Pentium 4 487: MindShare — Page Not Found

MindShare — Page Not Found

Page Not Found

We are sorry, there is no mindshare.com page matching your request. The page may have been renamed, moved or is no longer available. Please verify the address you typed is spelled correctly. If you are certain that this URL is valid, please send us feedback about the broken link.

Please use the links below or our search tool at the top of the page to locate the information you need.

Training

Books/eBooks

eLearning Courses

Public Courses

Newsletters / Tech Briefs

Enter your login information below to gain access to your electronic purchases and account settings.

Email Address:

Password:

Keep me signed in
for 1 month unless I sign out.

[Uncheck if on a shared computer]


Click here to create a free MindShare account.

Enter your email address below to have your login information sent to you.

Email Address:

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz

UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz

100-100000031BOX

YouTube*NEW*

About

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 694,601 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

6,954 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 36% Base clock 3 GHz
Worst Bench: 15% Base clock 3 GHz

Poor: 15%

Great: 36%

SPEED RANK: 1274^th / 1368

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

687,647 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4. 45 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 73% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)

Poor: 73%

Great: 92%

SPEED RANK: 152^nd / 1368

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 77%

Battleship


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		29.3 %			83 %	Hugely faster effective speed. +184%


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	53.9 Pts	77. 1 Pts	Much lower memory latency. +43%
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	22.5 Pts	132 Pts	Hugely faster single-core speed. +487%
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	28.6 Pts	257 Pts	Hugely faster dual-core speed. +799%
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	29.6 Pts	478 Pts	Insanely faster quad-core speed. +1,515%
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	29.8 Pts	789 Pts	Insanely faster octa-core speed. +2,548%


Memory OC Memory Latency	68 Pts	86. 9 Pts	Lower OC memory latency. +28%
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	27 Pts	141 Pts	Hugely faster OC single-core speed. +422%
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	34.8 Pts	280 Pts	Hugely faster OC dual-core speed. +705%
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	34.6 Pts	536 Pts	Insanely faster OC quad-core speed. +1,449%
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	34.8 Pts	858 Pts	Insanely faster OC octa-core speed. +2,366%

Market Share

Based on 56,313,234 CPUs tested.

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)		0 %			1.34 %	Insanely higher market share. +∞%
User Rating UBM User Rating		51 %			92 %	Hugely more popular. +80%


Age Newest	107+ Months	39 Months	Much more recent. +64%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	34.9 Pts	1093 Pts	Insanely faster OC 64-core speed. +3,032%
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	29.4 Pts	995 Pts	Insanely faster 64-core speed. +3,284%

Not suited even for modern versions of Ubuntu. It did outperform the Athlon at the time, but only by ramping up the clock speed to housefire levels.
Good for retro games. I’ll give it credit for that. ^{[Aug ’19 Slackware]}

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-threaded processor which succeeds the Ryzen 5 2600 improving upon it by 13% in terms of overclocked performance. The 3600 is in competition with Intel’s 6-core i5-9600K. AMD continues to push the multi-core performance envelope: benchmarks show that the 3600 has a 27% overclocked 64-core lead over the 9600K but that the i5-9600K leads by 14% on single to hex core workloads which translates to 10% higher EFps in most of the today’s top games (e.g. PUBG, GTAV and CSGO). Additionally, the 3600’s memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which adversely impacts gaming. Weaknesses in memory architecture are not readily picked up by CPU benchmarks but they are apparent whilst gaming. Cheaper CPUs such as the 9400F deliver better gaming performance in nearly all of today’s popular games. At $190 USD, the 3600 offers good value for purely workstation tasks such as film production but streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The masterfully hyped Ryzen 3600 may well be the best CPU for multimedia producers on a tight budget but in today’s market there are faster and less expensive alternatives for gamers, streamers and general desktop users. ^{[Jun ’19 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

To Be Filled By O.E.M. (12)

Gbt___ AWRDACPI (11)

Gigabyte GA-G41MT-S2PT (7)

Asus P5L-MX (6)

Asrock G41M-VS3. (5)

Gigabyte GA-G41MT-S2P (5)

Gigabyte GA-G41M-Combo (4)

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (5,411)

Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (3,584)

MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86) (2,064)

Gigabyte B450M DS3H (1,841)

Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE (1,841)

MSI B450M PRO-VDH MAX (MS-7A38) (1,657)

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (1,588)

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.

Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.

Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works

— Download and run UserBenchmark.

— CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.

— GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.

— Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.

— RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.

— SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.

— Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.

— Identify the strongest components in your PC.

— See speed test results from other users.

— Compare your components to the current market leaders.

— Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.

— Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated



Intel Core i5-13600K



Intel Core i5-12400F



Intel Core i7-12700K



Intel Core i5-12600K



Intel Core i5-12400



Intel Core i9-13900K



AMD Ryzen 5 5600X



Intel Core i3-12100F



AMD Ryzen 5 3600



Intel Core i7-11700K



Intel Core i3-12100



Intel Core i5-11400F

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

Comparison of Intel Celeron B815 and Intel Pentium 4-M 2.

40
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron B815 and Intel Pentium 4-M 2.40 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.

Intel Celeron B815

versus

Intel Pentium 4-M 2.40

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Celeron B815

Newer processor, release dates difference 8 year(s) 10 month(s) 9019 more cores to run 9019 more applications at the same time: 2 vs 1

Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm vs 130 nm

L1 cache is 16 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access

Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 43% higher: 694 vs 487

Performance in the PassMark — CPU mark benchmark 3. 4 times bigger: 720 vs 213

Release date November 1, 2011 vs January 2003

Number of cores 2 vs 1

Process 32 nm vs 130 nm

Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 8 KB

PassMark — Single thread mark 694 vs 487

PassMark — CPU mark 720 vs 213

Reasons to choose Intel Pentium 4-M 2.40

About 50% more clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Celeron B815
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4-M 2. 40

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

Name Intel Celeron B815 Intel Pentium 4-M 2.40

PassMark — Single thread mark 694 487

PassMark — CPU mark 720 213

Geekbench 4 — Single Core 283

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 495

Performance comparison

Intel Celeron B815 Intel Pentium 4-M 2. 40

Architecture name Sandy Bridge
Northwood

Production date November 1, 2011 January 2003

Place in the ranking 2414 2423

Processor Number B815

Series Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor

Status Launched Discontinued

Applicability Mobile Mobile

Support 64 bit

Base frequency 1. 60 GHz 2.40 GHz

Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI 400 MHz FSB

Crystal area 131mm 131 mm2

Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) 8KB

Level 2 cache 256 KB (per core) 512KB

Level 3 cache 2048KB

Process 32nm 130nm

Maximum core temperature 100 °C 100°C

Maximum frequency 1. 6 GHz 2.4 GHz

Number of cores 2 1

Number of threads 2

Number of transistors 504 million 55 million

Maximum case temperature (TCase) 100 °C

Permissible core voltage 1.3V

Maximum number of memory channels 2

Maximum memory bandwidth 21. 3 GB/s

Maximum memory size 16GB

Supported memory types DDR3 1066/1333 DDR1, DDR2

Graphics base frequency 650MHz

Graphics max dynamic frequency 1.05GHz

Maximum GPU clock 1.05GHz

Intel® Clear Video Technology HD

Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)

Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology

Intel® Quick Sync Video

Integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics

CRT

DisplayPort

eDP

HDMI

Maximum number of monitors supported 2

SDVO

WiDi support

Low Halogen Options Available

Maximum number of processors in configuration 1 1

Package Size 37. 5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) 35mm x 35mm

Supported sockets FCPGA988 PPGA478

Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 35 Watt

Number of PCI Express lanes 16

PCI Express revision 2.0

PCIe configurations 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 2×4

Anti-Theft Technology

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)

Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)

4G WiMAX Wireless

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology

Flexible Display Interface (FDI)

Idle States

Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2

Intel 64

Intel® AES New Instructions

Intel® Demand Based Switching

Intel® Fast Memory Access

Intel® Flex Memory Access

Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology

Intel® My WiFi Technology

Intel® Turbo Boost Technology

Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility

Thermal Monitoring

Parity FSB

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Monoblock 21.

5 «1920×1080 MSI Pro 22XT 10M-487RU Intel Pentium 3.4 GHZ 4 GB 128 GB Windows 11 Pro 9S6-ACD311-487
21.5″ (1920×1080) Intel Pentium-GH6400/4 GB6400/4 GB6400/4 GB6400/4 GB/Intel UHD 610/Wi-Fi Bluetooth/Windows 11 Pro/9S6-ACD311-487

Product code:
333340

Vendor code:
9S6-ACD311-487

Model:
Pro 22XT 10M-487RU

Manufacturer:

MSI

Availability:

Archived

Options:

— MSI Pro 22XT 10M-487RU

— 21. 5″ (1920×1080) Matte

— Intel Pentium-G6400 (3.4 Ghz)

— RAM 4 GB

— SSDx128 GB

— Intel UHD 610

— Windows 11 Pro

– 12 months warranty

Last price 51 583 rubles.

Comparing to

To favorites

Specification

Analogues
2

Similar products 2

Code: 330898
SKU: 9S6-AE0311-279

Monoblock 23.