Nvidia 960 vs 1050: Please click the green button to continue.

GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 1050 : Which one is better?

Home

GPU Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960’s Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.2GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)

384 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050’s Advantages

Released 1 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1455MHz vs 1178MHz)

Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 960
+29%

2. 413 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1050

1.862 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

GeForce GTX 960
+29%

0.075 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1050

0.058 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 960
+31%

2281

GeForce GTX 1050

1738

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce GTX 960
+25%

10

GeForce GTX 1050

8

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce GTX 960
+38%

25

GeForce GTX 1050

18

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce GTX 960
+12%

35

GeForce GTX 1050

31

GeForce GTX 960

VS

GeForce GTX 1050

Graphics Processor

GM206

GPU Name

GP107

GM206-300-A1

GPU Variant

GP107-300-A1

Maxwell 2. 0

Architecture

Pascal

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

28 nm

Process Size

14 nm

2,940 million

Transistors

3,300 million

228mm²

Die Size

132mm²

Graphics Card

Jan 2015

Release Date

Oct 2016

GeForce 900

Generation

GeForce 10

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3. 0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1127MHz

Base Clock

1354MHz

1178MHz

Boost Clock

1455MHz

1753MHz

Memory Clock

1752MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR5

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

112. 2 GB/s

Bandwidth

112.1 GB/s

Render Config

1024

Shading Units

640

-

SM Count

5

-

Tensor Cores

-

-

RT Cores

-

48 KB (per SMM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SM)

1024KB

L2 Cache

1024KB

Theoretical Performance

37. 70 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

46.56 GPixel/s

75.39 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

58.20 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

29.10 GFLOPS

2.413 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1.862 TFLOPS

75.39 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

58. 20 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W

TDP

75W

300W

Suggested PSU

250W

1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4. 6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

5.2

CUDA

6.1

6.4

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB

4

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs
AMD Radeon RX 580

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

© 2023 — TopCPU. net  

Contact Us

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Buy on Amazon

vs

Intel HD Graphics 4000

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 17.1x more texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 64x more pipelines: 1024 vs 16
• 71.8x better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• 17.6x better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 6032 vs 342
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 676 vs 189
• 32.4x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 17423 vs 538
• 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 vs 8.712
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 792. 44 vs 155.638
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 vs 0.931
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.338 vs 7.36
• 16.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 200.825 vs 12.009
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 754
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1492
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2392
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 754
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1492
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2392

Launch date	22 January 2015 vs 14 May 2012
Core clock speed	1127 MHz vs 650 MHz
Boost clock speed	1178 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate	72 billion / sec vs 4. 2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 16
Floating-point performance	2,413 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
PassMark — G3D Mark	6032 vs 342
PassMark — G2D Mark	676 vs 189
Geekbench — OpenCL	17423 vs 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	73.733 vs 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	792.44 vs 155.638
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.888 vs 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	35.338 vs 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	200.825 vs 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7218 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3691 vs 1492
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3335 vs 2392
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7218 vs 754
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3691 vs 1492
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3335 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 120 Watt

Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 120 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark — G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
PassMark — G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	792.44 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	200.825 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark — G3D Mark	6032	342
PassMark — G2D Mark	676	189
Geekbench — OpenCL	17423	538
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	73.733	8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	792.44	155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.888	0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	35.338	7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	200.825	12.009
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7218	754
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3691	1492
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3335	2392
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7218	754
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3691	1492
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3335	2392
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	2282	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Architecture	Maxwell 2. 0	Generation 7.0
Code name	GM206	Ivy Bridge GT2
Launch date	22 January 2015	14 May 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	462	1466
Price now	$229.99
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	34. 63
Boost clock speed	1178 MHz	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	1127 MHz	650 MHz
CUDA cores	1024
Floating-point performance	2,413 gflops	33.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	1024	16
Texture fill rate	72 billion / sec	4. 2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	2,940 million	1,200 million
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution	2048×1536
Multi monitor support
Bus support	PCI Express 3. 0
Height	4.376″ (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	9.5″ (24.1 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	400 Watt
SLI options	2x
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pins
DirectX	12. 0 (12_1)	11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.4	4.0
Vulkan
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	1
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
Quick Sync

GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs GeForce GTX 960

Page Content

• GPU
• Video Card
• Frequency
• Memory

9000 6 Render

• Performance
• Design and dimensions
• Graphics
• Other features

GPU

Chip	GP107	GM206
Chip variation	GP107-301-K1-A1	GM206-300-A1 a	Pascal	Maxwell 2. 0
Manufacturer	Samsung	TSMC
Process	14 nm	28 nm
Transistors	3.300 million	2.940 million
Die size	132 mm²	228 mm²

Video card

Release date a	May 21st, 2018	Jan 22nd, 2015
Generation	GeForce 10	GeForce 900
Predecessor	GeForce 900	GeForce 700
Successor	GeForce 20	GeForce 10
Production	End-of-life	End-of-life
Bus	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Reviews	58 in our database	124 in our database
Release price	—	199 USD

Frequency

90 030 Memory frequency

Base frequency 9Boost	1518 MHz	1178 MHz
1752 MHz 7 Gbps effective	1753 MHz 7 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory size	3 GB	2 GB
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory bus	96 bit	128 bit
Bandwidth	84. 10 GB/s	112.2 GB/s 90 033

Render

9 0030 Qty SM

Shaders	768	1024
TMUs	48	64
ROPs	24	32
6	—
L1 cache	48 KB (per SM)	48 KB (per SMM)
L2 cache 9 0031	768 KB	1024 KB
Qty SMM	—	8

Performance

900 32 37.70 GPixel/s

Pixel rate	36.43 GPixel/s
Texture rate	72.86 GTexel/s	75.39 GTexel/s
Performance FP16	36.43 GFLOPS (1:64)	—
FP32 performance	2.332 TFLOPS	2.413 TFLOPS
FP64 performance	72.86 GFLOPS (1:32)	75.39 GFLOPS (1:32)

Slot width lot	Dual-slot
Length	145 mm 5.