Intel Pentium 4 vs Intel Core i7-920
|
|
|
Intel Pentium 4 vs Intel Core i7-920
Compare the technical characteristics between the group of processors Intel Pentium 4 and the processor Intel Core i7-920, but also with the respective performance in the benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Intel Pentium 4 650 | 2005 Q1 | 90 nm | 1 | 2 | 3. 4 | 3.4 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 84 | 66.6 | 74 | 136 | 60 | 50 | 677 | 304 | 1045 | 1094 | 254 | 299 | ||||||||
Intel Pentium 4 631 | 2006 Q1 | 65 nm | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 86 | 64. 1 | 69 | 137 | 58 | 48 | 956 | 833 | 989 | 1110 | 154 | 190 | ||||||||
Intel Core i7-920 | 2008 Q4 | 45 nm | 4 | 8 | 2.66 | 2.93 | 8 | 24 | 16 | 130 | 67.9 | 369 | 1978 | 108 | 558 | 549 | 2872 | 1209 | 2698 | 2536 | 8528 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
This comparative table allows us to better appreciate the differences between the various processors. The performance for Geekbench 4 single-core and multi-core are established by default on the Windows operating system, on Linux if there is at least one server processor present in the comparison, on Mac OS X if we make a parallel with at least one Apple branded processor on Linux and Android if a smartphone processor other than Apple is present. Each time, in 64-bit version.
Performances:
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-920 |
369 1. 978 |
Intel Pentium 4 631 |
69 137 |
Intel Pentium 4 650 |
74 136 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-920 |
108 558 |
Intel Pentium 4 650 |
60 50 |
Intel Pentium 4 631 |
58 48 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-920 |
549 2.872 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-920 |
1.209 2.698 |
Intel Pentium 4 631 |
956 833 |
Intel Pentium 4 650 |
677 304 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-920 |
2.536 8.528 |
Intel Pentium 4 631 |
989 1.110 |
Intel Pentium 4 650 |
1.045 1.094 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score | |
---|---|
Intel Pentium 4 650 |
254 299 |
Intel Pentium 4 631 |
154 190 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i7-920 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Pentium GoldIntel Pentium IIIntel Pentium IIIIntel Pentium Silver
Intel Pentium D 820/915/920 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games
2 | 2 | 2.8 GHz |
Cores | Threads | Base Frequency |
---|
Geekbench 5 Single-Core
194
6%
Geekbench 5 Multi-Core
346
0%
Availability
No items available
Graphics Card
Resolution
Select game resolution
Graphics Settings
Select game graphics
Offset
. ..
Apply Offset
Value Rating
Performance Rating
Value per FPS
You will receive
… FPS
169
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
297
FPS
VALORANT
945
FPS
Minecraft
701
FPS
League of Legends
179
FPS
Apex Legends
184
FPS
Fortnite
Alternatives for Pentium D 820/915/920
1080p, High
No alternatives — this is the best option
Specifications
General | |
---|---|
Release Date | Unknown |
Socket | Socket 775 LGA |
Codename | Presler, SmithField |
Performance | |
---|---|
Cores | 2 |
Threads | 2 |
Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
Other | |
---|---|
Power Consumption | 95 W |
Overclockable | No |
Integrated Graphics | None |
Find out which of the 2 CPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.
Ryzen 5 5600X
$193.91
Pentium D 820/915/920
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 5800X
Pentium D 820/915/920
N/A Stock
Core i9-12900K
$562.38
Pentium D 820/915/920
N/A Stock
Core i9-9900K
Pentium D 820/915/920
N/A Stock
Core i5-10400F
Pentium D 820/915/920
N/A Stock
Ryzen 5 3600
$137.99
Pentium D 820/915/920
N/A Stock
Refine results to filter 1558 processors by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a CPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.
Found 1558 CPUs.
Popularity
Processor
Performance
Ryzen 5 5600X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$193.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$387. 99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5800X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$269 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 5600G
Release Date: Apr 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
$151.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 3600
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$137.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-12600K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$277.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-10700K
Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020
Performance Rating
$259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5700G
Release Date: Apr 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
$235.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-11900K
Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021
Performance Rating
$331.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-12900K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$562. 38 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-12700K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 5950X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$569.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-12700KF
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$379.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-11700K
Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021
Performance Rating
$285.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 3700X
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$260 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-11600K
Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021
Performance Rating
$179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 3900X
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$345 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-11700KF
Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021
Performance Rating
$255. 99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-10400
Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020
Performance Rating
$159 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-10900K
Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020
Performance Rating
$349 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-12900KF
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$534.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-10400F
Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020
Performance Rating
$107 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 3 3200G
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$134.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 3800X
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$257.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-10600K
Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020
Performance Rating
$229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- . ..
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next
Intel® Pentium® D 920 / Intel® Pentium® 4 650
techkill
Posts: 13 +0
-
-
#1
Intel® Pentium® D 920 / Intel® Pentium® 4 650 which should I buy if I want to game on it?….i honestly not sure…………….
I would appresiate some help
and i’m kinda new
kodrutz
Posts: 108 +1
-
-
#2
Try an AMD 64 with Venice core, it’ll worth every penny!
techkill
Posts: 13 +0
-
-
#3
I can t it isnt a selfbuild an these are my choises
LipsOfVenom
Posts: 160 +0
-
-
#4
in most benchmarks it is shown that single cores will usually play games better than dual core price equivalents. However, most of the tests used games coded around single processors so the 2 CPU’s are not utilized. In the future, many articles have speculated that companies will build games that can maximize the efficiency of 2 cores. So I would recommend the 920.
techkill
Posts: 13 +0
-
-
#5
which cpu should I choose?……ndd some serius help
these are the choises I stand before:
Intel Pentium 4 650
Intel Pentium D 820
Intel® Pentium® D 920
i’m a gamer and I would like to get the best output in games!
thanx :wave: :grinthumb
LipsOfVenom
Posts: 160 +0
-
-
#6
go for the 920!! new games in the future will be coded to utilize dual core platforms so u can get a step ahead. At the moment, the 650 will perform better on current games than the 820. But hey, dual cores are still good. the 920 is only $266 at newegg i think
JMMD
Posts: 840 +7
-
-
#7
I would go with a cheaper CPU and a better video card. Which video card are you planning on running with this CPU?
techkill
Posts: 13 +0
-
-
#8
im planning on using a geforce 6800
2 gs of ddr 2
swker98
Posts: 1,054 +0
-
-
#9
its ovoius go with the Pentuim 920, 65nm 4mb of L2 cache, go for it
Specs HP Intel Pentium D 920 processor 2.
8 GHz 4 MB L3 Processors (410612-001)
This is a demo of a seamless insert of an Icecat LIVE product data-sheet in your website. Imagine that this responsive data-sheet is included in the product page of your webshop. How to integrate Icecat LIVE JavaScript.
Intel® Pentium®
Embed the product datasheet into your content
Icecat LIVE: JS for HP 410612-001
Icecat Live DOC
CSV product data for HP 410612-001
CSV DOC
Download images pack
Icecat Add-ons
Download the free Open Icecat data-sheets
Download the Icecat taxonomy for »Processors»
Icecat PDF
Long product name HP Intel Pentium D 920 processor 2. 8 GHz 4 MB L3
:
The short editorial description of HP Intel Pentium D 920 processor 2.8 GHz 4 MB L3
Intel Pentium D 920, 4M Cache, 2.8 GHz, 800 MHz FSB, Ref
More>>>
HP Intel Pentium D 920 processor 2.8 GHz 4 MB L3:
The official marketing text of HP Intel Pentium D 920 processor 2.8 GHz 4 MB L3 as supplied by the manufacturer
Options, accessories, services and support for all your HP and Compaq products.
Short summary description HP Intel Pentium D 920 processor 2.8 GHz 4 MB L3:
This short summary of the HP Intel Pentium D 920 processor 2. 8 GHz 4 MB L3 data-sheet is auto-generated and uses the product title and the first six key specs.
HP Intel Pentium D 920, Intel® Pentium® D, LGA 775 (Socket T), 65 nm, 2.8 GHz, 64-bit, 4 MB
Long summary description HP Intel Pentium D 920 processor 2.8 GHz 4 MB L3:
This is an auto-generated long summary of HP Intel Pentium D 920 processor 2.8 GHz 4 MB L3 based on the first three specs of the first five spec groups.
HP Intel Pentium D 920. Processor family: Intel® Pentium® D, Processor socket: LGA 775 (Socket T), Processor lithography: 65 nm. Number of Processing Die Transistors: 376 M, Processing Die size: 162 mm²
Embed the product datasheet into your content
Icecat LIVE: JS for HP 410612-001
Icecat Live DOC
CSV product data for HP 410612-001
CSV DOC
Download images pack
Icecat Add-ons
Download the free Open Icecat data-sheets
Download the Icecat taxonomy for »Processors»
Report mistake
EN Access to this product is restricted. Please contact your account manager at Icecat.
Specs
Reviews
Distributors
Specs
Processor
Processor model
*
920
Processor base frequency
*
2.8 GHz
Processor family
*
Intel® Pentium® D
Processor cores
*
2
Processor socket
*
LGA 775 (Socket T)
Processor lithography
*
65 nm
Processor operating modes
*
64-bit
Processor cache
4 MB
Processor cache type
L3
Processor front side bus
800 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 W
VID Voltage Range
1. 200 — 1.3375 V
FSB Parity
Graphics
On-board graphics card
*
Features
Execute Disable Bit
Idle States
Thermal Monitoring Technologies
Features
Number of Processing Die Transistors
376 M
Processing Die size
162 mm²
Embedded options available
Processor special features
Improved Performance for Threaded Software
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology (Intel® HT Technology) makes efficient use of processor resources, enabling multiple threads to run on each core and increasing processor throughput. Available on Intel® Core™ and Intel® Xeon® processors, Intel HT Technology helps run demanding applications simultaneously, protect and manage systems, and provide headroom for business growth.»>Intel® Hyper Threading Technology (Intel® HT Technology)
Higher Performance When You Need It Most
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology 2. 0 accelerates processor and graphics performance by increasing the operating frequency when operating below specification limits. The maximum frequency varies depending on workload, hardware, software, and overall system configuration.»>Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Added Security with Faster Data Encryption
The Intel® Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (Intel® AES-NI) enable fast and secure data encryption and decryption for better performance and less risk from timing and cache-based attacks than table-based software implementations. Intel AES-NI supports usages such as standard key lengths, standard modes of operation, and even some nonstandard or future variants.»>Intel® AES New Instructions (Intel® AES-NI)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology
Intel Trusted Execution Technology
Intel Demand Based Switching
Operational conditions
Tcase
63.4 °C
Other features
Simplify Virtualization and Reduce Overheads
Intel® Virtualization Technology (Intel® VT) helps make virtualization practical by eliminating performance overheads, reducing complexity, and improving security with hardware assistance. Virtualization allows multiple workloads to share a common set of resources so that a variety of workloads can co-locate while maintaining full isolation from each other.»>Intel® Virtualization Technology (Intel® VT)
Reviews
Source | Testseek summary | Average rating |
---|---|---|
Updated: |
Uk has collected 2 expert reviews for HP Intel Pentium D 920 processor 2.8 GHz 4 MB L3 and the average expert rating is 82 of 100. The average score reflects the expert community’s view on this product. Click below and use Uk to see all ratings, product awards and conclusions. Read the full review |
Source | Review comments | Score |
---|---|---|
Behardware.com Updated: |
Dealing with current news means that we rarely have the opportunity to review old products and of course a comparison between the most recent products and those that came out several years ago can get a little problematic. But we’ve decided to push th… |
|
pcstats.com Updated: |
Built on Intels 65 nanometer manufacturing process and with two physical processing cores running at 3.2 GHz each, backed up by 2MB of L2 cache, the socket 775 chip certainly makes quite a splash. |
Distributors
1
Country | Distributor |
---|---|
1 distributor(s) | |
2 distributor(s) |
Login
or Register as new user (free)
if you want to see more distributor details .
If you represent a supplier and want to include your information here, please contact us.
what new pc? Pentium 4 650 or INTEL VIIV PENTIUM D 920
sninky
-
-
#1
im looking to get a new computer through work (has to be pc world) and
im not sure which of these twos sytems to go for?
The advent one has 4/650 processor, twice as much ram 2048mb and
appears to have higher clock speed 3.4 ghz the rest is almoast
identical
the Packard bell has INTEL VIIV PENTIUM D 920 only 1024mb ram and a
clock speed of 2. 8 ghz
they are both the smae price so im unsure which is the best buy is it
worth going for processor or ram???
im aware that Ghz clock speeds do not always indicate which will be
fastest
thanks
sninky
p.s
these are the computers im looking at
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…-15245&page=Product&sku=085705&fm=0&sm=0&tm=1
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…-15245&page=Product&sku=488717&fm=0&sm=0&tm=1
Advertisements
Tony Hill
-
-
#2
im looking to get a new computer through work (has to be pc world) and
im not sure which of these twos sytems to go for?The advent one has 4/650 processor, twice as much ram 2048mb and
appears to have higher clock speed 3. 4 ghz the rest is almoast
identicalthe Packard bell has INTEL VIIV PENTIUM D 920 only 1024mb ram and a
clock speed of 2.8 ghzthey are both the smae price so im unsure which is the best buy is it
worth going for processor or ram???im aware that Ghz clock speeds do not always indicate which will be
fastestthanks
sninkyp.s
these are the computers im looking athttp://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…-15245&page=Product&sku=085705&fm=0&sm=0&tm=1
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…-15245&page=Product&sku=488717&fm=0&sm=0&tm=1
Click to expand…
Hmm.. it’s unfortunately that you’re limited to only what PC World has
to offer, because their selection seems rather.. umm.. weak.
First off, I wouldn’t touch a Packard Hell computer with a 10-foot
pole. They were driven out of business in the height of the PC boom
for good reason, they made just abysmally bad products. Now they are
really just a model name for NEC computers, but I used one a few years
back and it was STILL terrible.
The downside to this is that the ONLY dual-core systems offered by PC
World are Packard Bell «VIIV» systems (note: VIIV = 100% marketing, 0%
technology).
Ordinarily the choice would be fairly easy. For games you would want
the fastest and best AMD Athlon64 (single-core) system you could
afford, while for everything else you would go for the fastest AMD
Athlon64 X2 (dual-core) system you could afford. Nice an easy because
you can rule out all the Intel systems which are BADLY outclassed by
AMD’s processors these days. Sadly though, the only AMD-based systems
that PC World seems to be selling are some bargain-basement Compaq
Pre-scary-Os.
Soo.. umm.. what to get? Well that depends a bit on what you’re going
to use the computer for. The Pentium-D 920 chip is a dual-core chip
(two processors in one package), which will make the PC more
responsive and allow it to multitask better. This is probably a
better choice for «standard» computer use, ie web browsing, office
applications, watching movies, playing songs and the occasional game.
The Pentium 650 is a single-core chip but at a higher clock speed. It
will be faster for doing one single task at a time, in particular, for
games. If there was a halfway decent make of Pentium-D based system I
would definitely recommend that over the Pentium4 based system for
most people, but as mentioned above, at PC World you’re limited to
Packard Hell systems. If you want to take a chance on their quality
having improved in the past 3 years, then it might be an option, but
it wouldn’t be my choice.
Out of all the systems listed on PC World’s web site, this would be my
personal pick:
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…fm=0&sm=0&tm=1&sku=568874&category_oid=-15245
Eerr.. hope that URL makes it through without too much corruption.
Otherwise it’s the Fujitsu Siemans 3801XP with 19″ LCD. Basically the
same specs as the «Advent» system you linked above, but from Fujitsu
who are supposed to have a pretty decent reputation (haven’t used ’em
much myself since they mainly only sell in Europe).
Student
-
-
#3
im looking to get a new computer through work (has to be pc world) and
im not sure which of these twos sytems to go for?The advent one has 4/650 processor, twice as much ram 2048mb and
appears to have higher clock speed 3.4 ghz the rest is almoast
identicalthe Packard bell has INTEL VIIV PENTIUM D 920 only 1024mb ram and a
clock speed of 2. 8 ghzthey are both the smae price so im unsure which is the best buy is it
worth going for processor or ram???im aware that Ghz clock speeds do not always indicate which will be
fastestthanks
sninkyp.s
these are the computers im looking athttp://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…-15245&page=Product&sku=085705&fm=0&sm=0&tm=1
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…-15245&page=Product&sku=488717&fm=0&sm=0&tm=1
Click to expand…
As far as CPU performance goes I’d start by comparing the difference of
the single core 650 3.4GHz versus the dual-core 920 2.8GHz. Dual core
isn’t for everyone, sort of depends what you want to mainly do with the
PC. I have an AMD 2.2GHz dual core and loving it.
1GB is OK, but 2GB will make it run smoother unless you never use that
much ram anyway (see Task Manager/Performance/Commit Charge/Peak) then
more ram won’t make much difference, it’s only when the PC has to use
the (virtual memory) hard drive (swap file) it slows things down
considerably.
Student,
just some links to reviews I’ve looked at in the past….
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051121/index.html
http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/processorsmemory/0,39024015,39233885,00.htm
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/28cpu-games.html
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1860533,00.asp
http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content.asp?id=a64x2&page=1
http://pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,122236,00.asp
http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=723
Student
-
-
#4
im looking to get a new computer through work (has to be pc world) and
im not sure which of these twos sytems to go for?The advent one has 4/650 processor, twice as much ram 2048mb and
appears to have higher clock speed 3. 4 ghz the rest is almoast
identicalthe Packard bell has INTEL VIIV PENTIUM D 920 only 1024mb ram and a
clock speed of 2.8 ghzthey are both the smae price so im unsure which is the best buy is it
worth going for processor or ram???im aware that Ghz clock speeds do not always indicate which will be
fastestthanks
sninkyp.s
these are the computers im looking athttp://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…-15245&page=Product&sku=085705&fm=0&sm=0&tm=1
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…-15245&page=Product&sku=488717&fm=0&sm=0&tm=1
Click to expand…
As far as CPU performance goes I’d start by comparing the difference of
the single core 650 3.4GHz versus the dual-core 920 2.8GHz. Dual core
isn’t for everyone, sort of depends what you want to mainly do with the
PC and Intel’s 2.8GHz dual core isn’t all that impressive IMHO.
1GB is OK, but 2GB will make it run smoother unless you never use that
much ram anyway (see Task Manager/Performance/Commit Charge/Peak) then
more ram won’t make much difference, it’s only when the PC has to use
the (virtual memory) hard drive (swap file) it slows things down
considerably.
Student,
just some links to reviews I’ve looked at before I built my last PC.
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051121/index.html
http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/processorsmemory/0,39024015,39233885,00.htm
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/28cpu-games.html
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1860533,00.asp
http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content.asp?id=a64x2&page=1
http://pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,122236,00.asp
http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=723
nobody
-
-
#5
Hmm. . it’s unfortunately that you’re limited to only what PC World has
to offer, because their selection seems rather.. umm.. weak.First off, I wouldn’t touch a Packard Hell computer with a 10-foot
pole. They were driven out of business in the height of the PC boom
for good reason, they made just abysmally bad products. Now they are
really just a model name for NEC computers, but I used one a few years
back and it was STILL terrible.The downside to this is that the ONLY dual-core systems offered by PC
World are Packard Bell «VIIV» systems (note: VIIV = 100% marketing, 0%
technology).Ordinarily the choice would be fairly easy. For games you would want
the fastest and best AMD Athlon64 (single-core) system you could
afford, while for everything else you would go for the fastest AMD
Athlon64 X2 (dual-core) system you could afford. Nice an easy because
you can rule out all the Intel systems which are BADLY outclassed by
AMD’s processors these days. Sadly though, the only AMD-based systems
that PC World seems to be selling are some bargain-basement Compaq
Pre-scary-Os.Soo.. umm.. what to get? Well that depends a bit on what you’re going
to use the computer for. The Pentium-D 920 chip is a dual-core chip
(two processors in one package), which will make the PC more
responsive and allow it to multitask better. This is probably a
better choice for «standard» computer use, ie web browsing, office
applications, watching movies, playing songs and the occasional game.
The Pentium 650 is a single-core chip but at a higher clock speed. It
will be faster for doing one single task at a time, in particular, for
games. If there was a halfway decent make of Pentium-D based system I
would definitely recommend that over the Pentium4 based system for
most people, but as mentioned above, at PC World you’re limited to
Packard Hell systems. If you want to take a chance on their quality
having improved in the past 3 years, then it might be an option, but
it wouldn’t be my choice.Out of all the systems listed on PC World’s web site, this would be my
personal pick:http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…fm=0&sm=0&tm=1&sku=568874&category_oid=-15245
Eerr.. hope that URL makes it through without too much corruption.
Otherwise it’s the Fujitsu Siemans 3801XP with 19″ LCD. Basically the
same specs as the «Advent» system you linked above, but from Fujitsu
who are supposed to have a pretty decent reputation (haven’t used ’em
much myself since they mainly only sell in Europe).Click to expand…
Try this one:
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…fm=0&sm=0&tm=1&sku=252538&category_oid=-15245
COMPAQ SR1639 AMD ATHLON 64 3700+ PROCESSOR + 19″ TFT FLAT PANEL
MONITOR
Features for this COMPAQ SR1639
— 1024Mb DDR RAM
— 320Gb Hard Disk Drive
— Multi-Format Dual Layer DVD-RW Drive
— 256Mb NVidia 6200 + TurboCache Graphics
— 9-In-1 Media Card Reader
— 7 USB connections
— Microsoft Works 8. 0 Software
— Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
— 19″ TFT Flat Panel Monitor
Just dump XP home/MS Works and install XP pro/Office. The rest of the
spec looks OK. A64 3700 will run circles around P4 3.4GHz.
The only advantage of P4-based system would be in case your boss is
skimpy on heating — it doubles as a space heater. OTOH, in the summer
you’ll need stronger air conditioner to cool down your office 😉
NNN
chrisv
-
-
#6
Student said:
1GB is OK, but 2GB will make it run smoother unless you never use that
much ram anyway (see Task Manager/Performance/Commit Charge/Peak) then
more ram won’t make much difference, it’s only when the PC has to use
the (virtual memory) hard drive (swap file) it slows things down
considerably.Click to expand…
I’d say 1G RAM is plenty for 99% of users…
Advertisements
sninky
-
-
#7
thanks
im more confused now than ever but all advice is helpfull
thanks again
Mark Whitlock
-
-
#8
sninky said:
thanks
im more confused now than ever but all advice is helpfull
thanks againClick to expand. ..
The answers would have been more succinct if you would
have added ‘I intend to use this for ‘ ;
blank Operating system
blank game or blank Application program
sincerely,
Mark Whitlock
Tony Hill
-
-
#9
Try this one:
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/st…fm=0&sm=0&tm=1&sku=252538&category_oid=-15245
COMPAQ SR1639 AMD ATHLON 64 3700+ PROCESSOR + 19″ TFT FLAT PANEL
MONITOR
Features for this COMPAQ SR1639— 1024Mb DDR RAM
— 320Gb Hard Disk Drive
— Multi-Format Dual Layer DVD-RW Drive
— 256Mb NVidia 6200 + TurboCache Graphics
— 9-In-1 Media Card Reader
— 7 USB connections
— Microsoft Works 8. 0 Software
— Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
— 19″ TFT Flat Panel MonitorJust dump XP home/MS Works and install XP pro/Office. The rest of the
spec looks OK. A64 3700 will run circles around P4 3.4GHz.Click to expand…
For many (most?) non-gaming applications it would indeed run circles
around the P4 650. However for most non-gaming applications I would
tend to prefer a dual-core solution. I think the improved
responsiveness of a dual-core system would be of a much greater
benefit than the smallish increase in raw processing speed.
For gaming though this Athlon system would get blown out of the water
by the P4 system mentioned above. Why you ask? Because it’s using a
GeForce 6200 Turbocache video card vs. the ATI x600 card in the P4.
The difference in video cards would be VERY substantial in games (and
most other 3D stuff), resulting in the Intel/x600 system offering 2 to
3 times the performance of the AMD/6200-TC system.
Besides, I’d be a bit leery of a new OEM system using a Socket 754
Athlon64. These are definitely yesterday’s technology.
Advertisements
sninky
-
-
#10
thanks everyone
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You’ll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Ask a Question
Still stuck on new pc Athlon vs pentium+graphics card | 2 | |
vista home premium upgrade or the other one | 2 | |
Bfg 260 | 11 | |
New Compaw Laptop — Can Someone Explain The Difference | 16 | |
Which of these two PC’s is best? | 9 | |
Advice pre-built Quad or Duo FSB 1333 or 1088 | 7 | |
Advent T9610 or PHILIPS HEPC 7501/05?? | 14 | |
buying computer from high street store . . | 4 |
Share:
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
The Pentium: An Architectural History of the World’s Most Famous Desktop Processor (Part II)
Introduction
Back when the P4 first came out, there was quite a bit of negativity toward the new design in the hardware enthusiast community. Initial benchmarks showed that its performance was clearly clock-for-clock worse than that of the P-III, which was to be expected given its much longer pipeline.
Poor benchmark performance aside, there were also quite a few technical criticisms of its radical new design, leveled with varying degrees of validity by everyone from programmers to technology pundits.
Perhaps the most common gripe about the Pentium 4’s microarchitecture, called Netburst by Intel, was that its staggeringly-long pipeline was a gimmick ? a poor design choice made for reasons of marketing and not performance and scalability. Intel knew that the public naively equated higher MHz numbers with higher performance, or so the argument went, so they designed the P4 to run at stratospheric clock speeds and in the process made design tradeoffs that would prove detrimental to real-world performance.
I was one of the original dissenters from this school of thought, and in my P4 vs. the G4e series I tried to make a plausible technical case for why the P4’s designers had made some of the design decisions that they did. I ultimately managed to convince myself and not a few others that the P4’s deeply pipelined design was, in fact, performance-driven and not marketing-driven.
That was then, and this is now. As it turns out, the P4 bashers were right. Revelations from former members of the P4’s design team, as well as my own off-the-record conversations with Intel folks, all indicate that the P4’s design was the result of a marketing-driven focus on clock speeds at the expense of actual performance and scalability.
It’s my understanding that this fact is pretty widely known within Intel, even though it’s not publicly acknowledged. Furthermore, the P4’s focus on megahertz has made it especially vulnerable to the industry-wide problems that have accompanied the 90nm transition, with the result that the new P4 probably won’t scale very well at all in terms of both clock speed and performance. But I’m not going to say any more about the 90nm P4 problems, because I’ve addressed those elsewhere.
Advertisement
We now know that that during the course of the P4’s design, the design team was getting pressure from the marketing folks to turn out a chip that would give Intel a massive MHz lead over its rivals. The reasoning apparently went that MHz is a single number that the general public understands, and they know that, just like with everything in the world except for golf scores, higher numbers are somehow better.
In the present article, which is the conclusion of my architectural history of the Pentium line, we’ll take a look at the P4’s Netburst architecture and at the sacrifices that Intel made at the altar of MHz. We’ll then look at the relatively new Pentium M, before finishing off with a look at Prescott. If you didn’t catch the previous article, be sure to read it first.
The Pentium 4
Pentium 4 summary table
Introduction date: April 23, 2001
Process: 0.18 micron
Transistor Count: 42 million
Clock speed at introduction: 1.7GHz
Cache sizes: L1: ~16K instruction,16K data
Features: hyperthreading added in 2002
I’m not going to give a breakdown of the P4’s massive 20-stage basic pipeline, because I’ve done that elsewhere, but I will make a few general remarks about the ways in which it differs from that of the P6 core. I’ll also cover one of P4’s most radical innovations: the trace cache.
The P4’s basic approach
The Pentium 4’s designers took the P6’s 12-stage pipeline and sliced it up into finer increments. Each stage does much less work, but this allows the processor to run faster. In this way, the P4 translates clock speed directly into performance, which is one way to take advantage of Moore’s Curves.
Actually, let me unpack the previous statement a bit to show you what I mean. The following scenario is a bit oversimplified, but it gets the basic point across.
Let’s say that each stage of a 20-stage processor does half the amount of work per clock cycle as each stage of a 10-stage processor. So the 20-stage processor takes two clock cycles to do what the 10-stage processor does in one. This means that the 20-stage processor has to run twice as fast as the 10-stage processor if it wants to do the same amount of work in the same amount of time. Why would you do things this way? Well, if people want to buy processors with higher clock speeds, then why not? Besides, as transistors shrink you can switch them faster, which means that you can continue to scale the clock speed of the processor as your manufacturing process improves. So to adapt the familiar dot-com business plan parody, we might say that Intel’s reasoning went something like:
Advertisement
- process improvements
- clock speed increases
- profit!!!!
This plan works pretty well until the clock speed increases start to run out of gas… but let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
If you read my article on Moore’s Law (the principle that I now call «Moore’s Curves») then you understand that there’s more than one way to take advantage of shrinking transistor sizes and other types of process improvements. Increasing clock speeds a la the P4 is one of them, but adding functionality is another. Instead of translating process improvements into clock speed increases, the P4’s competitors (e.g., AMD’s Athlon) decided to turn them into performance-enhancing hardware. Adding functionality in the form of execution hardware, branch prediction hardware, cache, etc. is another way to turn process improvements into performance.
Actually, both the P4 and the Athlon do a little bit of both: they add hardware and they increase their clock speed. The difference between the two designs is a matter of emphasis, with Intel emphasizing clock speed increases and AMD emphasizing hardware increases.
Unfortunately for AMD there’s no single magic number that sums up «performance as derived from various and sundry hardware improvements.» This didn’t stop AMD from trying to invent such a number, though. AMD debuted its performance rating system to mixed reviews from the tech community, but the company has stuck with the system and while its positive effects may be debatable it doesn’t seem to have done them any real harm. In fact, Intel is now adopting an analogous system for similar reasons, but more on that later.
Comparison of Intel Pentium 4 2.2 vs Intel Pentium D 920
Intel Pentium 4 2. 2 | Intel Pentium D 920 900 |
---|---|
Both processors from Intel | Two Processors Belibed by the Pentium | 9000 9001 |
Both CPU models belong to the table segment | |
Both processors have 2 streams |
9000 9001 4 2.2 is called Northwood
0 data on Intel Pentium system tire 4 2.2 — 400 MHZ FSB
9000 — 800 MHZ FSB FSB
9000 2. 2 significantly lags behind in the number of cores, 1 vs. 2
Comparison of instructions and technologies
Energy saving technologies
Technology or instruction name | Intel Pentium 4 2.2 | Intel Pentium D 920 | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep) | — | Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology. | |
Stop Grant state | Energy saving status. | ||
Sleep state | — | Sleep state. | |
Autohalt state | — | Auto stop status. | |
Extended HALT state | — | Extended stop state. |
Technology or instruction name | Intel Pentium 4 2.2 | Intel Pentium D 920 | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. | ||
SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Processor streaming SIMD extension. | ||
SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2. | ||
SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | — | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3. | |
EM64T (Extended Memory 64-bit Technology) | — | 64-bit extended memory technology. | |
NX (Execute disable bit) | — | Execution inhibit bit. |
Technology or instruction name | Intel Pentium 4 2.2 | Intel Pentium D 920 | Brief description |
---|---|---|---|
VT-x (Virtualization technology) | — | Virtualization technology. |
Technology or instruction name | Intel Pentium 4 2.2 | Intel Pentium D 920 | Short description |
---|---|---|---|
Hyper-Threading | — | Hyperthreading technology. | |
SMM (System Management mode) | — | System control mode. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The rating is calculated by the formula, taking into account the following data: test results for all programs, number of cores, threads, architecture, socket, instructions, base frequency, auto-overclocking technologies, year of release, temperature data , as well as other indicators. The results of the overall rating showed that the Pentium D 920 outperforms its rival Pentium 4 2. 2 in most parameters. The Pentium 4 2.2 model barely scores 159.84 points compared to its competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
All processors presented on our website have been tested in PassMark. Perhaps the most famous benchmark tester in Runet. The benchmark includes a wide pool of tools for large-scale evaluation of personal computer data, in particular CPUs. Among the tests there are calculations of game physics, floating point calculations, encryption, compression, integer calculations, extended instructions checking, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. Including it is possible to compare indicators with other configurations in the database. Performance Test showed a clear advantage of the Pentium D 9 processor20 (399 points) over Pentium 4 2.2 (157 points). The Pentium 4 2.2 with a score of 157 clearly loses in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
MAXON has appeared, it is based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. It is possible to test multi-processor systems. The main testing mode for speed is spatial light sources, working with light, global illumination simulation, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, multilevel reflections, and procedural shaders. Single-Thread in its work uses only one core and one thread for rendering. It uses a method of geometric optics — ray tracing. This benchmark for processors and video cards is obsolete in our time. Works on Windows, Mac.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread is another test option in Cinebench R10 that already uses multi-thread and multi-core test mode. Keep in mind that the number of threads in this version is limited to sixteen.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-threaded version of the CINEBENCH 11.5 benchmark, — can load the processor to the full, using all threads and cores. It differs from older versions, 64 threads are already supported here. Pentium D9 testing20 in the Cinebench R11.5 benchmark gave 0.62 points, which indicates a higher performance of this model. While the Pentium 4 2.2 gets 0.18 points, it is far behind its rival in this test.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Excellent fully functional Cinebench R11.5 from the Maxon team. His tests are still up to date. In tests, as before, ray tracing technology is used, a detailed three-dimensional room is calculated with many glass and crystalline and translucent balls. In this Single-Core variant, tests occur through the use of one core and one thread. The result of the check is the value «frames per second». Single thread test results for Pentium D 920 in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, its score was 0.3 points. But the Pentium 4 2.2 itself, scoring 0.18 points in this test, is far behind it.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
The Multi Core version of Cinebench R15 will load your assembly to the full, demonstrating what it can do. The test will involve all threads and CPU cores in the process of rendering detailed 3D objects. The benchmark is ideal for testing modern multi-threaded CPUs from AMD and Intel, as it can use 256 computation threads. Pentium D920 with a score of 57.58 scores unconditionally scores more in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its competitor Pentium 4 2.2 lags far behind with 16.45 points in the test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench Release 15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from Finns from Maxon. In the Single Core version of the program, one thread is used for rendering. A complex 3D scene is rendered with many light sources, highly detailed objects and reflections. It checks the entire system: both video cards and processors. For processors, the result of the calculation will be the number of PTS points, and for video cards, the number of frames per second. FPS. Single-threaded Pentium D 9 processor test20 in Cinebench R15 speaks for its high performance, with a score of 26.24 points. Compared to it, its Pentium 4 2.2 competitor fails this test with a score of 16. 48 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
This is a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 benchmark. It is the cross-platform support for different OS and devices that makes Geekbench tests the most valuable at the present time. Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core Pentium D 9 processor20 received 1681 points, which is significantly higher than the Pentium 4 2.2. In this test, the Pentium 4 2.2 processor gets a very low score of 395.34 points — compared to the Pentium D 920.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
The current single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing laptops and desktop PCs. For the first time, iOS and Android smartphones are also supported in this version of the tester. This benchmark, like its earlier versions, can be run on Mac OS, Windows, Linux. The Single-Core version uses 1 processor thread. Pentium D920 scored higher in the Geekbench 4.0 single-thread test, with a score of 1011. But its competitor Pentium 4 2. 2 is doing much worse — 394.18 points.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core version of Geekbench 3 benchmark — can allow you to make a big stress test of your processor and show the stability of your system.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
The Geekbench cross-platform benchmark is usually used to evaluate the system under Mac, but it works on both Linux and Windows. The main purpose is to test the efficiency of processors. The Single Core version of the program uses only one thread and one CPU core.
Geekbench 2
At the moment there are more recent updates, the current fourth and fifth. The old version of the Geekbench 2 tester. On our website, there are about two hundred CPU models that have testing data in this program.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In essence, this is a test in practice of system performance by transcoding HD files to the new H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. The number of frames processed per second. is a validation indicator. This test is faster than Pass 2, as the calculation is done at the same speed. This is the most appropriate test for multithreaded processors and many cores. MPEG 4 video processing speed for Pentium D 9 model20 is significantly higher at 15.67 FPS. But the Pentium 4 2.2 didn’t cope well with the task, its speed was 4.68 FPS.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the processing is at an inconsistent rate. The resulting value is also measured in frames per second. You need to understand that a completely real task is being performed, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of video programs. The output is a better quality video file. Therefore, the test results realistically assess the effectiveness of the system. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Pentium D 9 processor20 in mpeg4 format — the result was 3. 45 FPS. Its competitor Pentium 4 2.2 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 1.04 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
This test is often used by gamers and overclockers and those who like to overclock processors. Processors are tested in 2 ways: the game AI does the pathfinding, and the second test simulates the engine using PhysX. Based on DirectX by Futuremark. Benchmark program for checking the central processor, and video system. Pentium D920 performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, scoring 781.48 points. The processor Pentium 4 2.2 coped worse with this task, receiving 246.84 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Approximately 200 processors on our site have data in the 3DMark Physics test. This is a test that performs game physics calculations.
WinRAR 4.0
Everyone knows the archiver. The speed of compression in the RAR archive was checked, for this large amounts of random data were used. The resulting speed during compression «Kb / s» — this is the result of the test. The checks took place under the control of Windows. Pentium D920 has a clear advantage in WinRAR data compression and packing speed, the result of file processing was 439.35 Kb/s. The Pentium 4 2.2 was far behind it, the speed of which did not exceed 136.7 Kb/s.
TrueCrypt AES
This is not really a tester, but the results of its use can help evaluate the performance of the system. Unfortunately support for this project was stopped on May 28, 2014. The program can run on Windows, Mac OS X and Linux operating systems. Our site presents the results of encryption speed in Gb / s using the AES algorithm. The program has a built-in function for fast encryption of disk partitions.
Comparison of Intel Pentium D 920 and Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium D 920 and Intel Pentium 4 HT 531 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
Intel Pentium D920
versus
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium D 920
- Newer processor, 7 month(s) difference in release dates
- 2 more cores to run applications simultaneously vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- L1 cache about 75% larger, means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache is 4 times larger, so more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in Geekbench 4 benchmark — About 7% more Single Core: 179 vs 168
- Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance about 43% more: 307 vs 214
January 2006 vs June 2005 | |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Process | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Level 1 cache | 28KB vs 16KB |
Level 2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 179 vs 168 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 307 vs 214 |
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
- About 7% more clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2. 8 GHz
- About 7% more maximum core temperature: 67.7°C vs 63.4°C
- About 7% more maximum core temperature: 67.7°C vs 63.4°C
- About 7% more % less power consumption: 84 Watt vs 95 Watt
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 67.7°C vs 63.4°C |
Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Pentium D 920
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
Name | Intel Pentium D 920 | Intel Pentium 4 HT 531 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 179 | 168 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 307 | 214 |
Performance comparison
Intel Pentium D 920 | Intel Pentium 4 HT 531 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Presler | Prescott |
Production date | January 2006 | June 2005 |
Place in the ranking | 2712 | 2717 |
Processor Number | 920 | 531 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 2. 80 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
Crystal area | 162 mm2 | 112 mm2 |
Level 1 cache | 28KB | 16KB |
Level 2 cache | 4096KB | 1024KB |
Process | 65nm | 90nm |
Maximum core temperature | 63.4°C | 67.7°C |
Maximum frequency | 2. 8 GHz | 3GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Number of transistors | 376 million | 125 million |
Permissible core voltage | 1.200V-1.3375V | 1.200V-1.425V |
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 2 | 1 |
Supported sockets | PLGA775 | PLGA775 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 84 Watt |
Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm | |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Parity FSB | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
Comparison of Intel Pentium 4 HT 641 and Intel Pentium D 920
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium 4 HT 641 and Intel Pentium D 920 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
Intel Pentium 4 HT 641
versus
Intel Pentium D 920
Advantages Watt
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
Power consumption (TDP) | 86 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium D 920
- 1 more core, ability to run more applications at the same time: 2 vs 1
- 2x larger L2 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Level 2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2048 KB |
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Pentium 4 HT 641
CPU 2: Intel Pentium D 920
Name | Intel Pentium 4 HT 641 | Intel Pentium D 920 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 179 | |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 307 |
Performance comparison
Intel Pentium 4 HT 641 | Intel Pentium D 920 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Cedarmill | Presler |
Issue date | January 2006 | January 2006 |
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2712 |
Processor Number | 641 | 920 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 3. 20 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
Crystal area | 81 mm2 | 162 mm2 |
Level 1 cache | 28KB | 28KB |
Level 2 cache | 2048KB | 4096KB |
Process | 65nm | 65nm |
Maximum core temperature | B1,C1=69.2°C; D0-64.4°C | 63.4°C |
Maximum frequency | 3. 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 2 |
Number of transistors | 188 million | 376 million |
Permissible core voltage | 1.200V-1.3375V | 1.200V-1.3375V |
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 2 |
Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm | |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Supported sockets | PLGA775 | PLGA775 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 86 Watt | 95 Watt |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Parity FSB | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
Core i7-920 vs Pentium 4 3.
80GHz
Core i7-9twenty |
Model |
Pentium 4 3.80GHz |
Intel |
Manufacturer |
Intel |
47. 2 |
tests |
14.0 |
2008 |
Year of manufacture |
2014 |
Bloomfield |
Architecture |
— |
45 |
Process (nm) |
— |
four |
Cores |
— |
eight |
threads |
— |
130. 0 |
Heat dissipation, W |
— |
2660 |
Frequency |
— |
29thirty |
Frequency (Turbo) |
— |
67. 7 |
tests |
34.2 |
330.0 |
benchmarks |
51. 0 |
|
Device system identifiers |
|
|
Popular Assemblies |
|
Intel Pentium 4 630 Specifications0013
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 HT, EIST
90T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2. 26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2. 8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370) Celeron 333 (Slot 1) Celeron 300A (S370) Celeron 300A (SLOT 1) Celeron 300CELERON 266
Go to all processors
Compare
AMDryzen 9 7950XRYZEN 9 7900XRRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 7660XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN5950XRyzen 9 5900XRyzen 7 5800X3DRyzen 7 5800XRyzen 7 5700XRyzen 7 5700GRyzen 5 5600XRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 5 5600GRyzen 5 5500Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GRyzen 7 PRO 4750GERyzen 5 PRO 4650GRyzen 5 PRO 4650GERyzen 3 PRO 4350GRyzen 3 PRO 4350GERyzen Threadripper 3960XRyzen 9 3950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760KAthlon X4 750KAthlon X4 740Athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8 -5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3800Athlon II X4 631A6-3650A6-3600A6-3500 A4-3400A4-3300Phenom II X6 1100TPhenom II X6 1090T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2. 26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2. 8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370)Celeron 333 (Slot 1)Celeron 300A (S370)Celeron 300A (Slot 1)Celeron 300Celeron 266
Up to 10 processors can be selected simultaneously
by holding Ctrl
Intel Pentium 4 processor 641
Home / Processors / Intel Pentium 4 641
- Date of issue: January, 2006;
- Number of cores: 1;
- Frequency: 3.2 GHz;
- Power consumption (TDP): 86W;
Characteristics Intel Pentium 4 641
General parameters
Clock speed | 3. 2GHz |
---|---|
Cores | 1 |
Socket | LGA 775 |
Functions
NX-bit (XD-bit) present | Yes |
---|---|
Trusted computing support | No |
Virtualization support | No |
Instructions supported | MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 |
Support for dynamic frequency scaling (CPU Throttling) | Yes |
Power input
Power consumption | 86W |
---|---|
Annual cost of electricity (NON-commercial use) | 20.72 $/year |
Annual cost of electricity (commercial use) | 75.34 $/year |
Average energy consumption | 69.88W |
Memory module
Memory controller | Integrated |
---|---|
ECC support (error correction) | No |
Parts and Features
Architecture | x86-64 |
---|---|
Threads | 2 |
L2 cache | 2MB |
Second level cache per core (L2) | 2 MB/core |
Process | 65 nm |
Number of transistors | 188,000,000 |
Maximum processors | 1 |
Processor multiplier | 16 |
Voltage range | 1. 2 — 1.34V |
Operating temperature | Unknown — 1°C |
Overclocking Pentium 4 641
Overclocking Clock | 4.53 GHz |
---|---|
Water-cooled acceleration clock | 4.64 GHz |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 952.1 |
Air cooled boost clock | 4.53 GHz |
Integrated (integrated) graphics
Graphics core | No |
---|---|
Brand | No |
Latest DirectX | No |
Number of displays supported | No |
Graphics core clock speed | No |
Maximum clock frequency | No |
3DMark06 | No |
Bus
Architecture | FSB |
---|---|
Clock frequency | 800MHz |
Video reviews
What can a pentium 4 641 do on an lga 775?
PENTIUM 4 — Squeeze EVERYTHING!