Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb-vs-nvs-310%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
EPYC
7h22
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
1135G7
Core i5
12400F
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb-vs-nvs-310%23memory-specs
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
EPYC
7h22
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
1135G7
Core i5
12400F
Video card NVS 310 [in 2 benchmarks]
NVIDIA
NVS 310
- PCIe 2. 0 x16 interface
- Core frequency 523 MHz
- Video memory size 512 MB
- Memory type DDR3
- Memory frequency 1750 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Description
NVIDIA started selling NVS 310 on June 26, 2012 at a recommended price of 159$. This is a desktop graphics card based on Fermi 2.0 architecture and 40 nm manufacturing process, primarily aimed at designers. It has 512 MB of DDR3 memory at 1.75 GHz, and coupled with a 64-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 14.00 Gb / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a single-slot PCIe 2.0 x16 card. The length of the reference version is 156 mm. An additional power cable is not required for connection, and the power consumption is 20 W.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
7.44%
from the leader, which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce RTX
4090
Compare
General information
Information about the type (for desktops or laptops) and architecture of the NVS 310, as well as the time when sales began and the cost at that time. nine0005
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
NVS 310’s general parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak about the performance of the NVS 310, but for an accurate assessment you need to consider the results of benchmarks and gaming tests.
Compatibility and dimensions
Parameters that determine NVS 310 compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).
memory capacity | 14.00 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Video
Types and number of video connectors present on NVS 310. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Video connectors | 2x DisplayPort
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
NVS 310
PassmarkThis is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation by running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the latter is done in 4K resolution if possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute. Benchmark coverage: 25%
NVS 310 GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses the Khronos Group’s OpenCL API. nine0005 Benchmark coverage: 9%
NVS 310 Mining hashratesNVS 310 performance in cryptocurrency mining. Usually the result is measured in mhash / s — the number of millions of solutions generated by the video card in one second.
Is the NVS 310 good for gaming? nine0021FPS in popular games on NVS 310, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests. Relative capacityOverall performance of the NVS 310 compared to its closest competitor in workstation graphics cards.
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
AMD FirePro W5000
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
NVIDIA NVS 310
AMD FirePro W4300
AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 Competitor from AMDWe believe that the nearest equivalent to NVS 310 from AMD is FirePro W4300, which is slower by 1% on average and lower by 2 positions in our rating. Compare Here are some of AMD’s closest competitors to the NVS 310:
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
nine0003 AMD FirePro W5100
AMD FirePro W5000
NVIDIA NVS 310
AMD FirePro W4300
AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
AMD FirePro S7150 Other video cardsHere we recommend a few video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one. Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare Recommended ProcessorsAccording to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the NVS 310. 3.8% 3.8% 3.1% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 1.5% 1.5% 1. |