MindShare — Page Not Found
MindShare — Page Not Found
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 694,601 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
6,954 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 36% Base clock 3 GHz
Worst Bench: 15% Base clock 3 GHz
SPEED RANK: 1274th / 1368
687,647 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4. 45 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 73% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
SPEED RANK: 152nd / 1368
| Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
|29.3 %||83 %||Hugely faster effective speed.
Avg. Memory Latency
|53.9 Pts||77. 1 Pts||Much lower memory latency.
Avg. Single Core Speed
|22.5 Pts||132 Pts||Hugely faster single-core speed.
Avg. Dual Core Speed
|28.6 Pts||257 Pts||Hugely faster dual-core speed.
Avg. Quad Core Speed
|29.6 Pts||478 Pts||Insanely faster quad-core speed.
Avg. Octa Core Speed
|29.8 Pts||789 Pts||Insanely faster octa-core speed.
OC Memory Latency
|68 Pts||86. 9 Pts||Lower OC memory latency.
OC Single Core Speed
|27 Pts||141 Pts||Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
OC Dual Core Speed
|34.8 Pts||280 Pts||Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
OC Quad Core Speed
|34.6 Pts||536 Pts||Insanely faster OC quad-core speed.
OC Octa Core Speed
|34.8 Pts||858 Pts||Insanely faster OC octa-core speed.
Based on 56,313,234 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
|0 %||1.34 %||Insanely higher market share.
| User Rating
UBM User Rating
|51 %||92 %||Hugely more popular.
|107+ Months||39 Months||Much more recent.
OC Multi Core Speed
|34.9 Pts||1093 Pts||Insanely faster OC 64-core speed.
Avg. Multi Core Speed
|29.4 Pts||995 Pts||Insanely faster 64-core speed.
Not suited even for modern versions of Ubuntu. It did outperform the Athlon at the time, but only by ramping up the clock speed to housefire levels.
Good for retro games. I’ll give it credit for that. [Aug ’19 Slackware]
AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-threaded processor which succeeds the Ryzen 5 2600 improving upon it by 13% in terms of overclocked performance. The 3600 is in competition with Intel’s 6-core i5-9600K. AMD continues to push the multi-core performance envelope: benchmarks show that the 3600 has a 27% overclocked 64-core lead over the 9600K but that the i5-9600K leads by 14% on single to hex core workloads which translates to 10% higher EFps in most of the today’s top games (e.g. PUBG, GTAV and CSGO). Additionally, the 3600’s memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which adversely impacts gaming. Weaknesses in memory architecture are not readily picked up by CPU benchmarks but they are apparent whilst gaming. Cheaper CPUs such as the 9400F deliver better gaming performance in nearly all of today’s popular games. At $190 USD, the 3600 offers good value for purely workstation tasks such as film production but streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The masterfully hyped Ryzen 3600 may well be the best CPU for multimedia producers on a tight budget but in today’s market there are faster and less expensive alternatives for gamers, streamers and general desktop users. [Jun ’19 CPUPro]
Systems with these CPUs
Top Builds that include these CPUs
- To Be Filled By O.E.M. (12)
- Gbt___ AWRDACPI (11)
- Gigabyte GA-G41MT-S2PT (7)
- Asus P5L-MX (6)
- Asrock G41M-VS3. (5)
- Gigabyte GA-G41MT-S2P (5)
- Gigabyte GA-G41M-Combo (4)
- MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (5,411)
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (3,584)
- MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86) (2,064)
- Gigabyte B450M DS3H (1,841)
- Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE (1,841)
- MSI B450M PRO-VDH MAX (MS-7A38) (1,657)
- Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (1,588)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
Intel Core i5-13600K
Intel Core i5-12400F
Intel Core i7-12700K
Intel Core i5-12600K
Intel Core i5-12400
Intel Core i9-13900K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-11700K
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Comparison of Intel Celeron B815 and Intel Pentium 4-M 2.
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron B815 and Intel Pentium 4-M 2.40 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
Intel Celeron B815
Intel Pentium 4-M 2.40
Reasons to choose Intel Celeron B815
- Newer processor, release dates difference 8 year(s) 10 month(s) 9019 more cores to run 9019 more applications at the same time: 2 vs 1
- Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm vs 130 nm
- L1 cache is 16 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 43% higher: 694 vs 487
- Performance in the PassMark — CPU mark benchmark 3. 4 times bigger: 720 vs 213
|Release date||November 1, 2011 vs January 2003|
|Number of cores||2 vs 1|
|Process||32 nm vs 130 nm|
|Level 1 cache||64 KB (per core) vs 8 KB|
|PassMark — Single thread mark||694 vs 487|
|PassMark — CPU mark||720 vs 213|
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium 4-M 2.40
- About 50% more clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
CPU 1: Intel Celeron B815
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4-M 2. 40
PassMark — Single thread mark CPU 1 CPU 2 PassMark — CPU mark CPU 1 CPU 2 Name Intel Celeron B815 Intel Pentium 4-M 2.40 PassMark — Single thread mark 694 487 PassMark — CPU mark 720 213 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 283 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 495
Intel Celeron B815 Intel Pentium 4-M 2. 40 Architecture name Sandy Bridge Northwood Production date November 1, 2011 January 2003 Place in the ranking 2414 2423 Processor Number B815 Series Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor Status Launched Discontinued Applicability Mobile Mobile Support 64 bit Base frequency 1. 60 GHz 2.40 GHz Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI 400 MHz FSB Crystal area 131mm 131 mm2 Level 1 cache 64 KB (per core) 8KB Level 2 cache 256 KB (per core) 512KB Level 3 cache 2048KB Process 32nm 130nm Maximum core temperature 100 °C 100°C Maximum frequency 1. 6 GHz 2.4 GHz Number of cores 2 1 Number of threads 2 Number of transistors 504 million 55 million Maximum case temperature (TCase) 100 °C Permissible core voltage 1.3V Maximum number of memory channels 2 Maximum memory bandwidth 21. 3 GB/s Maximum memory size 16GB Supported memory types DDR3 1066/1333 DDR1, DDR2 Graphics base frequency 650MHz Graphics max dynamic frequency 1.05GHz Maximum GPU clock 1.05GHz Intel® Clear Video Technology HD Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology Intel® Quick Sync Video Integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics CRT DisplayPort eDP HDMI Maximum number of monitors supported 2 SDVO WiDi support Low Halogen Options Available Maximum number of processors in configuration 1 1 Package Size 37. 5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) 35mm x 35mm Supported sockets FCPGA988 PPGA478 Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 35 Watt Number of PCI Express lanes 16 PCI Express revision 2.0 PCIe configurations 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 2×4 Anti-Theft Technology Execute Disable Bit (EDB) Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) 4G WiMAX Wireless Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology Flexible Display Interface (FDI) Idle States Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2 Intel 64 Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Demand Based Switching Intel® Fast Memory Access Intel® Flex Memory Access Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology Intel® My WiFi Technology Intel® Turbo Boost Technology Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility Thermal Monitoring Parity FSB Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
5 «1920×1080 MSI Pro 22XT 10M-487RU Intel Pentium 3.4 GHZ 4 GB 128 GB Windows 11 Pro 9S6-ACD311-487
21.5″ (1920×1080) Intel Pentium-GH6400/4 GB6400/4 GB6400/4 GB6400/4 GB/Intel UHD 610/Wi-Fi Bluetooth/Windows 11 Pro/9S6-ACD311-487
Pro 22XT 10M-487RU
- — MSI Pro 22XT 10M-487RU
- — 21. 5″ (1920×1080) Matte
- — Intel Pentium-G6400 (3.4 Ghz)
- — RAM 4 GB
- — SSDx128 GB
- — Intel UHD 610
- — Windows 11 Pro
- – 12 months warranty
Last price 51 583 rubles.
Similar products 2
- Product code: