Pentium 3 vs atom: Intel Atom N270 @ 1.60GHz vs Intel Pentium III Mobile 1133MHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

Intel Atom N270 vs Intel Pentium III 800


Comparative analysis of Intel Atom N270 and Intel Pentium III 800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.

Intel Atom N270

Buy on Amazon


vs

Intel Pentium III 800

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Atom N270

  • Around 100% higher clock speed: 1.6 GHz vs 0.8 GHz
  • Around 13% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs 80°C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 180 nm
  • 7x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 7x lower typical power consumption: 2. 5 Watt vs 20.8 Watt







Maximum frequency 1.6 GHz vs 0.8 GHz
Maximum core temperature 90°C vs 80°C
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 180 nm
L1 cache 56 KB vs 8 KB
L2 cache 512 KB vs 256 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 2.5 Watt vs 20.8 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium III 800

  • Around 45% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 237 vs 164
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 182 vs 175



PassMark — Single thread mark 237 vs 164
PassMark — CPU mark 182 vs 175

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: Intel Atom N270
CPU 2: Intel Pentium III 800



PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2





Name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 800
PassMark — Single thread mark 164 237
PassMark — CPU mark 175 182

Compare specifications (specs)



























Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 800
Architecture codename Diamondville Coppermine T
Launch date 1 March 2008 n/d
Launch price (MSRP) $44
Place in performance rating 2715 2687
Processor Number N270
Series Legacy Intel Atom® Processors Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Vertical segment Mobile Desktop
64 bit support
Base frequency 1. 60 GHz 800 MHz
Bus Speed 533 MHz FSB 133 MHz FSB
Die size 26 mm2 80 mm
Front-side bus (FSB) 533 MHz
L1 cache 56 KB 8 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 256 KB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 180 nm
Maximum core temperature 90°C 80°C
Maximum frequency 1. 6 GHz 0.8 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Number of threads 2
Transistor count 47 million 44 million
VID voltage range 0.9V-1.1625V 1.75V
Maximum case temperature (TCase)

69 °C
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 22mm x 22mm
Sockets supported PBGA437 PPGA370, SECC2, SECC2495
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 2. 5 Watt 20.8 Watt
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Atom N270 with others




Intel
Atom N270



vs



Intel
Atom Z520




Intel
Atom N270



vs



Intel
Core 2 Duo SL9600




Intel
Atom N270



vs



Intel
Atom N455

Intel Atom D2550 vs Intel Pentium III 800


Comparative analysis of Intel Atom D2550 and Intel Pentium III 800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.

Intel Atom D2550

Buy on Amazon


vs

Intel Pentium III 800

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Atom D2550

  • 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
  • Around 133% higher clock speed: 1.86 GHz vs 0.8 GHz
  • Around 25% higher maximum core temperature: 100 °C vs 80°C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 180 nm
  • 16x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 20. 8 Watt
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 318 vs 237
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 423 vs 182










Number of cores 2 vs 1
Maximum frequency 1.86 GHz vs 0.8 GHz
Maximum core temperature 100 °C vs 80°C
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 180 nm
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 8 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB vs 256 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 20. 8 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark 318 vs 237
PassMark — CPU mark 423 vs 182

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: Intel Atom D2550
CPU 2: Intel Pentium III 800



PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2





Name Intel Atom D2550 Intel Pentium III 800
PassMark — Single thread mark 318 237
PassMark — CPU mark 423 182
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 95
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 271

Compare specifications (specs)



























Intel Atom D2550 Intel Pentium III 800
Architecture codename Cedarview Coppermine T
Launch date 5 January 2012 n/d
Place in performance rating 2694 2687
Processor Number D2550
Series Intel® Atom™ Processor D Series Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
64 bit support
Base frequency 1. 86 GHz 800 MHz
Die size 66 mm 80 mm
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) 8 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 256 KB
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 180 nm
Maximum core temperature 100 °C 80°C
Maximum frequency 1.86 GHz 0.8 GHz
Number of cores 2 1
Number of threads 4
Transistor count 176 million 44 million
VID voltage range 0. 91V -1.21V 1.75V
Bus Speed

133 MHz FSB
Maximum case temperature (TCase)

69 °C
Max memory channels 1
Maximum memory bandwidth 6.4 GB/s
Maximum memory size 4 GB
Supported memory types DDR3 800/1066
Graphics base frequency 640 MHz
Processor graphics Integrated
Number of displays supported 2
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 22mm X 22 mm
Sockets supported FCBGA559 PPGA370, SECC2, SECC2495
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 20. 8 Watt
Max number of PCIe lanes 4
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Intel 64
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) 36-bit
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Atom D2550 with others




Intel
Atom D2550



vs



AMD
Athlon 64 X2 4200+




Intel
Atom D2550



vs



Intel
Pentium D 945




Intel
Atom D2550



vs



AMD
Athlon 64 X2 5200+




Intel
Atom D2550



vs



Intel
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W)




Intel
Atom D2550



vs



AMD
Athlon 64 2000+




Intel
Atom D2550



vs



Intel
Atom D525

What is the Difference Between Intel Atom vs Intel Celeron vs Intel Pentium CPUs?

Intel has one of the most confusing naming convention for its CPUs. The names tell you absolutely nothing about where a processor stands in the speed hierarchy.

To confuse you even more, Intel has three lines of budget CPUs namely Atom, Celeron and Pentium CPUs all aiming for a very specific segment of the market.

However, for an average user, the difference between Intel Atom vs Intel Celeron vs Intel Pentium can sometimes be too minute to deduce.

And if that wasn’t enough to confuse you, there are even different sub-segments of the series i.e Intel Pentium Gold and Intel Pentium Silver. 

Looking at these three entry level series of CPUs as a fresher can easily overwhelm you. In this article, we will break down each of these lines of CPUs and talk about how they compare with each other.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Intel’s Three Different Lines of CPU for the Budget Segment

Essentially, Intel Atom, Celeron and the Pentium series all belong to the entry level market segment.

Why have three different lines of CPUs for the budget segment?

Well, this has to do more with the nuances of what the budget market entails.

Some segments of the budget market are far lower demanding as compared to the rest.

So while Intel Celeron CPUs are highly affordable and intended for very light use-cases, the Intel Pentium CPUs are slightly more expensive but great for basic productivity.

In the price/performance hierarchy, the series are ranked as follows:

Rank CPU
Series
Products Used In Remarks
1 Intel Pentium Desktop
Laptops
For Basic Productivity
2 Intel Celeron Desktop
Laptops
Highly Affordable
3 Intel Atom Netbooks
Mobile Devices
Discontinued for all mobile devices; only used for Servers now.

1. Intel Atom Processors

Intel Atom processors were originally designed to compete directly with the leading ultra-low powered mobile processor companies for smartphones and tablets namely:

  • Qualcomm Snapdragon
  • Apple Bionic
  • Samsung Exynos

However, they proved to be a failure as they were unable to make a significant dent in the smartphone and tablet market.

And hence, the Atom processors have been discontinued for all mobile devices since 2016.

Perhaps the most successful application of the Intel Atom processors was with the netbooks.

Netbooks were the baby version of the conventional laptops using Windows OS. They were small, cheap, compact and used weak processors such as the Intel’s Atom processor.

However, as the tablets advanced and as Google Chromebooks became an alternative option for affordable and ultra-portable computing, netbooks became obsolete and so did the value for Atom processors for the overall laptop market.

In the final days of the Intel Atom processors, the following were the most powerful CPUs from the series for mobile devices:

CPU Specs Passmak Score Year
Released
TDP
Intel Atom
x5-Z8550
(4c/4t) | 1.44-2.40 GHz 1198 2016 2W
Intel Atom
x7-Z8750
(4c/4t) | 1.6-2.56 GHz 1373 2016 2W

While the Intel Atom series has been discontinued for all commercial based mobile devices and computers, it continues its existence for Servers, Embedded Storage Appliances, Cellular Infrastructure Applications etc.

Also Read: Intel K vs KF vs F Series CPU

2. Intel Celeron CPUs

Intel Celeron CPUs are synonymous with ultra-budget computing.

With the discontinuation of Intel Atom CPUs for computers in 2016, Intel Celeron now hold the notorious title of being the slowest CPUs that you can find the market for laptops and desktops in any given generation.

Intel Celeron CPUs are basically dual core CPUs WITHOUT hyperthreading enabled. Hence they feature 2 threads only.

They are some of the worst performing CPUs in both single-core and multi-core performance benchmarks.

There are exceptions however. The newest Intel Celeron N5100 for instance features 4 cores and 4 threads.

Popular and Latest Intel Celeron CPUs

There are separate lines of Intel Celeron CPUs for Desktop and Laptops.

  • “G” Series Celeron CPUs are for Desktops
  • “N” Series Celeron CPUs are for Laptops

As is the case with all CPUs, the desktop based Celeron CPUs are more powerful compared to their laptop based counterparts. They also have a much higher TDP.

Note on CPU TDP

The higher the TDP (in Watts)

  1. The higher is the power consumption by the CPU.
  2. The higher is its clock speed (Generally).
  3. The better is its performance (compared to its lower TDP counterparts).
  4. The more heat it generates (very high TDP CPUs are thus not viable for mobile/laptop devices).
  5. The shorter is the battery life.

Currently, the Intel N4020 released back in 2019 is still a very popular Celeron CPU for entry level laptops. The newer Intel Celeron N4500 and the N5100 are more powerful but are rare. They may pick up steam soon.

For desktops, one of the most popular and powerful Celeron CPUs is the Intel Celeron G5905.

CPU Passmak Score
Type
Remarks
TDP
Intel Celeron
N4020
(2c/2t) | 1.10-2.80 GHz
1606 Laptop/
Mobile
A popular Celeron CPU found on many laptops; released in 2019 6W
Intel Celeron
N4500
(2c/2t) | 1. 10-2.80 GHz
2060 Laptop/
Mobile
Latest value based Celeron CPU; Not very popular
6W
Intel Celeron
N5100
(4c/4t) | 1.10-2.80 GHz
2540 Laptop/
Mobile
Flagship; Rare and latest Celeron CPU with 4 core ; Not very popular
6W
Intel Celeron G5905
(2c/2t) | 3.50 GHz
2846 Desktop Flagship and Popular desktop based Celeron CPU
58W

The table above shows how some of the newer and popular Celeron CPUs compare in terms of performance.

It should be noted that just because a certain CPU is flagship – the most powerful in series – it does not mean it is popular.

Therefore, as a buyer, when comparing Celeron CPUs with the rest, you would essentially take a model that is readily available for comparison.

For instance, currently for laptops, the most powerful Intel Celeron CPU is the N5100. However, since it is rare and almost none existent in products at the moment, it is not a great basis for comparison – for now.

Instead, you would rather look at the N4020 released in 2019 for a better comparison.

Compared to Intel Atom CPUs, judging by the benchmarks, even the weakest N4020 is more powerful than the Intel Atom Intel Atom x7-Z8750.

However, in Intel Atom x7-Z8750’s defense it was released in 2016 (three years earlier than N4020).

Also Read: Difference Between Intel Celeron vs i3

What is an Intel Celeron CPU Suitable For?

Intel Celeron CPUs are very popular among those who have a very basic computing need. This includes tasks like:

  • Web browsing
  • Video conferencing
  • Basic Homework/Schoolwork – research, essay and report writing etc
  • Email correspondence
  • Social media use
  • Netflix and video entertainment

Also Read:

  • Is Intel Celeron Good for School Work?
  • Is Intel Celeron Good for Gaming?

3.

Intel Pentium Processors

Intel Pentium processors position themselves as being the basic productivity CPUs.

They are far more inferior to the next CPUs series in line, the Core i3, but for those who want a seamless performance and a fair degree of multitasking capability, Intel Pentium CPUs are the way to go.

Basically the idea here is that while Intel Celeron CPUs can show lag and a lacking performance even in the most basics of tasks (particularly in multitasking), Intel Pentium CPUs can provide a smoother performance.

They can even be used for light gaming.

Intel Pentium CPUs used to be the flagship CPUs prior to the release of Intel Core series CPUs in 2006.

However, as it stands, compared to the original Pentium CPUs, the current Pentium CPUs share very little in common in terms of architecture.

The Pentium series is further bifurcated into two lines: Pentium Silver and Pentium Gold.

Intel Pentium Silver vs Intel Pentium Gold

As if the Intel entry level line of Intel CPUs wasn’t confusing enough, Intel has further divided the series into the Silver and Gold lines.

For starters, despite what common intuition entails, the Intel Pentium Gold isn’t necessarily made to be superior to the Intel Pentium Silver CPUs.

They are two completely different products.

Intel Pentium Silver CPUs:

Intel Pentium Silver CPUs are essentially the souped-up version of the Celeron processors. 

For instance, Intel Celeron N4020 and the Intel Pentium Silver N5030 both belong to Intel’s Gemini Lake generation.

They are intended for completely different product category as compared to the Pentium Gold CPUs.

You cannot buy Intel Silver CPUs off the shelf, instead, these come with pre-built OEM only PCs and devices.

Intel Pentium Silver CPUs are intended for very low powered devices and promise a very long battery life. Hence, they primarily target the mobile/notebook segment.

Here are some of the popular and latest Intel Pentium Silver CPUs.

CPU Passmak Score
Type
Remarks
TDP
Intel
Pentium Silver
N6005
(4c/4t) | 2.0-3.30 GHz
3224 Laptop/
Mobile
Flagship Intel Pentium Silver CPU; released in 2021 10W
Intel
Pentium Silver
N5030
(4c/4t) | 1.1-3.10 GHz
2637 Laptop/
Mobile
A Popular Intel Pentium Silver CPUs; released in 2019 6W
Intel Pentium Gold CPUs:

Intel Pentium Gold CPUs follow the Core series architecture. Intel Pentium Gold is thus a rebranding of the Core series processors except that they are a weaker version of a typical Core i3 processor.

Hence, they offer a lower amount of cores, clock speed or TDP compared to an Intel Core i3 processor but essentially hail from the same generation.

Again, the “Gold” in the name here does NOT entail that Intel Pentium Gold CPUs are superior to the Intel Silver CPUs. In fact, particularly in the mobile segment, Intel Pentium Gold CPUs perform worse compared to the Intel Pentium Silver CPUs.

The segment in which Intel Pentium Gold CPUs shine compared to the rest is in desktops.

Compared to the rest of series mentioned here i.e Atom, Celeron, Pentium Silver, the Pentium Gold series has best performing desktops CPUs.

CPU Passmak Score
Type
Remarks
TDP
Intel Pentium Gold
6405U
(2c/4t) | 2.4 GHz
2359 Laptop/
Mobile
Flagship and Popular laptop based Intel Pentium CPU – weaker than Intel Celeron N5100 and Pentium Silver CPUs 12. 5W
Intel Pentium G6400
(2c/4t) | 4.0 GHz
4155 Desktop Popular; desktop based Pentium CPU. 58W
Intel Pentium G6600
(2c/4t) | 4.2 GHz
4396 Desktop Flagship; desktop based Pentium CPU. 58W

As shown in the table above, the Intel Pentium Gold CPUs have an excellent performance for the desktop segment.

The laptop based Intel Pentium Gold 6405U is inferior not just to the Pentium Silver CPUs but also to some mobile grade Celeron CPUs.

Therefore, for an entry level desktop build for productivity, Intel Pentium Gold processors are recommended.

What is an Intel Pentium CPU Suitable for?

Intel Pentium CPUs are great for

  • Light multitasking (having multiple browser windows open for instance).
  • Light productivity (i.e for casual editing)
  • Light gaming (i.e playing games like League of Legends, Minecraft, and even Fortnite).

Following video shows Fortnite being played on Intel Pentium Gold G6400:

Watch this video on YouTube

Also Read: Is Intel Pentium Good for Gaming?

Intel Atom vs Intel Celeron vs Intel Pentium Benchmarks

The following shows the overall Passmark score of the various processors mentioned here. I have also added a 10th Intel Core i3 CPU in the mix for reference.

Intel Atom vs Intel Celeron vs Intel Pentium Passmark Scores

  • Results taken from CPUbenchmark.net

Also Read: Difference Between Pentium and Core i3 Processors

Celeron vs Pentium Performance/Dollar Value Consideration

The overall performance/dollar value of the Intel Celeron and Pentium is quite consistent meaning a higher dollar would give you a fair and a direct increase in performance.

For instance, take the popular current gen Desktop-Based Celeron CPU such as the Intel Celeron G5905. It has an MSRP of $42.

A popular current gen Intel Pentium G6400 CPU has an MSRP of $64 – so about a 65% increase in price compared to the Celeron.

As far as the performance scores go, Intel Celeron G5905 scores 2846 on Passmark whereas the Intel Pentium G6400 scores 4155 – so about a 68% higher score compared to the Celeron.

Of course, Passmark isn’t the only benchmark you should rely on, you should also consider Cinebench R15 and R20 benchmarks for comparison, but overall, the performance/dollar ratio of Celeron and Pentium CPUs is quite consistent.

Final Words

In the end the differences between Intel Atom vs Intel Celeron vs Intel Pentium are subtle but significant if you have a tight budget.

Essentially both the Celeron and the Pentium processors intend to target different segments of the market.

The Celeron is more focused toward very basic computing. In fact, it does not get any more basic than a Celeron CPU.

The Pentium CPUs, however, are essentially stripped version of the Core i3. If there ever was an Intel Core i1, the Intel Pentium (Gold) would essentially be replaced with it.

Pentium CPUs offer a better performance are great for tasks beyond basic computing such as light gaming, casual editing etc.

As far as the Atom processors are concerned, do not worry too much about them. They are obsolete and therefore should be of little significance to you.

Intel Atom N2600 vs Intel Pentium G4560: What is the difference?

18points

Intel Atom N2600

46points

Intel Pentium G4560

Comparison winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

Intel Atom N2600

Intel Pentium G4560

Why is Intel Atom N2600 better than Intel Pentium G4560?

  • 50MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    400MHzvs350MHz
  • 0. 5MB bigger L2 cache?
    1MBvs0.5MB
  • 50.5W lower TDP?
    3.5Wvs54W
  • 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core

Why is Intel Pentium G4560 better than Intel Atom N2600?

  • 2.19x faster CPU speed?
    2 x 3.5GHzvs2 x 1.6GHz
  • 1600MHz higher ram speed?
    2400MHzvs800MHz
  • 18nm smaller semiconductor size?
    14nmvs32nm
  • 6.46x higher PassMark result?
    3531vs547
  • 16KB bigger L1 cache?
    128KBvs112KB
  • 8.29x higher PassMark result (single)?
    2123vs256
  • 3 newer version of DirectX?
    12vs9
  • 62GB larger maximum memory amount?
    64GBvs2GB

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Atom N2600

vs

Intel Atom D2500

Intel Pentium G4560

vs

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Atom N2600

vs

Intel Atom D2550

Intel Pentium G4560

vs

Intel Core i3-7100

Intel Atom N2600

vs

AMD E-450

Intel Pentium G4560

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 1200

Intel Atom N2600

vs

Intel Core i3-2100

Intel Pentium G4560

vs

Intel Celeron N3350

Intel Atom N2600

vs

Intel Atom x5-Z8500

Intel Pentium G4560

vs

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Atom N2600

vs

AMD E-300

Intel Pentium G4560

vs

Intel Core i5-7400

Intel Atom N2600

vs

Intel Atom N570

Intel Pentium G4560

vs

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Atom N2600

vs

AMD E-240

Intel Pentium G4560

vs

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Atom N2600

vs

Intel Atom N2800

Intel Pentium G4560

vs

Intel Pentium Gold G6405

Intel Atom N2600

vs

Intel Core i3-3110M

Intel Pentium G4560

vs

Intel Core i5-3450

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Intel Atom N2600

0 User reviews

Intel Atom N2600

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

Intel Pentium G4560

3 User reviews

Intel Pentium G4560

8.3/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

 

7.7/10

3 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

 

7.7/10

3 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

 

7.0/10

3 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

 

9.0/10

3 votes

Energy efficiency

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

2 x 1.6GHz

2 x 3.5GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Atom N2600

✖Intel Pentium G4560

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7. L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

800MHz

2400MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

38.4GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

2.5GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖Intel Atom N2600

✖Intel Pentium G4560

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1. uses multithreading

✔Intel Atom N2600

✔Intel Pentium G4560

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✖Intel Atom N2600

✔Intel Pentium G4560

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✖Intel Atom N2600

✖Intel Pentium G4560

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✖Intel Atom N2600

✖Intel Pentium G4560

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Atom N2600

✔Intel Pentium G4560

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Atom N2600

✖Intel Pentium G4560

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Atom N2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G4560)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Pentium Silver N5030 vs Intel Atom N270








Intel Pentium Silver N5030 vs Intel Atom N270

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Pentium Silver N5030 on one side and the Intel Atom N270 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the entry-level notebook sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,1GHz. The second is used on the netbook segment, it has a total of 1 cores, 1 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

Intel Pentium Silver N5030

Intel Atom N270
Market (main)

Entry-level notebook

Netbook
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Goldmont Plus

Bonnell
Core name

Gemini Lake Refresh

Diamondville
Family

Pentium 5000

Atom N
Part number(s), S-Spec

FH8068003067442,

SRFDC

AU80586GE025D,

SLB73

Release date

Q4 2019

Q2 2008
Lithography

14 nm

45 nm
Transistors

47. 000.000
Cores

4

1
Threads

4

1
Base frequency

1,1 GHz

1,6 GHz
Turbo frequency

3,1 GHz


Cache memory

4 MB

512 KB
Max memory capacity

8 GB

8 GB
Memory types

DDR4/LPDDR4

DDR3-600
Max # of memory channels

2

1
Max memory bandwidth

38,4 GB/s

1,57 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

6


TDP

6 W

3 W
GPU integrated graphics

Intel UHD Graphics 605

None
GPU execution units

18


GPU shading units

144


GPU base clock

200 MHz


GPU boost clock

750 MHz


GPU FP32 floating point

230,4 GFLOPS


Socket

BGA1090

BGA437
Maximum temperature

105°C

90°C
Security

Execute Disable Bit
PassMark single thread

1. 329

161
PassMark CPU Mark

2.524

174
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

2.200

468
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

5.817

602
(Windows | Android)
Geekbench 5 single core

485

73
(Windows | Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core

1.277

111
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

42,42 GFLOPS

1,34 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

970 pts / W

241 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Pentium Silver N5030 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Pentium Silver N5030 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Atom N270 is less. The Intel Pentium Silver N5030 was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Pentium Silver N5030

1. 329

2.524
Intel Atom N270

161

174

In single core, the difference is 725%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1351%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Pentium Silver N5030

2.200

5.817
Intel Atom N270

468

602

In single core, the difference is 370%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 866%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Android:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Pentium Silver N5030

519

1.477
Intel Atom N270

73

111

In single core, the difference is 611%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1231%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

Intel Pentium Silver N5030 AMD equivalentIntel Atom N270 AMD equivalent

Intel Pentium G3250 vs. Intel Atom S1240

Intel Pentium G3250

The Intel Pentium G3250 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 53 W. The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket. This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1333 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2014

Intel Atom S1240

The Intel Atom S1240 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 6.1 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1283 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3-1333 RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 8 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Centerton Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports VT-x. The product was launched on Q4/2012

Intel Pentium G3250

Intel Atom S1240

Compare Detail

3. 20 GHz Frequency 1.60 GHz
2 Cores 2
No turbo Turbo (1 Core) No turbo
No turbo Turbo (All Cores) No turbo
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking No
normal Core Architecture normal

Intel HD Graphics (Haswell GT1)

GPU no iGPU
1.10 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
14 nm Technology 32 nm
1.10 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
11.1 DirectX Version
3 Max. displays
DDR3-1333 Memory DDR3-1333
2 Memory channels 1
Max memory
Yes ECC Yes
L2 Cache
3. 00 MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 2.0
16 PCIe lanes 8
14 nm Technology 32 nm
LGA 1150 Socket BGA 1283
53 W TDP 6.1 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x
Q3/2014 Release date Q4/2012

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Intel Pentium G3250 Intel Atom S1240
53 W Max TDP 6.1 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

New Atom versus old Celeron and Pentium 4

From a theoretical point of view, Intel Atom was described in great detail on our website. One can even say that it is exhaustive 🙂 However, not to the end — the question of the practical performance of systems based on it was not seriously raised. However, Intel itself often avoids this issue, preferring either to say nothing at all about performance, focusing only on the ability to run any x86 code, or to make comparisons that, let’s say, say little. For example, at one of the presentations I managed to hear the phrase: «In video encoding tasks, the new Atom is faster than the Pentium 4 520.» On the one hand, at least some information, on the other hand, not everyone already remembers how fast this same 520 worked. Moreover, Pentium 4 is a single-core processor, Atom is a dual-core processor (in older versions, but firstly, they were meant, and secondly, buyers of single-core models are far from interested in performance in the first place), video encoders are relatively well parallelized , so the gain can be explained by this. In general, we get by simple estimates that the Atom core is about one and a half times faster than the Pentium 4 core at the same clock frequency. Somewhere like that. Or not. Or not quite. Or not so at all 🙂 And for many, the Pentium 4 is a completely forgotten stage.

In principle, while testing some products based on Atom, we performed a number of performance tests that allow us to make assumptions about the speed of this processor. However, this work was not carried out deep enough, to which the readers had fair complaints. The ideal way to solve the problem would be to fully test Atom according to our full methodology. However, this path, for all its attractiveness, is not without pitfalls. The main one is the video system. In the first generation of the platform, this problem was not too acute — the chipset is separate, there are 16 PCIe lanes, so you can install any video card and conduct a full-fledged comparison (which has already been done, albeit in a limited mode). In Pine Trail, the video core is built-in, and very weak — GMA 3150, in fact, not far removed from GMA 950 chipsets from five years ago. And the use of an external one is difficult, since there are only four PCIe lanes left. Moreover, using them to organize an x4 slot means completely abandoning the use of any other PCIe peripherals. Therefore, manufacturers either ignore this possibility altogether, relying on the built-in Pine Trail video adapter, or integrate a low-performance notebook video chip directly onto the board connected by a single PCIe line — this is the new ION2 «platform» from NVIDIA.

In general, one has to come to terms with the idea that full-fledged testing will not work anyway. On the other hand, is it really necessary? Obviously, some applications will simply not work on entry-level integrated graphics, but no one will run most of them on such systems. Moreover, in our test method, almost all of them are concentrated in four groups: 3D visualization, rendering of three-dimensional scenes, scientific and engineering calculations, and, of course, games. But even if we get rid of these applications, there will still be enough tests within the methodology to evaluate the suitability of Atom for practical use on their basis. What are we going to do now. The frequency of the nucleus, GHC 1.8 3.2 3.0 1.8 Clefficient 13.5 16

16

16 9 10 Nuclei cumulative/Calculation flows 2/4 2/2 1/2 1/1 2/2 Kesh L1, I. /D, KB 32/24 64/64 32/32

But another «competitor» is more interesting — Celeron E1400. How? And the fact that this is one of the slowest dual-core processors based on a relatively modern architecture (first generation Core). It has not been produced for a long time, although it is still found in the computers of some users, and in retail chains too. But the main thing is not this, but the fact that it is slow 🙂 Accordingly, competition with it will be decisive for the verdict on the future fate of Atom. In the sense that if it turns out that the older models of this family are faster (or at least equal) to the ancient and slow Celeron, then it makes sense to study them further. And if they are even unable to compete with it, then it is better to put them aside until the manufacturer manages to significantly increase the speed of this family. And until this happens, it will be possible to simply remember that these are processors capable of executing x86 code and running mass operating systems, and having very low power consumption, but if at least some requirements, it is better, nevertheless, to turn your attention to completely different lines.

However, the E1400 is a slow processor, but not the slowest of those that are still found in modern life. Even in home computers, not to mention the offices of large and not very companies. Therefore, we decided to make testing more interesting by taking two more processors. The first — Celeron 430 — has been tested for a very long time. And then it demonstrated a slightly higher performance than the Pentium 4 521 — the same 520 (with which Intel sometimes compares new Atoms), but with support for the EM64T instruction set. But the Pentium 4 631 was not studied in detail, since it appeared later than the moment when the NetBurst architecture began to lose its relevance. Processors based on CedarMill differ from more familiar models on the Prescott core in the manufacturing process — 65 nm instead of 90 nm. Otherwise, the Pentium 4 631 is just a Pentium 4 🙂 With a frequency of 3 GHz (which processors with more modern architectures managed to repeat not so long ago), a 2M-byte L2 cache running at 800 MHz FSB and, most importantly, supporting Hyper-Threading, which allows it to perform two computational threads on one core at once.

Crucial Ballistix BL2KIT256664AA80A (2 » )

Motherboard RAM
BGA559 Gigabyte D525TUD KingSton KVR1333N9K3/6G (1 × 800; 6-6-6-15)
LGA775 GIGABYTE G41M-SES2H (G41)
AM3 GIGABYTE 890FXA-UD7 (AMD 890FX) Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (2 × 1066; 7-7-15-15-15-15-15, no matter , especially since Atom processors, as a rule, are simply soldered to the boards, but we tried to minimize the number of boards used. True, we had to take different memory, so perhaps over time we will return to the issue of Atom performance together with DDR2 — it is obvious that DDR3 in systems based on it is useful only in terms of power consumption, but it can also reduce performance (due to low frequency and, accordingly, large delays). For processors under LGA775, we used a G41 board with DDR2, since we really wanted to test the Pentium 4, and it’s not so easy to find a board that supports both it and DDR3 memory at the same time. Note that not all boards on the G41 support processors with the NetBurst architecture. For example, these are Intel boards. Gigabyte, as it turned out, has partial support, as a result of which we had to abandon one potential runner at the last moment — Celeron D 347. Moreover, Celeron on the CedarMill core is officially supported by the board, but only starting from model 352 and higher, and our 347, differing from them only by a multiplier, refused to start.

This time we took a mobile Winchester — Seagate Momentus 5400. 5 ST9320320AS (2.5 ″, rotation speed 5400 rpm, capacity 320 GB, 8 MB cache, SATA300 interface). For two reasons — firstly, many compact nettops are designed specifically for the use of portable hard drives, and secondly, desktop drives in older computers are often even slower. But we did not save on the amount of memory — after all, we use a modern 64-bit system, and 4 GB of RAM is now inexpensive. Of course, this greatly improves the results of older processors, which in reality often have to work in a much tighter environment (with 1-2 GB of RAM). However, the operating systems on ancient computers are rarely changed, preferring to use the one with which the system unit was sold, so we have a certain parity.

Testing

Performance testing methodology (list of software used and testing conditions) is described in detail in a separate article. For ease of perception, the results on the diagrams are presented in percentages (the result of AMD Athlon II X4 620 is taken as 100% in each of the tests). Detailed results in absolute terms are available as a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel format.

As mentioned above, we have completely removed four groups of tests. However, all the scores on the charts, except for the final one, are compatible with «full-format» tests, which allows you to quickly compare the presented processors with any of our tested ones. In order to make this possible, we removed the entire groups, instead of finer work with specific applications. The latter could give a more useful result in the narrow sense (since some of the discarded applications will probably work on Atom, and no one will run some of the stopped ones on such systems), but would not ensure compatibility of the results in the broad sense 🙂

Graphic editors

Adobe Photoshop looks like a black sheep here, but only at first glance — after all, in our country this program is still one of the most famous objects of piracy, which also leads to the fact that «amateur» programs (significantly cheaper and somewhat more adequate for personal use) are much less popular than in other countries. In general, «our man» is able to pile up Photoshop on a netbook, not to mention a nettop.

Another question is that you can do this only out of desperation — theoretically, two cores and four computation threads in Photoshop can give a gain compared to one or two threads of other test participants, but in practice this did not help Atom. However, Pentium 4’s presence of Hyper-Threading allowed it to «wrestle» with the Celeron 430. In general, as we can see, the Atom D525 in this group is twice behind the junior dual-core processors of the Celeron E1400 level and four times behind the older models with two computing cores. Yes, and single-core Celeron and Pentium 4 cope with this work one and a half times faster than the D525.

Archivers

Two compute threads and 2 MB of cache memory help the Pentium 4 631 keep up well with the Celeron 430, but the E1400 is noticeably ahead. Modern dual-core budget processors outperform their outdated single-core counterparts by a couple of times. But the Atom D525, although it has reduced the gap (thanks mainly to 7-Zip, where it overtook both the Pentium 4 631 and the Celeron 430), is still lagging behind.

Compilation

Again, at first glance, this is a professional use of a computer, but if you think a little… Programming is now studied in schools, not to mention institutes. And in a hostel, a cheap netbook or nettop is much more appropriate than a top-end computer: it’s more accessible to a student, and it’s not a pity if something happens. So this student may well try to compile something on such a platform. We would, however, advise him to think three times before doing this …

…because here, too, four computation threads helped the Atom only slightly outperform the dual-thread Pentium 4, but not catch up with the dual-core Celeron E1400. However, in this group of tests, the spread between slow processors is generally very small, so the second place of the D525 can be regarded as a success. Although it is obvious that this “success” matters only when compared with old processors: modern dual-core processors demonstrate a completely different level of performance, and they are the slowest of all modern processors in this area of ​​application 🙂

Java

There are a lot of Java applications around us lately. “Private traders”, however, usually encounter completely undemanding computer resources (for example, in Internet banking), however, serious companies have been eyeing Atom for a long time, replacing ancient and exhausted systems on the same Pentium 4 or Athlon XP (the Moreover, electricity is expensive in many countries).

And they don’t do it in vain! Of course, this second place does not hold a record, because modern budget processors are many times faster, but if the task is “not to be slower, but more compact and more economical”, then the dual-core Atom models quite successfully solve it.

Internet browsers

We have finally reached a platform where the results of these two scripted benchmarks can be of practical interest. True, this platform has managed to disappoint us somewhat here.

Once upon a time everyone laughed at the advertisement in which «Pentium 4 speeded up the Internet.» But they laughed in vain — compared to Atom, the “old man” is really capable of speeding up something 🙂 And now the complaints of netbook users who bought them “cleanly to browse”, but found out that “browsing” with comfort does not work out. As long as the pages are simple and not overloaded with interactive, the role of the processor in rendering them will be minimal (the communication channel is more important). However, it is worth adding complex scripts, as it immediately turns out that not all processors are equally useful. Moreover, this is all the more sad because if Flash, videos and similar multimedia content have already learned how to accelerate the hardware of the video chip, then JavaScript execution can be accelerated only by increasing the performance of the central processor itself.

However, there is one more workaround: if you look at the detailed results, you can see that the D525+Chrome combination is still an order of magnitude faster than Internet Explorer running on Athlon II X2 260, i.e. a competent approach to choosing software provision, this problem can be mitigated. But still, this approach does not lead to victory, but only to honorable surrender: Intel rightly considers compatibility with all applications created for x86 systems one of the key advantages of Atom over competing architectures. And then it suddenly turns out that there is not so much benefit from this compatibility: run everything is possible , but not everything costs to run. How this is better than a limited set of software for ARM, for example, is not entirely clear — all the same, you will have to give up your favorite IE or Firefox.

Audio encoding

Our audio encoding test «plays along» with multi-threaded processors a little on purpose — by launching simultaneous encoding of as many files as the number of streams will be supported by hardware. For the Atom D525, this number is four, which is more than for all other processors. However, as we can see, this doesn’t help it much: it is still one and a half times behind the Celeron E1400 — at a close clock frequency and despite Hyper-Threading support.

Video encoding

Obviously, no one in their right mind would buy an Atom computer for video work. However, if he is already there, sometimes such a task can “fall” on him. In any case, people who transcode video for mobile devices on NAS are personally known to us. The reason is simple — this is where everything is stored, and the NAS may turn out to be the only constantly on computer in the house, so let it not be idle, but also slowly engaged in transcoding.

And indeed, if the speed is not of great importance (that is, they loaded the computer with work, and whether it will perform it for a night or an hour is not important), this approach is quite justified. Now, if performance is important, then it should be taken into account that in fact any dual-core processor (with the possible exception of the junior Pentium D) is more than one and a half times faster than the older Atom. Modern dual-core models — by 3.5 times, and budget quad-core models — by all four times. In general, the destiny of Atom is to compete with old budget single-core processors or with even older non-budget ones, but also single-core ones 🙂

Total

Even the significant optimization of the latest version of the testing methodology (to be more precise, of the applications included in it) for multithreading did not allow the Atom D525 to reach the level of equal-frequency single-core processors with the Core microarchitecture (Core 2 and later). Here, it certainly outperforms the Pentium 4 of equal frequency, but what’s the point of such a gain? Not to mention the fact that in the conditions of using a smaller number of computational threads, a gain can easily turn into a loss. Thus, we can make the following verdict: the performance of the Atom line of processors in today’s performance is such that … it can not be seriously studied 🙂 That is, it is possible to determine what tasks the systems will cope with on this processor, and what should not be run on them. But you shouldn’t compare it with «full-fledged» processors — the lag is too big. One might even say that it is fundamentally great.

On the other hand, such a loss should not be considered a strategic defeat. Yes, of course, a modern (and not even the most modern) budget dual-core processor priced at $50-100 (not to mention more powerful processors) is several times faster than Atom, and nothing can be done about it. However, there is a certain set of tasks where a further increase in processor performance simply does not give anything — it is not a bottleneck. Unfortunately, such situations are difficult to simulate in tests, but they do happen. And the fact that companies still employ a large number of computers based on Pentium 4, and even Celeron D or Athlon XP, just shows that they are not so rare: if a more productive system unit could increase labor productivity employee, they would have been changed long ago. In addition, older systems are usually equipped with much less memory than in our testing, and slower hard drives too. And in a multitasking environment, they can feel worse, because background processes (at least an antivirus or a firewall) on single-threaded devices will “guzzle” resources from foreground applications, including the user interface.

In short, the availability of Atom-based systems for sale allows you to choose when upgrading your computer park — either the same level of power consumption, but higher performance, or remain at the same level of performance, but significantly reduce energy costs. Yes, of course, one can argue that modern processors consume little power at partial load (thanks to efficient energy-saving technologies), which makes the comparison less head-on, but . .. why buy extra computing resources? 😉 If it weren’t for the Atom, there would be no question: there is only one way, and you can’t turn off it. But Atom is! And there is a choice. And everyone can choose what he really needs — performance or energy efficiency 🙂

We thank the Russian representative office of the company Gigabyte ,
as well as the companies Crucial and OLDI
for their help in completing the test stands.

Comparison of Intel Atom 230 and Intel Pentium III 800

Comparative analysis of Intel Atom 230 and Intel Pentium III 800 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.

Intel Atom 230

versus

Intel Pentium III 800

Advantages

Causes to choose Intel Atom 230

  • ACTION FREEMED: 1.6 GHZ VS 0.8 GHZ
  • approximately 7% more nucleus: 85.2 ° C VS 80°C
  • Newer process technology to make the processor more powerful but with lower power consumption: 45 nm vs 180 nm
  • L1 cache is 8x larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • L2 cache is 2x larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • 5.3 times less power consumption: 4 Watt vs 20.8 Watt
  • Performance in PassMark — CPU mark about 15% higher: 210 vs 182
Max frequency 1.6 GHz vs 0.8 GHz
Maximum core temperature 85. 2°C vs 80°C
Process 45 nm vs 180 nm
Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 8 KB
Level 2 cache 512 KB vs 256 KB
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt vs 20.8 Watt
PassMark — CPU mark 210 vs 182

Reasons to choose Intel Pentium III 800

  • Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark is about 42% higher: 237 vs 167
PassMark — Single thread mark 237 vs 167

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Atom 230
CPU 2: Intel Pentium III 800

PassMark — Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
Name Intel Atom 230 Intel Pentium III 800
PassMark — Single thread mark 167 237
PassMark — CPU mark 210 182
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 436
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 552

Feature comparison

Intel Atom 230 Intel Pentium III 800
Architecture name Diamondville Coppermine T
Production date March 1, 2008 n/d
Place in ranking 2661 2687
Processor Number 230
Series Legacy Intel Atom® Processors Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Applicability Desktop Desktop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency 1. 60 GHz 800MHz
Bus Speed ​​ 533 MHz FSB 133 MHz FSB
Crystal area 26 mm2 80mm
System bus (FSB) 533MHz
Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) 8KB
Level 2 cache 512KB 256KB
Technological process 45nm 180nm
Maximum core temperature 85. 2°C 80°C
Maximum frequency 1.6 GHz 0.8 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Number of threads 2
Number of transistors 47 million 44 million
Permissible core voltage 0.9V-1.1625V 1.75V
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 69 °C
Low Halogen Options Available
Maximum number of processors in configuration 1 1
Package Size 22mm x 22mm
Supported sockets PBGA437 PPGA370, SECC2, SECC2495
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 20. 8 Watt
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Parity FSB
Idle States
Extended instructions Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Pentium III — frwiki.

wiki

Pentium III is Intel’s x86 microprocessor range. It is 6- and generation such as Pentium II and Pentium Pro.

The fifth processor sold under the Pentium brand (after the Pentium, Pentium MMX, Pentium Pro and Pentium II) was developed under the code name Katmai and was released in late February 1999. It differs from its Pentium II predecessor by the addition of 70 new SSE vector instructions (SIMD) executed by individual units (vector integers) or FPUs (vector floats).

Pentium III went through a number of production runs from 450 MHz to 1.13 GHz — even up to 1.4 GHz for the latest models released (Tualatin) — engraved models 0.25 µm = 250 nm (Katmaï), 0.18 µm. = 180 nm (Coppermine), then 0.13 µm = 130 nm (Tualatin). Its system bus was 100 MHz (BX circuit), then 133.33 MHz.

First offered with a BX chipset and SDRAM memory, it was later offered with a Rambus-related i820 chipset, but chipset issues (we could only use two memory cards) and memory cost made the i820 a commercial failure, the i810 and i815 turned out to be more successful.

Initially, it was distributed in the form of a cartridge (slot 1) up to versions with a frequency of 1000 MHz, then on socket 370 until the end of sales. Cartridge versions have a 512 KB L2 cache on the daughterboard that runs at half the microprocessor frequency. Socket 370 versions include 256 KB L2 directly on-chip for faster access (and microprocessor-identical frequency), 512 KB for Pentium III-S for servers.

Pentium III supports multi-processor configuration, commercial motherboards support up to four processors.

For server and workstation, there are Pentium III Xeons available in cartridges (slot 2), such as the Pentium II, but this has a different shape, and also supports higher frequencies than for slot 1, and allows «» has more efficient cooling system. The price level was addressed primarily to companies.

The Pentium III processor (special edition) is used in the Xbox game console.

The 1133 MHz version of the Pentium III Coppermine was quickly discontinued because that frequency caused an internal radiation problem that made the microprocessor unstable.

Summary

  • 1 Versions

    • 1.1 Version slot 1 — SECC2
    • 1.2 Socket 370 Version
  • 2 See also

    • 2.1 Related article
    • 2.2 External link

Versions

Slot version 1 — SECC2

  • Katmai , 0.25 µm = 250 nm, 100 MHz FSB, ??? 32 KB L1 Cache, 512 KB L2 Cache

    • 450, 500, 550, 600 MHz
  • Katmai , 0.25 µm = 250 nm, 133 MHz FSB, ??? 32 KB L1 Cache, 512 KB L2 Cache

    • 533B, 600V, MHz
  • Coppermine , 0.18 µm = 180 nm, 100 MHz FSB, 256 L2

    • 550E, 600E, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 1000 MHz
  • Coppermine , 0.18 µm = 180 nm, 133 MHz FSB, 256 L2

    • 533EB, 600EB, 667, 733, 800EB, 866, 933, 1000V, MHz

Socket 370 version

  • Coppermine , 0.18 µm = 180 nm, 100 MHz FSB, 256 L2, Socket 370 FC-PGA

    • 500E, 550E, 600E, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 1000, 1100 MHz
  • Coppermine , 0. 18 µm = 180 nm, 133 MHz FSB, 256 L2, Socket 370 FC-PGA

    • 533EB, 600EB, 667, 733, 800EB, 933, 1000B, 1133MHz
  • Coppermine-T , 0.18 µm = 180 nm, 133 MHz FSB, 256 L2, Socket 370 FC-PGA / FC-PGA2

    • 800EB, 933, 1000B, 1133 MHz
  • Tualatin , 0.13 µm = 130 nm, 133 MHz FSB, 256 L2, Socket 370 FC-PGA2

    • 1000A, 1133A, 1200, 1333, 1400MHz
  • Tualatin , 0.13 µm = 130 nm, 133 MHz FSB, 512 L2, Socket 370 FC-PGA2

    • 1133, 1266, 1400 MHz (Pentium III-S)

See also

Related article

  • Intel microprocessors # x86

External link

  • ( fr ) Pentium III, at arstechnica.com

Intel

processors

Abandoned
4 bits
  • 4004
  • 4040
Pre-x86 (8-bit)
  • 8008
  • 8080
  • 8085
x86-16 (16bit)
  • 8086
  • 8088
  • 80186
  • 80188
  • 80286
x87 (external FPU)
  • Bus 8/16 bit: 8087
  • 16-bit bus: 80287
  • 32-bit bus: 80387 , 80487
x86-32 / IA-32 (32-bit)
  • 80386

    • SX
    • 376
    • FORMER
  • 80486

    • SX
    • DX2
    • DX4
    • SL
    • RapidCAD
    • OverDrive Intel 80486 (ru)
  • Pentium

    • Original
    • OverDrive
    • Pro
    • II
    • II OverDrive
    • III
    • 4
    • M
  • Basic
  • Celeron M
  • Celeron D
  • A100 / A110 (ru)
x86-64 / EM64T (64-bit)
  • Pentium 4
  • Pentium D
  • Pentium Extreme Edition
  • Celeron D
  • Core 2
  • Core 2 Extreme
  • Dual-core Pentium
RISC
  • i860
  • i960
  • Strong hand
  • IOP and XScale
Other
  • Pentium 4-M
  • Centrino
Current
x86-32
  • EP80579 (en)
  • Atom
x86-64
  • Atom
  • Celeron
  • Pentium
  • Core i3
  • Core i5
  • Core i7
  • Core i9
  • Xeon
  • Core M
Other Itanium
Microarchitectures
  • P5
  • P6
  • NetBurst
  • Basic
  • Bonnel
  • Nehalem
  • Sandy Bridge
  • Haswell
  • Silvermont
  • Skylake
  • Kaby Lake
  • Coffee Lake
  • Apollo Lake
  • Comet Lake

History of Intel Atom processors

Egor Morozov

In the 80s, when the first laptops appeared, they differed little from personal computers — it was a large box with a built-in keyboard, motherboard, screen and carrying handle, even the battery was not always there. And this was understandable — there was no point in developing special processors for laptops, since the solutions existing on the market did not even require 1 watt. By the end of 90th processors already required at least radiators for cooling, but by the beginning of the 2000s, Intel realized that they needed to release separate processors for laptops with reduced power consumption — this is how the Intel Pentium M line appeared: such processors had a heat pack of 20-25 watts, which was quite suitable for their installation in laptops. In fact, these processors are heavily redesigned Intel Pentium III with lower frequencies:

However, a couple of years later, when Microsoft introduced Windows XP Tablet Edition, the question arose of an even greater reduction in heat dissipation — this is how the Intel Celeron ULV line was born (great-great-grandfather of all modern Intel Core i ULV): these processors represented even more stripped-down Pentium M — if the latter worked at frequencies of 1.5-2 GHz, the Celeron frequencies were often less than a gigahertz! In principle, this was enough to run XP (it required a processor with a frequency of at least 233 MHz), but the system worked quite thoughtfully.

In 2007, Intel introduced the «daddy» Intel Atom — the A100 and A110 processors, which were stripped down single-core 90 nm Pentium M with frequencies of about 600-800 MHz. Perhaps their only advantage was that their heat dissipation did not exceed 3 W, that is, they could be cooled passively. However, the performance was also passive — even worse than that of the Celeron M, so such processors were not found on the market. Intel realized that, firstly, it was time to transfer processors to a new process technology, and secondly, it was too early to make solutions with a passive cooling system — and in 2008 they introduced Intel Atom.

Intel Atom Bonnel

The first generation of Intel Atom was a Pentium M core on a 45 nm process technology with integrated graphics from PowerVR, L2 cache up to 1 MB and a DDR2 memory controller. Perhaps the most popular processor found in most netbooks of the time was the Atom N450. It was a single-core dual-threaded processor with a frequency of about 1.5 GHz, an integrated graphics card called the Intel GMA 3150, and it was equipped with 1-2 GB of RAM. Its heat dissipation did not exceed 6.5 W, so a small cooler was required for cooling.

The performance of such a processor was, of course, not high — in 3Dmark 06, the processor scored only 500 points, and the video card 150. For example, the processor in the original 2008 Macbook Air, Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, scored 1900 points, and its , GMA X3100, 430 points. As a result, on a netbook with such a processor, it was possible to open documents, surf the Internet, but nothing more — even 720p from YouTube slowed down, and you could forget about games in general. Nevertheless, netbooks with such processors were very popular — firstly, they were very compact and light (10-11″, 1-1.2 kg), secondly, they were cheap — basically no more than $ 200-300, and secondly, third, long-lived — 6 hours with a mixed load was easily achieved, which was rare in 2010. As a result, such devices were massively sold out by students and schoolchildren, because it was an ideal version of a typewriter with the ability to access the Internet.0003

Intel Atom Saltwell

As time went on, processors based on the 32 nm process technology began to appear, and Intel, of course, decided to update the Atom line. The main problem was not so much in a weak video card, where DX 9 support was screwed in hastily, but in a processor that categorically refused to pull the new Windows 8 normally, and the lack of the ability to view at least 720p in 2012 already looked ridiculous.

Therefore, Intel pulled themselves up and released the Atom Z2xxx line — most often the Z2760 was installed in tablets and netbooks on Windows, and we will consider it. This is a dual-core four-threaded processor with a frequency of about 1.8 GHz, built on a 32 nm process technology, with the same PowerVR graphics (albeit slightly modified), 1 MB L2 and support for up to 2 GB LPDDR2 memory. In terms of processor performance, it was already a completely different level — in 3Dmark 06 it already scored 1000 points, and the video card — about 350. At the same time, the heat pack was reduced to only 2 watts, that is, the processor cooled perfectly passively. Its performance was already enough for a fairly fast system operation, and somewhat improved graphics (they now had 6 computing units instead of 2 in the first generation of Atom) already made it possible, at the very least, but even to do the simplest photo processing in Photoshop. Well, of course, there were no problems with playing 720p and even some 1080p formats. However, in two years, from 2010 to 2012, user requests grew significantly, and the Z2760, which could only handle 768p resolution normally, faded somewhat compared to the iPad 4, which pulled 2048×1536, so Intel had room to grow.

Intel Atom Silvermont

In 2013, Intel finally completely figured out the 22 nm process technology, releasing the still current Haswell, and finally paid attention to Atom: Z2760 worked, of course, tolerably, but nothing more, and it needed a replacement. And Intel released the third generation of the Atom on the 22nm process, the Bay Trail.

I must say that Intel made simply excellent processors: firstly, they were able to «shove» 4 cores into a 2-3 W heat pack, secondly, the processors learned to work with DDR3, and thirdly, now they are equipped with a full-fledged Intel HD Graphics of the Ivy Bridge generation, so now there is support for DX11, SSE 4 and other modern instructions, which in theory made it possible to run almost any modern game on such a graphics. The final processor performance in 3Dmark 06 was as much as 1800 points — the level of Intel Core i ULV 2nd generation, which was just an excellent result — Windows started and ran quickly, and with 4 GB of RAM there were no problems with multitasking. Tablets on such hardware easily digested not only 1080p, but also 1440p video. The result of the video card was no worse — 1900 points: yes, a full-fledged HD 4000 scores about 4000 points in 3Dmark 06, but there are 16 computing units with a frequency of about 1000 MHz, and here there are only 4, with a frequency of about 600 MHz. Nevertheless, Civilization 5 performed tolerably on such a schedule — in comparison with the mobile truncated Civilization, this was a breakthrough. The same applies to other games — there are still no analogues of the same Dirt 3 for mobile OSes, and yet it ran briskly on these Atoms at the minimum settings.

Intel Atom Cherry Trail

After the release of the third generation, Intel relaxed, and this is understandable — Bay Trail did an excellent job with tablet tasks, there was a reserve for the future. The only thing that was not very good was the graphics — the processor could pull out a more powerful solution. And in the end, Intel focused only on graphics, releasing in 2015 the processors of the Z8xxx line (it would be logical to call them Z4xxx, but Intel has its own logic).

Let’s take, perhaps, the most popular representative of the new line — Z8300. This processor is built on a 14 nm process technology, has the same 4 cores with frequencies of about 2 GHz, but a much better video card — now, firstly, it is based on the integrated graphics of the new Broadwell generation at that time, and secondly, it has either 12 (as in this processor), or 16 (as in the Z8700) computing units with a frequency of about 500 MHz. It would seem that the increase in graphics should be 3-4 times, but in reality everything rested on the heat pack: if Bay Trail 2-3 W was enough in principle, then for full-fledged work of the graphics it was required at least 2-3 times more. Therefore, as a result, the video card became only 30-50% more powerful, while the processor generally remained at the same level. So it makes little sense to change tablets from Z3740 to Z8300 — the system will work the same way, the programs will run at the same time. The only increase is observed in games, but in general, if the game did not go to Bay Trail, then it will most likely be unplayable on Cherry.

Further development of the Intel Atom line

At the moment, the Intel Atom line, like the Core i, is fully debugged, and Intel will update it in the style of «+ 5-10% per generation» — and, in principle, more is not required: no one considers Atom tablets as high-performance devices, and they do their job well. For those who need not only to surf the Internet and watch movies, there is the Core M line, which is one and a half times more powerful in terms of processor and 3-4 in terms of graphics. Well, for those who need a portable hi-end, it makes sense to look at the line of Core i ULV processors, whose capabilities are enough for most user tasks.

Recommendations

  • Telegram may be removed from the Apple App Store

  • 📲 How to install applications removed from the App Store on iPhone — Sberbank, Alfa and others

  • «Yandex» greatly worsened the terms of the subscription «Yandex.Plus»

Recommendations

Telegram may be removed from the Apple App Store

AliExpress again took away the opportunity for Russians to save. This time seems to be forever

📲 How to install applications removed from the App Store on iPhone — Sberbank, Alfa and others

«Yandex» greatly worsened the terms of the subscription «Yandex.Plus»

See also

Research

Don’t send «eggplant» to girls. This could end badly

Emoji

Banks are introducing a useful function for Russians since October

Banks
Russia

Information technology in the lessons of economics and social studies

Category: Economy. Economic sciences.

This article is a small tutorial written with
to help school teachers
social disciplines (primarily
social studies, law and economics) in the implementation
modern information technologies. In her
lesson developments are presented,
involving non-traditional
lessons using gaming forms of learning on
based on the use of computer programs —
socio-political simulations.

The reader will probably not understand the move
my further reasoning, if he had not
previously dealing with computer games —
economic and political simulations.
Suggested in this article lesson
developments are based on the use of the game
«Tropico» or its more advanced version
Tropico is a fabulous island. «Tropico» —
joint publication of the company «1C» and the company
«Logrus» TROPICO — a picture copied from Cuba
period 50-60 years. At the start of the game, you have
at the disposal of about 500 subjects, land, densely
covered with tropical forest, and, of course,
state treasury. How will you be all of this
to dispose of good — exclusively yours
care. Almost no number of options
is limited and you will have to: fight the trading
scarce, build schools, churches, airport;
develop industry and tourism, create
jobs and make sure that everyone
Pedro’s breakfast was not a piece of bread, but a sandwich with
oil. However, you still won’t be perfect.
ruler never for two reasons. Firstly,
each at the beginning of the game chooses for his
characteristics at least two disadvantages (common
the number is about fifty). Secondly, subjects
a lot, but little money. Even with all your
hyperresponsibility and caring someone
sure to be dissatisfied. yes and reaction
The population is far from instantaneous — Hispanics people
southern, they need to think for a long time before they
will understand that their El Presidente is very good
dictator. In other words, a good deed a week before
elections are unlikely to raise your rating, that’s all
must be done in advance. In any case, the President
you can even open a Swiss bank account and
live quietly for yourself, not relying on adoration
Tropicans.

DOMESTIC POLICY

By assuming the role of a «good» ruler, you
risk earning extra gray hair and a couple
longitudinal wrinkles on the forehead. Question «WHERE TO GET
MONEY» will follow you everywhere. And
there will always be no money. And where are they from
can be a lot if it seems all life is on
Is the island spinning in a vicious circle?
The trade deficit is eliminated exclusively for
account for the export of cigars and rum. Only tobacco money
obviously not enough to build an airport,
develop infrastructure and industry.
A fateful decision is made to cut down
some of the expensive tropical
scaffolding to free up new funds. You already
dreaming about how to build an airport, how
grateful tourists will flock to Tropico in droves and
will happily say goodbye to crispy banknotes in
swimming pools, water parks and restaurants, but here your
dreams will surely be interrupted by selective abuse with
square from which you will know that you are a fiend,
destroyer of nature and take away from a poor country
last valuable resource.

In general, with the population you can
«negotiate» in different ways. You can find out
what worries the dissatisfied, and accept
appropriate measures. For example, if engineers
tired of wading through the thickets of the jungle
way to work, why not make people
pleasant and not pave a civilized path?
You can «remove» the recalcitrant by proxy or
arrange open persecution — it’s up to you to decide, you
after all, a dictator, after all. Cruel
people are afraid of the rulers, but quite
it is likely that after a few years of presidency
they will hate you so much that they will smash you to pieces
your palace and hang you on a flagpole to dry
next to tobacco leaves.

FOREIGN POLICY

In the field of foreign policy, you will depend
from the pointer of two superpowers — Russia and the United States. If you
act provocatively, they may
try to «advise» you how
lead the country. If you reject them
recommendations, they can impose an embargo,
stop funding, and will even defend
their interests with the help of the navy. And
beware of opposing one power, not
enlisting the support of another — you simply
crushed into powder. So issue decrees, live
for your own pleasure and do not forget in time
prepare for the elections. More about this game —
strategy and its modifications can be found at
official website of the game at http://games.1c.ru/tropico/

Problems to which the solution contributes
this form of student work in the classroom. The
the project aims to improve the quality
school social education through
wide introduction of information technologies,
project-based teaching methods, increasing motivation
students to study social science
disciplines. Particular attention is paid to the project
use of economic simulators,
methodological support for their implementation in
school social science education.
Economic and political simulations (games
– strategies that “simulate” the virtual
state to be governed by
specific domestic and foreign policy,
implementing economic and social reforms)
can
be used in practical exercises
as part of the school social studies course at 10 — 11
classes, the foundations of a market economy. Nami also
elective courses for pre-profile
preparation (grades 9). Economic and political
simulators can be used by teachers
social studies and economics as an organization
frontal work with the class, and for group
and individual lessons. Possible
independent work of students at home
having a personal computer). Implementation
project will combine the benefits
project-based learning and IR technology,
will contribute to the development of custom
skills of students and teachers. Project implementation
pursues not only educational purposes. In him
significant potential of educational
character. Introduction to teaching practice
social studies in the school of economic and political
simulators allows more successful than with
traditional approaches to achieve the following
targets:

  • Increase students’ interest in economics,
    social science.
  • Significantly improve the practical
    orientation of the course of economics, social science
    Develop social communication skills
    improve legal and political culture
    students.
  • The implementation of this project contributes to
    successful political socialization of students,
    formation of an active citizenship,
    formation in our society of political
    a culture of participation, the development of civic
    society and the rule of law.
  • Through trying on «historical
    masks”, “costumes” and education takes place
    history, civic education,
    active life position, personality education
    — an atom that is being formed in our country
    civil society.
  • Work in the virtual government
    states will promote the development
    social communication skills, the formation
    democratic political culture of students,
    political tolerance.

Teachers who have expressed a desire to implement this
technology into their practice, can do so without
additional education and coursework
preparation in several stages. First
stage
— self-educational. He is associated with
acquisition, study of the program, its
interface and features. Second
stage
— familiarization of students with the program,
use it for frontal work with
class. (We recommend creating an additional
game situation through formation with the class
virtual «cabinet of ministers» with subsequent
«dividing» ministerial portfolios by industry
economy and departments). More suitable for
this non-traditional form of the lesson in the form
meetings of the Cabinet of Ministers. students
encouraged to use mandatory
context of their keynote speeches
relevant social science terms that
important for preparing for the exam. Upon completion
each game is «debriefing» —
reflection, during which the causes are analyzed
successes or failures of certain reforms, undertakings.
Domestic and foreign policy of the state
subjected to comprehensive analysis,
causal relationships are developed
recommendations for the next Cabinet
ministers. (The second stage may take
3-4 hours of lesson time — 2 weeks). Alleged
result
— arouse the interest of students,
organize students’ acceptance of the goals of this
type of learning activity, familiarize them with
program interface, encourage them to
independent study of economic
simulator, organization of group work on
logical scheme: goal setting — conscious
«political» activity — reflection. AT
as head of the cabinet of ministers
the teacher acts (although options are possible in
composition and level
student readiness).

Third stage

— independent
«rule» of students. Structure and logic
activities coincide with the second stage.
The activity of the teacher in relation to students
more individualized. Can be placed
specific tasks of the board, such as, —
the transformation of the state of Tropico into an international
tourist Mecca, attracting foreign
investment, achieving social equality and
prosperity for all the inhabitants of the Tropics,
social and political stability — struggle
with political extremism, prevention
revolutions, etc. The main task of the teacher and the game is
encourage students to accept
political decisions, development of skills to build
futurological forecasts, think according to
state. Estimated result
formation of political culture, skills
make informed decisions, anticipate
effects. Consolidation of the theoretical
material, terminology. Active expansion
students’ vocabulary. Finally
students can present prepared
«Messages of the Presidents» in which
analyze their board, make plans and
directions of development of the state. maybe
press conferences, round tables and
other forms of lessons.

Experience with these programs
showed that paired lessons are more effective
or this form of work should be
used in a number of lessons in a row, — in blocks (up to 3
lessons in the block). Fortunately, the Tropico program
has the ability to save the game on any of its
stage with the possibility of further renewal.
Therefore, the lesson developments presented in
this edition have a block structure.

Lesson 1. Introduction

Lesson Objective: To introduce students to
Tropico political simulator, call to
him interest ; summarize the main features
history of peoples and states in general, to identify
the main factors in their development. The main problem —
show that the features of social —
economic development of peoples does not depend on
one cause or event, but from a complex,
combination of a number of factors. Demonstrate
students the possibility of the game «Tropico»,
to acquaint with its interface, «toolkit».
At the very first lesson, you can put in front of the class
game task — the transformation of the state
Tropico from an agrarian state to an agrarian —
industrial, so that in the process of joint
modeling to master the toolkit
game control.

TCO: Tropico game program, computer
not lower than Pentium 3 level, projection
equipment (TV with S-video, subject to availability)
S-video output on computer or laser projector,
or an interactive whiteboard). Most
the best option in terms of price, quality and
cost of operation is a TV
diagonal 74 cm, connected as
the monitor that refers to the class.

Lesson progress

Set the game mode, tasks and conditions
board, following the instructions of the program. For example —
achieving prosperity for all, holding —
free elections as a prerequisite
board, etc. Further, already with the beginning of the game,
students are encouraged to explore social
economic situation on the island. For this in
the program provides a JOURNAL, which contains
statistical information reflecting the dynamics
development of agriculture, tourism,
industries, data on average wages,
dispersion of incomes, the mood of the people, etc. Total
about 30 indicators. All information received
will give students the following
learning task — develop a reform program,
designed to modernize the economy, weaken
social tension in the state
Tropico.
The teacher may ask the students
draw historical parallels with Russia,
ask them to remember periods in the history of our
states, when we were faced with similar
situations. The most prepared students
may be able to mobilize historical experience
reforms (industrialization of the 20-30s of the XX century, etc.).

At the beginning of the game in the state budget will be
only 10,000 conventional currency units. It’s already
encourages the class to ask the following questions:
where to get money for industrialization? What are
there will be sources of initial accumulation
capital? Where can I get the necessary
qualified personnel? How to solve the problem
almost universal illiteracy of the population
Tropics? Which foreign countries to contact
for help? How to deal with a very significant
influence of the clergy on the population
relatively small electorate of other
political forces — militarists, communists,
green, the capitalist party? And how finally
retain power, strengthen its legitimacy? After all
uprisings, extremist
slogans are heard from the lips of some Tropicans.
Can bribe them, kill them in the best traditions
machiavellianism? These and many other questions
will inevitably face the students during the game.
The task of the teacher will be to
give meaning to the game, encourage students
develop «political programs»,
offer them to the general attention, defend
reasoned own position, evaluate
achieved results. During the lesson, the teacher
encourages the use of terms learned
earlier, expanding their active political
vocabulary. To do this, I practice writing on
board of terms that students should
try to use it in context. This form
work is also relevant in order to prepare
students to this form of examination
tests, like an essay (during the exam in
social science).

Sample list of terms: legitimacy,
modernization, reforms, social policy,
economic policy, foreign policy
course, power, pluralism, tolerance,
industrialization, aggregate purchasing power
ability, investment attractiveness,
socio-economic stabilization, etc.

The game lasts approximately 30 minutes. That’s why
initially in the game settings
Set duration to minimum
speed to the maximum. This is enough to
to achieve certain results of management and
complete the lesson with reflection, during which the class
attempts to analyze the causes of success and failure
board. At this stage, an indispensable assistant
teachers is a magazine available in the game
program that keeps statistics in
including the standard of living of the Tropicans, their
sentiments, attitudes towards the authorities.

PS. Playing this game requires
computer proficiency teachers enough
high level, high reaction speed,
a high level of attention and
perfect knowledge of the game interface
the Tropico program, i.e. orientation in the «game
world» programs.

Lesson 2. Practical work.

Lesson Objective: To equip students with skills
independent work with the game program,
independent decision-making related to
implementation of domestic and foreign policy
Tropical State.

Game task: In front of all students
a single game task is set — the transformation
islands into a «tourist paradise», an attraction
maximum number of foreign tourists
— the foundations of the future well-being of the inhabitants of the Tropics.

TSO: Computer lab connected in
local network. If there is no game disc on
each student, it is necessary to create a virtual
disc with the game program on each computer
or be able to boot the disk image from
servers to pre-created on all computers
virtual disks. (they can be created
for example, using the popular program
«Alcohol», which should be set to all
computers). If there is time, virtual
it is desirable to create disks in advance.

Lesson progress

At the beginning of the lesson, students are
heuristic conversation, during which it becomes clear
economic, social, environmental,
climatic, political, infrastructural and
other prerequisites for successful development
tourism industry of the economy. During this
conversations, we come to the following conclusions:
content: For the successful development of tourism in
our island needs conditions like

  • Developed infrastructure for tourism, services,
    recreation (hotels, recreational resources,
    transport, etc.).
  • Social and political stability in
    state.
  • Friendly foreign policy, positive
    international image of the state.
  • Capitals. own construction industry.
  • Foreign investment. Advertising. Pure
    ecological environment.
  • Labor resources. Accounting for needs and
    financial opportunities of tourists with different
    income level.
  • Historical sites, etc.

(Relevant notes are made on the blackboard)

Next, students are invited to independently
or in pairs, start playing the game
tasks, during which they will achieve
solutions to the above problems. Game success
estimated by the number attracted to the island
tourists, an increase in the quality of life of the inhabitants of the Tropics,
size of the state budget.

During play activities, students
face a number of problems. This is the deficit
budget, the struggle for votes on
regular elections, guidance of the public
order, crime fighting, solution
social problems, attraction of foreign
investment, construction, electrification,
development of medicine, education, etc.

In this case, the game scenario for each student will be
individual. Whose game can end
a little before the call. The board may be
interrupted by a successful revolt of the Tropicans,
mutiny troops, conspiracy, losing the election.

These students can start writing like this
the so-called «memoirs» of the President of the Tropics, in
who analyze their reign, the reasons for success
and failures, using the correct terms from the course
social science. (Students’ work is graded according to
a number of criteria for student essays on
USE exams). Working on them can be
completed at home.

Lesson 3. Practical work. (2 hours)

Lesson in the lesson system: This lesson is being
after completing the chapter
social science devoted to economic
sphere of society or in the course of the WEM.

Lesson Objective: Students Applying
theoretical knowledge gained during the study
economic sphere of society. During the lesson
students must use theoretical
knowledge, such as economic growth,
state budget, specialization, main
economic activity meters, basic
living standards, employment, unemployment,
law of supply and demand. They’ll have to
explain the relationship between economic development and the level
life, the relationship between production costs and income,
characterize the economics of the producer and
consumer, give examples of legal
regulation of the market economy.

Lesson form: Computer simulation with
using economic simulator

Game task: In front of all students
a single game task is set — the transformation
islands from an agricultural state to a state with
industrial-agrarian, and if possible
(program — maximum) to the industrial
state

TSO: Computer lab connected in
local network. If there is no game disc on
each student, it is necessary to create a virtual
disc with the game program on each computer
or be able to boot the disk image from
servers to pre-created on all computers
virtual disks. (they can be created
for example, using the popular program
«Alcohol», which should be set to all
computers). If there is time, virtual
it is desirable to create disks in advance.

Lesson progress

At the beginning of the lesson, or, preferably, at
the previous lesson with students is carried out
heuristic conversation, during which it becomes clear
possible sources of initial accumulation
capital for an industrial breakthrough (
internal savings, the main source
which may be agriculture, external
borrowing, trade in natural and
biological resources, assistance from developed countries)
the historical experience of countries is studied,
the above terms, theoretical
provisions.

Of the best prepared students (2–3
person) you can create a group in advance
analysts, whose task will be to
to analyze and comment every 15–20
minutes the development of the game situation for each
computer (let’s call it the «News» program).
They reveal cause and effect relationships
unfolding events, preparing
«futurological forecasts» for «presidents».

The terms mentioned above are used in
mandatory based on facts
social and economic life of the state
Tropico.

During 2 lessons, students are offered
on their own or in pairs, start
fulfillment of a game task, during which they
will strive to solve the above problems.
The success of a game is measured by the number of
profitable enterprises, volume
state budget, consumer
baskets, the employment of residents of the Tropics and other
measures of economic activity.

During play activities, students
face a number of problems. This is the deficit
budget, the struggle for votes on
next elections, lack of qualified
personnel, the need to develop their own
education system as a necessary condition
successful industrialization,
lack of energy resources, lack of
market infrastructure, industry, etc..
Establishing public order, fighting
crime, solving social problems,
attraction of foreign investments, development
medicine, the relationship with the Church is only
incomplete list of problems that will be faced and
which will be decided by our «presidents». Wherein
again, each student will have a game scenario
individual. Whose game can end
a little before the call. The board may be
interrupted by a successful revolt of the Tropicans,
mutiny troops, conspiracy, losing the election.
These students may begin to write so-called
«memoirs» of the President of the Tropics, in which
analyze their rule, the reasons for success and
failures, using the correct terms from the course
social science. (Students’ work is graded according to
a number of criteria for student essays on
USE exams). Working on them can be
completed at home or in class.

Homework. Write Essay. As
facts of social life, illustrating
theoretical material, you can cite facts from
stories of «Tropics», which proved themselves during the game.

The form of lessons and objectives can be
expand significantly. Everything depends on your
experience, desire and learning objectives that you, as
teacher, put in front of the class.

12/19/2006

Intel Atom x5-Z8500 vs Intel Pentium G4560: What is the difference?

4W vs 54W

  • 0. 25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
    • 25% higher CPU speed?
      2 x 3.5GHz vs 4 x 1.4GHz
    • 800MHz higher RAM speed?
      2400MHz vs 1600MHz
    • GPU frequency 150MHz more?
      350MHz vs 200MHz
    • 10°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
      100°C vs 90°C
    • 12.8GB/s more memory bandwidth? Is
      38.4GB/s vs 25.6GB/s
    • 0.9 a newer version of DirectX?
      12 vs 11.1
    • 56GB more max memory?
      64GB vs 8GB
    • Uses multithreading?

    What are the most popular comparisons?

    Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    vs

    Intel Celeron N3350

    Intel Pentium G4560

    vs

    Intel Core i7-7500U

    Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    vs

    Intel Celeron N3060

    Intel Pentium G4560

    vs

    Intel Core i3-7100

    Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    vs

    Intel Celeron N4020

    Intel Pentium G4560

    vs

    AMD Ryzen 3 1200

    Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    vs

    Intel Atom x5 Z8550

    Intel Pentium G4560

    vs

    Intel Celeron N3350

    Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    vs

    Intel Atom Z3735F

    Intel Pentium G4560

    VS

    Intel Core i5-3470

    Intel ATOM X5-Z8500

    VS

    Intel ATOM N2600

    Intel Pentium 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 VS 9000. 0003

    Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    vs

    Intel Celeron N3450

    Intel Pentium G4560

    vs

    Intel Core i3-6100

    Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    vs

    Intel Celeron N4000

    Intel Pentium G4560

    VS

    Intel Core i5-6500

    Intel ATOM X5-Z8500

    VS

    Intel Core i5-4258U

    Intel Pentium G4560

    VS

    Intel Pentium Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Goldum0002 Intel Atom X5-Z8500

    VS

    Intel Core i3-2365M

    Intel Pentium G4560

    VS

    Intel Core i5-3450

    9030.

    1 User reviews

    Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    8.0 /10

    1 User reviews

    Intel Pentium G4560

    Intel 906 G002 3 User reviews

    03

    8.3 /10

    3 reviews of users

    Functions

    Price and quality ratio

    7.0

    1 Votes

    7.7 /10

    9000 3 VOTES

    Games

    /10

    1 Votes

    7. 7 /10

    3 Votes

    performance

    7.0825 /10

    1 votes

    7.0825 /10

    9000 3 Votes

    Reliability

    8.0 /10

    1 votes

    /10

    3 Votes

    Energy Equality

    10.0

    1 votes

    9000.03

    9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

    9000

    9000

    9000

    9000 9000

    Performance

    1.CPU speed

    4 x 1.4GHz

    2 x 3.5GHz

    CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

    2.processor thread

    More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

    3. speed turbo clock

    2.2GHz

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    4. Has an unlocked multiplier of

    ✖Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    ✖Intel Pentium G4560

    Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing you to get better performance in games and other applications.

    5.L2 Cache

    More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    6.L3 cache

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    More L3 scratchpad results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    7.L1 cache

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    8.core L2

    0.5MB/core

    0.25MB/core

    More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

    9. L3 core

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    1.5MB/core

    More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

    Memory

    1.RAM speed

    1600MHz

    2400MHz

    Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    25.6GB/s

    38.4GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3rd DDR memory version

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

    4.Memory channels

    More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

    5.Maximum memory

    Maximum memory (RAM).

    6.bus baud rate

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

    7.Supports memory troubleshooting code

    ✖Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    ✖Intel Pentium G4560

    The memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    8.eMMC version

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

    9.bus frequency

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

    Geotagging

    1. PassMark result

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    This benchmark measures processor performance using multithreading.

    2nd PassMark result (single)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

    3. Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

    4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

    5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

    6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

    7. Blender test result (bmw27)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

    8.Blender result (classroom)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

    9.performance per watt

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

    Functions

    1.uses multithreading

    ✖Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    ✔Intel Pentium G4560

    processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

    2. Has AES

    ✔Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    ✔Intel Pentium G4560

    AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

    3. Has AVX

    ✖Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    ✖Intel Pentium G4560

    AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

    4.Version SSE

    SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

    5. Has F16C

    ✖Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    ✖Intel Pentium G4560

    F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

    6 bits transmitted at the same time

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Atom x5-Z8500)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Pentium G4560)

    NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

    7. Has MMX

    ✔Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    ✔Intel Pentium G4560

    MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

    8. Has TrustZone

    ✖Intel Atom x5-Z8500

    ✖Intel Pentium G4560

    Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM) technology .

    2022 © All rights reserved