken for testing. All AMD and Nvidia graphics cards have been tested at official clock speeds, so no factory overclocking is required. All data was collected using a Ryzen 7 5800X3D processor with 32GB dual rank DDR4-3200 CL14 dual channel memory on an Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Extreme motherboard using the latest BIOS that supports AGESA 1207.

    The RX 6750 XT is expected to cost $570, making it very close to the RTX 3060 Ti in terms of price, and it’s 8% faster in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Extraction. Compared to the RTX 3070, it’s only 2% slower, but we estimate it’s about 19% cheaper.

    Even so, the RX 6750 XT is only 7% faster than the RX 6700 XT, so a 15% price increase isn’t exactly what you’d expect.

    NVIDIA GeForce cards perform better at 1440p, where the RX 6750 XT can only match the 3060 Ti, while the RTX 3070 is 13% faster. Most disappointing is that the RX 6750 XT is only 4% faster than the RX 6700 XT.

    In resolution, things change again, the RX 6750 XT is 8% faster than the RX 6700 XT and again equals the RTX 3060 Ti, this time only 5% slower than the RTX 3070.

    Watch Dogs : Legion

    Watch Dogs: Legion RX 6750 XT is impressive compared to GeForce graphics cards, though not impressive compared to RX 6700 XT as it was only 4% faster. It was also faster than the RTX 3070 at 22% faster.

    The gap narrowed at 1440p, but the RX 6750 XT was still 13% faster than the RTX 3070, which is a great result considering how much cheaper it is.

    As usual, Nvidia’s Ampere architecture is much better used at 4K resolution, while the reverse is true for RNDA2. As a result, the RTX 3070 now matches the RX 6750 XT, which was 6% faster than the RX 6700 XT.

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider

    In Shadow of the Tomb Raider at 1080p, the RX 6750 XT performed well with 139

    At 1440p, the RX 6750 XT gained a 9% lead over the RX 6700 XT to keep it on par with the RTX 3070

    At 4K, the RTX 3070 takes the lead as the RX 6750 XT is 5% behind and is now on par with the RTX 3060 Ti. It was only 8% faster than the RX 6700 XT.

    The Outer Worlds

    As with many Unreal Engine 4 games, this game favors NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards. Therefore, even the RTX 3060 Ti was faster than the RX 6750 XT, which was only 7% faster than the RX 6700 XT.

    At 1440p, the situation is even more in favor of NVIDIA cards. The RX 6750 XT is now 6% slower than the RTX 3060 Ti and 14% slower than the RTX 3070. However, it was 7% faster than the RX 6700 XT.

    At 4K resolution, the GeForce cards are further behind, and the RX 6750 XT is now 7% slower than the RTX 3060 Ti and 18% slower than the RTX 3070. Unfortunately, the faster GDDR6 memory didn’t help it much, as we see only a 4% lead over the RX 6700 XT.

    F1 2021

    In F1 2021 at 1080p, the RX 6750 XT was only 5% slower than the RTX 3070 and 7% faster than the RX 6700 XT and RTX 3060 Ti it was 7% slower than the RTX 3070, 3% faster than the 3060 Ti, and 9% faster than the RX 6700 XT.

    The 4K results are very different: here even the RTX 3060 Ti is slightly faster than the RX 6750 XT, and the RTX 3070 is 20% faster. Meanwhile, the RX 6750 XT was only 5% faster than the RX 6700 XT.

    Power consumption

    A quick look at total power consumption shows that the system with the RX 6700 XT was drawing 336 watts, and the RX 6750 XT increased the system power consumption by 13%, which is a significant increase, considering not a huge increase in performance. However, compared to the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070, the power consumption of the RX 6750 XT is normal.

    Average FPS in 11 games

    In terms of performance, the Radeon RX 6750 XT looks good compared to the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070 in several of the games we just reviewed, but the lead over the RX 6700 XT isn’t impressive.

    Starting at 1080p, the RX 6750 XT is 6% faster than the RX 6700 XT, which isn’t great given the 15% price increase. It’s slightly faster than the much more expensive RTX 3070 and only slightly slower than the even more expensive RTX 3070 Ti.

    However, the RX 6700 XT is obviously a better option given the MSRP, especially since you can simply overclock it yourself to the performance of the RX 6750 XT

    At 1440p, the RX 6750 XT and RTX 3070 perform the same, while the RX 6750 XT is 5% faster than the RX 6700 XT.

    Then in 4K, the RX 6750 XT was 6% faster than the RX 6700 XT and 6% slower than the RTX 3070.