Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT Graphics Card Benchmarks and Specs
|
|
|
|
|
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT Graphics Card Benchmarks and Specs
Specifications of the Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT graphics card dedicated to the desktop sector, with 112 shading units, its maximum frequency is 0,6GHz The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the quantity of texture mapping units, of render output units, the release date, the GFLOPS performance, the values obtained in the benchmark platforms.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the link above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Graphics card | Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT | |||
| Market (main) | Desktop | |||
| Release date | Q4 2007 | |||
| Model number | G92-270-A2 | |||
| GPU name | G92 | |||
| Architecture | Tesla | |||
| Generation | GeForce 8 8800 | |||
| Lithography | 65 nm | |||
| Transistors | 754.000.000 | |||
| Bus interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |||
| GPU clock | 600 MHz | |||
| GPU shader clock | 1.500 MHz | |||
| Memory frequency | 900 MHz | |||
| Effective memory speed | 1,8 Gbps | |||
| Memory size | 512 MB | |||
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |||
| Memory bus | 256 Bit | |||
| Memory bandwidth | 67,6 GB/s | |||
| TDP | 125 W | |||
| Suggested PSU | 450W ATX Power Supply | |||
| Multicard technology | SLI | |||
| Outputs |
2x DVI |
|||
| Max display resolution |
2560 x 1600 (Digital), |
|||
| Maximum GPU Temperature | 100°C | |||
| Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 14 | |||
| Shading units (cuda cores) | 112 | |||
| TMUs | 56 | |||
| ROPs | 16 | |||
| Cache memory | 64 KB | |||
| Triangle fillrate | 3. 794 MT/s |
|||
| Pixel fillrate | 9,6 GPixel/s | |||
| Texture fillrate | 33,6 GTexel/s | |||
| Performance FP32 (float) | 336 GFLOPS | |||
| Amazon | ||||
| eBay |
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
TMUs: texture mapping units. This unit was a physical processor separated from the main graphics processing units. It is able to distort a bitmap image, and also to resize it, to rotate it and to place it as a texture onto a plane of a specific 3D model.
ROPs: render output units.
The other name of this unit is raster operations pipeline. This hadware component is taking pixel and texel information, and processing it through vector and matrix operations. The result will be a depth value or a final pixel. It is able to control antialiasing with the merge of several sample into one pixel.
SM: streaming multiprocessor. These processors are implied in the Kepler’s power efficiency when the GPU is using one unified clock speed.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Performance with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between this graphics card and those of equivalent power, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares and rendering performances.
Pixel fillrate performance comparison for this graphics card:
| Pixel fillrate performance in GPixels/s | |
|---|---|
|
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Alder Lake) |
11,6 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Alder Lake) |
11,2 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Raptor Lake) |
11,2 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
10,4 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
10,4 |
|
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT |
9,6 |
|
AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM |
8,24 |
|
AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM |
7,36 |
|
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
6,24 |
|
AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM |
6,24 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Texture fillrate performance comparison for this graphics card:
| Texture fillrate performance in GTexels/s | |
|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 |
35,23 |
|
XFX Radeon RX 550 4GB Double Dissipation |
34,91 |
|
Yeston RX550-4G D5 LP Radeon Chill |
34,27 |
|
Nvidia Quadro T400 |
34,2 |
|
Nvidia Quadro T400 4GB |
34,2 |
|
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT |
33,6 |
|
Dell Radeon R7 450 4GB |
29,6 |
|
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM |
29,6 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Raptor Lake) |
26,4 |
|
AMD Radeon R7 350 |
25,6 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
FP32 performance comparison (single precision; float; floating-point 32) for this graphics card:
| FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
|---|---|
|
Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32EU) |
384 |
|
Asus GeForce GT 710 GT710-SL-2GD5 |
366,3 |
|
Asus GeForce GT 710 GT710-4H-SL-2GD5 |
366,3 |
|
Gigabyte GeForce GT 710 GV-N710D3-2GL |
366,3 |
|
Gigabyte GeForce GT 710 GV-N710D3-1GL |
366,3 |
|
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT |
336 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
332,8 |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
192 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
List of comparisons:
AcerAMDAMD RadeonAMD Radeon GraphicsAMD Radeon HDAMD Radeon HD 6000AMD Radeon HD 7000AMD Radeon HD 7800AMD Radeon HD 8000AMD Radeon InstinctAMD Radeon MobileAMD Radeon PROAMD Radeon PRO MobileAMD Radeon R2AMD Radeon R4AMD Radeon R5AMD Radeon R6AMD Radeon R7AMD Radeon R7 200AMD Radeon R9AMD Radeon R9 200AMD Radeon RXAMD Radeon RX 300AMD Radeon RX 400AMD Radeon RX 500AMD Radeon RX 5000AMD Radeon RX 5000 MobileAMD Radeon RX 6000AMD Radeon RX 6000 MobileAMD Radeon RX 7000AMD Radeon RX VegaAMD Radeon VegaAMD Radeon Vega 11AMD Radeon Vega 3AMD Radeon Vega 6AMD Radeon Vega 8AMD Radeon Vega MobileAppleARMARM MaliARM Mali-400ARM Mali-450ARM Mali-470ARM Mali-G31ARM Mali-G51ARM Mali-G52ARM Mali-G57ARM Mali-G610ARM Mali-G68ARM Mali-G71ARM Mali-G710ARM Mali-G72ARM Mali-G76ARM Mali-G77ARM Mali-G78ARM Mali-T720ARM Mali-T760ARM Mali-T764ARM Mali-T820ARM Mali-T830ARM Mali-T860ARM Mali-T880ASRockASRock Radeon RX 6000AsusAsus GeForce 4000Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2000ATIATI Radeon HDATI Radeon HD 3000ATI Radeon HD 4000ATI Radeon HD 5000BFGBroadcomBroadcom VideoCoreColorfulColorful GeForce 4000DellDMPEVGAEVGA GeForce 1000EVGA GeForce 1600EVGA GeForce 2000EVGA GeForce 3000GainwardGainward GeForce 4000GalaxGigabyteGigabyte GeForce 4000ImaginationImagination PowerVRImagination PowerVR SGX543Imagination PowerVR SGX544Inno3DIntelIntel ArcIntel Arctic SoundIntel HD GraphicsIntel Iris GraphicsIntel Iris Plus GraphicsIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7Intel Iris Xe Graphics MobileIntel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 610Intel UHD Graphics 620Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 730Intel UHD Graphics 770Intel Xe GraphicsKuroutoshikouKuroutoshikou GeForceKuroutoshikou RadeonLeadtekMicrosoftMicrosoft XboxMSIMSI GeForce 3000MSI GeForce 4000NintendoNvidiaNvidia A100Nvidia GeForceNvidia GeForce 1000Nvidia GeForce 1000 MobileNvidia GeForce 1600Nvidia GeForce 1600 MobileNvidia GeForce 2000Nvidia GeForce 2000 MobileNvidia GeForce 3000Nvidia GeForce 3000 MobileNvidia GeForce 400Nvidia GeForce 4000Nvidia GeForce 500Nvidia GeForce 600Nvidia GeForce 600MNvidia GeForce 700Nvidia GeForce 700MNvidia GeForce 800M seriesNvidia GeForce 900Nvidia GeForce 900MNvidia GeForce GTNvidia GeForce GT 1000Nvidia GeForce GTXNvidia GeForce GTX 1000Nvidia GeForce GTX 1000 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 1600Nvidia GeForce GTX 1600 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 400Nvidia GeForce GTX 500Nvidia GeForce GTX 600Nvidia GeForce GTX 600 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 700Nvidia GeForce GTX 700 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 800 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 900Nvidia GeForce GTX 900 MobileNvidia GeForce MXNvidia GeForce RTXNvidia GeForce RTX 2000Nvidia GeForce RTX 2000 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 3000Nvidia GeForce RTX 3000 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 4000Nvidia GeForce RTX 4000 MobileNvidia GM20BNvidia Quadro NVSNvidia Quadro seriesNvidia TeslaNvidia Tesla V100Nvidia TitanNvidia VoltaPalitPalit GeForce 4000PNYPowerColorQualcommQualcomm AdrenoSamsungSaplosSapphireSapphire Nitro+ RadeonSonySony PlayStationValveVeinedaVivanteXFXYestonZotacZotac GeForce 4000Graphics cards groups
List of benchmarks:
FP32 performance
See also:
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GSNvidia GeForce 8800 GTS 320Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS 512Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS 640Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX
Equivalence:
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT AMD equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission.
Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
Temperature Testing & Power Consumption : Reinventing the G80 — the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
Trending
Apple iOS 17: all the key updates seen at WWDC 2023
I’ve tried Apple’s Vision Pro and it’s incredible (but I also have doubts)
Hands-on: Apple’s new 15-inch MacBook Air
Product Listing
- News
- Reviews & Articles
-
Page 1 of 10 — Reinventing the GeForce 8800Page 2 of 10 — NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB UnveiledPage 3 of 10 — Test SetupPage 4 of 10 — Result — 3DMark06 Pro (ver 102)Page 5 of 10 — Results — Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory & F.
E.A.R (DirectX 9 Benchmarks)Page 6 of 10 — Results — Supreme CommanderPage 7 of 10 — Results — Company of Heroes & Unreal Tournament 3 Beta DemoPage 8 of 10 — Temperature Testing & Power ConsumptionPage 9 of 10 — OverclockingPage 10 of 10 — The New Slim ShadyPage 8 of 10 — Temperature Testing & Power Consumption
- Next >
Temperature
Temperature could be a potential sticking point for the GeForce 8800 GT. From our observations, the single slot cooler for the GeForce 8800 GT is stretched to its limits here, with recorded temperatures of the core much higher than the GeForce 8800 GTX at full load. The memory chips were also found to be among the highest for the high-end cards. From the looks of the many overclocked versions to be released by vendors, heat doesn’t seem to worry the manufacturers, though custom coolers could be an option.
Power Consumption
On paper, the TDP for the GeForce 8800 GT alone is 105W but in our test system, the complete system’s power draw reached up to 225W at full load.
This is still the lowest for all the cards featured here, with only the Radeon HD 2900 XT having a lower idle power consumption figure.
-
Page 1 of 10 — Reinventing the GeForce 8800Page 2 of 10 — NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB UnveiledPage 3 of 10 — Test SetupPage 4 of 10 — Result — 3DMark06 Pro (ver 102)Page 5 of 10 — Results — Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory & F.E.A.R (DirectX 9 Benchmarks)Page 6 of 10 — Results — Supreme CommanderPage 7 of 10 — Results — Company of Heroes & Unreal Tournament 3 Beta DemoPage 8 of 10 — Temperature Testing & Power ConsumptionPage 9 of 10 — OverclockingPage 10 of 10 — The New Slim Shady
Page 8 of 10 — Temperature Testing & Power Consumption
- Next >
Join HWZ’s Telegram channel here and catch all the latest tech news!
Our articles may contain affiliate links. If you buy through these links, we may earn a small commission.
Sponsored Links
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS — Specifications, tests and comparisons
Specifications, price, tests in benchmarks and games.
GeForce 8800 GS is faster than 21.6 % of other cards in our database. It has 0.9 performance points in benchmarks.
Description
GeForce 8800 GS has 384 MB GDDR3 memory, 192 Bit bus width and supports DirectX 11.1. The graphics card is designed using a 65 nm process technology and consumes 105 W of power (TDP) at base loads. For maximum performance, we recommend using a motherboard with PCIe 1.0 x16. Also, when connecting, additional power connectors are required: 1x 6-pin.
Benchmark tests
With this benchmark, video cards are tested using 4 tests using DirectX versions (9, 10, 11, 12). On version 12, if possible, the «graphic chip» is also checked in 4K resolution.
A few more tests are also being done with DirectCompute.
GeForce 8800 GS
332
of 35552
This video card scored 332 out of 35552 possible points in this benchmark. The maximum number of points has the best «graphic card», which is in first place in the ranking.
Gaming performance
The GeForce 8800 GS meets 1.9% of the minimum and 0.9% of the recommended system requirements for the games we have on our site. To deliver all the power of the video card, there must be an appropriate processor.
Minimum Requirements
Recommended Requirements
Specifications NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
Find out the memory size of the video card, core frequency, TDP (heat dissipation) and other characteristics that are mainly responsible for the performance of the video card. But it is better to stick to the results in benchmarks and games.
Key features
| Memory type | GDDR3 |
| Memory size | 384MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit |
| Base core clock | 550MHz |
| Texturing speed | 26.40 |
| Energy consumption | 105W |
| Under heavy loads on the graphics card and overclocking, TDP (Power Consumption) may increase. | |
| PCI Express | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Optional
| Process | 65 nm |
| Length | 229 mm |
| Additional power connectors | 1x 6-pin |
| DirectX | 11. 1 |
| Shader model | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 |
| Cuda | 1.1 |
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
versus
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 12 year(s) 2 month( s)
- Core frequency 2.9 times (a ) more: 1485 MHz vs 513 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 90 nm
- 5.1 times faster memory frequency: 8000 MHz vs 1584 MHz
- 17.6 times faster performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 7854 vs 445
- 15.8 more times: 584 vs 37
| Release date | 30 April 2019 vs 12 February 2007 |
| Core frequency | 1485 MHz vs 513 MHz |
| Process | 12 nm vs 90 nm |
| Memory frequency | 8000 MHz vs 1584 MHz |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 7854 vs 445 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 584 vs 37 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 7854 | 445 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 584 | 37 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 39469 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
134.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.259 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.702 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.588 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 3595 |
Feature comparison
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | Tesla |
| Codename | TU107 | G80 |
| Production date | April 30, 2019 | 12 February 2007 |
| Price at the date of first issue | $179 | $269 |
| Place in the ranking | 314 | 1562 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Boost core clock | 1665 MHz | |
| Core frequency | 1485 MHz | 513MHz |
| Process | 12nm | 90nm |
| Floating point performance | 228. 1 gflops |
|
| Number of shaders | 96 | |
| Texturing speed | 12.31 GTexel/s | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 143 Watt | |
| Number of transistors | 681 million | |
| Video connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Number of DisplayPort | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 |
PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Additional power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | |
| DirectX | 12.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Memory frequency | 8000MHz | 1584MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 320MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.
|