Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.0E vs AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.0E and AMD Athlon 64 3000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.0E
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.0E
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 90 nm vs 130 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Launch date | February 2004 vs December 2003 |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 130 nm |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3000+
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 16 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium 4 HT 3. 0E
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3000+
| Name | Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.0E | AMD Athlon 64 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 549 | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 463 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 850 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 834 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.0E | AMD Athlon 64 3000+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Prescott | Clawhammer |
| Launch date | February 2004 | December 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 2167 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | |
| Price now | $74. 95 |
|
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.82 | |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 112 mm2 | 193 mm |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 73. 5°C |
|
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 125 million | 69 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.250V-1.400V | |
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
| Sockets supported | 478 | 754 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt | 89 Watt |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.
0E with others
Intel
Pentium 4 HT 3.0E
vs
Intel
Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40
Intel
Pentium 4 HT 3.0E
vs
Intel
Pentium 4 HT 3.40
Intel
Pentium 4 HT 3.0E
vs
Intel
Pentium 4 HT 3.2E
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ vs Intel Pentium 4 631
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ vs Intel Pentium 4 631
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ on one side and the Intel Pentium 4 631 on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,5GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 1 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ | Intel Pentium 4 631 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | K8 | Netburst | ||||||
| Core name | Brisbane | Cedarmill | ||||||
| Family | Athlon 64 X2 4000 | Pentium 4 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | ADO4800DOBOX, ADO4800IAA5DO |
BX80552631, BX80552631T, BX80552631T2, HH80552PG0802M, QIAZ, QMNY, QMRS, QQHU, SL8WJ, SL94Y, SL96L, SL9KG |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2006 | Q1 2006 | ||||||
| Lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 221. 000.000 |
188.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 1 | ||||||
| Threads | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,5 GHz | 3,0 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | — | ||||||
| Cache memory | 1 MB | 2 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 2 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR2-800 | DDR2-SDRAM | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 86 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | None | ||||||
| Socket | AM2 | LGA775 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM2 Motherboard | Socket LGA 775 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 68°C | 64. 1°C |
||||||
| Security | Enhanced Virus Protection | — | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 86 | 69 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 172 | 137 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 55 | 58 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 115 | 48 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 868 | 956 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 693 | 833 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.138 | 989 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
1. 833 |
1.110 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
238 | 154 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
443 | 190 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
10,8 GFLOPS | 5,76 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
28 pts / W | 13 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium 4 631 is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is lower. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
86 172 |
| Intel Pentium 4 631 |
69 137 |
In single core, the difference is 25%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 26%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
55 115 |
| Intel Pentium 4 631 |
58 48 |
In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 140%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium 4 631 |
956 833 |
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
868 693 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
1.138 1.833 |
| Intel Pentium 4 631 |
989 1.110 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 65%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
238 443 |
| Intel Pentium 4 631 |
154 190 |
In single core, the difference is 55%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 133%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Intel equivalentIntel Pentium 4 631 AMD equivalent
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We did not find such a page on our site: /ru/cpu/pentium-4-p4-3.0-protiv-athlon-64-x2-4000-plus%23gaming
Popular video card comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
nine0010
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
nine0012 1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8GB
nine0004
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
Popular video cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
nine0004
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular
processor comparisons
nine0005
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
nine0012 3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Core i5
10400F
nine0002 vs
Core i3
12100F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Popular processors
Ryzen 5
5500U
nine0010
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
nine0000 Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We did not find such a page on our website: /ru/cpu/pentium-4-p4-3.