GeForce 6100 + nForce 430
NVIDIA
GeForce 6100 + nForce 430
Buy
- Interface PCI
- Core clock speed 425 MHz
- Max video memory System Shared
- Memory type System Shared
- Memory clock speed System Shared
- Maximum resolution
Summary
NVIDIA started GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 sales 11 October 2004. This is Curie architecture desktop card based on 90 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers.
Compatibility-wise, this is an integrated video card.
We have no data on GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 benchmark results.
General info
Of GeForce 6100 + nForce 430’s architecture, market segment and release date.
Place in performance rating | not rated | |
Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | |
GPU code name | C61 | |
Market segment | Desktop | |
Release date | 11 October 2004 (17 years ago) |
Technical specs
GeForce 6100 + nForce 430’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce 6100 + nForce 430’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed | 425 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | of 4 (h200 PCIe) |
Texture fill rate | 0.43 | of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce 6100 + nForce 430’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCI | |
Width | IGP |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce 6100 + nForce 430: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory bus width | System Shared | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 6100 + nForce 430. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported by GeForce 6100 + nForce 430, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | |
Shader Model | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
OpenCL | N/A | |
Vulkan | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of GeForce 6100 + nForce 430. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 according to our statistics.
Athlon II
X2 250
13.6%
Athlon 64
X2 6000+
9. 1%
Xeon W
2255
4.5%
Xeon
E5440
4.5%
Athlon 64
X2 3800+
4.5%
Athlon 64
LE-1640
4.5%
Athlon X2
4050e
4.5%
Phenom X4
9650
4.5%
Athlon 64
3500+
4.5%
Athlon II
X2 215
4. 5%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about GeForce 6100 + nForce 430, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
The nVidia GeForce 6100 series chipset brings integrated video All current socket 939 and socket AM2 The GeForce The Geforce Here is
The nVidia nForce 430 is Serial ATA II compatible, and it even includes the option of Connecting the two chipsets together is
|
NVIDIA nForce 430 / GeForce 6100 Drivers Download for Windows 7, 8.1, 10
This site maintains the list of
NVIDIA Drivers
available for Download. Just browse our organized database and find a driver that fits your needs. If you has any Drivers Problem, Just download driver detection tool, this professional drivers tool will help you fix the driver problem for Windows 10, 8.1, 7, Vista and XP.
Here is the list of
NVIDIA nForce 430 / GeForce 6100 Drivers
we have for you. To
Download NVIDIA nForce 430 / GeForce 6100 Drivers
you should Download Our Driver Software of Driver Updater.
Then you can download and update drivers automatic. Just Download and Do a free scan for your computer now.
Type | Name | Driver | Size | Download |
---|---|---|---|---|
Device | 15.49_nforce_winvista_win7_32bit_international_whql.exe | 15.49_nforce_winvista_win7_32bit_international_whql.exe | 187 MB | Download |
Device | 15.49_nforce_winvista_win7_64bit_international_whql. exe | 15.49_nforce_winvista_win7_64bit_international_whql.exe | 210 MB | Download |
Device | 15.26_nforce_winxp64_international_whql.exe | 15.26_nforce_winxp64_international_whql.exe | 177 MB | Download |
Device | 15.26_nforce_winvista32_international_whql.exe | 15.26_nforce_winvista32_international_whql.exe | 159 MB | Download |
Device | 15.26_nforce_winxp32_international_whql.exe | 15.26_nforce_winxp32_international_whql.exe | 162 MB | Download |
Device | 15.26_nforce_winvista64_international_whql.exe | 15.26_nforce_winvista64_international_whql.exe | 181 MB | Download |
Device | 15.24_nforce_winvista64_international_whql.exe | 15.24_nforce_winvista64_international_whql.exe | 131 MB | Download |
Device | 15. 24_nforce_winxp64_international_whql.exe | 15.24_nforce_winxp64_international_whql.exe | 138 MB | Download |
Device | 15.24_nforce_winxp32_international_whql.exe | 15.24_nforce_winxp32_international_whql.exe | 125 MB | Download |
Device | 15.24_nforce_winvista32_international_whql.exe | 15.24_nforce_winvista32_international_whql.exe | 113 MB | Download |
Device | nforce_winvista64_15.01_international.exe | nforce_winvista64_15.01_international.exe | 22.5 MB | Download |
Device | nforce_winvista32_15.01_international.exe | nforce_winvista32_15.01_international.exe | 21.7 MB | Download |
Device | nforce_680i_sli_winvista32_15.00_english_whql.exe | nforce_680i_sli_winvista32_15.00_english_whql. exe | 19.67 MB | Download |
Device | nforce_680i_sli_winvista64_15.00_english_whql.exe | nforce_680i_sli_winvista64_15.00_english_whql.exe | 20.51 MB | Download |
Device | 8.26_11.09_nforce_winxp64_english.exe | 8.26_11.09_nforce_winxp64_english.exe | 75.5 MB | Download |
Device | 8.26_11.09_nforce_winxp_english.exe | 8.26_11.09_nforce_winxp_english.exe | 82.3 MB | Download |
About US
DriversDownloader.com have all drivers for Windows 10, 8.1, 7, Vista and XP. And for Windows 10, you can get it from here: Windows 10 drivers download. From this website, you can find find almost drivers for the Dell, Acer, Lenovo, HP, Sony, Toshiba, AMD, NVIDIA, etc manufacturers.
And if you cannot find the drivers you want, try to download Driver Updater to help you automatically find drivers, or just contact our support team, they will help you fix your driver problem.
Drivers Articles
- How To Find Drivers for Unknown Devices
- Can not find my usb drive on my windows Vista laptop
- Why do I need to update Drivers
- Why you should consider using a Drivers Update Tool?
- Drivers Backup, Restore & Uninstall
About US | Contect US | Privacy Pollcy | Links | Christmas | Copyright © 2019 DriversDownloader.com All rights are reserved.
Asrock Socket 939 NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 Drivers Download
Asrock Socket 939 NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 Drivers Download
Updating Your Socket 939 NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 Drivers Manually:
This built-in Socket 939 NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 driver should be included with your Windows® Operating System or is available through Windows® update. Built-in drivers will support basic functionality of your Motherboard, but usually not more advanced features.
Click here to see how to install the built-in drivers.
Programmer: | Asrock | |
Group: | Motherboard | |
Model: | Socket 939 | |
Series: | NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 | |
Operating Systems: | Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, 10, 11 | |
Optional Offer for DriverDoc by Solvusoft | EULA | Privacy Policy | Terms | Uninstall |
Automatically Update Socket 939 NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 Drivers:
Recommendation: For novice Windows users, we highly recommend downloading a driver update tool like DriverDoc [Download DriverDoc — Product by Solvusoft] to help update your Asrock Motherboard drivers. DriverDoc automatically downloads and updates your NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 driver, ensuring you are installing the correct version for your operating system.
In addition, DriverDoc not only ensures your Motherboard drivers stay updated, but with a database of over 2,150,000 drivers (database updated daily), it keeps all of your other PC’s drivers updated as well.
Product by Solvusoft
Download Now
(Asrock Driver Update Software)
Optional Offer for DriverDoc by Solvusoft | EULA | Privacy Policy | Terms | Uninstall
NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 Update FAQ
When Do I Update NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 Drivers?
For optimal NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 hardware performance, you should update your device drivers once every few months.
What Operating Systems are Compatible with NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 Drivers?
Windows.
How do I Update NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 Drivers?
Socket 939 NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 driver updates can be carried out manually with the Windows Device Manager, or automatically by downloading a driver update software utility.
What Is the Function of Asrock Motherboard Drivers?
Device drivers allow the hardware device (Motherboard) to communicate clearly with your operating system. Asrock has written these unique, «mini» software programs for the NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 to operate properly.
Ensuring You Have the Right Drivers
Socket 939 NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 errors may be linked to system drivers that are corrupt or obsolete. PC drivers can become problematic without any obvious cause. The positive aspect is that once you update your Motherboard’s driver it will stop crashing.
Finding the exact driver for your Socket 939 NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430-related hardware device can be extremely difficult, even directly on the Asrock or related manufacturer’s website. However, even if you are good at locating, installing, and upgrading drivers for the Socket 939 NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430, one can still waste lots of time and be very frustrated with this endeavor. Inaccurate driver versions may have an adverse impact on your computer’s performance, often creating more problems.
To stay updated with all of the essential new features of drivers, we suggest going with a driver updater program. A good driver update software will ensure you have the most recent and best driver so you’re never left with a problem with your device again. Backing up your drivers provides you with the security of knowing that you can rollback any driver to a previous version if something goes wrong.
Top 5 Socket 939 Drivers (8 Models)
-
AMD 785G
-
AMD 790GX
-
NVIDIA GeForce 6100
-
NVIDIA GeForce 7050 / nForce 630A MCP
-
SiS 756
Product by Solvusoft
Download Now
(Asrock Driver Update Software)
Optional Offer for DriverDoc by Solvusoft | EULA | Privacy Policy | Terms | Uninstall
(Advertisement)
Update Asrock Socket 939 NVIDIA GeForce 6100 / nForce 430 or GeForce 6150SE / nForce 430 Drivers in One-Click with DriverDoc:
GeForce 6100 and nForce 400 preview
Bjorn3D.com Reviewer
September 20, 2005
Previews
Leave a comment
Today nVIDIA is throwing its hat back into the integrated video market again. Last time they where in it was with the nForce 2 product line. nForce2 was aimed at the enthusiast market for the most part, this time they are aiming for corporate desktop, media center machine and what I call the inexpensive mom and pop machine.
INTRODUCTION
Today nVIDIA is throwing its hat back into the integrated video market again. Last time they where in it was with the nForce 2 product line. nForce2 was aimed at the enthusiast market for the most part, this time they are aiming for corporate desktop, media center machine and what I call the inexpensive mom and pop machine.
What we are going to show you today is the specifications of the different parts that are being introduced. You will not find these parts for sale at e-tail since they are designed for white box builders and OEMs. But within the coming months your very next office machine may be built around them and we wanted you to know what they are and can do.
The GeForce 6100/6150
The GeForce 6100 and the Geforce 6150 is as the name implies based on the GeForce 6 series of GPU’s. It allows the motherboards to feature both Dx9 and Shader Model 3.0 support as well as support for HD-video. The GeForce 6100 is the low-end solution while the GeForce 6150 the high-end solution.
It is pretty obvious that motherboards using this GPU will be an obvious choice for Media pc-builders. Finally we have a integrated solution that supports HD-video.
The dongle allows you to output HD-video
The nForce 410/430
A motherboard GPU needs a motherboard to live on and NVIDIA of course provides us with that to. Today NVIDIA are presenting the new nForce 410/430 chipsets, which of course are based on their successful nForce4 chipset. Motherboards using this chipset will all be micro-ATX formfactor making them idea for the various OEM-builders.
The nForce 400 series feature many of the things we’ve come to like from the nForce 4:
· NVIDIA ActiveArmor™
NVIDIA ActiveArmor Firewall includes secure networking features integrated into NVIDIA nForce 430 MCPs that protect your PC from sophisticated spyware and hacker intrusions. ActiveArmor Firewall secure networking is activated the moment you turn on your PC, inspecting at the deepest levels the data packets that flow in and out of your network connection.
· NVIDIA MediaShield™ – Confidently Store Your Digital Assets
Through a simple user interface, NVIDIA MediaShield storage allows you to easily manage multiple hard disk drives so you can safely store your digital assets. With support for a variety of hard disk drive configurations including the latest SATA 3Gb/s hard drives, MediaShield offers one of the most advanced storage solutions available for desktop PCs. MediaShield’s unique interface allows you to easily configure or modify your multidisk arrays.
Do you want your data fully protected? Just set up one disk as a mirrored copy of the first. Plus, provide further protection by assigning dedicated spare disks that are ready to be automatically used as backups if one of the mirrored disks with your digital assets fails. Another MediaShield storage innovation alerts you when a disk fails, and shows you which one to replace.
Do you want faster access to your stored assets? Set up two disks to operate in parallel (known as striping), by clicking a button on the storage management user interface. For the more technical user, MediaShield incorporates a choice of RAID configurations including RAID 0, 1, 0+1, 3 and 5.
· Native Gigabit Ethernet
· Support for SATA 3 Gb/s support
One motherboard to rule them all
One cool feature is the fact that NVIDIA has one single motherboard design and that the systembuilders and motherboard OEM’s can pretty easily change the GPU for instance if they want to upgrade it to a different variant. This makes it possible for the to offer almost any combination of GeForce 6100/6150 and nForce 410/430. Right now it looks like we will see the following combinations:
Motherboards should be available some time by the end of September and full systems from leading system builders and global OEM’s should be available later this autumn.
Previous Ergodex DX1 Input System
Next Biostar I945P-A7 Motherboard Review
Check Also
Once upon a time I used to be very interested in finding the perfect media …
AMD today unveiled the next generation APUs for notebooks: Trinity. With more performance, Eyefinity-support and …
Video card GeForce 6100 + nForce 430
NVIDIA
GeForce 6100 + nForce 430
- PCI interface
- Core frequency 425 MHz
- Video memory size System Shared
- Memory type System Shared
- System Shared Memory Frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
NVIDIA started GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 sales 11 October 2004. This is Curie architecture desktop card based on 90 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers.
In terms of compatibility, this is an integrated graphics card.
We don’t have test results for GeForce 6100 + nForce 430.
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of GeForce 6100 + nForce 430, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
Features
GeForce 6100 + nForce 430’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak about the performance of GeForce 6100 + nForce 430, but for precise assessment you need to consider the results of benchmarks and gaming tests.
Core clock | 425 MHz | out of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
1
|
of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
Video outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 6100 + nForce 430. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Video connectors | No outputs |
API
Benchmark tests
These are the results of GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.
Other video cards
Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the one considered.
Recommended processors
According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the GeForce 6100 + nForce 430.
Athlon II
X2 250
13.6%
Athlon 64
X2 6000+
9.1%
Xeon W
2255
4.5%
xeon
E5440
4.5%
Athlon 64
X2 3800+
4.5%
Athlon 64
LE-1640
4.5%
Athlon X2
4050e
4.5%
Phenom X4
9650
4.5%
Athlon 64
3500+
4. 5%
Athlon II
X2 215
4.5%
User rating
Here you can see the rating of the video card by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about GeForce 6100 + nForce 430, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
large family of integrated graphics chipsets for AMD64
Better late than never! — we decided and brought to its logical conclusion (which is actually this article) testing of the NVIDIA integrated chipset family. An additional information occasion was the replenishment of the line with truncated models made in one chip, which took place last autumn (and boards based on them are just beginning to seep into the market).
NVIDIA GeForce 6100/6150 + nForce 410/430
The chipset scheme hardly needs to be deciphered on all counts, motherboards based on it are already well known to consumers. The north bridge is responsible for supporting the PCI-Express bus — a PCI Express x16 graphics port and one (GeForce 6100) or two (GeForce 6150) PCIEx1 ports are available. Other differences are provided by the graphics core, which operates at 475 MHz for the older model, and 425 MHz for the younger one. revision received a simple TV-out. The intriguing designation NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S is an exact copy of the GeForce 6150 chipset, with a frequency reduced to the level of GeForce 6100, certified in accordance with the requirements of the AMD Commercial Stable Image Platform.
To connect the south bridge, a standard bus is used — HT with a frequency of up to 1 GHz and a width of 16 bits (as a rule, the maximum frequency is normally used, but since this bandwidth is obviously excessive, it can be limited in the BIOS by the board manufacturer, and very often there is the ability to lower the frequency and bit depth manually). The nForce 430 South Bridge provides support for 4 SATA-II with the ability to organize RAID arrays of levels 0, 1, 0+1 and 5, while nForce 410 only has two ports and, accordingly, RAID arrays of levels 0 and 1. nForce 430 has A Gigabit Ethernet MAC adapter with the well-known NVIDIA Active Armor functionality (a hardware-software firewall with the function of «unpacking» TCP/IP traffic using the chipset), and in nForce 410 — Fast Ethernet without additional functionality. Both versions support HD Audio, it is characteristic that initially there was also support for AC’97, but the nForce 430 southbridges shipped since August support only HD Audio, which is good, because it deprives manufacturers of inexpensive motherboards of the temptation to save on an audio codec. With PATA support, things were initially normal (two channels for four devices), but, following the general trend, only one channel was left in the updated revision of nForce 430.
NVIDIA GeForce 6100 + nForce 400/405
Last fall, the single-chip version of the GeForce 6100 became an addition to the family, in fact, the functionality of the nForce 410 with minimal cuts (one PATA channel instead of two) was transferred to the north bridge. The graphics core frequency remained the same, TV-out support was removed and the number of PCI Express lanes was reduced. As a result, nForce 405 supports PCI Express x8 for a video card, and nForce 400 does not require a graphics port at all. The resulting hybrids look very good, both in terms of cost and efficiency (and, as tests of the first motherboards on the older single-chip model show, heat dissipation is lower than that of a separate GeForce 6100 northbridge, obviously, the removal of part of the PCI Express lanes affected). Perhaps NVIDIA should have used a more logical name — GeForce 6000/6050, for example, since these chipsets do not have a south bridge, and PCI Express support was previously referred to as a north bridge. But these are minor quibbles, but in general, it must be admitted that this solution has almost no direct competitors, so far all common integrated solutions for the AMD64 platform have been dual-chip, which negatively affected the design of the board (required more complex wiring) and ultimately prevent further price cuts.
A few words need to be said about the characteristics of the graphics core, it supports DirectX 9.0, PureVideo technology (hardware accelerated decoding of H.264, VC-1 and MPEG-2 video, HD video post-processing in resolutions up to 1080p), has 2 pixel and 1 vertex pipeline and operates at 425 MHz (GeForce 6100) and 475 MHz (GeForce 6150). The combined operation of the integrated core and an external video card is supported, which allows building a multi-monitor configuration (up to 4 monitors if the board is based on the GeForce 6150 chipset and has two video outputs). It is curious that the competing solution (Radeon Xpress 1150) has a different approach to building a graphics core, it has 4 pixel pipelines (vertex shader support is emulated by the driver, but executed by the CPU) operating at 333 MHz. In addition, we note that the real frequency may differ from the nominal one and depends on the will of motherboard developers, and the differences can be quite serious, as our regular tests demonstrate.
9003L
+
Experture Study
Test stand:
- Processor: AMD Athlon 64 x2 4000+
- OS: Windows XP SP2
- 9000 nForce 430
- MSI K9NGM based on NVIDIA GeForce 6100 + nForce 410 chipset
- ECS GeForce6100SM-M based on NVIDIA GeForce 6100 + nForce 405
- MSI K9AGM based on Radeon Xpress 1150 9 chipset0008
Software:
- OS and drivers:
- Windows XP Professional SP2
- DirectX 9. 0c
- ATI Cati Cati-Catia 9000 Nvidia nvidia nvidia ForceWare 93.71
- Test applications:
- 7-ZIP 4.10b
- Codec XVID 1.0.2 (08/29/2004)
- DOOM 3 (v1.0.1282)
- Farcry (v1.3.1337)
- UNREAL TOURNAM (v3339)
- Windows Media Player 11
- CyberLink Video/SP Decoder 6.02.2086 from PowerDVD 7
- NVIDIA Video Decoder 4020.223.0.0
It is sufficient to test performance using an external video card
(or other applications that are especially sensitive to the performance of the memory subsystem) and only for the purpose of making sure that there are no omissions when setting the BIOS parameters of the boards participating in the test.
As required. However, as our regular tests of boards show, even a deviation of 5-7 seconds in this test allows us to consider the BIOS settings equivalent, since in other tests in this situation there is no difference at all. Based on this, the observed decrease in performance during the transition to the use of integrated graphics (due to the additional load on the memory controller in the processor from the video core) can also be called purely symbolic. In practice (with the exception, of course, of applications that use 3D image processing functions), the impact of additional video traffic is simply impossible to detect. Probably, it is this circumstance that explains the reluctance of motherboard manufacturers to install separate memory for video needs, in cases where such a possibility is provided by the chipset, such as for the Radeon Xpress 1150. Well, the very fact of a minimal decrease in performance can be logically explained by the characteristic features of the Direct Connect architecture, As you know, in server systems on modern AMD processors, access to the RAM connected to the “neighboring” processor is carried out through the Hyper-Transport interprocessor channel and the memory controller built into the “end” processor. It is quite natural that if the memory controller (and it is the same for server and desktop processors) is designed taking into account such a load, servicing integrated graphics requests is an easy warm-up for it. It should be noted that the video buffer can be useful in laptops, where freeing the processor from service tasks (updating data in the frame buffer) is useful in terms of energy saving and the ability to immerse the processor in deeper idle modes.
Another test that is sensitive to the efficiency of working with memory — the XviD video encoder under integrated graphics conditions shows a slight deviation of the results between the chipsets, however, taking into account the previous test, it can still be noted that the NVIDIA chipsets under consideration are slightly more economical in terms of exchange with RAM compared to the Radeon Xpress 1150.
Let’s move on to much more interesting tests — gaming, which, in order not to litter the diagrams with the same results, we will show only for the case of using integrated graphics.
DOOM 3 creates a very serious load even at the minimum resolution, which can hardly be called «playable» even for the leader — GeForce 6150. performance in modes with high and minimum graphics quality for NVIDIA chipsets.
Here we observe some kind of intermediate picture between the two previous ones, which does not violate the general arrangement. Hence the general conclusion: a significant, up to twofold, superiority of GeForce chipsets over the Radeon Xpress 1150 at low resolutions and graphics settings turned to the minimum (which, in general, sets very unsightly graphics in modern games) disappears and turns into a minus when tested on at medium and high resolutions, especially when compared with the GeForce 6100. The lag of the GeForce 6100 paired with the nForce 410 southbridge from the single-chip solution of the same name (nForce 405), which can be noted on all three diagrams, does not necessarily mean that this difference is to blame chipsets. Testing MSI K9NGM, representing the «old» GeForce 6100 chipset in this review, demonstrated its slight lag behind the Foxconn model on a similar chip (unfortunately, it was not available at the time of the «chipset» tests), while the ECS GeForce 6100SM-M is the only , available today, with a motherboard based on the GeForce 6100 + nForce 405. And since the deviations are not too large, it is logical to assume that, on average, motherboards on both versions, based on gaming performance, are equivalent, and to choose the «fastest» one should refer to the tests themselves boards (the actual frequency of the graphics core, according to the tests, differs for boards from different manufacturers).
From a practical point of view, NVIDIA chipsets look more attractive for active online games, when lowering the resolution and settings for the sake of maximum response speed is a natural step, while ATI will provide better support for «quiet» games — strategies, quests, etc. . And since today the Radeon Xpress 1150 is positioned even lower than the GeForce 6100 (mainboards based on it are cheaper), it can be noted that in the current conditions all the chipsets under consideration are in their place and there are no obvious outsiders.
Having dealt with the games, we move on to an even less studied aspect of the functioning of integrated graphics — support for decoding compressed video in MPEG2 and WMV formats. Support for «plain» MPEG2 playback has been around for a very long time, and modern chipsets should work with the HD version as well. But this — in theory, in practice, perhaps, the first question, especially after getting acquainted with the results of testing discrete video cards (moreover, older models), will be this — “is the integrated graphics enough power, and will it be any serious help for modern CPUs? The intuitive answer is “it won’t get worse”, even a little help from the chipset will allow the processor to be offloaded for other tasks. But let’s not jump to conclusions. To estimate the CPU time allocated for the decoding process during the video run, we used standard information from the Windows Task Manager — View menu — Select Columns — CPU Time. It is very easy to determine the average processor load in traditional percentages (namely, it is shown in the diagrams), knowing the duration of each video run.
It is obvious that an MPEG2 stream (about 0.7 MB/s in this case) is not difficult to decode, even if the processor takes care of it entirely, and even more so with the support of the chipset, and the results of the CyberLink decoder clearly illustrate this (here it is necessary It should be noted that all modern decoders use hardware acceleration functions, and not just the «proprietary» ones from NVIDIA and ATI). But what do we observe in the case of NVIDIA’s proprietary decoder? Even though about 10% of the load is not a critical value and will have little effect on performance in background tasks, but here we are considering the “lightest” compression format, and what will we see in more complex cases? There is no rational explanation, even if we assume that the decoder from NVIDIA relies more on the functions of the chipset (which, due to its low power, does not cope with the task), then why did the maximum load on the processor appear in the case of the most powerful chipset (GeForce 6150)? Since the real difference in the latter case is not large, let’s assume the influence of background processes and measurement errors (which, of course, cannot explain the lag behind the CyberLink decoder). Unfortunately, NVIDIA PureVideo will continue to surprise us further, and during the preparation of the article, the author has grown a huge tooth on it, since I had to retest several times with different boards, Windows and software distributions, drivers and versions of the decoder itself in order to make sure that the method obtaining results is reliable, and the point is in the decoder itself.
What is called — «arrived», the data stream increased to 2.4 MB / s, and if Cyberlink dealt with it with honor, then NVIDIA’s own decoder was probably doing some other internal calculations (working hypothesis — calculated the value number «pi»), please note that in one case the processor load exceeded 50%, which means that if our processor had not been dual-core, its resources would simply not have been enough in this situation (which is confirmed by tests with the younger Sempron purposely taken) . The GeForce 6150 chipset finally showed a visible advantage over the GeForce 6100, and the leader of the test (of course, when using the CyberLink decoder) was the Radeon Xpress 1150. The results seem even more unexpected, given that when comparing discrete video cards, the placement was almost accurate to the opposite. To smooth out the categorical conclusion (but completely dictated by the test result!), we note that, quite possibly, NVIDIA’s decoder uses more thorough and resource-intensive post-processing and, provided there are enough resources at its disposal, provides a clearer image. But, firstly, visually the difference in image quality is not detected in any way (an analysis with a magnifying glass in hand is good when the solutions are approximately equivalent in terms of other features, but here we have a completely inadequate difference in terms of resource intensity), and secondly, even if we assume that processor resources are really used entirely to improve image quality, NVIDIA simply has to be aware of the capabilities of its own hardware solutions and, apparently, allow the decoder to scale the load depending on the computer configuration.
Decoding of Windows Media Video (using the built-in WMV9 decoder in Windows Media Player) was not sensational. The chipsets under consideration are called equivalent, since deviations within 3-5% in this case fit into the measurement error. Summarizing the video decoding tests, it can be noted that the Cyberlink decoder gives a more stable result (let’s be more specific — it makes no sense to purchase NVIDIA’s own decoder for a motherboard with integrated graphics, which is clearly demonstrated by the tests), the advantage of the GeForce 6150 over the GeForce 6100 is indeed observed, but only in a single test. A very interesting and unexpected lead is the Radeon Xpress 1150, which, perhaps, can be noted as the preferred choice in terms of video decoding capabilities.
Conclusions
Integrated graphics solutions, by definition, are more conservative than discrete ones, and if the video core level is high enough at the time of release, they can successfully exist on the market for several years. However, support for the current set of peripheral interfaces is also important for the chipset. According to both criteria, the family of NVIDIA GeForce 6100/6150 chipsets can be called exceptionally successful, and with the release of single-chip versions, nothing prevents it from expanding into the segment of the cheapest motherboards, where equipment and performance requirements are minimal and VIA chipsets are traditionally strong. However, as testing has shown, the Radeon Xpress 1150, whose «career» under a different name began a year earlier, does not look unambiguously weaker, and performed, perhaps, even better than we expected. Obviously, in combination with the modern southbridge (SB600), the junior and currently the only integrated chipset from AMD (ATI) is a strong competitor to the GeForce 6100. videos in different formats, which is likely to follow with the release of the AMD 69 chipset0 and the appearance of boards based on it in our laboratory.
GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 review. Benchmarks and Specs
The GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 (GPU) graphics card is ranked 0 in our performance rating. Manufacturer: GEFORCE. Works GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 with a minimum clock frequency of 425 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or during overclocking. RAM size — GB with clock speed and bandwidth.
The power consumption of the GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 is , and the process technology is only 90 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important characteristics of the GeForce 6100 + nForce 430. To get an idea of which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.
3.6
From 7
Hitesti Grade
Popular video cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
AliExpress
General information
The base set of information will help you find out the release date of the GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 video card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost. This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.
Performance Rating Position: | not rated | |||
Architecture: | Curie | |||
Release date: | October 11, 2004 (17 years ago) | |||
GPU Code Name: | C61 | |||
Market segment: | Desktop |
Specifications
This is important information that determines all the power characteristics of the GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 video card. The smaller the chip manufacturing process, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).
Core Clock: | 425MHz | |||
Process: | 90nm | |||
Number of texels processed in 1 second: | 0.43 |
Dimensions, Connectors and Compatibility
There are many form factors for PC cases and laptop sizes, so it’s important to know the length of the video card and its connection types (except for laptop versions). This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.
Interface: | PCI |
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
The internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 + turbo overclocking option.
Memory type: | System Shared |
Support for ports and displays
As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.
Display connections: | No outputs |
API support
All APIs supported by GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.
DirectX: | 9.0c (9_3) | |||
OpenGL: | 2.1 | |||
Vulkan: | N/A | |||
Shader Model: | 3. 0 | |||
OpenCL: | N/A |
General gaming performance
All tests are based on FPS. Let’s see what place GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 took in the gaming performance test (the calculation was made in accordance with the recommendations of the game developer for system requirements; it may differ from real situations).
Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11. 11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2MEDLE-Evil Within : Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed Un ityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty : Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Description | |
5 | Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. |
May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. | |
30 | Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more |
40 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
60 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more |
May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates. | |
? | Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene. |
Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category. | |
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value. |
GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 in benchmark results
Benchmarks help determine performance in standard GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 benchmarks. We’ve compiled a list of the world’s best-known benchmarks so you can get accurate results for each one (see description). Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.
Overall performance in benchmarks
3.6
From 7
Hitesti Grade
Share on social networks:
In order to leave a review, you need to log in
Review GeForce 6100 + nForce 430
Compare GeForce 6100 + nForce 430
VS
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Qualcomm Adreno 685
AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
Frequency of conveyors when using 3D functions
transistors, million
Pipelines
Number of render pipelines per GPU
Texture units per pipeline
Maximum color depth per channel, bit
Internal for 3D rendering
Expanded dynamic color rendering range, bit
Render Simultaneously to Buffer No.
MPEG-2 Decoding
Supported Video Decoding Levels
Support VDPAU
Supported set of functions for the API, a
The frequency of the integrated RAMDAC, MHz
Maximum permission for VGA 9000 9000 9000 9000 75 Hz
Maximum resolution for DVI
TwinView support
Dual display capability
Thermal monitoring
Nvidia geforce 6150 nforce 430 features • Web cheat sheet for internet entrepreneurs!
Content
- 1 Description
- 1.1 Study of performance
- 1.2 Test results
- 1.3 Conclusions
- 1.4 We recommend reading
NVIDIA the start of the sale of GeForce 6150 SE + NFORCE 430 This is October 11, 2004. This is a desktop video card Curie architecture and process 90 nm, primarily aimed at gamers.
In terms of compatibility, this is a card connected via the PCI interface.
We don’t have test results for GeForce 6150 SE + nForce 430.
The GeForce 6150 SE + nForce 430 was released by NVIDIA, release date: 11 October 2004. The video card is designed for desktop computers and is based on the Curie architecture codenamed C61.
Core frequency — 425 MHz. Technological process — 90 nm.
Better late than never! — we decided and brought to its logical conclusion (which is actually this article) testing of the family of integrated chipsets NV >
The chipset scheme hardly needs to be deciphered in all respects, motherboards based on it are already well known to consumers. The north bridge is responsible for supporting the PCI-Express bus — a PCI Express x16 graphics port and one (GeForce 6100) or two (GeForce 6150) PCIEx1 ports are available. Other differences are provided by the graphics core, which operates at 475 MHz for the older model, and 425 MHz for the younger one. revision received a simple TV-out. The intriguing designation NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S is an exact copy of the GeForce 6150 chipset, with a frequency reduced to the level of GeForce 6100, certified in accordance with the requirements of the AMD Commercial Stable Image Platform.
To connect the south bridge, a standard bus is used — HT with a frequency of up to 1 GHz and a width of 16 bits (as a rule, the maximum frequency is normally used, but since this bandwidth is obviously excessive, it can be limited in the BIOS by the board manufacturer, and very often there is the ability to lower the frequency and bit depth manually). nForce 430 Southbridge provides support for 4 SATA-II with RA >
Last fall, the single-chip version of GeForce 6100 became an addition to the family, in fact, the functionality of nForce 410 with minimal cuts (one PATA channel instead of two) was transferred to the northbridge. The graphics core frequency remained the same, TV-out support was removed and the number of PCI Express lanes was reduced. As a result, nForce 405 supports PCI Express x8 for a video card, and nForce 400 does not require a graphics port at all. The resulting hybrids look very good, both in terms of cost and efficiency (and, as tests of the first motherboards on the older single-chip model show, heat dissipation is lower than that of a separate GeForce 6100 northbridge, obviously, the removal of part of the PCI Express lanes affected). Perhaps NVIDIA should have used a more logical name — GeForce 6000/6050, for example, since these chipsets do not have a south bridge, and PCI Express support was previously referred to as a north bridge. But these are minor quibbles, but in general, it must be admitted that this solution has almost no direct competitors, so far all common integrated solutions for the AMD64 platform have been dual-chip, which negatively affected the design of the board (required more complex wiring) and ultimately prevent further price cuts.
A few words need to be said about the characteristics of the graphics core, it supports DirectX 9. 0, PureVideo technology (hardware accelerated decoding of H.264, VC-1 and MPEG-2 video, HD video post-processing in resolutions up to 1080p), has 2 pixel and 1 vertex pipeline and operates at 425 MHz (GeForce 6100) and 475 MHz (GeForce 6150). The combined operation of the integrated core and an external video card is supported, which allows building a multi-monitor configuration (up to 4 monitors if the board is based on the GeForce 6150 chipset and has two video outputs). It is curious that the competing solution (Radeon Xpress 1150) has a different approach to building a graphics core, it has 4 pixel pipelines (vertex shader support is emulated by the driver, but executed by the CPU) operating at 333 MHz. In addition, we note that the real frequency may differ from the nominal one and depends on the will of motherboard developers, and the differences can be quite serious, as our regular tests demonstrate.
At the end of the theoretical introduction, we present a table of characteristics of the models of the family that exist today.
Chipset name | graphics core frequency | PCI Express | support HD Video, DVI, TV out | audio support | number of SATA ports | RAID modes | number of PATA channels | number of USB ports | Ethernet MAC adapter |
Quadro NVS 210S + nForce 430 | 425 | 1×16, 2×1 | + | HDA/AC’97 | 4 | 0.1.0+1.5 | 2 | 8 | Gigabit |
GeForce 6150 + nForce 430 | 475 | 1×16, 2×1 | + | HDA/AC’97 | 4 | 0.1.0+1.5 | 2 | 8 | Gigabit |
GeForce 6150 LE + nForce 430 | 425 | 1×16, 2×1 | + | HDA/AC’97 | 4 | 0.1.0+1.5 | 2 | 8 | Gigabit |
GeForce 6150 SE + nForce 430 | 425 | 1×16, 2×1 | DVI only and TV out via sDVO | HDA/AC’97 | 4 | 0. 1.0+1.5 | 1 | 10 | Gigabit |
GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 (before Aug. 2006) | 425 | 1×16, 1×1 | — | HDA/AC’97 | 4 | 0.1.0+1.5 | 2 | 8 | Gigabit |
GeForce 6100 + nForce 430 (after Aug. 2006) | 425 | 1×16, 1×1 | TV out only via sDVO | HDA | 4 | 0.1.0+1.5 | 1 | 10 | Gigabit |
GeForce 6100 + nForce 410 | 425 | 1×16, 1×1 | — | HDA | 2 | 0.1 | 2 | 8 | Fast |
GeForce 6100 + nForce 405 | 425 | 1×8, 2×1 | — | HDA | 2 | 0.1 | 1 | 8 | Fast |
GeForce 6100 + nForce 400 | 425 | 2×1 | — | HDA | 2 | 0. 1 | 1 | 8 | Fast |
Performance study
Test bench:
- Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
- OS: Windows XP SP2
- Motherboards:
- ASUS M2NPV-VM based on NVIDIA GeForce 6150 + nForce 430 chipset
- MSI K9NGM based on NVIDIA GeForce 6100 + nForce 410 chipset
- ECS GeForce6100SM-M based on NVIDIA GeForce 6100 + nForce 405 9 chipset0008
- MSI K9AGM based on Radeon Xpress 1150 chipset
Software:
- OS and drivers:
- Windows XP Professional SP2
- DirectX 9.0c
- ATI Catalyst 6.11
- NVIDIA ForceWare 93.71
Test results memory subsystems) and only for the purpose of making sure that there are no omissions when configuring the BIOS parameters of the boards participating in the testing.
As required. However, as our regular tests of boards show, even a deviation of 5-7 seconds in this test allows us to consider the BIOS settings equivalent, since in other tests in this situation there is no difference at all. Based on this, the observed decrease in performance during the transition to the use of integrated graphics (due to the additional load on the memory controller in the processor from the video core) can also be called purely symbolic. In practice (with the exception, of course, of applications that use 3D image processing functions), the impact of additional video traffic is simply impossible to detect. Probably, it is this circumstance that explains the reluctance of motherboard manufacturers to install separate memory for video needs, in cases where such a possibility is provided by the chipset, such as for the Radeon Xpress 1150. Well, the very fact of a minimal decrease in performance can be logically explained by the characteristic features of the Direct Connect architecture, As you know, in server systems on modern AMD processors, access to the RAM connected to the “neighboring” processor is carried out through the Hyper-Transport interprocessor channel and the memory controller built into the “end” processor. It is quite natural that if the memory controller (and it is the same for server and desktop processors) is designed taking into account such a load, servicing integrated graphics requests is an easy warm-up for it. It should be noted that the video buffer can be useful in laptops, where freeing the processor from service tasks (updating data in the frame buffer) is useful in terms of energy saving and the ability to immerse the processor in deeper idle modes.
Another test that is sensitive to the efficiency of working with memory — the XviD video encoder under integrated graphics conditions shows a slight deviation of the results between the chipsets, however, taking into account the previous test, it can still be noted that the NVIDIA chipsets under consideration are slightly more economical in terms of exchange with RAM compared to the Radeon Xpress 1150.
Let’s move on to much more interesting tests — gaming, which, in order not to litter the diagrams with the same results, we will show only for the case of using integrated graphics.
DOOM 3 creates a very serious load even at the minimum resolution, which can hardly be called «playable» even for the leader — GeForce 6150. performance in modes with high and minimum graphics quality for NVIDIA chipsets.
Here we observe some kind of intermediate picture between the two previous ones, which does not violate the general arrangement. Hence the general conclusion: a significant, up to twofold, superiority of GeForce chipsets over the Radeon Xpress 1150 at low resolutions and graphics settings turned to the minimum (which, in general, sets very unsightly graphics in modern games) disappears and turns into a minus when tested on at medium and high resolutions, especially when compared with the GeForce 6100. The lag of the GeForce 6100 paired with the nForce 410 southbridge from the single-chip solution of the same name (nForce 405), which can be noted on all three diagrams, does not necessarily mean that this difference is to blame chipsets. Testing MSI K9NGM, representing the «old» GeForce 6100 chipset in this review, demonstrated its slight lag behind the Foxconn model on a similar chip (unfortunately, it was not available at the time of the «chipset» tests), while the ECS GeForce 6100SM-M is the only , available today, with a motherboard based on the GeForce 6100 + nForce 405. And since the deviations are not too large, it is logical to assume that, on average, motherboards on both versions, based on gaming performance, are equivalent, and to choose the «fastest» one should refer to the tests themselves boards (the actual frequency of the graphics core, according to the tests, differs for boards from different manufacturers).
From a practical point of view, NVIDIA chipsets look more attractive for active online games, when lowering the resolution and settings for the sake of maximum response speed is a natural step, while ATI will provide better support for «quiet» games — strategies, quests, etc. . And since today the Radeon Xpress 1150 is positioned even lower than the GeForce 6100 (mainboards based on it are cheaper), it can be noted that in the current conditions all the chipsets under consideration are in their place and there are no obvious outsiders.
Having dealt with the games, we move on to an even less studied aspect of the functioning of integrated graphics — support for decoding compressed video in MPEG2 and WMV formats. Support for «plain» MPEG2 playback has been around for a very long time, and modern chipsets should work with the HD version as well. But this — in theory, in practice, perhaps, the first question, especially after getting acquainted with the results of testing discrete video cards (moreover, older models), will be this — “is the integrated graphics enough power, and will it be any serious help for modern CPUs? The intuitive answer is “it won’t get worse”, even a little help from the chipset will allow the processor to be offloaded for other tasks. But let’s not jump to conclusions. To estimate the CPU time allocated for the decoding process during the video run, we used standard information from the Windows Task Manager — View menu — Select Columns — CPU Time. It is very easy to determine the average processor load in traditional percentages (namely, it is shown in the diagrams), knowing the duration of each video run.
It is obvious that an MPEG2 stream (about 0.7 MB/s in this case) is not difficult to decode, even if the processor takes care of it entirely, and even more so with the support of the chipset, and the results of the CyberLink decoder clearly illustrate this (here it is necessary It should be noted that all modern decoders use hardware acceleration functions, and not just the «proprietary» ones from NVIDIA and ATI). But what do we observe in the case of NVIDIA’s proprietary decoder? Even though about 10% of the load is not a critical value and will have little effect on performance in background tasks, but here we are considering the “lightest” compression format, and what will we see in more complex cases? There is no rational explanation, even if we assume that the decoder from NVIDIA relies more on the functions of the chipset (which, due to its low power, does not cope with the task), then why did the maximum load on the processor appear in the case of the most powerful chipset (GeForce 6150)? Since the real difference in the latter case is not large, let’s assume the influence of background processes and measurement errors (which, of course, cannot explain the lag behind the CyberLink decoder). Unfortunately, NVIDIA PureVideo will continue to surprise us further, and during the preparation of the article, the author has grown a huge tooth on it, since I had to retest several times with different boards, Windows and software distributions, drivers and versions of the decoder itself in order to make sure that the method obtaining results is reliable, and the point is in the decoder itself.
What is called — «arrived», the data stream increased to 2.4 MB / s, and if Cyberlink dealt with it with honor, then NVIDIA’s own decoder was probably doing some other internal calculations (working hypothesis — calculated the value number «pi»), please note that in one case the processor load exceeded 50%, which means that if our processor had not been dual-core, its resources would simply not have been enough in this situation (which is confirmed by tests with the younger Sempron purposely taken) . The GeForce 6150 chipset finally showed a visible advantage over the GeForce 6100, and the leader of the test (of course, when using the CyberLink decoder) was the Radeon Xpress 1150. The results seem even more unexpected, given that when comparing discrete video cards, the placement was almost accurate to the opposite. To smooth out the categorical conclusion (but completely dictated by the test result!), we note that, quite possibly, NVIDIA’s decoder uses more thorough and resource-intensive post-processing and, provided there are enough resources at its disposal, provides a clearer image. But, firstly, visually the difference in image quality is not detected in any way (an analysis with a magnifying glass in hand is good when the solutions are approximately equivalent in terms of other features, but here we have a completely inadequate difference in terms of resource intensity), and secondly, even if we assume that processor resources are really used entirely to improve image quality, NVIDIA simply has to be aware of the capabilities of its own hardware solutions and, apparently, allow the decoder to scale the load depending on the computer configuration.
Decoding of Windows Media Video (using the built-in WMV9 decoder in Windows Media Player) was not sensational. The chipsets under consideration are called equivalent, since deviations within 3-5% in this case fit into the measurement error. Summarizing the video decoding tests, it can be noted that the Cyberlink decoder gives a more stable result (let’s be more specific — it makes no sense to purchase NVIDIA’s own decoder for a motherboard with integrated graphics, which is clearly demonstrated by the tests), the advantage of the GeForce 6150 over the GeForce 6100 is indeed observed, but only in a single test. A very interesting and unexpected lead is the Radeon Xpress 1150, which, perhaps, can be noted as the preferred choice in terms of video decoding capabilities.
Conclusions
Integrated graphics solutions, by definition, are more conservative than discrete ones, and if the video core level is high enough at the time of release, they can successfully exist on the market for several years. However, support for the current set of peripheral interfaces is also important for the chipset. According to both criteria, the family of NVIDIA GeForce 6100/6150 chipsets can be called exceptionally successful, and with the release of single-chip versions, nothing prevents it from expanding into the segment of the cheapest motherboards, where equipment and performance requirements are minimal and VIA chipsets are traditionally strong. However, as testing has shown, the Radeon Xpress 1150, whose «career» under a different name began a year earlier, does not look unambiguously weaker, and performed, perhaps, even better than we expected. Obviously, in combination with the modern southbridge (SB600), the junior and currently the only integrated chipset from AMD (ATI) is a strong competitor to the GeForce 6100. videos in different formats, which is likely to follow with the release of the AMD 69 chipset0 and the appearance of boards based on it in our laboratory.
nForce 410/430 chipsets: NVIDIA’s return to the integrated graphics market
Questions about why NVIDIA no longer makes chipsets with integrated graphics have been on the rise since the release of nForce3. Moreover, they sounded so insistent that the company’s managers seem to have exhausted the supply of evasive answers. Probably, such serious pressure from the IT community can also be considered an indirect reason for the appearance of a logic set with the code name C51. Seriously speaking, the time has come for such a solution, and NVIDIA has done everything possible to make it successful.
Indeed, the user remained at a loss for a long time why, after a very successful and, most importantly, popular nForce2 IGP (MX400 graphics core), NVIDIA had such a long pause before introducing a new generation of integrated GPUs to the world. The third series of nForce seems to be considered transitional, it did not become a cult, as it was with its predecessor nForce2, and in general, some uncertainty that is still felt around the Socket 754 platform did not contribute to the emergence of a mass solution with an integrated graphics core. Also, NVIDIA obviously did not have a suitable external GPU that could serve as the basis for creating a chipset. The low-end that existed at that time in the form of the GeForce FX5200, even as a separate graphics chip, showed deplorable results. What to expect from the combination of 5200 and nForce3 — one can only guess. So the budget Socket 754 remained with VIA and SiS, and thank God.
When the wonderful nForce4 chipset in every sense, or rather, motherboards based on it, dropped in price to the budget level while maintaining excellent functionality, it became clear that integrated graphics would no longer be enough. Two more factors served as additional incentives — the presence on the market of a very successful competing solution from ATI (Xpress 200, Radeon 9600 core), which exists for Intel and AMD platforms, and the launch of Sempron for Socket 939 with a retail price of less than $100.
Success formula:
6200+nForce4= 6100/50+nForce 410/430
nForce4 integrated version based on two |
The decision came by itself. NVIDIA has a great low-end GeForce 6200 core and a single-chip chipset for AMD64 processors. The easiest way to create an integrated solution is to simply solder both the GPU and the modified nForce4 with an additional HyperTransport channel connecting it to the graphics core on the motherboard. In general, they did just that. And to increase the range, they decided to use two versions of the GPU and two MCPs, as a result of which three platforms appeared (a faster GPU is aggregated only with the older version of the MCP).
The differences between the configurations are shown in the table, let’s comment on some points. There are a lot of differences between the GeForce 6150 and the 6100: increased frequency to 475 MHz (today the most “high-frequency” integrated core), support for two displays (including via DVI), optional TV tuner connection, hardware acceleration of HDTV stream (up to to the latest 1080i version) and high-quality video scaling on a 5×4 basis. The differences in the two MCP versions are not so significant: the younger model has only two SATA II, 10/100 Ethernet ports without a hardware firewall (NVIDIA ActiveArmor Firewall). Another characteristic feature of the new chipsets is support for High Definition Audio (which is not yet available even in expensive nForce4 models).
Foxconn WinFast 6100K8MA-RS –
new generation office/home platform nForce430) were released immediately after the announcement of the chipset and became available on the Ukrainian market. Our laboratory got a junior model with a GeForce 6100 core.
Foxconn Winfast 6100K8MA-RS: now with graphics, but still for $80 |
It looks like the board was designed to achieve maximum versatility for reasonable money: all types of processors designed for Socket 939 (including X2 and FX) are supported, two SATA II ports can operate in RAID 0.1 mode, the ALC655 six-channel codec, although does not meet the HDA standard, but is sufficient for office and home tasks. Considering the BIOS Setup, we can conclude that the board is designed not only for assemblers — the FSB, PCI-E frequencies, CPU multipliers and all HyperTransport bus multipliers (there are four of them), processor and DIMM voltages, five pairs of timings are implemented. In general, a set of settings at the level of mainstream products. Among the shortcomings, it is worth noting the impossibility of automatic control of the integrated GPU.
As already mentioned, for simplicity, the GeForce 6100 can be considered as a video card integrated on the PCB, but without its own memory. The amount of RAM allocated for the needs of the accelerator is static and varies between 16-128 MB, and if you do not manually disable the GPU when using an external video card, it will continue to work as a second video card with «eating off» the memory bandwidth. The reverse is also true: if you disable the built-in kernel and then remove the external video card, you will have to reset the BIOS, otherwise the system will signal that the video card is missing. Although such moments can be bypassed, we still attribute them to the shortcomings of both the chipset and the board itself.
Graphics core | GeForce 6150 | GeForce 6100 | GeForce 6100 |
Bridge MCP | nForce 430 | nForce 410 | |
Platform | Socket 939 | ||
DirectX 9. 0 (SM 3.0) compatible | + | ||
Optional TV encoder | + | — | |
Two outputs with DVI support | + | — | |
GPU frequency, MHz | 475 | 425 | 425 |
PCI Express ports | 1×16, 2×1 | 1×16, 1×1 | 1×16, 1×1 |
Video stream acceleration | HD(720p/1080i), MPEG-2, WMV9 | MPEG-2, WMV9 | MPEG-2, WMV9 |
Video scaling | Quality (5×4) | Standard (2×2) | Standard (2×2) |
SATA/PATA ports | 4/2 | 4/2 | 2/2 |
SATA II ports baud rate | 3 Gbps | ||
RAID support | 0.1.0+1.5 | 0.1.0+1.5 | 0.1 |
Support NVIDIA MediaShield | + | ||
NVIDIA ActiveArmor Firewall support | + | + | — |
Ethernet | 10/100/1000 | 10/100/1000 | 10/100 |
Audio codec | AC’97, High Definition Audio | ||
USB 2. 0 ports | 8 | ||
Compatible with NVIDIA nTune Utility | + |
Test results
There has been no revolution: performance in 3D applications is on average 2.5 times lower than that of the external GeForce 6200, and in especially severe cases (DOOM 3) the lag can be 4 times lower. But in the absolute standings, even the budget version of the GPU today is the most productive integrated core. Unfortunately, at the time of testing, we were unable to find a competitor based on the ATI XPress 200 chipset, but we dare to assume that this time NVIDIA will take the first place — the GeForce 6100 core is more technologically advanced, operates at a higher frequency, has one more vertex unit and, most importantly, fully supports Shader Model 3.0. Agree, 70 fps in Unreal Tournament 2004 (good rendering quality) and 55 fps in Far Cry (minimum quality) is a very worthy result. Also pleased with the minimum load on the integrated GPU memory bandwidth: according to the test results, the difference was only 15% — an excellent indicator.